Skip to main content

Full text of "A study of engineering education"

See other formats


illinrei*r*DVi    m 


7. 


A  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING 

EDUCATION 

PREPARED  FOR  THE  JOINT  COMMITTEE  ON  ENGINEERING 
EDUCATION  OF  THE  NATIONAL  ENGINEERING  SOCIETIES 

BY 
CHARLES  RIBORG  MANN 


BULLETIN  NUMBER  ELEVEN 


NEW  YORK  CITY 

576  FIFTH  AVENUE 


5 


D.  B.  UPDIKE  •  THE  MERRYMOUNT  PRESS  •  BOSTON 


\\\ 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 

PREFACE  v 

By  the  President  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation 

INTRODUCTION  ix 

By  the  Joint  Committee  on  Engineering  Education  of  the  National  Engi- 
neering Societies 


PART  I       PRESENT  CONDITIONS 

CHAPTER 

I.  The  Development  of  Engineering  Schools  in  the  United  States  3 

II.  Aims  and  Curricula  of  the  Early  Schools  9 

III.  The  Struggle  for  Resources  and  Recognition  15 

IV.  Development  of  the  Curriculum  into  its  Present  Form  21 
V.  Methods  of  Administration  in  Engineering  Schools  27 

VI.  Student  Elimination  and  Progress  32 

VII.  Types  of  Instruction  in  Engineering  Schools  37 

PART  II       THE  PROBLEMS  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

VIII.  Admission  47 

IX.  The  Time  Schedule  54 

X.  Content  of  Courses  60 

XI.  Testing  and  Grading  67 

XII.  Shopwork  75 

PART  III       SUGGESTED  SOLUTIONS 

XIII.  The  Curriculum  87 

XIV.  Specialization  95 
XV.  Teachers  101 

XVI.  The  Professional  Engineer  106 


iv  CONTENTS 

APPENDIX 
Objective  Tests  117 

SELECTED  BIBLIOGRAPHY  127 

INDEX  131 


PREFACE 

The  present  bulletin  has  been  prepared  under  conditions  somewhat  different  from 
other  publications  and  bulletins  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation.  This  study  of  Engineer- 
ing Education  arose  out  of  the  action  of  a  joint  committee  on  engineering  education, 
representing  the  principal  engineering  societies.  More  than  three  years  ago  the  Com- 
mittee had  gathered  a  considerable  amount  of  material  bearing  on  the  subject,  and 
had  come  to  the  opinion  that  the  work  could  be  best  carried  out  by  the  employment 
of  some  one  trained  in  applied  science,  who  should  devote  his  entire  attention  to  the 
study,  working  under  the  general  direction  of  the  Committee  and  in  touch  with  it. 
The  Carnegie  Foundation  agreed  to  appoint  such  a  man  and  to  bear  the  expense  of  the 
study.  Professor  Charles  R.  Mann,  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  undertook  the  work 
under  these  conditions,  and  the  report  which  follows  is  the  outcome  of  his  studies  under 
the  general  supervision  of  the  Committee.  The  discussion  of  Professor  Mann's  report 
by  the  Committee  forms  the  introductory  chapter. 

It  will  be  understood  that  the  report  did  not  contemplate  a  study  or  examination 
of  the  engineering  schools  of  the  United  States,  altho  a  limited  number  of  typical 
schools  were  visited  and  studied  by  Professor  Mann.  The  point  of  view  from  which 
the  study  was  undertaken  was  the  following:  Fifty  years  ago,  when  the  engineering 
schools  of  the  United  States  were  inaugurated,  they  began  their  work  upon  a  definite 
teaching  plan  and  one  that  had  at  least  pedagogic  consistency.  The  course  was  four 
years.  The  first  two  were  spent  mainly  in  the  fundamental  sciences — chemistry,  phy- 
sics, mathematics,  and  mechanics ;  the  last  two  years  mainly  in  the  applications  of 
these  sciences  to  theoretical  and  practical  problems. 

In  the  half  century  that  has  passed  this  course  of  study  has  been  overlaid  with  a 
great  number  of  special  studies  intended  to  enable  the  student  to  deal  with  the  con- 
stantly growing  applications  of  science  to  the  industries.  While  the  original  teaching 
plan  remains  as  the  basis  of  the  four-year  engineering  curriculum,  the  courses  given 
in  most  schools  have  been  greatly  modified  in  the  effort  to  teach  special  subjects.  Asa 
result,  the  load  upon  the  student  has  become  continually  heavier  and  bears  unequally 
in  different  places  and  in  different  parts  of  the  course.  In  addition  there  is  a  wide- 
spread feeling  that  under  this  pressure  the  great  body  of  students  fail  to  gain,  on 
the  one  hand,  a  satisfactory  grounding  in  the  fundamental  sciences ;  and  on  the  other 
hand,  do  not  fulfil  the  expectations  of  engineers  and  manufacturers  in  dealing  with 
the  practical  problems  with  which  they  are  confronted  on  leaving  the  engineering 
schools. 

It  is  out  of  this  situation  that  the  Committee  of  the  Engineering  Societies  began 
its  study,  whose  purpose  is  not  so  much  to  record  the  details  of  engineering  teaching 
in  the  various  schools  as  to  examine  the  fundamental  question  of  the  right  methods 
of  teaching  and  of  the  preparation  of  young  men  for  the  engineering  professions:  in 
other  words,  to  question  anew  the  pedagogic  solution  of  fifty  years  ago,  to  examine 


vi  PREFACE 

the  curriculum  of  to-day  and  the  methods  of  teaching  now  employed,  and  to  suggest 
in  the  light  of  fifty  years  of  experience  the  pedagogic  basis  of  the  course  of  study 
intended  to  prepare  young  men  for  the  work  demanded  of  the  engineer  of  to-day. 
In  the  effort  to  do  this,  the  point  of  view  of  the  teacher,  of  the  engineer,  and  of  the 
manufacturer  and  employer  has  been  kept  in  view. 

While  the  report  and  the  introduction  of  the  Committee  deal  with  many  matters 
of  detail  in  the  formation  and  development  of  a  suitable  curriculum,  and  suggest  vari- 
ous methods  for  simplifying  the  present  courses  of  study,  three  questions  of  impor- 
tance are  raised  which  are  closely  related  to  the  primary  purpose  for  which  the  engi- 
neering school  exists. 

Professor  Mann  argues  that  the  present  arrangement,  under  which  the  fundamental 
sciences  are  taught  in  advance  of  their  applications,  is  the  wrong  method  of  teaching, 
and  that  the  engineering  education  will  never  be  satisfactory  until  theory  and  prac- 
tice are  taught  simultaneously. 

For  example,  mathematics  is  the  most  important  tool  of  the  engineer.  It  is  taught 
for  two  years  in  the  engineering  school  in  separate  courses — higher  algebra,  coordi- 
nate geometry,  the  calculus,  and  mechanics.  The  splitting  up  of  mathematics  into  sepa- 
rate courses  is  itself  a  source  of  weakness  from  the  standpoint  of  the  student's  needs. 
He  needs  not  studies  nor  recitations  in  these  artificial  divisions  of  mathematics,  but 
a  single  course  in  mathematics  illuminated  and  made  alive  at  every  step  by  applica- 
tions in  the  solutions  of  actual  problems.  Algebra,  coordinate  geometry,  and  the  cal- 
culus are  not  separate  and  unrelated  studies,  but  merely  parts  of  the  one  subject  of 
mathematics. 

As  a  consequence  of  this  method  of  teaching  Professor  Mann  urges  that  the  engi- 
neering courses,  as  taught  in  the  preliminary  years,  do  not  form  sound  criteria  for  judg- 
ing as  to  the  ability  of  the  student  to  do  successful  engineering  work,  and  that  many 
students  are  sent  away  from  the  technical  school  without  having  had  any  fair  test 
as  to  their  capacity  for  engineering  practice  or  study. 

In  the  third  place  he  gives  the  results  of  certain  objective  tests  designed  to  throw 
light  upon  the  fitness  of  the  applicant  to  undertake  engineering  studies  and  practice. 
It  is  quite  clear  that  the  trial  of  these  tests  made  hitherto  is  not  sufficient  to  demon- 
strate their  trustworthiness,  but  the  question  raised  is  an  exceedingly  interesting  one. 
There  are  few  devices  connected  with  teaching  more  unsatisfactory  than  our  present 
day  examinations,  whether  used  as  tests  for  admission  or  as  criteria  of  performance  on 
the  part  of  the  student. 

In  general  these  suggestions  of  Professor  Mann,  if  carried  out,  would  affect  present 
day  teaching  of  engineering  in  much  the  same  way  that  Langdell's  case  method  revo- 
lutionized the  teaching  of  law. 

Langdell  built  the  teaching  of  law  exclusively  and  dh*ectly  upon  the  study  of  cases. 
His  notion  was  that  the  principles  upon  which  the  law  rests  are  few  in  number,  and 
that  these  could  be  best  apprehended  and  mastered  by  the  student  in  the  direct 


PREFACE  vii 

examination  of  typical  cases.  The  number  of  such  cases  necessary  to  illustrate  these 
principles  he  held  to  be  very  small  in  comparison  with  the  overwhelming  mass  of  law 
reports  to  which  the  student  had  formerly  been  directed  as  the  basis  of  the  study 
of  the  law  in  conjunction  with  textbooks.  Langdell's  method  involved  the  working 
out  by  the  student  of  the  principles  of  the  law  from  actual  cases  tried  and  decided 
in  the  courts.  Law  he  conceived  of  as  an  Applied  Science. 

Langdell's  method  is  not  infrequently  referred  to  as  the  laboratory  method  of 
teaching  law,  conveying  the  impression  that  the  case  method  of  teaching  law  con- 
sists in  transferring  to  the  teaching  of  law  the  methods  employed  in  the  teaching  of 
applied  science.  This  statement  has  been  the  cause  of  no  little  confusion.  The  teach- 
ing of  law  by  the  case  method  presents  only  a  remote  analogy  with  the  methods 
hitherto  employed  in  teaching  applied  science.  Applied  science  is  not  taught  ordi- 
narily in  the  engineering  school  by  the  case  method.  On  the  contrary,  the  methods 
actually  employed  in  teaching  the  so-called  laboratory  subjects  do  not  differ  appre- 
ciably from  the  methods  of  teaching  literature  or  Latin.  At  present  the  student  un- 
dertakes to  learn  a  vast  body  of  theory  under  the  name  of  physics,  mechanics,  or  chem- 
istry, illustrated  in  some  measure  in  the  laboratory,  and  then  seeks  later  to  select 
from  this  mass  of  knowledge  the  principles  to  be  applied,  for  example  in  electrical 
engineering.  The  case  method  would  proceed  in  directly  the  opposite  manner.  Taking 
up,  for  example,  the  dynamo  as  a  "case," — that  is,  as  an  illustration  of  physical  laws 
in  their  actual  concrete  working, — it  would  proceed  to  analyze  the  machine  for  the 
purpose  of  discovering  the  fundamental  physical  or  mechanical  principles  involved 
in  its  operation.  It  would  lead  the  student  from  practical  applications  by  analysis 
to  a  comprehension  of  theory,  instead  of  from  theory  to  applications  as  under  present 
methods  of  teaching. 

It  is  an  interesting  fact  that  while  much  is  said  about  the  teaching  of  science  in 
the  modern  school,  the  methods  of  teaching  science  are  actually  but  little  changed 
from  those  employed  in  teaching  the  subjects  that  filled  the  curriculum  before  the 
teaching  of  science  began  in  the  school.  The  practical  suggestion  of  this  report  is 
that  the  case  method  of  teaching  is  truly  scientific  and  that  the  present  methods  of 
teaching  applied  science  are  unscientific.  Furthermore,  as  an  essential  feature  of  the 
new  method  of  teaching  science,  Professor  Mann  would  combine  theory  with  practice 
much  more  intimately  than  occurs  in  the  law  schools  of  the  present  day,  by  requiring 
the  student  to  leam  to  operate  the  "  case  "  under  study.  The  student  must  not  merely 
observe  and  analyze  the  operation  of  the  dynamo:  he  must  also  actually  run  it  and 
repair  it  when  out  of  order.  The  method  of  teaching  he  advocates  for  engineering 
students,  while  based  on  the  same  conceptions  as  Langdell's  pedagogic  innovation, 
is  designed  to  meet  some  of  the  objections  commonly  raised  to-day  against  even  case 
method  law  schools. 

Whatever  may  be  thought  of  this  contention,  the  subject  is  one  of  great  signifi- 
cance, and  worthy  of  the  attention  of  teachers  and  engineers.  Engineering  schools, 


Vlll 


PREFACE 


like  all  institutions  of  learning,  are  slow  to  undertake  educational  experiments.  It  is 
sometimes  easier  to  start  a  new  school  than  to  try  an  educational  experiment  in  an 
old  one.  But  obviously  an  actual  experiment  thoroughly  carried  out  would  be  the  only 
satisfactory  demonstration  of  the  soundness  of  the  case  method  of  teaching  science. 
The  report  is  published  by  the  Carnegie  Foundation  as  a  work  of  cooperation  with 
the  great  engineering  societies,  and  with  the  hope  that  the  formulation  of  these 
important  enquiries  and  their  discussion  may  lead  to  a  serious  effort  on  the  part 
of  those  having  to  do  with  engineering  education  to  reexamine  the  curricula  of  the 
schools,  and  to  approach  the  problem  of  their  improvement  not  only  from  the  stand- 
point of  the  teacher,  but  also  from  that  of  the  practising  engineer  and  of  the  employer. 

Henry  S.  Pritchett, 
President  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Education,  at  its  Cleveland  meeting 
in  1907,  invited  the  American  Society  of  Civil  Engineers,  the  American  Society  of 
Mechanical  Engineers,  the  American  Institute  of  Electrical  Engineers,  and  the  Amer- 
ican Chemical  Society,  to  join  the  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Educa- 
tion in  appointing  delegates  to  a  "'Joint  Committee  on  Engineering  Education'  to 
examine  into  all  branches  of  engineering  education,  including  engineering  research, 
graduate  professional  courses,  undergraduate  engineering  instruction,  and  the  proper 
relations  of  engineering  schools  to  secondary  industrial  schools,  or  foremen's  schools, 
and  to  formulate  a  report  or  reports  upon  the  appropriate  scope  of  engineering  edu- 
cation and  the  degree  of  cooperation  and  unity  that  may  be  advantageously  arranged 
between  the  various  engineering  schools." 

At  the  Detroit  meeting  in  1908,  a  resolution  was  passed  authorizing  this  Com- 
mittee to  invite  the  Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching  and  the 
General  Education  Board  to  appoint  delegates. 

Notwithstanding  the  appropriation  by  the  American  Society  of  Civil  Engineers 
of  a  sum  to  assist  in  the  investigation,  it  was  found  to  be  utterly  impracticable  to 
carry  on  the  work  without  larger  funds,  and  the  Carnegie  Foundation  was  thereupon 
urged  to  undertake  the  work  on  a  comprehensive  scale.  After  proper  examination,  the 
Foundation  generously  acceded  to  this  request,  and  finally  selected  Professor  Charles 
R.  Mann  to  make  a  careful  investigation  and  report. 

In  presenting  Professor  Mann's  report,  the  Committee  desire  to  state  that  they 
have  been  closely  associated  with  Professor  Mann  during  his  investigations,  and  have 
frequently  conferred  with  him  in  the  progress  of  the  work  and  in  the  different  plans 
adopted  for  securing  information.  Many  of  the  conclusions  reached  have  been  dis- 
cussed at  public  meetings  of  educational  experts  and  have  had  the  advantage  of  ma- 
ture judgment  and  long  experience.  The  views  of  the  whole  engineering  profession, 
widely  scattered  throughout  the  country  and  representing  every  phase  of  professional 
activity  and  practice,  were  ascertained.  The  results  of  some  of  these  special  enquiries 
were  published  and  considered  by  the  engineering  societies ;  they  were  both  inter- 
esting and  surprising,  and  are  set  forth  in  Chapter  XVI  of  the  report. 

Notwithstanding  this  varied  experience,  it  was  not  until  the  Committee  had  the 
advantage  of  examining  advance  copies  of  Professor  Mann's  report  that  they  realized 
the  coordination  existing  between  all  of  the  different  portions  of  the  investigation, 
and  their  bearing  upon  the  value  of  the  whole  study. 

We  believe  that  this  report  possesses  particular  significance  on  account  of  the  simple 
and  clear  treatment  of  the  complicated  problems  involved.  The  history  of  the  origin 
and  development  of  the  schools  is  concisely  told,  and  the  connection  between  the  cur- 
riculum and  the  changing  demands  of  industrial  activities  and  growth  is  clearly  nar- 
rated. If  the  study  went  no  farther  —  and  this  is  but  the  threshold  of  the  report  — we 


x  INTRODUCTION 

believe  the  value  of  this  result  alone  would  go  far  toward  repaying  the  expense  of 
the  enquiry,  liberal  as  that  has  been. 

Other  significant  characteristics  of  the  report  are  found  in  the  discussions  of  the 
general  failure  to  recognize  such  factors  as  "  values  and  cost,"  the  importance  of 
teaching  technical  subjects  so  as  to  develop  character,  the  necessity  for  laboratory 
and  industrial  training  throughout  the  Courses,  and  the  use  of  good  English. 

Valuable  suggestions  are  offered  for  avoiding  or  reducing  present  difficulties  found 
in  many  other  directions,  and  all  of  the  problems  have  been  treated  in  a  broad  and 
comprehensive  spirit.  No  hard  and  fast  rules  are  laid  down  for  the  government  of 
engineering  education.  Such  a  course  would  inevitably  increase  the  difficulties  of  future 
advances.  Changes  must  be  made  from  time  to  time  to  meet  conditions  as  they  arise, 
and  any  attempts  to  solve  the  problems  of  engineering  education  must  be  of  so  flex- 
ible a  nature  as  to  admit  of  improvements. 

We  now  turn  to  a  few  of  the  principal  points  emphasized  in  the  report.  Professor 
Mann  has  called  attention  to  the  waste  occurring  in  educational  efforts  arising  from 
lack  of  coordination  shown  in  the  histories  and  aims  of  the  technical  schools  as  set 
forth  in  the  first  chapter  of  this  study. 

Another  point  is  the  perplexing  one  of  the  regulation  of  admissions.  At  present 
sixty  per  cent  of  those  who  enter  the  schools  fail  to  graduate.  The  importance  of 
limiting  admissions  more  strictly  to  those  students  who  possess  some  aptitude  for 
engineering  is  demonstrated,  and  a  substitution  of  objective  tests  in  place  of  those 
of  a  subjective  character  is  recommended. 

Another  point  emphasized,  and  one  of  deep  importance,  is  that  of  the  reorganiza- 
tion of  curricula  which  are  commonly  acknowledged  to  be  much  congested,  and  which 
it  is  stated  will  continue,  "as  long  as  departments  are  allowed  to  act  as  sole  arbiters 
of  the  content  of  the  courses."  Plans  are  offered  for  developing  particular  types  of 
curricula  suited  to  the  environment  of  each  school. 

Emphasis  is  also  given  to  the  necessity  for  a  broader  training  in  the  fundamentals 
of  science  as  an  equipment  for  all  engineers  and  forming  a  sort  of  "  common  core  " 
to  every  curriculum.  With  this  broad  training  in  the  first  and  second  years  the  stu- 
dent is  expected  to  develop  some  natural  leaning  toward  a  specialty,  and  then  will 
follow  vocational  guidance  in  the  later  stages  of  his  education. 

Among  the  questions  that  will  perhaps  occur  to  many  interested  in  the  status  and 
progress  of  engineering  education,  in  connection  with  this  report,  are — How  far  will 
the  recommendations  in  the  report  be  applicable  to  present  conditions?  and  what 
will  be  the  possible  influence  of  this  study  upon  education  and  practice  ?  These  ques- 
tions are  of  course  difficult  to  answer  with  precision.  We  can  only  form  an  estimate, 
based  upon  experience  and  knowledge  of  the  present  chaotic  condition  of  the  schools, 
arising  from  world-wide  events  over  which  they  are  called  to  exercise  a  powerful  in- 
fluence. There  probably  never  was  a  time  when  the  minds  of  teachers  were  so  intently 
alive  and  receptive  to  rapid  changes,  as  at  the  present  moment.  This  report,  made 


INTRODUCTION  xi 

under  the  auspices  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation  and  with  the  direct  assistance  of 
this  Committee,  will  be  read  and  studied  all  over  the  country,  as  soon  as  it  becomes 
available.  Engineering  educators  are  already  partially  familiar  with  the  trend  of  the 
report.  They,  better  than  others,  know  from  long  experience  something  of  the  dif- 
ficulties in  establishing  standards  by  which  to  measure  the  successes  or  failures  of 
their  efforts  to  provide  proper  training  for  engineers.  It  may  take  time  to  convince 
all  that  a  measure,  or  scale,  has  been  created  by  the  practising  engineers  of  the 
country  by  which  an  estimate  may  be  formed  of  the  amount  of  success  in  engineer- 
ing teaching,  irrespective  of  the  special  courses  involved.  That  scale  is  the  improve- 
ment of  character,  resourcefulness,  judgment,  efficiency,  understanding  of  men,  and 
last  of  all,  technique,  as  shown  by  students.  These  facts  have  already  been  published 
and  widely  circulated,  and  since  they  became  known  there  are  probably  few  intelli- 
gent educators  who  have  not  asked  themselves  the  question — Am  I  so  teaching  as 
to  produce  these  results  in  my  pupils  and  in  the  order  of  value  specified  by  the  en- 
gineering profession  ?  It  may  perhaps  be  considered  not  unreasonable  for  this  Com- 
mittee to  believe  that  if  portions  of  this  study  have  already  proved  of  value  and 
interest  to  the  schools,  there  is  some  secure  foundation  for  thinking  that  the  whole 
report  will  awaken  wide  interest  because  of  the  applicability  of  its  results,  and  that 
its  influence  on  engineering;  education  will  be  beneficial. 

In  addition  to  its  possible  effects  on  professional  educators,  we  entertain  the  hope 
that  it  will  also  have  a  wider  significance  as  an  important  contribution  to  the  gen- 
eral cause  of  education.  The  publication  of  the  study  in  the  present  emergency,  when 
the  Government  is  so  deeply  concerned  with  so  many  vital  questions  connected  with 
educational  processes,  may  assist  also  in  the  solution  of  some  of  the  many  problems 
arising  in  connection  with  vocational  training  in  the  different  branches  of  military 

science. 

American  Society  of  Civil  Engineers 

Desmond  FitzGekald,  Chairman,  Onward  Bates,  Daniel  W.  Mead 

American  Society  of  Mechanical  Engineers 
F.  H.  Clark,  Fred  J.  Miller 

American  Institute  of  Electrical  Engineers 

C.  F.  Scott,  Samuel  Sheldon,  Secretary 

American  Chemical  Society 

Clifford  Richardson,  Henry  P.  Talbot 

American  Institute  of  Chemical  Engineers 

J.  R.  WlTHROW 

American  Institute  of  Mining  Engineers 

Henry  M.  Howe,  John  Hays  Hammond 
Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Education 

D.  C.  Jackson,  G.  C.  Anthony,  C.  R.  Richards 

Joint  Committee  on  Engineering  Education  of  the  National  Engineering  Societies. 


PART  I 
PRESENT  CONDITIONS 


Chapter  I 

THE  DEVELOPMENT  OF  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS  IN  THE 

UNITED  STATES 

During  the  Colonial  period  industrial  production  in  America  was  almost  wholly  con- 
fined to  agriculture.  All  forms  of  manufacture  were  systematically  discouraged  by 
acts  of  Parliament.  Iron  mining  was  encouraged,  provided  the  product  was  shipped 
to  England  as  pig  iron ;  but  all  tools,  implements,  guns,  gunpowder,  and  machinery 
used  in  the  colonies  had  to  be  purchased  in  the  mother  country.  This  effort  to  limit 
American  production  to  agriculture  and  raw  materials  was  one  of  the  chief  causes  of 
the  War  of  Independence. 

When  the  supply  of  goods  from  British  factories  had  been  cut  off  by  the  non-im- 
portation agreement  between  the  colonies  (1774),  clothing,  gunpowder,  tools,  and 
equipment  soon  became  scarce.  An  immediate  need  arose  for  skilled  workers  in  all  the 
mechanic  arts.  Congress  sought  to  meet  this  need  by  urging  the  establishment  in  every 
colony  of  a  Society  for  the  Improvement  of  Agriculture,  Arts,  Manufactures,  and 
Commerce,  and  by  offering  premiums  for  the  best  achievement  in  every  essential  line 
of  industry.  Enough  was  accomplished  by  these  means  to  carry  the  war,  with  the  help 
of  France,  to  a  successful  termination. 

After  the  war  England  sought  to  crush  the  incipient  American  industries  by  sell- 
ing her  goods  here  at  lower  prices  than  were  charged  at  home.  The  Confederation  was 
threatened  by  an  industrial  domination  that  seemed  no  less  oppressive  than  political 
domination.  This  crisis  was  met,  first,  by  the  formation  of  numerous  societies  for  the 
promotion  of  the  useful  arts,  to  encourage  a  spirit  of  enquiry,  industry,  and  exper- 
iment among  the  members;  second,  by  offering  premiums  from  state  treasuries  for 
such  improvements  in  the  useful  arts  as  might  seem  beneficial  to  the  country;  and 
third,  by  inviting  trained  artisans  from  abroad  to  settle  here  and  give  America  the 
benefit  of  their  training.  It  was  on  this  basis  that  Samuel  Slater,  a  skilled  English 
worker  from  the  Arkwright  factory,  established  at  Pawtucket  in  1790  the  first  suc- 
cessful textile  mill  driven  by  water  power. 

The  real  beginnings  of  American  engineering  were  made  at  this  time  under  the 
spur  of  a  patriotic  spirit  of  industrial  independence.  In  1793  Eli  Whitney  invented 
the  cotton  gin,  which  determined  the  industrial  future  of  the  South.  Oliver  Evans 
made  the  first  machinery  for  flour  mills  in  1787,  and  in  1801  constructed  the  first 
high-pressure  steam  engine.  Philadelphia  equipped  its  water  works  with  a  double 
steam  pump  that  had  a  capacity  of  3,000,000  gallons  a  day,  built  by  Nicholas  I.  Roose- 
veldt  in  1801.  Six  years  later  Robert  Fulton  made  his  famous  trip  up  the  Hudson  in 
the  Clermont.  The  Santee  canal  in  South  Carolina  was  begun  in  1786.  Work  was  started 
on  the  Middlesex  canal  in  Massachusetts  and  on  the  canal  joining  the  Schuylkill  and 
the  Susquehanna  rivers  in  Pennsylvania  in  1793.  The  mechanical  inventions  were  made 


4  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

by  Americans  who  had  no  formal  engineering  training;  the  canals  were  built  by  foreign- 
trained  civil  engineers. 

The  effect  of  the  War  of  1812  was  similar  to  that  of  the  War  of  Independence.  For 
three  years  American  production  was  stimulated  by  being  thrown  on  its  own  resources. 
This  was  followed  by  a  period  of  stimulation  due  to  foreign  competition.  By  1812 
the  exhaustion  of  the  soil  because  of  unscientific  methods  of  agriculture  was  already 
driving  the  population  to  seek  new  land  in  the  West.  There  arose  a  loud  cry  both 
for  instruction  in  better  methods  of  farming  in  order  that  the  farms  might  not  be 
deserted,  and  for  better  means  of  transportation  to  the  West.  To  meet  the  latter,  the 
Erie  Canal  (1817-25)  was  built.  This  was  the  first  great  achievement  of  American  en- 
gineering, because  the  work  was  done  by  three  self-trained  Americans,  James  Geddes, 
Benjamin  Wright,  and  Charles  Brodhead. 

The  demand  for  scientific  information  to  increase  production  in  agriculture  and 
domestic  manufactures  is  voiced  in  an  enormous  number  of  memorials,  petitions, 
and  committee  reports  to  the  various  state  legislatures.  Of  these  the  Report  of  the 
Committee  on  Agriculture  presented  by  Jesse  Buel  to  the  New  York  State  legis- 
lature on  March  29,  1823,  is  perhaps  the  most  complete  and  expressive.  This  report 
urges  the  establishment  of  a  tax-supported  school  of  agriculture  along  the  lines  that 
had  proved  so  successful  at  the  Fellenberg  School  at  Hofwyl,  Switzerland.  Full  de- 
tails of  the  plan,  the  methods,  and  the  results  to  be  expected  are  given.  It  was  stated, 
finally,  that  if  the  state  would  undertake  the  support  of  the  school,  the  Hon.  Stephen 
van  Rensselaer  would  donate  the  necessary  land.  The  proposal  was  rejected  by  the 
legislature. 

The  following  year  Mr.  van  Rensselaer  established  at  Troy  the  pioneer  school  of  its 
kind  in  the  United  States,  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute.  At  the  beginning  a 
new  type  of  instruction  was  used,  but  it  proved  too  expensive.  In  1829  the  curriculum 
was  revised,  a  course  in  civil  engineering  added,  and  for  a  quarter  of  a  century  this 
school  divided  with  the  West  Point  Military  Academy  the  honor  of  supplying  men 
with  scientific  training  to  meet  the  country's  need  for  engineers.  Many  of  the  early 
graduates  of  both  schools  won  renown  in  designing  and  building  the  pioneer  high- 
ways, bridges,  canals,  and  railroads  that  led  to  the  conquest  of  the  West. 

For  engineering  education  the  striking  features  of  this  period  from  1770  to  1830 
are  the  gradual  and  persistent  growth  of  the  demand  for  scientific  information  for  the 
purpose  of  increasing  production,  and  the  scanty  attention  given  to  devising  ways  and 
means  of  satisfying  it.  After  twenty-three  years  of  keen  discussion,  the  Rensselaer 
Polytechnic  Institute,  which  soon  specialized  in  civil  engineering,  and  the  West  Point 
Military  Academy,  which  was  intended  for  a  totally  different  purpose,  were  the  only 
two  scientific  schools  in  the  country. 

In  the  fifty  years  from  1820  to  1870  the  industrial  conditions  in  the  United  States 
were  completely  reorganized.  During  this  period  the  percentage  of  the  working  popu- 
lation in  agriculture  dropped  from  83  to  47.6;  while  in  manufacturing,  trade,  and 


DEVELOPMENT  OF  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS         5 

transportation  it  increased  from  17  to  31.4.  In  addition  a  new  class  called  personal 
service,  claiming  18  per  cent  of  the  workers,  was  added  and  the  professional  group 
expanded  from  a  negligible  per  cent  in  1820  to  3  per  cent  in  1870.  Thus  the  advent 
of  the  steam  engine,  the  railroad,  and  the  reaper  reduced  the  number  of  farmers  by 
354  out  of  every  1000  workers,  increased  the  number  in  manufacturing,  trade,  and 
transportation  by  144,  and  created  the  new  trade  of  personal  service,  giving  occupa- 
tion to  180  per  thousand.  The  professional  group  also  expanded  to  include  30  per  thou- 
sand. The  number  of  patents  increased  in  this  same  period  from  about  two  hundred 
to  over  thirteen  thousand  per  year. 

A  high  degree  of  engineering  ability  was  required  to  accomplish  this  industrial  revo- 
lution. Among  the  civil  engineers  who  took  part  were  a  number  who  had  the  advan- 
tage of  scientific  training  either  at  Rensselaer  or  at  West  Point.  But  in  the  long  list  of 
mechanical  engineers  who  built  the  locomotives,  the  steam  engines,  the  machine  tools, 
and  the  farm  machinery,  it  is  difficult  to  find  a  single  one  who  had  any  special  school 
training  for  the  work.  As  science  developed  and  machinery  became  more  and  more 
complex,  the  need  of  special  training  for  the  mechanical  engineer  became  more  press- 
ing. Hence  the  period  from  1820  to  1870  may  be  said  to  have  indicated  the  value  of 
special  training  for  the  civil  engineer,  and  to  have  defined  the  need  for  trained  me- 
chanical engineers  for  industrial  production. 

Scattered  here  and  there  in  the  vast  mass  of  pamphlets,  petitions,  memorials,  and 
reports,  addressed  to  various  legislative  bodies  during  these  years,  urging  the  estab- 
lishment of  state  schools  for  training  in  mechanic  arts,  there  appears  another  concep- 
tion that  added  inspiration  to  the  industrial  demand  for  schools  of  science.  It  is  to  the 
effect  that  thorough  training  in  science  must  not  only  increase  production,  it  must 
also  raise  agriculture  and  mechanic  arts  to  the  rank  of  the  learned  professions  like  the- 
ology, medicine,  and  law.  In  the  Buel  report  just  mentioned  it  is  urged  that  because 
agriculture  is  the  basis  of  all  industry,  it  should  be  elevated  to  the  rank  of  a  liberal 
and  fashionable  study.  The  well-known  phrase  in  the  Morrill  Act — "to  promote 
the  liberal  and  practical  education  of  the  industrial  classes  in  their  several  pursuits 
and  professions  in  life  " — implies  the  same  conception.  Some  of  the  earliest  engineer- 
ing schools  were  called  Industrial  Universities. 

It  thus  appears  that  the  clearly  defined  practical  demand  for  training  in  science  as 
an  aid  to  industrial  production  was  blended  with  a  vaguely  defined  ideal  of  liberal 
training  thru  science.  These  were  the  forces  that  gave  scope  to  engineering  in  America 
and  compelled  the  development  of  the  schools. 

At  first  this  development  was  very  slow.  In  spite  of  the  widespread  recognition  of 
the  need,  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute  remained  for  twenty-three  years  the 
only  school  of  its  kind.  At  length  in  1847,  thru  private  benefactions,  the  Lawrence 
Scientific  School  was  established  at  Harvard  and  the  Sheffield  Scientific  School  at 
Yale.  The  University  of  Michigan  also  voted  that  same  year  to  offer  a  course  in  civil 
engineering.  These  were  the  only  additional  engineering  schools  opened  before  the 


6  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

Civil  War,  and  they  had  a  hard  struggle  for  existence  because  their  aims  seemed  dan- 
gerous to  academic  traditions. 

During  the  Civil  War  Congress  passed  the  Morrill  Act  (1862)  granting  federal 
aid  to  the  several  states  for  founding  colleges  of  agriculture  and  mechanic  arts.  State 
legislatures  that  had  for  years  been  deaf  to  all  appeals  now  quickly  accepted  the  fed- 
eral grants  and  voted  to  create  the  new  type  of  school.  Established  colleges  caught 
the  spirit  and  added  departments  of  engineering.  The  four  schools  of  1860  increased 
to  seventeen  by  1870,  to  forty-one  by  1871,  to  seventy  by  1872,  and  to  eighty-five  by 
1880.  Now  there  are  one  hundred  and  twenty-six  engineering  schools  of  college  grade, 
of  which  forty-six  are  land  grant  colleges  operating  under  the  Morrill  Act,  forty-four 
are  professional  schools  in  universities,  twenty  are  attached  to  colleges,  and  sixteen 
are  independent.  The  number  of  students  has  increased  from  fourteen  hundred  in  1870 
to  thirty-three  thousand  in  1917,  and  the  annual  number  of  graduates  in  engineering 
from  one  hundred  in  1870  to  forty -three  hundred.  Then  there  were  less  than  three 
graduates  per  million  population,  now  there  are  about  forty-three  per  million. 

The  rate  of  growth  of  the  schools  has  not  been  constant.  In  the  decade  1870-80 
the  number  of  graduates  per  million  population  increased  from  three  to  four.  The 
figures  for  the  successive  decades  are: 

Decade  Graduates  per  Increase  per 

ending  million  million  per 

year 

1860  1 

1870  3  0.3 

1880  4  0.1 

1890  10  0.6 

1900  17  0.7 

1910  36  1.9 

1916  43  1.1  (6  years) 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  growth  was  rapidly  accelerated  from  1870  to  1910,  especially 
during  the  last  decade.  Since  1910  the  growth  has  been  less  phenomenal. 

This  increase  in  the  number  of  graduates  indicates  another  important  change  in 
school  conditions.  In  1870  the  ratio  of  graduates  to  the  total  number  of  students  was 
one  hundred  to  fourteen  hundred,  or  one  to  fourteen.  In  1915  this  ratio  was  forty-three 
hundred  to  thirty-three  thousand,  or  one  to  seven  and  seven-tenths.  This  indicates 
that  a  much  larger  proportion  of  the  students  now  take  the  full  course ;  that  is,  there 
are  relatively  fewer  stragglers.  Back  in  the  '70's  the  mortality  was  in  many  cases  as 
high  as  90  per  cent,  that  is,  only  ten  out  of  every  hundred  freshmen  continued  thru 
the  whole  course.  Now  the  highest  mortality  among  the  schools  visited 1  is  75  per  cent, 
and  the  average  for  the  twenty  schools  is  60  per  cent.  Hence  the  schools  have  not 
only  increased  in  size,  but  their  work  has  been  better  systematized  and  standardized. 

From  figures  published  by  Mr.  A.M.Wellington  in  the  Engineering  News  for  1893 

1  See  page  32. 


DEVELOPMENT  OF  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS  7 

and  from  data  presented  in  the  Reports  of  the  United  States  Commissioner  of  Edu- 
cation it  appears  that  the  total  number  of  engineers  graduated  in  the  succeeding 
decades  was  approximately 

Prior  to  1870  866 

1871-1880  2,259 

1881-1890  3,837 

1891-1900  10,430 

1901-1910  21,000 

1911-1915  17,000 

The  total  number  of  engineering  degrees  granted  in  the  United  States  up  to  1915 
has  therefore  been  about  55,000.  In  1911  the  eleven  technical  high  schools  of  Ger- 
many were  graduating  engineers  at  the  rate  of  1800  per  year,  and  the  total  number 
of  graduates  up  to  that  date  was  14,215. 

In  addition  to  the  hundred  and  twenty-six  engineering  colleges  just  discussed  there 
are  forty-three  degree-giving  institutions  that  pay  some  attention  to  engineering 
work.  Of  these,  eighteen  are  arts  colleges  that  claim  to  give  "  two  years  of  engineer- 
ing;" sixteen  advertise  engineering  courses,but  have  neither  the  faculty  nor  the  equip- 
ment to  give  them  well;  four  are  military  schools  which  occasionally  graduate  a  civil 
engineer;  and  five  are  privately  owned  institutions  which  endeavor  to  teach  engineer- 
ing to  all  who  apply,  without  regard  to  previous  academic  training,  and  grant  a  con- 
siderable number  of  degrees  on  this  basis.  There  are  also  many  excellent  schools,  like 
the  Wentworth  Institute,  the  Lowell  Institute,  and  the  Franklin  Union  in  Boston ;  the 
Baltimore  Polytechnic  Institute,  Pratt  Institute,  the  Bliss  Electrical  School  in  Wash- 
ington, the  Casino  Night  School  in  Pittsburgh,  the  Dunwoodie  Institute  in  Minne- 
apolis, the  Cogswell  Polytechnic  in  San  Francisco,  and  the  numerous  technical  classes 
of  the  Young  Men's  Christian  Association  in  various  places,  that  teach  engineering 
but  make  no  pretense  of  granting  college  degrees.  These  schools  are  meeting  a  real 
need  in  a  genuinely  effective  way  without  departing  from  their  vocational  purpose 
or  confusing  the  educational  situation  by  granting  degrees. 

The  first  schools  offered  only  one  course  —  civil  engineering.  The  Massachusetts 
Institute  of  Technology  opened  in  1865  with  six  curricula  leading  to  degrees  in  civil, 
mechanical,  and  mining  engineering,  practical  chemistry,  architecture,  and  general 
science.  Now  the  specialized  courses  at  the  Institute  have  increased  to  fifteen  and  nu- 
merous other  specialties  are  offered  at  other  schools.  The  additions  include  all  phases 
of  engineering,  such  as  chemical,  sanitary,  metallurgical,  marine,  cement,  electro- 
chemical, textile,  automobile,  aeronautical,  ceramic,  highway,  agricultural,  and  en- 
gineering administration.  The  work  of  the  schools  has  thus  increased  in  scope  and 
become  more  complex. 

Unfortunately  it  is  not  possible  to  give  any  even  reasonably  trustworthy  figures 
as  to  the  resources  and  the  equipment  of  all  the  engineering  schools,  because  so  many 
of  them  are  inextricably  bound  up  with  colleges  and  universities.  The  United  States 


8  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

Bureau  of  Education  still  treats  engineering  under  the  general  heading  "Universities, 
Colleges,  and  Technological  Schools."  In  a  university  with  several  schools  it  is  a  very 
perplexing  problem  to  determine  how  much  of  the  total  equipment  and  expense 
should  be  charged  against  any  one  division  such  as  engineering.  In  order  to  secure 
some  estimate  of  the  cost  and  resources  of  engineering  education,  as  distinguished 
from  college  education,  the  following  summary  of  the  conditions  at  the  sixteen  inde- 
pendent schools  that  devote  all  their  resources  to  engineering  alone  is  presented.  The 
figures  are  from  the  Report  of  the  United  States  Commissioner  of  Education  for  1916. 

In  the  sixteen  independent  schools  there  were,  during  the  year  1914-15,  762  in- 
structors and  6807  students;  or  on  the  average  one  instructor  to  nine  students.  The 
total  expenditure  for  the  year  was  $2,348,000,  or  an  average  of  $345  per  student. 
The  plants  were  valued  at  $14,047,000,  the  equipment  at  $3,022,000,  and  they  had 
endowments  amounting  to  $12,985,000. 

These  sixteen  schools  are  widely  distributed  over  the  country,  the  number  of  in- 
structors varies  from  5  to  290,  the  number  of  students  from  26  to  1816,  the  value  of 
the  plant  from  $98,000  to  $6,300,000,  the  endowment  from  nothing  (at  state  schools) 
to  $3,236,000,  the  value  of  equipment  from  $51,000  to  $478,000,  and  the  cost  per 
student  year  from  $204  to  $1333.  Seven  are  state  institutions  and  nine  are  on  pri- 
vate foundations.  It  is  therefore  not  unreasonable  to  assume  that  the  conditions  that 
maintain  for  the  6807  students  of  these  schools  are  typical  of  conditions  for  the  33,000 
students  in  all  schools.  On  this  assumption,  the  total  annual  expenditure  for  the  en- 
gineering instruction  of  33,000  students  at  $345  per  year  is  $11,385,000.  On  the  same 
assumption  the  total  value  of  the  plants  used  for  this  purpose  is  about  $68,000,000, 
the  equipment  is  worth  about  $15,000,000,  and  the  endowment  is  about  $63,000,000. 
Altho  these  figures  are  merely  estimated,  they  are  as  trustworthy  as  any  that  are 
available  under  present  conditions. 

Since  the  engineering  schools  entered  upon  their  remarkable  development  fifty  years 
ago  the  conditions  of  industrial  production  have  changed,  new  fields  of  engineering 
have  been  developed,  the  professional  ideals  of  the  engineer  have  grown  more  defi- 
nite, laboratory  work  has  won  recognition  as  an  essential  element  of  all  instruction 
in  science,  and  educational  theory  and  practice  have  been  brought  within  the  range 
of  scientific  test.  Under  these  conditions  numerous  fundamental  questions  concerning 
engineering  education  have  of  necessity  emerged.  Do  we  need  fewer  or  more  schools? 
Is  the  curriculum  too  long  or  too  short?  Should  the  engineering  school  be  made  a 
graduate  professional  school?  What  are  the  present  demands  of  science,  of  industry, 
and  of  education?  How  well  are  the  schools  meeting  these  demands?  What  changes, 
if  any,  seem  desirable? 

The  answers  to  questions  like  these  are  at  present  both  vague  and  unconvincing. 
This  study  endeavors  to  define  a  number  of  the  more  important  problems  of  engi- 
neering education,  and  to  suggest  policies  and  methods  that  promise  to  be  fruitful  in 
working  toward  more  satisfactory  solutions. 


Chapter  II 

THE  AIMS  AND  CURRICULA  OF  THE  EARLY  SCHOOLS 

Engineering  schools  are  so  obviously  a  result  of  the  needs  of  industrial  production 
that  the  conceptions  on  which  they  are  founded  are  necessarily  much  the  same  for  all. 
Hence  three  schools — the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute  (1824),  the  University 
of  Illinois  (1867),  and  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  (1865) — are  here 
selected  as  typical  expressions  of  the  general  movement,  because  the  documents 
relative  to  the  founding  of  these  institutions  state  their  ultimate  aims  with  striking 
clearness.1 

From  the  evidence  presented  in  the  History  of  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute 
it  appears  that  in  planning  his  school  Mr.  van  Rensselaer  was  strongly  influenced  by 
two  foreign  institutions:  namely,  the  Royal  Institution  of  Great  Britain,  which  was 
established  by  Count  Rumford  in  1799  as  an  offshoot  of  the  Society  for  Increasing 
the  Comforts  of  the  Poor,  and  was  intended  to  facilitate  the  general  introduction 
of  useful  mechanical  inventions;  and  the  Fellenberg  School  at  Hofwyl,  Switzerland, 
which  sought  to  educate  the  children  of  the  poor  thru  manual  work  in  accordance  with 
methods  devised  by  Pestalozzi.  As  stated  in  the  official  notice  of  the  establishment 
of  the  school,  its  aim  was  to  furnish  instruction  "in  the  application  of  science  to 
the  common  purposes  of  life,"  in  order  to  train  men  to  teach  "the  sons  and  daugh- 
ters of  farmers  and  mechanics  .  .  .  and  who  will  be  highly  useful  to  the  community 
in  the  diffusion  of  a  very  useful  kind  of  knowledge,  with  its  application  to  the  busi- 
ness of  living."2  Prior  to  1829  no  mention  of  professional  engineers  is  made  beyond 
the  remark  in  the  Buel  report  (page  5),  that  because  agriculture  is  the  basis  of 
all  industry,  the  state  should  elevate  it  "to  the  rank  of  a  liberal  and  fashionable 
study." 

The  educational  conceptions  of  the  land  grant  colleges  developed  gradually  during 
the  quarter  century  from  1825  to  1850.  They  are  expressed  in  numerous  memorials 
to  the  Federal  Congress,  petitions  to  state  legislatures,  and  resolutions  of  societies  for 
the  promotion  of  agriculture  and  the  mechanic  arts.  An  analysis  of  the  more  impor- 
tant of  these  documents  and  of  the  debates  in  Congress  on  the  several  Morrill  acts 
has  just  been  published  by  the  Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teach- 
ing in  Dr.  I.  L.  KandePs  Bulletin  on  Federal  Aid  for  Vocational  Education.  These 
conceptions  reached  their  fullest  expression  in  the  meetings  of  the  Illinois  Industrial 
League  in  1851-53.  A  very  complete  statement  of  the  aims  of  the  new  schools  is  made 
in  a  memorial  sent  by  the  league  to  the  state  legislature  in  1852.3 

1  Cf.  P.  C.  Ricketts :  History  of  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  New  York,  Wiley,  1895 ;  W.  B.  Rogers :  Objects 
and  Plan  of  an  Institute  of  Technology,  Boston,  1861 ;  E.  J.  James :  The  Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  of  1862,  Uni- 
versity of  Illinois  Bulletin,  vol.  viii,  No.  10,  November,  1910. 

2  Ricketts,  loc.  cit.,  pages  6-10. 

5  E.  J.  James,  loc.  cit.,  pages  90-95. 


10  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

In  this  document  the  memorialists  state  that  as  members  of  the  industrial  classes 
personally  engaged  in  agricultural  and  mechanical  pursuits  they  have  forced  on  their 
attention  constantly  the  fact  that  from  one-third  to  one-half  of  the  products  of  the 
state  are  annually  sacrificed  because  of  the  worker's  ignorance  of  scientific  laws  and 
methods  of  work.  This  appalling  loss  might  be  prevented  if  there  were  established  a 
suitable  industrial  university  to  teach  what  is  already  known  and  to  carry  on  inves- 
tigations of  new  problems.  To  secure  these  ends,  it  is  necessary  to  establish  industrial 
universities  which  shall  give  the  industrial  classes  a  thorough  scientific  and  practical 
training  equivalent  in  all  respects  to  the  literary  training  already  given  so  success- 
fully and  abundantly  as  preparation  for  the  so-called  learned  professions. 

The  educational  aims  and  methods  required  for  this  purpose  were  stated  forcefully 
by  Professor  J.  B.  Turner  in  two  addresses  which  are  reprinted  in  President  James's 
pamphlet.  In  these  Professor  Turner  makes  clear  that  the  conventional  forms  of  in- 
struction in  literary  colleges  are  not  suitable  for  industrial  training.  Book  learning 
alone  does  not  suffice,  but  must  be  supplemented  by  a  study  of  things.  The  former 
produces  "laborious  thinkers,"  while  industry  needs  "thinking  laborers.'11  Nor  are 
schools  that  teach  the  application  of  science  to  the  art  of  killing  men  fitted  to  teach 
scientific  methods  of  feeding,  clothing,  and  housing  men.  A  special  type  of  instruction 
is  needed,  —  one  that  analyzes  practical  problems  and  sets  the  student  "to  earnest  and 
constant  thought  about  the  things  he  daily  does,  sees,  and  handles,  and  all  their  con- 
nected relations  and  interests."  Men  secure  true  discipline  best  by  "continued  habits 
of  reading,  thought,  and  reflection  in  connection  with  their  several  professional  pur- 
suits in  after  life."  In  this  way  schools  can  "teach  men  to  derive  their  mental  and 
moral  strength  from  their  own  pursuits."  There  are  "more  recondite  and  profound 
principles  of  pure  mathematics  immediately  connected  with  the  sailing  of  a  ship,  or 
the  moulding  and  driving  of  a  plow,  or  an  axe,  or  a  jack-plane  than  with  all  three  of 
the  so-called  learned  professions  together,"  and  these  should  be  made  objects  of  study 
in  order  to  "extend  the  boundaries  of  our  present  knowledge  in  all  possible  practical 
directions." 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  the  aim  of  the  founders  of  the  "Illinois  Industrial  Univer- 
sity" was  increased  production  and  professional  recognition.  The  conception  of  the 
need  and  the  methods  of  training  farmers  and  artisans  for  increased  production  in  such 
a  way  as  to  elevate  their  callings  to  the  rank  of  professions  is,  however,  much  more 
definitely  expressed  than  in  the  case  of  Rensselaer.  The  need  for  expanding  the  bounds 
of  knowledge  by  scientific  investigation  has  also  been  perceived. 

At  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  the  aims  and  methods  were  defined 
by  its  first  president,  William  B.  Rogers.  The  seeds  of  the  conception  of  a  polytechnic 
school  were  planted  in  him  during  his  first  experience  in  teaching  apprentices  at  the 
Mechanics  Institute  in  Baltimore  in  1827.  The  growth  of  the  plan  was  fostered  by 
his  share  in  the  preparation,  in  1837,  of  a  petition  for  the  Franklin  Institute  to  the 
Pennsylvania  State  Legislature  praying  for  the  establishment  of  a  state  school  of 


AIMS  AND  CURRICULA  OF  THE  EARLY  SCHOOLS  11 

applied  science,  and  by  his  formulation  for  his  brother  in  1846  of  a  "Plan  for  a  Poly- 
technic School  in  Boston."1 

The  final  statement  of  his  conceptions  was  printed  in  his  Objects  and  Plan  of  an 
Institute  of  Technology,  Boston,  1861.  In  this  pamphlet,  which  was  issued  to  attract 
support  for  the  enterprise,  the  argument  is  this:  "Material  prosperity  and  intellectual 
advancement  are  felt  to  be  inseparably  associated "  (page  1).  But  material  prosperity 
requires  intelligence  in  industrial  production,  and  this  in  turn  demands  "that  sys- 
tematic training  in  the  applied  sciences,  which  can  alone  give  to  the  industrial  classes  a 
sure  mastery  over  the  materials  and  processes  with  which  they  are  concerned.  Such  a 
training,  forming  what  might  be  called  the  intellectual  element  in  production,  has,  we 
believe,  become  indispensable  to  fit  us  for  successful  competition  with  other  nations 
in  the  race  of  industrial  activity,  in  which  we  are  so  deeply  interested ""  (page  20).  Such 
a  training  should  not  only  impart  knowledge  and  develop  habits  of  exact  thought; 
it  should  also  "help  to  extend  more  widely  the  elevating  influences  of  a  generous 
scientific  culture."  There  should  also  be  included  "a  department  of  investigation 
and  publication,  intended  to  promote  research  in  connection  with  industrial  science  " 
(page  6). 

It  appears  from  the  foregoing  pages  that  from  the  beginning  the  engineering 
schools  have  had  a  clear  conception  of  their  functions.  They  themselves  understood 
that  their  ultimate  aim  was  increased  industrial  production,  and  that  their  special 
contribution  to  this  end  was  systematic  instruction  in  applied  science.  In  addition 
they  believed  that  if  this  instruction  were  given  with  the  proper  spirit,  engineering 
would  become  a  learned  profession  and  scientific  research  a  recognized  necessity. 

The  means  employed  at  Rensselaer  in  1824  to  secure  these  ends  were  novel  and 
unique.  The  first  curriculum  required  one  year  for  its  completion,  and  was  divided 
into  three  terms.  School  opened  the  last  week  in  July  with  an  "experimental  term,"" 
during  which  the  students  gathered  botanical,  mineralogical,  and  zoological  speci- 
mens, visited  shops  and  factories  near  the  school,  and  discussed  with  the  class  the  sig- 
nificance of  what  they  had  collected  and  observed.  In  addition  each  student  gave  a 
number  of  lectures  on  chemistry  and  natural  philosophy,  fully  illustrated  by  experi- 
ments performed  with  his  own  hands. 

During  the  second  term,  from  the  end  of  November  to  the  first  of  March,  the  stu- 
dents reviewed  in  class  the  sciences  taught  in  the  fall,  and  in  addition  studied  rhetoric, 
logic,  geography,  and  mathematics.  The  spring  term  lasted  from  the  first  week  in 
March  to  the  end  of  June.  For  six  weeks  the  work  consisted  of  lectures  by  the  stu- 
dents on  experimental  philosophy,  chemical  powers,  substances  non-metallic,  metal- 
loids, metals,  soils,  and  mineral  waters.  For  the  remaining  nine  weeks  the  students 
were  exercised  in  the  application  of  the  sciences  to  practical  projects  and  in  the  study 
of  engineering  works  in  the  neighborhood  of  the  school. 

1  William  Burton  Rogers:  Life  and  Letters,  vol.  i,  pages  420-427. 


12  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

In  the  catalogue  published  in  1828  the  term  "civil  engineering"  occurs  for  the  first 
time  as  one  of  the  topics  on  which  the  senior  professor  would  lecture.  The  catalogue  for 
1831-32  states  that  the  second  sub-term  would  be  devoted  to  "Trigonometry,  Navi- 
gation, and  the  Elements  of  Civil  Engineering.'"  In  1835  the  legislature  was  petitioned 
to  amend  the  charter  of  the  school  so  as  to  permit  the  addition  of  a  "  department 
of  mathematical  arts,  for  the  purpose  of  giving  instruction  in  engineering  and  tech- 
nology." Graduates  of  this  department  were  to  receive  the  degree  of  Civil  Engineer. 
This  degree  was  awarded  for  the  first  time  in  the  United  States  to  four  members  of 
the  class  of  1835. 

It  will  be  noted  that  during  the  first  ten  years  the  Rensselaer  Institute  evolved  from 
a  school  of  natural  science  designed  to  train  teachers  able  to  spread  among  farmers 
and  artisans  scientific  information  that  would  assist  them  in  production,  into  a  school 
of  engineering  and  technology.  The  changes  in  curriculum  that  accompanied  this  evo- 
lution are  striking.  The  full  program  for  1835  is  printed  in  President  Ricketfs  His- 
tory. A  comparison  of  this  curriculum  with  the  first  one  shows  that  the  "experimental 
term"  at  the  beginning  has  disappeared.  The  school  year  begins  in  November  with 
class  work  in  "practical  Mathematics,  Arithmetical  and  Geometrical,"  combined  with 
"extemporaneous  speaking  on  the  subjects  of  Logic,  Rhetoric,  Geology,  Geography, 
and  History,"  and  "Lectures  on  National  and  Municipal  Law  "by  the  senior  professor. 
The  second  term  of  twenty-four  weeks  devotes  eight  weeks  to  practice  in  the  use  of 
instruments;  eight  weeks  to  study  of  the  theory  of  mechanical  powers,  bridges,  arches, 
canals,  etc. ;  four  weeks  to  calculations  of  the  quantity  of  water  per  second  supplied 
by  streams  with  reference  to  their  use  for  various  practical  purposes;  and  four  weeks 
to  inspection  of  "  mills,  factories,  and  other  machinery  or  works  which  come  within 
the  province  of  mathematical  arts." 

This  evolution  of  the  curriculum  was  carried  one  step  farther  in  1849,  when  the 
director,  Professor  B.  Franklin  Greene,  went  abroad  and  made  a  careful  study  of  French 
technical  schools.  On  his  return  the  course  at  Rensselaer  was  lengthened  to  three  years 
and  a  new  curriculum  adopted.  This  curriculum  is  a  combination  of  the  curricula 
of  L'Ecole  Centrale  des  Arts  et  Manufactures,  which  plans  to  train  civil  engineers, 
directors  of  works,  superintendents  of  factories,  and  the  like;  and  L'Ecole  Poly  tech- 
nique, which  prepares  for  certain  government  technical  institutions.  The  first  half  of 
the  curriculum  was  intended  to  lay  the  general  scientific  basis  of  all  engineering,  and 
the  second  half  to  develop  proficiency  in  some  special  line.  This  curriculum  is  given 
here  in  full  along  with  the  first  three  years  of  the  first  curricula  of  the  Massachusetts 
Institute  of  Technology  (1865)  and  the  University  of  Illinois  (1867). 


AIMS  AND  CURRICULA  OF  THE  EARLY  SCHOOLS 


13 


Rensselaer 


Massachusetts  Institute 
First  Year 


University  of  Illinois 


Algebra,  geometry, 

Algebra,  solid  geometry, 

Algebra,  geometry, 

trigonometry 

trigonometry 

trigonometry 

General  physics 

Elementary  mechanics 

Geometrical  drawing 

Drawing  —  mechanical  and 

Descriptive  geometry 

freehand 

and  drawing 

English 

English 

English  or 

Foreign  language 

Foreign  language 

Foreign  language 

Surveying 

Chemistry  —  inorganic 

History 

Botany 

Second  Year 

Botany 

Analytics,  calculus 

Analytics,  calculus 

Analytics,  calculus 

General  physics 

Physics 

Chemistry 

Chemistry 

Descriptive  geometry, 

Descriptive  geometry ,  machine 

Descriptive  geometry, 

machine  drawing 

and  freehand  drawing 

drawing 

Topographical  and  hydro- 

Surveying  —  plane 

Surveying 

graphical  surveying 

English 

English 

Foreign  language 

Foreign  language 

Foreign  language 

Mineralogy 

Astronomy,  navigation 

Zoology 

Geology 

Third  Year 

Mechanics 

Calculus,  analytic  and 

Calculus,  analytic 

applied  mechanics 

mechanics 

Practical  astronomy 

Spherical  astronomy 

Descriptive  astronomy 

Geodesy — trigonometrical, 

Surveying  —  roads, 

Railroad  surveying 

railroad  and  mine  surveying 

railroads  and  canals 

Descriptive  geometry — per- 

Descriptive geometry  — 

Shades,  shadows,  persp 

spective,  topographical 

masonry  and  carpentry 

drawing,  stereotomy 

Industrial  physics 

English 

Physics 

Physics 

Practical  geology 

English 

Physical  geography 

Drawings,  plans,  etc. 

Machines 

Foreign  languages 

Chemistry 

Constructions — theory  of 
structures,  bridges, 
hydraulic  works,  railways 

Mining 

Metallurgy 

Philosophy  of  mind 


Computation  of  earth 
work  and  masonry 


Hydrographical  surveying 


The  curricula  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute  and  the  University  of  Illinois  did  not 
evolve  thru  a  period  of  years.  They  were  simply  adopted  in  the  form  given.  How 
much  influence  the  Rensselaer  curriculum  had  in  shaping  the  others  it  is  impossible 
to  say.  Internal  evidence  suggests  that  this  influence  was  large. 


14  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

A  comparison  of  these  three  curricula  indicates  that  the  general  plan  is  very  much 
the  same  in  all.  The  third  year  at  Rensselaer  contains  some  of  the  technical  courses 
that  appear  in  the  fourth  year  of  the  other  two  schools.  But  they  all  agree  in  placing 
mathematics,  drawing,  descriptive  geometry,  physics,  and  chemistry  before  the  work 
in  applied  science.  In  other  words,  they  all  sought  to  meet  the  demand  for  increased 
production  by  first  teaching  the  necessary  theoretical  science  and  then  showing  how 
to  apply  it.  This  was  the  plan  in  the  French  schools,  and  it  was  transplanted  without 
change  to  America.  It  remained  and  still  is  the  prevailing  conception  underlying  the 
curricula  of  our  engineering  colleges. 

But  tho  these  three  curricula  agree  in  general  plan,  the  methods  of  handling  the 
work  in  the  three  schools  were  quite  different.  The  system  of  instruction  by  the  stu- 
dents, which  has  already  been  described,  had  by  1865  given  place  at  Rensselaer  to  the 
system  now  used  there  of  interrogations  and  blackboard  demonstrations.  Field  trips 
and  the  observation  of  industrial  processes  in  action  in  neighboring  shops  had  been 
discontinued.  These  changes  were  made  necessary  by  the  increased  attendance  at  the 
school. 

At  the  University  of  Illinois  the  instruction  in  theory  was  given  by  lectures  and 
recitations  from  textbooks  combined  with  the  use  of  plates  and  models.  This  was  in 
a  way  coordinated  with  shopwork,  in  that  machinery  planned  in  the  drafting  room 
was  actually  constructed  in  the  shops.  Much  of  the  early  equipment,  including  an 
eight  horse  power  steam  engine,  was  constructed  by  the  students  in  this  way.  Oppor- 
tunities for  manual  labor  for  pay  were  offered  the  students,  and  many  of  them  earned 
enough  to  meet  their  expenses  by  making  furniture  and  apparatus  in  extra  hours  of 
shopwork.  A  chemical  laboratory  was  part  of  the  earliest  equipment. 

At  the  Massachusetts  Institute  there  was  no  shopwork  until  1877.  The  lecture- 
recitation  method  of  instruction  was  used  in  all  class  work,  but  this  was  supplemented 
by  laboratory  work  in  physics  and  mechanical  engineering.  The  first  laboratory  for 
undergraduate  instruction  in  physics  was  opened  here  by  Professor  E.  C.  Pickering 
in  1869.  The  organization  and  many  of  the  experiments  he  devised  are  still  used  in 
physics  laboratories.  The  teaching  was  necessarily  very  like  that  in  other  colleges 
because  all  the  professors  had  been  trained  in  existing  schools  devoted  mainly  to  lit- 
erary studies. 


Chapter  III 

THE  STRUGGLE  FOR  RESOURCES  AND  RECOGNITION 

The  Rensselaer  Institute  began  work  in  1824  in  a  rented  house  with  several  hun- 
dred dollars  worth  of  equipment,  all  of  which  was  supplied  by  the  Hon.  Stephen  van 
Rensselaer.  There  were  25  students  the  first  year,  each  of  whom  paid  $36  tuition,  and 
these  fees  were  paid  to  the  two  professors  as  their  remuneration.  During  the  first 
eight  years  the  founder  paid  about  half  the  cost  of  maintenance — a  total  of  $22,000. 
By  that  time  the  value  of  the  equipment  had  increased  to  $4000.  For  twenty  years 
work  was  conducted  in  rented  quarters.  Finally,  in  1844,  a  house  and  lot  were  given 
the  school  by  the  city  of  Troy  on  condition  that  a  fund  equal  to  the  value  of  the 
property  be  raised  for  maintenance.  For  this  purpose  Mr.  William  P.  van  Rensselaer 
gave  $6500,  and  $1150  was  raised  by  subscription  to  build  a  chemical  laboratory. 
That  year  there  were  75  students,  the  tuition  was  $40  a  year,  and  the  total  value  of 
the  plant  was  appraised  at  $15,850. 

In  1850  the  course  was  lengthened  to  three  years  and  the  tuition  raised  to  $60  a 
year.  Tuition  was  increased  to  $100  in  1857,  to  $150  in  1864,  and  to  $200  in  1866, 
at  which  figure  it  still  remains.  In  1851  the  state  gave  the  institution  $3000  and  ten 
years  later  $3750,  for  general  purposes.  After  the  fire  that  destroyed  the  buildings 
in  1862,  the  state  gave  $10,000  to  help  rebuild,  and  this  was  increased  by  a  further 
grant  of  $15,000  in  1868.  From  1846  to  1854  the  school  was  classed  as  an  academy 
by  the  state  Board  of  Regents  and  as  such  received  $744  in  all  as  its  share  of  the  lit- 
erature moneys  distributed  to  the  academies  of  the  state.  These  figures  represent  the 
entire  support  granted  by  the  state,  a  total  of  $32,494. 

From  these  facts  it  appears  that  prior  to  the  beginning  of  the  Civil  War  this  insti- 
tution owed  its  existence  almost  wholly  to  private  benefactions  and  to  the  devoted 
services  of  its  staff,  whose  enthusiasm  and  self-sacrifice  made  the  continuance  of  the 
work  possible  with  meagre  equipment  and  slender  resources.  The  experience  of  other 
schools  of  this  period  was  similar.  At  Yale  the  scientific  school  was  started  in  1847, 
when  Professors  Silliman  and  Norton  opened  a  laboratory  for  practical  instruction 
in  the  application  of  science  to  the  arts  of  agriculture.  Professor  Norton  was  permit- 
ted to  hold  the  chair  of  agricultural  chemistry  on  condition  that  he  should  draw  no 
salai-y ;  this  entire  enterprise  was  housed  mainly  in  the  chapel  attic  until  1860,  when 
Joseph  E.  Sheffield  supplied  the  funds  needed  to  place  it  on  a  permanent  footing.  The 
Lawrence  Scientific  School  at  Harvard  was  more  fortunate  in  that  its  early  financial 
support  was  assured  by  the  gift  of  Mr.  Abbott  Lawrence  in  1847.  The  engineering 
department  at  the  University  of  Michigan  was  the  one  state-supported  school  of 
engineering  before  1860,  but  no  engineei-ing  degrees  were  granted  there  until  1861. 

Science  and  engineering  in  America  owe  a  great  deal  to  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic 
Institute.  Founded  at  a  time  when  the  great  masses  of  the  people  knew  little  about 


16  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

science  and  cared  less,  it  quietly  and  persistently  trained  teachers  and  engineers  who 
diffused  scientific  information  and  built  many  of  the  railways,  roads,  and  bridges 
that  were  essential  to  the  success  of  the  industrial  evolution.  By  1860  it  had  grad- 
uated 318  men,  while  from  the  West  Point  Military  Academy,  for  many  years  the 
only  other  school  for  scientific  training,  but  200  of  the  graduates  entered  engineer- 
ing before  1860.  The  Lawrence  School  at  Harvard  graduated  49  men  before  the  Civil 
War,  in  the  face  of  an  unconcealed  disdain  on  the  part  of  the  regular  faculty. 

It  is  a  very  striking  fact  that  before  the  Civil  War  so  little  progress  was  made  in  the 
establishment  of  schools  of  science.  Altho  there  were  many  far-seeing  men  who  urged 
the  need  of  them  in  memorials,  addresses,  and  petitions  to  legislatures,  there  was  little 
action  before  1860.  But  a  great  change  occurred  during  the  strife  and  turmoil  of 
battle.  Congress  passed  the  Morrill  Act  in  1862,  thereby  creating  in  each  state  a  fund 
for  the  establishment  of  a  college  "  for  the  liberal  and  practical  education  of  the  indus- 
trial classes  in  their  several  pursuits  and  professions  in  life."  In  1861  the  Massachu- 
setts State  Legislature  granted  a  charter  and  a  tract  of  land  to  the  Massachusetts 
Institute  of  Technology,  and  in  four  years  over  $100,000  had  been  raised  by  subscrip- 
tion for  a  building,  and  the  school  had  opened  for  work.  The  School  of  Mines  at 
Columbia  (1864),  the  Thayer  School  at  Dartmouth  (1867),  Cornell  University  (1867), 
the  Worcester  Polytechnic  Institute  (1868),  were  established  at  this  time.  In  addition 
the  states  of  Illinois,  California,  Iowa,  New  York,  New  Jersey,  Maine,  Michigan,  New 
Hampshire,  Pennsylvania,  Tennessee,  Vermont,  and  Wisconsin  accepted  the  terms  of 
the  Federal  land  grant  of  1862  before  1870. 

But  altho  after  the  Civil  War  money  began  to  flow  toward  the  support  of  techni- 
cal education,  the  financial  struggles  of  the  schools  were  by  no  means  ended.  At  the 
Massachusetts  Institute  in  1868,  in  spite  of  stringent  economy,  the  total  income  of 
the  school  was  $34,230  and  the  total  expense  $42,650.  The  deficit  had  to  be  made  up 
by  subscription  among  the  friends  of  the  project.  At  this  time  the  tuition  was  $100 
for  the  first  year,  $125  for  the  second,  and  $150  each  for  the  third  and  fourth.  But 
the  total  cost  per  student  per  year  was  $250.  At  Harvard  it  was  then  $180,  at  Yale 
$126,  at  Columbia  $115,  at  Brown  $178,  at  Amherst  $80,  and  at  the  University  of 
Pennsylvania  $42.  At  the  new  Illinois  Industrial  University,  with  a  total  income  in 
1869  of  $35,000  and  156  students,  it  was  $224,  and  there  were  no  tuition  fees.  In  other 
words,  the  schools  soon  found  that  instruction  in  science  was  not  only  new,  but  more 
expensive  than  regular  college  teaching,  because  of  the  relatively  high  cost  of  labora- 
tory work  and  the  small  number  of  students. 

In  the  thirty  years  from  1870  to  1900  the  schools  slowly  grew  stronger  and  more 
secure.  The  plant  at  Illinois  increased  in  value  from  $186,000  in  1870  to  $1,300,000 
in  1900,  or  at  the  average  rate  of  $37,000  a  year.  At  the  same  time  the  annual  income 
increased  from  $35,000  to  $483,000,  or  at  the  average  rate  of  about  $15,000  a  year. 
The  student  increase  during  this  period  was  from  156  to  1756,  the  average  rate  being 
53  per  year. 


STRUGGLE  FOR  RESOURCES  AND  RECOGNITION 


17 


The  complete  figures  for  the  typical  schools,  compiled  from  the  early  records  and 
the  Reports  of  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Education  for  1900  and  1916,  are  given 


in  the  following  table: 


Value  of  Plant 


1870 

1900 

1916 

Increase 

Increase  per  year 

1870-1900 

1900-16 

I 

1870-1900 

II 
1900-16 

Ratio  — 

Illinois 
Mass.  Inst. 
Rensselaer 

$186,000 

400,000 

50,000 

$1,300,000 
911,000 
240,000 

$5,152,000 
6,778,000 
1,521,000 

$1,114,000 
511,000 
190,000 

$3,852,000 
5,867,000 
1,281,000 

$37,000 

17,000 

6,300 

$240,000 

367,000 

80,000 

7 
22 
12 

Annual  Income 


Illinois 

$35,000 

$483,000 

$2,209,000 

$448,000 

$1,726,000 

$15,000 

$108,000 

7 

Mass.  Inst. 

45,000 

348,000 

817,000 

303,000 

469,000 

10,100 

29,300 

3 

Rensselaer 

19,000 

49,632 

225,000 

30,000 

175,000 

1,000 

11,000 

11 

Number  of  Students 


Illinois 

156 

1,756 

5,523 

1,600 

3,767 

53 

235 

4 

Mass.  Inst. 

167 

1,178 

1,816 

1,011 

638 

34 

40 

1.2 

Rensselaer 

125 

250 

545 

125 

295 

4 

18 

4.5 

From  these  figures  it  appears  that  the  resources  and  attendance  increased  steadily 
but  moderately  during  the  period  from  1870  to  1900.  Since  1900  the  development  has 
not  only  been  rapid;  but  the  buildings,  equipment, and  expenditures  have  increased 
much  more  rapidly  than  the  number  of  students.  Because  of  this  the  total  expendi- 
ture per  student  per  year  has  practically  doubled  since  1900,  and  every  institution 
in  the  country  is  finding  it  yearly  more  difficult  to  live  within  its  income. 

The  above  figures,  while  as  trustworthy  as  any  that  can  be  obtained,  are  not  accurate 
to  within  5  per  cent  or  so.  They,  however,  indicate  the  general  drift  clearly  enough.  In 
the  decade  from  1871  to  1880  private  benefactions  to  education  averaged  $6,000,000 
a  year.  In  the  past  decade  they  have  averaged  $26,000,000  a  year.  In  like  manner  total 
expenditures  for  education  in  the  United  States  have  increased  from  about  $75,000,000 
a  year  in  1870  to  $240,000,000  in  1900  and  to  nearly  a  billion  in  1916.  The  yearly 
increase  up  to  1900  was  about  $5,500,000;  since  then  it  has  been  $48,000,000,  or 


nine  times  as  great. 


This  growth  of  the  engineering  schools  in  size  and  resources  has  been  closely  par- 


IS 


STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 


alleled  by  the  development  of  the  engineering  profession  and  of  the  manufacturing 
activities  of  the  country.  As  has  been  pointed  out  (page  5),  the  elevation  of  the 
mechanic  arts  to  the  rank  of  a  learned  profession  has  always  been  one  of  the  con- 
scious aims  of  instruction  in  applied  science.  This  aim  was  very  vague  indeed  when  the 
Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute  was  founded,  for  at  that  time  there  was  no  engi- 
neering profession  to  define  professional  standards  as  a  guide  to  the  schools. 

The  first  effort  toward  a  more  specific  definition  of  the  profession  was  made  in  1839 
by  Benjamin  Latrobe,  John  F.  Houston,  Benjamin  White,  and  others,  when  they  tried 
to  establish  a  national  society  of  civil  engineers.  This  effort  was  not  successful.  The 
present  American  Society  of  Civil  Engineers  was  established  in  1852  and  held  its  first 
national  convention  in  1869.  The  mining  engineers  attained  this  same  degree  of  pro- 
fessional consciousness  in  1872,  when  the  American  Institute  of  Mining  Engineers 
was  founded.  The  American  Society  of  Mechanical  Engineers  was  established  in  1883, 
and  the  American  Institute  of  Electrical  Engineers  in  1884. 

The  Census  Reports  are  no  more  satisfactory  concerning  engineering  than  are  the 
Reports  of  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Education  (page  17).  The  Report  for  1850  lists 
512  civil  engineers.  In  1860  the  corresponding  entry  is  27,437  civil  and  mechanical 
engineers,  with  a  footnote  stating  that  this  includes  stationary  engine  and  locomotive 
engineers.  In  1870  the  heading  is  "electricians,  engineers  (civil,  etc.),  and  surveyors 
7,374."  Under  this  heading  the  number  in  1880  is  given  as  8261 ;  in  1890  it  is  43,239, 
and  in  1900  it  has  increased  to  93,956.  The  several  branches  of  the  profession  are 
recognized  for  the  first  time  in  the  1910  report,  which  enumerates  14,514  engineers 
(mechanical),  6930  mining  engineers,  52,033  civil  engineers  and  surveyors,  and  135,519 
electricians  and  electrical  engineers — a  total  of  208,996.  Probably  not  more  than 
80,000  of  these  engineers  enumerated  by  the  census  could  qualify  for  membership  in 
any  of  the  professional  societies  mentioned,  which  now  have  about  30,000  members. 
Recently  a  number  of  new  engineering  societies  have  been  organized,  representing 
cement,  automobiles,  electric  light,  electric  traction,  etc.  The  total  membership  in  all 
the  societies  having  headquarters  in  the  Engineering  Societies  Building  in  New  York 
is  about  53,000. 

The  rate  of  growth  of  the  engineering  societies  is  shown  in  the  following  table: 


Founded 

Membership 

Increase 

Increase  per  year 

Ratio  — 

I 

II 

1900 

1916 

Origin-1900 

1900-16 

0n'Gf!'n-1900 

1900-16 

Civil  Engineers 
Mining  Engineers 

1852 

1872 

-2-227 
2661 

7909 
5234 

1984 

(since  1810) 

2661 

5682 
2573 

66 
95 

355 
161 

5 
1.7 

Mechanical  Engineers 

1883 

1951 

6931 

1951 

4980 

114 

311 

2.8 

Electrical  Engineers 

1884 

1273 

8212 

1273 

6939 

80 

434 

5 

STRUGGLE  FOR  RESOURCES  AND  RECOGNITION  19 

These  figures  indicate  that  the  professional  societies,  like  the  schools,  have  grown 
much  more  rapidly  since  1900.  This  probably  does  not  result  so  much  from  mere  increase 
in  the  total  number  of  engineers  in  the  country,  as  from  an  awakening  and  expan- 
sion of  professional  consciousness.  The  establishment  of  the  Engineering  Foundation 
in  1915,  the  cooperation  of  the  engineering  societies  with  the  National  Academy  of 
Science  in  the  National  Research  Council,  the  bill  to  charter  an  American  Academy 
of  Engineers  introduced  into  Congress  in  1917,  and  the  recent  discussion  of  the  status 
of  the  engineer  also  indicate  that  the  engineers  have  only  just  reached  that  state  of 
professional  consciousness  where  they  are  able  to  define  their  status  among  the  learned 
professions.  This  definition  is  now  in  process  of  formulation ;  and  until  it  is  announced, 
it  is  unreasonable  to  expect  the  statisticians  at  the  Census  Bureau  or  the  Bureau  of 
Education  to  distinguish  clearly  between  the  professional  civil  engineer  and  the  sur- 
veyor or  between  the  electrician  and  the  electrical  engineer. 

The  part  played  by  the  colleges  in  this  development  of  professional  spirit  may  be 
estimated  from  the  fact  that  the  various  schools  had  graduated  866  engineers  up  to 
1870,  or  less  than  one-ninth  of  the  7374  practising  engineers  in  the  country  at  the 
time.  As  indicated  on  page  7,  the  total  number  of  engineering  degrees  granted  in 
the  United  States  has  been  approximately  55,000.  Since  a  number  of  these  graduates 
have  died  and  perhaps  a  fifth  of  them  have  gone  into  other  lines  of  work,  it  is  safe  to 
say  that  there  are  not  more  than  40,000  graduates  of  Amei'ican  engineering  colleges 
in  engineering  practice  to-day.  If  the  number  of  professional  engineers  is  approxi- 
mately 80,000,  it  follows  that  now  possibly  about  one  out  of  every  two  is  a  college 
graduate.  Since  this  ratio  was  only  one  in  eight  or  nine  in  1870,  the  magnitude  of 
the  contribution  of  the  schools  to  the  development  of  the  profession  is  obvious. 

The  growth  of  the  second  powerful  influence  on  the  development  of  the  engineer- 
ing schools — the  manufacturing  industries — is  indicated  by  the  following  facts :  The 
total  value  of  manufactured  products  in  the  United  States  in  1870  was  3400  million 
dollars.  In  1900  the  value  was  13,000  million  dollars,  and  in  1916  it  was  32,200  mil- 
lion dollars.  The  increase  in  value  of  manufactured  products  for  the  period  1870— 
1900  was  therefore  9600  million  dollars,  or  at  the  average  rate  of  320  million  a  year. 
In  the  sixteen  years  from  1900  to  1916  this  increase  was  18,200  million  dollars,  or 
at  the  average  rate  of  1138  million  a  year.  Hence,  like  the  schools  and  the  profes- 
sional societies,  the  manufacturing  industries  have  developed  much  more  rapidly  in 
the  twentieth  century  than  in  the  nineteenth. 

The  attitude  of  these  industries  toward  the  college-trained  man  is  indicated  by 
the  fact  that  of  the  4622  technically  trained  men  now  employed  by  98  representative 
manufacturing  establishments  1992,  or  43  per  cent,  have  engineering  degrees.  The 
highest  ratio  is  in  the  field  of  metal  refining,  where  87  per  cent  of  the  technical  men 
are  college  graduates.  The  lowest  ratio  is  in  the  automobile  trade,  where  only  49  out 
of  186,  or  24  per  cent,  are  college- trained  men.  In  shipbuilding  the  ratio  is  48  per 
cent,  359  out  of  735,  and  in  machinery  and  machine  tools  it  is  41  per  cent,  836  out 


20  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

of  2043.  In  response  to  the  question  "Do  you  employ  men  graduated  from  engineer- 
ing colleges  in  preference  to  men  trained  mainly  thru  practical  experience?"  60  out 
of  120  firms  answered  "yes;"  40,  or  one-third  of  the  number,  answered  "no;"  and 
20,  or  one-sixth  of  the  whole  number,  expressed  no  preference. 

It  is  difficult  to  interpret  the  interplay  that  has  been  going  on  among  industry, 
science,  and  engineering.  At  the  close  of  the  Civil  War  science  had  but  scant  recog- 
nition either  in  educational  institutions  or  among  the  masses  of  the  people.  Now  it 
has  assumed  a  commanding  position  because  of  the  transformations  it  has  wrought 
in  the  daily  life  of  every  one  thru  its  varied  and  fruitful  inventions.  In  this  develop- 
ment there  has  been  no  regular  procedure,  no  well-defined  organization.  It  has  been 
a  matter  of  independent  action  and  individual  effort.  Sometimes  it  was  the  college 
professor  of  science,  pure  or  applied,  sometimes  it  was  the  inventor  or  the  professional 
engineer,  and  sometimes  it  was  the  manufacturing  industry  that  took  the  initiative, 
conceived  the  new  idea,  or  made  the  new  discovery,  and  sought  the  assistance  of 
the  others  in  realizing  it  in  practice.  Now  evidences  are  multiplying  to  show  that 
the  time  has  come  for  a  clearer  definition  of  the  relations  among  research,  instruc- 
tion, engineering  practice,  and  industrial  production.  How  to  coordinate  these  ele- 
ments most  effectively  is  a  large  and  pressing  problem.  Further  consideration  of  the 
meaning  of  this  problem  to  the  engineering  schools  is  given  in  Chapter  XII. 


Chapter  IV 

THE  DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  ENGINEERING  CURRICULUM 

INTO  ITS  PRESENT  FORM 

In  the  fifty  years  that  have  elapsed  since  the  curricula  described  in  the  second  chapter 
were  established  a  number  of  striking  changes  have  taken  place.  The  general  nature 
of  these  changes  is  indicated  in  the  following  tables,  which  give  the  data  for  two  of 
the  schools  selected  as  typical.  The  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute  has  been  omitted 
because  its  early  programs  do  not  give  the  number  of  hours  per  week  assigned  to  the 
various  subjects. 

Entrance  Requirements 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology 


1870 

1914 

Arithmetic 
Geography 

Algebra  to  quadratics 

Algebra  A 

160  hours 

Algebra  B 

160  hours 

Plane  geometry 

Plane  geometry 

160  hours 

Solid  geometry 

160  hours 

English  grammar 

English  composition 
English  literature 
Physics 

French 

240  hours 

German 

240  hours 

Electives 

University  of  Illinois 

Arithmetic 
Geography 

Algebra  to  quadratics 

Algebra  A 

1  unit1 

Algebra  B 

\  unit 

Plane  geometry 

Plane  geometry 

1  unit 

Solid  and  spherical  geometry 

\  unit 

English  grammar 

English  composition 

1  unit 

English  literature 

2  units 

United  States  history 

Physics 

1  unit 

Electives 

8  units 

In  1867  admission  was  by  examination.  Graduation  from  high  school  was  not  men- 
tioned, the  sole  requirement  being  ability  to  meet  the  tests  and  an  age  limit  of  1 6  years. 
Admission  is  still  by  examination  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  while 
at  the  University  of  Illinois  it  isnowmainlv  by  certificate  from  accredited  high  schools. 

It  will  be  noted  that  arithmetic  and  geography  are  no  longer  required,  probably  be- 
cause it  is  assumed  that  they  have  been  satisfactorily  completed  in  the  grammar  school. 

1  The  unit  is  generally  defined  as  one-quarter  of  a  year's  work  in  a  secondary  school. 


22  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

The  number  of  examinations  (or  subjects  required)  has  increased  from  5  or  6  to  8  or 
10.  The  amount  of  algebra,  geometry,  and  English  required  has  been  increased  byfrom 
50  to  300  per  cent.  The  content  and  methods  of  instruction  in  the  various  high  school 
units  have  also  been  carefully  defined  and  standardized  by  the  College  Entrance  Exam- 
ination Board,  the  National  Educational  Association,  and  several  other  associations 
in  which  colleges  and  secondary  schools  are  represented. 

These  changes  are  the  direct  result  of  the  development  of  the  public  high  schools. 
Altho  the  average  age  of  entrance  to  college  has  remained  constant  at  about  19  years, 
the  present  freshman  has  had  more  instruction  and  more  highly  systematized  instruc- 
tion in  more  subjects  than  was  possible  before  the  recent  striking  development  of  sec- 
ondary education. 

At  present  all  but  4  of  the  126  engineering  colleges  require  at  least  14  units  for 
admission  without  condition.  These  four  are  tax-supported  institutions  in  states  where 
the  public  school  systems  have  not  developed  to  the  point  where  the  requirement  of 
four  years  of  preparatory  work  would  be  justified.  They  are  raising  their  requirements 
as  fast  as  local  conditions  permit.  Forty  of  the  schools  still  advertise  that  they  accept 
students  with  two  or  three  units  of  conditions.  All  admit  either  by  certificate  from 
accredited  high  schools  or  by  examination  excepting  the  Massachusetts  Institute  and 
the  Sheffield  Scientific  School,  which  admit  by  examination  only.  West  of  the  Alle- 
ghenies  entrance  examinations  are  rare. 

The  number  of  units  specifically  prescribed  for  admission  varies  from  5  at  the  North 
Carolina  College  of  Agriculture  and  Mechanic  Arts,  to  13  at  Yale  and  George  Wash- 
ington University,  or  even  to  14  at  Notre  Dame  University.  Half  specify  10  or  less, 
and  half  specify  more  than  10.  All  agree  in  demanding  English  and  mathematics,  the 
amounts  varying  from  2  to  4  units.  In  English  nine-tenths  of  the  schools  regard  3 
units  as  standard,  while  in  mathematics  six-tenths  have  settled  upon  3  as  standard, 
half  of  the  remainder  requiring  more  and  half  less.  History  is  specifically  required  by 
71  per  cent  of  the  schools  and  one  science  (physics  or  chemistry)  by  73  per  cent.  One- 
thh"d,  mostly  land  grant  colleges  and  state  universities,  require  no  foreign  languages 
for  admission. 

The  nature  of  the  changes  in  the  distribution  of  time  in  the  curriculum  itself  is 
indicated  by  the  following  typical  cases.  The  unit  is  the  semester-hour. 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology 
Mechanical  Engineering 


Foreign  languages 
English 
History 
General  studies 


[867 

1914 

Per  cent  of  Total  Time. 
1867                   1914 

31 

7 

14 

8 

3 

4 

0 

48 

12 
31 

31                       18 

DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  ENGINEERING  CURRICULUM  23 


1867 

1914 

Per  cent  of  Total  Time 
1867                    1914 

Mathematics 

Chemistry 

Physics 

Geology 

Mechanics 

16 
8 

12 
2 
4 

42 

17 
17 
14 
0 
13 
61 

27                      36 

Drawing  and  descriptive 
Mechanical  engineering 
Machinery  and  motors 
16  specialized  courses  in 

geometry 
M.  E. 

49 

10 

4 

0 

63 

17 

0 

0 

63 

80 

42                      46 

The  most  notable  changes  in  the  mechanical  engineering  curriculum  of  the  Massa- 
chusetts Institute  of  Technology,  as  noted  above,  are: 

The  reduction  of  the  foreign  language  requirement  from  31  to  7  credit  hours.  This 
is  partly  a  result  of  better  language  work  in  preparatory  schools. 

The  apparent  reduction  of  the  English  requirement  from  14  to  8  credit  hours.  In 
interpreting  this  fact  it  must  be  noted  that  in  1867  the  study  of  political  economy, 
the  United  States  Constitution,  and  some  history  of  civilization  were  included  under 
the  head  of  English.  Subjects  like  these  are  now  provided  for  in  the  12  credit  hours 
of  general  studies.  On  the  whole,  however,  the  time  given  to  these  "humanities  "has 
been  reduced  from  31  per  cent  to  18  per  cent  of  the  total. 

In  the  science  group,  chemistry  has  increased  from  8  to  17  credit  hours,  and  me- 
chanics now  gets  13  instead  of  4.  This  latter  increase  is  noteworthy  because  the  fun- 
damental principles  of  mechanics  have  not  changed  materially  in  the  past  fifty  years. 
Some  of  the  additional  time  is  devoted  to  laboratory  work  in  applied  mechanics, 
strength  of  materials,  etc.  Mathematics  and  physics  retain  practically  the  same  time 
allowance.  The  time  given  to  science  has  in  general  increased  from  27  per  cent  to  36 
per  cent. 

The  technical  subjects  have  been  given  more  time  (from  63  to  80  credit  hours), 
altho  their  percentage  has  increased  but  little  (42  to  46).  They  have,  however,  been 
specialized  to  a  high  degree.  The  only  technical  subjects  mentioned  in  the  program  for 
1867  were  drawing  (47  hours),  mechanical  engineering  (10),  machinery  and  motors  (4), 
and  stereotomy  (2).  To-day  the  mechanical  engineer  must  take  drawing  (17  hours), 
heat  engineering  (7),  mechanism  (6),  boiler  design  (3),  engineering  laboratory  (3), 
electrical  engineering  (7),  machine  design  (8),  dynamics  of  machinery  (2),  hydraulics 
(5),  factory  construction  (3),  power  plant  design(4),  foundations  (1),  refrigeration  (1), 
heating  and  ventilating  (1),  and  shopwork  (10). 

This  increasing  specialization  has  not  been  confined  to  the  subject-matter  of  each 
curriculum.  In  1886  the  civil  engineering  curriculum  was  divided  into  three  sub-spe- 
cialties, civil  engineering,  railroad  engineering,  and  topographical  engineering.  The 


24 


STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 


following  year  mechanical  engineering  was  divided  into  marine  engineering,  loco- 
motive engineering,  and  mill  engineering.  As  a  result,  the  six  different  curricula  of 
1867  have  now  expanded  into  more  than  twenty.  Fifty  years  ago  the  work  of  the  first 
two  years  was  the  same  in  all  six  curricula;  now  specialization  begins  in  the  middle 
of  the  first  year.  Then  a  student  carried  only  four  or  five  courses  at  one  time;  now 
he  carries  from  eight  to  thirteen. 

The  following  table  gives  the  distribution  of  time  among  the  three  main  divisions 
of  the  materials  of  instruction  for  two  curricula  in  the  two  typical  schools  together 
with  the  average  for  all  126  schools.  The  figures  are  per  cents. 


1867 


Illinois  C.  E. 
Illinois  M.  E. 


Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  C.  E. 
Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  M.  E. 

Average 


Languages 
Humanities 

25 

24 

29 
31 

27 


Mathematics 

Sciences 

33 

40 

29 
27 


Drawing 

Engineering 

42 

36 

42 
42     ■ 

41 


1914 


Illinois  C.  E. 
Illinois  M.  E. 


12 

30 

58 

14 

33 

53 

17 

35 

48 

18 

36 

46 

15 

34 

51 

19 

29 

52 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  C.  E. 
Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  M.  E. 

Average 

Average  (all  schools) 

There  is  no  agreement  as  to  what  percentage  of  time  should  be  devoted  to  each 
of  these  main  groups  of  subjects.  The  percentage  devoted  to  professional  work  varies 
from  25  at  Northwestern,  or  30  at  Johns  Hopkins  University,  to  70  at  Cornell,  or 
even  to  85  at  the  Michigan  College  of  Mines.  Similarly  there  is  no  accepted  propor- 
tion for  individual  subjects  like  calculus,  which  varies  from  52  hours  at  Rensselaer 
to  216  hours  at  the  University  of  Florida.  The  requirement  in  languages  in  college 
varies  from  zero  at  Leland  Stanford,  the  University  of  Virginia,  and  Cornell,  to  408 
hours  (18  per  cent)  at  the  Sheffield  Scientific  School  at  Yale,  or  to  594  hours  (18  per 
cent)  at  the  Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute.  The  total  number  of  hours  of  assigned 
work  required  for  graduation  varies  from  2000  to  3800,  and  the  number  of  required 
credit  hours  per  week  varies  from  16  to  28. 

At  several  of  the  schools  visited  efforts  are  being  made  to  adjust  the  requirements 
of  the  several  courses  in  such  a  way  that  a  student  will  be  able  to  accomplish  the 
work  in  50  hours  a  week,  including  class  work,  laboratory  work,  and  outside  prepa- 
ration. As  a  matter  of  fact  few  students  succeed  in  keeping  up  to  grade  without 
spending  much  more  than  this  on  their  work.  If  a  student  is  able  to  keep  within  the 
limit,  he  has,  when  he  is  carrying  thirteen  courses,  on  the  average  3  hours,  50  min- 


DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  ENGINEERING  CURRICULUM        25 

utes,  and  46.15  seconds  per  week  for  each.  Rensselaer  is  the  only  school  among  those 
visited  that  limits  the  students  to  three  subjects  at  any  one  time.  There  each  subject 
is  pursued  intensively  for  a  stated  period  that  varies  from  one  to  fourteen  weeks. 
Thus  the  freshman  begins  work  with  chemistry,  drawing,  and  French.  At  the  end  of 
eight  weeks  his  three  subjects  are  algebra,  drawing,  and  French.  In  the  second  term 
he  begins  with  trigonometry,  French,  and  steam  engineering,  which  is  changed  at  the 
end  of  five  weeks  to  gas  analysis,  French,  and  physics.  By  this  means,  altho  he  carries 
but  three  studies  at  one  time,  he  actually  completes  from  ten  to  eighteen  different 
subjects  each  year. 

There  is  almost  unanimous  agreement  among  schools,  pai'ents,  and  practising  engi- 
neers that  at  present  the  engineering  curriculum,  whatever  its  organization,  is  con- 
gested beyond  endurance.  It  is  obviously  absurd  to  require  from  the  student  more 
hours  of  intense  mental  labor  than  would  be  permitted  him  by  law  at  the  simplest 
manual  labor.  Yet  on  all  sides  the  pressure  of  topics  and  subjects  that  have  become 
important  because  of  the  extraordinary  growth  of  science  and  industry  is  constantly 
increasing.  In  1870  a  student  might  choose  his  specialty  at  the  end  of  his  second 
year;  now  he  must  decide  in  many  cases  in  the  middle  of  his  first  year.  Formerly  the 
choice  lay  among  civil,  mechanical,  and  mining  engineering;  now  the  selection  must 
be  made  from  aeronautical,  agricultural,  architectural,  automobile,  bridge,  cement, 
ceramic,  chemical,  civil,  construction,  electrical,  heating,  highway,  hydraulic,  indus- 
trial, lighting,  marine,  mechanical,  metallurgical,  mill,  mining,  railway, sanitary, steam, 
textile,  telephone,  topographical  engineering,  and  engineering  administration.  No  one 
school  offers  curricula  in  all  of  these  specialties.  But  all  are  offered  somewhere,  and 
enough  are  given  at  every  school  to  render  the  selection  during  the  freshman  year 
of  his  life's  specialty  a  peculiarly  difficult  matter  for  the  student. 

From  the  wide  variations  in  the  amount  of  time  required  for  completing  the  course 
and  the  great  diversity  of  ways  in  which  the  schools  have  met  the  demands  of  increas- 
ing specialization  in  industry  it  is  clear  that  they  have  reached  no  general  agreement 
as  to  how  to  deal  with  the  problem.  Each  has  sought  to  adjust  itself  as  best  it  could  to 
the  immediate  demands  in  its  locality,  and  has  added  specialized  courses  as  the  need 
for  them  appeared.  But  tho  there  are  many  variations  in  the  details  of  curricula  at 
the  several  schools,  all  have  remained  true  to  the  original  conception  of  the  early 
curriculum;  namely,  that  instruction  in  the  general  principles  of  science  and  in  the 
humanities  should  precede  instruction  in  the  various  technical  specialties.  In  nearly 
all  curricula  the  work  of  the  freshman  year  consists  of  chemistry,  mathematics,  Eng- 
lish, foreign  languages,  and  drawing.  The  work  of  the  sophomore  year,  while  not  so 
well  standardized,  very  generally  contains  calculus,  physics,  some  language  study,  and 
drawing,  with  here  and  there  a  few  of  the  engineering  courses.  The  junior  and  senior 
years  are  filled  to  overflowing  with  specialized  technical  courses. 

The  present  curricula  are  thus  the  natural  result  of  two  well-defined  influences; 
namely,  the  original  curriculum  that  was  imported  from  France  in  1849  by  Professor 


26  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

B.  F.  Greene  of  Rensselaer,  and  the  phenomenal  expansion  of  science  and  industry. 
Meanwhile,  two  other  influences  have  been  gradually  developing — the  engineering 
profession  and  the  science  of  education.  The  bearing  of  these  on  present  practices  is 
discussed  in  the  later  chapters. 

Since  the  plan  on  which  this  study  was  earned  out  did  not  contemplate  a  complete 
survey  of  engineering  schools  or  a  grading  of  them  into  classes  as  good,  bad,  or  indif- 
ferent, only  twenty  typical  schools  were  visited.  The  examples  in  the  following  chap- 
ters are  therefore  drawn  in  the  main  from  these  schools,  selected  not  because  of  their 
geographical  location,  but  because  they  seemed  representative  of  all  types  of  engi- 
neering college.  The  author  wishes  here  to  express  his  appreciation  of  the  cordial  man- 
ner in  which  all  college  presidents  and  teachers  cooperated  in  securing  all  the  infor- 
mation sought  and  in  frankly  discussing  mooted  points.  The  twenty  schools  visited 
were  the  following: 

The  United  States  Military  Academy,  West  Point,  N.  Y. 

Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  Troy,  N.  Y. 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  Cambridge,  Mass. 

Stevens  Institute,  Hoboken,  N.  J. 

Carnegie  Institute  of  Technology,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Columbia  University,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

Tufts  College,  Tufts  College,  Mass. 

Worcester  Polytechnic  Institute,  Worcester,  Mass. 

Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute,  Blacksburg,  Va. 

Purdue  University,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Pennsylvania  State  College,  State  College,  Pa. 

Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Sheffield  Scientific  School,  Yale  University,  New  Haven,  Conn. 

University  of  Pennsylvania,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

University  of  Virginia,  Charlottesville,  Va. 

University  of  Pittsburgh,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

University  of  Illinois,  Urbana,  111. 

University  of  Wisconsin,  Madison,  Wis. 

Ohio  State  University,  Columbus,  Ohio. 

University  of  Cincinnati,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 


Chapter  V 

METHODS  OF  ADMINISTRATION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS 

The  final  control  of  American  Engineering  Schools,  as  of  the  colleges  and  univer- 
sities, is  vested  in  a  board  of  trustees  or  regents.  In  the  case  of  state  institutions  the 
members  of  the  governing  board  are  usually  appointed  by  the  state  governors,  while 
in  independent  institutions  they  are  self-elected  for  long  terms.  Generally  the  regents 
or  trustees  are  citizens  who  have  won  distinction  in  either  professional  or  industrial 
life.  In  a  few  cases  a  limited  number  of  members  of  the  faculty  are  also  members 
of  the  board ;  but  as  a  rule  all  communication  between  the  faculty  and  the  board  is 
thru  the  president. 

The  regents  or  trustees  are  charged  with  the  financial  management  of  the  schools. 
They  elect  the  president  on  their  own  initiative  and  appoint  or  promote  members  of 
the  faculty  on  his  recommendation.  All  appropriations,  to  be  legal,  must  have  their 
sanction,  and  educational  policies  framed  by  the  president  or  the  faculty  are  nomi- 
nally subject  to  their  veto.  This  organization  places  large  responsibilities  on  the  presi- 
dent and  makes  it  possible  for  him  to  be  the  dominant  influence  in  the  development 
of  a  school. 

In  the  early  schools  the  problem  of  framing  and  administering  the  requirements 
for  admission  and  graduation  was  relatively  simple.  At  Rensselaer  the  first  faculty 
had  but  two  members,  both  chosen  because  of  their  sympathy  with  the  educational 
aims  of  the  institution.  Similarly  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute,  President  Rogers 
surrounded  himself  with  a  faculty  of  nine  men  who  were  enthusiastically  devoted  to 
him  and  to  the  new  venture.  Prior  to  1870  no  school  had  as  many  as  200  students, 
curricula  were  few,  and  the  faculties  were  so  small  that  a  close  and  intimate  coopera- 
tion among  the  members  and  with  the  president  was  everywhere  the  rule.  But  with 
a  teaching  staff  of  260  and  2000  students,  the  present  numbers  at  the  Massachusetts 
Institute,  this  direct  personal  contact  among  the  members  of  the  faculty  and  between 
instructor  and  student  is  no  longer  possible.  It  was  easy  for  Professor  Pickering  to 
exert  a  strong  personal  influence  over  every  one  of  the  25  students  in  his  pioneer 
physics  laboratory;  but  it  is  impossible  for  any  one  to  do  the  same  when  there  are  450 
students  who  need  apparatus,  attention,  and  guidance.  The  increase  in  number  of  stu- 
dents from  1500  in  1870  to  33,000  now,  in  value  of  plants  from  about  one  million 
dollars  to  sixty-eight  millions,  in  annual  expenditures  from  about  $250,000  to  over 
eleven  millions,  and  in  number  of  professional  specialties  from  four  to  perhaps  forty, 
has  compelled  the  devotion  of  a  large  amount  of  attention  to  the  organization  and 
administration  of  the  daily  routine  on  which  the  effectiveness  of  the  school  so  largely 
depends. 

The  regulations  and  the  administrative  systems  that  have  been  developed  at  the 
various  schools  under  the  pressure  of  increasing  size  and  complexity  differ  widely  from 


28  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

one  another.  All  bear  evidence  of  having  been  shaped  to  meet  local  needs  under  the 
guidance  of  individuals  of  strong  convictions.  But  while  it  is  not  possible  to  classify 
these  systems  in  well-defined  categories,  they  may  be  arranged  in  a  series  that  extends 
from  what  may  be  called  the  marked  military  type,  on  the  one  hand,  thru  the  autono- 
mous-department type,  to  the  well-defined  cooperative  type  on  the  other. 

The  leading  characteristics  of  the  military  type  are  exhibited  best  in  the  admin- 
istration of  the  United  States  Military  Academy  at  West  Point.  Since  this  school  is 
supported  from  the  federal  purse,  its  financial  control  is  vested  in  Congress,  which 
makes  its  appropriations  for  this  purpose  on  the  recommendation  of  the  War  Depart- 
ment and  the  Board  of  Visitors,  composed  of  five  senators  and  seven  members  of  the 
House  of  Representatives.  The  administration  of  the  school  is  entrusted  to  the  super- 
intendent and  the  academic  board,  consisting  of  the  superintendent,  the  commandant 
of  cadets,  and  the  eleven  heads  of  the  departments  of  instruction.  The  curriculum 
framed  by  this  board,  the  methods  of  instruction,  and  the  textbooks  selected  for  use 
are  subject  to  approval  by  the  War  Department.  The  time  schedule  and  the  order 
of  instruction  in  the  several  courses  ai'e  determined  by  the  academic  board,  which  also 
conducts  examinations,  passes  on  the  merits  and  proficiency  of  the  cadets,  grants  di- 
plomas, and  makes  recommendations  for  commissions  in  the  army.  When  considering 
questions  concerning  relative  standing  and  promotion,  the  senior  assistant  in  each 
department  sits  with  the  academic  board. 

The  officers  of  instruction  are  detailed  to  this  duty  by  the  War  Department.  Their 
number  varies  from  110  to  120  for  580  cadets.  Only  the  thirteen  members  of  the  aca- 
demic board  have  any  voice  in  selecting  subject-matter  and  determining  methods  of 
instruction.  The  classes  are  divided  into  small  sections,  usually  of  twelve  each.  The 
ground  to  be  covered  each  day  and  even  the  questions  to  be  asked  during  each  lesson 
are  as  a  rule  determined  by  the  head  of  the  department,  who  is  also  required  to  visit 
each  section  frequently  in  order  to  ascertain  the  proficiency  and  qualifications  of  the 
cadets  and  the  manner  in  which  the  instructors  perform  their  duty.  The  assistants 
seldom  serve  more  than  four  years,  but  new  appointees  are  usually  required  to  attend 
classes  and  study  the  methods  of  instruction  for  a  few  months  before  being  placed  in 
charge  of  sections. 

The  daily  routine  of  each  cadet  is  rigidly  prescribed.  He  is  responsible  for  some 
duty  every  hour,  is  sure  to  be  called  to  recite  at  every  class  meeting,  and  is  given  a 
numerical  grade  for  every  recitation.  These  grades  are  reported  by  every  instructor 
every  week,  and  the  roll  of  the  class  is  arranged  each  month  in  the  order  of  the  rat- 
ings. The  division  of  the  class  into  sections  is  made  according  to  the  relative  stand- 
ings; the  twelve  cadets  with  highest  standings  being  assigned  to  the  first  section,  the 
next  highest  twelve  to  the  second  section,  and  so  on.  The  instruction  is  to  a  certain 
extent  adjusted  to  the  ability  of  the  several  sections,  the  more  difficult  investigations 
and  subjects  being  given  only  to  the  higher  sections.  Assignments  after  graduation 
and  relative  rank  when  commissioned  follow  the  order  of  merit  at  graduation.  The 


METHODS  OF  ADMINISTRATION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS     29 

maximum  number  of  grade  points  attainable  by  a  cadet  in  the  four  years  is  2525; 
and  since  these  are  assigned  by  a  large  number  of  different  instructors,  the  number 
secured  is  a  pretty  accurate  measure  of  the  cadet's  ability  to  meet  the  requirements 
of  the  academy.  Because  of  this  fact,  the  grading  system  is  a  very  real  incentive  to 
good  work  and  to  the  maintenance  of  the  ideals  of  soldierly  honor  and  obedience  to 
orders  which  are  such  effective  features  of  this  school. 

While  military  drill  and  military  instruction  are  required  of  male  students  at  all 
the  land  grant  colleges,  military  methods  of  administration  are  little  used  in  engi- 
neering schools.  Here  and  there  maybe  found  a  single  department  that  is  administered 
in  a  military  manner.  At  the  University  of  Pennsylvania  several  departments  divide 
their  classes  into  small  sections,  outline  the  work  for  each  "section  hand,"  as  the  in- 
structors have  been  called,  and  rotate  the  instructors  among  the  sections  each  week. 
Johns  Hopkins  University  has  recently  introduced  a  curriculum  called  military  en- 
gineering very  similar  to  that  given  at  West  Point,  but  the  methods  of  administering 
it  do  not  differ  from  those  used  for  the  rest  of  the  school.  The  West  Point  honor  and 
grading  systems  and  West  Point  discipline,  either  for  instructors  or  for  students,  were 
not  found  at  any  of  the  other  schools. 

In  the  great  majority  of  engineering  schools  the  control  of  the  curricula,  the  regu- 
lations for  admission  and  graduation,  the  time  schedule,  and  the  discipline  are  vested 
in  the  faculty,  which  is  composed  of  all  officers  of  instruction  above  a  specified  rank, 
differently  defined  at  the  various  schools.  All  general  educational  policies,  require- 
ments, and  rules  for  students  are  determined  by  a  majority  vote  of  the  faculty  and 
administered  by  executive  officers,  deans,  and  boards  or  standing  committees,  usually 
appointed  by  the  president,  tho  at  several  institutions  they  are  elected  by  the  faculty. 
The  number  of  these  committees  varies  from  six  to  twenty-six.  Every  voting  member 
of  a  faculty  is  subject  to  service  on  committees,  many  of  which  have  to  meet  weekly 
and  devote  much  time  to  their  work. 

Faculty  control  generally  ends  with  the  adoption  of  the  curriculum  and  the  time 
schedule.  Having  determined  by  majority  vote  the  requirement  in  hours  for  each  sub- 
ject, the  choice  of  subject-matter,  texts,  and  methods  of  instruction  in  each  subject 
is  left  entirely  to  the  department  concerned.  For  example,  if  three  hours  a  week  is 
assigned  by  the  faculty  to  English,  the  department  of  English  may  use  that  time  in 
any  way  it  likes.  Each  department  is  treated  as  an  expert  in  its  own  line,  and  this  de- 
partmental autonomy  is  carefully  preserved  by  common  consent.  Departments  vary 
in  size  from  three  or  four  members  to  thirty  or  forty,  and  a  serious  effort  is  always 
made  to  assign  each  man  to  work  for  which  he  is  particularly  fitted  by  temperament, 
ability,  and  training.  Hence  the  various  phases  of  the  work  within  a  department  are 
usually  well  coordinated,  but  the  policies  and  methods  of  instruction  in  the  different 
departments  of  the  same  school  often  differ  widely  from  one  another.  While  faculty 
control  is  more  democratic  than  military  control  in  that  every  member  of  a  faculty 
has  a  vote  on  questions  of  general  requirements  and  policies,  it  does  not  produce 


30  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

the  unity  of  aim  and  effort  exhibited  at  West  Point  because  its  jurisdiction  ends  at 
departmental  boundaries.  For  this  reason,  this  form  of  administration  is  called  the 
autonomous-department  type. 

When  an  engineering  school  is  part  of  a  large  university,  —  like  Cornell,  Ohio  State, 
or  Illinois, —  which  also  contains  a  school  of  liberal  arts,  a  law  school,  a  medical  school, 
and  an  agricultural  school,  it  is  customary  to  vest  the  control  of  each  school  in  an  in- 
dependent faculty  of  its  own.  The  departments  of  English,  foreign  languages,  mathe- 
matics, physics,  and  chemistry  are  usually  organized  under  the  faculty  of  liberal  arts, 
frequently  without  representation  on  the  engineering  faculty.  In  such  cases  engineer- 
ing students  are  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  faculty  of  liberal  arts  for  most  of  their 
work  during  their  first  two  years,  and  the  engineering  faculty  has  limited  control  of 
the  instruction  of  its  students  in  these  fundamental  subjects.  Under  these  conditions 
the  four-year  course  in  engineering  has  no  coordinating  centre. 

The  cooperative  type  of  administration  has  reached  its  fullest  development  at 
the  engineering  school  of  the  University  of  Cincinnati,  tho  both  the  Sheffield  Scien- 
tific School  at  Yale  and  Stevens  Institute  are  experimenting  along  analogous  lines.  At 
Cincinnati  the  engineering  school  has  its  own  departments  of  English,  mathematics, 
and  foreign  languages;  and  the  departments  of  physics  and  chemistry,  tho  organ- 
ized under  the  faculty  of  liberal  arts,  are  represented  in  the  engineering  faculty  by 
the  instructors  who  teach  the  engineers.  The  faculty  thus  constituted  meets  every  Sat- 
urday morning  for  a  systematic  study  of  its  educational  problems.  A  syllabus  stat- 
ing the  objects,  the  methods,  the  subject-matter,  and  the  mechanism  of  the  school  as 
a  whole  was  prepared  by  the  dean  and  discussed  at  length  by  the  faculty.  After  many 
changes  and  amendments,  the  syllabus  was  finally  adopted  as  an  adequate  expression 
of  the  basic  conceptions  toward  which  the  school  as  a  whole  is  working.  Each  depart- 
ment in  turn  then  presented  a  similar  syllabus  setting  forth  in  detail  the  objects, 
methods,  subject-matter,  and  mechanism  by  which  it  proposed  to  contribute  to  the 
general  result.  These  departmental  syllabi  were  discussed  freely  by  the  whole  faculty, 
and  approved  only  when  a  general  agreement  had  been  reached.  In  this  way  there  has 
been  developed  a  very  effective  coordination  of  effort  among  the  several  departments.1 

The  coordination  of  effort  does  not  end  with  the  agreement  on  syllabi.  By  unani- 
mous vote  of  the  faculty  no  student  is  finally  passed  in  any  subject  until  he  gradu- 
ates. Each  student  is  graded  at  the  end  of  each  course ;  but  if,  after  receiving  a  pass- 
ing grade  in  any  subject,  he  shows  in  a  later  course  that  he  is  weak  in  that  subject, 
he  is  sent  back  to  the  department  in  question  for  more  work.  For  example,  the  pro- 
fessor of  machine  design  may  "  flunk  "  a  man  in  calculus  if  he  cannot  use  the  calculus 
properly  in  the  work  in  machine  design.  Again,  all  reports  prepared  for  the  technical 
departments  must  pass  the  department  of  English  before  reaching  the  department 
for  which  they  are  intended.  This  cooperation  among  the  departments  in  the  school 

1  A  full  description  of  the  system,  including  several  of  the  syllabi,  has  been  published  by  the  United  States  Bureau 
of  Education  in  Bulletin  51,  1916,  on  The  Cooperative  System  of  Education,  by  Professor  C.  W.  Park. 


METHODS  OF  ADMINISTRATION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS     31 

is  as  important  an  element  in  the  Cincinnati  experiment  as  is  the  cooperation  of  the 
school  with  the  industries.  The  University  of  Pittsburgh  and  the  Massachusetts  In- 
stitute of  Technology  are  cooperating  on  a  part  time  basis  with  industries,  but  their 
faculties  are  organized  on  the  autonomous-department  plan. 

The  cooperative  type  preserves  one  of  the  main  advantages  of  the  military  type 
in  that  its  jurisdiction  extends  within  departmental  boundaries.  Since  it  uses  this  ju- 
risdiction not  for  autocratic  control  but  as  a  means  of  converting  a  government  by 
majority  vote  into  a  community  of  effort  for  the  student's  good,  it  also  possesses 
another  of  the  effective  factors  of  the  military  type,  namely,  homogeneity  of  action. 
When  skilfully  organized,  as  at  Cincinnati,  the  engineering  faculty  is  a  coordinating 
centre  for  the  entire  engineering  curriculum.  Nor  does  it  appear  to  have  lost  any  of 
the  nominal  advantages  of  the  autonomous-department  type  in  the  way  of  personal 
freedom  of  its  members  and  inspiration  for  creative  work. 


Chapter  VI 

STUDENT  ELIMINATION  AND  PROGRESS 

Engineering  schools  as  a  rule  keep  accurate  account  of  the  number  of  students  in 
attendance  each  year  in  each  class.  These  figures,  however,  do  not  show  how  large  the 
actual  elimination  is,  because  a  number  in  every  graduating  class  have  pursued  irreg- 
ular courses — have  entered  with  advanced  standing  or  been  retarded  a  year  or  more. 
Hence  the  difference  between  the  number  of  graduates  in  any  given  year  and  the  num- 
ber of  freshmen  four  years  back  does  not  indicate  the  true  mortality.  In  order  to  de- 
termine this  it  was  necessary  at  each  of  the  schools  visited  to  pick  from  the  records 
of  the  graduating  class  all  students  who  had  entered  four  years  before  and  proceeded 
thru  without  break.  The  ratio  of  this  number  of  what  may  be  called  regular  gradu- 
ates to  the  total  number  of  freshmen  four  years  previously  is  one  expression  of  the 
manner  in  which  a  school  is  meeting  the  needs  of  its  locality. 

Only  one  of  the  schools  visited  already  knew  how  large  its  elimination  is  when 
counted  in  this  way.  Among  this  selected  list  of  schools  the  lowest  mortality  was 
found  at  Pennsylvania  State  College,  where  just  half  of  the  freshmen  went  thru 
regularly  and  graduated  in  four  years.  The  highest  losses  were  found  at  the  Univer- 
sities of  Illinois  and  Wisconsin,  where  only  about  one-quarter  of  those  admitted  as 
freshmen  graduate  regularly  on  schedule  time.  The  figures  vary  from  year  to  year  at 
every  school,  so  that  no  fixed  figure  can  be  given  for  any  institution;  but  from  the 
counts  made  for  two  years  at  twenty  schools  it  is  clear  that  less  than  40  per  cent  of 
all  freshmen  at  engineering  schools  complete  the  course  in  the  allotted  time.  While 
this  record  is  sufficiently  striking,  it  is  better  than  it  was  in  the  early  days.  Then  in 
some  cases  the  elimination  was  as  high  as  91  per  cent  and  the  average  was  nearer  75 
than  60.  This  change  for  the  better  is  in  large  measure  the  result  of  the  increased 
efficiency  of  the  secondary  schools. 

While  it  is  interesting  to  compare  the  elimination  of  66  per  cent  at  the  Massa- 
chusetts Institute,  which  admits  only  by  examination,  with  the  elimination  of  75  per 
cent  at  Wisconsin  or  Illinois,  which  admit  almost  wholly  by  certificate,  it  is  not  safe 
to  draw  any  conclusions  as  to  the  relative  merits  of  the  two  methods  of  admission. 
Elimination  depends  on  too  many  other  variable  factors,  such  as  physical  health, 
family  conditions,  financial  resources,  college  spirit,  the  appeal  of  the  college  work,  and 
the  friendly  personal  interest  of  the  faculty.  For  example,  the  date  of  Dean  Burton's 
appointment  as  counselor  to  freshmen  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute  is  recorded  by 
a  sharp  drop  in  the  freshman  mortality  figures.  Because  of  the  complexity  of  the  prob- 
lem it  is  perhaps  not  surprising  that  the  schools  have  no  records  as  to  the  reasons  for 
withdrawal. 

Nearly  half  of  the  elimination  takes  place  in  the  freshman  year  and  about  one-quar- 
ter more  in  the  second  year.  During  these  years  almost  all  of  the  time  is  spent  on  Eng- 


STUDENT  ELIMINATION  AND  PROGRESS  33 

lish,  mathematics,  foreign  languages,  chemistry,  and  physics,  and  little  opportunity  is 
afforded  for  contact  with  real  engineering  projects.  Hence  many  engineering  students 
are  eliminated  before  they  have  a  chance  to  show  their  ability  at  their  chosen  profes- 
sion. At  one  of  the  schools  several  cases  were  found  where  engineering  students  had 
been  eliminated  during  the  freshman  year  for  failure  to  meet  the  demands  of  the 
department  of  German.  At  another  English  literature  was  a  fertile  source  of  dis- 
couragement for  freshmen.  A  large  amount  of  pertinent  information  concerning  the 
success  of  school  administration  and  instruction  may  be  secured  from  a  study  of  the 
reasons  why  students  leave  engineering  schools,  especially  since  many  who  do  leave 
before  graduation  persist  in  engineering  and  make  a  success  of  it. 

The  variations  of  the  average  grades  of  a  group  of  students  thru  their  four  years 
of  work  supply  an  interesting  basis  on  which  to  j  udge  of  student  progress  and  the 
adaptation  of  the  work  to  student  needs.  The  following  table  presents  for  each  of 
the  four  years  the  weighted  average  grades l  of  a  group  that  entered  regularly,  pro- 
gressed normally,  and  graduated  on  time  at  the  several  schools  named: 


Institution 

Cases 

Fr. 

So. 

Jr. 

Sr. 

University  of  Illinois 

64 

86.9 

84.1 

83.7 

83.2 

University  of  Virginia 

17 

86.0 

84.0 

82.0 

85.0 

Purdue  University 

51 

84.7 

83.2 

80.7 

81.6 

Rensselaer 

22 

83.7 

81.7 

82.5 

83.7 

University  of  Wisconsin 

47 

84.5 

83.3 

83.2 

86.3 

Pennsylvania  State 

54 

80.6 

80.4 

78.4 

79.6 

Virginia  Polytechnic 

48 

79.6 

77.0 

77.3 

87.3 

Stevens 

51 

78.1 

73.4 

75.5 

74.0 

Cincinnati 

19 

77.4 

76.5 

74.9 

76.7 

Columbia 

56 

77.2 

76.2 

75.8 

74.9 

University  of  Pennsylvania 

55 

74.5 

72.0 

70.0 

71.5 

Ohio  State  University 

46 

72.0 

71.0 

70.6 

71.2 

Yale  (Sheffield) 

79 

67.0 

65.2 

68.2 

Massachusetts  Institute 

67 

66.8 

64.7 

65.6 

64.0 

Cornell  (Sibley) 

40 

75.2 

72.9 

73.2 

73.9 

Cornell  (C.E.) 

30 

76.3 

76.0 

72.1 

75.2 

Tufts 

39 

72.0 

68.0 

70.0 

73.0 

Average 

785 

76.9 

74.9 

74.8 

76.9 

Average  age  of  graduation  22  years,  11  months. 

In  every  case  the  standing  of  this  random  group  of  the  regular  graduates  is  higher 
in  the  freshman  than  it  is  in  the  sophomore  year.  In  the  general  average  for  the  785 
cases  studied  the  drop  of  2  points  persists  thru  the  junior  year  and  is  recovered  in  the 
last  year.  The  phenomenon  is  general,  altho  some  schools  exhibit  it  more  markedly 
than  do  others. 

While  several  interpretations  of  the  meaning  of  this  sag  in  the  average  grade  curve 
are  possible,  its  cause  may  be  located  statistically  by  noting  in  what  subjects  the 

1  The  weighted  average  is  found  by  multiplying  each  grade  by  the  number  of  credit  hours  it  represents,  adding  the 
products,  and  dividing  by  the  total  number  of  credit  hours  for  the  year. 


34  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

students  had  the  greatest  number  of  low  grades  in  those  years.  For  this  purpose  thirty 
or  more  records  of  regular  graduates  were  taken  at  random  and  the  number  who  re- 
ceived low  grades  in  each  subject  was  counted  for  each  school.  The  meaning  of  the 
term  "  low  grade  "  was  determined  at  each  institution  from  a  study  of  the  local  grad- 
ing system.  At  schools  that  grade  numerically  with  60  as  the  pass  mark,  like  Virginia 
Polytechnic  Institute,  Stevens  Institute,  and  Cornell  University,  all  marks  below  TO 
were  counted  as  low.  Thus,  for  example,  at  Stevens  Institute  out  of  51  cases  studied, 
31  had  at  least  one  grade  below  70  in  physics  and  the  average  mark  in  that  subject  for 
these  thirty-one  students  was  63.2.  In  calculus  26  had  received  grades  below  70,  the 
average  being  63.1,  and  so  on.  When  70  was  the  pass  mark,  as  at  the  Universities  of 
Illinois  and  Wisconsin  and  Pennsylvania  State  College,  marks  below  80  were  counted. 
At  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technologv,  where  50  is  the  pass  mark,  L,  which 
stands  for  a  rating  between  50  and  60,  was  considered  a  low  grade.  At  Sheffield  Sci- 
entific School  and  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  which  grade  on  a  scale  of  4  with 
2  as  the  pass  mark,  marks  below  2.4  were  counted.  The  grading  systems  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Pennsylvania,  Ohio  State  University,  and  Purdue  University  could  not  be 
used  for  this  purpose  because  they  recognize  only  three  grades,  A,  B,  and  C,  above 
pass  mark  and  the  lowest  grade  covers  too  wide  a  range.  At  Ohio  State  University 
a  new  grading  system  with  five  steps  between  pass  and  100  has  recently  been  intro- 
duced. 

The  table  on  page  35  gives  the  results  of  this  count  for  twelve  schools.  Every  stu- 
dent whose  record  was  counted  was  a  regular  student  who  had  entered  without  con- 
ditions, had  passed  thru  normally  in  the  regulation  time,  and  had  received  his  degree. 
The  low  marks  of  the  60  per  cent  who  were  "weeded  out""  are  not  included;  if  they 
had  been,  the  percentages  would  be  much  higher.  The  figures  in  the  table  are  there- 
fore a  fair  statement  of  the  results  achieved  by  a  school  under  the  most  favorable 
conditions. 

Taken  in  connection  with  the  facts  of  elimination,  these  figures  show  that  out  of 
every  1000  freshmen  not  more  than  400  graduate  in  the  specified  time,  and  that  half 
of  these  just  "get  by"  in  physics,  calculus,  and  mechanics.  The  percentage  of  low  grades 
is  about  the  same  in  English  and  modern  languages  when  these  subjects  are  required. 
This  means  that  out  of  every  1000  who  are  admitted  only  about  200 — 20  per  cent 
— adapt  themselves  creditably  to  the  requirements  of  the  schools  in  these  so-called 
"  fundamentals." 

The  two  tables  make  it  clear  that  the  drop  in  the  average  grades  occurs  when  physics 
and  calculus  with  an  average  low  grade  record  of  49.5  per  cent  replace  chemistry  and 
freshman  mathematics  with  an  average  low  grade  record  of  not  over  25  per  cent.  It 
is  not  possible  to  give  this  last  percentage  exactly  because  the  freshman  mathematics 
courses  are  not  comparable;  but  the  low  grade  counts  in  advanced  algebra,  trigonom- 
etry, and  analytics  are  all  below  20  per  cent.  Altho  the  third  year  program  and  courses 
differ  so  much  from  one  another  that  the  figures  from  various  schools  cannot  be  com- 


STUDENT  ELIMINATION  AND  PROGRESS  35 

Number  and  Percentages  of  Low  Grades  in  Particular  Subjects 


Insti- 
tution 

Number 
of  Cases 

Physics 

English 

Modern 
Languages 

Calculus 

Mechanics 

Chemistry 

Descriptive 
Geometry 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

67 
79 
51 
48 
43 
54 
19 
46 
64 
22 
44 
84 

43-64% 

40-51 

31-60 

21-47 

30-69 

38-70 

10-52 

13-28 

24-37 

15-68 

13-30 

39^7 

37-55% 

47-60 

11-21 

37-77 
not  required 
not  required 

10-52 

13-28 

31-48 

16-72 
7-16 

40-48 

38-57% 

51-64 

4-8 

34-69 

not  required 

not  required 

6-31 

16-35 

not  required 

7-33 

not  required 

48-57 

22-32% 
48-61 
26-51 
13-29 
32-74 
33-61 
9-47 
18-40 
27-42 
15-70 
22-50 
33-39 

21-31% 
47-60 
26-51 
20-42 
28-65 
35-65 
13-68 
25-54 
27-42 
5-23 
24-55 
49-58 

20-29% 

31-40 

11-21 

7-14 
14-32 
15-28 
11-58 

7-15 
14-22 
15-70 
12-27 
44-51 

13-19% 

26-33 

21-41 

5-10 
16-37 
21-40 

4-21 

6-13 

4-6 
10-45 

5-11 
34-40 

Totals 

621 

317 

249 
534 

198 
416 

298 

330 

201 

165 

51.0% 

46.6% 

47.5% 

48.0% 

53.1% 

32.3% 

26.5% 

pared,  it  is  fairly  evident  that  the  mechanics,  which  is  common  to  all  and  which  has 
a  low  grade  record  of  53.4  per  cent,  is  largely  responsible  for  the  continuation  of  the 
low  average  grade  thru  the  junior  year. 

While  many  professors  regard  a  high  percentage  of  low  grades  as  pi*oof  of  efficient 
teaching,  experience  has  proved  that  an  excessive  number  of  low  grades  in  some  par- 
ticular subject  in  the  records  of  regular  graduates  is  a  sign  of  some  trouble  that  can 
usually  be  removed  by  a  little  attention.  For  example,  80  per  cent  of  the  regular  grad- 
uates of  1914  in  Cincinnati  had  low  grades  in  History  50.  This  course  had  been  intro- 
duced the  previous  year  to  give  a  broader  outlook.  It  consisted  of  a  rapid  study  of 
geologic  evolution,  of  biologic  evolution,  and  of  the  evolution  of  civilization  given  by 
the  respective  heads  of  the  departments  of  geology,  biology,  and  history  in  the  Fac- 
ulty of  Arts,  Literature,  and  Science.  The  first  year  it  proved  a  great  success,  and  the 
engineering  students  in  the  class  of  1913  gathered  much  information  and  inspiration 
from  it.  But  the  class  of  1914  had  much  trouble  with  it  until  it  was  discovered  that 
it  had  been  turned  over  to  a  young  instructor  who  was  drilling  the  class  on  Guizot's 
History  of  Civilization  by  the  textbook-recitation  method.  The  course  was  promptly 
dropped  and  the  students  absolved  from  the  requirement  by  the  engineering  faculty. 

Since  employers  regard  college  grades  as  precarious  guides  in  selecting  men  for  jobs, 


36  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

an  effort  was  made  to  find  out  whether  the  fact  that  about  half  the  graduates  of  en- 
gineering schools  have  received  low  grades  in  physics,  calculus,  and  mechanics  means 
that  half  the  graduates  are  on  that  account  low  grade  engineers  or  not.  The  direct 
method  of  doing  this  would  involve  tracing  the  later  careers  of  those  who  received  the 
low  grades  to  see  if  they  were  relatively  less  successful  than  those  who  ranked  high 
in  these  fundamental  subjects.  This  method  is  impracticable  because  there  is  as  yet 
no  valid  definition  of  what  constitutes  success  in  engineering.  There  are,  however,  a 
number  of  large  industrial  firms  that  employ  several  hundred  college  graduates  each 
year  and  keep  records  of  their  accomplishments.  A  comparison  of  the  records  of  the 
same  men  in  college  and  in  industry  would  indicate  how  close  the  correlation  between 
them  is. 

Thru  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  A.  L.  Rohrer  of  the  General  Electric  Company  of  Sche- 
nectady, copies  of  his  records  of  the  168  graduates  in  their  employ  from  the  class  of 
1913  of  all  the  schools  visited  were  secured.  On  these  records  each  man  was  rated  by 
each  of  the  foremen  under  whom  he  worked  as  A,  B,  or  C  in  each  of  the  five  qualities, 
Technical  ability,  Accuracy,  Industry,  Ability  to  push  things,  and  Personality.  Thru 
the  courtesy  of  the  schools  copies  of  the  full  college  records  of  these  same  men  were 
secured.  An  extended  study  of  these  two  sets  of  records  by  Professor  E.  L.  Thorndike 
of  Columbia  showed  that  the  correlation  between  the  two  was  very  slight;  that  is, 
that  ability  to  secure  high  grades  in  college  was  no  indication  of  ability  to  meet  the 
requirements  of  the  General  Electric  Company.  On  the  other  hand,  the  college  grades 
signify  something,  since  the  grades  for  the  senior  year  correlate  closely  with  the  aver- 
age grade  for  the  entire  course,  showing  that  ability  to  secure  high  grades  in  college 
is  a  stable  and  permanent  characteristic  of  an  individual.  A  similar  study  was  made 
thru  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  C.  R.  Dooley  of  the  Westinghouse  Electric  and  Manufactur- 
ing Company  of  Pittsburgh  of  a  group  of  40  college  graduates  in  the  employ  of  that 
company.  The  results  were  practically  the  same. 

While  these  studies  have  not  yet  settled  the  problem,  they  serve  to  define  it  more 
clearly.  The  facts  are  that  half  of  the  college  graduates  are  rated  low  in  the  funda- 
mental subjects  by  their  college  instructors,  and  that  college  grades  show  little  cor- 
relation with  the  ratings  of  two  large  industrial  companies  that  "take  on"  several 
hundred  college  graduates  each  year. 


Chapter  VII 

TYPES  OF  INSTRUCTION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS 

The  method  of  instruction  employed  at  Rensselaer  during  the  first  five  years  (1824- 
29)  was  new  in  America,  tho  it  resembled  the  methods  inaugurated  in  1806  by  Pesta- 
lozzi  in  the  Fellenberg  School  at  Hofwyl,  Switzerland  (page  9).  It  was  designed  by 
the  first  senior  professor,  Amos  Eaton,  who  was  a  graduate  of  Williams  College  and 
had  done  graduate  work  with  Silliman  at  Yale.  At  no  other  school  was  the  student 
given  the  place  of  the  teacher  and  compelled  to  rely  on  his  own  resources  in  preparing 
subjects  for  presentation  to  his  classmates.  The  observation  of  industrial  processes  as 
the  basis  for  class  discussion  and  laboratory  problems  which  led  by  inductive  processes 
to  general  principles  after  the  manner  of  real  scientific  investigation  were  at  this  time 
unique  in  elementary  instruction.  No  other  school  treated  beginners  by  the  same 
methods  that  were  used  so  successfully  in  advanced  study.  But  altho  the  method  as 
practised  proved  successful,  it  had  to  be  abandoned  in  1829  because  it  was  too  ex- 
pensive for  the  slender  resources  of  the  school.  As  the  number  of  students  increased, 
still  more  didactic  methods  were  introduced;  until  in  1850,  when  the  French  curricu- 
lum was  adopted  (page  12),  the  student  lectures  had  become  blackboard  demonstra- 
tions prepared  from  texts  followed  by  "  interrogations"  and  recitations  conducted  by 
the  professors. 

At  the  opening  of  the  Massachusetts  Institute  in  1865  instruction  was  given  mainly 
by  lectures,  in  which  the  professor  presented  to  the  class  a  logically  well-organized  ex- 
planation of  the  general  principles  and  theories  of  the  subject  in  hand.  Lectures  were 
illustrated  by  experiments  and  accompanied  by  blackboard  demonstrations.  The  stu- 
dents took  notes,  recited  on  them  at  regular  quiz  hours,  and  worked  problems  that 
illustrated  the  principles  and  theories  presented.  Frequent  and  thorough  examina- 
tions were  given  for  the  double  purpose  of  testing  knowledge  and  inciting  to  dili- 
gence. As  soon  as  the  facilities  were  available,  laboratory  work  was  introduced,  in 
which  the  student  reproduced  standard  reactions,  measured  known  constants,  verified 
theories,  visualized  principles,  and  acquired  skill  in  manipulating  delicate  instruments. 

The  use  of  the  illustrated  lecture  in  instruction  in  science  was  not  new,  but  the  or- 
ganization of  laboratories  for  undergraduate  students  in  physics  was  a  striking  inno- 
vation, suggested  by  President  Rogers  and  carried  out  by  Professor  E.  C.  Pickering 
in  1869.  The  course  consisted  of  a  series  of  simple  experiments  illustrating  funda- 
mental principles  or  scientific  methods  of  study  and  involving  the  use  of  important 
instruments.  The  administration  of  the  work  was  made  practicable  by  having  com- 
plete apparatus  for  each  instrument  ready  for  use  together  with  carefully  prepared 
written  directions  for  its  correct  manipulation.  When  a  class  entered  the  laboratory 
each  member  received  a  number  directing  him  to  the  apparatus  and  written  directions 
for  making  the  required  measurements  and  recording  the  results.  In  this  way  Professor 


38  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

Pickering  was  able  to  care  for  a  class  of  twenty-five  students  at  one  time,  because,  as 
he  himself  tells  us,  the  written  directions  prevented  the  students  from  making  seri- 
ous mistakes. 

The  marvelous  expansion  of  this  method  of  laboratory  work  into  all  branches  of 
science  in  all  grades  of  schools  and  the  profound  impress  made  by  this  expansion  on 
the  American  school  system  are  matters  of  common  knowledge.  Here  it  is  important 
to  note  that  this  type  of  laboratory  work  was  devised  as  an  adjunct  to  the  illustrated 
lecture,  for  the  purpose  of  giving  training  in  pure  science,  to  foster  industrial  produc- 
tion, and  develop  the  scientific  or  professional  engineering  spirit. 

Besides  the  innovation  of  the  laboratory,  new  methods  of  teaching  English  were 
introduced  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute  by  Professor  W.  P.  Atkinson,  who  sought 
to  cultivate  a  taste  for  good  literature  and  a  love  of  reading  on  subjects  of  interest  to 
the  student  as  a  man  and  a  citizen.  After  a  rapid  review  of  composition  and  rhetoric 
the  classes  read  and  discussed  Duruy's  Histoire  des  temps  modernes  and  Guizofs  His- 
tory of  Civilization  in  Europe.  In  the  fourth  year  contemporary  problems  of  politics, 
economics,  and  sociology  were  discussed  and  written  reports  on  subjects  of  their  own 
selection  were  read  by  the  students  in  class.  Two  hours  a  week  throughout  the  four 
years  were  devoted  to  this  work. 

Since  1864,  but  especially  since  1900,  the  increase  in  the  number  of  students  and 
the  migration  of  students  among  the  schools  have  tended  to  standardize  methods  of 
teaching  in  both  high  school  and  college.  In  the  secondary  school  the  process  has  been 
accelerated  by  the  pressure  of  college  entrance  requirements  and  the  accompanying 
definitions  of  the  units  framed  by  the  colleges,  while  in  the  colleges  the  process  has 
been  retarded  by  the  universal  respect  for  departmental  autonomy  and  academic  free- 
dom with  the  consequent  "laissez  faire"  attitude  toward  the  problem.  Under  these  con- 
ditions some  college  subjects  have  become  more  standardized  than  others,  but  it  is  sel- 
dom possible  to  point  to  any  one  method  in  any  one  subject  as  generally  accepted.  At 
present  there  is  a  marked  tendency  in  certain  subjects  to  break  away  from  the  tradi- 
tional forms.  Some  of  the  efforts  in  this  direction  are  noted  in  subsequent  chapters. 

While  there  are  many  differences  in  the  details  of  curricula  and  methods  of  teach- 
ing, the  first  two  years  of  work  are  more  nearly  uniform  than  the  last  two  in  content 
and  general  treatment.  The  freshmen  in  almost  all  schools  take  mathematics,  chem- 
istry, English,  drawing,  and  shopwork;  while  sophomores  usually  study  mathematics, 
physics,  English,  drawing,  and  shopwork.  The  methods  of  instruction  in  some  of  these 
fundamental  subjects,  like  mathematics  and  physics,  are  very  much  the  same  every- 
where ;  while  in  chemistry,  English,  drawing,  and  shopwork  there  are  wider  variations 
and  several  distinct  types.  Still  the  salient  features  and  the  underlying  philosophy 
of  the  instruction  in  each  subject  are  enough  alike  at  most  institutions  to  make  pos- 
sible a  description  of  the  typical  treatment  accorded  to  engineering  students  during 
their  first  two  years  in  college.  Certain  striking  exceptions  in  which  totally  different 
conceptions  and  methods  prevail  are  discussed  in  the  later  chapters. 


TYPES  OF  INSTRUCTION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS  39 

The  aims  and  methods  of  teaching  mathematics  to  engineering  students  have  been 
fully  described  in  the  report  of  Sub-committee  IX  of  the  International  Commission 
on  the  Teaching  of  Mathematics.1  From  this  report  it  appears  that  mathematics  teach- 
ers are  generally  agreed  that  mathematics  should  be  taught  as  a  science  by  profes- 
sional mathematicians  and  not  as  a  tool  by  engineers.  While  all  regard  professional 
efficiency  in  the  use  of  mathematics  as  the  test  of  success,  they  hold  that  this  efficiency 
is  best  secured  by  teaching  mathematics  by  itself,  so  that  the  student's  mind  is  not 
distracted  from  the  mathematical  form  by  the  engineering  applications.  The  limited 
amount  of  time  allotted  to  mathematics  is  barely  sufficient  to  enable  the  mathematics 
teacher  to  cover  the  required  ground  thoroughly.  If  the  teacher  of  engineering  would 
familiarize  himself  with  the  mathematical  subjects,  the  methods,  and  even  the  nota- 
tion his  students  have  learned,  he  could  then  teach  them  how  to  use  their  mathe- 
matics with  a  success  and  completeness  not  possible  to  his  mathematical  colleague. 

Inasmuch  as  the  professors  of  mathematics  are  generally  agreed  on  this  point  of 
view,  the  mathematical  instruction  to  freshmen  and  sophomores  is  almost  universally 
based  on  the  use  of  a  standard  text,  in  which  the  successive  propositions  are  deduced 
by  logical  processes  from  definitions,  axioms,  and  postulates.  A  definite  portion  of 
the  text  is  assigned  as  a  lesson,  and  in  the  daily  recitations  the  students  are  required 
either  to  reproduce  demonstrations  given  in  the  text  or  to  solve  mathematical  prob- 
lems that  illustrate  the  theorems  under  discussion.  The  customary  division  of  math- 
ematics into  trigonometry,  analytics,  and  calculus  is  preserved  at  all  but  two  of  the 
schools  visited.  In  short,  mathematics  in  engineering  colleges,  as  in  the  high  schools, 
is  still  taught  by  the  standard  methods  that  are  so  well  known  as  to  need  no  further 
description.  According  to  the  report  just  mentioned  (page  30),  "There  is  nothing  to 
indicate  that  many  changes  have  taken  place  during  the  past  10  years,  or  that  many 
are  contemplated." 

In  chemistry  the  basis  of  the  instruction  is  the  demonstration  lectures,  at  which 
the  entire  class  assembles  two  or  three  times  a  week.  For  the  quiz  and  laboratory 
work  the  class  is  divided  into  sections,  usually  in  charge  of  assistants.  A  standard 
text  is  generally  followed  by  the  lecturer  and  used  by  the  students  as  a  source  of  in- 
formation for  the  quizzes.  A  separate  manual  containing  directions  for  the  laboratory 
experiments  is  customary. 

In  most  of  the  schools  visited  the  presentation  of  the  subject-matter  in  chemistry 
begins  with  general  statements  about  atoms,  molecules,  chemical  equations,  Avoga- 
dro's  law,  molecular  weight,  chemical  affinity,  diffusion,  valence,  and  formulas.  Then 
follows  descriptions  of  the  non-metals,  oxygen,  nitrogen,  carbon,  etc., — their  occur- 
rence, preparation,  and  properties, — leading  to  the  metals  in  due  order.  The  facts  dis- 
cussed in  the  lectures  are  learned  for  the  quizzes  ar\d  verified  in  the  laboratory.  The 
purpose  of  this  type  of  instruction  is  to  familiarize  the  student  with  the  elementary 

J  United  States  Bureau  of  Education,  Bulletin  No.  9, 1911. 


40  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

facts  and  reactions  of  chemistry  as  a  means  of  identifying  substances  and  therefore 
as  a  preparation  for  qualitative  and  quantitative  analysis. 

Recently  another  type  of  course  in  chemistry  has  been  introduced  in  a  number  of 
schools.  In  this  the  data  are  presented  not  as  elements  prerequisite  to  a  mastery  of 
chemical  analysis,  but  as  vehicles  for  the  elucidation  of  modern  chemical  theories.  In 
courses  of  this  type  the  study  of  oxygen  includes  such  topics  as  the  diffusion  and  lique- 
faction of  gases,  critical  temperature,  endothermal  and  exothermal  reactions,  the  gas 
laws,  and  the  kinetic-molecular  theory  of  matter.  Similarly  the  facts  about  hydrogen 
are  used  to  elucidate  reversible  reactions,  chemical  equilibrium,  equivalent  and  atomic 
weights,  and  chemical  equations.  The  study  of  water  furnishes  a  natural  thread  on  which 
to  string  the  law  of  combining  volumes,  Avogadro's  theory,  molecular  weight,  solu- 
tions, and  the  kinetic  theory  of  solution.  The  properties  of  chlorine  serve  as  a  basis 
for  the  presentation  of  electrical  conductivity  of  solutions,  osmotic  pressure,  ionic  the- 
ory, degrees  of  ionization,  electric  charges  on  the  ions,  valence  of  the  ions,  and  the  elec- 
tron theory.  About  ten  weeks  is  required  to  cover  these  topics,  and  then  the  remainder 
of  the  year  is  spent  in  studying  the  more  important  reactions  from  the  standpoint 
of  the  ionic  theory.  Incidental  references  are  made  to  the  industrial  uses  of  chemistry. 

Altho  these  two  types  of  courses  in  chemistry  differ  in  content,  both  use  the  lec- 
ture-quiz-laboratory method  of  imparting  information.  In  one  case  the  information 
is  being  stored  for  later  use  in  chemical  analysis;  in  the  other  it  is  being  organized 
for  the  elucidation  of  ionic  theories.  In  neither  case  is  the  student  given  such  a  pro- 
ject as:  "Make  baking  powder  and  determine  whether  it  is  better  and  cheaper  than 
any  you  can  buy."  His  problem  is  always  in  the  form :  "  Determine  the  chemical  com- 
position of  this  powder." 

Physics  is  generally  taught  in  the  second  year  as  a  one-year  course,  tho  five  of  the 
schools  visited  devote  some  time  to  it  in  the  first  year.  As  in  chemistry  so  here,  the 
typical  course  consists  of  three  parts,  demonstration  lectures,  quizzes,  and  laboratory 
work.  In  the  lectures,  of  which  there  are  two  or  three  a  week,  the  professor  presents 
the  essential  facts  and  principles  in  a  logically  well-arranged  order,  beginning  with 
definitions  and  statements  of  laws,  followed  by  their  mathematical  or  experimental 
demonstration,  and  ending  with  a  few  brief  remarks  concerning  practical  applications. 
Usually  the  entire  sophomore  class  attends  the  lectures  in  a  body;  so  that,  in  the 
larger  schools,  there  are  as  many  as  three  or  four  hundred  students  at  each  lecture.  For 
quizzes  the  class  is  divided  into  sections  of  from  twenty  to  twenty-five  each;  and  these 
are  turned  over  to  assistants  who  listen  to  recitations  on  assignments  in  the  text,  ques- 
tion the  students  on  the  content  of  the  previous  lecture,  and  assign  illustrative  prob- 
lems to  be  solved  at  home.  With  large  classes  of  from  twelve  to  twenty  sections  the 
quiz  and  laboratory  work  requires  a  large  corps  of  assistants,  many  of  whom  are  grad- 
uate students  or  fellows  who  receive  a  modest  stipend  (from  $200  to  $500  a  year)  for 
this  service. 

In  the  laboratory  work  the  methods  and  aims  defined  by  Professor  Pickering  in 


TYPES  OF  INSTRUCTION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS  41 

1869  are  still  dominant  everywhere.  About  one-third  of  his  original  experiments  are 
still  in  use,  and  the  new  ones  that  have  been  introduced  have  as  their  objects  the 
verification  of  some  known  law,  the  visualization  of  some  known  fact,  or  the  deter- 
mination of  some  known  constant.  When  the  same  experiments  are  used  year  after 
year,  as  is  the  case  at  most  schools,  the  students  soon  discover  that  the  number  of 
failures  and  low  grades  in  physics  can  be  materially  reduced  if  the  results  of  the 
physics  experiments  are  carefully  preserved  from  year  to  year  and  judiciously  used 
as  occasion  may  require.  Projects  of  the  form  "  Which  of  these  3  electric  motors  is 
the  best  for  the  price?" — a  question  that  cannot  be  answered  without  making  the 
experiment — are  almost  never  used.  The  prevailing  type  is  "Measure  the  efficiency 
of  this  electric  motor."  In  other  words,  physics  instruction,  like  that  in  chemistry, 
aims  to  stock  the  student's  mind  with  information  as  a  preparation  for  solving  real 
problems  should  they  ever  arise. 

The  proficiency  and  the  progress  of  students  in  mathematics,  chemistry,  and  physics 
is  measured  by  periodic  examinations,  which  as  a  rule  call  for  the  statement  of  defini- 
tions, the  mathematical  demonstration  of  principles  or  theorems,  and  the  solution  of 
illustrative  problems.  For  small  classes  the  professor  himself  is  usually  alone  respon- 
sible for  the  questions,  and  is  also  sole  judge  of  the  rating  of  the  replies.  For  large 
classes  the  examination  is  sometimes  set  by  the  professor  in  responsible  charge  and 
sometimes  by  the  entire  group  of  instructors  in  conference.  In  either  case  the  papers 
are  as  a  rule  distributed  among  the  instructors  for  rating  so  that  the  grade  assigned 
is  often  determined  by  the  judgment  of  a  single  observer.  The  final  grades  assigned 
for  the  year  are  a  combination  of  the  examination  grades,  the  quiz  grades,  and 
the  laboratory  grades.  In  making  the  combination  the  weights  given  to  these  sev- 
eral elements  vary  enormously,  some  treating  the  examination  as  the  sole  factor  and 
others  relying  mainly  on  the  quiz  and  laboratory  grades.  The  students  are  gener- 
ally well  posted  on  the  system  used  in  each  department,  and  their  grades  are  fairly 
accurate  statements  of  their  successes  in  meeting  the  requh'ements  of  the  various 
professors. 

With  regard  to  instruction  in  English,  the  engineering  schools  may  be  divided  into 
two  approximately  equal  groups,  the  one  composed  of  those  schools  that  maintain 
the  current  standard  college  course;  and  the  other  composed  of  those  that  are  trying 
to  discover  a  type  of  work  better  suited  to  engineers.  In  the  standard  type  of  course, 
the  student  studies  a  textbook  of  composition  and  rhetoric,  learns  the  rules  of  correct 
punctuation  and  paragraphing,  together  with  the  four  forms  of  discourse,  and  then 
writes  themes  on  assigned  subjects  selected  by  the  instructor  to  give  practice  in  either 
description,  narration,  exposition,  or  argumentation.  In  some  schools  the  strict  ad- 
herence to  this  plan  is  mitigated  by  allowing  a  choice  from  among  several  assigned 
subjects.  The  accompanying  study  of  literature  consists  of  a  brief  survey  of  the  lives 
of  the  great  writers  and  the  analysis  of  selected  passages  from  their  writings.  This 
well-known  type  of  course  was  developed  during  the  latter  half  of  the  past  century 


42  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

for  the  purpose  of  making  English  an  acceptable  substitute  for  the  classics  in  high 
schools  and  colleges. 

Doubtless  because  the  professional  engineers  have  been  so  frank  in  their  demand 
for  better  training  in  English,  about  half  of  the  engineering  schools  are  experiment- 
ing with  their  methods  of  teaching  this  subject.  These  experiments  are  so  varied  in 
plan  and  execution  that  it  is  not  possible  to  classify  them.  One  of  the  more  radical 
of  these  is  described  in  Chapter  X. 

But  if  it  is  impossible  to  describe  the  types  of  instruction  in  English  because  of 
their  number  and  diversity,  it  is  still  more  difficult  to  select  any  one  type  of  drawing, 
descriptive  geometry,  or  shopwork  as  characteristic  of  even  a  majority  of  the  schools. 
In  drawing  the  aims  of  the  instruction  range  all  the  way  from  imparting  enough  tech- 
nical skill  to  enable  a  graduate  to  earn  his  living  as  a  draughtsman,  to  developing 
the  power  of  visualizing  solid  objects  from  flat  drawings.  At  some  schools  the  subject 
is  introduced  with  geometrical  drawing  for  practice  in  the  use  of  instruments,  at  others 
the  first  plates  are  merely  copied,  while  at  still  others  freehand  sketching  in  perspec- 
tive takes  the  lead.  In  some  cases  descriptive  geometry  is  closely  correlated  with  draw- 
ing from  the  beginning;  in  others  it  is  treated  independently  and  even  by  a  separate 
department. 

The  variations  in  types  of  shopwork  are  no  less  numerous.  At  some  few  schools 
no  shopwork  whatever  is  required;  at  others  students  merely  visit  shops  and  listen  to 
lectures  on  the  subject,  but  do  no  actual  work  with  tools;  at  still  others  the  emphasis 
is  placed  on  acquiring  a  certain  amount  of  manual  dexterity  in  typical  operations 
with  tools,  but  nothing  is  actually  constructed;  at  others  production  of  salable  articles 
is  placed  foremost;  the  shop  is  used  in  some  cases  as  a  means  of  acquiring  practice  in 
scientific  management  and  business  administration;  while  under  the  cooperative  plan 
the  school  conducts  no  shopwork,  but  the  students  gain  practical  experience  with 
tools,  production,  and  management  by  working  half  time  for  pay  in  industrial  plants. 

It  is  a  striking  fact  that  the  three  subjects  in  which  there  are  such  wide  variations 
in  teaching  practice  are  the  three  that  are  constantly  exposed  to  objective  test.  Eng- 
lish, drawing,  and  shop  are  three  subjects  in  which  a  student's  ability  is  expressed 
objectively  if  at  all;  and  these  are  the  subjects  in  which  experiments  in  methods  of 
teaching  are  most  numerous. 

These  six  subjects  —  mathematics,  chemistry  >  physics,  English,  drawing,  and  shop 
—  occupy  the  major  part  of  the  time  for  the  first  two  years  in  all  engineering  cur- 
ricula. The  majority  of  schools  also  require  one  or  more  foreign  languages,  taught 
almost  invariably  by  the  standardized  method  of  grammatical  study  and  analysis.  The 
civil  engineering  curriculum  usually  includes  in  the  first  or  second  year  the  theory 
of  surveying,  followed  by  a  summer  camp  for  practical  work.  Apart  from  this  work  in 
surveying,  there  is  as  a  rule  very  little  that  makes  the  freshmen  or  the  sophomores 
vividly  aware  of  the  fact  that  they  are  studying  engineering.  This  has  been  recognized 
as  a  defect  by  some  schools,  which  have  sought  to  remedy  it  by  "orientation"  lee- 


TYPES  OF  INSTRUCTION  IN  ENGINEERING  SCHOOLS  43 

tures  and  talks  by  professional  men  describing  the  nature  of  real  engineering  work 
in  the  field.  Still  there  are  cases  on  record  where  freshmen  in  engineering  have  been 
"weeded  out"'  entirely  because  of  deficiencies  in  English  and  German. 

The  instruction  during  the  last  two  years  is  almost  wholly  devoted  to  professional 
work.  The  prevailing  methods  of  teaching  are  very  similar  to  those  used  in  the  earlier 
years  in  chemistry  and  physics,  the  difference  being  that  the  topics  and  problems  are 
technical  rather  than  purely  scientific.  Since  specialization  has  now  divided  the  juniors 
and  seniors  into  groups,  the  classes  are  generally  small  and  they  receive  the  atten- 
tion of  the  older  and  more  experienced  professors.  Theory  and  theoretical  design  are 
strongly  emphasized  throughout  and  some  attention — frequently  very  little — is 
given  to  the  practical  problems  of  labor,  organization,  values,  and  costs. 

Twenty-five  years  ago  every  senior  was  required  to  prepare  a  graduation  thesis  as 
an  exercise  in  the  application  of  all  he  had  learned  and  a  training  in  engineering  meth- 
ods of  attacking  real  problems.  At  present  only  half  of  the  schools  require  theses  of 
all  graduates;  in  one-tenth  the  thesis  is  elective,  in  one-tenth  the  better  students  only 
are  allowed  the  privilege  of  preparing  one,  and  in  the  remaining  three- tenths  no  thesis 
is  required.  Formerly  the  thesis  was  frequently  the  only  opportunity  given  the  stu- 
dent to  exercise  his  originality  and  express  his  initiative  in  constructive  work.  At  pres- 
ent engineering  projects  are  being  used  more  and  more  as  problems  and  exercises  in 
the  regular  class  work  of  the  last  two  years.  In  a  few  cases  real  engineering  problems 
are  freely  used  with  freshmen  and  sophomores.  These  tendencies  to  encourage  a  spirit 
of  investigation  among  the  younger  students  and  to  give  even  freshmen  opportunities 
for  creative  work  are  becoming  more  marked  each  year.  Several  significant  changes 
of  this  kind  are  discussed  in  the  later  chapters. 


h/ 


PART  II 
THE  PROBLEMS  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 


Chapter  VIII 

ADMISSION 

The  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Education  has  always  had  a  standing 
committee  on  Entrance  Requirements.  This  committee  has  made  periodic  reports, 
which  are  published  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Society.  Yet  the  variations  in  the  re- 
quirements for  admission  to  engineering  colleges  are  still  very  striking  (cf.  page  22), 
tho  the  content  and  methods  of  instruction  in  many  of  the  accepted  units  have  been 
partially  standardized  by  the  effective  work  of  the  College  Entrance  Examination 
Board  and  of  numerous  committees  on  the  definition  of  the  high  school  units. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  their  success  in  limiting  admission  to  engineering  schools 
to  those  who  have  some  aptitude  or  ability  for  engineering,  it  is  evident  that  when 
60  out  of  every  100  admitted  fail  to  continue  thru  the  course,  present  systems  of 
admission  are  not  satisfactory.  Even  when  due  allowance  is  made  for  those  who  leave 
for  financial  reasons  and  for  the  praiseworthy  desire  of  faculties  to  give  every  boy  who 
has  any  claim  to  consideration  a  chance  to  prove  his  mettle,  a  fairly  large  number  of 
students  who  ought  not  to  try  to  become  engineers  are  permitted  to  undertake  a 
course  of  study  for  which  they  have  little  natural  ability.  Nor  is  this  condition  justi- 
fied by  the  plea  that  an  engineering  training  is  good  discipline  for  a  journalist  or  a 
banker;  because  the  spirit  of  the  work  is  spoiled  for  true  engineers  by  the  presence 
of  the  temperamentally  unfit,  while  these  do  not  get  the  maximum  benefit  from  work 
they  cannot  really  do  well. 

Fifty  years  ago  every  college  gave  its  own  entrance  examinations.  But  as  the  sec- 
ondary schools  grew  stronger,  the  custom  of  accepting  their  certificates  as  satisfactory 
credentials  for  admission  gradually  expanded;  with  the  result  that  for  a  number  of 
years  two  ostensibly  rival  systems  have  existed  side  by  side,  and  many  a  wordy  debate 
over  their  relative  merits  has  been  held.  In  engineering  schools  the  statistics  of  elimi- 
nation (page  32)  indicate  that  the  success  of  present  admission  systems  does  not  depend 
seriously  on  whether  the  colleges  give  their  own  entrance  examinations  or  whether  they 
accept  certificates  from  the  secondary  schools. 

Reasons  for  the  similarity  of  results  by  the  two  methods  of  admission  are  not  hard 
to  find.  For  every  high  school  teacher  who  has  in  his  class  one  boy  preparing  to  take 
a  college  entrance  examination  is  fairly  sure  to  drill  the  entire  class  on  old  college  en- 
trance examination  questions,  large  collections  of  which  have  been  reprinted  by  pub- 
lishers of  textbooks  and  individuals  interested  in  maintaining  the  examination  sys- 
tem. Under  these  conditions  if  both  college  and  school  are  sincere  in  their  work, — 
which  unfortunately  is  not  always  the  case, — it  clearly  makes  little  difference  in  the 
boy's  real  attainments  at  the  end  of  the  course  whether  he  takes  his  examination 
at  school  or  at  college.  In  the  one  case  he  is  admitted  by  examination,  in  the  other 
by  certificate;  in  either  case  on  the  average  at  least  60  out  of  100  admitted  fail  to 


48  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

finish  the  course.  Evidently  the  source  of  the  difficulty  does  not  lie  in  the  machin- 
ery of  admission,  but  in  the  controlling  factor  that  is  common  to  both,  namely,  the 
nature  of  the  test  itself.  For  engineering  the  question,  therefore,  is  not  which  of  the 
two  methods  of  admission  is  the  more  efficient,  but  whether  current  college  entrance 
tests  really  measure  engineering  ability  or  not.  Ability  to  secure  high  grades  in  school 
is  a  stable  characteristic  of  an  individual;  but  is  ability  to  pass  current  school  and 
college  examinations  a  valid  criterion  of  engineering  ability  ?  And  if  not,  what  type 
of  test  can  be  safely  used?  This  is  the  real  problem  of  admission  as  it  is  the  real  prob- 
lem of  the  entire  college  course,  for  tests  control  teaching. 

Trustworthy  hints  as  to  the  ways  and  means  of  discovering  better  types  of  tests 
for  admission  to  engineering  colleges  are  expressed  in  the  recent  developments  of  en- 
trance systems.  For  when  every  college  gave  its  own  entrance  examinations  in  its  own 
way  the  secondary  schools  were  confronted  with  a  perfectly  impossible  task.  In  each 
subject  there  were  as  many  different  examinations  as  there  were  colleges;  and  since 
each  examination  measured  rather  the  degree  to  which  the  candidate  conformed  to 
the  examiner's  conception  of  the  subject  than  the  student's  real  ability,  great  con- 
fusion prevailed.  It  was  to  abolish  this  confusion  that  the  College  Entrance  Exam- 
ination Board  was  organized  in  1900.  By  having  the  examination  questions  framed 
by  committees  instead  of  by  individuals,  by  giving  the  same  examination  for  a  large 
number  of  colleges,  and  by  having  all  the  rating  done  by  one  group  of  readers,  con- 
ditions were  vastly  improved,  and  have  continued  to  improve  as  the  board  has  gained 
in  experience  and  skill. 

In  the  central  and  western  states,  where  admission  has  for  a  number  of  years  been 
by  certificate,  the  development  has  been  nominally  somewhat  different.  There  the  deci- 
sion as  to  whether  the  work  of  a  high  school  was  of  such  quality  as  to  warrant  the 
acceptance  of  its  certificate  for  entrance  to  college  was  made  first  by  professors  sent 
out  by  the  colleges;  then  by  state  high  school  inspectors,  who  visited  each  school 
periodically  and  reported  their  findings  to  the  state  universities.  On  the  basis  of  their 
reports  a  list  of  "accredited  schools"  was  constructed  for  each  state,  and  these  lists 
were  combined  by  such  organizations  as  the  North  Central  Association  of  Colleges 
and  Secondary  Schools  to  include  the  schools  over  a  wide  territory.  Recently  there 
has  been  a  tendency  to  check  the  findings  of  the  high  school  inspectors  by  the  ratings 
received  in  college  by  the  students  from  the  various  schools. 

While  the  respective  developments  of  admission  systems  east  and  west  appear  to 
be  quite  different,  they  are  in  reality  very  much  the  same.  In  the  examination  system 
committees  instead  of  individuals  both  set  the  questions  and  grade  the  papers.  In 
the  certificate  system  the  work  of  a  high  school  is  now  judged  more  by  the  ratings  of 
its  students  by  a  college  faculty  than  by  the  personal  judgment  of  one  high  school 
inspector.  Hence  in  both  cases  the  growth  has  been  away  from  reliance  on  the  personal 
judgment  of  individuals  toward  acceptance  of  the  combined  judgment  of  a  group. 
Under  the  certificate  system  this  combined  judgment  is  based  on  daily  observation 


ADMISSION  49 

of  the  student's  labors  for  a  number  of  months,  while  under  the  examination  system 
the  judgment  in  each  subject  is  based  on  the  reading  of  one  paper. 

From  the  foregoing  facts  it  appears  that  the  real  difficulty  with  college  admission 
systems  has  been  instinctively  recognized  everywhere.  The  determination  of  a  candi- 
date's fitness  to  enter  college  depends  ultimately  on  tests  of  some  kind ;  and  the  tend- 
ency in  selecting  and  applying  tests  has  clearly  been  to  eliminate  the  fallacies  and 
vagaries  of  individual  personal  judgment,  in  order  that  grading  may  become  more  a 
measure  of  ability  and  less  an  expression  of  how  far  the  student  conforms  to  the  estab- 
lished convictions  of  individuals.  But  tho  very  encouraging  progress  has  been  made 
of  late,  all  recognize  that  still  greater  improvement  is  possible,  and  that  the  forward 
movement  is  in  the  direction  of  reducing  the  personal  equation  to  a  minimum  by 
making  examinations  and  tests  as  objective  as  possible. 

The  expenditure  of  an  enormous  amount  of  time  and  energy  has  been  necessary 
to  liberate  college  entrance  tests  from  personal  bias  and  to  achieve  even  the  degree 
of  objectivity  that  has  been  attained.  The  precipitation  of  the  instinctive  feeling 
for  the  direction  of  progress  into  a  well-defined  statement  of  conscious  aim  has  pro- 
ceeded slowly.  Now  that  the  aim  is  clear  and  generally  recognized,  more  rapid  advance 
is  possible,  provided  the  schools  are  ready  to  undertake  the  arduous  and  plodding 
work  involved ;  for  both  the  invention  and  the  interpretation  of  satisfactory  tests 
require  long  and  careful  statistical  studies  by  competent  men  who  have  been  spe- 
cially trained  for  the  task.  The  work  is  worth  while  because  admission  to  college  is 
an  important  division  of  the  central  problem  of  education  —  vocational  guidance.  If 
any  reasonably  trustworthy  method  of  discovering  what  work  each  individual  is  best 
fitted  for  can  be  found,  the  other  problems  of  education  will  in  large  measure  solve 
themselves. 

Since  engineering  is  perhaps  the  most  objective  of  all  professions,  it  offers  excel- 
lent opportunities  for  the  scientific  study  of  objective  tests.  A  study  of  engineering 
education  therefore  provides  an  appropriate  opportunity  to  initiate  experiments  and 
to  attempt  to  sort  out  the  more  promising  methods  of  investigation  from  those  that 
prove  to  be  less  fruitful.  To  this  end  Professor  Edward  L.  Thorndike  of  Columbia 
University  undertook  a  special  series  of  experiments  with  freshmen  in  engineering 
at  Columbia,  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  the  University  of  Cincinnati, 
and  Wentworth  Institute.  The  experiences  with  the  Columbia  group  are  here  de- 
scribed as  typical  of  the  principles  and  methods  applied.  Further  details  with  samples 
of  the  tests  used  are  given  in  the  Appendix  (pages  117-125). 

Thru  the  courtesy  of  Dean  F.  P.  Keppel,  an  invitation  was  extended  by  Professor 
Thorndike  to  forty  freshmen  in  engineering  to  spend  two  successive  Saturdays  (four- 
teen hours)  in  taking  the  tests.  Each  of  the  thirty-four  students  who  completed  the 
series  was  given  a  small  fee  and  a  full  statement  of  his  record.  Fifteen  tests  in  all  were 
used,  each  designed  to  record  the  student's  relative  ability  in  some  one  particular 
activity  which  was  complete  in  itself,  altho  it  involved  a  rather  complicated  series  of 


50  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

reactions.  Thus  each  student  was  asked  to  read  paragraphs  and  write  answers  to  ques- 
tions on  their  meaning,  to  identify  words  as  proof  of  his  range  of  vocabulary,  to  supply 
missing  words  in  sentences,  to  solve  arithmetical  and  algebraic  problems,  to  perform 
algebraic  computations,  to  draw  graphs  from  given  data,  to  give  geometrical  proofs 
of  stated  theorems,  to  solve  problems  in  physics  described  in  words,  to  arrange  physi- 
cal apparatus  to  secure  stated  results,  to  match  each  of  a  series  of  pictures  with  one 
of  a  series  of  verbal  statements,  to  supply  missing  lines  in  drawings  of  machinery,  and 
to  construct  simple  mechanical  devices  from  their  unassembled  parts. 

Each  test  was  constructed  as  a  series  of  graded  steps  of  increasing  difficulty,  the 
first  being  so  easy  that  every  one  was  sure  to  accomplish  it,  and  the  last  one  so 
difficult  that  only  the  ablest  could  master  it.  The  grading  of  the  steps  is  secured  by 
first  submitting  a  large  number  of  problems  of  a  given  type  to  about  a  dozen  suc- 
cessful teachers  of  the  subject  and  asking  them  to  divide  them  into  groups  numbered 
1,  2,  3,  4,  etc.,  in  what  they  consider  to  be  the  order  of  difficulty.  Problems  common 
to  group  1  are  used  as  the  first  step,  those  common  to  group  2  as  the  second  step, 
and  so  on,  in  making  up  a  preliminary  test,  which  is  then  tried  on  a  number  of  classes 
in  different  schools.  The  relative  difficulty  is  then  in  inverse  order  to  the  number  who 
accomplish  each  step.  Much  further  experimenting  and  computation  are  necessary  if 
it  is  desired  to  make  sure  that  each  successive  step  is  more  difficult  than  its  predeces- 
sor by  the  same  amount.  Most  of  the  tests  used  in  these  experiments  with  engineering 
students  were  graded  in  steps  of  equal  difficulty. 

The  advantage  of  tests  of  graded  difficulty  lies  in  the  fact  that  a  student's  grade 
is  determined  by  the  number  of  steps  he  accomplishes  in  the  assigned  time.  Since  the 
questions  used  are  as  a  rule  of  a  type  that  cannot  be  answered  from  memory,  but 
must  be  answered  by  a  short  statement,  judgment  concerning  the  correctness  of  the 
answers  is  seldom  ambiguous,  so  that  personal  bias  in  assigning  grades  is  almost 
wholly  eliminated.  Independent  scorers  in  these  tests  repeatedly  made  ratings  that 
were  practicallv  identical  (correlations  .95  to  .98.  Cf.  page  119). 

The  ultimate  criterion  of  the  validity  of  these  tests  is  the  future  careers  of  those 
tested.  Since  extensive  data  of  this  kind  are  not  yet  obtainable,  the  results  of  the  tests 
were  compared  with  a  composite  rating  compiled  by  combining  the  students'  high 
school  marks  in  English,  mathematics,  and  physics,  their  ratings  in  the  Regents"1 
examinations  in  these  three  subjects,  their  freshman  records  in  English,  mathematics, 
and  chemistry,  the  combined  judgments  of  the  students  concerning  one  another's 
intellectual  ability,  the  judgment  of  the  teachers  who  were  acquainted  with  the  men, 
and  the  age  of  entrance  to  college.  This  composite  is  the  best  obtainable  summary  of 
the  current  school  judgment  concerning  the  relative  intellectual  abilities  of  the  stu- 
dents tested.  By  it  the  thirty-four  who  took  the  tests  were  ranged  in  a  series  in  the 
order  of  their  relative  standings  as  determined  by  current  school  methods. 

The  students  were  then  arranged  in  15  similar  series,  the  order  of  merit  in  each 
being  determined  by  the  ratings  in  one  of  the  15  tests;  and  each  of  these  15  series 


ADMISSION  51 

was  compared  with  the  series  defined  by  the  schools'  ratings  by  the  method  of  Pearson 
correlation  coefficients  (Appendix,  page  119).  Every  test  showed  a  positive  correlation 
with  this  composite  school  series,  the  correlation  coefficients  varying  from  .2  to  .8. 

This  indicates  that  all  the  tests  are  symptomatic  of  the  qualities  which  enable 
a  student  to  enter  college  young,  make  a  good  record  in  high  school  and  in  the  Re- 
gents' examinations,  do  well  during  the  freshman  year,  and  be  regarded  as  of  high 
general  ability  by  his  classmates  and  teachers.  When  all  fifteen  tests  are  combined  into 
a  single  measure,  the  test  series  and  the  composite  school  series  are  almost  identical 
(correlation  coefficient  .84). 

The  records  of  the  thirty-four  men  tested  at  Columbia  have  been  followed  for  three 
years.  Five  of  the  seven  who  stood  highest  in  the  tests  received  general  honors,  while 
five  of  the  seven  lowest  in  the  tests  failed  in  more  than  half  of  their  work  and  left 
school.  The  top  seven  all  made  more  than  125  credits  in  three  years,  the  middle  seven 
averaged  92  credits  each  in  three  years,  and  of  the  lowest  seven  the  two  who  did  not 
leave  averaged  56  points  each  in  three  years. 

The  tests,  however,  differ  in  their  validity  as  symptoms  of  intellectual  ability  and 
should  therefore  have  different  weights  in  making  up  a  summary.  The  computation 
of  the  relative  weights  was  carried  out  by  Dr.  Truman  L.  Kelley  by  the  method  of 
partial  correlation  coefficients.  His  investigation  shows  that  a  suitable  combination  of 
the  ratings  from  only  seven  of  the  tests  gives  a  closer  correlation  with  the  composite 
school  series  than  does  the  composite  of  all  fifteen  (coefficient  .87  as  against  .84).  These 
seven  tests  ai*e  the  five  in  mathematics  and  the  two  in  supplying  the  missing  words 
from  sentences.  These  seven  tests  require  five  hours  of  the  student's  time,  and  their 
results  arrange  the  students  in  an  order  of  intellectual  ability  practically  identical 
with  that  of  the  composite  school  series.  At  present  the  composite  school  judgment 
is  universally  accepted  as  determining  fitness  to  enter  college.  College  entrance  exam- 
inations consume  from  fifteen  to  twenty-five  hours  of  the  student's  time.  These  seven 
tests  gave  in  this  experiment  at  Columbia  as  good  a  rating  in  five  hours,  and  the  scor- 
ing is  independent  of  personal  bias.  Similar  results  were  obtained  at  the  other  schools. 

To  this  rather  striking  fact  must  be  added  another  no  less  important;  namely,  that 
the  other  eight  tests  contributed  practically  nothing  to  this  result.  These  eight  were 
paragraph  reading,  range  of  vocabulary,  giving  opposites  of  words,  laboratory  prob- 
lems in  physics,  matching  diagrams  with  sentences,  completing  imperfect  diagrams, 
physics  problems  stated  in  words,  and  the  construction  of  mechanical  devices  from  their 
unassembled  parts.  The  fact  that  these  eight  tests  are  unnecessary  in  determining  an 
order  of  ability  that  closely  resembles  the  order  defined  by  current  school  practices 
does  not  mean  that  they  are  on  that  account  useless.  On  the  contrary,  they  are  partic- 
ularly valuable  because  they  evidently  measure  abilities  of  which  the  current  school 
methods  take  no  account.  Further  experimentation  is  required  to  determine  just  what 
these  other  abilities  are.  They  probably  include  language  abilities  that  depend  on 
interest  in  reading,  clear  grasp  of  the  meaning  of  single  words  and  phrases,  power  to 


52  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

keep  in  mind  past  context  in  reading  a  connected  passage,  skill  in  working  with  dia- 
grams and  apparatus,  and  mechanical  sense.  All  of  these  are  of  prime  importance  in 
engineering.  The  development  of  all  the  men  tested  is  being  followed  for  the  purpose 
of  throwing  more  light  on  the  questions  here  raised. 

The  same  fifteen  tests  were  given  by  Professor  Thorndike  thru  the  courtesy  of  Dean 

A.  E.  Burton  to  forty  freshmen  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  thru 
the  courtesy  of  Dean  Herman  Schneider  and  with  the  cordial  cooperation  of  Professor 

B.  B.  Breese  to  forty-one  engineering  freshmen  at  the  University  of  Cincinnati,  and 
thru  the  courtesy  of  Director  A.  L.  Williston  to  sixty  students  at  the  Wentworth 
Institute  in  Boston.  The  students  in  these  groups  came  from  so  many  different  schools 
that  it  was  not  possible  to  make  a  composite  rating  of  their  abilities  on  the  basis  of 
their  school  records.  The  college  records  of  these  men  have  been  followed  for  two  years, 
with  the  result  that  in  Cincinnati  the  tests  prophesied  academic  achievement  in  these 
two  years  as  accurately  as  the  college  rating  for  one  year  prophesied  the  rating  for 
the  succeeding  year  (correlation  coefficients  .64  and  .62).  At  the  Massachusetts  Insti- 
tute the  tests  prophesied  the  college  ratings  for  the  two  years  four-fifths  as  well  as 
the  ratings  for  one  year  prophesied  those  for  the  succeeding  year  (correlation  coeffi- 
cients .49  and  .64).  The  implication  is  that  such  tests  as  these  tell  as  much  about 
a  student  before  he  enters  college  as  the  college  now  knows  of  him  at  the  end  of  his 
freshman  year. 

The  same  tests  were  given  to  groups  of  students  at  four  different  institutions. 
A  comparison  shows  large  differences  among  the  average  abilities  of  the  four  groups. 
This  indicates  that  certain  schools,  whether  because  of  their  locations,  their  repu- 
tations, their  student  activities,  or  the  excellence  of  their  training,  attract  boys  of 
greater  innate  ability.  When  further  developed  and  perfected,  tests  of  this  type  may 
make  it  possible  to  construct  a  scale  of  freshman  abilities,  by  which  each  school  can 
measure  the  quality  of  each  freshman  class.  It  is  conceivable  that  a  similar  scale  to 
measure  the  abilities  of  the  seniors  may  some  day  be  constructed.  Then  the  difference 
in  the  positions  of  the  freshmen  and  the  seniors  on  these  scales  would  be  a  much  more 
valid  criterion  of  the  success  of  the  school  work  than  any  now  available. 

Neither  present  admission  systems  nor  objective  tests  take  account  of  several  im- 
portant factors  that  in  many  cases  have  an  important  bearing  on  a  student's  efficiency 
in  school  work.  For  example,  Professor  Thorndike  found  that  during  their  high  school 
course  two-thirds  of  the  freshmen  examined  had  spent  more  than  8  hours  a  week  on 
work  other  than  school  work.  The  median  number  of  hours  per  week  of  such  work 
reported  was  12  during  school  time  and  40  during  the  summer  vacation.  Out  of  72 
freshmen  at  Columbia  and  the  Massachusetts  Institute,  21  reported  no  outside  work, 
37  reported  from  1  to  9  hours  of  outside  work,  11  from  10  to  19  hours,  and  3  more 
than  20  hours.  At  Cincinnati  all  the  engineering  students  spend  half  their  time  in 
outside  work.  One  student,  who  was  rated  low  in  the  composite  school  series  but  who 
made  an  excellent  record  in  the  tests,  was  found  to  be  doing  over  40  hours  a  week  of 


ADMISSION  53 

outside  work.  It  is  clear  that  a  record  of  the  amount  and  the  kinds  of  outside  work 
done  by  students  would  be  of  value  in  determining  fitness  to  enter  college. 

A  record  of  boyish  interests  and  activities  might  also  help  to  reveal  to  college  ex- 
aminers the  presence  or  absence  of  real  engineering  bent  or  temperament.  The  fresh- 
men tested  by  Professor  Thorndike  were  asked  to  indicate  by  numbers  their  present 
preference  for  bargaining,  managing  people,  studying  books,  clerical  work,  mechani- 
cal work,  farm  work,  work  with  animals.  In  the  replies  from  90  freshmen  mechanical 
work  was  rated  first  or  second  82  times  out  of  a  possible  200,  which  is  three  times  as 
often  as  chance  would  give,  and  over  three  times  as  often  as  was  the  case  for  a  group 
of  school  superintendents  at  the  same  age.  Out  of  103  engineering  freshmen  who  re- 
ported on  the  matter  of  boyish  activities,  91  had  constructed  on  their  own  initiative 
mechanical  or  scientific  devices  such  as  cannons,  telegraph  lines,  telephones,  electric 
motors,  arc  lights,  gasolene  motors,  lathes,  steam  engines,  water  wheels,  boats,  etc. 
None  of  the  engineering  schools  at  present  record  this  type  of  information  or  make 
any  systematic  effort  to  use  it  or  to  interpret  its  meaning;  nor  do  parents  and  ele- 
mentary school  teachers  realize  the  importance  of  giving  young  boys  and  girls  oppor- 
tunities of  expressing  their  innate  mechanical  sense  in  creative  work. 

Let  no  one  imagine  that  the  tests  presented  in  the  Appendix  are  a  final  solution  of 
the  college  entrance  problem.  They  are  but  the  beginning  of  an  effort  to  proceed  one 
step  farther  in  the  direction  indicated  by  the  development  of  college  entrance  systems 
during  the  past  twenty  years.  A  large  amount  of  experimentation  and  cross  checking 
among  different  schools  must  be  done  to  determine  the  validity  of  this  type  of  test 
and  to  interpret  the  results  of  its  use.  Enough  has  been  done  to  show  that  the  princi- 
ples of  testing  here  presented  are  worthy  of  further  investigation  and  that  methods 
of  procedure  have  been  indicated  that  point  to  a  safe  road  of  real  progress.  As  these 
principles  are  applied  and  these  methods  are  developed  by  many  observers  in  many 
schools,  it  may  be  possible  to  liberate  college  entrance  from  its  present  fetters  and 
place  it  on  a  more  rational  and  scientific  basis. 

The  effect  of  such  a  development  on  the  quality  of  preparation  for  college  is  sure 
to  be  most  beneficial.  College  professors  are  at  present  the  only  teachers  in  the  school 
system  who  are  permitted  to  teach  without  one  hour  of  special  training  for  teaching. 
With  mastery  of  their  respective  subjects  and  the  highest  idealism  and  sincerity,  they 
devise  specifications  for  the  content  of  high  school  courses,  and  then  enforce  those 
specifications  directly  or  indirectly  by  entrance  examinations  that  do  not  really 
measure  ability  or  create  the  best  conditions  for  its  development.  When  the  colleges 
are  able  to  define  their  admission  requirements  in  terms  of  abilities  as  measured  by 
objective  tests,  instead  of  in  terms  of  subject-matter  covered,  it  may  be  possible  to  lift 
the  great  incubus  of  ignorance  that  now  oppresses  the  secondary  schools,  to  supply 
the  colleges  with  freshmen  much  better  trained  and  sorted  on  the  basis  of  ability, 
and  to  reduce  the  mortality  of  60  per  cent  to  a  more  reasonable  figure. 


Chapter  IX 

THE  TIME  SCHEDULE 

When  faculties  were  small  and  the  number  of  subjects  that  seemed  essential  were  rel- 
atively few,  the  problem  of  the  time  schedule  was  a  fairly  simple  one.  All  the  neces- 
sary courses  could  be  arranged  in  a  compact  and  consistent  program  that  required 
the  student  to  carry  not  more  than  18  credit  hours  of  work  at  one  time  and  to  study 
not  more  than  four  or  five  different  subjects  each  term.  But  as  science  expanded  and 
became  more  intricate,  specialization  was  unavoidable.  By  1890  the  civil  engineer- 
ing student  had  to  choose  either  general  civil  engineering,  or  railroad  engineering, 
or  topographical  engineering.  Similarly  the  prospective  mechanical  engineer  had  to 
decide  by  the  end  of  his  second  year  whether  he  would  follow  the  general  curriculum 
in  mechanical  engineering,  or  one  that  specialized  in  marine,  in  locomotive,  or  in  mill 
engineering.  Since  1890  this  process  of  subdivision  and  specialization  has  advanced 
rapidly,  pushing  the  student's  choice  of  a  specialty  back  into  the  first  year,  increas- 
ing the  required  number  of  credit  hours  in  some  cases  to  as  many  as  27,  and  at  times 
loading  his  weekly  schedule  with  from  eight  to  thirteen  different  subjects. 

If  there  is  any  one  point  on  which  practising  engineers  and  teachers  of  engineer- 
ing are  in  substantial  agreement,  it  is  that  at  present  this  specialization  and  subdivi- 
sion of  curricula  has  gone  too  far.  The  congestion  that  inevitably  results  is  univer- 
sally recognized  to  be  a  fruitful  source  of  confusion  to  the  student  and  a  real  cause 
of  superficial  work.  Attention  is  distracted  from  mastery  of  the  subject  and  encour- 
aged to  seek  ways  and  means  of  securing  passing  grades  with  minimum  effort;  so  that 
a  rigid  and  exacting  department  is  likely  to  get  more  than  its  share  of  time  and  labor. 
There  is  too  little  time  for  persistent  thinking,  too  little  opportunity  to  realize  the 
joy  of  achievement,  and  too  much  inducement  to  join  in  the  scramble  for  credits. 

There  are  two  obvious  methods  of  relieving  congestion,  namely,  more  time  or  fewer 
subjects.  A  few  years  ago  Harvard  University  and  the  University  of  Missouri  expanded 
their  engineering  curricula  to  six  years,  partly  to  relieve  congestion  and  partly  to  raise 
engineering  to  the  rank  of  a  graduate  professional  study  like  law  and  medicine.  Both 
of  these  efforts  have  been  abandoned,  but  Columbia  has  undertaken  to  continue  the 
experiment.  The  University  of  Wisconsin  for  a  number  of  years  offered  a  five-year 
curriculum  along  with  the  regular  four-year  one,  but  this  was  given  up  because  it 
proved  to  be  a  haven  for  "lame  ducks"  who  could  not  accomplish  the  regular  work  in 
four  years.  Cornell  still  maintains  a  five-year  curriculum  and  is  much  pleased  with 
its  operation.  The  five-year  curriculum  at  Yale  consists  of  two  years  of  specialized 
graduate  work  added  to  the  regular  three-year  curriculum  that  leads  to  the  Ph.B. 
degree  in  engineering. 

In  the  matter  of  fewer  subjects  a  number  of  the  best  schools  are  succeeding  in  keep- 
ing the  required  number  of  credit  hours  below  18  per  term,  as  at  Cornell,  Ohio  State, 


THE  TIME  SCHEDULE  55 

Illinois,  and  Wisconsin.  Under  these  conditions  the  tendency  to  congestion  is  relieved 
to  a  certain  extent  by  having  a  fairly  large  number  of  specialized  curricula  and  allow- 
ing some  small  choice  of  electives  among  the  technical  subjects  in  the  last  two  years. 
Both  of  these  devices  really  result  in  a  reduction  of  the  amount  of  subject-matter 
by  a  limitation  of  its  range,  and  thus  bring  the  schools  face  to  face  with  the  charge  of 
training  narrow  specialists  instead  of  broad  gauge  professional  men. 

Thus  far  neither  more  time  nor  fewer  subjects  have  as  a  matter  of  fact  cured  con- 
gestion. For  the  amount  to  be  learned  in  every  field  is  so  vast  and  is  increasing  so 
rapidly  that  whenever  a  professor  gets  more  time  for  instruction,  he  usually  tries  to 
cover  more  ground;  and  this  tendency  is  supported  by  many  of  the  younger  alumni, 
who  keep  suggesting  the  addition  of  this,  that,  or  the  other  bit  of  information  that 
was  not  given  them  in  college,  but  would  have  been  useful  to  them  on  their  first  jobs 
if  it  had  been  included  in  the  curriculum.  This  pressure  to  keep  up  to  date,  combined 
with  the  natural  reluctance  of  every  teacher  to  abandon  material  he  has  once  worked 
up  for  presentation  to  the  class,  is  fairly  certain  to  produce  congestion  even  after  it 
has  been  temporarily  relieved.  The  real  causes  of  congestion,  however,  with  its  well- 
known  symptoms  of  mental  confusion,  superficiality,  and  scurry  for  credit,  lie  deeper. 
Their  roots  penetrate  to  the  methods  by  which  curricula  are  constructed  and  the  edu- 
cational conceptions  on  which  they  are  based. 

Engineering  curricula  were  originally  organized  on  a  very  different  basis  from  those 
in  other  professional  schools.  The  earliest  instruction  in  law  and  medicine  was  given 
by  the  apprenticeship  system.  As  these  professions  grew,  it  was  found  convenient  to 
gather  the  apprentices  together  in  groups  for  class  instruction  by  some  particularly 
well- qualified  practitioner.  These  classes  were  then  organized  into  schools  controlled 
and  managed  by  practitioners,  who,  until  recently,  also  gave  the  greater  part  of  the 
instruction  on  a  part  time  basis.  The  first  law  and  medical  schools  at  universities  were 
practitioners1  schools  appended  to,  but  never  fully  assimilated  by,  the  institutions 
to  which  they  were  attached.  Full  time  college  professors  of  medicine  and  law  are  of 
relatively  recent  date,  and  even  now  much  of  the  instruction  in  these  subjects  is  still 
given  in  university  schools  by  practitioners  on  a  part  time  basis.  The  curricula  of  these 
schools,  therefore,  developed  out  of  apprentice  courses  and  were  framed  by  men  in 
daily  contact  with  professional  work. 

In  engineering,  on  the  other  hand,  altho  the  apprenticeship  method  of  training  was 
originallv  employed  and  is  still  in  extensive  use, — about  half  of  the  professional  engi- 
neers in  America  to-day  being  shop-trained  men  (page  19), — this  system  of  training 
never  developed  into  engineering  schools  to  any  extent.  The  first  engineering  schools 
were  founded  by  colleges,  their  professors  were  college-trained  men,  and  their  curric- 
ula were  devised  by  college  faculties;  professors  also  gave  practically  all  the  instruc- 
tion with  very  little  assistance  from  practitioners.  For  this  reason  the  first  technical 
schools  had  a  serious  struggle  to  prove  that  engineers  could  be  trained  in  schools. 
Even  now  technological  schools  are  classed  in  the  Reports  of  the  United  States  Bureau 


56  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

of  Education  with  universities  and  colleges ;  while  schools  of  law,  medicine,  theology, 
dentistry,  pharmacy,  and  veterinary  medicine  are  classed  together  as  professional 
schools. 

This  dominance  of  the  college  of  liberal  arts  in  engineering  schools  has  undoubt- 
edly been  a  powerful  factor  in  the  development  of  the  engineering  profession.  The 
emphasis  still  placed  in  the  curriculum  on  pure  science,  pure  mathematics,  and  the 
humanities,  in  spite  of  numerous  vigorous  attacks  on  them,  is  evidence  of  the  extent 
to  which  the  ideals  of  the  American  college  still  dominate  the  technological  schools. 
But  tho  this  protection  of  the  conception  of  culture  within  the  engineering  schools 
has  tended  to  liberalize  them  and  to  prevent  their  becoming  too  materialistic,  it  has 
not  been  an  unmixed  blessing;  for  that  conception  has  been  slow  to  adapt  itself  to 
the  changed  conditions  produced  by  engineering,  and  has  tended  to  preserve  several 
fundamental  practices  that  are  now  regarded  as  the  probable  causes  of  congestion  and 
of  other  serious  difficulties  in  current  curricula. 

Prominent  among  these  outgrown  practices  is  the  method  of  constructing  and 
changing  curricula.  When  the  students'1  hardships  have  become  so  obvious  that  they 
can  no  longer  be  ignored,  a  committee  is  appointed  to  study  the  problem  and  sug- 
gest changes.  This  committee  usually  requests  each  department  to  submit  a  statement 
of  its  requirements  and  desires;  and,  while  this  is  being  prepared,  compiles  a  table 
showing  how  much  time  is  allotted  by  other  schools  to  each  of  the  subjects  included 
in  the  curriculum.  The  departmental  statements  are  also  compiled  so  as  to  show  how 
much  time  is  needed  to  fulfil  all  their  requests.  Generally  the  number  of  topics  each 
department  considers  essential  is  so  large  that  the  hours  required  to  cover  them  all 
would  be  double  or  triple  the  number  available.  The  various  claims  are  then  discussed 
in  committee,  reduced  within  reasonable  limits  by  a  process  of  cut  and  fit,  and  the 
result  reported  back  to  the  faculty.  In  the  faculty  debate  that  follows,  each  depart- 
ment presses  its  claims  for  more  hours,  and  numerous  changes  are  suggested,  debated, 
and  ordered  made  or  not  made  by  a  majority  vote.  When  the  matter  is  settled  each 
department  takes  the  time  awarded  to  it  and  uses  those  hours  in  any  way  it  likes.  In 
short,  distribution  of  time  among  the  departments  is  usually  regarded  as  the  chief 
function  of  the  faculty.  Respect  for  departmental  autonomy  forbids  any  investigation 
or  scrutiny  of  the  aims,  the  methods,  or  the  results  of  the  work  of  any  one  depart- 
ment by  the  faculty  or  by  any  of  its  committees. 

Under  present  conditions  the  members  of  the  various  departments  in  engineering 
schools  are  selected  in  the  main  because  of  their  abilities  as  specialists  in  their  re- 
spective fields.  Since  every  competent  specialist  is  always  an  enthusiast  over  his  spe- 
cialty, there  is  no  limit  to  the  number  of  hours  he  would  like  to  fill  or  the  amount 
of  information  he  would  like  to  impart  to  the  students,  especially  when  the  work  is 
conducted  by  the  lecture  method.  Therefore  congestion  of  the  curriculum  is  inevita- 
ble so  long  as  each  department  remains  sole  arbiter  of  the  content  of  its  courses, 
and  there  is  no  coordination  among  departments  with  respect  to  the  amount  and  the 


THE  TIME  SCHEDULE  57 

nature  of  the  subject-matter  in  courses,  and  no  scrutiny  of  the  results  of  each  depart- 
ment's work  by  some  agency  outside  the  department.  The  problem  of  congestion  is 
evidently  not  merely  a  question  of  the  time  schedule,  but  leads  at  once  to  such  specific 
departmental  questions  as:  What  is  the  minimum  mathematical  equipment  essential 
to  every  engineer,  no  matter  what  his  special  line  may  be  ?  What  fundamental  prin- 
ciples of  mechanics  must  be  mastered  by  every  engineer?  In  developing  a  mastery  of 
these  principles  of  mechanics,  what  coordination  of  work  among  the  departments  of 
mathematics,  physics,  mechanics,  and  engineering  is  most  effective?  Until  such  inter- 
departmental investigations  and  experiments  are  the  rule  everywhere,  instead  of  the 
exception,  congestion  is  likely  to  persist  and  grow  more  and  more  disastrous. 

Investigations  and  experiments  of  this  type  are  already  under  way  at  several 
schools.  Thus  at  the  Naval  Academy  an  effort  is  being  made  in  the  postgraduate  de- 
partment to  coordinate  mathematics  with  engineering  by  scanning  the  subject-mat- 
ter of  both  to  eliminate  non-essentials,  so  as  to  make  the  treatment  of  each  topic 
as  brief  as  is  consistent  with  clear  understanding;  there  is  also  an  earnest  effort  to 
arrange  the  material  in  both  departments  so  that  the  presentation  of  the  practical  by 
the  engineer  and  of  the  theoretical  by  the  mathematician  come  at  about  the  same 
time  and  complement  each  other.1  Similarly  at  Cincinnati,  many  of  the  problems 
used  in  the  mathematics  classes  are  actual  industrial  problems  brought  in  by  the 
students  from  their  practical  work  in  commercial  shops ;  and  the  work  in  English  is 
so  organized  that  theme  writing  gives  outlook  to  the  technical  courses  and  technical 
reports  are  also  exercises  in  English  composition. 

Important  as  are  experiments  of  this  sort  in  indicating  present  tendencies,  their 
benefits  are  limited  to  the  schools  where  they  are  made,  because  their  results  are  not 
tested  by  methods  easily  recognized  as  valid,  and  the  conclusions  derived  from  them 
are  not  expressed  in  terms  intelligible  and  convincing  to  all.  To  be  widely  effective, 
experiments  must  be  checked  by  tests  that  are  as  free  as  possible  from  the  personal 
equation  and  the  errors  of  subjective  judgment  on  the  part  of  the  experimenter.  There- 
fore, ultimately,  the  problem  of  congestion  leads,  like  the  problem  of  admission,  to 
the  need  for  more  impersonal  and  generally  intelligible  methods  of  testing  and  meas- 
uring the  growth  of  abilities.  The  invention  and  perfection  by  experiment  of  objec- 
tive tests  of  ability  seems  to  offer  the  most  promising  road  to  progress  toward  a  type 
of  instruction  that  places  less  emphasis  on  information  and  more  on  ability  to  use 
information  intelligently — toward  greater  cooperation  among  departments  and  less 
of  the  specialized  exclusiveness  of  departmental  autonomy,  and  hence  toward  the 
relief  and  the  ultimate  cure  of  congestion.  This  question  is  discussed  further  in  the 
following  chapters. 

The  seriousness  of  the  problem  of  congestion  has  been  widely  recognized.  There  is, 
however,  another  closely  related  and  equally  important  problem  the  significance  of 
which  has  not  been  so  fully  apprehended;  namely,  the  order  of  sequence  of  the  various 

1  R.  E.  Root:  Engineering  Education,  vol.  vii,  pages  190-196,  December,  1916. 


58  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

courses.  In  this  matter  the  1849  curriculum  at  Rensselaer  (page  12)  imported  a  French 
style  that  has  been  followed  implicitly  ever  since.  The  conception  underlying  this  and 
all  later  curricula  is  that  engineering  is  applied  science ;  and  therefore,  to  teach  engi- 
neering, it  is  necessary  first  to  teach  science  and  then  to  apply  it.  In  conformity  with 
this  conception  the  first  two  years  of  college  work  are  almost  universally  devoted 
wholly  to  learning  the  fundamental  principles  of  chemistry,  physics, and  mathematics. 
Onlv  when  the  student  has  passed  a  satisfactory  examination  on  these  fundamental 
principles  and  their  various  non-technical  applications  is  he  permitted  to  work  on 
engineering  projects. 

Some  of  the  peculiar  effects  that  result  from  this  universal  habit  of  teaching  first 
the  theory,  then  the  practice,  are  now  beginning  to  attract  attention.  Instructors  who 
are  close  to  freshmen  and  sophomores  tell  how  bewildered  and  discouraged  the  under 
classmen  often  are  because,  having  come  to  college  to  studv,  as  they  supposed,  the 
dynamic  agencies  for  doing  the  world's  work,  thev  find  themselves  merely  continuing 
their  elementary  and  high  school  drudgery  with  books  and  abstract  symbols.  Doubt- 
less some  of  the  freshman  elimination  is  due  to  this  discouragement,  and  it  has  been 
suggested  that  the  drop  in  student  grades  in  the  sophomore  year  (page  33)  may  be 
attributed  mainly  to  this  cause.  The  question  has  also  been  raised  whether  failure  to 
make  good  in  these  preliminary  studies  as  taught,  or  to  succeed  in  the  tests  as  given, 
is  really  conclusive  evidence  of  lack  of  engineering  ability. 

Several  of  the  schools  visited  have  found  that  the  introduction  of  "orientation'" 
courses  and  talks  by  practising  engineers  on  the  real  experiences  of  the  engineers  life 
are  effective  means  of  increasing  the  interest  and  strengthening  the  morale  of  the 
freshmen.  A  moving  picture  of  an  engineering  enterprise  in  action  is  not  without  re- 
sults. These  realistic  portrayals  of  the  technique  of  practice  lend  reality  to  the  book 
work  and  arouse  the  professional  ambitions  of  the  hearers.  The  actual  participation 
in  technical  work  under  the  cooperative  plan  at  Cincinnati,  Akron,  and  Lafayette,  the 
summer  vacation  work  in  industrial  plants,  and  the  summer  surveying  camps  all  tend 
in  the  same  direction. 

Recently  the  conception  that  beginners  might  learn  more  quickly  and  thoroughly 
if  real  experiences  were  coordinated  with  their  study  of  theory  has  been  carried  one 
step  further  by  introducing  real  work  into  the  class  work  itself.  Perhaps  the  most 
striking  of  the  several  recent  experiments  of  this  kind  is  that  conducted  by  Professor 
C.  C.  More  of  the  University  of  Washington.  Mechanics  is  generally  placed  in  the  third 
year  so  that  the  students  may  be  well  prepared  for  it  in  physics  and  calculus.  The 
conventional  course  begins  with  the  statement  of  definitions  and  the  deduction  of  gen- 
eral principles,  followed  by  the  solution  of  typical  problems.  Professor  More  begins  by 
asking  the  student  to  report  on  the  safety  of  the  sheet  piling  in  a  certain  cofferdam 
whose  dimensions  and  location  are  pictured  and  described.  Theory  and  principles  are 
worked  out  and  proved  as  they  are  needed  to  solve  the  problem.  Calculus  and  physics 
are  freely  used.  This  complete  reversal  of  the  conventional  order  proved  so  success- 


THE  TIME  SCHEDULE  59 

ful  that  last  year  the  same  course  was  tried,  including  the  calculus,  on  one  section  of 
engineering  freshmen,  who  mastered  it  with  little  more  trouble  than  the  juniors.  As 
a  result,  the  entire  engineering  faculty  now  sanctions  this  order  of  topics  from  appli- 
cation to  theory  as  a  great  improvement  over  the  older  conventional  one.1  Other  simi- 
lar experiments  are  discussed  in  subsequent  chapters. 

Altho  the  engineering  faculty  at  the  University  of  Washington  approve  of  Pro- 
fessor More"s  new  order  for  teaching  mechanics,  other  instructors  in  mechanics  who 
cannot  personally  observe  the  results  will  be  slow  to  follow  or  inaugurate  similar 
experiments  because  there  are  no  generally  intelligible  objective  tests  and  scales  of 
ability  in  tenns  of  which  the  results  may  be  expressed.  For  this  reason  experiments 
with  the  curriculum,  either  to  relieve  congestion  or  to  secure  more  enthusiastic  and 
intensive  work  thru  variations  in  the  nature  and  the  order  of  the  topics,  have  at  best 
a  limited  effect.  So  this  problem  too  settles  down  ultimately  to  one  of  inventing  and 
defining  tests  and  scales  to  measure  variations  in  ability.  Further  uses  for  such  scales 
are  explained  in  Chapter  XL 


1  Cf.  W.  E.  Duckering:  Engineering  Education,  vol.  iii,  pp.  618-535.  May,  1917. 


Chapter  X 

CONTENT  OF  COURSES 

One  of  the  most  striking  and  universally  recognized  features  of  the  technological 
schools  is  their  lack  of  agreement  on  the  content  of  courses  that  bear  the  same  or  simi- 
lar titles.  Some  of  the  more  marked  differences  in  elementary  chemistry,  English,  draw- 
ing, and  shop  work  have  been  mentioned  in  Chapter  VII  (page  38).  Obviously  the  52 
hours  of  calculus  at  Rensselaer  cannot  have  the  same  content  as  the  216  hours  of  cal- 
culus at  the  University  of  Florida  (page  24).  Some  of  the  courses  in  mechanics  place 
great  emphasis  on  the  absolute  system  of  units  while  others  use  only  the  engineers' 
units.  In  the  treatment  of  descriptive  geometry  the  number  of  essential  problems 
varies  from  27  to  86  and  the  number  of  fundamental  conceptions  from  6  to  12.  The 
teachers  of  each  subject  not  only  do  not  agree  on  what  equipment  in  their  subject  is 
essential  for  an  engineer,  but  they  have  not  yet  taken  the  first  step  toward  such  an 
agreement,  namely,  the  definition  of  the  criteria  that  must  govern  the  selection  and 
the  organization  of  the  content  of  their  several  courses. 

The  prevailing  wide  diversity  in  the  content  of  courses  is  clearly  a  necessary  result 
of  the  general  confusion  as  to  ends,  aims,  methods,  and  rating  of  instruction.  But 
while  the  many  strong  points  in  the  present  system  are  duly  appreciated,  it  is  grad- 
ually becoming  evident  that  in  training  men  for  so  definite  a  vocation  as  engineer- 
ing, in  which  the  various  elements — science,  mathematics,  language,  economics,  and 
hand  work — are  so  intimately  interrelated,  some  agreement  as  to  aims  and  some 
cooperation  among  departments  in  determining  the  content  of  courses  is  absolutely 
essential.  That  this  need  is  recognized  at  all  the  schools  is  evidenced  by  the  numerous 
common  complaints  among  departments.  The  departments  of  engineering  insist  that 
the  preliminary  work  in  mathematics  and  physics  is  unsatisfactory  because  students 
who  have  passed  these  courses  cannot  use  either  mathematics  or  physics  intelligently 
in  the  later  technical  work.  Conversely  the  teachers  of  mathematics  and  physics  claim 
that  the  students  are  poorly  prepared  in  these  subjects  in  high  school  and  that  the 
engineering  departments  make  unreasonable  demands.  All  the  other  departments 
decry  the  work  in  English  and  foreign  languages  as  inefficient  and  wasteful  of  the 
students'  time. 

To  remedy  these  well-recognized  difficulties,  conference  committees  are  frequently 
organized  and  friendly  meetings  are  held,  in  which  each  side  explains  its  point  of 
view.  The  resulting  changes,  however,  are  few.  At  one  school  a  professor  of  mathe- 
matics voluntarily  attended  numerous  classes  in  engineering  subjects  to  get  some 
notion  of  the  mathematical  needs  of  these  courses.  The  course  he  devised  on  the  basis 
of  the  information  thus  secured  was  so  successful  that  he  was  called  to  a  more  respon- 
sible position  in  another  institution ;  yet  his  colleagues  did  not  carry  on  his  experi- 
ment. At  another  school  a  professor  of  chemistry  conducts  a  volunteer  class  in  Ger- 


CONTENT  OF  COURSES  61 

man  in  order  that  the  students  in  chemistry  may  have  a  chance  to  get  the  practical 
mastery  of  German  that  every  chemist  needs.  One  professor  of  civil  engineering  and 
one  of  electrical  engineering  were  found  giving  regular  instruction  to  volunteers  in 
English  composition,  both  written  and  oral. 

In  spite  of  the  fact  that  deviations  from  established  practice  in  teaching  are  not 
encouraged,  so  that  there  is  an  almost  universal  disinclination  to  make  changes,  a  few 
important  experiments  are  being  made  for  the  purpose  of  discovering  more  appropri- 
ate content  for  courses.  Prominent  among  these  are  two  in  mathematics,  one  at  the 
Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  and  one  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin.  In 
both  the  aim  has  been  to  construct  a  single  two-year  course  in  mathematics  in  place 
of  the  customary  but  somewhat  unrelated  courses  in  algebra,  trigonometry,  analyt- 
ical geometry,  and  calculus.  Both  courses  have  been  published  in  textbook  form; 
the  former  in  Woods  and  Bailey's  Course  in  Mathematics 1  and  the  latter  in  Slichter's 
Elementary  Mathematical  Analysis 2  and  March  and  WolfFs  Calculus.2  While  the  par- 
ticular categories  under  which  the  various  topics  are  arranged  are  very  different  in 
these  two  courses,  the  underlying  conceptions  are  similar,  in  that  both  attempt  to 
reorganize  the  content  of  the  mathematics  courses  for  the  purpose  of  securing  a  more 
logically  coherent  presentation.  Each  is  a  consistent  working  out  of  a  mathemati- 
cian's conception  of  the  mathematical  equipment  needed  by  every  engineer.  This  em- 
phasis on  logical  sequence  has  undoubtedly  a  fascination  to  certain  types  of  mind — 
teachers  of  mathematics,  for  example.  Its  effectiveness  with  the  great  majority  of  stu- 
dents may  well  be  questioned,  especially  when  the  logic  is  expressed  in  curves  and 
symbols  carefully  detached  from  technical  applications.  Both  of  the  courses  just  con- 
sidered claim  to  pay  particular  attention  to  applications,  but  these  are  mostly  of  the 
non-technical  variety.  In  the  Woods  and  Bailey  text,  out  of  2288  problems  for  drill 
in  the  application  of  mathematical  principles,  only  103  even  mention  material  things; 
while  in  Slichter's  book,  only  146  out  of  1102  problems  discuss  concrete  realities. 

The  experiments  just  described  are  typical  of  one  method  of  attacking  the  problem 
of  finding  more  significant  content  for  engineering  courses.  The  emphasis  in  reor- 
ganization is  placed  on  more  logical  and  coherent  sequence  of  topics  and  a  better 
adaptation  to  modern  scientific  theories,  with  little  attention  to  the  introduction  of 
engineering  content  into  the  mathematical  forms  treated.  To  some  extent  the  con- 
tent of  courses  in  physics  and  chemistry  is  being  reorganized  into  more  logical  and 
coherent  presentations  of  current  kinetic  and  ionic  theories  of  matter.  The  methods 
of  instruction  followed  in  experiments  of  this  type  are  usually  much  the  same  as 
those  of  the  old  standard  courses. 

A  second  type  of  reorganization  of  content  is  being  worked  out  by  Professor  H.  M. 
Goettsch  at  the  University  of  Cincinnati.  After  sixteen  weeks  of  preliminary  train- 
ing very  similar  to  that  ordinarily  given  in  courses  in  elementary  chemistry,  the  fresh- 
men work  in  the  laboratory  from  8  a.m.  to  4.30  p.m.  for  ten  weeks  solving  problems 

1  Two  volumes.  Ginn  &  Co.,  1907.  2  McGraw-Hill,  1914. 


62  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

of  industrial  chemistry.  Projects  such  as  "Make  baking  powder  and  determine  whether 
it  is  better  and  cheaper  than  any  you  can  buy"  are  assigned  without  any  instructions 
or  references,  and  the  student  is  required  to  work  out  his  own  salvation  in  the  library 
and  the  laboratory.  In  the  period  of  ten  weeks  he  completes  a  number  of  these  pro- 
jects covering  a  wide  range  of  topics,  but  little  effort  is  made  to  present  the  topics 
in  logical  or  any  other  sort  of  orderly  sequence.  Much  emphasis  is  placed  on  synthetic 
work  and  on  the  cost  of  a  given  product  by  different  processes;  while  chemical  analysis 
and  the  ionic  theories  of  matter,  which  usually  occupy  the  centre  of  the  stage  in  chem- 
istry courses,  here  take  a  subordinate  place.  The  course  in  mechanics  devised  by  Pro- 
fessor C.  C.  More  at  the  University  of  Washington  (page  58)  is  another  example 
of  this  type  of  reorganization  of  content  in  which  the  logical  sequence  of  topics  is 
subordinated  to  project  work,  and  theory  is  evolved  from  rather  than  illustrated  by 
problems  and  experiments.  Professor  It.  M.  Bird  conducts  his  course  in  elementary 
chemistry  at  the  University  of  Virginia  on  this  plan  with  great  success. 

The  content  of  courses  of  this  type  is  clearly  determined  by  considerations  both  of 
logical  completeness  and  of  pedagogical  vigor.  For  a  series  of  interesting  projects  that 
does  not  eventually  compel  the  student  to  work  out  a  fairly  complete  conception  of 
the  large  theories  and  the  important  principles  of  chemistry  is  obviously  inadequate, 
no  matter  how  enthusiastic  the  students  are  in  their  work.  On  the  other  hand,  altho 
the  suggestion  that  an  effective  course  can  be  constructed  as  a  series  of  apparently 
disconnected  projects  comes  as  a  shock  to  those  who  have  grown  up  with  logically 
rigorous  courses,  the  value  of  the  enthusiasm  engendered  by  well-chosen  projects  must 
not  be  overlooked.  Our  most  valuable  information  and  training  come  from  working 
out  projects  that  are  really  worth  while;  and  if  this  method  works  in  life,  why  not  in 
school?  Especially  since  in  educational  institutions  it  is  always  possible  to  organize 
significant  projects  into  a  connected  series  that  leaves  a  well-developed  conception 
of  the  whole  subject  in  the  student's  mind.  This  has  been  accomplished  in  the  courses 
just  mentioned,  where  the  summing  up  is  done  after  sufficient  facts  to  warrant  sum- 
maries have  been  secured.  Their  success  should  encourage  others  to  further  experi- 
ments. The  inclusion  of  considerations  of  values  and  costs  in  the  content  of  these 
courses  is  also  an  element  of  enrichment  that  deserves  careful  attention. 

Those  who  find  a  series  of  projects  an  unsatisfactory  course  of  instruction,  but  who 
nevertheless  wish  to  make  the  content  real  and  of  great  value  to  the  students  may 
find  many  worthy  suggestions  in  Professor  R.  H.  Fernald's  course  in  power  plants  at 
the  University  of  Pennsylvania.  While  the  topics  in  this  course  follow  one  another  in 
a  logical  sequence,  they  are  chosen  largelv  from  engineering  practice,  and  include  much 
of  the  practical  information  every  engineer  must  have  when  he  goes  to  work.  Many 
of  the  problems  are  actual  cases  that  really  occur  in  engineering,  so  that  they  appeal 
both  to  professional  instincts  and  to  the  sense  of  values  and  costs — in  fact,  many  of 
them  are  openly  problems  that  deal  with  costs  of  operation  and  maintenance  in  work- 
ing plants.  Yet  the  course  is  not  a  mere  mass  of  useful  information ;  rather  useful 


CONTENT  OF  COURSES  63 

information  is  the  vehicle  for  conveying  to  the  student  a  firm  grasp  of  fundamental 
principles  and  engineering  methods  of  attacking  and  analyzing  problems  not  only 
from  the  point  of  view  of  scientific  theory  but  also  with  due  consideration  of  the  limita- 
tions imposed  by  practice  and  by  costs.  Professor  Fernald's  course  has  been  published 
in  textbook  form,1  and  a  number  of  other  schools  have  adopted  it  and  are  following 
it  with  satisfaction. 

The  emphasis  given  in  this  course  to  the  economic  aspects  of  power  plant  problems 
is  an  encouraging  sign  of  the  dawning  recognition  of  the  profound  importance  of  this 
side  of  engineering  in  technological  schools.  Most  of  the  technical  colleges  now  include 
short  courses  in  economic  theory,  banking,  contracts  and  specifications,  etc. ;  a  few 
give  some  small  amount  of  practice  in  figuring  costs  and  making  bills  of  materials 
from  drawings  assigned  by  the  instructors.  Here  and  there  the  attention  of  the  stu- 
dents is  directed  to  the  practical  difficulties  of  construction  and  the  controlling  power 
of  costs.  There  has  always  been  and  still  is  a  strong  aversion  on  the  part  of  colleges 
to  placing  emphasis  on  the  material  and  financial  aspects  of  the  engineer's  work.  Yet 
it  is  a  burning  question  whether  the  commercial  bearings  of  each  subject  cannot  be 
introduced  into  every  course  in  such  a  way  as  to  increase  enormously  its  use  and  its 
vitality  without  in  the  least  impairing  its  inherent  scientific  value.  The  enrichment 
of  the  content  of  courses  by  judicious  appeal  to  practice  and  costs  is  a  problem  that 
offers  rich  opportunities  for  further  experiment. 

But  if  experiments  of  this  sort  are  undertaken  in  large  numbers  in  every  school, 
there  is  obviously  serious  danger  of  actually  becoming  too  materialistic,  thereby  sacri- 
ficing powers  of  abstract  thought  and  humanistic  ideals  on  which  real  progress  ulti- 
mately depends.  Efficiency  in  the  mastery  of  materials  without  humane  intelligence 
to  guide  and  control  it  is  now  recognized  in  all  civilized  countries  as  a  curse.  Hence 
great  care  must  be  exercised  in  making  these  experiments,  and  every  effort  must  be 
made  to  enforce  the  truth  that  mechanical  efficiency,  while  essential  to  success,  is  ser- 
vant and  not  master.  The  opportunity  offered  to  the  humanistic  studies  by  this  situ- 
ation has  already  been  perceived  at  a  number  of  schools,  and  many  efforts  are  being 
made  to  alter  the  content  of  the  courses  in  English,  in  history,  and  in  economics  to 
meet  the  obvious  need.  Perhaps  the  most  striking  experiment  with  this  aim  is  that 
now  being  made  by  Professor  Frank  Aydelotte  in  cooperation  with  the  members 
of  the  department  of  English  of  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology.  At  this 
school  English  is  a  required  subject  for  all  students  throughout  the  first  two  years. 
The  first  half  of  the  freshman  year  is  devoted  to  general  composition,  with  the  object 
of  eliminating  the  more  common  errors  of  construction  and  of  leading  the  student  to 
see  that  excellence  in  writing  comes  not  so  much  from  the  negative  virtue  of  avoid- 
ing errors  as  from  the  positive  virtue  of  having  something  to  say. 

The  work  of  the  second  term  of  the  freshman  year  begins  with  a  class  discussion 
of  such  questions  as :  What  is  the  difference  between  a  trade  and  a  profession  ?  What 

1R.  H.  Fernald  and  G.  A.  Orrok :  Engineering  of  Power  Plants,  McGraw-Hill,  1916 


64  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

is  the  meaning  of  the  professional  spirit?  What  should  be  the  position  of  the  engi- 
neer in  society  in  this  new  era  of  the  manufacture  of  power — that  of  hired  expert  or 
that  of  leader  and  adviser?  Is  the  function  of  the  engineer  to  direct  only  the  material 
forces  of  nature,  or  also  human  forces  ?  Such  questions  readily  arouse  the  interest  of 
engineering  students  and  bring  on  thoughtful  discussion,  in  which  different  points 
of  view  are  expressed  by  the  students  and  debated  with  spirit.  Essays  by  engineers 
are  then  assigned  for  reading,  and  after  further  discussion  each  student  is  asked  to 
write  out  a  statement  of  his  own  position  on  the  mooted  questions.  These  themes  are 
criticized  in  personal  conferences  in  which  faults  are  corrected  by  asking  the  writer 
first  what  he  intended  to  say;  and,  second,  whether  the  sentence  or  phrase  in  ques- 
tion really  says  it,  rather  than  by  reference  to  formal  rules  of  grammar  and  rhetoric. 
Those  who  have  had  experience  with  this  work  claim  that  once  the  habit  of  self-crit- 
icism from  the  point  of  view  of  the  idea  is  established,  the  student  makes  astonishing 
progress  in  the  ability  to  express  himself  clearly  and  independently ;  he  gathers  hints 
from  all  sources ;  and  in  ways  too  complex  for  pedagogical  analysis  he  is  more  likely 
to  acquire  such  power  over  language  as  he  is  naturally  fitted  to  possess,  than  he  is  by 
current  formal  methods.  For  the  achievement  of  this  complex  end,  the  conventional 
instruction  in  technique  is  too  crude  and  clumsy  to  be  of  more  than  incidental  use. 

Having  discussed  the  question :  What  is  engineering  ?  the  class  proceeds  in  the 
same  manner  to  wrestle  with  such  problems  as :  What  is  the  aim  of  engineering  edu- 
cation ?  What  is  the  relation  between  power  of  memory  and  power  of  thought  ?  Is 
there  any  connection  between  a  liberal  point  of  view  and  capacity  for  leadership? 
What  qualities  do  practical  engineers  value  most  highly  in  technical  graduates?  What 
is  the  relation  between  pure  science  and  applied  ?  What  is  the  relation  of  science  to 
literature  ?  The  authors  read  in  connection  with  the  discussion  gradually  change  from 
engineers  to  scientists  like  Huxley  and  Tyndall,  and  then  to  literary  men  like  Ar- 
nold, Newman,  Carlyle,  and  Ruskin.  The  student  seems  to  read  this  material  with 
no  less  keen  interest  than  was  shown  for  the  writings  of  engineers ;  so  that  thru  his 
own  written  and  oral  discussion  of  masterly  essays  each  comes  to  work  out  for  him- 
self some  rational  connection  between  engineering,  with  which  he  began,  and  litera- 
ture, with  which  he  ends.  No  orthodox  point  of  view  is  prescribed;  his  own  reason  is 
the  final  authority.  The  aim  is  to  raise  questions  which  it  may  take  half  a  lifetime  to 
answer,  but  the  thoughtful  consideration  of  which  will  give  a  saner  outlook  on  life 
and  on  his  profession. 

A  similar  experiment  along  analogous  lines  is  being  made  by  Professor  Karl  Young 
and  his  colleagues  in  the  department  of  English  at  the  University  of  Wisconsin. 
Reports  indicate  that  this  type  of  course  is  a  great  success  there  also.  The  materials 
used  in  both  these  courses  have  been  reprinted  in  book  form  for  the  convenience  of 
the  classes.1 

1  Aydelotte :  English  and  Engineering.  New  York  :  McGraw-Hill,  1917 ;  The  Oxford  Stamp,  Essay  X.  New  York : 
Oxford  Press,  1917  ;  Foerster,  Manchester  &  Young:  Essays  for  College  Men,  New  York  :  Holt,  1913. 


CONTENT  OF  COURSES  65 

The  four  typical  experiments  just  described  indicate  that  the  reorganization  of  the 
content  of  courses  is  being  attempted  with  a  wide  variety  of  aims,  such  as  more  logical 
coherence,  better  pedagogical  organization,  greater  emphasis  on  the  economic  phases 
of  the  work,  or  a  broader  and  more  humanistic  outlook.  Many  other  aims  are  con- 
ceivable, and  many  combinations  of  these  four  are  possible,  so  that  there  is  unlimited 
opportunity  for  the  further  experiments  that  are  needed  as  a  basis  for  the  reconstruc- 
tion of  the  curriculum.  The  current  method  of  framing  curricula  by  first  distributing 
the  student's  time  among  the  various  subjects  by  faculty  action  and  then  allowing 
each  department  to  fill  in  its  quota  as  it  sees  fit  leads  to  the  impossible  conditions 
discussed  in  the  preceding  chapter.  The  way  out  lies  in  the  direction  of  reversing  the 
process;  that  is,  first  determining  by  cooperative  faculty  investigation  what  equip- 
ment in  each  subject  is  essential  to  every  engineer,  and  then  requiring  each  depart- 
ment to  discover  by  experiment  how  much  time  is  necessary  to  give  adequate  control 
of  that  essential  equipment  to  the  promising  students. 

In  order  to  carry  out  this  suggestion,  entrance  requirements  must  first  be  placed 
on  some  such  basis  as  that  described  in  Chapter  VIII,  so  that  the  technical  school  can 
be  reasonably  sure  that  the  majority  of  the  students  admitted  show  promise  of  suc- 
cess in  engineering.  Then  for  each  of  the  fundamental  subjects  common  to  all  engineer- 
ing curricula  an  answer  must  be  found  by  cooperation  among  all  departments  to  the 
question : 

What  is  the  minimum  equipment  essential  to  every  engineer,  no  matter  what  spe- 
cialty he  may  eventually  choose?  The  answers  to  this  question  must  be  stated  in  terms 
of  ability  to  accomplish  rather  than  in  the  customary  terms  of  topics  to  recite ;  for 
example,  the  familiar  "algebra  through  quadratics"  must  read  "ability  to  make  alge- 
braic computations  as  difficult  as  required  in  solving  for  x  in 

x  +  a       x-a  3?       _i» 

x-a       x  +  a       a2-x? 

After  such  statements  of  the  minimum  essentials  have  been  secured,  the  respective 
departments  will  be  able  to  construct  their  courses  intelligently  and  to  devise  objec- 
tive means  of  testing  their  progress. 

There  are  at  present  two  serious  obstacles  to  carrying  out  the  plan  here  proposed. 
One  is  the  reverence  for  departmental  autonomy,  which  makes  all  departments  reti- 
cent about  making  suggestions  to  one  another  and  inclines  each  department  to  regard 
any  suggestion  from  another  as  unwarranted  tampering  with  vested  rights  rather  than 
as  an  intelligent  effort  to  benefit  the  students.  The  other  is  the  lack  of  generally  intel- 
ligible and  transferable  scales  and  methods  of  testing.  These  two  obstacles  deprive 
such  experiments  as  are  being  made  of  the  greater  part  of  their  potential  usefulness, — 
the  former  by  limiting  the  scope  of  the  experiment  by  the  bias  inevitable  to  every 
specialist,  and  the  latter  by  making  it  impossible  for  the  experimenter  to  state  his 
conclusions  in  terms  that  are  convincing  to  others.  The  chances  for  real  progress  in 
vitalizing  the  content  of  courses  are  increased  in  proportion  as  departments  cooperate 


66  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

in  defining  the  minimum  essentials  and  as  scales  of  ability  and  methods  of  testing 
are  liberated  from  the  errors  of  individual  judgment.  It  is  here  that  the  teacher  has 
his  greatest  opportunity  for  creative  work;  for  when  the  content  of  a  course  is  well 
chosen  and  the  subject-matter  is  effectively  organized  to  meet  both  the  scientific  and 
the  human  requirements,  the  game  is  worth  the  candle  for  the  student  and  he  plays  it 
writh  energy  and  zest. 


Chapter  XI 

TESTING  AND  GRADING 

About  half  of  the  schools  visited  grade  students  on  a  numerical  scale  of  0  to  100, 
with  pass  marks  varying  from  50  to  70.  Two  grade  on  a  scale  from  0  to  4,  one  having 
3  and  the  other  2  for  the  passing  mark.  The  remaining  schools  ostensibly  grade  on 
literal  scales  (with  per  cent  values  attached);  but  of  these,  three  have  three  grades 
above  pass,  designated  respectively  by  A,  B,  C,  or  M,  P,  C,  or  C,  P,  L;  and  two  have 
four  grades  above  pass,  indicated  in  the  one  case  by  A,  B,  C,  D,  and  in  the  other  by 
D,  G,  P,  N.  As  a  result,  whenever  a  student  transfers  his  credit  from  one  school  to 
another,  it  is  very  difficult  to  evaluate  his  record  and  determine  his  status  in  the 
institution  to  which  he  comes.  Tho  all  student  grades  are  apparently  reducible  to 
numerical  values,  a  grade  of  88  is  hard  to  interpret  even  when  you  know  the  school 
and  the  instructor  that  gave  it,  because  each  school  and  each  instructor  has  a  per- 
sonal equation  in  grading. 

After  one  year's  experience  with  a  group  of  students,  a  teacher  of  mathematics,  for 
example,  undoubtedly  possesses  more  information  concerning  the  mathematical  in- 
terests and  abilities  of  these  students  than  can  possibly  be  ascertained  by  a  few  hours 
of  examination  or  testing.  But  his  knowledge  is  largely  in  the  form  of  personal  ex- 
perience and  intuitions  based  thereon,  which  cannot  be  expressed  in  the  usual  record 
blanks  and  so  is  seldom  transferred  to  other  departments.  The  knowledge  now  pos- 
sessed by  the  teachers  in  a  school  of  engineering,  tho  abundant,  is  not  accessible 
thru  records;  but  is  segregated  in  departments  and  individuals,  and  confused  by  per- 
sonal equations.  Even  tho  ability  to  secure  high  grades  in  school  and  college  seems 
to  be  a  stable  characteristic  of  an  individual  (page  36),  employers  have  long  since 
learned  that  college  records  are  precarious  guides  in  selecting  men  for  jobs. 

About  ten  years  ago  Professor  Max  Meyer  of  the  University  of  Missouri  started 
a  campaign  to  eliminate  the  personal  idiosyncrasies  of  individual  instructors  from 
academic  ratings  by  requiring  every  professor  to  distribute  his  grades  over  his  classes 
approximately  according  to  the  probability  curve.  It  was  pointed  out  that  when  all 
the  students  at  a  university  are  arranged  in  the  order  of  their  average  grades,  about 
fifty  per  cent  are  found  grouped  about  the  middle  grade,  with  about  25  per  cent 
higher  and  25  per  cent  lower.  Hence  the  University  of  Missouri  defines  its  grading 
system  thus :  "  In  classes  sufficiently  large  to  exclude  accidental  variations,  approxi- 
mately 50  per  cent  shall  receive  the  grade  M  (medium) ;  to  the  great  majority  of  the 
25  per  cent  above  M  the  grade  S  (superior)  shall  be  given ;  and  to  the  few  most  ex- 
cellent students  the  grade  E  shall  be  assigned;  the  majority  of  the  25  per  cent  below 
M  shall  receive  the  grade  I  (inferior),  and  the  minority  shall  be  given  the  grade  F 
(failure)." x  In  order  to  render  the  grading  significant  to  the  students,  30  per  cent 

1  Hyde :  Proceedings  of  the  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Education,  vol.  xxi,  p.  175, 1918. 


68  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

excess  credit  is  granted  for  all  work  done  with  a  grade  of  E,  15  per  cent  excess  for 
work  of  grade  S,  and  a  20  per  cent  reduction  of  credit  is  made  for  work  of  grade  I. 

The  results  of  this  experiment  at  Missouri  and  of  similar  investigations  at  other 
schools  indicate  that  considerable  progress  is  being  made  toward  reducing  the  number 
of  professors  who  either  mark  most  of  their  students  A  or  else  fail  a  large  percentage 
of  them.  The  mere  presentation  without  comment  to  each  member  of  the  faculty  of 
his  own  grade  distribution  curve  superposed  on  the  average  curve  for  the  whole 
institution  has  been  found  to  reduce  abnormalities  in  grading  without  discussion  or 
faculty  action.  Clearly  this  work  is  developing  in  the  same  direction  as  are  the  entrance 
requirements  (page  49);  namely,  toward  a  reduction  of  the  errors  in  grading  that 
result  from  personal  equations.  There  is  need  and  opportunity  for  further  effort  to 
stabilize  the  distribution  of  grades  along  the  lines  of  this  experiment. 

The  study  of  the  distribution  of  grades  is  now  expanding  in  the  direction  of  search- 
ing for  the  reasons  for  strikingly  anomalous  curves.  In  the  schools  visited  a  number  of 
cases  were  found  in  which  from  50  to  75  per  cent  of  the  students  who  graduated  had 
received  grades  just  slightly  higher  than  the  pass  mark  (page  34).  Experience  shows 
that  when  so  large  a  fraction  of  a  class  receive  such  low  grades  there  is  some  serious 
difficulty,  which  can  usually  be  removed  by  investigation'  (page  35).  As  a  result  of  nu- 
merous such  studies  it  appears  that  the  grading  systems  in  current  use  possess  several 
inherent  characteristics  which  have  been  accepted  so  long  as  a  matter  of  course  that 
their  normal  effect  on  the  distribution  of  grades  seems  to  have  been  largely  overlooked. 
Prominent  among  such  characteristics  are  theconvention  of  granting  the  same  amount 
of  academic  credit  for  all  grades  of  work  above  the  pass  mark,  and  the  habit  of  leav- 
ing the  definition  of  the  basis  of  testing  and  grading  in  each  subject  wholly  in  con- 
trol of  the  instructors  who  do  the  teaching. 

The  harmful  influence  of  both  of  these  characteristics  of  current  marking  systems 
is  very  generally  recognized.  Every  college  teacher  knows  well  that  many  of  the 
ablest  students  regard  it  as  an  evidence  of  poor  management  on  their  part  if  they  get 
grades  very  much  above  the  pass  mark.  College  authorities  have  sought  to  break  up 
this  student  tradition  by  offering  academic  honors  of  one  sort  or  another,  like  Phi 
Beta  Kappa,  Tau  Beta  Pi,  Sigma  Xi,  or  honorable  mention  on  the  commencement 
program.  A  further  and  more  effective  step  has  been  taken  by  the  University  of  Mis- 
souri in  granting  excess  credit  for  high  grades,  as  just  described.  Other  schools  are 
trying  the  experiment  of  adding  to  the  regular  grading  a  system  of  honor  points,  so 
framed  as  to  prevent  the  student  from  graduating  on  mere  pass  grades.  But  even 
these  devices  do  not  render  the  grades  intelligible  to  employers  and  to  other  colleges, 
nor  do  they  always  inspire  the  student  to  maximum  effort.  The  West  Point  grading 
system  (page  28),  on  the  other  hand,  does  act  as  a  real  incentive  to  good  work  and  as 
a  genuine  support  for  the  maintenance  of  the  honor  system. 

The  reasons  why  grades  under  present  conditions  do  not  act  as  real  incentives  to 
good  work  are  very  similar  to  the  reasons  why  payment  of  wages  to  workers  on  the 


TESTING  AND  GRADING  69 

basis  of  time  spent  at  work  fails  to  result  in  maximum  output  and  even  tends  to  scale 
down  the  efficiency  of  the  skilful  to  that  of  the  slothful.  So  long  as  the  credit  in  both 
cases  is  determined  mainly  by  the  time  consumed,  the  only  accomplishment  demanded 
being  a  certain  minimum  below  which  the  job  cannot  be  held,  so  long  there  is  no  real 
incentive  to  speed  up  and  show  mettle.  Hence  workmen  "soldier  "and  even  deliberately 
unite  to  deceive  their  employer  as  to  how  much  work  an  able  and  ambitious  worker 
can  do  in  a  day ;  and  students  have  been  known  to  practise  analogous  tricks  on  pro- 
fessors. All  of  which  has  a  decided  tendency  to  concentrate  grades  in  a  small  area  on 
the  safe  side  of  the  pass  mark.  The  device  of  granting  bonus  credit  for  high  grades, 
while  it  improves  the  situation,  is  not  likely  to  effect  a  real  cure  until  grades  are  a 
truer  measure  of  achievement  than  is  at  present  the  case.  For  the  students  know  as 
well  as  anybody  that  college  grades  are  very  ineffective  measures  of  the  type  of  abil- 
ity that  wins  recognition  in  the  world's  work — they  know  of  too  many  notable  ex- 
amples that  fortify  their  own  personal  observations  and  convictions  in  the  matter. 

The  real  cure  for  "soldiering"  in  college  work  has  already  been  found  and  put  into 
practice  in  one  department,  namely  athletics.  There  the  students  submit  gladly  to  rig- 
orous discipline  and  exert  themselves  to  the  utmost  in  the  games  because  the  work 
appeals  to  them  as  thoroughly  worth  while  and  the  score  is  a  valid  and  objective  mea- 
sure of  achievement.  In  their  studies,  on  the  other  hand,  the  game  does  not  always 
seem  worth  the  candle,  and  their  scores  often  depend  as  much  on  their  ability  to  con- 
form to  the  personal  points  of  view  of  their  instructors  as  on  their  real  achievement 
in  mastering  materials.  For  under  present  conditions  each  department — frequently 
each  individual  instructor — sets  all  examinations  and  tests  and  determines  the  rela- 
tive merits  of  the  students  by  means  of  individual,  subjective  standards.  College  boys 
understand  this  perfectly,  for  it  is  not  unusual  to  find  bright  ones  among  them  who 
win  high  grades  by  studying  the  instructor  rather  than  the  subject.  Obviously  here, 
as  in  the  case  of  admission,  the  need  is  for  more  objective  methods  of  measuring 
student  progress  and  more  assurance  that  the  tests  used  are  tests  of  the  abilities  the 
engineer  needs  to  have  developed,  rather  than  of  something  else  the  exact  nature  of 
which  is  at  best  vague,  uncertain,  and  undefined. 

The  analysis  of  a  large  number  of  the  examination  papers  and  quiz  questions  in 
current  use  reveals  the  chief  reasons  for  the  vagueness  and  uncertainty  of  the  results 
secured  by  conventional  methods  of  testing.  A  large  proportion  of  the  questions  can 
be  answered  by  reciting  or  writing  memorized  words,  phrases,  or  equations.  How  can 
the  instructor  decide  whether  correct  answers  to  these  questions  mean  merely  a  reten- 
tive memory,  or  whether  they  indicate  clear  understanding  of  the  relations  involved, 
or  an  ability  to  use  them  in  practice?  Again,  many  of  the  questions  call  for  verbal 
descriptions  of  apparatus  or  processes.  The  answers  to  questions  of  this  sort  are  fre- 
quently so  ambiguous  that  it  is  impossible  for  the  teacher  to  tell  whether  the  stu- 
dents do  not  understand  the  subject,  or  whether  they  are  unable  to  express  themselves. 
Hence  different  instructors  make  estimates  that  may  vary  from  30  to  80  on  the  same 


70  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

paper ;  and  there  are  no  means  of  deciding  as  to  which  estimate  is  best.  Finally,  little 
effort  is  made  to  arrange  the  questions  in  their  order  of  difficulty,  by  placing  the  easi- 
est first  and  the  most  difficult  last.  Occasionally  some  questions  are  given  greater 
weight  than  others,  but  the  assignment  of  weights  is  apt  to  be  an  act  of  arbitrary 
judgment  on  the  part  of  the  instructor. 

Since  tests  control  teaching,  it  is  obvious  that  one  of  the  most  effective  methods 
of  attacking  the  teaching  problem  is  thru  the  study  of  tests.  For  the  purpose  of  mak- 
ing a  beginning  of  such  a  study  aimed  at  removing  some  of  the  ambiguities  of  cur- 
rent examination  practice,  Professor  E.  L.  Thorndike  of  Columbia  University  devised 
for  seniors  in  electrical  engineering  a  series  of  objective  tests,  analogous  to  those  used 
in  his  experiments  with  freshmen  (page  49).  In  planning  the  tests,  and  selecting  the 
types  of  activity  that  seemed  most  likely  to  reveal  abilities  essential  to  engineering, 
Professor  Thorndike  was  assisted  by  a  volunteer  committee  consisting  of  Messrs.  E.  B. 
Katte,  Chief  Electrical  Engineer  of  the  Grand  Central  Terminal,  New  York ;  L.  D. 
Norsworthy,  Professor  of  Civil  Engineering  at  Columbia  University;  F.  P.  Keppel, 
Dean  of  Columbia  College;  J.  W.  Roe,  Professor  of  Mechanical  Engineering  at  Shef- 
field Scientific  School  at  Yale;  the  secretary  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation;  and  the 
author  of  the  present  study.  Descriptions  of  the  tests  used  in  this  experiment  are  given 
in  the  Appendix  (pages  117,  118). 

While  some  of  these  tests  appear  at  first  sight  very  similar  to  ordinary  examina- 
tions, they  are,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  constructed  on  very  different  principles.  In  the  first 
place  each  test  is  intended  to  measure  a  specific  ability,  such  as  arithmetical  compu- 
tation, geometric  construction,  paragraph  reading,  understanding  of  words,  mechani- 
cal dexterity,  or  comprehension  of  diagrams.  Each  of  these  is  a  single  activity,  altho 
requiring  a  complicated  coordination  of  psychological  processes.  Then  the  tasks  are  so 
selected  that  their  accomplishment  can  be  indicated  with  little  or  no  use  of  words, 
so  that  ability  to  perform  the  task  is  not  confused  with  powers  of  verbal  expression  ; 
and  the  errors  of  personal  judgment  in  deciding  whether  an  answer  is  right  or  wrong 
are  reduced  to  a  minimum.  Because  of  this  independence  of  the  personal  equation, 
results  obtained  by  these  tests  at  different  schools,  or  at  the  same  school  at  different 
times,  are  comparable  with  one  another.  Moreover,  tests  of  this  kind  are  capable  of 
indefinite  extension  by  alternative  tests  that  give  commensurable  results.  In  this  way 
the  danger  of  cramming  for  any  one  set  test  may  be  avoided ;  since  after  the  success- 
ful type  has  been  found,  it  is  a  relatively  simple  matter  to  construct  ten  or  twenty 
alternate  tests  on  the  same  pattern.  Again,  the  successive  tasks  on  each  test  are 
arranged  in  the  order  of  difficulty,  beginning  with  one  that  can  be  correctly  met  by 
almost  all  students  of  the  degree  of  training  in  question,  and  progressing  gradually 
to  one  that  can  be  done  by  only  a  very  few  of  the  most  gifted.  Such  a  test  is  a  scale 
up  which  the  student  climbs  to  the  extent  of  his  ability  in  the  particular  type  of 
activity  under  scrutiny;  so  that,  when  the  test  is  well  constructed,  his  relative  rank 
is  determined  without  ambiguity  by  the  difficulty  of  the  task  he  can  successfully 


TESTING  AND  GRADING  71 

master,  rather  than  by  an  estimate  of  how  much  credit  must  be  given  for  a  partially 
completed  task. 

Thru  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  C.  R.  Dooley  of  the  Westinghouse  Electric  and  Manu- 
facturing Company  at  Pittsburgh,  these  tests  were  tried  out  on  a  group  of  forty  engi- 
neering graduates  employed  by  that  company  as  graduate  apprentices.  These  appren- 
tices are  given  very  varied  tasks,  are  observed  by  superior  officers  with  a  view  to  per- 
manent employment,  and  are  given  ratings  on  a  series  of  essential  characteristics  by 
every  foreman  under  whose  direction  they  work.  The  essential  characteristics  used  in 
these  ratings  are:  physique,  personality,  knowledge,  common  sense,  reliability,  open- 
mindedness,  tact,  initiative,  attitude,  originality,  industry,  enthusiasm,  thoroughness, 
system,  analysis,  decision,  English,  and  ability.  In  addition  to  these  ratings  by  fore- 
men, the  two  officers  of  the  educational  department  of  the  company  who  are  in  closest 
touch  with  the  work  of  the  apprentices  rank  them  after  they  have  been  there  about 
nine  months,  for  general  ability  and  for  order  of  choice  for  employment  by  the  com- 
pany. The  apprentices  themselves  were  also  asked  to  rate  one  another,  as  far  as 
acquaintance  permitted,  for  promise  of  success  in  engineering. 

The  ratings  thus  obtained  from  the  records  by  foremen,  the  estimates  by  the  edu- 
cational experts,  the  opinions  of  the  apprentices  themselves,  and  the  tests  were  com- 
pared in  many  different  ways.  Unfortunately  the  college  records  of  the  apprentices 
could  not  be  used,  because  so  many  different  colleges  with  incommensurable  grading 
systems  were  represented  in  the  group.  As  a  result  of  the  analysis  it  appeared  that 
the  foremen's  ratings  would  give  as  good  a  record  if  they  used  the  six  qualities — 
ability,  analysis,  originality,  thoroughness,  enthusiasm,  and  common  sense  —  instead 
of  the  eighteen  just  mentioned.  The  order  determined  by  the  ratings  by  half  the 
foremen  agreed  fairly  well  with  the  order  determined  by  the  ratings  of  the  other  half 
(correlation  coefficient  .48);  and  the  order  of  merit  in  the  judgment  of  one  expert 
agreed  fairly  well  with  the  order  according  to  the  judgment  of  the  other  (correlation 
coefficient  .53) ;  but  the  foremen's  order  and  the  expert's  order  did  not  agree  so  well 
(correlation  coefficient  .24).  The  correlation  of  the  order  given  by  the  tests  with  the 
foremen's  order  was  also  .24  and  with  the  expert's  order  .37. 

The  orders  of  merit  given  by  the  four  different  ratings  were  finally  combined  into 
a  single  order,  which  most  probably  represented  the  best  order  as  determined  by  all 
available  information.  The  individual  orders  were  found  to  correlate  about  equally 
well  with  this  composite  (correlations  are:  foremen's  records  .73,  tests  .71,  appren- 
tices .70,  experts  .60).  Hence  in  this  case  the  tests,  which  require  eight  hours'  time, 
appear  to  give  as  reliable  an  order  of  merit  as  do  the  judgments  of  either  the  experts, 
the  foremen,  or  the  apprentices  themselves  after  six  months  of  experience  with  the 
men  in  a  specially  well-organized  industrial  company.  This  does  not  mean  that  these 
tests  are  infallible,  for  even  a  perfect  measure  of  achievement  under  one  set  of  con- 
ditions would  probably  be  in  error,  just  as  the  judgment  of  experts  would  be  in 
error,  as  a  prophecy  of  later  years  of  work  under  different  conditions.  The  subsequent 


72  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

careers  of  those  tested  must  be  followed  for  a  number  of  years  and  many  other  simi- 
lar experiments  must  be  made  before  the  validity  of  any  set  of  tests  can  be  definitely 
established.  It  does  mean,  however,  that,  in  a  given  case,  a  systematic  test  of  eight 
hours  may  detect  engineering  ability  and  prophesy  engineering  success  as  effectively 
as  expert  personal  inspection  of  actual  work  over  a  period  of  several  months.  It  is 
this  possibility  that  makes  experimentation  with  this  type  of  test  so  well  worth  while. 
The  tests  herewith  presented  are  in  no  sense  final.  They  are  first  approximations, 
requiring  much  study  and  trial  for  their  perfection.  Those  who  have  studied  these 
experiments  closely  are  convinced,  however,  that  the  method  of  attack  here  used  is 
sound,  and  that  progress  in  the  direction  here  indicated  is  both  safe  and  sure. 

Many  experiments  with  objective  tests  of  the  type  here  described  have  been  made 
in  recent  years  in  elementary  and  secondary  schools.  Similar  tests  are  being  tried  on 
a  very  extensive  scale  on  the  members  of  the  new  national  army  by  Major  Yerkes,  the 
well-known  psychologist,  who  has  accepted  a  commission  in  the  army  for  this  purpose. 
Industries,  too,  are  beginning  to  look  to  these  tests  to  guide  them  in  the  selection  and 
placing  of  workmen,  in  the  hope  of  reducing  the  labor  turnover  that  is  costing  the 
country  several  hundred  million  dollars  a  year.  Altho  the  movement  is  still  in  its 
infancy,  enough  has  been  done  to  forecast  what  may  be  accomplished  by  further  scien- 
tific work  in  this  field.  In  engineering,  for  example,  it  is  conceivable  that  before  long 
admission  to  college  and  achievement  in  college  may  be  liberated  from  the  bondage 
of  personal  equations  as  grading  becomes  less  a  matter  of  individual  bias  and  more  a 
valid  record  of  actual  accomplishment.  Then  college  grades  may  be  transferable  among 
colleges;  then  academic  marks  may  become  significant  to  employers;  then  the  results 
of  educational  experiments  may  be  stated  in  convincing  terms;  and  then  students  may 
come  to  respect  their  records  and  strive  to  beat  them  without  artificial  stimuli  in  the 
way  of  academic  honors  and  credit  bonuses. 

The  greater  the  number  of  schools  that  undertake  experiments  with  tests,  the  more 
rapid  the  progress  toward  the  attainment  of  these  ends.  It  is  not  a  question  of  merely 
superposing  a  few  tests  of  the  type  described  on  the  present  examination  and  grad- 
ing system.  Such  superposition  may  well  be  a  first  step;  but  ultimately  it  is  a  ques- 
tion of  working  the  whole  testing  and  marking  system  to  a  more  objective  basis,  and 
this  is  a  long  and  laborious  task.  For  the  final  rating  must  include  and  express  the 
enormous  amount  of  information  which  teachers  now  gather  about  students  by  inspec- 
tion of  their  work  and  by  the  regular  examinations,  quizzes,  and  reports,  in  terms  that 
are  intelligible  for  scientific  and  practical  use.  Then  a  rating  becomes  a  safe  instru- 
ment for  vocational  guidance,  which  is,  after  all,  the  fundamental  problem  of  the 
schools. 

When  grading  is  conceived  as  an  instrument  of  vocational  guidance,  rather  than  as 
an  expression  of  the  degree  to  which  an  individual  has  succeeded  in  conforming  to  an 
established  order  of  things,  more  information  is  needed  than  can  be  secured  from  pres- 
ent tests  and  examinations.  It  is  a  striking  fact  that  while  most  schools  grade  merely 


TESTING  AND  GRADING  73 

on  academic  work,  most  industries  rate  men  on  personal  traits  like  character,  initia- 
tive, tact,  accuracy,  responsibility,  and  common  sense.  This  fact  has  led  a  number  of 
schools  to  supplement  their  regular  grades  with  estimates  of  personal  qualities  such 
as  these.  At  Purdue,  the  University  of  Kentucky,  Pennsylvania  State  College,  and 
other  engineering  schools,  elaborate  records  of  personal  impressions  of  students  are 
kept  on  file  and  used  with  effect  in  guiding  students  into  suitable  positions.  Usually 
the  record  card  has  the  names  of  a  number  of  the  desired  qualities  printed  on  it,  and 
the  instructor  is  asked  to  place  a  grade  mark  opposite  each.  Sometimes  each  instructor 
does  this  in  private,  sometimes  the  grades  are  assigned  after  discussion  in  depart- 
mental meetings.  In  either  case  considerable  difficulty  is  experienced  in  selecting  the 
qualities  to  be  graded  and  in  deciding  on  the  proper  grade  to  be  given  to  each  individ- 
ual for  each  of  the  qualities  selected.  Among  the  many  schemes  that  have  been  devised 
for  this  purpose  two  seem  to  be  particularly  suggestive  to  schools  of  engineering. 

The  first  of  these  schemes  was  devised  by  Professor  W.  D.  Scott  of  the  Carnegie 
Institute  of  Technology  for  the  use  of  large  business  organizations  in  selecting  em- 
ployees and  executives,  and  is  now  being  used  by  the  War  Department  at  Washington 
for  grading  army  officers.  The  qualities  selected  for  grading  in  this  case  are :  1 .  Physique, 
including  bearing,  neatness,  voice,  energy,  and  endurance ;  2.  Intelligence,  including  ease 
of  learning,  capacity  to  apply  knowledge,  ability  to  overcome  difficulties;  3.  Leader- 
ship, including  self-reliance,  initiative,  decisiveness,  tact;  and  ability  to  command  obe- 
dience, loyalty,  and  the  cooperation  of  men;  4.  Character,  including  loyalty,  reliability, 
sense  of  duty,  carefulness,  perseverance,  and  the  spirit  of  service ;  and  5.  General  value 
to  the  service  as  a  drill  master,  a  leader  in  action,  an  administrator,  and  one  who  can 
arrive  quickly  at  a  sensible  decision  in  a  crisis.  Each  officer  who  grades  candidates  on 
these  qualities  is  required  to  construct  a  personal  scale  of  reference  for  each  quality 
by  writing  down  a  list  of  five  officers  of  his  acquaintance,  the  first  of  whom  seems  to 
possess  the  specific  quality  in  a  preeminent  degree,  and  the  last  of  whom  has  as  little 
of  it  as  any  one  he  knows.  The  third  man  is  then  selected  as  a  mean  between  the  two 
extremes,  and  the  second  and  fourth  as  means  between  the  middle  and  the  top  men 
or  the  middle  and  the  bottom  men  respectively.  The  various  grades  are  given  numeri- 
cal ratings  from  15  for  the  highest  to  3  for  the  lowest.  The  advantages  of  such  scales 
are  apparent,  since  it  is  obviously  easier  to  place  a  candidate  on  the  scale  by  com- 
parison with  other  men,  than  it  is  to  make  a  numerical  estimate  of  such  composite 
and  abstract  conceptions  as  intelligence  or  leadership.  The  method  has  proved  so  suc- 
cessful in  opei'ation  that  an  Army  Personnel  Committee  with  Professor  Scott  in  charge 
has  been  established  as  an  addition  to  the  Adjutant  General's  office  in  Washington 
to  supervise  this  and  other  activities  involved  in  sorting,  grading,  and  testing  men 
for  all  kinds  of  army  work. 

The  second  suggestive  method  of  rating  personal  qualities  as  a  help  to  vocational 
guidance  has  been  used  in  the  University  of  Cincinnati  for  a  number  of  years.  The 
characteristics  selected  for  rating  in  this  case  are  of  a  very  different  sort,  and  are  ar- 


74  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

ranged  in  pairs  of  related  opposites  as  follows :  (a)  physical  strength — physical  weak- 
ness; (b)  mental — manual;  (c)  settled — roving;  (d)  indoor — outdoor;  (e)  directive — 
dependent ;  (f)  original  (creative) — imitative ;  (g)  small  scope — large  scope ;  (h)  adapt- 
able— self-centred ;  (i)  deliberate — impulsive;  (j)  music  sense;  (k)  color  sense;  (^man- 
ual accuracy — manual  inaccuracy;  (m)  mental  accuracy  (logic) — mental  inaccuracy; 
(to)  concentration — diffusion;  (o)  rapid  mental  coordination — slow  mental  coordi- 
nation; (p)  dynamic — static.  These  pairs  of  related  opposites  are  printed  on  blanks, 
and  each  instructor  is  asked  to  express  his  judgment  of  each  student  by  checking  one 
or  the  other  of  each  pair.  The  independent  votes  of  the  instructors  are  summarized  in 
the  central  office.  The  method  of  using  this  type  of  rating  is  obvious.  No  one  would 
think  of  advising  a  man  of  settled,  indoor,  dependent,  self-centred,  and  static  tem- 
perament to  undertake  a  job  as  superintendent  of  construction  on  a  large  viaduct  or 
bridge. 

Under  present  conditions,  when  current  testing  and  grading  systems  are  more 
largely  estimates  of  the  amount  of  static  information  possessed  than  of  dynamic  abil- 
ities, it  is  evident  that  ratings  of  personal  characteristics  and  dispositions  are  essen- 
tial for  vocational  guidance.  Whether  this  will  be  so  or  not  when  grades  have  been 
made  to  express  abilities,  whether  correlations  will  be  found  between  various  tem- 
peraments and  various  types  of  ability  or  not  remains  an  open  question  for  further 
study.  In  the  meantime  there  is  no  investigation  that  is  likely  to  give  larger  returns 
in  fruitful  progress  than  the  scientific  investigation  of  testing  and  grading  systems; 
for  tests  control  teaching,  and  objective  records  of  achievement  are  one  of  the  most 
potent  means  of  releasing  creative  energy  in  both  students  and  faculty. 


Chapter  XII 

SHOPWORK 

In  American  technical  schools  shopwork  still  occupies  a  rather  anomalous  position. 
Few  teachers  of  the  mechanic  arts  have  been  granted  the  title  "Professor,"  and  the 
work  itself  is  seldom  recognized  as  being  intrinsically  of  "  university  grade."  Yet  no 
one  denies  that  it  is  an  essential  element  in  the  equipment  of  every  engineer;  and 
therefore  it  has  been  tolerated  by  engineering  faculties  and  allowed  to  develop  as  best 
it  could.  As  a  result  there  is  no  agreement  as  to  the  purposes  and  methods  of  shop- 
work.  Nearly  every  school  has  a  shop  philosophy  and  a  well-organized  shop  method 
of  its  own. 

The  first  engineering  school,  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  was  not  financially 
able  in  the  beginning  (1824)  to  support  shops  of  its  own.  Therefore  the  founder 
directed  "that  with  the  consent  of  the  proprietors,  a  number  of  well-cultivated  farms 
and  workshops  in  the  vicinity  of  the  school  be  entered  on  the  records  of  the  school 
as  places  of  scholastic  exercises  for  the  students,  where  the  application  of  the  sciences 
may  be  most  conveniently  taught."  The  students  were  required  in  the  first  three 
weeks  of  the  first  term  (page  11)  to  "examine  the  operations  of  artists  and  manu- 
facturers at  the  school  workshops  under  the  direction  of  a  professor  or  assistant,  who 
shall  explain  the  scientific  principles  upon  which  such  operations  depend,  four  hours 
on  each  of  six  days  in  every  week."  This  plan  is  identical  in  principle  with  that  now 
in  use  at  the  Sheffield  Scientific  School  at  Yale.  There  the  students  spend  their  whole 
time  for  three  weeks  before  the  opening  of  the  second  year  in  a  well-organized  course 
of  this  sort  called  "  mechanical  technology."  The  boys  do  no  actual  manual  work  in 
shops.  The  purpose  of  the  course  as  stated  in  the  catalogue  is :  "to  acquaint  the  stu- 
dent with  the  terms  and  processes  in  use  in  manufacturing  and  power  plants,  and  to 
give  him  some  personal  contact  with  engineering  work  before  taking  up  his  studies 
in  the  classroom  and  the  drafting  room." 

It  will  be  noted  that  this  type  of  course  gives  the  student  opportunity  for  first- 
hand observation,  study,  and  discussion  of  the  mechanical  technique  of  production 
under  real  commercial  conditions,  but  does  not  give  him  either  manual  skill  and  the 
"feel"  of  the  machine  that  come  only  from  actual  use  of  tools,  or  acquaintance  with 
the  habits  and  the  outlook  of  workmen.  Hence  the  benefits  derived  from  this  work 
are  perhaps  more  like  those  derived  from  inspection  trips,  the  value  of  which  is  un- 
questioned. 

A  totally  different  solution  of  the  shop  problem  is  presented  at  the  Worcester  Poly- 
technic Institute.  At  the  founding  of  this  school  (1868)  the  Hon.  Ichabod  Washburn 
gave  funds  with  which  to  establish  a  small  manufacturing  plant  on  the  campus.  In 
order  to  furnish  a  real  shop  atmosphere,  twenty  or  more  skilled  journeymen  are  regu- 
larly employed  and  articles  of  commercial  value  are  manufactured  and  sold  in  the 


76  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

open  market.  The  students  work  side  by  side  with  these  journeymen,  but  are  relieved 
by  them  of  much  of  the  drudgery  that  comes  from  the  too  frequent  repetition  of  the 
same  operation.  The  instruction  is  given  by  means  of  a  series  of  graded  exercises  upon 
machine  parts  required  for  the  business  of  the  shop. 

In  his  inaugural  address  as  first  president  of  Rose  Polytechnic  Institute  in  1883 
President  C.  O.  Thompson,  who  originally  organized  the  shops  at  Worcester,  tells  us 
that  this  work  was  guided  by  the  conviction  that  the  more  the  students  understand 
the  nature  and  the  difficulties  of  actual  practice,  and  the  more  they  use  theoretical 
principles  under  conditions  as  like  as  possible  to  those  of  real  practice,  the  greater  are 
their  chances  of  becoming  competent  and  successful  engineers.  Mere  contact  with  prac- 
tical work,  however,  is  not  enough.  For  the  best  results  the  student's  work  must  be 
subjected  to  the  inexorable  tests  of  business,  so  that  he  feels  responsibility  in  the  use 
of  valuable  materials,  and  the  stimulus  that  comes  from  knowing  that  he  is  making 
something  that  some  one  else  wants  but  cannot  make  for  himself.  Without  the  con- 
struction of  articles  whose  workmanship  is  subjected  to  the  objective  test  of  salability 
in  the  open  market,  shopwork  is  liable  to  exalt  the  purely  abstract  aspect  of  mechan- 
ical knowledge. 

The  shops  at  Worcester  are  still  run  as  a  manufacturing  plant  on  a  commercial 
basis.  But  in  addition  to  the  regular  instruction  in  shop  practice  and  the  construc- 
tion of  articles  for  sale,  much  attention  is  now  given  there  to  modern  methods  of  "sci- 
entific management."  The  students  analyze  the  cost  of  production  into  its  elements, 
and  determine  the  relative  values  of  different  methods  of  construction  to  meet  the 
limitations  of  manufacture  and  the  market  price.  The  organization  and  operation  of 
the  manufacturing  work  of  the  shop  furnish  materials  for  the  study  of  accounting, 
time  cards,  depreciation,  inventories,  overhead  costs,  purchasing,  and  selling. 

The  Worcester  plan,  it  will  be  noted,  seeks  to  coordinate  the  shop  instruction  with 
real  conditions  of  industrial  production  in  such  a  way  that  the  students  secure,  in  the 
least  possible  time,  manual  skill  with  tools,  understanding  of  the  principles  of  machine 
construction,  and  first-hand  knowledge  of  manufacturing  and  commercial  methods. 
The  manufacturing  shop  is  a  working  model  for  the  study  of  the  technique  of  business 
and  of  practice.  The  productive  nature  of  the  work  and  the  objective  test  of  its  sala- 
bility are  two  of  its  important  characteristics  that  tend  to  make  the  experience  signi- 
ficant to  the  students. 

Among  the  schools  visited,  two  others,  the  University  of  Illinois  and  Pennsylvania 
State  College,  regard  the  production  of  salable  articles  as  an  essential  element  of 
school  shopwork.  At  the  University  of  Illinois  the  shop  has  been  recently  organized  as 
a  manufacturing  plant  for  the  production  of  a  two-cylinder  gasoline  engine.  No  effort 
is  made  to  market  the  machine,  yet  no  difficulty  has  been  experienced  in  disposing  of 
the  entire  output  to  the  students  and  their  friends.  Manual  skill  is  not  made  a  spe- 
cial aim,  and  there  is  no  series  of  graded  exercises  to  teach  the  fundamental  operations. 
The  300  or  more  operations  required  for  the  construction  of  the  machine  are  all  stand- 


SHOPWORK  77 

ardized,  and  instruction  sheets,  like  those  regularly  used  in  scientifically  managed 
shops,  are  carefully  followed  by  the  students  in  all  their  work.  All  finished  parts  are 
tested  and  faulty  ones  rejected. 

No  paid  journeymen  are  employed,  but  each  section  of  the  class  is  organized  as  a 
working  unit,  consisting  of  workmen,  foremen,  tool-room  attendants,  production  man- 
ager, storekeeper,  inspectors,  etc.  Each  student  is  moved  periodically  from  one  type 
of  work  to  another  in  such  a  way  that  when  his  three  semesters  of  shop  work  are  com- 
pleted he  has  performed  all  the  essential  functions  of  operating  the  plant. 

Each  student  is  graded  according  to  his  efficiency  in  production.  Since  every  shop 
operation  is  standardized  and  has  an  experimentally  set  time  limit,  efficiency  is  de- 
fined in  terms  of  the  actual  time  taken  and  the  standard  time.  Grades  are  posted  each 
week  and,  like  all  objectively  determined  grades,  they  stimulate  great  rivalry  for  maxi- 
mum efficiency.  The  importance  of  careful  planning  and  complete  utilization  of  time 
is  forcefully  impressed,  for  the  several  sections  are  regarded  as  rival  teams,  and  no 
student  dares  waste  time  in  shop  lest  his  team  fall  behind. 

In  this  Illinois  plan  construction  is  still  an  integral  part  of  instruction ;  but  the 
omission  of  the  journeyman  mechanics  shifts  the  emphasis  from  actual  commercial 
production,  subject  to  the  objective  test  of  salability  in  the  open  market,  to  instruc- 
tion about  methods  of  commercial  production.  The  shop  becomes  a  "shop  laboratory  ? 
and  the  manipulations  there  partake  of  the  nature  of  experiments  designed  to  verify 
the  principles  of  production  that  are  operative  in  the  industrial  world,  rather  than 
to  solve  problems  that  arise  in  connection  with  their  productive  activities.  As  in  most 
current  laboratory  work,  the  chief  problem  for  the  student  is  likely  to  be  that  of  fol- 
lowing directions  intelligently,  rather  than  that  of  finding  the  answers  to  questions 
that  cannot  be  answered  without  making  laboratory  tests.1 

The  shopwork  at  the  great  majority  of  American  technical  schools  is  based  upon 
a  notion  that  is  very  different  from  those  that  have  just  been  presented.  This  notion 
has  existed  for  many  years,  but  it  was  given  great  prominence  by  President  Runkle  of 
the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  in  1876.  President  Runkle  was  so  much 
impressed  by  an  exhibit  of  Russian  shopwork  at  the  Centennial  Exposition  in  Phila- 
delphia that  he  immediately  addressed  a  special  report  on  this  subject  to  the  Cor- 
poration of  the  Institute  under  date  of  July  19,  1876.  He  explains  that  in  the  Rus- 
sian system  all  construction  has  been  analyzed  into  a  number  of  typical  operations 
which  may  be  arranged  in  groups,  each  of  which  involves  the  use  of  a  distinct  type 
of  tool.  The  novice  makes  most  rapid  progress  if  he  is  first  trained  in  the  so-called 
"fundamental  shop  operations11  without  any  idea  of  making  any  useful  article.  In- 
struction in  the  use  of  tools  is  thus  entirely  separated  from  construction  or  produc- 
tion; so  that  only  after  the  student  has  satisfactorily  achieved  skill  in  filing,  turning, 
boring,  forging,  and  the  like,  is  he  permitted  to  construct  anything.  Since  the  tools 

1  Cf.  B.  W.  Benedict:  Shop  Instruction  at  the  University  of  Illinois.  Bulletin,  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineer- 
ing Education,  vol.  vi,  pp.  234-257,  December,  1915. 


78  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

required  for  instruction  in  the  fundamental  operations  are  relatively  simple,  it  is  pos- 
sible at  reasonable  expense  to  equip  an  "instruction  shop"  that  will  accommodate  as 
many  students  as  one  teacher  can  instruct  at  the  same  time,  thereby  securing  the 
greatest  economy  of  both  time  and  money.  Besides,  the  more  expensive  construction 
shops  are  not  essential  at  a  school,  since  the  young  engineer,  after  graduating  in  such 
a  course,  will  find  no  difficulty  in  completing  his  practical  education  in  great  manu- 
facturing works. 

President  Runkle  was  very  enthusiastic  about  this  type  of  shop  organization,  call- 
ing it  "a  fundamental  and  complete  solution  of  this  most  important  problem  of  prac- 
tical mechanism  for  engineers."'1  As  a  result,  instruction  shops  were  established  at  the 
Massachusetts  Institute  and  are  still  being  operated  with  great  success  as  instruction 
shops  pure  and  simple.  The  work  is  now  so  thoroughly  well  organized  that  about  300 
hours  of  training  suffices  to  give  a  young  mechanic  skill  in  the  fundamental  opera- 
tions of  his  trade.  The  director  of  these  shops,  Mr.  R.  H.  Smith,  has  published  his 
instruction  sheets  in  two  excellent  handbooks  of  shop  practice. 

The  inference  that  President  Runkle  drew  from  his  studv  of  the  Russian  exhibit  at 
the  Centennial  Exposition,  namely,  that  the  instruction  shops  might  be  totally  sepa- 
rated from  the  construction  shops  without  loss  of  educational  value  for  engineers,  was 
very  generally  accepted  as  sound;  so  that  the  majority  of  college  shops  were  and  still 
are  organized  on  that  basis.  Undoubtedly  the  fact  that  the  instruction  shops  were  less 
expensive  to  equip  and  maintain  than  the  construction  shops  made  this  division  even 
more  attractive  at  a  time  when  funds  were  scarce  and  the  financial  problem  loomed 
large  before  the  schools.  Certain  it  is  that  in  the  great  majority  of  schools  there  is  no 
direct  connection  between  shopwork  and  industrial  production. 

This  type  of  shopwork  met  a  real  need  when  it  was  first  introduced,  forty  years 
ago.  At  that  time  skill  in  machine  tool  work  was  often  a  real  asset  to  a  young  engi- 
neer in  securing  his  first  job.  Manufacturing  shops  were  not  so  numerous  nor  so  well 
organized  as  they  are  to-day.  Under  the  present  changed  conditions,  the  question 
is  now  being  seriously  debated  whether  the  shop  courses  in  the  engineering  colleges 
ought  to  be  altogether  abolished.  This  question  has  been  answered  in  the  negative  at 
the  University  of  Illinois  by  the  recent  conversion  of  the  shops  into  shop  laboratories 
designed  to  teach  the  principles  of  industrial  production,  as  just  described.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  University  of  Cincinnati  has  answered  it  in  the  affirmative  by  the 
establishment  of  its  well-known  cooperative  plan. 

The  Cincinnati  plan  was  first  formulated  by  Dean  Herman  Schneider  in  1899,  while 
he  was  an  instructor  in  civil  engineering  at  Lehigh  University.  In  1902  Dean  Schneider 
presented  a  full  statement  of  his  scheme  to  the  directors  of  several  large  industrial 
firms  which  were  considering  the  establishment  at  Pittsburgh  of  a  new  technical  school 
to  give  an  engineering  training  that  would  be  better  suited  to  industrial  needs  than 
that  then  given  in  the  engineering  colleges.  This  plan  was  abandoned  when  Mr.  Carne- 
gie founded  the  Carnegie  Institute  of  Technology  in  the  City  of  Pittsburgh.  Finally, 


SHOPWORK  79 

in  1906,  Dean  Schneider  found  an  opportunity  to  make  his  experiment  at  the  Uni- 
versity of  Cincinnati. 

The  mechanism  of  the  scheme  is  very  simple.  The  students  are  divided  into  two 
groups,  one  of  which  is  assigned  to  work  in  industrial  plants  while  the  other  goes  to 
school.  At  the  end  of  each  bi-weekly  period  the  two  groups  change  places,  so  that  the 
shops  and  the  school  are  always  full-manned.  In  the  shops  the  students  work  as  regu- 
lar workmen  for  pay,  bat  the  nature  of  their  work  and  the  length  of  time  each  stays 
on  any  particular  job  are  subject  to  approval  by  the  university.  The  emphasis  of  the 
school  work  is  on  theory  and  principles,  but  these  are  well  interrelated  with  the  shop- 
work  by  "coordinators,"  who  visit  each  student  during  each  shop  period  and  then  meet 
the  several  groups  during  the  university  periods  in  special  "coordination"  classes  for 
this  purpose. 

The  curriculum  is  completed  in  five  years  of  11  months  each,  so  that  each  student 
receives  27  months  of  university  instruction.  Since  the  regular  four-year  curriculum 
in  other  schools  requires  about  36  months  of  actual  instruction,  it  would  seem  at  first 
glance  that  the  Cincinnati  curriculum  could  not  give  as  full  a  training  in  fundamentals 
as  is  given  elsewhere.  This  inference,  however,  is  wholly  unwarranted,  because  in  the 
27  months  of  industrial  work  the  student  gets  a  vast  amount  of  practical  knowledge 
which  is  given  in  other  schools  in  information  courses,  and  because  the  close  coordina- 
tion with  practice  makes  the  theory  more  intelligible  and  significant  to  the  students. 
The  graduates  of  Cincinnati  have  unquestionably  as  extensive  a  training  in  theory  as 
have  those  of  other  first  class  schools.  In  addition,  the  Cincinnati  graduates  are  able 
to  command  engineering  positions  at  graduation  without  one — or  two — year  "ap- 
prentice" courses,  such  as  are  required  of  men  from  other  schools  by  a  number  of  the 
large  corporations. 

About  one  hundred  of  the  industrial  firms  of  Cincinnati  and  the  vicinity  are  now 
cooperating  with  the  university  in  this  work.  These  firms  represent  every  important 
phase  of  engineering,  so  that  the  university  is  able  to  arrange  the  work  schedules  in 
such  a  way  that  each  student  progresses  regularly  thru  every  phase  of  his  specialty, 
from  the  crude  and  rough  work  to  the  more  difficult  and  responsible  positions.  For 
example,  a  civil  engineer  usually  begins  with  pick  and  shovel  as  a  member  of  a  gang 
repairing  track.  If  he  elects  railroad  work,  he  will  progress  to  switch  and  signal  work, 
to  bridge  work,  to  general  engineering  work  in  the  engineering  department,  and  to 
evaluation  work.  He  will  learn  how  to  run  regular  trains  and  work  trains,  how  to  place 
and  operate  the  equipment  for  repairs  or  new  construction,  and  how  to  calculate  cuts 
and  fills — all  as  part  of  the  regular  work  on  a  "real  railroad."  The  employers,  on  the 
other  hand,  also  benefit  by  the  arrangement;  they  have  found  the  labor  of  the  "co-op" 
students  both  reliable  and  profitable. 

Financially  the  cooperative  plan  is  very  economical  both  for  the  university  and 
for  the  students.  The  university  has  access  without  expense  to  shops  and  shop  equip- 
ment that  are  worth  millions  of  dollars  and  are  never  allowed  to  deteriorate  or  be- 


80  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

come  antiquated.  Since  only  half  the  students  are  in  school  at  any  one  time,  the  same 
school  equipment  is  adequate  for  twice  as  many  students  as  elsewhere.  The  result 
is  that  the  total  cost  to  the  university  per  student  per  year  at  Cincinnati  is  about 
SI 30.  At  no  other  school  of  equal  grade  is  this  cost  less  than  S250,  and  at  the  large 
endowed  schools  it  runs  as  high  as  S600  or  even  more.  The  money  earned  by  the 
student  during  his  shop  periods,  while  not  sufficient  to  pay  all  his  expenses,  is  of  great 
assistance,  and  makes  possible  an  engineering  education  to  many  a  worthy  boy  who 
could  not  otherwise  afford  it. 

In  addition  to  the  obvious  financial  advantage,  the  cooperative  plan  has  many  edu- 
cational advantages.  Not  only  is  instruction  combined  with  construction  so  that  its 
social  use  is  obvious  to  the  students,  but  the  construction  has  three  marked  points 
of  superiority  over  that  done  in  college  shops.  In  the  first  place  it  is  real  commercial 
production  that  must  succeed  or  fail  on  its  merits.  A  shop  atmosphere  does  not  have 
to  be  artificially  created.  In  the  second  place  the  variety  of  construction  work  is  much 
greater  than  is  possible  in  any  college  shop.  The  students1  experiences  are  not  limited 
to  those  of  making  a  gasolene  engine  or  a  drill  press,  but  may  include  any  of  the  activ- 
ities of  one  hundred  different  manufacturing  plants.  In  the  third  place  the  student 
is  thrown  into  close  personal  touch  with  workmen.  He  thus  comes  to  know  their  point 
of  view  in  a  sympathetic  way  and  secures  a  conception  of  the  human  problems  of 
industry  and  of  the  appraisement  of  human  values  and  costs  that  is  invaluable  to 
him  and  cannot  be  acquired  so  well  in  any  other  way. 

Another  striking  educational  advantage  is  secured  by  this  method  of  conducting 
the  shop  instruction.  Because  it  is  obviously  impossible  for  an  industrial  plant  to 
permit  its  workmen  to  spend  time  giving  instructions  to  green  college  boys,  many 
have  thought  that  the  student  must  waste  an  enormous  amount  of  time  doing  routine 
manual  labor.  This  loss  is  prevented  by  the  "work  observation  sheets"  that  are  given 
the  student  when  he  begins  a  new  job.  These  sheets  contain  from  fifty  to  two  hun- 
dred questions  concerning  the  details  of  the  job,  and  direct  him  to  sources  of  informa- 
tion where  he  can  find  the  answers.  He  is  required  to  be  able  to  answer  and  discuss 
these  questions  during  the  "coordination  periods."  In  this  way  the  manual  labor  is 
made  the  source  of  problems  that  are  solved  in  the  class-room  and  the  laboratories. 
Shopwork  thus  becomes  a  series  of  exercises  in  defining  and  solving  problems.  Under 
these  conditions  it  is  much  more  likely  to  be  intellectually  fruitful  than  when  it  con- 
sists in  carefully  following  the  specifications  of  standardized  direction  sheets. 

But  if  the  Cincinnati  plan  has  proved  stimulating  to  the  students,  it  has  been  revo- 
lutionary for  the  faculty.  Cooperation  and  business  methods  outside  have  compelled 
cooperation  and  business  methods  at  home,  with  the  results  already  discussed  in  Chap- 
ter V  (page  30).  Departmental  autonomy  has  practically  disappeared,  the  spirit  of 
investigation  has  been  liberated  in  the  field  of  education,  and  it  is  probable  that  more 
experiments  in  teaching  are  being  made  and  objectively  checked  there  than  anywhere 
else. 


SHOPWORK  81 

Dean  Schneider's  experiment  is  clearly  much  more  than  a  novel  and  inexpensive 
method  of  handling  the  shopwork.  It  is  an  effort  to  create  a  type  of  school  that  meets 
the  demands  of  an  industrial  age.  It  frankly  recognizes  that  the  present  need  is  for 
masters  of  materials  who  can  humanize  industry.  It  tries  to  emphasize  rather  than  to 
discourage  the  appraisement  of  values  and  costs,  and  endeavors  to  express  idealism  in 
the  mechanics  of  life  rather  than  build  ideals  that  are  unrelated  to  human  experience. 

Because  the  educational  conceptions  on  which  the  Cincinnati  plan  is  founded  are 
so  different  from  the  currently  accepted  conceptions  of  school  practice,  it  has  taken 
some  time  for  other  schools  to  recognize  the  significance  of  the  venture.  The  scheme 
was  scoffed  at  as  unworthy  of  a  real  university  and  more  likely  to  produce  skilled 
"boiler  makers,,  than  professional  engineers.  The  graduates  are  still  too  young  to 
prove  whether  this  criticism  is  to  any  extent  valid  or  not.  Meanwhile  the  cooperating 
firms  in  Cincinnati  eagerly  absorb  all  the  product  of  the  school,  while  other  schools 
are  introducing  similar  organizations.  For  several  years  the  University  of  Pittsburgh 
has  been  cooperating  on  the  same  principle  with  a  number  of  firms,  the  new  muni- 
cipal university  at  Akron  is  organized  as  a  cooperative  school,  and  the  Massachusetts 
Institute  has  just  completed  arrangements  whei'eby  juniors  and  seniors  in  chemical 
and  electrical  engineering  spend  a  number  of  months  under  school  guidance  in  in- 
dustrial plants  before  graduation.  A  detailed  account  of  the  Cincinnati  Cooperation 
System,  written  by  Professor  C.  W.  Park,  has  been  published  in  Bulletin  37  for  1916 
by  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Education. 

With  such  rich  opportunities  for  education  lying  plentifully  about  in  every  indus- 
trial plant,  it  is  a  striking  anomaly  that  the  schools  make  so  little  use  of  them.  The 
situation  is  all  the  more  impressive  because  the  cooperative  use  of  industrial  plants 
results  in  a  large  reduction  of  the  cost  of  schooling  and  gives  the  student  the  chance 
to  support  himself  partially  in  college.  The  neglect  of  the  possibilities  of  shopwork  is 
responsible  in  large  measure  for  the  professional  criticism  that  the  graduates  cannot 
apply  theory  to  practice,  for  the  establishment  by  large  corporations  of  apprentice 
schools  in  which  engineering  graduates  may  complete  their  training  on  the  practical 
side,  for  the  preference  shown  by  many  firms  for  shop-trained  rather  than  college- 
trained  men,  and  for  the  insignificant  percentage  of  production  managers  who  are 
college  graduates. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  neglect  of  shopwork  is  not  the  result  of  carelessness  or  of 
chance.  It  is  due  to  a  consistent  effort  to  meet  the  professional  demand  that  empha- 
sis in  school  be  placed  on  the  fundamentals  of  engineering  science.  But  while  practis- 
ing engineers  are  unanimous  in  this  demand,  they  recognize  that  something  is  wrong 
with  the  present  system.  The  fundamentals  that  are  presented  in  college  do  not  seem 
to  be  mastered  in  such  a  way  that  they  function  readily  in  practice.  Yet  common  sense 
instinctively  feels  that  there  is  no  essential  contradiction  in  the  practitioners  position, 
but  that  it  is  possible  for  colleges  to  teach  the  principles  of  science  and  develop  a  sci- 
entific attitude  of  mind  in  such  a  way  that  both  are  readily  transferable  to  practice. 


82  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

The  University  of  Cincinnati  endeavors  to  do  this  by  using  the  practical  problems 
of  the  shop  as  the  basis  of  the  theoretical  work  in  the  school.  But  the  established  en- 
gineering schools  hesitate  to  approve  this  solution.  In  spite  of  the  fact  that  their  real 
aim  is  to  develop  men  for  intelligent  production,  they  fear  too  close  an  intimacy  with 
industry.  They  shrink  from  offering  short  courses  and  extension  work  in  mechanic 
arts,  like  those  which  have  done  so  much  to  advance  agricultural  production,  because 
this  type  of  instruction  does  not  seem  to  be  "of  university  grade.ri  This  fear  is  justified 
so  long  as  shop  practice  is  limited  to  training  in  the  so-called  "fundamental  shop 
operations"  wholly  divorced  in  "instruction  shops"  from  production  and  contact  with 
workmen.  But  when  the  students  are  systematically  guided,  as  they  are  in  Cincinnati, 
by  work  observation  sheets  and  coordination  classes,  the  shopwork  not  only  develops 
mechanical  skill  and  imparts  practical  information  concerning  shop  practices,  but 
it  also  serves  as  a  source  of  problems  and  projects  for  theoretical  analysis  and  solu- 
tion in  the  university  classes  in  physics,  in  chemistry,  in  mathematics,  in  mechanics, 
in  economics,  in  sociology,  and  even  in  ethics.  The  problems  thus  defined  are  not  the 
stock  type  of  book  problems  that  were  made  up  to  illustrate  theories  already  demon- 
strated in  class;  they  are  the  real  engineering  problems  of  production  that  constitute 
the  warp  and  woof  of  the  engineer's  life.  On  this  basis  shopwork  is  perhaps  the  most 
effective  type  of  professional  training,  since  it  is  a  direct  application  of  the  adage  — 
Learn  to  do  by  doing. 

Recently  Dean  Schneider  has  been  able  to  express  this  fundamental  educational 
conception  of  the  cooperative  system  in  a  manner  that  is  easily  comprehensible  to 
university  men.  Several  of  the  industrial  firms  cooperating  with  the  university  are 
supporting  industrial  research  laboratories  for  the  purpose  of  increasing  production. 
These  laboratories  are  treated  by  the  university  exactly  like  every  other  section  of 
an  industrial  plant;  so  that  upper  classmen,  who  have  shown  ability  in  investigation 
by  the  way  in  which  they  have  discovered  and  defined  problems  in  industry  during 
their  earlier  years  of  shop  experience,  are  assigned  here  as  assistants  on  research  prob- 
lems for  their  regular  bi-weekly  industrial  tasks. 

During  the  past  decade  a  number  of  large  industrial  companies  have  established 
in  their  plants  research  laboratories  manned  by  eminent  scientists  of  pronounced 
research  ability.  These  laboratories  are  supported  by  the  industries,  and  are  excel- 
lent investments,  because  the  increase  in  the  efficiency  of  production  resulting  from 
their  labors  saves  each  year  more  than  the  cost  of  their  maintenance.  Now  that  in- 
creased production  has  become  a  national  necessity,  a  large  amount  of  attention  is 
being  given  to  the  question  of  the  relation  between  the  universities  and  the  indus- 
tries in  the  matter  of  research.  Up  to  the  present  the  Mellon  Institute  at  the  Uni- 
versity of  Pittsburgh  is  the  only  instance  of  cooperation  between  a  university  and 
the  industries  in  the  maintenance  and  operation  of  a  strictly  research  institution. 
The  success  of  this  experiment,  originally  devised  and  inaugurated  by  the  late  Robert 
Kennedy  Duncan  at  the  University  of  Kansas,  has  been  so  gratifving  to  the  univer- 


SHOPWORK  83 

sity  in  bringing  its  professors  in  contact  with  industrial  life,  and  to  the  industries 
in  reduced  costs  of  production,  that  other  similar  institutes  will  undoubtedly  soon 
be  established  under  the  pressure  of  the  present  great  national  need.  Industrial  shops 
are  literally  bursting  with  problems  that  call  for  scientific  investigation  of  the  high- 
est order ;  factories  are  filled  with  masses  of  observation  and  of  empirical  data  whose 
coordination  and  theoretical  analysis  would  be  of  the  utmost  value  to  production  if 
scientists  competent  to  accomplish  the  task  could  be  found.  Millions  of  dollars  are 
annually  wasted  in  the  United  States  by  the  duplication  and  repetition  of  investiga- 
tions and  experiments  in  several  different  plants  because  there  is  no  pooling  of  prob- 
lems or  of  scientific  interests  and  no  central  bureau  of  information,  record,  and  research 
to  which  all  could  look  for  scientific  enlightenment.  The  missing  link  is  a  technique 
for  coordinating  learning  and  labor  so  that  each  may  serve  the  other  to  the  fullest 
in  increasing  the  intelligence  and  the  economy  of  production  as  the  basis  of  mutual 
strength.  The  experiments  with  cooperative  shopwork  at  Cincinnati  and  with  indus- 
trial research  at  the  Mellon  Institute  at  Pittsburgh  are  rapidly  developing  such  a 
technique.  The  engineering  colleges  are  beginning  to  grasp  the  real  educational  sig- 
nificance of  cooperative  shopwork,  and  industrial  research  laboratories  at  universi- 
ties will  surely  be  forthcoming  as  soon  as  the  conception  of  their  national  scientific 
and  industrial  importance  is  clearly  defined.  Some  combination  of  the  two  will  un- 
doubtedly supply  the  ultimate  solution  of  the  problem  of  shopwork  in  engineering 
education. 


«■>' 


PART  III 
SUGGESTED  SOLUTIONS 


Chapter  XIII 

THE  CURRICULUM 

In  the  preceding  five  chapters  the  larger  problems  of  engineering  education  are  dis- 
cussed and  a  number  of  suggestions  are  offered  concerning  methods  of  investigation 
that  promise  progress  toward  effective  solutions.  It  remains  to  indicate  how  the  vari- 
ous conceptions  presented  may  be  integrated  in  a  consistent  and  workable  curriculum. 

The  question  of  admission  requirements  is  treated  with  sufficient  detail  in  Chap- 
ter VIII.  If  a  group  of  schools  will  take  up  the  careful  study  of  their  entrance  systems 
and  make  experiments  with  objective  tests  and  records  of  the  students1  youthful 
interests  and  achievements,  it  is  certain  that  the  percentage  of  elimination  can  be 
reduced  to  at  least  a  fourth  of  its  present  size,  with  an  enormous  saving  of  time, 
energy,  and  money  for  both  student  and  school.  The  effect  on  secondary  education 
would  also  be  most  salutary,  in  that  objective  entrance  tests  that  measure  ability 
require  a  shifting  of  the  emphasis  in  high  school  from  learning  facts  to  developing 
ability,  and  tend  to  liberate  teachers  from  the  bondage  of  detailed  syllabi  and  cram- 
ming methods.  In  order  to  accomplish  these  ends  it  is  necessary  to  expand  the  re- 
corder's office  into  a  bureau  of  investigation,  and  to  equip  it  with  a  competent  per- 
sonnel for  this  work;  for  at  present  most  college  record  offices  are  overburdened  with 
routine  work  and  so  cannot  undertake  this  experiment  without  both  expert  guidance 
and  additional  clerical  help.  It  is  more  than  probable  that  the  expense  thus  added 
will  prove  a  real  economy,  because  intelligent  selection  of  students  at  entrance  is 
bound  to  reduce  the  waste  that  comes  from  trying  to  teach  engineering  to  boys  who 
have  no  real  engineering  interest  or  ability. 

The  reorganization  of  the  college  curricula  to  accord  with  the  suggestions  in  the 
preceding  chapters  requires  several  radical  changes  from  current  practice.  In  the  first 
place  the  number  of  required  credit  hours  per  week  should  be  less  than  eighteen  — 
preferably  sixteen.  This  recommendation  is  not  intended  to  decrease  the  number  of 
hours  of  work  done  per  week  by  the  students,  but  to  make  it  possible  for  them  to  do 
all  of  their  work  more  thoroughly.  It  is,  of  course,  obvious  that  such  a  reduction  of 
required  credit  hours  cannot  be  satisfactorily  made  without  extensive  changes  in  the 
content  of  the  courses,  for  it  would  be  disastrous  to  leave  the  distribution  of  time 
among  the  departments  as  it  is  and  merely  try  to  organize  them  on  a  sixteen-hour- 
a-week  basis  instead  of  on  a  twenty  or  twenty-four  hour  basis. 

In  the  second  place,  the  few  experiments  that  have  been  made  on  the  subject  indi- 
cate that  college  students  do  their  best  work  when  the  number  of  different  subjects 
studied  at  a  given  time  is  not  greater  than  five.  In  constructing  a  curriculum  it  is 
desirable,  therefore,  to  limit  the  number  of  simultaneous  courses  to  four  or  five  at  the 
outside.  At  Rensselaer  they  are  limited  to  three,  but  the  advantages  of  this  are  to  a 
certain  extent  offset  by  frequent  changes  in  the  three  (page  25). 


88  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

A  third  essential  requirement  of  all  engineering  curricula  is  adequate  provision 
in  the  first  two  years  for  "orientation,-"  contact  with  real  engineering  projects,  and 
practical  experiences  that  make  the  boy  feel  that  he  has  actually  left  high  school  and 
entered  upon  a  professional  career.  Orientation  lectures  to  freshmen  meet  this  require- 
ment to  a  certain  extent;  practical  work  in  surveying  parallel  with  trigonometry 
during  the  first  term  of  freshman  year  is  perhaps  more  effective  for  this  purpose;  a 
course  in  mechanics,  such  as  is  now  given  to  freshmen  at  the  University  of  Washing- 
ton (page  58),  is  excellent;  but  the  cooperative  system  at  Cincinnati  (page  78)  is  the 
most  complete  and  thoroughgoing  solution  of  this  problem  yet  presented. 

Practical  engineering  work  is  essential  for  the  freshman  not  only  because  it  appeals 
to  his  professional  ambition,  arouses  his  enthusiasm,  and  gives  him  training  in  prac- 
tice, but  also  because  it  helps  him  to  master  the  theoretical  work  more  fully  and  more 
quickly.  Every  one  knows  that  at  present  the  engineering  professors  are  seriously  handi- 
capped in  their  work  with  juniors  and  seniors  because  the  students  are  notoriously 
unable  to  make  professional  use  of  the  principles  of  physics,  of  mathematics,  and  of 
mechanics  with  assurance  and  accuracy.  One  of  the  most  common  complaints  of  em- 
plovers  is  that  even  college  graduates  have  serious  difficulty  in  applying  theory  to  prac- 
tice. As  has  been  pointed  out  (page  80),  this  weakness  may  be  overcome  by  suitable 
coordination  of  theory  and  practice  during  the  learning  process.  Hence  to  the  three 
other  requirements  of  effective  curricula  must  be  added  this  need  for  interrelation 
between  the  concrete  and  the  abstract  throughout  the  entire  college  course. 

Besides  the  four  requirements  that  have  been  mentioned  there  are  a  number  of 
pertinent  suggestions  that  demand  attention  in  framing  curricula.  Thus  there  is  a 
widespread  agreement  among  professional  engineers  that  the  college  curriculum 
should  aim  to  give  a  broad  and  sound  training  in  engineering  science,  rather  than 
a  highly  specialized  training  in  some  one  narrow  line;  that  considerable  attention 
should  be  paid  to  humanistic  studies  like  English,  economics,  sociology,  and  history, 
not  merely  because  of  their  practical  value  to  the  engineer,  but  also  because  of  their 
broad  human  values;  and  that  the  young  graduate  should  have  some  conception  of 
business  management  and  of  the  most  intelligent  methods  of  organizing  and  control- 
ling men. 

It  is  well-nigh  impossible  to  construct  curricula  that  will  meet  all  of  these  require- 
ments and  suggestions  without  giving  careful  consideration  to  many  of  the  recent 
investigations  of  experimental  psvchology  and  to  the  rapidly  increasing  literature 
of  the  new  science  of  education.  Every  professor  who  takes  a  responsible  share  of 
this  work  will  find  much  to  help  him  in  the  books  listed  in  the  Selected  Bibliogra- 
phy on  page  127,  for  until  college  faculties  appreciate  the  necessity  for  experiments  in 
teaching  and  grasp  the  significance  of  the  results  already  obtained,  progress  is  likely  to 
be  slow.  Therefore  the  first  step  for  any  school  desiring  to  reorganize  its  curricula  is 
the  appointment  of  a  small  standing  committee  composed  of  men  who  are  interested 
in  the  problem  of  better  teaching  and  able  and  willing  to  give  considerable  time  to 


THE  CURRICULUM  89 

the  work.  This  committee  will  need  ample  facilities  in  the  way  of  clerical  help,  and 
effective  service  on  it  will  soon  be  recognized  by  everybody  as  one  of  the  surest  and 
most  expeditious  ways  of  winning  academic  advancement.  Unless  a  school  is  prepared 
to  place  this  study  of  education  on  a  basis  of  unquestioned  respectability,  it  is  just 
as  well  to  continue  the  present  methods  of  constructing  curricula  by  debates  on  the 
time  schedule  and  of  measuring  educational  progress  in  terms  of  hours  plus  a  passing 
grade. 

When  a  suitable  committee  on  instruction  has  been  appointed  and  given  adequate 
support,  its  first  big  problem  is  that  of  the  relations  of  the  school  with  the  industries. 
Here  the  solutions  are  bound  to  be  varied  because,  tho  there  is  general  agreement 
that  some  actual  experience  in  practical  work  is  an  essential  part  of  the  training  of 
every  engineer,  the  environments  of  the  schools  are  so  different  that  no  single  type 
of  arrangement  is  likely  to  prove  most  effective  for  all.  Even  in  industrial  centres 
like  Cincinnati,  Pittsburgh,  and  Boston,  quite  different  schedules  for  handling  coop- 
erative shopwork  are  in  use;  and  still  others  may  be  found  that  are  more  effective  for 
institutions  in  rural  communities,  like  Cornell,  the  University  of  Illinois,  or  the  Uni- 
versity of  Colorado.  The  important  point  is  that  in  some  way  adequate  provision  be 
made  for  personal  participation  in  industrial  work,  for  supervision  of  that  work  by 
the  school,  and  for  stimulating  the  student  to  be  ever  on  the  watch  for  practical  ques- 
tions and  problems  which  may  be  brought  back  to  the  school  for  discussion,  theo- 
retical analysis,  and  solution.  Professor  Thorndike  found  from  his  study  of  engineer- 
ing college  freshmen  that  95  per  cent  of  them  do  engage  in  productive  labor;  so  the 
problem  is  to  make  the  time  so  spent  fruitful  by  some  form  of  supervision  that  may 
prevent  their  wasting  their  energies  as  ushers  in  theatres  or  bell  boys  in  hotels  for 
the  sake  of  supporting  themselves  in  college. 

Having  selected  the  type  of  cooperative  industrial  work  that  seems  best  suited  to 
the  peculiarities  of  the  environment  of  each  particular  school,  the  committee  on 
instruction  may  proceed  to  formulate  a  curriculum  for  the  school  work  itself.  In  this 
it  is  conceivable  that  the  schools  will  reach  conclusions  that  are  more  similar  to  one 
another  than  is  probable  with  the  cooperative  industrial  work ;  for  if  it  is  agreed  that 
the  chief  function  of  school  work  is  to  give  the  greatest  possible  mastery  of  the  essen- 
tial principles  of  engineering  science,  then  there  is  a  common  foundation  on  which 
all  curricula  must  be  built.  The  first  step,  therefore,  in  framing  a  course  of  study  is 
to  define  this  common  basis  of  all  engineering  as  clearly  as  possible;  that  is,  to  make 
a  list  of  all  the  facts,  principles,  and  processes  that  are  essential  elements  in  the  equip- 
ment of  every  engineer.  Theoretically  this  is  the  plan  on  which  present  curricula  are 
founded,  for  they  all  have  a  common  core  made  up  of  three  distinct  parts,  namely, 
science  (mathematics,  chemistry,  physics,  and  mechanics),  mechanic  arts  (drawing  and 
shop),  and  humanities  (English  and  foreign  languages).  All  of  this  common  core  is 
usually  explicitly  required  of  every  student,  no  matter  what  specialty  he  may  choose. 

In  addition  to  this  explicitly  recognized  core  of  common  material  it  is  customary 


90  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

at  present  to  require  civil  engineers,  for  example,  to  take  brief  courses  in  mechanical 
and  electrical  engineering,  since  it  is  necessaiy  that  a  road  or  a  railroad  builder  know 
something  of  steam  machinery,  turbines,  electric  machinery,  and  gas  engines.  Con- 
versely, the  modern  electrical  engineer  must  know  something  about  steam  engineer- 
ing, girders,  trusses,  factory  construction,  and  even  tunneling;  and  the  sanitary  engi- 
neer finds  it  necessary  to  understand  at  least  the  elements  of  hydraulics  and  the  mech- 
anism of  pumps  and  pumping  machinery.  This  instruction  in  one  specialized  branch 
of  engineering  for  students  who  are  specializing  in  another  is  now  generally  supplied 
by  technical  courses  in  the  third  or  fourth  years,  sometimes  by  combination  courses 
required  of  all  students,  and  sometimes  by  special  short  courses  in  one  branch  for 
students  in  the  others.  Evidently  there  is  a  large  amount  of  material  which  is  now 
presented  in  technical  courses  after  specialization  has  begun,  but  which  is  really 
essential  to  every  engineer,  and  therefore  might  well  be  explicitly  recognized  in  the 
core  of  common  material. 

Without  regard  to  the  question  as  to  whether  the  subject-matter  of  this  common 
core  is  well  or  poorly  chosen  and  irrespective  of  the  success  with  which  the  work  is 
given,  there  is  a  fundamental  difficulty  in  the  current  organization  of  the  common 
core  of  all  engineering;  namely,  the  fact  that  it  recognizes  no  inherent  or  intrinsic 
relationships  among  the  three  categories  under  which  the  classification  is  made.  The 
sciences  are  usually  treated  as  sciences  pure  and  simple  without  regard  to  their  func- 
tion in  engineering  (page  39);  in  the  mechanic  arts  the  instruction  shops  are  as  a  rule 
purposely  separated  from  the  construction  shops  (page  78) ;  and  the  humanities  gen- 
erally strive  consciously  and  vigorously  to  get  away  from  engineering  in  order  that 
the  student  may  get  at  least  a  glimpse  into  the  mysteries  of  language  and  of  literature 
and  a  touch  of  culture.  As  a  result  of  this  lack  of  inherent  connection,  many  schools 
have  already  dropped  the  requirement  of  foreign  languages,  because  some  faculties 
recognize  that  French  and  German  when  taught  as  they  are  for  purposes  of  drill  in 
grammar  have  no  vital  connection  with  engineering.  Similarly  some  schools  are  seri- 
ously considering  giving  up  the  shopwork,  since  it  is  not  at  all  clear  why  skill  in  the 
handling  of  tools  is  essential  to  every  engineer.  There  has  even  been  some  talk  of  ceas- 
ing to  require  calculus  of  every  student,  because  there  is  very  little  obvious  connec- 
tion between  some  forms  of  calculus  and  engineering.  Thus  before  a  more  effective 
common  core  for  all  engineering  curricula  can  be  constructed,  it  is  necessary  to  adopt 
a  classification  of  the  subject-matter  that  obviously  expresses  the  intrinsic  relation- 
ships of  the  several  component  parts  to  the  needs  of  every  engineer. 

The  categories  for  a  new  classification  of  this  kind  may  be  deduced  from  the  fun- 
damental aim  of  engineering.  As  has  been  frequently  pointed  out  (pages  3—8),  the  real 
purpose  for  which  engineering  schools  were  established  is  to  increase  industrial  pro- 
duction, because  the  ultimate  aim  of  engineering  is  more  intelligent  production.  But 
every  production  project  requires  the  coordination  and  adjustment  of  three  factors, 
namely,  scientific  theory,  mechanical  practice,  and  cost.  A  theoretically  perfect  ma- 


THE  CURRICULUM  91 

chine  that  cannot  be  built  is  no  more  useless  than  one  that  costs  so  much  that  no 
one  is  willing  to  buy  it.  Success  in  engineering  comes  to  him  who  most  often  judges 
soundly  concerning  the  best  adjustment  of  these  three  complex  factors.  Therefore 
engineering  education  is  likely  to  be  more  effective  in  proportion  as  it  fosters  the 
development  of  skill  in  determining  the  most  expedient  adjustments  among  theory 
and  practice  and  cost. 

It  is  customary  in  designing  curricula  to  keep  these  three  essential  phases  of  engi- 
neering distinct  from  one  another  and  to  teach  them  as  independent  units,  leaving 
their  synthesis  into  well-organized  mental  processes  to  the  student's  own  efforts.  This 
practice  is  so  widespread  that  its  validity  is  naively  accepted  as  a  matter  of  course, 
and  few  seem  to  suspect  that  it  may  be  connected  in  any  way  with  the  year  or  two 
of  floundering  thru  which  most  graduates  pass  after  leaving  college  and  before 
finding  themselves.  Universal  experience,  on  the  other  hand,  seems  to  indicate  that 
the  most  effective  method  of  learning  is  by  doing;  so  that  if  engineering  depends 
ultimately  on  power  to  interrelate  theory  and  practice  and  costs,  a  training  that  re- 
quires the  student  frequently  to  interrelate  these  three  fundamental  factors  is  likely 
to  yield  a  better  product  than  is  secured  from  a  training  that  largely  ignores  their 
interdependence.  A  curriculum  that  recognizes  the  intrinsic  relationships  involved  is 
not  difficult  to  construct  after  the  fundamental  common  elements  of  all  engineering 
have  been  selected;  but  until  these  elements  have  been  chosen,  it  is  impossible  to  give 
more  than  a  general  outline  or  skeleton,  on  which  any  school  may  easily  construct 
a  program  by  filling  in  with  subject-matter  appropriate  to  its  environment  and  its 
educational  aim. 

A  curriculum  that  satisfies  all  of  the  requirement  mentioned  above  would  include 
at  least  four  types  of  work.  In  the  first  place  there  must  be  actual  participation  in 
real  industrial  work,  either  during  summer  vacations  or  better  thru  some  form  of  con- 
tinuous cooperation  with  industries.  This  industrial  experience  must  be  supervised 
by  the  school  and  used  as  a  source  of  problems  and  projects  for  scientific  analysis  and 
study  in  laboratory  and  class-room.  It  should  begin  at  the  beginning  of  the  freshman 
year  and  continue  at  least  until  the  work  common  to  all  branches  of  engineering  is 
completed.  In  the  later  years  it  may  well  take  the  form  of  cooperative  work  with  an 
industrial  research  laboratory  (page  82).  It  is  not  necessary  or  desirable  that  all  stu- 
dents do  the  same  type  of  thing,  provided  class  meetings  are  held  for  the  discussion 
and  exchange  of  experiences. 

In  the  second  place  there  should  be  engineering  laboratory  work,  including  draw- 
ing and  descriptive  geometry;  and  this,  too,  should  continue  throughout  the  com- 
mon portion  of  the  course.  Here  the  student  would  make  the  measurements  and  cany 
out  the  operations  needed  to  enable  him  to  solve  the  problems  and  projects  that  origi- 
nate either  in  his  industrial  or  in  his  class  work.  These  problems  and  projects  should 
be  as  far  as  possible  framed  in  such  a  wav  that  the  desired  solution  cannot  be  secured 
without  making  the  experiment;  thev  should  not  consist  of  mere  verification  of  known 


92  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

results  or  of  repetition  of  standardized  manipulations.  Elementary  surveying  is  a 
fruitful  source  of  problems  of  the  right  kind;  the  energy  transformations  and  effi- 
ciencies of  different  sorts  of  machines,  prime  movers,  and  motors  require  endless  in- 
vestigation, much  of  which  is  simple  enough  for  freshmen  yet  rich  in  engineering 
content.  Questions  concerning  the  kind  of  material  to  select  under  given  conditions 
of  stress,  wear,  and  cost  are  also  excellent.  Attention  has  already  been  called  to  simi- 
lar problems  now  in  use  in  mechanics  (page  58)  and  in  chemistry  (page  61).  All  of 
this  material  should  require  the  constant  use  of  the  fundamental  principles  that  every 
engineer  must  know,  and  frequent  problems  involving  the  computation  of  relative 
costs  under  various  conditions  should  be  discussed  and  solved. 

The  third  type  of  work  essential  to  the  new  curriculum  is  mathematics  and  sci- 
ence, which  should  be  developed  systematically  in  logical  order  so  as  to  furnish  the 
backbone  of  the  course.  The  determination  of  the  sequence  of  topics  for  the  labora- 
tory projects  and  for  the  classes  in  mathematics  and  science  offers  an  opportunity  for 
investigations  of  the  highest  order,  because  it  is  obviously  desirable  that  theory  and 
experiment  be  closely  interrelated,  and  this  requires  agreement  as  to  what  are  the 
fundamental  conceptions  of  mathematics,  mechanics,  and  physics.  The  Society  for  the 
Promotion  of  Engineering  Education  has  made  an  admirable  beginning  of  such  in- 
vestigations thru  its  committees  on  teaching  mathematics  and  on  teaching  mechanics; 
but  the  reports  of  these  committees  have  not  yet  been  generally  accepted,  and  the 
laboratory  side  of  the  problem  has  not  yet  received  serious  attention. 

The  humanistic  studies  make  up  the  fourth  type  of  work  essential  to  the  training 
of  every  engineer.  The  professional  criticisms  of  the  schools  indicate  that  this  field 
offers  the  greatest  opportunity  for  effective  changes  in  current  practice,  because  lack 
of  good  English,  of  business  sense,  and  of  understanding  of  men  are  most  frequently 
mentioned  by  practising  engineers  as  points  of  weakness  in  the  graduates  of  the 
schools.  The  criticisms  point  out'  two  types  of  weakness,  namely,  lack  of  technical 
facility  in  expression,  in  business,  and  in  handling  men ;  and  lack  of  appreciation  of 
and  interest  in  literature,  economics,  and  social  philosophy.  Clearly  the  humanistic 
departments  are  not  alone  responsible  for  these  weaknesses,  for  no  amount  of  drill  in 
the  technique  of  language  will  make  a  student  write  and  speak  clearly  if  he  does  not 
think  clearly;  and  training  in  clear  thinking  is  as  much  the  function  of  the  teachers 
of  science,  mathematics,  and  engineering  as  it  is  the  function  of  the  teachers  of  Eng- 
lish. And  if  the  professors  in  the  technical  subjects  rigidly  exclude  from  their  instruc- 
tion all  discussion  of  human  values  and  costs,  is  it  reasonable  to  expect  the  students 
to  appreciate  economics  and  social  science?  As  every  one  is  aware,  languages,  eco- 
nomics, and  social  sciences  are  generally  treated  as  "  extras "  in  curricula,  and  are  as 
generally  regarded  as  superfluous  "chores"  by  the  students. 

The  difficulty  in  present  school  practice  evidently  lies  in  the  exclusion  from  the 
technical  work  of  all  consideration  of  the  questions  of  human  values  and  costs;  and, 
conversely,  the  isolation  of  the  humanistic  studies  from  all  technical  interest.  The 


THE  CURRICULUM  93 

theory  has  been  that  engineering  at  best  is  tied  to  materials;  but  that  it  can  be  made 
less  materialistic  by  ignoring  the  question  of  dollars  and  cents  in  the  technical  work, 
and  by  teaching  science,  mathematics,  economics,  and  literature  for  their  own  sakes 
entirely  isolated  from  inherent  technical  relationships.  This  conception,  however,  is 
gradually  giving  way,  for  the  experiments  described  in  the  last  four  chapters  indicate 
that  technical  work  is  more  impelling,  and  is,  therefore,  more  fully  mastered,  when  it 
includes  the  consideration  of  values  and  costs;  while  humanistic  work  becomes  sig- 
nificant, and  therefore  educative,  when  it  starts  from  and  builds  upon  the  professional 
interest.  And  after  all,  the  ultimate  control  of  all  engineering  projects,  as  of  all  activi- 
ties, is  vested  in  some  man's  decision  that  the  game  is  really  worth  while;  and  this 
control  is  likely  to  be  more  salutary,  the  more  completely  the  man  who  decides  com- 
prehends the  full  import  of  the  values  and  costs  involved. 

A  good  example  of  one  method  of  treating  the  study  of  English  so  as  to  develop 
skill  in  expression,  appreciation  of  literature,  and  a  philosophy  of  values  and  costs 
may  be  found  in  Professor  Aydelotte's  experiment  with  freshmen  and  juniors  at  the 
Massachusetts  Institute  (page  63).  If  work  of  this  kind  were  continued  thru  several 
years,  it  might  readily  be  made  to  include  some  study  of  all  the  political,  economic, 
and  social  problems  which  every  engineer  is  compelled  to  meet.  The  experiment  of 
organizing  a  series  of  projects  and  problems  in  these  subjects  for  class  discussion,  out- 
side reading,  and  report,  into  a  consecutive  course  that  would  give  young  engineers 
some  conception  of  the  present  social  situation  and  of  the  engineers  relation  to  it, 
is  well  worth  trying.  It  may  be  that  such  a  course,  by  developing  in  students  an 
intelligent  understanding  of  the  meaning  of  engineering  in  modern  life,  would  be  a 
powerful  factor  in  defining  the  status  of  the  engineer  and  in  liberating  his  creative 
energies  for  still  larger  service. 

The  best  time  schedule  for  a  curriculum  built  along  the  lines  suggested  cannot  be 
determined  in  advance.  It  is  therefore  necessary  at  first  to  make  an  arbitrary  distri- 
bution of  the  15  credit  hours  available  and  then  make  adjustments  as  experience  may 
dictate.  Two  schools,  Brown  University  and  the  University  of  Washington,  are  try- 
ing a  new  curriculum  of  this  kind  this  year.  At  Brown  the  time  of  the  freshman  year 
is  divided  in  this  way :  mathematics  4,  drawing  and  descriptive  geometry  3,  engineer- 
ing mechanics  3,  English  3,  and  chemistry  3.  If  military  science  is  required,  it  might 
be  well  to  reduce  the  time  for  mathematics  from  4  to  3  in  order  to  make  place  for  it. 

It  is  also  impossible  to  decide  without  experiment  how  many  years  will  be  required 
to  give  this  training  in  the  essential  common  elements  of  all  engineering.  After  the 
essential  topics  have  been  selected,  as  much  time  as  is  required  to  teach  them  thor- 
oughly should  be  taken  for  this  purpose.  Two  years  may  be  enough,  but  if  this  is  found 
to  be  inadequate,  more  should  be  assigned  to  this  fundamental  portion  of  the  work. 
The  important  thing  is  that  the  essential  elements  be  first  selected  and  then  that  time 
enough  to  master  them  be  given,  instead  of  the  current  practice  of  assigning  the  time 
and  then  "covering"  as  much  as  is  possible  within  the  set  limits.  No  time  schedule 


94  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

of  the  proposed  curriculum  is  offered  here,  lest  schools  be  tempted  merely  to  fit  present 
courses  into  the  suggested  schedule  without  first  making  the  thorough  analysis  of 
the  problem  here  demanded.  Such  a  simple  rearrangement  of  the  old  bricks  in  a  new 
pattern  will  not  be  likely  to  accomplish  the  required  results. 

No  provision  is  made  for  foreign  languages  in  the  curriculum  just  suggested.  They 
have  been  omitted  because  three-quarters  of  the  1500  practising  engineers  who  re- 
plied in  writing  to  a  question  on  this  subject  agreed  that  they  had  never  found  for- 
eign languages  essential  to  their  professional  careers,  and  half  of  them  thought  that 
they  should  not  be  required.  In  addition,  there  is  a  growing  conviction  among  the 
schools  that  for  students  of  engineering  the  time  now  spent  in  college  on  foreign  lan- 
guages may  be  much  more  profitably  spent  in  other  ways.  If  it  appears  that  the  for- 
eign expansion  of  the  national  outlook  necessitates  facility  in  one  or  more  foreign 
languages,  every  effort  should  be  made  to  ensure  the  acquisition  of  that  facility  be- 
fore entering  college.  At  West  Point  the  cadets  acquire  all  the  control  an  engineer 
needs  over  French  in  200  hours  of  intensive  training;  and  the  technically  minded 
student  is  far  more  likely  to  become  broad-minded  and  cultured  thru  studies  of  lit- 
erature and  social  conditions  in  the  manner  just  described  than  he  is  thru  the  type 
of  linguistic  drill  that  is  now  universally  given  under  the  name  of  foreign  languages 
in  high  schools  and  colleges. 

The  organization  of  curricula  here  proposed  is  very  different  from  that  in  general 
use.  Therefore  it  would  not  be  wise  to  attempt  to  produce  a  curriculum  of  this  kind  by 
merely  substituting,  say,  engineering  laboratory  for  foreign  languages  and  the  new 
type  of  English  for  the  old,  without  in  any  way  changing  the  content  or  the  methods 
of  instruction  of  the  other  courses.  The  new  plan  is  based  on  the  proposition  that  it 
is  possible  to  analyze  engineering  practice  and  to  make  a  list  of  all  principles,  facts, 
and  theories  that  are  essential  to  the  equipment  of  every  engineer,  and  then  to  or- 
ganize this  subject-matter  into  a  curriculum  in  which  the  several  types  of  work  are 
interrelated  in  such  a  way  that  their  inherent  relations  are  obvious  to  the  learner. 
Such  a  curriculum  satisfies  the  professional  demand  for  broad  and  fundamental  train- 
ing for  all  engineers  and  renders  superfluous  the  requirement  of  two  or  three  years 
of  pre-engineering  work  in  a  college  of  liberal  arts.  It  does  not  prepare  specialists, 
and  hence  specialization  is  the  topic  of  the  next  chapter. 


Chapter  XIV 

SPECIALIZATION 

The  preceding  chapter  suggests  methods  that  may  be  profitably  employed  in 
framing  a  well-coordinated  curriculum  designed  to  give  all  students  of  technology 
a  broad  and  solid  foundation  in  engineering  science  and  practice,  thru  personal  con- 
tact with  industrial  work,  experience  in  solving  practical  problems  in  the  engineer- 
ing laboratories,  systematic  instruction  in  mathematics  and  science,  and  thought- 
ful consideration  of  the  significance  of  human  values  and  costs.  The  criterion  by 
which  to  determine  what  subject-matter  may  be  included  and  what  excluded  is  that 
of  common  necessity ;  so  that  all  those  principles,  processes,  facts,  and  theories  which 
are  approved  by  a  board  of  expert  judges  as  essential  to  the  equipment  of  every 
engineer  are  included,  and  all  others  are  excluded.  The  course  of  study  thus  organ- 
ized will  be  called  the  common  core  of  the  curriculum.  How  may  provision  best  be 
made  for  specialization  when  a  student  has  satisfactorily  mastered  this  common 
core  ? 

Evidently  the  first  step  toward  successful  specialization  is  intelligent  sorting  of 
the  students,  so  that  each  is  led  as  definitely  as  possible  into  that  type  of  work  for 
which  he  is  best  fitted  temperamentally.  This  requires  that  while  the  students  are 
working  thru  the  common  core  of  studies  every  effort  be  made  to  discover  the  par- 
ticular abilities  and  specific  bent  of  each,  not  only  by  means  of  ordinary  examinations 
and  academic  grades,  but  also  thru  objective  tests  of  graded  difficulty  (page  50),  per- 
sonality estimates  by  members  of  the  faculty  (page  73),  consideration  of  boyhood  in- 
terests (page  53),  and  observations  of  each  student's  reactions  to  the  different  portions 
of  the  common  core.  In  other  words,  the  work  of  the  common  core  offers  an  excellent 
chance  for  vocational  guidance;  so  that  the  student  would  not  choose  but  rather  be 
claimed  by  the  special  field  for  which  he  is  best  fitted.  Probably  nothing  would  con- 
tribute more  to  the  success  of  the  later  specialized  work  than  a  systematic  utilization 
of  this  opportunity.  A  number  of  schools  are  ostensibly  doing  this  now,  but  none  has 
yet  achieved  the  degree  of  success  that  is  easily  attainable  by  intelligent  experiment 
with  the  various  methods  now  in  use  in  many  places. 

By  the  methods  provided  for  sorting  the  students  during  the  first  two  or  three 
years  of  their  courses  it  should  be  possible  when  they  finish  the  common  core  of  the 
engineering  curriculum  to  divide  them  into  five  or  six  groups,  each  of  which  contains 
all  who  have  special  qualifications  for  one  of  the  major  lines  of  professional  work. 
For  each  such  group  a  curriculum  must  be  framed  on  the  same  plan  as  that  used  for 
the  common  core.  Thus  for  the  civil  engineering  group  a  competent  committee  would 
first  select  all  the  elements  essential  to  all  civil  engineers  but  not  already  included 
in  the  common  core,  and  these  essential  civil  engineering  elements  would  be  organ- 
ized into  a  consistent  curriculum  composed  of  the  same  four  types  of  work  required 


96  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

for  the  common  core.  A  similar  selection  of  subject-matter  has  to  be  made  for  the 
mechanical  engineering  group,  for  the  electrical  engineering  group,  and  for  each  of 
the  other  major  groups  which  the  school  desires  to  develop. 

As  with  the  common  core,  so  here,  the  amount  of  time  needed  to  master  the  mate- 
rials selected  as  essential  in  each  group  has  to  be  determined  by  experiment.  It  may 
well  happen  that  more  time  is  required  for  electrical  engineers  than  for  civil  or  min- 
ing engineers,  but  this  is  no  real  objection;  the  conception  that  four  years  of  study 
makes  any  kind  of  an  engineer  is  a  habit  rather  than  a  rational  conclusion.  If  the 
subject-matter  chosen  can  all  be  shown  to  be  really  essential,  and  if  the  instruction 
is  intensive,  then  the  school  may  well  insist  on  time  enough  to  do  its  work  thoroughly. 
This  does  not  mean  necessarily  that  more  than  four  years  will  be  required  for  thorough- 
going training,  for  the  present  congestion  of  curricula  is  in  large  measure  due  both 
to  the  presence  of  subject-matter  which  cannot  be  justified  on  the  ground  that  it  is 
essential,  and  to  the  teacher's  habit  of  underestimating  the  student's  actual  ability  and 
capacity  for  significant  work. 

The  number  of  these  semi-specialized  groups  at  any  one  school  may  well  depend 
on  the  location  and  the  capacity  of  the  school.  The  great  majority  of  institutions  will 
probably  have  one  for  each  of  the  commonly  accepted  branches,  as  civil,  mechanical, 
electrical,  and  chemical  engineering.  The  mining  group  has  already  been  somewhat 
separated  from  the  others  by  the  establishment  in  mining  districts  of  state  schools 
of  mines,  so  that  a  number  of  strong  schools  elsewhere  no  longer  offer  courses  in  min- 
ing engineering.  While  it  is  clear  that  every  technical  college  should  offer  the  com- 
mon core,  it  is  an  open  question  how  many  of  the  semi -specialized  groups  each  should 
attempt  to  supply.  It  is  conceivable  that  some  schools  might  do  much  more  thorough 
work  if  they  followed  the  example  of  Stevens  Institute  and  specialized  on  one  or  two 
groups.  It  may  even  happen  that  a  number  of  the  smaller  schools  will  find  it  to  their 
advantage  to  give  only  the  common  core  and  send  their  students  for  specialization 
to  the  stronger  schools.  It  may  also  be  best  for  many  of  the  students  to  leave  school 
when  they  have  completed  this  general  work,  especially  if  leaving  should  be  dignified 
by  the  award  of  a  suitable  certificate  or  diploma. 

On  the  other  hand,  there  is  an  urgent  need  that  a  number  of  the  schools  add  to 
these  semi-specialized  groups  one  in  production  engineering  or  engineering  admin- 
istration, as  it  is  called  at  Pennsylvania  State  College  and  the  Massachusetts  Insti- 
tute of  Technology.  The  seriousness  of  this  need  has  been  emphasized  by  war  con- 
ditions, which  have  demonstrated  how  essential  it  is  to  apply  engineering  methods 
to  accounting,  to  the  management  of  men,  and  to  the  organization  of  business,  if 
maximum  production  is  to  be  attained.  Until  recently  most  schools  have  specialized 
in  design,  with  the  result  that  at  present  fully  ninety-five  per  cent  of  the  production 
managers  in  manufacturing  plants  are  not  college  but  shop-trained  men.  The  oppor- 
tunity for  the  college-trained  engineer  is  now  very  much  larger  in  the  field  of  pro- 
duction and  administration  than  it  is  in  the  field  of  design,  so  that  the  most  striking 


SPECIALIZATION  97 

development  of  the  engineering  schools  in  the  next  twenty  years  will  probably  be 
made  in  the  direction  of  the  former. 

Throughout  the  period  of  semi-specialization  it  is  desirable  to  continue  all  of  the 
four  types  of  instruction  comprised  in  the  common  core,  but  the  technical  work  of 
the  several  groups  may  be  very  different,  each  along  the  line  of  the  group  specialty. 
In  the  humanistic  work,  however,  the  subject-matter  presented  may  well  be  the  same 
for  all,  because  the  engineering  attitude  which  these  studies  foster  is  the  same  for 
all.  By  this  means  it  is  possible  to  develop  among  the  engineering  students  a  unity 
of  purpose  and  outlook  which  will  be  a  great  asset  in  developing  a  professional  con- 
sciousness among  engineers,  because  it  tends  to  establish  engineering  standards  by 
which  to  interpret  and  attack  the  industrial  and  social  problems  of  the  day. 

The  systems  of  grading  and  personality  analysis  used  during  the  early  portion  of 
the  course  should  also  be  retained,  in  order  that  the  semi-specialized  work  may  fur- 
nish the  basis  for  more  accurate  guidance  of  each  student  into  the  particular  line  of 
work  for  which  he  is  best  fitted. 

When  the  student  has  completed  the  semi-specialized  work  he  should  be  well 
grounded  in  the  fundamental  principles  of  engineering  science  and  in  the  theory  and 
practice  peculiar  to  some  one  of  the  major  branches  of  the  profession.  If  during  this 
training  he  has  shown  particular  ability  in  some  specific  line  of  work,  opportunity 
should  be  given  him  to  pursue  his  specialty  in  elective  courses  of  highly  technical  con- 
tent. These  courses,  however,  should  not  consist,  as  many  of  the  senior  electives  do 
now,  of  detailed  study  of  the  technique  of  such  subjects  as  heating  and  ventilating, 
telephone  wiring,  roads  and  pavements,  sewage  disposal,  and  the  like.  If  the  student 
has  been  trained  as  he  should  be  in  methods  of  attacking  problems  and  gathering 
information,  he  will  probably  make  better  progress  in  this  kind  of  work  in  the  in- 
dustries than  he  will  in  school.  Since  these  courses  are  for  specialists  who  have  elected 
them  after  a  long  process  of  vocational  selection,  they  should  deal  with  the  more 
abstract  and  general  phases  of  each  subject.  For  the  industrial  phase  of  it,  current 
problems  in  industrial  research  with  practice  as  assistant  on  some  of  them  are  appro- 
priate; for  laboratory  practice,  expert  testing  and  trouble  hunting  might  serve  well; 
on  the  scientific  side,  thermodynamics,  the  ionic  theory,  differential  equations,  func- 
tions of  a  complex  variable,  wave  motion,  spherical  harmonics,  electromagnetic  theory, 
and  all  types  of  design,  might  be  given  for  those  whose  bent  and  abilities  warrant. 

The  plan  of  curriculum  here  proposed  may  seem  to  many  very  similar  to  the  one 
on  which  curricula  are  at  present  constructed.  In  a  general  way  this  is  true,  since  both 
the  present  plan  and  the  one  proposed  agree  in  requiring  all  engineers  to  take  the  same 
training  at  the  beginning  and  in  gradually  separating  them  into  specialized  groups 
later.  The  two  schemes,  however,  differ  radically  in  a  number  of  important  ways. 
In  the  first  place,  current  curricula  are  made  by  first  setting  the  time  limits  for  each 
of  the  several  subjects  involved  and  then  allowing  each  department  to  use  its  time 
allotment  as  it  may  see  fit  (page  56).  The  new  plan  suggests  that  the  faculty  first 


98  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

select  the  subject-matter  that  is  essential  to  the  equipment  of  every  engineer  and  then 
ask  the  several  departments  to  determine  experimentally  how  much  time  is  needed 
for  their  respective  parts.  The  former  is  a  centrifugal  system,  which  magnifies  depart- 
mental differences,  causes  confusion  as  to  the  aims  of  the  instruction,  and  wastes  an 
immense  amount  of  time;  the  latter  is  centripetal,  in  that  it  operates  to  bring  about 
mutual  understanding  and  hence  definiteness  of  aim  and  economy  of  time. 

Again,  the  proposed  plan  calls  for  the  student's  participation  in  real  industrial  work 
and  the  utilization  of  his  experiences  there  as  a  source  of  problems  for  theoretical 
analysis  and  solution  in  the  class-rooms.  This  is  suggested  as  a  substitute  for  most  of 
the  current  shop  practice,  such  elements  as  should  be  retained  in  school  being  included 
in  the  engineering  laboratory  work. 

In  the  third  place,  the  suggestion  is  made  that  engineering  laboratory  work  be  re- 
quired throughout  the  first  two  or  three  years.  At  present  such  work  is  given  almost 
entirely  in  the  last  two  years,  because  teachers  generally  believe  that  the  students  are 
incapable  of  working  intelligently  at  practical  engineering  projects  until  they  have 
been  well  drilled  in  theoretical  principles  and  mathematical  processes,  in  spite  of  the 
astonishing  manner  in  which  boys  of  high  school  age  learn  without  assistance  to  man- 
age wireless  telegraphy  or  gas  engines.  The  proposed  arrangement  makes  it  possible 
for  the  faculty  to  assign  tasks  that  tax  the  boy's  capacity  and  challenge  his  ingenu- 
ity and  his  natural  instinct  for  mechanism.  Such  tasks  are  almost  sure  to  be  effective 
means  of  releasing  creative  energy  and  of  directing  it  so  that  it  brings  the  greatest 
educational  returns.  Besides,  under  these  conditions  a  student  finds  himself  constantly 
in  need  of  the  principles  and  methods  developed  in  the  classes  in  mathematics  and  the 
sciences.  In  this  way  these  subjects  may  be  made  significant  to  boys  with  an  engineer- 
ing bent;  and,  as  is  well  known,  the  probability  of  learning  thoroughly  increases  with 
the  significance  of  the  lesson.  The  fact  that  a  boy  elects  engineering  indicates  that 
his  mind  is  probably  of  the  type  that  thinks  most  clearly  in  terms  of  specific  objects, 
and  that  grasps  general  principles  most  firmly  when  it  has  built  these  up  by  the  syn- 
thesis of  a  number  of  specific  concrete  cases.  In  combination  with  the  cooperative 
industrial  work  this  engineering  laboratory  work  furnishes  also  a  rational  foundation 
for  the  proposed  industrial  research  of  the  later  years  (page  82). 

In  the  fourth  place,  the  suggested  organization  requires  a  close  coordination  be- 
tween the  scientific  courses  of  the  common  core  and  the  practical  work.  At  present 
mathematics  and  the  fundamental  sciences  are  usually  taught  for  their  own  sake,  with 
independent  laboratories  and  little  attention  to  technical  applications.  Under  the 
arrangement  proposed  the  essential  portions  of  the  laboratory  work  in  elementary 
physics,  for  example,  would  be  absorbed  and  taught  in  the  engineering  laboratory. 
The  elementary  class  work  in  physics  would  then  be  limited  to  the  study  of  those 
fundamental  conceptions  and  principles  of  physics  that  are  embodied  in  all  engineer- 
ing work;  while  the  more  elaborate  and  recondite  portions  of  the  subject  would  be 
reserved  for  elective  courses  in  the  later  years,  where  they  would  be  better  appreciated 


SPECIALIZATION  99 

by  students  qualified  to  grasp  their  significance.  The  same  suggestion  applies  to  chem- 
istry and  especially  to  mathematics,  in  which  much  that  is  ordinarily  imposed  on 
unwilling  sophomores  would  be  eagerly  grasped  by  selected  seniors. 

A  fifth  departure  from  current  school  practice  is  made  in  the  recommendation  to 
emphasize  the  problems  of  values  and  costs.  This  topic  has  obtained  scant  recognition 
in  higher  education  for  fear  of  contaminating  university  ideals  with  those  of  the  mar- 
ketplace. Such  a  fear  is  justified  when  the  discussion  is  limited  to  monetary  values  and 
costs.  But  when  the  subject  is  treated  in  some  such  manner  as  Professor  J.  A.  Hobson 
treats  it  in  his  Work  and  Wealth,  A  Human  Valuation,1  it  may  be  made  the  most 
potent  means  of  expressing  the  highest  type  of  university  spirit.  Hence  in  ui'ging  ex- 
tended consideration  of  this  subject  it  is  taken  for  granted  that  the  discussions  will 
not  be  limited  to  questions  of  dollars  and  cents.  The  control  of  engineering  lies  in  the 
hands  of  those  who  judge  most  accurately  what  enterprises  men  value  sufficiently  to  be 
willing  to  assume  the  cost.  Because  engineering  education  has  confined  itself  largely 
to  technological  training,  engineers  are  seldom  placed  on  state  highway  commissions 
and  other  public  boards  that  must  decide  how  public  funds  shall  be  expended  on  engi- 
neering enterprises.  Too  frequently  the  engineer  is  employed  to  do  the  technical  work 
of  construction  only  after  a  board  composed  of  doctors,  lawyers,  clergymen,  bankers, 
merchants,  or  politicians  has  made  an  appraisement  of  values  and  costs  and  decided 
which  project  shall  go  forward  and  which  not.  The  conception  is  rapidly  developing 
that  the  public  interest  might  be  better  served  if  the  engineer  had  more  voice  in  mak- 
ing such  decisions,  and  to  win  greater  influence  in  this  direction  he  must  be  trained 
to  appraise  correctly  what  men  consider  to  be  most  worth  while. 

Because  the  appraisement  of  values  and  costs  is  the  controlling  factor  in  engineer- 
ing, the  final  important  change  from  current  school  practice  that  is  suggested  deals 
with  the  humanistic  studies.  The  usual  method  of  treating  these  subjects  in  short  in- 
dependent courses  in  the  technique  of  composition,  literature,  history,  economics,  and 
so  on,  seems  less  likely  than  the  method  proposed  (page  92)  to  develop  the  desired 
insight  into  these  profound  problems  of  value  and  cost.  The  experiments  at  Wiscon- 
sin and  the  Massachusetts  Institute  have  progressed  far  enough  to  show  how  success- 
ful this  type  of  work  is  with  freshmen  in  developing  powers  of  both  forceful  expres- 
sion and  appreciation  of  good  literature.  Therefore  it  seems  reasonable  to  expect  that 
the  extension  of  this  work  into  a  consecutive  course  extending  thru  the  entire  curri- 
culum and  consisting  of  live  discussions  and  extensive  study  of  the  best  that  has  been 
thought  and  said  concerning  the  immediate  and  the  ultimate  values  in  life,  offers  the 
most  promising  solution  of  the  problem  of  culture  for  engineers. 

The  organization  of  curricula  suggested  in  the  foregoing  chapters  does  not  solve 
the  problem  of  engineering  education.  It  does,  however,  create  conditions  that  are 
more  favorable  than  those  now  prevailing  for  progress  toward  the  desired  solutions  of 
a  number  of  the  major  questions.  Thus  objective  tests  for  admission  will  undoubtedly 

1  Macmillan,  1916. 


100  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

enable  the  schools  to  reduce  elimination  by  permitting  only  those  who  have  some 
demonstrable  degree  of  engineering  ability  to  enter,  but  much  time  and  many  experi- 
ments will  be  required  before  this  end  is  accomplished.  Similarly  the  engineering  work 
in  the  common  core,  when  measured  by  a  suitable  system  of  testing  and  grading,  makes 
the  experiences  of  the  first  two  or  three  years  both  valuable  to  technical  men  of  all 
grades  and  a  further  means  of  sorting  the  students  according  to  their  varying  degrees 
of  engineering  talent  and  ability.  On  completion  of  the  common  core  an  opportunity 
is  given  for  those  whose  capacities  and  temperaments  lead  them  to  prefer  the  prac- 
tical phases  of  production  to  leave  school  with  credit  and  go  to  work  immediately. 
Finally,  specialization,  which  has  been  the  source  of  so  much  trouble  to  curriculum 
makers,  is  subordinated  in  the  proposed  plan  to  vocational  guidance.  Because  the 
common  core  contains  real  engineering  work,  it  can  be  made  a  measure  of  engineering 
ability  that  is  much  more  searching  and  valid  than  is  possible  with  the  current  ab- 
stract, linguistic  type  of  work.  And  because  the  common  core  contains  the  essential 
elements  of  all  branches  of  engineering,  it  gives  the  student  a  chance  to  choose  his 
specialty  on  the  basis  of  experience,  and  furnishes  the  faculty  with  a  broader  range 
of  activities  on  which  to  base  its  judgment  of  special  aptitudes  for  particular  jobs. 
Hence  it  diverts  the  attention  of  the  faculty  from  the  construction  of  specialized 
grooves  down  which  the  student  may  be  shoved  by  routine  administrative  mechan- 
isms, to  the  study  of  the  personalities,  the  temperaments,  and  the  capacities  of  young 
men  who  are  eager  to  do  the  work  for  which  they  are  best  fitted.  The  required  change 
in  attitude  on  the  part  of  the  instructor  may  be  materially  encouraged  by  changing 
the  conditions  under  which  faculties  serve  along  the  lines  suggested  in  the  following 
chapter. 


Chapter  XV 

TEACHERS 

In  the  summer  of  1824  Amos  Eaton  was  employed  by  Stephen  van  Rensselaer  to 
deliver  a  series  of  lectures  on  natural  science,  with  experimental  illustrations,  at  a 
number  of  towns  in  New  York  State.  The  undertaking  was  so  successful  as  an  edu- 
cational venture  that  a  school  was  founded  to  train  teachers  to  instruct  farmers  and 
mechanics  in  the  applications  of  science  to  industrial  production.  Thus  the  first  Amer- 
ican Engineering  School  owed  its  existence  to  the  fact  that  a  man  of  rare  power  as 
a  teacher  had  been  found  to  conduct  it.  Following  the  inspiration  embodied  in  it  by 
Amos  Eaton,  the  Rensselaer  School  was  for  forty  years  a  Mecca  for  teachers  of  applied 
science.  The  published  works  of  Professor  Eaton  prove  that  he  was  also  a  scientific 
investigator  of  rare  merit. 

Thirty  years  later  (1853)  William  Barton  Rogers,  also  a  geologist  and  pioneer 
investigator  of  the  geology  of  Virginia,  moved  to  Boston  to  find  opportunity  to  teach 
industrial  workers  how  to  utilize  science  in  their  work.  For  twenty-five  years  Profes- 
sor Rogers  had  taught  natural  science  at  the  University  of  Virginia  with  such  spirit 
that  the  aisles  and  window-seats  of  his  lecture  room  were  often  crowded  by  young  men 
eager  to  listen  to  the  eloquent  words  of  the  teacher  they  so  much  admired.  It  was  in 
this  spirit  that  he  founded  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  and  the  nine 
men  whom  he  called  to  be  fellow  members  of  the  first  faculty  were  all  enough  inter- 
ested in  the  educational  problem  to  give  a  large  share  of  their  time  to  its  study. 

The  interest  in  the  teaching  problem  has  never  disappeared  wholly  from  engineer- 
ing schools,  as  it  has  from  some  of  the  universities.  The  first,  and  for  many  years  the 
only  association  for  the  study  of  education  in  colleges  was  the  Society  for  the  Pro- 
motion of  Engineering  Education,  which  developed  from  the  engineering  congress 
at  the  Columbian  Exposition  in  1893.  For  twenty-five  years  this  organization  has 
carried  on  extended  and  valuable  studies  in  its  field,  and  there  can  be  little  doubt 
that  the  recent  rapid  progress  in  engineering  education  has  been  in  large  measure 
due  to  its  activities.  At  present  about  one-third  of  all  the  teachers  in  American  tech- 
nological schools  are  enrolled  among  its  members,  yet  in  spite  of  this,  a  series  of  ques- 
tions on  educational  aims,  methods,  and  practices,  which  was  personally  presented  to 
the  faculties  at  the  first  seven  of  the  schools  visited,  proved  highly  unpopular;  and 
from  eighty-five  answers  that  were  turned  in  it  appeared  that  38  per  cent  of  the  pro- 
fessors spend  no  time  at  all  in  study  to  increase  their  understanding  of  educational 
methods,  60  per  cent  spend  from  one  to  ten  per  cent  of  their  time  in  this  manner,  and 
but  2  per  cent  spend  more  than  this.  Obviously  it  is  essential  to  pay  much  more  at- 
tention to  the  study  of  education  if  serious  progress  is  desired. 

Fifty  years  ago  little  was  required  of  the  college  professor  beyond  his  teaching. 
The  opportunities  for  participation  in  industry  were  relatively  few,  and  scholarship 


102  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

was  universally  regarded  as  a  valid  excuse  for  the  im practicality  of  academic  life.  But 
as  industrial  production  has  become  more  and  more  scientific,  the  bonds  between  the 
engineering  school  and  the  industries  have  become  closer,  until  now  it  is  generally 
recognized  that  intimate  cooperation  between  the  business  man  and  the  teacher  is  of 
the  greatest  benefit  to  both,  for  thereby  businesses  grow  more  creative  and  colleges 
more  business-like. 

The  infusion  of  business  methods  into  colleges  is  of  fundamental  importance  for 
good  teaching.  The  tradition  that  scholars  and  investigators  have  no  interest  in  the 
material  rewards  of  their  labors  is  true  only  with  regard  to  rewards  over  and  above 
what  may  be  considered  as  a  living  wage.  It  is  therefore  just  as  essential  for  good 
teaching  as  it  is  for  good  work  of  any  other  sort  that  the  worker  be  relieved  of  worry 
over  the  means  of  material  support  for  himself  and  his  family.  During  the  past  twenty 
years  schools  have  made  very  striking  progress  in  the  way  of  stabilizing  teachers' 
tenures  and  salaries  both  by  larger  endowments  and  appropriations  of  public  funds 
and  by  better  business  management.  Nevertheless  much  still  remains  to  be  done;  for, 
tho  teachers'1  pay  has  been  slowly  increasing,  the  median  salary  for  a  full  professor 
at  state-supported  institutions  is  now  only  $2500,  and  his  appointment  at  some 
schools  has  to  be  renewed  formally  every  year.  Even  at  universities  where  professorial 
appointments  are  ostensibly  made  for  life,  teachers  of  distinction  and  even  entire 
faculties  are  at  times  summarily  dismissed  by  the  board  of  trustees. 

Two  other  phases  of  the  problem  of  laying  firm  foundations  for  the  profession 
of  teaching  have  already  been  the  subjects  of  extended  investigation  and  report  by 
the  Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching.  Bulletin  Number  Five, 
on  Academic  and  Industrial  Efficiency,  indicates  how  modern  business  methods  may 
be  advantageously  applied  in  university  organization  to  liberate  teachers  from  such 
drudgery  as  care  of  buildings  and  grounds,  purchasing  supplies,  publicity,  keeping 
records,  financial  management,  and  supervision  of  the  material  welfare  of  students. 
At  some  of  the  larger  schools  professors  are  now  free  from  duties  of  this  sort,  but 
many  a  university  man  still  spends  much  time  and  energy  running  a  typewriter,  post- 
ing accounts,  keeping  records,  or  making  out  requisitions.  Bulletin  Number  Nine 
(1916),  on  A  Comprehensive  Plan  of  Insurance  and  Annuities  for  College  Teachers, 
describes  the  principles  and  methods  that  have  been  proved  by  ten  years  of  experi- 
ence and  exhaustive  study  to  be  essential  to  a  sound  and  effective  system  of  insurance 
and  annuities  for  college  teachers.  An  organization  for  putting  this  plan  into  action 
has  been  formed  and  financed,  thereby  supplying  one  of  the  most  essential  ingredients 
of  the  business  basis  on  which  a  new  liberalized  education  may  safely  be  built. 

The  creation  of  stable  financial  conditions,  the  assurance  of  permanency  of  tenure, 
of  a  living  wage,  of  relief  from  routine  clerical  work,  and  of  safe  insurance  against 
old  age,  however,  are  not  the  only  requirements  for  encouraging  good  teaching.  In- 
stitutions that  have  already  achieved  these  fundamental  prerequisites  are  still  ham- 
pered by  educational  conceptions  and  practices  that  discourage  rather  than  encourage 


TEACHERS  103 

progress  in  teaching.  Prominent  among  the  usages  that  tend  strongly  to  preserve  the 
status  quo  is  the  common  practice  of  employing  large  numbers  of  recent  graduates  or 
even  of  undergraduates  as  assistants  in  elementary  instruction  where  the  classes  are 
large.  These  assistants  have  usually  received  all  their  training  in  engineering  schools 
that  pay  not  the  slightest  attention  to  the  professional  education  of  the  teacher. 
When  such  a  novice  begins  his  apprenticeship  as  teacher,  his  instruction  depends 
entirely  on  the  attitude  of  the  head  of  his  department.  He  may  be  turned  loose  with- 
out directions  of  any  kind,  or  he  may  be  given  such  minute  directions  that  he  is  apt 
to  become  a  cog  in  a  machine.  In  any  case  he  instinctively  imitates  the  methods  and 
practices  of  his  own  teachers,  and  is  kept  so  busy  with  routine  work  that  he  has 
neither  the  time  nor  the  inclination  to  study  or  make  experiments  in  teaching.  That 
so  many  eventually  turn  out  to  be  good  teachers  is  a  tribute  to  Yankee  adaptability 
rather  than  to  educational  foresight,  but  the  energy  losses  due  to  inevitable  blunders 
during  the  teacher's  period  of  incubation  are  a  serious  drain  on  the  intellectual  out- 
put of  the  schools.  In  some  of  the  best  institutions  the  number  of  assistants  is  greater 
than  the  number  of  full  time  professors. 

In  selecting  young  graduates  for  assistants  in  teaching  it  is  customary  to  pick  out 
those  who  have  won  high  grades  in  the  subjects  they  are  called  upon  to  teach,  be- 
cause mastery  of  subject-matter  is  obviously  a  first  essential  for  teaching.  Several 
schools,  however,  have  recently  recognized  that  this  apparently  worthy  practice  may 
be  a  serious  handicap  both  to  progress  and  to  good  teaching.  Under  present  systems 
of  grading,  high  marks  are  quite  as  likely  to  indicate  adaptability  to  the  professor's 
point  of  view,  as  they  are  to  stand  for  either  mastery  of  the  subject  or  independence 
of  mind.  Hence  the  inbreeding  process,  even  when  based  on  high  grades,  in  reality 
tends  strongly  to  maintain  a  stolid  conservatism  which  deplores  innovations  and 
inhibits  experimentation. 

As  a  remedy  for  this  condition,  at  one  or  two  schools  appointments  to  the  teach- 
ing staff  are  made  only  after  the  candidate  has  had  one  or  more  years  of  successful 
experience  in  some  phase  of  engineering  practice.  In  a  few  of  the  more  progressive 
departments  no  man  is  ever  appointed  to  a  full  professorship  until  he  has  won  the 
recognition  of  the  technical  experts  in  his  own  line  of  work.  In  this  respect  condi- 
tions may  be  still  further  improved  by  freer  use  of  graded  objective  tests  and  of  per- 
sonality ratings  (page  73).  Schools  of  engineering  might  also  do  well  to  consider 
seriously  cooperation  with  departments  of  education  in  the  professional  training  of 
teachers  of  applied  science  and  in  the  scientific  study  of  their  teaching  problems. 

While  the  recruiting  of  the  teaching  staff  from  recent  graduates  tends  to  maintain 
conditions  as  they  are,  and  therefore  to  inhibit  experiments  in  teaching,  the  current 
indifference  of  colleges  to  problems  of  education  is  more  directly  traceable  to  the  lack 
of  effective  incentives  for  this  work.  After  the  teacher  has  been  liberated  from  worry 
over  material  support,  his  most  impelling  incentive  is  his  desire  for  self-expression  in 
creative  work.  Universities  recognize  this  fact,  and  have  for  forty  years  been  struggling 


104  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

to  develop  conditions  that  would  free  creative  imagination  and  expand  the  bounds  of 
knowledge.  In  this  they  have  been  marvelously  successful  in  the  field  of  natural  sci- 
ence— so  much  so,  that  research  and  the  publication  of  the  results  of  research  have 
become  the  measure  of  success  and  the  criterion  of  promotion  in  most  institutions  of 
higher  education  in  the  United  States.  So  completely  has  this  conception  of  research 
won  recognition  that  academic  promotion  is  now  determined  almost  wholly  by  suc- 
cess in  it.  This  fact  has  produced  the  impression,  prevalent  in  many  quarters,  that 
research  and  teaching  are  in  some  way  antithetical.  Hence  the  question  has  often 
been  raised  whether  research  should  not  be  discouraged  at  educational  institutions 
in  order  that  teaching  might  receive  a  larger  share  of  attention. 

It  is  unquestionably  true  that  research,  as  at  present  treated,  does  interfere  seriously 
with  teaching.  Hundreds  of  college  instructors  whose  interests  lie  in  the  human  prob- 
lems of  education,  rather  than  in  the  material  problems  of  natural  science,  are  now 
being  diverted  from  a  study  of  the  teaching  problem  and  induced  to  undertake  re- 
search because  academic  promotion  so  obviously  depends  on  the  latter.  Many  a  young 
man  with  promise  of  making  an  excellent  teacher  is  sidetracked  by  the  requirements 
for  the  Ph.D.  degree  and  becomes  instead,  a  mediocre  researcher.  Yet  tho  much  that  is 
done  under  the  name  of  research  is  but  pseudo-research,  the  university  is  clearly  right 
in  its  position  that  the  spirit  of  investigation  is  an  essential  factor  of  university  life. 

The  difficulty  does  not  lie  in  research  itself,  but  in  the  limitations  that  still  cling 
to  the  common  interpretation  of  it.  Because  research  has  been  developed  in  the  field 
of  natural  science  and  has  wrought  such  marvels  there,  its  activities  have  unconsciously 
been  thought  of  as  restricted  to  the  problems  of  the  material  world.  Because  the  tech- 
nique of  research  and  the  units  and  methods  of  measurement  have  been  so  perfected 
in  the  domain  of  natural  science  that  great  accuracy  and  definiteness  of  conclusion  are 
now  possible,  the  early  struggles  for  objectively  defined  standards  and  scales  have  been 
forgotten.  Hence  it  seems  to  many  grotesque  to  talk  about  research  in  education  and 
the  impersonal  measurement  of  the  vaguely  defined  and  elusive  qualities  of  human 
beings.  The  fact  that  such  measurements  have  as  yet  been  rather  crude  and  incon- 
clusive is  no  reason  against  trying  to  improve  them,  especially  now  when  the  great- 
est need  of  education  is  a  technique  and  a  terminology  that  will  make  the  results  of 
experiments  in  teaching  intelligible  to  every  one.  The  inability  of  teachers  to  carry 
conviction  as  to  the  merits  of  teaching  and  the  meaning  of  experiments  in  education 
is  one  of  the  chief  reasons  why  teaching  fails  to  receive  the  recognition  accorded  to 
research.  But  as  soon  as  it  is  possible  to  measure  the  results  of  teaching  by  impersonal 
means,  successful  teaching  will  be  as  easy  to  recognize  as  profitable  research.  Objective 
records  of  achievement  have  been  found  in  industry  to  be  one  of  the  best  incentives  to 
creative  work.  Hence  the  line  of  progress  in  education  does  not  lie  in  the  direction  of 
making  arbitrary  distinctions  between  research  and  teaching,  but  rather  in  the  direc- 
tion of  removing  the  limitations  placed  upon  the  spirit  of  enquiry  so  as  to  encourage 
its  expansion  to  education  and  human  relations  generally. 


TEACHERS  105 

If  university  trustees,  presidents,  and  faculties  will  unite  in  insisting  on  a  scientific 
study  of  their  educational  work,  they  will  create  the  conditions  needed  to  release 
teaching  power  in  the  engineering  schools.  The  professors  who  have  teaching  interest 
and  ability  will  welcome  the  opportunity  to  win  recognition  in  work  that  arouses 
their  enthusiasm  and  stirs  their  imagination  to  creative  effort  just  as  the  professors 
who  are  interested  in  natural  science  have  responded  to  the  opportunity  to  promote 
research.  This  should  not  result  in  a  diminution  of  output  in  research,  but  in  a  de- 
cided increase,  because  it  tends  to  give  each  man  the  work  he  is  best  fitted  to  do,  and 
therefore  leads  ultimately  to  maximum  efficiency. 

The  practical  carrying  out  of  this  suggestion  in  any  school  is  relatively  simple,  pro- 
vided the  faculty  is  ready  and  able  to  undertake  it  in  a  spirit  of  disinterestedness  and 
helpful  cooperation,  that  is,  in  a  real  scientific  spirit.  Many  practical  hints  concern- 
ing essential  details  of  operation  have  been  given  in  preceding  chapters.  Any  faculty 
that  will  get  together  and  take  time  to  think  out  their  problem  can  create  an  organ- 
ism that  will  be  a  live  influence  in  education ;  and  the  doing  of  it  will  in  two  years 
bring  more  joy  to  all  concerned  than  forty  years  of  weary  effort  to  maintain  things 
as  they  are. 

The  good  effects  of  an  interest  in  the  scientific  study  of  education  in  institutions 
of  higher  learning  are  not  limited  to  the  institutions  themselves.  For  a  number  of 
years  objective  methods  of  measuring  the  results  of  training  have  been  gaining  favor 
in  the  lower  schools.  Until  very  recently  the  colleges  and  universities  have  looked 
askance  at  the  progress,  and  refused  to  do  their  share  by  giving  professional  training 
to  those  whom  they  send  out  to  teach.  The  colleges  have  thus  been  a  positive  hin- 
drance to  this  development,  and  even  now,  when  more  than  half  of  their  graduates 
teach,  for  a  time  at  least,  no  professional  work  in  education  is  as  a  rule  required  out- 
side of  the  so-called  teacher's  colleges.  Meanwhile  the  industries  have  been  compelled 
by  the  slowness  of  the  academic  development  to  establish  schools  of  their  own,  and 
have  organized  the  National  Association  of  Corporation  Schools  with  an  active  mem- 
bership of  more  than  one  hundred  and  twenty -five  large  corporations,  which  are  as 
much  interested  in  the  scientific  study  of  vocational  guidance  and  methods  of  training 
as  they  are  in  industrial  research.  The  scientific  study  of  industrial  education  thus 
ranks  with  industrial  research  as  a  bond  of  union  between  the  engineering  schools 
and  the  industries.  On  the  fuller  development  of  both  teaching  and  research  depends 
the  realization  of  the  ultimate  aim  of  engineering  education,  namely,  more  intelligent 
production. 


Chapter  XVI 

THE  PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEER 

At  the  first  meeting  of  the  Joint  Committee  of  the  National  Engineering  Societies 
with  representatives  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching 
it  was  agreed  that  an  analysis  of  the  requirements  of  the  engineering  profession  was 
one  of  the  first  essential  steps  in  this  study  of  technological  education.  Accordingly 
a  number  of  representative  engineers  were  questioned  in  personal  interviews  concern- 
ing the  factors  that  are  most  powerful  in  determining  success  in  engineering  work  and 
most  effective  in  building  up  the  engineering  profession.  These  interviews,  together 
with  a  study  of  the  methods  of  rating  college  graduates  in  several  large  manufactur- 
ing companies,  indicated  that  personal  qualities  such  as  common  sense,  integrity, 
resourcefulness,  initiative,  tact,  thoroughness,  accuracy,  efficiency,  and  understanding 
of  men  are  universally  recognized  as  being  no  less  necessary  to  a  professional  engi- 
neer than  are  technical  knowledge  and  skill. 

The  statement  that  individuality  counts  for  as  much  as  learning  for  the  engineer, 
just  as  it  does  for  the  lawyer  or  the  physician,  seems  like  a  veritable  platitude.  Yet 
because  the  engineering  schools  have  always  made  it  their  chief  aim  to  impart  the 
technical  information  needed  in  industrial  production,  and  because  both  scientific 
knowledge  and  industrial  practice  have  grown  so  rapidly,  the  attention  of  technical 
schools  has  been  focused  chiefly  on  keeping  up  to  date  in  science  and  practice.  The 
university  emphasis  on  research  in  natural  science  has  also  tended  to  magnify  the 
importance  of  technique  and  to  minimize  the  importance  of  personality;  until  cur- 
ricula have  become  so  congested  with  specialized  courses  that  students  generally  re- 
gard literature  and  sociology  as  unnecessary  chores,  to  be  endured  rather  than  enjoyed. 
Therefore  it  seemed  necessary  to  consider  the  question  whether  this  emphasis  on  tech- 
nique is  producing  a  new  and  higher  type  of  engineer,  or  whether  the  engineering 
profession  still  stakes  its  faith  on  the  fundamental  thesis  that  personal  character  is, 
after  all,  the  real  foundation  for  achievement. 

The  results  of  this  enquiry  have  already  been  published.1  Briefly,  they  showed  that 
fifteen  hundred  engineers,  who  replied  in  writing  to  the  question  :  What  are  the  most 
important  factors  in  determining  probable  success  or  failure  in  engineering?  men- 
tioned personal  qualities  more  than  seven  times  as  frequently  as  they  did  knowledge 
of  engineering  science  and  the  technique  of  practice.  A  second  circular  letter  stating 
this  result  was  then  sent  to  the  thirty  thousand  members  of  the  four  large  engineer- 
ing societies,  and  each  was  asked  to  number  six  groups  of  qualities  headed  respec- 
tively Character,  Judgment,  Efficiencv,  Understanding  of  men,  Knowledge,  and  Tech- 
nique, in  the  order  of  importance  which  he  gave  them  in  judging  the  reasons  for 
engineering  success  and  in  sizing  up  young  men  for  employment  or  for  promotion. 

1  Engineering  Education,  vol.  vii.  No.  3.  pp.  125-144,  December,  1916;  Educational  Review,  vol.  53,  January,  1917: 
Columbia  University  Quarterly,  vol.  xix,  pp.  66-73,  December,  1916. 


THE  PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEER  107 

More  than  seven  thousand  engineers  replied  to  this  request,  and  their  votes  placed 
the  Character  group  at  the  head  of  the  list  by  a  majority  of  94.5  per  cent,  while 
Technique  was  voted  to  the  bottom  by  an  equally  decisive  majority.  A  very  similar 
definition  of  the  essential  requirements  of  the  engineer  was  formulated  by  Mr.  A.  M. 
Wellington  and  published  by  him  in  the  Engineering  News  for  May  11, 1893,  as 
the  conclusion  of  his  well-known  series  of  articles  on  the  engineering  schools  of  that 
time. 

This  definition  of  the  essential  characteristics  of  the  professional  engineer  is  impor- 
tant, because  it  proves  that  in  spite  of  the  enormous  development  of  scientific  infor- 
mation and  technical  skill,  the  engineers  of  America  have  not  been  beguiled  into 
thinking  that  efficient  control  of  the  forces  of  nature  is  the  sole  requirement  for  achieve- 
ment in  applied  science.  Therefore  the  schools  that  intend  to  train  engineers  cannot 
afford  to  neglect  wholly  the  personalities  of  the  students.  While  it  is  obvious  that 
personal  traits  like  integrity,  initiative,  and  common  sense  cannot  be  taught  didacti- 
cally like  the  rule  of  three,  it  is  no  less  obvious  that  the  growth  of  these  essential 
characteristics  in  students  may  be  either  fostered  and  encouraged  or  inhibited  and 
discouraged  by  the  manner  in  which  the  school  is  organized  and  the  subject-matter 
presented.  The  problems  of  finding  the  best  organization,  of  constructing  the  best 
curriculum,  and  of  discovering  the  best  methods  of  teaching  cannot  be  solved  by  logic 
alone  or  by  research  in  natural  science.  As  has  been  abundantly  shown  in  the  pre- 
ceding chapters,  their  solution  requires  extended  experiments  in  education  under  con- 
ditions that  command  respect. 

The  enquiry  just  described  was  completed  in  1916 — a  year  that  will  always  be 
memorable  in  the  history  of  engineering  because  it  marks  the  beginning  of  a  deeper 
public  recognition  of  the  importance  of  the  engineer's  function  in  national  life.  In 
that  year  the  Federal  Government,  for  the  first  time  in  its  history,  formally  recog- 
nized the  engineering  profession  in  the  organization  of  the  Naval  Consulting  Board, 
the  Council  of  National  Defense,  and  the  National  Research  Council.  The  first  of  these 
invited  the  National  Engineering  Societies  to  nominate  the  members  of  the  state  com- 
mittees on  Industrial  Preparedness  which  compiled  an  inventory  of  the  industrial 
resources  of  the  country.  Representatives  of  these  societies  are  also  members  of  the 
National  Research  Council  which  has  so  effectively  mobilized  the  scientific  resources 
of  the  country  for  national  service.  The  establishment  of  the  Engineering  Founda- 
tion, the  United  Engineering  Societies,  and  the  Engineering  Council,  and  the  recent 
appointment  of  one  man  as  secretary  of  them  all,  indicates  the  progress  that  is  being 
made  toward  the  conception  that  there  is  really  but  one  profession  of  engineering,  in 
spite  of  its  apparent  division  into  the  several  well-known  branches. 

War  conditions  have  not  only  hastened  public  recognition  of  the  engineer  as  an 
expert  in  applied  science  and  fostered  solidarity  of  the  profession,  they  have  also  opened 
to  him  new  fields  of  activitv.  Back  in  1914  most  people  believed  that  the  war  could 
not  last  long  because  enough  money  could  not  be  found  to  finance  it.  But  three  years 


108  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

of  experience  have  made  it  clear  to  every  one  that  altho  money  is  plentiful,  it  is  use- 
less if  there  is  nothing  to  buy ;  so  that  winning  the  war  depends  on  increasing  pro- 
duction by  an  amount  which  has  been  estimated  as  the  output  of  at  least  ten  million 
additional  industrial  workers.  This  extra  production  may  be  secured  either  by  train- 
ing more  workers  or  by  increasing  the  output  per  worker  by  engineering  methods. 
Hence  there  has  arisen  a  pressing  demand  for  men  who  can  deal  with  labor  and  with 
business  administration  in  the  engineering  spirit.  This  demand  is  further  emphasized 
by  the  fact  discovered  by  the  Federal  Trade  Commission,  that  only  ten  per  cent  of 
the  manufacturers  in  the  United  States  know  their  actual  costs  of  production.  The 
determination  of  these  costs  requires  a  scientific  study  of  production  which  only  an 
engineer  can  make.  This  work  involves  the  analysis  and  apportionment  of  overhead 
expenses,  and  thus  leads  at  once  to  such  fundamental  questions  of  economic  justice 
as :  Should  the  capital  invested  in  idle  machinery  be  paid  wages  tho  idle  workingmen 
are  not? 

These  new  opportunities  for  the  engineer  have  been  gradually  developing  for  a 
number  of  years,  but  the  profession  as  a  whole  has  been  slow  to  discern  them.  The 
war  has  focused  attention  on  them  and  precipitated  a  general  recognition  of  them. 
It  is  also  evident  that  the  mastery  of  these  new  activities  depends  in  greater  measure 
than  does  mastery  of  the  traditional  types  of  engineering  on  the  personality  of  the 
man.  The  success  of  a  designer  of  bridges  or  of  machinery  is  not  necessarily  impeded 
by  lack  of  insight  into  human  nature  or  of  failure  to  comprehend  the  things  that 
mankind  considers  most  worth  while.  But  to  the  man  who  would  deal  successfully 
with  human  labor  and  with  business,  personality  is  usually  a  greater  asset  than  tech- 
nical knowledge  and  skill.  Therefore  as  engineering  expands  into  the  new  fields  now 
opening  before  it,  the  conception  that  character,  judgment,  efficiency,  and  under- 
standing of  men  are  no  less  necessary  than  technical  knowledge  and  skill  will  become 
more  and  more  impelling,  and  it  will  become  more  and  more  essential  that  schools 
of  engineering  pav  greater  attention  to  the  effect  of  their  work  on  the  personal  de- 
velopment of  the  students.  Altho  many  specific  suggestions  as  to  how  this  may  be 
done  have  been  made  in  the  preceding  chapters,  a  connected  summary  of  the  educa- 
tional conceptions  on  which  the  suggestions  are  based  may  serve  to  make  clearer  why 
the  current  organization  is  inadequate  and  how  the  proposed  plan  more  fully  meets 
the  present  requirements  and  also  supplies  a  sound  basis  for  future  growth. 

The  ultimate  aim  of  engineering  education  has  always  been  and  still  is  more  in- 
telligent industrial  production.  Technical  schools  were  founded  when  industrial  evo- 
lution had  progressed  so  far  as  to  create  a  pressing  demand  for  men  who  knew  how 
to  utilize  the  new  and  rapidly  expanding  knowledge  of  natural  science  to  increase 
and  improve  production.  Science  was  then  little  taught  in  high  schools  and  colleges, 
so  that  both  the  public  and  the  manufacturers  were  ignorant  of  it.  Under  these  con- 
ditions the  obvious  need  was  for  scientific  enlightenment;  and  this  the  engineering 
schools  were  organized  to  supply.  President  Rogers's  statements  that  the  immediate 


THE  PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEER  109 

aim  was  to  supply  the  intellectual  element  in  production,  and  that  this  meant  know- 
ledge of  the  fundamental  principles  of  science,  were  accurately  true  when  he  made 
them  (1861). 

The  schools  have  loyally  pursued  this  aim,  and  have  thereby  contributed  enor- 
mously to  the  achievement  of  two  striking  results ;  namely,  the  extension  of  science 
instruction  into  the  school  system  generally,  and  the  development  of  public  recog- 
nition of  engineering  as  a  profession,  coordinate  with  theology,  medicine,  and  law. 
At  the  present  day  an  encouraging  fraction  of  the  people  are  reasonably  intelligent 
in  science,  the  worker  in  applied  science  has  become  socially  respectable,  and  there 
has  been  developed  a  large  conception  of  the  engineering  profession.  Meanwhile  the 
methods  of  dealing  with  the  material  problems  of  industry  in  a  scientific  way  have 
been  in  a  measure  established,  while  the  more  intricate  problems  of  organizing  and 
managing  men  are  rapidly  pressing  forward  and  demanding  engineering  treatment. 

The  net  result  is  that  the  curricula  and  methods  of  instruction  that  were  devised  to 
supply  the  intellectual  element  in  production  by  imparting  knowledge  of  natural  sci- 
ence must  be  reorganized  to  meet  the  new  industrial  demand  for  engineering  admin- 
istrators and  the  larger  professional  demand  for  men  of  strong  personality.  The  gen- 
eral plan  of  the  proposed  reorganization  is  based  upon  an  analysis  of  engineering  prac- 
tice into  its  three  essential  factors;  namely,  knowledge  of  engineering  science,  skill 
in  technique  of  application,  and  judgment  in  the  appraisement  of  values  and  costs. 
In  every  engineering  project  the  overlapping  claims  of  these  three  essential  factors 
must  be  harmonized  with  respect  to  the  two  fundamental  elements  of  production, 
namely,  materials  and  men.  Surely  every  engineer  should  have  some  conception  of 
the  present  conditions  and  problems  in  at  least  the  general  aspects  of  all  these  essen- 
tial factors  and  elements.  If  this  be  granted,  it  is  easy  for  any  school  to  discover 
where  its  curriculum  is  overloaded  and  where  it  is  deficient. 

This  analysis  also  indicates  how  the  present  organization  of  school  work  can  be 
modified  so  as  to  furnish  a  more  vital  training  for  professional  engineers.  Thus,  with 
regard  to  materials,  the  schools  do  give  careful  instruction  in  the  laws  of  physical 
science  and  in  the  properties  and  uses  of  materials.  Students  are  taught  the  relative 
strengths  of  substances  in  the  materials  laboratory,  kinematics  teaches  the  principles 
of  gearing,  the  shapes  of  gear- teeth  are  worked  out  in  the  drawing  room,  the  chemical 
properties  are  taught  in  chemistry,  mechanics  deals  with  the  forces  required  to  over- 
come inertia,  machine  work  is  relegated  to  the  shop,  and  so  on.  But  seldom  is  all  this 
information  coordinated  in  a  single  practical  problem,  such  as  determining  whether 
mild  steel,  nickel  steel,  or  phosphor  bronze  is  the  best  thing  to  use  in  making  a  par- 
ticular gearwheel;  nor  is  the  student  ever  asked  to  judge  what  combination  is  likely 
to  produce  the  most  valuable  result  for  the  price.  Yet  this  balancing  of  value  and 
cost  is  the  controlling  factor  in  all  intelligent  production. 

Again,  little  consideration  is  given  in  courses  in  machine  design  to  the  comfort 
and  safety  of  the  operator.  Yet  a  punch  press,  for  example,  that  requires  a  workman 


110  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

to  use  both  hands  to  operate  it  is  far  more  intelligent  than  one  that  takes  a  large 
annual  toll  of  fingers  because  the  driver  has  one  free  hand.  Similarly  the  importance 
of  good  heating,  lighting,  ventilation,  and  sanitation  in  increasing  the  output  of 
workers  and  in  keeping  them  strong  and  healthy  should  always  be  taken  into  account. 
These  human  factors  enter  in  large  measure  into  the  determination  of  the  values 
secured  for  a  given  cost. 

It  thus  appears  that  an  adequate  treatment  of  the  first  element  in  production  in- 
volves not  only  a  scientific  presentation  of  the  laws  of  nature  and  the  properties  of 
materials,  but  also  an  estimation  of  the  values  and  costs  from  both  the  material  and  the 
human  points  of  view.  The  chasm  between  the  school  and  practical  life  is  due  largely 
to  a  failure  to  appreciate  this  fact.  The  introduction  of  the  study  of  values  and  costs 
in  all  their  phases  is  the  most  direct  method  by  which  the  schools  can  bridge  this 
chasm.  Such  study  is  also  one  of  the  most  potent  means  of  liberating  creative  energy 
and  of  developing  the  spirit  of  investigation. 

With  regard  to  the  second  element  of  production — men — most  schools  at  present 
are  doing  practically  nothing  to  arouse  the  students  to  an  intelligent  appreciation 
of  the  problems  of  personal  and  human  relations  in  production.  Yet  these  problems 
are  every  day  becoming  more  acute,  as  indicated  by  such  movements  as  Americani- 
zation, human  engineering,  industrial  engineering,  and  scientific  management,  with 
their  various  efforts  to  improve  the  condition  of  the  workman  and  to  increase  his  out- 
put in  production.  Many  of  the  burning  questions  of  the  time  lie  in  this  field.  The 
loss  to  industry  from  turnover — the  hiring  and  firing  of  workmen — is  variously 
estimated  at  from  $150,000,000  to  $400,000,000  a  year.  This  expense  adds  from  7 
to  20  per  cent  to  the  cost  of  production,  and  yet  it  injures  rather  than  benefits  the 
product.  What  are  the  means  to  prevent  turnover — better  housing?  better  social  con- 
ditions ?  higher  wages  ?  profit  sharing  ?  opportunity  for  self-expression  ? juster  economic 
treatment?  or  more  kindliness?  Does  the  time-study  method  of  speeding  up  work  pay? 
Does  it  really  relax  or  wear  out  the  worker?  Does  it  produce  the  best  type  of  citizen- 
ship among  the  industrial  classes  ?  These  and  many  other  similar  unanswered  ques- 
tions are  now  waiting  for  an  engineering  analysis,  and  the  country  looks  to  the  engi- 
neering schools  to  train  men  who  shall  be  able  to  answer  them. 

The  training  of  men  for  the  solution  of  these  human  problems  cannot  be  carried 
out  in  the  schoolroom  alone.  The  students  must  have  some  vital,  first-hand,  personal 
contact  with  labor  and  workmen's  conditions,  either  by  a  cooperative  system,  as  at  the 
Universities  of  Cincinnati  and  of  Pittsburgh,  or  thru  the  industrial  service  movement, 
or  in  some  other  real  and  living  way.  Hence  meeting  this  demand  requires  some  form 
of  closer  cooperation  between  the  engineering  school  and  the  industries,  better  under- 
standing of  their  mutual  relations,  and  willingness  on  both  sides  to  approach  the 
problem  with  the  true  research  spirit.  Such  cooperation  is  needed  not  only  to  give 
the  students  a  vital  conception  of  the  workman's  point  of  view,  but  also  to  furnish 
that  intimate  personal  knowledge  of  the  details  of  production  which  cannot  be  secured 


THE  PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEER  111 

in  college  laboratories  and  shops.  The  lack  of  this  sense  of  the  physical  properties  of 
materials  is  one  of  the  chief  reasons  why  less  than  five  per  cent  of  the  production 
managers  in  this  country  are  college-ti'ained  men. 

It  is,  however,  in  the  matter  of  estimating  values  and  costs  that  this  problem 
assumes  its  most  far-reaching  consequences.  The  following  are  some  of  the  typical 
problems  now  pressing  for  solution  in  this  field.  What  is  the  effect  of  good  housing 
on  the  development  of  the  men,  the  efficiency  of  production,  and  the  size  of  the  profits? 
What  is  the  most  effective  incentive  to  maximum  output  — the  bonus  system  ?  oppor- 
tunity for  cooperation  in  management?  opportunity  for  creative  work?  or  shorter 
hours?  Does  the  assurance  of  justice  and  a  square  deal  always  tend  to  increase  output 
and  also  to  foster  the  growth  of  a  social  spirit  and  of  patriotism  ?  Does  a  plant  pay 
better  when  profits  and  output  are  increased  by  efficiency  methods  which  give  work- 
men no  chance  for  self-expression  ?  or  when  the  development  of  the  workmen  is  made 
an  aim  as  well? 

Every  manager  will  estimate  the  values  and  costs  of  these  various  methods  of  treat- 
ing workmen  in  accordance  with  his  own  philosophy  of  life.  There  is  as  yet  no  con- 
clusive evidence  to  prove  these  cases  one  way  or  the  other.  The  successful  manager 
to-day  is  the  one  who  estimates  most  accurately  the  human  values  involved.  There- 
fore, one  of  the  most  important  contributions  that  the  school  can  make  toward  the 
education  of  the  engineer  is  to  guide  him  in  developing  an  attitude  toward  life  and 
a  philosophy  of  living  that  will  enable  him  to  judge  rightly  as  to  the  things  human- 
ity considers  most  worth  while.  This  is  the  meaning  of  the  professional  demand  for 
larger  opportunities  for  cultural  and  literary  studies.  It  cannot  be  met  by  merely 
requiring  more  work  of  the  ordinary  academic  type  in  history,  in  economics,  and  in 
languages;  but  rather  by  introducing  the  consideration  of  values  and  costs  into  the 
regular  engineering  instruction  in  some  such  way  as  that  described  in  Chapters  XIII 
and  XIV. 

Some  attention  has  already  been  paid  by  the  engineering  schools  to  the  problem 
of  organizing  men  into  effective  working  groups.  At  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of 
Technology,  Pennsylvania  State  College,  and  several  other  schools  special  courses  in 
engineering  administration  are  now  given  regularly.  These  courses  deal  mainly  with 
the  various  types  of  organization,  the  technique  of  different  kinds  of  management, 
accountancy,  banking  methods,  and  economic  theoiy.  All  of  this  is,  of  course,  essen- 
tial to  every  engineering  administrator.  Industry  sorely  needs  men  thus  trained ;  for 
the  determination  of  costs  is  relatively  easy  so  far  as  materials  and  labor  are  concerned ; 
but  the  overhead,  because  it  includes  the  cost  of  maintaining  the  organization,  is  a 
matter  of  great  difficulty.  Analysis  by  engineers  shows  that  the  largest  wastes  in  pro- 
duction are  in  the  overhead  expenses,  and  result  from  faults  in  organization,  such  as 
idle  machinery,  inefficient  maintenance,  poor  routing,  lack  of  foresight  in  purchas- 
ing, delays  from  lack  of  instruction  from  the  office,  and  so  on.  The  study  of  overhead 
expenses  has  led  to  many  searching  questions  of  economics  and  industrial  justice, 


112  STUDY  OF  ENGINEERING  EDUCATION 

with  which  the  student  will  have  to  deal  after  graduation,  but  to  which  the  schools 
have  not  yet  given  serious  attention. 

But  it  is  gradually  becoming  evident  that  the  ultimate  success  of  any  organization 
depends  on  its  spirit;  and  this,  in  turn,  is  determined  by  the  manner  in  which  those 
in  control  coordinate  and  interrelate  the  intelligences  and  imaginations  of  men.  Great 
organizers  and  leaders  in  industry  are  those  who  not  only  master  the  laws  of  nature, 
but  who  also  shape  and  control  their  organization  thru  their  power  of  estimating  ac- 
curately the  value  which  each  worker  esteems  most  highly.  The  engineers  instinctively 
recognize  this  fact  and  the  educational  implications  of  it  when  they  declare  that  char- 
acter, judgment,  efficiency,  and  understanding  of  men  are  even  more  essential  to  the 
practising  engineer  than  is  knowledge  of  the  science  and  technique  of  engineering. 

The  educational  interpretation  of  this  professional  demand  is  not  nearly  so  mys- 
terious as  many  have  tried  to  make  it.  For  the  schools  have  already  discovered  that 
students  learn  best  when  they  are  inspired  by  the  conviction  that  the  work  is  really 
worth  while.  One  of  the  most  effective  ways  of  making  work  seem  worth  while  is  by 
constantly  relating  it  to  the  consideration  of  the  whole  range  of  values  involved  and 
all  the  costs.  Every  decision  in  daily  life  is  an  answer  to  the  question  whether  the  value 
is  worth  the  cost.  The  omission  of  this  mainspring  of  all  investigation  and  enquiry 
from  school  work  is  perhaps  the  chief  reason  for  the  breach  that  separates  the  schools 
from  life.  Hence  the  first  message  of  the  profession  to  the  schools  is — Motivate  your 
work  by  making  it  worth  while;  liberate  the  spirit  of  investigation  by  making  the 
game  worth  the  candle;  for  character,  judgment,  efficiency,  and  understanding  of  men 
develop  best  in  men  who  work  with  enthusiasm  and  intelligence  at  things  that  they 
believe  to  be  worth  while. 

But  there  is  a  second  message  in  the  professional  demand.  For  the  spirit  of  investi- 
gation accomplishes  valuable  results  only  when  the  investigator  is  resourceful,  accu- 
rate, and  efficient  in  mastering  facts,  and  when  he  has  judgment,  common  sense,  and 
a  wide  perspective.  These  qualities  depend  on  the  ability  to  put  things  in  their  proper 
places  at  the  proper  times,  which  ability  depends  in  turn  on  the  perception  of  intrinsic 
relationships.  The  most  successful  organizer  and  executive  is  the  one  who  perceives 
relationships  so  clearly  that  he  can  build  an  organization  which  acts  to  liberate  the 
creative  energy  of  each  in  ways  that  prove  most  helpful.  Hence  training  in  ability  to 
perceive  relationships — interrelation — is  one  essential  for  the  development  of  re- 
sourcefulness, judgment, common  sense,  perspective, efficiency,  and  the  rest.  This  is  also 
one  essential  to  the  acquisition  of  knowledge.  Therefore  in  so  far  as  the  school  work 
develops  the  student's  ability  to  perceive  relationships,  in  so  far  do  knowledge  and  the 
desired  personal  traits  increase  together. 

It  thus  appears  that  so  far  as  the  school  work  itself  goes,  the  professional  demand 
for  upbuilding  of  character  along  with  increase  of  knowledge  suggests  at  least  two 
promising  lines  of  educational  experiment,  namely,  motivation  and  interrelation.  The 
lower  schools  have  long  ago  recognized  the  possibilities  of  these  fields  of  investigation. 


THE  PROFESSIONAL  ENGINEER  113 

In  fact,  the  educational  progress  of  the  past  century  has  centred  around  these  two  con- 
ceptions. Many  fruitful  experiments  and  a  large  literature  have  gathered  about  the 
subject  of  motivation  and  the  related  topics  of  interest,  formal  discipline,  and  trans- 
ferable training.  In  like  manner  much  has  been  accomplished  toward  interrelation 
thru  efforts  that  have  been  made  to  correlate  various  subjects,  as  indicated  by  the 
terms  commercial-geography,  business-arithmetic,  household-science,  domestic-econ- 
omy, agricultural-chemistry,  soil-physics,  and  the  like. 

The  organization  of  curricula  proposed  in  Chapters  XIII  and  XIV  is  suggested  as 
one  practical  method  of  harmonizing  the  conflicting  demands  of  technical  skill  and 
liberal  education.  It  coordinates  the  results  of  numerous  individual  experiments  in 
a  consistent  program.  It  recognizes  all  the  essential  elements  and  factors  of  engi- 
neering as  well  as  the  educational  requirements  of  motivation  and  interrelation.  It 
is  not  a  Utopian  dream,  but  a  summation  of  the  best  that  has  been  thought,  said,  and 
done  in  education  during  the  past  two  centuries.  Finally,  it  embodies  the  modern 
conception  of  the  professional  engineer,  not  as  a  conglomerate  of  classical  scholar- 
ship and  mechanical  skill,  but  as  the  creator  of  machines  and  the  interpreter  of  their 
human  significance,  well  qualified  to  increase  the  material  rewards  of  human  labor 
and  to  organize  industry  for  the  more  intelligent  development  of  men. 


IH>' 


APPENDIX 


OBJECTIVE  TESTS 

The  investigations  here  described  were  made  by  Professor  Edward  L.  Thorndike  of 
Columbia  University,  as  an  integral  part  of  the  study  of  engineering  education.  Their 
bearings  on  the  problems  of  admission,  elimination,  and  grading  have  been  discussed 
here  and  there  throughout  the  report,  but  especially  in  Chapters  VIII  and  XI.  The 
types  of  test  used  were  the  following: 

Mathematical  Achievement 

M^.  Arithmetical  Problems.  The  student  is  allowed  thirty  minutes  to  solve  five  prob- 
lems requiring  arithmetical  computation  only.  The  problems  are  arranged  in  the 
order  of  difficulty  and  the  student  is  instructed  to  finish  each  before  passing  to  the 
next.  The  grade  is  determined  by  the  number  of  correct  answers.  The  first  problem 
of  the  series  is : 

1.  A  boy  was  tested  with  a  series  of  sixteen  problems  in  algebra.  He  did 
nothing  at  all  with  six  of  them ;  he  did  one  correctly  except  for  a  mistake  in 
changing  signs;  he  did  two  with  many  mistakes  in  each;  he  did  the  others  per- 
fectly. He  finished  the  work  in  one  hundred  minutes.  What  was  his  total  credit, 
supposing  that  he  is  given  a  credit  of  8  for  each  example  right,  a  credit  of  3  for 
each  example  right  except  for  changing  signs,  and  a  penalty  of  1  for  each  minute 
spent  over  an  hour  and  a  half? 

M2.  Algebraic  Problems.  This  test  is  similar  to  M1  in  that  it  consists  of  five  problems 
of  graded  difficulty,  but  these  require  the  use  of  algebraic  equations  for  their  solution. 
The  first  problem  of  the  series  is : 

1.  Let  L  stand  for  the  safe  load  that  can  be  hoisted  by  a  hemp  rope.  Let  C  stand 
for  the  circumference  of  a  rope.  If  L  =  100  C2  pounds,  how  many  pounds  are  a 
safe  load  for  a  hemp  rope  2^  inches  in  circumference  ? 

M3.  Algebraic  Computation.  A  series  of  seven  algebraic  equations  of  increasing 
difficulty,  requiring  substitution  of  numerical  values  and  solution  for  x.  The  rating 
is  determined  by  the  number  of  correct  answers  secured  in  thirty  minutes. 

M4.  Graph  Test.  This  is  a  series  of  five  problems  of  graded  difficulty  requiring  the 
plotting  of  a  series  of  points  to  represent  various  relations  between  dollars  earned  (d) 
and  hours  of  work  (h).  The  first  (d  —  2  h)  is  worked  out  by  way  of  illustration.  The 
others  are: 

7       h     ,  ,,6         .    ,       h2 

a  =  r»  a  =  4  +  h,  a  =  T.  ar>d  "  =  o    +  5 
5  no 

The  score  is  determined  by  the  number  of  equations  correctly  plotted  in  thirty 
minutes. 

M5.  Geometrical  Proof.  The  blank  for  this  test  contains  a  list  of  fourteen  geomet- 
rical facts  and  axioms  which  are  given  as  proved,  and  the  student  is  asked  to  prove 
five  theorems  with  the  use  of  the  data  given.  As  in  the  other  tests  the  theorems  are 
arranged  in  the  order  of  increasing  difficulty,  and  the  rating  is  determined  by  the 
number  correctly  demonstrated  in  half  an  hour. 


118  APPENDIX 

Achievement  in  English 

E]_.  Paragraph  Reading.  The  blank  for  this  test  contains  three  paragraphs,  the 
first  very  simple,  the  second  more  intricate,  and  the  last  very  complex.  Under  each  is 
a  series  of  five  or  six  questions  as  to  the  meaning  of  the  paragraph.  The  student  may 
read  each  paragraph  as  often  as  he  wishes  in  order  to  find  answers  to  the  questions. 
A  quick-witted  man  gets  the  point  from  a  single  reading,  while  a  slower  mind  has  to 
reread.  The  score  is  determined  by  the  number  of  correct  answers  written  in  thirty- 
six  minutes. 

E2.  Range  of  Vocabulary.  The  student  is  given  a  sheet  on  which  is  printed  a  series 
of  words,  beginning  with  those  in  common  use  and  leading  up  to  relatively  rare  terms. 
He  is  asked  to  write  under  each  word  a  suitable  symbol  to  indicate  whether  the  word 
means  a  flower,  an  animal,  a  boy's  name,  a  game,  a  book,  something  to  do  with  time, 
something  good  to  be,  or  something  bad  to  be.  As  in  the  other  tests  the  score  is  de- 
termined by  the  number  of  correct  answers  in  a  given  time. 

E3.  Completion  of  Sentences.  This  is  the  well-known  Ebbinghaus  test,  consisting  of 
a  series  of  sentences  of  increasing  intricacy,  from  which  key  words  have  been  omitted. 
The  student  must  supply  the  missing  words  in  such  a  way  as  to  make  sense.  The 
score  depends  on  the  number  of  blanks  correctly  filled. 

E4.  Verbal  Relations.  Twelve  minutes  is  allowed  in  this  test  to  write  the  opposite 
of  each  of  a  long  list  of  words,  as  up — down,  friend — enemy,  and  so  on.  The  obvious 
cases  at  the  beginning  are  followed  by  more  and  more  difficult  cases,  like  "  hiss," 
"some,"  "sacred,"  "if,"  and  "whether." 

Achievement  in  Physics 

P^  Practical  Laboratory  Problems.  Each  student  is  given  a  complete  set  of  the 
apparatus  required  to  solve  eight  simple  practical  problems  in  physics,  such  as 
"connect  the  electric  bell  to  the  dry  cell  so  that  it  will  give  a  single  stroke  but  will 
not  clatter  when  the  circuit  is  closed."  "  With  the  two  ounce  weight  provided,  find  the 
weight  of  the  meter  stick."  The  solution  of  each  is  recorded  on  a  suitable  blank,  from 
which  the  score  is  counted. 

P2.  Described  Problems.  This  is  a  series  of  five  ordinary  physics  problems  described 
in  words.  They  are  arranged  in  the  order  of  difficulty  and  the  student  is  given  twenty- 
five  minutes  in  which  to  answer  them. 

P3.  Matching  Diagrams.  On  one  half  of  the  blank  is  printed  a  series  of  diagrams 
and  pictures  of  physical  apparatus,  each  marked  with  a  number.  On  the  other  half 
is  a  series  of  statements  of  physical  facts  or  names  of  physical  phenomena,  each  of 
which  corresponds  to  one  of  the  pictures.  The  student  writes  at  the  head  of  each  state- 
ment the  number  of  the  corresponding  picture. 

P4.  Completing  Statements.  This  is  the  same  type  as  E3  except  that  the  sentences 
in  which  the  missing  words  are  to  be  supplied  are  statements  from  physics  texts. 

P5.  Completing  Diagrams.  There  are  eight  diagrams  representing  physical  appa- 
ratus, but  each  is  faulty  because  of  the  omission  of  several  lines.  The  student  must 
complete  the  diagrams  by  drawing  in  the  missing  lines. 


APPENDIX  119 

C.  The  Stenquist  Construction  Test.  Each  student  receives  a  box  divided  into  six 
compartments,  in  each  of  which  is  an  assembled  mechanical  device  and  the  pieces  re- 
quired to  construct  it.  The  first  contains  a  simple  piece  of  harness;  the  second,  a  snap 
switch ;  the  third,  a  door  lock ;  the  fourth,  an  electric  bell ;  the  fifth,  a  clock  work ; 
and  the  sixth,  an  electric  pull  socket.  The  student  is  given  fifty  minutes  in  which  to 
construct  the  finished  models  from  the  loose  parts.  His  score  depends  on  the  number 
he  accomplishes  successfully  in  the  given  time. 

The  Results  of  the  Tests 

In  the  experiment  with  thirty-four  Columbia  College  students  each  student's  scores 
in  these  tests  were  combined,  and  then  the  students  were  arranged  in  their  order  of 
merit  as  determined  by  this  combined  score.  To  test  the  validity  of  this  order,  which 
was  called  X,  all  available  information  concerning  each  student  was  gathered,  and 
the  thirty-four  were  arranged  in  their  order  of  merit  in  the  following  different  series: 

H.  According  to  high  school  records  in  English,  mathematics,  and  physics. 

R.  According  to  Regents'1  examination  records  in  English,  mathematics,  and 
physics. 

C.  According  to  college  records  for  scholarship  in  English,  mathematics,  and 
chemistry  during  the  freshman  year. 

B.  According  to  the  combined  judgment  of  the  students. 

T.  According  to  the  combined  judgment  of  the  dean  and  teachers. 

A.  According  to  age  at  entrance  to  college. 

The  series  X  was  then  compared  with  each  of  the  other  series  and  the  Pearson  cor- 
relation coefficient l  was  computed  for  each  comparison,  with  the  following  results : 

Correlation  of  (X)  with  (H)  High  School  Scholarship  .62 

Correlation  of  (X)  with  (R)  Regents'  examinations  .74 

Correlation  of  (X)  with  (C)  Freshman  year  record  .74 

Correlation  of  (X)  with  (B)  Opinion  of  classmates  .74 

Correlation  of  (X)  with  (T)  Opinion  of  teachers  .75 

With  the  age  at  entrance  to  college,  which  is  a  perfectly  objective,  altho  partial, 
measure  of  the  student's  past  ability  to  get  thru  the  elementary  school  rapidly  or  to 
begin  his  schooling  young,  or  both,  X  correlates  positively  to  an  extent  of  .30.  This 
correlation  could  not  be  expected  to  be  very  close,  even  if  the  tests  gave  a  perfect 
measure  of  general  scholarly  power,  and  is  in  fact  higher  for  the  tests  than  it  is  for 
H,  R,  C,  B,  or  T,  their  respective  correlations  with  A  being  .12,  .21,  .11,  .12,  and  .19. 

If  we  give  each  student,  as  a  rating  for  general  scholarly  power,  or  ability  with 
ideas,  or  intellect  in  the  sense  of  intellect  applied  to  school  tasks,  a  composite  of  H, 
R,  C,  B,  T,  A,  and  X,  allowing  approximately  equal  weight  to  H,  R,  C,  B,  and  X 
and  half  weight  to  T  and  A,2  the  rough  total  score  in  the  tests  correlates  with  this 
composite  (called  Ig)  to  an  extent  of  .84. 

1  If  the  two  series  are  identical,  the  coefficient  is  +1.  If  one  series  is  the  inverse  of  the  other,  the  coefficient  is  -1. 
A  coefficient  of  zero  indicates  that  there  is  no  resemblance  whatever  between  the  two  series.  A  coefficient  of  +.5 
indicates  a  close  resemblance,  and  one  of  +.9  expresses  one  of  the  closest  resemblances  found  in  nature  — that 
between  the  shape  of  the  right  and  the  left  hands  of  the  same  individual.  For  detailed  directions  as  to  the  method 
of  computing  these  coefficients,  cf.  Thorndike:  Mental  and  Social  Measurements,  chapter  xi.  New  York,  Teach- 
ers College,  1913. 

2  T  is  given  only  half  weight  because  it  is  already  largelycredited  underC ;  A  is  given  half  weight  because  the  age 
at  entrance  to  college  is  influenced  by  other  causes  than  ability. 


120  APPENDIX 

Every  one  of  the  tests  shows  a  positive  correlation  with  this  Ig,  our  best  obtain- 
able measure  of  general  intellect.  The  Pearson  coefficients  are : 

Mj.  Arithmetical  problems  .625 

M2.  Algebraic  problems  .796 

M3.  Algebraic  computation  .625 

M4.  Graph  test  .614 

M5.  Geometrical  proof  .531 

Ex.  Paragraph  reading  .447 

E2.  Range  of  vocabulary  .652 

E3.  Completing  sentences  .547 

E4.  Giving  opposites  .438 

Pi.    Laboratory  problems  .253 

P2.    Described  problems  .531 

P3.    Matching  diagrams  .309 

P4.    Completing  sentences  .654 

P5.    Completing  diagrams  .416 

C.      Construction  test  .180 

Every  one  of  these  tests,  excepting  the  construction  test,  is  thus  symptomatic  of  the 
quality  which  makes  a  student  enter  college  young,  possess  a  good  record  in  high  school 
and  in  the  impartial  Regents'  examinations,  do  well  during  freshman  year,  and  be  re- 
garded as  of  high  general  ability  by  his  classmates  and  teachers.  When  all  but  the  last 
are  combined  into  a  single  measure  they  are  symptomatic  of  it  in  a  very  high  degree. 
A  correlation  of  .84  is  probably  closer  than  that  which  would  be  found  between  the 
student's  average  grade  in  freshman  year  and  his  average  grade  in  sophomore  year. 

The  rough  total  score  in  the  tests  which  we  have  called  X  does  not  utilize  them 
to  the  full.  In  it  each  test  is  given  a  weight  in  rough  proportion  to  the  time  devoted 
to  it.  The  tests,  however,  differ  in  their  value  as  symptoms  of  Ig  and  should,  there- 
fore, have  different  weights.  The  probably  best  weights  to  attach  to  each  test  as  a 
symptom  or  prophecy  of  Ig  can  be  determined  by  the  method  of  partial  correlation 
coefficients,  developed  by  Edgeworth,  Pearson,  Yule,  and  Kelley.  The  calculations, 
which  are  necessarily  too  elaborate  to  be  reported  here,  were  made  by  Dr.  Truman  L. 
Kelley.  The  numerical  values  of  the  coefficients  for  the  various  tests  were  found  to  be: 


Mi. 

Arithmetical  problems 

+  .3376 

M2. 

Algebraic  problems 

+  .0669 

M3. 

Algebraic  computation 

+  .2941 

M4. 

Graph  test 

+  .2755 

M5. 

Geometrical  proof 

+  .1523 

Ei. 

Paragraph  reading 

-.3412 

E2. 

Range  of  vocabulary 

-.1429 

E3. 

Completing  sentences 

+  .2881 

E4. 

Giving  opposites 

+  .0149 

Pi- 

Laboratory  problems 

-.0552 

P2- 

Described  problems 

-.0731 

P3- 

Matching  diagrams 

+  .0912 

P4. 

Completing  sentences 

+  .6639 

P5. 

Completing  diagrams 

-.1910 

C. 

Construction  test 

-.0377 

APPENDIX  121 

The  partial  correlation  coefficients  show  substantially  that  a  practically  perfect 
prophecy  of  Ig  can  be  obtained  by  using  the  score  of  the  five  tests  in  mathematics, 
the  completion  test  in  English,  and  the  test  in  completing  statements  about  physics. 
Combining  these  seven  scores  so  as  to  give  them  relative  weights  of  about  4,  1,3,  3, 
1  -J,  3,  and  7  respectively,  we  obtain  a  composite  measure  (call  it  ME3P4),  which  cor- 
relates with  Ig  to  the  extent  of  .87  (Pearson  coefficient,  .86 ;  coefficient  by  the  method 
of  squared  differences  in  ranks,  .87 ;  coefficient  by  percentage  of  unlike-signed  pairs, 
.92). 

We  can  then  secure  a  practically  perfect  prophecy  of  Ig  by  these  seven  tests  alone. 
They  tell  us  very  closely  what  rating  a  student  would  have  if  we  combined  his  high 
school  marks,  Regents1  examination  marks,  marks  during  freshman  year,  grades  as- 
signed him  by  his  teachers  and  by  his  classmates,  age  at  entrance  (taken  inversely), 
and  score  in  our  fourteen  tests  (C  being  excluded).  The  other  three  tests  in  English 
and  the  other  four  tests  in  physics  do  almost  nothing1  toward  prophesying  this  Ig, 
except  in  so  far  as  they  involve  abilities  already  measured  by  the  completion  tests  and 
mathematical  tests. 

This  does  not  mean  that  these  tests  in  English  and  physics  are  of  no  independent 
value  as  symptoms  of  any  important  abilities  in  these  students.  On  the  contrary,  in 
so  far  as  we  may  trust  the  regression  equation,  they  are  proved  thereby  to  be  of  very 
great  value,  because  they  measure  abilities  which  the  entire  record  of  school  work, 
examinations,  and  judgment  by  teachers  and  fellow  students  fails  to  measure. 

Just  what  these  other  abilities  are  cannot  be  stated.  Further  experimentation  and 
the  calculation  of  other  sets  of  regression  equations  will  be  required  for  that.  They 
certainly  include,  however,  in  Pls  P3,  and  P5,  some  aspects  of  certain  abilities  with 
things  rather  than  abstract  elements  thereof.  These  abilities  seem  likely  to  be  of  spe- 
cial importance  for  future  success  in  the  study  and  practice  of  engineering.  They 
probably  include,  in  El5  E2,  and  E4,  certain  abilities  with  language  which  depend  on 
interest  in  reading,  memory  of  the  meaning  of  single  words  and  phrases,  and  efficiency 
in  keeping  in  mind  the  past  context  in  reading  a  connected  passage. 

Negatively,  they  are  abilities  which  the  records  of  high  school  and  freshman  year 
do  not  test,  and  which  are  other  than  the  abilities  for  managing  symbols  and  rela- 
tions tested  by  the  mathematical  and  completion  tests. 

Consider  now  the  test  in  "Construction"  or  assembling  parts  to  make  mechanisms. 
It  shows  a  positive  correlation  of  .18  with  Ig,  but  this  correlation  is  shown  by  the 
investigation  of  the  partial  correlation  coefficients  to  be  due  wholly  to  elements  of 
ability  already  fully  taken  account  of  by  Ml5  M2,  M3,  M4,  M5,  E3,  and  P4.  The  con- 
struction test  C  gives  us  primarily  a  measure  of  abilities  not  tested  by  the  record  of 
school,  entrance  examinations,  freshman  year,  and  opinions  of  fellow  students  and 
teachers.  They  are,  presumably,  concrete  knowledge  of  mechanisms  and  skill  in  putting 
them  togetlier.  Here  again  we  have  information  that  the  ordinary  school  records  and 
examinations  and  the  like  do  not  give,  and  that  is  probably  somewhat  prophetic  of 
success  in  the  study  and  practice  of  engineering. 

On  the  whole,  our  tests  fall  into  four  groups,  each  contributing  facts  of  sure,  or 
almost  sure,  importance.  First  we  have  M1?  M2,  M3,  M4,  M5,  E3,  and  P4.  When  an 
individual's  scores  in  these  are  properly  weighted  and  combined,  we  have  a  measure 
(called  ME3P4)  which  gives  us  substantially  the  same  rating  as  if  we  combined  (as 

1  P3,  the  test  in  matching:  diagrams  with  the  facts  or  laws  which  they  illustrate,  does  deserve  a  small  weight  (one- 
seventh  as  much  as  the  test  in  completing  sentences  about  physics).  The  others  deserve  none. 


122  APPENDIX 

in  Ig)  his  high  school  marks  for  four  years  in  mathematics,  English,  and  physics,  his 
entrance  examinations,  his  marks  for  freshman  year,  his  rating  for  general  intellect 
in  the  minds  of  his  teachers,  his  rating  for  general  intellect  in  the  minds  of  his  class- 
mates, his  age  at  entrance  to  college,  and  his  score  in  our  fourteen  tests  of  ability  in 
mathematics,  English,  and  physics.  ME3P4  thus  gives  us,  within  a  few  days  after  a 
boy  enters  an  engineering  school,  a  sufficiently  accurate  measure  of  what  is  commonly 
regarded  as  general  intellectual  ability  or  promise  as  a  student. 

In  the  second  place,  we  have  Pl5  P3,  and  P5,  the  tests  with  the  laboratory  prob- 
lems, matching  diagrams,  and  completing  diagrams.1  Call  this  combination  Pi35. 
These  measure  a  mixture  of  abilities  measured  by  ME3P42  and  other  abilities  not 
measured  by  ME3P4  or  by  Ig.  These  other  abilities  seem  likely  to  be  prophetic  of 
future  success  in  engineering  rather  than  law,  teaching,  or  business. 

In  the  third  place,  we  have  the  test  in  mechanical  skill,  which  has  very  little  in  com- 
mon with  the  El5  E2,  E4  group,  and  not  much  more  in  common  with  the  M12345E3P4 
group,  but  does  have  much  in  common  with  the  P135  group,  and  also  much  that  is 
peculiar  to  itself.  For  the  construction  test  C  the  correlations  are:  With  the  compos- 
ite of  El5  E2,  and  E4,  .166  by  the  method  of  squared  differences  in  ranks,  .055  by  the 
Spearman  foot-rule;  with  the  ME3P4  composite,  .25  (.247  and  .250  by  the  two  meth- 
ods); with  the  P135  composite,  .5  (.61  and  .62  by  the  two  methods). 

In  the  fourth  place,  we  have  the  tests  in  reading  English  words  and  paragraphs  and 
in  giving  opposites  (El5  E2,  and  E4).  This  combination,  which  may  be  called  E124,  has 
a  good  deal  in  common  with  ME3P4  (r  equals  .7),  but  practically  nothing  in  com- 
mon with  P135  or  with  the  tests  in  mechanical  knowledge  and  skill  (r  equals  .2  for  the 
former  and  .1  for  C  of  the  latter).  They  have  much  that  is  peculiar  to  themselves. 

That  each  of  the  first  three  groups  tells  us  something  important  about  candidates 
for  an  engineering  education,  probably  no  competent  person  will  doubt.  The  future 
careers  of  students  tested  as  the  thirty-four  students  were  tested  will  give  the  mate- 
rial for  measurements  of  correlations  which  will  decide  their  merits  beyond  dispute. 

The  fourth  group  of  tests  (El9  E2,  and  E4)  give  rather  specialized  information  con- 
cerning a  candidate's  mastery  of  the  vernacular,  which  is  useful  chiefly  as  a  means  of 
interpreting  the  results  of  other  tests.  If  they  were  left  out,  we  should  have  nearly 
as  adequate  measures  of  the  abilities  of  direct  importance  as  indications  of  probable 
success  in  the  study  and  practice  of  engineering  as  we  have  from  the  entire  series.  We 
would  not,  however,  be  able  to  tell  so  well  as  we  could  by  their  aid,  whether  failure 
with  verbally  stated  problems  was  due  to  lack  of  scientific  and  technical  ability  or  to 
the  lack  of  linguistic  ability. 

These  same  tests  were  given  to  forty-one  freshmen  at  the  Massachusetts  Institute 
of  Technology.  No  adequate  measures  of  Ig  (General  Intellect)  are  available,  but  the 
value  of  the  tests  appears  from  the  following  facts:  Using  the  team  of  seven  tests  (all 
five  tests  in  mathematics,  and  the  tests  in  completing  English  sentences  and  complet- 
ing statements  about  physics),  a  boy's  score  in  the  tests  resembles  his  average  score 
in  the  studies  of  freshman  year  more  closely  than  does  his  score  in  the  elaborate 
series  of  entrance  examinations  given  by  the  Institute.  The  average  correlation  be- 
tween the  score  in  these  tests  and  the  academic  record  in  either  half  of  the  subjects  of 
the  freshman  year  is  +.45;  the  correlation  between  the  median  entrance  examina- 

1  P2,  the  test  with  the  described  problems,  may  belong  with  this  group  or  in  a  special  class  by  itself.  It  probably 
involves  in  part  the  abilities  involved  by  the  ME3P4  group,  those  involved  by  the  Pi35  group,  and  certain  special 
abilities  to  understand  language. 

2  The  correlation  of  Pi35  with  ME3P4  is  .5  (.50  by  the  method  of  squared  differences  in  ranks  and  .66  by  the  Spearman 
foot-rule  method):  the  correlation  with  Ig  is  also  about  .5  (.48  and  .46  by  the  two  methods  just  mentioned). 


APPENDIX  123 

tion  mark  and  the  academic  record  in  either  half  of  the  subjects  of  the  freshman  year 
is  +.37.  The  correlation  between  the  two  halves  of  the  academic  record  is  only  +  .76. 

The  tests  were  given  also  to  forty-one  freshmen  in  the  Engineering  School  of  the 
Univei'sity  of  Cincinnati.  In  this  case  also  there  were  no  such  adequate  measures  of 
Ig  available  as  was  the  case  with  the  thirty-four  Columbia  students.  The  tests,  how- 
ever, tell  how  well  a  boy  will  do  in  one  half  of  his  freshman  studies  just  as  well  as  his 
marks  in  the  other  half  do.  That  is,  using  the  first  three  subjects  (average  of  12  marks), 
the  last  four  subjects  (average  of  16  marks),  and  the  record  in  the  selected  weighted 
team  of  tests  (Ml5  M2,  M3,  M4,  M5,  and  the  tests  in  completing  English  sentences 
and  completing  statements  about  physics),  we  find: 

The  resemblance  between  the  score  in  the  tests  and  the  score  in  the  first  3 

subjects  is  +  .49 

The  resemblance  between  the  score  in  the  tests  and  the  score  in  the  last  4 

subjects  is  +.57 

The  resemblance  between  the  score  in  the  first  3  subjects  and  the  score  in 

the  last  4  subjects  is  +.49 

This  team  of  seven  tests  also  tells  how  well  a  boy  will  be  rated  in  his  shopwork  for 
pay  nearly  as  well  as  does  either  half  of  his  marks  in  freshman  studies.  Neither  one, 
however,  corresponds  at  all  closely  to  this  shop  rating.  The  average  resemblance  of 
half  of  the  freshman  marks  to  the  opinion  of  the  coordinator  as  to  the  boy's  shop- 
work  for  pay  during  the  year  is  +.22.  The  resemblance  of  the  selected  team  of  tests 
is  +.14. 

Considering  the  facts  from  both  Cincinnati  and  the  Massachusetts  Institute,  it 
appears  that  the  team  of  seven  tests  foretells  how  well  a  student  will  do  in  either 
half  of  his  freshman  year  studies  about  four-fifths  as  well  as  does  his  record  in  the 
other  half  of  these  studies  themselves. 

It  also  appears  from  a  study  of  the  academic  records  made  by  the  Columbia  group 
in  their  sophomore  year,  that  these  seven  tests  foretell  how  well  a  student  will  do  in 
the  sophomore  year  at  least  three-fourths  as  well  as  does  his  entire  academic  record 
for  the  freshman  year. 

Teachers  of  engineering  will  naturally  inquire  why  any  technological  school  should 
not  give  these  tests  to  its  entering  students  instead  of  accepting  a  high  school  certi- 
ficate or  a  regular  college  entrance  examination.  The  chief  reasons  for  giving  these 
tests  in  addition  to  those  of  the  secondary  schools  are  the  following: 

1.  These  tests  give  relatively  much  more  weight  to  the  ability  to  deal  with  "real" 
situations  and  problems  than  ordin^i'v  examinations  do.  In  the  mathematical  work, 
for  example,  problems  which  life  could  never  offer,  because  to  frame  the  problem  one 
must  first  know  the  answer,  are  rigidly  excluded.  So  also  are  fantastic  and  artificial 
problems  invented  for  disciplinary  purposes  alone. 

2.  Ordinary  examinations  confuse  the  ability  to  think  and  do  with  the  ability  to 
understand  verbal  descriptions  and  tell  in  words  what  one  does  think  or  do.  The  stu- 
dent who  has  a  good  command  of  language  thus  gets  undue  credit.  Ability  to  handle 
verbally  described  problems  in  physics  means,  for  example,  ability  to  understand  the 
words,  the  necessary  knowledge  of  physical  facts  and  laws,  and  ability  to  express  one's 
response  in  words.  A  student  might  be  able  to  repair  an  electric  bell  if  he  saw  it,  but 
not  be  able  to  tell  what  the  trouble  was  from  a  verbal  description ;  or,  if  he  could  do 
the  latter,  not  be  able  to  tell  in  words  how  he  would  repair  it.  Ability  to  handle  verbal 
symbols  is  important,  and  these  tests  measure  it,  but  they  are  designed  to  measure 


124  APPENDIX 

also  and  separately  the  ability  to  think  with  things  and  diagrams.  Three  of  the  five 
tests  in  physics  demand  responses  to  actual  objects  or  pictures  of  objects. 

3.  It  has  been  shown  that  tests  M1?  M2,  M3,  M4,  M5,  E3,  and  P4  together  give  us 
a  practically  sufficient  measure  of  the  abilities  involved  in  and  tested  by  ordinary 
school  achievements.  Pl5  P3,  and  P5  give  us  something  very  different.  The  test  for 
mechanical  skill  gives  us  something  still  different.  El5  E2,  and  E4  give  us  something 
still  different.  If  the  ordinary  examinations  were  so  given  as  to  be  as  commensurate, 
objective,  scientific,  and  convenient  as  these  tests,  they  could  be  used  in  place  of 
Mls  M2,  M3,  M4,  M5,  E3,  and  P4;  but  we  should  still  need  to  supplement  them  by 
P1?  P3,  and  P5,  and  by  the  tests  in  mechanical  skill. 

4.  A  high  school  mark  is  simply  a  statement  of  relative  position  in  that  school. 
The  same  mark  has  many  values  in  different  high  schools;  all  of  these  are  unknown 
quantities  until  they  are  defined  in  terms  of  the  actual  tasks  given  during  the  school 
course.  If  John  Doe  in  School  A  was  marked  85  and  Richard  Roe  in  School  B  was 
marked  75,  we  do  not  know  how  much  either  knew  or  could  do,  or  which  was  the 
better. 

An  entrance  examination  mark  has  the  same  defects,  altho  to  a  much  smaller  ex- 
tent. The  examinations  in  different  years  may  vary  in  difficulty,  and  the  grades  that 
different  examiners  would  attach  to  the  same  set  of  answers  may  vary  widely.  The 
authorities  responsible  for  these  examinations  could  eliminate  the  former  possibility 
by  proper  investigations,  and  could  reduce  the  latter  to  a  harmless  minimum  by  other 
investigations.  It  is  not  known  that  they  have  ever  made  investigations  of  either  sort, 
altho  the  New  York  Regents'  examinations  seem  to  be  rather  free  from  both  defects. 

5.  It  is  unlikely  that  the  average  school  or  entrance  examination  would  show  the 
low  constant  errors  and  high  correlations  between  different  judges'  scores  which  these 
tests  have.  The  measurements  made  by  Elliott  and  others,  indeed,  lead  one  to  expect 
a  marked  inferiority  in  this  respect.  Until  those  responsible  for  these  examinations 
measure  their  constant  errors  and  coefficients  of  reliability,  we  may  fairly  assume  that 
they  will  be  inferior  to  tests  devised  with  especial  attention  to  objectivity. 

6.  The  ordinary  examination  is  a  collection  of  tasks  selected  largely  irrespective 
of  other  criteria  than  that  it  be  a  "fair"  test,  and  that  it  distinguish  those  below  from 
those  above  a  certain  standard  for  passing.  These  tests  are  constructed  of  steps  of 
increasing  difficulty,  thereby  making  possible  a  fairly  definite  determination  of  the 
degree  of  difficulty  where  a  student's  efforts  change  from  success  to  failure. 

7.  In  the  tests  recommended  here  the  plan  of  constructing  the  tests,  and  the  details 
of  scoring  them,  are  settled  so  that  the  work  of  arranging  for  them  each  year  is  greatly 
reduced. 

8.  The  value  of  all  other  measurements  of  an  entering  class,  such  as  their  records 
in  high  school  or  records  in  the  regular  college  entrance  examination,  is  increased 
when  these  tests  also  are  given.  They  would  be  worth  giving  if  only  as  a  means  of 
equating  to  a  uniform  scale  the  grades  of  schools,  different  years,  and  the  like.  The 
trouble  with  our  present  information  about  students  at  entrance  is  not  so  much  that 
it  is  intrinsically  misleading,  as  that  it  requires  common  denominators  to  interpret  it. 
The  record  made  in  the  school  of  engineering  itself  is  one  such  denominator.  These 
tests  furnish  another.  Each  has  its  advantages.  The  two  together  will  enable  the  of- 
ficers of  schools  of  engineering  to  interpret  the  records  sent  in  by  secondary  schools 
and  examining  boards,  and  to  suggest  improvements  in  the  examining  machinery  by 
which  these  records  are  secured. 


APPENDIX  125 

To  prevent  unfair  preparation  for  the  tests,  and  to  permit  repeated  measurements 
of  the  same  individuals,  it  is  necessary  to  have  many  alternative  series  of  each  sort  of 
test.  These  should  be  so  devised  that  the  same  person  would  get  approximately  the 
same  score  for  ability  in  English,  ability  in  mathematics,  or  ability  in  physics,  no  mat- 
ter by  what  series  of  the  tests  he  was  tested.  If  all  the  alternative  forms  of  each  sepa- 
rate test  could  be  equal  in  difficulty,  that  would  be  still  better.  The  plan  of  these  tests 
permits  the  selection  of  such  alternates. 

The  provision  of  satisfactory  alternative  series  of  tests  involves  much  experimen- 
tation and  statistical  work,  there  being  hardly  any  other  satisfactory  criterion  of 
"equally  difficult"  than  "such  that  equal  percentages  of  the  same  group  of  students 
succeed  therewith."  The  group  must  also  be  representative,  and  therefore  large. 

If  the  tests  described  here  are  found  to  be  as  useful  in  practice  as  they  seem  likely 
to  be,  state  examining  boards  and  institutions  interested  in  knowing  what  the  abili- 
ties of  their  entering  students  really  are  should  cooperate  to  provide  fifteen  or  twenty 
alternative  series.  That  number  could,  by  interchange  of  elements  and  by  easily  ar- 
ranged devices  to  detect  and  penalize  heavily  any  student  who  had  been  "  crammed  " 
for  the  specific  tests,  be  made  to  last  indefinitely. 

Whatever  the  merit  of  these  particular  tests  may  be,  it  is  certain  that  the  criteria 
by  which  any  test  should  be  judged  are  worth  attention.  An  institution  which  uses 
any  set  of  examinations  to  judge  the  fitness  of  entering  students  should  find  the 
coefficients  of  correlation  (1)  between  each  of  such  tests  and  another  of  similar  plan, 
(2)  between  the  score  given  to  each  of  such  tests  by  one  judge  and  that  given  by  an- 
other judge  independently,  (3)  between  each  of  such  tests  and  the  Ig  or  Mg  or  Eg 
or  whatever  ability  is  supposed  to  be  measured,  and  (4)  between  the  total  score  of 
the  team  of  tests  used  to  decide  entrance  and  the  Ig  or  F  (some  other  measure  of 
demonstrated  degree  of  fitness  for  the  work  of  the  institution).  It  should  not  toler- 
ate a  system  showing  a  correlation  below  .9  for  the  team  of  tests  with  Ig  or  F  in  the 
case  of  pupils  from  approximately  equallv  good  schools.  It  should  use  the  regression 
equation  or  equivalent  "cut  and  fit"  methods  to  find  the  team  of  tests  which  gives 
a  correlation  of  .9  or  more  with  a  minimum  cost  of  time  and  a  maximum  amount  of 
intelligibility  of  units,  convenience,  and  easy  extension  by  alternates  and  good  effect 
upon  the  teaching  and  learning  of  the  lower  schools. 

Such  an  evaluation  of  a  set  of  examinations  requires  knowledge  of  the  theory  and 
technique  of  educational  measurements  and  much  labor,  but  there  is  no  other  sound 
way.  The  merit  of  a  system  of  entrance  examinations  is  not  a  matter  for  divination 
or  faith. 


1*1 


SELECTED  BIBLIOGRAPHY 


>-'' 


SELECTED  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

The  following  list  of  books  has  been  made  short  in  order  to  encourage  teachers  to 
read  and  study  at  least  some  of  them.  Each  throws  additional  light  from  an  inde- 
pendent point  of  view  on  the  problems  discussed  in  this  study. 

Aydelotte,  F. 

English  and  Engineering.  New  York:  McGraw-Hill,  1917. 

Beard,  C.  A. 

The  Economic  Foundations  of  JefFersonian  Democracy.  New  York:  Macmillan,  1915. 

Clark,  V.  S. 

History  of  Manufactures  in  the  United  States.  Washington:  Carnegie  Institution,  1916. 

Dewey,  John 

How  We  Think.  Boston:  D.  C.  Heath,  1910. 

Democracy  and  Education.  New  York:  Macmillan,  1916. 

Ferguson,  C. 

The  Great  News.  New  York:  Kennerley,  1915. 

Gantt,  H.  L. 

Industrial  Leadership.  New  Haven:  Yale  University  Press,  1916. 

Hobson,  J.  A. 

Work  and  Wealth,  a  Human  Valuation.  New  York:  Macmillan,  19l6\ 

Democracy  after  the  War.  New  York:  Macmillan,  1918. 

James,  E.  J. 

The  Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  of  1862.  University  of  Illinois  Bulletin,  vol.  viii, 
No.  10,  1910. 

Kandel,  I.  L. 

Federal  Aid  for  Vocational  Education.  The  Carnegie  Foundation,  Bulletin  No.  10, 1917. 

Keppel,  F.  P. 

The  Undergraduate  and  his  College.  Boston:  Houghton  Mifflin  Co.,  1918. 

Mann,  C.  R. 

The  Teaching  of  Physics  for  Purposes  of  General  Education.  New  York:  Macmillan, 
1912. 

Pritchett,  H.  S. 

What  is  Religion?  Boston:  Houghton  Mifflin  Co.,  1906. 

Rice,  J.  M. 

Scientific  Management  in  Education.  New  York:  Hinds,  Noble  &  Eldridge,  1913. 

Roe,  J.  W. 

English  and  American  Tool  Builders.  New  Haven:  Yale  University  Press,  1916. 


130  SELECTED  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Schneider,  H. 

Education  for  Industrial  Workers.  The  World  Book  Company,  191 6. 

Taylor,  F.  W. 

The  Principles  of  Scientific  Management.  New  York:  Harpers,  1913. 

Thorndike,  E.  L. 

Education.  New  York:  Macmillan,  1914. 

Theory  of  Mental  and  Social  Measurements.  New  York:  Teachers  College,  1913. 

Wellington,  R.  G. 

The  Political  and  Sectional  Influence  of  the  Public  Lands.  Boston,  1914. 


IO ) 


INDEX 


INDEX 


Ability,  engineering,  test  of,  48. 

Academic  and  Industrial  Efficiency,  102. 

Accredited  schools,  48. 

Accuracy  in  engineering,  106. 

Achievement,  tests  of,  117  If. 

Activities,  extra-school,  importance  of,  53. 

Administration  of  engineering  schools,  27  ff. 

Cooperative  type,  30  f. 

Faculty  control,  29. 

Military  type,  28  f. 
Admission  requirements  in  engineering  schools, 

21f.,47. 
Agricultural  instruction,  demand  for,  4. 
Agriculture  in  the  United  States,  4,  5. 
Aims  of  early  engineering  schools,  9  ff. 
Akron,  University  of,  cooperative  plan  at,  58, 81. 
Algebraic  problems,  tests  in,  117. 
American  Academy  of  Engineers,  19. 
American  Institute  of  Electrical  Engineers,  18. 
American  Institute  of  Mining  Engineers,  18. 
American  Society  of  Civil  Engineers,  18. 
American  Society  of  Mechanical  Engineers,  18. 
Amherst  College,  tuition  at,  16. 
Apprenticeship  and  professional  training,  55. 
Arithmetical  problems,  tests  in,  117. 
Army  officers,  grading  of,  73. 
Army  Personnel  Committee,  73. 
Army,  tests  in  the,  72. 
Assistants  in  universities,  103. 
Atkinson,  Professor  W.  P.,  38. 
Aydelotte,  Professor  Frank,  63,  64,  93. 

xJaltimore  Polytechnic  Institute,  7. 

Banking  in  engineering  schools,  63. 

Bibliography,  127. 

Bird,  Professor  R.  M.,  62. 

Bliss  Electrical  School,  7. 

Board  of  Visitors  of  United  States  Military 
Academy,  28. 

Boards  of  regents,  27. 

Boards  of  trustees,  27. 

Breese,  Professor  B.  B.,  52. 

British   manufactures  and   American   produc- 
tion, 3. 

Brodhead,  Charles,  4. 

Brown  University,  new  curriculum  at,  93. 
Tuition  at.  16. 

Buel,  Jesse,  4,  5,  9. 

Burton,  Dean  A.  E.,  32,  52. 

(calculus,  place  of,  90. 
California  and  federal  land  grant.  16. 
Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of 
Teaching.  102,  106. 


Carnegie  Institute  of  Technology,  78. 
Carnegie,  Andrew,  78.  [77  f. 

Casino  Night   School,  Centennial   Exposition, 
Census  Reports  and  engineering,  18. 
Certificate  system  and  examination  system  com- 
pared, 48  f. 

Admission  by,  47,  48. 
Character  and  achievement,  146  f. 

As  quality  in  grading.  73. 
Chemistry  for  engineering  students,  39  f. 
Cincinnati,  University  of 

Administration  in,  30  f. 

Cooperative  plan  at,  58,  78  ff.,  88. 

Coordination  at,  57. 

Grading  at,  33,  35,  73  f. 

Graduates  of,  79. 

Reorganization  of  content  at,  61  f. 

Shopwork  in,  78. 

Testing  of  students  in,  52,  123. 
Civil  engineer,  degree  of,  12. 

Training  of,  5. 
Civil  engineering,  first  mention  of,  12. 

Specialization  in,  23  f.,  54. 
Civil  engineers,  statistics  of,  18. 
Clermont,  the,  3. 
Coefficients  of  correlation,  119f. 
Cogswell   Polytechnic  Institute,  San  Francis- 
co, 7. 
College  Entrance  Examination  Board,  47,  48. 
Colleges  and  professional  development  of  en- 
gineering, 19. 
Colleges,  arts,  engineering  work  in,  7. 
Columbian  Exposition,  101. 
Columbia  University 

Engineering  curricula  in,  54. 

Grading  in,  33. 

Testing  of  students  in,  49  f.,  119  ff. 

Tuition  in,  16. 
Columbia  University,  School  of  Mines,  16. 
Committee  on  Agriculture,  report  of,  to  New 

York  State  Legislature,  4. 
Committees  on  Instruction,  88  f. 
Common  sense  in  engineering,  106. 
Completion  tests,  118f. 
Comprehensive  Plan  of  Insurance  and  Annuities 

for  College  Teachers,  102. 
Congress  and  Administration  of  United  States 

Military  Academy,  28. 
Congress  and  industrial  development,  3. 
Contracts  and  specifications  in  engineering 

schools.  63. 
Cooperative  plan,  58,  78  ff.,  89,  110. 

Advantages  of,  80. 

Cost  of,  80. 

Meaning  of,  81. 


134 


INDEX 


Cooperative  System  of  Education,  The,  30. 
Cooperative  type  of  administration,  30. 
Coordination  in  engineering  schools,  57,  9$. 
Coordinators,  79. 
Cornell  University 

Engineering  courses  in,  24,  54 f. 

Student  grades  in,  33, 
Correlations,  coefficients  of,  119  f. 
Correlations  in  Thorndike  tests,  119  f. 
Cost  of  cooperative  plan,  80. 
Costs,  practice  in  figuring,  63. 

And  values,  99. 
Cotton  gin  invented,  3. 
Council  of  National  Defense,  107. 
Courses,  engineering,  length  of,  54  ff.,  93  f. 

Content  of,  60  ff. 
Credit  hours  in  engineering  courses,  54  f. 
Culture  in  engineering  schools,  56. 
Curricula  of  engineering  schools,  7f.,  9ff.,  21  ff., 
38ff.,60ff. 

Commercial  subjects  in,  63. 

Congestion  of,  25,  57. 

Construction  of,  56,  65. 

Control  of,  29,55,  60  f. 

Coordination  in,  57. 

Distribution  of  time  in,  22  f.,  24  ff.,  54  ff. 

Essentials  of,  89. 

Experiments  in,  61  ff. 

Length  of,  54  ff. 

Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  13, 
22. 

Methods  of  teaching,  37  ff. 

Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  13,  57. 

Reorganization  of,  87  ff. 
Methods  of,  88  f. 

Required  credit  hours  and,  87. 

Specialization  of,  23,  25,  54,  55. 

University  of  Illinois,  13,  24,  55. 

.Dartmouth  College,  Thayer  School,  16. 
Dentistry,  schools  of,  56. 
Dooley,  C.  R.,  36,  71. 
Drawing  for  engineering  students,  42. 
Duckering,  \V.  E.,59. 
Duncan,  Robert  Kennedy,  82  f. 
Dunwoodie  Institute,  Minneapolis,  7. 
Duruy,  Histoire  des  temps  modemes,  38. 

xLatov,  Amos,  37,  101. 
Ecole  Centrale  des  Manufactures,  12. 
Economic  theory  in  engineering  schools,  63. 
Edgeworth,  partial  correlation  coefficients  of, 

120. 
Education,  science  of,  88. 
Efficiency  in  engineering,  106. 
Electrical  engineers,  statistics  of,  18. 
Elimination  of  students,  22  ff.,  100. 


Causes  of,  33. 

Determination  of,  32. 
Engineer,  the  professional,  106  ff. 

Equipment  of,  65. 

Opportunity  for,  107,  108. 
Engineering  ability,  test  of,  47. 

Administration,  courses  in,  111. 

Aim  of,  90. 

And  apprenticeship,  55. 

Census  reports  on,  18. 

Colleges  and,  19. 

Common  basis  of,  89. 

Curricula  in,  7,  9  ff.,  21  ff.,  38 ff.,  60  ff. 

Education,  aim  of,  9ff.,  108  ff. 
Demand  for,  4,  5. 
Problems  of  8,  47  ff. 

Essentials  of,  106. 

Profession  of,  18  f. 

Qualities  required  in,  106. 
Engineering  Council,  107. 
Engineering  Foundation,  19,  107. 
Engineering,  professional  ideals  of,  8. 
Engineering  schools,  administration  of,  27  ff. 

Aims  of,  9  ff. 

Chemistry  in,  39  f. 

Classification  of,  by  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Educa- 
tion, 56. 

Commercial  subjects  in,  63. 

Content  of  courses  in,  60  ff. 

Coordination  in,  57. 

Culture  in,  56. 

Curricula  of,  7,  9  ff. 

Descriptive  geometry  in,  42. 

Development  of,  3  ff. ,  55  f. 

Drawing  in,  42. 

English  in,  38,  41. 

Entrance  requirements  of,  12. 

Equipment  of,  7  f.,  15  ff. 

Examinations  in,  41. 

Experiments  in,  61. 

Faculty  control  in,  56. 

Financial  management  of,  27. 

Foreign  languages  in,  42. 

Grading  and  testing  in,  67  ff. 

Graduates  of,  6,  7. 

Graduation  thesis,  43. 

History  in,  38. 

In  large  universities,  30. 

Liberal  arts  in,  56. 

Mathematics  in,  39. 

Methods  in,  14. 

Methods  of  instruction  in,  37  ff. 

Number  of,  6. 

Number  visited,  26. 

Orientation  courses  in,  58. 

Problems  of,  8. 

Resources  of,  7f.,  15  ff. 


INDEX 


135 


Shopwork  in,  42,  76. 

Students  in,  6,  15  ff. 

Teachers  in,56f.,  101  ff. 

Tests  of  students  in,  117ff. 

Theory  and  practice  in,  58. 

Tuition  in,  16. 

Types  of,  28  ff. 
Engineering  societies,  18. 
Engineering,  specialization  in,  23,  25. 
Engineering  work  in  arts  colleges,  7. 
English,  in  entrance  requirements,  22. 

Methods  of  teaching,  38,  41  f. 

Reorganization  of,  63,  93,  99. 

Tests  of  achievement  in,  118  ff. 
English  literature  and  elimination  of  students, 

33. 
Entrance  requirements  in  engineering  schools. 

See  Admission  requirements. 
Equipment  of  engineering  schools,  7  f.,  15  ff. 
Erie  Canal,  4. 
Evans,  Oliver,  inventor,  3. 

Examination  system  and  certificate  system  com- 
pared, 48  f. 

And  tests,  17ff. 

In  engineering  schools,  41  f. 
Extra-school  activities,  importance  of,  53. 

1*  aculty  control  in  engineering  schools,  29,  56. 
Federal  Aid/or  Vocational  Education,  9. 
Federal  land  grant,  acceptance  of,  16. 
Federal  Trade  Commission,  108. 
Fellenberg  School,  Hofwyl,  Switzerland,  4,  9, 

37. 
Fernald,  Professor  R.  H.,  62  f. 
Fernald,  R.  H.,  and  Orrok,  G.  A.,  Engineering 

of  Power  Plants,  63. 
Financial  management  of  engineering  schools, 

27. 
Florida,  University  of,  engineering  courses  in, 

24,  60. 
Flour  mills,  machinery  for,  made,  3. 
Foreign  languages  for  engineering  students,  42, 

90,  94. 
Foremen,  qualities  of,  36. 
Franklin  Union,  Boston,  7. 
French  in  engineering  schools,  90,  94. 
French  technical  schools.  12,  14. 
Freshman  year  in  engineering,  25,  38. 

Grades  in,  35. 

Practical  engineering  in,  88,  91. 
Fulton,  Robert,  3. 

Geddes,  James,  4. 

General  Electric  Company,  36. 

General  studies  in  engineering  curricula,  22  f. 

Geometrical  drawing  for  engineering  students, 

42. 
Geometrical  proof,  test  in,  117. 


Geometry,  descriptive,  for  engineering  students, 

42. 
George  Washington  University,  entrance  re- 
quirements, 22. 
German  and  elimination  of  students,  33,  90. 
Germany,  graduating  engineers  in,  7. 
Goettsch,  Professor  H.  M.,  61  f. 
Grades,  low,  meaning  of,  34. 

And  employment,  36. 

And  specialization,  97. 

Distribution  of,  68. 

Number  and  percentage  of,  35. 

Qualities  selected  for,  73  f. 

Student,  33  ff.,  67  ff.,  117  ff. 

Vocational  guidance  and,  72.  [19. 

Graduates  of  engineering  schools,  6,  7,  16,  17, 

Employment  of,  20. 
Graduation,  average  age  of,  33. 
Graph  test,  117. 

Greene,  Professor  B.  Franklin,  12,  26. 
Guizot,  History  of  Civilization,  35,  38. 

XjLarvard  University 

Engineering  curricula  at,  54. 
Tuition  in,  17. 

High  school  inspectors,  48. 

History  in  entrance  requirements,  22. 

History  of  engineering  schools,  3  ff. 

History  of  the  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Insti- 
tute, 9. 

Hobson,  Professor  J.  A.,  Work  and  Wealth,  a 
Human  Valuation,  99. 

Houston,  John  F.,  18. 

Human  factors  in  engineering,  109  f. 

Humanities  in  engineering  schools,  89,  90,  92  f., 
99. 

Illinois  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Illinois  Industrial  League,  9. 
Illinois  Industrial  University,  10. 

Tuition  at,  16. 
Illinois,  University  of,  9. 

Curricula  of,  13,  24,  55. 

Elimination  in,  32. 

Entrance  requirements,  21  f. 

Graduates  of,  16,  17. 

Resources  of,  16, 17. 

Shopwork  in,  76  f.,  78. 

Student  grades  in,  33,  34. 

System  of  instruction  in,  14. 
Inbreeding  in  college  faculties,  103. 
Individuality  in  professions,  106. 
Industrial  companies  and  research,  82  f. 
Industrial  universities,  5. 

Industry  in  the  United  States,  development  of, 
3,  4f.,18,  19. 

Engineering  schools  and,  8,  9  ff.,  14,  78  ff,  89, 
90,91,  98,  108  f. 


136 


INDEX 


Foreign  artisans  and,  3. 

Patriotism  and,  3. 

Scientific  information  and,  4,  10,  20. 

State  treasuries  and,  3. 

War  of  1812  and,  3. 

War  of  Independence  and,  3. 
Initiative  in  engineering,  106. 
Instruction,  methods  of,  in  engineering  schools, 

37  ff. 
Integrity  in  engineering,  106. 
Intelligence  as  quality  in  grading,  73. 
International  Commission  on  the  Teaching  of 

Mathematics,  39. 
Interrelation,  112. 
Iowa  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 

James,  E.  J.,  Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  of 

1862,  9,  10. 
Johns  Hopkins  University,  engineering  school 
in,  administration  of,  29. 

Engineering  courses  in,  24. 
Judgment  in  engineering,  106  f. 
Junior  year  in  engineering,  25. 

Grades  in,  35. 

IVaxdel,  Dr.  I.  L.,  on  Federal  Aid  for  Voca- 
tional Education,  9. 

Kansas,  University  of,  and  industrial  research, 
82  f. 

Katte,  E.  B„  70. 

Kelley,  Dr.  Truman  L.,  51,  120. 

Kentucky,  University  of,  grading  of  students 
at,  73. 

Keppel,  DeanF.  P.,49,  70. 

Knowledge  in  engineering,  106  f. 

Laboratory  problems,  tests  in,  118  f. 
Laboratory  work  in  engineering  education,  8, 

91,98. 
Lafayette  College,  cooperative  plan  at,  58. 
Land  Grant  Colleges,  movement  for,  9. 
Latrobe,  Benjamin,  18. 
Law  and  apprenticeship,  55. 
Lawrence,  Abbott,  14. 

Lawrence  Scientific  School,  Harvard  Univer- 
sity, 5. 

Graduates  of,  15. 
Leadership,  as  quality  in  grading,  73. 
Liberal  arts  in  engineering  schools,  56. 
Liberal  training  and  science,  5. 
Lowell  Institute,  7. 

Maine  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Manufactures  and  engineering.  See  Industry  in 

the  United  States. 
March  and  Wolff,  Calculus,  61. 
Market  conditions  in  shopwork,  77. 
Marks,  67  ff.,  117  ff. 


Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology 

Administration  in,  111. 

Administration  of,  27. 

Aims  of,  10,  11. 

Cooperation  plan  in,  31,  81. 

Curricula  of,  7, 13,  22,  24. 

Elimination  in,  32. 

English  in,  63,  93,  99. 

Entrance  requirements,  21  f. 

Grant  from  state  to,  16. 

Methods  of  instruction  in,  37  f. 

Resources  of,  16,  17,  27. 

Shopwork  in,  77  f. 

Specialization  in,  96. 

Student  grades  in,  33,  34. 

Students  of,  17,  27. 

System  of  instruction  in,  14. 

Testing  of  students  at,  52,  119  f. 
Massachusetts  state  legislature,  16. 
Matching  diagrams,  tests  in,  118.  [39. 

Mathematics  for  engineering  students,  aims  of, 

In  entrance  requirements,  50. 

Methods  of  teaching,  39. 

Reorganization  of,  61. 

Tests  of  achievement  in,  117  ff. 
Mechanic  arts  in  engineering  schools,  89, 90,  91  f. 

Demand  for  training  in,  5. 
Mechanical  engineering,  specialization,  24. 

Courses  in,  22  f. 
Mechanical  engineers,  statistics  of,  18. 

Training  of,  5. 
Mellon  Institute,  82. 
Medicine  and  apprenticeship,  55. 

Schools  of,  56. 
Meyer,  Professor  Max,  67. 
Michigan  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Michigan  College  of  Mines,  engineering  courses 

in,  24. 
Michigan,  University  of,  5. 

Engineering  school  at,  14. 
Middlesex  Canal,  3. 
Military  drill  in  land  grant  colleges,  29. 
Military  type  of  administration,  28. 
Mining  engineers,  statistics  of,  18. 
Minnesota,  University  of,  engineering  curricula 

at,  54. 
Missouri,  University  of,  grading  at,  67. 
More,  Professor  C.  C,  58  f.,  62. 
Morrill  Act,  5,  6,  15. 
Motivation,  112. 

Na-hoxal  Academy  of  Science,  19. 

National  Association  of  Corporation  Schools, 

105. 
National  Engineering  Societies,  106,  107. 
National  Research  Council,  19,  107. 
Naval  Consulting  Board,  107. 
New  Hampshire  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 


INDEX 


137 


New  Jersey  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 

New  York  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 

Norsworthy,  Professor  L.  D. ,  70. 

North  Carolina  College  of  Agriculture  and  Me- 
chanic Arts,  entrance  requirements,  22. 

North  Central  Association  of  Colleges  and  Sec- 
ondary Schools,  48. 

Northwestern  University,  engineering  courses 
in,  24. 

Norton,  Professor  W.  A.,  14.  [22. 

Notre  Dame  University,  entrance  requirements, 

O EJECTS  and  Plan  of  an  Institute  of  Technol- 
ogy, 9,  11. 

Officers,  army,  grading  of,  73. 

Ohio  State  University 

Engineering  curricula  in,  54  f. 
Student  grades  in,  33. 

Orientation  courses,  58,  88. 

Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  o/1862,  9. 

Paragraph  reading,  tests  in,  118. 

Park,  Professor  C.  W.,  The  Cooperative  System 

of  Education,  30,  81. 
Patriotism  and  industrial  development,  3. 
Pawtucket,  textile  mill  at,  3. 
Pearson  coefficients,  120. 
Pennsylvania  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Pennsylvania  State  College 

Elimination  in,  32. 

Engineering  courses  in,  111. 

Shopwork  in,  76. 

Specialization  in,  96. 

Student  grades  in,  34,  73. 
Pennsylvania,  University  of 

Administration  of,  29. 

Student  grades  in,  33. 

Tuition  in,  16. 
Personal  service  in  the  United  States,  5. 
Pestalozzi,  9. 
Pharmacy,  schools  of,  56. 
Phi  Beta  Kappa,  68. 

Philadelphia  water  works,  equipment  of,  3. 
Physics  for  engineering  students,  40  f. 

Tests  of  achievement  in,  118  f. 
Physique  as  quality  in  grading,  73. 
Pickering,  Professor  E.  C,  27,  37,  40. 
Pittsburgh,  University  of,  cooperative  plan  in, 

31,81. 
Practical  engineering  for  freshmen,  88. 
Practice  and  theory  in  engineering  schools,  58, 

88,  91,  98  f. 
Pratt  Institute,  7. 
Problems  described,  tests  in.  118. 
Production   and  Science.  See  Industry  in  the 

United  States. 
Production,  elements  of,  91.  109  f. 
Professional  engineer,  definition  of,  106  ff.,  113. 
Professional  schools  of  law  and  medicine,  55,  56. 


Professional  service  in  the  United  States,  5. 

Professional  work  in  engineering  schools,  24,  43. 

Profession  of  engineering  and  education,  112. 

Progress  of  students,  32 ff.,  41  f. 

Projects,  use  of,  62,  91  f. 

Psychology,  experimental,  88. 

Purdue  University,  student  grades  in,  33,  73. 

(Qualities  of  foremen,  36. 

Qualities  required  in  engineering,  106. 

ixEcoRDERs'  offices,  reorganization  of,  87. 

Regents,  boards  of,  27. 

Regents'  examinations,  119ff. 

Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute,  4,  5,  9,  101. 

Administration  of,  27. 

Aims  and  methods  of,  1 1  ff. 

Curricula  of,  11  ff.,  24,  25,  58,  60. 

Equipment  of,  14. 

Graduates  of,  15,  17. 

Methods  of  instruction  in,  37. 

Resources  of,  14. 

Shopwork  in,  75. 

Student  grades  in,  33. 

Students  of,  17. 

System  of  instruction  in,  14. 
Rensselaer,  Stephen  van,  4,  9, 101. 
Reorganization  of  engineering  curricula.  88. 
Research  in  engineering  schools,  43,  103  f.,  112. 
Research  laboratories  in  industrial  plants,  82. 
Resourcefulness  in  engineering,  106. 
Resources  of  engineering  schools,  7  f.,  9ff.,  15  ff. 
Ricketts,  P.  C,  History  of  the  Rensselaer  Poly- 
technic Institute,  9. 
Roe,  Professor  J.  W.,  70. 
Rogers,  President  W.  B.,  9,  10,  11,  37,  101. 
Rohrer,  A.  L.,36. 
Rooseveldt,  Nicholas  I.,  Philadelphia  Water 

Works,  3. 
Root,  R.  E.,  59. 

Rose  Polytechnic  Institute,  shopwork  in,  76. 
Royal  Institution,  Great  Britain,  9. 
Rumford,  Count,  9. 
Runkle,  President,  77  f. 
Russian  shopwork,  77  f. 

oantee  Canal,  3. 

Scales  of  measurement,  59,  117  ff. 

Schneider,  Dean  Herman,  52,  78,  81,  82. 

Schuylkill-Susquehanna  Canal,  3. 

Science  and   production.  See  Industry  in   the 
United  States. 
And  Liberal  training,  5. 

Science  subjects  in  engineering  curricula,  23, 89, 
90,  92. 

Scientific  information,  demand  for,  in  indus- 
tries. 4. 

Scientific  study  of  education,  105. 


138 


INDEX 


Scott,  Professor  W.  D.,  73. 
Senior  year  in  engineering,  25. 

Grades  in,  35. 
Sentences,  completion  of,  tests  in,  118. 
Sheffield,  Joseph  E.,  14. 

Sheffield  Scientific  School.  See  Yale  University. 
Shop  work,  42,  75ff.,90. 

And  theory,  82. 
Sigma  Xi,  68. 
Silliman,  Benjamin,  14,  37. 
Six-year  courses,  54  f. 
Slater,  Samuel,  and  industrial  development  in 

America,  3. 
Slichter,  Elementary  Mathematical  Analysis,  61. 
Smith,  R.  H.,  78. 
Society   for   Increasing   the  Comforts   of  the 

Poor,  9. 
Society  for  the  Improvement  of  Agriculture, 

Arts,  Manufactures,  and  Commerce,  3. 
Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Engineering  Edu- 
cation, Committee  on  Entrance  Requirements 

of,  47,  92,  101. 
"Soldiering,"  69. 
Sophomore  year  in  engineering,  25,  38. 

Grades  in,  35. 
Specialization  in  engineering,  23,  25, 54, 55, 95  ff. 
State  institutions,  administration  of,  27. 
State  treasuries  and  industrial  development,  3. 
Steam  engine,  high  pressure,  invented,  3. 
Stenquist  construction  test,  119. 
Stevens  Institute 

Cooperative  administration  in,  30. 

Specialization  in,  96. 
Students,  elimination  of,  6,  32  ff. 

Grades  of,  33,  73. 

In  engineering  schools,  6,  17. 

Progress  of,  32  ff. 

Tests  of,  117  ff. 

1  act  in  engineering,  106. 

Tau  Beta  Pi,  68. 

Teachers  in  engineering  schools,  56,  101  ff. 

And  research,  103  f. 

Practical  experience  of,  102,  103. 

Qualifications  of,  101  f. 

Salaries  and  tenure,  102. 
Technical  subjects  in  engineering  curricula,  23. 
Technique  in  engineering,  106  f. 
Technological  schools,  classification  of,  55  f. 
Tennessee  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Tests,  and  examinations,  70. 

And  secondary  education,  4  f . 

And  teaching,  70. 

Effect  of  outside  work  on,  52  f. 

In  English,  118  ff. 

In  mathematical  achievement,  117  ff. 

In  physics,  118  ff. 

In  the  army,  72. 


Nature  of,  49  ff. 

Results  of,  119  ff. 

Validity  of,  50. 

Value  and  purpose  of,  49,  57,  59,  67  ff.,  117  ff. 
Thayer  School,  Dartmouth  College,  16. 
Theology,  Schools  of,  56. 
Theory  and  practice  in  engineering  schools,  58, 

88,  91,98  f. 
Thesis,  graduation,  43. 
Thompson,  President  C.  O.,  76. 
Thorndike,  Professor  E.  L.,  36,  49,  52,  53,  70, 

89,  117  ff. 

Thoroughness  in  engineering,  106. 

Time  schedule    in  engineering  schools,  22  ff., 

54ff.,60,  93. 
Trade  in  the  United  States.  See  Industry  in  the 

United  States. 
Transportation  in  the  United  States,  5. 
Trustees,  boards  of,  27. 
Tufts  College,  student  grades  in,  33. 
Tuition,  about  1870,  16. 
Turner,  Professor  J.  B.,  on  industrial  training, 

10. 

U  nderstanding  of  men  in  engineering,  106. 

United  Engineering  Societies,  107. 

United  States  Bureau  of  Education  and  Engi- 
neering Schools,  8,  55  f. 

United  States,  educational  expenditures  in,  17. 

United  States,  industrial  conditions  in.  See  In- 
dustry in  the  United  States. 

United  States  Military  Academy 
Administration  of,  28  f. 
French  at,  94. 
Grading  at,  68. 

United  States  Naval  Academy,  57. 

Universities,  Colleges,  and  Technological 
Schools,  classification  of,  by  United  States 
Bureau  of  Education,  8. 

Values  and  costs,  99,  110,  111,  112. 
Verbal  relations,  tests  in,  118. 
Vermont  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 
Veterinary  medicine,  schools  of,  5G. 
Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute 

Engineering  courses  in,  24. 

Student  grades  in,  33. 
Virginia,  University  of 

Reorganization  of  content  at,  62. 

Student  grades  in,  33. 
Vocabulary  range,  tests  in,  118. 
Vocational  guidance  and  grading,  72  f. 

War  Department  and  administration  of  United 
States,  grading  of  officers  by,  73. 
Military  Academy,  28. 

War  of  Independence  and  industrial  develop- 
ment, 3. 

Washburn,  Hon.  Ichabod,  75. 


INDEX 


139 


Washington,  University  of 
Coordination  at,  58  f. 
Mechanics'  courses  in,  88. 
New  curricula  in,  93. 

Wellington,  A.  M.,  on  essentials  in  engineer- 
ing, 107. 

Wentworth  Institute,  7,  52. 

Westinghouse  Electric  and  Manufacturing  Com- 
pany, 36,  71. 

West  Point.  See  United  States  Military  Acad- 
emy. 

White,  Benjamin,  18. 

Whitney,  Eli,  inventor,  3. 

Williston,  Director  A.  L.,  52. 

Wisconsin  and  federal  land  grant,  16. 

Wisconsin,  University  of 
Elimination  in,  32. 
Engineering  curricula  in,  54  f. 


English  in,  64,  99. 

Student  grades  in,  33,  34. 
Woods  and  Bailey,  Course  in  Mathematics,  61. 
Worcester  Polytechnic  Institute,  shopwork  in, 

75,  76. 
Wright,  Benjamin,  4. 

Yale  University 
Cooperative  administration  in,  30. 
Engineering  curricula  in,  54  f. 
Entrance  requirements  to,  22. 
Shopwork  in,  75. 
Student  grades  in,  33. 

Yerkes,  Major,  72. 

Young  Men's  Christian  Association,  engineer- 
ing work  of,  7. 

Young,  Professor  Karl,  63. 

Yule,  partial  correlation  coefficients  of,  120. 


* 


THE  CARNEGIE  FOUNDATION 
FOR  THE  ADVANCEMENT  OF  TEACHING 

PENSIONS  FOR 
PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

A  REPORT  FOR  THE  COMMITTEE  ON  SALARIES,  PENSIONS 
AND  TENURE,  OF  THE  NATIONAL  EDUCATION  ASSOCIATION 

BY 
CLYDE  FURST  and  I.  L.  KANDEL 


BULLETIN  NUMBER  TWELVE 


I-    ^ 

N> .  t 


NEW  YORK  CITY 

576  FIFTH  AVENUE 


D.  B.  UPDIKE  •  THE   MERRYMOUXT  PRESS  •  BOSTON* 


CONTENTS 

PAGK 

PREFACE  v 

By  Joseph  Swain,  Chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Salaries,  Pensions,  and 
Tenure  of  the  National  Education  Association 

THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS 

The  History  of  Pensions  3 

The  Need  for  Pension  Systems  3 

Non-contributory  Pensions  4 

Contributory  Pensions  6 

Voluntary  or  Compulsory  Systems  7 

Pension  Financing  8 

Accrued  Liabilities  8 

The  Cost  of  Pensions  9 

Age  of  Retirement  11 

Pension  Benefits  12 

Reports  and  Valuations  13 

THE    FUNDAMENTAL  PRINCIPLES    OF    PENSIONS  15 

THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS 

European  Systems  17 

Systems  in  the  United  States  18 

Lack  of  Scientific  Basis  19 

Administration  20 

Amount  of  Pensions  20 

Service  and  Age  Retirement  20 

Disability  Allowances  21 

Financing  22 

Financial  Unsoundness  24 

The  Report  of  the  New  York  City  Commission  24 

The  Report  of  the  Illinois  Commission  26 

The  Massachusetts  Plan  27 

The  Pennsylvania  Plan  29 


iv  CONTENTS 

A  SUGGESTED  SYSTEM  OF  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS  IN 

THE    PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  THE  STATE  OF  VERMONT 

The  Suggested  System  31 

Statistical  Basis  37 

Theory  and  Principles  48 

TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF  TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  56 

SUMMARY  OF  TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  70 

MAP  OF  TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  73 

BRIEF  BIBLIOGRAPHY  75 

INDEX  79 


i 


PREFACE 

The  National  Education  Association's  Committee  on  Salaries,  Tenure, 
and  Pensions,  appointed  in  1911,  has  published,  independently  or  in 
cooperation  with  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Education,  reports  on 
"Teachers'  Salaries  and  Cost  of  Living"  (January,  1913),  "The Tangible 
Rewards  of  Teaching"  (Bulletin  16,  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Education,  1914), 
"Salaries  of  Teachers  and  School  Officers "  (Bulletin  31,  U.  S.  Bureau 
of  Education,  1915),  and  "State  Pension  Systems  for  Public  School 
Teachers"  (Bulletin  14,  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Education,  1916). 

The  Committee  has  also  enlisted  the  cooperation  of  the  Carnegie 
Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching  which,  in  addition  to  its 
granting  of  pensions  to  university  and  college  professors,  has  conducted, 
for  a  dozen  years,  comprehensive  studies  of  pensions  for  teachers, 
wherever  such  systems  exist.  The  President  of  the  Foundation,  Dr. 
Henry  S.  Pritchett,  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  Committee  all  of  this 
material,  together  with  the  services  of  the  Secretary  of  the  Foundation, 
Dr.  Clyde  Furst,  and  his  colleague,  Dr.  I.  L.  Kandel. 

These  gentlemen  have  met  in  extensive  conference  with  the  Com- 
mittee and  invited  representatives  from  each  state  at  the  meetings  of 
the  National  Education  Association  and  its  Department  of  Superin- 
tendence, at  Detroit  and  New  York  in  1916,  and  Atlantic  City  and 
Pittsburgh  in  1918.  The  reports  which  they  prepared  for  these  meet- 
ings, the  meeting  at  Kansas  City  in  1917,  and  the  meeting  of  the  Na- 
tional Council  of  Education  at  New  York  in  1916,  have  been  printed 
in  the  Tenth,  Eleventh,  and  Twelfth  Annual  Reports  of  the  Carnegie 
Foundation,  which  have  been  sent,  without  charge,  to  all  teachers  who 
requested  them.  Addresses  on  pensions,  delivered  by  Commissioner 


vi  PREFACE 

Claxton,  Dr.  Furst,  and  the  chairman  of  the  Committee,  before  the 
Association  as  a  whole,  at  New  York  in  1916,  are  printed  in  the  Pro- 
ceedings of  that  meeting. 

All  of  the  material  thus  provided  by  the  Foundation  is  brought 
together,  completed,  condensed,  and  rearranged  in  the  present  Bulletin, 
which  the  Foundation  will  send,  without  charge,  to  any  teacher  or  school 
officer  who  requests  it.  The  Committee  desires  to  record  its  appreci- 
ation of  the  sympathetic  and  complete  cooperation  of  the  Carnegie 
Foundation,  which  has  thus  rendered  a  service  to  every  teacher  in  the 
country. 

There  are  many  reasons  for  teachers  pensions.  Economically,  the  work 
of  an  organization  is  not  effective  unless  there  is  a  satisfactory  method 
of  retiring  aged  or  infirm  workers,  with  the  consequent  freedom  from 
anxiety  concerning  such  risks  on  the  part  of  the  workers.  Only  a  sat- 
isfactory pension  system  can  prevent  either  the  dismissal  of  aged  or 
infirm  teachers  without  resources,  or  the  sacrifice  of  the  best  interests  of 
the  schools  in  order  to  continue  the  employment  of  teachers  who  are  no 
longer  capable.  Socially,  men  and  women  of  character  and  intelligence 
are  willing  to  undertake  difficult  public  service  that  is  poorly  paid ;  but 
it  is  too  much  to  expect  them  also  to  sacrifice  the  prospect  of  security 
and  dignity  in  old  age  and  disability.  Educationally,  there  is  great  need 
to  attract  and  retain  and  advance  able  people  in  teaching  as  a  perma- 
nent career.  A  good  pension  system  helps  to  do  this. 

These  facts  were  first  apprehended  in  the  United  States  a  quarter 
of  a  century  ago.  Eight  systems  of  pensions  for  teachers  were  founded 
before  1900,  twenty -three  in  the  next  decade,  and  thirty-six  since  the 
beginning  of  1910.  There  are  now  sixty-seven  different  systems  in  thirty- 
four  states.  The  experience  of  this  brief  period  has  been  fruitful,  so  that 
we  are  already  able  to  correct  errors  and  proceed  with  more  confidence. 


PREFACE  vii 

The  time  should  soon  come  when  every  state  will  have  made  such  pro- 
vision for  its  teachers. 

The  organization  of  the  teachers  pension  systems  now  in  existence  is 
generally  satisfactory,  there  being  ordinarily  a  small  special  board  upon 
which  the  teachers  and  the  public  are  about  equally  represented.  More 
attention,  however,  is  demanded  by  the  need  of  having  the  actual 
administration  under  expert  direction  with  the  supervision  of  the  state's 
banking  and  insurance  commissioners. 

The  greatest  difficulty  that  has  been  encountered  has  been  the  pro- 
vision of  adequate  funds.  The  cost  of  a  pension  system  for  teachers  may 
be  borne  by  the  teacher  alone,  by  the  public  alone,  or  by  the  teacher  and 
the  public  together.  If  the  cost  is  borne  by  the  teacher  alone,  he  cannot 
afford,  out  of  a  small  salary,  to  set  aside  enough  money  to  purchase 
adequate  protection,  and  the  public  fails  to  fulfil  its  obligation.  If  the 
cost  is  borne  by  the  public  alone,  the  pensions  are  really  considered  as 
part  of  the  teacher's  compensation,  and  the  majority  who  withdraw  or 
die  before  retirement  receive  no  return  for  their  reduced  pay.  On  the 
other  hand,  when  the  cost  is  borne  by  the  teachers  and  the  public  to- 
gether, the  teacher  receives  appropriate  compensation  and  contractual 
security  and  the  teacher  and  the  public  cooperate  in  an  economic,  social, 
and  educational  obligation.  This  principle  of  cooperation  between  the 
teacher  and  the  public  is  recognized  by  most  of  the  pension  systems 
that  are  now  in  operation. 

The  application  of  the  principle  of  cooperation,  however,  is  not  so 
satisfactory.  Only  a  few  dozen  systems  relate  the  amount  of  the  contri- 
bution to  the  prospective  cost  of  the  pensions.  Frequently  public  money 
is  expected  from  sources  like  excise,  inheritance,  license,  or  transfer 
receipts;  or  deductions,  fines,  or  forfeitures  from  teachers  salaries  for 
absence  or  illness ;  or  from  tuitions  of  non-resident  students,  which  can- 


viii  PREFACE 

not  be  accurately  estimated  in  advance  and  so  cannot  furnish  a  reliable 
basis  for  pension  payments.  Equally  unsatisfactory  is  the  expectation 
of  paying  pensions,  when  they  fall  due,  from  current  school  or  other 
funds,  without  any  assurance  that  these  funds  will  be  adequate ;  or  from 
special  or  general  appropriations,  without  any  certainty  that  such  appro- 
priations will  be  made  by  future  and  perhaps  unsympathetic  adminis- 
trations. Indeed,  it  is  not  uncommon  to  limit  in  advance  the  sums  that 
may  be  taken  from  such  sources,  thus  reducing  the  proportion  of  the 
pension  that  can  be  paid,  or  leaving  the  whole  question  of  payment 
largely  to  accident. 

The  only  way  in  which  absolute  security  can  be  obtained  is  for  the  con- 
tribution of  the  public  as  well  as  that  of  the  teacher  to  be  paid  annually, 
credited  to  the  individual  teacher,  and  set  aside  to  accumulate  until 
the  time  of  his  retirement.  This  also  is  the  only  economical  method. 
Any  system  that  agrees  to  pay  a  pension  from  current  funds  after  the 
teacher  retires,  plans  to  spend  two  or  three  times  as  much  money  as 
would  be  required  if  sums  were  set  aside  each  year  to  accumulate  it 
during  the  teacher's  period  of  service.  Any  other  method  is  parallel  to 
issuing  bonds  without  provision  for  retiring  them. 

Pension  systems  are  still  too  generally  organized  without  estimating 
their  cost.  The  probable  length  of  life  of  a  teacher  in  service  or  after 
retirement  may  be  estimated  from  the  tables  of  mortality  that  have 
been  developed  by  the  life  insurance  companies,  with  adjustment  for 
the  fact  that  teachers  live  longer  than  other  people.  Some  basis  is  be- 
coming available  for  estimates  of  the  likelihood  of  disability  and  the 
probable  length  of  life  after  retirement  because  of  disability.  It  is  wise 
to  avoid  so  far  as  possible  basing  pensions  upon  salaries  at  or  near  the 
age  of  retirement,  since  no  one  can  predict  what  any  teacher's  salary 
will  be  thirty,  or  forty,  or  fifty  years  hence. 


PREFACE  ix 

There  is,  of  course,  a  definite  relation  between  the  benefits  and  the 
cost  Of  pensions.  No  one  can  secure  expensive  benefits  in  return  for  very 
small  contributions.  Only  failure  awaits  the  systems  which  promise  re- 
tirement after  twenty  years  of  service  or  at  the  age  of  fifty ;  or  in  which 
teachers  contribute  only  one-half  of  one  per  cent  of  their  salaries;  or  in 
which  the  public  contributes  only  one-half  as  much  as  the  teachers. 

Such  errors  may  easily  be  corrected  by  a  very  simple  pension  system, 
based  upon  conservative  tables  of  mortality,  and  upon  a  safe  rate  of 
interest,  with  the  provision  that  the  teacher  receives  the  benefit  of  the 
accumulation  of  all  of  his  contributions  and  those  made  for  him.  It  is 
possible  to  estimate  with  reasonable  definiteness  what  certain  desired 
benefits  will  cost,  or  what  benefits  can  be  had  for  the  money  available. 
It  is  easy  to  estimate  what  any  annual  contribution,  beginning  at  any 
age,  and  accumulating  at  a  given  percentage,  will  amount  to  after  any 
number  of  years.  If  then  the  money  is  deposited  in  a  central  fund,  each 
contributor  can  be  guaranteed  a  definite  annuity  for  life,  since  the  lives 
of  all  are  averaged  in  the  standard  mortality  tables.  Thus,  an  annual  con- 
tribution of  $100  a  year,  beginning  at  the  age  of  25,  and  accumulated  at 
4  per  cent  interest,  will  amount  at  65  to  $8882.65,  at  70  to  $12,587.06. 
These  sums  will  provide  a  man  with  an  annuity  for  life,  according  to  the 
McClintock  Table  of  Mortality  and  3 \  per  cent  interest,  of  $1086  a  year 
beginning  at  65,  or  of  $1681  a  year  beginning  at  70.  If,  on  the  other 
hand,  a  man  wishes  to  be  sure  of  a  life  annuity  of  $1000  a  year  at  65  or 
70,  he  knows  that  this  will  cost  $9098.60  or  $8642.40  at  those  ages, 
and  that  it  would  require  a  contribution  of  $92  or  of  $68  a  year  from 
the  age  of  25  to  accumulate  these  sums.  The  annuities  from  such  a  con- 
tribution for  women,  who  live  longer  than  men,  would  be  about  four- 
fifths  of  the  sums  that  have  been  mentioned. 

These  figures  imply  a  return  of  the  accumulations  of  the  teacher  who 


x  PREFACE 

dies  before  retirement  and  of  those  who  withdraw  from  the  system  for 
any  reason.  If  it  is  desired  for  the  sake  of  family  protection,  there  may 
be  also  a  return  of  the  balance  of  the  accumulations  of  the  teacher  who 
retires  but  dies  before  he  has  drawn  all  of  his  accumulations.  This  also 
can  be  calculated  from  standard  mortality  and  interest  tables.  These 
cost  about  one-fourth  more  than  a  straight  annuity.  If  further  protec- 
tion is  desired  against  disability,  this  can  be  similarly  provided  by  the 
use  of  the  best  tables  that  we  have,  with  the  proviso  that  the  rates  for 
those  who  enter  into  the  system  in  the  future  may  be  modified  accord- 
ing to  future  experience. 

A  pension  system  of  the  kind  that  has  been  mentioned  is  just  and 
fair  to  all  concerned,  giving  the  teacher  secure  and  adequate  protection 
at  a  reasonable  cost  to  himself  and  to  the  public. 

Such  a  system  provides  for  retirement  on  the  basis  of  age  or  of  dis- 
ability after  any  suitable  period  of  service.  The  age  of  retirement,  which 
is  now  usually  fixed,  can,  if  desired,  be  left  to  the  teacher  and  the  ad- 
ministration. If  the  need  is  great,  retirement  may  be  earlier,  in  spite  of 
the  fact  that  the  smaller  accumulations  would  then  make  the  pension 
smaller.  In  general,  retirement  will,  in  all  probability,  be  later  than  at 
present,  because  of  the  larger  pension  provided  by  the  longer  accumu- 
lation, and  the  educational  desirability  of  keeping  the  able  teacher 
in  service  as  long  as  possible.  Disability  can  be  provided  for  by  using 
whatever  money  has  been  accumulated  at  the  time  when  retirement 
becomes  unavoidable,  perhaps  with  some  supplement  from  the  state 
until  statistical  experience  makes  it  possible  to  provide  specifically  for 
disability. 

The  system  suggested  provides  full  protection  for  both  the  teacher 
and  those  who  are  dependent  upon  him,  since  the  form  of  contribution 
sets  up  a  contractual  relation  which  provides  definite  returns  in  case  of 


PREFACE 


XI 


withdrawal  or  death.  Return  of  contribution  in  case  of  resignation  is 
now  sometimes  arranged,  but  return  in  case  of  dismissal  or  of  death  is 
seldom  provided  for.  Contractual  arrangements  for  the  return  of  con- 
tributions under  all  these  circumstances  will  facilitate  the  desirable 
transfer  of  the  teacher  from  one  system  to  another.  Indeed,  with  the 
spread  of  sound  plans,  pension  systems  throughout  the  country  will 
become  more  and  more  uniform,  so  that  the  experience  of  each  will 
help  all.  Continuity  of  employment  during  efficiency  and  good  behavior 
is  essential  to  any  sound  pension  system. 

Joseph  Swain,  Chairman 

President  of  Swarthmore  College 

Ernest  C.  Moore 

President  Los  Angeles  State  Normal  School 

David  B.  Johnson 

President  Winthrop  Normal  and  Industrial  College  of  South  Carolina 

Harlan  Updegraff 

Professor  of  Educational  Administration,  University  of  Pennsylvania 

Grace  C.  Forsythe 

District  Superintendent  of  Schools,  Brooklyn 

James  Ferguson 

Deputy  Superintendent,  Riverside  County,  California,  Schools 

Francis  G.  Blair 

State  Superintendent  of  Public  Instruction,  Illinois 

John  W.  Carr 

Principal,  Friends  Central  School,  Philadelphia 

National  Education  Association  Committee 
on  Salaries,  Pensions,  and  Tenure. 


*>} 


PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS 

The  History  of  Pensions 

Teachers  pension  systems  are  part  of  a  recent  world  movement  for  social  insurance. 
Pensions  of  some  kind  have  been  in  existence  since  the  Roman  era,  but  until  recently 
they  have  been  granted  in  a  merely  haphazard  fashion,  and  have  not  been  regarded 
as  a  responsibility  to  be  assumed  by  society  toward  its  superannuated  or  disabled  ser- 
vants. They  were  granted  first  as  rewards  to  court  favorites,  or  for  military  or  naval 
services,  or  for  distinguished  contributions  in  the  fields  of  literature,  art,  or  science. 
As  the  administrative  departments  of  government  developed,  employing  large  num- 
bers of  civil  servants  with  a  certain  security  of  tenure,  they  also  introduced  pensions, 
partly  as  a  compensation  for  low  salaries  paid  during  active  service,  partly  as  a  means 
of  attracting  desirable  workers  to  the  service.  This  practice  spread  to  other  branches 
and  types  of  public  service  under  local  government  authorities. 

So  long  as  the  occupations  of  industry  and  commerce  were  on  a  small  scale,  where 
the  employer  had  only  a  few  employees  with  whom  he  could  maintain  personal  rela- 
tions, cases  of  superannuation  or  disability  could  be  taken  care  of  either  by  the  em- 
ployer or  by  fellow  workers.  But  with  the  development  of  industry  on  a  large  scale, 
whereby  hundreds  or  thousands  of  employees  were  congregated  in  large  factories,  the 
conditions  under  which  the  employer  could  exercise  a  personal  interest  in  the  welfare 
of  his  employees  disappeared,  and  at  the  same  time  the  direct  appeal  to  fellow  work- 
ers in  cases  of  distress  lost  its  intimate  force.  Out  of  these  circumstances  and  the  so- 
cial consciousness  which  began  late  in  the  nineteenth  century  to  replace  the  previous 
individualistic  laissez-faire  policy,  there  developed  a  feeling  of  social  responsibility 
for  those  who  became  incapacitated  thru  age  or  disability  for  further  wage-earning. 
Society  has  come  to  demand  that  an  employee  who  has  given  the  services  of  a  life- 
time to  an  employer  be  provided  for  in  his  old  age.  Social  justice  demands  that  this 
protection  be  more  definite  and  dignified  than  that  of  common  charity. 

The  Need  for  Pension  Systems 

Such  considerations  alone,  however,  while  they  direct  attention  to  the  need  of  some 
system  of  pensions,  approach  the  subject  only  from  the  point  of  view  of  the  retiring 
employee.  They  base  the  claim  to  a  pension  on  gratitude  for  past  services  or  on  social 
justice.  They  accept  the  claim  of  employees  that  they  have  a  moral  and  equitable 
right  to  pensions,  over  and  above  the  remuneration  that  they  have  received  during 
active  service.  An  even  broader  social  philosophy  requires  that  the  justification  for 
pensions  should  rest  not  only  on  their  service  in  cases  of  distress,  but  also  on  the  ex- 
tent to  which  they  may  improve  the  conditions  of  service,  increase  the  efficiency  of 
workers,  and  promote  social  welfare  generally.  Any  service,  whether  public  or  private, 
is  likely  to  become  impaired  as  a  result  of  the  waste  and  demoralization  caused  by 


4  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

the  retention  of  employees  who  are  inefficient  because  of  old  age  or  disability.  The 
retention  in  service  of  worn-out  employees  further  tends  to  clog  the  avenues  of  pro- 
motion and  to  discourage  younger  and  abler  men.  At  the  same  time  the  absence  of 
provision  against  the  hazards  of  life  creates  uncertainty  as  to  the  future,  perplexity, 
and  worry  on  the  part  of  the  employee,  throughout  his  service. 

The  justification  of  a  pension  system  accordingly  arises  from  the  interests  of  both 
the  employer  and  the  employee,  the  demands  of  economic  efficiency  as  well  as  of  social 
justice.  The  employee  who  knows  that  he  will  be  provided  for  when  the  time  comes 
for  him  to  retire  from  his  occupation  is  likely  to  be  contented  and  free  from  worry, 
and  will  render  more  effective  and  more  continuous  service.  A  calling  or  profession 
will  attract  and  hold  men  of  intelligence,  ability,  and  devotion,  only  so  far  as  they 
recognize  that  the  avenue  of  promotion  is  open  to  them  and  that  security  is  afforded 
against  the  risks  of  life.  From  these  points  of  view  the  establishment  of  a  pension 
system  ceases  to  be  merely  a  matter  of  sentiment,  or  a  reward  for  past  services,  or 
a  compensation  for  low  salaries.  It  becomes  a  matter  in  which  the  employee,  the  em- 
ployer, and  society  at  large  are  vitally  interested.  It  is  because  pensions  have  been 
approached  hitherto  without  taking  into  consideration  all  these  factors  that  a  sound 
theory  of  the  subject  has  not  been  developed,  and  without  a  sound  theory  sound 
practice  is  impossible. 


Non-Contributory  Pensions 

It  is  only  by  defining  clearly  the  interests  to  be  served  by  a  pension  system  that 
it  is  possible  to  proceed  to  a  consideration  of  the  methods  by  which  such  a  system  is 
to  be  maintained  and  managed.  Where  pensions  have  been  regarded  from  the  point 
of  view  of  sentiment  or  moral  right  or  compensation  due  for  past  services,  the  burden 
of  their  maintenance  and  management  has  been  placed  wholly  upon  the  employer. 
Some  confusion  also  has  been  caused  by  the  attempt  to  transplant  to  conditions  prev- 
alent in  a  democracy  institutions  that  arose  in  continental  Europe  under  a  regime 
of  government  supervision  and  paternalism.  But  even  in  Europe  recent  progress  in 
social  insurance  is  based  on  the  mutual  cooperation  of  governments,  employers,  and 
employees.  Another  tradition  that  has  been  detrimental  to  the  development  of  sound 
pension  theory  has  been  the  paternalistic  and  political  practice  of  the  United  States 
government  in  pensioning  its  army  and  navy  veterans.  But  here  too,  at  last,  the  prin- 
ciple of  cooperation  has  been  adopted — in  the  Federal  War  Risk  Insurance  Act  of 
1917.  The  advocates  of  free,  straight,  or  non-contributory  pensions,  paid  by  the  em- 
ployer alone,  have  failed  to  realize  the  limitations  of  such  pensions.  A  free  pension  not 
only  fails  to  satisfy  the  requirements  of  social  philosophy  described  above,  but  it  is 
open  to  many  other  objections.  A  system  of  free  pensions,  if  they  are  to  be  adequate 
for  subsistence,  can  be  supported  only  out  of  resources  that  are  unlimited.  The  cost, 
which  depends  upon  the  judgment  or  generosity  of  the  employer,  cannot  be  calculated 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS  5 

in  advance,  and  while  it  may  be  small  at  first,  it  rises  rapidly  within  a  short  period. 
The  appropriations  for  pensions  for  war  veterans  in  the  United  States  have  reached 
the  sum  of  more  than  $185,000,000  annually.  The  private  employer  does  not  as  a 
rule  possess  the  means  to  meet  the  demands  of  such  a  pension  system  unless  the  indi- 
vidual pensions  are  pitiably  small,  or  unless  the  right  is  reserved  to  prorate  the  pen- 
sions when  the  burden  becomes  too  great.  Such  a  provision  inevitably  introduces  an 
element  of  uncertainty  and  a  lack  of  confidence  in  the  system  on  the  part  of  employ- 
ees, while  the  employer  under  this  scheme  is  accumulating  a  debt  without  laying  aside 
a  reserve  to  meet  the  obligation  when  it  falls  due.  A  free  pension  plan  under  the  con- 
trol of  the  employer  accordingly  furnishes  a  merely  speculative  benefit  in  the  remote 
future,  fails  to  affect  the  attitude  of  the  employee  to  his  work,  and  does  not  produce 
the  continuity  of  service  and  the  contentment  that  are  among  the  essential  objects  of 
a  sound  pension  scheme.  A  free  pension  plan,  for  example,  has  never  yet  prevented 
strikes,  as  some  employers  hoped  that  it  would.  The  financing  of  a  scheme  on  this 
basis  necessarily  places  its  control  and  management  in  the  hands  of  the  employer,  a 
practice  that  does  not  avail  itself  of  the  advantages  of  the  cooperation  and  mutual 
understanding  that  may  be  expected  from  another  type  of  administration.  Nor  does 
a  free  pension  system  ever  secure  the  moral  and  educative  values  of  a  system  that 
encourages  cheerful  performance  of  service,  efficiency,  thrift,  and  foresight. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  the  employees,  the  free  pension  plan,  altho  it  has  always 
had  a  strong  appeal  as  being  "  something  for  nothing,""  is  misleading,  for  it  is  too 
often  forgotten  that  any  prospective  benefit  over  and  above  wages  is  inevitably  con- 
sidered as  compensation  in  lieu  of  wages.  In  other  words,  a  free  pension  system  is 
inevitably  contributory,  altho  in  an  indirect  way.  The  English  civil  servants,  more- 
over, argued  that  the  free  pension  promised  them  not  only  kept  their  salaries  low, 
but  that  their  salaries  were  reduced  by  an  amount  that  would  have  more  than  paid 
for  the  pensions.1  At  the  same  time,  altho  a  free  pension  is  technically  maintained  by 
"constructive  contributions,"  or  the  amounts  by  which  wages  are  depressed,  the  em- 
ployees have  no  withdrawal  equities  if  they  resign  or  die  before  becoming  eligible  for 
retirement.  Finally,  such  a  plan  is  contrary  to  the  interests  of  employees  because  it 
confers  no  contractual  right  to  the  pension;  it  merely  holds  out  a  promise  of  a  benefit 
if  there  are  funds  to  meet  the  cost.  There  is  in  fact  no  free  pension. 

Briefly  stated,  then,  the  free  pension  plan  fails  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of  a  sound 
pension  theory.  From  the  standpoint  of  the  employer  it  is  likely  to  prove  exceedingly 
costly  and  does  not  promote  the  efficiency  and  well-being  of  employees,  while  to  the 
employees  it  offers  an  uncertain  and  contingent  benefit  for  which  they  are  themselves 
indirectly  paying  more  than  it  costs. 


*  See  Report  of  the  Royal  Commission  on  Superannuation  in  the  Civil  Service.  London,  1908. 


6  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

Contributory  Pensions 

Since  so-called  free  pensions  fail  to  achieve  the  proper  objects  of  a  pension  system, 
some  plan  is  necessary  which  distributes  the  burden  of  the  cost  equitably,  provides 
for  cooperation  between  employer  and  employees,  can  be  administered  justly,  economi- 
cally, and  with  due  regard  to  scientific  actuarial  principles,  establishes  contractual 
security  for  the  employees,  includes  elements  of  elasticity  so  that  benefits  and  pro- 
tection against  other  risks  besides  those  of  old  age  can  be  furnished,  and,  in  addi- 
tion, has  moral  and  educative  values.  Such  a  scheme  is  found  in  the  contributory  plan, 
which  involves  the  joint  contributions  and  the  joint  administration  of  employer  and 
employee. 

For  the  employer  the  contributory  plan  is  considerably  cheaper  than  the  free  pen- 
sion system  because  it  replaces  an  uncertain  but  continuing  and  increasing  burden 
by  a  fixed  and  limited  liability.  This  is  particularly  true  if  the  reserve  system  of  meet- 
ing the  cost  is  adopted,  and  a  definite  sum  for  pension  purposes  is  set  aside  annually 
as  a  part  of  the  current  expense  of  production,  instead  of  being  postponed  as  a  charge 
upon  a  future  generation  which  receives  no  benefit  in  return.  A  sound  contributory 
plan,  like  any  other,  assumes  that  the  employer  owes  a  humane  duty  to  his  worn-out 
employees,  but  unlike  any  other  plan  it  does  not  depend  on  his  discretion  whether  he 
will  meet  this  obligation  or  not.  The  employer's  contribution  becomes  a  consideration 
in  return  for  which  the  employees  permit  deductions  from  their  salaries.  Such  a  system 
can  be  placed  on  a  contractual  basis  and  be  more  effective  than  any  other  system  of 
pensions  in  securing  a  readier  performance  of  duty  and  a  higher  efficiency  among 
employees,  and  in  attracting  and  holding  men  of  energy  and  ability.  A  pension  sys- 
tem based  on  the  contributory  plan  is  not  an  extravagance  for  the  employer  but  an 
economical  expenditure,  dictated  not  by  feudal  or  sentimental  purposes  but  by  the 
desire  to  improve  the  conditions  that  determine  efficient  service  as  well  as  by  a  broad 
humanity.  For  the  employee  the  establishment  of  a  pension  plan  on  the  contribu- 
tory principle,  while  intended  primarily  as  a  protection  against  the  risk  of  unemploy- 
ment as  the  result  of  superannuation  or  disability,  furnishes,  further,  an  opportunity 
for  saving  and  the  development  of  habits  of  thrift.  Far  from  affecting  the  independence 
of  employees  adversely,  as  is  sometimes  feared,  the  contributory  plan  strengthens  it 
by  giving  the  employees  a  sense  of  financial  security  to  the  extent  of  the  accumula- 
tions, however  small,  standing  to  their  credit.  The  fact  that  a  contributory  plan  is 
based  on  the  financial  cooperation  of  employer  and  employees  implies  cooperation  in 
administration  and  furnishes  a  starting-point  for  that  broader  mutual  understand- 
ing that  is  becoming  increasingly  essential  and  increasingly  common  in  industrial 
relations. 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS  7 

Voluntary  or  Compulsory  Systems 

The  contributory  plan  not  only  promotes  cooperation  between  employer  and 
employees,  but  takes  cognizance  of  the  fact  that  modern  industrial  and  professional 
organization  brings  men  together  in  groups  working  under  uniform  conditions.  The 
latter  fact  alone  furnishes  a  basis  on  which  employees  may  unite  for  protection  against 
the  chief  hazards  of  life  and  for  the  promotion  of  other  common  interests.  Since  it  is 
the  function  of  a  pension  system  not  only  to  obviate  the  hardships  and  distress  that 
may  come  with  the  cessation  of  income,  but  also  to  secure  efficiency,  it  is  obvious  that 
an  effectual  contributory  plan  must  also  be  compulsory.  A  voluntary  system  may  fail 
to  provide  protection  for  those  who  need  it  most ;  a  discriminating  or  selective  feature 
may  fail  to  promote  that  efficiency  and  whole-hearted  cooperation  at  which  the  system 
aims.  The  success  of  a  pension  plan,  moreover,  depends  upon  the  participation  of  mem- 
bers in  such  numbers  that  the  ordinary  tables  of  mortality  may  be  employed  until 
special  tables,  representing  the  experience  of  the  system,  be  worked  out.  Such  repre- 
sentative tables  cannot  anticipate  the  experience  of  a  small  number  of  voluntary  par- 
ticipants. Nor  does  such  a  compulsory  plan  militate  against  the  development  of  thrift 
and  foresight.  Thrift  is  a  habit,  a  mental  attitude,  that  grows  with  the  opportunities 
for  its  exercise  and  the  experience  of  its  benefits.  The  argument  that  it  would  be  wiser 
to  increase  wages  and  leave  to  the  individual  the  provision  of  his  own  protection  is 
valid  for  those  who  already  possess  the  habit  of  thrift,  but  breaks  down  for  the  large 
majority  in  not  providing  help  for  those  who  may  need  it  most,  including  the  man 
who  suffers  early  disability.  A  contributory  plan  offers  exactly  the  desirable  oppor- 
tunity for  developing  this  habit,  and  has  the  further  value  of  promoting  a  sense  of 
cooperation  and  mutual  responsibility.  It  furnishes  the  possibility  of  saving  and 
investment  that  is  not  open  in  the  ordinary  commercial  channels  for  men  on  small 
fixed  incomes.  The  compulsory  character  of  a  plan  does  not  restrict  its  flexibility ;  the 
accumulations  standing  to  the  credit  of  a  contributor  can  be  employed  to  furnish  not 
merely  a  pension  on  his  retirement  but  support  in  case  of  his  disability  or  provision 
for  his  family  in  the  event  of  his  decease.  Nor  does  such  a  plan  militate  against  the 
mobility  of  the  employee ;  the  contributions  made  by  him  continue  to  be  his,  and 
accumulate  with  interest,  and  if  he  chooses  to  withdraw  from  his  present  employ- 
ment, he  takes  with  him  these  accumulations  in  which  he  has  secured  a  vested  right. 
A  valid  argument  may  further  be  made  that  the  employer's  contributions  should  also 
belong,  at  least  after  a  certain  period  of  service,  to  the  employees  on  the  ground  that 
technically  they  are  deferred  wages.  The  employee  protected  by  a  plan  in  which  he 
pays  his  due  share  need  not  feel  that  he  is  an  object  of  charity  nor,  for  the  same  reason, 
can  the  charge  of  undue  privilege  be  brought  against  him,  as  it  well  might  be  under 
a  free  or  optional  pension  system. 

A  pension  system  that  is  based  upon  contributions  from  employer  and  employees 
is  therefore  the  only  method  by  which  all  of  the  desired  objects  can  be  attained.  Such 


8  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

a  system  promotes  the  interests  not  only  of  employers  and  employees  but  of  society 
in  general,  in  so  far  as  society  is  interested  in  the  promotion  of  individual,  indus- 
trial, and  social  welfare.  The  employer  secures  more  efficient  service,  the  employee  is 
protected  and  freed  from  anxiety  for  the  future,  and  society  benefits  both  from  the 
increased  efficiency  and  serenity  and  from  the  prevention  of  the  dangers  that  may 
arise  from  discontent. 

Pension  Financing 

The  soundness  of  a  pension  system,  as  of  any  other  financial  undertaking,  depends 
on  ability  to  meet  the  obligations  incurred.  One  of  the  weaknesses  of  the  free  pension 
plan  is  the  difficulty  of  estimating  the  obligations,  owing  to  changes  in  conditions 
that  cannot  be  predicted,  such  as  the  increase  in  the  number  of  beneficiaries,  the  ad- 
vance in  salaries,  or  the  lengthening  of  life,  any  one  of  which  may  impose  the  strain 
of  a  cumulative  burden.  It  is  almost  impossible  to  provide  for  the  payment  of  a  free 
pension  in  any  other  way  than  by  annual  appropriations.  A  contributory  plan,  how- 
ever, lends  itself  to  a  method  of  financing  that  is  at  once  secure  and  inexpensive. 
Heretofore,  altho  part  of  the  pension  may  have  been  met  by  accumulations  from  the 
contributions  of  the  employees,  the  remainder  has  been  met  usually  by  annual  appro- 
priations by  the  employer.  This  method  on  the  part  of  the  employer  of  meeting  obli- 
gations as  they  arise  is  known  as  the  cash  disbursement  plan ;  altho  not  as  expensive 
as  a  free  pension  system,  it  may  cost  as  much  as  a  third  of  the  expenditure  for  wages 
in  each  year.  It  may  thus  become  burdensome  and  lead  to  some  of  the  abuses  associ- 
ated with  free  pension  systems.  To  avoid  this  danger  and  to  equalize  the  cost  for  both 
employer  and  employee,  the  reserve  plan  is  now  advocated  for  both :  employer  and  em- 
ployee making  their  contributions  at  the  same  time,  as  a  rule  in  equal  sums,  and  thus 
securing  the  advantages  of  accumulations  with  compound  interest  and  of  the  existence 
of  a  fund  to  meet  obligations  as  they  arise.  Under  this  plan  each  contributor  is  in  a 
position  to  know  exactly  how  much  he  must  contribute,  how  much  he  has  to  his  credit 
in  the  pension  fund,  and  further  is  enabled  to  calculate  the  benefits  that  can  be  pur- 
chased from  these  accumulations.  By  this  method  adequate  pension  benefits  can  be 
provided  by  sums  not  exceeding  five  per  cent  of  wages  contributed  annually  by  the 
employer  and  five  per  cent  by  the  employee.  These  sums  remain  a  fixed  part  of  over- 
head expenses  and  there  is  no  danger  of  a  sudden  strain  from  the  development  of 
unforeseen  contingencies,  the  pension  provision  being  made  regularly  in  advance  for 
each  individual  employee.  The  reserve  plan  is  thus  not  only  the  least  expensive  method 
of  financing  a  pension  system,  but  the  only  one  that  meets  the  test  of  essential  sound- 
ness. 

Accrued  Liabilities 

Up  to  this  point  the  distribution  of  the  cost  of  maintaining  a  pension  system  has 
been  discussed  on  the  assumption  that  all  the  employees  are  young  and  of  approxi- 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS  9 

mately  the  same  age,  and  that  all  are  just  entering  on  their  period  of  service.  As  a 
matter  of  practice  pension  funds  are  seldom  established  under  such  satisfactory  con- 
ditions, but  are  introduced  after  an  organization  has  been  in  existence  for  some  time, 
with  employees  of  different  ages  and  different  periods  of  service.  The  estimate  that 
a  pension  system  can  be  maintained  at  a  cost  of  ten  per  cent  of  the  payroll,  divided 
between  employer  and  employees,  will  be  true  only  in  relation  to  employees  who  are 
entering  or  have  been  in  service  but  a  short  time,  and  who  can  make  a  sufficient  number 
of  annual  contributions  to  purchase  adequate  annuities.  Under  a  scheme  that  is  based 
on  actuarial  principles,  the  cost  of  providing  annuities  for  older  employees  by  annual 
contributions  alone  would  be  prohibitive.  In  order  to  restrict  such  contributions  to  a 
maximum  that  can  be  borne  by  the  employees,  say  five  per  cent  of  their  pay,  part  of 
the  additional  burden  must  be  borne  by  the  employer.  In  other  words,  the  accrued  lia- 
bilities or  those  obligations  that  are  incurred  because  of  the  service  of  older  employ- 
ees prior  to  the  establishment  of  a  pension  system,  must  accordingly  be  assumed  as  a 
continuous  charge  until  the  older  employees  have  passed  out  of  the  service  into  retire- 
ment. The  burden  of  accrued  liabilities  is  frequently  heavy,  but  it  cannot  be  neglected 
in  a  sound  pension  plan.  To  neglect  it  is  to  invite  bankruptcy ;  this  has  been  the  ex- 
perience of  many  contributory  pension  systems, — the  absence  of  special  funds  to  take 
care  of  older  members  has  led  to  the  exhaustion  of  accumulations  that  should  have 
been  kept  intact  to  pension  the  younger  members.  The  provision  of  the  additional  cost 
for  pensioning  older  employees,  or  to  meet  the  accrued  liabilities,  is  a  necessary  corol- 
lary of  the  principle  that  all  contributions,  whether  by  the  employer  or  employees,  be 
separately  credited,  during  the  period  of  accumulation,  to  the  individual  by  and  for 
whom  the  contributions  were  made,  and  be  used  as  contingencies  arise  to  pay  the  bene- 
fits due  to  that  individual  only,  and  for  no  other  purpose.  Under  existing  conditions 
in  most  pension  plans  all  contributions  are  paid  into  one  fund,  from  which  pensions  are 
paid  so  long  as  solvency  continues.  Bankruptcy  threatens  every  pension  system  that  is 
on  an  unsound  and  insecure  foundation,  whether  thru  neglect  of  the  accrued  liabili- 
ties or  of  some  other  of  the  actuarial  principles  involved.  The  ensuing  failure  to  meet 
obligations  and  the  consequent  hardship  and  distress  imposed  on  those  least  able  to 
bear  them  impair  confidence  in  all  pension  systems.  Provided  that  other  conditions  of 
the  pension  system,  such  as  the  amount  of  the  pension,  the  age  of  retirement,  and  the 
length  of  service  required,  are  clear  and  definite,  the  cost  of  paying  accrued  liabilities 
can  be  calculated  in  advance,  and  can  be  funded  in  the  same  way  as  the  remainder  of 
the  obligations. 

The  Cost  of  Pensions 

The  cost  of  a  pension  system  depends  on  the  nature  of  the  benefits  that  are  granted, 
the  age  and  sex  distribution  of  the  employees,  their  years  of  service,  the  expense  of 
administration,  and,  as  has  already  been  mentioned,  the  method  of  financing.  The  ex- 


10  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

pense  of  administration  forms  but  a  small  percentage  of  the  total  annual  expenditure, 
and  may  best  be  provided  for  separately  by  the  employer.  The  accrued  liabilities  will 
vary  with  the  number  of  older  employees  in  the  service.  The  main  cost  will  depend  upon 
the  amount  of  pension  determined  as  satisfactory.  In  general  a  pension  ought  to  be 
sufficient  in  amount  to  furnish  adequate  subsistence  in  old  age;  it  cannot  and  should 
not  be  expected  to  equal  the  income  earned  during  the  period  of  highest  working 
efficiency.  Under  a  contributory  plan  the  pensions  can  easily  be  higher  than  those 
paid  under  a  free  pension  system.  The  tendency  has  always  been  to  fix  pensions  at 
about  one-half  of  the  average  salary  earned  over  a  period  of  years.  Such  a  sum  may 
well  be  taken  as  an  adequate  standard,  but  for  actuarial  purposes  it  is  more  satisfac- 
tory to  eliminate  the  guesswork  involved  in  anticipating  exactly  what  the  final  sal- 
aries will  be  and  to  determine  the  pensions  generally  approximating  such  a  stand- 
ard, but  based  definitely  on  the  actual  accumulations.  In  addition  to  the  cost  of  the 
pensions,  the  cost  of  providing  disability  allowances  is  also  to  be  considered.  In  most 
progressive  industrial  communities  this  is  already  provided  for  under  the  laws  govern- 
ing workmen's  compensation,  but  where  these  do  not  apply,  the  additional  cost  of  pro- 
tection against  disability  is  not  large.  The  cost  of  refunds  in  case  of  withdrawal  by 
reason  of  dismissal,  resignation,  or  death,  and  of  the  guarantee  of  a  fixed  amount  of 
interest  on  accumulations  must  also  be  taken  into  account.  All  the  benefits  here  men- 
tioned, provided  the  pension  basis  is  approximately  half  salary,  can  be  met  by  annual 
contributions  equivalent  to  about  ten  per  cent  of  the  payroll,  divided  equally  between 
employer  and  employees.  The  only  additional  items,  which  usually  fall  largely  on  the 
employer,  are  the  cost  of  administration  and  of  the  accrued  liabilities  in  inaugurating 
the  system. 

For  the  employees  the  annual  cost  of  the  pension  benefit,  or  the  annual  contribu- 
tions that  they  will  be  required  to  make,  will  depend  not  only  on  the  amount  of  the 
pension  promised,  but  also  on  sex,  present  age,  age  of  retirement,  the  rate  of  interest 
at  which  the  contributions  accumulate,  and  the  number  and  kinds  of  benefits  pro- 
vided. The  cost  may  vary  from  two  or  three  per  cent  of  salary  for  the  younger  em- 
ployees to  as  high  as  twelve  or  more  per  cent  for  the  older  employees.  The  cost  of 
the  same  pensions  for  women  is  higher  than  for  men  because  women  both  retire  earlier 
and  are  longer  lived.  A  system  that  furnishes  benefits  in  case  of  disability  and  with- 
drawal is  more  expensive  than  one  without  these  benefits.  A  pension  that  begins  at 
an  early  age  requires  higher  contributions  than  one  beginning  at  a  later  age.  The 
individual  who  can  make  more  annual  contributions  before  his  retirement  than 
another  may  make  each  contribution  smaller,  not  merely  because  of  the  larger  num- 
ber of  contributions  but  because  of  the  cumulative  influence  of  interest.  Altho  all 
of  these  factors  are  self-evident,  most  of  them  have  been  neglected  in  the  framing  of 
pension  systems  heretofore.  The  association  of  the  term  "pension"  with  the  idea  of 
a  free  or  gratuitous  payment  of  money  tends  to  obscure  the  fact  that  a  sound  pen- 
sion system  must  necessarily  be  established  on  the  same  principles  that  underlie  the 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS  11 

purchase  of  annuities  or  insurance.  Even  in  contributory  plans,  however,  the  contri- 
butions have  been  determined  without  reference  to  these  fundamental  factors,  and 
some  pension  systems  have  required  the  same  annual  contributions  —  called  a  "  flat 
rate" — from  all  members,  irrespective  of  their  salaries,  age,  or  sex,  or  promised  pen- 
sion. Such  uniform  contributions  not  only  fail  to  ensure  financial  security,  but  they 
are  inequitable  to  the  employee.  Under  such  a  plan  the  younger  employee,  having 
longer  to  wait  before  retirement,  is  likely  to  pay  considerably  more  than  is  necessary 
to  provide  his  own  pension,  while  the  older  employee  will  pay  considerably  less,  the 
younger  men  virtually  paying  part  of  the  pensions  of  the  older.  Again,  since  the 
older  employee  probably  enjoys  a  higher  salary,  the  burden  imposed  by  the  flat  rate 
is  lighter  for  the  better  paid  than  for  the  more  poorly  paid  participant,  thus  intro- 
ducing an  inevitable  element  of  discontent.  A  sound  system  demands  that  the  annual 
contributions  be  calculated  on  the  basis  of  all  the  factors  referred  to.  The  heavy 
burden  that  might  fall  on  the  older  employees  may  be  avoided  either  by  making 
membership  in  the  pension  fund  optional  for  them  or  by  limiting  their  contributions 
to  some  fixed  proportion  of  salary,  the  amount  of  accrued  liability  beyond  this  being 
carried  by  the  employer. 


Age  of  Retirement 

The  age  at  which  retirement  from  service  is  permitted  plays  an  important  part  in 
determining  the  amount  both  of  the  pension  and  of  the  annual  contribution.  It  is 
impossible  to  determine  dogmatically  the  age  at  which  retirement  should  be  allowed; 
it  will  undoubtedly  differ  for  the  two  sexes,  and  will  vary  according  to  occupation 
and  perhaps  according  to  locality.  In  the  sedentary  and  professional  callings  a  man 
may  be  at  his  best  at  the  age  of  sixty,  while  in  those  occupations  that  require  physical 
strength  and  demand  constant  exposure  to  risks  a  man  may  cease  to  be  fit  at  that 
age.  It  is  true  that  the  followers  of  every  vocation  claim  special  privileges  because  of 
peculiar  hardships  associated  with  it,  but  in  general  it  may  be  said  that  sixty  is  a 
generous  age  at  which  voluntary  retirement  may  be  permitted  in  any  pension  system. 
Under  the  mistaken  conception  that  a  pension  is  purely  a  reward  for  services  ren- 
dered, and  as  a  result  of  the  fallacious  plea  of  special  occupational  strain,  provision 
has  been  made  in  many  systems  for  retirement  after  a  certain  period  of  service  with- 
out any  age  restriction.  Retirement  on  the  ground  of  service  alone,  however,  usually 
means  retirement  at  an  early  age;  some  systems  do  not  exclude  the  possibility  of 
retirement  after  twenty  years  of  service,  thus  enabling  employees  to  retire  at  the  age 
of  forty-five  or  fifty,  and  to  enjoy  their  pensions  for  half  of  their  adult  lives.  Such 
early  retirement  is  economically  and  socially  unjustifiable.  It  is  unfair  that  the 
followers  of  some  occupations  should  enjoy  in  the  prime  of  life  a  privilege  meant 
as  a  protection  for  old  age,  it  deprives  the  occupation  concerned  of  its  most  efficient 
service,  and  it  is  extremely  expensive,  for  obviously  a  man  who  retires  at  the  age  of 


12  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

fifty-five  may  be  expected  normally  to  enjoy  his  pension  for  a  longer  period  than  one 
retiring  at  sixty  or  sixty-five.  Further,  the  granting  of  early  pensions  is  socially  detri- 
mental since  it  is  open  to  abuse.  Such  a  system  emphasizes  the  idea  that  a  pension  is 
a  reward  for  services  rendered,  instead  of  a  measure  intended  as  a  provision  for  old 
age  and  for  the  promotion  of  efficient  service.  Where  this  idea  prevails  it  is  not  un- 
usual to  find  pensioners  enjoying  a  retiring  allowance  from  one  employer  while  actively 
engaged  in  occupation  for  another.  The  man  who  at  fifty  feels  that  he  has  discharged 
all  obligations  for  which  the  pension  is  a  reward,  feels  also  that  he  cannot  live  on  the 
reduced  income  represented  by  the  pension,  and  that  he  is  justified  in  adding  to  it 
in  any  way  open  to  him.  This  is  merely  proof  of  the  fact  that  every  normal  man  in 
the  enjoyment  of  health  prefers  to  remain  at  his  work  as  long  as  his  efficiency  con- 
tinues. It  is  only  the  young  employee  that  dreads  the  prospect  of  continuing  in  his 
occupation  for  thirty  or  forty  years,  a  dread  that  is  replaced  by  a  desire  to  continue 
as  the  opportunity  of  retiring  approaches.  A  minimum  requirement  of  service  is,  of 
course,  necessary,  if  only  to  make  possible  the  accumulation  of  sufficient  contributions 
toward  a  reasonable  pension.  But  it  is  difficult  to  see  why  any  employee  with  good 
health  and  unimpaired  faculties  should  be  retired,  except  on  the  basis  of  age  in  addi- 
tion to  a  service  requirement.  A  minimum  age  limit  may  be  established,  at  which  an 
employee  may  retire  voluntarily  or  be  retired  if  his  efficiency  is  impaired.  There  is, 
however,  no  reason  for  placing  difficulties  in  the  way  of  continuing  in  service  for  some 
years  longer  up  to  a  compulsory  age  limit,  which  will  vary  in  different  occupations. 
The  postponement  of  the  age  of  retirement  as  long  as  is  compatible  with  occupa- 
tional efficiency  implies  a  reduction  in  the  burden  of  annual  contributions,  and  if 
voluntarily  carried  beyond  the  minimum  age  of  retirement  means  a  pension  which 
rapidly  increases  in  size  as  the  result  of  additional  accumulations. 


Pension  Benefits 

Up  to  the  present  time  the  payment  of  pensions  has  seldom  taken  any  other  form 
than  a  monthly  allowance  to  the  pensioner  as  long  as  he  lives.  Since  the  aim  of  recent 
pension  philosophy  is  to  introduce  as  much  flexibility  as  possible,  thei'e  is  a  tendency 
to  provide  different  methods  for  paying  out  the  accumulations  standing  to  the  credit 
of  a  pensioner  at  the  time  of  his  retirement.  These  options  may  provide  benefits  for 
the  pensioner  himself  alone,  or  for  the  pensioner  and  his  widow  after  his  death,  or 
either  of  these  benefits  with  a  return  to  his  estate  of  any  sums  remaining  to  his  credit 
after  the  payment  of  these  benefits.  The  accumulations  virtually  belong  to  the  em- 
ployee: the  chief  object  of  their  existence  is  accomplished  when  the  pensioner  makes 
satisfactory  provision  for  his  own  maintenance  at  the  time  of  his  retirement;  beyond 
that  he  may  have  an  opportunity  of  making  such  further  provision  for  his  dependents 
as  may  seem  to  him  desirable. 

The  essential  purposes  of  a  pension  system  are  met  if  it  makes  adequate  provi- 


THE  SOCIAL  PHILOSOPHY  OF  PENSIONS  13 

sion  for  old  age,  and  if  it  succeeds  in  promoting  efficient  service.  These  purposes  can 
be  carried  out  only  when  the  cooperation  of  employer  and  employees  is  enlisted  in 
sharing  the  burden  with  justice  and  fairness  to  each  side,  and  as  economically  as 
is  consistent  with  the  objects  proposed.  In  addition  to  the  provision  of  protection 
against  the  risk  that  may  come  from  loss  of  wage-earning  efficiency  due  to  old  age, 
the  interests  of  efficient  service  require  also  protection  against  loss  of  wage-earning 
capacity  as  a  result  of  disability.  While  cases  of  disability  are  not  frequent,  they  are 
accompanied  when  they  do  occur  with  considerable  distress.  In  many  occupations  they 
are  already  covered  by  workmen's  compensation  laws.  Where  such  provision  is  absent, 
it  may  well  be  made  a  part  of  a  pension  system.  The  chief  questions  underlving 
the  granting  of  disability  allowances  are  whether  in  the  interests  of  efficiency  the 
protection  should  be  furnished  to  employees  from  the  time  of  their  entrance  into 
service  or  only  after  a  few  years  of  service,  and  how  the  financial  cost  of  such  allow- 
ances should  be  met.  The  period  of  service  that  should  be  required  as  a  qualification 
for  a  disability  pension  will  depend  probably  on  the  number  of  years  that  it  takes 
an  employee  to  become  thoroughly  efficient  in  his  occupation  and  to  acquire  perma- 
nency of  tenure ;  the  period  will  accordingly  vary  with  the  occupations.  In  order  to 
be  adequate,  the  amount  of  a  disability  allowance  needs,  like  the  old  age  pension,  to 
approximate  half  the  salary  at  the  time  of  retirement.  Part  and  perhaps  all  of  the 
cost  of  such  allowances  can  be  met  by  the  accumulated  contributions  of  the  employer 
and  employee;  the  remainder,  like  the  accrued  liabilities,  may  be  paid  by  the  em- 
ployer, at  least  until  statistical  knowledge  of  disability  accumulates  sufficiently  to 
make  possible  the  calculation  of  definite  contributions  to  provide  for  such  contin- 
gencies. This  will  not  prove  such  a  burden  as  it  appears  at  first  sight,  partly  because 
the  cases  of  retirement  on  the  basis  of  disability  are  likely  to  be  few,  partly  because 
the  contributions  paid  by  the  employer  on  account  of  employees  who  leave  before 
completing  a  minimum  period  of  service  may  well  be  retained  and  accumulated  for 
the  payment  of  disability  grants.  In  every  case,  of  course,  the  grants  would  be  made 
only  for  permanent  disability,  and  would  be  subject  to  periodical  review  by  a  medical 
board. 

By  the  addition  to  the  main  benefits  of  an  old  age  pension  of  such  provisions  for 
disability,  options  at  retirement,  and  returns  of  contributions,  a  pension  system,  man- 
aged by  a  board  representing  both  the  employer  and  employees,  and  acting  on  actu- 
arial advice,  should  be  successful  in  promoting  the  objects  and  interests  that  are 
dictated  by  a  sound  social  philosophy  and  are  warranted  by  the  recent  experience 
of  both  private  and  public  services. 


Reports  and  Valuations 

Such  success,  however,  will  depend  ultimately  upon  the  possession  of  definite  infor- 
mation concerning  the  obligations  undertaken.  This  information  can  be  furnished  only 


14  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

from  accurately  kept  and  detailed  records  and  carefully  constructed  reports,  present- 
ing a  clear  statement  of  assets  and  liabilities.  Pension  reports  should  indicate  the  ac- 
tual and  expected  resources,  the  rate  of  interest,  the  nature  of  investments,  the  rate 
of  mortality  as  compared  with  accepted  tables,  as  well  as  the  cost  of  benefits  of  differ- 
ent kinds  that  may  be  expected  to  accrue  to  those  in  service  at  the  time  that  the  report 
is  issued.  More  especially  are  clearness  and  detail  essential  in  a  newly  created  pension 
system  until  the  vital  statistics  of  the  particular  service  affected  are  thoroughly  estab- 
lished. Many  questions  around  which  the  foundation  of  a  sound  pension  system  centres 
are  involved  here — longevity,  the  incidence  of  disability,  the  rate  of  withdrawal,  and 
the  rate  of  mortality.  Accurate  records  and  careful  reports  may  serve  not  merely  as 
a  method  of  checking  up  the  reliability  and  adequacy  of  a  pension  system,  but  as  a 
measure  for  controlling  and  perhaps  ultimately  reducing  the  cost. 

The  construction  or  valuation  of  a  pension  system  requires  complicated  calculation. 
It  is  necessary  to  have  complete  information  concerning  the  age,  sex,  and  length  of 
service  of  all  who  are  included  in  the  system ;  information  for  as  many  years  as  possi- 
ble concerning  their  salaries,  and  the  experience  of  the  system  with  regard  to  with- 
drawals, disability,  and  death.  The  tables  of  probable  mortality  and  expectation  of 
life  which  have  been  derived  from  the  experience  of  insurance  and  annuity  associations 
must  then  be  used  to  estimate  the  proportion  of  those  in  the  service  who  will  probably 
die  before  they  reach  the  age  of  retirement.  Others  will  withdraw  from  the  service  or 
be  disabled  before  that  time.  From  such  tables,  similarly,  may  be  derived  the  average 
expectation  of  life  of  the  group  which  remains  in  service  until  retirement,  and  the 
average  number  of  years  of  their  receipt  of  retiring  allowances.  This  multiplied  by 
the  amount  of  the  average  pension,  taking  interest  into  consideration,  gives  the  pro- 
spective financial  load  for  the  group.  The  age  of  retirement  is  fixed  by  the  regula- 
tions of  the  pension  system;  the  amount  of  the  pension  may  be  related  to  present  or 
prospective  salaries.  To  ensure  the  existence  of  funds  to  pay  the  pensions  when  they 
are  due  requires  the  fixing  and  continuance  of  appropriate  contributions,  a  conserva- 
tive rate  of  interest,  and  adjustments  for  the  return  of  contributions  for  those  who 
withdraw  or  die  early.  Different  provisions  for  men  and  women  and  special  provisions 
for  widows  necessitate  further  adjustments,  and  all  of  the  factors  that  have  been  men- 
tioned must  be  separately  considered  for  those  who  have  already  retired,  those  who 
are  now  in  the  service,  and  those  who  will  enter  the  service  hereafter.  Even  so  simple 
a  statement  of  some  of  the  mathematical  problems  of  pension  systems  indicates  that 
they  can  be  adequately  solved  only  by  persons  of  special  training  and  experience, — 
that  is,  by  professional  actuaries.  The  further  fact  that  all  the  elements  that  have  been 
mentioned  are  constantly  changing,  indicates  the  necessity  of  almost  continuous 
expert  attention.  It  is  especially  necessary  to  establish  mortality  and  other  tables 
representing  the  experience  of  the  system  itself,  as  in  some  respects  the  experience 
of  each  system  is  peculiar. 


THE  FUNDAMENTAL  PRINCIPLES  OF  PENSIONS 

The  following  fundamental  principles  of  a  sound  pension  system  for 
teachers  were  recommended  to  the  Carnegie  Foundation  on  April  27, 
1917,  by  a  commission  comprising  representatives  of  the  Association  of 
American  Universities,  the  National  Association  of  State  Universities, 
the  Association  of  American  Colleges,  the  American  Association  of 
University  Professors,  and  the  Carnegie  Foundation.  These  principles 
were  approved  by  the  Trustees  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation  on  May 
18,  1917,  and  carried  out  in  a  reorganization  of  the  pension  system  of 
the  Foundation  in  1918. 

I 

1.  The  function  of  a  pension  system  is  to  secure  to  the  individual  who 
participates  in  it  protection  against  the  risk  of  dependence  due  to  old 
age  or  to  disability. 

2.  The  obligation  to  secure  this  protection  for  himself  and  for  his  family 
rests  first  upon  the  individual.  This  is  one  of  the  primary  obligations 
of  the  existing  social  order.  Society  has  done  its  best  for  the  individual 
when  it  provides  the  machinery  by  which  he  may  obtain  this  protec- 
tion at  a  cost  within  his  reasonable  ability  to  pay. 

3.  Men  either  on  salary  or  on  wages  are,  in  the  economic  sense,  employ- 
ees. The  employer,  whether  a  government,  a  corporation,  or  an  indi- 
vidual, has  a  direct  financial  interest  in  the  establishment  of  some 
pension  system  which  shall  enable  old  or  disabled  employees  to  retire 
under  satisfactory  conditions.  In  addition,  society  demands  to-day 
that  the  employer  assume  some  part  in  the  moral  and  social  better- 
ment of  his  employees.  The  obligation  of  the  employer  to  cooperate 
in  sustaining  a  pension  system  is  primarily  a  financial  one,  and  in  the 
second  place,  a  moral  one. 

4.  A  pension  system  designed  for  any  group  of  industrial  or  vocational 
workers  should  rest  upon  the  cooperation  of  employee  and  employer. 

5.  Teachers  pensions  should  be  stipendiary  in  character,  amounting  to 
a  fair  proportion  of  the  active  pay. 


16  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

II 

1.  In  actuarial  terms  a  pension  is  a  deferred  annuity  upon  the  life  of  one 
or  more  individuals,  payable  upon  the  fulfilment  of  certain  conditions. 

2.  In  order  that  an  individual  participating  in  a  pension  system  may  be 
assured  of  his  annuity  when  due,  one  condition  is  indispensable:  There 
must  be  set  aside,  year  by  year,  the  reserve  necessary,  with  its  accu- 
mulated interest,  to  provide  the  annuity  at  the  age  agreed  upon.  On 
no  other  conditions  can  the  participator  obtain  a  satisfactory  contract. 
The  man  of  thirty  who  participates  in  a  pension  plan  under  which 
he  expects  an  annuity  thirty-five  or  forty  years  in  the  future  will  take 
some  risk  of  disappointment  in  accepting  any  arrangement  less  secure 
than  a  contractual  one. 

3.  A  pension  system  conducted  upon  the  actuarial  basis  of  setting  aside, 
year  by  year,  the  necessary  reserve  is  the  only  pension  system  whose 
cost  can  be  accurately  estimated  in  advance. 

4.  A  method  by  which  a  pension  is  paid  for  in  advance  in  annual  or 
monthly  instalments  is  the  most  practical  plan  which  can  be  devised 
for  purchasing  a  deferred  annuity,  provided  that  the  contributions 
begin  early  in  the  employee's  career,  and  provided  also  that  the 
contributions  paid  in  year  by  year  receive  the  benefit  of  the  current 
interest  for  safe  investments. 

5.  As  a  matter  of  practical  administrations  pension  system  should  apply 
to  a  group  whose  members  live  under  comparable  financial  and  eco- 
nomic conditions.  To  attain  its  full  purpose,  participation  in  the 
pension  system  to  the  extent  of  an  agreed  minimum  should  form 
a  condition  of  entering  the  service  or  employment  the  members  of 
which  are  cooperating  in  the  pension  system. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS 

European  Systems 

Teachers  pensions  are  now  provided  almost  universally  in  European  countries.  This 
has  followed  from  the  fact  that  the  profession  of  teaching  has  long  been  under  the 
more  or  less  direct  control  of  a  central  administration.  In  these  countries  teaching  is 
adopted  as  a  life  career,  entrance  to  which  depends  upon  a  period  of  professional  train- 
ing and  certification  by  the  state.  Once  a  teacher  enters  upon  his  work  he  enjoys  se- 
curity of  tenure  and  a  moderate  and  progressive  income ;  pensions  and  disability  pro- 
visions have  been  added,  as  they  have  in  other  branches  of  public  service,  to  attract 
able  candidates  to  the  profession,  to  improve  efficiency,  and  to  afford  the  teacher 
protection  in  case  of  retirement  from  service  owing  to  age  or  disability.  Teachers 
pensions  are  accordingly  found  in  Belgium,  France,  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  Italy, 
Greece,  and  Russia;  in  Holland,  Denmark,  and  Sweden;  as  well  as  in  all  the  states  of 
the  German  Empire  and  Austria-Hungary ;  and,  outside  of  Europe,  in  New  Zealand 
and  Japan,  South  America  and  South  Africa.  In  the  large  majority  of  these  systems 
the  teachers  cooperate  with  the  state  in  the  provision  of  pensions ;  in  Italy  the  state 
makes  no  contribution;  while  in  Japan  and  in  all  but  four  of  the  states  of  Germany 
free  or  non-contributory  pension  systems  prevail.  Of  the  free  pensions  in  Germany, 
one  of  the  oldest  and  best  known  of  the  elementary  school  teachers  has  said:1  "The 
straight  pensions  push  the  salary  question  into  the  background  considerably,  since  an 
official  with  the  right  to  a  pension  and  protection  for  his  dependents  can  hardly  com- 
pare his  income  with  those  in  other  callings  and  cannot  easily  base  a  claim  for  salary 
on  such  comparisons.  In  practice  the  result  is  that  in  the  regulation  of  salaries  the 
benefits  of  a  pension  privilege  are  estimated  too  high."  In  the  contributory  systems 
the  annual  contributions  vary  from  three  to  ten  per  cent  of  salary,  the  periods  of  ser- 
vice required  from  twenty-five  to  forty  years,  the  age  of  retirement  from  fifty-five  to 
seventy,  and  the  amounts  of  pensions  from  one-sixtieth  of  the  average  salary  over 
a  period  of  years  for  each  year  of  service  to  three-fourths  of  final  salary.  In  England 
and  Ireland  the  pension  consists  of  an  annuity  purchased  with  the  teachers  accumu- 
lated contributions  and  an  additional  sum  paid  by  the  state;  both  systems  are  subject 
to  periodical  actuarial  investigations,  with  necessary  changes  both  in  contributions 
and  annuities.  The  pensions  in  England  and  Ireland  are  small  but  secure. 


1  J.  Tews,  in  Rein,  Encyklopadisch.es  Handbuch  der  Padagogik,  vol.  vi,  p.  618.  1907. 


18 


PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

Teachers  Pensions  in  Foreign  Countries 


Country 

Source  c 
State 

rf  Funds 

Teachers 

Retiring  Alloivances 
Basis                                             Amount 
Service    |       Age 

Belgium 

Appropriations 
from  current 
revenues 

From  3%  to  5%  of 
salary  and  addi- 
tions on  increase 
of  salary 

30 

55 

One-fiftieth  of  average  salary  for  last 
five  years  of  service  for  each  year  of 
service  up  to  a  maximum  of  two- 
thirds  of  the  average  salary 

France 

Appropriations 
from  current 
revenues 

5%  of  salary  and 
additions  on  in- 
crease of  salary 

25 

55 

One-half  of  the  average  of  the  six 
highest  salaries  and  one-fiftieth  of 
the  average  for  each  year  after  25 
years  of  service  up  to  a  maximum  of 
three-fourths  of  the  average  salary 

England 

Appropriations 
according  to 
estimates 

$17.49  men;  $11.67 
women,  annually 

65 

Annuity  purchased  with  accumu- 
lated contributions  and  $4.86  from 
state  for  each  year  of  service 
Average,  men  $195.50;  women  $142.85 

Prussia 

Appropriations 
from  current 
revenues 

10 

65 

From  fifteen  to  forty-five  sixtieths  of 
final  salary  according  to  years  of  ser- 
vice 
Average,  men  $468;  women  $271 

Austria 

Appropriations 

3.8%  of  salary 

10 

40%  of  final  salary  after  10  years  of 
service  and  2%  of  final  salary  for  each 
year  of  service  thereafter  up  to  a  maxi- 
mum of  full  salary  after  40  years  of 
service 
Minimum  final  allowance  $160 

Italy 

Premiums  accord- 
ing to  age 

55 

Annuity  purchased  with  accumu- 
lated contributions 

New  Zealand 

Subsidy 

5%tol0%ofsalary 
according  to  age 
at  entrance 

40  men; 
30  women 

66  men; 
66  women 

One-sixtieth  of  average  salary  during 

last  3  years  of  service  for  each  year  of 

service 

Average,  about  $250 

Transvaal 

Annual  sum 
equal  to  teach- 
ers contribu- 
tions 

3%  of  salary 

55 

Total  contributions  with  4%  interest 
returned  in  a  lump  sum 

Japan 

Appropriations 
from  current 
revenues 

15-40 

60 

One-fourth  of  final  salary  plus  one- 
two-hundred-fortieth  of  final  salary 
for  each  year  of  service  after  15  years 
and  up  to  40  years 
Average,  about  $46 

Systems  in  the  United  States 

Pension  systems  for  teachers  in  the  United  States  have  but  a  brief  history;  the  first 
system  for  city  school  teachers  was  established  in  Chicago  in  1893,  followed  three  years 
later,  in  1896,  by  the  organization  in  New  Jersey  of  a  mutual  benefit  plan  for  disabled 
teachers  in  that  state.  The  majority  of  existing  systems  have  been  established  dur- 
ing the  past  ten  years.  There  are  at  the  present  time  twenty-one  state  pension  sys- 
tems, while  four  other  states  have  general  laws  permitting  local  bodies  to  set  up  plans. 
Of  the  twenty-one  state  systems  fifteen1  have  adopted  the  contributory  plan  and  six2 
the  non-contributory  scheme.  Of  the  permissive  systems  three3  are  contributory  and 
one4  n  on -contributory.  In  a  few  of  the  states  the  larger  cities  are  exempt  from  the 

1  California,  Connecticut,  Illinois,  Indiana,  Massachusetts,  Michigan,  Minnesota,  Montana,  Nevada,  New  York,  North 
Dakota,  Pennsylvania,  Vermont,  Virginia,  and  Wisconsin. 

2  Arizona,  Maine,  Maryland,  New  Hampshire,  New  Jersey,  and  Rhode  Island. 
s  Kentucky,  Ohio,  and  Utah.  *  Colorado. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  19 

operations  of  the  state  system.  There  are  accordingly,  in  addition  to  the  state  sys- 
tems, sixty-four  city  and  county  systems,  of  which  only  three  are  on  a  non-contrib- 
utory basis.  The  details  of  all  of  these  systems  are  given  in  the  tabular  statement 
and  summary  on  pages  56  to  72.  The  eighty-nine  systems  here  referred  to  are  covered 
by  sixty-seven  separate  provisions  given  in  the  tables  and  summary.  The  distribution 
of  the  state  systems  is  shown  by  the  map  on  page  73.  The  following  discussion  is  re- 
stricted to  them.  The  prevailing  tendency  to  establish  state  rather  than  local  systems 
is  most  fortunate.  A  sovereign  state  has  advantages  of  freedom  and  security  in  caring 
for  its  employees  that  are  unapproachable  by  any  local  or  private  establishment. 


Lack  of  Scientific  Basis 

Beyond  their  classification  as  contributory  or  non-contributory  plans,  the  various 
systems  show  uniformity  in  only  one  respect.  With  the  exception  of  the  systems  of 
Massachusetts,  Connecticut,  and  Erie,  Pennsylvania,  which  fall  into  one  group,  and 
Pennsylvania  and  New  York  City,  which  form  another,  no  serious  attempts  seem  to 
have  been  made  to  look  ahead  and  to  ensure  security  for  the  future  by  the  employ- 
ment of  a  sound  and  scientific  basis.  Whether  these  funds  were  inaugurated  in  a 
merely  sentimental  mood,  or  thru  imitation,  or  in  honest  ignorance,  or  in  the  attempt 
to  start  some  system,  however  faulty,  with  the  hope  of  improving  it  later,  the  result 
has  been  the  same, — after  the  needs  of  older  teachers  have  been  satisfied,  most  of  these 
funds  have  found  themselves  facing  bankruptcy.  At  last,  however,  the  threat  of  insol- 
vency, involving  disappointment  to  many  at  a  time  when  help  is  most  needed,  together 
with  the  reports  of  commissions  that  have  investigated  the  condition  of  such  funds 
as  those  of  New  York  City1  and  the  State  of  Illinois,2  has  directed  the  attention  of 
teachers  to  a  consideration  of  some  of  the  more  fundamental  principles  involved.  It 
is  gradually  but  surely  being  realized  by  those  who  are  interested  in  pensions  that 
there  is  no  mystery  underlying  these  principles,  and  above  all  that  financial  obliga- 
tions cannot  be  carried  out  for  any  length  of  time  unless  funds  are  in  existence  to 
meet  them,  and  that  so  far  as  teachers  and  their  employers  are  concerned,  the  chief 
question  to  be  studied  is  how  to  provide  these  funds  in  the  most  inexpensive  and 
economical  method  consistent  with  justice  to  the  teachers,  fairness  to  the  public,  and 
the  promotion  of  efficiency  in  education. 

The  haphazard  development  of  the  pension  systems  now  in  existence  is  well  illus- 
trated by  the  large  number  of  variations  that  are  found  in  such  fundamental  matters 
as  management,  maintenance,  amount  of  contributions  annually  paid  by  teachers, 
amount  of  pension,  age  and  years  of  service  required  as  qualifications  for  retirement, 
and  the  equity  of  teachers  in  their  contributions  in  case  of  withdrawal  from  service 
on  account  of  resignation,  dismissal,  or  death. 

1  New  York  City  Pension  Commission :  Report  on  the  Teachers  Retirement  Fund  of  the  City  of  Neiv  York,  1915. 
*  Illinois  Pension  Laws  Commission:  Report,  1916. 


20  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

Administration 

The  practice  in  the  management  of  pension  funds  appears  to  vary  somewhat  with 
the  character  of  the  system.  In  general  it  seems  to  be  the  aim  of  the  contributory 
systems  to  give  the  teachers  representation  and  of  the  non-contributory  systems  to 
retain  control  in  the  hands  of  the  state.  In  three  of  the  non-contributory  systems  the 
state  board  of  education  is  charged  with  the  management  of  pensions,  while  in  three 
others  this  function  is  entrusted  to  the  state  superintendent  of  education.  Only  in 
California,  Nevada,  and  Virginia,  of  the  contributory  systems,  does  the  state  board 
of  education  administer  the  pensions,  while  the  remaining  systems  have  retirement 
boards  consisting  of  state  officials  ex-ojjicio  and  teachers  either  appointed  or  elected. 
The  representative  boards  have  from  three  to  seven  members,  and  generally  include  the 
state  superintendent  of  public  instruction;  the  ex-qfficio  officers  are  either  the  state 
treasurer,1  the  state  auditor,2  the  state  attorney-general,3  the  superintendent  of  in- 
surance,4 or  the  state  bank  commissioner.4  The  teachers  representatives,  together  with 
the  state  superintendent  of  public  instruction,  usually  constitute  a  majority  of  the 
members  of  the  boards.  The  constitution  of  such  a  board  is  important  since  it  needs 
to  represent  the  social  sense  of  the  community  as  well  as  actuarial  science. 

Amount  of  Pensions 

In  the  majority  of  the  state  systems  the  amount  of  the  pensions  to  be  paid  is  not  de- 
termined by  the  age  at  which  retirement  takes  place,  sex,  the  rate  of  interest,  or  the 
amount  of  money  available.  The  most  frequent  basis  that  is  used  is  the  average  salary 
received  for  a  few  years  before  retirement.  In  one  system  the  pension  consists  of  a  sum 
equal  to  one-half  of  the  largest  salary  received  during  service ;  in  one  it  is  equal  to 
sixty  per  cent  and  in  five  to  fifty  per  cent  of  the  average  salary  received  during  the 
last  five  years  of  service.  In  eight  systems  the  pension  is  the  same  for  all  teachers,  and 
in  three  is  a  fixed  amount  for  each  year  of  service,  regardless  in  both  cases  of  the  aver- 
age salary  prevailing  in  the  state.  The  amount  of  an  annuity  can  be  determined  on  an 
actuarial  basis  only  by  the  amount  of  money  available,  the  age  and  sex  of  the  recip- 
ient, the  rate  of  interest,  and  the  table  of  mortality.  Such  an  actuarial  foundation  is 
provided  by  only  three  state  systems,  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  and  Pennsylvania, 
and  only  these  systems  offer  options  by  means  of  which  a  teacher  may  provide  some 
protection  for  his  dependents. 

Service  and  Age  Retirement 

From  an  analysis  of  the  state  pension  systems  that  are  here  being  considered  the 
inference  may  be  drawn  that  pensions  to  teachers  are  granted  generally  as  rewards  for 

1  Illinois,  Montana,  North  Dakota,  Pennsylvania,  Vermont,  and  Wisconsin.  *  Indiana  and  Minnesota. 

3  Indiana  and  Montana.  4  Connecticut  and  Massachusetts. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  21 

service.  Thirteen  out  of  twenty-five  state  systems  allow  teachers  to  retire  on  the  basis 
of  service  alone,  and  the  requirement  varies  from  twenty  years  in  two  systems1  to 
thirty-five  years  in  three,2  while  five3  permit  retirement  after  twenty-five  years  and 
three*  after  thirty  years.  Assuming  that  the  majority  of  teachers  begin  their  service 
at  the  age  of  twenty-five,  they  could  under  these  provisions  retire  at  as  early  an  age 
as  forty-five,  and  none  need  remain  in  service  after  sixty.  Retirement  on  the  basis  of 
service  alone  is  an  expensive  luxury.  It  requires  the  annual  contribution  beginning 
at  twenty-five  of  one-third  of  a  man's  salary  to  provide  a  half-pay  pension  after 
twenty  years  of  service;  it  takes  twenty  per  cent  to  provide  such  a  pension  after  twenty- 
five  years,  and  fifteen  per  cent  after  thirty  years  of  service.  Neither  teachers  nor  the 
public  appear  to  be  willing  to  pay  such  a  price.  This,  however,  is  no  misfortune,  for 
such  retirement  encourages  the  withdrawal  from  service  of  experienced  teachers  at 
the  time  when  they  are  doing  their  best  work  and  injures  the  cause  of  pensions  in 
general  by  the  creation  of  a  privileged  class  who  may  be  at  leisure  for  a  third  or  a 
half  of  their  adult  lives.  A  few  systems,  accordingly,  require  both  an  age  and  a  service 
qualification  for  retirement;  one  system5  permits  it  at  the  age  of  fifty,  two6  at  sixty; 
two7  require  teachers  to  have  reached  the  age  of  sixty  and  to  have  served  thirty  years, 
while  only  one8  requires  the  same  age  and  thirty-five  years  of  service.  Two  systems9 
permit  women  to  retire  a  few  years  earlier  than  men.  Only  two  systems10  permit  re- 
tirement at  a  given  age,  irrespective  of  previous  service.  In  most  cases  where  an  age 
basis  is  provided  retirement  is  voluntary  at  the  stated  age  or  later;  in  three  systems11 
seventy  has  been  fixed  as  the  age  of  compulsory  retirement. 


Disability  Allowances 

Disability  allowances  are  usually  a  proportion  of  the  amount  paid  for  retirement 
on  account  of  age, — an  unsatisfactory  basis,  generally  yielding  less  than  subsistence. 
There  is,  however,  more  justification  for  guesswork  in  the  case  of  disability  pen- 
sions, since  so  little  is  known  about  the  incidence  of  sickness  among  teachers.  No 
justification  exists  for  the  general  lack  of  provision  for  the  prevention  of  abuse  of 
disability  privileges.  Medical  examinations  are  required  in  every  case  before  disability 
pensions  are  granted,  but  onlv  the  most  recently  established  systems,  like  that  of 
Pennsylvania,  require  periodical  medical  examinations  and  the  return  to  service  of 
those  who  are  shown  to  have  recovered  from  their  disability.  The  whole  subject  of  the 
kind  of  disability  to  which  teachers  are  peculiarly  exposed  needs  further  study,  before 
a  completely  intelligent  administration  of  these  benefits  can  be  developed.  There  is 

I  Minnesota  and  New  Jersey.  -  Connecticut,  Indiana,  and  Rhode  Island. 

s  Arizona,  Montana,  New  York,  North  Dakota,  and  Wisconsin.  4  California,  Michigan,  and  Nevada. 

5  Illinois.  8  Maine  and  Maryland. 

7  Massachusetts  and  Vermont.  8  New  Hampshire  (in  the  case  of  men).  9  New  Hampshire  and  Virginia. 

10  Connecticut  (as  an  alternative  to  the  thirty-five  years  of  service  alone)  and  Pennsylvania. 

II  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  and  Pennsylvania. 


22  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

very  little  guidance  concerning  the  subject  to  be  drawn  from  actual  practice,  either 
as  to  the  amount  of  the  pension  that  should  be  granted  or  the  years  of  service  that 
should  be  required.  There  is  no  reason,  for  example,  why  an  allowance  for  genuine  per- 
manent disability  should  be  much  less  than  an  old  age  pension,  nor  why  one *  system 
should  require  ten  years  of  service  as  a  qualification,  while  nine2  others  require  fifteen 
years,  one3  eighteen,  one4  twenty-five,  and  one5  thirty-five,  while  one6  other  system 
grants  a  disability  pension  only  to  those  incapacitated  after  the  age  of  fifty-five. 


Financing 

In  the  non-contributory  systems  of  Arizona,  Maine,  Maryland,  New  Hampshire, 
New  Jersey,  and  Rhode  Island,  the  pensions  are  paid  entirely  out  of  state  appropria- 
tions ;  in  the  cases  of  Maine  and  Maryland,  however,  the  amount  of  the  annual  appro- 
priation is  limited  to  a  fixed  maximum,  with  the  consequent  prorating  of  pensions  that 
are  already  in  force  in  those  years  when  the  total  cost  is  likely  to  exceed  the  maxi- 
mum. In  the  contributory  systems  the  share  of  the  state  is  paid  sometimes  out  of  regu- 
lar appropriations,  as  in  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  New  York,  North  Dakota,  Penn- 
sylvania, Vermont,  and  Virginia,  the  annual  appropriation  being  limited  to  $10,000 
in  Vermont  and  to  $5000  in  Virginia;  sometimes  out  of  the  proceeds  of  a  property 
tax,  as  in  Illinois  and  Minnesota,  or  out  of  the  tax  on  inheritance  and  transfers  of 
property,  as  in  California;  sometimes  out  of  the  school  fund,  as  in  Indiana.  In  Wis- 
consin the  state,  by  recent  legislation  (1917),  undertakes  only  to  make  up  deficits  as 
they  arise.  In  most  of  the  regulations  provision  is  made  for  supplementing  the  re- 
sources provided  by  the  public  with  such  miscellaneous  support  as  may  come  from  do- 
nations, gifts,  legacies,  and  bequests.  Such  sources,  however,  cannot  be  depended  upon 
for  any  adequate  and  regular  supply  of  funds.  The  expenses  of  administration  in  most 
cases  are  paid  out  of  the  general  fund,  to  that  extent  reducing  the  amount  available 
for  pensions,  even  tho  the  sum  required  for  expenses  forms  but  a  minor  part  of  the 
total  cost  of  maintaining  a  pension  system.  A  few  systems,  including  Connecticut, 
Massachusetts,  Montana,  New  Jersey,  and  Pennsylvania,  make  separate  appropriations 
for  administration,  thus  leaving  the  general  fund  intact  to  meet  the  purpose  for  which 
it  exists.  It  is  obvious  that  no  state  can  look  forward  with  serenity  to  the  annual  ap- 
propriation of  such  large,  indefinite,  and  increasing  sums;  that  no  definitely  limited 
amount  can  meet  the  needs  of  an  enlarging  service;  that  the  proceeds  of  property  and 
inheritance  taxes  have  no  relation  to  the  needs  of  a  pension  system ;  and  that  irreg- 
ular sources  like  gifts,  deductions,  and  so  on,  cannot  be  depended  upon  to  make  up 
deficits.  Pension  systems  have  little  or  no  security  under  such  methods  of  providing 
funds. 

1  Pennsylvania. 

2  California,  Illinois,  Massachusetts,  Michigan,  Minnesota,  Montana,  Nevada,  New  York,  and  North  Dakota. 
8  Wisconsin.  *  Indiana.  B  New  Jersey.  6  Connecticut. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  23 

The  uncertainty  that  underlies  most  pension  funds  is  further  indicated  by  the 
variation  in  the  amount  of  annual  contribution  that  is  expected  from  the  teachers 
in  the  contributory  systems.  In  ordinary  commercial  insurance  the  premium  rates  for 
similar  benefits  show  only  slight  differences  throughout  the  country.  The  only  uni- 
formity in  the  contributory  feature  of  pension  systems  is  an  evident  desire  to  make 
the  teachers  contributions  as  low  as  possible,  regardless  of  whether  or  not  they  are 
adequate  to  furnish  the  promised  benefits.  In  fact,  a  very  common  formula1  is  that 
a  teacher  before  becoming  eligible  for  retirement  shall  have  contributed  a  total  sum 
equal  to  or  even  less  than  the  amount  of  the  prospective  pension  for  one  year  only; 
the  obligations  beyond  being  apparently  assumed  by  the  general  fund,  the  provision 
for  which  is  equally  inadequate.  Recent  pension  investigations  have  emphasized  the 
importance  of  the  ordinary  business  method  of  keeping  an  individual  account  for 
each  teacher  in  order  that  he  may  be  sure  at  least  that  his  own  contributions  are  al- 
lowed to  accumulate  to  provide  a  pension  benefit  for  him  alone.  It  too  frequently  hap- 
pens under  the  prevailing  practice  that  the  money  contributed  by  the  younger  teach- 
ers is  used  to  pay  the  pensions  of  the  older.  In  four  states2  the  amount  of  the  annual 
contribution  is  made  the  same  for  all  teachers,  irrespective  of  age  or  salary;  in  three 
states3  the  contributions  consist  of  flat  rates  within  three  or  four  groups  of  teachers, 
graded  according  to  years  of  service;  in  the  remaining  systems  the  teachers  contribute 
a  percentage  of  their  salaries,  varying  from  one-half  of  one  per  cent  to  seven  per  cent 
in  each  year.  With  the  exception  of  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  and  Pennsylvania, 
no  state  system  definitely  relates  the  contributions  to  age,  years  of  service,  sex,  rate 
of  interest,  or  the  amount  of  pension  to  be  paid,  altho  there  is  sometimes  a  rough 
estimate  that  a  particular  annual  contribution  will  lead  toward  a  pension  that  will 
be,  say,  half  of  the  final  salary  before  retirement, — which  salary  cannot,  of  course,  be 
accurately  estimated  so  long  in  advance.  Teachers  pension  systems  are  thus  still  re- 
garded as  mutual  associations,  in  which  benefits  are  paid  out  of  a  general  fund  so  long 
as  the  money  lasts;  or  as  charitable  relief,  the  chief  burden  for  which  is  placed  upon 
the  public  treasury,  unless  this  is  so  protected  that  only  limited  appropriations  can 
be  provided  each  year.  The  one  conscious  effort  that  is  frequently  made  for  security 
is  inequitable;  this  is  the  merging  of  the  teachers  contributions,  as  soon  as  paid,  into 
the  general  fund  for  those  who  remain  until  retirement,  and  not  regarding  them  as 
the  teacher's  own  savings,  to  which  he  is  entitled  if  he  withdraws  from  service.  In  six 
states  there  are  no  refunds  whatever.  Most  systems  provide  for  the  return  of  only  a 
part  of  the  contributions,  without  interest,  in  the  event  of  resignation,  dismissal,  or 
death.  In  three  states  all  of  the  contributions  are  returned  without  interest;  but  only 
three  state  systems4  refund  the  whole  of  the  teachers  contributions  with  interest  at 
a  fixed  rate. 

1  California,  Illinois,  Indiana,  Michigan,  Minnesota,  Nevada,  New  Jersey,  New  York,  North  Dakota,  and  Wisconsin. 

2  California,  Montana,  Nevada,  and  Ohio.  3  Illinois,  Indiana,  and  Minnesota. 

4  Connecticut  (with  actual  interest  earned),  Massachusetts  (with  interest  at  three  per  cent),  and  Pennsylvania  (with 
interest  at  four  per  cent). 


24  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

Financial  Unsoundness 

The  inevitable  consequence  of  the  development  of  pension  practice  in  this  country 
until  recently,  without  reference  either  to  the  social  philosophy  that  should  be  its  jus- 
tification or  the  actuarial  principles  that  should  be  its  foundation,  has  been  insolvency, 
either  actual  or  threatened.  It  is  difficult  to  persuade  teachers  of  the  insecurity  of  sys- 
tems of  which  they  are  members,  for,  so  long  as  there  are  funds  with  which  to  meet 
current  obligations,  they  regard  their  systems  as  sound.  Fortunately,  during  the  past 
three  years  two  exhaustive  studies  of  pensions  have  been  made,  one  in  New  York  City 
and  one  in  the  State  of  Illinois,  which  prove  convincingly  that  a  pension  system  is 
neither  sound  nor  secure  unless,  like  an  insurance  company,  it  is  in  a  position  to  meet 
its  obligations  to  all  its  participants  when  they  become  eligible  for  the  promised  bene- 
fits. Whether  or  not  a  pension  system  shall  be  established  is  a  matter  of  social  phi- 
losophy; how  it  shall  be  organized  is  a  matter  for  the  actuary.  This  expert,  however,  is 
rarely  consulted  until  bankruptcy  is  imminent.  The  importance  of  such  expert  advice 
has  been  recognized  in  the  recently  established  pension  plans  of  Connecticut,  Massa- 
chusetts, New  York  City,  and  Pennsylvania,  in  which  provision  is  made  for  keeping 
essential  and  accurate  records,  issuing  annual  reports,  and  making  periodical  actua- 
rial investigations.  Attention  has  been  focused  on  the  whole  subject  by  the  consid- 
eration given  to  the  theory  in  the  reports  of  New  York  City  and  Illinois,  and  by  the 
practical  incorporation  of  new  principles  in  the  important  Massachusetts  Teachers 
Retirement  System,  which  is  discussed  later. 

The  Report  of  the  New  York  City  Commission 

The  New  York  City  Pension  Commission,  which  was  appointed  in  1913,  issued  its 
report  on  the  New  York  Teachers  Retirement  Fund  in  1915. *  The  report  contained 
a  descriptive  account,  a  critical  study,  and  suggestions  for  a  reorganization  of  the 
fund  on  sounder  actuarial  principles,  and  was  accompanied  by  detailed  actuarial  cal- 
culations, based  on  a  careful  investigation  of  the  vital  statistics  of  the  teaching  pro- 
fession. According  to  this  report  the  old  plan,  which  followed  the  prevailing  prac- 
tices just  described,  failed  to  promote  the  efficiency  of  the  service  and  was  conducted 
without  any  regard  for  or  knowledge  of  the  cost.  A  continuation  of  the  scheme  would 
have  required  annual  appropriations  that  might  amount  to  20  per  cent  of  the  pay- 
roll. The  fund's  actuarial  liabilities  amounted  to  $69,809,760,  with  prospective  assets 
of  only  $15,066,440  to  meet  these  obligations,  leaving  a  deficiency  of  $54,743,320 
or  about  twice  the  amount  of  the  annual  payroll.  The  failure  of  such  a  system  was 
inevitable  from  the  start;  it  was  hastened  by  lax  administration.  The  fund  was  used, 
for  example,  to  get  rid  of  undesirable  teachers ;  teachers  were  retired  before  they  had 
completed  the  required  period  of  service;  disability  allowances  were  granted  on  the 
sole  evidence  of  the  applicant's  own  physician  ;  no  distinction  was  made  in  the  cost  of 

1  New  York  City  Pension  Commission:  Report  on  the  Teachers  Retirement  Fund  of  the  City  of  New  York,  1915. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  25 

retiring  men  and  women;  age  was  not  considered  as  a  basis  for  retirement;  teaching 
experience  outside  the  city  was  counted  toward  service  retirement,  altho  no  contri- 
butions were  paid  for  this  period ;  and  too  much  reliance  was  placed  on  fluctuating 
revenues  from  miscellaneous  sources. 

The  Commission  concluded  that  the  chief  problem  in  establishing  a  pension  system 
is  financial,  and  that  the  cost  cannot  be  calculated  without  a  knowledge  of  the  facts 
involved  and  rigid  adherence  to  principles  accepted  from  the  start.  It  recommended 
that  retirement  should  be  on  the  basis  of  age  as  well  as  of  service,  that  provision  should 
be  made  for  retirement  on  the  ground  of  disability  only  when  this  was  adequately  at- 
tested by  physicians,  employed  by  the  pensioning  authority,  and  investigated  period- 
ically, that  definite  rules  should  be  laid  down  to  govern  cases  of  service  outside 
the  system  covered  by  the  pension,  and  that  teachers  contributions  be  returned  with 
interest  in  case  of  resignation,  dismissal,  or  death.  Each  additional  benefit,  however, 
would  mean  an  increase  in  the  amount  of  the  annual  contribution. 

In  the  opinion  of  the  Commission  the  financial  problem  of  pensions  is  complicated 
by  a  number  of  factors.  When  a  new  plan  is  substituted  for  one  that  has  failed,  three 
factors  must  be  taken  into  consideration.  The  first  is  the  problem  of  obligations 
already  assumed  or  soon  to  be  assumed;  the  second  is  constituted  by  the  body  of 
teachers  in  active  service;  and  the  third  by  teachers  who  will  enter  the  service  in  the 
future.  It  was  suggested  in  the  report  that  the  city,  after  careful  revision  of  the  list 
of  pensions  already  being  paid,  assume  its  obligations,  if  possible;  that  in  the  case  of 
the  active  teaching  force,  the  city  assume  all  the  obligations  above  the  amount  raised 
by  teachers  contributions,  up  to  8  per  cent  of  their  salaries,  on  a  new  scale  gradu- 
ated according  to  age  and  length  of  service.  It  was  estimated  that  the  present  value 
of  the  city's  obligations  for  these  two  classes  was  $27,899,430,  which  the  city  could 
liquidate  on  the  cash  disbursement  plan  by  sixty  annual  appropriations  of  $1,233,220 
each.  The  teachers  appointed  in  the  future  would  enter  on  the  basis  of  an  actuarially 
adjusted  scheme. 

The  chief  problem  for  the  city,  which  must  consider  provisions  not  only  for  teachers 
but  also  for  employees  in  other  branches  of  its  service,  was  how  to  meet  the  cost,  which 
would  undoubtedly  be  great.  Two  methods  might  be  employed.  The  city  might  make 
annual  appropriations  to  meet  its  obligations  as  they  fall  due  each  year;  that  is,  adopt 
the  "cash  disbursement"  plan.  Or,  having  calculated  the  future  cost,  it  might  set  aside 
during  the  active  service  of  employees  amounts  which  with  interest  accumulations 
would  be  adequate  to  pay  the  pensions  in  the  future;  this  is  the  " reserve ""  plan.  The 
first  plan  is  that  most  commonly  adopted;  it  is  simple  and  attractive  because  in  the 
beginning  the  demands  to  be  met  are  small,  only  to  increase  with  amazing  rapidity. 
The  bankruptcy  of  most  current  schemes,  apart  from  their  inadequate  planning,  is  due 
largely  to  the  phenomenal  increase  of  the  demands.  The  reserve  plan,  on  the  other 
hand,  takes  into  consideration  the  factor  of  interest,  which  accumulates  rapidly.  It  is 
efficient  not  merely  because  it  is  cheaper,  but  because  each  contributor  can  feel  when 


26  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

he  pays  his  own  assessment  that  the  city  is  matching  it  with  its  contribution,  and  that 
when  the  time  comes  for  his  retirement  these  two  sums  will  have  accumulated  a  fund 
to  pay  his  expected  allowance.  Under  the  reserve  plan  the  expenditure  for  pensions 
is  reduced  to  little  more  than  one-half  of  the  expenditure  under  the  cash  disburse- 
ment plan,  the  amount  to  be  set  aside  is  a  constant  factor  for  both  city  and  employees, 
and  each  generation  taxes  itself  to  pay  its  own  pensions;  under  the  cash  disburse- 
ment plan  the  city's  share  is  changing  and  constantly  increasing,  and  the  burden  is 
shifted  from  one  generation  to  the  next.  A  plan  embodying  the  recommendations  of 
the  Commission  and  its  experts,  but  making  certain  concessions  to  the  demands  of 
the  teaching  body,  was  drawn  and  passed  in  1917. 

The  new  system  is  to  be  administered  by  a  board  of  seven  members,  some  ex-qffi- 
cio,  some  appointed,  and  some  elected  by  the  teachers.  The  city  will  bear  the  cost  of 
administration,  of  the  pensions  due  under  the  old  retirement  plan,  and  of  the  accrued 
liabilities,  by  annual  appropriation  on  the  cash  disbursement  plan.  To  meet  the  cost 
of  future  pensions  the  contributions  of  the  city  will  be  made  annually  to  accumulate 
a  reserve  fund,  and  the  teachers  will  contribute  such  sums  as  will  yield,  together  with 
the  city's  share,  pensions  equivalent  to  half  of  their  average  salaries  during  ten  years 
preceding  retirement,  which  will  be  permitted  either  at  the  age  of  sixty-five  or  after 
thirty-five  years  of  service.  At  the  time  of  retirement  the  teacher  may  choose  an  an- 
nuity for  himself  alone,  or  provision  for  both  himself  and  his  dependents,  or  other 
forms  of  benefit,  approved  by  the  board.  Disability  allowances  are  to  be  granted  after 
ten  years  of  service,  subject  to  periodical  examinations  by  physicians  of  the  Retire- 
ment Board,  and  will  be  equal  to  twenty  per  cent  of  the  average  salary  from  the  city 
together  with  an  annuity  purchased  by  the  teacher's  own  accumulations.  Their  ac- 
cumulated contributions  with  compound  interest  at  four  per  cent  will  be  returned  to 
teachers  withdrawing  from  service  for  any  reason,  and  in  case  of  death  additional  bene- 
fits of  fifty  per  cent  of  salary  in  the  year  preceding  death  will  be  paid  to  dependents. 
Actuarial  investigations  are  to  be  made  in  1919, 1922,  and  every  five  years  thereafter. 
The  system  is  under  the  general  supervision  of  the  State  Department  of  Insurance. 

The  Report  of  the  Illinois  Commission 

The  conclusions  of  the  New  York  City  Pension  Commission  were  fully  corroborated 
in  the  report  of  the  Illinois  Pension  Laws  Commission 1  which  was  issued  in  1916.  This 
Commission  was  appointed  by  the  governor  of  the  state  in  1916  to  investigate  the 
operation  of  all  existing  pension  laws  in  the  state,  to  gather  information  on  the 
present  and  probable  future  cost  of  these  funds,  and  to  enquire  into  the  operation  of 
pension  laws  in  other  states  and  countries.  In  a  survey  of  the  history  of  pensions  in 
Illinois  the  report  brings  out  significantly  the  fact  that  they  are  characterized  by  an 
absence  of  foresight,  ignorance  of  the  probable  future  cost  of  the  obligations  under- 

1  Illinois  Pension  Laws  Commission  :  Report,  1916. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  27 

taken,  and  complete  absence  of  uniformity  of  policy  in  such  matters  as  contributions, 
age  and  service  qualifications  for  retirement,  refunds  in  cases  of  withdrawal,  and  the 
amount  of  pensions.  The  Commission  concluded  that  the  existing  pension  funds  cov- 
ering policemen,  firemen,  and  teachers  were  so  unsound  that  it  would  be  impossible 
to  make  any  patchwork  attempts  at  improvement,  and  that  the  only  reasonable  pro- 
cedure would  be  entirely  new  legislation,  based  on  definite  principles,  which  the  Com- 
mission proceeded  to  consider. 

The  Commission  accepted  the  principle  that  a  pension  system  for  public  employ- 
ees is  essential  in  the  interests  of  public  service  in  order  that  continuity  of  competent 
service  may  be  secured,  that  means  may  be  at  hand  to  relieve  the  service  of  those  who 
have  become  incompetent  thru  superannuation,  and  that  protection  may  be  afforded 
to  employees  and  their  families  in  old  age.  A  sound  pension  system  encourages 
thrift,  and  is,  for  the  man  of  small  resources,  the  most  advantageous  form  of  safe 
and  secure  investment  by  means  of  savings  during  the  most  productive  period  of  life. 
In  accordance  with  this  principle  the  Commission  advocated  the  extension  of  pro- 
tection to  the  dependents  of  employees,  a  form  of  protection  which  is  virtually  in 
the  nature  of  compulsory  life  insurance.  The  pension  to  employees  should  be  granted 
only  on  the  basis  of  the  attainment  of  a  minimum  age  as  well  as  length  of  service, 
since  "it  seems  clear  that  some  of  the  greatest  abuses  of  a  pension  system  come  from 
the  failure  to  specify  a  pi*oper  minimum  age  of  retirement.-11  Minimum  pensions,  vary- 
ing with  the  different  services,  should  be  provided  and  maintained  by  contributions 
from  employers  and  employees,  with  extra  or  surpensions  accumulated  by  additional 
contributions  made  as  salaries  increase.  The  employers  contributions  should  be  paid 
in  at  the  same  time  as  those  of  the  employees,  since  the  reserve  plan  is  both  a  more 
economical  and  a  more  secure  basis  than  the  cash  disbursement  plan.  All  contributions 
made  by  the  employees  should  be  returned  with  the  accumulated  interest  in  case  of 
withdrawal  from  service.  The  principles  recommended  by  the  Commission  are  embod- 
ied in  an  outline  for  a  standard  pension  plan,  and  additional  suggestions  are  proposed 
for  bringing  existing  funds  under  this  plan,  in  other  words,  for  meeting  the  accrued 
liabilities. 

The  Massachusetts  Plan 

The  consideration  of  sound  pension  principles  combined  with  the  actual  or  threat- 
ened failure  of  a  number  of  existing  pension  systems  has  borne  fruit  in  recent  legis- 
lation, which  falls  into  two  groups.  The  first  teachers  pension  system  to  make  a  de- 
parture from  the  prevailing  tradition  was  that  established  in  Massachusetts  in  1913; 
since  that  time  Erie,  Pennsylvania,  in  1916,  and  Connecticut,  in  1917,  have  followed 
the  lead  of  Massachusetts  and  have  adopted  almost  identical  systems.  Additional 
study  of  the  subject  led  to  the  establishment  of  a  somewhat  different  plan  in  New 
York  City  in  1917,  followed  in  the  same  year  with  certain  modifications  in  Penn- 
sylvania. Both  groups  are  open  to  certain  criticisms,  but  both  aim  to  embody  sound 


28  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

principles.  It  is  not  to  be  expected  that  there  shall  be  uniformity  throughout  the 
country;  the  only  uniformity  that  is  desirable  is  that  all  systems  shall  be  as  financially 
sound  as  actuarial  calculation  can  make  them,  and  shall  secure  the  ends  at  which  a 
pension  system  aims. 

The  Massachusetts  Teachers  Retirement  Act  was  passed  in  1913  and  came  into  force 
in  1914  as  the  result  of  a  careful  study  inaugurated  by  state  commissions1  in  1910  and 
1913.  It  applies  to  all  teachers  in  the  Commonwealth  with  the  exception  of  Boston. 
The  system  is  administered  by  a  teachers  retirement  board  of  seven  members,  includ- 
ing the  state  insurance  commissioner,  the  state  bank  commissioner,  and  the  state  com- 
missioner of  education,  three  members  elected  by  members  of  the  retirement  associa- 
tion, and  a  seventh  member  elected  by  the  other  six.  Membership  in  the  Association 
was  made  optional  for  teachers  in  service  and  compulsory  on  all  new  entrants.  The 
system  is  contributory,  and  the  assessments  are  determined  annually  by  the  retire- 
ment board  in  accordance  with  actuarial  advice,  but  are  limited  to  sums  equal  to  from 
three  to  seven  per  cent  of  salaries.  Teachers  may  retire  voluntarily  at  the  age  of  sixty, 
or  may  be  retired  by  the  employing  school  committee  at  any  time  after  that  age  if 
incapable  of  discharging  their  duties;  retirement  is  compulsory  at  seventy.  On  reach- 
ing the  age  of  retirement  and  after  thirty  years  of  service  teachers  become  entitled 
to  an  allowance  consisting  of  an  annuity  purchased  with  their  accumulated  contribu- 
tions and  a  pension  of  an  equal  amount  paid  out  of  annual  state  appropriations.  An 
option  is  permitted  by  which  a  retiring  teacher  may  accept  annuities  of  smaller  amount 
with  the  provision  that  these  be  continued  after  his  death  to  his  dependents,  as  he 
may  direct.  In  case  of  teachers  withdrawing  from  service  before  reaching  the  age  of 
retirement,  or  in  case  of  death,  their  estates  are  entitled  to  a  return  of  all  their  con- 
tributions with  compound  interest  at  three  per  cent.  Disability  allowances  were  not 
included  in  the  original  act  but  were  added  in  191 7,  and  provide  these  benefits  to  teach- 
ers who  become  incapacitated  for  continued  work  in  the  schools  after  fifteen  years  of 
service.  While  this  plan  marks  a  considerable  step  in  advance  and  opens  up  a  new  era 
in  the  history  of  teachers  pensions  in  this  country,  it  is  still  open  to  the  objection  that 
it  is  impossible  to  predict  what  the  probable  cost  of  the  share  assumed  by  the  state 
is  likely  to  be  in  the  future  on  the  cash  disbursement  plan  that  has  been  adopted. 
The  reserve  plan  would  have  defined  the  state's  obligations  clearly,  and  would  have 
furnished  to  the  whole  system  the  security  that  now  underlies  the  teachers  contri- 
butions. It  should  be  mentioned,  however,  that  the  retirement  board  is  watching  the 
development  of  the  system  carefully,  is  accumulating  valuable  information,  and  has 
the  constant  advice  of  an  actuary. 


1  Report  of  the  Commission  on  Old  Age  Pensions,  Annuities  and  Insurance,  House  No.  1400.  Boston,  1910.  Report 
of  the  Commission  on  Pensions,  House  No.  2450.  Boston,  1914. 


THE  PRESENT  STATUS  OF  TEACHERS  PENSIONS  29 

The  Pennsylvania  Plan 

The  Pennsylvania  system,  passed  in  1917  but  not  effective  until  1919,  is  an  exam- 
ple of  the  second  group,  because  it  represents  the  tendency  to  establish  funds  of  state- 
wide scope  and  because  it  has  not  been  affected  by  some  of  the  local  problems  that 
influenced  the  drafting  of  the  New  York  City  bill  passed  in  1917.  The  bill  contains 
many  of  the  features  of  the  New  York  City  pension  scheme,  including  actuarial  val- 
uations, in  addition  to  one  already  made,  in  1919,  1921,  1924,  and  every  fifth  year 
thereafter.  Membership  is  to  be  optional  for  teachers  in  service  at  the  time  of  the 
establishment  of  the  system.  Retirement  will  be  permitted  only  on  the  basis  of  age  or 
disability.  The  fund  will  be  accumulated  wholly  on  the  reserve  plan.  The  teachers  con- 
tributions will  be  determined  according  to  age,  sex,  mortality  tables,  and  interest 
rates,  but  teachers  will  have  the  option  of  not  paying  more  than  five  per  cent  of  sal- 
ary each  year,  and  the  maximum  salary  from  which  deductions  will  be  made  will  be 
$2000.  Teachers  in  service  at  the  establishment  of  the  fund  will  be  expected  to  pay 
contributions  only  for  that  part  of  their  service  following  the  establishment,  and  the 
state  will  meet  the  cost  of  the  accrued  liabilities  or  the  allowance  dependent  on  prior 
service. 

In  general  it  is  intended  that  a  teacher  shall  retire  on  request  at  the  age  of  sixty- 
two  and  compulsorily  at  the  age  of  seventy  on  an  allowance  equal  approximately 
to  half  salary,  which  will  be  made  up  of  an  annuity  purchased  with  the  accumula- 
tions of  the  teachers  contributions  and  a  state  annuity  of  one  one-hundred-sixtieth 
of  final  salary  for  each  year  of  service.  The  method  of  calculating  the  state's  share  is 
open  to  the  objection  that  a  teacher  is  not  in  a  position  to  know  what  pension  he  may 
expect  until  he  has  retired,  and  to  the  danger  that  the  system  may  be  exposed  to  the 
not  unknown  abuse  of  sudden  advances  in  the  final  salary  which  is  the  basis  for  the 
granting  of  pensions.  On  retirement  teachers  have  the  choice  of  a  number  of  options : 
(a)  to  receive  their  allowances  in  monthly  instalments;  or  (b)  to  receive  reduced  pay- 
ments with  the  provision  that  any  sums  remaining  at  death  shall  be  paid  to  heirs  or 
assigns;  or  (c)  to  receive  reduced  payments  with  payments  to  a  designated  beneficiary 
thru  life;  or  (d)  to  receive  such  other  form  of  actuarial  equivalent  as  may  be  approved 
by  the  Retirement  Board.  Disability  allowances  will  be  granted  after  ten  years  of  ser- 
vice, and  will  be  equal  to  at  least  thirty  per  cent  of  final  salary,  rising  to  a  maximum 
of  eight-ninths  of  the  amount  of  the  allowance  which  would  have  been  due,  had  the 
teacher  been  able  to  continue  in  service  until  the  age  of  retirement.  The  disability 
provision  is  well  protected  and  requires  frequent  physical  examinations.  If  a  teacher 
retired  on  the  basis  of  disability  should  recover  sufficiently  to  pursue  some  gainful 
occupation,  the  amount  of  the  allowance  may  be  reduced  by  the  amount  thus  earned. 
Refunds  of  total  contributions  are  provided  for  with  interest  compounded  at  four 
per  cent. 

It  is  estimated  that  the  present  value  of  the  benefits  that  would  accrue  to  the 


30  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

42,727  teachers  now  in  service  would  amount  to  $60,587,657,  of  which  $22,793,664 
would  be  contributed  by  the  teachers  and  $37,793,993  by  the  employers.  To  accu- 
mulate the  employers  share  would  require  the  annual  appropriation  of  a  sum  equal  to 
5.6  per  cent  of  the  payroll  for  teachers  now  in  service,  or  about  $1,500,000  annually, 
and  to  2.75  per  cent  for  future  entrants,  beginning  the  first  year  with  about  $25,000. 
The  act  does  not  apply  to  those  school  systems  that  already  have  a  pension  plan 
in  force  unless  two-thirds  of  the  teachers  petition  to  join  the  state  system.  While  the 
state  will  administer  the  fund  thru  the  Retirement  Board  of  seven  members, — the 
Superintendent  of  Public  Instruction,  the  State  Treasurer,  one  member  appointed  by 
the  governor,  three  members  elected  by  the  teachers,  and  one  member  elected  by  the 
board, — and  will  guarantee  the  financial  soundness  of  the  fund,  the  act  provides  that 
the  state  shall  be  reimbursed  by  the  employers  of  the  teachers  throughout  the  state 
to  the  extent  of  one-half  of  the  amount  paid  by  it  to  meet  the  future  costs  of  the 
pensions.  The  intention  of  this  provision  is  clear;  it  is  an  effort  on  the  one  hand  to 
interest  the  local  employer  in  the  welfare  of  teachers,  and  on  the  other  to  distribute 
the  cost.  But  however  laudable  these  purposes  may  be,  the  principle  is  open  to  sev- 
eral objections,  of  which  the  strongest  is  that  since  the  act  provides  that  the  state 
may  reimburse  itself  out  of  money  due  to  local  education  authorities  for  school  pur- 
poses, the  school  expenditures  may  be  crippled  to  that  extent.  If  the  state  desired 
to  share  the  cost  of  the  pensions,  this  should  not  have  been  done  at  the  expense  of 
the  schools.  The  burden  of  the  cost  may  tend  to  discourage  local  authorities  from 
raising  salaries,  or  lead  to  the  employment  of  only  low-salaried  teachers,  and  to  this 
extent  the  migration  of  good  teachers  may  be  checked.  A  state  pension  system,  state 
maintained  in  reality  and  not  in  name  only,  would  result  in  putting  into  practice  a 
principle  that  is  beginning  to  be  established,  that  teachers  are  servants  of  the  state; 
it  would  tend  to  consolidate  the  profession  and  break  down  the  rigid  and  artificial 
barriers  between  rural  and  city  school  teachers;  and,  finally,  it  would  contribute 
toward  a  general  raising  of  standards  based  on  a  community  of  professional  interests 
and  a  recognition  of  community  service. 


SUGGESTED  SYSTEM  OF  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES 

FOR  TEACHERS  IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS 
OF  THE  STATE  OF  VERMONT 

The  Suggested  System 

The  following  system  of  retiring  allowances  embodies  the  advantages 
and  avoids  the  dangers  that  are  discussed  elsewhere  in  this  Bulletin.  It 
is  much  simpler  than  any  system  now  in  existence.  Each  teacher  may 
have  a  formal  contract.  It  is  based  upon  exact  information  concerning 
all  of  the  teachers  that  it  is  designed  to  protect.  Such  information,  altho 
essential  to  the  soundness  of  any  pension  system,  has  never  before  been 
collected  for  any  state.  In  making  it  available  for  the  present  study,  the 
Commissioner  of  Education  for  Vermont,  Dr.  JMilo  B.  Hillegas,  and  the 
teachers  of  the  state  have  performed  a  national  service.  Altho  adapted 
to  educational  conditions  in  the  State  of  Vermont,  it  is  believed  that 
this  system  can  be  easily  adjusted  to  the  conditions  in  any  other  state. 

I.  Administration 

1.  A  Teachers  Pension  Board  of  five  members: 

two  elected  by  the  contributing  teachers  for  terms  of  three 

years, 
two  representing  the  state  (probably  the  Treasurer  and  the 

Commissioner  of  Insurance), 
the  Commissioner  of  Education. 

2.  Cost  of  Administration : 

To  be  appropriated  in  advance  by  the  state  at  each  meeting 
of  the  legislature,  in  accordance  with  a  budget  presented 
by  the  Board. 

II.  Membership 

1.  Compulsory  for  all  teachers  entering  the  service  after  the  in- 

auguration of  the  system ; 

2.  Optional  for  those  already  in  service,  if  the  option  is  exercised 

within  one  year  from  the  inauguration  of  the  system. 


32  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

III.  Retirement 

1.  On  the  basis  of  Age: 

Optional  at  60  or  later  for  women, 
at  65  or  later  for  men; 

a 

After  30  years  of  service, 

20  of  this  in  the  state; 
Compulsory  for  all  at  70. 

Allowance  :  The  sums  contributed  annually  by  the  teacher 
and  the  state,  accumulated  at  compound  interest  of  at  least 
4  per  cent,  applied  at  the  time  of  retirement  to  purchase 
annuities  on  the  basis  of  McClintock's  Table  of  Mortal- 
ity Among  Annuitants  and  3  J  per  cent  interest.  The 
teacher  may,  if  he  or  she  desires,  choose  at  retirement: 

(1)  an  annuity  covering  his  or  her  life  alone,  or 

(2)  one  guaranteeing  also  the  return  of  the  contributions 

remaining  after  his  or  her  death,  or 

(3)  an  annuity  for  life  followed  by  a  life  pension  for  his 

widow. 

2.  On  the  basis  of  Disability: 

After  6  years  of  service  in  the  state, 

on  the  approval  of  the  Board,  after  certification  of  total 
inability  to  teach,  by  the  physicians  of  the  Board  and  of 
the  teacher; 

An  annuity  based  upon  the  sums  accumulated  on  the  basis 
of  McClintock's  Table  of  Mortality  Among  Annuitants 
and  3j  per  cent  interest,  with  an  additional  annual  pay- 
ment from  the  state  sufficient  to  make  the  total  annual 
pension  equal  to  one-half  of  the  average  annual  salary 
throughout  the  teacher's  entire  period  of  active  service 
in  the  state.  If,  after  retirement,  the  teacher  should  die 
before  receiving  in  the  form  of  an  annuity  all  of  the  accu- 
mulations up  to  the  time  of  his  disability  from  his  own 
and  the  state's  annual  contributions  on  his  account,  the 
balance  will  be  paid  to  his  family; 

Allowance  continued  during  agreement  as  to  the  teacher's 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  33 

total  disability,  by  the  Board,  its  own  and  the  teachers 
physicians,  after  annual  medical  examinations. 
The  cost  to  the  state  of  its  share  of  these  allowances  cannot 
be  estimated  exactly  until  there  is  a  larger  accumulation 
of  experience  with  regard  to  the  disability  of  teachers.  In 
other  systems  the  cost  of  retirements  on  the  basis  of  dis- 
ability has  been  about  one-tenth  of  those  on  the  basis  of 
age. 

IV.  Retirement  of  Teachers  now  in  Service 

1.  Teachers  who  are  under  forty-five  when  they  enter  the  sys- 

tem will  retire  on  the  basis  of  the  accumulations  of  their 
contributions  and  those  of  the  state  for  them,  as  in  the  case 
of  teachers  who  begin  to  contribute  when  they  enter  the 
service. 

2.  Teachers  who  are  forty -five  or  over  when  they  enter  the  sys- 

tem will  receive,  in  addition  to  the  allowance  based  upon 
the  accumulations  as  in  1,  an  annual  payment  from  the  state 
sufficient  to  make  the  total  annual  pension  equal  to  one- 
half  the  average  annual  salary  throughout  the  teacher's 
entire  period  of  active  service  in  the  state,  as  in  the  case  of 
teachers  who  retire  on  the  basis  of  disability. 

The  maximum  cost  to  the  state  of  these  extra  payments  for 
teachers  who  are  forty-five  or  over  on  entering  the  sys- 
tem, if  the  payments  are  made  after  the  retirement  of  the 
teacher,  will  be  from  about  $5000  a  year  at  the  beginning 
of  the  system  to  about  $35,000  a  year  after  fifteen  years, 
from  which  point  it  will  decrease  steadily  until  it  disap- 
pears in  about  thirty  or  forty  years  thereafter.  If  the  pay- 
ments of  the  state  are  made,  like  those  of  the  teachers, 
annually,  in  advance,  they  will  begin  at  about  $60,000  a 
year,  and  decrease  steadily  until  they  disappear  in  about 
twenty  years,  their  total  being  only  about  two-thirds  as 
great/These  estimates  are  based  upon  McClintock's  Table 
of  Mortality  Among  Annuitants,  and  the  supposition  that 
all  teachers  will  retire  at  the  minimum  ages  on  allowances 


34  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

averaging  one-half  of  their  present  salaries.  (See  Table 
III,  page  39.)  Both  of  these  assumptions  are  conservative. 

V.  Contributions 

1.  Required  or  optional: 

A.  Required  of  all  teachers  entering  the  service  after  the  plan 

is  adopted: 

B.  Optional  for  teachers  in  service  when  the  plan  is  adopted, 

if  they  exercise  the  option  within  one  year  from  the  in- 
auguration of  the  system : 

2.  Amount: 

A.  By  teachers  annually, — 

Five  per  cent  of  their  current  annual  salaries,  with  a 

minimum  of  $16; 
Up  to  any  sum  the  teacher  cares  to  contribute. 

B.  By  the  state  annually, — 

Equal  to  the  payment  required  of  the  teacher  and  paid 
into  the  fund  at  the  same  time,  with  a  maximum  of 
5  per  cent  of  the  teacher's  salary  in  the  year  of  pay- 
ment and  a  minimum  of  $16. 
The  cost  to  the  state  of  its  share  of  these  allowances  will 
begin,  at  the  inauguration  of  the  system,  at  about  $6000 
a  year, — that  is,  $16  for  each  of  the  375  new  teachers — 
and  increase  to  about  $67,000  a  year, — 5  per  cent  of 
the  present  salaries  of  the  present  number  of  teachers. 
This  sum  will  increase  slowly  as  the  size  and  the  sala- 
ries of  the  teaching  staff  increase,  but  it  will  never  be 
more  than  approximately  5  per  cent  of  the  total  pay- 
ments for  salaries. 
Probably  one-half  of  these  payments  will  return  to  the 
state,  because  of  the  early  death  or  withdrawal  of  teach- 
ers from  service. 

VI.  Accumulations 

To  be  credited,  in  individual  accounts,  with  compound  interest, 
a  rate  of  at  least  4  per  cent  per  annum  being  guaranteed  by 
the  state. 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  35 

Roughly,  the  contribution  of  a  dollar  a  year  begun  at  the  age 
of  20  or  25  will  yield  a  man  a  dollar  a  month  for  life,  begin- 
ning 40  years  later.  Annuities  for  women  cost  about  a  fourth 
more. 

The  exact  accumulation  at  4  per  cent  compound  interest  of  any 
sum  contributed  annually,  beginning  at  any  age  from  20  to  45; 
the  exact  annuity  for  life  that  any  accumulation  will  provide, 
and  the  exact  cost  of  any  desired  annuity  according  to  Mc- 
Clintock's  Table  of  Mortality  Among  Annuitants  and  3j  per 
cent  interest,  beginning  at  any  age  from  60  to  70,  are  given  in 
Tables  I  and  II  on  page  38. 

VII.  Return  of  Contributions 

1.  Of  the  teacher: 

A.  In  case  of 

resignation, 

dismissal,  or 

death  before  retirement, — 

All  of  the  teacher's  contributions  with  compound  in- 
terest at  3j  per  cent  will  be  returned  to  the  teacher 
or  to  his  or  her  family. 

B.  In  case  of 

early  death  after  retirement, — 

If,  upon  retirement,  the  teacher  has  chosen  this  form 
of  annuity,  the  unexpended  balance  of  the  teacher's 
accumulation  will  be  paid  in  instalments  to  his  or 
her  family. 

2.  Of  the  state : 

A.  In  case  of  a  teacher's 
death, 

withdrawal,  or 
dismissal 

After  the  completion  of  six  years  of  service  in  the  state, 
the  state's  contributions  on  his  or  her  account,  with 
their  accumulations  at  3j  per  cent,  will  be  returned 
to  the  teacher  or  to  his  or  her  family. 


36  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

B.  In  case  of  such 
death, 

withdrawal,  or 
dismissal 

Before  the  completion  of  six  years  of  service  in  the 
state,  the  state's  contributions  on  his  or  her  account, 
with  their  accumulations,  will  be  placed  in  the  Re- 
serve Fund,  for  the  general  purposes  of  the  system. 

VIII.  Accounting 

The  system  shall  be  audited  annually,  and  a  detailed  report  of 
all  of  its  activities  shall  be  presented  to  each  meeting  of  the 
legislature. 

IX.  Actuarial  Valuations 

The  system  shall  be  studied  actuarially,  preferably  by  a  differ- 
ent actuary,  at  least  every  three  years. 

The  Board  shall  have  power  to  change  the  scale  of  contribu- 
tions, in  accordance  with  actuarial  experience,  for  teachers 
entering  into  the  system  thereafter. 

X.  Adjustment  to  Present  System 

The  moneys  of  the  Vermont  State  Teachers'  Retirement  Fund 
Association  shall  be  placed  in  the  new  system,  to  be  used 
only  for  the  benefit  of  the  teachers  for  whom  they  were  pro- 
vided. 

XI.  Reserve  Fund 

1.  Gifts  and  receipts  from  any  sources  other  than  those  already 

mentioned ; 

2.  Returns  to  the  state  of  its  contributions  on  account  of 

early  deaths  or 

withdrawals  from  the  service; 

3.  Balances  that  may  accrue  because  of 

conservative  interest,  or 
mortality  rates,  or 
other  causes; 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  37 

4.  And  any  other  savings, 

shall  be  placed  in  a  Reserve  Fund, 

to  be  kept  in  part,  according  to  the  judgment  of  the 

Board,  for  contingencies,  and 
to  be  used  in  part,  according  to  the  judgment  of  the 
Board,  for 
administration, 
accrued  liabilities,  or 
any  of  the  other  purposes  of  the  pension  system. 

XII.  Change  of  Rules 

Any  of  these  rules  and  regulations  may  be  changed  by  the 
Board  in  the  interests  of  the  whole  body  of  teachers; 
Such  changes,  however,  shall  affect  only  the  teachers  who 
enter  the  system  after  their  adoption,  or  other  teachers 
who  may  prefer  them  to  the  earlier  rules. 
The  entire  contract  with  each  teacher  shall  be  carried  out  on 
the  basis  of  the  rules  and  regulations  in  force  at  the  time  of 
that  teacher's  entrance  to  the  system,  unless  he  may  agree 
formally  with  the  Board  to  come  under  later  rules. 


Statistical  Basis 

Of  the  tables  which  follow,  I  and  II  were  furnished  by  Samuel  S.  Hall, 
Associate  Actuary  of  the  Mutual  Life  Insurance  Company  of  New 
York,  who  also  approved  Table  III.  Tables  III  to  XV,  inclusive,  were 
prepared  by  the  authors  of  this  Bulletin,  from  information  furnished 
by  the  teachers  of  Vermont,  thru  their  Commissioner  of  Education.  The 
circles  and  lines  on  the  tables  indicate  the  representative,  median  expe- 
rience. 


38 


RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 


TABLE  I 

Accumulations  of  $1  per  annum  in  Advance,  from  Entry  to  Ages  indicated, 

at  4  per  cent  compound  interest 


Age  at 

Accumulations  to  Age 

Begin- 

ning 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

06 

67 

68 

09 

70 

20 

$98.8265 

$103.8196 

$109.0124 

$114.4129 

$120.0294 

$125.8706 

$131.9464 

$133.2632 

$144.8337 

$151.6671 

$158.7737 

21 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

125.8706 

131.9454 

138.2632 

144.8337 

151.6671 

22 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

125.8706 

131.9454 

138.2632 

144.8337 

23 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0256 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

125.8706 

131.9454 

138.2632 

24 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0256 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

125.8706 

131.9454 

25 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

125.8706 

26 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

120.0294 

27 

68.8579 

72.6622 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

114.4129 

28 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

109.0124 

29 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6622 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

103.8196 

30 

58.3285 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

98.8265 

31 

55.0849 

68.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

94.0255 

32 

61.9663 

65.0849 

68.3283 

61.7015 

66.2095 

68.8579 

72.6622 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

89.4091 

33 

48.9676 

51.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8679 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

84.9703 

34 

46.0842 

48.9676 

51.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6522 

76.5983 

80.7022 

36 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

61.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2096 

68.8579 

72.6522 

76.5983 

36 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

61.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

72.6522 

37 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

51.9663 

65.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

68.8579 

38 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

51.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

65.2095 

39 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

51.9663 

55.0849 

58.3283 

61.7015 

40 

30.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

61.9663 

55.0849 

68.3283 

41 

28.7781 

30.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

51.9063 

55.0849 

42 

26.6712 

28.7781 

30.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

61.9663 

43 

24.6454 

26.6712 

28.7781 

30.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

46.0842 

48.9676 

44 

22.6976 

24.6464 

26.6712 

28.7781 

80.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.8117 

46.0842 

45 

20.8245 

22.6975 

24.6464 

26.6712 

28.7781 

30.9692 

33.2480 

35.6179 

38.0826 

40.6459 

43.3117 

TABLE  II 
Options  with  regard  to  Annuities 

ACCORDING  TO  MCCLINTOCk's  TABLE  OF  MORTALITY  AMONG  ANNUITANTS 

AND  3|-  PER  CENT  INTEREST 


Option  (1) 

Option  (2) 

Option  (3) 

Life  Annuity,  income  to  cease  at 
annuitant's  death 

Guaranteed  Life  Annuity,  amount  of 
excess,  if  any,  of  accumulations  over 
income  paid,  to  be  paid  in  instal- 
ments to  annuitant's  estate 

Life  income  to  teacher  with 
50%  thereof  to  widow  during 
her  lifetime  after  his  death, 
income  to  cease  with  death 
of  last  survivor 

Men 

Women 

Men 

Women 

Age 

Value  of 
Life  ' 

Income 
of$l 

Income 
Pur- 
chased 

by  $1000 

Value  of 
Life 

Income 
of$l 

Income 
Pur- 
chased 
by  $1000 

Value  of 

Life 
Income 

of  p. 

Income 

Pur- 
chased 
by  $1000 

Value  of 

Life 
Income 

of$l 

Income 
Pur- 
chased 
by  $1000 

Value  based  on 

Income  of  $1  to 

Husband 

Income  Pur- 
chased by  $1000 

60 

$12.2198 

$81.83 

$13.8856 

$72.02 

61 

11.8630 

84.30 

13.5749 

73.66 

62 

11.5045 

86.93 

13.2605 

75.41 

63 

11.1450 

89.73 

12.9432 

77.26 

64 

10.7850 

92.72 

12.6284 

79.19 

65 

$9.0986 

$109.91 

10.4245 

95.92 

$11.1774 

$89.47 

12.3100 

81.23 

$11.4433 

$87.39 

66 

8.7617 

114.13 

10.0647 

99.35 

10.8660 

92.03 

11.9886 

83.41 

11.0842 

90.22 

67 

8.4269 

118.67 

9.7060 

103.03 

10.5581 

94.71 

11.6722 

85.67 

10.7244 

93.25 

68 

8.0946 

123.55 

9.3489 

106.96 

10.2503 

97.56 

11.3528 

88.09 

10.3645 

96.48 

69 

7.7654 

128.78 

8.9943 

111.19 

9.9306 

100.70 

11.0303 

90.66 

10.0050 

99.95 

70 

7.4400 

13441 

8.6424 

115.71 

9.6380 

103.76 

10.7146 

93.33 

9.6466 

103.66 

IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT 


39 


TABLE  III 

Additional  Cost  to  the  State  for  Teachers  now  45  or  Over 
ox  the  reserve  basis  and  on  the  cash  disbursement  basis 


Age 

Number 

Average 
Salaries 

Teachers' 

and 
State's  5% 

Number 
of  Pay- 
ments 

Allowance 

from, 
Accumu- 
lation 

Pension 
of  Half 
Salary 

Part  of 

Pension 

paid  by 

State 

Total  Cost  to  State 

_                  Cash  Dis- 

ReJerve      bursement 

Basis            Basis 

Men  Retir- 
ing at  66 

46  to  49 

60  to  54 

55  to  59 

60  to  69 

70  to  75 

17 
9 
8 
2 
1 

$1550 

1650 

1750 

525 

j 

$155.00 
166.00 

175.00 

18 

13 

8 

$464.37 
313.59 
184.34 

$775.00 
825.00 
875.00 
414.60  * 
414.60  ' 

$320.63 
511.41 
690.66 
414.60 
414.50 

$30,623.68 

30,480.20 

44,583.52 

8,871.00 

3,607.00 

$39,116.86 

40,912.80 

65,262.80 

9,749.04 

3,237.24 

$118,165.40 

■Women 

Retiring 

at  60 

45  to  49 

85 

50  to  54 

51 

55  to  59 

31 

60  to  69 

16 

70  to  75 

3 

Returned  to  State      35,031.64 


,133.86     $148,268.74 


$475 
475 
525 
425 
725 


$47.50 
47.50 
62.50 


13 


$67.21 

$237.50 

$170.29 

$129,048.75 

$155,023.82 

36.43 

237.50 

201.07 

109,843.48 

120,642.00 

14.21 

262.60 

248.29 

113,087.41 

101,510.61 

— 

212.50 

212.50 

35,360.00 

41,016.70 

— 

362.60 

362.60 

9,385.00 

6,383.52 

$396,724.64 

Returned  to  State 

41,715.62 

$356,009.02 

$424,576.65 

Total   $438,142.88     $672,845.39 


TABLE  IV 

Employees  Subject  to  Retirement  Law 
as  of  december  1,  1916 


Class  of  Employees 

Men 

Women 

Total 

Total 
Annual 
Salaries 

Average 
Annual 
Salary 

Superintendents 

Principals 

Teachers 

62 

33 

173 

4 

11 

2600 

68 

44 

2773 

$102,569 

53,488 

1,188,476 

$1,627.00 

1,193.00 

408.39 

Total 

268 

2615 

2883 

Total  Annual  Salaries 
Average  Annual  Salaries 

$220,978 
$829 

$1,123,555 
$429 

$1,344,633 

$466 

1  Median  salaries. 


40  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

TABLE  V 
Distribution  of  Men  Teachers  by  Year  of  Birth 


1899 

1 

1883 

10 

1898 

2 

1882 

7 

1897 

4 

1881 

8 

1896 

5 

1880 

4 

1895 

4 

1879 

7 

1894 

6 

1878 

4 

1893 

18 

1877 

4 

1892 

22 

1876 

6 

1891 

18 

1875 

7 

1890 

12 

1874 

5 

1889 

10 

1873 

3 

1888 

16 

1872 

7 

1887 

11 

1871 

2 

1886 

12  Median 

1870 

5 

1885 

11 

1869 

4 

1884 

7 

1868 

3 

1867 

3 

1866 

- 

1865 

3 

1864 

2 

1863 

2 

1862 

2 

1861 

2 

1860 

2 

1859 

- 

1858 

1 

1857 

3 

1856 

- 

1855 

1 

1854 

- 

1853 

1 

1840 

1 

268 

TABLE  VI 
Distribution  of  Women  Teachers  by  Year  of  Birth 


1899 

11 

1882 

48 

1865 

9 

1898 

81 

1881 

47 

1864 

9 

1897 

171 

1880 

29 

1863 

3 

1896 

202 

1879 

34 

1862 

17 

1895 

240 

1878 

47 

1861 

10 

1894 

222 

1877 

31 

1860 

4 

1893 

202 

1876 

40 

1859 

5 

1892 

195  Median 

1875 

32 

1858 

4 

1891 

125 

1874 

35 

1857 

8 

1890 

117 

1873 

28 

1856 

4 

1889 

90 

1872 

26 

1855 

1 

1888 

74 

1871 

15 

1854 

6 

1887 

78 

1870 

14 

1853 

1 

1886 

52 

1869 

24 

1852 

4 

1885 

56 

1868 

18 

1850 

2 

1884 

55 

1867 

14 

1847 

1 

1883 

55 

1866 

13 

No  record 

2 

2611 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT 

TABLE  VII 
Men  Teachers — Active  Foece — Classified  by  Age  and  Service 


41 


Total 

Length  of  Service 

Present  Age 

Less 

than 

5  years 

5  and 

less 

than  10 

10  to  Ik 

15  to  19 

SO  to  2k 

25  to  29 

30  to  Sk 

35  and 
over 

70  to  75 
60  to  69 
55  to  59 
50  to  54 
45  to  49 
40  to  44 
35  to  39 
30  to  34 
25  to  29 
20  to  24 
17  to  19 

1 

2 
8 

9 

17 
28 
27 
47 
67 
55 
7 

1 

1 
12 

© 

(t) 

1 

3 
6 

21 
1 

1 

4 
5 

9 

I 
1 

2 
1 

4 

2 
127 

(w) 

9 
1 

3 

2 

1 
1 

-® 

Total 

268 

121 

58 

35 

19 

24 

8 

2 

1 

TABLE  VIII 
Women  Teachers — Active  Force — Classified  by  Age  and  Service 


Present  Age 

Total 

Length  of  Service 

Less 

than 

6  years 

5  and 

less 

than  10 

10  to  Ik 

15  to  19 

20  to  2k 

25  to  29 

30  to  Sk 

35  and 
over 

65  to  70 

3 

— 

— 

1 

— 

— 

1 

— 

® 

60  to  64 

16 

— 

— 

— 

2 

2 

2 

1 

(T) 

55  to  59 

30 

— 

1 

2 

4 

1 

6 

fsf 

8 

50  to  54 

51 

— 

2 

7 

5 

9 

J\£f 

12 

2 

45  to  49 

85 

2 

1 

12 

19 

j(§r 

24 

3 

1 

40  to  44 

163 

7 

14 

28 

©" 

54 

8 

35  to  39 

188 

12 

20 

57 

/so) 

19 

30  to  34 

266 

27 

72 

Jwwf 

20 

25  to  29 

484 

155 

(286) 

42 

1 

20  to  24 

1061 

(973f 

88 

17  to  19 

263 

(263) 

Total 

2610 

1439 

484 

296 

183 

108 

55 

24 

21 

42 


RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 


TABLE  IX 
Distribution  of  Men  Teachers  by  Age  and  Salary 


Present  Age 

Total 

Less 
than 

$250 

$260 

to 

$299 

$300 

to 

$349 

$350 

to 

$399 

$400 

to 

$449 

$450 

to 

$499 

$500 

to 

$549 

$650 

to 

$599 

$600 

to 

$649 

$650 

to 

$699 

$700 

to 

$749 

$760 

to 

$799 

$800 

to 

$849 

$850 

to 

$899 

70  and  over 

65  to  69 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

®~ 



60  to  64 
65  to  59 

60  to  54 

4 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

- 

45  to  49 

2 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

— 

- 

40  to  44 

5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

1 

1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

36  to  39 

5 

- 

- 

1 

1 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

30  to  34 

10 

- 

- 

1 

1 

1 

- 

1 

- 

1 

- 

1 

2 

2 

- 

26  to  29 

29 

- 

1 

2 

5 

1 

3 

O 
0 

4 

- 

1 

1 

2 

5 

1 

20  to  24 

43 

- 

2 

7 

6 

3 

2 

2 

2 

1 

o 

-(o)~ 

2 

6 

2 

17  to  19 

7 

- 

1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

(5  V 

Total 

106 

- 

5 

11 

14 

9 

7 

9 

12 

Q 
0 

3 

8 

6 

15 

4 

TABLE  X 
Distribution  of  Women  Teachers  by  Age  and  Salary 


Present  Age 

Total 

Less 
than 
$200 

$200 

to 

$249 

$250 

to 

$299 

$300 

to 

$349 

$360 

to 

$399 

$400 

to 

$449 

$450 

to 

$499 

$600 
to 

$549 

$550 

to 

$599 

$600 
to 
$649 

$650 
to 

$699 

65  to  70 

1 
12 

- 

- 

: 

: 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

- 

60  to  64 

(sjL. 

1 

1 

- 

1 

- 

55  to  69 

27 

- 

- 

- 

i 

3 

11 

- 

^nT) 

3 

2 

1 

60  to  64 

37 

- 

- 

2 

i 

4 

16 

Qy 

3 

3 

3 

2 

45  to  49 

70 

- 

- 

l 

4 

9 

25 

GD 

7 

8 

C 

4 

40  to  44 

138 

1 

I 

2 

10 

17 

41 

© 

15 

15 

11 

7 

36  to  39 

166 

- 

2 

3 

18 

23 

44 

j@ 

22 

15 

12 

u 

30  to  34 

246 

1 

- 

15 

33 

37 

@T 

33 

34 

18 

7 

7 

25  to  29 

452 

o 

0 

15 

47 

115 

(ll9) 

60 

36 

31 

19 

5 

20  to  24 

1048 

o 

3 

75 

187 

(374) 

199 

88 

48 

3G 

36 

- 

17  to  19 

255 

l 

2 

37 

(Qj 

97 

13 

1 

2 

Total 

2452 

I 

ll 

150 

403 

680 

537 

234 

174 

129 

98 

29 

IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT 


43 


TABLE  IX  (Continued) 
Distribution  of  Men  Teachers  by  Age  and  Salary 


Present  Age 

Total 

$900 

to 

$949 

$960 

to 

$999 

$1000 

to 
$1099 

$1100 

to 
$1199 

$1200 

to 
$1299 

$1300 

to 
$1399 

$1400 
to 

$1499 

$1500 

to 
$1599 

$1600 

to 
$1699 

$1700 

to 
$1799 

$1800 

to 
$1899 

$1900 

to 
$1999 

$2000 
and 
over 

No 
Rec- 
ord 

70  and  over 

1 
1 

7 

- 

— 

CD" 

= — 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

65  to  69 

"~© 

CO  to  64 

XD 

_ 

_ 

3 

55  to  59 

1 

- 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

1 

'     - 

- 

50  to  54 

6 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

- 

Jzf 

- 

1 

- 

4 

- 

45  to  49 

15 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3 

- 

1 

Qf 

- 

2 

4 

- 

1 

1 

40  to  44 

23 

1 

- 

1 

- 

1 

- 

1 

(g) 

2 

2 

o 

1 

4 

2 

35  to  39 

22 

1 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

4 

(t) 

4 

3 

1 

1 

30  to  34 

37 

- 

1 

5 

__$__ 

— CD" 

"T~ 

2 

8 

8 

- 

4 

25  to  29 

38 

(D~ 

— 2 

8 

5 

6 

3 

1 

4 

- 

1 

20  to  24 

12 

5 

2 

5 

17  to  19 

Total 

102 

16 

5 

21 

11 

13 

4 

10 

29 

14 

9 

12 

2 

12 

4 

TABLE  X  (Continued) 
Distribution  of  Women  Teachers  by  Age  and  Salary 


Present  Age 

Total 

$700 

to 

$749 

$760 

to 

$799 

$800 

to 

$849 

$850 

to 

$899 

$900 

to 

$949 

$960 

to 

$999 

$1000 

to 
$1099 

$1100 

to 
$1199 

S1200 
and 
over 

No 
Record 

65  to  70 

2 

JS 

1 

60  to  64 

4 

1 

1 

- 

- 

1 

- 

1 

55  to  59 

4 

- 

1 

1 

- 

- 

1 

1 

50  to  54 

14 

o 

4 

1 

- 

2 

1 

4 

45  to  49 

15 

3 

3 

2 

- 

1 

- 

4 

1 

1 

40  to  44 

25 

5 

1 

o 

3 

3 

2 

3 

4 

1 

1 

35  to  39 

22 

2 

5 

1 

3 

- 

1 

4 

1 

4 

1 

30  to  34 

20 

5 

3 

1 

3 

3 

- 

2 

1 

- 

2 

25  to  29 

32 

11 

12 

4 

2 

1 

2 

20  to  24 

13 

3 

- 

1 

9 

17  to  19 

8 

8 

Total 

159 

33 

31 

13 

11 

11 

5 

19 

6 

C 

24 

44 


RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 


TABLE  XI 
Distribution  of  Men  Teachers  by  Service  and  Salary 


Length  of  Service 

Total 

Less 

than 
$250 

$260 

to 
$299 

$300 

to 

$349 

$350 

to 

$399 

$400 

to 

$449 

$450 

to 

$499 

$500 

to 

$549 

$660 

to 

$699 

$600 

to 

$649 

$660 

to 

$699 

$700 

to 

$749 

$750 
to 

$799 

$800 
to 

$849 

$850 

to 

$899 

35  and  over 

SO  to  34 

25  to  29 

1 

1 

20  to  24 

4 

2 

2 

15  to  19 

4 

1 

1 

1 

1 

10  to  14 

6 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

5  to  9 

15 

1 

1 

1 

2 

4 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

Less  than  5  years 

76 

3 

9 

16 

4 

1 

5 

7 

1 

2 

7 

©~ 

11 

4 

Total 

106 

5 

11 

18 

9 

7 

8 

9 

3 

3 

8 

6 

15 

4 

TABLE  XII 
Distribution  of  Women  Teachers  by  Service  and  Salary 


Length  of  Service 

Total 

Less 
than 
$250 

$250 
to 

$299 

$300 

to 

$349 

$350 

to 

$399 

$400 

to 

$449 

$450 
to 

$499 

$500 
to 

$549 

$550 

to 

$599 

$600 

to 

$649 

$650 

to 

$699 

35  and  over 

14 

6 

2 

2 

(EX 

2 

30  to  34 

15 

1 

1 

3 

1 

2 

2^ 

^D 

2 

25  to  29 

41 

1 

3 

12 

4 

(D" 

7 

o 

3 

20  to  24 

95 

1 

o 

10 

28 

6 

J@ 

15 

9 

5 

15  to  19 

1G2 

1 

2 

9 

15 

53 

@T 

27 

16 

10 

5 

10  to  14 

271 

1 

7 

33 

52 

(jiY^ 

39 

34 

18 

12 

4 

5  to  9 

457 

1 

22 

55 

125 

^@) 

60 

33 

14 

11 

6 

Less  than  5  years 

1396 

15 

117 

302 

©" 

238 

97 

50 

55 

41 

10 

Total 

2451 

18 

150 

403 

677 

541 

233 

174 

129 

91 

35 

IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT 


45 


TABLE  XI  (Continued) 
Distribution  of  Men  Teachers  by  Service  and  Salary 


Length  of  Service 

Total 

$900 

to 

$949 

$950 

to 

$999 

$1000 

to 
$1099 

$1100 

to 
$1199 

$1200 

to 
$1299 

$1300 

to 
$1399 

$1400 

to 
$1499 

$1500 

to 
$1599 

$1600 

to 
$1699 

$1700 

to 
$1799 

$1800 

to 
$1899 

$1900 

to 
$1999 

$2000 

and 

over 

No 
Rec- 
ord 

35  and  over 

1 
2 

(D~ 

;KD 

30  to  34 

25  to  29 

7 

1 

1 

(2)- 

3 

20  to  24 

20 

1 

1 

3 

1 

2-C 

_)    5 

2 

4 

1 

15  to  19 

15 

1 

®" 

■"""■"2"" 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

10  to  14 

29 

2 

1 

1 

^_4_ 

— (  '  ) 

5 

6 

1 

1 

1 

5  to  9 

43 

2 

2 

7    . 

-dy~ 

■   if 

3 

3 

8 

6 

3 

Less  than  5  years 

45 

13 

3 

11 

5 

5 

1 

2 

4 

1 

Total 

162 

16 

5 

21 

11 

13 

4 

10 

28 

14 

10 

12 

3 

12 

3 

TABLE  XII  (Continued) 
Distribution  of  Women  Teachers  by  Service  and  Salary 


Length  of  Service 

Total 

$700 

to 

$749 

$750 

to 

$799 

$800 

to 

$849 

$850 

to 

$899 

$900 

to 
$949 

$950 

to 

$999 

$1000 

to 
$1099 

$1100 

to 
$1199 

$1200 
and 
over 

No 
Record 

35  and  over 
30  to  34 
25  to  29 
20  to  24 
15  to  19 
10  to  14 
5  to  9 
Less  than  5  years 

7 
9 
14 
13 
24 
25 
27 
41 

3 

2 
3 
3 
6 
9 
10 

2 
4 
1 
2 
4 
3 
5 
6 

1 

1 
1 
2 
3 
3 
1 

1 

5 
2 
2 
1 

1 
1 
1 
1 
4 
2 
1 
1 

2 

1 

1 

1 
1 

1 
6 
3 

5 
4 

1 
4 
1 

1 

1 
2 

2 

2 

2 
21 

Total 

160 

36 

27 

12 

11 

12 

6 

19 

6 

6 

25 

46 


RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

TABLE  XIII 
Service  of  Men  Teachers  outside  the  State  (110) 


Present 
Age 

1  year  or 
less 

1  and  less 
than  2 

2toh 

Less  than 
5  years 

5  to  9 

10  to  lh 

15  to  19 

20  to  2k 

25  or  over 

Total 

20  to  24 

5 

1 

6 

6 

25  to  29 

11 

1 

5 

17 

5 

22 

30  to  34 

7 

5 

4 

16 

8 

1 

25 

35  to  39 

1 

- 

5 

6 

6 

3 

1 

16 

40  to  44 

3 

1 

1 

5 

3 

3 

3 

1 

15 

45  to  49 

2 

- 

2 

4 

1 

4 

2 

1 

12 

50  to  54 

- 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

- 

5 

55  to  59 

- 

- 

2 

2 

2 

2 

- 

1 

7 

60  to  64 

1 

- 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

65  to  70 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

1 

30 

8 

20 

58 

26 

14 

8 

3 

1 

110 

TABLE  XIV 
Service  of  Women  Teachers  outside  the  State  (354) 


Present 
Age 

1  year  or 
less 

1  and  less 
than  2 

2toU 

Less  than 
5  years 

5  to  9 

10  to  IK 

15  to  19 

20  to  2h 

25  or  over 

Total 

17  to  19 

1 

1 

1 

20  to  24 

39 

18 

8 

65 

65 

25  to  29 

27 

14 

29 

70 

11 

81 

30  to  34 

7 

9 

13 

29 

21 

4 

54 

35  to  39 

11 

7 

7 

25 

4 

8 

2 

1 

40 

40  to  44 

12 

6 

9 

27 

8 

5 

5 

1 

1 

47 

45  to  49 

8 

- 

4 

12 

8 

5 

2 

2 

1 

30 

50  to  54 

4 

1 

- 

5 

2 

3 

2 

4 

1 

17 

55  to  59 

2 

1 

2 

5 

1 

- 

- 

2 

- 

8 

60  to  64 

- 

2 

- 

2 

- 

2 

1 

2 

- 

7 

65  to  70 

1 

- 

2 

3 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

4 

112 

58 

74 

244 

55 

28 

12 

12 

3 

354 

IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  47 

TABLE  XV 

Withdrawals  from  Service 

1911-16 


Men 

Marriage 

Disability              Death 

Other  Causes 

Total 

1911 

- 

- 

2 

2 

1912 

1 

- 

4 

5 

1913 

- 

- 

5 

5 

1914 

- 

1 

6 

7 

1915 

- 

1 

7 

8 

1916 

- 

- 

5 

5 

Plus  2  incomplete 

records 

32 

Women 

1911 

20 

3 

7 

30 

1912 

47 

3                      2 

14 

66 

1913 

75 

5                        2 

23 

105 

1914 

65 

7 

23 

95 

1915 

65 

9                       3 

38 

115 

1916 

86 

14                        1 

68 

169 

Plus  9  incoi 

oplete 

records 

580 

Men  Women  Total                    Withdrawals 

1911  265  3021  3286  32 

1912  256  2735  2991  71 

1913  227  2852  3079  110 

1914  215  2885  3100  102 

1915  235  2797  3032  123 

1916  228  2764  2992  174 


48  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

Theory  and  Principles 

Retirement  Board 

A  small  board  is  recommended  in  order  to  secure  administrative  efficiency  and  a  sound 
system  of  centralized  responsibility.  The  state  is  represented  by  those  executive  officers 
who  have  charge  of  finance  and  insurance ;  the  commissioner  of  education  is  included 
as  representing  both  the  state  and  the  teachers.  In  some  states  it  may  be  desired  to 
include  also  the  attorney-general  and  a  third  representative  of  the  teachers.  In  ac- 
cordance with  generally  accepted  principles  it  is  advisable  that  the  representatives 
of  the  teachers  should  be  elected  at  large  to  serve  for  periods  that  are  long  enough  to 
give  them  familiarity  with  the  problems  that  they  are  to  handle;  a  term  of  at  least 
three  years  would  probably  be  a  satisfactory  period.  The  terms  of  service  should  over- 
lap in  order  to  secure  continuity  of  policy  and  the  necessary  knowledge  of  details  on 
the  part  of  the  majority  of  the  members  at  any  one  time.  It  is  not  desirable  to  pay 
members  of  retirement  boards  more  than  will  compensate  them  for  any  loss  of  income 
incurred  thru  attending  to  the  business  of  the  board. 

The  chief  function  of  the  board  is  to  frame  by-laws  and  regulations  to  carry  out 
the  purposes  of  the  act,  and  to  supervise,  subject  to  the  necessary  expert  advice,  the 
management  of  the  fund.  In  the  majority  of  pension  systems  the  boards  have  been 
given  discretionary  powers  to  make  changes,  as  for  example  in  prorating  pensions,  that 
affect  the  interests  of  teachers  who  are  already  in  the  service.  Such  discretionary  powers 
are  too  wide.  In  order  to  maintain  the  confidence  of  participants  in  the  system,  sound 
policy  requires  that  changes  either  in  the  amount  of  contribution  required  or  in  the 
amount  of  retiring  allowance  to  be  paid  should  be  made  only  on  the  advice  of  actu- 
aries after  an  investigation  of  the  fund,  and  that  such  changes  should  apply  only  to 
future  entrants  into  the  system,  altho  teachers  already  in  the  system  may  accept  the 
changes  by  formal  amendment  of  their  contracts. 

The  administration  of  a  system  involving  such  a  small  number  of  teachers  as  those 
of  Vermont  does  not  necessitate  the  permanent  employment  of  an  actuary,  altho  the 
services  of  a  consulting  actuary  may  be  retained.  An  actuarial  investigation  at  least 
every  three  years,  however,  is  essential  for  security.  The  sound  administration  of  a  pen- 
sion system  requires  at  the  inauguration  the  elaboration  of  a  careful  system  of  records 
and  accounting  which  in  themselves  are  an  important  element  in  securing  soundness. 
Of  existing  systems  only  those  of  Massachusetts,  Connecticut,  and  Erie,  Pennsylvania, 
and  the  new  systems  of  New  York  City  and  Pennsylvania,  all  in  their  infancy,  have 
provided  for  the  keeping  of  accurate  records.  A  system  of  records,  organized  on 
the  advice  of  an  actuary,  forms  the  basis  of  accurate  pension  reporting,  for  which  no 
good  standard  has  yet  been  developed. 

Membership 

The  principle  that  membership  in  a  pension  fund  should  be  compulsory  for  all  new 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  49 

teachers  is  now  widely  accepted.  Compulsion  in  such  cases  does  not  involve  any  hard- 
ship if  it  becomes  generally  recognized  that  the  acceptance  of  the  provisions  of  a  pen- 
sion act  is  one  of  the  conditions  of  appointment.  Compulsory  membership  in  a  pen- 
sion fund  is  essential  not  merely  in  order  to  afford  every  teacher  some  protection 
against  dependency  in  old  age,  but  it  is  only  on  this  basis  that  school  authorities  can 
relieve  the  system  of  teachers  who  become  inefficient,  without  imposing  undue  hard- 
ships. At  the  same  time  a  well-organized  pension  plan  tends  to  encourage  thrift,  and 
may  perform  the  same  function  as  a  savings  bank  in  which  the  teachers  deposit  not 
only  the  contributions  required  under  the  plan  but  any  sums  above  this  that  they 
desire.  Membership  cannot  be  made  compulsory  for  teachers  already  in  service  because 
many  of  them  may  have  made  arrangements  for  protection  against  life  contingen- 
cies, or  may  have  incurred  other  obligations  that  would  make  the  requirement  of  a 
contribution  to  another  fund  impossible,  or  they  may  be  so  old  that  the  necessary 
actuarial  contributions  required  from  them  would  be  too  burdensome.  It  is,  however, 
advisable  to  afford  these  teachers  such  inducements  as  are  possible  to  become  mem- 
bers of  the  system  for  the  same  reasons  that  are  given  above.  These  may  properly  take 
the  form  of  meeting  in  whole  or  in  part  the  accrued  liabilities  by  appropriations  from 
the  state  treasury. 

Teachers  in  service  at  the  time  of  the  passage  of  a  pension  act,  provided  that  special 
arrangements  are  made  for  them,  may  be  required  to  declare  within  one  year  after  its 
establishment,  whether  they  will  become  members  of  the  pension  system.  This  require- 
ment leaves  the  teachers  ample  time  for  a  consideration  of  all  the  conditions  involved 
and  enables  the  authorities  to  obtain  an  early  estimate  of  the  state's  future  obliga- 
tions. A  longer  postponement  would  involve  either  increased  assessments  or  smaller 
pensions.  It  should  be  understood  that  teachers  who  give  a  declaration  in  writing 
of  their  intention  not  to  avail  themselves  of  the  provision  of  the  act  have  no  claim, 
sentimental  or  otherwise,  on  it  either  for  disability  or  retiring  allowances,  since  the 
one  aim  of  the  plan  is  to  avoid  the  complications  of  a  discretionary  measure  and  to 
ensure  stability  by  careful  actuarial  calculations  of  the  future  cost. 

Retirement 

The  proposed  measure  provides  for  the  retirement  of  teachers  on  the  combined  basis 
of  age  and  service.  Most  existing  plans  that  provide  for  retirement  on  the  basis  of  ser- 
vice alone  are  in  danger  of  financial  instability.  Under  these  systems  teachers  may 
spend  from  one-third  to  one-half  of  their  adult  lives  in  retirement,  or  may  retire  at 
the  time  of  their  greatest  efficiency,  since  such  systems  enable  a  teacher  to  retire  at  as 
early  an  age  as  forty-five  or  fifty.  Measures  of  this  kind  are  not  only  opposed  to  the 
interests  of  society,  but  they  are  almost  impossibly  expensive,  and  since  the  rates  of 
contribution  in  most  systems  have  not  as  a  rule  been  actuarially  calculated  to  provide 
for  such  early  retirement,  the  funds  tend  to  be  diminished  very  rapidly,  with  the  re- 
sulting bankruptcy  of  the  system  within  a  few  years.  Retirement  on  the  basis  of  age 


50  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

alone  is  inequitable,  since  the  employer's  contributions  to  the  pension  fund  are  made 
in  recognition  of  service  rendered,  in  order  to  furnish  protection  for  the  employee  in 
old  age.  It  is  desirable  to  place  the  age  of  voluntary  retirement  lower  for  women  than 
for  men ;  the  present  plan  places  the  age  of  voluntary  retirement  for  women  at  60 
and  at  65  for  men.  It  is  essential  to  remember,  however,  that  since  actuarial  statistics 
show  that  women  are  longer-lived  than  men,  the  same  accumulations  will  purchase 
lower  annuities  for  them  than  for  men,  or,  to  put  it  in  another  way,  the  same  annuity 
will  cost  more  for  women  than  for  men.  The  ages  of  60  and  65  are  the  ages  for  volun- 
tary retirement ;  it  is  proposed  that  no  teacher  be  permitted  to  remain  in  service  after 
the  age  of  70.  Since  the  pension  protection  is  provided,  such  compulsory  retirement 
imposes  no  hardship.  The  existence  of  the  pension  protection  also  affords  a  justifica- 
tion for  the  compulsory  retirement  by  a  school  committee  of  a  teacher  at  the  age 
of  60  or  65,  if  by  his  retention  the  efficiency  of  the  school  concerned  appears  to  be 
impaired.  Thirty  years  has  been  taken  as  the  service  qualification  in  the  present  plan, 
of  which  twenty  years  must  be  in  the  State  of  Vermont.  Service  outside  Vermont  is 
recognized  on  the  principle  that  failure  to  include  such  service  may  tend  to  discour- 
age the  mobility  of  the  profession. 

Retiring  Allowance 

The  amount  of  retiring  allowances  for  future  teachers  and  teachers  below  the  age 
of  forty-five  who  are  in  service  at  the  time  of  the  introduction  of  the  pension  plan 
will  be  determined  by  the  amount  contributed  annually  by  and  on  behalf  of  each 
teacher,  by  the  rate  of  interest  earned  or  guaranteed  by  the  fund,  and  by  the  rates 
of  mortality ;  in  other  words,  the  retiring  allowance  will  be  the  annual  sum  that  can 
be  purchased  by  the  accumulations  standing  to  a  teacher's  credit  at  the  time  of  re- 
tirement. Such  sums  can  be  predicted  with  scientific  accuracy  by  the  actuaries,  and 
the  teacher  is  all  the  time  in  a  position  to  know  exactly  how  much  retiring  allowance 
mav  be  expected  in  return  for  any  given  contribution,  or  how  much  must  be  con- 
tributed in  order  to  secure  any  desired  allowance.  Under  this  system  teachers,  if 
they  so  desire,  may  obtain  contracts  setting  forth  these  expectations.  McClintock's 
Table  of  Mortality  Among  Annuitants,  recommended  here,  with  interest  at  3|  per 
cent,  is  the  table  most  generally  required  by  the  state  laws  in  calculating  annuities. 
The  experience  of  the  system  may  result  in  tables  representing  the  expectations  of 
teachers  even  more  closely.  This  plan  avoids  the  complications  that  arise  in  many 
svstems  which  base  the  retiring  allowance  on  the  salary  received  by  the  teachers  at 
the  time  of  retirement  or  the  average  salary  for  a  few  years  preceding  retirement,  or 
by  the  payment  of  a  flat  rate,  or  by  calculating  it  on  the  basis  of  service.  The  course 
of  salaries  cannot  be  predicted  over  a  period  of  twenty-five,  thirty,  or  more  years,  and 
to  calculate  a  pension  on  such  a  basis  introduces  an  element  of  guesswork,  since  nobody 
can  foretell  whether  the  accumulation  of  the  annual  contributions  paid  by  the  teacher 
and  the  employer  will  or  will  not  yield  a  pension  related  to  the  salary  at  the  time  of 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  51 

retirement.  The  chief  objection  to  the  flat  rate — that  is,  the  same  pension  to  every 
teacher — is  that  its  cost  is  more  burdensome  on  the  low-salaried  teacher  than  on  the 
teacher  enjoying  a  high  salary,  and  on  the  younger  rather  than  on  the  older  teacher, 
assuming  the  annual  contribution  required  to  be  the  same  for  all;  further,  it  has  gen- 
erally failed  to  serve  as  an  inducement  to  the  high-salaried  teacher  to  retire  before  the 
compulsory  age  for  retirement  is  reached.  The  determination  of  a  pension  on  the  basis 
of  a  certain  sum  for  each  year  of  service  is  open  to  the  same  objections  as  the  flat 
rate,  and  has  the  further  defect  that  the  pension  proposed  under  this  plan  bears  no 
relation  either  to  salary  or  to  contribution. 

Salary  has,  however,  been  taken  into  account  under  the  present  scheme  in  so  far  as 
it  is  expected  that  each  teacher  will  contribute  toward  a  retiring  allowance  that  will 
enable  him  to  continue  on  somewhat  the  same  standard  of  living  in  retirement  as  in 
active  service.  In  order  to  enable  teachers  to  make  such  arrangements  as  may  best  suit 
their  circumstances,  the  plan  gives  them  the  opportunity  of  increasing  their  contri- 
butions as  their  salaries  increase,  and  of  selecting  one  of  three  options  at  the  time  of 
their  retirement. 

Disability  Allowances 

The  administration  of  disability  allowances  has  been  surrounded  hitherto  with  con- 
siderable difficulty.  The  appeal  of  sentiment  in  favor  of  the  teacher  who  is  incapaci- 
tated for  further  work  on  account  of  mental  or  physical  disability  has  been  almost 
as  great  as  in  the  case  of  incapacity  due  to  old  age.  One  cause  of  the  difficulty  is  that 
as  yet  there  are  but  meagre  statistics  available  to  indicate  the  incidence  of  complete 
disability  among  teachers  as  a  class.  The  probability  is  that  it  is  not  great,  but  hitherto 
disability  claims  have  usually  been  presented  and  accepted  on  the  testimony  of  the 
applicant's  own  physician  without  further  check.  It  is  here  proposed  that  disability 
allowances  be  granted  only  on  the  certification  of  both  the  physician  attending  the 
teacher  and  of  physicians  appointed  by  the  Board  of  Retirement.  In  order  to  guard 
against  the  continued  payment  of  an  allowance  in  cases  where  disability  has  been 
overcome,  it  is  recommended  that  a  teacher  who  is  granted  a  disability  allowance  be 
reexamined  by  his  own  and  the  Board's  physicians  once  each  year.  This  implies  the 
reen trance  into  service  of  the  teacher  whose  health  is  restored. 

The  great  variety  of  practice  in  this  field  appears  in  the  number  of  years  of  service 
that  are  required  as  a  basis  for  the  granting  of  a  disability  allowance  and  in  the  amount 
of  the  allowance  in  different  systems.  The  service  requirement  varies,  in  different  sys- 
tems, from  two  to  thirty-five  years,  and  the  amount  of  the  disability  allowance  varies 
from  a  sum  determined  at  the  discretion  of  the  Board  concerned  to  a  sum  bearing 
the  same  proportion  to  a  regular  retiring  allowance  as  do  the  years  of  service  before 
disability  to  the  total  period  of  service  required  for  retirement. 

Until  such  time  as  a  medical  examination  is  required  for  entrance  upon  teaching, 
it  would  seem  advisable  to  establish  the  principle  that  the  minimum  length  of  service 


52  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

after  which  a  teacher  may  become  eligible  to  a  disability  allowance  should  be  that 
which  is  generally  recognized  as  qualifying  for  permanent  appointment.  In  the  case 
of  Vermont  this  period  tends  to  be  six  years;  accordingly  the  state  will  permit  teachers 
who  are  totally  incapacitated  for  further  teaching  to  retire  on  a  disability  allowance 
after  this  period.  Until  more  information  on  the  subject  of  teachers  disability  has  been 
accumulated,  it  would  be  advisable  to  determine  the  amount  of  the  disability  allow- 
ance so  far  as  possible  on  the  same  basis  as  the  retiring  allowance,  that  is,  the  annuity 
that  can  be  purchased  with  the  accumulations  standing  to  the  teacher's  credit.  Since 
in  the  case  of  early  disability  such  an  annuity  would  be  very  small,  the  state  may 
properly  assume  the  cost  of  the  difference  between  this  annuity  and  half  of  the  teach- 
er's annual  average  salary  during  the  entire  period  of  his  active  service  in  the  state. 

Contributions 

The  amounts  that  teachers  may  be  expected  to  contribute  annually  are  determined 
most  simply  by  the  fact  that  they  bear  a  definite  relation  toward  their  retiring  al- 
lowances. It  would  be  inequitable  to  permit  teachers  to  contribute  such  small  sums 
annually  that  the  annuity  that  could  be  purchased  with  their  accumulations  would 
hardly  be  sufficient  to  maintain  life.  On  the  other  hand,  it  would  be  unjust  to  require 
such  high  annual  contributions  that  teachers  would  feel  too  great  a  burden  on  their 
present  expenditures.  It  is  advisable  that  teachers  should  be  required  to  contribute 
such  annual  sums  as  will  together  with  contributions  from  the  state  ultimately  yield 
an  annuity  that  will  keep  them  in  comfort  in  retirement.  In  general,  such  an  annuity 
is  equivalent  to  about  one-half  of  the  average  salary  at  the  time  of  retirement  and  can 
be  purchased  with  the  accumulation  of  annual  contributions  equal  to  about  5  per  cent 
of  salary,  duplicated  by  the  state's  contributions.  Since  salaries  in  Vermont  are  not  yet 
large,  a  minimum  contribution  of  $16  a  year  is  required,  even  tho  this  be  more  than 
5  per  cent  of  the  initial  salary.  Since  the  fund  here  proposed  guarantees  interest  at  4 
per  cent,  it  may  prove  an  encouragement  to  thrift  to  permit  teachers  to  increase  their 
annual  contributions  up  to  any  sum  beyond  the  required  minimum,  the  additional 
accumulations  serving  to  purchase  higher  annuities.  In  such  cases,  however,  the  state's 
contributions  would  be  limited  to  a  sum  equal  to  5  per  cent  of  the  teachers  salaries. 

As  a  consequence  of  the  principle  that  the  justification  of  a  pension  system  is  based 
as  much  on  the  requirements  of  public  service  as  on  the  desirability  of  furnishing  pro- 
tection for  teachers  in  their  old  age,  it  is  now  generally  accepted  that  the  state  should 
share  equally  with  the  teachers  the  cost  of  the  retiring  allowances,  except  in  the  case 
of  those  teachers  who  are  so  old  that  the  annual  actuarial  contributions  that  would 
be  required  to  purchase  them  a  reasonable  pension  would  be  too  burdensome.  But  for 
the  younger  teachers  and  for  new  teachers  it  is  desirable  that  the  annual  contribu- 
tions of  the  state  should,  within  the  limits  provided,  duplicate  those  of  the  teachers 
and  be  paid  into  the  fund  at  the  same  time. 

The  requirement  that  the  state  shall  make  its  payments  on  behalf  of  teachers  at 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  53 

the  same  time  as  the  teachers  is  based  on  the  principle  that  this  plan,  known  as 
the  reserve  plan,  is  the  cheapest  and  safest  both  for  the  state  and  the  teacher.  The 
state  might  meet  its  obligations  for  pensions  by  annual  appropriations  as  the  needs 
arise.  It  has  been  found  that  this  method,  the  cash  disbursement  plan,  while  perhaps 
cheap  at  first,  becomes  too  burdensome  and  may  rise  as  high  as  one-third  of  the 
annual  salary  roll  of  active  teachers.  This  burden  may  become  so  excessive  that  relief 
may  be  sought  by  prorating  pensions  with  the  consequent  disappointment  of  the 
teachers  expectations.  Under  the  reserve  plan,  on  the  other  hand,  the  cost  always 
remains  uniform,  and  need  not  rise  above  5  per  cent  of  the  cost  for  salaries  in  any 
one  year,  and  may  be  limited  to  that  amount,  as  in  the  present  plan.  Advantage  is  also 
taken  of  the  interest  rate,  which  after  a  few  years  yields  very  rapid  accumulations. 
Thus  one  dollar  set  aside  each  year  for  thirty  years  at  4>  per  cent  compound  interest 
would  become  $58.32,  and  in  forty  years  $98.82.  A  further  advantage  of  the  reserve 
plan  is  that,  if  combined  with  the  practice  of  keeping  individual  accounts  for  each 
teacher,  the  accumulations  necessary  to  purchase  the  allowances  for  a  retiring  teacher 
are  always  ready  to  hand,  and  the  dangers  attending  a  system  in  which  the  funds  are 
pooled  are  absent. 

Teachers  who  have  been  in  service  for  some  years  before  the  introduction  of  a  pen- 
sion plan,  and  upon  whom  the  burden  of  paying  sufficient  contributions  to  secure  an 
adequate  retiring  allowance  would  be  excessive,  constitute  a  separate  problem.  No 
difficulty  would  arise  if  a  pension  system  were  established  wholly  for  future  entrants 
or  for  a  body  of  young  teachers.  The  presence  of  the  older  teachers  gives  rise  to  the 
difficulty  of  meeting  what  are  known  as  accrued  liabilities.  Membership  in  the  fund 
remains  optional  for  them  for  the  period  prescribed,  but  once  they  join,  they  must 
contribute  regularly.  It  is  here  recommended  that  they  contribute  annually  the  same 
percentage  of  their  salaries  as  other  teachers  in  service,  but  that  the  state  pay  annu- 
ally on  their  account,  in  addition  to  the  ordinary  duplication  of  the  teachers  contri- 
butions, such  sum  as  with  the  other  accumulations  will  provide  an  annuity  equal  to 
half  of  the  average  annual  salary  of  a  retiring  teacher  throughout  his  period  of  ser- 
vice. These  additional  sums  needed  to  meet  the  accrued  liabilities  make  a  pension  sys- 
tem costly  for  a  time  only;  they  decrease  and  ultimately  disappear  entirely.  Failure  to 
recognize  that  teachers  in  service  require  a  provision  different  from  that  for  future 
entrants  has  been  the  most  frequent  cause  of  the  breakdown  of  pension  plans. 

Accumulations 

Following  the  principle  observed  in  savings  and  insurance  systems,  it  is  desirable  that 
the  contributions  of  both  the  teachers  and  the  state  be  kept  in  individual  accounts 
credited  to  each  teacher  up  to  the  time  of  retirement.  In  most  of  the  existing  systems 
all  funds  are  credited  to  one  account;  where  the  funding  has  been  inadequate  this 
method  has  resulted  at  first  in  the  payment  of  pensions  in  full,  then  pro  rata,  and 
finally  in  bankruptcy,  the  younger  teachers  in  effect  contributing  toward  the  pay- 


54  RETIRING  ALLOWANCES  FOR  TEACHERS 

ment  of  the  pensions  of  their  older  colleagues  instead  of  toward  the  accumulation  of 
a  fund  for  themselves. 

It  is  advisable,  and  in  the  present  prospects  of  the  investment  market  entirely  pos- 
sible, for  the  state  to  guarantee  interest  to  the  fund  at  4  per  cent ;  any  sums  that  may 
be  earned  above  this  may  be  placed  in  a  reserve  fund  or  be  employed  to  reduce  appro- 
priations. 

Return  of  Contributions 

One  of  the  results  of  the  merely  sentimental  and  philanthropic  character  of  many 
pension  funds  has  been  the  unwillingness  to  return  contributions  to  teachers  who 
withdraw  from  service  owing  to  resignation,  dismissal,  or  death.  A  scientifically 
planned  system  will  return  not  only  the  teacher's  contributions,  but  after  a  period 
of  service  those  placed  to  his  credit  by  the  state.  It  follows,  since  funds  are  kept  in 
individual  accounts  and  provision  for  the  future  pensions  is  made  on  an  individual 
basis,  that  this  can  be  done  safely  without  curtailing  the  rights  and  expectations  of 
other  members  of  the  fund.  Further,  since  the  new  systems  are  based  on  the  savings 
plan  and  aim  partly  to  encourage  thrift,  a  teacher's  contributions  are  regarded  as  his 
own  savings  and  always  belong  to  him.  The  state's  contributions  are  paid  to  a  teach- 
er's credit  to  serve  at  once  as  a  consideration  for  service  and  to  meet  a  future  contin- 
gency;  it  is  doubtful  whether  it  can  be  satisfactorily  argued  that  a  teacher's  right  in 
these  payments  from  the  state  inures  from  the  first  year  of  service.  On  the  basis,  how- 
ever, that  the  state's  payments  are  regarded  as  deferred  pay,  the  state's  contributions 
may  be  returned  to  a  teacher  withdrawing  after  a  continuous  service  of  six  years,  the 
period  necessary  to  qualify  for  permanent  appointment.  The  total  amount,  therefore, 
standing  to  the  credit  of  a  teacher  who  resigns,  or  is  dismissed,  or  dies  before  retire- 
ment, may  be  returned  with  interest  at  3|  per  cent,  the  difference  between  the  rate 
for  withdrawal  and  the  rate  for  retirement  being  considered  as  some  return  for 
the  protection  afforded  during  the  period  of  service,  and  being  used  to  pay  for  the 
cost  of  administration.  When  such  accumulations  are  small,  it  is  most  convenient  to 
return  them  in  a  lump  sum.  When  they  are  considerable  in  amount,  it  may  be  better 
to  allow  them  to  remain  and  accumulate  until  the  time  of  retirement  as  the  basis 
of  a  partial  annuity. 

In  the  case  of  a  teacher  who  dies  after  retirement  before  the  total  fund  standing 
to  his  credit  has  been  exhausted  in  the  payment  of  his  retiring  allowance,  the  un- 
expended balance  may  be  returned  to  his  family  with  interest  at  4  per  cent,  provided 
that  this  form  of  option  has  been  selected. 

Actuarial  Valuations 

Until  within  the  last  three  years  few  pension  systems  in  the  United  States  were  es- 
tablished with  the  advice  and  help  of  actuaries.  They  have  been  resorted  to  usually 
when  a  fund  was  approaching  bankruptcy.  In  order  to  establish  and  maintain  the  sta- 
bility of  a  fund,  it  is  essential  that  actuarial  cooperation  be  secured  before  the  or- 


IN  THE  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  OF  VERMONT  55 

ganization  of  a  system  and  employed  periodically  during  its  existence.  This  is  all  the 
more  necessary  at  present  because  of  the  absence  of  special  professional  statistics  that 
tell  the  story  of  a  teacher's  career.  Little  is  known  about  the  length  of  service,  lon- 
gevity, or  disability  of  teachers.  Even  if  the  teaching  profession  shows  the  same  expe- 
rience as  the  ordinary  tables,  the  actuary's  assistance  is  still  necessary.  It  is  essential, 
therefore,  that  pension  systems  should  be  actuarially  sound  at  their  inauguration, 
and  that  the  soundness  should  be  maintained  by  periodical  investigations.  It  is  es- 
timated that  such  investigations  should  be  conducted  at  least  once  in  three  years. 
For  most  plans  the  permanent  appointment  of  an  actuary  is  unnecessary  after  the 
initial  organization  has  been  effected  and  a  good  system  of  forms,  records,  and  book- 
keeping has  been  introduced.  The  latter  are  no  less  necessary  than  the  periodical  in- 
vestigations, for  they  alone  can  furnish  the  basis  for  sound  and  accurate  reports  which 
will  serve  in  turn  as  the  basis  for  the  state's  appropriations  and  for  publicity,  in  itself 
a  strong  element  of  stability.  Annual  reports  based  on  information  secured  in  this  way 
furnish  the  best  safeguard  for  any  particular  system  and  an  essential  means  of  pro- 
moting a  more  accurate  and  scientific  knowledge  of  the  principles  that  should  underlie 
pension  systems  in  the  future.  The  whole  problem  of  pensions  is  not  only  actuarial,  but 
also  economic,  professional,  and  social. 

Change  of  Rules 

From  time  to  time,  as  more  accurate  information  accumulates  about  the  teacher's  needs 
and  wishes,  or  as  an  actuarial  investigation  may  suggest,  a  change  in  existing  rules 
may  appear  desirable.  Under  most  existing  systems  this  power  is  left  to  the  Board 
of  Retirement  or  to  some  corresponding  board.  Usually  boards  are  permitted  to  pro- 
rate the  pensions  of  those  who  have  already  retired,  or  are  about  to  retire.  It  is  un- 
just to  grant  such  power  unreservedly  to  any  board,  and  the  need  for  any  such  changes 
is  obviated  by  organizing  the  system  with  as  much  scientific  accuracy  as  possible.  The 
power  to  change  rules  is  essential  for  the  adjustment  of  the  system  to  future  contin- 
gencies, but  it  is  fair  to  employ  such  power  only  as  it  affects  the  interests  of  teachers 
joining  the  system  subsequent  to  the  introduction  of  the  changes.  Any  alterations  in 
the  contract  existing  between  the  pension  fund  and  the  teachers  in  service  is  permis- 
sible only  by  formal  agreement  with  the  teachers  concerned. 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Arizona 


California 


Colorado 
Denver 


Connecticut 


New  Haven 


New  London 


Df.laware 
Wilmington 


Illinois 


Chicago 


Peoria 


1912 


1913 


1909 


1917 


1911 


1911 


1911 


1915 


1893 


1913 


Indiana 


Administration 


Board 


Including 
Teachers' 
Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Adminis- 
tration 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


State  Board  of 
Education 


State  Board  of 
Education 


Local  Boards  of 

School 

Directors 


Teachers'  Re- 
tirement 
Board,  5  mem- 
bers 


BoardofRetire- 
ment,  5  mem- 
bers 


BoardofRetire- 
ment,  5  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Retire- 
ment, 7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  Illinois 
State  Teachers 
PensionandRe- 
tirement  Fund, 
5  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 9  members 


Board  of  Man- 
agement, 9 
members 


2  teachers 
elected  by 
members  of 
the  retire- 
ment asso- 
ciation 


1  member 
elected 
by  the 
teachers 


Such  sum  from 
the  general 
fund  as  is  ne- 
cessary to  pay 
clerical  and 
other  expenses 


2  members 
of  the 
teaching 
staff 
elected 


3  members 
of  the 
teaching 
staff 
elected 


3  elected 
by  the 
teachers 


6  members 
elected  by 
contribu- 
tors to  the 
fund 


Optional  up 
to  Jan.  1, 
1914 


Annual  state 
appropriations 
according  to 
the  estimates 
for  expenses 


Compensation 
of  Secretary 
and  expenses  of 
members  of  the 
Board  paid  out 
of  the  fund 


6  must  be 
elected  by 
active 
teachers 


1915 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  the  In- 
diana State 
Teachers'  Re- 
tirement Fund, 
5  members 


2  teachers 
appointed 
by  the 
Governor 


Clerical  assist-  May  join  at 
anceand  actual  any  time  on 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory after 
passage  of 
act 


Optional 
up  to  Sept. 
1920 


Optional 
up  to  July 
1,  1916 


Compul- 
sory 


School  Fund  of  the 
State 


6%  of  inheritance  and 
transfer  taxes;  income 
and  interest  from  in- 
vestments; donations, 
gifts,  legacies ;  state 
appropriations 


Special  levy  on  school 
district  up  to  one-tenth 
of  a  mill ;  gifts  and  be 
quests 


Compul- 
sory 


Annual  state  appropri 
ations 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


5%  of  salary,  not  less 
than  $25  nor  more  than 
$100  a  year 


Appropriations,  gifts, 
or  bequests  from  pub- 
lic or  private  sources : 
deductions  from  sala- 
ries for  absence  or  ill- 
ness 


1%  of  salary  during 
first  10  years  of  ser- 
vice ;  2%  beyond  that 


Appropriations,  gifts, 
or  bequests  ;  6%  of  ex- 
cise moneys  or  license 
fees;  an  appropriation 
from  city  fund 


$1000  yearly  provided 
by  City  Board  of  Edu- 
cation; donations,  leg- 
acies, bequests,  gifts, 
etc.;  $2000  yearly  from 
the  Council  of  the  city 


Compul- 
sory 


expenses  of 
members  of  the 
Board  paid  for 
out  of  the  fund 


payment  of 
arrearages 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


One-tenth  of  one  mill 
upon  each  dollarof  the 
assessed  valuation  of 
all  the  taxable  proper- 
ty of  the  state  coming 
under  the  provisions  of 
the  act ;  donations  and 
legacies,  etc. 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  bequests,  etc.; 
the  interest  on  taxation 
for  school  purposes; 
and  from  public  money 
up  to  twice  the  amount 
of  the  teachers  contri- 
butions annually 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  bequests 


Gifts,  devises,  be- 
quests, appropriations 
from  legislature; 
money  or  property  from 
other  sources;  interest 
on  investments  ;  semi- 
annual apportionments 
from  state  school  tui 
tion  tax 


1%  of  salary 


1%  of  salary  during 
first  10  years;  2%  dur- 
ing next  10  years  ;  3% 
after  20  years.  Maxi- 
mum of  $50  in  one  year 


$5  first  10  years  ;  $10 
succeeding 5  years;  $; 
succeeding  10  years 


50  cents  a  month  during 
first  5  years  ;  $1  a  month 
during  next  5  years  ; 
$1.50  during  the  next 
5  :  $3  a  month  after  15 
years  of  service 


first 5  years  ;  $10  next 
5  years  ;  $15  next  5 
years ;  $30  beyond  15 
years  of  service 


$10  first  15  years  ;  $20 
next  1G  years;  $25  next 
10  years;  $20  up  to  and 
including  fortieth  year 
of  service 


I 


TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS 


n 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1915-16 ' 


Retiring  Alloivances 
Amount  Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 
Requirement  Amount 


Refunds 
Cause  Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


$770.40 


$600 


$360 


$998.45 


A  sum 
equal  to  the 
amount  of 
the  annu- 
ity of  the 
first  year 


$400 


$400 


$450 


$600-$700 


$632.85 


$624.35 


$778.98 


$598.63 


$381.40 


$760.85 


$1267.52 


$747.44 


$680.32 


$500 


30  years,  15 
years  in  state 


$480  maximum 


25  years 


Amount  pur- 
chased by  the 
contributions 
of  an  equal  sum 
from  the  state, 
or  options 


One-half  of  av 
erage  annual 
salary  during 
last  5  years'of 
service.  Mini- 
mum, $400; 
maximum, 
a  year 


50%  of  average 
innual  salary 
during  last  6 
years  of  service 


$400  and  a  pro- 
portionate sum 
in  case  of  re- 
tirement after 
20  years  and  less 
than  35  years  of 
service 


30  years  and 
age  65,  or  35 
years,  20  in  city 
of  Wilmington 


$16  for  each 
year  of  service, 
with  $400  max- 
imum 


$400 


$600-$700  ac- 
cording to 
years  of  service 
above  85 


25  years,  15 
years  in  state 


35  years  or 
30  years  and 
age  60 


30  years,  20 
years  in  the 
city;  40  years  of 
service  up  to 
time  of  estab- 
lishment of  the 
fund 


30  years,  15 
years  in  city  at 
discretion  of 
Board; 35 
years,  15  years 
in  city,  or  65 
years  of  age, 
on  request 


25  years,  15 
years  in  state 


25  years,  16 
years  in  city 


25  years,  15 
years  in  city 


35  years,  23  in 
state 


60  years, 
men ;  65 
years, 
women 


60  volun- 
tarily; 
70  compul- 
sorily 


65 


65 


50 


Bodily  or  mental 
infirmity ;  15  years 
of  service 


Permanent  inca- 
pacity; 10  years' 
service 


Incapacity  for 
further  satisfac- 
tory service  after 
age  55 


Mental  or  physical 
incapacity  certified 
by  three  physicians 
appointed  by  the 
Board  of  Retire- 
ment ;  16  years  of 
service,  10  in  the 
city 


One-thirtieth  of 
full  pension  for 
each  year  of  service 
up  to  30  years 


Mental  or  physical 
disability  after  25 
years  of  service,  15 
years  in  city 


Incapacitated  for 
performance  of 
duty  after  20  years' 
service.  Medical 
examination  from 
time  to  time 


Incapacity  de- 
clared by  two  phy- 
sicians ;  15  years' 
service ;  must  pay 
a  total  of  $400  into 
the  fund 


Permanent  disabil- 
ity proved  by  three 
physicians  at  re- 
quest of  Board  of 
Trustees  after  15 
years  of  service 


Permanent  disabil- 
ity proved  by  three 
physicians  at  the 
request  of  the 
Board  of  Manage- 
ment after  15  years 
of  service 


Disability  proved 
by  medical  exam- 
nation  at  teacher's 
expense;  25  years 
of  service 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years 
served  are  to  30 
years 


maximum 


Same  basis  as  pen- 
sion 


Same  basis  as  pen- 
sions 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


$16  for  each  year  of 
service,  with  $400 
maximum 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


$350-$575  according 
to  years  of  service 
above  25 


IX,  p.  30 


IX,  p.  36 
XII,  pp.  87  ff. 


Withdraw- 
al from 
service  or 
death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
with  com- 
pound 
interest 


XII,  pp.  87  ff. 


Dismissal 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


Resigna- 
tion 


Death 


Two- 
thirds 
without 
interest 
One-half 
of  total 
contribu- 
tions 
without 
interest 


Ceasing  to 
teach  be- 
fore com- 
pleting 15 
years'  ser- 
vice 


50%  of 
amount 
contrib- 
uted with- 
out inter- 
est 


X,  p.  51  f. 


Resigna- 
tion before 
completing 
16  years  of 
service,  or 
dismissal 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions; 
the  total  in 
case  of  dis- 
missal 


VII,  pp.37,  38 


Resigna- 
tion before 
completing 
15  years  of 
service. 
Dismissal 
or  failure 
of  reap- 
pointment 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 

Total  con- 
tributions 


Leaving 
service  for 
any  reason 


Amount 
contrib- 
uted with- 
out inter- 
est 


X,  p.  52 


1  Based  on  Report  of  United  States  Commissioner  of  Education,  1917. 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Administration 


Board 


Including 
Teachers' 
Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Administra- 
tion 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


Indianapolis 


1907 


Terre  Haute 


Kansas 
Topeka 


Kentucky 
Louisville 


Cities  of  Second 
Class 
(Permissive) 


Louisiana 
New  Orleans 


Maine 


Maryland 


Allegany  Co. 


Baltimore  Co. 


Baltimore 


1913 


1931 


1912 


1914 


1910 


1913 


1908 


1912 


1912 


1908 


Board  of  Trus 
tees,  7  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 6  members 


Board  of  Edu- 
cation 


Trustees  of 
Teachers'  An- 
nuity Fund  of 
7  members 


Board  of  Insur- 
ance and  Annu 
ity  of  7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  7  mem- 
bers 


State  Superin- 
tendent of 
schools 


State  Board  of 
Education 


3  members 
elected  by 
public 
school 
teachers  of 
the  city 


3  members 
elected  by 
public 
school 
teachers  of 
the  city 


6  members 
employed 
in  the  ser- 
vice elect- 
ed by  teach- 
ers 


4  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


3  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


Board  of  Trus-  3  elected 
tees.  5  members  by  teachers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 9  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 7  members 


5  elected 
by  teachers 


3  elected 
by  teachers 


Compul- 
sory on 
teachers 
receiving 
$450  a  year 
or  more 


Optional 


Optional 


Remuneration 
to  the  Treas- 
urer paid  annu 
ally  out  of  the 
fund  as  decided 
by  the  Board 


Remuneration 
totheSecretary 
and   any  other 
employees 
fixed  by  the 
Board 


Compul- 
sory on 
teachers 
receiving 
$460  a  year 
or  more 


Optional 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory on 
teachers 
receiving 
$450  a  year 
or  more 


Optional 


Optional  to 
Jan.  1,1911 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


do. 


Compul- 
sory on 
teachers 
receiving 
$450  a  year 
or  more 


Compul- 
sory after 
passage 
and 

adoption 
of  the  act 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


do. 


Gifts,  grants,  devises, 
or  bequests,  a  tax  of  1 
cent  upon  $100  of  tax- 
able property  in  the 
city 


1%  of  salary  during 
first  15  years  of  service 
up  to  $10 ;  2%  of  salary 
after  first  16  years  up 
to  $20 


Gifts,  grants, devises,  or 
bequests  ;  a  tax  of  \i  of 
one  mill  upon  each  $1 
of  taxable  property 


Gifts,  etc.;  a  sum  from 
general  funds  of  not 
less  than  1%  times  the 
amount  of  the  assess- 
ments on  salaryand  not 
less  than  the  amount 
necessary  to  meet  the 
demands  of  the  fund 


Gifts,  grants,  devises, 
or  bequests,  etc. 


$1000  yearly  out  of 
funds  for  maintenance 
of  schools ;  a  levy  of  1 
cent  on  every  $100  of 
taxable  property; 
donations,  gifts,  etc. 


Gifts,  grants,  bequests 


State  appropriation  of 
$S000  a  year  first  year 
and  $25,000  annually 
thereafter 


State  appropriation  of 
$28,000  annually 


Gifts,  grants,  bequests: 
county  appropriations 
to  meet  the  expenses 
of  the  fund 


do. 


$10  a  year  for  first  12 
years  of  service  ;  $20  a 
year  for  next  8  years 
$25  a  year  for  10  years 
thereafter 


1-15^%  of  salary 


l%of  salaryduring  first 
15  years,  up  to  $10  a 
year  :  2%  up  to  $20  a 
year  thereafter 


1%  of  the  salaries  of 
teachers  during  first  10 
years  and  2%  there- 
after ;  maximum  $40  a 
year 


1%  of  salary  of  class- 
room teachers  during 
first  10  years  ;  1^%  dur- 
ing next  10  years ;  2% 
thereafter.  Non-class- 
room teachers  pay  2% 
of  salary 


1%  first  10  years;  \%% 
during  next  10  years; 
2%  thereafter.  Maxi- 
mum in  each  period 

$10,  $15,  $18 


1%  first  10  years:  \\i% 
during  next  10  years; 
2%  thereafter.  Maxi- 
mum in  each  period 
$14.40,  $21.60,  $28.80 


do. 


TEACHERS    PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Continued) 


*1 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 
Annual 
Salary 
1916-16 


Retiring  Allowances 


Amount 


Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 


Cause 


Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


At  least 
$250 


§510 


A  sum 
equal  to 
the  first 
year's  an- 
nuity if  re- 
tiring after 
30  years' 
service 


A  sum 
equal  tothe 
amount  of 
the  first 
year's  an- 
nuity 


A  sum 
equal  tothe 
amount  of 
the  first 
year's  an- 
nuity 


§610 
maximum 


A  sum 
equal  to 
the  amount 
of  the  first 
payment 


do. 


in 


§682.54 


§765.18 


§751.69 


§600  maximum. 
Proportionate 
pension  for  less 
than  40  years 
of  service 


§300-§600,  ac- 
cording to 
years  of  service 


$500 


§400  maximum. 
Proportionate 
pension  for  less 
than  40  years 
of  service 


30%  of  average 
salary  for  last 
5  years  of  ser- 
vice plus  2%  of 
this  salary  for 
each  year 
above  26  years. 
Maximum  60% 
or  §600 


§730.63 


§430.24 


§150-$260  ac- 
cording to 
length  of  ser- 
vice 


§561.06 


$557.00 


$739.00 


§693.32 


One-half  of  av 
erage  annual 
salary  for  last  5 
years  of  ser- 
vice. Minimum 
$300;  maximum 
$600 


§200 


50%  of  average 
annual  salary 
during  last  6 
years  of  ser- 
vice. Minimum 
$200;  maximum 
$400 


50%  of  average 
annual  salary 
during  last  5 
years  of  ser- 
vice. Minimum 
§360;  maximum 
§600 


do. 


40  years 


20  years  or 
more,  12  of 
which  may 
have  been 
outside 


30  years.  15 
years  in  thecity 
schools 


40  years  for  full 
pension,  30 
years  for  pro- 
portionate pen- 
sion. All  service 
must  be  in  the 
city 


25  years,  20  in 
the  state  and  15 
in  the  city  con- 
cerned 


40  years 


25-35  years,  20 
years  in  state 


25  years  ;  and 
physical  or 
mental  infirm- 
ity 


40  years,  20 
years  in  the 
county 


35  years,  20 
years  in  the 
county 


40  years,  20 
years  in  the 
city 


60 


60 


Aged,  infirm,  dis- 
eased, or  disabled 
teachers  after  15 
years  of  service 
and  examination 
by  a  physician  ;  to 
be  reexamined 
from  time  to  time 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


Disability  or  inca- 
pacity af  ter25years 
of  service,  15  years 
in  the  city  schools 


Disability  or  dis- 
ease after  20  years 
of  service  on  exam- 
ination by  a  physi 
cian 


Disability  after  15 
years  of  service  in 
the  state,  and  10  in 
the  city  concerned 
after  medical  ex- 
amination 


Disability  after  10 
years  of  service 
after  medical  ex- 
amination 


Disability  after  20 
years  of  service 
after  medical  ex- 
amination 


do. 


do. 


Withdraw- 
al from  ser- 
vice before 
receiving 
benefit 
from  the 
fund,  or  in 
case  of 
death 


W  ithdraw- 
al  from  ser- 
vice before 
completing 
20  years  of 
service,  or 
in  case  of 
death 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


Dismissal 

Withdraw- 
al from  ser- 
vice or 
death 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  of  the  total 
required 


Proportionate 
amount  of  full  pen 
sion  according  to 
length  of  service 


Proportionate 
amount  of  full  pen 
sion  according  to 
length  of  service 


Same  basis  as  sal- 
ary 


do. 


do. 


One-half  of 
the  total 
contribu- 
tions with 
out  inter- 
est 


Withdraw- 
al from  ser- 
vice 


Resigna- 
tion or  dis- 
missal 


Resigna- 
tion or 
death 


Ceasing  to 
teach  in 
the  county 
or  death 


do. 


do. 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


Total  con- 
tributions. 
One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 
without  in- 
terest 


Three- 
fourths  of 
contribu- 
tions with- 
out inter- 
est 


One-half  of 
contribu- 
tions 
without 
interest 


One-half  of 
contribu- 
tions 
without 
interest 


do. 


do. 


IX,  p.  37 


VII,  p.  33 


VII,  p.  26 
IX,pp.25,28f. 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Administration 


Board 


Including 
Teachers' 
Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Adminis- 
tration 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


Massachusetts 


Boston  (1) 


Boston  (2) 


Michigan 


Detroit 


Minnesota 


Duluth 


Minneapolis 


St.  Paul 


Missouri 
St.  Louis 


Montana 


1913 


1900 


1908 


1915 


1895 


1915 


1909 


1909 


1909 


1901 


1915 


Teachers'  Re- 
tirement 
Board,  7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 11  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 3  members 


State  Teachers 
Retirement 
Fund  Board,  6 
members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  the 
Teachers'  Re- 
tirement Fund, 
5  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 9  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 9  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 11  mem- 
bers 


Executive 
Committee, 
9  members 


Public  School 
Teachers'  Re- 
tirementSalary 
Fund  Board, 
3  members 


3  members 
elected  by 
the  benefi- 
ciaries 


6  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


At  least 
one  woman 
teacher. 
Appointed 
by  Gov- 
ernor 


3  teachers 
elected  by 
members  of 
the  fund 


3  elected  by 
the  mem- 
bers of  the 
retirement 
fund  asso- 
ciation 


Selected  by 
the  teach- 


5  elected  by 
the  teach- 


ers 


6  members 
elected  by 
the  mem- 
bers of  the 
fund 


5  members 
elected  by 
the  Teach- 
ers' Benev- 
olent Fund 
Association 


Annual  state 
appropriations 
according  to 
the  estimates 
for  expenses 


Maximum  of 
$1600  a  year 
appropriated 
by  the  city 


Not  less  than 
$1500  a  year  for 
Secretary,  and 
actual  ex- 
penses of  mem- 
bers of  the 
Board  paid  out 
of  the  fund 


Salary  of  Secre- 
tary and  all 
necessary  ex- 
penses paid  out 
of  the  fund 


Legislature 
makes  such  ap- 
propriations as 
may  be  neces- 
sary 


Optional 
up  to  Sept. 
30,  1914,  or 
thereafter 
on  paying 
arrearages 
with  inter- 
est 


Optional 


Optional 
within  1 
year  of  the 
passing  of 
the  act 


Optional  up 
to  Sept.  1, 
1917 


Optional 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Optional  up 
to  Jan.  1, 
1916 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


State  appropriation, 
annually 


Gifts  and  legacies 


Annual  appropriation 
by  city  of  5  cents  on 
each  $1000  of  the  valua- 
tion of  the  city 


Donations,  gifts,  lega- 
cies, etc.;  income  from 
investments 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  bequests,  etc.; 
appropriations  by  the 
Board  of  Education  or 
the  Common  Council 
and  the  Board  of  Esti- 
mates Reductions  from 
teachers'  salaries  for 
absence,  etc.;  and  tui- 
tion of  non-residents 


Donations,  gifts,  lega- 
cies, bequests,  etc.;  in- 
terest on  investments; 
one-tenth  of  one  mill  on 
all  taxable  property  in 
the  state 


One- tenth  of  money  re- 
ceived each  year  from 
property  tax 


do. 


do. 


Gifts,  donations,  be- 
quests, interest  on 
investments 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  and  bequests;  in- 
come and  interest  from 
investments 


3%  to  7%  of  salary;  not 
less  than  $36,  nor  more 
than  $100 


$3  from  every  alternate 
monthly  payment 


WJo  of  salary  (up  to  $5) 
in  first  6  years;  1%  (up 
to  $10)  next  10  years; 
2%  (up  to  $20)  next  16 
years 


1%  to  3%  of  salary  up 
to  $1000  salary  a  year 


$5  first  6  years;  $10  sec 
ond  5  years;  $20  next  10 
years;  $25  next  5  years 


$10  first  6  years,$20  next 
5  years,  and  $25  up  to  30 
years 


0first5years:$20next 
5  years ;  $25  up  to  end  of 
30  years  of  service 


Initiation  fee  $5;  1%  of 
salary  up  to  $25  per 
year 


Members  before  Oct. 12, 
1907,  pay  1%  of  salary 
for  30  or  25  years ;  others 
pay  1%  of  salary  up  to 
$15  a  year  for  35  years 


$1  a  month,  up  to  and 
including  25  years 


TEACHERS   PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Continued) 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1915-16 


Retiring  Allowances 


Amount 


Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 


Cause 


Amount 


Discussion  in 

Carnegie 

Foundation 

Reports 


From  $1050 
to  $3000    in 
30  contri- 
butions 


$640 


$425  maxi- 
mum or  at 
least  60% 
of  the 
prospective 
annuity  for 
1  year 


$800.18 


$1337.59 


Annuity  pur- 
chased by  con- 
tributions and 
an  equal  sum 
from  the  state ; 
or  options 


do. 


$605.47 


$660 


Maximum 

$625 


$300 


$969.78 


$521.52 


$895.80 


$1122.28 


$1081.41 


$702.43 


Determined 
each  year  by 
the  Board  of 
Trustees.  Max- 
imum  $1,80 


30  years 


30  years,  10 
years  in  the 
city 


One-third  of 
salary  at  time 
of  retirement; 
minimum  $312, 
maximum  $600 


One-half  aver- 
age annual  sal 
ary  for  6  years 
preceding  re- 
tirement. Min. 
$200;  max.  $50( 
Proportionate 
amount  for  ser- 
vice from  26  to 
30  years 


$330 


$350-$500 
according  to 
years  of 
service 


$333.33-$500 
according  to 
years  of  service 
from  20  to  30 
years 


$333.33-$500  ac- 
cording to  years 
of  service  from 
20  to  30  years 


$480 


Annual  appro- 
priation made 
and  divided 
equally  among 
annuitants 


$600 


30  years,  10  in 
the  city 


30  years,  15  in 
the  state 


30  years,  20  in 
city  or  25  years 
in  city  onappli 
cation;25  years, 
16  in  city,  at 
discretion  of 
Board 


20  years,  10 
years  in  the 
state 


20  years 


20  years 


25  years,  15 
years  in  the 
city 


Members  be- 
fore Oct.  12, 
1907,  30  years 
for  men,  25  for 
women,  15 
years  in  city. 
Other  members 
35  years'  ser- 
vice and  16 
years  in  Asso- 
ciation 


25  years,  15 
years  in  the 
state 


Voluntary 
at  60  ;  com- 
pulsory at 
70 


66 


Inability  to  render 
satisfactory  service 
after  15  years  of 
service 


Incapacity  certi- 
fied by  2  physi- 
cians ;  2  years  of 
service 


Incapacity.  Same 
requirement  of  ser 
vice  as  for  pension 


Physically  or  men- 
tally incapable  in 
judgment  of  em- 
ploying board ;  15 
years  of  service 


Incapacity  in  judg- 
ment of  Board.  20 
years  of  service,  10 
in  city 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity;  15 
years'  service 


Incapacity  after  2 
years 


Incapacity  after  2 
years  of  service 


Incapacity  after  5 
years  of  service  de- 
termined by  3  phy- 
sicians 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity,  by  vote 
of  Board 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity;  15 
years'  service 


Same  basis  as  pen- 
sion 


Same  basis  as  pen- 
sion 


One-thirtieth  of 
full  annuity  multi 
plied  by  years  of 
service 


Same  as  retiring 
allowance 


One-twentieth  of 
the  full  annuity 
for  each  year 


An  amount  deter- 
mined by  the 
Board 


An  amount  deter- 
mined by  the 
Board 


Same  ratio  to  full 
pension  as  years 
of  service  to  total 
required 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years 
served  are  to  25 
years 


Withdraw 
al  from  ser- 
vice before 
retirement 
age;  or  in 
case  of 
death 


Resigna- 
tion from 
service 
after  2 
years 


Withdraw 
al  from  ser 
vice  before 
retirement 
age 


Resigna- 
tion or  dis 
missal  for 
cause 


Resigna- 
tion from 
service  or 
death  be- 
fore receiv 
ing  pension 


Discharge 

Resigna- 
tion 


Withdraw 
al  from  ser- 
vice 


Discharge 
from  ser- 
vice 

Resigna- 
tion 


Amount 
contrib- 
uted with 
compound 
interest  at 
3% 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 


50%  of  the 
amount 
contrib- 
uted 
without 
interest 


Not  to  ex 
ceed  50%  of 
contribu- 
tions at  dis 
cretion  of 
Board 


60%  of  the 
amount 
contrib- 
uted with- 
out interest 


All  the  con- 
tributions 
without  in- 
terest. One- 
half  the 
contribu- 
tions with- 
out interest 


An  amount 
equal  to  the 
total  con- 
tributions 


Total  con- 
tributions 

Half  of 
total 
contribu- 
tions 


VIII,  p.  46 
IX,  p.  28 


VII,  p.  41 
IX,  p.  25 


VII,  p.  41 


X,  p.  53 


X,  pp.  53  f. 


VII,  p.  36 
IX,  p.  36 


X,  p.  64 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Administration 


Board 


Including 

Teachers7 

Represen- 

ta tives 


Expenses  of 
Adminis- 
tration 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Teachers'1  Annual 
Contributions 


Nebraska 
Omaha 


Nevada 


New  Hampshire 


New  Jersey  (1) 


New  Jersey  (2) 


New  York 


Albany 


Buffalo 


Cohoes 


Mt.  Vernon 


1909 


1915 


1915 


1896 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  the 
Teachers'  Re- 
tirement Fund. 
9  members 


1903 


1911 


1907 


1896 


1908 


1909 


Board  of  Edu- 
cation 


State  Board  of 
Education 


State  Superin- 
tendent of 
Instruction 


Commissioner 
of  Education 


State  Teachers' 
Retirement 
Fund  Board, 
5  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 3  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 5  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 7  members 


Board  of  Edu- 
cation 


5  teachers 
nominated 
by  elected 
delegates 
and  ap- 
pointed by 
the  Gov- 
ernor 


3  represen- 
tatives ap- 
pointed by 
the  Com- 
missioner 
of  Educa- 
tion 


2  members 
of  teachers 
associa- 
tions ex 
officio 


5  teachers 
elected  by 
the  teach- 
ers 


Clerical  and 
other  expenses 
paid  by  the 
state  up  to 
$1500  per 
annum 


Maximum  of 
$2000  annually 
for  Secretary 
out  of  the 
funds;  also 
actual  ex- 
penses of 
members  of  the 
Board 


Optional  up 
to  Oct.  1, 
1915 


Optionalup 
to  Jan.  1, 
1909 


Compul- 
sory after 
date  on 
which  the 
act  came 
into  effect 


Optional 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Grant  of  one  and  one- 
half  times  the  amount 
of  teachers  contribu- 
tions each  year 


1%  of  salary 


An  ad  valorem  tax  of  3 
mills  on  the  $100  of  all 
taxable  property  in  the 
state.  Donations,  lega- 
cies, gifts,  and  be- 
quests, and  interest 
and  income  from  in- 
vestments 


Annual  state  appropri- 
ation 


i  a  year 


Donations,  gifts,  lega- 
cies, bequests,  etc.,  and 
interest  from  invest- 
ments 


Deductions  from  the 
annual  apportionment 
to  counties  for  school 
purposes 


State  appropriations 
to  carry  out  purposes 
of  the  law;  donations, 
legacies,  gifts,  etc.,  in- 
terest from  invest- 
ments; districts  and 
cities  contribute  an 
amount  equal  to  the 
sum  contributed  by  the 
teachers  employed  by 
them 


Donations,  legacies, 
etc.,  5%  of  excise 
moneys 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  bequests,  etc.; 
annual  appropriations 
by  the  common  council 
of  city  of  a  sum  not  ex- 
ceeding the  teachers 
contributions  of  the 
preceding  year 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts;  a  sum  equal  to 
3%  of  salary  roll  from 
excise  moneys;  forfeit- 
ures and  deductions  of 
salaries 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts;  5%  of  excise 
moneys  of  the  city; 
deductions  and  for- 
feitures from  salary 


2%  of  salary  first  10 
years;  iWJo  next  5 
years;  3%  next  5 years, 
Not  more  than  $50  in  1 
year 


1%  of  salary 


1%  of  salary 


1%  to  2%  of  salary 


1%  of  salary.  Maximum 
$100  a  year 


1%  of  salary 


I 


p 


TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Continued) 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1916-16 


Retiring  Allowances 


Amount 


Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 
Cause         Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


$854.29 


$500 


Voluntary 
after  35  years' 
service,  20 
years  in  city; 
compulsory 
after  40  years 


Disability  after  26 
years'  service 


$782.86 


$500 


30  years,  15  in 
the  state 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity  for 
work  after  15  years' 
service  in  the 
state 


$486.80 


60%  of  average 
annual  salary, 
for  5  years  pre- 
ceding retire- 
ment 


30  years,  15 

years  in  the 

state ; 

35  years 

Must  hold  state 

certificate 


55  women 
60  men 


Maximum 
$1000  or  at 
least  as 
much  as 
the  first 
year's  an- 
nuity 


$861.86 


60%  of  average 
annual  salary 
for  last  6  years 
of  service. 
Minimum  $250; 
maximum  $650 


20  years  in 
state,  and  in- 
capacitated for 
service 


$861.86 


One-half  of 
average  annual 
salary  for  5 
years  preced- 
ing retirement 


35  years  in  pub 
lie  school  work 
25  years  in  the 
state;  or  70 
years  of  age 
and  last  20 
years'  service 
in  state;  or  32 
years'  service 
in  state  and  75 
years  of  age 


An  amount 
of  at  least 
50%  of  the 
expected 
annuity 


$967.20 


One-hal  f  of 
average  annual 
salary  during  5 
years  preced- 
ing retirement 
Maximum  $600 


25  years,  15 
years  in  the 
state 


A  sum 
equal  to 
30%  of  sal- 
ary for  last 
5  years  of 
service 


$756.62 


do. 


30  years  in  city 


A  sum 
equal  to 
40%  of  sal- 
ary at  time 
of  retire- 
ment 


$881.30 


One-half  of  sal- 
ary at  time  of 
retirement 
with  a  maxi- 
mum of  $800 


30  years,  wo- 
men,  24  years  in 
city;  35  years, 
men,  28  years  in 
city 


An  amount 
equal  to 
20%  of  sal- 
ary at  time 
of  retire- 
ment. Max- 
imum $300 


70 


One-half  of  sal- 
ary at  time  of 
retirement. 
Maximum  $500 


30  years,  15  in 
city, on  request; 
40  years,  16  in 
city,  compulso- 
rily 


A  sum 
equal  to 
30%  of 
annuity 


$949.85 


One-half  of  sal 
ary  at  time  of 
retirement. 
Maximum  $800 


25  years,  wo- 
men; 30  years, 
men;  16  years 
in  city 


70 


75 


Enforced  retire- 
ment thru  disabil- 
ity 


Physical  disability 
after  36  years'  ser- 
vice in  state  and 
age  70  years 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity;  15 
years'  service,  9 
years  in  state 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity  after 
20  years'  service 


Permanent  inca- 
pacity for  efficient 
service.  20  years' 
service  for  women ; 
25  years  for  men ; 
four-fifths  of  period 
in  city 


Mental  or  physical 
incapacity  after  20 
years'  service,  15  in 
city 


Mental  or  physical 
incapacity  after  20 
years'  service,  10  in 
city 


Proportionate 
allowance  of  full 
pension 


An  annual  amount 
in  same  ratio  of  f u 1 1 
pension  as  years  of 
service  are  of  30 
years 


Same  proportion  of 
full  pension  as 
years  of  service  are 
of  total  service 
required 


Same  as  pension 


Same  proportion  of 
full  pension  as 
years  of  service  are 
of  25  years 


Same  proportion  of 
full  pension  as 
years  of  service  are 
of  25  years 


Same  basis  as  full 
pension 


Proportional  al- 
lowance of  full 
pension  according 
to  years  of  service 


Proportional  allow- 
ance of  full  pension 
for  years  of  service 


IX,  p.  36 


X,  pp.  54  f. 


X,  p.  55 


VII,  p.  27 

IX,  pp.  28  f. 

X,  pp.  62  f.,  92 


VII,  p.  27 

IX,  pp.  28  f. 

X,  p.  92 


VII,  p.  30 


VII.  pp.  30-33 


Failure  to 
be  reap- 
pointed 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without  in- 
terest 


Dismissal 
for  cause 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


Discharge 
or  failure 
to  be  re- 
appointed 


do. 


VII,  pp.  30-33 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Administration 


Board 


Including 
Teachers' 
Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Administra- 
tion 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


New  York 


Rochester 


Syracuse 


Westchester  Co. 


North  Dakota 


Ohio 
Cincinnati 
Cleveland 
Columbus 
Dayton 
Hamilton 
Springfield 
Toledo 
Tiffin 
Younsrstown 


Oregon 
Portland 


Pennsylvania 


1917 


1905 


1897 


Board  of  Edu- 
cation 


1909 


Board  of  5  ap- 
pointed by 
county  judge 


1913 


1911 


1911 


1917 
(Effec- 
tive 
1919) 


BoardofRetire- 
ment,  7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  the 
Teachers'  In- 
suranceandRe- 
tirement  Fund. 
5  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 3-7  mem- 
bers 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 11  mem- 
bers 


Retirement 
Board,  7  mem- 
bers 


3  members 
elected  by 
the  teach- 


2  members 
in  service 
elected  by 
the  teach- 
ers 


Superin- 
tendent or 
principal 


3  members 
appointed 
by  the  Gov 
em  or  from 
teachers 


4-5  mem- 
bers elect- 
ed by  the 
teachers 


6  members 
elected  by 
members  of 
the  Teach- 
ers' Retire- 
ment Fund 
Association 


3  teachers 
elected  by 
members  of 
the  retire- 
ment asso- 
ciation 


Annual  appro- 
priations by 
city  according 
to  estimates 
for  expenses 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul 
sory 


Annual  appropriations 
to  accumulate  areserve 
for  each  teacher  to  fur- 
nish half  of  the  retiring 
allowance,  and  death 
benefits 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Maximum  of 
$1200  annually 
for  Secretary 
out  of  the  fund 
also  actual  ex- 
penses of  mem- 
bers of  the 
Board 


Optional 
up  to  Jan. 
1, 1914 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


State  appro- 
priations ac- 
cording to 
estimates  of 
the  Board 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Such  percentage  of  sal- 
ary as  will  accumulate 
to  provide  half  of  the 
retiring  allowance; 
minimum  of  3%  of  sal- 
ary for  those  in  service 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  etc.;  annual  ap- 
propriations by  city  of 
one-half  of  teachers' 
contributions,  etc. 


Deductions  for  ab- 
sence; donations,  lega- 
cies, gifts;  and  other 
sources 


Donations,  legacies, 
etc.;  appropriations 
not  exceeding  total  of 
teachers'  assessments 


A  fund  of  ten  cents  for 
each  child  of  school  age 
in  each  county 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  and  bequests; 
1%  to  2%  of  gross  re- 
ceipts of  taxation 
raised  by  the  board  of 
education;  deductions 
for  absence,  etc. 


Gifts  and  donations: 
3%  of  taxes  levied  for 
school  purposes:  fines 
and  forfeitures  on 
teachers 


State  appropriations  to 
accumulate  a  reserve 
for  each  teacher  to 
furnish  half  the  retir- 
ing allowance 


2%  of  salary 


Maximum  of  1%  of  sal- 
ary 


1%  of  salary 


l%of  salary  during  the 
first  10  years  up  to  $20; 
2%  during  the  next  15 
years  up  to  $40 


$2  a  month  from  salary 


$1  a  school  month  dur- 
ing the  first  10  years; 
$2  a  school  month  dur- 
ing the  next  10  years; 
$3  a  school  month  for 
10  years  following 


An  annual  sum  up  to 
5%  of  salary  (maximum 
$2000)  actuarially  de- 
termined to  yield  about 
half  of  retiring  allow 
ance 


I 


TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Continued) 


l&' 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1915-16 


Retiring  Alloivances 


Amount 


Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 
Cause         Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


$1261.41 


Amount 
equal  to 
50%  of 
annuity 
expected 


40%  of  sal- 
ary at  time 
of  retire- 
ment 


$860.25 


A  sum 
equal  to 20% 
of  salary 
at  time  of 
retirement 


A  sum 
equal  at 
least  to  full 
amount 
of  the 
annuity 
expected. 
Maximum 


$600 


$689.41 


$574.76 


$528.88 


$1222.18 


$470.18 


Annuity  equal 
to  half  of  aver- 
age salary  dur- 
ing last  10  years 
of  service,  pur- 
chased with 
accumulations 
of  contribu- 
tions from  city 
and  teacher ;  or 
options 


One-half  of  sal- 
ary at  time  of 
retirement 
with  a  maxi- 
mum of 


do. 


One-half  of 
annual  salary 
in  5  years  pre- 
ceding retire- 
ment. Maxi- 
mum $600; 
superintendent 
or  principal 
$800 


One-fiftieth  of 
average  salary 
for  five  years 
preceding  re- 
tirement multi 
plied  by  total 
years  of  ser- 
vice. Maxi- 
mum $750 


$12.50  for  each 
year  of  service, 
with  a  maxi- 
mum of  $450 


$333.33Ms  at  end 
of  20  years 
service  plus 
$16.66%  for 
each  additional 
year  of  service. 
Maximum  $500 


Annuity  pur- 
chased with  ac- 
cumulated con- 
tributions and 
from  state  one- 
one-hundred 
sixtieth  for 
each  yearof  ser- 
vice; or  options 


35  years  of  ser- 
vice or  age,  as 
in  next  column 


20  years,  wo- 
men, 25  years, 
men ;  15  years 
in  city,  in  case 
of  dismissal  or 
compulsory  re- 
tirement. Vol- 
untarily, SO 
years  for  wo- 
men, 35  years 
for  men;  15 
years  in  city 


do. 


25  years,  10  in 
county 


25  years,  18 
years  in  state 


30  years,  15  in 
city  paying  the 
pension 


30  years 


65  volunta- 
rily; 70 
compulso- 
rily 


62  volunta- 
rily; 70com- 
pulsorily 


Mental  or  physical 
incapacity  for  per- 
formance of  duty 
after  10  years  of 
service;  periodical 
medical  examina- 
tion required 


Mental  or  physical 
incapacity;  15 
years  of  service,  6 
years  in  county 


Permanent  mental 
or  physical  disabil- 
ity; 15  years  of 
service 


Physical  or  mental 
disability;  20  years 
of  service.  10  in  city 
paying  the  pen- 
sion ;  vote  of  a  ma- 
jority of  Board  of 
Trustees 


Total  disability 
after  20  years  of 
service,  10  years  in 
city 


Disability  after  10 
years  of  service ; 
periodical  medical 
examination  re- 
quired 


Annuity  purchased 
by  teachers'  ac- 
cumulations, and 
pension  from  city 
of  one-fifth  of  aver- 
age salary  during 
last  10  years  of  ser- 
vice for  each  year 
of  service 


Resigna- 
tion, dis- 
missal, or 
death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
with  com- 
pound in- 
terest, plus 
half  of  final 
salary  in 
case  of 
death 


VII,  pp.  39-41 

VIII,pp.53-55 

IX,  p.  39 

X,  pp.  59  ff. 

XI,  pp.  112  fif. 

XII,  pp.  87  ff., 
106  ff. 


Discharge 
or  failure 
to  be  re- 
appointed 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
nterest 


do. 


do. 


Same  ratio  of  full 
pension  as  years  of 
service  are  of  total 
required 


do. 


do. 


Same  basis  as  in 
case  of  full  pension 


Withdraw- 
al before 
retirement 


One-hal  f  of 
the  sum 
contrib- 
uted with- 
out inter- 
est 


IX,  pp.  28, 31 


Same  basis  as  re- 
tiring allowance 


Failure  to 
be  reap- 
pointed be- 
fore com- 
pleting 20 
years  of 
service 
Resigna- 
tion 


Total  con- 
tributions 


Half  of  to- 
tal contri- 
butions 


VII,  p.  37 
IX,  p.  36 


Same  as  retiring 
allowance 


Failure  to 
be  reap- 
pointed or 
discharge 
Resigna- 
tion 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 
Any  sum  in 
excess  of 
$300  without 
interest 


Annuity  purchased 
with  accumulated 
contributions,  and 
from  state  one- 
ninetieth  of  final 
salary  for  each  year 
of  service.  Mini- 
mum 30%;  maxi- 
mum eight-ninths 
of  final  salary 


Resigna- 
tion, dis- 
missal, or 
death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
with  com- 
pound in- 
terest, or 
an  annuity 
purchased 
therewith 


XII,  p.  110 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish 
ment 


Administration 


Board 


Including 
Teachers' 

Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Adminis- 
tration 


Membership 


Teachers 

already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Erie 


Harrisburg 


Philadelphia 


1916 


l'.NIS 


Scranton 


Rhode  Island 


Newport 


Providence 


South  Carolina 
Charleston 


Tennessee 
Chattanooga 


Utah 

Permissive  in 
cities  of  first  or 
second  class 


Salt  Lake  City 


1907 


Teachers'  Re- 
tirement 
Board,  5  mem- 
bers 


2  teachers 
elected  by 
the  Teach- 
ers' Retire- 
ment Asso- 
ciation 


Retirement 
Board,  5  mem- 
bers 


1911 


1907 


1898 


1897 


1898 


1915 


1917 


1909 


Retirement 
Board,  6  mem- 
bers 


2  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


2  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


Annual  appro- 
priations by 
Board  of  School 
Directors 
according  to 
estimates  for 
expenses 


Retirement 
Board,  7  mem- 
bers 


State  Board  of 
Education 


Board  of  Trus 
tees,  7  members 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees, 8  members 


Board  of  Trus 
tees,  3  members 


Board  of  Com- 
missioners 


Local  Retire- 
tirement  Com- 
missions, 3 
members 


Retirement 
Commission,  7 
members 


3  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


3  elected  by 
teachers 


3  elected  by 
teachers 


1  member 
elected  by 
teachers 


3  members 
elected  by 
the  mem- 
bers of  the 
retirement 
associa- 
tions 


3  members 
elected  by 
teachers 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory except 
where 
teacher  re- 
ceives only 
the  mini- 
mum salary 
under  state 
law 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory as  for 
teachers  in 
service 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Optional 


No  compensa- 
tion for  Com- 
missioners or 
officers 


No  compensa- 
tion for  Com- 
missioners or 
officers 


Optional 
for  30  days 
after  local 
organiza- 
tion 


Optional 
for  30  days 
after  local 
organiza- 
tion 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


Annual  appropriations  3%  to  7%  of  salary;  not 
by  Board  of  School  Di-  less  than  $35,  nor  more 


rectors  in  accordance 
with  estimates 


Annual  appropriation 
by  Board  of  School  Di- 
rectors of  a  sum  equal 
to  the  amount  of  teach- 
ers contributions;  any 
other  funds 


Annual  appropriation 
of  a  sum  equal  to  the 
amount  of  teachers 
contributions.  Mini- 
mum $50,000 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Compul- 
sory 


Annual  appropriation 
by  Board  of  School  Di- 
rectors of  a  sum  equal 
to  the  amount  of  teach- 
ers contributions;  any 
other  funds 


Annual  appropriations 
to  carry  out  the  pur- 
poses of  the  act 


Donations,  legacies, 
bequests,  etc. ;  appro- 
priations 


than  §100 


2%  of  salary  during  the 
first  ten  years;  3% of 
salary  thereafter.  Max 
imum  in  one  year  $50 


l%of  salary  during  first 
ten  years  of  service ; 
2%  of  salary  thereafter 
Maximum  in  one  year 
$50 


$9  a  year  during  first 
10  years ;  $15  a  year  sub- 
sequently for  20  years 


1%  of  salary 


Donations,  legacies, 
bequests,  etc. 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  bequests, etc. ;  8% 
of  gross  income  of  the 
special  school  fund 
paid'on  the  one  mill  tax 
until  1927 


Local  taxes 


Donations,  legacies, 
bequests,  etc.;  deduc- 
tions for  absences, 
etc. 


Donations,  legacies, 
bequests, etc.;  deduc- 
tions for  absences,  etc. 


1%  of  salary 


1%  of  salary  with  max- 
imum of  $12  a  year 


1%  of  salary  with  max- 
imum of  $12  a  year 


TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Continued) 


H 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1915-16 


Retiring  Allowances 


Amount 


Basis 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Allowances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 
Cause  Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


25  pay- 
ments 


25  pay- 
ments 


OS 


$714.83 


Annuity  pur- 
chased by  con- 
tributions and 
an  equal  sum 
from  the  city 


One-half  of  an 
nual  salary  at 
date  of  retire- 
ment. Mini-  , 
mum  $300; 
maximum 


$946.52 


Maximum 


$652.77 


$721.91 


$580.05 


$784.54 


$553.52 


.11 


$724.92 


$866.46 


One-half  of  an- 
nual salary  at 
date  of  retire- 
ment. Mini- 
mum $400 ;  max- 
imum $800. 
Smaller  pen- 
sions may  be 
supplemented 
out  of  E!kin 
Fund 


Maximum  $500 


One-half  of 
average  annual 
salary  for  five 
years  preced- 
ing retirement. 
Maximum  $500 


One-half  of  an- 
nual salary  at 
time  of  retire- 
ment. Maxi- 
mum $600 


do. 


One-half  of  an- 
nual salary  at 
time  of  retire- 
ment. Maxi- 
mum $260 


Two-thirds  of 
salary  in  last 
year  of  service 


One-half  of 
average  annual 
salary  during 
last  5  years  of 
service.  Maxi- 
mum $600 


One-half  of  av- 
erage annual 
salary  during 
last  5  years  of 
service.  Maxi- 
mum $600 


30  years 


60 


30  years,  20  in 
city 


30  years,  20  in 
city;  if  physi- 
cally or  men- 
tally incapaci 
tated,  or  age  60 


30  years,  15 
years  in  city 


35  years,  25 
years  in  state. 
Must  hold  state 
teacher's  certi- 
ficate 


30  years,  15  in 
city 


35  years,  men, 
30  years,  wo- 
men ;  20  years 
in  city 


25  years ;  need 
of  maintenance 
must  be  proved 


30  years 


30  years,  10 
years  in  state 


60 


60 


Physical  or  mental 
disability  after  15 
years  of  service 


Disability;  5  years 
of  service 


Disability ;  5  years  One-thirtieth  of 
of  service  full  annuity  for 

each  year  of  service 


Same  basis  as  retir- 
ing allowance 


One-thirtieth  of 
full  annuity  for 
each  year  of  ser- 
vice 


60 


60 


30  years,  10 
years  in  state 


60 


Total  disability;  6 
years  of  service ; 
re-examination  by 
physician 


Physical  or  mental 
incapacity  after  10 
years  of  service, 
after  medical 
examination 


do. 


Physical  or  mental 
disability;  30  years 
of  service,  10  in 
state 


Physical  or  mental 
disability;  30  years 
of  service,  10  in 
state 


Same  basis  as 
pension 


do. 


One-half  of  average 
annual  salary  dur- 
ng  5  years  preced- 
ing retirement. 
Maximum  $600 


One-hal  f  of  average 
annual  salary  dur- 
ng  5  years  preced- 
ing retirement. 
Maximum  $600 


With- 
drawal 
or  death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
with  com- 
pound in- 
terest 


Dismissal 


Dismissal 


In  case  of 
death 


In  case  of 
death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


A  sum 
varying 
from  total 
amount  to 
one- third  of 
contribu- 
tions 

according 
to  years  of 
service 


Total 
amount 
of  contri- 
butions 


Total 
amount 
of  contri- 
butions 


XI,  p.  109 


VII,  pp.  42,  43 


VII,  p.  27 


XI,  p.  109 


VII,  p.  36 
IX,  p.  32 

XII,  p.  94 


TABULAR  STATEMENT  OF 


State 


Date  of 
the  Es- 
tablish- 
ment 


Administration 
Board 


Including 
Teachers' 
Represen- 
tatives 


Expenses  of 
Adminis- 
tration 


Membership 


Teachers 
already  in 

Service 


New 
Teachers 


Source  of  Funds 


State,  etc. 


Teachers'  Annual 
Contributions 


Vermont 


Virginia 


West  Virginia 
Wheeling 


Wisconsin 


Milwaukee 


1913 


1908 


State  Board 
of  Education 


1916 


1911 


1909 


Public  School 
Teachers' 
Annuity  and 
Retirement 
Fund  Trustees, 
9  members 


Board  of  Man- 
agers, 7  mem- 
bers 


2  members 
elected  by 
members  of 
the  retire- 
ment asso- 
ciation 


Actual  ex- 
penses of  mem- 
bers of  the 
Board  paid  out 
of  the  fund 


Board  of  Trus 
tees,  7  members 


2  teachers 
elected 


Clerk  of  Board 
receives  2%  of 
annual  receipts 


Board  of  Trus- 
tees of  the 
Teachers'  In- 
surance and 
Retirement 
Fund,  5  mem- 
bers 


3  members 
elected  by 
the  mem- 
bers of  the 
fund 


Maximum  of 
$1200  annually 
for  Secretary, 
and  actual 
expenses  of 
members  of 
the  Board  to 
be  paid  out  of 
the  fund 


4  teachers 


Donations,  legacies, 
gifts,  etc.;  state  appro- 
priation not  exceeding 
$10,000  annually; 
income  and  interest 
from  investments 


State  appropriation  of 
$5000 :  legacies,  be- 
quests, etc. ;  income 
and  interest  from 
investments 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Gifts  and  donations; 
appropriations  of 
Board  to  meet  the 
requirements 


Optional  up 
to  Sept.  1, 
1912 


Compul- 
sory 


Optional 


Compul- 
sory 


Donations,  legacies, 
etc.;  state  to  make  up 
deficit  out  of  school 
funds 


Gifts  and  legacies;  in- 
come and  interest  from 
investments;  and  at 
the  discretion  of  Board 
of  School  Directors  a 
sum  not  to  exceed  1% 
of  the  gross  amount 
of  the  school  fund  in 
one  year 


Fixed  by  local  author- 
ities 


1%  of  salary 


1%  of  salary  during 
first  10  years  up  to  $15 ; 
2%  but  not  more  than 
$30  during  next  15  years 


:  a  month 


I 


wn 


TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  (Concluded) 


Amount  of 
Total  Con- 
tributions 


Average 

Annual 

Salary 

1915-16 


Retiring  Allowances 


Amount 


Ha. fix 


Service 


Age 


Disability  Alloivances 


Requirement 


Amount 


Refunds 
Cause  Amount 


Discussion  in 
Carnegie 

Foundation 
Reports 


40%  of  the 

expected 

annuity 


30%  of  av 
erage  an- 
nual salary 
during  last 
5  years  of 
service 


$600 


Maximum 

$600 


$500 


$422.72 


$341.90 


$685.85 


$545.00 


$983.62 


One-half  of  the 
largest  salary 
received  by 
beneficiary 
during  service 
in  the  state. 
Maximum  $600 


One-half  of  av- 
erage annual 
salary  during 
last  5  years  of 
service.  Maxi- 
mum $600 


$360 


$12.50  for  each 
year  of  service. 
Maximum 


$400 


25  years  in  the 
state ;  30  years 
total,  20  years 
in  the  state 


30  years  in  the 
state 


60 


Age  or  infirmities 


58  men 
50  women 


30  years,  20 
years  in  the 
city 


25  years,  18 
years  in  the 
state 


25  years,  15 
years  in  the 
city 


65 


Physical  or  mental 
disability  certified 
by  State  Board  of 
Health  and  Board 
of  Education 


Total  disability 
after  20  years 
of  service  at 
discretion  of 
Board 


Physical  or  mental 
disability ;  18  years 
of  service 


Incapacity,  certi- 
fied by  2  physi- 
cians ;  15  years  of 
service 


Discretionary 


Same  basis  as 
pension 


Same  basis  as 
pension 


Same  basis  as 
pension 


At  discretion  of 
Trustees  if  tempo- 
rary ;  if  permanent 
one-twenty-fifth  of 
full  annuity  for 
each  year  of  service 


Resigna- 
tion, dis- 
missal, or 
death 


Resigna- 
tion, dis- 
missal, or 
death 


Resigna- 
tion, dis- 
missal, or 
death 


Total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 
without 
interest 


One-half  of 
total  con- 
tributions 


IX,  p.  32 


VII,  p.  26 


XI,  p.  110 


VII,  pp.  26,  27 

IX,  p.  28 

XII,  p.  94 


SUMMARY  OF  TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS 

A  study  of  67  pension  plans  for  teachers  in  the  United  States,  representing  twenty-five 
states  and  sixty-four  counties  and  cities,  shows  that  the  movement  for  such  pensions 
is  recent  but  widespread,  and  still  extending.  Generally  the  systems  are  administered 
by  special  boards,  in  which  the  teachers  constitute  a  majority.  Provision  is  as  a  rule 
made  for  retirement  on  the  basis  of  service  and  of  disability,  but  usually  only  for  teach- 
ers entering  the  service  after  the  establishment  of  the  system.  Funds  are  in  most  cases 
provided  by  teachers  contributions  and  by  public  appropriations  in  approximately 
equal  amounts,  but  the  funds  arranged  for  are  frequently  insufficient  to  pay  the  pen- 
sions that  have  been  promised. 

The  first  system  of  teachers  pensions  to  be  established  in  the  United  States  was  that 
of  Chicago,  which  was  inaugurated  in  1893.  Before  the  year  1900  seven  other  systems 
had  been  founded.  Before  1910  there  were  23  more.  More  than  half  of  all  of  the  sys- 
tems (36),  however,  have  come  into  existence  since  the  beginning  of  1910.  Our  general 
experience  concerning  teachers  pensions,  therefore,  is  still  very  brief, — and  this  in 
spite  of  the  fact  that  there  are  some  questions  concerning  pensions  that  experience 
alone  can  answer.1 

There  are  now  state  wide  pension  systems  for  teachers  in  21  states,  permissive  sys- 
tems in  4  others,  and  local  systems  in  9  more.  Thus  34  states  are  represented  in  the 
movement.2 

The  existing  pension  systems  are  sometimes  administered  by  the  superintendent  or 
commissioner  of  education,  sometimes  by  the  Board  of  Education,  but  in  nearly  four- 
fifths  of  the  systems  there  is  a  special  pension  board,  or  commission,  or  committee. 
These  boards  have  from  three  to  eleven  members,  but  two-thirds  of  them  have  five  or 
seven.  Nearly  all  of  these  special  boards  (49  out  of  51  reporting)  include  representa- 
tives of  the  teachers,  who  are  generally  (42  out  of  49  reporting)  elected  by  the  teach- 
ers themselves.  In  slightly  more  than  half  of  the  boards  the  teachers  representatives 
constitute  a  minority.  As,  however,  the  superintendent  or  commissioner  of  educa- 
tion is  generally  an  ex-officio  member,  it  may  be  said  that  the  teachers  representatives 
generally  constitute  a  majority.3 

In  nine-tenths  of  the  systems  (47  out  of  52  reporting)  membership  is  compulsory  for 
new  teachers.  Membership  has  been  optional  for  the  teachers  already  in  service  at  the 

1  Years  of  establishment  of  67  systems  reporting:  1893,  1895,  1896  (2),  1897  (2),  1898  (2),  1900,  1901,  1903,  1905, 1907  (4), 
1908  (6),  1909  (9),  1910, 1911  (9),  1912  (4),  1913  (7),  1914, 1915  C8).  1916  (2),  1917  (4). 

2  State  systems:  Arizona,  California,  Connecticut,  Illinois,  Indiana,  Maine,  Maryland,  Massachusetts,  Michigan, 
Minnesota,  Montana,  Nevada,  New  Hampshire,  New  Jersey,  New  York,  North  Dakota,  Pennsylvania,  Rhode  Island, 
Vermont,  Virginia,  Wisconsin. 

Permissive  systems:  Colorado,  Kentucky,  Ohio,  Utah. 

Local  systems :  Delaware,  Kansas,  Louisiana,  Missouri,  Nebraska,  Oregon,  South  Carolina,  Tennessee,  West  Vir- 
ginia. 

3  Direction  of  67  pension  systems  reporting:  Superintendent  or  commissioner  3,  Board  of  Education  10,  special  pen- 
sion board,  commission,  or  committee  64. 

Size  of  51  special  boards  reporting  :  3  (5),  5  (17),  6,  7  (15),  8, 9  (8).  11  (4). 

Teachers  representatives  on  48  boards  reporting:  Minority  (27):  1/6,  Vs  (2),  2/7  (2)  1/3,  3/8,  2/6  (8),  8/7  (11),  4/9; 
majority  (21):  «/ii  (3),  6/9  (4),  4/7,  »/s  (8),  2/8  (2),  6/7  (2),  3. 


SUMMARY  OF  TEACHERS  PENSION  SYSTEMS  71 

inauguration  of  seven-tenths  of  the  systems  (37  out  of  52  reporting).  This  illustrates 
the  difficulty  of  providing  fully  for  the  retirement  of  teachers  who  are  not  in  position 
to  contribute  their  full  share  of  the  expense, — the  difficulty  that  is  known  as  the  prob- 
lem of  accrued  liabilities. 

In  all  the  systems  retirement  is  on  the  basis  of  from  20  to  40  years  of  service,  most 
frequently  30  years  (32  out  of  80  provisions).  About  one-half  of  the  systems  (29  out  of 
67)  make  provision  also  for  retirement  on  the  basis  of  age,  at  from  50  to  75  years,  most 
frequently  60  years,  for  both  men  (13  out  of  26  provisions)  and  women  (11  out  of  26 
provisions).  Nearly  six-sevenths  of  the  systems  (57  out  of  67)  have  provisions  for  disa- 
bility, usually  a  proportion  of  the  full  pension  equal  to  the  proportion  of  the  full  years 
of  service  completed  before  retirement.1 

Teachers  contribute  to  the  funds  in  about  six-sevenths  of  the  systems  (57  out  of  67), 
most  frequently  (34  out  of  57)  1  or  2  per  cent  of  their  salaries.  In  about  six-sevenths 
of  the  systems  (54  out  of  67)  public  funds  are  supplied  also,  from  incidental  sources 
(46  instances),  school  (12),  or  special  taxes  (13),  deductions  from  teachers  pay  (9),  or, 
in  nearly  three- sevenths  of  the  instances  (28  out  of  67),  from  direct  appropriations. 
The  public  contribution  is  not  related  to  that  of  the  teachers  in  as  many  systems  as 
would  be  expected  (only  14  reported).  Where  it  is  so  related  it  most  frequently  equals 
the  contribution  of  the  teacher  (9  out  of  14  reporting).2 

Return  of  the  teachers  contributions  in  case  of  resignation  is  provided  for  in  about 
one-half  of  the  systems  (30  out  of  67),  the  refund  being  most  frequently  one-half  of 
the  contribution,  without  interest  (19  out  of  29  reporting).  Return  in  case  of  dismissal 
is  provided  in  about  one-half  of  the  systems  (35  out  of  67),  this  refund  nearly  always 
being  (22  out  of  34)  all  of  the  contribution  without  interest.  Return  in  case  of  death 
is  provided  in  about  one-third  of  the  systems  (20  out  of  67),  this  refund  being  some- 
times one-half  (12  instances)  and  sometimes  the  entire  contribution  (9  instances),  usu- 
ally without  interest.3 

The  financial  experience  of  these  systems  is,  as  has  been  said,  yet  brief.  The  repre- 
sentative salary  (the  median  of  averages  ranging  from  $341  to  $1337)  of  the  teachers 
in  the  63  systems  reporting  is  $730  a  year.  The  representative  pension  in  these  sys- 
tems (58  reporting)  is  $500  a  year  (the  median  of  averages  ranging  from  $180  to  $800). 
The  representative  total  contribution  on  the  part  of  the  teacher  is  $510  (the  median 

1  Service  for  retirement :  20  years  (7),  25  years  (21),  30  years  (31),  35  years  (14),  40  years  (7). 

Age  for  retirement :  Men :  50,  58,  60  (13),  62,  65  (4),  70  (5),  75;  women  :  50  (2),  55  (2),  60  (11),  62,  65  (4),  70  (5),  75. 

2  Teachers  contributions:  1/2%,  1%  (24),  1-2%,  1-3%,  1V2%  (5),  2%  (16),  2V2%,  3%  (4),  3-7%  (2),  5%  (2). 

Public  contributions :  1/2  of  teachers,  Rochester  (NewYork);  11/2,  Omaha  (Nebraska);  1V2  or  more,  Topeka  (Kansas); 
equal  or  less,  Buffalo,  Westchester  County,  New  York;  equal,  New  York  City,  New  York  State,  Erie,  Harrisburg, 
Philadelphia,  Scran  ton  (Pennsylvania),  Pennsylvania;  twice  or  less,  Chicago;  three  times,  Cohoes(New  York). 

3  Refunds:  Tn  case  of  resignation :  1/2  of  contribution  or  less,  1/2  without  interest  (19),  2/3  without  interest,  3/4  with- 
out interest,  all  without  interest  (3),  all  with  interest  (5)  —  Erie  (Pennsylvania),  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  New 
York  City.  Pennsylvania. 

In  case  of  dismissal:  1/2  or  less,  1/2  (9),  3/4  without  interest,  all  without  interest  (19),  all  with  interest  (5)— Erie 
(Pennsylvania),  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  New  York  City,  Pennsylvania. 

In  case  of  death :  1/2  without  interest  (12),  all  without  interest  (4),  all  with  interest  (5)—  Erie  (Pennsylvania),  Con- 
necticut, Massachusetts,  New  York  City,  Pennsylvania. 


72  PENSIONS  FOR  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  TEACHERS 

of  25  averages  extending  from  $250  to  $1000),  a  frequent  requirement  being  a  sum 
equal  to  the  first  year's  annuity.  When  it  is  remembered  that  various  systems  appro- 
priate only  an  amount  equal  to  the  teacher's  contribution,  it  will  be  evident  that 
a  considerable  number  of  systems  are  providing  funds  that  will  pay  pensions  for  two 
years  only.  There  is  general  need,  therefore,  for  further  adjustment  between  the  retire- 
ment privileges  and  the  funds  that  the  teachers  are  able,  and  the  public  is  willing,  to 
provide.1 

As  a  matter  of  actual  experience,  the  disbursements  of  the  former  New  York  City 
system,  which  was  established  in  1894,  began  to  be  larger  than  the  receipts  in  1910. 
The  Teachers1  Retirement  Fund  of  New  Jersey,  established  in  1896,  required  increased 
income  in  1899,  1903,  and  1906,  and  its  solvency  is  still  in  question.  The  system  in 
Porto  Rico,  established  in  1898,  was  abandoned  in  1905.  The  Boston  system,  established 
in  1900,  encountered  deficiencies  in  1914.  The  Indianapolis  fund,  established  in  1907, 
almost  met  financial  difficulties  in  1914.  The  Maryland  fund,  established  in  1908,  had 
to  increase  its  resources  in  1912  and  1914.  The  Virginia  system,  established  in  1908, 
had  to  reduce  its  pensions  as  early  as  1912.  The  Cincinnati  fund,  established  in  19ll, 
had  to  reduce  its  pensions  inl914.TheIllinois  system,  established  in  191 5, encountered 
a  legislative  investigation  in  the  same  year.  Large  privileges,  small  resources,  and  the 
lack  of  adjustment  between  the  two,  promise  similar  difficulties  for  numerous  other 
systems. 

Meanwhile  a  safer  and  happier  future  for  pension  systems  is  promised  by  careful 
and  comprehensive  studies  like  those  of  the  Massachusetts  Commissions  on  Pensions 
in  1910  and  1914  and  the  studies  made  in  New  York  City  and  Illinois  in  1915,  1916, 
and  1918. 


1  Average  salaries,  1915-16:  $341,  $381,  $422,  $430,  $470,  $486  (2),  $521,  $528,  $645.  $553,  $557, $558,  $561,  $574,  $580  (2),  $598,  $605, 
$624,  $632,  $652,  $682  (2),  $685,  $689,  $693, $702,  $714,  $721,  $724,  $730,  $739,  $747,  $750,  $751,  $756,  $765,  $770.  $778,  $782,  $784,  $800, 
$821,  $854,  $860,  $861,  $866  (2),  $881,  $895,  $946,  $949,  $967,  $969,  $989,  $998,  $1081,  $1122,  $1222.  $1261,  $1267,  $1337. 

Representative  pensions:  $150  to  $250,  $180,  $200,  $200  to  $400,  $200  to  $500,  $250,  $250  to  $600,  $300,  $300  to  $600  (2),  $300 
to  $800.  $312  to  $600,  $330,  $333  to  $600  (2).  $350  to  $500,  $360,  $360  to  $600,  $400  (6),  $400  to  $480,  $400  to  $800  (2),  $450  (2), 
$480  (2),  $500  (10),  $600  (10),  $600  to  $700,  $750,  $800  (5). 

Average  total  contributions:  $250,  $270.  $300  (2),  $360  (2),  $390,  $400  (3),  $426,  $450,  $500,  $510,  $540,  $600  (3),  $600  to $700, 
$610,  $625,  $650  (2),  $800,  $1000. 


I 


s* 


r 


% 


5    (    5 


o  < 


^ 


^J 


*r>, 


:03E 


\    \ 


o 


ul 


->=» 


=5       Z 


^3 


.uJ      I, 


<s> 


2f 


0* 


Ui 


t/> 


,U1 


•2  ^S 


V3 


$  .3 


~<g<5S 


So 


w 


BRIEF  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Caiinegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching1 

The  Sixth  Annual  Report,  1911.  Includes  discussions  of  the  moral  influence  of  a 
pension  system ;  and  the  obligations  of  colleges  in  the  matter  of  providing  pen- 
sions for  teachers. 

The  Seventh  Annual  Report,  1912.  Includes  discussions  of  college  pensions ;  pensions 
for  public  school  teachers;  proposed  state  systems;  local  systems;  municipal  sys- 
tems; industrial  pensions;  civil  service  pensions  in  New  South  Wales;  the  Civil 
Service  Pension  Act  of  South  Africa;  contributory  and  non-contributory  pensions; 
subsistence  and  stipendiary  pensions;  a  feasible  pension  system  for  a  college;  and 
a  feasible  pension  system  for  public  schools. 

The  Eighth  Annual  Report,  1913.  Includes  discussions  of  new  pension  systems;  and 
New  York  Municipal  Pensions. 

The  Ninth  Annual  Report,  1914.  Includes  discussions  of  pensions  for  public  school 
teachers;  industrial  pensions;  federal  pensions. 

The  Tenth  Annual  Report,  1915.  Includes  discussions  of  pensions  for  public  school 
teachers;  pensions  for  university  professors;  clergy  pension  funds;  industrial  pen- 
sions; and  tabular  statements  of  industrial  and  institutional  pensions  and  of  teach- 
ers pension  systems,  with  a  summary. 

The  Eleventh  Annual  Report,  1916.  Includes  discussions  of  insurance  and  annuities 
for  college  teachers;  pensions  for  public  school  teachers;  New  York  City  Pensions; 
industrial  pensions;  and  clergy  pension  funds. 

The  Twelfth  Annual  Report,  1917.  Includes  discussions  of  insurance  and  annuities 
for  college  teachers;  current  pension  developments;  the  Illinois  Pension  Laws  Com- 
mission; New  York  City  Pensions ;  Pennsylvania,  Ontario,  and  Alberta  pension  sys- 
tems; and  pension  reporting. 

Bulletin  Number  Nine.  A  Comprehensive  Plan  of  Insurance  and  Annuities  for  Col- 
lege Teachers,  1916.  A  discussion  by  the  president  of  the  Foundation  of  pensions  and 
annuities,  and  life  insurance  in  general  and  for  teachers  in  particular,  with  indica- 
tions of  the  limitations  of  the  Foundation's  system  and  suggestions  for  the  develop- 
ment of  a  comprehensive  and  permanent  plan,  which  has  since  been  inaugurated. 

Illinois  Pension  Laws  Commission 

Report,  1916.  Includes  discussions  of  and  actuarial  reports  on  various  pension  funds 
in  Illinois,  pension  laws  in  foreign  countries,  and  a  consideration  of  underlying 
principles  and  specific  recommendations  for  a  revised  pension  plan. 

1  The  publications  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation  are  distributed  without  charge. 


76  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Joint  Commission  on  the  Support  of  the  Clergy 

Preliminary  Report,  1913.  Presents  proposals,  after  a  consideration  of  pension  prin- 
ciples, for  establishing  a  pension  system  for  the  clergy  of  the  Protestant  Episcopal 
Church. 

Massachusetts 

Report  of  the  Commission  on  Old  Age  Pensions,  Annuities,  and  Insurance,  House 
No.  1400, 1910.  Altho  devoted  mainly  to  the  consideration  of  old  age  pensions,  the 
report  discusses  the  questions  of  contributory  and  non-contributory,  voluntary 
and  compulsory  systems,  and  contains  recommendations  concerning  pensions  for 
municipal  and  other  public  employees. 

Report  of  the  Commission  on  Pensions,  House  No.  2450,  1914.  Includes  statistical 
and  actuarial  investigations  of  some  existing  pension  funds  for  teachers  and  others, 
discusses  the  pension  problem,  and  presents  a  digest  of  pension  legislation  for  pub- 
lic employees  of  all  states  in  the  United  States. 

Meriam,  L. 

Principles  governing  Retirement  of  Public  Employees.  New  York,  1918.  Discusses 
the  whole  subject  of  pensions  from  the  social,  financial,  and  actuarial  standpoints. 
Bibliography. 

National  Education  Association 

Report  of  the  Committee  on  Teachers'1  Salaries  and  Cost  of  Living,  1913.  Contains 
a  digest  of  Teachers1  Pension  Laws  in  the  United  States. 

New  York  City  Pension  Commission 

Report  on  the  Teachers  Retirement  Fund  of  the  City  of  New  York,  1915.  Includes  an 
interpretative  and  constructive  report,  a  tentative  reorganization  plan  with  recom- 
mendations for  financing,  and  an  actuarial  valuation  of  the  existing  and  proposed 
laws. 

Report  on  the  Pension  Funds  of  the  City  of  New  York.  Parts  I  and  II,  1916;  Part 
III,  1918.  Pai't  I  presents  a  discussion  of  the  operation  of  the  nine  existing 
pension  funds  in  the  New  York  City  municipal  employees;  Part  II  contains  the 
actuarial  investigation  of  these  funds;  Part  III  offers  recommendations  for  a  law 
to  reconstitute  all  the  existing  pension  funds  on  a  unified  plan  based  on  scientific 
pension  principles  together  with  an  actuarial  report  on  the  probable  cost. 

Prosser,  C.  A.,  and  Hamilton,  W.  I. 

The  Teacher  and  Old  Age.  Boston,  1913.  A  discussion  of  existing  provisions  for 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  77 

pensioning  teachers,  the  social  principles  underlying  teachers  pensions,  and  the 
characteristics  of  a  model  retirement  law.  Bibliography. 

United  States  Bureau  of  Education 

Bulletin  No.  34,  1913.  Teachers  Pension  Systems  in  Great  Britain.  Analyzes  the 
history  and  present  organization  of  teachers  pensions  in  England  and  Wales  and 
Scotland,  and  of  local  educational  areas,  with  conclusions  and  bibliography. 

Bulletin  No.  14,  1916.  State  Pension  Systems  for  Public  School  Teachers.  Includes 
an  analysis  in  tabular  form  of  existing  state  pension  systems,  notes  on  the  situ- 
ation in  various  states,  a  bibliography,  and  typical  pension  and  retirement  laws. 

United  States.  Sixty-first  Congress,  Third  Session,  1911 

Document  No.  823.  Teachers  Pensions  Laws  in  the  United  States  and  Europe.  A 
compilation  of  teachers  pension  laws  in  the  United  States  and  Europe  that  ap- 
peared from  time  to  time  in  the  Reports  of  the  United  States  Commissioner  of 
Education. 

Sixty-second  Congress,  Second  Session,  1912 

Document  No.  732.  Retirement  from  the  Classified  Civil  Service  of  Superannuated 
Employees.  Includes  a  report  on  retirement  allowances  by  the  Commission  on 
Economy  and  Efficiency  dealing  with  underlying  principles  of  pension  systems,  a 
savings  and  annuity  plan  proposed  for  the  retirement  of  superannuated  employees; 
and  an  account  of  the  civil  service  retirement  plans  in  Great  Britain,  New  Zealand, 
and  New  South  Wales. 

Sixty-fourth  Congress,  First  Session,  1916 

Hearing  before  the  Committee  on  Civil  Service  and  Retrenchment,  United  States 
Senate.  Consists  of  a  report  of  the  hearing  on  two  Senate  Bills  for  the  Retirement 
of  Employees  in  the  Classified  Civil  Service,  and  deals  in  the  main  with  the  ques- 
tion of  contributory  or  non-contributory  pensions. 


INDEX 


INDEX 


Accounting,  pension,  36. 

Accrued  liabilities,  8f.,  10,  33,  39,  49,  53,  71. 

Cost  of,  9. 
Accumulations,  viii,  ix,  38,  53  f. 
Actuarial  meaning  of  pensions,  16. 
Actuary,  function  and  place  of,  14,  24,  36,  54  f. 
Administration  of  teachers  pensions,  20,  48,  70. 

Cost  of,  10. 

In  proposed  Vermont  plan,  31. 
Age  of  retirement,  viii,  x,  1 1  f. ,  20  f. ,  32, 49  f.,  71. 

In  proposed  Vermont  plan,  32. 

Relation  of,  to  contributions,  10. 
To  pensions,  11. 

Voluntary  and  compulsory,  12,  50. 
Age,  relation  of,  to  contributions,  10. 

To  pensions,  9. 
Albany,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62  f. 
Allegany  County,  teachers  pension  system  in, 

58  f. 

Allowance,  retiring,  50  f. 

In  Vermont  plan,  32. 
American  Association  of  University  Professors, 

Amount  of  teachers  pensions,  20,  32,  50  f. 
Annuities  and  pensions,  11. 
Appropriations  for  teachers  pensions,  22,  71. 
Arizona,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21 ,  22, 56  f. , 
70. 

Art,  pensions  for,  3. 

Association  of  American  Colleges,  15. 

Attorney-general,  state,  and  administration  of 

pensions,  20,  48. 
Attractive  power  of  pensions,  vi,  3,  4. 
Auditor,  state,  and  administration  of  pensions, 

20,  48. 

Austria-Hungary,  teachers  pension  system  in, 
17,  18. 

.Baltimore,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f. 

Baltimore  County,  teachers  pension  system  in. 
58  I. 

Belgium,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17,  18. 

Benefits,  pension,  types  of,  10,  12  f. 
Relation  of,  to  contributions,  10. 

Bibliography  on  pensions,  75  If. 

Blair.  Francis  G.,  xi. 

Boards  of  education  and  administration  of  pen- 
sions, 20,  70. 

Boards  of  retirement,  20,  48,  70. 

Boston,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60 f.,  72. 

Buffalo,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62 f.,  71. 

California,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20, 21, 

22,  23,  56  f.,  70. 
Carnegie  Foundation,  The,  v,  15. 


Conferences  of,  with  National  Education  As- 
sociation, v. 

Trustees  of,  and  fundamental  principles  of 
pensions,  15. 
Carr,  John  W.,  xi. 
Cash  disbursement  plan,  8,  25,  53. 
Charleston,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f. 
Chattanooga,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f. 
Chicago,  teachers  pension  system  in,  18,  56 f., 

70,  71. 

Cincinnati,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64 f.,  72. 
Civil  service,  pensions  in,  3. 
Claxton,  Commissioner  P.  P.,  v. 
Cleveland,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 
Cohoes,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62  f.,  71. 
Colorado,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f.,  70. 
Columbus,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 

Commissionerof  education  on  retirement  board, 

48. 

Committee  on  Salaries,  Tenure,  and  Pensions, 

National  Education  Association,  v,  xi. 
Compulsory  or  voluntary  pension  systems,  7, 

11,  16,  31,  48 f.,  70 f. 
Connecticut,  teachers  pensions  in,  19,  20,  21, 

22,  23,  24,  27,  56  f.,  70,  71. 
"Constructive  contributions,"  5. 
Contractual  right  to  pensions,  x,  5,  6,  16. 
Contributions,  amount  of,  in  teachers  pension 
systems,  10,  22 f.,  52 f.,  71. 

Conditions  determining,  25,  52. 

"Flat  rate,"  11. 

In  proposed  Vermont  plan,  34. 

Return  of,  10,  14,  23,  54,  71. 

Sources  of,  22,  71. 
Contributory  pensions,  6. 

Cost  of,  6,  10  f. 

Voluntaryor  compulsory  pension  systems,  7f. 
Cooperation  between  employers  and  employees 

and  pensions,  vii,  6,  7,  13,  15. 
Cost  of  pensions,  vii,  6,  9  ff. 

Conditions  underlying,  9. 
Court  favorites,  pensions  for,  3. 

-Dayton,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 
Death,  returns  in  case  of,  10,  14,  54. 
Deferred  wages,  pensions  as,  7. 
Delaware,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f.,  70. 
Denmark,  teachers  pensions  in,  17. 
Denver,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f. 
Departmentof  Superintendence,  meetings  of,  v. 
Detroit,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f. 
Disability  allowances,  vi,  viii,  x,  4,  10, 13,  21  f., 
32,  51  f.,  71. 

In  Massachusetts,  28. 

In  New  York  City,  26. 


82 


INDEX 


In  Pennsylvania,  29. 

Medical  examinations  for,  21. 

Proposed  Vermont  plan,  32,  51  f. 

Service  requirement  for,  13,  22,  51  f. 
Dismissal,  returns  in  case  of,  10,  14,  54. 
Duluth,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f. 

Jcjfficiency  and  pensions,  vi,  3f.,  7,  13. 

Employers  and  employees,  relations  between, 
and  pensions,  3,  5,  6,  12,  15. 

Employers,  interest  of,  in  pensions,  3f.,  6,  15. 

England,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17,  18. 

English  civil  servants  and  non-contributory  pen- 
sions, 5. 

Erie,  teachers  pension  system  in,  19,  27,  48,  66, 
71. 

Europe,  teachers  pension  systems  in,  4,  17  f. 

Expectation  of  life,  14. 

X*  a  July,  protection  of,  and  pensions,  x,  7, 12  f., 

14,  15,  26,  29,  38. 
Federal  War  Risk  Insurance  Act,  4. 
Ferguson,  James,  xi. 

Financing  of  teachers  pensions,  22  f.,  71  f. 
Financing,  pension,  vi,  8,  25. 
"Flat  rate,"  contributions,  11. 

Pensions,  50  f. 
Forsythe,  Grace  C,  xi. 
France,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17,  18. 
Free  pensions.  See  Non-contributory  pensions. 
Fundamental  principles  of  pensions,  15  f. 
Furst,  Dr.  Clyde,  v. 

German  Empire,  teachers  pension  system  in, 

17,  18. 
Government  pensions,  3. 

Great  Britain,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 
Greece,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 

.Hall,  Samuel  S.,  37. 

Hamilton,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 

Harrisburg,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66 f., 

71. 
Hillegas,  Dr.  Milo  B.,  31. 
History  of  pensions,  3. 
Holland,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 

Illinois,  pension  commission  reports,  19,  24, 
26  f.,  72. 

Teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21,  22,  23, 
56  f.,  70,  72. 
Indiana,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21,  22, 

23,  56  f.,  70. 
Indianapolis,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58 f., 

72. 
Industrial  relations  and  pensions,  6. 
Industry,  pensions  in,  3. 
Insurance  and  pensions,  11. 


Interest,  rate  of,  relation  of,  to  contributions, 
ix,  10. 
To  pensions,   14. 
Interest  table,  38. 

Ireland,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 
Italy,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17,  18. 

Japan,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17,  18. 
Johnson,  David  B.,  xi. 

jVandel,  Dr.  I.  L.,  v. 

Kansas,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f.,  70. 

Kentucky,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f.,  70. 

Literature,  pensions  for,  3. 

Louisiana,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f.,  70. 

Louisville,  teachers  pension  system  in.  58  f. 

McClintock's  Table  of  Mortality,  ix,  32,  33, 

35,  38,  50. 
Maine,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21,  22,  58  f., 

70. 
Maryland,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21,  22, 

58  f.,  70,  72. 
Massachusetts,  teachers  pension  system  in,  19, 

20,  21,  22,  23,  24,  26  f.,  48,  60  f.,  70,  71,  72. 
Massachusetts  Teachers  Retirement  Act,  28. 
Medical  examination  for  disability,  21,  32,  51. 
Membership  in  pension  systems,  7,  11,  16,  31, 

48  f.,  53,  70  f. 
Michigan,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21,  22, 

23,  60  f.,  71. 
Military  pensions,  3. 

Influence  of,  4. 
Milwaukee,  teachers  pension  system  in,  68  f. 
Minneapolis,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f. 
Minnesota,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21, 

22,  23,  60  f.,  70. 
Missouri,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f.,  70. 
Mobility  of  employees  and  pensions,  7. 
Montana,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21, 

22,  23,  60  f.,  70. 
Moore,  Ernest  C,  xi. 
Mortality  tables,  viii,  7,  14. 

Mt.  Vernon,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62  f. 

J\  ational  Association  of  State  Universities,  15. 
National  Council  of  Education,  v. 
National  Education  Association.  Committee  on 
Salaries,  Tenure,  and  Pensions,  v,  xi. 

Meetings  of,  v. 

Proceedings  of,  v. 
Naval  pensions,  3. 

Influence  of,  4. 
Nebraska,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62  f.,  70. 
Nevada,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21,  22, 

23,  62  f.,  70. 

New  Hampshire,  teachers  pension  system  in, 

21,  22,  62  f.,  70. 


INDEX 


83 


New  Haven,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f. 
New  Jersey,  teachers  pension  system  in,  18,  21, 

22,  23,  62  f.,  70,  72. 
New  London,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f. 
New  Orleans,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f. 
Newport,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f. 
New  York  City,  teachers  pension  system  in,  19, 
26,  27,  29,  48,  64 f.,  71,  72. 

Pension  commission  reports,  19,  24  ff.,  72. 

Teachers  Retirement  Fund,  report  on,  24  ff., 
72. 
New  York  State,  teachers  pension  system  in, 

21,22,  23,  62 f.,  70,  71. 
New  Zealand,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17, 

18. 
Non-contributory  pensions,  vii,  4  f. 

Cost  of,  viii,  4  f. 

Effect  on  tenure,  5. 

English  civil  servants  and,  5. 

Influence  of,  10. 

Objections  to,  4  f. 
North  Dakota,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20, 

21,  22,  23,  64  f.,  70. 

Obligation  for  pension  protection,  15. 
Ohio,  teachers  pension  system  in,  23,  70. 
Old  age  and  pensions,  vi,  4,  12,  20  f.,  32,  49  f. 
Omaha,  teachers  pension  system  in,  62  f.,  71. 
Optional  membership  in  pension  systems,  7,  11, 

16,31,  48 f.,  70f. 
Options  in  pension  payments,  7,  12 f.,  14,  15, 

26,  29,  38. 
Oregon,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f.,  71. 

Paternalism  and  pensions,  4. 
Pennsylvania,  teachers  pension  system  in,  19, 
20,  21,  22,  23,  24,  29  f.,  48,  64  f.,  70,  71,  72. 

Estimated  cost  of,  30. 
Pension  Commissions,  reports  of,  19,  24 ff.,  72. 
Pensions,  accounting  of,  36,  54  f. 

Accrued  liabilities  in,  8f.,  10,  33,  39,  49,  53, 
71. 

Administration  of,  10,  20,  48,  70. 

Age  of  retirement  and,  viii,  11  f.,  20  f.,  32, 
49  f.,  71. 

Amount  of,  10,  20,  32,  50  ff. 

As  deferred  wages,  7. 

As  subsistence  wage,  10. 

Attraction  of,  vi,  3,  4. 

Bibliography,  75  ff. 

Cash  disbursement  plan  and  cost  of,  8,  25,  53. 

Charity  and,  3,  7. 

Conditions  of,  9. 

Contractual  right  to,  5,  6,  16. 

Contributory,  6. 

Advantages  of,  vii,  6,  16. 

Cooperation  and,  vii,  6,  7,  13,  15. 

Cost  of,  vii,  69  ff. 


Disability  and,  4,  10,  13,  21  f.,  26,  28,  29,  32, 
51  f.,  71. 

Efficiency  and,  3f.,  7,  13. 

English  civil  servants  and,  5. 

European,  4,  17. 

Financing  of,  vii,  8. 

Flat,  50  f. 

Flexibility  and,  12. 

Free,  4  ff. 

Fundamental  principles  of,  15  f. 

Geographical  distribution,  73. 

History  of,  3,  18,  70. 

Insurance  and  annuities,  11. 

In  United  States,  4f.,  18ff,  70  ff. 

Investment  and,  7. 

Mobility  of  employees  and,  7. 

Need  for,  3  f. 

Non-contributory,  4  f. 

Obligation  for,  15. 

Old  age  and,  4,  12,  20  f.,  32,  49  f. 

Options  and,  7,  12  f.,  14,  15,  26,  29,  38. 

Paternalism  and,  4. 

Purpose  of,  3,  12,  15. 

Rate  of  interest  and,  14. 

Reasons  for,  vi. 

Records,  value  of,  14. 

Relation  of,  to  salary,  viii,  10,  15,  50. 

Reports  and  valuations  of,  13  f.,  36,  54  f. 

Reserve  system  and  cost  of,  6,  8,  16,  25,  53. 

Returns,  x,  10,  14,  23,  26,  28,  29,  35,  54,  71. 

Salaries  and,  viii,  3. 

Savings  and,  7. 

Scope  of,  7,  10,  12  f. 

Sentiment  and,  4. 

Social  philosophy  of,  3  ff. 

Stipendiary,  15. 

Straight,  4  ff. 

Teachers.  See  Teachers  pension  system. 

Tenure  and,  3,  4. 

Thrift  and,  5,  6,  7,  27. 
Peoria,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f. 
Philadelphia,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f., 

71. 
Philosophy,  social,  of  pensions,  3  ff. 
Portland,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 
Porto  Rico,  teachers  pension  system  in,  72. 
Principles  of  pensions,  fundamental,  15  f. 
Pritchett,  Dr.  Henry  S.,  v. 
Providence,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f. 
Prussia,  teachers  pension  system  in,  18. 
Purpose  of  pensions,  3  f. ,  12  f. 

Rate  of  interest  and  pensions,  14. 
Records  in  pension  systems,  14,  55. 
Refunds.  See  Returns. 
Reports  of  pension  systems,  13  f.,  36,  54 f. 
Scope  of,  14. 


84 


INDEX 


Reserve  system  and  cost  of  pensions,  6,  8,  16, 

25,  53. 
Resignation,  returns  in  case  of,  x,  10,  14,  54. 
Retirement,  age  of,  viii,  x,  11  f.,  20  f.,  32,  49  f., 
71. 

Relation  of,  to  contributions,  10. 
To  pensions,  11. 

Voluntary  and  compulsory,  12,  50. 
Retirement  Boards,  20,  48,  70. 
Retirement  for  service,  ix,  x,  11,  12,  20  f.,  32, 

49  f. 
Returns  in  teachers  pension  systems,  x,  10,  14, 
23,  54,  71. 

In  Massachusetts,  28. 

In  New  York  City,  26. 

In  Pennsylvania,  29. 

In  proposed  Vermont  plan,  35. 
Rhode  Island,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21, 

22,  66  f.,  70. 
Risks  of  life,  protection  against,  vi,  6,  13. 
Rochester,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f.,  71. 
Rules,  change  of,  37,  55. 
Russia,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 

St.  Louis,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f. 
St.  Paul,  teachers  pension  system  in,  60  f. 
Salaries  and  pensions,  viii,  3,  10,  15,  50. 
"Salaries  of  Teachers  and  School  Officers,"  v. 
Salaries,  teachers,  71. 

In  Vermont,  42  ff. 
Salt  Lake  City,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f. 
Science,  pensions  for,  3. 
Scope  of  pensions,  7,  10,  12 f.,   14,  15,  26,  29, 

38. 
Scranton,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f.,  71. 
Sentiment  and  pensions,  4. 
Service,  retirement  for,  ix,  11,  21,  20  f.,  32,  49  f. 

And  disability  allowances,  13,  22,  51  f. 
Sex,  relation  of,  to  contributions,  10. 

To  pensions,  ix,  9,  14. 
Size  of  retirement  board,  20,  48,  70. 
Social  philosophy  of  pensions,  vi,  3  ff. 
South  Africa,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17, 

18. 

South  America,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 

South  Carolina,  teachers  pension  system  in, 
66  f.,  70. 

Springfield,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 

State  officers  on  retirement  boards,  vii,  20,  48. 

"State  Pension  Systems  for  Public  School 
Teachers,"  v. 

State  superintendent  of  education,  and  admin- 
istration of  pensions,  20,  48. 

Straight  pensions.  See  Non-contributory  pen- 
sions. 

Strikes  and  pensions,  6. 

Subsistence  and  pensions,  10. 

Swain,  Joseph,  xi. 


Sweden,  teachers  pension  system  in,  17. 
Syracuse,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 

JL  angible  Rewards  of  Teaching,  The,"  v. 
Teachers  in  service  and  pension  systems,  33,  39, 

49,  53. 
Teachers  in  Vermont,  statistics  of,  39  ff. 
Teachers  pension  systems,  17  ff. 
In  Europe,  17  f. 
In  United  States,  18 ff.,  70 ff. 

Administration  of,  vii,  20,  48,  70. 
Amount  of  pensions  in,  20. 
Contributions  in,  10,  22 f.,  52 f.,  71. 
Financial  unsoundness  of,  24. 
Financing,  22  f. 
Geographical  distribution,  73. 
Number  of,  18f.,  70. 
Returns,  10,  14,  23,  54,  71. 
Scientific  basis  lacking  in,  19  f. 
State  and  local  systems,  19,  70. 
Summary,  70  ff. 
Tabular  statement,  56  ff. 
Teachers,  representation  of,  on  retirement 

boards,  vii,  20,  70. 
"Teachers  Salaries  and  Cost  of  Living,"  v. 
Tennessee,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f., 

70. 
Tenure  and  pensions,  4. 

And  non-contributory  pensions,  5. 
Terre  Haute,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58  f. 
Tews,  J.,  on  German  teachers  pensions,  17. 
Thrift  and  pensions,  5,  6,  7,  27. 
Tiffin,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 
Toledo,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 
Topeka,  teachers  pension  system  in,  58 f.,  71. 
Transvaal,  teachers  pension  system  in,  18. 

U  niteo  States  Bureau  of  Education,  reports 

on  salaries,  v. 
United  States,  teachers  pension  system  in,  18ff., 
56  ff.,  70  ff.,  73. 

History  of,  vi,  18f. 

Scientific  basis  lacking  for,  19  f. 
Unsoundness,  financial,    of  teachers   pension 

systems,  24. 
Updegraff,  Harlan,  xi. 
Utah,  teachers  pension  system  in,  66  f.,  70. 

Valuations  of  pension  systems,  13  f.,  55. 

Factors  involved  in,  14. 

In  proposed  Vermont  plan,  36. 
Vermont  State  Teachers  Retirement  Fund,  20, 

21,  22,  36,  68  f.,  70. 
Vermont,    suggested    retirement    system    for 
teachers  in,  31  ff. 

Accounting,  36. 

Accrued  liabilities,  33. 

Actuarial  valuation,  36. 


INDEX 


85 


Administration,  31,  48. 
Allowances,  32. 
Change  of  rules,  37. 
Contributions,  34,  52  f. 
Cost,  33,  39. 
Membership,  31,  48  f. 
Retirement  for  age,  32. 

For  disability,  32. 
Theory  and  principles,  48  ff. 
Vermont  teachers,  number,  39. 

Distribution  by  age  and  salary,  42  f. 

By  age  and  service,  41. 

By  service  and  salary,  44  f. 

By  year  of  birth,  40. 
Service  of,  outside  the  state,  46. 
Withdrawals  of,  47. 
Virginia,  teachers  pension  system  in,  20,  21,  22, 
68  f.,  70,  72. 


Voluntary  or  compulsory  pension  systems,  7  f., 
11,  16,  31,48f.,  70  f. 

Westchester  County,  teachers  pension  sys- 
tem in,  64  f.,  71. 

West  Virginia,  teachers  pension  system  in, 

68  f.,  70. 
Wheeling,  teachers  pension  system  in,  68  f. 
Widows,  pensions  for,  7,  12  f.,  14,  15,  26,  29, 

38. 

Wilmington,  teachers  pension  system  in,  56  f. 
Wisconsin,  teachers  pension  system  in,  21,  22, 

23,  68  f.,  70. 
Withdrawal,  rate  of,  14. 

Returns  in  case  of,  10,  14,  54. 
Workmen's  compensation  laws,  13. 

1  oungstown,  teachers  pension  system  in,  64  f. 


C    ' 


efc 


X 


JUSTICE  AND  THE  POOR 

A  STUDY  OF  THE  PRESENT  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

AND  OF  THE  AGENCIES  MAKING  MORE  EQUAL 

THEIR  POSITION  BEFORE  THE  LAW 

WITH  PARTICULAR  REFERENCE  TO  LEGAL  AID  WORK 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 

BY 

REGINALD  HEBER  SMITH 

OF   THE  BOSTON   BAR 


BULLETIN  NUMBER  THIRTEEN 


fl 


NEW  YORK  CITY 

576  FIFTH  AVENUE 


D.  B.  UPDIKE  •  THE  MERRYMOUNT  PRESS  •  BOSTON 


ANALYSIS  OF  CONTENTS 

PAGE 

Foreword  ix 

Introduction  xi 

PART  I.  THE  EXISTING  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

CHAPTER 

I.  Freedom  and  Equality  of  Justice — the  Ideal  3 

II.  Denial  of  Justice — the  Fact  6 

III.  The  Defects  in  the  Administration  of  Justice  13 

1.  Preliminary  Definitions  13 

2.  Substantive  Law  13 

3.  Defects  in  Administration  15 

4.  The  Particular  Defects  16 

IV.  The  First  Defect— Delay  17 

1.  Denial  of  Justice  through  Delay  17 

2.  The  Nature  of  Delay  18 

3.  The  Elimination  of  Delay  19 
V.  The  Second  Defect — Court  Costs  and  Fees  20 

1.  Nature  and  History  of  Costs  and  Fees  20 

2.  The  Present  Situation  22 

3.  Costs  in  the  Trial  Court  24 

4.  Costs  on  Appeal  27 

5.  Witnesses,  Briefs,  and  Transcripts  27 

6.  Denial  of  Justice  through  Costs  28 

7.  Summary  30 
VI.  The  Third  Defect— Expense  of  Counsel  31 

1.  Essential  Nature  of  the  Lawyer's  Function  31 

2.  Inability  of  the  Poor  to  Pay  for  Counsel  33 

3.  Cost  of  Counsel  the  Fundamental  Difficulty  33 


IV 


CONTENTS 


PART  II.  AGENCIES  SECURING  A  MORE  EQUAL  ADMINISTRATION 

OF  THE  LAWS 

VII.  The  Nature  and  Position  of  the  Remedial  Agencies  37 

1.  Introductory  37 

2.  Classification  of  the  Agencies  38 

3.  Tests  Applied  to  the  Agencies  39 
VIII.  Small  Claims  Courts  41 

1.  Inadequacy  of  the  Common  Law  Machinery  41 

2.  The  Kansas  Small  Claims  Courts  43 

3.  The  Portland  Small  Claims  Court  46 

4.  The  Cleveland  Small  Claims  Court  48 

5.  The  Chicago  Small  Claims  Court  51 

6.  Future  Extension  of  Small  Claims  Courts  52 

7.  Collateral  Functions  56 

1.  Assistance  to  Parties  by  Clerks  56 

2.  Payment  of  Judgment  by  Instalments  57 

3.  Function  of  Court  Trustee  57 

4.  Control  over  Ejectment  Proceedings  59 

5.  Conciliation  59 
IX.  Conciliation  60 

1.  Definition  60 

2.  History  61 

3.  Conciliation  in  Europe  61 

4.  Conciliation  in  the  United  States  63 

5.  Significance  of  Conciliation  66 

6.  Future  of  Conciliation  66 
X.  Arbitration  68 

1.  The  Rise  of  Arbitration  68 

2.  Judicial  Arbitration  71 

3.  Future  of  Judicial  Arbitration  71 

4.  Summary  72 


CONTENTS  v 

XL  Domestic  Relations  Courts  73 

1.  The  Present  Situation  73 

2.  Increasing  Use  of  Criminal  Remedies  74 

3.  Significance  of  Domestic  Relations  Courts  76 

4.  Conciliation  in  Domestic  Relations  80 

5.  Future  Development  81 
XII.  Administrative  Tribunals  83 

1.  Delays  and  Costs  under  Workmen's  Compensation  Acts  83 

2.  Attorneys  under  Workmen's  Compensation  Acts  85 

3.  Future  of  Administrative  Tribunals  90 

4.  The  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  92 

5.  Summary  93 

XIII.  Administrative  Officials  94 

1.  Definition  94 

2.  General  Assistance  by  Administrative  Officials  94 

3.  Legal  Services  in  Litigation  95 

4.  Collection  of  Wages  by  Administrative  Officials  96 

5.  Future  Development  98 

XIV.  Assigned  Counsel  100 

1.  Assignment  of  Counsel  in  Civil  Cases  100 

2.  Assignments  in  Divorce:  Divorce  Proctors  102 

3.  Assignment  of  Counsel  in  Criminal  Cases  103 
XV.  The  Defender  in  Criminal  Cases  105 

1.  Preliminary  Definitions  105 

2.  The  Argument  107 

3.  The  Existing  System  107 

4.  The  System  of  Assigned  Counsel  111 

5.  The  Genesis  of  the  Defender  Plan  115 

6.  The  Defenders  and  their  Work  1 17 

7.  Further  Results  of  the  Defenders  121 

8.  Defenders  in  the  Lower  Courts  124 


vi  CONTENTS 

9.  Future  Development  of  the  Defender  127 

XVI.  Legal  Aid  Organizations  128 

PART  III.  LEGAL  AID  WORK  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 

XVII.  Origin  and  Development  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations  133 

1.  Preliminary  133 

2.  The  First  Period:  1876  to  1899  134 

3.  The  Second  Period:  1900  to  1909  140 

4.  The  Third  Period:  1910  to  1913  145 

5.  The  Fourth  Period :  1914  to  1918  147 

6.  Review      .  148 
XVIII.  Work  of  the  Legal  Aid  Organizations  150 

1.  Introductory  150 

2.  The  Total  Work  151 

3.  Nature  of  the  Work  152 

4.  Sources  of  the  Cases  158 

5.  Disposition  of  the  Cases  159 

6.  Principles  in  the  Conduct  of  the  Work  161 

7.  The  Charging  of  Fees  165 
XIX.  Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations  169 

1.  The  Five  Types  169 

2.  Specialized  Organizations  169 

3.  Legal  Aid  by  Employees  and  Employers  171 

4.  In  General  of  the  Five  Types  173 

5.  Independent  versus  Departmental  Organizations  176 

6.  Public  versus  Private  Organizations  180 
XX.  Present  Position  of  Legal  Aid  Work  187 

1.  Present  Extent  of  the  Work  187 

2.  Legal  Aid  Staffs  192 

3.  Poor  Finances  193 

4.  Lack  of  Central  Control  197 


CONTENTS  vii 

XXI.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Law  200 

1.  Legal  Aid  and  Legislation  200 

2.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Common  Law  206 
XXII.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Community  210 

1.  Community  Service  210 

2.  War  Work  212 

3.  Preventive  Law  214 

4.  Good  Citizenship  217 

XXIII.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Organized  Charities  219 

1.  The  Volunteer  Counsel  Plan  219 

2.  Service  by  Legal  Aid  Organizations  223 

3.  Cooperation  224 

XXIV.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Bar  226 

1.  Legal  Aid  Services  to  the  Bar  226 

2.  The  Lawyer's  Obligation  to  the  Poor  230 

3.  Services  of  the  Bar  to  Legal  Aid  Work  234 

4.  Financial  Support  by  the  Bar  237 
XXV.  A  More  Equal  Administration  of  Justice  240 

1.  Immediate  Constructive  Action  240 

2.  A  More  Efficient  Legal  Aid  Work  244 

3.  Legal  Aid  under  Judicial  Control  246 

4.  Conclusion  249 

APPENDIX 

Note  to  Statistical  Tables  252 

Table      I,  showing  Cases  received  by  Legal  Aid  Organizations 

Table    II,  showing  Amounts  collected  for  Clients  bv  Legal  Aid  Or- 
ganizations 

Table  III,  showing  the  Expenses  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 

INDEX  253 


I 


FOREWORD 

THIS  book  began  in  a  study  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  designed  to  secure 
thorough  information  and  a  just  estimate  of  value  for  the  benefit  of  those 
who  are  called  upon  from  time  to  time  to  contribute  to  their  support. 

The  work  has  grown  into  a  systematic  treatise  and  practical  handbook  upon  the 
Administration  of  Justice  in  the  United  States  in  the  direction  which  is  at  this  time 
of  the  most  critical  importance.  It  is  full  of  trustworthy  information  and  suggestion, 
and  should  be  of  great  value  to  the  multitude  of  Americans  who  are  interested  in 
the  Americanization  of  the  millions  of  foreigners  who  have  immigrated  to  this 
country,  and  who  fail  to  understand  or  who  misunderstand  American  institutions. 
It  should  be  useful  to  the  members  of  the  American  Bar,  who  during  the  past  few 
years  have  been  gradually  awakening  to  a  sense  of  their  responsibility  for  the  admin- 
istration of  law  in  general,  beyond  the  interests  of  the  particular  cases  in  which  they 
are  engaged.  This  subject  was  under  consideration  in  the  Conference  of  Bar  Associ- 
ations at  Saratoga  in  September,  1917,  and  I  commend  this  book  to  the  attention  of 
all  the  gentlemen  who  were  interested  in  that  discussion. 

New  projects  are  continually  suggested  for  improving  the  condition  of  the  poor 
by  the  aid  of  government,  and  as  to  many  of  them  there  is  a  debatable  question 
whether  they  come  within  the  proper  province  of  government  and  whether  official 
interference  will  not  in  the  long  run  do  more  harm  than  good  to  the  beneficiaries 
and  to  the  community.  No  one,  however,  doubts  that  it  is  the  proper  function  of 
government  to  secure  justice.  In  a  broad  sense  that  is  the  chief  thing  for  which  gov- 
ernment is  organized.  Nor  can  any  one  question  that  the  highest  obligation  of  govern- 
ment is  to  secure  justice  for  those  who,  because  they  are  poor  and  weak  and  friend- 
less, find  it  hard  to  maintain  their  own  rights.  This  book  shows  that  we  have  not  been 
performing  that  duty  very  satisfactorily,  and  that  we  ought  to  bestir  ourselves  to 
do  better. 

I  do  not  think  that  we  should  be  over-harsh  in  judging  ourselves,  however,  for  the 
shortcomings  have  been  the  result  of  changing  conditions  which  the  great  body  of 
our  people  have  not  fully  appreciated.  We  have  had  in  the  main  just  laws  and  honest 
courts  to  which  people — poor  as  well  as  rich — could  repair  to  obtain  justice.  But 
the  rapid  growth  of  great  cities,  the  enormous  masses  of  immigrants  (many  of  them 
ignorant  of  our  language),  and  the  greatly  increased  complications  of  life  have  cre- 
ated conditions  under  which  the  provisions  for  obtaining  justice  which  were  formerly 


x  FOREWORD 

sufficient  are  sufficient  no  longer.  I  think  the  true  criticism  which  we  should  make 
upon  our  own  conduct  is  that  we  have  been  so  busy  about  our  individual  affairs  that 
we  have  been  slow  to  appreciate  the  changes  of  conditions  which  to  so  great  an  extent 
have  put  justice  beyond  the  reach  of  the  poor.  But  we  cannot  confine  ourselves  to 
that  criticism  much  longer;  it  is  time  to  set  our  own  house  in  order.  And  as  we  do 
so  we  should  recognize  with  gratitude  the  noble  and  unselfish  men  and  women  whom 
this  book  shows  to  have  been  devoting  themselves  to  the  task  which  most  of  us  have 
been  neglecting. 

Elihu  Root. 


July,  1919- 


INTRODUCTION 

THE  present  Bulletin  constitutes  the  second  in  a  series  of  studies  of  legal  educa- 
tion and  cognate  matters  that  is  in  course  of  publication  by  the  Carnegie 
Foundation,  under  the  general  charge  of  Mr.  Alfred  Z.  Reed.  The  first  number, 
published  before  the  war,  was  the  report  of  Professor  Redlich  upon  the  Case  Method. 
The  present  volume  will  be  followed  by  a  detailed  study  of  law  schools  and  exami- 
nations for  the  bar.  A  large  number  of  persons  have  cooperated  in  the  general  under- 
taking, and  the  mass  of  material  is  not  only  enormous,  but  complex. 

It  was  inevitable  that  any  such  comprehensive  study  should  touch  at  many  points 
the  administration  of  the  law  itself  and  the  effects  of  this  administration  upon  the 
people  for  whose  protection  and  contentment  law  and  courts  exist.  The  presentation 
of  the  present  report  as  a  special  bulletin  in  this  series  was  suggested  in  the  first 
instance  by  the  application  of  certain  legal  aid  societies  to  the  Carnegie  Corporation 
for  grants  of  funds.  The  trustees  of  the  Corporation,  while  disposed  to  look  upon  the 
work  of  these  bodies  as  important,  felt  that  a  thoroughgoing  report  on  the  whole 
question  of  legal  aid  should  precede  any  such  action  on  their  part.  They  agreed, 
therefore,  to  defray  the  expense  of  such  a  report  if  prepared  with  the  cooperation  of 
the  Carnegie  Foundation  in  conjunction  with  its  already  partially  completed  enquiry. 
The  work,  including  the  visitation  of  all  legal  aid  societies  in  the  United  States,  and 
the  reduction  of  the  material  into  its  present  form,  has  been  accomplished  in  a  most 
careful  and  discriminating  fashion  by  Mr.  Reginald  Heber  Smith,  of  the  Boston  bar. 
Although  primarily  designed  to  deal  only  with  legal  aid  work,  the  scope  of  the  study 
inevitably  broadened.  It  proved  impossible  to  consider  existing  legal  aid  societies 
without  taking  into  account  at  the  same  time  other  agencies  which  experience  has 
suggested  in  the  effort  to  make  the  administration  of  justice  direct,  simple,  and  ac- 
cessible alike  to  rich  and  poor.  The  present  report  deals,  therefore,  with  the  whole 
question  of  administration  of  the  law  as  it  affects  members  of  the  body  politic  who 
by  reason  of  poverty,  ignorance,  or  lack  of  knowledge  of  the  language  are  at  a  dis- 
advantage in  the  effort  to  secure  justice  as  between  man  and  man  in  the  various 
disputes  that  arise  in  our  present  complicated  industrial  and  social  relations. 

The  study  touches  so  closely  the  source  of  much  current  discontent  and  points  the 
way  to  constructive  action  so  important  and  yet  so  feasible,  that  its  publication  now 
is  especially  timely.  There  never  was  a  time  when  it  was  more  important  to  pro- 
vide machinery  that  shall  be  adequate  to  accomplish  in  fact  that  justice  at  which  the 
law  aims  and  for  whose  attainment  amongst  men  it  was  established.  It  is  not  enough 
for  the  law  to  intend  justice.  It  must  be  so  administered  that  for  the  great  body  of 
citizens  justice  is  actually  attained.  Be  the  law  never  so  good  in  theory,  uncertain  or 
dilatory  administration,  through  the  present  cumbersome  or  defective  machinery, 
goes  far  to  defeat  its  aims.  The  widespread  suspicion  that  our  law  fails  to  secure  jus- 
tice has  only  too  much  basis  in  fact.  If  this  suspicion  is  allowed  to  grow  unchecked, 


xii  INTRODUCTION 

it  will  end  by  poisoning  the  faith  of  the  people  in  their  own  government  and  in  law 
itself,  the  very  bulwark  of  justice. 

That  justice  can  be  attained  only  through  the  law  is  made  clear  at  the  outset  of 
this  report.  Human  experience  in  all  ages  and  in  all  countries  proves  that  our  only 
hope  to  attain  a  fair  equality  of  justice  for  every  member  of  society,  wise  or  igno- 
rant, good  or  bad,  rich  or  poor,  lies  in  a  system  of  law  based  on  principles  long  tried 
and  administered  by  those  removed  from  the  pull  of  personal  interest.  A  citizen  of 
any  state  may  have  a  reasonable  confidence  in  justice  for  himself  only  so  long  as  his 
rights  and  privileges  are  defined  by  the  rules  of  law  and  not  by  the  whim  of  any  in- 
dividual. Freedom  and  justice  for  the  individual  member  of  the  body  politic  can  be 
hoped  for  only  through  the  reign  of  law,  and  not  through  the  favoritism  of  any  ruler 
or  class  or  faction.  No  lesson  of  human  society  can  be  more  clear  than  this,  that  law 
is  nothing  other  than  the  crystallized  experience  of  mankind,  embodied  in  principles 
that  aim  at  the  attainment  of  justice  as  between  man  and  man  and  as  between  soci- 
ety and  the  individual. 

It  follows  directly  from  this  conception  of  law,  however,  that  in  the  process  of  social 
development  some  readjustment  of  the  law,  in  the  light  of  altered  conditions  and 
widened  experience,  is  from  time  to  time  required.  Otherwise  our  inherited  body  of 
legal  principles  and  our  ideals  of  abstract  justice  are  in  danger  of  growing  apart.  If  the 
task  of  bringing  them  together  again  should  by  any  chance  be  deferred  until  a  large 
element  of  our  population  suffer  long  continued  grievances  under  the  existing  law,  a 
temper  of  mind  is  created  that  does  not  make  for  sane  reform  by  orderly  methods. 

The  conclusion  to  which  the  author  of  this  study  is  led  is  that  in  so  far  as  con- 
cerns what  is  technically  known  as  the  substantive  law,  the  poor  are  at  no  special 
disadvantage  as  compared  with  the  rich.  If  no  more  were  required  for  the  even-handed 
distribution  of  justice  than  this,  that  the  rights  of  all  men,  rich  or  poor,  strong  or 
weak,  should  be  impartially  and  equally  defined  under  the  law,  then  democracy  has 
come  near  to  realizing  its  ideal.  No  special  procedure  for  enforcing  this  substantive 
law  needs  to  be  invoked  when  it  is  well  settled,  and  is  well  known,  and  no  dispute 
exists  in  regard  to  the  facts  and  all  parties  affected  are  strictly  law  abiding.  For- 
tunately the  great  number  of  our  activities  are  conducted  in  this  manner. 

There  is,  however,  a  class  of  activities,  exceptional  yet  enormous  in  the  aggregate, 
where  these  conditions  do  not  obtain  —  where  the  substantive  law,  determining  the 
point  at  issue,  is  not  settled,  or  if  settled,  is  not  known  to  the  individual;  or  where 
the  parties  affected  disagree,  in  good  faith,  as  to  the  facts  upon  which  their  relative 
rights  depend ;  or  where  one  or  the  other  of  them  does  not  respect  the  law,  whether 
from  impatient  desire  to  remedy  what  he  conceives  to  be  its  defects,  or  more  fre- 
quently from  naked  self-interest.  These  are  the  cases  where  justice  has  to  be  actu- 
ally administered  with  the  aid  of  lawyers  and  of  courts.  If  for  any  reason  this  neces- 
sary machinery  of  justice  cannot  be  employed,  then  the  theoretical  protection  that 
the  individual  possesses  under  the  law  is  of  no  practical  use  to  him. 


INTRODUCTION  xiii 

It  is  on  this  side  that  the  author  shows  the  danger  to  lie.  In  the  law  that  fixes 
and  prescribes  the  machinery  through  which  rights  are  enforced  or  defended — that 
is  to  say,  in  what  is  technically  known  as  procedural  or  adjective,  as  distinguished 
from  substantive  law — he  finds  grave  defects.  He  shows  how,  not  because  any  one 
has  deliberately  intended  to  do  wrong,  but  because  no  one  has  squarely  faced  the 
needs  of  our  new  immigrant  citizens,  our  increasing  class  of  wage-earners,  and  of  our 
vast  urban  populations,  the  expense  and  delay  needed  to  obtain  legal  relief  are  fre- 
quently such  that  the  poor  cannot  afford  it.  Many  are  actually  deprived  of  their 
rights.  Still  others  believe  that  they  are  so  deprived  and  cherish  grievances  that  a 
less  expensive  and  more  prompt  administration  of  the  machinery  of  justice  might 
serve  to  dispel.  Even  if  they  are  not  quite  sure  that  they  are  in  the  right,  the  mere 
fact  that  they  cannot  have  their  claims  quickly  passed  upon  by  an  impartial  tribunal 
under  simple  procedure  seems  to  them  an  unjust  discrimination,  devised  by  the  rich 
to  oppress  the  poor.  Under  these  conditions  the  claim  of  the  demagogue  or  of  the 
sincere  but  mistaken  doctrinaire  that  justice  can  be  made  to  order  by  some  new  form 
of  social  machinery  falls  upon  ready  ears.  The  long  lesson  of  human  experience  in 
the  effort  to  attain  justice  is  easily  forgot,  and  those  who  are  discontented  by  reason 
of  real  or  fancied  ills  and  who  are  more  directly  interested  than  any  other  members 
of  the  body  politic  in  a  freedom  defined  by  law  are  ready  to  have  their  civil  liberty 
defined  in  terms  of  personal  influence  or  of  class  prejudice. 

How  much  the  present  weaknesses  in  the  administration  of  the  law  work  against 
the  interest  of  the  poor  as  such  it  is  of  course  impossible  to  say.  It  would  be  a  mistake 
to  assume  that  the  cost  of  litigation  and  the  law's  delay  benefit  the  rich  exclusively. 
In  a  great  number  of  cases  they  work  to  the  advantage  of  the  dishonest  poor.  The 
deserving  poor  man  is  helpless  to  obtain  speedy  justice  from  any  one,  poor  or  rich. 
The  question  is  not  primarily  one  as  between  rich  and  poor,  but  concerns  rather  the 
fundamental  necessity  in  a  free  country  to  place  justice,  so  far  as  it  is  humanly  possible 
to  do  so,  within  the  reach  of  those  who  occupy  any  station  in  life.  Our  civilization 
rests  upon  an  honest  and  sincere  attempt  to  realize  this  ideal. 

While  the  poor,  like  the  rich,  come  to  serious  disputes  with  their  fellow-men  and 
with  the  agencies  in  the  social  order  with  which  they  have  relations  in  many  ways, 
the  great  proportion  of  questions  which  they  desire  to  bring  to  settlement  lie  in  a 
few  fields  —  questions  concerning  wages,  those  resulting  from  injury  while  in  employ- 
ment, and  those  which  originate  in  the  family  relations  and  affect  directly  the  hap- 
piness of  wives  and  children  and  the  integrity  of  the  home.  The  very  natural  failure 
of  the  administration  of  the  law  to  keep  pace  with  the  rapid  industrial  transforma- 
tion of  the  country  is  the  source  of  much  of  the  complaint  of  the  poor  and  partic- 
ularly of  the  poor  man  who  is  also  an  alien,  touching  all  the  matters  relating  to  his 
employment,  his  citizenship,  and  the  disputes  which  arise  in  his  domestic  relations. 

The  study  here  presented  sets  forth  in  simple  and  non-technical  language,  first  the 
defects  in  the  administration  of  the  law  which  work  in  effect  a  denial  of  justice  to  the 


xiv  INTRODUCTION 

poor  or  to  the  ignorant;  and  secondly,  the  agencies,  supplementary  to  the  existing 
machinery,  whose  object  is  to  remedy  these  defects. 

The  important  defects  are  three — delay,  court  costs  and  fees,  and  the  expense  of 
counsel.  The  agencies  suggested  to  remedy  these  defects  fall  into  two  groups  accord- 
ing as  the  nature  of  the  case  admits  of  settlement  without  legal  counsel  or,  on  the 
other  hand,  requires  counsel  for  the  full  protection  of  the  disputants. 

In  the  first  group  of  remedial  agencies  are  placed  the  small  claims  court,  the  agen- 
cies for  conciliation  and  arbitration,  the  domestic  relations  courts  and  administrative 
tribunals,  and  all  officials  authorized  to  deal  promptly  with  disputants.  For  the  other 
group  of  cases — those  for  whom  legal  counsel  is  necessary — the  present  report  dis- 
cusses the  defender  in  criminal  cases,  the  assignment  of  counsel,  and  finally  and  most 
exhaustively  the  legal  aid  organizations. 

The  outcome  and  the  object  of  the  report  is  the  effort  to  prove  that  these  various 
agencies,  if  properly  articulated  with  the  existing  system  of  the  administration  of  jus- 
tice, can  be  made  to  secure,  so  far  as  human  means  can  do,  the  practical  equality  of 
all  men  before  the  law  and  to  afford  to  all  citizens  without  regard  to  wealth  or  rank 
or  race  the  means  for  a  prompt,  inexpensive,  and  fair  adjudication  of  their  complaints. 

For  no  group  in  the  citizenship  of  the  countrv  is  this  more  needed  than  in  the 
case  of  the  great  mass  of  citizens  of  foreign  birth,  ignorant  of  the  language,  and  help- 
less to  secure  their  rights  unless  met  by  an  administration  of  the  machinery  of  justice 
that  shall  be  simple,  sympathetic,  and  patient.  To  such  the  apparent  denial  of  jus- 
tice forms  the  path  to  disloyalty  and  bitterness. 

This  report,  prepared  with  great  care  and  stated  in  moderate  terms,  deserves  at  the 
hands  of  the  members  of  the  bar  serious  and  sympathetic  attention.  If  those  who 
officially  represent  the  law  do  not  bend  their  energies  and  give  their  best  thought  to 
make  the  administration  of  justice  fair,  prompt,  and  accessible  to  the  humblest  citizen, 
to  what  group  in  the  body  politic  may  we  turn  with  any  hope  that  this  matter  will 
be  dealt  with  wisely  and  justly  ? 

The  world  is  to-day  filled  with  the  word  "democracy."  Sometimes  it  is  used  to 
denote  a  government  in  which  the  civil  rights  of  the  individual  rest  upon  a  consti- 
tutional guarantee,  sometimes  to  describe  a  class  rule  more  autocratic  than  that  of 
the  Czar.  An  autocracy  can  exist  without  law,  but  a  free  democracy  cannot.  The 
very  existence  of  free  government  depends  upon  making  the  machinery  of  justice 
so  effective  that  the  citizens  of  the  democracy  shall  believe  in  its  impartiality  and 
fairness. 

Henry  S.  Pritchett, 

President  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation. 


June,  1919. 


PART  I 
THE  EXISTING  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 


Chapter  I 
FREEDOM  AND  EQUALITY  OF  JUSTICE— THE  IDEAL 

To  no  one  will  we  sell,  to  no  one  will  we  refuse  or  delay,  right  or  justice. 
Magna  Carta,  cap.  40. 

FREEDOM  and  equality  of  justice  are  twin  fundamental  conceptions  of  Amer- 
ican jurisprudence.  Together  they  form  the  basic  principle  on  which  our  entire 
plan  for  the  administration  of  justice  is  built.  They  are  so  deep-rooted  in  the 
body  and  spirit  of  our  laws  that  the  very  meaning  which  we  ascribe  to  the  word  jus- 
tice embraces  them.  A  system  which  created  class  distinctions,  having  one  law  for  the 
rich  and  another  for  the  poor,  which  was  a  respecter  of  persons,  granting  its  pro- 
tection to  one  citizen  and  denying  it  to  his  fellow,  we  would  unhesitatingly  condemn 
as  unjust,  as  devoid  of  those  essentials  without  which  there  can  be  no  justice. 

From  the  dawn  of  Anglo-Saxon  legal  history,  this  idea  has  been  manifest.  The 
earliest  laws  continually  directed  that  justice  be  done  alike  to  rich  and  poor.1  The 
equal  right  to  law  was  asserted  in  the  Charter  of  Liberties  of  Henry  II.2  The  idea 
received  its  classic  embodiment  and  statement  in  the  fortieth  paragraph  of  Magna 
Carta,  where  was  inscribed  "nulli  vendemus,  nulli  negabimus,  aut  drfferemus,  rectum 
autjusticiam.""  As  a  purely  historical  fact  this  did  not  signify,  or  inaugurate,  an  era 
of  absolute  freedom  of  justice,  but  it  was  a  first  step  in  that  direction.  Its  supreme 
importance,  however,  lies  in  the  tradition3  which  gradually  attached  to  it,  and  which 
glorified  the  idea  into  an  ideal — an  ideal  which  steadily  persisted  in  men's  minds 
throughout  five  centuries,  and  which  was  brought  by  the  colonists  to  the  New  World.4 
In  the  constitutional  conventions  which  followed  the  American  Revolution  the 
ideal  was  given  concrete  expression  in  the  various  state  Bills  and  Declarations  of 
Rights.5  The  Massachusetts  Constitution,  adopted  in  1780,  declared:6 

"Every  subject  of  the  Commonwealth  ought  to  find  a  certain  remedy,  by  hav- 
ing recourse  to  the  laws,  for  all  injuries  or  wrongs  which  he  may  receive  in  his 
person,  property,  or  character.  He  ought  to  obtain  right  and  justice  freely,  and 
without  being  obliged  to  purchase  it;  completely,  and  without  any  denial; 
promptly,  and  without  delay;  conformably  to  the  laws." 

As  state  after  state  has  been  added  to  the  Union,  its  people,  in  constitutional  assem- 
bly, have  written  the  same  declaration  into  their  fundamental  law.  In  New  York  the 

1  Pound:  Causes  of  Popular  Dissatisfaction  with  the  Administration  of  Justice,  29  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1906)  395; 
citing  Secular  Ordinance  of  Edgar,  cap.  I ;  Secular  Ordinance  of  Cnut,  2;  Laws  of  Ethelred,  VI,  1;  Laws  of  Ed- 
ward, Preface. 

2  Stimson:  Federal  and  State  Constitutions  (1908),  page  16. 

3  McKechnie:  Magna  Carta  (1914),  pages  127,  395-398. 

4  For  a  general  discussion  of  the  influence  of  Magna  Carta  on  American  institutions  see  H.  D.  Hazel  tine:  Influence 
of  Magna  Carta  on  American  Constitutional  Development,  17  Columbia  L.  Rev.  (1917)  1. 

0  Our  American  Bills  of  Rights  bear  a  direct  relation  to  Magna  Carta.  See  James  Q.  Dealey :  Growth  of  American 
State  Constitutions  —  1776  to  1914,  page  35.  Bryce  aptly  called  them  "the  legitimate  children  of  Magna  Carta." 

1  American  Commonwealth,  422. 

6  Part  I :  Declaration  of  Rights,  Article  XI. 


4  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

declaration  is  contained  in  a  statute,1  but  this  is  exceptional.  To-day,  the  constitu- 
tion of  nearly  every  state,  by  express  provision  of  the  Bill  of  Rights,  guarantees 
the  freedom  and  equality  of  justice.2  The  Fourteenth  Amendment  to  the  Constitu- 
tion of  the  United  States  adds  to  the  state  guaranty  the  authority  of  the  supreme 
law  of  the  land.3 

As  a  matter  of  law,  the  right  stands  inviolable.  It  is  recognized  and  established  by 
the  highest  possible  authority.  But  that  is  not  all.  Its  incorporation  into  the  Bills 
of  Rights  transformed  the  principle  from  merely  a  legal  or  juristic  conception  to  a 
political  consideration  of  supreme  importance.  Not  only  was  the  right  to  freedom  and 
equality  of  justice  set  apart  with  those  other  cardinal  rights  of  liberty  and  of  con- 
science which  were  deemed  sacred  and  inalienable,  but  it  was  made  the  most  important 
of  all  because  on  it  all  the  other  rights,  even  the  rights  to  life,  liberty,  and  the  pur- 
suit of  happiness,  were  made  to  depend.4  In  a  word,  it  became  the  cornerstone  of  the 
Republic. 

Ours  was  designed  to  be,  and  is,  a  government  of  laws  and  not  of  men.  Under  a 
government  so  constituted  the  right  of  the  individual  to  life,  to  freedom  of  motion, 
of  thought,  of  conscience,  to  his  children,  to  his  home,  and  the  social  interest  in  se- 
curing these  things  to  human  beings  all  depend,  in  last  resort,  entirely  and  absolutely 
on  law.  This  is  recognized  by  our  constitutions,  and  has  been  repeatedly  emphasized 
by  decisions  of  courts,  in  the  speeches  of  statesmen,  and  in  treatises  on  government.5 
The  New  Hampshire  constitution,6  which  is  typical,  thus  expresses  it: 

"It  is  essential  to  the  preservation  of  the  rights  of  every  individual,  his  life,  lib- 
erty, property,  and  character,  that  there  be  an  impartial  interpretation  of  the  laws 
and  administration  of  justice." 

To  secure  impartial  laws  and  an  equal  administration  of  justice,  and  thereby  to 
make  possible  the  enjoyment  of  the  rights  and  opportunities  contemplated  by  a  demo- 
cracy, the  State  itself  exists.7  The  best  welfare  and  the  greatest  possible  happiness  of 
the  men,  women,  and  children  of  the  nation  is  the  ultimate  goal.  The  State  is  their 
servant  and  its  government  the  means  by  which  the  desired  end  can  best  be  obtained. 

Concerning  these  fundamentals  there  is  no  dispute,  at  least  within  America.  Their 
extended  statement  here  would  be  superfluous  but  for  the  fact  that,  although  the  de- 
pendency of  every  right  and  interest  on  law  is  recognized,  the  consequences  which  in- 

1  Civil  Rights  Law,  §  10 ;  I.  Birdseye's  dimming  and  Gilbert:  Consolidated  Laws  of  New  York,  page  620. 

2  For  citations  to  each  state  constitution  see  Stimson :  Federal  and  State  Constitutions,  pages  148,  149. 

3  Root :  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship  (1916),  page  460. 

4  "These  cardinal  rights  may  be  divided  into  the  four  great  realms  of  Rights  to  Liberty,  to  Property,  to  Law,  and 
Rights  of  the  People  as  against  the  Government.  Logically  and  historically  the  first  is  the  right  to  law,  for  there 
can  be  no  property,  no  government,  and  no  real  liberty  without  law."  Stimson  :  Federal  and  State  Constitutions, 
page  10. 

s  See  Cotting  v.  Kansas  City  Stock  Yards  Co.  183  U.  S.  79,  84.  Wheeler:  American  Liberty  Protected  and  Ruled  by 
Law,  48  Am.  L.  Rev.  (1914)  1.  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  pages  98,  106,  640.  73  Annals  of  the 
American  Academy  of  Political  and  Social  Science  (1917),  137.  Lyman  Abbott:  Report  of  Speeches  at  New  York 
Legal  Aid  Society  Banquet  (1901),  page  31. 

6  Constitution  of  New  Hampshire  (1792),  Part  I,  Bill  of  Rights,  §  36. 

7  "That  to  secure  these  rights  governments  are  instituted  among  men."  Declaration  of  Independence. 


FREEDOM  AND  EQUALITY  OF  JUSTICE  5 

evitably  flow  from  such  a  form  of  government  seem  not  to  be  generally  appreciated. 

These  consequences,  summarily  stated,  are: — First,  there  can  be  no  political,  so- 
cial, or  economic  equality,  no  democracy,  unless  the  substantive  law  by  fair  and 
equitable  rules  gives  reality  to  equality  by  making  it  a  living  thing.  Second,  the 
substantive  law,  however  fair  and  equitable  itself,  is  impotent  to  provide  the  neces- 
sary safeguards  unless  the  administration  of  justice,  which  alone  gives  effect  and  force 
to  substantive  law,  is  in  the  highest  sense  impartial.  It  must  be  possible  for  the  hum- 
blest to  invoke  the  protection  of  law,  through  proper  proceedings  in  the  courts,  for 
any  invasion  of  his  rights  by  whomsoever  attempted,  or  freedom  and  equality  vanish 
into  nothingness. 

To  withhold  the  equal  protection  of  the  laws,  or  to  fail  to  carry  out  their  intent 
by  reason  of  inadequate  machinery,  is  to  undermine  the  entire  structure  and  threaten 
it  with  collapse.  For  the  State  to  erect  an  uneven,  partial  administration  of  justice 
is  to  abnegate  the  very  responsibility  for  which  it  exists,  and  is  to  accomplish  by  in- 
direction an  abridgment  of  the  fundamental  rights  which  the  State  is  directly  for- 
bidden to  infringe.  To  deny  law  or  justice  to  any  persons  is,  in  actual  effect,  to  outlaw 
them  by  stripping  them  of  their  only  protection. 

It  is  for  such  reasons  that  freedom  and  equality  of  justice  are  essential  to  a  demo- 
cracy and  that  denial  of  justice  is  the  short  cut  to  anarchy. 


Chapter  II 
DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE— THE  FACT 

Of  all  the  questions  which  are  before  the  American  people,  I  regard  no 
one  as  more  important  than  the  improvement  of  the  administration  of  jus- 
tice. We  must  make  it  so  that  the  poor  man  will  have  as  nearly  as  possible 
an  equal  opportunity  in  litigating  as  the  rich  man,  and  under  present  condi- 
tions, ashamed  as  we  may  be  of  it,  this  is  not  the  fact.  Ex-Presdient  Taft 
in  an  Address  before  the  Virginia  Bar  Association. 

THE  inhabitants  of  the  American  colonies  learned  from  the  tyrannies  and  arbi- 
trary conduct  of  George  III  and  the  Royal  Governors  what  denial  of  justice 
meant,  and  it  incited  them  to  rebellion.1  In  their  first  law-making,  after  attaining 
independence,  they  declared  that  justice  must  be  equal  and  accessible  to  all.  This 
principle  they  regarded,  not  as  an  utopian  ideal,  but  as  the  indispensable  safeguard  of 
their  hard  won  liberties,  and  they  proceeded  to  give  it  immediate  effect.  Their  deter- 
mination is  still  evidenced  by  our  constitutional  provisions2  protecting  persons  accused 
of  crime,  which  were  originally  written  by  the  framers  to  eliminate  from  our  institu- 
tions the  most  glaring  inequality  of  the  English  law.3 

By  contrast  with  the  complexity  of  the  present  task,  their  problem  was  relatively 
simple.  They  were  a  vigorous,  self-reliant,  homogeneous  people,  possessed  of  average 
intelligence  and  shrewd  common  sense,  living  mostly  in  small  towns  and  agricultural 
communities,  so  that  there  was  not  much  litigation.  As  only  the  simplest  sort  of  judi- 
cial machinery  was  required,  mechanical  defects,  with  their  attendant  delays,  were  at 
a  minimum.  Inexpensive  justice  was  demanded  and  was  secured — sometimes  by  the 
doubtful  economy  of  providing  cheap  judges.4  In  the  lower  courts  where  the  smaller 
cases  were  heard  the  poor  could  plead  their  own  causes.  This  seemed  natural  because 
it  had  been  done  very  largely  during  the  colonial  era,5  and  it  was  possible  because 
there  was  little  law  and  few  precedents;  in  fact,  many  of  the  judges  were  laymen.6 
This  early  administration  of  justice  was  in  many  respects  inferior  to  our  present  sys- 
tem, but  whatever  its  shortcomings  it  at  least  made  some  provision  for  the  smaller 
cases  and  there  was  no  insuperable  barrier  of  expense  fixed  between  the  poor  and 
the  courts. 

The  forces,  in  short,  which  have  caused  our  administration  of  justice  to  break 
down  as  to  the  small  causes  and  the  claims  of  the  poor,  are  not  inevitable,  or  inex- 

1  Declaration  of  Independence,  Paragraphs  3,  4,  11, 17,  20,  21,  and  particularly  Paragraph  10  —  "  He  has  obstructed 
the  administration  of  justice  by  refusing  his  assent  to  laws  establishing  judiciary  powers." 

2  United  States  Constitution,  Amendments  V,  VI,  and  VIII.  For  citations  to  the  state  provisions,  and  for  a  com- 
plete discussion,  see  Stimson:  Federal  and  State  Constitutions,  pages  164  et  seq. 

3  The  English  criminal  law  of  the  eighteenth  century  not  only  inflicted  extreme  punishments  but  deprived  pris- 
oners of  a  fair  trial,  as  by  forbidding  them  counsel  for  their  defence.  This  injustice  was  ameliorated  in  1836  and 
abolished  by  the  Prisoners'  Defence  Act  of  1903. 

4  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII  (1915),  page  26. 

6  Lawyers  had  repeatedly  been  excluded  by  assembly  enactments  from  appearing  in  the  courts.  Warren:  History 
of  the  American  Bar  (1913),  pages  4,  106. 

8  Ibid.,  page  16. 


DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  7 

tricably  interwoven  in  the  development  of  our  institutions,  or  even  of  long  duration, 
but  are  rather  the  result  of  the  tremendous  changes  which  have  taken  place  in  every 
phase  of  the  nation's  life. 

These  changed  conditions,  to  which  our  rigid  court  organization  with  inflexible 
machinery  was  unable  to  adapt  itself,  are  mainly  due  to  immigration,  the  rise  of  the 
wage-earning  class,  and  above  all,  to  the  startling  growth  of  urban  population  with 
all  that  it  entails.  With  the  great  cities  came  the  infinite  complexity  of  modern 
life,  of  business,  and  of  affairs  in  general  which  breeds  litigation.1  The  law  itself 
became  highly  complicated.  With  thirteen  thousand  decisions  of  courts  of  last  resort 
being  made  each  year  and  twelve  thousand  laws  annually  enacted  by  the  legislatures, 
no  man  could  determine  his  rights  without  employing  attorneys.2  The  legislative 
attempt  to  fix  the  machinery  of  justice  in  all  its  details  made  of  procedure  a  maze 
which  precluded  litigation  unless  the  suitor  could  engage  counsel  to  guide  his  case 
through  all  the  technicalities.  The  first  attempt  to  meet  the  enormous  pressure  of 
litigation  was  by  multiplication  of  courts,  which  served  only  to  confound  the  confu- 
sion3 by  injecting  additional  questions  of  jurisdiction,  venue,  and  procedure4  into  a 
system  already  enmeshed  in  its  own  superabundant  technicalities.  The  situation  is 
summarized  by  Dean  Pound  in  these  words:5 

"Our  judicial  organization  and  the  great  body  of  our  American  common  law  are 
the  work  of  the  last  quarter  of  the  eighteenth  century  and  the  first  half  of  the 
nineteenth  century.  On  the  other  hand  our  great  cities  and  the  legal  and  social 
problems  to  which  they  give  rise  are  of  the  last  half  of  the  nineteenth  century,6 
and  indeed  the  pressing  problems  do  not  become  acute  until  the  last  quarter  of 
that  century."7 

One  of  these  problems  was  "to  make  adequate  provision  for  petty  litigation 
in  communities  where  there  is  a  huge  volume  of  such  litigation  which  must  be 
dealt  with  adequately  on  pain  of  grievous  denial  of  justice;  to  provide  for  dis- 
posing quickly,  inexpensively,  and  justly  of  the  litigation  of  the  poor,  for  the 
collection  of  debts  in  a  shifting  population,  and  for  the  great  volume  of  small 
controversies  which  a  busy,  crowded  population,  diversified  in  race  and  language, 
necessarily  engenders.'" 

The  realization  that  there  are  grave  defects  in  the  administration  of  justice  came 
but  slowly.  Had  not  enough  laws  been  passed,  enough  courts  organized,  court  houses 
built,  judges,  clerks,  and  officers  provided  and  paid  salaries — what  more  was  neces- 
sary? When  Roscoe  Pound  delivered  his  epoch-making  address  on  "The  Causes  of 
Popular  Dissatisfaction  with  the  Administration  of  Justice"  before  the  American 

1  Preliminary  Report  on  Efficiency  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  for  the  National  Economic  League,  page  29; 
American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  /(1914),  page  1;  represented  in  52  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1914),  208. 

:  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  page  159. 

3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  FT  (1915),  page  18;  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City, 

26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (1913)  308,  313. 

*  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1917),  15.  s  Pound :  op.  cit,  pages  303,  310,  315. 

6  New  York  did  not  have  a  population  of  one  million  until  1880. 

7  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  organized  legal  aid  was  first  considered  in  1875. 


8  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

Bar  Association  in  1906,1  his  was  like  a  voice  crying  in  the  wilderness.  From  the 
reported  discussion,2  one  would  judge  that  most  of  the  lawyers  present  were  incred- 
ulous, and  that  not  a  few  were  indignant  at  the  intimation  that  our  justice  was  not 
closely  akin  to  perfection  itself. 

In  the  twelve  years  that  have  followed,  the  evidence  has  become  overwhelming.  The 
facts,  though  not  the  causes  which  underlie  them,  are  well  known.  The  administration 
of  American  justice  is  not  impartial, the  rich  and  the  poor  do  not  stand  on  an  equality 
before  the  law,  the  traditional  method  of  providing  justice  has  operated  to  close  the 
doors  of  the  courts  to  the  poor,  and  has  caused  a  gross  denial  of  justice  in  all  parts 
of  the  country  to  millions  of  persons. 

Sweeping  as  this  indictment  may  appear,  it  is  substantiated  by  ample  authority.3 
A  few  statements  deserve  to  be  presented  here. 

"  If  there  is  one  sad  anomaly  that  should  stand  out  in  our  present  days  of  con- 
scientious self-searching,  it  is  the  harsh  fact  that,  with  all  our  prating  about  jus- 
tice, we  deliberately  withhold  it  from  the  thousands  who  are  too  poor  to  pay 
for  it."4 

"The  sources  from  which  industrial  unrest  springs  are:  ...  3.  Denial  of  justice 
in  the  creation,  in  the  adjudication  and  in  the  administration  of  law."5 

"The  equal  administration  of  the  laws  is  a  right  guaranteed  by  the  funda- 
mental law  of  the  land ;  and  yet  no  person  will  deny  that  this  privilege  is  more 
honored  in  the  breach  than  in  the  observance;  for  there  are  very  many  people 
in  every  American  community  who,  through  ignorance  of  their  rights  or  their 
inability  to  pay  the  imposts  levied  by  the  state  as  a  condition  precedent  to  the 
pursuit  of  justice  in  the  courts,  are  constantly  being  denied  that  equal  admin- 
istration of  the  laws  and  the  justice  that  is  supposed,  logically,  to  follow  it."6 

"Taking  the  country  as  a  whole  it  is  so  obvious  that  we  have  almost  ceased 
to  remark  it,  that  in  petty  causes,  that  is,  with  respect  to  the  every  day  rights 
and  wrongs  of  the  great  majority  of  an  urban  community,  the  machinery 
whereby  rights  are  secured  practically  defeats  rights  by  making  it  impracti- 
cable to  assert  them  when  they  are  infringed.  Indeed  in  a  measure  this  is  so  in 
all  causes.  But  what  is  merely  exasperating  in  large  causes  is  downright  pro- 
hibitive in  small  causes.  While  in  theory  we  have  a  perfect  equality,  in  result, 
unless  one  can  afford  expensive  and  time-consuming  litigation,  he  must  con- 
stantly forego  undoubted  rights,  to  which  in  form  the  rules  of  law  give  full 
security  but  for  which,  except  where  large  sums  are  involved,  the  actual  conduct 
of  litigation  affords  no  practicable  remedy." 

1  29  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1906)  395.  2  Ibid.,  beginning  page  55. 

3  Hyde :  Reorganization  of  the  Bar,  8  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1913)  241;  San  Francisco  Recorder  of  July  13,  1914  (editorial) ; 
Proceedings  of  Virginia  Conference  of  Charities  and  Correction  (1916),  78;  Report  of  Proceedings  of  Tliird  Confer- 
ence of  National  Alliance  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1914),  36 ;  Wood:  Position  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Admin- 
istration of  Jtistice  (1914),  23  ;  16  Boston  Legal  Aid  Rep.  (1915)  8;  1  San  Francisco  L.  A.  R.  (1916)  3;  106  Outlook  (1914), 
660,  661;  26  World's  Work  (1913),  663;  Commercial  Club  of  Nashville  Tattler  of  July,  1916,  page  21;  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac. 
Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1917),  5,  106,  140. 

4  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII  (1915),  page  24. 

B  Summary  of  the  Manly  Report  of  the  United  States  Commission  on  Industrial  Relations  (1915),  5;  see  also 
page  9. 

6  San  Francisco  Recorder  of  November  6,  1916,  page  1. 


DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  9 

"Many  causes  have  contributed  to  this  neglect  which  disgraces  American  jus- 
tice."1 

The  majority  of  our  judges  and  lawyers  view  this  situation  with  indifference.  They 
fail  to  see  behind  this  denial  of  justice  the  suffering  and  tragedy  which  it  causes,  the 
havoc  it  plays  in  individual  lives,  and  its  influence  in  retarding  our  Americanization 
program.  "The  judicial  department,''''  said  Chief  Justice  Marshall,2  "comes  home  in 
its  effects  to  every  man's  fireside.  It  passes  on  his  property,  his  reputation,  his  life, 
his  all."  Because  law  is  all-embracing,  the  denial  of  its  protection  means  the  destruc- 
tion of  homes  through  illegal  foreclosures,  the  loss  through  trick  or  chicanery  of  a 
lifetime's  savings,  the  taking  away  of  children  from  their  parents  by  fraudulent  guar- 
dianship proceedings.3  Hundreds  of  thousands  of  men,  many  of  them  immigrants, 
have  been  unable  to  collect  their  wages  honestly  earned.4 

Denial  of  justice  is  not  merely  negative  in  effect;  it  actively  encourages  fraud 
and  dishonesty.  Unscrupulous  employers,  seeing  the  inability  of  wage-earners  to 
enforce  payments,  have  deliberately  hired  men  without  the  slightest  intention  of 
paying  them.3  Some  of  these  employers  are  themselves  poor  men,  who  strive  in  this 
way  to  gain  an  advantage.  The  evil  is  not  one  of  class  in  the  sense  that  it  gives  the 
poor  over  to  the  mercies  of  only  the  rich.  It  enables  the  poor  to  rob  one  another;  it 
permits  the  shrewd  immigrant  of  a  few  years'  residence  to  defraud  his  more  recently 
arrived  countrymen.  The  line  of  cleavage  which  it  follows  and  accentuates  is  that 
between  the  dishonest  and  the  honest.  Everywhere  it  abets  the  unscrupulous,  the 
crafty,  and  the  vicious  in  their  ceaseless  plans  for  exploiting  their  less  intelligent  and 
less  fortunate  fellows.  The  system  not  only  robs  the  poor  of  their  only  protection,  but 
it  places  in  the  hands  of  their  oppressors  the  most  powerful  and  ruthless  weapon  ever 
invented. 

The  law  itself  becomes  the  means  of  extortion.  As  Lord  Brougham  said  of  the 
English  administration  of  justice  in  1800,  it  puts  "a  two-edged  sword  in  the  hands 
of  craft  and  oppression."  From  the  cradle  to  the  grave  the  poor  man  is  the  prey  of 
a  host  of  petty  swindlers,6  who  find  it  easy,  through  such  devices  as  fraudulent 
assignments,  trustee  process,  or  garnishment  of  wages  for  fictitious  debts,7  to  rob  and 


1  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (1913)  316. 

2  John  Marshall,  10  American  Statesmen  Series,  249. 

3  For  such  cases  see  1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  7;  7  Detroit  L.  A.  R.  9,  case  9;  14  Boston  L.  A.  R.  19;  3  Buffalo  L.  A.  R. 
cover. 

4  2  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  5;  3  Detroit  L.  A.  R.  11,  case  9;  4  Detroit  L.  A.  R.  8,  case  5;  32  Minneapolis  L.  A.  R.  26; 
Newark  L.  A.  R.  for  1916,  4;  16  Louisiana  Bar  Ass'n  R.  331 ;  2  Hartford  L.  A.  R.  6: 19  New  York  Educational  Alliance 
R.32. 

6  40  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  16,  32. 

6  St.  Louis  Bar  Ass'n  L.  A.  R.  1-3. 

7  For  a  complete  discussion  of  such  abuses  in  Missouri  see  1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  14-20  ;  numerous  other  instances 
are  found  in  2  Boston  L.  A.  R.  7 ;  Boston  L.  A.  S.  case  9262,  case  6750  of  1918  ;  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  S.  Prospectus  (1909), 
Purpose  Clause  of  Constitution ;  4  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  12, 13  ;  1  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  2;  Portland  (Oregon)  Social  Ser- 
vice Bureau  Report  (1913),  47;  St.  Louis  Bar  Ass'n  L.  A.  R.  2. 

An  investigation  in  Omaha  disclosed  a  case  in  which  the  defendant's  summons  had  been  left  in  his  woodpile.  By 
the  time  he  discovered  it,  a  default  judgment  had  been  entered. 


10  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

despoil.  There  exist  to-day  businesses  established,  conducted,  and  flourishing  on  the 
principle  that  as  against  the  poor  the  law  can  be  violated  with  impunity  because 
redress  is  beyond  their  reach.  It  is  this  situation  which  allowed  such  unrestrained 
abuse  of  the  laws  regulating  the  assignment  of  future  wages  that  a  sort  of  quasi- 
slavery  resulted,  which  brought  the  loan  shark  into  being,  and  permitted  flagrant 
usury  to  grow  into  a  monstrous  thing.1 

The  effects  of  this  denial  of  justice  are  far  reaching.  Nothing  rankles  more  in  the 
human  heart  than  the  feeling  of  injustice.  It  produces  a  sense  of  helplessness,  then  bit- 
terness.2 It  is  brooded  over.  It  leads  directly  to  contempt  for  law,  disloyalty  to  the  gov- 
ernment, and  plants  the  seeds  of  anarchy.3  Theconviction  grows  that  law  is  not  justice4 
and  challenges  the  belief  that  justice  is  best  secured  when  administered  according  to 
law.  The  poor  come  to  think  of  American  justice  as  containing  only  laws  that  punish 
and  never  laws  that  help.5  They  are  against  the  law  because  they  consider  the  law 
against  them.6  A  persuasion  spreads  that  there  is  one  law  for  the  rich  and  another 
for  the  poor.7 

How  this  comes  about  can  be  simply  told.  One  afternoon,  Arthur  v.  Briesen, 
President  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  took  Theodore  Roosevelt,  then  Po- 
lice Commissioner  of  New  York,  to  the  Society's  office  to  see  what  went  on.  They  sat 
at  the  interviewing  desk.  A  glazier  came  in  and  related  that  he  had  set  twenty-two 
panes  of  glass  in  a  barn  and  that  the  owner  of  the  barn  had  refused  to  pay  him 
$6.60,  the  agreed  price.8  He  had  been  out  of  work  and  needed  this  money  to  buy 
bread  and  milk  for  his  family's  supper.  On  his  way  home  from  the  West  Side,  where 
he  had  worked,  to  the  East  Side,  where  he  lived,  he  crossed  Fifth  Avenue  at  Forty- 
fourth  Street  and  passed  the  luxurious  restaurants  on  either  corner.  His  own  chil- 
dren went  to  bed  supperless.  The  next  morning  he  sought  out  a  lawyer,  who  told  him 
that  to  bring  suit  the  costs  and  the  fee  would  be  ten  dollars.  This  he  could  not  pay. 
From  there  he  went  to  the  Municipal  Court,  originally  known  as  "The  Poor  Man's 
Court,"  where  he  saw  a  judge,  who  was  obliged  to  explain  that  he  had  neither  the 
time,  nor  the  money,  nor  the  right  to  undertake  the  necessary  proceedings;  that  as 
the  man  had  no  money,  he  could  not  prosecute  the  case;  and  that,  inasmuch  as  the 
expenses  would  exceed  the  amount  in  dispute,  he  had  better  drop  it.  As  the  man  told 

1  For  a  graphic  description  of  the  extent  of  the  loan  business  see  an  article  in  the  New  York  Times  for  March  25, 
1917,  Magazine  Section,  page  4,  quoting  from  Arthur  H.  Ham,  Director  of  Division  of  Remedial  Loans,  of  the  Russell 
Sage  Foundation ;  also  Business  of  Licensed  Petty  Loan  Brokers  in  Baltimore,  a  study  made  in  1916  by  the  Legal 
Aid  Bureau  of  the  Federated  Charities  of  Baltimore. 

2  Cf.  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98  (1912),  page  289. 

3  Theodore  Roosevelt  in  the  Metropolitan  Magazine  for  May,  1917,  page  66;  Municipal  Court  of  Philadelphia,  Re- 
port for  1915,  pages  viii,  37. 

4  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  page  480. 

6  St.  Louis  Department  of  Public  Welfare,  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  Report  to  the  Mayor  (April  10, 1916),  page 7.  Cf.  Pound: 
Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (1913)  315. 

6  Catchings:  Work  of  the  Neiv  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  15  Green  Bag  (1903),  313,  318. 

7  Wells  :  The  Man  in  Court  (1917),  page  30. 

8  This  is  the  case  referred  to  by  Mr.  Roosevelt  in  his  speech  at  the  Twenty-fifth  Anniversary  Dinner  of  the  New  York 
Legal  Aid  Society.  Report  of  Speeches  (1901),  page  12. 


DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  11 

his  story,  sitting  in  the  office  of  the  legal  aid  society,  he  was  an  incipient  anarchist. 

The  effect  on  the  immigrant  is  peculiarly  unfortunate.  He  comes  to  this  country, 
often  from  lands  of  injustice  and  oppression,  with  high  hopes,  expecting  to  receive 
fair  play  and  square  dealing.  It  is  essential  that  he  be  assimilated  and  taught  respect 
for  our  institutions.  Because  of  the  strangeness  of  all  his  surroundings,  his  ignorance 
of  our  language  and  our  customs,  often  because  of  his  simple  faith  in  the  America 
of  which  he  has  heard,  he  becomes  an  easy  prey.  When  he  finds  himself  wronged  or 
betrayed,  keen  disappointment  is  added  to  the  sense  of  injustice.  Through  bitter  dis- 
illusionment he  becomes  easily  subject  to  the  influences  of  sedition  and  disorder.1 

The  essentially  conservative  bench  and  bar  will  vehemently  deny  any  suggestion 
that  there  is  no  law  for  the  poor,  but,  as  the  legal  aid  societies  know,2  such  is  the 
belief  to-day  of  a  multitude  of  humble,  entirely  honest  people,  and  in  the  light  of 
their  experience  it  appears  as  the  simple  truth.  Consider,  for  example,  this  actual 
case.3  A  woman  borrowed  ten  dollars  in  1914,  and  for  two  years  paid  interest  at  180 
per  cent.  In  1916  a  law  was  enacted  fixing  36  per  cent  as  the  maximum  rate.4  The 
lender,  by  a  device  contrary  to  the  statute,  compelled  her  to  continue  paying  156  per 
cent  interest.  The  law  also  provided  that  if  excess  interest  were  charged,  the  loan 
would  be  declared  void  by  a  suit  in  equity.5  The  law  was  on  the  books.  The  court 
house  was  open,  the  equity  court  in  session  with  its  judge  on  the  bench  and  its  offi- 
cers in  attendance.  All  that  was  of  no  avail  to  her,  for  the  law  could  not  bring  its 
redress  until  five  dollars  was  paid  for  service  of  process  and  entry  fee,  and  ten  dollars 
to  an  attorney  to  draw,  file,  and  present  the  necessary  bill  of  complaint.  Fifteen  dol- 
lars she  did  not  have  and,  because  of  her  condition,  could  not  earn.  For  her  there 
was  no  law. 

Repeated  warnings  have  come  from  sources  entitled  to  respect  that  such  a  condition 
of  affairs  is  capable  of  producing  incalculable  harm. 

"When  litigation  is  too  costly,  the  result  for  many  persons  is  a  denial  of  justice. 
Such  denial  or  partial  denial  of  justice  engenders  social  and  commercial  friction. 
The  sense  of  helplessness  thus  caused  incites  citizens  to  take  the  law  into  their  own 
hands.  It  causes  crimes  of  violence.  It  saps  patriotism  and  destroys  civic  pride. 
It  arouses  class  jealousies  and  breeds  contempt  for  law  and  government."6 

"The  problem  is  fundamental.  It  strikes  at  the  very  root  of  our  economic,  social 

1  See  The  Immigrants  in  America  Review,  vol.  i,  No.  4  (January,  1916),  pages  31,  32 ;  Second  Report,  California  Com- 
mission of  Immigration  (1916),  101, 103;  Prospectus  of  New  Jersey  Legal  Aid  Society:  A  Legal  Clinic  (1906),  2;  17 
Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1901),  165;  Report  of  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Immigration  for  1914,  House 
Document  No.  2300  of  1914,  page  111. 

2  1  Buffalo  L.  A.  R.  3;  5  Buffalo  L.  A.  R.  6;  6  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  7;  Cleveland  L.  A.  S. :  Justice  for  the  Poor,  page  1 ; 
Nashville  Commercial  Club:  The  Legal  Aid  Society  (1915);  1  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  3:  8  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  15;  16 
Jewish  Charities  of  Chicago  R.  (Bureau  of  Personal  Service)  70,  72,  73;  26N.Y.  L.  A.R.  5;  Wood:  Office  of  Public  De- 
fender (Los  Angeles),  page  3 ;  2  L.  A.  Rev.  No.  2,  p.  1 ;  8  L.  A.  Rev.  No.  3,  p.  2 ;  Report  of  Proceedings,  Third  Conven- 
tion National  Alliance  L.  A.  S.,  page  22;  Ibid.,  Fourth,  page  123. 

3  Mary v.  Star  Finance  Co.,  reported  in  full  in  16  Boston  L.  A.  R.  12-14. 

4  Mass.  Acts  of  1916,  chap.  224. 

4  Mass.  Acts  of  1911,  chap.  727,  §§  10, 13. 

6  Chief  Justice  Olson  in  the  Eighth  and  Ninth  Annual  Report  of  the  Chicago  Municipal  Court  (1915),  page  128. 


12  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

and  political  structure.  The  man  or  woman  who  has  honestly  toiled  and  cannot 
obtain  the  wages  earned,  loses  faith  in  humanity  and  the  efficacy  of  our  laws  and 
courts;  is  often  turned  out  a  beggar,  vagrant,  or  criminal,  or  seeks  redress  by 
forcible  means.,n 

"If  ever  a  time  shall  come  when  in  this  city  only  the  rich  man  can  enjoy  law 
as  a  doubtful  luxury,  when  the  poor  who  need  it  most  cannot  have  it,  when 
only  a  golden  key  will  unlock  the  door  to  the  court  room,  the  seeds  of  revolu- 
tion will  be  sown,  the  firebrand  of  revolution  will  be  lighted  and  put  into  the 
hands  of  men,  and  they  will  almost  be  justified  in  the  revolution  which  will 
follow."2 

In  that  direction  we  have  imperceptibly,  unconsciously,  and  unintentionally  drifted. 
The  end  of  such  a  course  is  disclosed  by  history.3  Differences  in  the  ability  of  classes 
to  use  the  machinery  of  the  law,  if  permitted  to  remain,  lead  inevitably  to  dispar- 
ity between  the  rights  of  classes  in  the  law  itself.  And  when  the  law  recognizes  and 
enforces  a  distinction  between  classes,  revolution  ensues  or  democracy  is  at  an  end. 


1  Sixteenth  Biennial  Report  of  the  California  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics  (1914),  page  15.  Cf.  Harley :  Ultimate  Types 
of  Inferior  Courts  and  Judges,  22  Case  and  Comment  (1915),  6. 

2  From  a  speech  by  Lyman  Abbott  at  the  Twenty-fifth  Anniversary  Dinner  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society. 
Report  of  Speeches  (1901),  page  32. 

3  By  the  third  century  a.d.  class  distinction  had  been  set  up  by  the  Roman  law.  For  an  excellent  statement,  see 
Davis:  Tlie  Influence  of  Wealth  in  Imperial  Rome  (1910),  page  323. 


Chapter  III 
THE  DEFECTS  IN  THE  ADMINISTRATION  OF  JUSTICE 

The  profession  and  the  courts  must  take  up  vigorously  and  fear- 
lessly the  problem  of  to-day  —  how  to  administer  the  law  to  meet 
the  demands  of  the  world  that  is.  Roscoe  Pound  in  Justice  Ac- 
cording to  Law.1 

§   1 

THE  end  of  all  our  legal  institutions  is  to  secure  justice.  What  is  the  just  de- 
cision in  any  controversy  we  determine,  not  by  the  arbitrary  will  or  opinion 
of  any  individual,  but  in  accordance  with  definite  rules  of  law.  This  is  the  method 
.  of  justice  according  to  law,  and  because  it  so  far  surpasses  all  other 

.  .      "    attempts  at  human  justice  it  stands  as  a  basic  principle  from  which  we 
u  cannot  safely  depart. 

Our  system  of  justice  according  to  law  has  clear  defects  which  exist  first,  because 
law  is  not  omnipotent  but  has  limits  beyond  which  its  action  is  ineffective,2  and  sec- 
ond, because  the  system,  like  all  finite  projects,  has  its  own  particular  weak  points.3 
From  the  ensuing  discussion,  defects  traceable  to  these  limitations  and  disadvantages 
must  be  eliminated,  for  so  long  as  we  desire  to  retain  the  manifold  benefits  of  jus- 
tice according  to  law,  it  is  profitless  to  quarrel  about  its  concomitant  and  inherent 
shortcomings. 

§  2 
Freedom  and  equality  of  justice  for  the  poor  depend  first  on  an  impartial  substan- 
tive law  and  second  on  an  even-handed  administration  of  that  law.  The  substantive 
law  is  primary,  for  through  it  are  created,  stated,  and  defined  all  the 
rights,  obligations,  and  relationships  between  individuals,  between  in- 
dividuals and  the  State,  and  through  it  are  secured  the  social  interests 
in  the  health,  safety,  security,  and  general  well-being  of  the  individual  and  the  com- 
munity. It  is  an  absolute  condition  precedent,  for  if  it  acknowledged  differences  in 
rights  between  rich  and  poor,  a  perfected  machinery  of  enforcement  would  serve  only 
to  accentuate  the  distinctions  and  make  them  the  more  intolerable. 

The  body  of  the  substantive  law,  as  a  whole,  is  remarkably  free  from  any  taint 
of  partiality.  It  is  democratic  to  the  core.  Its  rights  are  conferred  and  its  liabilities 
imposed  without  respect  of  persons.  While,  in  this  age  of  transition,  it  is  confronted 
with  tremendous  problems  as  yet  unsolved,  while  it  is  slow  to  employ  the  more  lib- 
eral premises  demanded  by  a  new  era,4  it  deserves  to  be  recognized  as  a  remarkably 
satisfactory  human  achievement.  This  is  the  opinion  of  our  greatest  legal  scholars  and 

1  13  Columbia  L.  Rev.  696;  14  Columbia  L.  Rev.  1, 103  (1913-14).  In  the  reprint  in  separate  form  see  page  39. 

2  Pound:  Limits  of  Effective  Legal  Action,  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1  (January,  1917),  65,  particularly  pages  66-70. 

3  Pound :  Justice  According  to  Law,  particularly  pages  17,  18. 

4  Cf.  Pound:  Ibid.,  page  60. 


14  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

of  the  most  searching  critics  of  our  judicial  institutions ;  of  such  men  as  Roscoe  Found, 
John  H.  Wigmore,  and  the  group  who  comprise  the  membership  of  the  American 
Judicature  Society.1  A  careful  examination  of  the  fairness  of  the  substantive  law  from 
the  point  of  view  of  the  poor  has  recently  been  made  by  Judge  Parry  of  the  English 
County  Courts,2  from  which  it  is  instantly  apparent  that  the  legal  disabilities  of  the 
poor  in  nearly  every  instance  result  from  defects  in  the  machinery  of  the  law  and  are 
not  created  by  any  discriminations  of  the  substantive  law  against  them. 

Three  branches  of  substantive  law,  it  is  true,  have  been  much  criticized.  With  re- 
gard to  public  service  law  it  has  been  popular  to  claim  that  the  railroads,  traction 
companies,  gas  and  electric  light  corporations  were  imposing  on  the  public  without 
let  or  hindrance  from  the  law.  The  better  opinion  is  that  the  provisions  of  substan- 
tive law  were  entirely  fair  and  adequate,  but  that  the  courts,  without  administrative 
machinery,  were  unable  to  cope  with  the  problems  of  enforcement  and  supervision.3 

Again,  much  of  our  landlord  and  tenant  law  is  still  feudal  in  its  conceptions. 
The  rule  that  most  of  our  city  dwellers,  because  they  occupy  without  written  leases, 
are  only  tenants  "  at  will"  and  so  liable  to  immediate  dispossession  does  not  accord 
with  modern  conditions  and  often  causes  extreme  hardship.  Legislative  attempts, 
as  in  Massachusetts,4  to  invest  such  tenants  with  a  measure  of  security  by  requiring 
notice  to  quit  two  weeks  in  advance  have  been  frustrated  by  the  courts'  adherence 
to  the  common  law  rule  that  the  landlord  may  give  a  written  lease  for  a  year  to  a 
third  person,  who  then  has  a  higher  legal  estate  with  right  of  possession  after  forty- 
eight  hours1  notice.5  In  practice  this  means  that  fictitious  leases  are  delivered  to 
ejectment  companies,6  which  exercise  their  superior  title  by  removing  the  tenant's 
household  furniture  to  a  warehouse  to  be  interned  till  all  charges  are  paid.  This 
anachronism  could  easily  be  remedied,  however,  by  giving  to  proper  courts  discre- 
tionary power  to  control  the  time  which  tenants,  for  cause  shown,  may  continue  in 
possession  after  the  landlord's  notice  to  vacate.7 

Finally,  the  redress  afforded  injured  employees  by  the  law  has  called  forth  the 
bitterest  attacks,  and  here  the  impartiality  of  the  substantive  law  has  most  justly 
been  challenged.  The  workman  who  sought  to  recover  for  injuries  sustained  at  work, 
due  to  the  negligence  of  his  employer,  was  placed  at  an  enormous  disadvantage  by 
the  rules  defining  the  master's  liability.  The  fellow  servant  rule  and  the  doctrine  of 
assumption  of  risk,  growing  out  of  two  cases  which  are  now  severely  condemned8  and 

1  See  also.  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (1913)  302  ;  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac. 

Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (September,  1917),  pages  133,  134,  136 ;  Report  of  Proceedings  of  Missouri  Bar  Association  in 

1914,  page  146.  Cf.  Bentwick :  Legal  Aid  for  the  Poor,  105  Contemporary  Review  (1914),  669. 

*  Edward  Abbott  Parry :  Tlie  Law  and  the  Poor  (1914).  A  limited  examination  is  made  by  Frances  M.  Burdick  in  an 

article  entitled,  "  Is  Law  the  Expression  of  Class  Selfishness  ?  "  25  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (1912)  349.  Professor  Burdick's 

conclusion  is  in  favor  of  the  fairness  of  the  substantive  law. 

3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VI,  page  7.  *  Mass.  Revised  Laws  of  1902.  chap.  129,  §  12. 

6  Pratt  v.  Farrar,  92  Mass.  (1865)  519 ;  for  a  statement  of  the  general  doctrine  see  Swift  v.  Boyd,  202  Mass.  (1909)  26. 

6  See  Lewis:  Leasing  out  the  Tenant  at  Will,  2  Mass.  L.  Quarterly,  No.  6  (August,  1917),  640. 

7  This  is  stated  more  fully  in  Chapter  VIII,  Small  Claims  Courts,  §  7-4,  page  59. 

8  As  to  Farwell  v.  Boston  &  Worcester  Ry.  (the  first  American  case)  4  Metcalf  (1842),  49,  see  Abbott:  Justice  and 


DEFECTS  IN  ADMINISTRATION  15 

elaborated  by  a  process  which  can  only  be  called  judicial  legislation,1  came  perilously 
near  to  constituting  an  actual  class  distinction  in  the  law.  Happily  this  stigma  no 
longer  attaches,  because  within  the  last  seven  years  workmen's  compensation  statutes, 
which  supplant  the  outworn  doctrines  of  liability  with  the  principle  of  insurance, 
have  been  enacted  in  nearly  every  jurisdiction. 

On  examination  and  on  authority,  the  statement  is  warranted  that  the  substan- 
tive law,  with  minor  exceptions,  is  eminently  fair  and  impartial.  In  other  words,  the 
existing  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  is  not  attributable  to  any  injustice  in  the  heart 
of  the  law  itself.  The  necessary  foundation  for  freedom  and  equality  of  justice  exists. 
The  immemorial  struggle  is  half  won. 


§  3 

In  sharp  contrast,  there  are  grave  defects  in  the  administration  of  the  law.  It  is 

the  wide  disparity  between  the  ability  of  the  richer  and  poorer  classes  to  utilize  the 

_   „        .  machinery  of  the  law  which  is,  at  bottom,  the  cause  of  the  present 

Defects  in  .  . 

,,.  .         .        unrest  and  dissatisfaction.  Denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  is  due  to  the 
Administration  7.,.         .  , ,  ,...       ,  ,  .  ,     , 

conditions,  imposed  by  our  traditional  system,  upon  which  alone  can 

suits  be  brought  and  conducted.  There  is  something  tragic  in  the  fact  that  a  plan  and 

method  of  administering  justice,  honestly  designed  to  make  efficient  and  certain  that 

litigation  on  which  at  last  all  rights  depend,  should  result  in  rearing  insuperable 

obstacles  in  the  path  of  those  who  most  need  protection,  so  that  litigation  becomes 

impossible,  rights  are  lost,  and  wrongs  go  unredressed. 

The  present  inequalities  and  defects  in  the  administration  of  justice  are  not  the 
result  of  any  deliberate  intention.  No  dominating  group  or  class  has  consciously  set 
out  to  foreclose  the  rights  of  the  poor.  The  procedural  laws  have  been  passed  by  the 
legislatures  in  good  faith.  The  courts  have  interpreted  and  applied  the  adjective  law 
without  bias  or  favor.  Corruption  has  played  no  part.2 

The  fact  is  that  no  one  clearly  perceived  the  general  trend  of  affairs.  A  Bureau 
of  Justice  of  the  type  advocated  by  Dean  Pound  before  the  Conference  of  Delegates 
of  State  and  Local  Bar  Associations,3  in  1917,  could  have  detected  and  prevented  the 
breakdown  before  it  became  serious,  but  as  yet  our  judicial  administration  lacks  that 
necessary  adjunct.  Complaints  gradually  became  audible  that  whereas  all  other  busi- 
ness was  pointed  toward  efficiency,  reduction  of  costs,  and  a  general  speeding-up,  judi- 
cial machinery  remained  cumbersome,  wasteful,  time-consuming,  and  very  expensive. 

the  Modern  Laiv  (1913),  page  264.  As  to  Priestly  v.  Fowler  (the  first  English  case),  3  Meeson  &  Welsby  (1837),  1,  see 
Parry :  The  Law  and  the  Poor,  pages  76  et  seq. 

1  Judicial  treatment  of  this  particular  class  of  cases  incurred  such  strong  public  disapproval  that  such  cases  have 
now  been  taken  out  of  the  courts  and  entrusted  to  administrative  tribunals.  Seepost,  Chapter  XII,  Administrative 
Tribunals,  page  83. 

2  There  are,  of  course,  specific  instances  of  bribery  and  judicial  corruption.  Most  conspicuous  is  the  old  justice  of 
the  peace  system,  cf.  post,  page  42.  On  a  broad  view,  however,  corruption  has  played  such  a  trivial  part  in  breaking 
down  our  administration  that  it  can  be  dismissed. 

3  This  is  mentioned  in  24  Case  and  Comment  (October,  1917),  423. 


16  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

These  complaints  sounded  in  terms  of  delay  and  annoyance,  not  prohibition.  Even 
to-day  it  is  only  dimly  understood  that  this  faulty  organization  and  procedure,1  which 
is  exasperating  in  large  suits  between  persons  of  means,  in  all  small  suits  and  in  all 
litigation  to  which  the  poor  are  party  causes  an  absolute  denial  of  justice. 

The  conditions,  under  which  our  customary  system  requires  litigation  to  be  con- 
ducted, impair  rights  guaranteed  by  the  substantive  law  because  law  is  not  self-en- 
forcing; only  through  application  in  the  courts  does  the  law  have  life  and  force.2  The 
most  fundamental  rights  remain  idle  abstractions  unless  the  courts  are  able  to  give 
them  efficacy  through  enforcement.  The  Mexican  Constitution  exceeds  any  of  our 
bills  of  rights  in  its  solicitude  for  life,  liberty,  and  property,  and  yet  in  no  country 
have  these  rights  been  more  steadily  violated  with  impunity.3  For  this  reason  the  me- 
chanics of  the  law  occupy  a  place  of  great  importance.  The  vital  problem  of  to-day 
in  the  administration  of  justice  is  to  repair  the  breakdowns  and  to  overhaul  parts  of 
the  machinery  so  that  it  may  work  more  smoothly  and  may  be  workable  by  all. 


§  4 
The  defects  in  the  administration  of  the  law  fall  into  three  distinct  divisions.  In  the 
language  of  Piers  Plowman : 

"To  the  poor  the  Courts  are  a  maze, 
If  he  plead  there  all  his  life, 
Law  is  so  lordly 
And  loath  to  end  his  case; 
Without  money  paid  in  presents 
Law  listeneth  to  few." 

These  three  difficulties  are  not  yet  overcome.  They  still  weigh  heavily  on  the  poor. 
,  Delay  plays  its  unfair  part.  Money  must  be  paid  in  fees  and  costs 

„  or  else  the  courts  are  closed.  The  law  is  necessarily  an  intricate  and 

complicated  science,  which  may  not  be  understood  or  utilized  with- 
out the  assistance  of  a  trained  counsellor  and  advocate  who  must  be  paid.4 

These  are  the  conditions  of  modern  litigation.  The  following  three  chapters  con- 
sider their  precise  nature  and  their  results. 


1  "Our  system  of  courts  is  archaic  and  our  procedure  behind  the  times."  Pound:  Causes  of  Popular  Dissatisfaction 
with  the  Administration  of  Justice,  29  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1906)  Part  I,  395,  408.  See  also  Report  of  the  Committee  on 
Judicial  Procedure  of  the  Massachusetts  Constitutional  Convention  (July  16,  1917),  Convention  Report  No.  314. 

2  "  Applicatioest  vita  regulae,"  2  Bulstrode,  79.  "The  law  as  a  practical  force  always  receives  its  final  effect  through 
the  pronouncement  of  the  judge."  Wigrnore:  The  Qualities  of  Current  Judicial  Decisions,  9  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1915)  529. 

3  Ezra  R.  Thayer:  Judicial  Administration (1915),  page  1. 

4  All  that  can  be  done  within  the  scope  of  this  work  is  to  examine  these  cardinal  defects  which  have  brought  about 
a  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor.  Many  other  factors,  such  as  the  frailties  in  human  nature,  maladjustments  in  our 
social  order,  ignorance,  unfairnesses  in  our  economic  system,  contribute  to  this  deplorable  result. 

One  further  cause  is  so  closely  linked  to  the  administration  of  justice  that  it  must  be  stated,  although  it  cannot 
be  discussed  in  detail.  There  are  to-day  many  members  of  the  Bar  so  ill-trained  in  law  and  so  poorly  equipped  to 
practise  law  that  the  cases  entrusted  to  them  are  mishandled  and  ruined  and  the  rights  of  their  clients  lost.  Unques- 
tionably too  large  a  proportion  of  the  existing  denial  of  justice  is  traceable  to  this  source. 


Chapter  IV 
THE  FIRST  DEFECT— DELAY 

While  the  law  is  enforced,  justice  waits.  The  possibilities  of  delay 
and  of  forcing  a  compromise  to  avoid  expense  and  annoyance  in- 
duce litigation  by  those  who  wish  to  escape  the  faithful  perform- 
ance of  their  contracts.  The  calendars  are  crowded  with  such  cases. 
In  such  a  game  the  poor  stand  little  chance  against  the  rich,  or  the 
honest  against  the  unscrupulous.  Elihu  Root.1 

§1 

ALTHOUGH  the  days  of  Jarndyce  v.  Jarndyce  are  over,  the  course  of  American 
to  justice  still  amply  provides  the  opportunity  for  delay  "  which  gives  to  monied 
might  the  means  abundantly  of  wearying  out  the  right.11  Delay  is 
J  not  entirely  bad.  In  cases  where  it  serves  to  cool  hasty  tempers  and 

'  stay  spiteful  litigation  it  is  desirable.  But  when  it  becomes  so  pro- 

°  "     longed  that  the  issue  ceases  to  be  that  of  the  merits  of  the  case  and 

becomes  one  as  to  the  respective  length  of  the  parties1  pocketbooks,  it  is  altogether 
intolerable. 

This  evil  of  delay  is  established  and  the  injustice  which  it  causes  is  universally 
recognized.2  It  works  to  defeat  justice  in  two  ways:  first,  by  making  the  time  re- 
quired to  reduce  a  case  to  final  judgment  so  long  that  persons,  unable  to  wait,  do 
not  start  the  case  at  all  but  give  it  up ;  and  second,  by  forcing  unfair  settlements  and 
compromises  on  persons  so  situated  either  before  suit  is  brought  or  in  discount  of 
a  verdict  after  trial  in  exchange  for  a  waiver  of  appeal.  In  a  wage  claim  speed  is  the 
essence  of  justice,  for  the  suit  is  brought  to  obtain  the  means  of  livelihood.  A  judg- 
ment years  or  even  months  later  is  little  better  than  no  judgment.3  In  negotiations 
between  counsel  for  the  settlement  of  personal  injury  cases  it  is  customary  to  deduct 
something  from  the  amount  agreed  on  as  fair  damages  on  the  theory  that  less  is 
better  now  than  more  three  years  hence  in  the  due  course  of  the  law.  The  evil  tends 
to  aggravate  itself  by  encouraging  parties  without  meritorious  defences  to  make  a 
sham  contest  so  that  they  may  avail  themselves  of  delay  and  perhaps  beat  down  the 
claim  against  them.4  The  natural  delay  of  the  system  is  thus  increased  by  this  arti- 
ficial burden ;  it  is  like  throwing  sand  in  unoiled  gears. 

■ 

1  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship  (1916),  page  493;  and  see  Ending  the  Scandal  of  the  Law's 
Delay,  Ibid.,  page  177. 

2  Taft:  The  Administration  of  Justice—  Its  Speeding  and  Cheapening,  72  Central  L.  Journal  (1911),  191,  193, 194; 
(same  article)  18  Yale  L.  Journal,  28;  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  302, 
312,  313 ;  Chicago  Bar  Association  Annual  Report  for  1912,  page  12 ;  Storey :  Reform  of  Legal  Procedure  (1911),  page  3 ; 
Harley :  A  Unified  State  Court  System  (n.d.),  page  10  ;  Root :  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  pages  125, 
177, 179,  440, 493 ;  Report  of  Special  Section  of  the  California  Bar  Association,  Exhibit  3,  printed  in  the  San  Francisco 
Recorder  for  Julyl4,  1916,  page6;  The  Mediator,  vol.  iv,  No.  6  (June,  1912),  p.  11;  6  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  4,  p.  25; 
7  L.  A.  R.  No.  4,  p.  25. 

3  In  recognition  of  this  fact,  special  industrial  courts  have  been  created  in  European  countries,  United  States 
Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98  (January,  1912),  p.  281. 

*  See  Chicago  Bar  Association  Annual  Report  for  1917,  page  32. 


18  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

§2 

Delays  are  mainly  of  two  sorts:  those  encountered  in  getting  a  case,  after  its  entry 
in  court,  actually  heard  and  determined,  and  those  occasioned  by  the  taking  of  ap- 
peals  on  points  of  law  to  the  highest  courts.  The  following  case  illus- 
„  trates  the  delays  in  securing  a  final  judgment  in  Philadelphia  before 

the  creation  of  the  municipal  court  in  1913,  and  is  typical  of  a  con- 
dition which  has  existed  in  every  large  city:1  A  wage-earner  had  a  claim  for  ten  dol- 
lars, which  represented  a  week's  work.  On  January  19,  1911,  the  Legal  Aid  Society 
tried  his  case  in  the  Magistrate's  Court  and  secured  judgment.  On  February  8, 1911, 
the  defendant  appealed  to  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  which  gave  him  the  right  to 
have  the  entire  case  tried  all  over  again.  On  March  11, 1911,  the  plaintiffs  claim  was 
filed  in  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas  and  the  case  marked  for  the  trial  list.  Owing  to 
congested  dockets  the  case  did  not  actually  appear  on  a  trial  list  until  February  7, 
1912. 

Here  entered  a  rule  of  procedure  which  would  be  incredible  if  it  did  not  exist.2  A 
case  marked  for  trial  Monday  must  be  tried  Monday  or  Tuesday  or  else  go  off  the  list 
entirely.  That  is,  if  any  prior  case  or  cases  marked  on  Monday's  calendar  should  occupy 
the  time  of  the  court  during  Monday  and  Tuesday,  then  all  other  cases  assigned  on 
that  list  are  cancelled  and  the  parties  must  begin  at  the  bottom  again,  re-marking 
the  case  for  trial  and  awaiting  the  assignment.  While  this  is  going  on  in  one  session, 
another  session  of  the  same  court  may  have  no  cases  and  so  be  obliged  to  suspend, 
for,  under  the  legal  procedure,  it  was  forbidden  to  do  the  common-sense  thing  of 
transferring  cases  from  a  congested  to  an  empty  session  of  court. 

The  wage-earner's  case,  assigned  for  February  7,  1912,  was  not  reached  on  that  day 
or  the  next,  and  so  went  off  the  list.  It  was  re-marked  and  assigned  for  April  3,  1912. 
Not  being  reached  on  April  3  or  4,  it  again  went  off  and  did  not  reappear  until  Octo- 
ber 10,  1912.  Fortunately,  it  was  reached  and  tried  on  October  11,  1912,  and  judg- 
ment entered  for  the  plaintiff.  It  took  one  year  and  nine  months,  and  required  eleven 
days  in  court  for  both  attorney  and  client,  to  collect  the  original  ten  dollars.3 

In  the  criminal  law,  delays  while  awaiting  trial  are  even  more  serious,  for,  where 
the  defendant  is  too  poor  to  furnish  bail,  delay  is  equivalent  to  a  sentence  of  impris- 
onment for  poverty.4 

In  appeals  taken  to  the  courts  of  last  resort  on  points  of  law,  a  reasonable  delay 
is  to  be  expected.  The  right  of  appeal  cannot  be  cut  off,  and  a  certain  deliberation 

1  See  Eighth  and  Ninth  Annual  Report,  Municipal  Court  of  Chicago  (1915),  page  11. 

2  Compare  the  similar  rule  in  the  Suffolk  County  (Mass.)  Probate  Court  referred  to  post,  page  77. 

3  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1912),  page  22 ;  Address  of  Charles  L. 
Brown,  President  Judge  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  Philadelphia  (December  8,  1914),  page  9.  Before  the  creation  of 
the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  the  Common  Pleas  Court  was  two  years  behind  in  its  docket.  Report  of  Proceed- 
ings of  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  70. 

4  See  Justice  for  the  Poor,  a  report  of  the  Committee  on  Criminal  Courts  of  the  (  New  York)  Charity  Organization 
Society. 


DELAY  19 

of  the  points  raised  is  desirable.  Such  appeals  are  relatively  few  in  number  and  are 
not  objectionable.  But  when  the  highest  courts  get  years  behind  in  their  cases,  as  has 
happened  in  California  and  New  York,  and  parties  appeal  not  to  secure  rights  but 
to  secure  delay,  to  get  the  benefit  of  the  old  adage  that  "time  fights  for  the  defend- 
ant," with  hopes  that  the  opposing  party  will  die,  or  run  out  of  funds,  or  become 
discouraged  and  give  up,  then  delay  becomes  an  outrage. 


§3 

The  delays  which  mar  the  existing  administration  of  justice  originate  in,  and  are 
made  possible  by,1  our  faulty  court  organization  and  our  "thoroughly  antiquated 
civil  and  criminal  procedure."  2  With  unification  of  court  organiza- 
tion and  simplification  of  procedure  unconscionable  delay  will  be 
tion  of  Delay 

°       swept  away. 

The  outlook  for  a  speedy  reformation  is  promising.  Already  great  strides  have  been 
taken.3  On  this  score  the  public  conscience  is  aroused.  The  elimination  of  inter- 
mediate appeals  permitting  two  trials  on  the  facts  has  accompanied  the  creation  of 
modern  municipal  courts  and  has  done  away  with  one  of  the  most  flagrant  abuses.* 
The  municipal  courts,  despite  their  vast  number  of  cases,  are  keeping  abreast  of  their 
dockets.5  The  intelligent  propaganda  of  the  American  Judicature  Society  is  clearly 
pointing  to  the  methods  whereby  judicial  administration  can  be  lifted  out  of  the 
muddle  into  which  it  has  fallen,  and  there  is  an  increasing  disposition  on  the  part  of 
the  courts,  the  bar,  and  the  legislatures  to  make  the  needed  changes.  With  the  pass- 
ing of  delay  one  great  cause  of  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  will  be  at  an  end. 

Tedious  proceedings  and  long  delays  are  not  necessary.  They  are  not  inevitable  or 
inherent  in  the  nature  of  our  judicial  institutions.  They  can  be  abolished  whenever 
we  so  will  it. 


1  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  page  vii ;  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VI.  page  8  ;  Pre- 
liminary Report  for  the  National  Economic  League  on  Efficiency  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  pages  20-26. 

2  Redlich:  The  Common  Law  and  the  Case  Method,  Carnegie  Foundation  for  the  Advancement  of  Teaching, 
Bulletin  No.  8(1914),  page  49. 

3  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1917),  3,  211. 

4  Report  of  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  for  1916,  pages  5-7. 

6  In  February,  1917,  the  New  York  Municipal  Court  rendered  judgment  in  a  tort  claim  for  an  accident  which 
happened  in  February.  It  is  not  unusual  for  judgment  in  breach  of  contract  cases  to  be  entered  the  same  month 
in  which  the  breach  occurred. 


Chapter  V 
THE  SECOND  DEFECT  — COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES 

Believing  that  courts  as  governmental  agencies  are  operated  as  a  part  of  our  so- 
cial system  for  the  benefit  of  all,  we  are  unwilling  to  subscribe  to  the  view  that 
the  litigant  should  pay  all  expenses  of  maintaining  the  court.  Inasmuch  as 
the  law  of  the  state  requires  that  fees  and  costs  be  taxed  and  charged  to  the 
litigants  and  has  conferred  no  power  upon  this  court  to  abolish  them  entirely, 
we  could  not  consider  doing  away  with  all  fees  however  desirable  that  might 
seem.  Committee  on  Costs  of  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court.1 

THE  entire  question  of  the  costs  and  fees  paid  to  courts  and  court  officers  is  one 
that  has  been  neglected  in  discussions  concerning  the  betterment  of  the  admin- 
istration of  justice.  While  the  total  expense  of  litigation  and  the  injustice  which  it 
causes  is  a  common  topic,  the  precise  part  played  by  the  system  of  imposts  fixed  and 
levied  by  the  State  on  persons  who  are  compelled  to  resort  to  the  courts  for  protec- 
tion or  redress  has  never  received  any  general  or  extended  consideration.2  The  Amer- 
ican Bar  Association's  "Special  Committee  to  Suggest  Remedies  and  Formulate  Pro- 
posed Laws  to  Prevent  Delay  and  Unnecessary  Cost  in  Litigation,"  which  has  been 
in  existence  since  1907  and  has  submitted  annual  reports,  has  laid  almost  all  of  its 
emphasis  on  procedure  and  has  done  but  little  with  the  subject  of  costs.3 

This  is  perhaps  natural,  for  the  present  system  and  tariff'  of  fees  is  so  curious  that, 
with  the  exception  of  the  taxing  clerk  and  those  attorneys  who  live  by  costs,  few 
lawyers  understand  its  details  or  why  many  of  the  items  exist.  And  yet,  inasmuch 
as  these  costs  form  no  inconsiderable  item  and  are  a  prolific  source  of  denial  of  justice 
to  the  poor,  they  require  careful  statement  and  examination. 


§  i 

Costs  have  existed  so  long  that  there  is  a  general  disposition  to  regard  them  as 

fundamental,  as  immutably  bound  up  with  our  legal  institutions. 

This  is  a  mistake;  costs  are  not  established  by  our  constitutions,  they 

"  /  are  not  the  product  of  common  law,  thev  exist  solely  and  entirely  as 

Costs  and  Fees  „   ,    ,        , 

creatures  of  statute. 

The  early  English  law  had  no  system  of  costs.  An  unsuccessful  plaintiff  or  defend- 

1  From  the  second  page  of  the  Report  of  the  Committee  on  Costs  of  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court,  submitted 
September  26,  1913.  This  report  was  adopted  by  unanimous  vote  of  the  judges,  and  its  reduced  schedule  of  costs 
went  into  effect  October  1,  1913. 

2  The  Cleveland  Report  is  possibly  an  exception  to  this.  While  the  judges  on  the  Committee  examined  into  the 
subject  thoroughly,  the  report  itself  is  brief  and  local  in  application. 

3  In  three  reports  there  is  some  consideration  of  fees.  In  34  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1909)  600  there  is  a  short  discussion; 
in  36  A.  B.  A.  R.  (1910)  622  a  bill  to  diminish  costs  on  appeal  is  submitted ;  in  38  A.  B.  A.  R.  (1913)  552,  572,  it  is  pro- 
posed to  eliminate  travel  expenses  in  certain  cases  by  permitting  marshals  to  mail  processes  to  deputies  in  outly- 
ing districts.  In  the  summary  of  the  work  of  this  Committee  set  out  in  42  A.  B.  A.  R.  (1917)  336-339,  costs  are  not 
mentioned. 

4  11  Cyclopedia  of  Law  and  Procedure,  24;  cases  cited. 


COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES  21 

ant  might  be  amerced  pro  clamor e  f  also,  that  is,  the  court  might  impose  a  fine  for  set- 
ting up  a  false  claim  or  defence,  but  it  is  doubtful  if  this  was  done  to  any  extent.1 
So  far  as  costs  played  any  part,  they  were  included  in  the  damages  or,  on  occasion, 
assessed  in  the  arbitrary  discretion  of  the  judge.2  It  is  true  that  it  was  the  royal 
prerogative  of  the  earlier  kings  to  charge  suitors  for  writs  to  the  King's  Court,  but 
it  was  an  accepted  maxim  that  the  poor  should  have  their  writs  for  nothing.3  "Be- 
fore the  Statute  of  Gloucester  (6  Edward  I,  cap.  1)  no  person  was  entitled  to  recover 
any  costs  of  suit  either  in  plea,  real,  personal,  or  mixed."4 

With  this  statute  of  Edward  I  the  system  of  fixed  costs  begins.  The  motivating 
causes  which  led  to  the  establishment  of  court  fees  are  not  clear.  They  seem  to  have 
been  a  survival  of  the  idea  of  revenue,  a  carrying  over  of  the  conception  of  fines  for  a 
false  claim  (for  in  theory  only  the  wrongdoer  bears  costs),  and  a  desire  to  impose  a  de- 
terrent to  litigation.  At  the  same  time,  there  was  a  clear  idea  that,  while  revenue  and 
a  deterrent  were  desirable,  costs  ought  never  to  operate  as  a  prohibition,  and  by  the 
time  of  Henry  VIII  ample  provision  had  been  made  to  safeguard  the  rights  of  the  poor. 

The  Statute  of  11  Henry  VII,  cap.  12,  permitting  poor  persons  to  sue  without 
payment  of  costs  merits  quotation,  for  the  centuries  which  have  intervened  between 
its  enactment  in  1495  and  the  establishment  of  the  small  claims  court  in  Cleveland 
in  1913  bear  witness  to  no  more  comprehensive  attempt  to  secure  freedom  of  justice 
to  the  poor.  The  tendency  has,  in  fact,  until  recently  been  entirely  in  an  opposite  direc- 
tion. It  was  provided — 

"  That  every  poor  person  or  persons  which  have  or  hereafter  shall  have  causes 
of  action  against  any  person  within  this  realm  shall  have  by  the  discretion  of 
the  Chancellor  of  this  realm,  for  the  time  being,  writs  or  writs  original,  and 
subpoenas  according  to  the  nature  of  their  causes,  therefore  nothing  paying  to 
your  Highness  for  the  seals  of  the  same,  nor  to  any  person  for  the  writing  of 
the  said  writs  to  be  hereafter  sued;  and  that  the  said  Chancellor  shall  assign 
clerks  to  write  the  same  writs  ready  to  be  sealed;  and  also  learned  counsel  and 
attornies  for  the  same,  without  any  reward  taken  therefor;  and  if  the  said  writ 
or  writs  be  returned  before  the  king  in  his  bench,  the  justices  shall  assign  to  the 
same  poor  person  or  persons,  counsel  learned,  by  their  discretions,  which  shall 
give  their  counsels,  nothing  taking  for  the  same;  and  the  justices  shall  likewise 
appoint  attorney  for  such  poor  person  or  persons  and  all  other  officers  requisite 
and  necessary  to  be  had  for  the  speed  of  the  said  suits,  which  shall  do  their  duties 
without  any  reward  for  their  counsels,  help  and  business  in  the  same;  and  the 
same  law  shall  be  observed  of  all  such  suits  to  be  made  before  the  King's  jus- 
tices of  his  Common  place,  and  barons  of  his  Exchequer,  and  all  other  justices  in 
the  courts  of  record  where  any  such  suit  shall  be.11 

This  was  the  origin  of  the  in  forma  pauperis  proceeding.5  It  is  an  important  land- 
mark which  has  been  too  much  forgotten.  Because  it  gives  effect  to  the  spirit  of  Magna 

1  11  Cyclopedia  of  Law  and  Procedure,  24;  17  Fed.  2;  4  Blackstone,  379. 

2  John  Hullock:  Law  of  Costs  (London,  1796),  2-4.  3  Pollock  and  Maitland:  1  History  of  English  Law,  174. 
4  Hullock  :  op.  cit.,  2-4;  Society  for  Comparative  Legislation,  vol.  i  (1st  Series),  241. 

6  16  Encyclopedia  of  Pleading  and  Practice,  675  ;  Roy  v.  Louisville  &  Nashville  Ry.  Co.,  34  Fed.  276. 


22  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

Carta  it  has  been  regarded  as  establishing  a  constitutional  principle.1  This  enact- 
ment was  carried  to  its  logical  completion  by  23  Henry  VIII,  cap.  15,  which  freed 
a  pauper  plaintiff  from  imposition  of  costs  if  he  failed  to  obtain  a  verdict  or  was  non- 
suited. The  statute  left  the  defeated  poor  suitor  to  be  subjected  to  such  other  punish- 
ment as  the  judges  deemed  reasonable.  The  old  books  state  that  if  a  pauper  abused  the 
proceeding  or  was  nonsuited,  he  might  be  taken  to  the  market-place  and  whipped;2  but 
the  general  spirit  of  the  law  was  such  that  when  a  motion  came  before  Lord  Chief 
Justice  Holt  to  order  a  nonsuited  pauper  to  be  whipped,  he  denied  the  motion,  observ- 
ing that  there  was  no  officer  for  the  purpose  and  that  he  had  never  known  it  done.3 

These  statutes  remained  in  force  in  England  until  1883,  when  by  the  Statute  Law 
and  Civil  Procedure  Act  (46  &  47  Victoria,  c.  49)  they  were  repealed  and,  with  them, 
these  rights  and  privileges  swept  away.4  The  English  law  remained  inhospitable  to 
poor  suitors  until  the  great  changes  inaugurated  in  1913.5 

The  American  states  carried  over  into  their  judicial  systems  the  plan  of  costs  and 
fees,  but  many  neglected  to  include  the  necessary  corollary  of  the  proceeding  in  forma 
pauperis.  In  Pennsylvania  it  has  been  held  that  the  statute  of  11  Henry  VII,  c.  12,  is 
part  of  the  common  law  of  the  state,6  but  in  practice  the  statute  is  ignored.  To-day, 
the  permission  to  sue  without  costs  is  granted  by  statute  in  about  half  the  states. 
Even  in  such  states  the  right  is  a  good  deal  hedged  about,  by  limiting  it  to  specified 
types  of  cases,  as  wage  claims,  by  confining  it  to  proceedings  in  certain  courts,7  and  by 
holding  it  inapplicable  to  cases  on  appeal.8  In  several  states  it  has  fallen  into  disuse. 


§2 
It  is  extremely  difficult  to  present  with  any  conciseness  the  existing  costs  and  fees 
in  the  United  States.  The  items  are  innumerable,  they  vary  from  state  to  state,  and 
_  within  a  state  they  differ  in  different  courts,  in  different  proceedings, 

'  and  a  line  of  cleavage  runs  through  law  and  equity.  In  the  Boston 

Municipal  Court  service  of  process  must  be  made  by  a  sheriff  or  con- 
stable whose  fees  are  paid  by  the  plaintiff;  in  the  Cincinnati  court  the  constable  must 
serve  processes,  but  he  is  paid  a  salary  by  the  city;  in  Cleveland  the  mail  is  used;  in 
New  York  any  disinterested  person  may  serve  the  summons.  In  some  states  fees  are 

1  Frederick  J.  Stimson  in  Federal  and  State  Constitutions  (1908)  lists  this  statute  in  his  historical  digest  of  con- 
stitutional principles,  Book  II,  chap,  ii,  p.  100. 

2  Bacon's  Abridgment,  vol.  ii,  tit.  Costs,  §  4,  p.  51.  3  Salk.  506;  Bacon,  op.  cit.;  Hullock  :  Laiu  of  Costs,  page  213. 
*  Bisschop:  Legal  Aid  for  the  Poor,  48  Law  Journal  (1913),  242;  Bentwick:  Legal  Aid  for  the  Poor,  47  Law  Journal 
(1912),  48. 

5  These  are  discussed  post  in  Chapter  XIV,  Assigned  Counsel,  page  102;  and  in  Chapter  XXV,  A  More  Equal  Admin- 
istration of  Justice,  page  248. 

6  Cowan  v.  City  of  Chester,  2  Delaware  County  R.  234;  7  Weekly  Notes  of  Cases,  31 ;  Roberts'  Digest  (second  edition, 
Philadelphia,  1847),  116;  1  Johnson  on  Practice  in  Pennsylvania,  71. 

7  In  Maryland  the  in  forma  pauperis  act  does  not  apply  to  the  People's  Court  in  Baltimore;  in  New  Jersey  it  does 
not  apply  to  the  District  Courts. 

8  16  Encyc.  Pleading  and  Practice,  693.  It  seems  to  apply  to  appeals  only  in  the  Federal  Courts  and  in  Georgia. 
Fite  v.  Black,  85  Ga.  413;  in  North  Carolina,  Mason  v.  Osgood,  71  N.  Car.  212;  and  in  Tennessee,  Lynn  v.  Mfg.  Co. 
8  Lea,  29. 


COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES  23 

charged  for  marking  cases  on  the  calendar,  for  entering  judgment,  for  issuance  of 
execution;  in  others  such  costs  are  unknown.  If  a  cook,  suing  for  wages  earned  on 
land  in  Boston,  takes  an  appeal  from  the  Municipal  Court  to  the  Supreme  Judicial 
Court,  the  entry  fee  is  three  dollars;  but  if  a  cook,  suing  for  wages  earned  on  a  vessel 
which  comes  into  the  port  of  Boston,  takes  an  appeal  from  the  District  Court  to  the 
Circuit  Court  of  Appeals,  the  entry  fee  is  thirty-five  dollars.  In  Oregon,  to  the  regu- 
lar filing  fee  in  the  county  court  there  has  been  added  a  one  dollar  fee  for  the  benefit 
of  the  Multnomah  County  law  library.1  In  many  states  jury  fees  varying  greatly  in 
amounts  are  charged — California  $24  per  day,  Connecticut  one  payment  of  $6,  Min- 
nesota $3,  Pennsylvania  $4,  Virginia  $1.50,  Oregon  $6  (jury  of  six);  in  Ohio  a  law 
prescribing  a  jury  fee  of  $5  was  declared  unconstitutional.2  In  California,  until  changed 
in  1915  at  the  instance  of  the  Public  Defender,3  the  cost  of  entering  and  marking  a 
case  on  appeal  was  borne  by  the  plaintiff,  although  the  judgment  in  the  lower  court 
was  in  his  favor  and  he  had  not  taken  the  appeal.  In  some  jurisdictions  a  defendant 
must  pay  a  fee  before  he  can  appear  and  file  an  answer.  In  Illinois  the  respondent  in 
a  divorce  case  has  been  obliged  to  pay  three  dollars  for  the  privilege  of  contesting, 
while  in  Missouri  the  court  was  doing  its  utmost  to  prevent  divorces  by  default,  and 
thereby  to  safeguard  the  interest  of  the  state.4 

It  is  impossible  to  find  any  principle  by  which  costs  are  determined  and  regulated. 
They  are  too  low  to  deter  the  rich,  but  high  enough  to  prohibit  the  poor.  They  bear 
little  relation  to  the  actual  disbursements  of  the  parties.5 "  Term  fees"  which  are  taxed 
in  favor  of  the  successful  party  represent  no  cash  expenditure  by  anybody.  The  bill 
of  costs  includes  one  dollar  for  a  writ  that  can  be  purchased  at  any  law  stationer's  for 
five  cents.  It  allows  to  the  prevailing  party  two  or  three  dollars  as  an  attorney's  fee, 
while  the  actual  charge  made  by  the  attorney  to  his  client  is  probably  ten  times  that 
amount. 

The  fees  paid  by  the  litigants  bear  no  closer  relation  to  the  state's  expense  in  main- 
taining the  judicial  organization.  The  average  daily  cost  to  the  state  for  a  trial  with 
jury  is  variously  estimated  to  be  from  fifty  to  one  hundred  and  fifty  dollars.6  The  total 
fees  paid  by  litigants  for  such  a  trial  range  from  three  to  thirty-two  dollars. 

If  the  existing  system  were  brought  forward  de  novo,  it  would  be  ridiculed  as 
absurd.  Considering  it  as  a  part  of  our  traditional  method  of  working  out  justice,  it 
is  fairer  to  call  it  an  anachronism.  The  Cleveland  report7  accurately  summarizes  the 
situation : 

1  Lord's  Oregon  Laws,  §  1125. 

2  Second  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  (1913)  page  16;  L.  A.  Griffin  Co.  v.  R.  &  F.  Co.,  Common  Pleas  Court  Journal, 
189,  page  1079 ;  Aff.  Court  of  Appeals,  vol.  i,  p.  91  (1913). 

3  California  Code  of  Civil  Procedure,  §  981. 

4  For  a  statement  of  the  divorce  proctor  and  his  work  in  Missouri,  see  post.  Chapter  XIV,  Assigned  Counsel,  page 
102. 

5  Storey:  Reform,  of  Legal  Procedure,  page  34. 

6  The  expense  of  litigation  to  the  state  is  presented  more  fully  in  Chapter  XIX,  Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations, 
page  183. 

7  Report  of  Committee  on  Costs  of  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court,  filed  September  26,  1913. 


24  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

"The  old  standards  worked  serious  inequalities  and  frequently  discriminated 
against  the  smaller  cases.  Charges  are  made  in  smaller  cases  for  services  which 
are  not  charged  in  larger.  For  example,  in  the  justice  code  fees  are  charged  for 
services  of  the  judge  in  trying  the  case  and  in  entering  judgment,  while  for  sim- 
ilar services  rendered  by  judges  of  common  pleas  no  charge  is  made.  There  are 
also  instances  of  greater  charges  for  purely  clerical  or  ministerial  work,  for  ex- 
ample, taking  affidavits,  bonds,  undertakings,  issuing  process,  orders  of  attach- 
ment, poundage,  etc.  The  committee  was  of  opinion  that  like  services  should  be 
charged  for  equally. 

"  In  making  the  revision  we  have  endeavored  to  adapt  the  charges  to  modern 
conditions.  The  present  schedule  is  a  relic  of  stage  coach  days  and  in  many  re- 
spects has  come  down  to  us  unchanged  from  the  laws  of  the  Northwest  Territory 
and  from  the  first  enactments  of  Ohio  after  achieving  statehood,  passed  in  Feb- 
ruary, 1805.  These  schedules  of  fees  were  enacted  under  different  conditions,  when 
communication  was  difficult,  facilities  of  transportation  were  scarce  and  labor- 
saving  devices  unknown. 

"An  inspection  of  the  old  schedule  under  modern  conditions  shows  also  dispro- 
portionate charges  and  absurdities;  for  instance,  the  charge  of  twenty-five  cents 
for  copies  which  are  now  made  by  using  carbon  paper  and  not  by  long  hand 
as  was  necessary  before  the  day  of  the  typewriter.  So  is  the  method  of  charging 
mileage  or  travelling  expenses  inexcusable.  For  these  reasons  your  committee 
deemed  revision  of  many  fees  necessary." 

By  eliminating  all  fictitious  costs  and  leaving  the  worry  over  that  puzzle  to  the 
taxing  clerk,  and  so  narrowing  the  inquiry  to  the  actual  cash  expenses  for  costs  which 
must  be  met  by  persons  desiring  to  use  the  courts,  it  is  possible  to  make  a  more  con- 
crete presentation.  Because  of  radical  differences,  it  is  convenient  to  separate  costs  into 
three  groups:  first,  costs  in  the  trial  court  paid  to  the  court  or  its  officers;  second, 
costs  on  appeal;  third,  costs  for  witnesses,  transcripts  of  evidence,  and  briefs.  As  to 
the  first,  there  being  several  trial  courts,  each  with  its  own  costs,  it  is  advisable  to 
study  only  the  inferior  courts,  where  the  cases  of  the  poor  are  generally  heard,  except 
where  the  inferior  court's  limit  of  jurisdiction  is  so  low  that  cases  are  necessarily 
brought  in  the  superior  courts. 


§3 

The  actual  expenses  in  a  trial  court,  exclusive  of  witness  fees,  may  be  reduced  to  the 
writ  or  summons,  the  service  of  process,  entry  fee,  calendar  fee,  trial  fee,  entry  of judg- 
^-r  ,  •  ,7  ment,  and  issuance  of  execution.  It  is  proper  to  eliminate  the  jury  fee, 
„  for  so  long  as  a  trial  by  a  judge  is  possible,  no  denial  of  justice  can 

fairly  be  alleged.  For  a  similar  reason  fees  for  attachment  or  garnish- 
ment are  excluded.  Each  court  uses  a  different  combination  of  these  items.  In  some 
one  or  two  payments  cover  everything,  in  others  the  charges  are  made  separately. 
Since  our  inquiry  is  only  to  determine  the  actual  expense,  all  the  various  items  may 
be  rolled  into  one  total.  The  figures  given  below  are  not  absolute;  they  may  be  varied 


COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES  25 

by  the  distance  traveled  for  service,  by  the  number  of  motions  or  interlocutory  pro- 
ceedings, and  by  other  factors;  but  they  fairly  represent  the  minimum  cost  in  an 
ordinary  case. 


City 

Court 

Minimum  Cost 

Baltimore 

People's  Court 

$2.40 

Boston 

Municipal  Court 

2.65 

Chicago 

Cincinnati 

Cleveland 

Municipal  Court 
Municipal  Court 
Small  Claims  Court 

3.50 

2.00 

.52 

Dayton 
Hartford 

Municipal  Court 
City  Court 

2.00 
5.76 

Superior  Court 

15.51 

Jersey  City 
Los  Angeles 

District  Court 
Justice's  Court 

4.00 
5.00 

Superior  Court 

8.00 

Minneapolis 
New  York 

Municipal  Court 
Municipal  Court 

3.50 
2.00 

Philadelphia 

Pittsburgh 

Richmond 

Municipal  Court 
County  Court 
Justice's  Court 

11.00 
5.50 
1.30 

Law  Court 

3.50 

Portland 

Small  Claims  Court 

1.75 

Saint  Paul 

Justice's  Court 

3.00 

These  figures  would  be  much  higher  were  it  not  for  the  advent  of  municipal  courts, 
which  have  done  much  to  reduce  costs.  In  Cincinnati,  Columbus,  and  Dayton,  for 
example,  it  is  provided  by  the  court  act  that  costs,  exclusive  of  witness  fees,  shall 
not  exceed  two  dollars.  While  these  actual  expenses  may  seem  small  in  substantial 
causes,  they  loom  large  in  the  troubles  of  the  poor.  In  claims  under  fifty  dollars,  an 
immediate  expenditure  of  four  or  five  dollars  may  well  be  disproportionate;  in  any 
event  it  is  often  more  than  the  needy  litigant  can  afford,  particularly  where  additional 
outlays  for  witnesses  and  attachments  are  necessary. 

Before  considering  how  the  general  situation  as  to  costs  in  the  trial  court  may  be 
improved,  it  is  necessary  to  make  passing  mention  of  two  plans  by  which  costs  are 
charged.  In  some  jurisdictions,  as  Ohio  and  Maryland,  costs  are  not  prepaid;  they 
are  charged  only  at  the  end  of  the  proceedings,  with  the  result  that  often  they  are  un- 
collectable.  Such  a  plan  assists  the  unscrupulous  more  than  the  poor  and  unnecessarily 
deprives  the  State  of  revenue  in  cases  which  could  bear  costs.1  In  other  places,  as  in 
Virginia  and  Texas,  costs  are  not  prepaid  but  a  bond  to  cover  them  is  filed.  This 
might  occasionally  assist  a  destitute  suitor  whose  character  enabled  him  to  procure 
sureties. 

The  two  immediate  and  practicable  remedies  are  to  scale  down  all  costs  to  a  mini- 

1  In  its  survey  of  Columbus,  the  New  York  Bureau  of  Municipal  Research  found  in  the  Municipal  Court  in  one  year 
400  cases  where  the  fees  had  never  been  paid.  In  its  report,  dated  January  31, 1917,  and  filed  with  the  City  Council, 
it  recommended  "that  all  fees  be  payable  in  advance."  Also  reported  in  Ohio  State  Journal,  February  7, 1917. 


26  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

mum  and  to  vest  in  the  judges  discretionary  power  to  permit  in  forma  pauperis  pro- 
ceedings in  all  cases  in  all  courts.  A  general  reduction  of  costs  is  desirable,1  and  it  can 
be  accomplished  without  materially  impairing  the  state's  revenue.  The  expense  of 
service  of  process,  which  in  many  inferior  courts  is  the  largest  item,2  can  be  eliminated 
by  permitting  citizen's  service  as  in  New  York  and  Minnesota,  or  by  the  simple  ex- 
pedient of  using  the  mails.3  All  proceedings  in  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  may 
now  be  served  by  mail.4  The  California  Industrial  Accident  Board  sends  its  notices 
by  mail.5  Probate  citations  in  Massachusetts  may,  on  the  court's  order,  be  served  by 
mail.6  This  has  proved  successful;  it  is  the  opinion  of  Cleveland  judges  that  fewer 
motions  to  remove  defaults  are  brought  in  cases  of  service  by  mail  than  by  consta- 
bles; and  it  effectuates  a  reduction  of  this  item  from  $1.75  to  $.12  or  $.02,  without 
depriving  the  state  of  any  revenue. 

Where  reduction  of  court  costs  is  accompanied  by  efficient  court  organization  no 
loss  to  the  state  results.  In  1914  the  tariff  of  costs  in  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court 
was  radically  lower  than  in  1913,  and  yet  the  cost  of  the  court  to  the  tax-payers 
was  less  in  1914  than  in  1913.7  In  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  District  of  Columbia, 
where  the  cost  of  suit  is  $1.85,  the  court's  accounts  for  the  year  ending  June  30, 1913, 
showed  a  profit  over  and  above  all  expenses  including  rent  of  more  than  $12,000.8 

If  costs  are  lowered  in  this  manner,  the  number  of  persons  who  cannot  secure  a 
trial  will  be  reduced  to  a  minimum.  Provision  should  be  made  for  such  persons  by 
a  comprehensive  in  forma  pauperis  statute,  similar  to  that  in  the  federal  courts  under 
which  it  is  possible  for  a  poor  person  to  carry  a  case  through  the  Supreme  Court  of 
the  United  States  without  payment  of  costs  to  the  court.  Proceedings  in  forma  pau- 
peris, where  properly  guarded,  as  in  Scotland  and  in  France  under  "l'assistance  ju- 
diciaire,"9  cause  but  slight  loss  to  the  state,  for  such  suits  are  permitted  only  when 
a  good  cause  of  action  is  disclosed,  so  that  in  the  majority  of  cases  a  judgment  fol- 
lows and  the  costs  paid  by  the  defendant  may  be  used  to  reimburse  the  state. 

Such  steps  would  not  swamp  the  courts  with  specious  litigation.  In  Cleveland  no 
abuse  has  resulted  from  the  radical  reduction  of  costs.  While  from  the  nature  of  the 
proposition  statistics  are  impossible,  it  is  the  general  opinion  that  fewer,  and  certainly 
no  more,  fraudulent  claims  for  personal  injuries  are  presented  to  Industrial  Accident 
Boards  where  there  are  no  costs  than  were  formerly  brought  to  the  courts  where  fees 
obtained. 

1  Taft:  Administration  of  Justice,  72  Central  L.  Journ.  191, 196. 

2  In  the  Boston  Municipal  Court,  60  per  cent. 

3  See  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1917),  164;  2  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  R.  19 ;  2  Cleveland  Municipal 
Court  R.  9,  11,  20  ;  3  Ibid.,  84. 

4  4  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  11,  20,  71,  73  insert. 
B  1  Southwestern  L.  Rev.  (January,  1917),  81. 

6  Massachusetts  Acts  of  1915,  c.  24. 

7  3  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  8,  57. 

8  Baer:  Justice  for  the  Small  Man,  90  Century  Magazine  (1916),  144,  147. 

9  These  systems  are  discussed  in  detail  in  Chapter  XXV,  A  More  Equal  Administration  of  Justice,  page  247. 


COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES  27 

§4 

Costs  paid  to  the  court  on  appeal  consist  of  the  entry  fee  and  the  expense  of  making 
up  and  printing  the  record  of  the  case  on  appeal,  or  on  exceptions,  or  on  writ  of 
Costs  on  error#  Such  costs  in  the  aggregate  are  seldom  less  than  twenty-five  and 
Jvveal  °ften  run  over  a  hundred  dollars.  While  appellate  costs  affect  the  poor  only 
in  a  proportionately  small  number  of  cases,  it  is  highly  desirable  in  the  in- 
terests of  justice,1  and  for  the  sake  of  a  well-rounded  development  of  our  common 
law,  that  it  be  possible  for  poor  persons  to  obtain  decisions  on  questions  of  law  which 
arise  in  their  cases.  The  condition  which  has  been  too  common  under  the  compensa- 
tion acts,  of  having  cases  appealed,  briefed,  and  argued  only  by  the  insurer,  the  em- 
ployee being  unable  to  meet  the  expense,  is  not  healthy.  One-sided  argument  inev- 
itably tends  to  produce  a  one-sided  construction  of  the  law.2 

These  expenses  represent  a  waste  and  are  unnecessary.  With  proper  organization 
of  courts  they  will  automatically  disappear.  In  a  unified  court,  as  in  England,  there 
is  no  entry  fee,  for  the  appeal  is  effected  merely  by  transfer  from  the  trial  to  the 
appellate  division.  There  is  no  necessity  for  printing  of  records,  transcripts,  bills  of 
exceptions,  certificates  of  evidence,  and  the  like,  for,  since  the  appellate  and  trial  tri- 
bunals are  simply  branches  or  divisions  of  one  court,  each  judicially  knows  the  rec- 
ords of  the  other,  and  uses  all  the  original  files,  papers,  and  documents.3 


§5 
Expenses  incurred  in  litigation  for  witness  fees,  briefs,  and  transcripts  of  evidence, 
which  counsel  invariably  needs  for  his  own  preparation,  raise  an  entirely  different 
problem.  Their  amount  varies  indefinitely  according  to  the  number  of 
n  .  /»  \  witnesses  summoned,  the  complexity  of  the  points  to  be  argued,  and  the 
rp  •  length  of  the  trial.  The  peculiar  difficulty  which  they  present  is  that 

"  they  are  not  payments  which  the  state  can  waive.  Persons  who  are  com- 
pelled to  leave  their  work  to  testify  in  court,  printers,  and  stenographers  are  unques- 
tionably entitled  to  be  paid.  Such  expenses  cannot  be  scaled  down,  nor  can  they  be 
eliminated  by  any  reorganization  of  courts  or  procedure. 

There  is  no  solution  except  for  the  state  to  provide  a  fund  to  be  disbursed  by,  and 
under  the  supervision  of,  its  judicial  department  or  legal  aid  bureau.4  Such  a  propo- 

1  Root :  Addresses  on  Citizenship  and  Government,  page  133.  See  a  pamphlet  by  Hiram  T.  Gilbert  (the  author  of  the 
Chicago  Municipal  Court  Act),  dated  May  25, 1910,  and  entitled  "A  Synopsis  of  a  Bill  for  an  Act  in  Relation  to  Courts 
to  be  Introduced  in  the  47th  General  Assembly,"  at  page  14. 

2  See  an  article  entitled  "Preventive  Law"  in  15  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.,  No.  2  (April,  1917),  p.  3. 

3  Pound:  Organization  of  Courts,  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VI,  page  25;  Pound:  Causes  of  Popular 
Dissatisfaction  with  the  Administration  of  Justice,  29  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  395,  410.  The  same  thing  holds  true  in  the 
Boston  Municipal  Court  as  between  the  trial  and  appellate  divisions. 

4  Cf.  the  suggestions  made  by  Hiram  T.  Gilbert  in  his  book,  Practice  in  the  Municipal  Court  of  Chicago  (1908).  at 
page  546,  and  in  his  pamphlet,  A  Synopsis  of  a  Bill  for  an  Act  in  Relation  to  Courts  to  be  Introduced  in  the  Ulth 
General  Assembly,  at  page  114,  §  2036. 


28  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

sition  is  not  wholly  without  precedent.  It  is  a  general  rule  that  the  state  will  reim- 
burse for  expenses  incurred  in  disbarment  proceedings.1  In  the  municipal  legal  aid 
bureaus  provision  is  made  for  the  expenses  incurred  in  the  litigation  of  the  bureau's 
clients.  The  Duluth  Legal  Aid  Bureau  has  expended  out  of  the  public  treasury  the 
following  amounts:  in  1914,  $150;  in  1915,  $126.01;  in  1916,  $108.18.  In  Los  An- 
geles the  Public  Defender  is  authorized2  to  apply  to  the  county  treasury  for  litiga- 
tion expenses,  although  he  has  never  done  so,  fearing  that  such  a  course  might  be 
unconstitutional.3  The  1913  Rules  of  the  English  High  Court  of  Judicature,  in  mak- 
ing provision  for  poor  litigants,  call  for  the  defraying  of  their  expenses  by  a  Treasury 
grant.4  Mr.  Taft,  in  speaking  before  the  Virginia  Bar  Association  in  1908,  after  argu- 
ing for  "a  mandatory  reduction  of  court  costs  and  fees,"  said:5 

"I  believe  that  it  is  sufficiently  in  the  interest  of  the  public  at  large  to  promote 
equality  between  litigants,  to  take  upon  the  government  much  more  than  has 
already  been  done,  the  burden  of  private  litigation." 


§6 
Certain  it  is  that  until  thoroughgoing  changes  are  made,  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor 
because  of  inability  to  pay  the  required  court  costs  and  fees  will  continue.  That  the 
.        _  present  system  of  costs  works  daily  to  close  the  doors  of  the  courts 

,  ,         to  the  poor  is  proved  by  ample  evidence.6  In  Boston  the  Legal  Aid 

°  Society  has  kept  precise  figures  since  April  1,  1916.  During  the  sev- 

enteen months  ending  August  81,  1917,  thei*e  were  551  cases  which 
could  not  be  settled  out  of  court,  which  were  meritorious  and  required  court  action ; 
386  were  taken  to  court  and  won,  36  were  taken  and  lost,  and  129  could  not  be  brought 
before  the  courts  because  of  the  client's  inability  to  pay  the  costs.  In  other  words,  the 
fees  required  by  the  state  caused  a  total  failure  of  justice  to  twenty-three  per  cent 
of  the  persons  who  needed  to  invoke  the  aid  of  the  machinery  of  justice. 

How  the  existing  system  of  costs  literally  forbids  resort  to  the  courts  by  the  poor 
is  illustrated  by  the  laws  requiring  security  for  costs.  A  plaintiff  must  not  only  pay  the 
costs  for  summons,  service,  entry,  trial,  judgment,  and  the  like,  but  in  addition  he 

1  See  Connecticut  Practice  Book  of  1908,  page  206.  This  includes  the  expense  for  attorney's  services,  Burrage  v. 
County  of  Bristol,  210  Mass.  (1911)  299. 

2  Section  23  of  the  Charter  of  Los  Angeles  County  provides,  "The  costs  in  all  actions  in  which  the  Public  Defender 
shall  appear  under  this  section,  whether  for  plaintiff  or  for  defendants,  shall  be  paid  out  of  the  County  Treasury." 

3  This  question  arises  from  the  decisions  holding  unconstitutional  statutes  giving  to  laborers,  who  obtain  judg- 
ments under  mechanic's  liens,  a  special  attorney's  fee  to  be  paid  by  the  defendant  on  the  ground  of  denial  of  equal 
protection  of  the  laws.  See  Atkinson  v.  Woodman,  74  Pac.  640;  note  in  17  Harvard  L.  Rev.  355,  citing  cases. 

4  See  48  Law  Journal,  243,  468. 

6  Taft:  Administration  of  Justice,  72  Central  L.  Journal,  191,  196;  4  National  Municipal  Review,  454. 

6  San  Francisco  Legal  Aid  R.  for  1916, 9 ;  8  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  14, 17 ;  Office  of  the  Public  Defender  (Los  Angeles),  pages 
14,  24 ;  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  pages  23,  24 ;  5  Boston  L.  A.  R.  6;  Bulletin  of 
Legal  Aid  Society  of  Chicago,  1916-17,  No.  2,  pp.  vii,  viii;  31  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  29;  S3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  81 ;  4  United 
Charities  of  Rochester  R.  12 ;  6  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  3 ;  2  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  R.  34,  35: 1  Milwaukee  L.  A.  R. 
8.  The  legal  aid  societies  in  Cincinnati,  Newark,  New  Orleans.  Omaha,  and  Philadelphia  state  that  proper  litigation 
is  often  rendered  impossible  because  of  the  inability  of  clients  to  pay  the  required  court  costs. 


COURT  COSTS  AND  FEES  29 

must,  on  motion,  furnish  a  bond  to  guarantee  that  the  defendant,  if  successful,  shall 
not  be  out  of  pocket.  In  the  Connecticut  law,  for  example,  the  bond  is  in  the  sum  of 
fifteen  dollars  in  the  City  Court  of  Hartford  and  seventy-five  dollars  in  the  Superior 
Court.1  The  defendant  may  bring  such  a  motion  on  the  ground  that  the  plaintiff  is 
a  poor  person.  The  net  result  is  that  a  poor  person  who  is  unable  to  give  or  secure 
such  a  bond  may  be  thrown  out  of  court  altogether.  In  Campbell  v.  Chicago,  etc., 
R.  Co.2  a  defendant  moved  that  the  plaintiff,  a  poor  person,  be  required  to  furnish  a 
bond.  The  judge  continued  the  case  for  a  week  to  give  the  plaintiff  time  to  file  such 
a  bond  and,  on  his  inability  to  do  so,  dismissed  his  case.  On  appeal  the  court  said: 

"We  have  no  statute  which  permits  a  person  to  sue  in  forma  pauperis.  It  seems 
almost  like  a  hardship  that  a  poor  person  should  not  be  able  to  litigate.  But 
this  is  a  matter  for  the  legislature  to  regulate  and  not  the  justice." 

Laws  requiring  security  for  costs,  despite  their  patent  harshness  to  the  poor,  have 
uniformly  been  upheld.3  In  striking  contrast  are  the  early  English  decisions  which, 
perceiving  the  injustice  of  a  rule  of  exclusion,  and  without  hiding  behind  the  absence 
of  a  legislative  mandate,  gave  to  the  common  law  the  proceeding  in  forma  pauperis. 
If,  as  excellent  authority  has  stated,4  this  was  done  as  "an  indulgence  arising  out  of 
the  humanity  of  the  judges,"  what  can  be  said  for  our  nineteenth  century  judges  who, 
acting  in  a  democratic  country,  were  not  even  willing  to  follow  the  fair  provisions  of 
the  common  law? 

The  result  is  no  different  than  it  would  be  if  our  bills  of  rights  read,  —  "Every 
subject  who  can  furnish  a  bond  for  fifteen  or  seventy-five  dollars  ought  to  obtain 
justice  freely,  completely,  and  without  delay;  to  all  others  the  courts  are  closed."  In 
a  democratic  government  of  laws,  where  the  state  exists  to  guarantee  through  its 
administration  of  justice  the  security  of  fundamental  rights,  it  is  a  sad  perversion  for 
the  state,  by  its  law,  to  cut  off  any  class  of  citizens  from  the  protection  of  the  courts. 
On  the  one  hand,  the  state  through  its  criminal  statutes  respecting  breach  of  the 
peace  and  larceny  forbids  persons  to  redress  their  own  wrongs  or  collect  their  debts  by 
self-help  and  remits  them  to  the  courts,  and  on  the  other  it  imposes  conditions  as  to 
the  use  of  the  courts  which  the  poor  cannot  satisfy. 

An  epoch-making  decision  by  the  Supreme  Court  of  California,  rendered  in  1917,5 
lends  judicial  sanction  to  the  ideas  expressed  in  this  chapter.  The  case  is  striking.  It 
will  be  recalled  that  jury  fees  in  California  are  twenty-four  dollars  a  day,  to  be  paid  in 
advance.  A  day  laborer,  the  father  often  minor  children  all  wholly  dependent  on  him 
for  support,  desired  to  bring  suit  in  the  Superior  Court  for  the  wrongful  killing  of  his 
daughter  and  claimed  his  right  to  a  jury  trial.  He  filed  an  affidavit  that  he  did  not  have 
more  than  twenty-five  dollars  and  asked  leave  to  sue  in  forma  pauperis.  There  is  a  local 

1  Connecticut  General  Statutes  of  1902,  §§  714,  716.  2  23  Wisconsin,  490. 

8  Gesfordv.  Critzer,  7  111.  698;  Grover's  Succession,  49  La.  Ann.  1060;  Haneyu.  Marshall,  9  Md.  194;  Aklingv.  St.  Louis 
Packet  Co.,  46  S.  W.  24;  Miller  v.  Norfolk,  etc.,  Ry.  Co.,  47  Fed.  264. 

4  31  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (January,  1918)  486. 

B  Martin  v.  Superior  Court  of  Alameda  County,  54  California  Decisions,  No.  2874  (October  19,  1917),  p.  422. 


30  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

statute  permitting  such  a  proceeding  before  a  justice  of  the  peace,  but  none  making 
provision  for  suits  in  the  courts  of  record.  The  Superior  Court  refused  the  application. 

The  attorney  for  the  San  Francisco  Legal  Aid  Society  intervened  as  amicus  curiae, 
and  the  case  was  appealed.1  The  Supreme  Court  held  that  the  in  forma  pauperis  pro- 
ceeding was  a  part  of  the  English  common  law,  which  had  become  part  of  the  Ameri- 
can common  law,  and  that  the  court  had  inherent  power  to  grant  leave  to  sue  with- 
out costs  so  that  justice  might  not  be  denied  to  the  poor. 

Parts  of  this  decision,  which  is  the  first  ever  to  translate  into  action  the  fundamen- 
tal constitutional  principles  of  freedom  and  equality  of  justice,  express  the  situation 
so  clearly  that  it  is  difficult  to  understand  why  the  majority  of  courts  have  always 
been  blind  to  it.2 

"Imperfect  as  was  the  ancient  common  law  system,  harsh  as  it  was  in  many  of 
its  methods  and  measures,  it  would  strike  one  with  surprise  to  be  credibly  in- 
formed that  the  common  law  courts  of  England  shut  their  doors  upon  all  poor 
suitors  who  could  not  pay  fees,  until  Parliament  came  to  their  relief.  Even  greater 
would  be  the  reproach  to  the  system  of  jurisprudence  of  the  state  of  California 
if  it  could  be  truly  declared  that  in  this  twentieth  century,  by  its  codes  and  stat- 
utes, it  had  said  the  same  thing.  .  .  ." 

"Again  we  say  that  it  would  be  an  unmerited  reproach  cast  upon  the  legisla- 
tive branch  of  our  state  government  to  hold  that  it  .  .  .  designed  to  forbid  such 
a  poor  suitor  from  prosecuting  his  action  according  to  the  laws  of  the  land  in 
a  court  of  record,  when  rights  might  and  could  be  all-important  and  his  recovery 
of  the  utmost  consequences.'1 

Costs  have  their  place  as  a  deterrent,  but  they  should  serve  to  discourage,  not  all 
litigation,  but  false  litigation,  specious  pleas,  vexatious  proceedings  taken  for  delay, 
and  to  insure  prompt  compliance  with  court  orders.  The  system  of  costs  in  equity 
approaches  this  plan,  and  in  England  the  use  of  costs  for  such  purposes  is  established.3 


§7 

Costs,  like  delay,  present  in  the  main  no  fundamental  or  inherent  difficulty.  A  re- 
duction of  costs  and  provision  for  in  forma  pauperis  proceedings  can  easily  be  effected. 
~  It  is  a  question  of  the  will  to  do  it.  The  proposal  for  direct  state  aid  as 

tSll7H7)l(XVlJ 

to  the  expenses  which  cannot  be  eliminated  goes  somewhat  farther.  It 
will  depend  very  largely  on  the  development  of  state  controlled  legal  aid  bureaus, 
for  in  nature  and  result  the  embarrassment  caused  by  these  unavoidable  expenses  of 
litigation  is  precisely  like  that  caused  by  the  necessity  of  retaining  and  paying  an 
attorney. 

1  Cf.  1  San  Francisco  L.  A.  R.  9. 

2  See  the  excellent  note  in  31  Harvard  L.  Rev.  (January,  1918).  485-487.  For  a  recent  decision  holding  that  the  re- 
quirement of  costs  is  not  in  contravention  of  equal  protection  of  the  laws,  see  In  re  Lee,  168  Pac.  63.  In  a  comment 
on  this  case  it  is  well  pointed  out  that  the  rule  would  be  tenable  if  the  costs  statute  provided  for  in  forma  pauperis 
proceedings.  16  Michigan  L.  Rev.  192. 

3  See  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  XI.  pages  102-107 ;  Ibid.,  Bulletin  VI,  page  67. 


Chapter  VI 
THE  THIRD  DEFECT  —  EXPENSE  OF  COUNSEL 

The  office  of  the  attorney  is  indispensable  to  the  administration  of  justice, 
and  vital  to  the  well-being  of  the  court.  Justice  Killtts  in  In  re  Thatcher.1 

THE  lawyer  is  indispensable  to  the  conduct  of  proceedings  before  the  courts,  and 
yet  the  fees  which  he  must  charge  for  his  services  are  more  than  millions  of  per- 
sons can  pay.  Simple  as  these  propositions  are,  they  are  too  often  forgotten  in  the 
discussions  concerning  the  administration  of  justice.  The  emphasis  has  been  on  sim- 
plification of  procedure  and  reorganization  of  courts;  but  even  the  best  procedure  in 
the  most  orderly  courts  will  require  the  presence  of  the  trained  advocate.  When  those 
highly  desirable  ends  are  accomplished,  the  problem  of  the  attorney  will  still  remain 
the  great  stumbling-block  in  the  path  toward  freedom  and  equality  of  justice. 


The  expense  of  counsel  is  a  fundamental  difficulty  because  the  attorney  is  an  inte- 
gral part  of  the  administration  of  justice.  While  the  precise  origin  of  the  attorney 
.        is  veiled  in  some  obscurity,2  it  is  clear  that  when  courts  are  regularly 

constituted  and  a  method  of  administering  justice  is  established,  the 

,  attorney  soon  makes  his  appearance.  The  real  beginnings  of  court 

„        .  organization  and  of  a  definite  procedure  were  made  in  the  reign  of 

Henry  II,  and  by  the  time  of  Henry  III  the  need  of  retaining  good 
lawyers  was  everywhere  appreciated.3  In  one  of  the  first  year  books  the  reporter  makes 
the  chief  justice  say, — "B  loses  his  money  because  he  hadn't  a  good  lawyer."3  In  our 
colonial  era  repeated  attempts  to  do  without  lawyers  were  made,  but  soon  proved 
impracticable.  With  the  development  of  American  law  and  the  establishment  of 
courts  the  lawyer  rapidly  assumed  the  important  position  in  the  administration  of 
justice  which  he  has  ever  since  maintained.4 

With  a  vast  body  of  ever  changing  law,  which  a  man  after  a  lifetime  of  devotion 
is  only  beginning  to  master,  it  is  apparent  that  the  layman,  in  order  to  understand 
his  rights,  what  he  can  and  cannot  do,  must  have  the  assistance  of  counsel.5  We  do 
not,  as  in  Nero's  time,  write  our  laws  in  small  letters  at  the  top  of  high  columns, 
but  the  multitudinous  laws  in  our  voluminous  case  books  and  statute  books  are  as 
hard  to  learn.6  Similarly,  the  procedural  law,  in  accordance  with  which  litigation 

1  190  Fed.  969;  aff.  212  Fed.  801. 

*  See  Brunner:  Early  History  of  the  Attorney,  3  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1908)  267. 

3  Zane:  Bench  and  Bar  in  the  Golden  Age  of  the  Common  Laic,  2  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1907)  18. 

4  Warren:  History  of  the  American  Bar;  see  particularly  the  introductory  chapter  called  "  Law  Without  Lawyers." 
6  Cf.  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  page  159;  Proceedings  of  Virginia  Conference  of  Charities 
and  Correction  in  1916,  page  79. 

6  The  volumes  of  the  reports  of  our  cases  number  1300  and  include  more  than  1,113,000  cases.  12  Illinois  L.  Rev. 
349,  350. 


32  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

must  be  conducted,  is  a  maze  to  the  uninitiated;  it  is  a  science  in  itself.  The  law  per- 
mits every  man  to  try  his  own  case,  but  "the  lay  vision  of  every  man  his  own  lawyer 
has  been  shown  by  all  experience  to  be  an  illusion."1  It  is  a  virtual  impossibility  for 
a  man  to  conduct  even  the  simplest  sort  of  a  case  under  the  existing  rules  of  proced- 
ure, and  this  fact  robs  the  in  forma  pauperis  proceeding  of  much  of  its  value  to  the 
poor  unless  supplemented  by  the  providing  of  counsel.2 

It  is  not  easy  to  convey  in  few  words  a  true  impression  of  the  enormous  impor- 
tance of  the  attorney  in  our  system  of  achieving  justice,  but  the  mention  of  the  broad 
outlines  of  his  work  is  suggestive.  He  must  start  the  case  properly  by  satisfying  all 
the  requirements  of  venue,  jurisdiction,  service,  entry,  and  the  law  of  pleadings. 
When  the  case  is  before  the  court,  our  system  contemplates  the  doing  of  justice  by 
applying  general  laws  to  the  facts  of  the  particular  case.  In  many  cases  the  attornev 
must  be  ready  to  assist  the  court  in  determining  the  law  applicable,  and  in  every  case 
he  must  have  ascertained  the  facts  by  investigation,  must  have  selected  the  material 
facts  admissible  according  to  the  law  of  evidence,  must  have  the  witnesses  and  docu- 
ments at  hand,  and  must  present  the  case  in  accordance  with  the  rules  governing 
trials.  When  judgment  is  rendered,  he  must  transform  that  into  an  execution,  and 
finally  undertake  to  satisfy  such  execution  by  levy  on  the  defendant's  property.  At 
every  stage  the  attorney  supplies  the  motive  power;  without  him  the  judicial  ma- 
chinery would  never  move.3  It  is  estimated  that,  on  an  average,  all  property  passes 
through  the  hands  of  lawyers  as  often  as  once  in  each  twenty -five  years.4 

The  lawyer  is  as  necessary  as  the  engineer  or  the  doctor;  each  is  a  specialist  who 
applies  the  laws  he  knows  for  the  benefit  of  the  civilized  community.  Without  up- 
rooting our  entire  administration  of  law  it  would  be  as  impossible  to  abolish  the 
lawyer  as  it  would  be  the  judge.  Justice  Miller  in  Ex  parte  Garland5  stated: 

"It  is  believed  that  no  civilized  nation  of  modern  times  has  been  without  a  class 
of  men  intimately  connected  with  the  court,  and  with  the  administration  of  jus- 
tice, called  variously  attorneys,  counsellors,  solicitors,  proctors,  and  other  terms 
of  similar  import.  They  are  as  essential  to  the  successful  workings  of  the  court 
as  the  clerks,  sheriffs,  and  marshals,  and  perhaps  as  the  judges  themselves,  since 
no  instance  is  known  of  a  court  of  law  without  a  bar." 

In  similar  vein,  Dean  Wigmore  has  said  of  the  lawyer,6 

"He  is  a  necessary  part  of  the  State's  function  of  doing  justice.  In  the  part  he 
plays,  he  is  as  essential  as  the  judge." 


1  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  319.  Cf.  1  Kent's  Commentaries,  307; 
Honestus  (Benjamin  Austin):  Observations  on  the  Pernicious  Practice  of  the  Law  (1819),  page  29. 

2  20  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  10 ;  23  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  11. 

3  "  All  men  at  all  times  and  in  all  places  do  stand  in  need  of  Justice  and  of  Law,  which  is  the  rule  of  Justice,  and 
of  the  interpreters  and  Ministers  of  the  Law,  which  give  life  and  motion  unto  Justice."  Preface  Dedicatory  to  Sir 
John  Davies'  Reports  (1615). 

4  Illinois  State  Bar  Ass'n  R.  for  1903,  Part  II,  p.  102;  Carter:  Ethics  of  the  Legal  Profession  (1915),  page  36. 

5  4  Wall.  333,  384. 

6  Carter:  op.  cit..  Introduction,  page  xxii ;  see  also,  page  31;  and  6  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  6. 


EXPENSE  OF  COUNSEL  33 

§  2 

The  inability  of  the  poor  to  pay  for  the  services  of  counsel  has  often  been  stated,  * 

and  the  general  fact  is  known.  The  vast  number  of  persons  who  are  thus  debarred 

J.,.        „         from  legal  advice  and  the  essential  services  of  the  lawyer  in  court, 

,    p  p         however,  is  not  realized.  It  is  possible  to  form  an  estimate  of  what 

.,      _  ,         this  number  must  be.  It  is  known  that  in  1913  the  average  wage  of 

JOT*  i  onti^pL 

the  clients  of  the  Cincinnati  Legal  Aid  Society  was  $10  per  week,2  and 
that  in  the  year  1916  out  of  1981  cases  analyzed  by  the  Legal  Aid  Society  in  Newark, 
1579  or  80  per  cent  of  the  applicants  earned  less  than  $20  each  week.3  It  is  safe  to  say 
that  single  persons  earning  less  than  $500  yearly  and  that  married  persons,  with  de- 
pendent families,  earning  less  than  $800  each  year  are  never  in  a  financial  position 
where  they  can  afford  to  pay  any  substantial  sum  for  attorneys'  services.4  Within  these 
classes,  according  to  Dr.  King,5  there  are  3,758,000  single  persons  and  7,040,000 
families.  Inasmuch  as  each  member  of  a  family,  the  wife  and  children  as  well  as  the 
husband,  may  need  legal  advice  and  assistance,  it  is  proper  to  multiply  the  families6 
out  to  their  number  of  constituent  individuals. 

From  this  calculation  it  appears  that  there  are  in  the  United  States  over  35,000,000 
men,  women,  and  children  whose  financial  condition  renders  them  unable  to  pay  anv 
appreciable  sum  for  attorneys'  services.  It  is  true  that  in  country  districts  and  in  the 
smaller  towns  such  people  generally  are  able  to  secure  assistance  from  lawyers7  as  a 
matter  of  kindness  or  charity ;  consequently  it  is  primarily  in  the  larger  cities  that 
inability  to  pay  fees  results  in  a  denial  of  justice.  Even  if  we  were  to  eliminate,  how- 
ever, the  seventy-eight  per  cent8  of  our  population  living  in  cities  and  towns  con- 
taining less  than  one  hundred  thousand  inhabitants,  there  would  still  remain  nearly 
8,000,000  persons  who  do  not  know  where  to  turn  for  legal  advice  and  assistance 
when  the  need  arises.  These  figures  are  only  approximations.  Cut  them  in  two  and 
it  is  still  perfectly  apparent  that  a  thoroughgoing,  equal  administration  of  justice 
must  take  cognizance  of,  and  provide  for,  a  class  of  citizens,  numbering  millions,  who 
cannot  secure  for  themselves  the  legal  services  without  which  the  machinery  of  jus- 
tice is  unworkable. 


§3 

This  is  the  great  difficulty.  Part  of  the  need  for  attorneys'  services  is  undoubtedly 
artificial.  There  is  no  reason  why  a  court  summons  should  read,  "We  command  you 

1  Hyde:  Reorganization  of  the  Legal  Profession,  8  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1913)  243;  Doerfler:  Duty  of  the  Lawyer  as  an 
Officer  of  the  Court,  24  Green  Bag  (1912),  74;  Summary  of  the  Manly  Report  of  the  United  States  Commission  on 
Industrial  Relations,  page  9  ;  Office  of  the  Public  Defender  (Los  Angeles),  page  22;  23  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  R.  10. 

2  6  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  10.  3  New  Jersey  L.  A.  R.  for  1916,  Table  6,  page  11.  *  Cf.  3  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  5. 
6  King:  The  Wealth  and  Income  of  the  People  of  the  United  States  (1915),  page  224. 

6  Ibid.,  page  129.  The  average  family  is  4.6  persons. 

7  See  Chapter  XX,  The  Present  Position  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  page  188.  8  King:  op.  cit.,  page  16. 


34  DENIAL  OF  JUSTICE  TO  THE  POOR 

to  appear  before  our  Justices  of  the  Municipal  Court  on  Saturday  the  twenty -first  day 

of  December,  a.d.  1918,  at  nine  o'clock  in  the  forenoon.  Fail  not  of  ap- 

'      j  pearance  at  your  peril;"1  so  that  it  is  necessary  to  employ  counsel  to 

explain  that  the  plain  English  words  do  not  mean  what  they  say,  but 

Fundamental     .    ,  ,,    ,  •    j  .  u  e      j.u  n 

in  law  mean  that  you  are  not  required  to  appear  betore  the  court  at  all, 

■"         "  but  must  file  an  answer  with  the  clerk  any  time  on  Tuesday,  December 

the  twenty-fourth.2  A  little  modernizing  will  eliminate  such  purely  parasitic  services. 

But  with  all  reformation  of  procedure  and  reorganization  of  courts  the  true  and 
essential  functions  of  the  attorney  will  remain  and  the  need  for  his  services  will,  as 
to  the  vast  proportion  of  advice  work,  consultation,  negotiation,  and  litigation,  be 
the  same.  This  great  underlying  problem  cannot  be  summarily  disposed  of  or  dis- 
missed with  few  words.  The  remainder  of  the  report  is  essentially  a  presentation  and 
examination  of  the  various  methods  and  agencies,  both  those  within  and  those  with- 
out the  judicial  system,  which  have  come  into  existence  and  are  being  utilized  in  the 
endeavor  to  remove  this  inequality  and  thereby  to  promote  the  ideal  of  freedom  and 
equality  of  justice. 


1  Form  of  summons  in  nse  by  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  City  of  Boston. 

2  Compare  the  need  of  employing  attorneys  to  interpret  the  complicated  New  York  Codes.  Root:  Addresses  on  Gov- 
ernment and  Citizenship,  pages  435,  469. 


PART  II 

AGENCIES  SECURING  A  MORE  EQUAL  ADMINISTRATION 

OF  THE  LAWS 


Chapter  VII 
THE  NATURE  AND  POSITION  OF  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

The  fundamental  difference  between  the  law  of  the  nineteenth  century  and  the 
law  of  the  period  of  legal  development  on  which  we  have  entered  is  not  in  the 
least  due  to  the  dominance  of  sinister  interests  over  courts  or  lawyers  or  jurists. 
It  is  not  a  conflict  between  good  men  and  bad.  It  is  a  clash  between  old  ideas  and 
new  ideas,  a  contest  between  the  conceptions  of  our  traditional  law  and  modern 
juristic  conceptions  born  of  a  new  movement  in  all  the  social  sciences.  Roscoe 
Pound  in  Justice  According  to  Laio. 

§1 

THERE  are  in  the  United  States  to-day  a  number  of  agencies  and  methods  which 
are  attacking  and  to  an  extent  remedying  the  inequalities  caused  by  our  cus- 
tomary and  traditional  method  of  administering  justice.  Most  of  these 
Introductory  : r  .,  ..  i  n       i  <*  i 

^  agencies  are  the  creations  and  developments  of  recent  years,  some  hav- 
ing been  brought  into  being  for  the  direct  purpose  of  securing  more  adequately  the 
rights  of  the  poor,  others  having  this  only  as  a  collateral  object,  and  not  a  few  being 
forced,  by  the  enormous  pressure  which  has  made  itself  felt,  to  provide  and  furnish 
some  assistance  to  poor  persons  in  matters  within  their  jurisdiction. 

In  general,  and  with,  only  a  rare  exception  here  and  there,  it  must  be  said  that  these 
agencies  and  their  developments  have  not  been  brought  about  by  judges  acting  as  a 
body  in  charge  of  the  administration  of  justice,  or  bylawryers  acting  as  a  group  through 
their  recognized  Bar  Associations.  In  addition  to  the  rigidity  of  court  organization 
which  has.made  progress  difficult,  there  has  seemingly  been  an  ignorance  of,  or  indif- 
ference to,  the  disadvantages  under  which  the  poor  have  struggled.  The  Constitution 
of  Illinois  required  the  judges  of  the  Supreme  Court  to  report  annually  to  the  Gov- 
ernor such  defects  in  the  laws  as  they  might  find,  together  with  suggestions  for  im- 
provement, but  under  this  general  power  nothing *  was  done.  The  Michigan  courts 
neglected  for  years  their  wide  rule-making  powers,  with  the  result  that  the  legislature 
was  forced  to  pass  several  thousand  sections  relating  to  practice  and  procedure.2  The 
Bar,  likewise,  has  been  slow  to  take  up  the  task,  with  which  it  may  fairly  be  charged, 
of  working  for  the  steady  betterment  of  justice.3  In  an  effort  to  arouse  the  Bar  from 
its  conservatism  and  inertia  to  a  more  lively  sense  of  the  splendid  possibilities  of  its 
concerted  action,  Dean  Vance  of  the  University  of  Minnesota  Law  School  said : 4 

"Bluntly  put,  the  American  lawyer  has  proved  a  failure.  In  no  other  free  and 
civilized  country  are  the  laws  so  ill-administered  as  in  these  United  States.  We 
lead  the  world  in  most  of  the  great  struggles  mankind  is  making,  but  in  the 

1  Cf.  Gilbert:  A  Synopsis  of  a  Bill  for  an  Act  in  Relation  to  Courts  to  be  Introduced  in  the  l*7th  General  Assembly 
(1910),  page  5. 

2  Harley :  A  Unified  State  Court  System,  page  3. 

3  Cf.  Gilbert:  op.  cit.,  page  19:  Carter:  Ethics  of  the  Legal  Profession,  Introduction  by  Dean  Wigmore,  page  xxiii ; 
73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  5. 

4  Storey:  Reform  of  Legal  Procedure,  page  5. 


38  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

administration  of  the  law  America  lags  two  generations  behind  the  rest  of  the 
civilized  world.  No  constructive  reforms  of  a  comprehensive  kind  have  been  seri- 
ously attempted  since  the  days  of  David  Dudley  Field,  now  passed  a  half  cen- 
tury and  more." 

When  the  propriety  of  contingent  fees  has  been  discussed,  lawyers  have  not  been 
wanting  to  proclaim  the  necessity  of  giving  the  poor  an  equal  chance,  but  one  may  read 
the  proceedings  of  all  the  bar  associations  and  find  no  mention  made  of  taking  care 
of  those  cases — the  vast  proportion  of  the  cases  of  the  poor — which  cannot  pay  even 
a  contingent  fee. 

These  things  are  said  simply  because  they  explain,  in  large  measure,  the  present 
situation  of  the  remedial  agencies  and  their  peculiar  relation  to  the  regular  adminis- 
tration of  justice.  It  is  due  to  the  zeal  and  enthusiasm  of  small  and  isolated  groups  of 
judges,  lawyers,  and  laymen,  working  independently  in  different  places,  that  the  path 
of  reform  has  been  blazed.  The  natural  result  has  been  that  agencies  designed  to 
meet  the  same  need  are,  in  different  localities,  entirely  dissimilar,  and  that  they  lack 
any  semblance  of  uniformity  or  cooperation.  Each  is  virtually  a  law  to  itself.  And  the 
further  inevitable  result  has  been  that  the  agencies  have  developed  as  patches  on,  and 
additions  to,  our  judicial  machinery  instead  of  as  integral  parts  of  it.  Although 
they  are  administering  justice  as  much  as  the  courts  themselves,  many  of  them  exist 
to-day  outside  of  our  traditional  legal  machinery,  as  extra-legal  institutions,  some  in 
the  eyes  of  the  law  having  no  relationship  whatever  to  the  administration  of  justice 
and  others  standing  in  an  ill-defined  relationship. 

Further,  if  duplication  of  tribunals,  wasted  effort,  and  unnecessary  friction  is  to  be 
avoided,  and  unless  history  is  to  reverse  itself,  these  agencies  must  ultimately  become 
incorporated  as  integral  parts  of  our  judicial  institutions.  This  process  of  assimila- 
tion, which  indeed  has  already  begun,  must  be  kept  steadily  in  mind,  for  some  of  the 
advantages  claimed  for  the  remedial  agencies  are  those  of  an  extra-legal  organiza- 
tion, of  justice  without  law,  which  in  all  probability  will  be  thoroughly  changed,  if 
not  reversed,  as  the  process  of  assimilation  goes  on. 


§2 

Any  attempt  to  reduce  to  a  hard  and  fast  classification  the  various  agencies  which 

are  playing  a  part  in  equalizing  the  administration  of  the  law  is  somewhat  arbitrary 

.        because  the  newer  agencies  and  methods  for  disposing  of  controversies, 

_  having  grown  up  locally  and  independently,  do  not  readily  conform  to 

type.  Each  has  a  different  jurisdiction  and  organization;  even  those 

bearing  similar  names  and  designed  to  meet  the  same  purpose  differ  so 

much  in  degree  as  to  constitute  a  difference  in  kind.  Nevertheless,  some  grouping  is 

necessary  so  that  an  orderly  presentation  may  be  made.  The  following  classification 

will  be  used: 


THEIR  NATURE  AND  POSITION  39 

1.  Small  Claims  Courts. 

2.  Conciliation  Courts  and  Conciliation  in  General. 

3.  Arbitration  by  Courts  and  Other  Organizations. 

4.  Domestic  Relations  Courts. 

5.  Administrative  Tribunals. 

6.  Administrative  Officials. 

7.  Assigned  Counsel. 

8.  Defenders  in  Criminal  Cases. 

9.  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 


§3 

It  is  the  purpose  of  the  following  chapters  to  examine  these  various  agencies,  study 
their  history,  set  out  the  work  they  have  done,  and  from  that  background  to  try  to 
ascertain  how  far  they  now  are,  or  may  be  developed  into,  sound  meth- 
""  ods  for  more  nearly  equalizing  the  administration  of  justice. 

One  simple  line  of  approach  which  is  helpful  is  made  possible  by  the 
°  fact  that  the  legal  difficulties  of  the  poor,  though  legion  in  number, 

fall  as  to  a  high  percentage  of  the  total  into  these  four  well-defined  groups: 

1.  Claims  for  wages. 

2.  Domestic  difficulties. 

3.  Personal  injuries. 

4.  A  vast  number  of  miscellaneous  small  debts  and  claims,  as  for  rent,  groceries, 
loans,  and  arising  out  of  chattel  mortgages  and  assignments  of  wages,  in 
which  the  poor  may  appear  either  as  plaintiffs  or  defendants. 

Many  of  the  agencies  deal  specifically  with  these  problems.  Their  proper  solution 
means  a  vast  improvement  in  the  legal  position  of  the  poor,  so  that  this  is  in  the 
nature  of  a  test  which  can  be  applied  to  the  agencies  in  appraising  them. 

The  real  test  of  their  success,  however,  will  steadily  be  their  effect  on  delays,  costs, 
and  above  all  on  the  great  stumbling-block  of  the  expense  of  employing  attorneys. 
The  one  connecting  thread  which  runs  through  them  all  is  this  attack,  often  dis- 
guised and  sometimes  unconscious,  on  the  fundamental  difficulty  of  the  expense  of 
counsel.  There  are  conceivably  three  solutions:  the  first,  to  abolish  the  expense  by 
abolishing  the  attorney ;  the  second,  to  eliminate  the  expense  by  making  the  attor- 
ney's services  unnecessary ;  and  the  third,  to  avoid  the  expense  to  the  poor  by  sup- 
plying them  with  attorneys  gratuitously. 

All  three  methods,  singly  or  in  combination,  are  being  tried.  Before  passing  to  a 
consideration  of  each  group  of  agencies  in  detail,  it  may  be  helpful  to  visualize  the 
general  situation  by  means  of  the  following  simple  diagram: 


40 


THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 


Chart  showing  the  Three  Methods  used  by  the  Nine  Agencies  in 
Attacking  the  Problem  of  the  Expense  of  Counsel1 


1 

PROHIBITING 
THE  ATTORNEY 


MAKING  THE 
ATTORNEY  UNNECESSARY 


SUPPLYING  THE  ATTORNEY  OR 
SOME  ONE  TO  PERFORM  HIS  FUNCTIONS 


1  The  proportions  are  not  based  on  mathematical  computations.  Sufficient  figures  do  not  exist.  The  chart  gives  a 
correct  impression  of:  1.  The  total  extent  to  which  each  method  is  used.  2.  The  present  relative  importance  of  the 
different  agencies.  3.  The  proportionate  extent  to  which  each  agency  uses  each  method. 


Chapter  VIII 
SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS 

The  splendid  thing  about  Judge  Levine's  court  [the  Cleveland 
court  for  small  causes]  is  that,  for  the  mass  of  cases,  it  does  jus- 
tice where  before  now  there  was  no  court  justice  at  all.  It  fills  a 
vacant  space.  John  H.  Wigmore.1 

§  1 

THE  inability  to  provide  justice  in  small  causes  has  always  been  one  of  the  weak- 
est points  in  our  system  of  administering  justice.  From  the  days  of  ordeal  by  bat- 
tie,  the  method  provided  by  the  common  law  for  proving  and  reducing 
n.i  to  judgment  any  type  of  small  claim  has  been  cumbersome,  slow,  and 

expensive  out  of  all  proportion  to  the  matter  involved.2  Our  legal 
.  system  has  taken  too  literally  the  ancient  maxim,  "de  minimis  non 

curat  lex."3  A  complicated  procedure  requires  the  attorney,  but  the 
expense  for  his  services  is  more  than  the  traffic  can  bear.  It  was  once  asked  at  a  meet- 
ing of  the  American  Bar  Association  whether  a  lawyer  in  suing  for  seven  dollars  wages 
due  his  client,  a  blacksmith,  was  justified  in  charging  a  fee  of  half  that  amount.4 
The  question  reveals  the  common  dilemma — the  services  were  worth  the  amount 
charged  and  yet,  to  the  blacksmith,  it  would  hardly  be  satisfactory  to  collect  seven 
dollars  at  a  cost  of  three  dollars  and  a  half.  As  Dean  Pound  puts  it : 5 

"For  ordinary  causes  our  contentious  system  has  great  merit  as  a  means  of 
getting  at  the  truth.  But  it  is  a  denial  of  justice  in  small  causes  to  drive  liti- 
gants to  employ  lawyers  and  it  is  a  shame  to  drive  them  to  legal  aid  societies 
to  get  as  charity  what  the  state  should  give  as  a  right." 

Similarly,  court  costs  constitute  an  expense  prohibitory  to  small  litigation.  The 
man  hired  at  fifteen  dollars  a  week  who  is  put  off  the  first  week  and  not  paid  the 
second  has  a  valid  claim  for  thirty  dollars  but  often  not  a  dollar  in  his  pocket.  In 
addition  to  an  attorney's  fee,  he  cannot  pay  court  costs  because  he  has  not  been  paid, 
and  yet  because  he  has  not  been  paid  court  action  is  imperative.  It  is  indeed  a  vicious 
circle,  but  within  that  circle  thousands  of  unpaid  wage-earners  have  been  caught. 

Delay  plays  its  part  by  permitting  a  debtor,  who  has  no  real  defence,  to  file  an 
appearance  and  answer  and  interlocutory  motions,  to  have  the  case  continued  once 
or  twice,  and  then,  when  it  is  finally  called  for  trial,  to  default.6  This  serves  to  hold 

1  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  23. 

2  Justice  Strasburger  (of  the  Municipal  Court  for  the  District  of  Columbia):  A  Plea  for  the  Reform  of  the  Inferior 
Court,  22  Case  and  Comment  (1915),  20 :  Grinnell :  Constitutional  History  of  the  Supreme  Judicial  Court  of  Massa- 
chusetts, 2  Mass.  L.  Quarterly  (1917),  472,  note ;  Preliminary  Report  on  Efficiency  in  the  Administration  of  Justice, 
page  29. 

3  Cf.  1  Hartford  L.  A.  R.  6.  4  33  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  79. 

6  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  318. 

6  In  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  the  number  of  defendants  who  defaulted  when  the  case  was  finally  called  for  trial 
numbered  2165  in  1913,  2388  in  1914,  2385  in  1915  (eleven  months).  See  Report  for  1916,  page  54.  For  a  statement  as  to 
appeals  taken  solely  for  delay  see  Ibid.,  page  7. 


42  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

the  plaintiff  off  for  months,  to  cause  him  loss  of  time  in  court  attendance,  and  to  rob 
the  ultimate  judgment  of  much  of  its  worth.1 

Small  tradespeople  to-day  are  forced  to  the  practice  either  of  wiping  all  small  claims 
off  their  books  or  of  selling  them  at  a  ridiculous  discount  to  professional  collection 
agencies.  They  have  the  possible  relief  of  increasing  the  price  of  the  necessities  they 
sell,  thereby  adding  the  waste  of  the  judicial  system  to  the  cost  of  living.  The  wage- 
earner  and  the  small  lodging-housekeeper,  under  conditions  of  modern  competition, 
have  not  even  that  relief;  they  have  been  obliged  to  stand  their  losses. 

Claims  of  this  sort  are  often  contemptuously  spoken  of  as  "petty  litigation."  But 
it  is  in  this  very  field  that  the  courts  have  their  greatest  political  effect.  In  every  urban 
community  these  are  the  cases  of  the  large  majority  of  citizens.  As  they  are  treated 
well  or  ill,  so  they  form  their  opinion  of  American  judicial  institutions.2  The  vast 
number  of  such  cases  demanding  attention  cannot  be  told  from  our  court  dockets,  for, 
as  Dean  Wigmore  says,3  "this  class  of  cases  simply  does  not  ordinarily  appear  in  the 
regular  courts."  An  idea  may  be  gained  from  the  English  County  Courts,  where  pro- 
vision is  made  for  "petty  litigation."  Of  1,224,000  cases  entered  in  1913, 1,207,000, 
or  98i  per  cent,  were  for  claims  under  £20,  and  the  average  claim  was  about  £3.4  For 
such  matters,  Mr.  Root  has  said,5  "  Our  procedure  ought  to  be  based  upon  the  com- 
mon intelligence  of  the  farmer,  the  merchant,  and  the  laborer.  And  there  is  no  reason 
whv  it  should  not  be.  I  say  it  not  without  experience  in  legal  procedure.  There  is  no 
reason  why  a  plain,  honest  man  should  not  be  permitted  to  go  into  court  and  tell  his 
story6  and  have  the  judge  before  whom  he  comes  permitted  to  do  justice  in  that  par- 
ticular case,  unhampered  by  a  great  variety  of  statutory  rules.'Tnstead  of  that,  "we 
have  got  our  procedure  regulated  according  to  the  trained,  refined,  subtle,  ingenious 
intellect  of  the  best  practiced  lawyers,  and  it  is  all  wrong." 

This  deplorable  condition  is  not  the  result  of  the  evil  machinations  of  any  group 
or  class;  it  is  the  consequence  of  the  failure  of  the  judicial  system  to  keep  pace  with 
the  changing  conditions  of  life.  In  our  judicial  history  small  cases  were  first  entrusted 
to  justices  of  the  peace.  This  plan  for  a  while  gave  simplicity  and  despatch,  but 
when  applied  to  cities  it  failed  utterly.  The  justices,  being  subject  to  no  supervi- 
sion, and  depending  so  much  on  their  fees  that  J.  P.  came  to  mean  "Judgment  for 
the  Plaintiff,"  formed  unholy  alliances  with  collection  agencies,  instalment  houses, 
and  the  like,  and  very  generally  became  actually  corrupt.7  They  were  so  strongly 

1  Strasburger:  A  Plea  for  the  Reform  of  the  Inferior  Court,  22  Case  and  Comment  (1915),  23;  Pound:  Administra- 
tion of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  319;  Alger :  Sicift  and  Cheap  Justice,  27  World's  Work  (1913), 
167;  11  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  4,  p.  8. 

-  Julius  Henry  Cohen :  The  Municipal  Court  Bill,  5  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.,  No.  2,  p.  9;  Root :  Addresses  on  Govern- 
ment and  Citizenship,  pages  135, 136, 185. 
3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bullet  in  V ill,  page  23. 

*  Rosenbaum:  Studies  in  English  Court  Procedure  (1916),  vol.  ii,  Tlve  Crninty  Courts,  pages,  1,  2.  Cf.  1  Cleveland 
Municipal  Court  R.  (1912),  51. 

5  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  page  231. 

6  This  is  the  system  in  the  English  County  Courts.  See  Parry:  The  Law  and  tlie  Poor,  page  102. 

7  See  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  for  Better  County  Government  in  Nevt  York  Stated9l4\  pages  47,  48; 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  43 

entrenched  in  local  politics  that  the  process  of  ousting  them,  which  is  not  yet  com- 
pleted, has  been  long  and  difficult.  They  have  aptly  been  called  "those  barnacles  of 
jurisprudence"1  because  they  have  clung  on  long  after  their  usefulness  expired. 

In  the  cities,  the  justice  of  the  peace  was  first  supplanted  by  specially  created  ma- 
gistrates who,  as  the  cities  continued  to  grow,  became  just  as  inefficient  and  even  more 
corrupt.2  Finally,  they  were  succeeded  by  the  organized  modern  municipal  court  of 
the  type  that  is  now  familiar.  With  the  municipal  court  came  honest,  trained,  and 
capable  judges,  but  also  there  came  the  rules  of  pleading,  of  procedure,  and  of  evi- 
dence. Honesty  and  certainty  were  secured  at  the  sacrifice  of  simplicity  and  speed. 
There  has  been  a  steady  tendency  to  increase  the  jurisdictions  of  the  municipal 
courts  so  that  they  have  lost  sight  of  the  little  cases ;  expense  and  delay  have  been 
allowed  to  creep  in,  with  the  result  that  small  claims  have  not  been  cared  for  satis- 
factorily.3 

In  a  few  communities  the  last  and  logical  step  has  been  taken  of  combining  the 
simplicity,  speed,  and  cheapness  which  were  sought  in  the  justice  of  the  peace  plan4 
with  the  honesty  and  efficiency  of  the  municipal  court  by  a  new  type  of  court  termed 
variously  "small  claims  court,"  "small  debtors'  court,"  "conciliation  court,"  and 
"court  for  small  causes."  The  name  of  "small  claims  court"  is  the  most  descriptive 
and,  to  avoid  confusion,  will  hereafter  be  applied  to  all  such  courts.  Small  claims  courts 
exist  in  Cleveland,  Chicago,  Minneapolis,  Portland  (Oregon),  and  in  three  cities  in 
Kansas.5  They  present  so  many  differences,  some  being  fundamental,  that  before  any 
generalizations  as  to  the  nature,  the  success,  and  the  future  of  this  type  of  court  are 
warranted,  they  must  each  be  described. 


§2 
The  Kansas  small  claims  courts,  which  are  to  be  found  in  Topeka,  Leavenworth,  and 
Kansas  City  under  the  name  of  "Small  Debtors'  Courts,"  were  made  possible  by  a 
1913  act  of  the  legislature.6  The  law  was  drawn  by  the  attorney-general,  who,  so  the 
story  goes,  had  the  inadequacy  of  our  regular  courts  brought  vividly  to  his  attention 

1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  13:  Nashville  L.  A.  R.  for  1915-16,  page  2;  Baer:  Justice  for  the  Small  Man,  90;  The  Century 
(1916),  144, 146;  Harley:  Ultimate  Types  of  Inferior  Courts  and  Judges,  22  Case  and  Comment,  3;  American  Judica- 
ture Society,  Bulletin  YUI,  page  26;  Ibid.,  Bulletin  VTI-A,  page  57;  Fuessle:  Making  Americans  by  Justice,  65 
Collier's  (July  3, 1915),  27. 

1  Olson :  Proper  Organization  and  Procedure  of  a  Municipal  Court,  in  7  Proceedings  of  the  American  Political  Sci- 
ence Association  (1910),  80. 

2  Harley :  Ultimate  Types  of  Inferior  Courts  and  Judges,  22  Case  and  Comment,  4;  The  Forgotten  Army,  Report 
of  Six  Tears'  Work  of  the  Committee  on  Criminal  Courts  of  the  New  York  Charity  Organization  Society  (1918), 
page  11. 

s  The  best  illustration  of  this  is  afforded  by  the  New  York  Municipal  Court  which,  when  created,  was  called  "  The 
Poor  Man's  Court."  See  Root:  Addresses  on  Government  and  Citizenship,  pages  135,  185 ;  Frederick  De  Witt  Wells 
(a  Justice  of  the  New  York  Municipal  Court):  The  Man  in  Court  (1917),  page  101.  The  District  Court  in  Jersey  City 
has  undergone  a  similar  evolution. 

*  See  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VTI-A,  pages  56,  57,  and  also  pages  71,  72. 

*  The  New  York  Municipal  Court  with  its  1917  Rules  for  Arbitration  has  in  effect  provided  a  small  claims  court. 
This  is  considered  in  detail  in  Chapter  X,  Arbitration,  page  71. 

6  Kansas  Session  Laics  0/1913,  c.  170,  p.  291;  General  Statutes  of  Kansas  (1915),  c.  27,  art.  19,  §§  3316-3327. 


44  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

by  the  fact  that  a  washerwoman,  in  whom  he  was  interested,  was  owed  three  dollars 
by  a  well-to-do  man,  who  refused  to  pay  her  and  whom  she  was  un- 
able  to  sue  because  she  could  not  pay  the  necessary  counsel  fees  and 

costs.1  Having:  in  mind  the  informality  of  some  of  the  Canadian  courts 
Courts  .  . 

in  hearing  small  matters,2  he  wrote  a  bill,  which  was  passed  and  be- 
came law  on  March  15,  1913.  This  law  merits  partial  quotation  because  it  repre- 
sents the  violent  reaction  that  is  taking  place  against  our  traditional  procedure  which 
has  become  so  formal,  costly,  and  inefficient.3 

"Section  2.  It  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  appointing  power — the  board  of  county 
commissioners  or  the  mayor — to  select  as  judge  of  such  small  debtors1  court 
some  reputable  resident  citizen  of  approved  integrity  who  is  sympathetically  in- 
clined to  consider  the  situation  of  the  poor,  friendless  and  misfortunate,  .  .  .  '' 

"Section  3.  The  judge  of  the  small  debtors'  court  may  hold  his  court  in  his  own 
home,  or  in  his  own  office  or  place  of  business,  or  at  some  place  provided  by  the 
power  appointing  him." 

"Section  6.  Before  entertaining  any  suit  in  such  small  debtors'  court,  the  plain- 
tiff must  appear  before  the  judge  of  the  court  personally,  .  .  .  and  state  his  case 
orally,  and  if  the  judge  believes  the  plaintiff  has  a  cause  of  action  he  shall  docket 
the  same  by  an  entry  in  his  docket,  and  shall  summon  the  defendant  orally, 
or  by  United  States  mail,  or  by  telephone,  and  try  the  cause  considerately  and 
summarily  and  give  judgment  thereon.  But  no  costs  shall  be  assessed  or  charged 
to  either  party." 

"Section  10.  The  judge  of  the  small  debtors'  court  shall  serve  without  pay,  fee, 
or  award ;  and  no  attorney  at  law  or  any  other  person  than  the  plaintiff  and 
defendant  shall  concern  himself  or  intermeddle  in  any  manner  whatsoever  with 
the  litigation  in  the  small  debtors'  court,  nor  shall  it  be  necessary  to  summon 
witnesses,  but  the  judge  may  informally  consult  witnesses  or  otherwise  investi- 
gate the  controversy  between  the  parties,  and  in  every  case  give  judgment  ac- 
cording to  the  very  right  of  the  cause." 

The  act  restricts  the  courts  to  small  debts  and  accounts  (thereby  excluding  all 
matters  sounding  in  tort)  not  exceeding  twenty  dollars  in  amount,  owed  by  defend- 
ants who  reside  in  the  county  or  city  of  which  the  court  has  jurisdiction.4  Further, 
the  plaintiff  must  satisfy  the  judge  not  only  that  he  has  a  good  cause  of  action,  but 
that  he  cannot  afford  to  employ  counsel  or  use  the  regular  courts.5 

In  the  Topeka  court  from  May  18,  1913,  to  May  18,  1914,  378  cases  were  filed 
and  in  addition  about  50  were  settled  at  once  before  any  docket  entry  was  required.6 
The  claims  ran  from  the  twenty  dollar  maximum  down  to  a  claim  for  forty-five  cents 
brought  by  a  newsboy.  The  average  judgment  rendered  was  $4.65.  In  the  Leaven- 
worth court,  100  cases  were  docketed  and  heard  during  its  first  year,  and  another 

1  Appo:  Justice  Tempered  with  Mercy,  112  Outlook  (1916),  153. 

2  For  a  brief  statement  of  the  informal  procedure  in  Toronto  see  American  Judicature  Society, Bulletin  VIII,  page  35. 

3  Ibid.,  page  48.  *  Kansas  Session  Laws  of  1913,  c.  170,  §  4.  5  Ibid.,  §§  5, 11. 
6  22  Case  and  Comment,  30. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  45 

100  matters  were  disposed  of  without  entry.1  The  Kansas  City  court  tried  its  first  case 
on  August  25,  1913,  and  from  that  date  until  October  17, 1916,  has  been  called  upon 
in  about  400  matters.  Wage  claims  furnish  the  greatest  number  of  cases.  Most  of  the 
judgments  rendered  are  paid2  and  very  few  appeals  are  taken.3 

How  these  courts  meet  the  three  defects  of  the  customary  administration  of  jus- 
tice is  expressed  in  the  law  and  carried  out  in  practice.  Costs  are  abolished.  Delays 
in  obtaining  a  trial  are  eliminated,  for  the  judge  can  hold  his  court  day  or  night  and 
at  any  place,  so  that  when  he  telephones  the  defendant  to  appear  he  can  always  fix 
a  reasonable  time  for  appearance  within  a  day  or  two.  It  is  sought  to  prevent  delays 
through  appeal  by  denying  any  appeal  to  the  plaintiff  and  by  making  it  burdensome 
to  the  defendant.4  The  fundamental  difficulty  of  the  attorney's  expense  is  met  by  the 
legislative  fiat  forbidding  attorneys  from  "intermeddling"  in  cases  before  these  courts. 
This  prohibition  would  not,  of  itself,  be  successful ;  the  problem  is  really  solved  by 
the  procedure  of  the  court  and  the  functions  of  the  judge.  The  judge  himself  makes 
out  the  simple  forms  which  start  the  case,  he  summons  the  defendant  and  any  ne- 
cessary witnesses,  he  is  authorized  to  investigate  the  facts  in  any  manner  he  chooses, 
and  at  the  hearing  the  parties  tell  their  own  stories  under  the  direction  of  the  judge 
without  regard  to  rules  of  evidence  or  trial  procedure.  It  is  therefore  more  accurate 
to  say  that  these  courts  avoid  the  expense  of  counsel  by  making  the  presence  of  coun- 
sel unnecessary  in  their  proceedings.  The  act  further  attempts  to  equalize  the  situa- 
tion on  appeal  by  providing  that  no  pleadings  shall  be  required  in  the  District  Court 
and  that  the  defendant,  if  he  loses,  must  pay  fifteen  dollars  to  the  plaintiff  for  his 
attorney's  fees. 

Aside  from  their  extremely  narrow  jurisdictional  limits,  these  courts  are  unsound 
in  two  particulars.  They  represent  a  recurrence  of  the  old  unfortunate  tendency  of  cre- 
ating new  courts  for  new  needs,  which  inevitably  causes  duplication  and  confusion. 
More  serious,  thev  indicate  a  renewed  attempt  to  secure  j  ustice  without  trained  j  udges 
and  without  law.  Any  reputable  layman  may  be  the  judge,  and  his  duty  is  declared 
to  be  to  give  his  decision  not  according  to  the  law  but  according  "to  the  very  right 
of  the  cause.1'  This  means  justice  according  to  individual  conscience  after  the  manner 
of  an  Eastern  Cadi.5  One  may  doubt  whether  in  the  long  run  this  plan  can  succeed 
when  like  plans  throughout  our  legal  history  have  always  ended  in  failure.  At  the 
present  time  the  courts  are  superior  to  the  act  which  formed  them.  Judge  Lee  of  the 
Kansas  City  court  is  a  capable,  trained  lawyer  of  integrity,  whose  notion  of  right 
generally  conforms  with  the  rule  of  law.  But  in  a  system  without  supervision  or  re- 


1  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  YIII,  page  48. 

2  Where  the  defendant  fails  to  pay,  the  judge  certifies  his  judgment  to  the  District  Court  so  that  execution  may 
issue.  In  Topeka,  out  of  326  judgments,  only  30  were  so  certified,  and  in  Leavenworth  only  2  per  cent  were  cer- 
tified. 

3  In  three  years  only  15  appeals  have  been  taken  from  the  Kansas  City  Court;  6  being  taken  by  one  firm. 

4  Kansas  Session  Laws  of  1918,  c.  170,  §  8. 

6  Cf.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  YIII,  page  48. 


46  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

sponsibility,  lacking  in  all  the  safeguards  demonstrated  by  history  to  be  necessary, 
there  is  no  guarantee  for  the  future. 

In  fact,  these  courts  are  less  like  courts  and  more  like  legalized  legal  aid  societies.1 
The  provision  that  they  are  to  assist  only  such  persons  as  cannot  afford  to  employ 
attorneys  is  directly  analogous  to  the  legal  aid  rule,  the  judge  must  be  satisfied  as 
to  the  merit  of  the  case  as  must  the  legal  aid  attorney,  and  in  his  decision  the  judge 
is  only  slightly  more  judicial  than  the  legal  aid  attorney  who  always  is  desirous  of 
hearing  both  sides  and  of  acting  accordingly.  The  only  difference  is  that  the  judge 
of  the  small  claims  court  has  the  sanction  of  the  state  behind  him,  and  his  decision 
when  made  becomes  a  legal  judgment. 

The  great  accomplishment  of  these  courts  is  that  they  have  concretely  demon- 
strated that  justice  administered  without  regard  to  procedural  and  evidential  rules 
of  law  not  only  meets  with  popular  approval2  but  is  entirely  feasible;  in  other  words, 
that  as  to  small  civil  causes  the  three  defects  in  the  traditional  administration  of  jus- 
tice can  be  readily  overcome. 


§3 

The  small  claims  court  of  Portland,  Oregon,  technically  known  as  the  Small  Claims 
Department  of  the  District  Court  for  Multnomah  County,  was  created  by  act  of  legis- 
lature  in  1915. 3  Judge  Dayton,  and  the  persons  interested  in  the  pro- 
posal,4  had  the  Kansas  courts  in  mind,  so  that  the  law  in  many  of  its 
sections  follows  its  Kansas  prototype.  Jurisdiction  is  limited  to  money 
claims  not  exceeding  twenty  dollars,5  there  are  no  pleadings,  the  hear- 
ings are  informal  "with  the  sole  object  of  dispensing  speedy  justice,"6  and  the  judge 
may  consult  the  witnesses  informally  and  otherwise  investigate  the  case.7  Costs  are 
not  abolished,  but  are  limited  to  seventy -five  cents,8  so  that  the  provision  requiring 
process  to  be  served  by  court  officers9  does  not  cause  excessive  expense.  The  plaintiff 
cannot  appeal,  and  if  the  defendant  does,  he  is  liable  to  the  fifteen  dollars  attorney's 
fee  and  must  give  a  bond  to  secure  all  costs.10  On  this  appeal  in  the  Circuit  Court,  no 
pleadings  are  necessary.10  Attorneys  are  forbidden  to  appear  in  the  court,  with  a  sav- 
ing clause  that  the  court  may  in  its  discretion  admit  them.11 

The  procedure  differs  in  that  there  are  no  restrictions  concerning  the  poverty  of 
the  plaintiff  or  as  to  the  merit  of  his  cause.  He  is  entitled,  as  of  right,  to  go  before 

1  Walton  Wood  recommended  that  in  his  civil  legal  aid  work  in  Los  Angeles  he  be  given  power  to  arbitrate  dis- 
putes and  to  render  judgment.  See  Tlie  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  26.  If 
this  had  been  done,  his  office  would  have  become  exactly  like  a  Kansas  small  claims  court. 

2  These  courts  have  attracted  wide  attention  and  elicited  much  comment.  In  addition  to  the  articles  already  cited 
see  The  Docket  (1916),  page  1280 ;  La  Follette's  Magazine  for  October,  1915  ;  Boston  Evening  Transcript  for  February 
6,  1915. 

3  Oregon  General  Laivs  of  1915,  c.  827.  *  Cf.  Report  of  the  Portland  Associated  Charities  for  1913,  page  47. 
6  General  Laws  of  1915,  c.  327,  §  1.            6  Ibid.,  §  9.  7  Ibid.,  §  8.  "  Ibid.,  §  3. 

°Ibid.,  §4.  10lbid.,  §12. 

u  Ibid..  §  8.  In  practice  attorneys  seldom  ask  and  seldom  are  allowed  to  appear. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  47 

the  clerk  of  the  District  Court,  who  thereupon  fills  out  the  appropriate  form  of  claim, 
has  it  signed  and  sworn  to  by  the  plaintiff,1  makes  out  a  summons  to  the  defendant, 
and  assigns  the  date  for  hearing,2  which  must  be  at  least  five  days,  but  not  more  than 
ten  days,  after  service  of  the  summons.3 

This  court  is  a  great  improvement  over  its  Kansas  model  in  that  it  secures  the 
advantages  of  simplicity,  cheapness,  and  speed,  without  sacrificing  any  fundamentals. 
It  is  justice  by  trained  judges  who5  although  given  wide  discretion  by  the  statute,4 
in  fact  decide  cases  according  to  substantive  law  and  not  their  own  arbitrary  opinion 
of  right  and  wrong.  It  is  an  entire  breaking  away  from  our  traditional  justice  con- 
ducted according  to  procedural  and  evidential  law,  but  its  justice  is  nevertheless  as- 
certained and  administered  according  to  substantive  law.  It  thus  reemphasizes  the 
lesson  afforded  by  the  Kansas  courts,  that  justice  in  small  causes  can  be  secured  with- 
out reliance  on  technical  procedure  and  without  the  assistance  of  counsel.  Further, 
the  court  has  the  advantage  of  not  being  a  separate  court,  but  a  department  of  the 
District  Court  (which  corresponds  to  a  municipal  court).  There  is  a  curious  and 
wholly  unnecessary  taking  over  of  the  Kansas  idea  of  a  distinct  court  in  the  provision 
that  a  judgment  of  a  judge  sitting  in  the  small  claims  department  is  not  automati- 
cally given  full  legal  effect,  but  must  first  be  certified  to  the  clerk  who  enters  it  in 
the  District  Court  docket,  whereupon  it  acquires  validity  and  execution  may  issue.5 

The  court  has  been  eminently  successful.  Its  procedure  appeals  so  strongly  to  the 
average  person  that  in  known  instances  plaintiffs  with  valid  claims  over  twenty  dollars 
have  deliberately  scaled  them  down  in  order  to  be  able  to  avail  themselves  of  the 
speed  and  inexpensiveness  of  the  small  claims  department.  The  court  has  published 
no  report,  but  from  an  examination  of  its  docket  made  November  6,  1917,  the  volume 
of  its  business  was  ascertained  to  be: 

From  May  24,  1915,  to  May  24,  1916  705  cases 

From  May  24,  1916,  to  November  6,  1916         1123  cases. 

When  one  considers  how  defendants  in  the  regular  courts  use  the  technicalities  of 
procedure  and  evidence  to  delay  and  to  defeat  valid  claims,  it  would  seem  inevitable 
that  under  the  Portland  plan  defendants  would  appeal  to  the  Circuit  Court  where, 
by  having  attorneys,  they  could  interpose  technical  objections.  The  docket,  however, 
shows  that  out  of  the  total  1828  cases  in  seventeen  months  there  have  been  only  two 
appeals.  It  seems  a  fair  conclusion  that  the  spirit  and  procedure  of  the  court  com- 
mand such  respect  that  its  judgments  are  accepted. 

There  was  some  indication  in  Portland  of  the  existence  of  a  factor  that  must  be 
reckoned  with  because  it  is  the  greatest  menace  to  the  success  of  this  kind  of  court. 
There  was  evidence  that  not  all  of  the  judges  were  by  temperament  and  training 
qualified  to  conduct  the  court.  A  weak,  or  incapable,  or  narrow-minded  judge  can  do 
more  harm  in  a  court  of  wide  discretion,  as  a  small  claims,  a  juvenile,  or  a  domestic 

1  General  Laws  of  191b,  c.  327,  §2.  *  Ibid.,  §  3.  3  Ibid.,  §  6.  * Ibid.,  §  8.  *  Ibid.,  §13. 


48  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

relations  court,  than  anywhere  else.  The  greatest  latent  flaw  in  the  otherwise  admir- 
able conception  of  this  type  of  court  is  the  demand  that  it  makes  for  superlative 
judges,  without  whom  it  cannot  succeed. 


§4 

The  Cleveland  small  claims  court,  technically  known  as  the  Conciliation  Branch  of  the 

Municipal  Court,  has  had  a  most  interesting  development.  Though  still  lacking  in 

certain  important  attributes,  it  stands  to-day  as  the  most  nearly  per- 

.  feet  type  of  a  court  for  small  causes  to  be  found  in  the  United  States. 

_  The  Municipal  Court  of  Cleveland  was  established1  in  1912  to  rid 

C  ouirt 

the  city  of  the  intolerable  abuses  of  the  justice  of  the  peace  system. 

The  public  opinion  which  secured  the  legislative  enactments  demanded  not  only 
an  honest  administration  of  justice,  but  likewise  a  simple  and  easy  judicial  proced- 
ure.2 As  a  first  attempt  to  realize  this,  the  court  passed  two  rules,3  one  providing  for 
assistance  by  the  clerk  to  parties  having  small  cases  and  the  other  for  arbitration  by 
a  judge.  The  latter  was  not  acted  upon,  but  under  the  former  a  clerk  was  designated, 
beginning  February  24,  1912,  to  help  parties  draw  and  file  the  necessary  papers 
required  by  the  municipal  court  procedure  and  also  to  endeavor  to  adjust  claims 
between  parties  where  opportunity  offered.4  William  F.  Burke,  chief  clerk  of  the  civil 
branch  of  the  court,  was  assigned  to  this  novel  post,  and  with  rare  insight  and  great 
courage  he  began  in  all  claims  involving  small  amounts  of  money  and  the  detention 
of  personal  property  to  try  to  bring  the  parties  together  and  secure  a  settlement 
without  litigation.  His  method  was  simply  to  write  a  letter — which  had  no  legal 
standing  whatever — to  the  defendant,  inviting  him  to  call  and  talk  the  matter  over. 
Thus  far  the  work  was  exactly  like  that  of  a  legal  aid  society.  In  1912,  about  twelve 
hundred  cases  were  successfully  disposed  of  in  this  way.5  The  judges  were  greatly 
impressed,  and  decided  to  expand  the  idea  from  a  ministerial  to  a  judicial  function. 
Their  deliberations  were  going  on  during  the  latter  part  of  1912  at  precisely  the 
time  when  a  similar  but  independent  line  of  thought  was  developing  in  Kansas.  The 
amendment  to  the  municipal  court  act  permitting  service  by  mail  made  the  next  step 
possible,  and  on  March  15, 1913, — two  months  before  the  first  Kansas  Small  Debtors' 
Court, — the  Conciliation  Branch  was  opened.6 

The  effect  of  the  mail  service  law  was  to  change  the  clerk's  letter  to  the  defendant 
from  a  mere  request  to  a  legal  summons  by  the  simple  expedient  of  having  the  letter 

1  For  the  acts  see  99  Ohio  Laws,  362;  as  amended,  101  Ohio  Laws,  156. 

2  1  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  15;  cf.  White:  Conciliation  Branch  of  the  Municipal  Court,  13  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid 
Rev.,  No.  4,  p.  2. 

3  See  Rule  24,  "Clerk  to  assist  Parties  in  Small  Cases,"  and  Rule  25,  "Settlement  Room,"  quoted  in  1  C.  M.  C.  R.39. 
1  1  C.  M.  C.  R.  49:  2  Ibid.  38. 

6  1  Ibid.  49  (table  giving  detailed  statistics):  Moley:  Justice  through  Common  Sense,  33  The  Survey  (1914),  101. 
6  2  C.  M.  C.  R.  38. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  49 

deposited  in  the  mail  box  by  the  bailiff.  Thereby  the  court  acquired  legal  jurisdiction 
and  could  proceed  to  hear  the  case  or  enter  an  automatic  default  according  as  the 
defendant  answered  or  neglected  the  letter  summons. 

The  present  course  of  procedure  is  as  follows :  A  person  goes  to  the  clerk  of  the 
Conciliation  Branch,  who  has  a  separate  office,  exactly  like  a  legal  aid  society,  where 
the  person  may  feel  at  home  and  at  liberty  to  talk  the  difficulty  over  with  the  clerk. 
If  the  dispute  seems  one  that  offers  fair  hope  of  immediate  adjustment,  the  clerk, 
like  a  legal  aid  society  attorney,  telephones  or  writes  the  defendant  and  endeavors  to 
secure  an  amicable  settlement.  If  that  fails,  or  if  the  case  at  once  appears  likely  to 
demand  judicial  consideration,  the  clerk  fills  out  in  the  court  docket  a  very  brief  state- 
ment of  claim,  which  the  plaintiff  signs.  A  date  for  the  hearing — the  defendant  being 
entitled  to  three  days'  notice — is  at  once  assigned,  the  plaintiff  being  given  a  little 
card  bearing  the  date,  the  time,  the  court  room,  and  the  court  address  and  telephone 
number.  A  summons  is  made  out,  and  delivered  to  the  bailiff,  who  deposits  a  copy  in 
the  mail  box  and  certifies  to  that  effect  on  the  original  summons.  At  first  registered 
mail  was  used,  but  to-day  ordinary  mail  is  employed  because  in  the  event  of  a  defec- 
tive address  it  is  returned  more  promptly.  If  the  summons  cannot  be  delivered,  it  is 
returned  at  once  to  the  court  and  the  bailiff  amends  his  return  of  service.  The  sum- 
mons states  the  precise  time  and  the  exact  room  for  the  hearing,  and  the  case  is  tried 
at  that  time  and  place. 

The  small  claims  court  room  is  like  any  other  court  except  that  attorneys  are 
noticeably  absent.  They  are  not  excluded  by  law,  but  the  attitude  of  the  court  and 
the  opinion  of  the  bar  is  to  discourage  their  attendance.  Omitting  the  conciliation 
feature  for  the  moment,  the  court  tries  the  case  by  letting  the  parties  tell  their  stories, 
and  by  questioning  them  and  permitting  them  to  question  each  other.  The  court  is 
as  dignified,  its  proceedings  are  as  orderly,  it  commands  as  much  respect  as  a  supreme 
court.  The  judgment  rendered  by  the  court  is  final  on  the  facts,  and  an  appeal  on 
law  goes  directly  to  the  Court  of  Appeals.1 

The  court,  handles  only  matters  involving  less  than  thirty-five  dollars.  It  is  not 
limited  to  actions  of  contract  or  debt.2  All  kinds  of  small  matters,  including  torts, 
have  been  heard  and  determined.  While  the  court  has  had  no  difficulty  with  actions 
of  tort  for  the  detention  of  personal  property  (particularly  the  retention  of  trunks  and 
furniture  under  claims  of  landlord's  or  lodging-housekeeper's  liens),  it  has  often  found 
that  its  procedure  is  not  adapted  to  torts  for  negligence,  as  in  automobile  collisions 
causing  property  damage.  If  parties  appear  with  counsel,  or  with  a  large  number  of 
witnesses,  or  if  the  issues  involve  extended  accounts  or  any  problem  not  adapted  to 
informal  treatment,  the  case  is  transferred  from  the  small  claims  court  to  the  reg- 
ular trial  court,  which  is  accomplished  merely  by  the  judge's  direction  to  that  effect, 
inasmuch  as  both  courts  are  simply  departments  of  the  one  municipal  court. 

1  4  C.  M.  C.  R.  35.  Originally  there  was  an  intermediate  appeal  to  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas. 

2  Conciliation  Branch,  Rule  1;  2  C.  M.  C.  R.  18. 


50  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

The  work  of  the  small  claims  court  may  be  summarily  presented  as  follows : 

Year  Cases  disposed  of  Amount  of  Judgments 
1913 l                                        2367  $10,410.53 

19142  4719  20,752.64 

1915 3  5106  32,872.14 

1916*  5182 

These  statistics  show  only  the  cases  that  reach  the  trial  stage.  A  large  number  are 
disposed  of  through  the  advice,  correspondence,  and  negotiation  of  the  clerk's  office.  A 
statement  of  this  work  appears  in  each  annual  report;5  that  for  1916  gives  an  accurate 
idea  of  its  extent.  Two  hundred  and  twelve  money  claims  amounting  to  $1896.69  were 
settled  without  commencement  of  suit  for  $1736.24;  106  were  found  on  investigation 
to  be  without  merit;  and  in  28  the  plaintiffs  dropped  the  proceedings.  In  197  claims 
for  the  detention  of  personal  property,  107  were  settled  by  a  surrender  of  the  prop- 
erty on  receipt  of  a  letter  from  the  clerk's  office,  37  had  no  merit,  and  13  were  dropped 
by  the  claimants.  The  clerk  assisted  parties  to  institute  38  actions  of  replevin.  There 
was  much  further  miscellaneous  work  done.  This  is  an  excellent  illustration  of  legal 
aid  work  performed  under  judicial  direction,  and  at  public  expense.6 

The  Cleveland  small  claims  court  is  unquestionably  a  remarkable  institution.  Like 
the  Portland  court,  it  is  a  branch  or  session  of  the  regular  municipal  court,  so  that 
no  difficulties  of  jurisdiction  are  created.  It  exists  not  under  statutory  regulation  but 
under  rules  of  the  municipal  court,  which  is  a  preferable  plan  because  changes  can 
be  more  readily  made  as  needs  arise  or  as  experience  may  dictate;  thus  its  limit  of 
thirty-five  dollars  may  at  any  time  be  raised.  It  is  a  court  of  election,  not  compulsion. 
The  original  rule  requiring  all  cases  involving  amounts  under  thirty-five  dollars  to 
be  entered  on  the  small  claims  docket  was  given  up  in  favor  of  a  rule7  requiring  the 
clerk  to  place  cases  on  the  docket  only  when  so  requested  by  the  plaintiff.  The  court 
may  issue  attachments,  which  the  Portland  court  is  forbidden  to  do,8  but  their  use  is 
discouraged  except  in  cases  where  the  defendant's  home  address  is  unknown,  but  his 
place  of  work  is  known,  so  that  garnishment  serves  to  give  the  court  jurisdiction  and 
bring  the  claim  to  the  defendant's  attention.  Speed  is  secured,  most  cases  being  heard 
and  determined  within  a  week  after  their  filing;  and  the  cost  is  extremely  low,  the  total 
fees  and  costs  amounting  only  to  fifty-seven  cents.9  The  procedure  is  so  simple  that  no 
pleadings  at  all  are  required. 

1  2  C.  M.  C.  R.  39. 

2  S  Ibid.  51,  insert.  Note  the  increase  of  81  per  cent  due  largely  to  the  reduced  tariff  of  costs  which  went  into  effect 
October  1,  1913. 

3  4  Ibid.  43.  4  Report  for  1916  not  published  at  this  writing.  This  figure  was  furnished  by  the  clerk. 
0  For  1913,  see  2  C.  M.  C.  R.  38;  for  1914,  3  Ibid.  64;  for  1916,  4  Ibid.  41. 

6  Seeposr,  Chapter  XXV,  A  More  Equal  Administration  of  Justice,  page  246. 

7  The  rule  was  changed  in  1916.  Cf.  Conciliation  Branch,  Rule  1,  as  stated  in  3C.  M.  C.  R.  29  with  the  same  rule  as 
stated  in  4  Ibid.  17. 

8  Oregon  General  Laws  0/1916,  c.  327,  §9. 

8  The  fees  are  five  cents  for  filing,  twenty-five  cents  for  issuing  summons,  twenty  cents  for  bailiff's  copy  and  return 
of  service,  two  cents  postage  for  service  by  mail.  Cf.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  14. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  51 

This  is  clearly  a  court  in  which  justice  is  not  conducted  according  to  the  usual 
procedural  or  evidential  rules  of  law;  but  it  is  none  the  less  dispensing  a  justice  that 
meets  with  universal  approval.  The  number  of  cases  disposed  of  is  sufficient  evidence 
of  the  opinions  entertained  by  parties.  From  the  state's  point  of  view,  the  procedure 
permits  a  judge  in  two  morning  sessions  a  week  to  dispose  of  over  five  thousand  cases 
a  year,  which  is  at  the  rate  of  about  one  hundred  each  full  day.  The  local  public 
opinion  is  reflected  in  an  editorial  of  the  Cleveland  Press  of  January  16, 1915,  which 
praises  the  court  and  calls  it  "  a  movement  towards  justice  in  spite  of  lawyers,"  and 
an  indication  of  general  public  opinion  is  afforded  by  the  fact  that  this  editorial  was 
copied  verbatim  in  the  Salt  Lake  City  Evening  Telegram  for  January  22, 1915. 

There  has  been  some  discussion  as  to  whether  this  court  ascertained  and  admin- 
istered its  justice  in  accordance  with  the  rules  of  substantive  law.  Judge  Levine  has 
been  called  a  Haroun-al-Rashid,1  the  inference  being  that  he  dispensed  a  sort  of 
Oriental  justice  without  regard  to  rules  of  law.  The  court  unquestionably  exercises 
wide  equity  powers — wider,  perhaps,  than  can  be  supported  by  adjudicated  cases.  In 
a  suit  for  the  conversion  of  shoes  it  has  ordered  the  shoes  returned  instead  of  giv- 
ing a  judgment  for  damages.  Where  a  defendant  admitted  that  he  owed  four  dollars 
but  had  refused  to  pay  it  because  the  plaintiff  had  insulted  his  wife,  and  the  plaintiff 
denied  that  he  personally  had  insulted  her  but  admitted  that  one  of  his  employees 
had  used  improper  language,  the  court  ordered  him  to  telephone  to  the  wife  apolo- 
gizing for  anything  that  had  been  said,  which  he  gladly  did,  using  the  telephone  in 
the  judge's  room;  he  was  then  given  a  judgment  for  the  four  dollars. 

Fundamentally,  however,  the  court  is  a  court  of  law.  Its  judges  are  trained  judges, 
who  render  their  judgments  by  applying  to  the  proved  facts  the  rules  of  substantive 
law.  In  the  now  famous  mattress  case,2  where  a  boarder  set  fire  to  the  mattress  by 
smoking  in  bed,  for  which  the  landlady  demanded  twenty-five  dollars,  and  the  judge 
by  telephoning  a  department  store  ascertained  that  an  identical  mattress  could  be 
had  for  eight  dollars,  which  the  boarder  was  quite  willing  to  pay  and  for  which  judg- 
ment was  entered,  —  it  would  never  occur  to  the  judge  to  dismiss  the  case  because 
he  personally  approved  of  smoking  in  bed  and  considered  landladies  amply  paid  to 
insure  against  such  risks,  or  to  give  the  landlady  the  desired  twenty-five  dollars  on 
the  ground  that  he  thoroughly  disapproved  of  smoking  in  bed  and  desired  to  give 
the  community  an  object  lesson. 


§  5 
The  Chicago  small  claims  court  is  a  branch  of  the  Municipal  Court,  created  by  and 
operating  under  rules  of  that  court.  It  was  brought  into  existence  on  February  26, 
1916,  the  purpose  being  as  much  to  secure  to  the  state  the  advantage  and  economy 

1  See  Fuessle  :  The  People's  Court,  55  Collier's  (July  3,  1915),  27. 

2  See  Moley:  Justice  through  Common  Sense,  33  The  Survey  (1914),  101. 


52  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

of  disposing  of  a  vast  number  of  cases  quickly  and  at  small  overhead  cost  as  to  assist 
poor  persons.  All  money  claims  within  the  small  claims  jurisdiction 
.         are,  therefore,  automatically  entered  by  the  clerk  on  the  small  claims 
docket.  Costs  were  not  lowered  and  remain  the  same  for  the  small 
claims  branch  as  for  the  regular  branches.  Speed  is  secured,  the  case 
being  defaulted  or  tried  on  the  return  day.  An  early  attempt  to  break  down  the  plan 
and  secure  delay  by  claiming  jury  trial  was  defeated  by  having  two  jury  sessions  in 
readiness  to  hear  such  cases  at  once.  The  pleadings  are  simple,  the  plaintiff  files  an 
informal  statement  of  claim,  but  the  defendant  need  only  appear  in  court  on  the  dav 
set  for  hearing;  it  is  unnecessary  for  him  to  file  either  an  appearance  or  an  answer.1 
The  outstanding  feature  of  the  court  is  the  simplicity  and  despatch  of  the  pro- 
ceedings at  the  trial,  with  the  added  fact  that  this  informal  procedure  has  been  suc- 
cessfully applied  in  cases  involving  larger  amounts  of  money  than  has  been  attempted 
in  any  other  small  claims  court.  Technicalities  are  not  countenanced.  Attorneys  are 
not  forbidden  by  law,  but  they  seldom  appear  and  their  conduct  of  cases  in  the  small 
claims  branch  has  been  discouraged  by  resolution  of  the  Chicago  Bar  Association.2 
Like  its  prototypes,  the  court  has  been  popular  and  is  considered  successful.3  An 
expert  in  judicial  administration  calls  it  "undoubtedly  the  solution  of  one  of  the 
most  difficult  questions  which  court  reform  has  faced,  to  wit:  the  successful  adjudica- 
tion of  small  civil  cases."4  The  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  finds  it  of  great  assist- 
ance.5 That  this  movement  is  of  national  interest  is  again  evidenced  by  the  fact  that 
when  the  establishment  of  such  a  court  was  first  discussed,  the  plan  received  edi- 
torial endorsement  from  the  Boston  Evening'  Traveler,6  and  that  shortly  thereafter 
the  editorial  was  reprinted  in  Los  Angeles.  The  exact  volume  of  the  work  is  not  yet 
known,  but  its  first  year's  business  is  estimated  at  more  than  25,000  cases.7 


§  6 
These  four  types  of  small  claims  courts  have  amply  demonstrated  that  as  to  small 
civil  causes  the  defects  of  the  traditional  administration  of  justice  can  easily  be  elim- 
inated. In  these  courts  delay  is  entirely  absent.  Costs,  either  through  reduction  or 
abolition,  cease  to  forbid  access  to  the  courts.  The  fundamental  difficultv  of  the  ex- 
pense of  lawyers  is  avoided  bv  a  simplicity  of  pleading  and  procedure  in  which  there 
is  no  need  for  any  attorney.  The  accruing  advantage  of  having  the  parties  brought 

1  There  is  no  specific  rule  to  this  effect,  but  it  is  the  practice  followed.  Cf.  Olds:  The  Small  Claims  Court,  1  South- 
western L.  Rev.  (1917)  100. 

2  Chicago  Bar  Association  Report  for  1915,  page  41 ;  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  26. 

3  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  5  (February,  1918),  p.  145. 

4  Herbert  Harley,  Secretary  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  in  an  address  to  the  Louisiana  State  Bar  Associ- 
ation on  May  8,  1915,  reprinted  in  pamphlet  form  under  the  title  of  "A  Modern  Experiment  in  Judicial  Administra- 
tion." See  page  20. 

6  11  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  26.  6  Boston  Evening  Traveler  for  January  2,  1915. 

7 1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  2  (August,  1917),  p.  27.  In  a  more  recent  number  (No.  5,  p.  145) 
in  February,  1918,  the  estimate  is  increased  tr>  35.000  cases,  which  is  half  of  the  entire  civil  business  of  the  court. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  53 

into  direct  contact  with  the  judge,  of  making  justice  seem  a  more  real  thing  to  the 

average  man  with  its  resultant  beneficial  effects  on  good  citizenship 

and  loyalty  can  only  be  mentioned  here.  The  small  claims  courts  are 

J .         a  mighty  force  in  revising  the  present  day  opinion  of  the  humbler 
Small  Claims      ,  ,     ,  ,  .    , 

classes  as  to  law  and  courts. 

■     (Miff"  *? 

There  are  three  basic  principles  which  must  be  adhered  to  by  these 
courts  if  their  promised  advantages  are  to  be  realized.  First,  the  small  claims  court 
must  not  be  a  distinct  entity,  as  in  Kansas,  but  a  branch  of  the  regular  court  organ- 
ization, as  in  Cleveland  and  Chicago.2 

Second,  the  proceedings  must  be  conducted  without  lawyers.  Only  in  this  way  can 
the  simplicity  of  procedure  be  maintained  and  the  prohibitive  expense  of  lawyers1 
services  be  eliminated.3  On  all  the  evidence  there  seems  to  be  no  danger  in  infor- 
mality of  procedure  in  these  small  cases.  The  only  test  which  can  be  applied  to  deter- 
mine whether  parties  feel  aggrieved  or  believe  that  injustice  has  been  done  is  to  ex- 
amine the  number  of  appeals.4  Complete  figures  are  lacking,  but  enough  exist  to  be 
illuminating.  We  may  compare  the  appeals  taken  from  the  English  County  Courts, 
the  Kansas  and  Portland  small  claims  courts,  and  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  Dis- 
trict of  Columbia5 — all  courts  where  informal  procedure  obtains — with  the  appeals 
taken  from  two  Massachusetts  inferior  courts  where  all  the  traditional  safeguards  of 
common  law  pleadings,  rules  of  procedure,  rules  of  evidence,  and  lawyers  are  to  be 
found.  Judgments  rendered  after  an  informal  hearing  seem  comparatively  immune 
from  appeals  in  clear  contrast  to  those  reached  after  a  technical  trial. 


Court 

Period 

Cases 

Appeals 

Per  Cent 
Appealed 

English  County  Courts6 

1902 

46,000 

140 

.3 

English  County  Courts' 

1913 

802,600 

788 

.1 

Kansas  City  Small  Claims 

Aug.  25,  1913,  to  Oct.  17, 

Court8 

1916 

400 

15 

3.8 

Portland  Small  Claims 

May  24,  1915,  to  Nov.  6, 

Court9 

1916 

1,828 

2 

.1 

Municipal  Court,  District  of 

March,  1909,  to  January, 

Columbia10 

1913 

92,736 

448 

.5 

Boston  Municipal  Court11 

Several  years  prior  to  1913 

— 

— 

10.0 

Southern  Essex  District  Court12 

1912-14 

700 

209 

30.0 

1  See  National  Municipal  Review  for  January,  1915,  pages  455,  456;  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII, 
page  43;  Fuessle:  Making  Americans  by  Justice,  55  Collier's  (July  3, 1915),  27. 

2  Cf.  Harley:  A  Modern  Experiment  in  Judicial  Administration,  page  41. 

3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  pages  21,  22. 

4  Cf.  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  5  (February,  1918),  p.  145. 

5  The  Municipal  Court  of  the  District  of  Columbia  has  not  been  discussed  in  this  chapter  because  it  is  not  a  small 
claims  court.  But  for  the  purposes  of  the  test  it  is  helpful  because  its  procedure  is  entirely  informal.  Cf.Baer:  Jus- 
tice for  the  Small  Man,  90  The  Century  (1915).  144. 

6  Storey:  Reform  of  Judicial  Procedure,  page  190. 

7  Rosenbaum:  Studies  in  English  Civil  Procedure,  2  The  County  Courts,  p.  2.  note  7.  8  See  ante,  page  45,  note  3 
9  See  ante,  page  47.  10  Baer :  Justice  for  the  Small  Man,  90  The  Century  (1915),  144, 146. 

11  Before  1913,  an  appeal  on  facts  lay  from  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  to  the  Superior  Court.  Absolute  figures  are 
unknown.  The  percentage  figure  is  taken  from  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1916,  page  7. 

12  Report  No.  4  (March,  19151  of  the  Committee  on  Law  and  Procedure,  Association  of  Justices  of  District,  Police,  and 


54  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

The  third  principle  is  that  while  procedural  law  can  be  cast  aside,  rules  of  sub- 
stantive law  must  be  adhered  to.  This  is  the  situation  at  present1  and  in  future  ex- 
tensions of  the  idea  it  cannot  safely  be  departed  from.  In  other  words,  while  the  small 
claims  courts  clearly  demonstrate  that  the  doing  of  justice  is  not  dependent  on  re- 
ligious observance  of  our  traditional  rules  of  procedure  and  evidence,  they  do  not  at 
all  invalidate  or  weaken  the  principle  that  justice  is  best  done  when  it  is  ascertained 
and  administered  by  a  trained  judge,  according  to  the  rules  of  substantive  law. 

As  against  the  manifest  advantages  of  this  sort  of  court,  only  two  objections  have 
been  urged.  The  first  is  that  they  will  encourage  litigation.  They  will  increase  liti- 
gation, for  they  make  possible  justice  in  cases  where  justice  hitherto  has  not  been  done 
and  they  open  the  courts  to  persons  who  hitherto  have  found  that  the  courts  were 
not  for  them.  To  such  an  objection,  Dean  Pound  makes  this  short  answer:2 

"When  better  provision  for  petty  litigation  is  urged,  many  repeat  the  stock  say- 
ing that  litigation  ought  to  be  discouraged.  It  will  not  do  to  say  to  the  popula- 
tion of  modern  cities  that  the  practical  cutting  off  of  all  petty  litigation,  by  which 
theoretically  the  rights  of  the  average  men  are  to  be  maintained,  is  a  good  thing 
because  litigation  ought  to  be  discouraged." 

The  other  objection  is  that  collection  agencies  will  flood  the  courts  with  their 
business.3  Judge  Levine  of  Cleveland  answers  this  by  saying  that  collection  agencies 
were  not  deterred  by  the  former  procedure  and  costs.  In  fact,  it  played  into  their 
hands  by  giving  them,  in  addition  to  the  judgment,  a  large  bill  of  costs  with  which 
they  could  further  harass  their  debtors.  The  result  of  the  small  claims  court  is  to 
save  a  debtor  anywhere  from  two  to  ten  dollars.  If  any  undesirable  tendency  mani- 
fests itself,  it  can  readily  be  controlled  by  requiring  the  original  claimants,  and  not 
their  assignees,  to  sign  the  statement  of  claim  and  to  present  the  case  to  the  judge  in 
person.4 

How  far  can  these  courts  be  extended?  There  is  no  reason  why  they  should  not 
be  created  immediately  in  every  large  city  as  an  indispensable  department  of  a  mod- 
ern municipal  court.  Minneapolis  secured  such  a  court  on  April  17,  1917.5  Judge 
Wheeler,  who  made  an  investigation  for  the  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court,  strongly 
recommends  the  addition  of  a  small  claims  branch.6  Legislation  toward  this  end  has 


Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts.  Some  latitude  must  be  allowed  in  these  figures,  for  they  represent  appeals  after 
trials,  whereas  the  other  figures  give  the  proportion  of  appeals  out  of  all  entries.  But  these  figures  as  they  stand  may 
be  compared  with  the  English  County  Court  record  of  32,000  judgments  made  by  judges  in  1913  with  only  167  appeals 
and  621  motions  for  new  trials. 

'This  opinion  has  been  expressed  in  foregoing  pages.  It  is  confirmed  in  American  Judicature  Society,  Bullet  in 
VIII,  page  36  ;  but  see  Ibid.,  pages  18,  19. 

5  Pound:  Administration  of  Justice  in  the  Modern  City,  26  Harvard  L.  Rev.  320. 

3  See  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  41 ;  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  R.  for  1915,  page  40. 

4  This  has  been  done  in  Portland  by  statute.  Oregon  General  Laws  of  1915,  c.  327,  §  7.  In  Cleveland  the  judges  have, 
as  occasion  required,  insisted  that  the  creditor  himself  appear. 

6  Minnesota  Session  Laws  0/1917,  c.  263.  Costs  are  abolished  and  attorneys  are  excluded,  §  3.  This  court  is  discussed 
in  1  Minnesota  Law  Review,  107;  2  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  1,  p.  16. 

6  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  R.  for  1915,  page  S3;  see  also  page  19:  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  11. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  55 

been  introduced  in  the  Connecticut  legislature  but  not  yet  acted  on.1  The  Rochester 
Legal  Aid  Bureau  expresses  the  need  for  some  such  court.2  The  modern  municipal 
courts  of  Milwaukee,  Pittsburgh,  Buffalo,  and  Atlanta,  under  their  rule-making 
powers,  can  establish  small  claims  branches  at  short  notice.3  The  New  York  Munici- 
pal Court  with  its  1917  rules  for  conciliation  and  arbitration  has  substantially  estab- 
lished a  small  claims  court.4  A  movement  for  such  a  court  is  clearly  under  way  in 
Boston,5  in  Newark,  and  in  Jersey  City.6  There  is  every  reason  to  predict  that  the 
immediate  future  will  see  small  claims  courts  established  in  all  of  the  larger  cities  of 
the  United  States.7  If  this  comes  about,  it  will  mean  an  enormous  step  forward  toward 
freedom  and  equality  of  justice.  Remembering  that  small  claims  courts  are  able  to 
handle  nearly  all  wage  claims  and  miscellaneous  small  debt  matters  which  together 
form  a  substantial  part  of  the  litigation  of  the  poor,  it  is  not  too  much  to  say  that 
with  a  wide  territorial  expansion,  these  courts  are  capable  of  reducing  by  one  quar- 
ter the  existing  denial  of  justice. 

Not  all  claims  of  the  poor,  even  in  the  fields  of  wages  and  miscellaneous  debts,  are 
below  twenty  or  even  thirty-five  dollars.  The  question  of  how  far  the  monetary  limit 
of  the  small  claims  jurisdiction  can  be  extended  is  not  easy  to  answer.  If  claims  up 
to  two  or  five  hundred  dollars  can  be  adjudicated  properly  without  formal  procedure 
and  without  attorneys,  the  serviceability  of  these  courts  to  the  poor  will  be  propor- 
tionately increased.  The  precise  question  is  not  as  to  raising  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
whole  court,  but  as  to  fixing  the  point  at  which  it  ceases  to  be  practicable  and  wise 
to  transfer  cases  to  a  special  department  where  the  proceedings  are  informal. 

The  Kansas  limit  of  $20  was  increased  in  Cleveland  to  $35.  Chicago,  beginning 
at  $35,  very  quickly  raised  its  jurisdiction  to  $50,  then  to  $100,  and  finally  to  $200.8 
It  is  superficially  said  that  informal  procedure  cannot  be  extended  to  larger  claims 
because  they  are  more  complicated.  Every  lawyer  knows  that  in  contract  and  debt 
actions  the  size  of  the  claim  has  little  relation  to  the  complexity  of  the  issues  or  the 
difficulty  of  proof.9  It  is  easier  to  prove  a  five  thousand  dollar  claim  on  a  note  than  a 
five  dollar  claim  for  wages  where  there  is  a  defence  of  improper  workmanship.  To  this 
problem  no  deductive  answer  can  be  made.  The  only  sane  course  to  pursue  is  grad- 
ually to  mark  the  limit  up,  and  to  stop  when  signs  appear  that  the  plan  is  not  work- 
able. The  answer  must  be  inductive  and  therefore  must  rest  on  future  experience.10 


1  House  Bill  443  (1915).  filed  by  Thomas  Hewes,  attorney  for  the  Hartford  Legal  Aid  Committee. 

2  4  United  Charities  of  Rochester  R.  13.  3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  44. 

4  This  is  discussed  in  detail  in  Chapter  IX,  Conciliation,  and  Chapter  X,  Arbitration,  pages  63  and  71. 

5  See  House  Bill  No.  590,  filed  in  the  Massachusetts  Legislature  by  Richard  W.  Hale  in  1918. 

6  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  5  (February,  1918),  p.  157. 
'  Ibid.,  p.  149 ;  42  American  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1917)  377. 

8  See  8  &  9  Chicago  Municipal  Court  Reports  (1913-15),  129 ;  Chicago  Bar  Association  Report  for  1917,  page  31. 

9  And  see  Parry:  The  Law  and  the  Poor,  page  145  ;  Docket  (West  Publishing  Co.)  for  1915,  page  1523. 

10  This  is  the  conclusion  arrived  at  by  Dean  Wigmore,  who  has  addressed  himself  to  the  precise  question.  See  Amer- 
ican Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  pages  20  et  seq. 


56  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

§  7 

The  essential  features  of  a  small  claims  court  are  extremely  low  costs  or  none  at 
all,  no  formal  pleadings,  no  lawyers,  and  the  direct  examination  of  parties  and  wit- 

;;  .  „  nesses  without  formality  by  a  trained  judge  who  knows  and  applies 

,      .    .  ,        the  substantive  law.  There  are,  in  addition,  five  collateral  functions 

'  .  .  which  these  courts  ought  to  undertake.  Varying  combinations  of 

;    ,  the  five  are  found  in  different  courts.  None  as  yet  are  empowered 

to  perform  them  all. 

The  first  is  to  provide  some  official  who  shall  assist  parties.  While  the  lawyer  is 
largely  rendered  unnecessary,  certain  bits  of  his  traditional  functions  remain  and 
must  be  performed  by  some  one.  It  is  highly  desirable  that  all  cases  should  not  at 
once  be  docketed  for  trial.  In  many,  a  letter  to  the  defendant  will  secure  the  desired 
result,  and  in  such  cases  the  court  ought  not  to  be  bothered  or  the  parties  caused 
loss  of  time  in  attendance.  The  statement  of  claim,  however  simple,  must  be  filled  out 
under  the  supervision  of  a  person  who  knows  the  law  and  procedure.  Parties  need 
advice  as  to  their  rights.  A  successful  litigant  needs  instructions  as  to  collecting  his 
judgment.  There  will  be,  even  in  small  disputes,  cases  presenting  complicated  states 
of  fact  or  raising  intricate  questions  of  law  wherein  the  judge  needs  the  assistance  of 
counsel  and  the  parties  require  representation  if  justice  is  to  be  done.  There  must  be 
some  official  to  sort  such  cases  and,  especially  where  one  side  has  retained  counsel,1  to 
advise  consulting  a  lawyer  or  the  legal  aid  society.  There  is  always  a  danger  that  per- 
sons (as  has  been  the  case  with  injured  workmen  and  industrial  accident  commissions) 
will  rely  too  much  on  the  court  and  expect  from  it  more  protection  and  safeguarding 
of  rights  or  defences  than  it  can  legally,  or  in  the  nature  of  things,  give. 

In  Kansas  the  judge  affords  this  assistance  and  in  Portland  the  clerk.  In  Cleveland 
more  has  been  done  than  elsewhere  through  the  creation  of  a  special  department  of 
the  clerk's  office,  which  has  already  been  described.  In  one  case  where  the  defendant  had 
appealed,  raising  a  jurisdictional  question,  the  clerk  prepared  for  the  plaintiff  a  brief 
on  the  point  and  instructed  him  as  to  its  filing.  This  illustrates  the  necessity  of  main- 
taining a  watch  over  the  small  cases  in  order  that  when  an  attorney  does  become 
necessary,  the  party  may  be  so  advised.  Under  a  proper  coordination  of  work  the  legal 
aid  society  would  be  called  in,  or  counsel  assigned,  in  all  such  cases.  Courts  are  more 
and  more  undertaking  such  work,2  and  unless  rights  and  defences  are  to  be  sacrificed  in 
a  margin  of  cases,  it  is  essential. 

A  second  power  which  a  small  claims  court  should  have  is  that  of  ordering  the 
judgment  paid  by  instalments.  This  is  not  only  a  fairness  to  the  defendant  who  under 
modern  conditions  of  the  weekly  wage  seldom  has  enough  at  any  one  time  to  pay  a 

1  See  8  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  6. 

2  In  addition  to  Kansas,  Portland,  and  Cleveland,  see  Rule  13  of  the  Cincinnati  Municipal  Court ;  Philadelphia 
Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  page  xi. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  57 

judgment  in  full,  but  also  it  facilitates  the  court's  disposition  of  cases.  A  defendant 

often  denies  a  debt  simply  because  he  cannot  pay  it.  If  he  realizes 

"  that  he  is  not  to  be  harassed,  he  is  more  willing  to  confess  judgment 

^  ,  and  try  to  obtain  suitable  terms.  This  power  to  order  and  accept 

**  instalment  payments  is  granted  by  law  to  the  Kansas,  Portland, 

and  Minneapolis  courts.1  In  Cleveland  it  is  done  de  facto. 

Such  a  power  might  be  attacked  on  constitutional  grounds  as  impairing  the  obli- 
gation of  contract,  but  it  would  probably  be  upheld  because,  under  our  law  forbid- 
ding imprisonment  for  debt  and  giving  liberal  exemptions,  it  is  in  fact  of  great  benefit 
to  creditors.  The  present  proceeding  of  examination  after  judgment  or  poor  debtor 
process  is  designed  only  to  discover  existing  property.  The  instalment  payment  order 
is  a  means  whereby  a  judgment  can  be  paid  out  of  future  earnings.  It  is  only  a  slight 
extension  of  the  Massachusetts  equitable  proceeding,  permitted  by  statute2  after  a 
judgment  founded  on  necessaries,  whereby  a  judge  may  order  a  defendant  to  pay  so 
much  a  week,  and  which  has  been  held  constitutional.3  This  plan  is  used  in  the  Eng- 
lish County  Courts;  in  1913  about  £2,700,000  was  so  collected  and  paid  over  to 
suitors.4  The  sweeping  provisions  of  the  Soldiers'  and  Sailors'  Civil  Relief  Act  per- 
mit every  court  in  entering  or  staying  judgment  against  a  man  in  military  service  to 
order  that  the  judgment  shall  be  paid  in  instalments.5 

The  small  claims  courts  statutes  do  not  specifically  state  what  is  to  happen  in  case 
the  debtor  fails  to  pay  the  ordered  instalments.  The  procedure  should  be,  as  in  Eng- 
land and  Massachusetts,  for  the  issuance  of  a  summons,  promptly  returnable,  at  which 
time  the  enquiry  is  not  what  the  debtor  has,  but  whether  he  has  had  the  funds  out 
of  which  to  pay  the  ordered  amount.  If  it  appears  that  he  has  had  money  and  has 
refused  to  apply  it  in  payment,  he  is  amenable  to  such  orders  as  the  court  deems  fair, 
for  he  then  stands  not  only  in  default  but  in  contempt  of  a  court  order. 

A  third  function  which  every  small  claims  court  ought  to  exercise,  and  one  which 

will  speedily  be  thrust  upon  it  if  it  employs  the  instalment  plan  to  any  extent,  is  that 

„„„,..  of  acting  as  trustee  for  a  debtor  who  owes  numerous  creditors.  It  is 

o.  1  he  Func- 

_  obviously  an  injustice  for  the  court  to  lend  its  aid  to  one  creditor,  to 

**  the  exclusion  of  others  who  have  been  more  lenient  and  refrained  from 

bringing  suit,  thereby  causing  a  clear  preference.  It  would  automati- 
cally force  all  creditors  to  bring  suit,  and  their  proceedings,  coupled  with  attachment 
and  garnishment  which  they  could  legally  use,  would  in  turn  make  it  impossible  for 
the  debtor  to  pay  the  ordered  instalments.  The  court  would  be  robbed  of  much  of  its 
power  for  good;  instead  of  helping  all  parties,  it  would  cause  costs  to  all  and  bring 
relief  to  none.  The  needed  procedure  is  like  informal  bankruptcy.  In  essence,  it  per- 

1  Kansas  Session  Laws  of  1913,  c.  170,  §  7;  Oregon  General  Laws  of  1915,  c.  327,  §  10;  Minnesota  Session  Laws  of 
1917,  c.  263,  §§  4,  5. 

2  Mass.  Revised  Laws  of  1902,  c.  168,  §§  80-86.  s  Brown's  Case,  178  Mass.  (1899)  498. 

1  Rosenbaum  :  Studies  in  English  Civil  Procedure,  2  The  County  Courts,  p.  10,  note  18. 
6  Public  Act  No.  103  of  the  65th  Congress,  §  204. 


58  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

mits  a  debtor  to  come  into  court,  disclose  his  assets,  state  his  creditors,  and  then, 
after  notice  and  hearing,  to  have  the  court  fix  the  proportion  of  his  income  which  is 
to  be  set  aside  for  creditors,  and  to  issue  an  order  protecting  him  from  garnishment 
and  attachment. 

The  small  man  does  not  owe  many  creditors  or  much  money.  For  such  matters  bank- 
ruptcy is  too  expensive  and  cumbersome,  and  where  a  debtor  desires  to  pay,  the  law 
ouo-ht  not  to  force  an  election  between  canceling  all  debts  and  perpetual  harassing. 
One  creditor  of  a  man  who  owes  five  creditors  one  or  two  hundred  dollars  may,  by 
garnishment,  tie  up  all  his  wages  or  cause  him  to  be  discharged,  so  that  he  has  diffi- 
culty in  supporting  his  family  and  little  opportunity  of  meeting  his  obligations.1 

The  trusteeship  suggested  has  never  been  carefully  tried  in  America.  In  Kansas 
the  court  can  protect  the  debtor  against  further  proceedings  by  the  judgment  cred- 
itor,2 but  not  as  against  other  creditors.  In  Cleveland  the  enterprising  clerk's  office 
established  a  trustee  department  which  succeeded  at  first,3  but  failed,  as  it  was  doomed 
to  fail,  because  the  court  had  no  power  to  restrain  creditors  or  to  protect  the  debtor. 
The  legal  aid  societies  have  had  as  much  success  with  the  plan  as  their  limited  au- 
thority permitted,4  particularly  in  Nashville,  where  the  Legal  Aid  Bureau5  through 
its  close  affiliation  with  the  Commercial  Club  has  a  quasi-legal  hold  over  the  creditors 
and  so  can  afford  a  genuine  protection  to  the  debtor,  which  is  unquestionably  the  sine 
qua  non  of  any  such  plan.  The  necessity  for  the  establishment  of  such  a  court  depart- 
ment has  been  repeatedly  urged  in  various  cities,6  and  a  law  giving  such  power  to  the 
Columbus  Municipal  Court  was  passed,7  but  nothing  has  as  yet  been  accomplished. 

In  England,  under  the  name  of  "administration  orders,"  the  plan  of  having  the 
County  Court  act  as  trustee  for  a  small  debtor  is  in  very  general  use.  The  plan  differs 
slightly  in  that  it  is  a  part  of  the  bankruptcy  law,  so  that  the  courts  may  order  par- 
tial payment  in  full  satisfaction  by  way  of  composition  or  dividend.  This  would  be 
both  unnecessary  and  undesirable  in  America.  In  1913  these  courts  made  5426  admin- 
istration orders,  of  which  2884  were  for  payment  in  full.  The  average  total  indebted- 
ness was  ascertained  to  be  £25, 16s.,  and  the  average  creditor's  claim  to  be  £2,  7*. 
The  court  may  refuse  to  issue  a  protecting  order  if  the  petition  for  the  order  or  the 
incurring  of  the  debts  appears  fraudulent,  but  in  only  11  per  cent  of  the  total  appli- 
cations has  a  refusal  been  necessary.  The  effectiveness  of  the  method  has  been  vitiated 
in  part  by  the  excessive  court  costs  which  attend  these  orders.  There  seems  to  be  no 

1  Cf.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  15. 

2  Edholm :  The  Small  Debtors'  Court,  22  Case  and  Comment,  30.  3  3  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  55. 

4  A  great  deal  of  this  work  has  been  done  in  Chicago  and  Duluth.  In  both  instances,  the  plan  has  had  a  measure  of 
success  only  because  of  the  moral  hold  which  the  legal  aid  society  had  on  the  creditors.  See  also  1  Milwaukee 
L.  A.  R.  10. 

6  Nashville  Legal  Aid  Bureau  Report  for  1915-16,  page  10;  Commercial  Club  Tattler  for  July,  1916,  page  29;  Proceed- 
ings of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  111,  112. 

8  See  6  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.8;  7  Ibid.  16;  9  Ibid.  12  ;  6  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  9;  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of 
Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  43.  Cf.  Rochester  L.  A.  Leaflet  for  1915,  page  3. 

7  1  Supplement  to  Page  and  Adams'  Ohio  General  Code,  §§  1658-54  c  (page  592).  After  its  protecting  order  has  been 
issued,  the  court  may  stop  creditors'  suits  by  writ  of  prohibition. 


SMALL  CLAIMS  COURTS  59 

doubt  that  if  this  difficulty  were  removed,  the  plan,  under  proper  supervision,  would 
be  an  instrument  of  great  service  to  creditors  and  debtors  alike.1 

A  fourth  power  which  could  well  be  added  to  the  small  claims  courts  is  a  discre- 
tionary control  over  ejectment  proceedings.  Any  authority  to  exercise  discretion  to 
forbid  the  ejection  of  tenants  either  after  expiration  of  the  tenancy  by 
notice  or  for  non-payment  of  rent  is  unknown  in  the  United  States.2 
p  Our  common  law  gives  the  landlord  certain  rights,  and  these  the  courts 

must  enforce  regardless  of  the  circumstances  of  the  case.  A  control  over 
the  right  to  occupy  or  eject  from  premises  is  as  necessary  as  our  home- 
stead laws  and  our  provisions  exempting  certain  property  from  attachment  and  execu- 
tion. Both  are  based  on  the  theory  that  at  a  certain  point  the  interest  of  the  state 
supervenes  and  rises  superior  to  the  rights  of  the  creditor. 

The  vast  majority  of  the  poorer  people  living  in  cities  possess  their  homes  with- 
out written  leases,  so  that  in  law  they  are  merely  tenants  at  will.  They  are  liable  to 
eviction  on  summary  notice  whether  they  have  paid  their  rent  or  not.  Homes  are  of 
social  as  well  as  individual  importance,  but  millions  of  homes  are  at  the  mercy  of  a 
law  which  has  altered  but  little  from  feudal  days  when  a  tenant  at  will  was  only  one 
grade  better  than  a  trespasser.  Admittedly  an  economic  problem  is  involved.  Land- 
lords are  entitled  to  their  just  dues,  but  a  more  even  balancing  of  rights  and  inter- 
ests is  desirable  and  this  may  best  be  secured  by  entrusting  to  the  courts  a  discre- 
tionary control  over  ejectments.  In  England,  if  the  judge  finds  the  landlord  entitled 
to  use  and  occupancy,  he  has  power,  after  considering  the  circumstances,  to  make  an 
order  for  "possession  in  a  week"  or  even  "in  six  weeks."  This  discretionary  power  is 
vested  in  the  court  by  statute.3 

The  final  power  which  every  small  claims  court  should  in  unmistakable  language 
be  given  is  the  authority  to  endeavor  to  conciliate  the  parties  and  to  assist  them  in 
reaching  a  satisfactory  solution  or  adjustment  by  agreement.  This 
matter  of  conciliation  has  such  great  possibilities  and  is  so  little 
understood  that  it  deserves  a  careful  presentation  and  consideration  which  is  at- 
tempted in  the  next  chapter. 


1  The  English  system  is  fully  presented  in  Rosenbaum:  Studies  in  English  Civil  Procedure,  2  The  County  Courts, 
47-61.  Cf.  Parry:  The  Laio  and  the  Poor,  pages  120-124. 

2  Since  this  was  written,  a  very  important  beginning  has  been  made.  As  to  cases  in  which  soldiers  and  sailors  and 
their  dependents  are  involved,  this  power  has  now  virtually  been  given  to  every  court  in  the  United  States  by 
the  Soldiers'  and  Sailors'  Civil  Relief  Act.  Public  Act  No.  103  of  the  66th  Congress,  §  300.  For  a  commentary  see 
12  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (February,  1918)  449,  459. 

3  Rosenbaum:  op.  tit.,  pages  46,  47. 


Chapter  IX 
CONCILIATION 

It  is  the  duty  of  a  good  judge  to  remove  causes  of  litigation.  .  .  . 
(1628.)  2  Institutes,  306.1 

The  conciliation  system  marks  a  new  epoch  in  the  administration 
of  justice  in  this  State.  .  .  .  (1917.)  Statement  of  the  Justices  of  the 
New  York  Municipal  Court.  * 

THE  idea  of  conciliation  is  not  new,  but  it  is  to-day  so  little  understood  that 
attempts  to  employ  it  as  a  method  of  settling  litigation  are  very  generally  viewed 
by  the  bench  and  bar  with  suspicion  and  distrust,  if  not  hostility.  It  therefore  be- 
comes necessary  to  state  what  conciliation  means  and  to  explain  that  in  its  true  form 
it  is  neither  revolutionary  nor  destructive  of  cherished  institutions. 


By  reason  of  the  fact  that  the  Cleveland  small  claims  court  was  given  the  name  of 

"conciliation  court"  there  is  a  mistaken  idea  abroad  that  conciliation  is  a  particular 

.         court  or  that  it  pertains  only  to  small  matters.3  Conciliation  is  a  method 

J  or  principle  for  settling  litigation,  and  as  such  can  be  used  in  every  court 

and  is  applicable  to  all  civil  cases,  and  to  certain  types  of  criminal  cases. 

Conciliation  is  the  process  used  by  two  lawyers  who  succeed  in  adjusting  a  dispute 
between  their  clients.  The  duty  to  conciliate  in  proper  cases  is  enjoined  by  the  Canons 
of  Ethics.4  Judicial  conciliation  means  nothing  more  than  giving  to  the  court  power 
to  follow  the  advice  of  Abraham  Lincoln,  which  has  been  deemed  proper  enough  to 
be  used  as  a  preface  to  the  American  Bar  Association  Canons  of  Ethics:5 

"Discourage  litigation.  Persuade  your  neighbors  to  compromise  whenever  you 
can.  Point  out  to  them  how  the  nominal  winner  is  often  the  real  loser — in  fees, 
expenses,  and  waste  of  time.  As  a  peacemaker  the  lawyer  has  a  superior  oppor- 
tunity of  being  a  good  man." 

There  is  no  set  form  for  judicial  conciliation.  It  is  an  entirely  voluntary  affair,  an 
informal  proceeding  by  which  the  two  disputants  are  enabled  to  discuss  the  issue 
before  a  trained  and  impartial  third  person  having  the  dignity  of  judicial  office,  who 
explains  to  them  the  rules  of  law  applicable,  informs  them  of  the  uncertainties  and 
expense  of  litigation,  tries  to  arouse  their  friendly  feelings  and  suppress  their  fight- 
ing instincts,  and  if  an  adjustment  agreeable  to  the  parties  is  reached,  draws  up  a 

1  The  same  maxim,  in  a  more  extended  version,  is  contained  in  4  Coke,  16  b;  5  Coke,  31  a;  Bart.  Max.  191. 

2  When  the  new  conciliation  rules  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  City  of  New  York  were  promulgated,  a  statement, 
prepared  by  Justice  Spiegelberg,  was  issued  to  the  press.  See  page  1. 

3  Cf.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  pages  28,  29;  2  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  1 
p.  3. 

4  See  Canon  8, 33  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1908)  678;  see  also  Sharswood :  Legal  Ethics  (5th  ed.  1884),  page  109. 
6  33  A.B.  A.R.  574. 


CONCILIATION  61 

proper  agreement,  has  it  executed,  and  gives  it  the  sanction  of  a  judgment.  All  of 
this  is  done  without  prejudice  to  the  parties  if  adjustment  fails  and  a  trial  is  ren- 
dered necessary.1 

§2 

In  the  reform  wave  of  1846  to  1852,  which  accomplished  certain  improvements  in 
the  administration  of  justice,  provisions  respecting  conciliation  were  inserted  in  six 
of  the  new  constitutions  which  were  adopted  during  that  period.2  The  New 
u     York  provision  read: 

"Tribunals  of  conciliation  may  be  established,  with  such  powers  and  duties  as 
may  be  prescribed  by  law,  but  such  tribunals  shall  have  no  power  to  render 
judgment  to  be  obligatory  on  the  parties,  except  they  voluntarily  submit  their 
matters  in  difference  and  agree  to  abide  the  judgment,  or  assent  thereto,  in  the 
presence  of  such  tribunal,  in  such  cases  as  shall  be  prescribed  by  law." 

A  bill  to  carry  this  clause  into  effect  was  prepared,  but  failed  of  passage.  The 
constitutional  provision  became  a  dead  letter  and  was  eliminated  in  1894.3  In  the 
other  jurisdictions  the  plan  met  with  like  failure,  for  the  time  was  not  ripe.  Mean- 
while conciliation  as  a  means  of  settling  collective  disputes  was  slowly  coming  to  the 
fore  in  nearly  all  European  countries  and  in  America,  and  so  clearly  demonstrated  its 
superiority  over  the  litigious  method  of  injunction,  suits  for  damages,  and  the  like 
that  to-day,  in  the  event  of  a  strike  or  lockout,  the  first  thought  of  the  parties  and 
of  the  general  public  is  of  the  possibility  of  employing  conciliation.4 

Inasmuch  as  the  use  of  conciliation  by  American  courts  to  settle  individual  dis- 
putes is  of  extremely  recent  origin,  it  is  necessary  to  examine  briefly  the  plan  of  con- 
ciliation as  employed  in  Europe  in  order  to  gain  some  concrete  idea  of  what  it  is  and 
how  far  it  is  successful. 


§3 

In  Norway  and  Denmark  courts  of  conciliation  have  existed  since  1795.5  The  court 

has  jurisdiction  of  every  civil  proceeding,  and  before  any  lawsuit  can  be  instituted 

.         the  dispute  must  be  submitted  to  the  local  conciliation  commission, 

which  consists  of  two  members.  Unless  a  suitor  can  present  a  certificate 

"  that  this  condition  precedent  of  an  attempt  at  judicial  conciliation  has 

been  complied  with,  the  law  courts  will  refuse  to  hear  the  case.  The  costs  are  seventy- 

1  Charles  A.  Boston  gives  substantially  the  same  definition  in  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  112. 

2  New  York  Const,  of  1846,  Art.  VI,  §  23;  Ohio  Const,  of  1851,  Art.  IV,  §  19;  Indiana  Const,  of  1851,  Art.  VII,  §  19;  Mich- 
igan Const,  of  1850,  Art.  VI,  §  23;  Wisconsin  Const,  of  1848,  Art.  VII,  §  16 ;  California  Const,  of  1849,  Art.  VI,  §  13. 

3  See  New  York  Const,  of  1894,  Art.  VI ;  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  111. 

*  The  use  of  conciliation  in  the  United  States,  Canada,  Great  Britain,  and  in  Europe  is  fully  set  forth  in  United 
States  Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98  (1912).  The  serviceability  of  the  method  in  the  United  States  is  well  known. 
For  the  English  experience  see  pages  123,  137. 
5  2  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  1  (June,  1918),  pp.  5,  9. 


62  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

five  cents,  the  hearings  are  in  secret  in  order  that  no  disclosures  may  prejudice  sub- 
sequent litigation,  and  lawyers  are  rigidly  excluded.  Proceedings  are  most  informal, 
the  disputants  tell  their  own  stories,  and  the  conciliation  commissioners  endeavor  to 
guide  them  to  a  fair  adjustment. 

As  conciliation  has  no  validity  except  what  it  obtains  from  the  voluntary  consent  of 
the  litigants  themselves,  it  would  be  wholly  worthless  unless  it  worked.  But  it  appears 
that  in  Norway  75  per  cent  and  in  Denmark  90  per  cent  of  all  litigation  is  peaceably 
adjusted  through  judicial  conciliation.1  Precise  figures  for  the  Norwegian  courts  in 
1888  are  known.  The  total  number  of  civil  cases  brought  was  103,969,  of  which  2300 
were  dismissed  by  the  Conciliation  Commissioners.  Of  the  remaining  101,669  con- 
ciliation produced  adjustments  agreeable  to  the  litigants  in  81,015  cases,  and  in  addi- 
tion 7886  were  submitted  to  the  Conciliation  Court  by  the  parties  for  decision. 
Thus  only  12,768  cases  went  to  the  regular  courts  for  formal  litigation,  this  informal 
preliminary  tribunal  of  conciliation  having  disposed  of  87  per  cent  of  all  matters  to 
the  satisfaction  of  both  parties.  That  the  method  of  conciliation  works  no  injustice 
is  well  attested  by  the  fact  that  throughout  a  period  of  over  a  century  during  which 
constitutions  have  been  liberalized  and  systems  of  law  recast,  the  courts  of  concilia- 
tion have  not  only  been  left  intact,  but  have  steadily  been  strengthened  and  per- 
fected.2 

In  the  industrial  courts  of  France,  Switzerland,  and  Germany  which  have  juris- 
diction over  disputes  between  employers  and  employees,  conciliation  plays  a  leading 
part.  These  courts,  whose  history  began  in  France  in  1806,3  had  no  counterpart  in 
American  judicial  institutions,  with  the  exception  of  an  isolated  attempt  made  in 
Pennsylvania  in  1883,  which  immediately  failed,4  until  the  creation  of  the  small 
claims  courts.  The  essential  features  of  the  system  are  the  same  as  those  already 
described.  These  courts  accomplish  their  great  volume  of  work  by  conciliation  and 
not  by  trial  and  judgment.5  Conciliation  is  frankly  their  primary  object.6  The  statis- 
tics again  show  that  conciliation  fits  in  with  human  nature  and  that,  when  rightly 
conducted,  it  is  very  successful. 


Settled 

Court 

Tear 

by  Conciliation 

by  Judgment 

France 7 

1905 

17,731 

5,041 

France 

1906 

19.064 

6,637 

Geneva " 

1908 

793 

139 

Geneva 

1909 

914 

222 

1  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  9.  2  Ibid. 

8  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98,  p.  292. 

*  Ibid.,  p.  290.  B  Ibid.,  p.  280.  6  Ibid.,  p.  278.  '  Ibid.,  p.  437.  8  Ibid,,  p.  452. 


CONCILIATION  63 

§4 

The  legal  aid  societies  have  always  recognized  the  possibilities  of  conciliation  and 
have  steadily  employed  it.1  In  the  words  of  the  greatest  figure  in  all  legal  aid  work:2 

Conciliation       "The  Legal  Aid  Society  brings  antagonists  together,  inculcates 
T    //    TJ  7/7     the  spirit  of  compromise  and  adjustment,  under  authority  of  the 
searching  legal  mind,  expert  in  resource,  linked  with  reserve  com- 
itates pulsory  powers ;  yet  in  the  persuasive  and  kindly  attitude  of  a  lover 
of  humanity  unselfishly  seeking  to  render  unto  every  one  his  own." 

Judicial  conciliation  in  the  United  States  begins  its  history  with  the  establish- 
ment of  the  Cleveland  small  claims  court  in  1913.  The  rules  merely  say  that  the  judge 
shall  endeavor  to  effect  an  amicable  adjustment,3  and  leave  the  rest  to  his  tact,  dis- 
cretion, and  patience.  In  1914  judgments  were  rendered  in  1879  cases  and  794  were 
settled  by  the  parties;4  in  1915  the  judgments  were  2754  and  the  settlements  634.5 
In  this  court,  if  conciliation  fails,  the  court  may  proceed  to  hear  the  case  and  render 
judgment  forthwith.6 

In  1917  a  small  claims  branch  was  added  to  the  Minneapolis  Municipal  Court 
and  the  right  to  attempt  conciliation  conferred  on  the  court.7  It  is  provided  that  a 
person  may  bring  a  matter  before  the  conciliation  judge  either  by  going  directly  to 
the  judge  or  by  filing  a  claim  with  the  clerk.  The  defendant  may  be  summoned 
orally,  or  by  telephone,  or  by  mail,  or  by  the  usual  summons.  There  are  no  costs  and 
no  attorneys.  At  the  hearing,  if  a  settlement  is  reached,  it  becomes  a  judgment  when 
countersigned  by  the  judge.  If  conciliation  fails,  the  court  must  dismiss  the  case  if 
the  claim  or  counter-claim  exceeds  fifty  dollars ;  otherwise  it  may  proceed  to  a  hear- 
ing at  once  and  render  judgment.8 

In  these  courts  it  is  difficult,  if  not  impossible,  to  determine  where  their  function 
as  a  conciliation  tribunal  ends  and  their  work  as  a  small  claims  court  begins.  Fortu- 
nately it  is  not  necessary.  In  the  field  of  small  claims  the  two  merge  and  become 
indistinguishable  because  both  are  based  on  precisely  the  same  informal  procedure. 

In  April,  1917,  the  justices  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  City  of  New  York, 
acting  under  authority  of  the  new  municipal  court  act,9  promulgated  a  series  of  rules 

1  McCook:  The  Judicial  Aspect  of  the  Works  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  5  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  3,  p.  17; 
6  Ibid.,  No.  1,  p.  3;  3  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  7  ;  Proceedings  of  Third  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  25;  Ibid., 
Fourth  Conference,  page  128. 

2  Arthur  v.  Briesen,  long  president  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society.  This  quotation  is  taken  from  the  program 
of  a  concert  given  on  May  2, 1908,  for  the  Society's  benefit. 

3  Conciliation  Branch,  Rule  3. 

4  3  Cleveland  Municipal  Court  R.  56.  6  4  Ibid.  43. 

6  Conciliation  Branch,  Rule  4. 

7  Minnesota  Session  Laws  o_f  1917,  c.  263. 

8  This  court  is  discussed  by  Dean  Vance  of  the  University  of  Minnesota  Law  School  in  1  Minnesota  L.  Rev.  No.  2 
(February,  1917),  p.  107. 

*  Lauer:  Municipal  Court  Code  in  the  City  of  Neiv  York  (1916) ;  see  Section  6,  subdivision  6,  and  Section  8,  subdivi- 
sion 5,  of  the  Code.  See  also  Justice  Lauer's  article  in  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  5  (Febru- 
ary, 1918),  p.  153. 


64  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

establishing  and  regulating  conciliation.1  The  important  points  in  these  rules  are 
that  attorneys  shall  play  a  part  in  the  proceedings  only  in  the  court's  discretion, 
there  are  no  costs,  service  is  by  mail,  and  the  court  cannot  render  a  judgment  in  any 
case.  This  last  is  overcautious;  if  the  disputants  have  come  to  an  agreement  under 
circumstances  which  preclude  coercion  and  overreaching,  there  is  no  reason  why  it 
should  not  be  made  a  judgment  and  thereby  given  legal  validity.  The  framers  of  the 
rules  doubtless  feared  that  any  compulsion  would  jeopardize  the  plan.  Compulsion 
exercised  to  force  a  settlement  is,  of  course,  not  conciliation  at  all,  but  unless  an 
agreement  can  be  enforced,  the  door  is  left  open  for  fraud  by  refusal  to  abide  by  the 
adjustment,  so  that  the  proceeding  merely  results  in  loss  of  time  and  disappoint- 
ment. This  detail  should  not  be  adopted  elsewhere.  It  will  do  little  mischief  in  New 
York  because  a  parallel  system  of  rules  for  arbitration  was  concurrently  provided 
by  the  justices,  under  which  a  binding  award  may  be  secured.2  The  distinguishing 
feature  of  the  New  York  conciliation  rules  is  that  no  monetary  limit  is  fixed.  There- 
fore any  claim  under  one  thousand  dollars,  the  maximum  jurisdiction  of  the  Munici- 
pal Court,  may  be  submitted  for  conciliation.  This  should  provide  experience  from 
which  the  conciliation  plan  may  be  further  developed  as  a  method  of  settling  large 
as  well  as  small  causes. 

In  fields  other  than  small  claims  there  have  been  slight  experiments  with  concili- 
ation, but  all  informal  in  nature  and  without  any  clear  legal  sanction.  In  matters 
of  divorce  and  domestic  difficulties  there  are  great  possibilities  for  conciliation3 
with  a  view  to  reconciliation,  and  progress  in  this  direction  is  quietly  being  made  in 
the  domestic  relations  courts  of  Philadelphia,  Cincinnati,  Cleveland,  Kansas  City, 
and  elsewhere.4  Industrial  Accident  Commissions  have  begun  to  employ  it  as  a  pre- 
liminary to  a  formal  hearing.  In  Massachusetts,  for  example,  in  many  cases  the  par- 
ties request  a  "conference" — a  thing  not  to  be  found  in  the  statute — at  which  they 
appear  before  a  single  member  of  the  Industrial  Accident  Board,  talk  the  matter  over 
informally,  have  the  benefit  of  his  observation,  and  often  come  to  an  amicable  under- 
standing which  is  then  validated  as  a  binding  agreement.5 

Judge  Levine,  who  was  largely  responsible  for  the  development  of  conciliation  in 
the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court,  has  carried  his  faith  in  its  efficacy  to  the  Common 
Pleas  Court,  of  which  he  is  now  a  judge,  and  has  used  it  more  widely  than  any  one 
else.  Several  notable  triumphs  stand  to  his  credit.  In  a  suit  for  repairs  to  a  large 
"butterfly  valve"  with  a  defence  of  non-compliance  with  specifications,  the  type  of 
case  which  bristles  with  the  most  technical  engineering  points,  the  parties  arrived 

1  These  rules  are  printed  in  New  York  Law  Journal  for  April  26,  1917,  and  in  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature 
Society,  No.  2,  p.  13. 

2  This  is  discussed  in  the  next  chapter,  page  71. 

3  The  National  Desertion  Bureau  of  New  York  has  had  great  success  with  conciliation.  See  Family  Desertion, 
Report  of  the  Committee  on  Desertion  (1912),  page  16.  For  further  conciliation  in  general  see  Parry  :  The  Law  and 
the  Poor,  pages  127, 187,  298. 

'  This  particular  development  is  considered  more  in  detail  in  Chapter  XI,  Domestic  Relations  Courts,  §  4,  page  80. 
6  This  is  later  mentioned  in  Chapter  XII,  Administrative  Tribunals,  page  88. 


CONCILIATION  65 

armed  with  their  lawyers,  models,  and  experts.  A  trial  in  usual  course  would  have 
consumed  about  ten  days,  and  each  side  was  paying  about  two  hundred  dollars  a  day 
in  expenses.  At  the  close  of  the  first  day's  trial,  the  Judge  called  the  parties  into  his 
room,  reduced  the  issue,  as  he  saw  it,  to  its  simplest  terms,  and  asked  if  they  were 
unable  to  come  to  any  agreement.  They  asked  for  time,  and  returned  the  next  morn- 
ing having  come  to  an  agreement,  and  prepared  to  continue  instead  of  break  off  their 
business  relations.  The  model  of  the  valve  was  given  to  the  Judge  as  an  expression 
of  appreciation. 

In  a  delicate  case  of  slander  where  honor,  not  damages,  was  the  issue,  where  one 
might  expect  conciliation  to  fail,  the  Judge,  after  conference  with  the  plantifF  and 
defendant,  discovered  that  at  bottom  the  difficulty  was  a  misunderstanding.  His  sug- 
gestion that  the  defendant  state  in  writing  that  he  had  never  believed  the  plaintiff 
dishonest  and  that  the  plaintiff  dismiss  her  case  met  with  cordial  approval  by  the 
parties  and  was  done.  The  following  statement  to  the  jury  is  almost  unparalleled  in 
legal  annals:1 

"Gentlemen  of  the  Jury,  in  your  absence  I  have  conferred  with  both  sides  to  this 
lawsuit.  After  hearing  the  evidence  so  far  given,  and  after  speaking  to  both  sides, 
I  felt  it  was  the  duty  of  the  Court,  in  view  of  its  conviction,  to  be  of  some  sub- 
stantial assistance  to  both  sides,  if  possible.  I  was  convinced  that  I  was  dealing 
with  good  people,  who  had  a  serious  misunderstanding.  I  saw  the  futile  loss,  part 
of  which  you  have  heard;  I  saw  the  burden  which  each  side  would  have  to  bear, 
by  way  of  waste  of  time  and  court  expenses,  and  after  speaking  to  both  plaintiff 
and  defendant,  I  was  convinced  that  neither  bore  any  real  feelings  towards  the 
other,  but  that  it  was  purely  a  case  of  an  unfortunate,  serious  misunderstanding. 

"The  defendant  in  this  case  signed  the  following  statement  .  .  . 

"It  has  been  agreed  between  the  parties  to  call  this  legal  strife  to  an  end.  .  .  . 
I  hope  that  the  end  of  this  lawsuit  upon  which  you  both  agree  by  common  con- 
sent, will  be  the  end  of  all  controversy  or  feeling  between  you,  for  you  have  no 
cause  to  feel  anything  but  the  deepest  friendship  for  one  another. 

"  Gentlemen  of  the  Jury,  I  hope  this  meets  with  your  approval.  {Applause  by 
the  Jury.)" 

The  traditionally  trained  judge  or  lawyer  unconsciously  feels  a  certain  distrust  and 
aversion  for  such  a  proceeding.  This  is  an  illustration  of  the  tendency  to  make  law  a 
thing  apart,  an  end  unto  itself,  forgetting  that  only  as  it  squares  with  life  and  aids 
human  beings  has  it  any  reason  for  existence.  It  is  difficult  to  see  how  exception  can 
properly  be  taken  to  a  proceeding  which  has  satisfied  the  litigants,  saved  them  un- 
necessary expense,  saved  the  state  nearly  a  thousand  dollars,  enabled  other  cases  to 
be  reached  sooner,  and  tended  to  heal  rather  than  inflame  a  misunderstanding  be- 
tween honest  people.  Justice  has  various  definitions,  but  this  runs  counter  to  none. 


1  From  the  stenographic  record  in  Payne  v.  Henry,  No.  146,594,  Cuyahoga  County,  Court  of  Common  Pleas. 


66  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

§  5 

The  significance  of  judicial  conciliation  for  this  study  is  that,  of  its  very  nature,  it  is 
a  prompt  proceeding,  calling  for  minimum  or  no  court  costs,1  and  involving  no  expense 
to  the  parties,  not  even  for  attorneys'  fees.  The  attorney  is  eliminated 
°    J      because  conciliation  depends  for  its  effect  on  bringing  the  parties  to- 
/  .         gether,  on  smoothing  out  irrelevancies  by  confrontation,  and  then  pro- 
ceeding to  a  direct,  business-like,  personal  adjustment  of  the  real  issue. 
It  is  the  almost  universal  experience  that  conciliation  is  best  worked  without  lawyers.2 
It  results  that  as  conciliation  automatically  obviates  the  three  difficulties  in  the 
traditional  administration  of  justice,  it  is  capable  of  reducing  denial  of  justice  to  the 
poor  exactly  in  proportion  as  it  makes  headway  in  being  used  by  the  courts.  When 
a  poor  person  is  able  to  go  before  a  judge,  have  the  defendant  summoned  at  once  or  in 
a  few  days,  obtain  an  informal  hearing  out  of  which  an  amicable  adjustment  becomes 
possible,  and  have  a  judgment  rendered  thereon,  he  has  indeed  partaken  of  free  and 
equal  justice. 

§  6 
The  most  perplexing  problem  raised  by  conciliation  is  whether  the  court  which 
attempts  conciliation  should  have  authority,  if  it  fails,  to  proceed  to  a  hearing  and 

judgment.  In  New  York  the  court  cannot,  in  Cleveland  it  can,  and  in 
...         Minneapolis  it  depends  on  the  amount  involved.  In  Norway  the  judge 

can  render  a  judgment  only  if  both  parties  have  consented;  in  the  in- 
dustrial courts  the  hearing  for  judgment  is  before  a  larger  body,  but  of  which  the 
conciliation  officials  are  members. 

There  is  a  fear  that  if  the  same  judge  exercises  both  functions,  it  may  result  in 
forced  compromises.  When  the  case  is  one  which  is  to  be  tried  according  to  strict  rules 
of  evidence  there  may  be  a  danger  in  permitting  a  judge  to  hear  the  stories  with  the 
fullness  in  which  they  are  told  at  the  conciliation  stage.  Yet  this  is  no  more  than  a 
judge,  sitting  without  a  jury,  does  every  day.  He  passes  on  the  admissibility  of  evidence 
which  he  actually  hears  and  then  determines  his  finding  according  to  a  state  of  facts 
from  which  such  evidence  in  law  is  excluded.  In  small  claims,  where  the  trial  itself  is 
under  informal  procedure,  it  is  difficult  to  see  why  the  judge  should  not  be  empowered 
to  pass  judgment.  It  may  be  said  that  a  judge  would  be  biased  or  piqued  by  the  re- 
fusal of  one  party  to  accept  his  suggestion,  but  if  judges  were  not  able  to  rise  above 
such  personal  considerations,  they  would  equally  take  offence  at  every  exception  and 
a  thousand  things  that  occur  in  any  hard  fought  trial.  If  two  hearings  by  two  tri- 

1  The  industrial  courts  in  Europe  have  most  successfully  eliminated  delay  and  expense.  United  States  Labor  Bulle- 
tin No.  98,  p.  281. 

2  It  has  already  been  noted  that  they  are  excluded  in  Norway,  Denmark,  and  Minneapolis:  that  in  fact  they  sel- 
dom appear  in  Cleveland ;  that  in  New  York  their  appearance  is  only  by  permission.  In  the  European  industrial  courts 
they  rarely  appear.  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98,  pp.  278,  320.  See  also,  American  Judicature  Soci- 
ety, Bulletin  VI,  page  60. 


CONCILIATION  67 

bunals  are  to  be  required,  much  delay  and  waste  of  judicial  time  will  be  caused.  The 
answer  can  only  be  worked  out  empirically.  It  will  be  safer  to  attempt  it  first  in  the 
simpler  matters  and  then  gradually  to  experiment  with  extensions.  The  line  of  cleav- 
age between  the  two  functions  which  cannot  safely  be  departed  from  is  that  as  con- 
ciliator the  judge  may  suggest  any  solution  likely  to  be  acceptable  to  the  parties,  but 
as  judge  he  must  abide  by  the  rules  of  substantive  law. 

How  far  conciliation  may  be  counted  on  as  a  solution  for  the  existing  denial  of 
justice  is  doubtful.  As  with  the  small  claims  courts,  there  is  evidence  of  its  general 
popularity.1  The  proposed  New  York  Code  planned  to  make  provision  for  it.2  The 
American  Judicature  Society  in  its  draft  for  a  model  State- Wide  Judicature  Act  in- 
cludes a  system  of  conciliation  by  local  magistrates.3  The  New  York  State  Bar  Asso- 
ciation in  1916  adopted  resolutions  calling  for  the  appointment  of  a  Commissioner 
in  Conciliation.4  A  bill  has  been  introduced  in  Wisconsin  providing  for  the  establish- 
ment of  conciliation  branches  in  the  Civil  Court  of  Milwaukee  County.5 

Despite  these  promises  of  development,  it  is  well  not  to  put  too  much  reliance  on 
conciliation  as  of  great  immediate  value  in  securing  more  adequately  the  rights  of 
the  poor.  Conciliation  is  compounded  of  common  sense  and  psychology.  The  Ameri- 
can people  may  take  slowly  to  the  idea.  Judges  are  likely  to  be  distrustful  of  the  plan 
and  of  their  ability  to  carry  it  through.  It  is  a  delicate  adjustment,  depending  much 
on  custom,  drawing  a  large  part  of  its  moral  suasion  from  a  public  opinion  that  parties 
ought  to  try  to  conciliate,  and  calling  for  judges  experienced  in  its  use.  Such  things 
can  come  but  slowly. 


1  See  editorials  in  the  Cleveland  Press  for  February  4, 1915,  and  Duluth  Evening  Herald  for  November  18, 1916. 

2  1  Report  of  the  Board  of  Statutory  Consolidation  (1915),  9,  25,  228. 

3  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VII- A,  pages  57,  72. 

4  New  York  State  Bar  Ass'n  R.  for  1916,  pages  291,  309;  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  p.  35.  See  also  1  Journal  of  the 
American  Judicature  Society,  No.  5  (February,  1918),  p.  157. 

5  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  1,  p.  25. 


Chapter  X 
ARBITRATION 

It  would  be  better  for  the  people  if  more  of  their  controversies 
should  be  settled  by  arbitration,  and  justice  would  be  quite  as  likely 
to  be  done  as  when  administered  by  the  more  formal  methods  of 
litigation  in  the  courts.  Curtis  v.  Gokay,  68  N.  Y.  300,  305. 

ARBITRATION,  as  a  method  of  settling  disputes,  is  more  generally  and  better 
t  known  than  conciliation.  It  stands  midway  between  conciliation  and  court  lit- 
igation. Like  the  former,  it  is  a  method  that  can  be  used  only  by  consent,  and  so 
differs  from  judicial  procedure  which  rests  on  compulsion.  But  once  the  agreement 
is  made,  and  the  arbitration  tribunal  has  entered  its  award,  the  enforceability  of  the 
decision  rests  not  on  consent  as  in  conciliation,  but  on  the  compulsion  of  legal  pro- 
cess by  judgment  and  execution. 

In  its  details,  arbitration  has  meant  different  things  at  different  times,  so  that  its 
present  form,  and  what  is  more  important,  the  significance  of  its  present  tendency 
in  relation  to  our  problem  of  the  administration  of  justice,  may  more  easily  be 
described  after  a  brief  preliminary  review. 


Arbitration  is  an  ancient  practice  at  common  law,1  but  it  has  had  a  checkered  de- 
velopment. In  earlier  times  the  courts,  having  few  cases  and  being  jealous  of  their 
prerogatives,  viewed  it  askance  and  accorded  it  little  support;2  later, 
e  tlise  oj     havmrr  crowded  dockets  and  being  overworked,  the  courts  set  the  seal 

A     h't        i' 

Arottration  Qf  ^-nejr  emphatic  approval  upon  it.  Again,  arbitration  has  at  times 
been  in  vogue  and  has  then  relapsed  into  disuse.  It  was  frequently  employed  in  an 
organized  way  by  New  York  merchants  as  early  as  1768,3  and  in  Boston  in  1819  a 
plea  was  made  for  its  more  extended  development.4  It  underwent  a  process  of  statutory 
development,  following  the  course  in  England,5  but  during  the  last  quarter  of  the 
nineteenth  century  it  existed  as  an  unused  appendage  to  the  legal  machinery  for 
disposing  of  controversies. 

Arbitration  as  provided  for  by  statute6  in  effect  permits  disputants  to  create  a 
tribunal  of  their  own  either  by  agreeing  on  the  persons  to  arbitrate  or  by  agreeing 
to  use  the  arbitration  machinery  of  some  private  organization,  as  a  chamber  of  cora- 

1  5  Corpus  Juris,  16. 

-  1  Journal  of  the  American  Judicature  Society,  No.  2,  p.  15. 

3  Commercial  Arbitration.  Report  of  the  Special  Committee  on  Arbitration  of  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce 

(1911),  page  6. 

*  Honestus:  Observations  on  the  Pernicious  Practice  of  tlie  Law  (1819),  page  8. 

6  For  a  history  of  the  English  statutory  development  see  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  XII,  page  12. 

6  Typical  statutes  are  those  of  New  York,  Code  of  Civil  Procedure,  chap.  17,  tit.  VIII,  §§  2365-2386. 


ARBITRATION  69 

merce.  This  agreement  is  generally  called  a  "submission,"  and  if  it  contains  a  pro- 
vision to  that  effect,  the  law  permits  the  award  to  be  entered  as  a  court  judgment  and 
enforced  in  like  manner.  The  great  defect  in  the  American  statutes  is  that  either 
party  may,  after  the  submission  and  any  time  before  the  final  award,  revoke  his  agree- 
ment and  thereby  annul  all  the  proceedings.1 

The  arbitration  proceeding  is  obviously  one  not  conducted  according  to  the  legal 
rules  of  procedure  and  evidence.  So  long  as  the  arbitrators  give  the  disputants  a  fair 
chance  to  present  their  full  case,  they  can  conduct  the  hearings  as  they  like  and  ac- 
cept such  evidence  as  seems  to  them  helpful.  More  important,  statutory  arbitration 
need  not  at  all  be  a  determination  of  right  and  wrong  according  to  rules  of  substan- 
tive law.  An  award  may  be  revoked  for  fraud,  corruption,  or  serious  and  prejudicial 
misconduct,  just  as  the  decisions  of  a  court  may  be  set  aside  on  like  grounds,  but 
there  is  no  authority  for  revoking  a  finding  because  it  fails  to  accord  with  rules  of 
law.  In  its  Handbook  for  Arbitrators  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce  says:2 

"If  any  law  points  are  involved,  they  should  disregard  pure  technicalities  and 
go  to  the  merits.  If  they  believe  that  the  legal  proposition  is  based  upon  sound 
sense  and  the  experience  of  mankind  generally,  they  should  follow  it." 

Arbitration  has  been  coming  more  and  more  generally  into  use  through  the  in- 
sistence of  merchants  acting  through  their  trade  groups  or  chambers  of  commerce. 
Under  the  energetic  guidance  of  Charles  L.  Bernheimer  a  splendid  organization  has, 
since  1911,  been  built  up  under  authority  of  the  Chamber  of  Commerce  of  the  State 
of  New  York,3  which  has  been  followed  elsewhere,  notably  by  the  Chicago  Association 
of  Credit  Men.4  This  revival  has  been  forced  by  three  considerations, — first,  a  desire 
for  a  decision  by  an  expert  having  personal  knowledge  of  trade  conditions  and  cus- 
toms, a  thing  which  the  courts  have  never  been  able  to  afford;5  second,  a  hope  of 
supplanting  the  enmity  provoking  litigious  method  with  an  amicable  procedure  which 
would  not  interrupt  business  relationships;  and  thirdly  and  chiefly,  a  determination 
to  escape  from  the  intolerable  delays  of  the  regular  administration  of  justice.6 

AVhile  business  men  have  desired  expert  decisions,  a  more  liberal  attitude  toward 
trade  customs,  and  have  preferred  a  prompt  decision  according  to  conscience,  the 
arbitrium  boni  viri  of  the  Roman  law,7  to  a  delayed  judgment  according  to  law,  the 
rise  and  expansion  of  these  organized  but  extra-legal  arbitration  tribunals  does  not 
at  all  reflect  a  dissatisfaction  with  a  justice  ascertained  and  administered  according 

1  This  has  been  remedied  in  England.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  XII,  page  19. 

2  Commercial  Arbitration,  Report  of  the  Special  Committee  on  Arbitration  of  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce 
(1911),  page  52. 

3  See  Annual  Reports  of  the  Committee  on  Arbitration  of  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce,  1911-16;  also 

3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  p.  28. 

4  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  XII,  pages  3,  63. 

6  Warren:  History  of  the  American  Bar,  page  148;  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  XII,  pages  4,  62. 

6  Taft:  Administration  of  Justice,  72  Central  L.  Journal,  193;  Business  Arbitration.  99  Outlook  (1911),  104 ;  Werner: 
Voluntary  Tribunals,  Missouri  Bar  Ass'n  Proceedings  for  1914.  pages  145,  150;  Commercial  Arbitration,  Report  of 
the  Special  Committee  on  Arbitration  of  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce  (1911),  page  3. 

7  Cf.  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  136. 


70  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

to  rules  of  substantive  law.1  This  fact  is  of  the  highest  importance,  for  it  lays  the 
solid  foundation  for  judicial  arbitration.  Indeed,  the  chief  difficulty  with  extra-legal 
arbitration  has  been  the  inability  to  combine  with  technical  knowledge  and  prompt, 
informal  proceedings  the  desire  to  have  the  controversy  determined  according  to  sub- 
stantive law  which  calls  for  trained  judges.2 

Commercial  arbitration  has  not  solved  expense3  because  it  has  not  tried  to.  Costs 
and  fees  have  not  been  prohibitive  to  business  men.  It  has,  however,  served  to  elim- 
inate delay,  it  has  greatly  reinforced  the  idea  of  conciliation,  of  which  the  New  York 
Chamber  of  Commerce  Arbitration  Committee  says,4  "Perhaps  the  most  important 
work  of  your  Committee  has  been  in  the  way  of  conciliation,1'  and  it  has,  through  its 
informal  procedure,  occasionally  been  of  direct  assistance  to  poor  persons.5  For  us, 
its  great  significance  is  that  it  has  revived  the  idea,  and  delivered  a  body  blow  to  that 
legal  Cerberus  of  pleading,  procedure,  and  evidence  by  proving  that  justice  can  be  as 
faithfully,  more  satisfactorily  to  the  parties,  and  more  quickly  administered,  even  as 
to  claims  as  large  as  one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  dollars,  through  an  informal 
tribunal  which  has  found  no  necessity  for  technical  pleadings,  or  for  a  predetermined 
detailed  procedure,  or  for  excluding  the  kind  of  logical  evidence  which  all  the  world, 
except  the  courts,  uses  in  making  its  decisions. 

Through  several  other  channels  the  arbitration  idea  has  steadily  been  coming  to  the 
fore.6  In  the  legal  aid  societies  the  principle  of  arbitration  in  conjunction  with  con- 
ciliation is  daily  employed.7  In  the  workmen's  compensation  acts,  in  order  to  empha- 
size the  informality  of  the  hearings  of  disputed  claims,  such  proceedings  are  given  the 
name  of  arbitration  instead  of  trial.  The  1910  Protocol  in  the  New  York  cloak,  suit, 
and  skirt  industry  provided  a  machinery  whereby  individual  disputes  of  all  sorts 
between  employers  and  employees,  including  claims  for  wages,  might  be  conciliated 
and  arbitrated,  and  this  proved  one  of  the  most  successful  features  of  the  truce.8 

1  This  point  is  very  strongly  made  by  William  L.  Ransom,  former  Justice  of  the  City  Court  of  New  York  and  Chief 
Counsel  of  the  New  York  State  Public  Service  Commission  for  the  First  District,  in  an  article  entitled  "  The  Lay- 
man's Demand  for  Improved  Judicial  Machinery,"  printed  in  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  132,  particularly 
pages  148,  149. 

"  Cf.  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulleti7i  XII,  page  3. 

3  The  expense  of  an  arbitration  hearing  under  the  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce  is  about  sixty  dollars. 

4  New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce  Committee  on  Arbitration,  Report  for  1914,  page  3. 

8  A  woman  in  Maine  bought  by  mail  order  a  corset  cover  for  sixty-eight  cents  which  she  claimed  was  defective. 
The  Chamber  of  Commerce  adjusted  the  dispute  with  the  mail  order  house. 

6  See  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  pp.  36,  49-51. 

7  4  Buffalo  L.  A.  R.  5;  5  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  22;  Report  of  Jewish  Charities  of  Chicago  for  1916,  page  70:  4  Cleveland 
L.  A.  R.  7,  8  ;  6  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  3;  21  Whittier  House  (Jersey  City)  R.  25 ;  22  Jersey  City  L.  A.  R.  17;  Louisville  Asso- 
ciated Charities  Report  for  1914,  page  19;  Office  of  the  Public  Defender  (Los  Angeles),  page  3;  Place  of  the  Public  De- 
fender in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  pages  25,  26;  10  Newark  L.  A.  R.  5;  Nashville  Commercial  Club  Tattler 
for  July,  1916,  pages  28,  30  ;  2  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  3;  3  Ibid.  4;  6  Ibid.  5;  1  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  4;  4  Ibid.  9;  30  N.  Y. 
L.  A.  R.  61;  32  Ibid.  29;  10  N.  Y.  Educational  Alliance  R.  31 ;  7  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.,  No.  3,  p.  23;  Ibid.,  No.  4,  p.  26;  11  76i'd., 
No.  2,  p.  3;  Ibid.,  No.  3,  p.  14  ;  15  Ibid.,  No.  3,  p.  7  ;  1  Milwaukee  L.  A.  R.  9 ;  Report  of  First  Conference  of  Legal 
Aid  Societies,  pages  8,  13 :  Ibid.,  Fourth  Conference,  page  8 ;  Proceedings  of  Virginia  Conference  of  Charities  and 
Correction  in  1916,  page  80 ;  Report  of  the  Attorney  of  the  St.  Louis  Legal  Aid  Bureau  to  the  Mayor,  page  3.  In  Ger- 
many several  of  the  legal  aid  offices  are  empowered  to  act  as  official  arbitrators.  Reichs-Arbeitsblatt  for  July  27, 
1911,  page  526. 

8  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Bulletin  No.  98,  pp.  203,  230,  247,  248;  Brandeis:  Business  a  Profession  (1914), 
page  xxxviii. 


ARBITRATION  71 

An  interesting  manifestation  of  arbitration  is  to  be  found  in  New  York's  East  Side, 
where  the  newly  arrived  immigrants,  having  learned  by  experience  that  if  both  parties 
to  a  lawsuit  in  a  Russian  court  were  Jews  both  would  lose,  have  been  in  the  habit  of 
submitting  all  controversies  to  the  Rabbi  for  his  arbitration.  The  plan  was  entirely 
successful  until  it  was  attempted  in  the  same  informal  manner  to  obtain  divorces.1 


§  2 
"  There  is  a  growing  disposition  on  the  part  of  our  organized  city  courts  to  assist 
in  this  movement'" 2  toward  arbitration.  There  are  signs  that  the  courts  are  profit- 
ing from  the  object  lesson  and  are  preparing  to  do  their  share.  In  the 
Cleveland  and  Cincinnati  Municipal  Courts  provision  is  made  by  rule 
for  arbitration.3  The  Municipal  Court  of  Chicago  has  established  an 
Arbitration  Branch  as  an  auxiliary  to  commercial  arbitration.4 

In  April,  1917,  the  Justices  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  the  City  of  New  York 
issued  a  series  of  rules  by  which  it  is  now  possible  for  parties,  by  agreement,  to  submit 
a  dispute  to  an  agreed  arbitrator  who  may  be  the  judge  of  the  court.5  Under  these 
rules  there  are  no  costs  or  fees  of  any  kind,  the  only  pleadings  are  a  brief  recital  of 
the  nature  of  the  controversy,  rules  of  evidence  do  not  apply,  the  parties  may  not 
withdraw  after  the  first  hearing,  and  an  award  becomes  a  judgment  two  days  after 
filing.  No  statistics  of  work  are  yet  available,  but  it  is  estimated  that  under  these 
rules,  together  with  the  conciliation  rules,  half  a  million  controversies  will  annually 
be  settled.6  As  the  Justices  say  in  their  statement  accompanying  the  rules,  "an 
opportunity  is  now  given  to  have  controversies  settled  impartially,  quickly,  and 
without  expense." 

A  judicial  arbitration  of  a  small  claim  is  exactly  the  same  as  a  proceeding  in  a 
small  claims  court,  for  the  keynote  of  both  is  an  informal  procedure  which  makes 
for  despatch,  saves  expense,  and  generally  renders  the  attorney  unnecessary.  And  in 
both  the  judgment  rendered  is  in  accordance  with  substantive  law.  Arbitration,  how- 
ever, is  not  limited  to  small  claims,  but  extends  to  all  claims,  irrespective  of  amount. 


§  3 
The  successful  extension  of  judicial  arbitration  will  be  one  more  step  toward  free- 
dom and  equality  of  justice.  As  to  the  cases  which  can  come  within  its  sphere,  it 


1 11  Educational  Alliance  R.  55;  22  N.  Y.  L.  A.R.  11. 

2  1  American  Judicature  Society  Journal,  No.  2,  p.  15. 

3  Rule  23  of  the  Cincinnati  Municipal  Court;  Rule  29  of  the  Cleveland  Municipal  Court. 

4  1  American  Judicature  Society  Journal,  No.  2,  p.  15;  Ibid.,  No.  5,  p.  145. 

0  These  rules  are  printed  in  the  New  York  Law  Journal  for  April  26,  1917,  and  in  1  American  Judicature  Society 

Journal,  No.  2,  p.  15.  See  also  No.  6,  p.  153. 

6  Report  of  the  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  for  1915,  page  37. 


72  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

breaks  down  two  of  the  defects  of  the  traditional  administration  of  justice,  for  where 
_,  ,  .it  exists  costs  are  minimized  or  abolished  and  delays  are  absent.  The 

T '  lltllTC  Of 

fundamental  problem  of  the  expense  of  counsel  is  solved  because  in 
most  cases  it  will  be  unnecessary  for  parties,  in  the  absence  of  plead- 
ings, technical  procedure,  and  rules  of  evidence,  to  retain  attorneys. 
The  clerk  tells  them  how  to  file  the  submission,  and  for  the  rest  they  merely  appear 
and  tell  their  stories. 

Arbitration  is,  of  course,  always  subject  to  the  limitation  th  J;  it  can  begin  only 
by  agreement.  How  far  it  can  go  is  to-day  purely  a  matter  of  conjecture.  When  it 
was  sought  to  change  the  Athenian  rule  that  if  a  plaintiff  claimed  a  debt  of  twenty 
minae  and  proved  eighteen  judgment  must  be  for  the  defendant,  Aristotle  replied 
that  such  a  proposal  would  turn  a  judicial  proceeding  into  a  mere  arbitration.  The 
modern  world  says  if  that  be  arbitration,  then  by  all  means  let  us  have  it.  The  tem- 
per of  to-day  is  to  pay  scant  regard  to  such  theoretical  logical  perfection  if  by  its 
sacrifice  a  more  practical,  efficient,  and  serviceable  judicial  administration  may  be 
secured.1  While  this  disposition  is  calculated  to  secure  for  arbitration  a  definite  place 
in  the  machinery  for  administering  justice,  the  development  will  not  come  in  a  day 
or  a  year.  As  with  conciliation,  arbitration  offers  no  immediate  guarantee  of  a  more 
equal  administration  of  the  laws. 


In  their  effect  on  the  problem  of  denial  of  justice  and  in  the  solution  that  they 
afford,  small  claims  courts,  conciliation,  and  arbitration  have  much  in  common.  In 
all  three,  court  costs  cease  to  prohibit,  for  they  have  been  minimized  or 
"  abolished.  The  proceedings,  in  their  very  nature,  make  despatch  easy 
and  delay  difficult.  In  parallel  ways  they  avoid  the  fundamental  difficulty  of  the 
expense  of  counsel  by  making  the  employment  of  attorneys  unnecessary.  In  all  con- 
ciliation, in  the  large  proportion  of  small  claims,  and  generally  in  matters  submitted 
to  arbitration,  after  rules  of  pleadings,  procedure,  and  evidence  have  been  eliminated, 
there  is  nothing  left  for  the  lawyer  to  do. 

We  now  pass  to  a  different  type  of  agency  dealing  with  a  different  sort  of  case  in 
which  the  solution  is  not  so  easily  obtained,  wherein,  even  after  simplification  of  pro- 
cedure has  done  its  best,  a  part  of  the  function  of  the  attorney  and  the  need  for  his 
services  still  remain. 


1  Cf.  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  19. 


Chapter  XI 
DOMESTIC  RELATIONS  COURTS 

In  my  judgment  the  present  system  of  enforcing  the  payment  of  alimony 
by  court  proceedings  should  be  supplemented  by  the  power  lodged  in  the 
same  court  to  issue  a  warrant  for  non-support  in  proper  cases.  A  technical 
contempt  proceeding  costs  a  destitute  wife  more  than  she  is  apt  to  get  out 
of  it  if  her  lawyer  receives  what  his  services  are  worth.  Judge  Lacey  of  the 
Detroit  Court  of  Domestic  Relations? 

§1 

OF  the  four  great  classes  of  cases  which  make  up  the  larger  proportion  of  the 
legal  difficulties  of  the  poor,  the  second  is  domestic  troubles.  In  this  unhappy 
and  perplexing  field  are  included  all  the  difficulties  between  husband  and  wife,  between 
„  parent  and  child,  illegitimacy,  juvenile  and  contributory  delinquency, 

„.        .  '  guardianship,  custody,  and  adoption.  Here  the  law,  even  at  its  best, 

labors  under  a  heavy  disadvantage  in  trying  to  work  out  justice  because 
the  controversies  are  peculiarly  intimate  in  nature  and  because  they  are  produced  by 
causes  as  variable  and  elusive  as  human  nature  itself,  further  influenced  and  compli- 
cated by  everything  in  our  present  day  civilization  from  the  economic  structure  of 
society  to  religion.  Yet  in  precisely  this  field  the  law  is  increasingly  being  urged  to  put 
forth  its  supreme  effort,  its  sphere  is  being  widened,  new  complementary  administra- 
tive agencies  are  being  added  to  it,2  because  in  all  these  controversies  is  involved  the 
security  of  the  home,  on  which  the  existing  state  is  founded,  and  the  welfare  of  chil- 
dren, on  whom  the  future  state  depends.  In  the  main  the  state  must  rely  on  indi- 
vidual complaint  to  discover  wrongs  in  the  home,  and  only  through  the  proceeding 
instituted  by  the  individual  claimant  can  the  state  set  in  motion  its  protecting  and 
guarding  machinery.  In  affairs  of  such  import  denial  of  justice  transcends  individual 
or  personal  injustice  and,  like  a  cancer,  eats  into  the  health  and  moral  well-being  of 
the  body  politic. 

For  securing  these  interests  the  substantive  law  makes  reasonable  provision.  There 
are  to-day  a  multitude  of  rights,  remedies,  and  punishments.  As  between  husband 
and  wife  there  is  divorce,  with  or  without  alimony,  to  be  paid  in  a  lump  sum  or  under 
a  decree  for  periodic  payments;  separate  maintenance  (also  called  separate  support, 
judicial  separation,  or  limited  divorce),  with  or  without  a  decree  ordering  periodic 
payments  for  support;  and  the  criminal  proceedings  for  desertion,  abandonment,  and 
non-support,  which  do  not  separate  the  parties,  but  either  order  pavments  for  sup- 
port or  punish  the  offender  for  the  crime.  In  these  proceedings,  questions  of  custody 
and  support  of  children  may  or  may  not  be  involved.  As  between  parent  and  child 

1  25  American  Legal  News,  No.  9(1914),  p.  13.  The  word  "alimony."  in  Michigan  law,  means  payments  under  a  sep- 
arate support  decree. 

2  Pound:  Limits  of  Effective  Legal  Action,  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  p.  66. 


74  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

there  is  guardianship,  custody,  and  the  criminal  proceedings  for  desertion,  abandon- 
ment, non-support,  and  contributory  delinquency.  Concerning  children,  there  is  adop- 
tion, truancy,  and  other  juvenile  delinquency.  As  to  illegitimacy,  some  states  give 
civil  remedies,  others  criminal,  and  a  few  none.  With  all  these  proceedings  the  poor, 
and  the  children  of  the  poor,  are  immediately  concerned. 

No  one  court  as  yet  comprises  within  its  jurisdiction  all  these  matters.  One  disin- 
tegrating force  is  the  sharp  historical  distinction  between  the  civil  and  the  criminal 
law.  As  courts  are  now  organized,  each  has  a  slice  of  this  whole  jurisdiction.  There  is 
neither  unification,  nor  specialization,  nor  even  uniformity.  In  Boston  divorces  are 
granted  by  the  Superior  Court  with  an  appeal  to  the  full  bench  of  the  Supreme  Judicial 
Court,  separation  suits  are  heard  in  the  Probate  Court  with  an  appeal  to  the  Superior 
Court  on  the  civil  side,  complaints  for  non-support  are  heard  in  the  Municipal  Court 
with  an  appeal  to  the  Superior  Court  on  the  criminal  side,  and  juvenile  matters  are 
determined  in  the  Juvenile  Court  with  a  like  appeal.  In  Cleveland  family  cases  may 
come  before  any  one  of  eighteen  judges.1  The  confusion  that  results  from  such  mul- 
tiplicity robs  the  law  of  much  of  its  possible  effectiveness.2  Instances  such  as  the  fol- 
lowing have  happened  in  Boston.  A  wife,  living  apart  from  her  husband  because  of 
his  brutality,  brings  a  proceeding  in  the  criminal  court  of  one  district  to  compel  the 
husband  to  support  herself  and  the  children.  The  court  rules  that  until  the  Probate 
Court  has  passed  on  the  question  of  her  right  to  live  apart  and  substantiated  her  posi- 
tion by  giving  her  a  decree  legally  permitting  her  to  live  apart,  it  cannot  order  the 
husband  to  support  a  wife  not  living  with  him.  The  wife  then  goes  to  the  Probate 
Court,  proves  her  case,  and  gets  her  decree.  Meanwhile  she  has  taken  another  position 
and  moved  her  home,  or  the  husband  may  have  moved.  She  then  brings  her  complaint 
in  another  district  court  which  has  jurisdiction  and  is  told  that  inasmuch  as  a  pro- 
bate decree  is  outstanding,  the  criminal  court  has  no  jurisdiction  and  cannot  hear  the 
case.3  Both  decisions  are  honestly  made  by  judges  who  are  interpreting  the  law  as 
they  understand  it ;  but  the  result  is  disastrous. 


§  2 
It  is  the  consensus  of  the  best  opinion  that  there  must  be  unification  of  jurisdic- 
tion and  specialization  by  judges.4  These  ends  have  been  accomplished  to  an  extent 
by  the  creation  of  special  courts,  or  special  sessions  of  courts,  to  which  all  cases  of  a 
given  type  are  sent  and  where  the  same  judge  permanently  presides.  Such  are  the 


1  8  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  7 

2  Seventh  Report  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  Chicago  (1913),  page  89. 

3  See  Association  of  Justices  of  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts,  Committee  on  Law  and  Pro- 
cedure, Report  No.  7  (1916),  page  17. 

*  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VI,  pages  21,  22 ;  Address  of  Judge  Brown  of  the  Municipal  Court  of  Phila- 
delphia before  the  National  Conference  of  Probation  Officers  (1917),  page  6:  Harley:  Ultimate  Types  of  Inferior 
Courts  and  Judges,  22  Case  and  Comment,  6. 


DOMESTIC  RELATIONS  COURTS  75 

domestic  relations  courts  in  Chicago,  Cincinnati,  New  York,  Philadelphia,  and  Bos- 
ton. In  the  development  toward  unification,  the  interesting  fact,  and 

n  J?.         one  which  is  of  great  immediate  concern  to  our  problem,  is  that  the 
Use  of  Crim-  ...  .  ... 

J  criminal  jurisdiction  is  absorbing  the  civil,  instead  of  the  civil  the 

criminal.  Although  the  domestic  relations  and  juvenile  courts  which 

are  to  be  found  chiefly  on  the  criminal  side  of  the  court  are  rapidly  eliminating  the 

traditional  forbidding  aspects  of  a  criminal  trial  by  informality  of  procedure,  by  using 

the  summons  instead  of  the  arrest,  by  having  the  attending  officers  in  plain  clothes, 

and  by  having  the  parties  sit  around  a  table  with  the  judge  instead  of  standing  in 

cages  or  behind  bars,  nevertheless  the  machinery  of  the  criminal  law  is  more  and 

more  being  used. 

This  is  entirely  logical  because  the  law  has  always  claimed  that  the  state  has  a 
direct  interest  in  all  marital  and  family  questions,  and  the  best  way  to  enforce  that 
interest  in  fact  is  through  criminal  proceedings  to  which  the  state  is  a  party  and 
over  which  it  can  keep  a  much  closer  watch.  The  accretion  to  criminal  jurisdiction 
at  the  expense  of  civil  jurisdiction,  however,  is  less  the  result  of  logic  and  more  of 
the  fact  that  the  domestic  relations  courts  have  proved  more  effective  and  more  capa- 
ble than  their  civil  predecessors.  Nearly  all  of  these  matters  were  originally  civil;  then 
followed  a  series  of  statutes,  culminating  in  the  comprehensive  uniform  desertion  act, 
which  afforded  criminal  remedies.1  To  care  for  the  large  volume  of  cases  brought  under 
the  criminal  statutes,  the  domestic  relations  courts2  or  sessions  were  established,  and 
they  went  at  their  task  so  thoroughly  and  served  so  efficiently  that  inevitably  a  tend- 
ency set  in  to  widen  their  jurisdiction.3  The  Philadelphia  Domestic  Relations  Court, 
which  has  jurisdiction  over  all  matters  except  full  and  limited  divorce,  now  asks  that 
divorce  jurisdiction  be  added  to  it.4  In  addition  to  the  criminal  proceedings,  the  Cin- 
cinnati Court  of  Domestic  Relations  has  jurisdiction  over  divorce,  separate  support, 
and  annulment,  and  it  administers  the  mothers'  pension  fund  law.5  Its  jurisdiction 
is  complete  except  as  to  matters  of  guardianship,  adoption,  and  illegitimacy. 

The  most  complete  court  was  that  in  Detroit  under  a  law  passed  unanimously  by 
both  houses  of  the  legislature  in  1913,  establishing  a  domestic  relations  court  and 
giving  to  it,  in  addition  to  the  usual  criminal  jurisdiction,  exclusive  control  over  di- 
vorce, separate  support,  custody  of  children,  illegitimacy,  and  violations  of  the  com- 
pulsory education  law.  The  court  was  organized  September  1,  1913,  and  was  declared 
illegal  by  the  Michigan  Supreme  Court  on  the  ground  that  the  act  which  created  it 


1  Cf.  Association  of  Justices  of  the  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts,  Committee  on  Law  and 
Procedure,  Report  No.  7  (1916),  page  6. 

2  The  term  "domestic  relations  courts"  in  its  widest  sense,  which  is  here  used,  includes  the  juvenile  courts. 

3  In  1910  the  Pittsburgh  Legal  Aid  Society  argued  along  this  line.  2  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  11, 12.  See  also  Family 
Desertion,  Report  of  the  Committee  on  Desertion  of  the  National  Conference  of  Jewish  Charities  (1912),  pages  37,  38. 

4  Report  of  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  for  1915,  page  5. 

8  First  Annual  Report,  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  Division  of  Domestic  Relations,  Hamilton  County  (1915),  page  3. 


76  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

was  local,  instead  of  general,  as  required  by  the  constitution.1  Of  this  broad  jurisdic- 
tion, Judge  Lacey  writes : 2 

"  In  conclusion,  let  me  emphasize  the  tremendous  advantages  of  a  court  with 
combined  jurisdiction  over  all  family  cases  in  that  it  prevents  either  spouse  from 
shifting  from  one  court  to  another  and  prevents  the  separation  of  the  family  in 
its  litigation.  The  court  should  be  able  to  deal  with  the  family  as  a  unit  and 
given  ample  power  to  effectuate  justice.  The  present  system  of  non-support  cases 
in  one  court,  abandonment  in  another,  divorce  in  a  third,  and  children  in  a  fourth 
tends  to  nullify  the  power  of  each  court  for  good.  .  .  . 

"  I  believe  the  most  essential  and  valuable  feature  of  the  Domestic  Relations 
Court  of  Wayne  County  was  the  combination  of  jurisdiction  which  it  had  over 
all  family  cases,  which  aimed  to  enable  one  judge  to  hear  and  dispose  of  every 
phase  of  the  whole  controversy  in  a  disturbed  household.'''' 


§  3 
Desertion  and  refusal  to  support  wives  and  children  were  made  crimes  in  order  to 
protect  the  state's  interest  in  the  family,  but  this  change  automatically  worked  a 
great  improvement  in  the  position  of  the  poor  before  the  law  because 
5r_y         .        it  made  available  the  processes  of  the  criminal  law. 
J       .  There  are  no  court  costs  to  prohibit  access  to  the  criminal  courts. 

There  are  no  fees  for  writs,  entry,  trial,  or  judgment.  Service  of  process 
is  made  by  police  officers  without  charge  to  the  complainant.  Witnesses 
are  summoned  in  like  manner  and  their  fees  for  attendance  paid  out  of  public  funds. 
Deserted  wives,  who  formerly  have  found  the  path  to  relief  through  the  civil  courts 
blocked  by  the  requirement  of  costs  which,  by  hypothesis,  they  were  in  no  position 
to  pay,  now  are  accorded  unpriced  relief. 

Criminal  process  is  summary.  The  return  day  is  as  soon  as  the  accused  can  be  found 
and  taken  into  custody.  If  the  defendant  is  not  bailed,  the  case  is  tried  at  once;  if  he 
secures  bail,  there  may  be  a  continuance,  but  rarely  for  more  than  a  week,  and  that 
often  is  granted  only  on  condition  that  a  payment  be  made  to  support  the  wife  during 
that  week.  It  is  only  natural  that  under  these  circumstances  persons  should  prefer 
the  criminal  remedies.3  The  contrast  between  the  two  systems,  and  the  denial  of  justice 
caused  by  the  delays  in  the  former  administration  of  justice,  is  strikingly  illustrated 
by  the  following  case.4  A  narration  of  the  facts  renders  comment  superfluous. 

A  woman,  who  had  suffered  physical  abuse  from  her  husband  and  was  not  being 
supported  by  him,  applied  to  the  Legal  Aid  Society  for  relief.  The  attorney  investi- 


1  25  American  Legal  News,  No.  9  (1914),  p.  5.  For  the  decision  see  180  Mich.  329. 
■  Ibid.,  p.  13. 

3  Association  of  Justices  of  the  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts,  Committee  on  Law  and  Pro- 
cedure, Report  No.  7,  page  17. 

4  In  the  files  of  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society,  number  1009;  Probate  Court  for  Sulfolk  County,  number  162,928;  Domes- 
tic Relations  Session  of  the  Boston  Municipal  Court,  number  1914  D  161. 


DOMESTIC  RELATIONS  COURTS  77 

gated  the  case  and  filed  a  petition  for  separate  support  in  the  Probate  Court  on  Octo- 
ber 31, 1913.  The  next  day  he  called  for  the  citation  and  had  it  served  by  a  con- 
stable at  a  cost  of  $1.60.  He  had  affidavit  of  service  made,  filed  it,  and  then  awaited 
the  elapse  of  fourteen  days  until  return  day.  On  the  fourteenth  day  the  respondent 
filed  an  appearance.  An  agreement  for  a  decree  was  entered  into  November  20, 1913. 
The  attorney  then  saw  a  judge  and  had  a  time  assigned  for  hearing,  a  week  later,  at 
which  time  a  decree  was  entered.  The  respondent  paid  nothing.  The  legal  aid  attor- 
ney then  filed  a  petition  for  contempt  proceedings,  secured  the  citation  the  follow- 
ing day,  had  it  served,  made  affidavit  of  service  and  filed  it,  and  again  awaited  the 
elapse  of  fourteen  days  till  return  day.  Again  the  respondent  filed  an  appearance. 
Notice  was  then  sent  to  the  respondent's  attorney,  a  judge  was  seen,  and  the  case 
assigned  for  hearing  on  March  30, 1914.  On  that  day  the  case  fortunately  was  reached, 
— had  it  not  been,  it  would  have  been  dropped  from  the  list  and  the  notice,  assign- 
ment, and  hearing  would  all  have  had  to  be  gone  through  again,  —  but  the  respond- 
ent did  not  appear  and  was  defaulted.  A  capias  authorizing  his  arrest  was  issued.  This 
was  delivered  to  a  sheriff,  who  arrested  the  husband  after  four  o'clock  when  court 
had  adjourned,  so  that  he  was  taken  to  jail  to  be  kept  overnight  at  the  wife's  expense. 
The  next  morning  the  sheriff  brought  him  before  the  court,  the  case  was  heard,  and 
the  judge  released  the  respondent  on  his  agreement  to  do  better.  The  cost  for  the 
sheriff  and  the  board  at  jail  was  $16.  During  April  and  May  the  husband  still  paid 
nothing. 

On  June  2, 1914,  the  wife  again  appealed  to  the  Legal  Aid  Society.  On  the  same 
morning  the  attorney  had  a  criminal  complaint  sworn  out,  which  was  at  once  delivered 
to  police  officers  for  service.  The  husband  was  traced  and  found  at  midnight  trying 
to  get  out  of  his  room  by  means  of  the  fire  escape.  He  was  put  under  arrest  and  brought 
into  court  the  next  morning.  Trial  was  had  at  once,  the  husband  was  convicted,  and 
sentenced  to  three  months  at  hard  labor,  the  state  to  pay  fifty  cents  a  day  toward 
the  wife's  support.  The  civil  proceeding  took  five  months,  cost  $17.60,  and  resulted 
in  nothing ;  the  criminal  proceeding  required  twenty-six  hours,  cost  nothing,  and  re- 
sulted in  punishment  of  the  guilty  husband  and  provision  for  assisting  the  wife. 

Judges  of  domestic  relations  courts  have  been  the  first  to  sacrifice  their  own  Con- 
es 

venience  for  the  sake  of  the  persons  coming  before  them,  so  that  hearings  might  be 
prompt  and  no  loss  through  absence  from  work  be  occasioned.  In  Kansas  City  the 
court  opens  at  7.30  a.m.  and  in  Los  Angeles  it  begins  at  5  p.m.  and  sits  as  late  as 
is  necessary.  These  courts  are  respectively  called  "  The  Sunrise  Court "  and  "  The 
Twilight  Court,"  and  they  deserve  the  prominence  which  their  picturesque  titles  have 
given  them  because  of  their  consideration  for  the  parties  who  need  their  assistance 
and  must  earn  their  living  at  the  same  time. 

Thus  our  first  two  defects  in  the  traditional  administration  of  justice  are  conspic- 
uously absent  from  the  modern  domestic  relations  courts.  As  to  cases  within  their 
jurisdiction,  delays  and  court  costs  do  not  operate  to  defeat  justice.  These  courts. 


78  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

likewise,  squarely  meet  the  third  and  greater  difficulty  of  the  attorney's  expense  and 
reduce  it  to  a  minimum  by  the  double  process  of  eliminating  the  attorney's  function 
so  far  as  it  is  dispensable  and,  as  to  the  rest,  of  supplying  the  attorney  or  some  one 
to  perform  his  functions.1  Complaints  have  been  so  standardized2  and  simplified  that 
a  wife,  under  the  direction  or  with  the  assistance  of  the  clerk,  can  make  out  the  neces- 
sary papers  to  start  proceedings.  Under  the  general  practice  the  complaint  is  passed 
on  by  the  judge  before  the  warrant  issues.  In  this  way  the  clerk  and  judge  decide  for 
her  the  questions  of  jurisdiction,  venue,  and  the  items  of  the  complaint  which  on  the 
civil  side  would  require  an  attorney  to  draw  the  libel  for  divorce  or  the  petition  for 
separate  support.  While  this  plan  is  generally  satisfactory,  it  is  not  always  so.  Errors 
in  allegations,  in  material  dates,  or  in  jurisdiction  are  sometimes  made  because  the 
court  may  not  have  in  its  possession  the  facts  which  an  attorney  would  ascertain  be- 
fore drawing  any  petition.  In  some  jurisdictions  this  danger  is  obviated  by  having 
a  preliminary  investigation  by  the  probation  staff,  or  by  giving  the  wife  the  assist- 
ance of  a  deputy  district  attorney. 

After  proceedings  are  begun  and  the  defendant  is  served  with  notice  or  arrested, 
the  need  for  the  attorney's  function  manifests  itself  in  three  places, — in  investigating 
and  preparing  the  case  for  trial,  in  conducting  the  trial,  and  in  following  up  the  case 
after  judgment.  This  last  is  a  peculiarity  of  domestic  relations  cases,  but  it  is  perhaps 
the  most  important  of  all  because  the  decrees  or  orders  for  support  are  generally  for 
weekly  or  other  periodic  payments,  so  that  unless  an  order  is  kept  track  of,  and  sup- 
plemental proceedings  are  instituted  where  necessary,  the  judgment  or  order  is  of  very 
little  value. 

The  work  of  preparation  for  trial  is  now  universally  in  the  hands  of  the  probation 
staff,  which  is  an  indispensable  adjunct  of  every  domestic  relations  court.3  Thus  far 
this  plan  of  investigation  by  officers  of  the  court  has  proved  eminently  successful.  In 
addition  to  the  facts  of  the  dispute,  the  personal  history  of  both  parties  is  fully  inves- 
tigated, the  cooperation  of  employers,  churches,  and  charities  is  secured,  and  a  type- 
written report  as  accurate  and  as  complete  as  any  attorney  would  expect  from  his 
junior  or  his  investigator  is  prepared. 

At  the  trial,  several  plans  are  in  use.  In  some  courts  the  proceedings  are  quite 
informal,  so  that  the  complainant  has  little  difficulty  in  telling  her  own  story  and 
in  answering  the  judge's  questions.  In  others,  the  probation  officer  acts  as  a  sort  of 
informal  counsel.  In  yet  others,  the  complaining  witness  has  the  benefit  of  the  state's 
counsel,  either  an  assistant  district  attorney,  or  an  assistant  city  prosecutor.  There  is 
much  complaint  that  these  attorneys  try  the  cases  in  a  most  perfunctory  manner. 

1  In  New  York  the  Legal  Aid  Society  reports :  "The  Domestic  Relations  Court,  dealing  with  support,  has  gone  a  long 
way  toward  relieving  us  of  the  burden  heretofore  borne  in  non-support  cases."  41  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  17. 

2  See  Association  of  Justices  of  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts,  Committee  on  Law  and  Pro- 
cedure, Report  No.  7,  page  21. 

3  For  a  statement  of  this  sort  of  probation  work  see  Annual  Report  of  Division  No.  2  of  the  Kansas  City  (Mo.)  Muni- 
cipal Court  (1912-13),  page  14;  Association  of  Justices  of  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts, 
Committee  on  Law  and  Procedure,  Report  No.  7,  page  36.  Cf.  Wells:  The  Man  in  Court,  page 269. 


DOMESTIC  RELATIONS  COURTS  79 

This  objection  is  founded  on  fact,  but  it  is  a  matter  outside  the  scope  of  this  report, 
its  cure  being  political,  not  judicial  reform.  Any  system  that  can  be  devised  is  neces- 
sarily predicated  on  the  theory  that  the  officers  appointed  by  the  state  or  elected 
by  the  people  will  perform  their  work  to  the  best  of  their  ability.  Of  the  three  plans, 
it  is  hard  to  say  which  is  best.  The  first  two,  if  the  defendant  has  no  counsel,  secure  an 
informality,  an  absence  of  interruption  and  technical  objection,  which  greatly  facili- 
tates the  court  in  dealing  with  cases  of  this  sort.  On  the  other  hand,  where  the  defend- 
ant's liberty  is  at  stake,  he  has  a  constitutional  right  to  counsel  and  a  right  to  have  his 
guilt  clearly  established  in  the  manner  prescribed  by  law.  If  he  does  appear  with  coun- 
sel, and  if  he  raises  questions  of  law  or  fact  with  which  the  probation  officer  cannot 
cope,  the  wife  ought  not  to  be  left  at  a  disadvantage.  It  is  imperative  that  the  judge, 
and  highly  desirable  that  the  probation  officer,  should  remain  impartial,  so  that  it  is 
unwise  to  thrust  on  them  the  burden  of  conducting  the  wife's  case.  It  would  not  be  im- 
possible to  work  out  a  combined  procedure  whereby  the  matter  would  be  heard  infor- 
mally if  the  parties  did  not  appear  with  counsel,  and,  if  the  defendant  did  appear  with 
an  attorney  and  the  case  was  one  where  the  wife's  interests  required  similar  protection, 
the  court  could  order  a  short  suspension  or  continuance  and  summon  in  an  attorney 
from  the  district  attorney's  office  or  the  legal  aid  society  to  conduct  the  prosecution. 

In  the  work  of  following  up  orders  the  procedure  in  the  domestic  relations  courts 
is  unexcelled.  Under  a  civil  order  for  support  the  husband  generally  pays  the  alimony 
or  allowance  directly  to  the  wife.  It  inevitably  results  that  there  are  frequent  dis- 
putes as  to  just  what  has  been  paid.  The  system  breeds  litigation.  And  further,  as 
we  have  seen,  if  the  husband  fails  to  pay,  the  wife  is  obliged  to  start  a  new  form  of 
proceeding  called  "  an  order  to  show  cause  why  the  respondent  should  not  be  adjudged 
in  contempt  of  court,"  which  proceeding  again  involves  delays,  costs,  and  attorney's 
fees.  These  civil  supplementary  proceedings  are  a  failure.  Respondents  who  are  ad- 
vised as  to  how  they  can  delay,  and  procrastinate,  and  finally  escape  altogether,  worry 
not  at  all  about  their  technical  contempt,  but  feel  a  genuine  contempt  for  the  court 
and  its  weak  proceedings. 

On  the  criminal  side,  the  order  requires  the  husband  to  pay  the  weekly  sum  directly 
to  the  probation  officer  or  to  some  like  officer,  as  the  Public  Trustee  in  Los  Angeles. 
Thereafter  there  can  be  no  dispute  about  payments.  If  the  man  fails  to  pay,  a  pro- 
bation officer  checks  up  the  case  to  see  if  the  failure  was  occasioned  by  unemployment 
or  illness.  If  it  was  wilful,  the  supplementary  proceedings  are  summary.  In  law,  the 
court  order  has  put  the  husband  on  probation,  therefore  if  he  violates  the  terms  of 
the  probation,  he  must  be  surrendered  to  the  court.  This  means  that  an  officer  is  sent 
out  to  arrest  the  defaulting  probationer  and  bring  him  before  the  court.  The  hearing 
is  most  summary.  When  these  matters  are  originally  heard  the  courts  quite  frequently 
make  a  finding  of  guilty,  impose  sentence,  then  suspend  sentence,  and  put  the  man 
on  probation.  At  the  supplemental  hearing,  therefore,  the  court  mei'ely  puts  into 
effect  the  original  sentence.  The  only  facts  in  issue  are  whether  the  husband  has 


80  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

failed  to  pay,  and  whether  the  refusal  was  wilful.  All  these  facts  are  within  the  pro- 
bation officer's  possession.  As  to  all  proceedings  after  judgment  in  the  domestic  rela- 
tions court  the  private  attorney  is  obviously  unnecessary,  being  entirely  supplanted 
bv  the  probation  officer.  The  rights  of  the  wife  are  perfectly  protected.1 

The  following  statistics,  showing  how  much  has  been  collected  for  wives  and  children 
through  the  machinery  of  the  domestic  relations  courts  which  operate  without  any 
expense  to  the  parties,  afford  striking  evidence  of  the  great  progress  made  in  recent 
years  in  this  particular  field  of  law  toward  a  free  and  more  equal  administration  of 
justice. 


omestic  Relations  Court 

Period 

Actual  Payments 

or  Probation  Staff2  in 

for  Support 

Chicago3 

1911 

$19,618.05 

Chicago 

1912 

61,419.78 

Chicago 

1913 

99,433.44 

Chicago 

1914 

94,869.08 

Chicago 

1915 

117.179.78 

Philadelphia4 

1913 

320,989.08 

Philadelphia 

1914 

345,490.94 

Philadephia 

1915 

409,329.59 

Philadelphia 

1916 

520,066.80 

Cincinnati 5 

1914 

10,157.34 

Cincinnati 

1915 

17,343.19 

Detroit8 

Sept. 

,  1913,  to 

April 

1914 

46,875.00 

Boston 7 

1913 

23,003.00 

Boston 

1914 

36,500.00 

Boston 

1915 

34,621.00 

Massachusetts8 

1916 

303,009.01 

4 

As  the  domestic  relations  courts  have  applied  themselves  to  the  fast  growing  problem 
„  .,.  .  of  desertion  and  non-support  they  have  more  and  more  employed  the 
.  .       method  of  conciliation.  The  interest  of  the  state  in  these  cases  is  that 

homes  should  not  be  broken  up  except  for  grave  causes  and  that  fami- 
lies should  be  reunited  whenever  possible  A  litigious  proceeding  is  de- 
structive, it  is  calculated  to  embitter  the  contestants,  and  after  a  trial  in  open  court 

1  For  a  concrete  illustration  of  how  thorough  the  probation  work  is,  see  the  forms  used  in  Philadelphia,  printed  in 
Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  pages  236-243.  Forms  5-9  relate  to  follow-up  work.  See  also  Address 
of  President  Judge  Brown  before  the  Men's  Club  of  Market  Square  Presbyterian  Church  (1914),  page  17. 
-  For  a  statement  of  the  orders  made  in  the  New  York  Juvenile  Court,  see  its  Report  for  1916,  page  56. 

3  Eighth  and  Ninth  Reports  of  the  Chicago  Municipal  Court,  page  60. 

4  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  page  164  ;  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  67. 

0  First  Annual  Report,  Hamilton  County  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  Division  of  Domestic  Relations  (1915),  page  18. 

6  25  American  Legal  News,  No.  9,  p.  6. 

7  Association  of  Justices  of  District,  Police,  and  Municipal  Courts  of  Massachusetts,  Committee  on  Law  and  Pro- 
cedure, Report  No.  7,  page  27. 

8  Eighth  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Probation  (1916;,  Public  Document  No.  85,  page  9. 


DOMESTIC  RELATIONS  COURTS  81 

husband  and  wife  feel  a  real  grievance  toward  each  other  where  before  there  may  have 
been  only  a  temporary  discontent.  A  conciliation  proceeding  gives  the  court  its  only 
chance  to  repair,  reunite,  and  construct. 

A  conciliation  proceeding,  as  has  earlier  been  pointed  out,  is  simply  a  method  and 
one  that  can  be  used  in  any  case  in  any  court.  It  can  be  employed  in  divorce  as  well 
as  in  non-support,  in  the  criminal  court  as  well  as  in  the  civil.  To  the  extent  that  it 
is  used,  it  automatically  promotes  equality  before  the  law  because  in  its  nature  it  is 
a  summary  proceeding  requiring  no  costs,  and  depending  for  success  more  on  the 
absence  than  the  presence  of  counsel.  Conciliation  is  used  very  generally  by  the  do- 
mestic relations  courts  as  a  sort  of  preliminary  proceeding,  particularly  in  Chicago,1 
Philadelphia,2  and  Kansas  City.3  In  Cleveland  a  special  division  of  the  Court  of 
Common  Pleas,  where  divorce  matters  are  heard,  is  in  contemplation.4  Where  the 
domestic  relations  courts  have  been  given  civil  jurisdiction,  as  in  Cincinnati5  and 
Detroit,6  they  have  extended  the  use  of  conciliation  to  the  civil  proceedings  of  di- 
vorce and  separate  support. 


It  is  readily  apparent  that  the  domestic  relations  courts,  as  to  the  large  majority 
of  cases  within  their  jurisdiction,  secure  freedom  and  equality  of  justice  to  a  degree 
hitherto  never  attained.  There  is  a  margin  where,  owing  to  the  com- 
;  plexity  of  the  issues  or  the  difficulty  of  legal  points  involved,  the  ser- 

vices of  an  attorney  will  be  required,  but  such  cases  are  the  minority. 
This  type  of  court  is  now  clearly  established,  and  will  undoubtedly  in  a  short  time 
extend  itself  into  every  large  city.  It  almost  completely  solves  the  problem  of  denial 
of  justice  in  cases  of  desertion,  abandonment,  non-support,  and  also  of  illegitimacy, 
where  such  cases  are  within  its  jurisdiction. 

For  the  greater  part,  divorce,  separate  maintenance,  and  questions  of  custody  re- 
main unaffected.  But  we  have  seen  the  steady  drift  toward  incorporating  these  matters 
within  the  jurisdiction  of  the  domestic  relations  courts,  and  further  the  tendency 
of  such  courts,  wherever  they  have  acquired  civil  jurisdiction,  to  apply  to  the  civil 
matters  the  same  processes  as  those  originally  developed  through  the  summary  crimi- 
nal remedies.  This  movement  is  only  at  its  inception,  but  signs  of  its  development 
are  clear.  In  Detroit  the  court  carried  over  into  divorce  cases  all  the  machinery  for 
investigation  by  the  probation  staff.7  The  Philadelphia  court  urges  legislation  to 

1  Seventh  Report,  Chicago  Municipal  Court,  page  88. 

2  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  pages  viii,  9, 159  ;  Theodore  Roosevelt :  The  Brotherly  Court  of 
Philadelphia,  Metropolitan  Magazine  for  May,  1917,  page  66.  As  to  the  success  of  conciliation,  see  Philadelphia 
Municipal  Court  Report  for  1916,  page  65. 

s  Annual  Report,  Division  No.  2,  Municipal  Court  of  Kansas  City  (1912-13),  page  11. 

*  Proceedings  of  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  113  :  see  also  The  New  Republic  for  December  2, 
1916,  page  124. 

6 First  Annual  Report,  Hamilton  County  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  Division  of  Domestic  Relations,  page  6. 

6  25  American  Legal  News,  No.  9,  p.  7.  7  Ibid.,  pp.  10,  11. 


82  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

permit  it  "to  utilize  the  probation  arm  of  the  Court  in  divorce  proceedings."1  In 
Cincinnati,  every  divorce  case  is  thoroughly  investigated  and  reported  on  to  the 
Court  before  the  parties  put  in  their  evidence.2  The  report  blanks  require,  in  addi- 
tion to  the  facts  of  the  dispute,  a  complete  personal  history,  including  such  matters 
as  church  membership,  moral  character,  temperance,  mentality,  occupation,  a  state- 
ment as  to  the  character  of  the  home,  its  sanitation,  cleanliness,  and  order,  and  de- 
tailed figures  as  to  the  earnings  and  joint  holdings  of  the  parties.  The  Detroit  Court 
proposed  to  use  the  summary  criminal  processes  for  enforcing  the  payment  of  civil 
orders  in  divorce  and  separation  cases.3 

From  our  particular  point  of  approach  this  means  that  delays  are  being  reduced, 
and  that  part  of  the  attorney's  work  of  preparation  and  of  following  up  court  orders 
is  being  done  by  the  administrative  arm  of  the  court.  How  far  this  may  go  is  prob- 
lematical. A  complete  development  is  justified  in  order  to  give  the  state  an  oppor- 
tunity to  protect  its  paramount  interest.  Denial  of  justice  to  the  individual  decreases 
in  exact  proportion  as  the  administrative  work  done  in  the  state's  interest  increases. 

While  the  territorial  expansion  of  domestic  relations  courts  will  be  rapid,  the 
increase  in  jurisdiction  of  each  court  to  include  all  domestic  disputes  and  all  pro- 
ceedings relating  thereto  will  probably  be  slow.  There  is  a  gulf,  fixed  by  history  and 
tradition,  between  civil  and  criminal  matters  that  will  not  easily  be  bridged.  The 
individualistic  conception  in  law  revolts  at  the  idea  of  a  court  deciding  a  divorce 
case  on  what  it  knows  through  its  own  agents  instead  of  from  such  evidence  as  the 
parties  choose  to  offer,  and  this  idea  will  die  only  as  the  fact  that  the  state  is  the 
supreme  party  in  interest  in  all  litigation,  particularly  domestic  litigation,  gradu- 
ally becomes  recognized. 


1  Philadelphia  Municipal  Court  Report  for  1915,  page  6. 

*  In  1915  the  probation  staff  made  359  interviews  and  ordered  14  medical  examinations  in  divorce  cases.  First 

Annual  Report,  Hamilton  County  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  Division  of  Domestic  Relations,  page  18. 

3  See  quotation  at  the  head  of  this  chapter. 


Chapter  XII 
ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS 

So  far  for  three  generations  our  political  life  has  been  controlled  by  court 
decisions.  But  no  court  can  alter  on  review  the  formal  decision  of  our 
mightiest  commission.  While  we  cling  to  all  the  extraneous  and  adventitious 
elements  of  a  mediaeval  procedure,  civilization  pours  its  real  judicial  prob- 
lems into  new  channels  that  are  almost  without  a  semblance  of  contentious 
procedure,  Herbert  Harley  in  A  Modern  Experiment  in  Judicial  Adminis- 
tration.1 

IF  one  were  compelled  to  state  the  most  important  experiment  in  the  administra- 
tion of  justice  made  in  the  twentieth  century,  the  answer  would  unhesitatingly  be 
the  attempt  to  secure  justice  through  administrative  tribunals.  Such  tribunals  have 
sprung  up  with  amazing  rapidity,  they  have  taken  over  an  enormous  amount  of  litiga- 
tion formerly  handled  by  the  courts,  and  the  law  concerning  administrative  justice  is 
the  most  rapidly  growing  branch  of  law  in  our  entire  jurisprudence.2  Profound  as  has 
been  the  effect  of  this  great  movement,  which  has  extended  throughout  the  United 
States,3  on  our  traditional  method  of  judicial  administration,  its  effect  on  our  partic- 
ular problem  has  been  no  less  significant  and  important.  For  one  of  the  chief  causes 
which  swept  these  tribunals  into  being  on  a  wave  of  popular  feeling  was  the  general 
dissatisfaction  with  the  inequalities  of  the  old  law,4  not  only  in  its  substance  but  in 
its  enforcement. 

There  are  two  great  classes  of  administrative  tribunals, — those  which  administer 
the  workmen's  compensation  acts,  generally  named  Industrial  Accident  Commissions, 
and  those  supervising  and  regulating  the  public  service  corporations,  such  as  railway, 
gas,  and  electric  lighting  companies,  of  which  the  United  States  Interstate  Commerce 
Commission  is  the  most  powerful  and  the  chief  exponent.  Though  having  much  in 
common,  the  two  groups  are  sufficiently  distinct  to  warrant  separate  consideration. 
The  Industrial  Accident  Commissions  will  be  dealt  with  first. 


§  1 
In  discussing  the  relation  between  denial  of  justice  and  the  substantive  law  we  have 
earlier  seen  that  the  one  great  charge  which  could  properly  be  made  against  the 


1  An  Address  before  the  Louisiana  State  Bar  Association  in  1916,  reprinted  separately.  See  page  36. 

2  Report  of  Dean  Pound  to  the  President  of  Harvard  University  for  1916-16,  at  page  1. 

3  For  example,  the  workmen's  compensation  acts  began  to  be  adopted  in  1911.  At  the  close  of  1917  such  acts  were  in 
force  in  thirty-seven  states  and  three  territories. 

*  This  dissatisfaction  has  by  no  means  subsided.  The  current  of  affairs  still  runs  into  the" new  channel.  The  war  le- 
gislation which  prescribes  the  allowances  and  allotments  for  soldiers  and  their  dependents,  awards  compensation  for 
injuries  in  line  of  duty,  grants  insurance  to  all  fighting  men,  and  protects  their  policies  of  insurance  from  lapse  or 
forfeiture  is  giving  rise  to  hundreds  of  thousands  of  claims  which  will  in  the  near  future  run  into  the  millions.  No 
part  of  this  work  has  been  entrusted  to  the  courts.  Entire  and  exclusive  authority  is  vested  in  what  has  already 
become  the  world's  greatest  administrative  tribunal— The  Bureau  of  War  Risk  Insurance. 


84  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

equality  of  the  substantive  law  was  its  treatment  of  injured  workmen.1  And  we  have 
seen  that  around  this  inequality  of  substance  grew  up  a  monstrous  in- 
,         equality  of  administration  and  procedural  enforcement  which  consti- 
tutes  one  of  the  blackest  pages  of  our  legal  history. 

That  delays  were  systematically  used  by  defendants  and  by  the  lia- 
bility  insurance  companies  in  particular  to  defeat  or  impair  rights  is 
common  knowledge.  Costs  were  entirely  beyond  the  reach  of  the  average  plaintiff, 
for  in  addition  to  the  usual  fees  paid  to  the  court,  there  were  always  a  number  of 
witnesses  to  be  summoned,  and  the  medical  expert,  charging  his  expert  fee,  was  an 
essential  element  in  the  proof  of  every  case.  As  the  workmen's  compensation  acts 
remedied  the  substantive  defect,  by  substituting  the  principle  of  insurance  for  that 
of  liability  for  fault,  so  they  also  dealt  rigorously  with  the  procedural  defects  of  ad- 
ministratiorL  Delays  have  been  greatly  lessened;  so  far  as  the  Industrial  Accident 
Commissions  and  the  proceedings  before  them  are  concerned,  unconscionable  and 
unreasonable  delay  is  entirely  absent.2  A  member  of  the  California  Industrial  Acci- 
dent Commission  has  well  expressed  it:3 

"  In  industrial  accident  cases  more  than  in  any  other  form  of  legal  controversy 
a  delay  of  justice  often  amounts  to  a  denial  of  justice.  It  is  therefore  incumbent 
upon  the  Commissioners  charged  with  the  administration  of  the  act  jealously 
to  guard  procedure  against  falling  into  the  rut  of  procrastination.  It  is  the  pur- 
pose of  the  Commission  to  decide  cases  in  as  short  a  time  and  with  as  little  for- 
mality as  is  consistent  with  correct  decision.  We  do  not  regard  as  incompatible 
the  prompt  determination  and  just  disposition  of  pending  causes.  Under  the 
rules  of  practice  and  procedure  adopted  by  the  Commission  the  average  case  is 
brought  to  a  final  determination  in  a  fraction  of  the  time  usually  consumed  in 
the  trial  of  a  personal  injury  case  in  a  court  of  law." 

Costs  cease  to  act  as  a  prohibition.  No  fees  are  paid  to  the  commissions  for  their 
services.4  Such  processes  and  notices  as  are  required  are  sent  by  mail.5  Witnesses  must 
still  be  summoned,  but  fewer  are  generally  required  because  of  the  information  which 
the  commission  itself  secures,  and  the  great  expense  for  expert  medical  fees  is  very 
largely  made  unnecessary.  The  compensation  acts  provide  for  the  appointment  by  the 
commission  of  a  physician  who,  acting  in  an  impartial  capacity,  examines  the  injured 
man  and  reports  to  the  commission.  The  charge  for  his  services  is  borne  either  by  the 
insurance  company  or  by  the  state.  In  some  states  it  is  provided  that  the  report  itself 
shall  be  admissible  in  evidence,  so  that  there  is  not  even  the  expense  of  an  ordinary 

1  See  ante.  Chapter  III,  §  2,  page  14. 

2  For  typical  statutory  provisions  see  Connecticut  Public  Acts  of  1913,  c.  138,  as  amended  by  Public  Acts  of  1915, 
c.  288,  Part  B,  §§  24-27 ;  Minnesota  General  £a?«so/1913,  c.  467,  §  22  (2),  as  amended  by  General  Laws  of  1915,  c.  209, 

5  10.  Cf.  Report  of  New  York  Industrial  Commission  for  1915,  page  124 ;  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  115. 

3  Hon.  Meyer  Lissner:  Procedure  before  the  California  Industrial  Accident  Commission,  1  Southwestern  L. 
Uev.  83. 

4  Fees  are  abolished  by  most  compensation  acts. 

6  1  Southwestern  L.  Rev.  81 ;  Massachusetts  Acts  of  1911,  c.  751,  Part  II,  §  17;  Rule  No.  4  of  the  Massachusetts  Indus- 
trial Accident  Board. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS  85 

summons  and  attendance  fee.1  Costs  on  appeal  still  play  their  unfortunate  part  except 
under  plans  like  that  in  Ohio,  where  in  certain  cases  the  commission  itself  under- 
takes the  appeal.2 

§2 

The  defect  in  the  traditional  method  of  administering  justice,  of  making  as  an  abso- 
lute condition  precedent  to  all  litigation  the  retaining  of  attorneys  at  prices  which 
.  parties  could  not  afford  to  pay,  reached  its  most  acute  form  in  this  field. 

j\  ttoTTtCMS 

7      ,  Several  factors  combined  to  create  a  thoroughly  bad  situation.  It  was 

about  1880  that  the  great  industrial  expansion  began,  when  all  the  ac- 
.         .  cent  of  business  was  on  production,  on  "speeding-up"  output,  and  not 

on  safety.  Employment  in  many  industries  became  more  hazardous  than 
military  service  even  in  time  of  war.  Thousands  of  injured  workmen,  to  secure  the 
redress  vouchsafed  by  law,  faced  long  and  difficult  litigation  calling  for  the  expendi- 
ture of  much  money  for  expenses  and  lawyer's  fees.  This  same  commercial  expansion 
left  its  mark  on  the  practice  of  law.  Many  of  the  largest  and  best  offices  gave  up  gen- 
eral practice  and  engaged  exclusively  in  business  and  corporation  law.  The  charity 
work  which  had  always  been  a  part  of  the  older  type  of  office  was  discarded  under  the 
pressure  of  the  new  era.3 

There  was  no  place  to  which  an  injured  workman  could  turn  for  assistance.  To 
meet  the  general  demand  caused  by  these  changed  conditions,  the  legal  aid  society 
came  into  existence,  but  it  was  only  a  straw  in  a  hurricane.  It  had  little  support,  was 
hopelessly  inadequate  to  meet  the  need,  and  lacked  the  vision  even  to  do  its  utmost,  for 
it  actually  declined  to  accept  any  personal  injury  cases.  In  fairness  it  must  be  added 
that  at  this  time  legal  aid  work  had  only  lukewarm  support  and  a  good  deal  of  hostility 
from  the  Bar,  so  that  it  feared  to  take  accident  cases  lest  it  be  accused  of  competing 
with  lawyers  and  have  its  slender  support  withdrawn. 

As  justice  was  organized  and  as  law  practice  was  conducted,  there  was  no  one  to 
help  an  injured  workman.  There  was  a  void  in  the  system.  To  fill  the  gap  came  the 
contingent  fee.  The  system  of  charging  fees  depending  on  the  success  of  the  litiga- 
tion was  the  necessary  result  of  the  conditions  which  were  allowed  to  exist.  Without 
doubt  it  was  better  than  nothing.  The  man  whose  leg  or  arm  had  been  cut  off  would 
prefer  to  accept  half  of  the  amount  awarded  him  by  a  jury  than  to  receive  nothing 
through  inability  to  get  his  day  in  court.  Many  honorable  lawyers  took  cases  on  the 
contingent  basis,  conducted  their  cases  honestly,  and  charged  as  small  a  percentage 
of  the  recovery  as  they  could. 


1  Massachusetts  Acts  of  1911,  c.  761,  Part  III,  §  8,  as  amended  by  Acts  of  1914,  c.  708,  §  10  and  Acts  of  1916,  c.  72. 

2  See  post,  page  89. 

3  Rowe:  Joseph  H.  Choate  and  Right  Training  for  the  Bar,  24  Case  and  Comment  (September,  1917),  264,  see  particu- 
larly pagres  266,  272 ;  12  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  4,  p.  1. 


86  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

Nevertheless,  the  system  as  a  whole  has  been,  and  is,  the  greatest  blot  on  the  history 
of  the  American  Bar.  There  is  little  doubt  that  if  a  modern  contingent  fee  agreement 
had  been  offered  to  any  judge  a  hundred  years  ago,  it  would  unhesitatingly  have  been 
declared  illegal  and  void.  The  bar  did  not  sanction  it  without  a  struggle,1  and  the 
courts  resorted  to  fictions  before  they  upheld  it.2  Stripped  of  verbiage,  and  in  actual 
practice,  the  system  is  one  whereby  the  lawyer  gambles  on  the  outcome  of  litigation. 
If  he  loses  his  investment  in  one  case,  he  must  recoup  out  of  his  winnings  in  the  next. 
It  is  obviously  inconsistent  with  any  theory  that  the  lawyer  is  a  minister  of  justice; 
he  is  an  interested  party  to  the  litigation  because  he  is  betting  on  its  outcome. 
However  much  it  might  be  glossed  over,  when  the  acid  test  was  applied  this  truth 
was  judicially  admitted.  Contingent  fees  have  been  justified  on  the  ground  that  only 
by  them  could  the  poor  obtain  justice,  but  when  a  poor  injured  workman  applied 
for  permission  to  sue  in  forma  pauperis  the  court  refused  the  petition,  saying,  "  the 
suit  is  carried  on  partially  for  the  benefit  of  the  counsel."3 

The  contingent  fee  system  brought  about  a  thousand  abuses  of  its  own.  It  attracted 
undesirable  persons  to  become  members  of  the  profession.  Because  the  stakes  were 
high  and  the  players  essentially  gamblers  it  induced  the  unholy  triumvirate  of  lawyer- 
runner-doctor  conspiring  together  to  win  fraudulent  cases.  It  has  degraded  expert  tes- 
timony and  served  as  a  cloak  for  robbery  through  extortionate  fees.  Unquestionably 
it  has  done  more  than  anything  else  to  bring  the  bar  into  deserved  disrepute.4  The 
late  Joseph  H.  Choate,  always  an  optimist  concerning  the  bar,  had  this  to  say  of  con- 
tingent fees:5 

"But  the  chief  cause  of  detraction  from  our  absolute  independence  and  dis- 
interestedness as  advocates  is  that  fatal  and  pernicious  change,  made  several 
generations  ago  by  statute,  by  which  lawyers  and  clients  are  permitted  to  make 
any  agreements  they  please  as  to  compensation  —  so  that  contingent  fees,  con- 
tracts for  shares,  even  contracts  for  half  the  result  of  a  litigation,  are  permissible, 
and  I  fear  not  unknown.  How  can  we  wonder,  then,  if  the  community  implicates 
the  lawyer  who  conducts  a  cause  with  the  morale  of  the  cause  and  of  the  client? 
If  he  has  bargained  for  a  share  of  the  result,  what  answer  can  we  make  to  such 
a  criticism  ?  And  how  can  we  blame  the  community  when  it  suspects  that  such 
practices  are  frequent  or  common,  and  even  sanctioned  by  eminent  members  of 
the  profession,  if  they  confound  us  all  in  one  indistinguishable  crowd  and  refuse 
to  accord  to  any  of  us  that  strictly  professional  relation  to  the  cause  which  the 
English  barrister  enjoys?  And  how  can  courts  put  full  faith  in  the  sincerity  of 

1  The  question  of  contingent  fees  came  up  when  the  Canons  of  Ethics  were  discussed.  See  33  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  76 
et  seq. 

s  Thus  it  has  been  held  that  while  an  agreement  to  pay  half  of  the  amount  recovered  is  void,  an  agreement  to  pay 
a  sum  equal  to  half  the  amount  recovered  is  valid.  Wilhite  v.  Roberts,  4  Dana  (Ky.),  172. 

3  Boyle  v.  Great  Northern  Ry.  Co.,  63  Fed.  639. 

4  Storey  :  Reform  of  Legal  Procedure,  page  53 ;  Doerfler:  Duty  of  the  Lawyer  as  an  Officer  of  the  Court,  24  Green 
Bag,  74,  76;  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science,  112,  167;  Thompson:  Expert  Testimony,  23  Massachusetts  Medical 
Society  Communications,  Article  XXI ;  Burr:  Extortionate  Fees,  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  p.  52. 

0  From  an  address  on  "The  English  Bar  "  before  the  New  York  State  Bar  Association  in  1907.  See  Choate  :  American 
Addresses  (1911),  page  308. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS  87 

our  labors  as  aids  to  them  in  the  administration  of  justice,  if  they  have  reason 
to  suspect  us  of  having  bargained  for  a  share  of  the  result?11 

The  denial  of  justice,  caused  by  this  difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel  and  by  the 
abuses  growing  out  of  it,  was  so  clear  in  this  class  of  cases  that  when  the  compensation 
acts  were  adopted,  it  was  hoped  that  the  lawyer  might  be  eliminated  altogether.1  This 
failed,  as  it  was  bound  to  fail,  because  the  attorney's  function,  in  all  but  limited 
types  of  cases,  is  indispensable  to  our  method  of  administering  justice.  But  the  com- 
pensation acts  and  the  industrial  accident  commissions  have  worked  great  changes. 
A  double  process  of  limiting  the  need  for  counsel  on  the  one  hand  and  of  supplying 
counsel  on  the  other  may  clearly  be  seen.2 

Restriction  of  the  attorney's  function  has  been  accomplished  in  several  ways.  In 
lieu  of  writs,  summonses,  and  declarations,  there  are  notices  of  injury  and  claims 
for  compensation  whose  forms  have  been  simplified  and  standardized.  There  are  no 
details  of  service  of  process,  for  the  mails  are  used.  Questions  of  jurisdiction  and 
venue  have  no  importance,  for  one  commission  acts  for  the  entire  state.  There  are  no 
pleadings  and  no  interlocutory  proceedings  worth  mention.  Trial  lists  and  calendars 
are  not  used;  every  case  is  assigned  for  hearing  at  a  specific  hour  on  a  specific  date, 
and  notice  is  sent  by  the  commission  to  all  parties.  Thus  all  preliminaries  up  to  the 
point  of  trial,  which  in  common  law  tort  litigation  required  the  services  of  counsel, 
are  performed  either  by  the  party  himself  or  by  a  clerk  of  the  commission. 

The  law  itself  is  infinitely  more  simple.  The  whole  question  of  damages,  on  which 
many  a  lawyer  has  exercised  his  utmost  ingenuity,  is  reduced  to  mathematical  pre- 
cision, and  in  a  given  case  the  precise  award  is  determined  by  consulting  a  table 
which  a  grammar  school  child  could  understand.  The  issue  of  liability  is  shifted 
from  the  doubtful  and  contentious  ground  of  negligence  complicated  by  contributory 
negligence,  assumption  of  risk,  and  the  fellow-servant  rule,  to  injuries  "arising  out 
of  and  in  the  course  of  the  employment." 

Although  when  a  definition  is  widened  it  still  has  limits,  so  that  marginal  cases 
arise  in  plenty  to  cause  disputes,  under  the  compensation  plan  thousands  of  cases  are 
so  clearly  within  the  law  and  the  damages  are  so  easily  computed  that  settlements 
are  made  automatically  and  as  a  matter  of  routine.  These  settlements  are  in  the  form 
of  agreements  to  pay  a  stated  sum  each  week  until  disability  ceases.  They  are  all 
checked  by  investigators  of  the  industrial  accident  commission  and  are  not  binding 
without  its  approval.  Whereas  under  the  former  system  an  injured  workman  in  set- 
tling a  claim  was  obliged  either  to  employ  counsel  to  advise  him  as  to  his  rights  and 
damages,  or  else  trust  himself  to  the  mercies  of  a  usually  pitiless  and  shrewd  casualty 
company  adjuster,  and  was  bound  by  any  release  he  signed,  now  thousands  of  claims 
are  concluded  promptly  and  accurately,  with  fairness  guaranteed  by  the  commission's 

1  Storey:  Reform  of  Legal  Procedure,  page  79 ;  Parry:  The  Law  and  the  Poor,  page  298.  Cf.  Field  v.  Longden,  1902; 

1  K.  B.  Div.  47,  66. 

2  Cf.  Report  of  New  York  Industrial  Commission  for  1916,  pages  115,  118. 


Cases  Automatically 

Cases  wherein  a 

Settled  and  Approved 

Hearing  was  Claimed 

7,000 

584 

13,856 

799 

15,496 

1,201 

15,864 

1,600 

15,135 

1,007 

88  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

supervision,  the  entire  process  costing  the  employee  not  a  cent.1  Statistics  in  Massa- 
chusetts reveal  how  large  a  proportion  of  matters  are  thus  settled.2 

Period 

July  1,  1912-November  30,  1913 
December  1,  1913-November  30,  1914 
December  1,  1914-November  30,  1915 
December  1,  1915-November  30,  1916 
December  1,  1916-June  13,  1917 

Totals  67,351  5,191 

This  signifies  that  the  compensation  act  plus  proper  administration  has  been 
able  in  the  large  majority  of  cases  to  secure  absolute  freedom  and  equality  of  justice 
to  injured  workmen.  When  it  is  remembered  that  seventy-five  per  cent  of  injured 
employees  earn  less  than  fifteen  dollars  a  week3  and  would  under  the  common  law 
system  have  been  obliged  either  to  settle  at  the  insurance  company's  terms,  or  employ 
counsel  under  an  unfavorable  contingent  fee  contract,  or  suffer  a  total  denial  of 
justice,  it  can  be  appreciated  that  the  present  order  of  things  is  little  short  of  a 
revolution  in  the  administration  of  the  law. 

Even  if  the  case  is  not  settled,  the  commissioners  employ,  as  we  have  seen,4  the 
method  of  conciliation  where  opportunity  offers,  so  that  a  further  number  of  cases  are 
brought  to  a  fair  conclusion  speedily,  and  without  requiring  the  services  of  counsel.5 

As  to  cases  which  go  to  trial,  the  traditional  functions  of  an  attorney  are  first  to 
investigate  and  prepare  the  facts,  second  to  prepare  the  law,  and  third  to  conduct  the 
trial  according  to  the  rules  of  procedure  and  evidence.  At  hearings  before  industrial 
accident  commissions  the  last  function  is  rendered  negligible.  Rules  of  evidence  have 
been  cast  to  the  four  winds,6  the  commissions  themselves  are  sovereign  as  to  the  pro- 
cedure before  them,  and  they  are  able  to  guarantee  that  no  case  is  lost  by  technical 
error  in  presentation.  In  the  mechanics  of  putting  parties  on  the  stand  and  ques- 
tioning them,  a  timid  a"  J  ignorant  workman  would  be  at  a  disadvantage,  but  the 
commissioner  generally  undertakes  that  responsibility  for  him.  On  the  preparation 
of  the  facts,  the  commission  has  its  investigating  staff.  These  investigators  talk  with 
the  witnesses,  examine  the  locus,  photograph  the  machinery,  and  file  an  impartial  re- 
port which  generally  covers  all  the  basic  facts.  This  is  supplemented  by  the  employ- 

1  Report  of  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accident  Board  for  1913-14,  Public  Document  No.  105  of 1915,  page  20.  See  also 
Report  for  1912-13,  No.  105  of  1914,  page  24.  Cf.  Bulletin  of  the  Industrial  Commission  of  Ohio  for  December,  1917, 
vol.  iv.  No.  13,  p.  11,  note  ;  Report  of  New  York  Industrial  Commission  for  1915,  pages  24, 120 ;  Indiana  Industrial 
Board  R.  (1916-17),  page  3.  All  but  2.1  per  cent  of  the  cases  were  adjusted  by  agreement. 

*  These  figures  were  furnished  by  Mr.  Broderick,  Chief  Statistician  of  the  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accident  Board. 
They  are  published  in  part  in  the  1913-14  Report  cited  above. 

3  The  percentage  of  injured  employees  in  Massachusetts  earning  less  than  $15  per  week  is  known  to  be  78  per  cent 
in  1913,  73.8  per  cent  in  1914,  72.9  per  cent  in  1915,  and  72.8  per  cent  in  1916. 

*  See  ante.  Chapter  IX,  §  4,  page  64. 

8  Report  of  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accident  Board  for  1913-14,  page  18  ;  the  Report  for  1912-13  (page  25)  shows 
that  3000  claims  were  so  adjusted,  and  that  in  182  cases,  even  after  hearing  had  been  claimed,  conciliation  brought 
about  a  settlement.  Report  of  New  York  Industrial  Commission  for  1915,  page  124;  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  114. 
8  8  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  1,  p.  57.  The  Ohio  Law  is  typical.  1  Supplement  to  Page  &  Adams  Ohio  General  Code, 
§§  1466-91  (page  543). 


ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS  89 

ers  detailed  report  of  the  accident,  filed  with  the  commission  as  required  by  law.  The 
medical  evidence  is  contained  in  the  impartial  physician's  report.  In  New  Jersey  a 
compensation  aid  bureau  has  been  established1  to  investigate  and  certify  the  facts. 
Thus  the  case  is  prepared  without  requiring  the  employee  to  engage  counsel.  In  most 
cases  this  preparation  is  entirely  adequate  as  to  the  facts. 

Legal  issues  are  not  so  satisfactorily  cared  for.  The  investigators  are  not  lawyers, 
so  that  they  may  fail  to  appreciate  legal  difficulties  and  are  incompetent  to  brief  the 
law.  Until  recently  this  gap  has  not  been  serious,  for  the  hearing  is  essentially  one 
on  facts,  the  substantive  rules  were  simple,  and  there  were  few  precedents.  A  real 
difficulty,  however,  did  exist  on  appeals.  An  appeal  is  almost  always  on  a  question 
of  law,  and  most  commissions  had  no  way  of  securing  representation  for  employees 
in  the  appellate  courts  except  by  cooperation  with  the  legal  aid  societies.  In  Ohio, 
in  certain  cases,  the  Commission  itself  takes  the  appeal  for  the  employee2  and  the 
county  prosecutor  acts  as  counsel,  and  in  New  Jersey  it  is  provided  that  counsel  may 
be  assigned,3  but  in  most  states  when  a  case  passes  from  the  commission  to  the  court, 
it  becomes  subject  to  the  traditional  method  of  administering  justice,  which  pays  but 
little  heed  to  the  inequality  between  the  parties.  Commissioners  recognize  this  and 
have  grappled  with  it  by  incorporating  in  their  findings  points  of  law  with  authori- 
ties in  support.4  As  this  becomes  part  of  the  record  it  serves  as  a  brief,  but  at  best 
it  is  a  precarious  way  of  ensuring  the  equal  administration  of  law. 

The  statement  that  the  industrial  accident  commissions  wholly  remove  the  need 
for  the  attorney  is  not  warranted.  They  are  fallible,  and  they  have  made  errors  which 
have  been  corrected  through  the  investigation  of  counsel  for  the  injured  employee.5 
There  is  an  inherent  limitation  which  appears  in  cases  which  present  a  sharp  conflict 
of  testimony  or  raise  a  complicated  question  of  law,  and  which  call  for  a  delicate 
weighing  of  facts  and  arguments  and  decision  thereon.  Obviously  the  commission 
cannot  itself  secure  the  evidence,  brief  the  law,  present  the  facts,  and  argue  the  case 
with  whole-hearted  zeal  and  at  the  same  time  decide  the  case  with  judicial  impartial- 
ity. Where  the  functions  are  in  conflict  the  judicial  must  be  maintained,  and  as  the 
employee  is  unable  to  present  his  own  case,  if  fairness  is  to  be  preserved  resort  must 
necessarily  be  had  to  the  attorney. 

Rights  of  injured  employees  cannot  be  perfectly  secured  unless  the  commission  is 
able,  in  necessary  cases,  to  ensure  for  them  adequate  representation.  The  same  need 
occurs  in  certain  cases  presented  to  small  claims  courts  and  domestic  relations  courts. 
Inasmuch  as  it  is  neither  economical  nor  necessary  for  each  court  and  each  depart  - 

1  New  Jersey  Session  Laws  of  1916,  chap.  64. 

2  1  Supplement  to  Page  &  Adams  Ohio  General  Code,  §§  1465-74  (page  520).  Cf.  Report  of  New  York  Industrial  Com- 
mission for  1915,  page  140 ;  Ibid,  for  1916,  page  40. 

3  New  Jersey  Session  Laws  o/1916,  chap.  54. 

4  For  an  excellent  example  see  Travelers'  Insurance  Co.  v.  Bowden.  No.  26571  Equity,  in  the  files  of  the  Massachusetts 
Supreme  Judicial  Court  for  Suffolk  County. 

6  See  7  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  6:  similar  cases  in  the  files  of  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society  are  In  re  Charles  Cellin,  No.  3; 
In  re  Benjamin  Langer,  No.  1017  and  No.  4199. 


90  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

ment  to  have  its  own  staff  of  counsel,  the  ideal  arrangement  would  be  some  central 
legal  agency,  like  a  legal  aid  society,  existing  as  a  department  of  the  administration 
of  justice,  to  which  all  courts  and  departments  could  refer  such  cases  as  needed  the 
special  care  of  counsel. 

In  discussing  court  costs  it  has  been  pointed  out  that  a  reduction,  when  coupled 
with  proper  court  organization,  did  not  mean  an  increased  burden  to  tax-payers.  So 
under  the  compensation  acts,  although  the  industrial  accident  commissions  perform 
most  of  the  services  for  which  employees  formerly  have  had  to  pay  counsel,  it  does 
not  appear  that  any  increased  cost  to  the  state  results.  By  a  careful  computation  of 
the  most  accurate  statistics  obtainable  it  appears  that  the  Commonwealth  of  Massa- 
chusetts, by  having  so  many  cases  taken  out  of  the  courts,  was  saved  in  1914  a  sum 
of  approximately  SISO^OO.1  During  the  same  year  the  entire  appropriation  for  the 
Industrial  Accident  Board  was  $87,400.2  In  considering  the  reorganization  of  the 
administration  of  justice  with  a  view  to  making  the  position  of  the  poor  more  equal 
before  the  law  there  need  be  no  bugaboo  about  prohibitive  cost  to  the  state  or  intol- 
erable burden  to  the  tax-payer. 


§  3 
There  cannot  be  much  expansion  of  this  sort  of  administrative  tribunal  as  regards 
injured  workmen.  Most  states  now  have  workmen's  compensation  acts.  The  recent 
decision  of  the  United  States  Supreme  Court3  depriving  longshoremen 
.    .        and  others  engaged  in  maritime  work  of  the  benefit  of  state  compen- 
*'     .  .      sation  acts  was  promptly  remedied  by  Congressional  legislation.4  Em- 

ployees in  interstate  commerce  and  sailors  on  American  vessels5  are  still 
unprotected,  and  the  compensation  plan  might  well  beextended  to  them. 
It  would  not  be  surprising  if  justice  by  administrative  tribunals  were  extended 
into  an  entirely  new  field  through  the  provision  of  a  compensation  plan  for  injured 
passengers  on  railways,  including  street  railways.  If  this  were  done,  a  second  great 
group  of  cases  would  be  taken  out  of  the  courts,  out  of  the  sphere  of  the  traditional 
administration  of  justice,  and  placed  under  administrative  commissions.  This  plan 
has  been  advocated  by  eminent  jurists.6  It  has  very  recently  received  a  thorough  analy- 
sis and  presentation  by  Arthur  A.  Ballantine,  of  the  Boston  Bar.7  The  idea  was  en- 


1  Report  of  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accide7it  Board  for  1914-15,  Public  Document  No.  105  of  1916,  page  70. 

2  Massachusetts  Acts  o/1914,  c.  434. 

3  Southern  Pacific  Co.  v.  Jensen  (May,  1917),  244  U.  S.  205;  37  Supreme  Court  Reporter,  524. 

4  Public  Acts  No.  82  of  the  65th  Congress.  Approved  October  6, 1917. 
6  Cf.  13  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  3,  p.  7. 

6Taft:  Administration  of  Justice,  72  Central  L.  Journal,  191, 197.  In  discussing  the  compensation  plan  Mr.  Taft 
included  passengers.  Storey:  Reform  of  Legal  Procedure,  page  82.  Mr.  Storey  develops  the  idea  in  some  detail. 
71  Mass.  Law  Quarterly  (1917),  265;  reprinted  from  the  Harvard  haw  Review  for  May,  1916;  see  also,  Ballantine: 
Modernizing  Railway  Accident  Law,  Tlie  Outlook  for  November  15, 1916. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS  91 

dorsed  by  the  Massachusetts  Bar  Association,1  and  pursuant  to  its  suggestion  a  re- 
solve was  introduced  into  the  legislature  in  1917  calling  for  the  appointment  of  a 
commission  to  investigate  the  feasibility  of  the  project.  The  resolve  was  defeated  on 
several  grounds,2  not  the  least  of  which  was  the  opposition  by  a  certain  type  of  lawyer 
which  called  it  an  "anti-lawyer""  bill.  The  objection  is  in  reality  one  of  the  strongest 
arguments  for  extending  the  plan  to  railway  accidents.  Elimination  of  the  contingent 
fee  lawyer  is  not  derogatory  to  justice;  and  the  administrative  method  under  which 
lawyers  are  often  unnecessary  is  a  great  step  toward  a  better  realization  of  freedom 
and  equality  of  justice. 

The  future  development  of  this  type  of  administrative  tribunal  perplexes  all  jurists. 
It  is  undoubtedly  true  that  some  of  its  present  advantages  are  due  to  the  fact  that 
it  occupies  an  extra-legal  position3  and  that  temporarily  it  escapes  from  the  limita- 
tions of  justice  according  to  law  and  judicial  justice.  It  is  closely  analogous  to  the 
rise  of  equity,4  with  the  exception  that  instead  of  entrusting  justice  to  priests  in  place 
of  judges,  our  recourse  has  been  to  laymen.  New  agencies  enjoy  a  sort  of  hiatus  when 
rules  and  precedents  are  few,  when  the  liberalizing  spirit  is  strong,  but  this  is  tran- 
sitory.5 It  is  certain  that  the  administrative  tribunals  must  ascertain  and  adminis- 
ter their  justice  according  to  law,  and  it  is  likely  that  they  will  ultimately  become 
part  of  the  regular  judicial  system.6 

In  any  merger,  and  in  developments  in  that  direction,  there  is  nothing  to  compel 
a  giving  up  of  the  use  by  administrative  tribunals  of  investigators,  impartial  physi- 
cians, simple  procedure,  simple  forms,  mail  service,  and  the  automatic  settlement  of 
claims.  These  are  permanent  improvements.  They  conflict  with  nothing  basic.  If  they 
interfere  with  parts  of  the  traditional  machinery,  such  parts  ought  to  be  scrapped. 
Administrative  tribunals  have  much  to  teach  judicial  tribunals  about  promptness, 
inexpensiveness,  and  limiting  the  attorney  to  clearly  defined  functions. 

Under  the  industrial  accident  commissions  the  lawyer's  services  are  neither  entirely 
limited  nor  supplied.  As  time  goes  on,  this  gap  will  steadily  increase.  The  burden  of 
work  will  force  the  commissioners  more  and  more  back  on  their  judicial  function  to 
the  exclusion  of  their  work  in  behalf  of  employees.  As  the  law  becomes  defined  in  a 
thousand  cases,  precedents  and  rules  grow  up  which  require  that  each  side  be  repre- 
sented if  the  trial  is  to  be  fair.  Under  the  older  compensation  acts  this  is  already  felt. 
Commissioners  are  reversing  their  attitude  and  are  preferring  to  have  employees  rep- 
resented by  counsel.  With  regard  to  the  difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel,  the  net 
result  of  the  administrative  plan  will  probably  be  to  provide  machinery  for  automati- 

1  2  Mass.  Law  Quarterly  (1917),  61. 

2  The  great  difficulty  in  this  plan  is  the  fixing  of  any  schedule  of  damages  which  will  fairly  compensate  injured 
persons  whose  vocations  and  incomes  vary  infinitely. 

3  Pound:  Organization  of  Courts,  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VI,  page  4. 

*  Ibid.,  page  5. 

B  Pound  :  Justice  According  to  Law,  page  11. 

*  Ibid.,  page  42 ;  Report  of  Dean  Pound  to  the  President  of  Harvard  University  for  1915-16,  page  2. 


92  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

cally  adjusting  many  cases,  and  for  conciliating  a  few  more,  but  as  to  cases  requiring 
hearing  or  trial,  the  attorney  will  be  increasingly  necessary. 


§4 
The  public  service  commissions  represent  a  group  distinct  from  the  industrial  acci- 
dent commissions.  In  function,  purpose,  and  in  the  reasons  leading  to  their  creation 
they  present  points  of  difference.  To  meet  the  difficult  questions  of 

e   ner   ae    regUjatjon  Qf  public  utilities,  individual  action  by  injunction  or  man- 
.    .  damus  was  an  unsatisfactory  way  to  protect  general  public  interests, 

so  that  some  administrative  machinery  became  imperative.  Further, 
the  issues  involved  in  supervision  of  rates  and  service  are  essentially  complicated 
questions  of  fact  calling  for  investigation  rather  than  points  of  law  requiring  decision. 
The  function  is  much  more  administrative  and  much  less  judicial  than  is  the  case 
with  the  accident  commissions.  The  public  service  commissions  came  into  existence 
not  as  a  revolt  against  justice  according  to  law,  but  to  fill  a  new  administrative  need. 

The  relation  of  such  commissions  to  our  problem  is  best  illustrated  by  the  United 
States  Interstate  Commerce  Commission.1  This  Commission  in  its  general  work  of 
securing  fair  rates  and  adequate  service  through  its  investigators,  experts,  and  attor- 
neys, is  incidentally  bringing  justice  to  millions  of  persons  who  could  never  afford 
the  expense  of  private  litigation  to  secure  redress  in  their  own  behalf.  The  Commis- 
sion, however,  does  more  than  secure  justice  in  general.  It  has  power  to  investigate 
and  redress  individual  cases  of  overcharge  and  similar  matters.  It  has  erected  a  machin- 
ery tending  to  secure  more  equal  justice  for  the  poor  litigant  against  his  powerful  ad- 
versary by  its  promptness,  by  no  requirement  of  costs,  and  by  the  double  process  of 
limiting  the  need  for  counsel  to  an  extent  and  likewise,  to  an  extent,  supplying  him. 

The  Commission  gives  much  legal  advice  to  shippers  by  correspondence.2  A  small 
shipper  may  thus  be  advised  of  his  rights  and,  if  he  is  unable  to  secure  a  settlement 
with  the  carrier,  he  may  complain  informally  to  the  Commission.  This  is  placed  on 
the  informal  docket,  and  the  Commission  endeavors  by  correspondence,  or  otherwise, 
to  secure  a  satisfactory  settlement.3  The  Commission  thus  does  exactly  what  the 
private  attorney,  in  analogous  cases,  does  in  negotiating  for  a  settlement. 

If  this  proceeding,  which  is  akin  to  conciliation,  fails,  the  shipper  is  instructed  to 
file  a  formal  complaint.  A  standardized  form  is  sent  him,  together  with  a  copy  of 
the  Rules  of  Practice  before  the  Commission,  which  contains  an  offer4  to  "  advise  any 

1  For  an  excellent  presentation  of  the  advantages  of  the  administrative  machinery  of  the  state  public  service  com- 
missions, see  an  article  by  Max  Thelen,  President  of  the  California  Railroad  Commission,  in  The  Utilities  Magazine, 
vol.  iii.  No.  1  (January,  1918),  p.  3. 

2  Thirtieth  Report  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  (for  1916),  page  2.  In  this  year  about  50,000  enquiries  were 
answered. 

3  Twenty-ninth  Report  (for  1916),  Part  I,  p.  1.  For  the  year  ending  October  31,  1916,  6600  such  complaints  were 
received. 

4  Rules  of  Practice  before  the  Commission  (1916),  Rule  XX. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  TRIBUNALS  93 

party  as  to  the  form  of  complaint,  answer,  or  other  paper  necessary  to  be  filed  in  any 
proceeding."  If  the  complaint  is  incorrectly  filled  out,  notations  are  made  and  it  is 
returned.  When  properly  filed,  the  Commission  itself  obtains  service  on  the  defend- 
ant.1 The  Commission  itself  investigates  the  facts  through  its  investigators,  a  hear- 
ing is  had  before  one  of  its  Examiners,  and  at  the  hearing  rules  of  evidence  are  not 
enforced  and  the  procedure  is  informal.2  As  the  burden  of  proof  is  on  the  earner,3 
in  the  simpler  sort  of  dispute  the  shipper  is  entirely  able  to  carry  on  his  case  without 
aid  of  counsel.  The  facts  are  then  certified  to  the  Commission,  which  enters  its  find- 
ing. If  the  shipper  wins,  and  the  railroad  declines  to  pay,  the  shipper  may  take  the 
case  to  the  federal  courts  without  payment  of  costs,4  and  if  he  is  successful,  he  is 
reimbursed  for  his  attorney's  fee.4 

Among  the  cases  of  the  poor,  matters  of  this  sort  are  a  very  small  item.  The  work 
of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  is  valuable,  however,  as  one  more  illustra- 
tion of  how  much  the  courts  could  do  toward  securing  a  more  equal  justice  by  sim- 
plifying procedure,  eliminating  costs,  and  particularly  if  they  were  equipped  with 
auxiliary  administrative  departments. 


§5 

In  the  five  agencies  and  methods  thus  far  discussed  we  have  seen  freedom  and  equality 
of  justice  furthered  by  simplification  of  procedure  which  conduces  to  despatch,  and 
by  elimination  of  court  costs  which,  in  actual  operation,  has  not  at  all 
J  served  to  foment  fraudulent  litigation.  With  regard  to  the  root  diffi- 
culty of  the  expense  of  counsel  we  have  seen  that  small  claims  courts,  conciliation, 
and  arbitration  solve  the  problem  by  making  the  attorney  unnecessary  in  such  pro- 
ceedings, and  that  domestic  relations  courts  and  administrative  tribunals  afford  a 
middle  solution  of  rendering  his  services  unnecessary  in  part  and  of  supplying  his 
services  in  part.  We  now  pass  to  a  third  group  of  agencies,  dealing  with  cases  from 
which  the  attorney  cannot  be  eliminated,  which  recognize  this  situation  and  frankly 
undertake  to  relieve  it  by  supplying  the  attorney,  or  persons  to  perform  his  functions, 
without  expense  to  the  litigant. 


1  Rules  of  Practice  before  the  Commission  (1916),  Rule  III. 

2  All  of  the  laws  on  this  subject  up  to  January  1,  1917,  have  been  collected  by  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission 
and  published  in  separate  form  as  77ie  Act  to  Regulate  Commerce.  See  §  17,  p.  36. 

3  Ibid.,  §  15,  p.  30. 

4  Ibid.,  §  16,  p.  33. 


Chapter  XIII 
ADMINISTRATIVE  OFFICIALS 

A  New  Jersey  act  creating  a  bureau  in  the  labor  department  to 
assist  injured  employees  ...  is  an  interesting  provision  for  state 
aid  to  that  class  of  litigants  least  likely  to  possess  the  initiative 
or  the  money  necessary  to  begin  and  prosecute  an  action  in  the 
courts.  Parkinson:  Important  Legislation  during  191G.1 

§1 

THE  distinction  between  administrative  tribunals  and  administrative  bureaus 
or  officials  is  not  always  clear.  Substantially,  the  difference  is  that  the  adminis- 
trative tribunal  as  part  of  its  work  exercises  an  important  judicial  function,  it  passes 
.        judgment  on  contested  and  disputed  states  of  fact,  applies  the  law  to  the 
J  facts  as  found,  and  enters  an  order  accordingly,  whereas  the  administra- 

tive official  exercises  an  executive  function,  he  enforces  the  law,  but  if  he  secures  evi- 
dence of  a  violation,  his  only  authority  is  to  repair  to  a  regularly  constituted  court 
and  ask  for  its  judgment.  Examples  of  the  latter  are  insurance,  tax,  and  labor  com- 
missioners. Both  administrative  tribunals  and  officials  vary  greatly  in  type  and  often 
approach  a  point  where  it  is  impossible  to  distinguish  them.  Sometimes  both  are 
united  in  one  body  as  a  state  Board  of  Labor  charged  with  enforcing  the  labor  laws 
and  administering  the  compensation  act.  In  their  bearing  on  our  problem  it  may  be 
said  that  the  administrative  tribunal  is  analogous  to  a  court  and  the  official  to  a 
lawyer. 

§  2 
The  poor  man  may  to-day  obtain  free  legal  advice  and  a  certain  amount  of  assistance 
in  divers  branches  of  law  by  applying  at  the  appropriate  state  departments.  The  in- 
surance commissioner  will  advise  him  whether  his  policy  of  life  or 
fire  insurance  is  in  accordance  with  law  and  as  to  his  rights  there- 

~         under.  The  tax  commissioner  will  explain  to  him  his  obligations,  if 

Administrative  j      ,,      .       ,         2  \   j       ±    u     1  •  •    •  -n  • 

any,  under  the  tax  laws/  A  deputy  banking  commissioner  will  m- 

^  struct  him  as  to  the  usury  laws,  the  rates  of  interest  permitted  on 

small  loans,  and  the  restrictions  on  assignments  of  wages  given  as  security.  In  each 
important  port  there  is  a  United  States  Shipping  Commissioner  who  advises  seamen.3 
He  has  authority,  upon  agreement  of  parties,  to  arbitrate  disputes.  In  fact  he  has  a 
wider  jurisdiction  because  almost  invariably  his  informal  recommendation  as  to  pay- 
ment of  wages,  deductions,  discharge,  and  the  like  will  be  accepted  by  the  captain 

1  Professor  Thomas  I.  Parkinson  of  the  Legislative  Drafting  Bureau  of  Columbia  University  in  his  Review  of  Impor- 
tant Legislation  in  the  United  States  during  1916,  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  2,  pp.  168,  172. 

2  See  Requirements  of  the  Massachusetts  Income  Tax  Law  (1916),  Bulletin  No.  1  of  the  Income  Tax  Commissioner, 
§  15,  p.  26. 

s  See  United  States  v.  The  Grace  Lothrop,  95  U.  S.  527. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  OFFICIALS  95 

of  any  American  vessel.  Immigration  commissions  are  coming  into  existence  which 
give  much  legal  assistance  to  newly  arrived  immigrants.  The  best  illustration  is 
afforded  by  the  California  Commission  on  Immigration  and  Housing,  which  main- 
tains a  bureau  of  complaints,  and  does  its  best  to  adjust  legal  disputes  in  which  im- 
migrants are  involved.1 

The  service  afforded  by  these  bureaus  and  officials  includes  advice  and  an  attempt 
to  adjust  controversies,  but  stops  there.  They  do  not  render  assistance  in  litigation. 
Thus,  if  the  insurance  commissioner  or  the  immigration  commissioner  finds  that  a 
complainant  has  been  wronged,  and  is  unable  to  secure  redress  by  negotiation,  there 
is  nothing  to  be  done  except  to  refer  him  to  some  other  official,  or  to  a  legal  aid  soci- 
ety, or  to  a  private  attorney.2 


§  3 
There  is  a  growing  number  of  administrative  officials  empowered  to  render  direct 
legal  services  in  litigation.  The  New  Jersey  workmen's  compensation  bureau,3  after 
its  investigation,  certifies  the  facts  to  the  county  court.  This  in  fact  oper- 
.  *    .  ates  as  a  petition  and  starts  the  litigation.  It  goes  no  further,  but  the 

.  statute  permits  the  court  to  assign  counsel  to  carry  the  case  on.  The  Min- 

°  nesota  Department  of  Labor  gathers  facts  in  compensation  claims  and 

is  authorized  by  law4  to  send  its  investigators  into  the  district  courts,  where  all  deci- 
sions are  made,  to  aid  and  counsel  any  party. 

In  Virginia  a  recent  statute5  gives  the  commissioner  of  agriculture  supervisory 
authority  over  licensed  commission  merchants.  A  farmer  who  is  not  paid  for  his  pro- 
duce may  complain  to  the  commissioner  and  obtain  a  hearing.  If  the  facts  warrant, 
the  commissioner  is  empowered  to  revoke  the  merchant's  license  and  to  bring  suit  to 
recover  for  the  complainant  the  money  due  him.6  Similarly,  the  supervisor  of  small 
loans  in  Massachusetts  has  authority  to  entertain  complaints  for  violations  of  the  law 
regulating  interest  charges  and  the  small  loans  business  in  general,  to  conduct  hear- 
ings, and  to  bring  actions  in  the  courts  for  violations  of  law.7  In  most  cities  there 
are  legally  constituted  boards  of  health  to  which  a  person  can  complain  as  to  the 
unsanitary  condition  of  his  neighbor's  backyard,  and  the  board  will  itself  institute 
proceedings,  thereby  saving  the  party  the  expense  of  bringing  a  private  suit  to  abate 
a  nuisance. 

1  Second  Annual  Report  of  the  California  Commission  on  Immigration  and  Housing  (1916),  pages  95,  108, 117  a. 
In  1915  legal  advice  was  given  in  388  cases  and  174  matters  were  adjusted.  Massachusetts  has  very  recently  created 
a  similar  Commission,  which  has  its  own  attorney  to  assist  immigrants. 

2  See  Ibid.,  pages  98, 103, 117  a. 

3  New  Jersey  Session  Laws  of  1916,  c.  54. 

4  Fourteenth  Biennial  Report  of  the  Minnesota  Department  of  Labor  for  191Sand  1914,  page  S9.  The  precise  num- 
ber of  cases  in  which  court  assistance  is  given  is  not  known.  It  is  estimated  at  fifty  cases  a  month. 

6  Virginia  Acts  o/1916,  c.  77. 

6  Parkinson:  Re  view  of  Important  Legislation  in  the  United  States  during  1916,  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  No.  2, 172. 

7  Massachusetts  Acts  0/1911,  c.  727. 


96  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

§  4 
The  most  striking  example  of  state  aid  to  parties  in  private  litigation  is  afforded 
n  11     •        s    ky  the  Massachusetts  Labor  Commissioner  in  his  authority  to  enforce 
o  ec  ion  j    payment  Qf  wages>  'pne  plan,  as  it  has  been  built  up,  is  so  unique  and 
*\   .™         has  been  so  successful  that  it  deserves  thorough  presentation.1  The 
.  Commissioner  is  the  executive  officer  of  the  State  Board  of  Labor  and 

• "  Industries,2  which  has  general  supervision  over  the  labor  laws  regulat- 

ing hours  of  work,  sanitary  provisions,  safety  appliances,  employment  of  minors,  and 
the  like. 

Since  1886  there  has  existed  in  Massachusetts  a  law  requiring  corporations  to  pay 
wages  weekly  and  providing  for  criminal  proceedings  against  employers  for  viola- 
tions.3 In  1895  the  law  was  extended  to  include  individual  and  partnership  employers.4 
Before  making  this  important  amendment  the  legislature  asked  the  Supreme  Judi- 
cial Court  whether  such  a  law  would  be  constitutional.  The  Court  filed  an  opinion  that 
the  law  would  be  valid.5  Although  there  are  contrary  decisions  in  other  states,  the 
point  of  constitutionality  has  never  been  raised  in  an  actual  case.6  The  original  law 
has  been  amended  nearly  every  year,  but  always  in  the  direction  of  widening  its  oper- 
ation and  including  within  its  provisions  additional  classes  of  employees.7  The  scope 
and  plan  of  the  law  appears  from  its  text : 8 

"Every  person,  firm,  or  corporation  engaged  in  carrying  on  a  hotel  in  a  city,  or 
a  factory,  workshop,  manufacturing,  mechanical,  or  mercantile  establishment, 
mine,  quarry,  railroad  or  street  railway,  or  a  telephone,  telegraph,  express  or 
water  company,  or  in  the  erection,  alteration,  or  repair  or  removal  of  any  build- 
ing or  structure,  or  the  construction  or  repair  of  any  railroad,  street  railway, 
road,  bridge,  sewer,  gas,  water  or  electric  light  works,  pipes  or  lines,  shall  pay 
weekly  each  employee  engaged  in  his  or  its  business  the  wages  earned  by  him  to 
within  six  days  of  the  date  of  said  payment,  but  any  employee  leaving  his  or  her 
employment,  shall  be  paid  in  full  on  the  following  regular  pay  day ;  and  any 
employee  discharged  from  such  employment  shall  be  paid  in  full  on  the  day  of 
his  discharge.  .  .  . 

"Whoever  violates  the  provisions  of  this  section  shall  be  punished  by  a  fine  of 
not  less  than  ten  nor  more  than  fifty  dollars." 

Enforcement  of  this  law  was  first  in  the  hands  of  the  state  police,  and  in  1912  was 
transferred  to  the  Labor  Commissioner.9  The  rigor  of  the  law  is  self-evident: 

1  For  a  commentary  on  the  Massachusetts  law,  and  similar  laws  of  other  states,  see  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor 
Statistics,  Bulletin  No.  229  (1918),  pages  70  et  seq. 

2  Massachusetts  Acts  o/1912,  c.  726,  §  2.  See  United  States  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics  Bulletin  No.  229  (1918),  pages 
70,  73. 

3  Statutes  of  1886,  c.  87.  4  Ibid.,  1895,  c.  438.  °  Opinion  of  the  Justices,  163  Mass.  (1895)  589. 
e  See  Commonwealth  v.  Dunn,  170  Mass.  (1898)  140. 

7  Revised  Laws  of  1902,  c.  106,  §  62;  Acts  of  1909,  c.  514,  §  112;  Acts  of  1910,  c.  350:  Acts  of  1911.  c.  208;  Acts  of  1914, 
c.  247;  Acts  of  1916,  c.  76;  Acts  of  1916,  c.  229. 

8  General  Acts  of  1916,  c.  229. 

9  Acts  of  1912,  c.  726,  §  5  ;  Acts  of  1916,  c.  14. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  OFFICIALS  97 

"The  state  board  of  labor  and  industries  may  make  a  complaint  against  any 
person  for  a  violation  of  the  provisions  of  the  preceding  section.  Complaints  for 
such  violation  shall  be  made  within  three  months  after  the  date  thereof,  and, 
on  the  trial,  no  defence  for  failure  to  pay  as  required,  other  than  the  attach- 
ment of  such  wages  by  the  trustee  process  or  a  valid  assignment  thereof,  or  a 
valid  set-off  against  the  same,  or  the  absence  of  the  emplovee  from  his  regular 
place  of  labor  at  the  time  of  payment,  or  an  actual  tender  to  such  employee  at 
the  time  of  payment  of  the  wages  so  earned  bv  him,  shall  be  valid.  The  defend- 
ant shall  not  set  up  as  a  defence  a  payment  of  wages  after  the  bringing  of  the 
complaint." 

The  Commissioner  has  two  deputies,  twenty-four  inspectors,  a  chief  clerk,  and  an 
attorney  on  his  staff.  Whereas  most  labor  commissioners  can  only  try  conciliation, 
and  if  that  fails  refer  the  employee  to  a  legal  aid  society *  or  leave  him  without  any 
assistance,  it  is  apparent  that  the  Massachusetts  Commissioner  has  the  legal  power 
and  equipment  to  assist  unpaid  wage-earners  as  far  as  is  necessary.  The  proceeding 
being  under  the  criminal  code,  its  process  is  summary,  there  are  no  costs,  and  the 
attorney  is  supplied  by  the  Commission  without  expense  to  the  employee.  The  ma- 
chinery is  so  effective  that  it  seldom  has  to  be  used.  Wholesale  non-payment  of  wages 
does  not  exist  in  Massachusetts  as  it  does  elsewhere.  Unfortunately,  the  statistics  of 
the  work  done  are  available  only  since  1915.  They  show: 


Year 

Number  of  Wage 
Complaints 

Adjusted  by 
Legal  Department 

Sums 
Collected 

Prosecuted 
in  Court 

1915  2 

896 

698 

$3,192.22 

198 

1916  s 

1,746 

1,586 

12,374.61 

160 

1917* 

— 

1,432 

8,885.32 



The  effectiveness  and  success  of  this  plan  are  well  attested  by  the  fact  that  rela- 
tively few  persons  apply  to  the  legal  aid  society  in  Boston  for  assistance  in  collect- 
ing their  wages.  Of  those  that  do  apply  the  larger  number  are  domestic  servants 
who  are  not  included  within  the  act,  or  persons  whose  claims  are  more  than  three 
months  old  and  so  barred  by  the  statute.  Comparative  statistics  for  1916  make  this 
clear : 


Aid  Organization  in 

Total  Cases 

Wage  Claims 

Per  Cent 

Boston 

2,608 

314 

12 

Chicago 

10,697 

3,134 

29 

Dallas 

1,464 

476 

32 

Kansas  City 

6,202 

2,118 

34 

Los  Angeles 

2,571 

1,938 

75 

Newark 

2,152 

804 

37 

New  York 

41,646 

15,922 

38 

1  Cf.  Fourteenth  Biennial  Report,  Minnesota  Department  of  Labor  (1913-14),  pages  135,  201;  8  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  17. 

2  Th  ird  Annual  Report  of  the  State  Board  of  Labor  and  Industries,  Public  Document  No.  104,  of  1916,  page  20.  These 
figures  cover  only  the  last  five  months  of  the  year. 

3  Fourth  Report,  Ibid.,  Public  Document  No.  104  of  1917,  page  26. 

4  From  January  1  to  September  30.  These  figures  were  furnished  by  Miss  Andrews  of  the  State  Board  of  Labor  and 
Industries. 


98  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

In  1911  California  attempted  to  provide  the  same  machinery  for  wage  collections, 
by  passing  the  weekly  payment  law,1  with  criminal  penalties  for  violation,  and  by 
placing  its  enforcement  in  the  hands  of  the  State  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics.  This 
law,  on  November  23,  1914,  was  held  unconstitutional  on  the  ground  that  it 
conflicted  with  the  constitutional  prohibition  against  imprisonment  for  debt.2  The 
Board,  like  most  commissions,  has  a  general  authority  to  summon  in  parties,  and 
under  that  provision  it  has  proceeded  to  aid  unpaid  wage-earners  to  the  best  of  its 
ability.  It  has  rendered  great  legal  assistance,  as  appears  from  its  statistical  reports.3 


Year 

Claims  Filed 

Claims  Collected 

Amounts  Collected 

1912 

1,899 

1,292 

$24,445.59 

1913 

3,573 

2,213 

36,450.69 

1914 

7,330 

4,904 

110,911.93 

1915 

9,320 

5,249 

153,804.20 

1916 

10,167 

5,672 

179,132.22 

The  higher  percentage  of  claims  enforced  during  the  first  two  years  as  contrasted 
with  the  last  two  years  is  an  immediate  reflection  of  the  court's  decision  in  1914, 
which  necessarily  deprived  the  Board  of  its  final  power.  To-day,  if  an  employer  re- 
fuses to  pay,  the  Board  cannot  institute  litigation  for  the  employee,  it  can  only  refer 
him  to  the  Public  Defender  in  Los  Angeles  and  the  Legal  Aid  Society  in  San  Fran- 
cisco, and  elsewhere  to  no  one. 

That  the  Board  is  able  to  accomplish  as  much  as  it  does  is  a  tribute  to  the  effec- 
tiveness of  the  method  of  conciliation  under  official  conduct.  The  Board  is  like  a  poor 
man's  court,4  without  power  to  render  a  judgment  or  to  enforce  its  own  finding.  It  can 
secure  a  result  only  through  the  mutual  consent  of  the  parties,  which  is  conciliation. 


The  complexity  of  government  in  the  modern  state  will  undoubtedly  call  for  a  steady 
development  of  the  administrative  arm.  As  officials,  bureaus,  and  commissions  are 
„  ,         _.        necessarily  added,  there  will  be  an  increase  in  the  fields  of  law  as  to 

7  ,        which  poor  persons  can  secure  legal  advice  and  certain  preliminary  Wal 

"  assistance  without  consulting  private  attorneys. 

Of  more  immediate  importance  is  the  possibility  of  extending  the  Massachusetts 
plan  for  the  collection  of  wages.  The  poor  man's  case  more  often  relates  to  wages 
than  to  anything  else.  A  state  board  empowered  to  use  the  summary  criminal  process 
is,  in  many  respects,  of  more  assistance  than  the  small  claims  court.  The  plan,  if  it 
could  be  extended,  would  probably  stop  non-payment  of  wages  almost  entirely,  but 

1  See  Statutes  of  1911,  page  1268. 

1  Ex  parte  Crane,  145  Pacific  R.  733.  This  is  a  decision  of  the  District  Court  of  Appeals  for  the  First  District.  No  final 
appeal  to  the  Supreme  Court  was  ever  taken.  The  constitutional  provision  is  Article  I,  §  16. 

8  See  Seventeenth  Biennial  Report  of  the  California  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics  for  1916-16,  pages  9-16;  also  Six- 
teenth Biennial  Report,  Ibid.,  page  16. 

4  Seventeenth  Biennial  Report,  Ibid.,  page  9. 


ADMINISTRATIVE  OFFICIALS  99 

the  constitutional  prohibition  against  imprisonment  for  debt,  which  in  most  aspects 
is  wholly  desirable,  stands  as  a  barrier.1  It  is  likely  that  the  states  would  refuse  to 
amend  that  provision;  and  it  is  certain  that  it  could  only  be  done  after  a  long  edu- 
cational campaign.  The  only  warrantable  conclusion  is  that  while  here  and  there  the 
idea  may  be  adopted  and  while  it  serves  to  exemplify  one  strikingly  successful  solu- 
tion for  an  important  part  of  the  problem,  no  general  reliance  can  be  placed  on  it 
as  the  best  immediate  solution  of  the  nation-wide  difficulty  of  the  poor  in  collecting 
their  wages  through  the  processes  of  the  law. 


1  For  a  recent  ease  in  Arizona  holding  that  criminal  process  to  enforce  payment  of  wages  is  valid  as  against  cor- 
porations, see  Arizona  Power  Co.  v.  State  (1917),  166  Pacific  R.  276. 


Chapter  XIV 
ASSIGNED  COUNSEL 

Kent  :  This  is  nothing,  fool. 

Fool:  Then  't  is  like  the  breath  of  an  unfee'd  lawyer,  you  gave  me 
nothing  for  't.  King  Lear,  Act  I,  Sc.  4. 

OF  the  nine  agencies  securing  a  more  equal  administration  of  the  laws  which  are 
under  consideration,  the  only  one  which  is  not  of  recent  origin  is  the  system  of 
assignment  of  counsel  to  indigent  persons  in  civil  and  criminal  cases.  This,  together 
with  the  provisions  for  bringing  suits  in  forma  pauperis,  constitutes  the  sum  total  of 
the  machinery  provided  by  our  traditional  administration  of  justice  for  safeguard- 
ing the  rights  of  poor  persons. 

This  matter  of  the  assignment  of  counsel  by  courts  to  represent  persons  unable  to 
employ  their  own  attorneys  raises  several  questions  of  the  highest  importance.  A  de- 
termination of  the  law  on  which  the  system  is  built  answers  the  now  disputed  issue 
as  to  the  relationship  between  the  bar  and  legal  aid  organizations;  on  the  workability 
and  feasibility  of  the  plan  depends  in  large  measure  the  argument  about  the  public 
defender.  These  matters  must  be  relegated  to  their  appropriate  chapters.1  In  this  chap- 
ter our  concern  is  to  examine  how  far  the  difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel  has  been 
solved  by  the  assignment  method  and,  on  that  basis,  how  far  it  ought  to  be  incor- 
porated into  any  thorough  plan  designed  to  remedy  the  existing  inequalities.lt  is  con- 
venient to  divide  the  discussion  into  assignments  in  civil  cases,  the  divorce  proctors, 
and  assignments  in  criminal  cases. 


§  1 

The  system  of  assignment  of  counsel  looms  large  in  the  books,  but  has  amounted  to 

very  little  in  practice.  Analytically,  it  would  appear  that  this  power  of  the  courts  to 

.     .  ,     _    assign  attorneys  to  assist  poor  persons  in  cases  where  representation 

Assignment  of  °  J  : F        r  / 

°  .j  .  was  necessary  was  a  complete  answer  to  the  difficulty  ot  the  expense 

_.   „  _  of  attorneys.  Practically,  it  has  been  no  solution  at  all. 

In  addition  to  the  inherent  power  of  courts  to  assign  attorneys, 
on  the  general  theory  that  they  are  agents  of  the  court  and  ministers  of  justice,  there 
are  statutes  in  many  jurisdictions  expressly  conferring  this  authority  on  the  judges, 
to  be  used  in  their  discretion.  Following  the  ancient  precedents,  the  authority  is  gen- 
erally contained  in  the  laws  permitting  suits  in  forma  pauperis.2  For  some  reason 
this  power  seems  never  to  have  been  used.  Judges  who  are  thoroughly  familiar  with 
the  practice  in  the  New  York  and  Chicago  municipal  courts  state  that  within  their 

1  See  post.  Chapter  XXI V.  Legal  Aid  and  the  Bar,  page  226;  and  Chapter  XV,  The  Defender  in  Criminal  Cases,  page  111. 

2  Examplesof  these  statutes  are  New  York  Code  of  Civil  Procedure,  §§  460,  463;  Hurd's  Revised  Statutes  of  Illinois 
(1906),  page  555;  Missouri  Annotated  Statutes  (1906),  §  1645 :  Carroll's  Kentucky  Statutes,  §  884. 


ASSIGNED  COUNSEL  101 

recollection  counsel  have  never  been  assigned  in  civil  cases.  When  counsel  for  the  New 
York  Legal  Aid  Society  petitions  in  behalf  of  a  client  for  leave  to  sue  without  pay- 
ment of  costs,  the  petition  contains  a  prayer  that  he  be  assigned  as  counsel,  and  this 
is  granted  as  a  matter  of  course;  but  the  rule  that  the  courts  of  their  own  initiative 
do  not  designate  members  of  the  bar  to  assist  needy  suitors  is  not  controverted  by 
any  other  evidence.  The  system  is  so  thoroughly  in  disuse  that  in  many  quarters  its 
very  existence  is  denied.  The  large  majority  of  attorneys  do  not  realize  that  there  is 
any  authority  which  can  require  them  as  a  matter  of  duty  to  give  their  services  with- 
out charge  to  poor  persons. 

It  is  not  easy  to  state  with  precision  why  a  system  so  deep-rooted  in  the  history 
of  our  legal  institutions  should  both  in  England  and  in  the  United  States  fall  into 
such  neglect.  Doubtless  it  is  in  part  due  to  the  general  failure  to  realize  how  the 
changed  conditions  of  life  had  put  the  employment  of  counsel  beyond  the  reach  of 
so  many  persons.  Probably  even  more  important  has  been  the  fact  that  the  system  con- 
tains a  certain  unfairness.  As  the  bar  has  developed,  most  of  its  members  have  been 
obliged  to  work  hard  to  earn  their  living.  To  force  such  an  attorney  to  undertake 
litigation  without  remuneration  seemed  a  hardship  which  a  court  naturally  would 
hesitate  to  impose.  The  highest  courts  in  Indiana  and  Wisconsin  have  considered 
the  unfairness  so  great  as  to  constitute  deprivation  of  property  without  due  pro- 
cess of  law,  and  have  declared  unconstitutional  statutes  requiring  attorneys  to  serve 
under  assignments  without  compensation.1  In  this  situation  is  revealed  the  great  weak- 
ness of  the  plan.  If  an  attorney,  obliged  to  earn  his  livelihood  by  practice,  is  com- 
pelled to  serve  a  poor  person  without  hope  of  reward,  all  the  probabilities  of  human 
nature  are  that  he  will  neglect  that  case  in  favor  of  cases  brought  by  paying  clients. 

Because  of  this  fact  and  of  our  experience,  one  would  be  tempted  to  cast  the  as- 
signment plan  aside  and  to  hold  that  no  good  could  come  from  it;  but  no  such  sum- 
mary dismissal  is  justified,  for  elsewhere  it  has  been  made  to  operate  with  great  suc- 
cess. The  legal  aid  societies  in  Philadelphia,  Duluth,  and  Los  Angeles2  have  built  up 
very  careful  systems  under  which  they  assign  to  outside  attorneys  such  cases  as  they 
are  unable  or  forbidden  by  rule  to  undertake.  They  have  had  no  difficulty  in  obtain- 
ing a  sufficient  number  of  attorneys  to  serve,  and  by  carefully  selecting  their  list  and 
by  a  slight  amount  of  supervision  they  have  been  able  to  make  the  plan  work  sat- 
isfactorily to  all  parties  concerned.  What  the  legal  aid  societies,  informally  and  with- 
out authority,  can  do  ought  not  to  be  impossible  for  the  courts. 

The  entire  legal  aid  system  in  Scotland  and  France  has  for  centuries  been  operated 
by  a  combination  of  the  bench  and  the  bar  using  the  assignment  plan  as  part  of  the 
in  forma  pauperis  proceeding.3  In  Scotland  about  two  thousand  persons  a  year  apply 

1  Webb  v.  Baird,  6  Ind.  13;  Dane  County  v.  Smith,  IS  Wis.  685. 

2  The  Los  Angeles  plan  is  described  in  detail  in  the  San  Francisco  Recorder  for  September  8, 1914,  and  in  5  Journal 
of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology,  601. 

3  This  subject  of  judicial  legal  aid  is  considered  in  further  detail  post  in  Chapter  XXV,  A  More  Equal  Administra- 
tion of  Justice,  page  246. 


102  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

for  this  assistance;  the  assignment  of  counsel  goes  on  in  daily  practice,  as  a  glance 
at  the  reports  shows.1  In  England,  where  there  has  recently  been  a  great  awaken- 
ing to  the  inability  of  the  poor  to  utilize  the  machinery  of  justice,  the  assignment 
system  is  being  made  the  chief  reliance  in  the  comprehensive  reform  undertaken  by 
the  courts.2  In  1913  the  English  High  Court  of  Judicature,  after  conferences  with 
the  bar,  issued  a  series  of  rules  making  provision  for  poor  persons'  cases  and  calling 
for  the  formation  of  lists  of  solicitors  and  counsel  who  would  accept  assignments. 
Despite  the  complications  resulting  from  the  war,  the  most  recent  information  is  to 
the  effect  that  the  plan  gives  promise  of  being  successful.3  Before  their  numbers  were 
depleted  by  enlistments,  there  were  three  hundred  barristers  and  five  hundred  soli- 
citors throughout  England  who  stood  ready  to  undertake  assigned  cases.4 

While  there  are  drawbacks  to  the  assignment  idea,  it  is  too  valuable  to  be  given  up 
altogether.  In  America  it  ought  to  be  revived.  There  should  be  such  a  lively  sense  of 
obligation  on  both  bench  and  bar  that  no  civil  suitor  should  be  forced  by  poverty  to 
do  without  counsel  in  cases  requiring  skilled  preparation  and  presentation.  When- 
ever such  cases  appear  the  judges  should  feel  at  perfect  liberty  to  assign  the  cause 
either  to  the  legal  aid  organization  or  to  other  counsel.  Although  in  most  respects  an 
organized  and  specialized  legal  aid  bureau  is  far  more  efficient  than  any  assignment 
system,  the  latter  can  be  made  an  effective  auxiliary,  and  a  last  safeguard,  in  any 
complete  plan  for  securing  rights  to  the  poor. 


§  2 
In  some  states  there  are  attorneys,  known  as  divorce  proctors,  who  intervene  in  divorce 
matters  under  assignment  from  the  court.  This  work  is  done  to  safeguard  the  interest 

of  the  state,  not  to  assist  needy  parties,  and  the  practice  is  mentioned 
.     ^  here  merely  to  establish  the  fact.  It  is  valuable  because  it  affords  one 

more  precedent  for  the  state's  concerning  itself  and  lending  its  as- 
sistance in  matters  that  are  generally  regarded  as  "private"  litigation. 

The  idea  originated  in  England,  where  the  office  of  King's  Proctor  was  created  to 
prevent  collusion  in  divorce  cases.5  The  first  attempt  to  establish  a  similar  position 
in  America  was  made  in  New  York  in  1901,  but  failed.6  In  a  few  states  this  function 
is  performed  either  under  statute  as  in  New  Jersey 7  and  the  District  of  Columbia,8  or 


1  The  Scotch  system  is  presented  in  105  Contemporary  Review,  569,  562,  and  in  47  Law  Journal,  49 ;  for  cases  arising 
out  of  this  practice  see  Ross  v.  Ross,  1  Scots  Law  Times  (1914),  299:  McGregor  v.  Kinloeh,  Ibid.,  4T4. 

2  Rules  dated  April  28, 1913,  and  published  in  the  1914  Rule  Book.  See  Order  16,  IV,  §§  22-31. 

3  Law  Times  for  March  18,  1916.  4  49  Law  Journal  (1914),  362. 

6  For  the  acts  see  23  &  24  Vict.  c.  144,  §  T;  36  &  37  Vict.  c.  31 ;  for  a  discussion  see  Halsbury :  Laws  of  England,  vol. 
xvi,  tit.  Husband  and  Wife,  §§  1125-1132. 

6  For  the  bill  see  State  of  New  York  Senate  Bill  No.  82,  reprinted  No.  837;  see  also  printed  report  of  the  Committee 
on  Amendment  of  the  Law  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association,  dated  March  14, 1901. 

7  Biddle:  New  Jersey  Divorce  Practice  (2d  ed.),  page  134. 

8  District  of  Columbia  Code,  §  982;  for  a  similar  statute  in  Massachusetts  see  Acts  O/1907.  c.  390. 


ASSIGNED  COUNSEL  103 

simply  under  the  general  authority  of  the  court  to  assign  counsel  as  in  Denver  and 
Kansas  City. 

Generally  the  duty  of  such  an  officer  is  to  appear  in  default  divorce  cases  to  ascer- 
tain whether  the  proceedings  are  fraudulent  and  whether  the  defendant  had  proper 
notice.  Indirectly  this  may  occasionally  serve  to  benefit  some  poor  person,  but  the 
design  is  simply  to  protect  the  interest  of  the  state  that  divorces  should  not  be 
granted  except  for  valid  cause. 


§  3 

Assignment  of  counsel  in  criminal  cases  is  as  common  as  it  is  uncommon  in  civil 

cases.  In  the  federal  courts  and  in  the  majority  of  the  state  courts  of  general  criminal 

jurisdiction  the  law  provides  that  the  court  must,  on  request,  ap- 

&  J       point  counsel  to  represent  the  accused.  It  is  the  universal  rule  that 

.  no  man  is  permitted  to  stand  trial  for  murder  unless  he  has  counsel 

Criminal  Cases  ,  ,  .      T     ,,     .  £  ■>  ,        .        1 

to  represent  him.  In  the  interior  courts  counsel  are  not  assigned. 

In  most  states  the  right  to  counsel  is  guaranteed  by  the  constitution.  Also  the 

Sixth  Amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  provides: 

"In  all  criminal  prosecutions  the  accused  shall  enjoy  the  right  to  a  speedy  and 
public  trial; ...  to  have  compulsory  process  for  obtaining  witnesses  in  his  favor; 
and  to  have  the  assistance  of  counsel  for  his  defence." 

In  a  number  of  states  the  constitutional  provision  has  been  supplemented  by  statu- 
tory enactments  giving  express  power  to  the  courts  to  assign  counsel.1  The  systems 
in  vogue  vary  infinitely.  In  some  states  counsel  are  paid,  in  others  not.  Some  courts 
assign  counsel  in  all  matters,  others  only  when  requested. 

The  general  statement  is  warranted  that  in  criminal  matters  the  courts  and  the 
bar  have  viewed  their  duty  in  an  entirely  different  manner  than  in  civil  cases.  The 
power  of  assignment  and  the  duty  to  serve  are  clearly  established.  That  the  courts 
have  acted  on  their  own  initiative  and  that  the  assignment  practice  is  regularly 
established  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  injustice  of  requiring  a  person  to  present  his 
side  of  the  story  in  a  criminal  matter  without  the  advice  of  counsel  is  much  more 
apparent  than  in  civil  controversies.  When  liberty  is  at  stake,  the  desire  that  there 
should  be  fair  play  is  more  easily  aroused. 

It  might  appear,  therefore,  that  we  might  confidently  look  to  the  assignment  system 
to  secure  equality  before  the  law  at  least  in  the  more  serious  criminal  cases.  Unhap- 
pily this  is  not  the  case.  The  truth  about  the  assignment  system  in  criminal  cases  is 
that  as  a  whole  it  has  proved  a  dismal  failure,  and  that  at  times  it  has  been  worse 
than  a  failure.  Because  of  this  breakdown,  there  has  been  sweeping  over  the  country 
during  the  past  five  years  a  movement,  commonly  known  as  the  public  defender  move- 

1  Thus  see  New  York  Code  of  Criminal  Procedure,  §  460. 


104  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

ment,  which  is  probably  destined  to  supplant,  or  radically  alter,  the  assignment  prac- 
tice. The  details  of  the  failure  of  the  assignment  system  in  criminal  cases  are  so  inex- 
tricably bound  up  with  the  discussion  about  the  public  defender  that  they  can  best 
be  considered  in  that  connection  in  the  next  chapter. 

It  must  be  recorded  that  the  traditional  administration  of  justice  failed  utterly 
to  make  the  assignment  system — the  only  machinery  it  provided — any  kind  of  a 
satisfactory  solution  for  the  inequality  caused  by  the  inability  of  the  poor  to  pay 
the  fees  of  attorneys.  In  civil  cases,  the  plan  fell  into  disuse,  so  that  legal  aid  organ- 
izations were  found  necessary  to  fill  the  gap  in  the  machinery  of  justice.  In  crimi- 
nal cases,  use  by  the  courts,  through  lack  of  supervision,  degenerated  into  abuse 
by  attorneys,  so  that  the  public  defender,  which  is  only  another  name  for  legal  aid 
in  criminal  cases,  was  required  to  supplant  a  part  of  the  machinery  that  failed  to 
perform  its  function. 


Chapter  XV 
THE  DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES 

In  criminal  cases,  the  defence  of  the  poor  and  destitute  is  a  neces- 
sary obligation  devolving  upon  the  county,  and  to  the  extent  of 
providing  counsel  for  them  the  court  is  agent  for  the  county.  Hoic- 
ard  County  Commissioners  v.  Pollard.* 

HERE  for  the  first  time  we  are  confronted  with  the  question  of  the  position  of 
the  poor  before  the  criminal  law.  Thus  far  we  have  dealt  almost  exclusively 
with  the  law  on  its  civil  side,  and  with  agencies  designed  to  secure  more  equal  rights 
in  the  bringing  and  defending  of  civil  matters.  It  is  the  object  of  this  chapter  to 
examine  the  administration  of  justice  on  its  criminal  side,  to  see  how  far  it  guaran- 
tees freedom  and  equality  to  poor  persons  accused  of  crime,  and  to  determine  what 
betterments  may  be  made. 

In  recent  years  our  criminal  law  and  procedure  have  been  subjected  to  violent  and 
persistent  attacks.  In  no  other  field  has  the  cry  of  one  law  for  the  rich  and  another 
for  the  poor  been  more  exploited  or  more  thoroughly  believed.  The  proceedings  in 
certain  notorious  trials  of  rich  men  for  serious  offences  have  aroused  indignation  and 
served  to  degrade  all  law  in  the  opinion  of  hosts  of  persons.  There  is  something  dra- 
matic about  criminal  trials  which  excites  popular  imagination  and  focuses  public 
attention  on  the  criminal  rather  than  the  civil  law.  The  new  office  in  criminal  cases, 
generally  called  that  of  public  defender,  has  had  more  written  about  it  and  is  more 
generally  known  than  all  the  other  remedial  agencies  combined.  There  being  a  wealth 
of  discussion,2  our  problem  here  is  not  so  much  one  of  simple  exposition,  as  it  has  been 
in  earlier  chapters,  but  rather  one  of  analysis.  This  is  particularly  necessary  because 
much  of  the  discussion  thus  far  has  been  at  loggerheads.  It  has  not  settled  anything 
because  frequently  the  essential  issues  have  been  overlooked  or  confused  and  the  close 
relation  between  this  particular  problem  and  the  whole  problem  of  injustice  to  the 
poor,  between  the  defender  in  criminal  cases  and  the  other  remedial  agencies,  has  not 
been  observed. 


The  term  "public  defender"  is  itself  a  source  of  confusion  because  its  meaning  has  be- 
come ambiguous.  The  office  of  the  first  defender  in  Los  Angeles  was  created  by  stat- 
ute and  supported  by  the  county  treasury,  so  that  "public  defender"  at  once  acquired 

1 153  Indiana,  371,  372. 

2  The  best  arguments  for  the  agency  are  Wood :  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice 
(1914),  and  Mayer  C.  Goldman's  book.  The  Public  Defender  (1917);  contra.  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Com- 
mittee of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association  on  The  Necessity  and  Advisability  of  Creating  the  Office  of  Public 
Defender  (1916),  and  Majority  Report  of  Sub-Committee  on  Public  Defender  of  the  Committee  on  Courts  of  Crim- 
inal Procedure  of  the  New  York  County  Lawyers'  Association,  which  was  published  in  Bench  and  Bar,  n.  s.,  vol.  ix, 
p.  809.  These  adverse  reports  are  discussed  in  the  Minority  Report  published  in  6  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and 
Criminology  (1915),  660:  and  in  6  Pjid.  18.  Citations  to  the  most  helpful  of  the  other  articles  are  made  in  following 
pages. 


106  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

the  connotation  of  a  public  official  paid  at  public  expense.  However,  when  a  private 

attorney  in  Houston  offered  his  services  to  poor  persons  accused  of 

.      *     crime,  the  press  entitled  him  "public  defender."  The  New  York  or- 

J  ganization,  being  financed  bv  subscription,  consciously  took  the  name 

of  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  but  the  man  in  the  street  knows  it  only  as  the 
"public  defender"  office.  Articles  that  condemn  the  public  defender  as  unnecessary 
and  then  praise  the  voluntary  defender1  have  bewildered  most  readers  and,  what  is 
worse,  they  have  side-tracked  the  discussion. 

In  the  hope  of  avoiding  these  pitfalls,  the  words  "public"  and  "private'1  will  be 
eliminated  from  this  chapter.  The  official  or  agency  under  discussion  will  be  called  the 
defender  in  criminal  cases,  or,  more  simply,  the  defender. 

The  fundamental  issue  is  whether  our  administration  of  justice  is  unfair  to  the 
poor  accused  of  serious  crimes,  so  that  some  agency  for  their  better  protection  is  re- 
quired. In  their  bearing  on  that  question  all  the  defender  organizations  which  have 
been  established  may  be  considered  together,  for  in  function  they  are  all  identical. 
The  subordinate  problem  of  whether  they  should  be  supported  publicly  or  privately 
has  interesting  legal  and  political  aspects,  but  as  it  is  precisely  the  same  issue  which 
must  be  faced  later  in  discussing  public  versus  private  legal  aid  organizations,2  it,  to- 
gether with  other  collateral  matters,  will  be  relegated  to  the  appropriate  place  in  the 
subsequent  chapters  on  legal  aid  work. 

This  substantial  identity  of  the  defender  and  the  legal  aid  organizations  is  not  real- 
ized. Well-informed  writers  have  treated  them  as  distinct  agencies  far  removed  from 
each  other,  so  that  a  second  confusion  has  resulted.  Reports  have  been  made  that 
defenders  are  not  necessary,  but  recommending  that  legal  aid  societies  extend  their 
assistance  in  criminal  matters.  This  is  tracing  a  circle  around  the  question  without 
answering  it.  To  advise  a  man  who  is  debating  whether  he  requires  a  lawyer  or  not 
that  he  should  not  have  lawyer  A  because  he  needs  no  attorney,  but  that  it  would 
be  well  for  him  to  secure  lawyer  B,  does  not  resolve  his  main  doubt.  The  distinction 
arose  from  the  historical  fact  that  legal  aid  societies  generally  confined  themselves 
to  civil  matters.  Analytically  the  two  agencies  are  as  alike  as  two  sessions  of  the  same 
court;  both  were  called  into  being  by  the  same  general  causes,  both  exist  for  the  same 
purpose,  and  both  stand  in  the  same  relation  to  the  administration  of  justice.  While 
they  have  operated  in  different  fields,  evolution  is  fast  breaking  down  this  distinction, 
for  many  legal  aid  organizations  are  giving  defence  in  criminal  cases,  and  the  defender 
agencies  are  giving  their  aid  in  civil  cases. 

Finally,  it  is  necessary  to  distinguish  between  that  part  of  criminal  law  which  deals 
with  serious  crimes  such  as  murder,  burglary,  larceny,  assault  and  battery,  and  that 
part  which  is  concerned  with  relatively  trivial  matters  such  as  selling  without  a  li- 
cense, violations  of  the  road  law,  of  the  building  or  sanitary  codes,  in  short,  public 

1  For  example  see  an  article  in  the  New  York  Evening  Sun  for  March  26, 1917. 

*  Chapter  XIX,  Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations,  §  6.  Public  versus  Private  Organizations,  page  180. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  107 

torts,  and  with  such  lesser  crimes  as  drunkenness,  street- walking,  and  vagrancy.  In 
a  rough  way  the  line  of  cleavage  is  between  the  inferior  courts  and  the  superior 
courts  of  general  criminal  jurisdiction.  The  defender  is  concerned  primarily  with  the 
more  serious  offences  and  with  the  defence  of  persons  in  the  superior  criminal  courts. 
The  following  discussion  deals  with  that  field.  There  are  defenders  in  some  inferior 
courts,  but  they  stand  on  quite  a  different  footing  and  their  consideration  will  be 
taken  up  in  a  separate  section. 


Whether  the  defender  in  criminal  cases  is  necessary  to  secure  equal  justice  to  poor 

„.      .  persons  accused  of  serious  crimes  depends  on  the  answers  given  to 

1  he  Argument     ,,         ,,  ° 

°  these  three  questions: 

1.  Do  we  believe  that  persons  accused  of  the  more  serious  crimes  should  have 
adequate  representation  ? 

2.  If  so,  does  the  existing  law  and  practice  secure  such  adequate  representation  ? 

3.  If  the  existing  system  is  inadequate,  is  the  defender  a  sound  plan  for  securing 
proper  representation  ? 

The  first  question  answers  itself.  When  our  general  principle  of  the  right  of  ac- 
cused to  have  counsel  is  combined  with  the  principle  of  freedom  and  equalitv  of 
justice,  the  conclusion  is  inevitable.  Nowhere  has  any  one  openly  declared  that  poor 
persons  in  serious  criminal  cases  should  be  left  without  adequate  representation.  Such 
a  claim  would  be  tantamount  to  arguing  for  a  return  to  the  harsh  English  criminal 
law,  as  it  existed  prior  to  the  American  Revolution,  forbidding  accused  persons  to 
have  the  assistance  of  counsel.  In  its  effect  on  the  individual  poor  person  standing 
accused,  in  its  effect  on  the  administration  of  justice,  and  in  its  political  effect  there 
is  no  distinction  between  precluding  an  indigent  by  law  from  having  counsel  and 
erecting  a  system  which  in  fact  precludes  him  from  obtaining  counsel.  There  is 
unanimity  of  opinion  that  the  administration  of  the  criminal  law  should  guarantee 
that  no  one  shall  be  convicted  of  a  serious  crime  without  a  fair  trial,  and  without 
adequate  representation. 


§  3 

In  weighing  the  fairness  of  the  existing  system  there  are  two  half-truths  which  have 

served  too  often  to  tip  the  balance,  but  which  must  strictly  be  ruled  out  of  account 

.         because  they  beg  the  question  and  prejudge  the  issue.  The  first  is  the 

widespread  impression  that  people  are  not  arrested  unless  they  are 

°    **  guilty; l  that  when  the  blue-coated  officer  of  the  law  takes  a  man  into 

custody,  there  "must  be  something  in  it."  The  second  is  that  too  much  protection 

1  Cf.  73  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1917).  198. 


108  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

is  afforded  already  because  the  guilty  sometimes  escape  conviction.  A  sound  judgment 
cannot  be  predicated  on  such  biased  premises,  but  must  be  arrived  at  from  an  examina- 
tion of  what  protections  are  actually  accorded  poor  persons  accused  of  crime. 

Eight  distinct  protections  may  be  discerned  in  our  present  administration  of  crimi- 
nal law.  Stated  in  the  order  of  procedure  they  are:  (1)  at  the  preliminary  arraign- 
ment a  case  against  the  accused  must  be  made  out;  (2)  if  he  is  held,  the  district  at- 
torney reviews  the  case  and  may,  if  the  evidence  is  insufficient,  dismiss  or  nol  pros 
the  complaint;  (3)  thereafter  the  grand  jury  deliberates  and  will  not  indict  except 
for  cause  shown;  (4)  an  investigation  is  made  by  an  impartial  probation  staff;  (5)  at 
the  trial  the  judge  guards  the  defendant's  rights;  (6)  the  law  lends  its  assistance  by 
presuming  innocence  and  requiring  proof  beyond  reasonable  doubt;  (7)  the  prose- 
cuting attorney  is  a  judicial  official,  so  that  in  theory  he  is  interested  only  in  the 
whole  truth  and  thus  acts  for  the  defendant;  (8)  if  persons  are  too  poor  to  employ 
counsel,  provision  is  made  for  assigning  counsel  in  their  behalf. 

This  last  is  the  crux  of  the  situation.  The  other  seven  do  not  of  themselves  afford 
adequate  safeguards.  Standing  alone  and  without  counsel  for  the  accused  to  call 
them  into  action,  they  would  be  of  doubtful  efficacy.  This  is  because  they  are  quali- 
fied, not  absolute,  protections.  Singly  or  in  combination  they  provide  no  sure  test 
of  guilt  or  innocence.  They  were  never  designed  for  that  purpose.  They  are  useful  in 
winnowing  out  the  clearer  cases  of  innocence,  but  all  other  cases  pass  beyond  them  to 
a  final  determination  by  jury  verdict.  Through  them  many  innocent  persons  have 
been  released,  but  likewise  through  all  these  seven  stages  have  gone  many  cases  in 
which  innocence  did  not  appear  until  it  was  brought  out  by  counsel  for  the  defence 
at  trial. 

A  brief  review  shows  these  statements  to  be  true  and  why  they  are  true.  The  pre- 
liminary hearing  before  a  magistrate  is  intended  to  determine  only  whether  the  ac- 
cused is  so  palpably  innocent  as  to  be  entitled  to  immediate  release,  or  whether  there 
is  sufficient  evidence  to  hold  him  for  further  investigation  and  action  by  the  grand 
jury,  in  technical  language  whether  there  is  "probable  cause."  Not  only  does  the 
law  expect  persons,  if  there  is  any  sufficient  evidence,  to  be  held,  but  the  magistrates, 
particularly  where  the  charge  is  serious,  hesitate  to  free  a  man  if  there  is  any  evi- 
dence against  him  and  incline  to  pass  the  responsibility  on  to  the  higher  court.1  At 
these  hearings  no  counsel  are  assigned. 

In  New  York  in  1914,  of  13,327  men  and  women  arraigned  for  serious  offences, 
7088  were  held  for  trial.  That  forty-seven  per  cent  were  discharged  demonstrates  the 
need  for  this  protection.  Further,  it  proves  the  falsity  of  the  generalization,  based  on 
a  lack  of  understanding  as  to  how  easily  the  organized  power  of  society  can  be  started 
in  pursuit  of  an  individual,2  that  most  persons  who  are  arrested  are  guilty.  The  fair- 
ness of  our  existing  system  cannot  be  supported  by  lightly  assuming  that  it  deals 

1  5  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology,  661;  6  Ibid.  21 ;  Train  :  77ie  Prisoner  at  the  Bar  (2d  ed.  1915),  page  66. 
*  Annual  Report  for  1914  of  the  New  York  City  Magistrates'  Courts,  page  150.  Statistics  from  1905  to  1914  are  given. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  109 

onlv  with  criminals  who  deserve  no  protection,  but  must  depend  on  the  provision  it 
makes  for  an  impartial  determination  of  guilt  or  innocence  after  a  full  hearing  at 
which  both  sides  are  adequately  represented. 

The  second  protection  is  the  review  by  the  district  attorney.  This  is  aimed  pri- 
marily to  ascertain  whether  the  state  can  make  out  a  case.  It  does  not  purport  to  be 
a  thorough  review  of  both  sides.1  The  district  attorney  cannot  know  all  the  facts 
favoring  the  accused,  for  rare  indeed  is  the  prisoner  who  will  confide  in  the  man  who 
is  to  prosecute  him.  Similarly,  the  grand  jury  hearing  is  ex  parte.  Neither  the  ac- 
cused, nor  his  counsel,  nor  his  witnesses  are  heard.2  Their  presence  is  prohibited.  The 
proceeding  is  summary — seven  minutes  per  case  is  the  average  deliberation  of  the 
grand  jury  in  New  York — and  it  is  of  so  little  value  for  any  purpose  that  its  abo- 
lition is  seriously  considered.3 

In  jurisdictions  where  a  probation  staff  is  attached  to  the  criminal  courts  its 
investigation  is  unquestionably  impartial.  But  it  is  an  enquiry  into  the  prisoner's 
personal  history,  past  record,  associations,  and  environment  (of  importance  in  assist- 
ing the  court  to  fix  a  just  sentence)  rather  than  into  the  facts  constituting  the  crime 
charged.  The  probation  officer  does  not  testify  at  the  trial;  his  lips  are  sealed  until 
after  verdict.4 

At  the  trial  the  judge  presides  over  the  proceedings  and  guarantees,  so  far  as  it  is 
within  his  power,  that  they  are  conducted  fairly  and  in  accordance  with  the  prisoner's 
legal  rights.  It  was  long  maintained  in  England  that  this  was  a  complete  protection 
in  itself,  so  that  the  accused  needed  no  counsel.5  In  practice,  however,  it  proved  demon- 
strably inadequate  and  was  abandoned  in  1903.6  This  safeguard  through  judicial 
control  is  in  reality  very  limited  in  scope.  It  is  not  because  our  judges  are  dishonest, 
unwilling,  or  incapable.  They  desire  to  follow  Bacon's  adjuration:7 

"A  judge  ought  to  prepare  his  way  to  a  just  sentence,  as  God  useth  to  prepare 
his  way,  by  raising  valleys  and  taking  down  hills;  so  that  when  there  appeareth 
on  either  side  an  high  "hand,  violent  prosecution,  cunning  advantages  taken, 
combination,  great  power,  great  counsel,  then  is  the  virtue  of  a  judge  seen,  to 
make  inequality  equal,  that  he  may  plant  his  judgment  as  upon  an  even  ground." 

The  trouble  is  that  under  our  existing  system  the  judge  has  so  little  opportunity 
to  "  make  inequality  equal."  His  hands  are  so  much  tied  that  he  is  more  of  an  aloof 
umpire  than  an  active  protecting  official.8  He  rules  on  objections  made  by  counsel, 
but  does  not  himself  interpose  objections  to  testimony.  Except  in  the  federal  courts 
he  is  forbidden  to  express  any  opinion  or  to  instruct  the  jury  on  the  facts.  In  an  ob- 

1  The  Office  of  the  Public  Defender  (Los  Angeles,  1914),  page  8. 

3  5  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  661 ;  6  Ibid.  22 ;  Train :  The  Prisoner  at  the  Bar,  page  56. 

8  Olson:  Efficiency  in  the  Administration  of  Criminal  Justice  (1917),  pages  14  et  seq. 

4  6  Journal  of  Crim.  L.22 ;  Probation  Manual,  published  by  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Probation  (1916),  page  IT. 
6  Fultz:  Public  Defender,  31  American  Law  Review  (1897),  394. 

6  After  much  agitation  the  Prisoners'  Defence  Act  was  passed  in  1903  to  provide  counsel  to  represent  the  accused. 

7  Francis  Bacon:  Essays  on  Counsels  Civil  and  Moral,  LVI,  Of  Judicature. 

8  5  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  495;  6  Poid.  22. 


110  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

vious  miscarriage  of  justice  he  can  order  a  new  trial,  but  the  practice  is  seldom  to 
interfere  with  jury  verdicts.  The  judge  labors  under  the  further  difficulty  of  know- 
ing only  those  facts  that  are  introduced  in  evidence.  A  defendant,  who  was  unrepre- 
sented and  could  not  secure  the  attendance  of  witnesses,  might  have  a  valid  defence 
of  which  the  judge  would  be  ignorant  because  the  facts  would  not  be  before  him.  He 
could  not  learn  the  facts  for  himself,  since  he  is  neither  empowered  nor  equipped  to 
conduct  any  investigation. 

The  law  attempts  to  throw  its  protecting  mantle  over  the  prisoner  by  means  of 
three  rules  which  in  books  are  strongly  in  his  favor,  but  which  in  action  are  uncer- 
tain quantities.  It  presumes  the  defendant  innocent  up  to  the  moment  when  the  fore- 
man pronounces  the  jury's  verdict.  This  rule  in  practice  has  little,  if  any,  effect.  The 
whole  criminal  system  runs  counter  to  it.  If  it  were  taken  seriously,  the  state  would 
long  since  have  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  accused  resources,  comparable  to  those 
arrayed  against  him,  to  enable  him  in  fact  to  defend  or  assert  the  innocence  which 
in  law  presumably  attaches  to  him.1  A  second  rule  requires  guilt  to  be  proved  "be- 
yond a  reasonable  doubt."  Although  every  defendant's  counsel  urges  this  in  his  argu- 
ment and  every  judge  states  it  in  his  charge,  it  is  a  matter  of  conjecture  whether 
juries  clearly  understand  it  or  its  equivalent  of  "moral  certainty,"  and,  if  they  do, 
whether  they  follow  the  legal  line  closely  enough2  to  make  it  a  factor  of  any  impor- 
tance in  their  deliberations.  The  third  rule,  that  the  defendant's  failure  to  testify  is 
not  to  be  construed  against  him,  is  commonly  disregarded  by  juries3  and  is  fast  be- 
coming a  dead  letter. 

That  the  prosecuting  attorney  is  a  judicial  officer  is  a  sound  statement  of  law,  but 
the  deduction  that  he  therefore  acts  as  much  for  the  accused  as  for  the  state  is  not 
warranted.  To  an  extent  he  may  aid  the  defendant  by  his  review  of  the  case  and  by 
fairly  presenting  the  evidence  to  the  grand  jury  as  has  been  indicated,4  but  at  the 
trial  he  acts  primarily  as  advocate  for  the  government.  He  may  aim  to  produce  the 
whole  truth,  but  he  seldom  knows,  or  can  know,  the  defendant's  story.  In  every  popu- 
lous district  he  is  an  extremely  busy,  generally  overworked  man,  necessarily  occupied 
in  trying  cases  to  the  best  of  his  ability,  and  with  little  time  or  opportunity  to  look 
out  for  the  other  side.  In  the  heat  of  trial  and  in  his  zeal  to  convict,  the  prosecuting 
officer  has  often  gone  such  lengths  that  new  trials  constantly  have  to  be  ordered  by 
courts  of  last  resort  because  of  his  unfairness.5  An  epitome  of  adjudicated  cases  reveals 
that  he  "has  misstated  the  facts  and  obtruded  improper  matter  into  his  opening  state- 
ment to  the  jury,  has  impressed  the  jury  by  the  suggestion  of  crimes  other  than  the 
one  charged,  has  attempted  to  get  improper  matter  before  the  jury,  has  abused 

1  Cf.  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Immigration  (1914),  page  112 ;  Minority  Report  of  Special  Com- 
mittee on  the  Public  Defender  of  the  New  York  County  Lawyers'  Association  (1914),  page  11. 

2  Train :  Tfie  Prisoner  at  the  Bar,  pages  169-161 ;  Storey :  Reform  of  Criminal  Procedure,  page  214. 

3  Train:  op.  cit.,  pages  207  et  seq. 

*  See  ante,  page  109. 

*  Preliminary  Report  for  the  National  Economic  League  on  Efficiency  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  27. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  111 

witnesses,  injected  his  personal  and  unsworn  and  damaging  statements  into  the  tes- 
timony, called  the  defendant  all  the  vile  names  in  his  too  plethoric  Billingsgate  dic- 
tionary, and  has  resorted  to  all  sorts  of  reprehensible  devices  to  awaken  prejudice."1 
Much  of  such  unfair  conduct  is  due  to  the  peculiar  difficulty  under  which  the  district 
attorney  labors.  He  is  pitted  against  lawyers  who  are  willing  in  their  defence  to  use 
every  trick,  strategy,  subterfuge,  and  device  in  their  repertoire  to  delay  or  defeat 
him.  He  is  forced  to  adopt  an  aggressive,  distrustful,  partisan  attitude  which  is  not 
consistent  with  the  theory  of  his  official  impartiality.2  In  short,  to  expect  him  ade- 
quately to  represent  both  sides  is,  as  every  lawyer  knows,  to  expect  the  impossible. 

These  seven  safeguards  are  essentially  latent,  not  active,  in  their  nature.  The  shrewd 
criminal  supplied  with  money  and  able  counsel  may  employ  them  and  the  technical- 
ities which  accompany  this  procedure  to  such  an  extent  as  to  set  the  whole  system  at 
naught.  Because  some  such  striking  instances  are  known  to  most  people,  when  these 
several  protections  are  stated  one  after  the  other,  there  is  a  temptation  to  jump  to  the 
conclusion  that  the  law  is  already  too  considerate  of  defendants.  It  is  overlooked  that 
in  the  cases  of  the  poor,  standing  alone  without  counsel  and  without  funds,  they  may 
prove  unavailing. 

The  great  defect,  which  is  common  to  them  all,  is  that  they  are  effective  only  in  a 
negative  way.  Evervbody  who  investigates  the  case  for  trial — from  the  complainant  on 
through  the  police,  bureau  detectives,  and  the  district  attorney — is  on  one  side.  If  the 
evidence  shows  the  defendant  to  be  not  guilty,  the  protections  operate;  but  nowhere  in 
this  system  is  any  provision  made  for  ascertaining  the  facts  or  the  law  in  favor  of  the  ac- 
cused. Many  defences  are  affirmative  in  their  nature,  as  character  evidence,  self-defence, 
alibi,  and  the  bias  or  malice  of  the  complaining  witness.  The  type  of  case  in  which 
innocence  fails  to  manifest  itself  at  one  stage  is  precisely  the  type  of  case  in  which 
innocence  will  not  be  discovered  by  these  protections  at  any  stage  of  the  proceedings. 

These  are  the  reasons  why  the  foregoing  checks  and  precautions  fail  to  secure  to 
the  poor  as  adequate  protection  as  we  believe  to  be  the  right  of  every  individual 
accused  of  serious  crime.  Adequate  protection,  in  last  analysis,  depends  on  adequate 
representation,  so  that  if  our  criminal  procedure,  as  it  stands,  is  to  be  found  sufficient, 
it  must  be  on  the  ground  that  it  does  provide  proper  representation  to  the  poor 
through  its  system  of  assigning  counsel. 

§4 

After  a  case  has  reached  the  superior  court  and  passed  through  the  preliminary 
stages,  the  prisoner  is  required  to  plead  guilty  or  not  guilty  to  the  indictment,  and 

1  With  only  a  change  of  tense,  this  sentence,  every  phrase  of  which  is  supported  by  decisions,  is  to  be  found  in 
Fultze:  The  Public  Defender,  31  American  Law  Rev.  395.  More  recent  cases  are  cited  and  quoted  in  Goldman  :  The 
Public  Defender,  pages  28-31 ;  Wood:  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  9. 

2  6  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  662;  McCulloch:  Here  is  Justice,  31  Everybody's  Magazine  (1914),  248,  249:  Goldman:  The 
Public  Defender,  chapter  iii.  Public  Prosecution  and  Prosecutors;  The  Office  of  the  Public  Defender,  page  9:  Tlie 
Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice ,  page  8. 


112  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

at  this  time,  if  he  has  no  counsel  and  is  too  poor  to  employ  his  own  counsel,  it  is  the 
practice  in  the  majority  of  American  jurisdictions  for  the  judge  to  as- 
j?  a    •  s*Sn  nmi  some  lawyer  to  act  in  his  behalf  at  the  trial.  In  this  one  par- 

"^  j  ticular  department  the  traditional  administration  of  justice  has  recog- 

nized that  the  function  of  the  attorney  is  essential,  that  there  are  per- 
sons who  cannot  afford  attorneys,  and  that  therefore  in  the  furtherance  of  its  justice 
the  state  must  gratuitously  furnish  such  persons  with  counsel. 

The  assignment  system  varies  from  state  to  state,  but  its  important  features  are 
these.  Counsel  are  always  assigned  in  murder  cases,  and  this  is  true  even  in  those  states, 
such  as  the  New  England  States,  where  there  is  no  general  assignment  system.  In  mur- 
der cases  assigned  counsel  are  paid  and  in  many  jurisdictions  have  an  additional  allow- 
ance for  expenses.1  In  about  half  the  states  counsel  are  assigned  in  all  felony  or  more 
serious  cases,  that  is,  to  practically  all  defendants  who  appear  in  the  superior  crim- 
inal courts  without  their  own  counsel.  In  all  but  seven  states  counsel  in  such  cases 
are  not  paid  and  have  no  allowance  for  expenses. 

Although  there  are  local  exceptions  due  to  the  fairness  of  the  law  in  reimbursing 
counsel  or  to  the  exceptional  pains  of  the  judge  in  making  assignments,  the  follow- 
ing generalization  as  to  the  system  is  warranted:  in  murder  cases  the  assignment  of 
counsel  has  been  reasonably  successful,  often  brilliantly  so,  and  in  all  other  cases 
it  has  been  a  dismal  failure.  This  is  no  paradox;  the  reasons  for  this  partial  success 
of  themselves  show  why  in  the  main  the  system  has  been,  and  was  bound  to  be,  a 
failure. 

Counsel  assigned  in  murder  cases  work  with  great  zeal.  They  generally  earn  a  greater 
fee  than  the  state  pays  and  expend  more  than  they  are  reimbursed.  But  it  is  recog- 
nized that  the  newspaper  publicity  which  attends  a  murder  trial  gives  a  lawyer  the 
best  advertising  he  can  ever  have  and  is  just  as  valuable  as  a  cash  payment.  The  fact 
that  the  defendant's  life  is  in  his  hands  naturally  spurs  the  lawyer  on.  In  a  word,  the 
case  appeals  simultaneously  to  the  lawyer's  self-interest  and  to  the  best  traditions  of 
his  profession. 

The  situation  is  reversed2  in  other  cases.  The  prisoner  arrested  for  burglary,  rape, 
or  assault  may  arouse  no  sympathy,  in  fact  the  matter  may  be  revolting.  More  im- 
portant, the  average  lawyer,  however  honest  and  desirous  of  performing  his  profes- 
sional obligations,  cannot  afford  to  give  a  thorough  defence.  Even  if  he  could  devote 
several  days'  time  to  the  trial,  he  cannot  pay  out  of  his  own  pocket  for  investigators, 
detectives,  and  medical,  handwriting,  or  other  experts.  Witnesses  may  be  in  other 
states,  and  he  can  neither  pay  their  travel  expenses  nor  engage  counsel  to  take  deposi- 
tions. The  situation  forces  on  the  conscientious  lawyer  the  ugly  dilemma  of  either 
spending  largely  of  his  own  funds  or  of  giving  an  improper  defence.  Few  lawyers  are 

'  This  is  so  in  Massachusetts,  where  counsel  are  assigned  only  in  capital  cases.  Revised  Laws  of  1902,  c.  157,  §§  16, 17. 

2  District  Attorney  Smith,  of  Nassau  County,  New  York,  wrote  to  the  Committee  on  the  Public  Defender  of  the  New 
York  County  Lawyers'  Association:  "I  find  that  attorneys  assigned  to  defend  persons  charged  with  crime  other  than 
capital  cases  do  not  always  take  the  same  interest  in  behalf  of  their  clients  as  attorneys  do  who  are  retained." 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  113 

in  a  position  to  take  the  former  course.  The  more  well-to-do  attorneys  are  entirely 
out  of  criminal  practice,  and  as  they  lack  experience  in  this  work  are  virtually  exempt 
from  assignment.1 

In  the  light  of  reason  and  in  the  face  of  the  evidence  which  has  been  adduced  it 
is  clear  that  the  assignment  system  in  all  but  capital  cases  is  unfair  to  the  attorney, 
unfair  to  the  accused,  and  that  it  does  not  work.2  The  adverse  report  on  the  public 
defender  by  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association  admits,  "There  is  considerable  force 
in  this  contention"  that  "a  poor  man's  defence  is  seriously  hampered  and  often  pre- 
vented by  the  failure  of  our  laws  to  make  any  provision  for  the  expense  of  investigat- 
ing and  obtaining  evidence,  or  for  compensation  to  assigned  counsel,  except  in  mur- 
der cases."3  The  adverse  majority  report  of  the  New  York  County  Lawyers'  Associ- 
ation makes  the  statement  that  "juries  are  prone  to  extend  sympathy  to  defendants 
when  it  appears  that  counsel  has  been  assigned  to  defend  them."4  As  an  argument, 
this  is  an  admission  which  gives  the  case  away.  As  a  fact,  the  jurors  cannot  know 
whether  counsel  is  retained  or  assigned  except  in  rare  instances.  Once  they  did  know, 
for  a  frank  advocate  closed  his  address  to  the  jury  with:  "This  man  has  no  lawyer.  I 
am  only  assigned  counsel.  I  get  no  pay.  My  only  reward  is  in  heaven,  and  how  can  I 
ever  get  there!" 

Courts  have  made  spasmodic  efforts  to  whip  the  assignment  system  into  shape  by 
enlisting  the  leaders  of  the  bar,  but  the  attempts  have  not  succeeded  and  have  been 
short-lived.  Assignments  as  a  rule,  except  in  murder  cases,  fall  either  to  very  young 
members  of  the  profession  who  are  willing  to  serve  for  the  sake  of  the  experience,  or  to 
a  peculiar  class  which  has  arisen  in  response  to  our  curious  condition  of  affairs.  How- 
ever amusing  to  the  bar  the  custom  of  assigning  criminal  defences  to  its  most  recent 
accessions  may  be,  the  proceeding  on  its  face  is  unfair.  With  legal  education  as  it  is, 
the  fledgling  is  little  more  qualified  to  defend  than  the  prisoner  is  to  conduct  his  own 
defence.  Every  lawyer  remembers  his  first  cases.  However  great  his  zeal  or  untiring  his 
efforts,  the  inexperienced  attorney  labors  under  an  enormous  handicap.  It  cannot  be 
said  that  where  liberty  and  disgrace  are  the  stakes  a  contest  between  an  experienced, 
capable  district  attorney  armed  with  all  the  resources  of  organized  society  and  a  young, 
untried,  resourceless  attorney,  generally  embarrassed  and  often  frightened,  is  a  fair 
trial.5 

A  consideration  of  the  second  class  of  attorneys  to  whom  assignments  fall  brings 

1  See  Prospectus  of  New  York  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  published  in  the  New  York  Law  Journal  for  March 
19, 1917,  and  also  separately  in  leaflet  form. 

:  See  5  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  496,  927  ;  84  Independent  (1915),  86,  94;  Prospectus  of  the  New  York  Voluntary  Defend- 
ers Committee ;  Wood :  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice  (1914),  pages  6-8 ;  Gold- 
man: The  Public  Defender ,  chapter  ii.  The  Injustice  of  the  Assigned  Counsel  System;  J.  P.  Schmitt:  The  Duty  of  So- 
ciety to  the  Poor  before  the  Law(1914);  Minority  Report  of  the  Public  Defender  Committee  of  theNew  York  County 
Lawyers'  Association,  containing  letters  from  judges  and  district  attorneys. 

3  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Committee  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association  (1916),  page  15. 

4  This  statement  in  the  Majority  Report  may  be  found  in  Bench  and  Bar,  n.s.,  vol.  ix,  p.  313.  It  is  quoted  and  pointed 
out  on  page  18  of  the  Minority  Report. 

D  Wood:  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  6 ;  5  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  496 ;  Gold- 
man: The  Public  Defender,  page  20. 


114  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

us  to  one  of  the  sorest  spots  in  all  our  administration  of  justice.  Just  as  the  neglect 
to  appreciate  the  position  of  injured  workmen  brought  in  the  contingent  fee  with  its 
train  of  abuses,  so  the  impossibility — to  the  honest  lawyer — of  the  assignment  sys- 
tem has  given  rise  to  the  "professional"  assigned  counsel.  Less  polite  terms,  such  as 
"jail  lawyers,"  "shysters,"  and  "Tombs  runners,"  are  often  used  as  descriptive  of  this 
class.  Every  lawyer  who  has  the  slightest  acquaintance  with  the  criminal  side  knows 
that  this  condition  exists ;  it  is  frankly  admitted  even  by  those  who  disbelieve  in  the 
necessity  for  a  defender  in  criminal  cases.1 

These  men  have  learned  how  to  make  a  living  out  of  assigned  cases.  On  days  when 
the  grand  jury  returns  its  indictments,  and  the  prisoners  are  brought  to  the  rail  to 
plead,  these  lawyers  may  be  seen  sitting  within  the  bar  enclosure  expectantly  waiting.2 
Sometimes  they  are  easily  identified  by  their  "lean  and  hungry  look." They  are  willing 
to  take  assignments  because  they  have  succeeded  by  intimidation,  threats,  extortion, 
and  even  worse,  in  putting  the  assignment  system  on  a  commercial  basis.  They  know 
how  to  strip  a  prisoner  and  his  relatives  of  every  last  cent.  For  one  whose  conscience 
permits  him  to  magnify  the  crime,  the  sureness  of  conviction  (unless  he  is  paid  to 
defend),  the  severity  of  the  judge,  and  the  horrors  of  prison,  the  process  is  simple 
and  produces  results.  They  have  procured  fees  in  devious  ways,  ranging  from  com- 
pelling the  mortgage  to  some  shark  of  all  the  household  goods  to  forcing  the  pris- 
oner's wife  to  sell  herself  on  the  streets.  That  this  degradation  exists  in  connection 
with  the  administration  of  criminal  justice  is  common  knowledge.  And  back  of  the 
professional  assigned  counsel  have  grown  up  runners  and  straw  bondsmen,  who  have 
worked  their  way  into  the  jails,  corrupted  officials,  and  preyed  on  the  prisoners.3 

A  system  of  justice  which  entrusts  one  of  its  essential  functions  to  such  men  is  a 
bad  system.  If  well  paid,  the  professional  assigned  counsel  undertakes  a  defence  that 
knows  no  bounds  of  honesty  or  propriety.  It  is  largely  this  sort  of  conduct  which 
has  forced  prosecuting  attorneys  out  of  their  impartial  position  into  an  attitude  of 
hostility  and  distrust.  In  these  cases  it  would  be  ridiculous  to  consider  the  lawyer  as 
a  minister  of  justice.  If  not  paid,  he  is  perfectly  willing  to  betray  his  client  by  neglect- 
ing the  case,  or  forcing  him  to  plead  guilty,  or  deserting  him  altogether. 

The  assignment  of  counsel  in  criminal  cases,  except  when  the  offence  charged  is 
murder,  has  been  a  general  failure.  In  part  it  has  become  a  means  of  extortion.  As 
a  system,  both  in  plan  and  operation,  it  deserves  unqualified  condemnation. 


1  See  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Committee  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association,  page  14. 

2  Prospectus  of  New  York  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  page  2. 

3  For  statements  as  to  the  existing  situation  see  Wood :  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of 
Justice ;  Goldman :  The  Public  Defender,  page  19 ;  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Immigration,  page 
HI ;  Report  of  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  (1916),  page  15 ;  Train :  The  Prisoner  at  the  Bar,  pages  72-77 :  Report  of 
the  Chicago  Bar  Association  (1916),  pages  29,  75  et  seq. ;  1  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  596 ;  Final  Report  of  the  New  York  Com- 
mission to  Inquire  into  Courts  of  Inferior  Criminal  Jurisdiction,  Assembly  No.  54  of  1910,  p.  70  ;  Chicago!/.  A.  S. 
Bulletin,  1912-13,  No.l,  p.  7;1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  10;  27  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  34;  33  Ibid.  13:  35  Ibid.  11,  22;  15  N.  Y.  Legal 
Aid  Rev.  No.  3,  p.3;  Proceedings  of  Fourth  Convention  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  20. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  115 

Because  of  this  breakdown  the  idea  of  a  defender  in  criminal  cases  came  into  being 
and  in  the  last  few  years  has  grown  apace.  Some  attempt  has  been  made  to  discredit 
the  plan  by  stamping  it  as  visionary,  as  a  prelude  to  complete  social- 
„  ization  of  the  bar,  and  as  subversive  of  fundamental  rights.  The  pro- 

„  j  nj  posal  to  establish  a  definite  defender  is  not  revolutionary,  nor  is  the 
J  thought  new.1  It  is  not  an  untried  experiment,  but  one  that  can  be  sub- 

jected to  the  test  of  accomplishment.  The  essential  underlying  ideas  in  the  proposi- 
tion are  two :  first,  that  the  official  or  attorney  responsible  for  the  defence  of  indi- 
gent prisoners  should  be  paid  for  his  services  and  his  expenses  defrayed;  second,  that 
instead  of  having  counsel  changing  from  case  to  case,  all  the  work  should  be  central- 
ized in  the  hands  of  one  official  or  organization. 

The  criminal  procedure  of  other  countries  shows  that  elsewhere  much  progress 
has  been  made  in  these  two  directions.  For  centuries  in  Scotland  there  has  been  an 
arrangement  whereby  the  bar  associations  (both  of  advocates  and  solicitors)  each 
year  designate  certain  members  to  act  for  the  poor,  and  to  this  group  all  assignments 
are  made,  thereby  securing  responsibility  and  a  certain  amount  of  centralization.2 
In  New  Zealand,  the  magistrate,  if  satisfied  after  examination  of  the  poverty  of  the 
defendant,  assigns  him  counsel  from  the  list  furnished  by  the  Law  Society.  Such 
counsel  receives  the  same  fees  as  the  local  Crown  solicitor  for  the  prosecution,  and 
is  allowed  money  to  defray  expenses.3  In  Rome,  there  is  a  Society  for  the  Gratuitous 
Defence  of  Accused  Persons,  composed  of  counsellors  and  attorneys,  which  was 
licensed  as  a  charitable  corporation  in  1904  and  represents  the  plan  of  a  legal  aid 
society  for  criminal  cases.4  In  the  Argentine  Republic,  the  defence  is  entrusted  to 
counsel  appointed  by  the  Supreme  Court  for  life  at  a  monthly  salary;  in  Norway, 
the  expense  of  counsel  for  the  defence  is  borne  by  the  state;  and  in  Denmark,  the 
court  appoints  for  each  case  a  prosecutor  and  defender,  both  being  selected  from 
a  list  of  public  attorneys  appointed  by  the  King.5 

In  America,  the  idea  was  urged  at  the  end  of  the  eighteenth  century.  Concurrently 
with  the  work  of  the  constitutional  conventions,  which  did  much  to  put  accused  per- 
sons in  a  more  favorable  position,  Benjamin  Austin  wrote;6 

"As  we  have  an  Attorney  General  who  acts  in  behalf  of  the  State,  it  is  proposed 
that  the  Legislature  appoint  another  person  (with  a  fixed  salary)  as  Advocate 

1  6  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  559;  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Committee  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association 
(1915),  page  2. 

2  Kecdy:  Criminal  Procedure  in  Scotland,  American  Institute  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology,  Bulletin  No.  XI 
(1913),  page  11. 

3  48  Law  Journal  (1913),  538;  19  Virginia  Law  Register  (1914),  788. 

4  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Review,  vol.  v,  No.  3  (October,  1908),  p.  7. 

5  Goldman:  The  Public  Defender,  pages  9-13. 

6  Honestus:  Observations  on  the  Pernicious  Practice  of  the  Laic,  page  26. 


116  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

General   for  all  persons  arraigned  on  criminal  prosecutions;   whose   business 
should  be  to  appear  in  behalf  of  all  persons  indicted  by  the  State's  attorney." 

After  a  period  of  quiescence  the  idea  was  revived,  and  by  1896  legislation  pointing 
toward  public  defence  had  been  introduced  in  a  dozen  states.1  Since  then  the  move- 
ment has  gone  forward  with  accelerating  velocity.  In  1906,  Arthur  Train  in  his  fa- 
mous The  Prisoner  at  the  Bar  wrote  of  the  imperative  need  for  relief  in  criminal  cases 
and  advocated  an  organization  analogous  to  the  legal  aid  society.2  Two  years  later 
Dean  Wigmore  wrote,  "Ultimately  we  shall  have  a  public  defender,  appointed  and 
paid  by  the  state,  precisely  like  the  public  prosecutor."3  In  1909,  the  New  York  Legal 
Aid  Society  was  petitioned  to  undertake  the  defence  in  criminal  cases.4  During  1909 
and  1910,  the  proposition  was  urged  in  Cleveland  by  the  Legal  Aid  Society.5  A  year 
or  two  later,  a  pamphlet6  was  prepared  by  J.  P.  Schmitt  of  the  New  York  Bar  strongly 
advocating  the  idea,  which  is  of  especial  interest  because  it  names  Judge  Latshaw  of 
Kansas  City  as  "one  of  the  ablest  advocates  of  the  establishment  by  the  State  of  a  pub- 
lic defender."  The  significance  of  this  statement  lies  in  the  fact  that  Judge  Latshaw,  as 
presiding  Justice  of  the  Kansas  City  Criminal  Court,  has  done  everything  within  his 
power  to  make  the  assignment  system  successful,  and  unquestionably  in  his  court  it  has 
operated  more  satisfactorily  than  in  the  large  majority  of  other  courts.  His  endorse- 
ment, therefore,  is  that  of  one  who  has  seen  the  assignment  system  at  its  best.  In  1914, 
the  Massachusetts  Immigration  Commission  reported  squarely  for  the  public  defender 
and  proposed  a  bill.7  From  1914  on,  there  has  been  a  flood  of  articles  in  both  legal  and 
popular  magazines,  bar  associations  have  appointed  special  committees  to  consider 
the  plan,8  and  a  large  number  of  bills  have  been  introduced  into  the  various  state 
legislatures.9 

An  examination  of  this  literature  reveals  the  fact  that  the  defender  idea,  in  last 
analysis,  is  nothing  more  revolutionary  than  a  plea  for  the  extension  of  what  is  best 
in  the  assignment  system  and  for  reorganization  along  modern  lines  of  efficiency.  As 
payment  of  a  reasonable  sum  for  services  and  expenses  in  murder  cases  has  worked 
well,  let  it  be  extended  to  the  other  cases,  for  assignments  in  all  cases  rest  on  the  same 
principle  and  are  used  to  secure  the  same  result.  As  centralization  of  work  makes  for 
economy,  efficiency,  and  responsibility,  let  there  be,  instead  of  a  shifting  group  of 
attorneys,  one  definite  official  or  organization  charged  with  the  duty  of  defending  the 
poor,  to  whom  all  assignments  may  be  made. 

1  Fultz:  The  Public  Defender,  31  American  L.  Rev.  (1897)  393. 

2  Train  :  The  Prisoner  at  the  Bar,  page  77. 

3  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Review,  vol.  v,  No.  3  (October,  1908),  p.  7. 

4  7  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  2  (April,  1909),  p.  1.  6  3  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  12 ;  4  Ibid.  12. 

6  The  Duty  of  Society  to  the  Poor  before  the  Law.  This  is  undated.  It  was  published  in  1914. 

7  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Immigration,  pages  112,  228. 

8  In  addition  to  the  two  New  York  Committees  whose  reports  have  already  been  cited,  see  1915  Report  of  the  Chicago 
Bar  Association,  page  63  :  1916  Ibid.,  page  75;  1917  Ibid.,  page  69. 

9  For  a  chronology  of  the  legislation  from  1913  to  1916  see  Goldman  :  The  Public  Defender,  pages  87-96.  Since  1916 
legislation  has  been  introduced  in  Connecticut,  Colorado,  and  Virginia. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  117 


§6 

Provision  for  the  first1  defender  in  criminal  cases  was  made  by  the  Los  Angeles  County 

Charter2  which,  after  adoption  by  the  people  and  ratification  by  the  legislature,  went 

into  effect  in  June,  1913.  After  civil  service  examinations,  Walton  J. 

/  Wood  was  selected  for  the  position,  and  his  office  was  opened  on  Jan- 

CVS  (171'Cl 

■    \\r  uary  7, 1914.  In  February,  1915,  a  defender  in  the  municipal  court  was 

provided  in  Portland,  Oregon,3  in  July  a  defender  in  the  superior  court 
was  established  in  Omaha;4  and  in  November  the  city  of  Los  Angeles  created  a  police 
court  defender.5  In  February,  1916,  the  city  of  Columbus  under  its  Home  Rule  Charter 
made  provision  for  a  defender  in  the  municipal  court.6  In  New  York  a  splendid  organ- 
ization under  the  name  of  the  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee  began  work  on  April 
2, 1917. 

Under  the  impetus  of  the  movement  several  states  have  passed  laws  entitled  acts  to 
establish"  public"  defenders,  but  the  provisions  only  go  half-way,  so  that  it  is  some- 
what inaccurate  and  rather  misleading  to  consider  them  as  establishing  definite  offi- 
cials or  organizations,  though  they  are  unquestionably  steps  in  that  direction.  Thus 
Virginia  in  1916  provided  for  the  appointment  of  a  defender  in  Richmond  by  the 
presiding  justice,  to  hold  office  for  two  years,  but  to  be  paid  no  salary  unless  the  city 
council  should  see  fit  to  appropriate  a  sum  for  that  purpose.7  Such  a  law  secures  cen- 
tralization, but  still  leaves  the  old  difficulty  of  putting  an  unfair,  if  not  impossible, 
burden  on  the  attorney.  The  Connecticut  legislature  in  1917  authorized  the  judges 
of  the  superior  court  to  appoint  an  attorney  as  defender  for  the  term  of  court,  his 
services  and  expenses  to  be  paid  out  of  public  funds.8  This  makes  possible  adequate 
representation,  but  loses  the  advantages  of  permanent  responsibility. 

As  the  work  in  Omaha  is  relatively  small,  and  as  no  reports  have  been  issued,  the 
test  of  the  defender  in  the  superior  court  on  the  basis  of  accomplishment  is  best  made 
by  examining  the  work  done  in  Los  Angeles  and  New  York.  An  idea  of  the  extent 
of  the  work  is  gained  from  the  following  record  of  cases  undertaken : 9 

City  Period  Cases 

Los  Angeles  January  7,  1914-June  30,  1914  200 

Los  Angeles  July  1,  1914-June  30,  1915  450 

1  In  1911  Oklahoma  provided  its  Commissioner  of  Charities  with  an  official  who  was  called  a  "public  defender."  The 
title  was  a  misnomer.  His  function  was  not  to  conduct  the  defence  of  poor  persons  in  criminal  cases  but,  as  defined  by 
the  statute,  to  "institute,  prosecute,  or  defend  any  suit  or  action  in  any  court  on  behalf  of  any  minors,  orphans,  de- 
fectives, dependents,  and  delinquents."  This  office  was  abolished  in  1914.  See  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Com- 
mittee of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association  (1915),  pages  4-8,  26. 

•  Los  Angeles  County  Charter,  §  23.  3  City  of  Portland,  Ordinance  No.  30,107  of  1915. 

*  The  law  was  passed  by  the  Nebraska  legislature  in  1915.  Session  Laws  of  1915.  c.  165.  In  July,  1915,  the  Governor 
made  an  ad  interim  appointment.  Since  November,  1915,  the  office  has  been  elective. 

6  City  of  Los  Angeles,  Ordinance  No.  33,348,  new  series. 

6  Proceedings  of  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  135. 

'  Virginia,  Acts  of  Assembly  of  1916,  c.  204.  See  also  c.  373.  8  Connecticut  Public  Acts  of  1917,  c.  225. 

8  The  Los  Angeles  figures  are  taken  from  the  annual  reports  to  the  County  Board  of  Supervisors,  the  New  York 

figures  from  the  published  report  for  April-May-June,  1917. 


118  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

City  Period  Cases 

Los  Angeles  July  1,  1915-June  30,  1916  431 

Los  Angeles  July  1,  1916-June  30,  1917  522 

New  York  April  2,  1917-June  30,  1917  195 

The  large  majority  of  these  cases  involve  felony  charges;  a  few  matters  of  parole 
and  pardon  are  included.  Owing  to  the  newness  of  the  work,  accurate  or  standard- 
ized classifications  are  lacking.  By  translating  the  figures  into  percentages,  some  idea 
of  the  nature  of  the  work  may  be  obtained.  In  Los  Angeles,  the  work  is  divided  as 
follows:1  felony  cases  64  per  cent,  non-support  matters  19  per  cent,  juvenile  offences 
9  per  cent,  the  remainder  representing  inebriety  and  insanity  cases,  paroles,  and  con- 
sultations. In  New  York,  the  felony  cases  are  subdivided  and  are:2  burglary  38  per 
cent,  larceny  30  per  cent,  robbery  12  per  cent,  assault  8  per  cent,  homicide  3  per  cent, 
and  the  balance  miscellaneous  crimes. 

Of  greater  significance  is  the  record  as  to  what  happened  in  these  various  cases. 
By  keeping  the  figures  in  percentages  a  more  accurate  idea  is  gained. 

Disposition  Los  Angeles  New  York 

Pleas  of  guilty  entered  68.0%  76.0% 

Tried  and  convicted  13.0  2.6 

Tried  and  acquitted  5.7  5.3 

Jury  disagreed  1.9  — 

Case  dismissed  11.0  5.3 

Discharged  on  recognizance  —  10.5 

After  a  plea  or  finding  of  guilt  the  defender's  work  still  continues.  When  sentence 
is  to  be  imposed,  an  excessive  or  unmerited  prison  term  may  constitute  as  great  an 
injustice  as  an  erroneous  verdict.  At  this  stage  it  is  the  duty  of  the  defender  to  in- 
form the  court  of  all  the  surrounding  circumstances,  the  condition  and  past  history 
of  the  prisoner's  life,  to  ask  mercy  where  it  is  deserved,  and  to  assist  the  court  in 
arriving  at  a  just  disposition  of  the  case.3  In  Los  Angeles,  of  258  persons  who  pleaded 
or  were  found  guilty,  probation  was  granted  to  107;  in  New  York,  of  121  persons 
who  came  up  for  sentence,  46  were  released  under  suspended  sentences.  People  v. 
Harris  is  a  California  case  which  illustrates  the  need  for  adequate  representation  after 
determination  of  guilt,  if  the  court  is  to  be  enabled  to  mete  out  justice.4  Harris  was 
arraigned  as  a  burglar,  pleaded  guilty,  and  claimed  that  he  had  entered  the  house 
to  secure  food.  The  defender's  investigation  revealed  that  he  had  been  unable  to  se- 
cure work,  had  applied  to  the  chief  of  police  and  secured  a  job  for  one  day,  had  nearly 
starved  for  two  days  before  committing  the  crime,  and  that  his  record  was  clear.  As 
he  had  not  actually  stolen  anything,  the  question  of  restitution  was  not  involved.  He 

1  From  the  1916  Report  to  the  Board  of  Supervisors. 

'  Report  of  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  April-May- June,  1917. 

3  Cf.  Prospectus  of  the  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  page  3;  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Admin- 
istration of  Justice,  page  10. 

4  This  ease  is  reported  in  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  11;  see  also 
50  Review  of  Reviews  (1914),  742. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  119 

was  released  on  probation,  which  disposition  was  unquestionably  fairer  to  him  and 
more  in  the  interests  of  society  than  a  term  in  the  state  prison. 

How  far  the  defender  will  prevent  the  conviction  of  innocent  persons  cannot,  in 
the  nature  of  things,  be  answered  with  precision  or  by  statistics.  The  question  is  based 
on  an  imaginary  premise,  for  we  rarely  know  whether  the  accused  is  guilty  or  inno- 
cent. In  the  more  serious  cases  there  are  seldom  impartial  eye-witnesses  to  the  act. 
Only  the  accused,  and  sometimes  his  accuser,  has  absolute  knowledge,  and  the  word 
of  neither  can  be  accepted  as  final.  There  is  no  standard  of  comparison,  for  it  is  im- 
possible to  determine  how  many  verdicts  of  guilty  are  erroneously  found  under  our 
present  system.  From  time  to  time  cases  come  to  light  where  error  appears  to  have 
been  committed,1  but  this  again  is  conjectural,  for  we  lack  even  a  court  adjudica- 
tion as  a  guide.  We  have  no  proceeding,  such  as  that  in  France,2  whereby  a  man  once 
found  guilty  and  his  case  closed  can  some  time  later  secure  a  new  trial  and  be  pro- 
nounced innocent.  With  us,  he  may  be  pardoned  or  paroled,  but  never  acquitted. 

It  is  unquestionable  that  the  existence  of  the  defender  must  prevent  some  unjust 
convictions.  We  believe  that  by  a  jury  verdict  after  a  fair  trial  we  approximate  the 
truth  as  closely  as  is  possible.  The  defender  reduces  the  danger  of  error  to  a  mini- 
mum because  he  guarantees  a  fair  trial  to  every  one.3  This  is  the  fact  in  Los  Angeles. 
Although  the  defender  instructs  more  of  his  clients  to  plead  guilty  than  did  assigned 
counsel  under  the  former  regime,  and  although  he  tries  only  cases  where  he  has  faith 
in  the  defendant,  he  has  secured  a  substantially  larger  number  of  acquittals.4 

The  case  for  the  defender  rests  primarily  on  the  fact  that  such  an  office  performs 
an  essential  function  in  the  administration  of  justice  more  efficiently,  more  economi- 
cally, and  with  all-round  better  results  than  any  other  plan.  The  increased  efficiency 
can  readily  be  appreciated.  It  is  apparent  that,  if  other  factors  are  anywhere  near  even, 
the  attorney  who  devotes  all  his  time  to  criminal  work  is  more  familiar  with  the  law 
and  the  details  of  procedure  than  the  attorney  who  is  occasionally  assigned  a  case.  Cen- 
tralization of  work  makes  specialization  possible.  The  office  learns  the  easiest  method 
of  conducting  the  work,  it  develops  its  own  staff  of  investigators,  and  knows  the  proper 
authorities  to  consult  as  points  arise.  The  defender  becomes  an  expert  in  criminal  law 
just  as  we  have  experts  in  patent,  or  mining,  or  corporation  law.  The  result  is  the  same 
as  the  greatly  increased  efficiency  in  caring  for  the  civil  cases  of  the  poor  which  has 
resulted  from  centralizing  all  such  work  in  a  well-organized  legal  aid  society. 

A  defender's  office,  whether  supported  by  the  state  or  by  contributions,  obviously 
costs  more  than  assigned  counsel  who  are  paid  nothing.  If,  however,  adequate  repre- 
sentation is  to  be  had,  assigned  counsel  must  be  paid  and  their  expenses  reimbursed, 

1  Of  these  the  most  recent  is  the  Stielow  case  in  New  York,  New  York  Times  for  May  12,  1918,  page  X  5.  See  also  106 
Outlook  (1914),  660;  Boston  Herald  for  October  10, 1917;  and  the  statement  of  Judge  Crist  in  62  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  & 
Soc.  Science  (1914),  179. 

2  For  an  explanation  of  the  French  review  proceeding  see  Richard  W.  Hale:  Tlie  Dreyfus  Story  (3d  ed.  1899). 

3  Tlie  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  13. 
*  The  statistics  are  given  post,  page  123. 


120  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

so  that  the  true  comparison  to  determine  the  more  economical  method  is  between  the 
defender  and  paid  assigned  counsel.  During  its  first  ten  months  the  expense  of  the 
criminal  department  of  the  Los  Angeles  office  was  about  $8400;  during  1915,  894*00; 
and  during  1916,  $1 1,161 .40.1  The  average  cost  per  case  was  respectively  $23.86, 
$20.88,  and  $21.38,  or  a  flat  average  for  three  years  in  1324  cases  of  $21.87  per  case. 
In  the  superior  criminal  court  for  Milwaukee,  where  assigned  counsel  are  paid,  the 
expense  over  a  period  of  four  years  ending  1913  averaged  $4934.25  per  year  for  121 
assignments  each  year,  or  an  average  cost  per  case  of  $40.86. 2  It  is  probably  not  in- 
accurate to  estimate  that  to  secure  adequate  representation  for  indigent  prisoners  by 
paying  assigned  counsel  is  twice  as  expensive  as  by  the  defender  plan. 

Undoubtedly  a  further  saving  accrues  to  the  state  from  the  greater  despatch  with 
which  the  defender  conducts  his  cases,  thereby  reducing  the  enormous  overhead  ex- 
pense of  maintaining  the  judicial  machinery.  The  defender  has  no  outside  conflicting 
engagements ;  both  he  and  the  district  attorney  are  available  for  trial  when  reached. 
He  saves  time  in  not  raising  formal  or  interlocutory  questions  for  purposes  of  delay. 
His  position  and  his  relationship  with  the  district  attorney  are  such  that  cases  are 
tried  to  the  merits  rather  than  on  technicalities.  The  delays  which  at  times  have 
amounted  to  an  open  scandal  are  not  utilized  by  him,  because  that  is  not  his  duty. 
Mathematical  demonstration  is  based  on  such  involved  computations  that  it  would 
be  an  unjustified  digression  in  this  study.  In  his  1916  report  to  the  Board  of  Super- 
visors, Mr.  Wood  undertakes  an  extended  analysis  of  these  figures  and  reaches  the 
conclusion,  which  is  warranted  by  the  facts,  that  his  department  saves  Los  Angeles 
County,  over  and  above  all  expenses,  a  sum  of  about  two  thousand  dollars  each  year.3 

Before  passing  to  a  consideration  of  some  of  the  further  particular  results  of  the 
defender  plan,  it  is  necessary  to  advert  briefly  to  certain  questions  about  the  conduct 
of  the  work  which  always  obtrude  themselves  in  the  discussions.  They  are  mostly 
philosophical  or  ethical  in  their  nature,  such  as  "  Will  the  defender  defend  men  whom 
he  knows  to  be  guilty?"  and  "  Should  he  require  defendants  to  take  the  stand  against 
their  will?"  Such  questions  are  admittedly  difficult,  but  they  are  not  peculiar  to  the 
defender  in  criminal  cases.  They  are  precisely  those  questions  which  confront  all  law- 
yers, and  which  the  codes  of  ethics  can  answer  only  in  generalities.  So  far  as  the  lines 
of  conduct  are  clear  they  will  be  better  observed  by  the  defender  than  has  been  the 
case  with  retained  criminal  lawyers.  He  may  not  be  able  to  prevent  his  clients  from 
using  perjured  defences,  but  certainly  he  will  not  be  a  party  to  manufacturing  them. 
It  is  his  duty,  as  it  is  that  of  every  attorney,*  to  refuse  to  permit  evidence,  known  to 

1  These  figures  are  taken  from  the  reports  to  the  Board  of  Supervisors.  They  are  not  absolute  because,  as  the  public 
defender  also  does  civil  work,  some  administration  expenses  had  to  be  prorated;  but  if  they  err,  it  is  not  on  the  side 
of  underestimation. 

2  These  figures  were  furnished  by  the  Milwaukee  Bar  Association,  and  are  published  in  The  Place  of  the  Public  De- 
fender in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  18. 

3  See  also  8  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  230.  597. 

4  For  a  discussion  see  In  re  Palmieri,  162  N.  Y.  Supp.  799.  The  case  was  reversed  on  the  facts  but  not  on  the  law  in 
221  N.  Y.  131. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  121 

him  to  be  false,  to  be  introduced  before  the  court.  Though  he  may  believe  the  defend- 
ant guilty,  it  is  his  duty,  under  all  codes  of  ethics,  to  represent  the  defendant  at  the 
trial  and  give  him  an  honest  defence.  Mere  belief  gives  to  the  lawyer,  acting  under  a 
court  assignment,  no  right  to  constitute  himself  judge  and  jury.  If  he  has  indepen- 
dent knowledge  of  guilt,  it  must  be  from  facts  which  would  make  it  his  duty  to  be 
witness  and  not  advocate. 

The  most  troublesome  question  is  as  to  his  duty  when  his  knowledge  comes  from 
his  client's  confession,  which  is  privileged.  In  practice  this  issue  has  not  presented 
itself.  In  New  York,  all  defendants  who  have  admitted  guilt  have  been  persuaded  to 
be  honest  with  the  court  and  plead  guilty.1  When  the  problem  does  arise  its  solution 
will  have  to  be  left  to  the  individual  conscience  deciding  on  the  facts  of  the  partic- 
ular case.  It  is  the  strongly  prevailing  present  opinion  of  the  bar  that  in  such  cases 
it  is  the  lawyer's  duty  to  defend,  refraining  from  introducing  any  false  evidence,  per- 
mitting no  perjury  known  to  him,  but  requiring  the  state  to  prove  fairly  the  truth 
of  its  charges.  More  instructive  than  any  abstraction  is  the  story  of  what  actually 
takes  place.  William  Dean  Embree,  in  his  first  report  as  counsel  for  the  Voluntary 
Defenders  Committee,  makes  this  frank  statement  of  his  experience  in  New  York:2 

"  Of  the  twelve  cases  actually  tried  there  were  eight  acquittals  and  four  con- 
victions; of  the  twelve  men  who  went  to  trial  all  asserted  their  innocence  to 
counsel.  Of  the  eight  acquitted  we  believed  in  the  innocence  of  six.  Of  the  four 
convicted  two  were  clearly  guilty:  the  evidence  against  the  third  was  over- 
whelming; and  the  evidence  against  the  fourth  was  not  strong  but  he  had  all  the 
subjective  evidences  of  guilt.11 


§7 

In  addition  to  the  essential  features  of  the  defender's  work,  which  are  to  advise  prison- 
ers as  to  their  legal  rights,  give  them  honest  representation  at  the  trial,  and  submit 
to  the  court  the  facts  by  which  a  just  sentence  may  be  fixed,  there  are 

ur     1      e-     certain  further  important  results.  The  whole  tone  of  criminal  trials 
su  s  oj  j^  \)een  raiSed.  The  superficial  but  common  remark  that  it  is  absurd 

ejen  er  ^  society  to  employ  one  man  to  convict  and  another  to  acquit  has 

been  shown  to  be  wholly  beside  the  point.  The  administration  of  justice  gives  to  each 
merely  the  function  of  presenting  his  side  of  the  case  in  the  belief  that  in  the  clash 
truth  is  best  discerned.  Instead  of  working  at  odds,  it  has  been  possible  for  the  two 
attorneys  to  work  in  harmony  to  a  common  end.3 

In  both  Los  Angeles  and  New  York  the  defender  has  the  cordial  support  of  the  dis- 

1  Report  of  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  April-May-June,  1917,  page  3.  For  the  same  experience  in  Los  Angeles, 
see  Clary:  The  Public  Defender,  7  Pomona  College  Quarterly,  49,  56. 

2  Report  of  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  supra. 

5  See  Report  of  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  April-May- June,  1917,  page  4 :  The  Office  of  Public  Defender, 
page  16 ;  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  pages  16-20 :  107  Outlook  (1914).  828. 


122  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

trict  attorney.  The  defence  is  conducted  without  resort  to  trickery  or  deliberate  false- 
hood, and  the  knowledge  of  this  fact  permits  the  prosecution  to  adopt  an  equally 
high  plane  of  conduct.  This  is  well  demonstrated  by  the  attitude  of  the  two  officials 
in  insanity  cases.  In  murder  cases  the  defence  of  insanity  has  at  times  been  so  much 
abused  as  to  become  a  by-word.  It  has  been  said  that  alienists  could  be  secured  to 
testify  to  anything.  Certain  it  is  that  the  spectacle  of  six  experts  testifying  for  the 
government  that  the  accused  is  wholly  normal  and  an  equal  number  swearing  for 
the  defence  that  he  is  violently  insane  has  not  been  edifying.  It  has  tended  to  turn 
a  trial  into  a  farce  and,  as  developed  by  the  press,  it  has  thrown  discredit  on  the 
entire  administration  of  law.  When  such  a  case  arose  in  Los  Angeles  and  the  defender 
interposed  the  defence  of  insanity,  the  prosecutor  knew  the  claim  was  bona  fide.  The 
two  officials  asked  the  court  to  appoint  three  disinterested  physicians  as  experts,  and 
it  was  stipulated  that  no  other  alienists  would  be  called  at  the  trial.1  Such  a  method 
is  fair,  economical,  and  calculated  to  dignify  the  whole  tone  of  our  criminal  pro- 
cedure. 

That  the  defender  tries  his  cases  on  their  merits  without  resort  to  technical  objec- 
tions taken  chiefly  for  purposes  of  delay,  and  that  this  course  saves  time  and  expense 
to  the  state  without  prejudice  to  the  defendants,  is  borne  out  by  such  figures  as  are 
available.  In  such  a  field  as  this,  it  is,  of  course,  impossible  to  attain  mathematical 
precision  ;  all  that  can  be  done  is  to  submit  facts  from  which  reasonable  inferences 
may  be  drawn.  An  idea  as  to  the  use  of  technicalities  is  gained  by  reviewing  the  work 
of  the  Los  Angeles  defender  in  1914  in  contrast  with  that  of  paid  attorneys  in  Los 
Angeles  during  the  same  year.2  The  figures  as  to  demurrers  are  striking. 


Number  of  felony  cases 
Number  going  to  trial 

Demurrers  filed 
Demurrers  sustained 
Motions  to  quash 
Motions  granted 

Motions  for  new  trials 
Motions  granted 

Appeals  taken 


Paid  Attorneys 
in  191U 

The  Defender 
in  191k 

514 

260 

147 

58 

40 

2 

2 

2 

21 

0 

2 

0 

27 

6 

1 

0 

27 

3 

ie  comparison 

shows  the  following  fac 

'aid  Attorneys 
in  191U 

The  Defender 
in  191L 

147 

58 

239 

59 

1.626 

1.017 

Number  of  trials 
Number  of  days  in  trial 
Average  time  in  days  per  trial 

1  G.  Smith  :  Making  the  Law  work  Both  Ways,  84  Independent  (1915),  94;  7  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  597. 

2  These  figures  were  submitted  by  Mr.  Wood  to  the  Board  of  Supervisors  as  a  part  of  his  report  for  1916.  They  were 
subsequently  published  in  7  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  230. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  123 

The  time  saved  by  the  defender  being  on  an  average  slightly  more  than  half  a  day 
per  case  tried,  it  is  easy  to  see  that  in  the  course  of  fifty  or  one  hundred  trials  quite 
a  saving  is  effected  when  it  is  remembered  that  the  daily  cost  to  the  state  of  a  crimi- 
nal jury  trial  is  from  one  hundred  and  fifty  to  two  hundred  dollars.1 

That  the  defender's  conduct  is  not  a  deprivation  of  substantial  rights,  and  that  it 
does  not  militate  against  the  accused's  chances  to  demonstrate  innocence,  is  reason- 
ably well  borne  out  by  the  following  table.  The  inference  is  warranted  that  persons 
represented  by  the  public  defender  have  fared  as  well  as  those  represented  by  their 
own  attorneys,  and  better  than  those  represented  by  assigned  counsel  before  the  advent 
of  the  defender. 


Work  of  Assigned 
Counsel  in  1913 

Work  of  the 
Defender  in  191k 

Work  of  Paid  At 
torneys  in  191k 

Number  of  cases 
Pleas  of  guilty  entered 
Their  percentage 

115 

71 

62% 

260 
183 

70% 

514 

250 

48% 

Defendants  given  probation 
Their  percentage 

31 

28% 

87 
33% 

154 

30% 

Number  of  trials 

30 

5S 

147 

Per  cent  going  to  trial 

26% 

22% 

28% 

Verdicts  of  not  guilty  or 

disagreements 
Their  percentage 

6 

20% 

20 

34% 

54 

36% 

The  above  table  contains  a  clue  to  the  greatest  immediate  benefit  which  the  estab- 
lishment of  the  defender  has  brought  about.  In  Los  Angeles  he  has  taken  over  al] 
work  formerly  done  by  assigned  counsel,  and  yet  it  appears  that  in  1914  more  than 
twice  as  many  cases  came  to  him  than  reached  the  assignment  stage  in  1913.  The 
chief  reason  for  this  is  that  under  the  former  system,  as  counsel  were  assigned  only 
at  the  time  of  arraignment  in  the  Superior  Court,  prisoners  had  no  one  to  advise 
them  while  in  jail,  they  faced  the  preliminary  hearing  without  any  one  to  represent 
them,  and  so  very  easily  fell  prey  to  the  jail  lawyers  and  their  "runners'"  who  infest 
the  jails.  The  defender  has  fought  fire  with  fire.  Each  day  a  deputy  visits  the  jails, 
cards  stating  that  the  defender  is  available  for  advice  or  help  are  in  the  cells,  prison- 
ers pass  the  word  around,  and  the  turnkeys  are  willing  to  forward  notes.  The  jailers 
have  cooperated  because  when  the  chance  is  given  them  they  prefer  to  recommend 
the  unfortunates  in  their  custody  to  an  honest  attorney  rather  than  to  sharpers. 

As  the  influence  of  the  defender  increases,  that  of  the  jail  lawyer  wanes.  In  Los 
Angeles  that  species  of  lawyer  has  been  eliminated.2  It  has  always  been  recognized 
that  the  establishment  of  an  organization  for  public  defence  was  certain  to  have  this 
effect,3  but  the  importance  of  the  result  has  not  been  fully  appreciated.  It  is  no  ex- 

1  Mr.  Wood  estimates  the  cost  in  Los  Angeles  at  $200  per  day.  The  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accident  Board  in  its 
report  for  1914-15  (Massachusetts,  Public  Document  No.  105  of  1916,  p.  71)  estimates  the  cost  of  a  civil  jury  trial  in 
Massachusetts  at  $248.89  per  day. 

2  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  14;  7  Journal  of  Crim.  L.  595. 

3  Cf.  Fifth  Report  of  the  Law  Reform  Committee  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association,  page  14. 


124  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

aggeration  to  say  that  if  no  other  reason  existed,  the  defender  plan  would  be  more 
than  justified  by  its  success  in  stamping  out  these  serious  evils  and  thereby  protect- 
ing from  these  "shysters'1  and  "jail  lawyers"  not  only  the  prisoners  but  the  admin- 
istration of  justice  itself. 

One  further  result  deserves  mention  here.  The  defender  in  criminal  cases  will  be 
able  to  accumulate  a  fund  of  experience  and  data  which  will  cover  new  fields  and 
complement  the  facts  gathered  by  probation  staffs  and  the  courts  themselves,  all  of 
which  will  be  invaluable  in  pointing  the  way  to  the  betterment  of  our  criminal  pro- 
cedure and  our  treatment  of  the  criminal.1  This  opportunity  is  similar  to  that  afforded 
by  the  legal  aid  organizations,  so  that  its  signifiance  may  conveniently  be  treated 
more  fully  in  a  later  section  devoted  to  this  subject.2 


§8 
Whether  or  not  the  defender  plan  ought  to  be  extended  to  the  lower  courts  is  a  ques- 
tion that  does  not  admit  of  easy  answer.  As  to  that  part  of  the  work  of  inferior  crim- 
_  inal  tribunals  which  relates  to  preliminary  arraignments  and  proba- 

,     _  ble  cause  hearings  there  mav  be  need  of  a  defender,  but  he  should 

171  ttl€   LtOZCCV 

be  the  same  official  who  works  in  the  superior  court.  This  original 
jurisdiction  of  the  police  and  municipal  courts  includes  felonies, 
and  the  proceedings  constitute  the  first  stage  in  all  serious  criminal  charges.  If  the 
defender  is  later  to  be  called  upon  to  represent  the  accused  in  the  superior  court,  he 
clearly  ought  to  have  the  right  to  appear  at  every  step  in  the  procedure,  and  there- 
fore as  to  this  limited  field  there  may  be  need  of  his  services.  Certainly  the  Los  An- 
geles charter  provision  which  precludes  the  defender  from  acting  in  the  lower  courts 
in  such  instances  is  a  mistake.3 

As  to  misdemeanors  and  all  other  cases  over  which  the  lower  courts  have  final 
jurisdiction  (subject  only  to  appeal),  by  having  power  themselves  to  impose  a  fine 
or  prison  sentence,  the  situation  is  entirely  different.  Many  of  the  reasons  for  the  de- 
fender in  the  superior  courts  do  not  obtain  in  the  inferior  courts.  Very  often  there 
is  no  prosecutor,  or  if  there  is,  his  work  is  purelv  formal,  so  that  there  is  little  or  no 
inequality  in  not  furnishing  counsel  to  the  accused.  Formal  trials  are  the  exception. 
The  procedure  is  simple:  in  the  absence  of  counsel  the  judge  follows  the  rules  of  evi- 
dence only  loosely,  and  generally  the  judge  himself  conducts  the  proceedings,  bringing 
out  the  facts  on  both  sides.  It  is  possible  for  the  defendant  to  tell  his  own  story  in 
his  own  words.  As  to  many  of  the  offences  which  bulk  large  in  the  work  of  the  lower 
courts,  such  as  drunkenness,  street- walking,  selling  without  a  license,  vagrancy,  and 
overspeeding,  the  arresting  officer  is  himself  the  witness  and,  except  in  those  courts 

1  See  Introduction  by  Dean  Wigmore  in  Train  :  The  Prisoner  at  the  Bar  (2d  ed.),  page  xvii. 

2  Chapter  XXn,  Legal  Aid  and  the  Community,  §  3,  Preventive  Law,  page  214. 

3  The  Place  of  the  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  20. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  125 

where  the  dangerous  practice  obtains  of  making  the  police  act  as  prosecuting  attor- 
neys, which  at  once  forces  them  into  an  aggressive  and  partisan  attitude,  such  evi- 
dence is  generally  free  from  the  taint  of  spite  or  malice  or  revenge  which  may  charac- 
terize the  evidence  in  complaints  sworn  out  by  private  parties. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  can  properly  and  with  much  force  be  urged  that  these  are 
the  courts  of  the  people,  that  it  is  here  that  the  great  majority  of  persons  have  their 
only  contact  with  the  administration  of  justice,  and  that  in  accordance  with  the 
treatment  they  receive — particularly  is  this  true  of  the  immigrant  population — will 
they  judge  our  institutions.1  Further,  as  to  cases  where  representation  is  necessary, 
the  only  possibilitv  is  to  have  a  defender  because  the  inferior  courts  never  have 
exercised  the  power  of  assigning  counsel.  Finally,  it  is  truthfully  said  that  the  evil  of 
jail  lawyers,  " runners,"1"1  unreliable  interpreters,  and  preying  bondsmen,  exists  in  its 
most  malignant  form  in  connection  with  the  inferior  courts.2 

There  is  need  for  some  one  to  assist  the  foreigner,  the  ignorant,  and  the  terrified,  if 
their  side  of  the  story  is  to  be  fairly  heard.  Undoubtedly  a  responsible  intermediary 
who  talked  with  the  prisoners  before  their  cases  were  reached  could  present  the  facts 
more  intelligently  and  with  a  great  saving  of  time  to  the  court.  It  does  not  follow, 
however,  that  such  a  person  must  be  an  attorney.  As  in  the  small  claims  court,  the 
attorney's  function  in  the  inferior  criminal  court  is  slight.  There  are  few  questions 
of  law,  the  facts  are  generally  simple,  and  the  procedure  is  informal.  It  is  likely  that 
so  far  as  representation  is  concerned,  all  that  is  needed  or  desirable  could  be  secured 
through  the  probation  officers.  Much  of  the  work  done  by  the  existing  police  court 
defenders  finds  its  counterpart  in  other  states  in  the  work  of  the  probation  staff.  After 
its  study  of  the  Columbus  Municipal  Court,  the  Bureau  of  Municipal  Research  recom- 
mended that  the  office  of  defender  be  abolished  on  the  ground  that  the  work  was  a 
duplication  of  that  of  the  probation  officer.3  In  Cleveland  an  intermediate  plan  was 
tried.  The  Legal  Aid  Society  asked  Newton  D.  Baker,  then  City  Solicitor,  to  appoint 
a  defender  for  the  police  court.  It  was  arranged  with  the  court  that  if  parties  needed 
or  asked  for  advice,  they  might  be  assigned  attorneys  from  the  civil  side  of  the  City 
Attorney's  office.4 

The  best  examples  of  defenders  in  the  lower  courts  are  to  be  found  in  the  police 
court  of  the  city  of  Los  Angeles,  and  in  the  municipal  court  of  Portland,  Oregon. 
For  nearly  a  year  the  work  was  performed  in  Portland  by  a  voluntary  committee,  until 
in  1915,  by  ordinance,  the  position  was  made  official.5  David  Robinson  was  appointed 
as  defender  and  began  work  in  March,  1915.  No  reports,  other  than  monthly  state- 

1  Cf.  Final  Report  of  the  (Neiv  York)  Commission  to  Inquire  into  Courts  of  Inferior  Criminal  Jurisdiction,  As- 
sembly No.  64  of  1910,  page  86:  9  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  2,  p.  5. 

2  Final  Report  of  the  (New  York)Commission,etc,  pageTO ;  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Commission  on  Immigration 
(1914),  House  Document  No.  2300,  page  107  :  Report  of  the  Boston  Municipal  Court  for  1915,  page  16;  Train:  The  Pris- 
oner at  the  Bar,  page  74. 

3  Report  of  the  New  York  Bureau  of  Municipal  Research  to  the  City  Council  of  Columbus,  dated  January  31, 1917. 
See  page  28. 

4  Baker:  Police  Court  Prosecutions  and  a  Public  Defender,  2  American  City  (1910),  266. 

6  Ordinance  No.  30,107  of  1916.  To  be  appointed  by  the  Council  to  hold  office  at  its  pleasure  at  an  annual  salary  of  $1800. 


126  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

merits  to  the  Mayor,  have  been  made.  From  an  examination  of  such  reports  and  the 
files  the  following  facts  appear:  From  May  1, 1915,  to  December  31, 1915,  1998  cases 
were  undertaken,  and  during  the  year  1916  the  number  was  1363.  The  great  decrease 
was  due  to  the  prohibition  law  which  took  effect  January  1, 1916.  An  analysis  of  3077 
of  these  cases  (May,  1915,  to  November,  1916)  shows  the  following  results: 


No.  of  Cases 

Discharged 

Held  for 
Grand  Jury 

Punished  by  Fine 
or  Imprisonment 

Continued 
for  Sentence1 

3077 

997 

79 

544 

1457 

In  Los  Angeles  the  great  success  of  the  defender  for  the  county  led  to  the  passage 
of  an  ordinance  on  November  18,  1915,  creating  the  position  of  city  police  court  de- 
fender.2 James  H.  Pope  qualified  under  the  civil  service  law  and  began  his  work  Febru- 
ary 14,  1916.  Up  to  November  1, 1916,  there  had  been  883  cases.  No  analysis  of  these 
figures  is  available.3 

The  methods  employed  by  both  officials  are  nearly  identical  and  may  be  stated 
together.  Neither  attempts  to  represent  all  persons,  but  confines  his  activities  to  those 
who  are  too  poor  to  engage  their  own  counsel.  Those  who  have  obtained  bail  are  con- 
sidered able  to  pay  fees.  In  Portland,  there  is  the  further  precaution  of  requiring  an 
affidavit  of  poverty;  in  Los  Angeles,  the  prisoner's  property  slip,  made  out  by  the  jailer, 
affords  the  basis  for  decision.  Each  night  the  jailer  makes  out  a  list  of  persons  who 
have  been  arrested  and  transmits  it  to  the  clerk,  who  checks  off  those  released  on  bail. 
Early  each  morning  the  defender  receives  this  list  from  the  clerk  and  then  goes  through 
the  jail,  hearing  each  man's  story,  advising  him  how  to  plead,  and  often  further  ad- 
vising him  as  to  his  future  conduct.  As  the  cases  are  called  in  court  the  defender  again 
suggests  as  to  the  plea,  states  the  facts  briefly  to  the  judge,4  and  suggests  a  proper 
disposition.  If  the  plea  has  been  not  guilty,  the  process  is  nearly  the  same.  There  is 
a  marked  absence  of  formal  trials,  of  cross  examination,  argument,  and  the  like.  It  is 
for  these  reasons  that  an  adequate  probation  staff  ought  to  be  able  to  perforin  the 
necessary  work  as  well  as  an  attorney. 

Many  of  the  same  advantageous  results  which  have  already  been  noted  in  connec- 
tion with  the  defenders  work  in  the  superior  courts  can  be  observed  in  the  inferior 
courts.  There  has  been  a  saving  of  time  with  its  consequent  economy.  Prisoners  are 
properly  advised,  their  cases  are  brought  promptly  before  the  courts  so  that  they  are 
not  unnecessarily  detained  in  confinement,  trials  are  more  honestly  conducted,  for  the 
defender  is  never  party  to  perjured  or  manufactured  defences,  and  by  reason  of  this 
the  relationship  with  the  prosecuting  officer  is  one  of  cordial  cooperation.  Finally, 
the  jail  lawyers  with  their  runners  and  bondsmen  have  been  practically  eliminated. 

1  Continued  for  sentence  is  analogous  to  release  on  probation  under  a  suspended  sentence. 

2  Ordinance  No.  33,348,  new  series.  The  office  was  later  put  under  civil  service.  The  appropriation  for  the  first  year 
was  $2710.  The  defender's  salary  is  $1680. 

3  The  only  report  is  a  typewritten  statement  made  to  the  Mayor  on  September  20, 1916.  This  deals  with  the  work 
generally. 

4  See  84  Independent  (1915),  95, 99. 


DEFENDER  IN  CRIMINAL  CASES  127 

All  of  these  results,  except  possibly  the  last,  can  be  secured  by  an  adequate  pro- 
bation staff.1  As  the  probation  branch  is  indispensable  to  every  criminal  court,  the 
sounder  line  of  development  would  seem  to  be  to  entrust  this  service  to  the  proba- 
tion officers  rather  than  to  duplicate  the  work  and  create  new  officials.  There  remains 
the  great  and  growing  evil  of  the  jail  lawyer.  Thus  far  it  has  not  been  met  by  any 
agency  as  successfully  as  by  the  defender.  There  is  not  at  present  sufficient  experience 
to  warrant  a  final  statement.  If,  however,  after  intelligent  cooperation  between  court, 
jailer,  and  probation  staff,  the  mischief  caused  by  the  shyster  is  not  abated,  there  will 
exist  an  irrefutable  argument  for  establishing  defenders  in  the  municipal  and  police 
courts. 

§  9 
The  defender  in  criminal  cases,  whether  publicly  or  privately  supported,  is  unques- 
tionably the  best  immediate  method  for  securing  freedom  and  equality  of  justice 
,_,  ,         _      7      to  poor  persons  accused  of  serious  crimes.  It  is  a  complete  solution 

.     „  ,,        of  the  difficulties  in  the  existing  administration  of  the  criminal  law 
opment  of  tlie         .  .  .   .  ,       ,  °  .  ..     .  .  . 

JL   „     .  which  have  placed  poor  prisoners  at  a  serious  disadvantage,  and  it 

remedies  some  of  the  most  glaring  abuses  which  have  brought  the 

criminal  law  into  disrepute. 

The  plan  has  gained  great  popular  favor.  An  interesting  reflection  of  this  is  to  be 
found  in  recent  political  campaigns  in  which  district  attorneys  have  asserted  that,  if 
elected,  they  would  themselves  be  public  defenders.2  Five  years  ago  the  phrase  would 
have  been  meaningless.  The  idea  gives  promise  of  rapid  development.  Since  1914  it 
has  spread  very  generally  throughout  the  country,  and  has  made  more  headway  in 
legislatures  and  in  the  community  at  large  than  the  proposed  reforms  in  court  reor- 
ganization and  simplification  of  procedure.  In  three  years  it  has  made  more  impres- 
sion on  the  public  mind  than  its  more  ancient  ally,  the  legal  aid  society,  has  been  able 
to  make  in  forty  years. 

It  is  not  unlikely  that  the  superior  court  defender  will  become  recognized  in  the 
near  future  as  an  integral  part  in  the  administration  of  criminal  justice.  In  the  east 
the  initiative  is  more  likely  to  come  from  private  than  from  public  sources.  If  the 
legal  aid  societies  possess  the  requisite  vision  and  strength,  they  maybe  expected  to  ex- 
tend their  work  into  the  criminal  field  and  establish  departments  which  will  afford  to 
the  poor,  who  are  accused  of  serious  offences,  the  services  of  a  skilful,  well-equipped, 
and  honest  defender. 


1  After  an  examination  of  the  Women's  Night  Court  in  New  York,  where  there  is  an  excellent  probation  service, 
made  by  Mr.  Embree,  counsel  for  the  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,  and  the  writer,  and  after  consultation  with 
Judge  Frothingham  of  that  court,  it  seemed  evident  that  there  was  no  need  for  a  public  defender. 

2  During  the  1916  November  election  the  hoardings  in  Denver  carried  this  advertisement:  "  Vote  for  Foley  for  Dis- 
trict Attorney—  A  Public  Defender  not  a  Persecutor." 


Chapter  XVI 
LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

The  purpose  of  this  Society  shall  be  to  render  legal  aid,  gratui- 
tously if  necessary,  to  all  who  may  appear  worthy  thereof,  and 
who  are  unable  to  procure  assistance  elsewhere.1 

THE  last  and  the  greatest  remedial  agency  is  the  legal  aid  society.  Though  it 
stands  as  an  extra-legal  institution,  unrecognized  by  the  traditional  adminis- 
tration of  justice,  it  has  done  more  to  place  the  poor  in  a  more  equal  position  before 
the  law  than  all  the  other  agencies  combined.  For  years  it  was  alone  in  combating 
the  denial  of  justice.  Now  it  is  supported  and  aided  by  the  recent  development  of  the 
other  agencies  which  have  already  been  described. 

The  legal  aid  organization  is  not  a  thing  unto  itself;  its  tremendous  importance 
consists  of  the  direct  part  which  it  takes  in  the  administration  of  justice.  For  this 
reason  the  only  true  definition  of  legal  aid  work  is  in  terms  of  relationship  to  the 
administration  of  justice  and  to  the  various  remedial  agencies.  Only  such  a  defini- 
tion can  ascertain  the  principles  common  to  all  legal  aid  organizations,  prevent  our 
being  led  astray  by  apparent  differences  in  work  in  different  cities,  and  establish  a 
standard  by  which  we  can  gauge  the  success  and  failure  of  legal  aid  work  as  far  as  it 
has  developed. 

A  summarization  of  what  has  gone  before  brings  us  to  a  precise  definition.  We 
have  seen  that  our  present  inequalities  are  the  result,  not  of  an  unfair  substantive 
law,  but  of  the  procedure  which  we  have  inherited  and  built  up  for  administering 
that  law.  We  have  seen  that  the  defects  in  the  machinery  of  justice  which  cause  the 
denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  are  delays,  court  costs,  and  the  expense  of  engaging 
counsel.  We  have  seen  that  delays  and  procedural  difficulties  will  be  eliminated  in 
due  course  as  the  reorganization  of  courts  and  simplification  of  procedure  makes  its 
inevitable  headway,  and  that  costs  can  be  taken  out  of  the  way  whenever  we  have 
the  courage  and  will  to  do  it.  We  know  that  the  great  difficulty,  the  difficulty  which 
is  inherent  in  our  system  of  administering  justice  and  cannot  easily  be  done  away 
with,  is  the  expense  of  engaging  counsel  for  advice  or  assistance  in  litigation. 

We  have  examined  eight  groups  of  agencies  and  methods  which  are  attempting 
the  equalization  of  justice  by  solving,  in  one  way  or  another,  the  problem  of  the  ex- 
pense of  counsel.  Discarding  the  system  of  assignment  of  counsel,  which  has  amounted 
to  little  and  which  contains  but  small  promise,  we  have  found  that  the  four  types 
of  cases  which  make  up  the  chief  burden  of  the  poor  are  beginning  to  be  taken  care 
of  through  six  agencies.  Through  the  small  claims  court  wage  claims  and  miscella- 
neous small  cases  are  beginning  to  receive  suitable  treatment.  By  conciliation  and 
arbitration  a  start  has  been  made  in  the  employment  of  a  new  method  of  caring  for 

1  Constitution  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  Article  I,  §  2. 


LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS  129 

small  claims  and  domestic  disputes.  In  the  domestic  relations  courts  a  vast  number 
of  domestic  difficulties  are  securing  proper  disposition.  Under  the  administrative 
tribunals  great  progress  has  been  made  in  the  settlement  and  adjustment  of  suits 
growing  out  of  industrial  accidents.  From  administrative  officials  much  legal  advice 
is  obtainable,  and  in  a  few  instances  direct  assistance  in  litigation,  notably  in  con- 
nection with  wage  claims,  is  available.  Analysis  has  shown  that,  on  the  one  hand, 
the  agencies  are  capable  of  large  expansion  both  through  their  adoption  in  more 
jurisdictions  and  through  an  increase  in  their  functions ;  and  that,  on  the  other  hand, 
they  are  not  and  probably  never  will  be  complete  solutions  for  the  difficulty  of  the 
expense  of  the  attorney. 

As  to  all  cases  in  certain  fields  of  the  law  and  as  to  certain  types  of  cases  in  all 
fields,  the  attorney  is  a  necessity.  To  secure  equality  of  justice  in  such  cases,  the  only 
possible  solution  is  to  supply  the  attorney  gratuitously  to  poor  persons.  Thus  in  the 
field  of  criminal  law  there  is  no  possibility  of  eliminating  the  attorney,  and  the  prob- 
lem of  how  best  to  supply  him  is  answered  by  the  seventh  agency  considered, —  the 
defender  in  criminal  cases.  What  is  true  of  the  criminal  law  is  equally  true  of  great 
parts  of  the  civil  law.  The  only  possible  solution  is  to  supply  counsel,  and  here  the 
legal  aid  society  makes  its  appearance. 

The  function  of  the  legal  aid  society  is  to  furnish  counsel  to  poor  persons;  to 
undertake  their  cases  when  no  other  assistance  elsewhere  is  available.  This  definition 
fixes  the  relationship  between  legal  aid  organizations  and  the  other  remedial  agen- 
cies and  the  entire  administration  of  justice.  Before  these  other  agencies  came  into 
being  the  whole  burden  was  thrust  on  legal  aid  organizations,  to  be  met  by  them  as 
best  they  could.  Their  load  is  lightened  and  their  particular  work  changed  as  the 
other  remedial  agencies  are  established  and  developed.  The  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society 
must  supply  attorneys  for  miscellaneous  small  suits  in  the  Municipal  Court;  the 
Cleveland  Legal  Aid  Society  can  refer  such  causes  to  the  Small  Claims  branch  of  the 
Municipal  Court.  The  Kansas  City  Legal  Aid  Bureau  must  be  prepared  to  under- 
take proceedings  to  collect  wages ;  in  Boston  they  need  merely  to  be  referred  to  the 
State  Board  of  Labor  and  Industries.  While  the  work  varies  radically  from  city  to 
city,  the  function  everywhere  is  the  same.  A  steady  change  in  the  cases  requiring 
assistance  from  legal  aid  organizations  is  inevitable  because  of  the  part  they  play. 
As  the  domestic  relations  courts  widen  their  functions  and  take  over  illegitimacy 
and  separate  maintenance,  such  cases  will  disappear  from  the  legal  aid  offices;  and 
as  the  industrial  accident  boards  become  less  able  to  take  care  of  disputed  compen- 
sation cases,  injured  workmen  will  appear  in  increasing  numbers  among  the  legal  aid 
applicants. 

If,  in  the  language  of  the  day,  we  conceive  of  organized  society  at  war  with  the 
inequalities  in  the  administration  of  justice,  then  the  first  six  agencies — small  claims 
courts,  conciliation,  arbitration,  domestic  relations  courts  with  their  probation  staffs, 
administrative  tribunals,  and  administrative  officials — constitute  the  first  line  of 


130  THE  REMEDIAL  AGENCIES 

attack.  It  is  for  the  legal  aid  organizations,  including  the  defenders  in  criminal  cases, 
to  constitute  the  second  line,  to  sweep  up  all  that  may  evade  or  break  through  the 
first  line,  and  to  go  forward  on  the  points  which  the  first  line  cannot  reach. 

Having,  in  this  general  way,  defined  the  relationship  of  legal  aid  work  to  the  other 
agencies  and  its  relation  to  the  entire  administration  of  justice,  we  now  turn  to  a 
more  detailed  examination  of  how  legal  aid  organizations  came  into  being,  of  what 
they  have  accomplished,  of  their  present  position,  their  future,  and  of  their  effect  on 
the  law,  on  the  bar,  and  in  the  community. 


PART  III 
LEGAL  AID  WORK  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


Chapter  XVII 

ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  OF  LEGAL 
AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

The  founders  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  whose  original  intention  it  was  to  pro- 
tect a  certain  class  of  poor  immigrants  from  the  rapacity  of  runners,  ticket 
speculators  and  the  like,  certainly  had  no  idea  of  the  majestic  proportions 
which  their  enterprise  would  assume.  Like  an  avalanche  it  has  gathered  strength 
and  increased  in  proportions  as  it  advanced.  Arthur  v.  Briesen.1 

§1 

1EGAL  aid  work  of  an  informal,  unorganized,  individual  sort  has  always  existed. 
J  The  first  legal  aid  work  in  the  United  States  was  undoubtedly  done  in  the  first 
law  office  established  in  the  American  colonies.  The  various  charity  organizations, 

some  of  which  were  established  early  in  our  history,  have  always  done 
Preliminary  ,, ,       ,     .j         ,         .,  ,  ,         n. 

a      a  measure  ot  legal  aid  work  as  the  need  arose  by  calling  upon  some 

individual  attorney  to  give  legal  assistance  in  a  particular  case.  In  a  real  sense  the 
service  rendered,  whether  by  law  office  or  charity,  may  be  called  legal  aid.  Such  work 
by  the  individual  lawyer  is  still  to  be  found  in  any  smaller  city  or  town,  and  many  of 
the  charities,  even  in  the  larger  cities,  still  continue  to  give  legal  as  well  as  material 
assistance. 

All  work  of  this  nature,  though  it  must  be  recognized,  lies  beyond  the  scope  of 
our  enquiry.  Our  concern  is  with  the  administration  of  justice  as  it  affects  the  poor, 
with  agencies  which  are  playing  a  part  in  the  betterment  of  that  administration,  and 
with  any  movement  that  seems  to  offer  some  solution  for  the  existing  denial  of 
justice.  Informal  and  individual  legal  aid  work,  from  its  nature,  is  transitory  and 
fleeting.  However  much  it  may  have  aided  the  individual  poor  person  here  and  there, 
it  failed  to  affect  the  administration  of  justice,  it  offered  nothing  permanent  on  which 
to  build,  and  when  the  enormous  demand  for  legal  assistance  came  with  immigration 
and  the  growth  of  great  cities  in  the  last  quarter  of  the  nineteenth  century,  it  col- 
lapsed. Then  arose  organized  legal  aid  work  which,  being  possessed  of  permanence 
and  rapidly  taking  on  the  character  of  an  institution,  steadily  grew  in  every  direc- 
tion and  dimension.  Our  concern  is  with  this  organized  legal  aid  movement  because 
it  offers  one  great  solution  for  the  inherent  difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel,  and 
because  it  bids  fair  to  exercise  a  profound  effect  upon  the  administration  of  justice 
itself.  For  our  purposes,  the  distinction  between  individual  and  organized  legal  aid 
work  may  be  likened  to  the  difference  between  the  personal  charity  work  of  a  phy- 
sician for  individual  patients  and  the  establishment  of  hospitals  and  dispensaries.  Or, 
to  come  more  nearly  to  our  own  subject,  judges  have  from  time  to  time  tried  to  ad- 
just small  disputes  by  conciliation  or  informal  hearing,  but  such  isolated  instances 

1  From  the  Twenty-fourth  Annual  Report  of  the  President  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  24  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  6. 


134  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

left  no  impression  on  the  administration  of  justice  and  afforded  no  solution  for  the 
general  problem  of  securing  justice  in  a  multitude  of  small  matters.  It  was  only  the 
organized  small  claims  court  that  had  the  power  to  alter  the  course  of  judicial  ad- 
ministration and  to  offer  a  general  solution  for  the  general  problem. 

We  have  already  seen  that  legal  aid  work  consists  of  giving  legal  advice  and  legal 
assistance  in  negotiation  and  litigation  to  poor  persons,  without  cost  to  them  or 
at  a  minimum  cost  which  they  can  afford,  in  matters  where  no  other  assistance  is 
available.  In  the  light  of  modern  developments  this  may  be  spelled  out  to  mean  the 
furnishing  of  lawyers  in  cases  where  lawyers  are  necessary  if  justice  is  to  be  done,  and 
where  no  other  agency,  as  the  state  or  the  court,  provides  the  attorneys  or  persons 
to  perform  the  attorney's  functions.  A  legal  aid  organization  is  simply  an  organization 
which  has  undertaken  that  responsibility.  The  organization  may  be  a  corporation,  or 
a  voluntary  association,  or  a  department  of  a  larger  organization  such  as  a  bar  as- 
sociation, a  municipality,  or  an  organized  charity;  but  there  is  implied  something 
more  than  individual  effort,  there  must  be  some  elements  of  association,  combina- 
tion, and  cooperation,  through  which  are  secured  continuity  and  permanence. 

As  the  primary  object  of  this  study  is  to  set  out  the  functional  importance  of  the 
various  agencies  which  are  equalizing  the  administration  of  justice,  the  history  of 
these  movements  is  of  importance  only  as  it  makes  clearer  the  part  which  each  plays 
or  may  be  expected  to  play.  With  over  forty  legal  aid  organizations  in  the  United 
States,  a  volume  could  be  written  on  the  one  subject  of  their  history.  All  that  can 
be  attempted  here  is  to  present  the  broad  outlines  of  the  rise  and  development  of 
legal  aid  organizations  in  order  that  from  such  a  background  the  work  itself  and 
its  possibilities  may  be  better  appreciated  and  estimated. 


§2 

Organized  legal  aid  work  began  its  history  in  the  city  of  New  York  in  the  year 

1876.  For  nearly  a  century  there  had  been  in  that  city  an  association  called  The 

German  Society,  which  had  an  especial  interest  in  German  immigrants. 

'        Following  the  Civil  War  there  was  a  great  German  emigration,  and  to 

fi  meet  the  legal  questions  which  were  constantly  arising,  particularly  with 

reference  to  the  protection  of  newly  arrived  immigrants,  The  German 

Society  appointed  a  special  legal  committee.  By  1875  the  burden  of  legal  work  had 

become  so  great  that  it  was  suggested  by  Sigismund  Kaufman  and  Charles  Hauselt 

that  a  separate  society  be  formed.1 

Accordingly,  early  in  the  year  1876  a  group  of  American  citizens  of  German 
birth  and  members  of  The  German  Society  in  New  York  met  at  the  law  office  of 
Edward  Salomon,  an  ex-governor  of  Wisconsin,  for  the  purpose  of  forming  an  as- 
sociation, and  on  March  8,  1876,  their  organization  was  incorporated  under  the  name 

1  Holls  :  Tlie  Legal  Aid  Society,  8  Charities  Review  (1898),  16. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  135 

of  "  Der  Deutsche  Rechtsschutz  Verein."  Their  purpose,  as  the  original  constitution 
stated,1  was  "to  render  legal  aid  and  assistance,  gratuitously,  to  those  of  German 
birth,  who  may  appear  worthy  thereof,  but  who  from  poverty  are  unable  to  procure 
it.11  Ex-Governor  Salomon  was  elected  president,  offices  were  opened  at  39  Nassau 
Street,  and  an  attorney,  who  had  his  own  law  practice,  was  paid  a  salary  to  take 
charge  of  the  cases  of  the  new  organization.2 

This  was  not  a  legal  aid  society  within  the  modern  meaning  of  that  phrase.  It  ex- 
isted to  protect  German  immigrants  from  the  rapacity  of  runners,  boarding-house 
keepers,  and  a  miscellaneous  coterie  of  sharpers  who  found  that  the  trustful  and  be- 
wildered newcomers  offered  an  easy  prey.  The  purpose  was  relatively  a  narrow  one.3 
There  was  no  conception  of  furnishing  legal  assistance  in  general,  of  preventing  in- 
justice except  in  this  limited  field,  or  of  taking  any  part  in  the  administration  of 
justice.  The  organization  was  proprietary  in  its  nature;  it  was  supported  entirely  by 
The  German  Society,  by  German  merchants,  and  by  persons  interested  in  assisting 
Germans.  At  the  outset  there  was  no  vision  of  the  future.  There  was  not  even  an 
intention  to  try  to  develop  into  a  general  and  far-reaching  organization.  But  it  was 
a  beginning  which  was  strong  enough  to  weather  the  distrust  and  jealousy  at  first 
manifested  by  the  legal  profession,4  and  which  did  in  fact,  albeit  unconsciously,  lay 
a  firm  foundation  for  the  great  development  that  was  to  come. 

The  organization  was  made  efficient  and  businesslike.  Careful  records  of  the  cases 
and  of  sums  collected  for  clients  were  made,  and  excellent  reports,  written  in  Ger- 
man, were  published  each  year.5  In  1879  the  directors  voted  that  on  all  collections 
of  over  twenty  dollars  the  Society  should  charge  a  commission  of  ten  per  cent,  and 
in  1881  the  charge  was  extended  to  all  collections  above  ten  dollars.  It  is  interest- 
ing to  note  that  at  the  very  outset  two  types  of  cases  clearly  predominated.  Out  of 
212  cases  received  in  1876,  there  were  113  claims  for  wages  and  51  matters  concern- 
ing domestic  relations;  and  in  1877,  out  of  750  cases,  281  related  to  wages  and  61 
to  domestic  difficulties.  Until  1890  the  work  grew  steadily,  but  it  remained  routine 
in  nature. 

At  about  this  same  time  a  similar  but  entirely  independent  and  unrelated  move- 
ment was  taking  place  in  Chicago.  As  in  New  York  the  frauds  perpetrated  on  immi- 
grants called  attention  to  their  legally  defenceless  condition  and  led  to  the  forma- 
tion of  a  society  to  help  them,  so  in  Chicago  the  great  number  of  seductions  and 
debaucheries  of  young  girls  under  the  guise  of  proffered  employment  aroused  the 
women  of  the  city6  and  led,  through  the  instrumentality  of  the  Chicago  Woman's 
Club,  to  the  formation  in  1886  of  an  organization  which  was  the  next  year  incorpo- 

1  Constitution  of  1877,  Article  I,  §  2. 

2  History  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  (1912),  page  4. 

3  11  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  2,  p.  2. 

4  Holls:  The  Legal  Aid  Society,  8  Charities  Review  (1898),  15, 17. 
6  The  first  report  was  published  February  28, 1877. 

6  Conover:  The  Chicago  Protective  Agency,  8  Charities  Review  (1898),  287. 


136  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

rated  under  the  title  of  The  Protective  Agency  for  Women  and  Children.1  Like  the 
New  York  society,  there  was  no  vision  of  a  general  rendering  of  legal  assistance  to 
poor  persons.  By  force  of  circumstances,  however,  the  work  did  outgrow  its  original 
limits,  and  although  still  confined  to  assistance  for  women  and  children,  it  was  extended 
to  include  all  legal  difficulties  presented  by  such  persons.  From  an  extremely  small 
beginning  of  about  six  cases  a  month,  the  work  rapidly  grew  to  formidable  propor- 
tions. In  1890  there  were  1455  cases,  of  which  349  were  claims  for  wages.  It  was  from 
the  outset  the  policy  of  this  Protective  Agency  to  charge  no  fees  of  any  description. 
Careful  annual  reports  were  published. 

In  1888,  on  the  initiation  of  the  Ethical  Culture  Society  of  Chicago,  there  was  es- 
tablished in  that  city  a  second  organization,  which  was  named  the  Bureau  of  Justice.3 
This  was  in  fact  the  first  true  legal  aid  organization.  It  undertook  to  supply  legal 
services  in  all  cases  to  all  persons,  regardless  of  nationality,  race,  or  sex.  It  was  in  no 
sense  proprietary;  its  leadership,  control,  and  support  were  not  derived  from  any  par- 
ticularly defined  group,  and  its  income  came  from  charitably  disposed  persons  in  the 
general  public.  It  adopted  the  policy  of  charging  some  fees  to  its  clients.  By  reason 
of  its  wider  scope,  its  work  increased  by  leaps  and  bounds,  so  that  by  1890  it  was 
thrice  the  size  of  its  sister  agency.  According  to  the  third  annual  report  for  the  period 
March  1, 1890,  to  March  1, 1891,  the  cases  numbered  3783,  and  the  sum  of  $10,658.45 
was  collected  for  clients.  Had  the  society  in  New  York  continued  along  its  original 
lines,  the  leadership  in  the  legal  aid  movement  would  have  devolved  on  the  Bureau 
of  Justice,  but  even  while  these  twin  Chicago  organizations  were  making  their  first 
brave  experiments,  changes  destined  to  affect  profoundly  the  whole  future  develop- 
ment of  legal  aid  work  everywhere  were  quietly  taking  place  in  New  York. 

Emerson  has  said,  "Every  institution  is  but  the  lengthened  shadow  of  some  one 
man,'1  and  nowhere  is  the  truth  of  the  statement  more  clearly  illustrated  than  in  the 
relationship  of  legal  aid  work  to  Arthur  v.  Briesen.  No  history  of  legal  aid  work  could 
be  complete  if  it  failed  to  pay  tribute  to  his  courageous  vision,  his  faithful  leadership, 
and  his  untiring  labors  in  bringing  justice  within  the  reach  of  the  poor,  whom  he 
knew  and  loved.  Mr.  Briesen  was  not  one  of  the  original  incorporators  of  the  New  York 
Legal  Aid  Society.  His  connection  with  the  work  began  in  1884,  when  his  name 
appeared  on  the  slender  membership  roll.  During  1889  he  was  a  member  of  the  law 
committee,  and  at  the  annual  meeting  he  was  elected  president  for  the  year  1890,  a 
position  to  which  he  was  annually  reelected  during  the  space  of  twenty-six  years,  and 
which  was  terminated  only  by  his  resignation  so  that,  in  his  own  words,  "younger  and 
stronger  hands  might  take  the  helm.11 

To  understand  the  situation  which  confronted  the  new  president,  it  is  necessary 
to  review  what  the  Society  had  accomplished  up  to  1890.  The  work  had  gone  forward 
steadily,  increasing  from  212  cases  in  1876  to  3413  in  1882,  and  remaining  nearly 

1  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1916),  page  137. 

2  Wigmore :  Additional  History  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  1  Mass.  L.  Quarterly  (1916),  288. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  137 

constant  at  about  that  figure  through  the  next  seven  years.  Monies  collected  for  cli- 
ents had  steadily  increased  from  $1000  in  1876  to  $12,460.71  in  1882  and  $20,104.20 
in  1889.  The  Society  had  had  great  difficulty  in  collecting  money  for  itself.  Its  total 
expenses  had  been  nearly  $38,000,  of  which  The  German  Society  had  contributed  one- 
fourth.  The  balance,  except  for  a  small  income  from  fees,  was  contributed  by  a  few 
members,  whose  number  averaged  sixty-four.  During  these  thirteen  years  the  Society 
had  six  times  closed  the  year  with  a  deficit.  Until  1890  all  the  annual  reports  were 
published  in  German,  and  from  a  statistical  table  showing  the  nationalities  of  appli- 
cants, published  for  the  first  time  in  1889,  it  appears  that  of  the  3500  clients  in  that 
year  2438  were  natives  of  Germany,  346  were  Russian  Poles,  148  were  Russians,  147 
were  Hungarians,  and  31  were  Americans. 

Mr.  Briesen  not  only  breathed  new  life  into  this  wavering  institution,  but  he 
brought  to  it  a  new  vision  of  its  wider  usefulness.  From  his  own  struggles  he  knew, 
and  as  he  looked  about  him  he  saw,  that  injustice  was  not  confined  to  Germans.  He 
saw  that  all  nationalities,  even  native-born  Americans,  were  daily  obliged  to  lose  clear 
legal  rights  which  they  had  no  means  to  enforce.  It  was  his  creed  that  as  all  these 
persons,  whatever  the  country  of  their  birth,  had  come  to  America  to  be  Americans, 
so  the  legal  aid  society  should  extend  to  all  of  them,  irrespective  of  nationality,  its 
protection  and  guidance  up  to  the  furthest  limit  of  its  ability.  By  such  stars  was  the 
true  course  of  legal  aid  work  finally  charted. 

He  at  once  set  about  to  put  these  changes  into  effect.  The  annual  report  for  1890, 
which  was  printed  in  German,  following  the  usual  custom,  he  translated  and  repub- 
lished in  English.  By  the  act  of  translation  the  somewhat  forbidding  and  formidable 
title  which  the  Society  had  borne  was  presented  to  the  public  in  the  more  under- 
standable form  of  "The  German  Legal  Aid  Society."  Under  the  charter  provisions 
persons  other  than  Germans  had  no  right  to  assistance,  and  legally  the  Society  had 
no  authority  to  expend  its  funds  in  their  behalf,  but  by  1889,  such  persons  finding 
no  relief  in  the  courts  or  from  law  offices  were  seeking  the  Society's  help  in  large 
numbers,  and,  as  Mr.  Briesen  wrote  in  his  report,1  "without  special  instructions,  the 
attorney,  following  the  dictates  of  humanity,  found  himself  obliged  to  extend  his  field 
of  operations  to  all  sufferers."  To  regularize  this  situation  and  in  accordance  with 
his  belief,  he  persuaded  the  directors  to  change  the  constitution  by  omitting  the 
words  "  of  German  birth."  Inasmuch  as  the  policy  of  charging  small  fees  had  for  some 
time  been  determined  upon,  a  further  minor  change  of  qualification  was  made.  The 
amended  purpose  clause,  as  adopted  in  1890,  read: 2  "Its  object  and  purpose  shall  be 
to  render  legal  aid  and  assistance,  gratuitously  if  necessary,  to  all  who  may  appear 
worthy  thereof  and  who,  from  poverty,  are  unable  to  procure  it."  This  was  the  lan- 
guage of  a  real  legal  aid  organization ;  but  the  change  was  not  made  without  a  strug- 
gle. Many  of  the  directors  did  not  understand  Mr.  Briesen's  belief;  The  German  So- 
ciety withdrew  its  support;  but  his  faith  was  rewarded,  for  by  the  end  of  the  year 

1  15  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  3.  2  Constitution  of  1890,  Art.  I,  §  2. 


138  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

1890  the  Society's  support  had  widened  and  its  membership  increased  from  81  to 
170  subscribers.  Mr.  Briesen  saw  that  the  Society  not  only  had  a  direct  contribution 
to  make  to  the  administration  of  justice,  but  that  it  stood  in  a  peculiar  relationship 
to  the  bar.  He  spread  the  knowledge  of  this  new  organization  among  lawyers,  and 
from  them  he  asked  assistance.  For  the  first  time  the  bar  began  to  get  an  inkling  of 
what  its  purposes  were,  and  slowly,  by  dint  of  much  persuasion,  the  larger  firms  were 
enrolled  as  members.  In  the  report  for  1890  a  table  was  submitted,  showing  the  size 
of  the  claims  collected  for  clients,  which  serves  as  an  interesting  reflection  of  the 
character  of  the  work.  Of  507  claims  collected,  350  were  under  ten  dollars,  127  were 
between  ten  and  fifty  dollars,  13  were  between  fifty  and  one  hundred  dollars,  and  17 
ranged  upwards  to  about  five  hundred  dollars. 

Although  from  its  inception  the  Society  was  obliged  to  face  much  criticism  and 
indifference,  its  first  enemy  appeared  in  1893  in  the  guise  of  a  fraudulent  legal  aid 
society.  Such  an  attack  was  inevitable,  and  it  was  the  precursor  of  similar  attacks, 
which  were  repeated  in  following  years  until  stopped  by  legislation.1  As  the  Society 
built  up  its  reputation  for  honesty  and  square  dealing,  the  phrase  "legal  aid"  came  to 
carry  a  very  clear  connotation  of  safety  and  relief  to  the  minds  of  the  poor.  The  shy- 
ster element  at  the  bar  was  not  slow  to  see  that  there  was  a  magic  in  the  words  which 
could  be  capitalized  into  a  cash  value.  A  number  of  associations,  carrying  the  phrase 
"legal  aid"  as  a  part  of  their  title,  sprang  up,  and  like  wolves  in  sheep's  clothing 
went  about  seeking  whom  they  might  devour.  It  was  a  difficult  moment  for  this  rela- 
tively new  and  generally  unrecognized  Society.  Had  it  failed  to  stand  its  ground,  its 
fair  name,  its  greatest  asset,  and  its  only  way  of  reaching  the  poor,  would  have  been 
lost  and  "legal  aid  society"  would  have  become  a  term  of  obloquy  even  as  it  has 
in  England.  The  directors  fought  this  dangerous  situation  by  seeking  relief  in  the 
courts,  and  it  is  to  the  credit  of  the  judges  that  they  perceived  the  true  condition  and 
protected  the  Society  in  its  title  by  enjoining  the  use  of  the  words  "legal  aid"  for 
any  purpose  calculated  to  deceive  or  mislead  the  poor.2 

In  1894  the  legal  aid  idea  took  root  in  Jersey  City.3  No  definite  organization 
emerged  for  many  years  and  the  work  remained  small  in  scope,  but  the  circumstances 
of  its  establishment  reveal  how  local  the  legal  aid  plan  was  even  after  eighteen  years 
and  how  slowly  it  made  headway.  Although  Jersey  City  is  directly  across  the  Hud- 
son River  from  New  York,  and  although  the  society  in  New  York  had  existed  since 
1876,  the  Jersey  City  organization  was  created  in  entire  ignorance  of  its  near  neigh- 
bor. It  was  modeled  after  the  "Poor  Man's  Lawyer"  at  the  Mansfield  Settlement 
House  in  London,  which  was  known  to  the  founder  of  the  Whittier  House  Settlement 
in  Jersey  City  because  she  had  lived  in  London.  For  years  the  two  kindred  efforts 
existed  side  by  side,  each  without  knowledge  of  the  other. 

1  See  18  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  7 ;  23  Ibid.  9  ;  28  Ibid.  8;  31  Ibid.  16:  32  Ibid.  11;  6  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  3,  p.  19. 

2  For  the  injunction  in  the  ease  of  The  Legal  Aid  Society  v.  The  Cooperative  Legal  Aid  Society,  see  28  N.  Y.L.  A.R.  8. 

3  Cf.  Twenty-second  Annual  Report  of  the  Whittier  House  Association  (Jersey  City,  1916),  page  14. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  139 

Several  noteworthy  developments  took  place  in  New  York  during  1896.  For  the 
first  time  a  retaining  fee  of  ten  cents  was  asked  of  applicants  who  were  able  to  pay 
that  amount.  The  directors  expressed  their  purpose  to  be  that  "of  removing  the  sting 
of  charity  from  the  applicants,  and  of  making  the  client  feel  that  the  assistance  ren- 
dered was  in  the  nature  of  a  regular  business  transaction."1  This  fee  has  been  contin- 
ued ever  since.  The  Society's  internal  organization  was  placed  on  a  better  basis.  Ori- 
ginally, the  attorney  had  received  a  salary  and  was  allowed  to  engage  in  private  prac- 
tice. Later,  the  attorney  was  given  a  lump  sum,  out  of  which  he  engaged  all  his  assist- 
ants and  paid  all  expenses,  retaining  the  balance  plus  a  proportion  of  the  fees  as  his 
salary.  In  1896  the  Society  placed  the  attorney  on  a  definite  salary,  required  all  his 
time,  and  itself  paid  all  expenses  under  a  budget.  This  plan  was  adhered  to,  and 
served  as  a  precedent  for  other  organizations  in  later  years  as  to  the  proper  rela- 
tionship between  a  society  and  its  attorney.  Most  important,  the  idea  of  Americaniz- 
ing the  Society,  which  Mr.  Briesen  had  steadily  advocated,2  was  finally  consummated 
by  a  charter  amendment  under  which  the  Society  dropped  its  German  title  and 
became  simply  "The  Legal  Aid  Society."3  By  this  act  renewed  emphasis  was  placed 
on  the  fact  that  the  organization  offered  its  assistance  to  all  persons  irrespective  of 
nationality  and,  reciprocally,  it  asked  for  wider  support  from  all  persons.  This  was 
not  promptly  forthcoming,  but  it  managed  by  diligent  work  to  increase  its  income 
sufficiently  to  meet  its  fast  rising  tide  of  applications. 

The  records  show  a  decrease  in  cases  in  1897,  but  this  is  due  only  to  a  change  in 
the  recording  system  whereby  advice  cases  were  not  listed  or  recorded.4  In  fact,  the  in- 
crease was  so  great  that  in  1899  it  was  found  necessary  to  open  three  branch  offices:5 
a  Seamen's  Branch,  which  instantly  took  a  commanding  position  and  proved  to  be  a 
very  haven  of  refuge  for  "poor  Jack;" a  branch  in  the  University  Settlement,  which 
later  became  the  East  Side  Branch ;  and  a  Women's  Branch,  which  later  moved  and 
became  the  Up-Town  Branch. 

When  the  nineteenth  century  drew  to  its  close,  the  idea  of  organized  legal  aid  work 
had  been  in  existence  for  twenty-four  years,  and  yet  it  had  taken  root  in  only  three 
American  cities.  Of  its  span  of  life  from  birth  up  to  the  present  moment,  more  than 
half  had  passed  with  a  record  of  achievement  of  only  three  legal  aid  organizations 
established,  whose  combined  work  in  1889  aggregated  only  10,425  cases.  Each  was 
struggling  with  financial  difficulties,  and  the  general  outlook  was  by  no  means  hope- 
ful. Perhaps  the  most  encouraging  fact  that  appeared  at  the  close  of  this  first  era 
was  the  statistical  record,  which  proved  that  Mr.  Briesen's  belief  that  Americans  needed 
assistance  as  well  as  Germans,  that  citizens  as  well  as  immigrants  were  the  victims 
of  injustice,  was  absolutely  correct  and  that  his  desire  to  make  the  legal  aid  society 

1  History  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  page  15. 

2  See  his  statement  in  1891  in  16  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  14. 

3  Constitution  of  1896,  Art.  I,  §  1:  "The  name  by  which  this  Society  shall  be  known  in  law  is  The  Legal  Aid  Society." 

4  22  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  3.  6  24  Ibid.  7. 


140  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

an  American  institution  was  realized.  In  1889  the  application  lists  showed  2569  na- 
tives of  Germany  and  2317  natives  of  the  United  States.  From  that  time  on,  in  steadily 
increasing  measure,  the  largest  number  of  applicants  were  Americans,  who  sought  a 
relief  which  their  own  institutions  failed  to  provide. 


§  3 

The  first  decade  of  the  new  century  gave  indications  that  organized  legal  aid  work 

was  to  develop  into  a  national  project.  The  expansion  was  not  rapid,  but  it  went  on 

steadily,  and  by  1910  organized  legal  aid  work  was  reasonably  well  estab- 

_,    .         lished  in  all  of  the  larger  cities  of  the  east.  This  development  was  not 

due  to  any  propaganda  or  missionary  work.  There  was  no  central  organ- 
1 900-09  .      .  .        r       .  J  .,  , 

ization  which  consciously  planned,  or  led,  or  built  up  the  movement.  The 

growth  came  about  because  in  the  larger  cities  persons  in  different  walks  of  life  and  in 
their  various  associations,  such  as  the  charities,  churches,  bar  associations,  women's 
clubs,  and  the  like,  found  themselves  confronted  with  the  pressing  problem  of  how 
to  obtain  justice  for  poor  persons  who  came  to  their  attention.  The  older  solution 
of  taking  the  individual  case  to  some  kind  lawyer  was  not  only  becoming  unsatis- 
factory to  all  concerned,  but  was  rendered  out  of  the  question  by  the  greatness  of  the 
demand,  which  no  private  office  could  undertake  to  meet.  There  was  a  certain  vague 
knowledge  abroad  that  something  was  being  done  in  New  York,  no  one  understood 
precisely  what  it  was  or  exactly  what  Mr.  Briesen  was  driving  at,  but  to  New  York 
they  all  turned  for  instruction. 

It  is  this  fact  which  makes  the  development  of  ideas  about  the  work  in  New  York 
of  such  great  importance,  for  those  conceptions  were  largely  copied,  often  for  no 
other  reason  than  that  New  York  did  its  work  in  that  particular  way.  The  mistakes 
of  New  York  became  the  faults  of  the  entire  movement,  but  as  most  of  its  plans  and 
rules  and  tendencies,  under  Mr.  Briesen's  inspiration,  were  of  the  highest  order  and 
in  the  main  correct,  the  New  York  pattern  of  organization,  which  was  widely  copied, 
proved  an  excellent  model.  It  is  due  to  this  fact,  and  not  merely  because  of  its  size, 
that  New  York  has  deservedly  been  supreme  in  the  legal  aid  world.  As  one  reviews  the 
history  and  sees  the  accomplishments  of  this  society  and  that  society  it  becomes 
increasingly  clear  that  the  New  York  organization  has  justly  earned  its  title  of  The 
Legal  Aid  Society. 

In  1900  a  group  of  attorneys  in  Boston,  all  closely  identified  with  the  Bar  Asso- 
ciation, felt  a  clear  demand  by  the  poor  of  the  city  for  the  assistance  of  counsel,  and 
decided  to  form  an  organization  like  that  in  New  York.  In  April  a  charter  of  incor- 
poration was  granted,  which  stated  the  title  to  be  "  The  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society." 
Up  to  this  time  there  was  no  standard  nomenclature;  there  was  one  Legal  Aid  Society, 
one  Protective  Agency,  one  Bureau  of  Justice,  and  one  Poor  Man's  Lawyer.  With  its 
adoption  in  Boston,  and  later  elsewhere,  the  term  "legal  aid"  grew  into  the  standard 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  141 

and  uniform  name  for  this  sort  of  organization.  It  has  become  something  akin  to  a 
trademark.  The  new  society  in  Boston  took  over  what  appeared  to  be  the  New  York 
policy  and  decided  to  reject  criminal  cases.1  The  most  important  thing  about  this 
society  is  the  fact  that  its  initial  impulse  came  entirely  from  the  bar.2  For  the  first 
time  an  object  lesson  was  afforded  of  the  definite  relationship  between  legal  aid 
work  and  members  of  the  bar.  It  is  true  that  the  relationship  was  put  on  the  narrow 
ground  of  providing  an  agency  to  relieve  private  offices  of  their  charity  cases,  but  it 
did  plant  a  seed  which  is  now  beginning  to  bear  fruit  throughout  the  country. 

The  New  Jersey  Legal  Aid  Association  came  into  existence  in  1901.  The  facts 
about  this  organization  are  not  entirely  clear.  Plans  were  begun  in  1897  to  bring 
about  a  state  instead  of  a  city  organization,  and  this  was  carried  through  in  name, 
but  the  object  was  not  realized.  The  Association  became  in  fact  the  legal  aid  society 
for  Newark,  and  although  when  the  society  was  incorporated  in  1907,  the  state  name 
of  "The  New  Jersey  Legal  Aid  Society"  was  retained,  the  organization  was,  and  is, 
a  local  organization  doing  its  work  in  Newark.  It  does  not  control  the  work  in  Jer- 
sey City  or  Hoboken,  and  it  never  established  societies  in  Trenton,  Paterson,  or  else- 
where. It  conforms  more  to  fact,  and  is  less  confusing,  to  consider  this  organization 
as  the  Newark  Legal  Aid  Society. 

In  March,  1901,  the  New  York  Labor  Secretariat,  a  specialized  form  of  legal  aid 
work  which  has  failed  to  make  headway  in  this  country,  was  formed.  Germany  had 
learned  of  organized  legal  aid  work  from  New  York,  and  the  idea  had  promptly  been 
put  into  general  effect,  with  the  modification  that  the  agencies  which  established 
legal  aid  bureaus  were  religious  groups,  political  parties,  and  labor  unions.  From  Ger- 
many the  conception  of  a  labor  union  legal  aid  society  came  back  to  New  York  and 
the  Labor  Secretariat  was  created.  Its  work  is  in  every  respect  like  that  of  a  legal  aid 
society,  but  its  membership  is  restricted  to  persons  in  unions  which  have  joined  the 
plan.  It  is  a  cooperative  idea  closely  resembling  the  similar  arrangement  more  gen- 
erally in  vogue  for  providing  physician's  services.  The  Secretariat  plan  was  never  for- 
mally extended  beyond  New  York,  and  it  is  perhaps  fortunate,  for  if  legal  aid  work 
had  developed  along  class  or  group  lines,  its  real  position  in  the  administration  of  jus- 
tice, the  essentially  public  nature  of  its  service,  would  have  been  obscured. 

Philadelphia  was  next  in  line,  following  closely  the  New  York  pattern,  and  get- 
ting under  way  in  September,  1902.  A  description  has  been  written3  which  merits 
quotation,  for  it  conveys  a  picture  of  the  meagre  way  in  which  most  legal  aid  organ- 
izations were  obliged  to  begin,  and  of  the  precarious  hold  which  they  had  in  the  com- 
munity at  their  start. 

"All  of  the  multitude  of  charitable  organizations  for  which  the  city  of  Phila- 
delphia is  famous,  agreed  that  there  was  no  opening  or  necessity  for  such  a 
society.  One  of  them,  the  Society  for  Organizing  Charity,  showing  that  its  bark 

1 1  Boston  L.  A.  R.  9.  '  See  A  Lawyers'  Legal  Aid  Society,  23  Case  and  Comment,  1008. 

3  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1911),  page  7. 


142  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

was  worse  than  its  bite,  loaned  the  Legal  Aid  Society  a  room  down  in  the  slums 
for  use  without  charge  two  evenings  during  the  week.  There  the  first  attorney 
met  clients  at  a  temperature  which  hovered  somewhere  near  zero,  as  the  Society 
for  Organizing  Charity  was  not  able  to  supply  heat.  The  attorney  was  accus- 
tomed to  advise  clients  in  an  ulster  and  gloves.  The  Provost  of  the  University 
of  Pennsylvania  subscribed  the  sum  of  $25  for  incidental  expenses,  such  as  post- 
age, stationery,  and  costs.  On  this  equipment,  namely,  a  fireless  room,  $25,  and 
a  couple  of  enthusiastic  young  attorneys,  the  Legal  Aid  Society  of  Philadelphia 
began  its  work." 

In  the  same  year  a  committee  was  formed  in  New  Rochelle  to  furnish  legal  assist- 
ance in  that  city  and  in  Westchester  County.  In  October  the  Educational  Alliance 
of  New  York,  located  on  the  East  Side,  where  it  was  in  a  position  to  reach  the  vast 
Jewish  and  Russian  immigrant  population,  undertook  legal  aid  work,  for  which  it 
had  felt  the  need  for  several  years  but  had  lacked  the  necessary  funds,  by  establishing 
within  its  organization  a  Legal  Aid  Bureau.1  It  was  planned  to  confine  the  services 
to  advice,  conciliation,  and  arbitration.  It  soon  appeared,  however,  that  such  a  limi- 
tation was  untenable,2  for  in  the  worst  cases  of  injustice  court  action  is  generally  the 
only  solution.  Curiously  enough,  while  this  effort  to  reach  the  Jewish  population  in 
New  York's  East  Side  by  means  of  an  independent  organization  instead  of  by  exten- 
sion of  the  existing  organization  was  being  undertaken,  a  parallel  development  was 
taking  place  in  Chicago  with  a  view  to  bringing  legal  assistance  to  the  large  Jewish 
population  in  Chicago's  West  Side.  The  Bureau  of  Personal  Service,  which  had  started 
in  1897,  had  not  found  its  proper  sphere  of  usefulness  until  in  1902  it  saw  the  great 
existing  need  and  entered  the  field  of  legal  aid  work.  From  the  point  of  view  of  ideal 
arrangement  it  is  regrettable  that  this  duplication  of  organizations  arose,  but  in  fact 
there  was  no  duplication  of  work,  for  the  new  organizations  entered  new  fields.  As  the 
older  organizations  in  both  New  York  and  Chicago  lacked  the  financial  strength  to 
answer  completely  the  great  demand  for  legal  assistance,  these  new  agencies  became 
valuable  allies,  and  justified  their  creation  by  accomplishing  a  vast  amount  of  work. 

Two  important  contributions  on  the  side  of  more  accurate  records  were  made  by 
the  attorneys  for  the  Boston  society  during  1902.  Up  to  this  time  the  records  of  the 
work  included  only  the  number  of  clients,  their  nationalities,  the  nature  of  the  cases 
presented,  and  the  amounts  collected  for  clients.  To  this  the  Boston  attorneys  added 
a  table  showing  the  sources  from  which  the  clients  came.3  The  value  of  this  information 
to  the  proper  development  of  the  work  was  quickly  appreciated.  It  was  adopted  in  New 
York  in  1905,4  and  thereafter  was  generally  utilized.  Even  more  valuable,  there  was 
added  a  table  showing  the  disposition  of  all  cases.5  Other  organizations  had  recorded 
the  dispositions  of  court  cases,  but  none  had  classified  and  published  the  results  of  the 
work  in  all  cases.  Logically,  it  would  seem  that  a  complete  record  of  dispositions  is 
a  necessary  complement  to  a  record  of  cases  received,  as  necessary  as  the  disbursement 

1  7  Educational  Alliance  R.  20  ;  10  Ibid.  31.  *  13  Ibid.  48. 

3  3  Boston  L.  A.  R.  24.  4  30  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  35.  c  3  Boston   L.  A.  R.  12. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  143 

side  of  a  cash-book,  if  any  balance  or  estimate  of  results  is  to  be  had;  but  this  im- 
portance has  never  been  grasped.  Boston  itself  discarded  the  method,  and  not  until 
1907  was  it  definitely  established.  The  older  organizations  and  the  majority  of  the 
newer  have  never  adopted  any  classification  of  dispositions,  chiefly  because  New  York 
was  the  recognized  leader  and  its  system  was  generally  followed. 

During  1903  no  new  organizations  were  formed.  An  innovation  was  made  in  New 
York  by  the  publication  of  a  quarterly  review  of  legal  aid  work.  The  directors  be- 
lieved the  subject  was  of  such  intrinsic  worth  that  if  information  about  it  could  be 
brought  home  to  the  public,  the  needed  financial  support  would  be  forthcoming.  A 
printed  monthly  statistical  report  was  sent  to  all  members  as  a  first  experiment,  but 
this  proved  dry  reading.  The  idea  of  a  quarterly  review  which  should  contain,  in 
addition  to  a  statistical  statement,  the  stories  of  interesting  cases  and  leading  arti- 
cles was  hit  upon,  and  in  April,  1903,  The  Legal  Aid  Review,  of  eight  pages,  made 
its  initial  appearance.  The  Review,  which  has  ever  since  been  continued,  proved  to  be 
of  more  than  local  value.  It  carried  notes  on  the  development  of  the  work  in  other 
cities  and  provided  a  medium  for  many  excellent  articles  dealing  with  legal  aid  work 
and  its  significance.  It  was  analogous  to  any  trade  or  professional  journal  and  it 
served  the  same  purposes.  To  the  existing  organizations  there  was  made  available 
information  concerning  methods  for  conducting  the  work,  of  which  they  needed  all 
they  could  get,  a  community  of  interest  was  fostered,  and  the  message  in  this  compact 
and  readable  form  was  carried  far  and  wide  into  new  fields.1 

Three  organizations  were  added  to  the  growing  list  in  1904.  Atlanta  produced  a 
society  which  did  good  work  and  gave  every  promise  of  a  sturdy  development.2  In- 
terest subsided,  however,  and  the  enterprise  languished  and  disappeared.  This  was 
the  first  death  in  the  otherwise  healthy  legal  aid  family,  and  it  was  the  more  un- 
fortunate because  this  was  the  first  foothold  in  the  South.  In  Cleveland  a  group  of 
lawyers  and  the  Jewish  Federated  Charities,  both  finding  an  imperative  need  for  some 
definite  plan  for  providing  legal  services,  happily  discovered  each  other  and  in  com- 
bination set  up  the  splendid  Cleveland  Legal  Aid  Society.3  Up  to  this  time  nearly 
all  of  the  organizations  were  of  the  same  mould  and  conformed  to  type,  but  in  Den- 
ver a  departure  was  made  of  much  interest  in  the  field  of  legal  education,4  when  the 
local  law  school  started  "The  Legal  Aid  Dispensary  of  Denver."  The  instructor  in 
practice  was  made  the  attorney  and  the  senior  students  were  used  as  his  assistants. 
The  plan  was  too  successful  and  had  to  be  abandoned.  The  character  of  the  service 
given  was  so  high  that  hundreds  of  persons  applied.  The  rising  cost  entailed  thereby 


1  Chicago  at  one  time  published  a  Legal  Aid  Review,  which  was  discontinued,  and  since  1912  has  published  a  Bul- 
letin. This  is  issued  only  at  irregular  intervals.  It  has  never  attained  the  position  or  exercised  the  influence  of  the 
New  York  Review. 

3  Atlanta  Constitution  for  September  5,  1904,  quoted  in  2  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  4,  p.  2. 

3  Work  was  begun  in  January,  1904.  The  Society  was  incorporated  in  May,  1906. 

4  This  is  the  first  "legal  clinic."  This  matter  is  beyond  the  scope  of  this  report,  but  is  discussed  in  a  separate  pam- 
phlet entitled  "Legal  Aid  Organizations  and  Legal  Education." 


144  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

exceeded  the  funds  at  the  disposal  of  the  law  school,  and  as  neither  the  lawyers  nor 
the  charities  would  help,  the  project  was  discontinued  in  1910. 

During  the  next  five  years,  from  1905  to  1909,  both  inclusive,  the  progress  con- 
tinued steadily.  On  June  15,  1905,  the  Bureau  of  Justice  and  the  Protective  Agency 
were  wisely  consolidated  into  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society.  As  each  had  widened 
its  scope  to  meet  the  increasing  demands,  the  jurisdictions  of  the  two  became  nearly 
identical,  so  that  the  merger  was  the  only  sound  business  course.  Later  developments 
demonstrated  the  fact  that  the  strength  of  one  combined  organization  would  exceed 
the  total  strength  of  its  component  parts.  As  these  two  original  Chicago  organiza- 
tions do  not  again  enter  into  our  discussions,  it  is  convenient  at  this  point  to  sum- 
marize their  accomplishment.  The  Bureau  of  Justice  in  its  seventeen  years1  enter- 
tained 66,616  cases,  collected  S87,067.05  for  its  clients,  and  expended  875,449.11  in 
the  prosecution  of  its  work.  The  Protective  Agency  for  Women  and  Children  during 
nineteen  years,  with  one  year's  figures  missing,2  cared  for  39,341  matters,  collected 
for  clients  a  total  of  $38,844.98,  and  expended  S52,469.39. 

New  York  opened  its  Harlem  Branch  in  1905,  and  in  1906  tried  to  start  a  Crimi- 
nal Branch,  or  at  least  to  provide  some  assistance  in  the  inferior  criminal  courts,  but 
as  the  needed  funds  could  not  be  secured,  the  criminal  work  was  reluctantly  aban- 
doned. The  failure  of  the  Society  to  extend  its  legal  aid  into  the  criminal  field  and 
thereby  to  meet  the  need  which  in  recent  years  has  called  the  public  defender  into 
being  was  not  due  to  lack  of  perception  but  to  lack  of  funds.  Nevertheless  the  fact 
gave  the  legal  aid  movement  a  twist  away  from  criminal  work.  Other  societies,  lack- 
ing in  experience  and  not  clearly  understanding  the  position  of  legal  aid  work  in  its 
relation  to  the  administration  of  justice,  saw  that  criminal  cases  did  not  appear  in 
the  New  York  reports  and  blindly  adopted  what  they  supposed  was  some  rule  or  pol- 
icy against  such  work. 

In  1907  New  York  opened  an  office — its  fifth  branch — in  Brooklyn.  Financial 
stringency  caused  this  to  be  closed  the  next  year,  but  in  1910  it  was  permanently  re- 
opened. Cincinnati  set  up  an  organization  in  1907,  Pittsburgh  followed  in  1908,3  and 
Detroit  in  1909.  This  last  is  of  interest  because  it  was  established  and  supported  bv 
the  Association  of  the  Bar  of  the  City  of  Detroit.  Thus  for  the  first  time,  after  thirty- 
three  years,  the  bar  in  its  collective  capacity  took  a  part  in  this  movement  for  mak- 
ing justice  more  accessible  to  the  poor. 


1  These  figures  are  complete  except  for  the  half  year  January  1,  1906-June  16, 1905,  for  which  period  no  report  was 
ever  made. 

2  The  report  for  the  period  April  1, 1893-April  1,  1894,  being  the  Eighth  Annual  Report,  is  missing. 

3  In  1908  an  association  bearing  the  legal  aid  name  was  formed  in  Los  Angeles.  No  reports  were  ever  published.  No 
attorney  was  ever  put  in  charge  of  the  work.  It  did  render  a  certain  amount  of  service  until  1914,  when  the  Public 
Defender's  office  took  over  all  such  work.  From  such  evidence  as  is  available  it  is  proper  to  exclude  it  from  the  field 
which  is  of  concern  to  us  as  not  being  a  definite  organization. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  145 

§  4 
The  third  era  consists  of  a  four-year  period  in  which  the  territorial  expansion  of  the 
work  went  ahead  very  rapidly.  Whereas  in  1909  there  were  fourteen  definite  organi- 
zations in  existence,  by  the  end  of  1913  the  number  had  doubled  to 
twenty-eight.  As  the  preceding  period  marked  the  establishment  of 
legal  aid  organizations  in  the  East,  so  this  is  primarily  the  period  of 
^     ~  extension  into  the  Middle  West — Kansas  City  in  1910,  St.  Louis,  Akron, 

and  St.  Paul  in  1912,  Duluth,  Minneapolis,  and  Louisville  in  1913.  A  further  pene- 
tration of  the  eastern  field  went  on  at  the  same  time.  Baltimore  and  Rochester  were 
added  in  1911.  New  York,  now  possessed  of  two  organizations  with  five  branch 
offices,  added  further  to  its  legal  aid  equipment  by  the  establishment  of  the  National 
Desertion  Bureau.  This  organization,  created  by  the  National  Conference  of  Jewish 
Charities  to  combat  the  growing  evil  of  family  desertion,  represents  a  specialized 
legal  aid  organization  and  affords  a  striking  illustration  of  the  efficiency  that  attends 
specialization  of  work.  In  1912  a  strong  society  was  started  in  Buffalo,  and  in  the  same 
year  two  young  men  who  had  learned  of  the  idea  in  the  East  started  a  small  but 
valuable  society  in  Colorado  Springs. 

The  year  1913  marked  the  second  attempt  to  plant  legal  aid  work  in  southern 
fields.  In  New  Orleans  an  organization  was  fostered  by  the  Louisiana  Bar  Association, 
which  has  managed  to  hold  on  although  its  development  has  been  disappointing.  In 
the  industrial  city  of  Birmingham  a  legal  aid  bureau  was  opened  as  a  branch  of  the 
Lawyers1  League,  an  association  of  lawyers  formed  for  social  and  civic  betterment. 
The  bureau  was  never  very  active  and  when  the  Lawyers' League  died  it  also  succumbed. 

Students  in  the  Harvard  Law  School  organized  in  1913  a  legal  aid  bureau  in  Cam- 
bridge, which  not  only  served  as  the  first  representative  of  a  new  type  of  organiza- 
tion, but  also  brought  into  life  again  the  question  of  a  possible  cooperation  between 
legal  aid  and  law  schools.  In  Minneapolis,  which  has  already  been  mentioned,  under 
the  guidance  of  Dean  William  R.  Vance  of  the  University  of  Minnesota  School  of  Law, 
an  alliance  was  made  between  society  and  school  which  operated  to  mutual  advantage 
and  served  again  to  bring  into  prominence  the  question  of  a  legal  clinic,  which  by  this 
time  had  been  reluctantly  given  up  in  Denver. 

An  outstanding  fact  of  the  development  during  this  third  era  was  the  change 
which  took  place  in  the  predominant  type  of  legal  aid  organization.  Up  to  1910, 
of  the  fourteen  societies  that  attained  permanence,  ten  were  organized  as  private 
charitable  corporations.  From  1910  through  1913,  of  the  fourteen  societies  that 
lasted,  eight  came  into  being  as  departments  of  organized  charities.  Leaving  aside 
Colorado  Springs,  which  represents  a  venture  of  eastern  men  rather  than  any  western 
impulse,  a  glance  at  the  map  shows  that,  with  one  exception,  the  legal  aid  movement 
had  not  pushed  farther  west  than  the  Mississippi  River  by  the  end  of  1913. 

Kansas  City,  Missouri,  was  the  exception,  and  it  was  also  an  exception  in  a  more 


146  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

important  than  a  territorial  way.  Hon.  Frank  P.  Walsh,  then  a  practising  attorney 
in  Kansas  City,  and  later  Chairman  of  the  United  States  Commission  on  Industrial 
Relations,  was  interested  in  the  work  of  the  Board  of  Public  Welfare  which  had  been 
created  by  the  city  to  take  care  of  prisoners  and  to  supervise  parole.  Mr.  Walsh  had 
visited  the  legal  aid  societies  in  New  York  and  Chicago,  and  he  knew  from  his  own 
practice  that  there  was  a  similar  need  in  Kansas  City.  He  conceived  of  the  idea  of 
placing  such  work  under  the  supervision  of  the  city's  Board  of  Public  Welfare.  Six 
attorneys  were  found  who  were  willing  to  devote  two  hours  each  on  one  day  a  week. 
Under  this  plan  the  office  was  opened  on  August  10, 1910.  On  the  first  day  there  were 
twenty  applications,  and  the  volume  of  the  work  clearly  showed  that  a  more  perma- 
nent arrangement  was  necessary.  Accordingly  on  September  15  the  Board  of  Public 
Welfare  appointed  one  attorney  to  devote  all  his  time  to  the  work,  gave  him  a  sal- 
ary, and  supplied  him  with  assistants.1  No  special  ordinance  was  passed;  the  Welfare 
Board  acted  under  its  general  authority  and  drew  the  necessary  money  from  its  gen- 
eral funds.2 

This  was  a  step  of  profound  importance,  destined  to  influence  the  entire  history  of 
legal  aid  work  and  probably  destined  to  affect  the  whole  course  of  the  administration 
of  justice.  This  public  Legal  Aid  Bureau  challenged  the  long  accepted  conception, 
on  which  our  civil  administration  of  justice  was  built,  that  the  state's  duty  ends  when 
it  has  provided  judge  and  court  house,  and  that  it  has  no  interest  and  no  right  to 
take  a  part  in  private  litigation.  Here  in  Kansas  City  for  the  first  time  an  American 
community  put  the  ideal  of  the  fundamental  law  into  practice  and  saw  that  no  one 
was  denied  justice  because  of  inability  to  employ  counsel.  As  it  has  rather  aptly  been 
put,  "By  the  organization  of  the  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  justice  in  this  city  has  been 
placed  on  the  free  list  with  religion,  education,  and  health."3  The  significance  of  a 
public  society  was  not  at  once  grasped,  nor  was  it  followed  for  awhile.  But  the  vigor 
of  the  idea  proved  itself  when  at  the  end  of  its  first  full  year  the  Kansas  City  Bureau 
took  third  rank  among  the  then  existing  nineteen  legal  aid  organizations,  easily  out- 
distancing societies  in  larger  cities  which  had  had  more  time  for  growth,  as  in  Bos- 
ton, Cleveland,  and  Philadelphia.  This  undertaking  of  legal  aid  work  by  a  municipal 
government  and  the  payment  of  expenses  out  of  the  public  treasury  made  a  deep  im- 
pression in  the  legal  aid  world.  It  is  not  to  be  wondered  that  its  full  significance  was 
not  at  once  appreciated,  for  it  is  a  long  step  from  thinking  of  a  legal  aid  society  in 
terms  of  a  charity  and  as  a  place  where  lawyers  may  send  their  charity  cases,  to  con- 
ceiving of  it  as  a  department  of  government  and  a  part  of  the  public  administration 
of  justice.  Kansas  City  stood  as  an  object  lesson,  and  because  of  it  the  thought  of  the 
leaders  in  the  movement  in  various  cities  began  to  crystallize  as  to  the  true  function 
and  position  of  a  legal  aid  organization. 

1  1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  3. 

2  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Tliird  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1914),  pages  38,  39. 

3  2  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  1. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  147 

One  other  important  development  took  place  during  this  period.  Very  slowly  there 
had  been  growing  up  among  the  various  organizations  a  feeling  of  comradeship  and  a 
realization  that  all  were  engaged  in  a  common  enterprise.  In  1911  this  took  the  prac- 
tical shape  of  an  invitation  from  Pittsburgh  to  meet  to  discuss  common  problems 
and  the  advisability  of  a  central  organization.  Thirteen  societies  responded  by  send- 
ing delegates.  The  discussion1  disclosed  that  there  were  many  practical  reasons  for 
the  formation  of  an  alliance.  A  central  office  could  lead  in  propaganda  work  in  new 
fields  and  could  provide  a  clearing  house  through  which  cases  could  be  transferred 
for  action  from  one  city  to  another.  Legal  aid  work  was  developing  in  Europe  and  the 
movement  had  assumed  an  international  character,  so  that  there  was  need  of  some 
official  to  whom  foreign  legal  aid  societies  could  send  cases  for  reference  to  the  proper 
local  society.  It  was  further  pointed  out  that,  by  combining,  the  legal  aid  societies 
might  take  a  part  in  national  problems  and  in  remedial  legislation.  Such  beneficial 
results  were  so  obvious — indeed  they  had  earlier  been  presented  by  New  York2 — that 
it  is  remarkable  that  the  union  was  not  effected  sooner  than  it  was.  As  a  result  of 
this  first  conference  in  Pittsburgh  a  committee  was  appointed  to  draw  up  a  plan  for 
a  permanent  central  organization. 

A  second  conference  was  held  in  New  York  in  191 2,  at  which  time  the  National  Alli- 
ance of  Legal  Aid  Societies  was  formed, and  a  constitution  and  by-laws  were  adopted.3 
As  has  generally  been  the  case  in  the  history  of  American  institutions,  this  initial 
attempt  at  federation  resulted  in  producing  a  very  weak  central  body,  lacking  both 
the  funds  and  the  power  to  provide  any  real  leadership.  Legal  aid  work  having  de- 
veloped entirely  as  a  local  growth,  it  was  inevitable  that  local  feeling  should  run  high 
in  the  sense  that  each  organization  was  afraid  to  surrender  any  authority  to  a  central 
governing  body.  The  Alliance  has  called  two  conventions,  one  at  Chicago  in  1914  and 
one  in  Cincinnati  in  1916,  and  its  president  has  done  some  work  in  foreign  cases,  but 
beyond  that  it  has  amounted  to  nothing. 

The  fourth  period,  consisting  of  the  last  four  years  up  to  1918,  constitutes  the  most 

remarkable  chapter  in  the  entire  history.  The  idea  spread  very  rapidly,  reaching  out 

„7     _        T     to  the  Pacific  Coast  and  into  the  Southwest,  until  nearly  all  of  the 
1  he  rourth     .  ...,__.,  0  .     ,         . ,.  .     ,  ,       ,     ., 

.  larger  cities  in  the  United  States  had  established  legal  aid  organiza- 

.  „,  .   .  „  tions.  Whereas  in  1914  there  were  twenty-eight  societies,  in  1917  there 

I  yl 4—1 8  . 

were  forty-one  societies,  among  which  number  are  included  two  public 
defender  organizations  doing  civil  as  well  as  criminal  work,  and  in  addition  there 


1  The  complete  discussion  is  contained  in  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies 

(1911). 

231N.  Y.  L.  A.R.  19. 

8  These  are  contained  in  Report  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  (1912)  page  17. 


148  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

were  four  public  defender's  offices  confining  themselves  to  criminal  work.  In  nineteen 
other  cities  the  idea  was  welcomed  and,  although  definite  results  are  not  yet  apparent, 
from  some  of  these  places  new  organizations  will  soon  emerge.  In  all  cities  where 
legal  aid  had  been  established  the  work  continued  to  increase  steadily. 

The  most  important  fact  in  this  last  period  is  that  the  prevailing  type  of  organ- 
ization shifted  to  that  of  the  publicly  controlled,  publicly  supported  bureau.  In  1914 
the  Los  Angeles  Public  Defender's  office,  charged  also  with  the  responsibility  of  civil 
work,  was  opened,  and  the  woi'k  in  Duluth  was  taken  over  by  the  city.  In  1915  the 
municipalities  took  over  the  work  in  St.  Louis  and  Dayton,  and  in  Dallas  the  Board 
of  Public  Welfare  created  a  Free  Legal  Aid  Bureau.  During  the  same  year  public 
defenders  were  established  in  Los  Angeles  (for  the  police  court),  in  Omaha,  and  in 
Portland,  Oregon,  in  which  last  city  the  official  was  so  besieged  by  applicants  for 
civil  assistance  that  perforce  his  office  became  a  regular  legal  aid  society.  In  1916  the 
city  of  Omaha  established  a  public  society,  the  people  of  Hartford  voted  on  refer- 
endum to  have  a  municipal  legal  aid  bureau,  and  in  Columbus  a  public  defender 
was  provided. 

In  Washington  and  New  Haven  the  Harvard  plan  of  a  law  school  legal  aid  society 
was  put  into  effect  by  students  in  the  George  Washington  and  Yale  Law  Schools. 
Strong  organizations  came  into  being  in  San  Francisco  and  Milwaukee,  and  lesser 
but  still  important  societies  were  started  in  Columbus,  Nashville,  Plainfield,  Rich- 
mond, and  San  Diego.  In  Jersey  City  the  work,  which  can  be  traced  back  to  the 
"  Poor  Man's  Lawyer"  at  the  Whittier  House  Settlement  in  1894,  blossomed  out  and 
produced  a  full-fledged  society.  The  last  event  in  the  period  covered  by  this  report 
was  the  establishment  in  New  York  in  1917  of  a  splendid  organization  to  provide 
legal  aid  in  criminal  cases,  called  "The  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,"  which  serves 
to  round  out  the  legal  aid  equipment  of  that  city  by  carrying  the  work  into  the 
criminal  field,  which  none  of  the  other  societies  had  been  able  to  reach. 


§  6 

The  history  of  the  movement  for  organized  legal  assistance  to  the  poor  is  that  of 
a  conception  possessing  great  intrinsic  value  which  could  earn  appreciation  only  with 
.  the  passage  of  time.  After  a  painfully  slow  beginning  during  a  period  of 
twenty-four  barren  and  almost  stagnant  years,  the  idea  pushed  forward  grad- 
ually, but  nevertheless  steadily,  for  the  space  of  ten  years,  and  then  for  seven  years 
raced  ahead  with  constantly  accelerating  velocity.  From  period  to  period  the  advance 
has  been  in  geometric  progression.1  The  high  tide  of  territorial  expansion  has  been 
passed,  but  the  momentum  has  by  no  means  subsided. 

Side  by  side  with  this  territorial  expansion,  and  keeping  pace  with  it,  there  has 


1  See  the  table  showing  the  increase  in  number  of  organizations  and  in  cases,  post,  page  162. 


ORIGIN  AND  DEVELOPMENT  149 

gone  on  a  steady  evolution  of  thought  about  the  work.  The  beginnings  of  a  tech- 
nique as  to  how  the  work  may  most  effectively  and  efficiently  be  done  have  been  made. 
More  important,  there  has  gradually  been  dawning  a  clearer  conception  of  the  mean- 
ing of  organized  legal  assistance  to  the  poor.  The  movement  has  passed  through  three 
stages  and  is  entering  a  fourth.  From  its  original  position  as  a  sort  of  proprietary 
organization  with  the  narrow  mission  of  aiding  only  a  limited  group,  it  broadened 
out  and  took  on  the  stature  of  a  charity,  anxious  to  help  all  who  needed  its  assist- 
ance, but  still  viewing  its  object  as  that  of  dispensing  legal  assistance  as  other  char- 
ities dispense  material  assistance.  Thence  it  emerged  onto  a  higher  plane,  where  it 
understood  that  in  its  daily  work  it  was  not  so  much  giving  anything  to  the  poor 
as  it  was  obtaining  for  them  their  just  dues;  that  it  was  not  dispensing  charity,  but 
was  securing  justice. 

The  mind  of  the  bar  and  of  the  community  in  general  has  not  advanced  beyond 
the  second  stage.  To  most  persons  a  legal  aid  organization  is  still  a  charity.  The  di- 
rectors of  legal  aid  societies  and  the  attorneys  in  charge  have  nearly  all,  through 
their  closer  contact  with  the  work,  come  to  an  appreciation  of  the  fact  that  they  are 
engaged  in  essentially  a  public  undertaking,  and  that  they  have  a  part  in  the  admin- 
istration of  justice. 

The  last  development,  which  is  the  fourth  stage  in  the  evolution,  regards  the  or- 
ganized legal  aid  movement  not  as  a  thing  apart  or  as  a  thing  unto  itself,  but  rather 
as  an  important  and  contributing  factor  in  a  greater  movement — a  movement 
embracing  the  reorganization  of  courts,  the  simplification  of  procedure,  and  all  the 
remedial  agencies  and  methods  examined  in  Part  II  of  this  study — for  the  better- 
ment of  our  administration  of  justice.  It  recognizes  that  legal  aid  work,  even  at  its 
best,  is  not  the  whole  solution  or  the  only  solution,  and  that  it  can  reach  its  own 
maximum  strength  only  in  alliance  with  the  other  forces  and  agencies  about  it,  pre- 
ferring them  where  they  are  the  more  efficient,  supplementing  them  where  they  fail. 
In  this  light  legal  aid  work  ceases  to  be  an  end  in  itself;  it  becomes  merged  in  a 
great  design  according  to  which  the  whole  administration  of  justice  is  to  be  rebuilt 
and  reshaped  to  the  end  that  denial  of  justice,  so  far  as  we  now  understand  it,  may 
cease.  The  majority  of  those  identified  with  the  work  have  not  yet  recognized  or 
consciously  accepted  this  last  conception ;  but  in  the  reports  which  are  now  being  pub- 
lished and  in  the  character  of  the  work  being  undertaken  there  is  ample  evidence 
that  shortly  it  will  be  accepted  as  the  guiding  principle  for  the  future. 


Note:  In  this  chapter  all  the  definitely  established  legal  aid  organizations  have  been  mentioned.  For 
a  complete  list,  both  of  organizations  in  existence  and  those  in  process  of  formation,  alphabetically 
arranged  and  giving  the  names  of  officers  and  addresses,  see  15  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  3  (July, 
1917),  pp.  13-15;  24  Case  and  Comment  (August,  1917),  216-218.  The  earlier  lists  published  in  8  Pitts- 
burgh L.  A.  R.  27;  11  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  37;  and  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of 
Legal  Aid  Societies  (1916),  page  156,  are  now  inaccurate. 


Chapter  XVIII 
WORK  OF  THE  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

I  have  known  about  the  Legal  Aid  Society  for  some  years,  but 
it  conducts  its  affairs  so  quietly  and  so  unostentatiously  that 
I  did  not  know,  until  the  other  day,  how  extensive  is  the  work 
it  is  doing.  It  stirs  one's  blood  and  compels  one's  deep  homage 
to  read  the  great  figures !  Mark  Twain.1 

.    .     .§1  . 

THE  final  test  of  any  organization  lies  in  its  accomplishment.  This  challenge  the 
legal  aid  organizations  are  not  afraid  to  meet.  To  make  a  compact  presentation 
of  the  work  that  has  been  done,  one  is  necessarily  driven  to  the  use  of  statistics,  but  it 
_  should  be  remembered  that  figures,  however  great,  are  incapable  of  por- 

^  traying  results  in  terms  of  human  happiness  and  welfare.  An  idea  of 
this  larger  benefit  can  be  obtained  to  a  limited  extent  by  examining  the  individual 
cases  that  are  presented  in  the  reports  of  the  legal  aid  organizations.  These,  if  col- 
lected, would  fill  several  volumes,  and  still  they  would  represent  only  an  infinitesimal 
part  of  the  good  which  has  been  achieved.  This  human  side  of  the  work,  the  splendid 
efforts  that  have  been  made,  the  encouragement,  comfort,  and  help  which  have  been 
brought  to  those  in  trouble,  the  far-reaching  effects  of  this  practical  ministration  in 
accordance  with  the  American  ideal  of  justice  and  fair  play, — such  things  will  never 
be  presented  in  their  full  force  until  there  appears  a  Dickens  to  write  a  twentieth 
century  version  of  Bleak  House  or  a  Hugo  to  depict  the  struggles  of  a  modern  Jean 
Valjean. 

The  essence  of  the  work  of  legal  aid  organizations  is  the  rendering  of  legal  advice 
and  legal  assistance  to  the  individual  in  the  individual  case.  It  is  for  this  purpose  that 
they  exist,  and  it  is  with  such  work  that  we  are  here  concerned.  Out  of  the  individ- 
ual case  work  there  grows  other  work,  more  general  in  its  nature,  such  as  the  support 
of  remedial  legislation,  cooperation  with  the  charities,  and  service  to  the  community 
in  driving  out  the  loan  sharks.  These  matters  are  secondary  and  may  be  postponed 
for  later  consideration.2 

If  ever  there  was  an  occasion  for  the  use  of  statistics  without  an  apology  or  justi- 
fication, it  exists  in  connection  with  legal  aid  work.  It  is  high  time  that  the  figures 
were  presented  and  that  attention  be  called  to  them.  Feeling  themselves  bound  by 
professional  ethics,  the  societies  have  never  exploited  their  work  in  individual  cases,3 
and  as  a  matter  of  policy  they  have  preferred  to  do  their  job  "without  noise  or  osten- 

1  From  a  letter  written  December  12, 1905,  to  Mr.  Louis  Windmuller,  Treasurer  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society. 

2  Chapters  XXI  to  XXV  deal  with  work  in  this  broader  field  and  with  the  relationships  between  legal  aid  organi- 
zations and  the  law,  the  community,  the  charities,  and  the  bar. 

3  See  A  Lawyer's  Legal  Aid  Society,  23  Case  and  Comment,  1008 ;  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference 
of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  36. 


THEIR  WORK  151 

tation."1  As  a  result,  in  the  community  at  large  and  even  among  the  members  of 
the  bar,  the  work  is  very  little  known  and  has  received  but  scant  acknowledgment. 
It  has  been  done  so  silently  and  it  has  gone  ahead  so  quietly  that  a  statement  of  the 
dimensions  to  which  it  has  attained  is  in  the  nature  of  a  revelation. 


§  2 
The  forty-one  legal  aid  organizations  of  the  United  States,  as  their  contribution 
toward  making  more  equal  the  position  of  the  poor  before  the  law,  have  provided  at- 
TJ     Til      torneys  to  1,133,700  persons,  have  collected  for  their  clients  sums  ag- 
\xr    j,  gregating  $3,590,681,  and  to  accomplish  this  work  they  have  expended 

$1,573,733.  These  are  minimum  figures.  All  estimates  and  conjectures 
have  been  excluded.  If  all  the  figures  could  be  known,  the  number  of  clients  would  be 
considerably  increased.  If  it  were  possible  to  estimate  the  amount  which  clients  have 
received  from  weekly  orders  secured  for  them  by  legal  aid  societies,  the  figure  repre- 
senting collections  would  probably  be  doubled.  Orders  and  decrees  for  the  support  of 
wives  and  children  and  findings  under  the  compensation  acts  all  call  for  weekly  pay- 
ments. The  former  run  indefinitely,  they  may  remain  in  force  as  long  as  the  person 
lives,  but  it  is  impossible  to  know  or  estimate  with  any  accuracy  how  much  is  paid  in 
accordance  with  their  terms,  for  these  payments  by  husbands  are  both  irregular  and 
uncertain.  The  latter  continue  throughout  the  period  of  disability  up  to  ten  years, 
payments  are  certain,  but  as  the  date  when  an  injured  man  returns  to  work  and  com- 
pensation stops  is  almost  never  known  to  the  society,  no  computations  are  possible. 
All  that  can  be  offered  is  opinion,  and  the  best  opinion  is  that  if  such  actual  pay- 
ments were  known,  they  would  swell  the  total  collections  to  seven  million  dollars.  Tak- 
ing the  figures  as  they  stand,  they  offer  ample  evidence  of  the  inadequacy  of  the  tradi- 
tional administration  of  justice  in  itself  to  protect  the  rights  of  the  poor  through  law. 
Without  organized  legal  aid,  what  would  have  been  done  for  these  hundreds  of  thou- 
sands of  persons  who  were  justly  entitled  to  several  millions  of  dollars? 

While  the  height  of  territorial  expansion  has  been  passed,  the  volume  of  work  has 
by  no  means  reached  its  zenith.  In  the  last  six  years  the  work  has  doubled,  and  the 
increase  is  due  not  only  to  the  creation  of  new  organizations,  but  also  in  a  very  appre- 
ciable measure  to  the  growing  work  of  the  older  societies.  How  vast  the  work  will  be 
at  the  end  of  the  next  decade  no  one  can  foretell,  but  it  is  certain  that  the  develop- 
ment is  still  going  on  apace.  Complete  figures  showing  the  increase  in  case  work,  in 
collections  for  clients,  and  in  expenses,  year  by  year  for  each  organization  and  in  total 
for  all  organizations,  are  contained  in  the  three  statistical  tables  appended  to  this 
report.  A  condensation  of  these  tables  shows  that  the  work  has  grown  as  follows  : 


1  This  description  was  applied  in  an  editorial  in  the  Outlook  for  July  18,  1903.  Quoted  in  1  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev. 
No.  3,  p.  3. 


152  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 


Tear 

Number  of 
Organizations 

Cases 

Collections 
for  Clients 

Expenses 

1876 

1 

212 

$1,000 

$1,060 

1885 

1 

3,802 

17,711 

2,870 

1890 

3 

9,316 

47,580 

11,953 

1895 

4 

16,128 

66,341 

14,312 

1900 

5 

20,896 

101,970 

21,669 

1905 

12 

33,352 

80,020 

42,734 

1910 

15 

52,644 

166,851 

76,602 

1912 

21 

77,778 

217,532 

119,705 

1914. 

32 

109,048 

268,849 

160,189 

1916 

41 

117,201 

340,199 

181,408 

§3 

The  nature  of  legal  aid  work  has  already  been  pointed  out  in  general  terms  in  earlier 
connections.  Writing  in  the  light  of  experience  gained  in  a  hundred  thousand  cases, 
_    the  attorney  for  the  New  York  Society  thus  expresses  it : 1 

tl     Wo  k  "What  is  Legal  Aid  Work?  What  kind  of  work  do  you  do?  How 

often  these  questions  are  asked  each  year,  and  surprising  as  it  may 
be  to  some,  there  are  thousands  in  this  City  of  ours,  who  are  not  only  unfamiliar 
with  our  purposes,  but  to  whom  our  existence  is  unknown. 

"From  birth  to  death,  the  poor  man  is  the  prey  of  a  host  of  petty  swindlers. 
He  is  educated  to  believe  that  justice  is  free  and  he  finds  that  to  get  it,  he  must 
pay  a  lawyer  a  price  he  cannot  afford.  It  has  often  been  said  that  only  the  poor 
know  the  sorrows  of  the  poor.  This  may  be  so,  but  I  believe  that  only  the  Legal 
Aid  Society  knows  their  wrongs.  Unless  injuries  and  unfairness  to  the  poor  man 
are  punished,  he  feels  that  justice  is  not  for  him,  and  that  he  has  not  the  same 
opportunity  and  protection  as  the  rich  man ;  he  becomes  anarchistic.  The  fun- 
damental object  of  our  Society,  therefore,  is  to  see  that  all,  no  matter  how  poor, 
or  how  oppressed,  shall  get  justice.  We  care  nothing  for  race,  sex,  color,  creed, 
or  previous  condition  of  servitude;  we  do  believe  that  the  laws  mean  something 
and  our  work  is  to  see  that  they  mean  the  same  for  the  poor  that  they  do  for  the 
rich.  Let  me  emphasize  that  the  Society  does  not  give  charitable  support  to  needy 
persons,  but  only  justice  and  the  enforcement  of  just  and  honorable  claims." 

The  scope  of  the  work  is  confined  to  the  field  of  legal  action.  The  societies  are  en- 
gaged in  the  practice  of  law  and  not  in  social  service  work  as  that  phrase  is  gener- 
ally used.  More  closely  than  anything  else,  the  work  resembles  the  work  of  an  attor- 
ney engaged  in  general  practice,  the  chief  points  of  difference  being  in  the  matter  of 
fees  and  in  the  number  of  cases.  To  many  of  the  innumerable  questions  which  are 
asked  the  attorneys  give  answers  based  as  much  on  common  sense  as  on  law,  but  the 
bar  will  admit  that  this  is  not  a  peculiarity  confined  to  legal  aid  practice. 

Proceeding  to  a  more  specific  examination  of  just  what  cases  are  brought  to  the 
legal  aid  societies,  it  is  at  once  apparent  that  claims  for  wages  and  domestic  difficul- 

'SSN.  Y.  L.  A.  R.23. 


THEIR  WORK  153 

ties  far  outnumber  any  other  classes  of  cases.  Almost  universally  the  collection  of 
wages  comprises  the  greatest  work,  then  come  the  husband  and  wife  difficulties  with 
suits  for  separation  (not  divorce)  and  proceedings  to  enforce  support,  and  beyond 
these  two  great  groups  the  cases  presented  range  widely  over  the  whole  field  of  civil 
law,  except  that  poor  corporations  have  not  yet  sought  legal  aid,  so  that  there  is  little 
practice  in  corporation  law. 

The  societies  have  kept  accurate  records  of  the  nature  of  their  cases,  and  although 
the  classifications  have  never  been  standardized,  it  is  possible  to  compile  an  intelli- 
gent tabk  lowing  the  kind  of  work  presented  by  clients  to  organizations  in  seven 
different  typical  cities  during  the  year  1914,  which  was  a  normal  year.1  As  the  vol- 
ume of  work  varies  from  city  to  city,  the  relative  importance  of  the  groups  of  cases 
is  best  seen  from  percentages.  This  table  is  on  the  following  page. 

Legal  aid  work  varies  from  city  to  city,  but  the  average  percentage  figures  in  this 
table  give  an  accurate  idea  of  the  general  run  of  the  cases  and  in  what  sorts  of  work 
the  organizations  are  engaged. 

There  are  five  particular  classes  of  cases  about  which  some  doubts  have  been  raised 
as  to  whether  they  could  properly  be  entertained  by  legal  aid  organizations.  These 
are  criminal  cases  (other  than  family  desertion  and  non-support  and  bastardy),  per- 
sonal injury  cases,  divorce  libels,  complaints  against  attorneys,  and  bankruptcy  pro- 
ceedings. The  last  two  admit  of  summary  disposition.  There  are  only  three  societies 
which  refuse  bankruptcy  cases  as  a  matter  of  rule.  The  organization  in  Nashville,  which 
is  allied  to  the  Commercial  Club,  is  its  chief  exponent.2  There  is  every  reason  for 
discouraging  voluntary  bankruptcy,  but  there  is  no  reason  for  flatly  refusing  to  file 
schedules  as  a  matter  of  rule.  Until  the  small  claims  courts  evolve  a  successful  court 
trustee  plan,3  bankruptcy  is  often  the  only  relief  allowed  by  law.  In  cases  where  a 
vindictive  creditor  is  harassing  his  debtor,  causing  him  to  lose  his  job  as  fast  as  he 
finds  employment,  making  it  difficult  to  support  his  family  and  impossible  to  pay 
other  creditors,  neither  ethics  nor  morals  enjoin  resort  to  the  bankruptcy  court. 

Only  three  societies  refuse  to  give  any  consideration  to  complaints  against  attor- 
neys. It  is  a  common  policy  to  refer  all  such  matters  directly  to  the  proper  Bar  Associa- 
tion. The  soundness  of  such  a  policv  depends  entirely  upon  the  condition  of  the  local 
Grievance  Committee.  In  New  York  there  is  excellent  reason  for  promptly  referring 
complaints  to  the  Grievance  Committees  of  the  City  and  County  Bar  Associations, 
both  of  which  maintain  investigators  and  attorneys  for  just  such  cases  and  do  excel- 
lent work.  Of  few  other  Grievance  Committees  can  this  be  said;  reference  to  many 
of  them  results  in  pigeonholing  the  complaint.  In  general,  it  would  be  well  for  legal 
aid  organizations  to  accept  and  prosecute  cases  against  attorneys.  The  societies  deal 


1  This  is  not  true  of  workmen's  compensation  cases.  Many  of  the  compensation  acts  were  not  passed  until  1914  or 
later.  The  societies  are  just  beginning  to  find  their  function  in  this  new  field  of  litigation. 

2  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  111. 

3  See  ante.  Chapter  VIII,  Small  Claims  Courts,  §  7-3,  page  57. 


^    «5 


to  S  fr. 


^  a. 


•O    ©    OS 
i-S    0»    M    — 


ID    t-    I    t- 
t-    <N    o    ■■* 


oi  oi  —  co   eo  co  ■* 


■—1     -^>     rt     t^     CC 


i-i  ©>.  co 

OS 


6 


q  © 


p     1 

1      «     ft     H 

i    h  n  is  o  s» 

1    e*>  x 

1     *  *-:  fh    ' 

©>'            fH    *-'    e©' 

1    cs!  —. 

C 


u 

B 

3 


3 

2 

_o 
id 


a 

s 

"3 
E 
rt 

T3 

0) 

'5 

CJ 
0) 


o 


E 
Cfl 

■a 

B 
.^ 

•3 


B 

'3 
a 

u 

01 

J3 


05 

< 


o 

W 

Eh 
O 

o 

H 
O 


CO 

O 


■§ 


2 


IS 


K    © 

S  <o 

3  to 


^j  CO 


73 

-a 

s 

si 

CO 

rt 

O 


o 
8. 


n  "o  o  «i 
<n  ■*'  ai  co 


CO    «J    CO 

eo'  to'  i-J 


X 


JjX©ph"«$i«5G0© 
£  x'    CN 

8, 


©>    «5    O    t"^ 

CO* 


«5 

XXCOOiOXO©-* 


CO 

©" 
©» 


co 


t-     X 


X 

CO   c 


t-    M    O)    *    h 
CO 


CM 


co  o) 


«o    CO 

1    <o  x  ■— 

1    *° 

t-  o 

1      '     '  ^ 

1     0» 

Sco 


a  e»  o  *  o 

©i    «i    ®    H    H 


"*    o 

^H      «) 

CO 

1     8«    O    «) 

—   -* 

i-H 

©> 

©> 

rH    ■*    «J 

2> 

^» 

Z 

s 

l-H 

O 

5    ® 

o  -1 

a, 

a 

C/J 

s 

h5 

*a 

Si 

S    OS 

s 

5  <s 

Q 

V 
ej 

eo  co   c.   co  co 

GS  CO    rA 


t—  ©  q  as 

oJ  oJ  x  ji 


«o    rt    -*    i-i    "• 


©)    *o    ©>   CO 
CM 


•Q    X    x    to    CO 

si  si  h   lo  oi 


.2  « 


en 

M       « 

™      03 

W     C3 

s  "i  -t-1  2    S 

SfflCJOO 


T3 
0) 
CO 

cS 

o 

u 

CJ 
T3 

O 


en 

eg 

u 

c 

CJ 

bo 

es 

C 

E 

1' 

a 

K  i 


u 

3 
T3 
C 
0 
CJ 


(9 

i  § 

rt     3 
en     en 

3     3 


"1 

en 

C 
rt 

B 

en 

« 

en 

rt 

i- 

h 

X3 

S 

11) 

:r 

'C 

b 

a 

c 

^ 

c 

rt 

rt 

o 

J 

J 

J 

4) 

5. 

O 


CJ 
en     cj 


—   ,M     ^  _. 


3    & 

CJ     3 

bo  — 


rt 

a 
c 


3 

.2 

cd 

CO 

3 
— 

e 

o 
u 


3 

1/ 


C  CJ  — 

o  a  co 

co  □  -p 

cj  cj  o    cj  c  >r  'D 

Om  cd  H  Cl,  !?  j?  <j 


CD 

CJ    J^     CJ 

bo  t.   '> 


CO 


©»   <fl 
eo"    ci 


CO 

c» 


3 

o 


■a 

3 

a 


CD 

T3 


en 

3 

C 

CJ 

3 

cj     ed 

rt  — 

3     co 

0  K 


eu 
B 
O 
etc 

S 

o 


■3 
cj 


9 
= 


■a 

B 
rt 

b" 
o 


o 

u 

a 

a 

a 

3 


B 

_o 

a 
o 

■3 
rt 


e« 

3 
tL 

•3 

o 

— 
eo 
3 
CJ 


O1 

>. 

B 

a 

CJ 

= 

rt 

en 

cj  ce 

B 

B  « 

e<  n 

CJ 

_  o 

u 

*    CJ 

— 

br 

ej  cj 

3 

= 

,?;  '•"» 

rt 

— 
rt 

s 

•3   si 

2  — 

= 

j3 

—    4-> 

en 
O 

*j 

rs  cj 

01 

en 

43 
— i 

a;  •- 

v  — 

eu 

■3 
B     o 

5     3 

■3    5m 


o"5 

u      3 

cj   .3 


3  $> 

a  rt 

fi  J3 

.3  c 

O  CJ 


o 


O  i 


.3  so 
3  > 
w     a) 

s  =» 

a  -o 

u     3 

CJ     — 

■3     CJ 

B  c 
&    o 

■  a 

u  I 

CJ     ^ 

A    o 

**  .2 

aj 
CJ 

CE 


B    >-     CJ 


0  & 

>>   o 

3    *■ 

.S  c 

'       ^2 


CJ 


a 


CJ  : 
U  2 

CJ  -2 
O    CJ 

o  K 

CJ    CJ 


.3  E 
CJ 

•a  s 

eg  fc 

'35  iM 

w  w 

eel  -a 

"3  ^ 

2  o 

5s  w 


■w  eel 

..  CJ 

£  rt 

CJ  en 

'E  r 

CJ  M 

2  E 

g  CJ 

5  o 


'J  w 

b.  en 

CJ  IV 

£  B 

rt  O 


2    c 


■3 
E 
at 

*j 
3 
V 

-a 


THEIR  WORK  155 

with  the  poor,  who  are  most  easily  imposed  on  and  taken  advantage  of;  they  are  more 
likely  to  encounter  certain  types  of  abuse  than  any  other  agency;  and  they  may  work 
in  excellent  cooperation  with  the  local  Grievance  Committee.  When  the  misconduct  is 
so  gross  that  disbarment  is  warranted,  the  complaint  and  the  evidence  should  go  to  the 
Bar  Association,  for  it  is  desirable  that  any  court  proceedings  should  be  instituted 
in  that  name,  but  as  to  all  other  matters  the  legal  aid  organizations  can  render  in- 
valuable service  to  the  community  and  to  the  bar  itself  by  investigating  complaints 
and  fearlessly  prosecuting  the  cases  where  action  is  warranted. 

In  divorce  matters  there  is  a  clear  and  well-justified  rule  to  refuse  to  institute  di- 
vorce proceedings.  Of  thirty-one  organizations  doing  general  legal  aid  work  and  hav- 
ing existed  long  enough  to  have  settled  rules  of  policy,  twenty-two  decline  to  repre- 
sent divorce  libellants,  and  in  addition  two,  though  accepting  the  cases,  use  every 
means  to  discourage  such  proceedings.  There  is  a  strong  public  policy  against  mak- 
ing divorces  easy  and  cheap.  The  argument  for  costs  as  a  deterrent  can  be  well  made 
in  this  field.  The  issue  is  not  between  divorce  and  no  relief;  non-support  proceed- 
ings will  secure  support  and  separation  proceedings  will  protect  against  brutality  or 
physical  abuse.  The  issue  is  between  legal  action  which  breaks  up  a  home  forever  and 
legal  action  which  preserves  the  home  or  leaves  the  path  open  for  reconciliation.  Or- 
ganizations, as  in  Jersey  City  and  Boston,1  have  attempted  to  accept  divorce  cases 
and  have  found  that  their  assistance  was  abused,  and  so  have  changed  their  tactics. 
While  exceptions  are  sometimes  warranted  in  unusual  circumstances,  the  rule  is  a  wise 
one,  for  its  very  existence  puts  the  legal  aid  attorney  in  a  firm  position  in  dealing  with 
such  applicants.  The  reason  which  justifies  declining  the  institution  of  divorce  pro- 
ceedings requires  that  such  libels,  when  brought  by  other  attorneys,  be  defended  by 
legal  aid  attorneys  in  all  cases  where  there  is  a  proper  defence.  The  extension  of  the 
original  rule  to  include  refusing  to  represent  libellees  in  divorce  matters  is  entirely 
without  justification.  The  desire  to  preserve  the  integrity  of  the  home,  which  is  the 
reason  for  not  bringing  divorces,  requires  the  representation  of  the  wife,  whose  hus- 
band seeks  a  divorce,  in  order  that  the  home  may  be  broken  up  only  for  cause  shown 
and  not  for  lack  of  representation  or  for  default.  Most  organizations  perceive  and 
follow  this  distinction. 

In  reviewing  the  history  of  legal  aid  organizations  we  have  already  seen  that  in 
New  York  the  legal  aid  society  was  unable  to  undertake  general  criminal  work.  New 
York's  leaders  saw  that  the  need  for  legal  assistance  was  as  great  in  criminal  as  in 
civil  matters,2  but  as  the  necessary  funds  for  the  proposed  Criminal  Branch  were  not 
forthcoming,  and  as  the  District  Attorney  sent  deputies  into  the  magistrates'1  courts 
who,  it  was  hoped,  would  act  impartially,  the  society  gave  up  its  venture  into  the  crim- 
inal field.3  The  Chicago  organization  in  its  earlier  years  did  a  good  deal  of  work  in 

1  4  Boston  L.  A.  R.  17. 

5  35  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  11;  36  Ibid.  38. 

3  This  is  further  discussed  in  7  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  1,  p.  2;  No.  2,  p.  1  ;  No.  3,  p.  19. 


156  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

the  criminal  courts,  but  gradually  abandoned  it.1  In  Boston  it  was  early  determined 
to  refuse  criminal  cases.2  Buffalo  started  out  to  undertake  criminal  work,3  but  has 
felt  obliged  to  change  its  policy.  In  fact,  the  situation  to-day  is  that  of  the  thirty- 
one  organizations  having  any  clear  policies  or  rules,  twenty-one  refuse  criminal  cases, 
and  those  which  have  no  rule  do  very  little,  if  any,  such  work.  Three  considerations 
have  brought  about  this  unfortunate  result.  First,  as  has  been  pointed  out,  many 
societies  adopted  the  rule  because  in  doing  so  they  thought  they  were  following  a 
precedent  based  on  experience  in  New  York.  Second,  all  societies  are  overworked  and 
undermanned,  so  that  they  have  feared  to  be  swamped  if  they  opened  the  flood-gates 
of  criminal  applications.  Third,  as  criminal  practice  has  grown  into  a  specialized  field, 
requiring  expert  investigators,  and  specially  trained  and  experienced  counsel,  the 
societies  have  recognized  that  they  lacked  the  proper  equipment  to  conduct  criminal 
cases,  especially  the  more  serious  matters,  properly. 

The  legal  aid  organizations  have  failed  to  develop  in  this  direction  as  they  should 
have  developed.  The  public  defender  movement  is  the  result  of  their  shortcoming. 
Legal  aid  societies  in  general  should  bestir  themselves  and  strain  every  effort  to  pro- 
vide assistance  in  this  important  field.  They  will  do  well  to  take  advantage  of  the 
momentum  of  the  public  defender  idea,  and  merge  it  with  themselves,  by  establish- 
ing public  defender  departments.  To  have  two  sets  of  organizations  existing  side  by 
side  will  entail  unfortunate  results  in  duplication  of  work  and  increased  expense 
to  be  borne  by  the  public  or  the  community.  As  it  is  always  difficult  to  merge  estab- 
lished organizations,  it  is  highly  desirable  that  the  legal  aid  societies  secure  the  re- 
quisite funds,  equip  themselves  properly,  and  then  let  it  be  known  that  they  are  pre- 
pared to  accept  assignments  from  the  court  or  direct  applications  from  persons  charged 
with  the  more  serious  offences.  How  far  the  legal  aid  societies  should  attempt  to  prac- 
tise in  the  lower  courts  is  the  same  question  which  has  been  considered  in  connec- 
tion with  the  police  court  public  defender.*  This  is  a  local  question  for  each  society 
to  answer  in  accordance  with  local  conditions. 

The  chief  point  of  contention  among  the  organizations  is  with  regard  to  accepting 
personal  injury  cases.  Of  the  thirty-one  organizations,  twenty-four  refuse  such  cases 
unless  they  be  claims  for  trifling  amounts.  The  rule  is  a  result  of  the  contingent  fee 
system.  The  majority  position  is  that  to  do  such  work  is  to  enter  into  competition 
with  the  bar.  The  injured  person  who  is  able  to  retain  his  own  counsel  is,  of  course, 
not  entitled  to  free  assistance  from  a  legal  aid  organization.  It  is  argued  that  by 
virtue  of  the  contingent  fee  any  injured  person,  no  matter  how  poor,  can  secure  the 
services  of  counsel.  The  minority  hold  to  the  proposition  that  a  poor  man  does  not 
cease  to  be  entitled  to  the  services  of  a  legal  aid  organization  because  he  has  suffered 
a  serious  injury.  They  regard  the  contingent  fee,  as  it  is  used  in  practice,  as  an  ex- 

I  This  may  be  seen  by  reviewing  the  attorney's  reports  in  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  Reports  from  1905  to  1910. 

I I  Boston  L.  A.  R.  9.  ■  1  Buffalo  L.  A.  R.  5. 

1  See  ante.  Chapter  XV,  The  Defender  in  Criminal  Cases,  §  8.  page  124. 


THEIR  WORK  157 

ploitation  of  the  unfortunate  position  of  the  injured  person  and  not  as  a  method 
of  giving  him  proper  relief.1  The  organizations  which  decline  personal  injury  cases 
are  forced  into  a  most  uncomfortable  position.  An  injured  poor  person  applies  for 
assistance,  which  is  refused;  he  then  asks  to  whom  he  should  go,  and  this  informa- 
tion cannot  be  given  him.  This  second  refusal  is  a  necessary  result  of  the  first,  for  the 
reference  of  personal  injury  cases  to  selected  members  of  the  bar  forces  the  society 
into  discrimination  and  gives  rise  to  a  practice  more  objectionable  to  the  bar  than 
is  the  practice  of  accepting  the  cases.  The  result  of  the  double  refusal  either  to  accept 
the  case  or  to  recommend  an  attorney  is  disastrous.  The  injured  party  may  not  know 
anywhere  to  go  and  so  fail  of  relief  altogether,  or,  what  is  more  likely,  will  fall  into 
the  hands  of  a  "runner"  or  lawyer's  agent,  and  will  then  pay  the  larger  proportion 
of  any  settlement  or  recovery  in  fees.  To  combat  this  evil,  many  of  the  organiza- 
tions have  qualified  their  rule  by  accepting  such  cases  for  arbitration  or  settlement, 
but  not  for  litigation.  The  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  which  first  laid  down  the 
rule  against  personal  injury  cases,  illustrates  all  these  propositions.  The  Society  has 
always  refused  to  accept  these  cases  and  logically  has  refused  to  recommend  appli- 
cants to  any  named  attorney,  but  in  recent  years  it  has  been  willing  to  entertain 
the  cases  for  purposes  of  settlement  only.2  This  modification  of  the  rule,  although  a 
step  forward,  is  in  violation  of  the  principle  on  which  the  rule  itself  is  based.  Law- 
yers charge  contingent  fees  in  settled  as  well  as  litigated  cases,  the  bar  derives  more 
income  from  the  settlements  than  from  the  verdicts  in  negligence  cases.  The  poor 
man  can  as  easily  get  an  attorney  to  undertake  his  case  for  settlement  as  for  litiga- 
tion, and  the  legal  aid  society  in  accepting  the  case  for  settlement  is  just  as  directly 
competing  with  the  bar  as  if  it  accepted  the  case  with  a  view  to  litigation.  The  situ- 
ation brings  about  a  clash  between  the  two  principles  that  legal  aid  organizations 
should  assist  the  poor  and  that  they  should  not  compete  with  the  bar.  In  any  such 
conflict  the  proper  interests  of  the  poor  should  be  given  priority.  It  is  their  need 
which  is  the  very  reason  for  the  existence  of  legal  aid  organizations.  If  the  legal  aid 
societies  had  been  strong  enough  at  the  outset  to  accept  these  cases  generally,  and 
thereby  to  ward  off  the  contingent  fee  system,  they  would  have  rendered  an  invalu- 
able service  to  American  justice  and  to  the  bar  itself.  Having  failed  of  that,  they 
should  not  now  acquiesce  in  the  situation,  but  should  have  the  courage  to  minimize 
the  bad  condition  by  accepting  the  personal  injury  cases  of  poor  persons  and  by  giv- 
ing complete  legal  assistance  in  this  as  in  any  other  kind  of  case.  This  position  finds 
support  in  the  remarks  of  one  of  the  best  attorneys  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid 
Society : 3 

"However  much  we  may  vary  in  our  opinion  that  attorneys  may  be  unfair  or 
unjust,  we  must  admit  that  there  is  about  the  negligence  case,  an  atmosphere 

1  The  arguments  are  set  out  in  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  43-52. 
J  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  51. 
3  See  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  61. 


158  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

that  is  totally  different  from  any  other  kind  of  case,  and  as  a  matter  of  fact 
negligence  cases,  personal  injuries,  have  taken  on  an  atmosphere  of  gambling; 
and  I  do  think  that  our  Legal  Aid  Society  or  any  other,  might  well  take  up  that 
class  of  case,  simply  for  the  purpose  of  getting  the  profession  generally  back 
to  a  more  wholesome  view  of  that  kind  of  case,  and  make  all  attorneys  realize 
that  those  are  cases  which  can  be  treated  like  other  cases." 

As  most  of  the  personal  injury  cases  offered  to  legal  aid  societies  are  those  of 
injured  workmen,  the  passage  of  the  workmen's  compensation  acts,  which  have  so 
largely  done  away  with  contingent  fees,  would  have  rendered  this  argument  aca- 
demic were  it  not  for  the  fact  that  several  societies  have  carried  over  their  rule  and  ap- 
plied it  to  cases  under  the  new  law.  Thus  the  rule  tends  to  reinforce  the  too  common 
opinion  that  attorneys  are  unnecessary  under  the  compensation  acts,  so  that  the 
legal  aid  societies  are  keeping  out  of  a  field  where  their  services  are  sorely  needed. 
Not  all,  but  many  of  them  are  making  their  original  mistake  over  again.  An  injured 
workman,  receiving  one-half  or  two-thirds  of  his  former  pay,  is  not  in  a  position  to 
pay  largely  for  lawyer's  services.  As  his  compensation  comes  in  weekly  instalments, 
instead  of  in  one  sum,  the  contingent  fee  is  less  applicable.  With  the  passage  of  time 
there  will  inevitably  be  an  increasing  necessity  on  the  part  of  injured  workmen  for 
representation  at  hearings  in  all  contested  cases.  It  will  be  tragic  if  the  legal  aid 
organizations,  through  blind  adherence  to  an  originally  doubtful  and  now  clearly 
outworn  rule,  persist  in  refusing  their  assistance  to  a  large  class  of  poor  persons 
who  stand  in  dire  need  of  that  assistance. 


§4 

Inasmuch  as  the  legal  aid  societies  do  no  advertising,  feeling  themselves  bound  by 
the  traditions  of  the  profession  in  that  regard,  it  is  interesting  to  ascertain  how  the 
_  vast  army  of  clients  finds  its  way  to  their  offices.  Nearly  all  the  organ- 
izations  keep  records  of  the  channels  through  which  their  cases  come, 
but  the  records  are  in  a  form  which  leaves  much  to  be  desired.  From 
the  point  of  view  of  the  individual  society,  properly  classified  source  records  are 
indispensable  to  an  intelligent  direction  of  the  work.  By  a  classification  of  source 
names  which  represent  the  vai'ious  elements  and  groups  in  the  community, — as  the 
organized  charities,  the  courts,  the  newspapers,  the  churches,  etc., —  it  is  possible  to 
determine  where  the  society  is  known  and  where  it  is  not,  and  then  take  steps  cal- 
culated to  bring  its  existence  to  the  knowledge  of  the  latter  group.  Our  concern  here 
is  merely  to  ascertain  how  clients  learn  of  the  legal  aid  societies  and  what  groups  in 
the  community  are  using  the  societies.  There  is  an  utter  lack  of  standardization,  which 
precludes  any  comparison  between  cities,  or  the  taking  of  any  general  average,  as  was 
possible  in  considering  the  nature  of  the  cases  in  the  preceding  section.  On  the  basis 
of  existing  information  no  satisfactory  table  can  be  compiled.  It  is  probably  better 


THEIR  WORK 


159 


than  nothing,  however,  to  take  the  records  of  four  of  the  older  and  better  established 
organizations  for  the  year  1914  which  has  already  been  used,  and  with  some  slight 
rearrangement  to  submit  the  figures  as  they  stand.  It  will  readily  be  seen  that  such 
general  headings  as  "Friends''''  made  percentage  figures  valueless.  It  should  also  be 
noted  that,  except  in  New  York,  the  heading  "Former  Clients"  includes  not  only 
persons  themselves  former  clients,  but  persons  referred  by  former  clients.  The  num- 
ber of  clients  who  themselves  return  to  the  legal  aid  society  in  the  course  of  a  year  is 
relatively  small. 


Classification  of  Sources 

Boston 

Chicago 

Cleveland 

New  York 

Judges,  clerk  of  courts,  public  officials 

423 

2,557 

494 

4,233 

Lawyers,  including  legal 

aid  societies 

177 

299 

37 

776 

Organized  charities 

343 

1,093 

128 

449 

Newspapers 

73 

925 

518 

882 

(By)  Former  clients 

560 

2,088 

552 

2,019 

Doctors  and  hospitals 

18 

— 

13 

— 

Ministers  and  churches 

32 

— 

12 

— 

Direct  applications 

— 

2,555 

608 

5,470 

By  friends 

551 

5,824. 

— 

17,754 

Consuls  for  other  nations 

— 

30 

— 

401 

From  foreign  sources 

— 

— 

— 

1,646 

Miscellaneous 

52 

750 

178 

6,800 

Total  cases 

analyzed 

2,229 

16,121 

2,540 

40,430 

The  most  interesting  figures  are  those  relating  to  the  courts.  Although  generali- 
zations based  on  this  table  alone  must  be  made  with  caution,  there  is  extrinsic  evi- 
dence which  corroborates  the  above  figures  showing  that  from  judges, clerks,  and  other 
officials  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society  receives  19  per  cent  of  its  clients,  Chicago  16 
per  cent,  Cleveland  19  per  cent,  and  New  York  10  per  cent.  It  is  a  fact  that  the  legal 
aid  organizations  have  everywhere  earned  good  reputations  before  the  courts,  and 
that  the  judges  and  clerks  are  glad  to  refer  needy  persons  to  them.  It  is  not  unusual 
for  a  judge  to  stop  a  case  in  which  it  becomes  apparent  that  an  unrepresented  party 
needs  counsel  and  instruct  the  clerk  to  give  him  a  card  to  the  legal  aid  society.  Up 
to  the  present  time,  a  splendid  foundation  has  been  laid  for  a  cooperation  between 
the  judiciary  and  legal  aid  organizations  which  ought  to  grow  steadily  closer  as  time 
goes  on. 


§5 

If  complete  figures  were  available,  the  most  valuable  would  be  those  telling  what 

results  the  organizations  have  obtained  in  the  matters  entrusted  to  them.  Such  figures 

.  .  do  not  exist.  A  few  organizations,  mostly  smaller  societies,  compile  and 

^  '  publish  their  dispositions  of  cases.  A  number  of  organizations  state  the 


of  Cases 


results  in  litigated  cases,  but  as  these  are  only  a  fraction  of  the  total 


intake,  the  facts  have  only  a  limited  application.  Too  many  societies  present  as  their 


160  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

annual  balance  sheet  a  statement  of  cases  received  and  money  expended.  Proper  ac- 
counting should  show  to  the  community  the  funds  received  (by  subscriptions  or  pub- 
lic grant)  for  carrying  on  the  work  and  what  has  been  done  with  that  money  in  terms 
of  results  accomplished  in  their  cases.  From  such  a  comparison  the  societies  have 
nothing  to  fear.  Their  work  can  stand  the  test.  The  omission  to  make  proper  records 
of  results  is  due  to  a  failure  to  think  the  situation  through  and  to  appreciate  the 
necessity  for  such  a  tabulation,  but  it  is  none  the  less  a  bad  failure. 

No  clearer  proof  of  the  extremely  local  nature  of  the  development  of  legal  aid  work 
could  be  desired  than  the  chaotic  condition  of  the  most  basic  records.  As  to  the  na- 
ture of  the  cases,  the  classifications  are  not  standardized ;  as  to  their  sources,  there 
is  not  even  proper  classification;  and  as  to  their  disposition,  in  the  great  number  of 
instances  there  is  no  classification  whatever.  So  far  as  concerns  the  records  on  which 
reports  to  the  public  are  based,  all  cases  except  those  taken  to  court  might  have  been 
thrown  in  the  waste  basket.  There  never  having  been  any  central  organization  which 
had  power  to  unify,  relate,  and  standardize  the  work  of  the  various  local  societies,  each 
has  built  up  its  own  system  or  lack  of  system  with  the  inevitably  resulting  confusion. 
This  deplorable  condition  will  probably  continue  until  the  National  Alliance  of  Legal 
Aid  Societies  is  made  over  into  a  living  instrument  with  some  power  to  influence  and 
mould  the  general  course  of  legal  aid  work. 

The  disposition  figures  of  the  few  societies  which  keep  such  records  admit  of  simple 
classification  and,  in  percentage  form,  give  a  very  fair  picture  of  what  becomes  of  the 
cases.  In  the  following  table  the  results  of  the  work  done  by  six  organizations  during 
1916  is  analyzed. 

Table  showing  Disposition  of  Legal  Aid  Cases 

Cases  analyzed 

Classification  of  disposition 

1.  Advice  given  or  papers  drawn 

2.  Prohibited  by  rule1 

3.  Client  not  entitled  to  aid 

4.  Referred  to  appropriate  agency 

5.  No  legal  relief  possible2 

6.  Investigated,  no  merit  in  case3 

7.  Lapsed  by  client 

8.  Relief  by  settlement  or  adjustment 

9.  Relief  by  court  proceedings 

10.  Defeat  in  court  proceedings 

1  "Prohibited  by  rule"  refers  to  such  matters  as  criminal,  personal  injury,  and  divorce  cases,  and  to  persons  able 
to  retain  their  own  counsel. 

2  "No  legal  relief  possible"  means  either  that  the  facts  disclosed  no  cause  of  action  or  that  relief  wa,s  impossible 
as  where  a  defendant  had  left  the  jurisdiction  or  was  without  assets. 

3  "Investigated,  no  merit"  means  that  the  organization  investigated  the  claim  and  found  it  to  be  without  merit 
This  is  primarily  used  where  the  evidence  is  conflicting  and  the  investigation  leads  the  attorney  to  believe  that  his 
client  is  in  the  wrong  or  cannot  prove  his  case. 


Boston 
2602 

Detroit 
452 

Milwaukee 
847 

Minneapolis 
2633 

Newark 
1673 

San  Francisco 
229 

per  cent 
25.4 

per  cent 
27.8 

per  cent 
9.3 

percent 
28.6 

per  cent 
12.2 

per  cent 
37.5 

3.1 
4.3 

6.5 

4.6 

10.5 
2.6 

2.7 
6.6 

5.1 
5.5 

7.8 
15.2 

16.6 

2.0 

15.3 

5.7 
4.6 

19.8 
15.0 
18.5 

3.4 
10.4 
18.1 

3.5 

10.7 

6.4 

11.3 
10.0 

17.4 

6.4 

.9 

47.5 
9.5 

24.2 

22.1 

52.9 
3.4 

10.0 
7.0 

.8 

THEIR  WORK  161 

The  percentages  in  the  foregoing  table  give  a  wholly  accurate  idea  of  what  hap- 
pens when  the  cases  are  passed  through  the  legal  aid  office.  If  statistics  from  the 
larger  organizations  could  be  presented,  they  would  show  very  much  the  same  results. 
Out  of  one  hundred  cases  brought  to  a  legal  aid  organization,  one-quarter  are  requests 
for  advice  or  for  the  drawing  of  instruments,  as  wills,  notes,  or  mortgages,  and  these 
are  quickly  disposed  of.  Five  applicants  cannot  be  accepted  because  their  cases  relate 
to  criminal,  divorce,  or  personal  injury  matters,  or  because  they  are  able  to  engage 
their  own  attorneys.  Three  persons  the  society  declines  to  represent  because  they  do 
not  deserve  assistance,  regardless  of  the  strict  merits  of  the  case,  as  where  they  desire 
to  institute  litigation  and  garnishee  a  debtor's  wages  for  reasons  of  spite  or  vindic- 
tiveness.  Six  persons,  either  at  the  outset  or  later  as  the  case  develops,  prove  to  need 
medical  or  charitable  more  than  legal  assistance,  and  so  are  put  in  touch  with  the 
appropriate  agency.  In  ten  of  the  complaints  it  quickly  becomes  apparent  that  legal 
action  will  afford  no  relief,  as  where  the  facts  fail  to  constitute  a  cause  of  action,  or 
the  defendant  is  beyond  the  jurisdiction,  or  the  defendant  is  judgment-proof,  or  the 
plaintiff  lacks  the  necessary  money  to  pay  the  court  costs  and  other  expenses  called 
for  by  the  necessary  litigation. 

This  leaves  fifty-one  cases  requiring  further  investigation  or  action  of  one  sort  or 
another.  Such  investigation  discovers  that  in  eight  cases  the  additional  facts  brought 
to  light  fail  to  confirm  the  client's  story  or  so  weaken  it  as  to  give  rise  to  a  reason- 
able inference  that  he  himself  is  in  the  wrong.  In  ten  cases  the  society's  efforts  go  for 
nothing,  because  the  client  fails  to  return  when  he  is  later  needed  to  take  further 
steps  in  the  prosecution  of  the  case.  Sometimes  this  is  because  the  society's  work  has 
brought  the  defendant  to  terms  and  he  makes  his  settlement  directly  with  the  client, 
often  it  is  because  the  clients  move,  or  lose  interest,  or  find  the  law  too  slow,  or  for 
any  one  of  a  thousand  reasons.  These  are  the  most  discouraging  cases  in  legal  aid 
work,  but  because  of  the  class  of  people  among  whom  the  society's  work  lies,  it  is 
inevitable  that  a  certain  number  of  clients  will  allow  their  cases  to  lapse.  There  re- 
main thirty-three  cases  requiring  action  and  in  which  the  society  is  satisfied  on  inves- 
tigation that  the  claims  are  well  founded.  Of  these  it  is  possible  to  settle  or  adjust 
twenty-five.  Eight  opposing  parties  are  obstinate  or  refuse  to  attempt  to  reach  a  fair 
compromise  so  that  suits  are  brought  against  them.  Of  these  eight  litigated  cases, 
one  is  lost  and  seven  are  won.  Multiplied  out  to  the  proper  proportions,  these  figures 
show  the  grist  of  the  legal  aid  mill. 


§6 
The  office  of  a  legal  aid  organization  is  like  any  ordinary  private  law  office.  The  only 
objective  signs  of  difference  that  impress  the  observer  are  the  modesty  of  the  appoint- 
ments and  the  steady  procession  of  persons  coming  and  going.  In  general  the  or- 
ganizations, through  their  attorneys,  conduct  their  cases  just  as  anv  attorney  con- 


162  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

ducts  his  practice.  In  a  few  offices  the  work,  up  to  the  point  of  litigation,  is  taken 

_  .  .  ,  .  charge  of  bv  persons  who  are  not  lawyers,  but  these  instances  are  ex- 
Pnnciples  in  ,r  ,z  .,.  , 

n      ,  ceptions  to  the  prevailing  rule. 

As  the  legal  aid  organizations  stand  in  a  quasi-public  position,  as 
**  '  they  are  charged  with  the  responsibility  of  expending  the  sums  en- 

trusted to  them  only  for  proper  purposes,  they  are  confronted  with  certain  peculiar 
problems  which  have  led  to  the  adoption  of  several  interesting  principles  concerning 
the  conduct  of  the  work.  Realizing  that  their  work  was  in  the  field  of  the  law  and 
that  they  were  taking  a  part  in  the  administration  of  justice,  the  organizations  have 
wisely  refrained  from  erecting  any  moral  standard  which  applicants  must  satisfy 
before  being  entitled  to  assistance.  The  only  test  is  the  intrinsic  merit  of  the  claim 
plus  a  due  regard  for  those  restrictions  which  good  ethics  impose  on  all  members 
of  the  bar.  Suits  for  reasons  of  spite,  vexatious  proceedings  taken  for  delay,  tech- 
nical defences  to  just  claims,  will  not  be  undertaken.  The  main  principle  may  be  illus- 
trated in  an  extreme  way  by  stating  that  if  the  worst  man  in  the  world  was  actually 
owed  ten  dollars  by  the  best  man,  the  society  would  undertake  the  collection  for  the 
former,  provided  he  was  too  poor  to  engage  his  own  attorney.  It  is  a  tribute  to  the 
clear-sightedness  of  the  leaders  in  the  movement  that  the  societies  early  took  this 
stand.  Had  they  undertaken  to  lay  down  rules  concerning  the  morality  of  applicants, 
they  would  have  arrogated  to  themselves  the  right  to  define  justice  differently  than 
the  law  defines  it,  and  they  would  have  lost  sight  of  their  main  objective  of  securing 
the  legal  rights  of  persons  unable  to  obtain  assistance  elsewhere. 

There  are  very  few  exceptions  to  this  rule.  New  York  refuses  to  accept  claims  from 
domestic  servants  who  have  left  without  reasonable  notice.  This  is  only  a  half  excep- 
tion, for  the  custom  of  notice  is  now  so  clearly  established  in  that  occupation  that 
it  would  surprise  no  one  to  have  the  law  hold  that  the  week's  notice  is  an  implied  con- 
dition of  the  contract.  Servants  who  are  discharged  without  a  week's  notice  constantly 
seek  recovery  of  pay  for  that  week,  so  that  the  New  York  rule  is  simply  making  the 
principle  work  both  ways.  In  domestic  tangles,  particularly  where  children  are  in- 
volved, the  organizations  make  careful  investigation  of  the  client's  life  and  history, 
and  decline  to  act  if  he  or  she  proves  unworthy.  In  these  cases  the  moral  test  is  itself 
the  legal  test.  In  a  proceeding  for  guardianship  or  custody  of  children  the  fitness  of 
the  petitioner  is  put  in  issue  by  the  law.  Morality  as  a  test  of  exclusion  is  sometimes 
applied  in  illegitimacy  cases.  The  society  will  assist  a  woman  in  such  a  case,  no  matter 
how  much  she  herself  may  have  been  to  blame,  in  the  first  such  instance,  and  prob- 
ably in  the  second,  but  after  that  the  society  will  decline  to  act. 

In  all  their  work  the  organizations  earnestly  endeavor  to  refrain  from  competition 
with  the  bar.  They  have  been  so  anxious  on  this  score  that  at  times  they  have  gone  too 
far,  they  have  refrained  from  what  seemed  competition  even  at  the  expense  of  their 
clients,  as  in  personal  injury  cases.  In  this  relationship  to  the  bar  the  societies  have 
kept  their  record  remarkably  clean.  The  number  of  clients  who  are  able  to  impose  on 


THEIR  WORK  163 

them  is  so  trivial  as  to  be  negligible.  No  serious  charge  has  been  made  by  responsible 
members  of  the  bar  that  the  societies  were  representing  persons  able  to  pay  for  their 
legal  services.  When  it  is  considered  that  the  societies  do  the  work  more  economically 
than  a  private  office  could  and  yet  lose  from  five  to  thirty-five  thousand  dollars  a  year, 
it  is  self-evident  that  they  are  engaged  in  a  class  of  work  which  would  represent  a  dead 
loss  to  the  profession  if  its  members  were  called  upon  to  perform  the  necessary  services. 

The  only  criticism  which  requires  consideration  is  that  the  societies  "  feed  "  cases 
to  certain  attorneys.  By  this  it  is  meant  that  the  society  refers  such  cases  as  it  de- 
clines—  criminal,  divorce,  personal  injury,  and  paying  cases — to  a  limited  number 
of  attorneys.  It  is  because  of  this  criticism  that  many  of  the  societies  which  decline 
negligence  cases  also  decline  to  refer  the  applicants  to  any  attorney.  What  to  do 
with  cases  which  are  rejected  has  always  been  a  difficult  question.  If  a  society  is  to 
refer  cases  at  all,  it  must  refer  them  to  attorneys  whom  it  knows  and  trusts,  for  it 
unavoidably  pledges  its  reputation  that  the  case  will  be  rightly  conducted  and  that 
no  excessive  fee  will  be  charged.  This  results  in  discrimination.  Here  again  there  is 
a  conflict  between  two  principles,  and  in  such  a  conflict  the  interests  of  the  clients 
should  be  held  superior,  they  should  not  be  sent  empty  away;  if  the  society  can- 
not itself  act  for  them,  it  ought  at  least  to  see  that  they  come  into  proper  hands.  It 
therefore  becomes  largely  a  question  of  how  the  reference  system  can  be  made  least 
objectionable. 

There  are  three  plans  in  existence.  In  Los  Angeles,  the  bar  association  certifies  a 
list  of  attornevs  who  are  willing  to  take  cases,  and  civil  matters  are  referred  to  them 
in  rotation,  following  the  alphabetical  order,  by  the  public  defenders  office.  The  list 
is  extensive,  so  that  the  element  of  discrimination  is  reduced  to  a  low  point,  but  cor- 
respondingly there  is  a  real  danger  that  some  attorney  will  prove  incompetent,  or 
neglect  his  case,  or  charge  an  improper  fee.  Whenever  this  happens  it  injures  the 
society's  reputation,  deters  persons  from  seeking  its  assistance,  and  lessens  its  power 
in  the  community.  In  Philadelphia,  cases  are  referred  to  a  limited  list  consisting  of 
eleven  attorneys.  Their  work  is  reviewed  by  the  legal  aid  attorney,  he  meets  with 
this  informal  staff  regularly  and  checks  up  the  progress  made  in  their  cases,  and  all 
fees  charged  are  communicated  to  him  and  recorded.  This  method  is  highly  efficient, 
it  protects  the  society  entirely,  but  the  element  of  discrimination  becomes  large.  The 
plan  has  been  so  well  conducted  in  Philadelphia  that  criticism  has  not  been  heard, 
but  if  attempted  elsewhere,  it  might  easily  meet  with  disfavor  and  arouse  hostility. 
In  Chicago,  Boston,  and  several  other  cities,  the  cases  are  referred  to  attorneys 
formerly  on  the  legal  aid  staff.  This  is  perhaps  the  least  objectionable  method,  for 
it  very  completely  guards  the  society's  position  and  good  name,  and,  on  the  other 
hand,  as  the  group  of  ex-attorneys  in  those  cities  is  constantly  enlarging  and  chang- 
ing each  year,  the  discrimination  does  not  appear  great.  There  is  no  complete  solution 
of  this  difficulty,  which  is  precisely  like  that  confronting  judges  in  their  selection 
of  masters,  auditors,  receivers,  and  referees. 


164  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

Litigation  is  always  the  last  resort  in  a  legal  aid  society.  Conciliation  and  arbitra- 
tion are  the  favorite  means  employed,  as  has  earlier  been  pointed  out.1  Many  of  the 
cases  of  the  poor  are  against  other  poor  persons  who  are  equally  unable  to  pay  attor- 
ney's fees.  The  societies  have,  in  their  respective  communities,  earned  such  reputa- 
tions for  fair  dealing  that  the  opposing  party  is  very  often  willing  to  come  to  the 
office  and  fully  relate  his  side  of  the  story.  The  legal  aid  attorney  changes  his  atti- 
tude from  that  of  advocate  to  that  of  arbitrator.  Force  of  circumstances  gives  his 
decision  the  validity  of  a  legal  judgment  because  neither  party  can  afford  to  pay 
counsel  to  fight  his  decree.  The  attorney  in  this  function  closely  resembles  the  judge 
of  a  small  claims  court,  and  the  results  obtained  have  been  as  gratifying.  It  is  the 
rare  case  where  the  parties  are  not  willing  voluntarily  to  abide  by  the  decision. 
Although  the  societies  bring  justice  to  thousands  of  persons  whose  claims  otherwise 
could  never  be  heard,  there  is  much  warrant  for  the  statement  that  the  net  result 
of  the  work,  because  of  the  manner  in  which  it  is  conducted,  is  to  decrease  rather 
than  increase  litigation. 

Figures  based  on  records  for  1915  show  that  in  Boston  out  of  the  total  number 
of  cases  received  only  9  per  cent  were  taken  to  the  courts,  in  Cleveland  8  per  cent, 
in  Kansas  City  and  New  York  6  per  cent,  and  in  Chicago  4  per  cent.  Examining 
further  into  the  New  York  work,  which  is  the  lai'gest  and  of  longest  duration,  it 
appears  that  year  after  year  the  proportion  of  cases  in  which  proper  relief  could 
not  be  obtained  without  resort  to  litigation  has  been  less  than  one- tenth  of  the  total 
number.2  These  figures  are  not  accidental ;  they  are  the  result  of  a  policy  consciously 
adopted  and  followed.  The  attorney  for  the  society  in  his  report  for  1907  gives  it 
clear  expression:3 

"  Since  the  first  day  of  January,  1907,  there  has  hung  in  each  of  the  six  offices 
of  The  Legal  Aid  Society  a  neatly  framed  placard  containing  an  extract  from 
the  writings  of  Abraham  Lincoln — who  was  not  only  a  great  lawyer,  but  a  great 
friend  of  the  poor — words  which  seem  particularly  appropriate  to  guide  and 
inspire  the  work  of  the  attorneys  of  the  Society.4  .  .  . 

"  The  poor  applicant  who  makes  his  plea  for  legal  aid,  and  the  person  against 
whom  he  lodges  his  complaint,  each  knows  that  behind  the  advice  and  counsel 
which  is  given  by  the  Society's  attorneys  lies  the  sanction  of  the  law  and  the 
resort  to  the  tribunals  established  by  the  law.  Nevertheless,  these  tribunals  are 
sought  only  as  a  last  resort.  The  truth  so  forcibly  expressed  by  Lincoln  has  more 
and  more  come  to  be  recognized  as  a  principle  which  should  be  followed  in  busi- 
ness relations,  and  it  is  the  working  rule  of  The  Legal  Aid  Society." 

The  societies  institute  or  defend  cases  in  court  only  when  they  are  reasonably 
convinced  that  the  truth  is  on  their  side.  Their  appearance  in  court  depends  on  the 

1  See  ante,  pages  63  and  70. 

2  History  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  page  29.  For  detailed  figures  and  statements  see'32  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  30 ; 
34  Ibid.  7 ;  36  Ibid.  10;  37  Ibid.  24 ;  38  Ibid.  24  ;  41  Ibid.  8. 

8  32  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  29. 

4  Here  follows  the  quotation  of  the  famous  saying  as  to  the  discouragement  of  litigation  which  has  earlier  been 
quoted  on  page  60. 


THEIR  WORK  165 

merits  of  the  case  as  they  understand  it  and  not  on  the  payment  of  fees.  They  have 
established  a  standard  of  conduct  which  is  likely  to  exert  a  powerful  influence  in 
the  future.  The  standard  accords  with  the  best  ethics,  but  it  unquestionably  is  far 
in  advance  of  the  average  attitude  of  the  bar.  They  deal  with  the  old  and  vexing 
question  of  duty  by  frankly  placing  their  duty  to  the  court  before  their  duty  to  the 
client.  There  is  to-day  a  steady  trend  of  thought  which  is  shifting  the  emphasis  of 
the  lawyer's  duty  from  one  owed  primarily  to  his  client  to  one  owed  to  the  court 
whose  minister  in  the  search  for  truth  and  the  administration  of  justice  he  is.1  The 
legal  aid  societies  are  putting  this  hopeful  theory  into  practice,  and  if  they  should 
become  the  training  schools  in  practice  for  law  students,  their  influence  on  the  next 
generation  of  lawyers  would  play  an  important  part  in  bringing  about  a  more  gen- 
eral realization  and  acceptance  of  this  higher  definition  of  professional  obligation. 


§7 

Whether  or  not  legal  aid  organizations  are  justified  in  charging  fees  has  been  a  fruit- 
ful topic  of  discussion  at  all  their  conferences.2  The  fees  called  into  question  are  of  two 
.         sorts.  First,  there  is  a  fee  which  is  charged  when  clients  apply  for 
.  s    &     assistance,  commonly  called  a  retainer  fee,  and  ranging  in  its  amount 

as  used  by  different  organizations  from  ten  to  fifty  cents.  Second, 
there  is  a  charge  by  way  of  commission  on  sums  collected  for  clients,  which  also 
varies,  but  never  exceeds  ten  per  cent.  New  York  adopted  the  policy  of  charging 
small  fees  early  in  its  history.  In  1879  it  put  into  effect  the  commission  charge,  and 
in  1896  it  instituted  the  retainer  fee.  Nearly  all  of  the  older  organizations  followed 
the  plan.  The  newer  organizations,  particularly  the  public  bureaus,  have  adopted  a 
contrary  policy.  At  the  present  time  the  societies  stand  very  nearly  evenly  divided 
in  opinion  and  practice.  A  careful  investigation  made  in  1916  by  the  Chicago  Legal 
Aid  Society  ascertained  that  of  thirty-nine  organizations,  eighteen  charged  fees  and 
twenty-one  did  not.  Analyzing  the  figures  more  closely,  it  appears  that  of  fifteen 
organizations  of  the  private  corporation  type  (representing  in  the  main  the  older 
and  larger  organizations),  nine  made  charges  and  six  did  not;  of  fifteen  organiza- 
tions existing  as  departments  of  charities,  five  did  and  ten  did  not;  and  of  five  public 
bureaus,  one  did  and  four  did  not. 

If  the  charging  of  fees  prohibited  deserving  clients  from  securing  the  assistance 
of  legal  aid  societies,  or  if  it  worked  serious  hardship  on  them,  or  if  it  was  contrary 
to  any  fundamental  principle  of  legal  aid  work,  then  fees  ought  to  be  wholly  abol- 
ished. The  evidence  indicates  that  none  of  these  three  bad  results  follows  from  a  proper 
system  of  charges.  If  the  retainer  fee  were  an  absolute  condition  precedent,  it  would 

1  Cf.  Public  Service  by  the  Bar,  an  address  delivered  by  Elihu  Root  as  President  of  the  American  Bar  Association 
at  its  meeting  on  August  30,  1916. 

2  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  67;  Pjid.,  Third  Conference,  page  39- 
Ibid.,  Fourth  Conference,  page  89. 


166  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

work  great  hardship.  The  universal  rule  is  that  it  may  be  abated  or  entirely  waived 
in  the  discretion  of  counsel.  No  charge  is  made  in  cases  of  deserted  wives.  In  fact, 
the  charge  is  only  collected  from  about  one  out  of  every  three  clients.  The  figures 
of  cases  received  give  no  indication  that  the  fees  make  any  difference.  When  the 
New  York  Society  rearranged  its  fees  in  1902,  it  had  this  possibility  in  mind  and  ap- 
pointed a  special  committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  to  make  an  investigation.  They 
reported  that  the  fees  as  charged  did  not  keep  clients  away.1 

It  does  not  seem  that  the  fees  charged  work  any  hardship  on  the  clients.  Chicago 
found  cases  where,  after  it  had  charged  fees,  the  client  was  obliged  to  seek  charitable 
assistance.2  If  that  were  generally  the  case  elsewhere,  it  would  be  a  final  argument, 
but  there  is  rather  interesting  evidence  in  existence  which  points  in  a  contrary  di- 
rection. In  Detroit  the  policy  has  been  followed  of  making  no  charges,  but  of  per- 
mitting clients  to  give  as  a  donation  any  sum  they  desire.  This  affords  a  test  of 
what  clients  feel  willing  and  able  to  give  in  payment  for  services  rendered.  It  may 
be  contrasted  with  Boston,  which  has  always  charged  fees  by  way  of  commissions 
on  amounts  collected.  The  criterion  is  the  percentage  relationship  which  the  fees  or 
donations  from  clients  bear  to  the  amounts  collected  for  them.  The  following  table 
shows  for  a  period  of  six  years  the  percentage  of  sums  recovered  which  clients  donated 
in  Detroit  and  the  percentage  which  was  charged  in  Boston : 

Tear  Percentage  of  Collections 

Donated  in  Detroit  Charged  in  Boston 

1910  14.7  7.6 

1911  12.5  6.0 

1912  12.0  10.0 

1913  4.5  7.5 

1914  18.3  6.3 

1915  18.3  5.3 

1916  6.6  5.9 

It  is  a  fair  inference  that  if  clients  in  Detroit  felt  able  to  give  $1.24  out  of  each  $10 
collected  for  them,  no  hardship  was  done  in  Boston  in  charging  its  clients  .69  on 
each  $10  collected.  Where  discretion  is  vested  in  counsel  to  make  the  charge  accord- 
ing to  the  nature  of  the  case  and  the  needs  of  the  client,  it  is  unlikely  that  injustice 
will  be  done.  The  fee  is  fixed  at  the  end  of  the  case,  by  which  time  the  attorney  knows 
the  client  and  his  situation  well.  As  attorneys  are  paid  fixed  salaries  and  receive  no 
part  of  any  fees  collected,  no  personal  interest  is  involved.  The  fact  that  two-thirds 
of  the  organizations  operating  as  departments  of  charities  do  not  charge  fees  might 
give  rise  to  an  inference  that  the  charities  regarded  any  fee  as  working  a  hardship. 
In  the  absence  of  more  direct  evidence  no  such  general  inference  is  warranted,  for 
it  appears  that  in  1916  the  Cleveland  Federation  for  Charity  and  Philanthropy  in- 
structed the  Legal  Aid  Society  that  it  would  do  well  to  give  more  attention  to  requir- 
ing the  payment  of  fees  in  pi'oper  cases. 

1  27  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  6.  2  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  90. 


THEIR  WORK  167 

The  charging  of  fees  is  not  contrary  to  any  fundamental  principle.  The  proposi- 
tion for  which  legal  aid  organizations  stand  is  equality  before  the  law.  The  world 
of  clients  is  not  to  be  divided  between  persons  able  to  employ  their  own  counsel  and 
persons  able  to  pay  nothing.  The  larger  number  of  legal  aid  clients  are  not  applicants 
for  charity — man}7  of  them  would  refuse  to  apply  for  assistance  if  they  considered 
that  they  were  being  given  charity;1  they  are  mainly  self-supporting,  self-respecting 
persons,  whose  income  does  not  give  them  a  sufficient  margin  to  pay  the  fee  which  a 
private  attorney  must  charge.  The  ideal  of  the  legal  aid  organization  is  to  give  to  the 
poor  man  at  a  price  he  can  afford  to  pay,  whether  it  be  two  dollars  or  fifty  cents  or 
nothing,  as  competent  legal  services  as  the  rich  can  buy.2  If  it  were  able  to  do  that, 
it  would  secure  complete  equality.  Its  aim  would  be  fully  realized. 

The  dispute  is  not  one  of  principle,  but  resolves  itself  into  practical  considerations. 
It  was  on  practical  grounds  and  not  on  any  matter  of  principle  that  the  Women's 
Committee  of  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  advocated  the  abolition  of  fees.3  It  was 
felt  that  it  was  impossible  to  devise  a  system  which  worked  with  justice  and  uni- 
formity. It  is  possible  that  clients  may  deliberately  impose  on  an  attorney  and  thus 
avoid  the  small  fee,  and  so  a  discrepancy  or  lack  of  uniformity  may  result.  Such  in- 
stances ought  to  be  very  rare  because  most  clients  have  no  desire  to  reward  good  deeds 
with  bad,  or  honest  dealing  with  trickery,  and  also  because  the  attorney,  by  virtue 
of  his  position,  knows  so  much  about  the  client  that  he  cannot  readily  be  imposed 
upon. 

Most  practical  considerations  weigh  in  the  balance  in  behalf  of  charging  fees.  The 
request  to  a  client  that  he  pay  a  retainer  fee  often,  twenty-five,  or  fifty  cents  is  only 
asking  him  to  defray  the  incidental  cash  expenses  to  which  the  society  is  at  once  put. 
To  conduct  the  case,  the  society  incurs  expense  for  postage,  telephone,  and  carfares, 
and  there  is  no  reason  why  a  client,  when  able,  should  not  defray  such  items.  This  is 
directly  in  accord  with  the  universal  rule  of  all  organizations  to  require  clients,  when 
able,  to  pay  court  costs  and  witness  fees.  This  type  of  fee  is  negligible  as  a  source  of 
income,  but  many  of  the  older  organizations,  as  those  in  New  York,  Philadelphia, 
Boston,  and  Cleveland,4  believe  that  a  small  initial  charge  is  worth  while  because  it 
puts  the  relationship  between  client  and  society  on  a  more  businesslike  basis,  it  tends 
to  maintain  self-respect,  it  prevents  a  tendency  to  pauperization,  and  it  gives  the  client 
a  greater  sense  of  responsibility  toward  the  society.  Cases  which  the  society  is  forced 
to  close  as  "lapsed"  are  generally  those  where  it  alone  has  expended  money,  time,  and 
effort;  rarely  does  the  client  who  has  invested  his  cash,  however  little,  fail  to  see  the 
case  through. 

The  income  from  the  second  kind  of  fees,  commissions  on  collections,  though  not 

1  See  post.  Chapter  XIX,  Typesof  Legal  Aid  Organizations,  §  5,  page  178. 

2Cf.  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  7;  Ibid.,  Fourth  Conference,  page  100. 
3  "  The  committee  makes  this  recommendation  on  practical  grounds."  The  report  is  quoted  in  Report  of  Proceed- 
ings of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  90. 
*  12  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  9. 


168  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

large  of  itself,1  is  sufficient,  because  of  the  low  cost  per  case,  to  enable  an  organiza- 
tion to  undertake  many  more  cases  than  it  otherwise  could  afford  to  accept.  It  has 
been  pointed  out  that  New  York  is  thus  enabled  each  year  to  undertake  seven  or  eight 
thousand  more  cases.2  As  every  organization  works  up  to  its  financial  limit,  this  is  a 
practical  consideration  of  importance.  In  actual  result  it  means  that  clients,  who  are 
able  to  do  so,  return  to  the  society  a  small  portion  of  the  benefits  which  the  society 
has  secured  for  them,  not  in  order  that  the  society  may  prosper  or  its  attorneys  be 
enriched,  but  so  that  the  society  may  be  able  to  do  more  work  for  less  fortunate  cli- 
ents who  are  unable  to  pay  anything  whatsoever  for  the  services  that  they  receive. 


1  The  fees  charged  by  legal  aid  organizations  by  way  of  commissions  on  collections  are  set  out  in  their  annual 
reports.  The  following  table  gives  an  idea  of  their  amount  The  figures  are  for  1916  except  as  to  Chicago,  whose 
figure  is  that  for  1915. 

Amount  Collected 
for  Clients 

$22,808.31 

2,881.67 

18,528.99 

2,271.38 

unknown 

323.70 

7,401.54 

6,704.10 

128,005.10 

16.537.62 

11,286.34 

689.38 

5,109.00 

As  the  organizations  conduct  their  work  at  a  cost  of  from  $1.50  down  to  .50  per  case,  it  is  apparent  that  these  com- 
missions enable  them  to  do  a  substantially  larger  work  than  their  income  otherwise  would  permit. 

2  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Third  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  43. 


Organization 

Commissions 

Charged 

Boston 

$1,354.73 

Buffalo 

275.30 

Chicago 

716.25 

Cincinnati 

49.45 

Cleveland 

145.85 

Hartford 

12.35 

Minneapolis 

467.05 

Newark 

612.25 

New  York  : 

Legal  Aid  Society 

7,631.89 

Educational  Alliance 

844.14 

Philadelphia 

383.93 

Rochester 

3.40 

St.  Louis 

591.94 

Chapter  XIX 
TYPES  OF  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

Private  agencies  lack  the  essential  quality  of  this  new  (public)  office:  the 
recognition  of  the  whole  community's  obligation  to  the  man  in  court  and  to 
its  own  self-respect  as  a  democracy.  The  Independent  for  October  18,  1915. 1 

§  1 

IN  the  development  of  the  work  thus  far  there  have  emerged  five  distinct  types  of 
legal  aid  organizations.  They  are: 

TJ  e  Fi  <p  *'  I*"vate  corporation  societies. 

2.  Public  bureaus. 
1  ypes  q  Departments  of  organized  charities. 

4.  Bar  association  societies. 

5.  Law  school  societies. 

There  are  one  or  two  organizations  which  do  not  fit  into  these  classes,  and  within 
the  groupings  there  are  many  varieties,  but  these  clearly  are  the  types  of  organization 
now  in  existence.  Before  taking  up  and  weighing  the  respective  merits  of  these  vari- 
ous types,  it  is  worth  while  to  mention  briefly  the  few  special  organizations  that  are 
engaged  in  legal  aid  work. 

§2 

The  standard  legal  aid  organization  would  be  one  which  rendered  to  all  persons  who 
were  unable  to  procure  assistance  elsewhere  that  legal  advice  and  assistance  which 
.  ..  they  needed  in  any  case  in  any  branch  of  the  law,  excepting  only  the 

J^        .      .  instituting  of  divorce  proceedings.  The  test  should  be  the  inability 

of  the  client  to  employ  counsel,  and  only  very  rarely  the  nature  of 
the  case.2  We  have  seen  that  the  large  majority  of  organizations  give  general  civil 
relief  except  in  personal  injury  and  divorce  cases,  but  that  they  give  no  criminal 
relief. 

There  are  a  few  organizations  which  specialize  in  limited  kinds  of  work  and  accept 
nothing  else.  Most  of  the  public  defender  organizations  confine  themselves  to  criminal 
matters.  This  is  not  true  in  Los  Angeles  or  Portland,  but  it  applies  to  the  defenders 
in  Omaha  and  Columbus  and  to  the  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee  in  New  York. 
There  is  no  reason  for  this  divided  jurisdiction.  Ultimately  this  specialized  work 
ought  to  be  merged  with  the  general  legal  aid  work  so  far  as  organization  is  con- 
cerned. That  we  have  this  specialized  form  of  legal  aid  service  is  due  to  the  historical 
fact  that  the  legal  aid  organizations  themselves  never  met  the  demand  in  the  crimi- 

1  From  an  article  by  Geddes  Smith  entitled  "Making  the  Law  Work  Both  Ways,"  84  The  Independent.  94,  95. 

2  There  might  occasionally  have  to  be  some  qualification.  If  such  cases  were  presented,  the  societies  might  well  be 
justified  in  refusing  breach  of  promise  and  alienation  of  affection  cases,  which  too  often  are  only  cloaks  for  black- 
mail. 


170  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

nal  field.  Hence  arose  the  necessity  for  some  one  to  do  that  particular  work  to  com- 
plement and  carry  to  completion  the  legal  aid  idea.  To  fill  that  particular  need  came 
the  public  defender  rendering  that  particular  service.  The  same  thing  would  happen 
if  all  legal  aid  societies  were  to-morrow  to  refuse  all  domestic  relations  cases.  The 
need  for  legal  assistance  in  that  field  would  soon  manifest  itself,  and  we  would  see 
either  the  domestic  relations  courts  extending  their  functions  by  adding  attorneys 
to  their  probation  staffs,  or  the  erection  of  organizations  providing  legal  assistance 
in  that  special  field. 

An  illustration  of  this  same  process  is  afforded  by  the  National  Desertion  Bureau. 
The  legal  aid  societies  have  done  reasonably  well  in  meeting  the  problem  of  non- 
support,  but,  with  the  exception  of  Kansas  City,  they  have  failed  to  cope  with  deser- 
tion. When  a  husband  deserts  or  abandons  his  family  he  very  often  goes  into  another 
state,  so  that  the  case  against  him  presents  the  practical  difficulty  of  ascertaining 
his  whereabouts  and  the  legal  difficulty  of  extradition.  The  National  Desertion 
Bureau  was  established  in  New  York  in  1912  by  the  National  Conference  of  Jew- 
ish Charities.  It  is  a  legal  aid  organization  confining  its  work  entirely  to  desertion 
and  abandonment  cases.  This  specialization  has  resulted  in  maximum  efficiency.  The 
Bureau  has  been  amazingly  successful  in  locating  deserters,  it  has  cooperated  with 
the  prosecuting  attorneys  in  securing  their  return  to  the  jurisdiction,  and  by  thus 
compelling  husbands  to  perform  their  obligations  of  support  it  has  saved  to  the 
United  Hebrew  Charities  thousands  of  dollars  which  formerly  it  had  to  pay  out  for 
the  support  of  abandoned  families.1 

This  Bureau,  with  the  admirable  technique  of  work  which  it  has  devised,  stands 
as  an  example  to  all  legal  aid  organizations.  Desertion  and  abandonment  ought  to 
be  sternly  combated  in  evei*y  community,  and  it  can  best  be  done  through  efficient 
legal  aid  work.  It  would,  however,  be  a  mistake  for  every  city  to  have  its  own  special 
bureau  for  this  special  work.  It  can  far  better  be  done  as  a  part  of  the  work  of  the 
existing  legal  aid  organizations.  Much  of  the  success  in  desertion  work  depends  upon 
having  reliable,  efficient,  cooperating  agencies  throughout  the  country.  This  is  ready 
at  hand  if  a  strong  enough  central  body  is  created  to  bring  the  local  organizations 
into  closer  alliance  and  to  provide  the  necessary  clearing  house  for  the  transmission 
of  cases  and  information. 

The  few  greatest  cities  may  need  special  organizations  for  special  purposes,  but 
the  general  development  should  be  in  the  direction  of  merging  all  branches  of  legal 

1  The  records  show  quite  clearly,  particularly  when  the  growth  of  population  is  remembered,  the  effect  produced 
by  the  National  Desertion  Bureau  since  its  creation  in  1912. 

Year 

1910 
1911 
1912 
1913 
1914 
1915 
1916 


Num  ber  of  Persons 

Amount  granted 

given  Charity  Relief 

by  United  Hebrew  Charities 

521 

$81,261.00 

431 

24,950.00 

313 

18.319.00 

298 

18,lfi0.27 

234 

17,384.49 

267 

17,094.87 

195 

14,803.77 

THE  FIV'E  DIFFERENT  TYPES  171 

aid  service  in  any  community  into  one  definite  society  or  bureau.  This  involves  no 
loss  of  efficiency.  Specialization  should  continue,  but  it  should  not  be  specialization 
of  organization,  but  specialization  of  work  within  the  one  organization.  Specializa- 
tion is  imperatively  needed  for  desertion  cases  and  criminal  cases.  It  is  just  as  much 
needed  for  seamen's  cases,  workmen's  compensation  cases,  loan  shark  cases,  in  fact, 
for  any  extensive  branch  of  the  law  giving  rise  to  many  cases  among  the  poor.  The 
one  organization,  if  properly  equipped,  can  secure  the  same  efficiency  through  de- 
partmental specialization,  and  in  addition  it  secures  unity  of  purpose,  control,  and 
policy,  better  cooperation,  less  duplication,  and  it  effects  many  economies  in  the 
overhead  and  administrative  expenses. 


§3 
The  legal  aid  system  of  Germany  is  very  largely  built  on  group  lines.  There  are  po- 
litical, religious,  and  class  bodies  or  associations  which  provide  legal  assistance  for 
;      .  their  members.  Fortunately,  the  development  in  the  United  States, 

°  J        due  chiefly  to  the  influence  of  Mr.  Briesen,  which  has  already  been 

„      ,  noted,  has  been  in  an  entirely  different  direction.  The  type  of  or- 

JLrnployers  .     ..       ..    .  ,    .,  .  ,  „  . 

ganization  that  extends  its  assistance  to  all  poor  persons  in  a  city, 

regardless  of  politics,  religion,  or  class  is  more  democratic  and  it  is  sounder.  As  its 

function  is  to  play  a  direct  part  in  the  administration  of  justice,  it  should  no  more 

be  founded  or  carried  out  on  partisan,  or  sectarian,  or  any  other  lines  of  cleavage 

than  should  the  administration  of  justice  itself. 

There  are  two  organizations  in  America  which  act  for  definitely  limited  groups 
rather  than  for  the  community  in  general.1  The  Labor  Secretariat  in  New  York  is  a 
cooperative  legal  aid  society  giving  its  assistance  to  the  members  of  its  constituent 
labor  unions.  The  plan  of  itself  is  an  entirely  worthy  one.  It  has  never  grown  to  any 
size  nor  has  it  extended  itself  into  other  cities.  Though  it  has  existed  since  1902,  it 
has  been  so  far  outstripped  by  other  types  of  organizations  that  it  has  been  lost  sight 
of.  In  such  an  organization  inevitably  the  fundamental  conception  of  legal  aid  work 
is  lost.  It  does  not  represent  an  extension  of  the  administration  of  justice.  It  repre- 
sents only  a  plan  for  securing,  through  combined  purchasing  power,  the  services  of 
a  private  attorney.  Had  most  of  the  organizations  been  of  this  type,  the  true  posi- 
tion of  the  legal  aid  society  in  the  administration  of  justice  would  have  been  clouded, 
and  its  influence  in  bettering  and  equalizing  that  administration,  which  has  clearly 
been  at  work  since  the  establishment  of  public  legal  aid  in  1910,  would  not  have 
been  strong  if  it  had  been  felt  at  all. 

As  a  sort  of  complement  to  the  Labor  Secretariat,  which  typifies  legal  aid  bv 
employees,  there  is  in  Detroit  the  Ford  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  which  represents  legal  aid 

1  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  in  Havana,  Cuba,  legal  aid  is  furnished  by  Wage  Earners'  Clubs.  See  9  N.  Y.  Legal 
Aid  Review,  No.  3,  p.  2. 


172  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

by  employers.  This  Bureau  was  started  in  March,  1914,  as  a  part  of  the  general  wel- 
fare work  which  is  carried  on  in  the  Ford  factories.  The  Bureau  is  a  division  of  the 
company's  legal  department.  It  has  its  office  in  the  main  factory  building,  and  has 
a  staff  of  four  attorneys.  The  Bureau  is  chiefly  interested  in  searching  titles  for  men 
buying  their  homes  under  the  profit-sharing  plan,  in  protecting  them  from  fraudu- 
lent insurance  agents  and  others,  in  taking  care  of  garnishment  suits,  and  in  facil- 
itating naturalization  proceedings.1  The  Bureau  gives  general  advice,  but  does  not 
usually  undertake  litigation.2  It  is  a  fair  criticism  that  the  Bureau  is  more  inter- 
ested in  matters  which  affect  or  concern  the  company  than  in  matters  which  affect 
the  employee  alone.  Thus,  if  a  man  is  sued  and  his  wages  are  garnisheed  for  a  debt  of 
ten  dollars,  he  will  be  given  representation,  but  if  he  is  owed  ten  dollars,  he  will  not 
be  given  an  attorney  to  bring  suit  in  his  behalf.  The  following  table,  covering  an 
eight  months'  period  from  June,  1916,  through  January,  1917,  shows  the  nature  of 
the  work  done:3 


Nature  of  Cases 

Number  of  Cases 

Titles  examined 

723 

Appraisals  of  real  estate 

568 

Advice  on  real  estate  matters 

7,917 

General  legal  advice 

8,109 

Citizenship  cases 

403 

Protection  in  fraudulent  transactions 

316 

Garnishments 

1,982 

Orders  to  show  cause 

223 

Representations  in  court 

528 

Summons  served 

376 

Total 

21,145 

In  general  the  idea  deserves  the  highest  commendation.  If  it  is  developed  along 
the  lines  of  other  legal  aid  organizations,  it  is  capable  of  doing  great  good  with  its 
vast  clientele  of  nearly  one  hundred  thousand  workmen.  If  it  develops  as  a  proprie- 
tary organization,  its  efficacy  will  be  seriously  impaired.  It  is  a  striking  illustration 
of  a  principle  that  is  steadily  gaining  better  recognition  in  the  business  world.4 
It  is  known  that  a  sick  employee  is  an  inefficient  employee.  Methods  for  safeguard- 
ing health  and  providing  medical  assistance  are  common.  It  is  equally  true  that  the 
mentally  worried  or  harassed  employee  cannot  do  his  best  work.  Worry  impairs  effi- 
ciency, but  it  is  not  realized  how  many  men  and  women  are  troubled  by  domestic 
difficulties,  by  fear  of  the  loan  shark,  or  by  other  problems  which,  because  they  involve 
the  law,  terrify  persons  who  do  not  know  where  to  turn  for  advice  and  counsel.  It  is 
both  humanitarian  and  good  business  for  employers  to  afford  legal  as  well  as  medical 
assistance.  It  is  almost  certain,  however,  that  this  can  best  be  arranged  not  through 

1  This  is  set  out  in  Helpful  Hints  to  Ford  Employees  (1916),  pages  32-34. 

2  This  statement  is  made  in  a  prospectus  of  the  work  prepared  by  the  legal  department  for  publication. 

3  Compiled  from  the  daily  reports  of  the  Factory  Legal  Department  to  the  Department  of  Education. 

1  The  Manufacturers'  Association  of  the  City  of  Bridgeport:  Report  on  Welfare  Work  in  Bridgeport  (1P18),  pages 
70,  124. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  173 

a  bureau  controlled  by  the  company  but  through  the  independent  legal  aid  organi- 
zation existing  in  the  city.  Because  of  a  reticence  which  can  easily  be  understood, 
men  are  slow  to  reveal  their  troubles  to  their  "boss"  or  to  attorneys  responsible  to 
him.  Thev  would  be  unlikely  to  admit  having  troubles  at  home,  or  having  borrowed 
money,  or  being  in  debt.  In  dealing  with  an  independent  legal  aid  attorney  there  is 
no  such  reluctance,  at  least  no  more  than  there  is  with  any  attorney.  The  legal  aid 
organizations  are  not  now  in  a  financial  position  to  add  largely  to  their  work, 
but  the  company  could  properly  pay  the  increased  cost  of  its  increased  work  by  a 
subscription,  which  would  be  less  than  it  would  cost  to  run  its  own  legal  aid  de- 
partment. 

It  is  not  unlikely  that  in  the  future  the  large  employers  of  labor  will  enter  into 
some  relationship  with  legal  aid  organizations.  The  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  Nashville 
is  a  department  of  the  Commercial  Club,  and  its  existence  is  due  in  large  measure 
to  the  interest  and  activity  of  business  men.  Its  secretary  has  emphasized  the  services 
that  legal  aid  organizations  may  render  to  business  organizations.1  A  step  in  this 
direction  has  been  taken  in  Boston.  The  Edison  Electric  Illuminating  Company  has 
always  permitted  its  employees  to  consult  its  own  counsel,  but  recognizing  that  "it 
is  a  question  whether  all  of  our  employees  who  might  take  advantage  of  this  do  so," 
it  has  made  an  extended  statement  concerning  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society,  and 
offers  to  give  any  employee  a  letter  of  recommendation  from  its  Welfare  Bureau  to 
the  society.2 


Returning  to  a  consideration  of  the  five  types  of  legal  aid  organizations  proper,  it 

is  desirable  first  to  fix  the  extent  to  which  each  type  has  been  used.  We  have  earlier 

seen  in  studying  the  history  of  legal  aid  work  that  during  the  first  two 

periods  of  its  development  the  private  corporation  society  was  the  favor- 

J   '  ite  type,  that  during  the  third  period  the  departmental  type  prevailed, 

'™  and  that  during  the  last  period  the  public  bureau  predominated.  There 

have  been  fifty-eight  distinct  times  when  the  question  of  organization  has  presented 

itself.  This  includes  organizations  which  have  been  founded  and  then  lapsed,  mergers, 

and  reorganizations. The  various  types  have  been  employed  to  the  following  extent: 

Type  Number 

1.  Private  corporation  societies  15 

2.  Public  bureaus  9 

3.  Departments  of  organized  charities  17 

4.  Bar  association  societies  5 

5.  Law  school  societies  5 

6.  Miscellaneous  7 

1  M.  G.  Denton:  The  Services  of  Legal  Aid  Societies  to  Business,  Particularly  to  Employers  of  Labor,  Report  of 
Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  108. 

2  8  Edison  Life,  No.  8  (August,  1917),  pp.  257-259. 


174  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

With  the  miscellaneous  group  we  are  not  concerned.  They  are  in  the  main  organ- 
izations whose  work  has  never  become  extensive  or  which  have  not  yet  had  time  to 
decide  on  their  final  form  of  organization.  Of  the  fourth  and  fifth  types — the  bar 
association  and  law  school  societies —  there  are  fewer  organizations,  and  as  they  raise 
no  difficult  questions  and  may  be  easily  described,  it  is  advisable  to  deal  with  them 
first. 

The  law  school  type,  though  of  great  interest  in  connection  with  legal  education, 
is  not  of  importance  in  the  general  field  of  legal  aid  work.  With  the  exception  of  the 
Harvard  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  they  have  proved  weak  and  have  done  onlya  small  amount 
of  work.1  The  limitations  of  this  type  are  inherent  and  obvious.2  A  staff  of  untrained 
men,  not  members  of  the  bar,  limited  as  to  the  time  at  their  disposal,  and  all  dis- 
persed during  the  summer  vacation,  is  not  a  model  to  be  followed.  These  organiza- 
tions have  done  no  harm,  much  good  to  the  comparatively  few  cases  which  have  come 
to  them,  and  a  great  deal  of  good  to  the  men  who  have  done  the  work.  This  last  is 
the  great  asset  of  this  type.  It  will  leave  its  mark  on  the  rising  generation  of  lawyers. 
In  discovering  and  developing  this  asset — an  asset  both  to  legal  aid  and  legal  edu- 
cation— the  law  school  society  has  made  an  important  contribution.  The  idea  is  one 
to  be  treasured  and  not  lost.  Fortunately  it  can  be  preserved  and  carried  out  more 
effectively  in  connection  with  other  types  of  legal  aid  organizations  which  have  per- 
manence, trained  supervision,  and  better  equipment. 

The  bar  association  type  has  been  employed  only  to  a  limited  extent.  In  St.  Louis  the 
Bar  Association  established  an  excellent  society.  As  it  was  soon  afterward  taken  over 
by  the  city  and  operated  as  a  department  of  government,  it  does  not  offer  any  final  test 
for  this  type.  The  Birmingham  attempt  failed,  so  that  New  Orleans,  Columbus,  and 
Detroit  are  the  only  remaining  societies  of  this  sort.  From  the  experience  afforded  in 
these  three  fields  the  bar  association  type  is  found  wanting.  Apparently  the  bar  associ- 
ations thus  far  have  not  had  a  proper  vision  of  the  opportunity  and  they  have  proved 
a  weak  instrument  to  which  to  entrust  this  important  service.  In  New  Orleans  and 
Columbus  the  work  has  gone  forward  but  slowly  and  the  organization  has  hardly 
crystallized  at  all.  In  Detroit,  where  the  society  was  started  in  1909,  despite  an  enor- 
mous growth  of  the  city,  the  Bar  Association  has  methodically  gone  on  year  after 
year  appropriating  five  hundred  dollars  for  the  legal  aid  work,  never  grasping  the 
opportunity  or  perceiving  the  need  growing  around  it,  and  never  giving  more  than 
perfunctory  attention  to  the  work.  The  result  has  been  that  despite  the  efforts  of  an 
able  attorney  in  charge,  the  work  has  sunk  to  a  low  level.  Detroit,  conceded  in  1917  to 
be  the  fifth  city  in  the  country,  in  legal  aid  work  ranked  twenty-fourth.  There  are 
several  reasons  for  the  failure  of  this  type.  The  greatest  is  undoubtedly  the  general 

1  The  Legal  Aid  Society  of  the  George  Washington  University  Law  School  ranks  second  and  has  done  reasonably 
well  under  adverse  conditions;  the  Yale  Legal  Aid  Bureau  has  never  attained  strength;  and  no  information  is  avail- 
able as  to  the  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  the  University  of  Tennessee.  The  Denver  society  is  no  longer  in  existence. 

2  For  an  extended  presentation  and  discussion  of  this  subject  see  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference 
of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  11-20;  and  Third  Annual  Report  of  the  Harvard  Legal  Aid  Bureau. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  175 

indifference  with  which  the  bar  has  thus  far  regarded  legal  aid  work.  There  is  further 
the  natural  conservatism  of  the  bar,  which  makes  the  development  of  the  bar  associ- 
ations themselves  a  tedious  process,  with  the  result  that  any  activity  of  the  associa- 
tion also  grows  slowly.  There  are  two  other  limitations  which  also  appear  in  other 
types  and  are  more  fully  considered  in  their  connection.  They  are:  first,  that  an  or- 
ganization does  better  when  it  is  independent  and  has  to  stand  on  its  own  responsi- 
bility; and  second,  that  although  legal  aid  work  is  primarily  a  legal  affair,  its  best 
control  and  direction  are  secured  when  to  the  lawyer's  point  of  view  there  are  added 
other  opinions  representing  other  elements  in  the  community. 

The  private  corporation  societies,  the  public  bureaus,  and  the  departments  of  or- 
ganized charities  constitute  the  three  great  types  of  organization.  Not  only  do  they 
greatly  outnumber  the  other  types,  but  by  them  is  borne  the  burden  of  the  work.  In 
1916,  out  of  a  total  of  117,201  cases,  they  cared  for  116,099  cases. 

These  three  types  raise  two  great  questions.  The  first  is  as  to  the  respective  merits 
of  the  independent  society,  on  the  one  hand,  and,  on  the  other,  of  the  society  or  bureau 
which  is  not  independent,  but  is  a  department  of  some  larger  charity  organization. 
This  is  a  question  relating  solely  to  organization,  and  it  is  the  chief  question  from 
the  point  of  view  of  how  legal  aid  work  may  best  be  organized.  The  private  corpora- 
tion represents  the  independent  form  and  the  charity  bureau  the  departmental  form. 
On  this  issue  the  public  bureaus  afford  examples  of  both  kinds.  There  are  independent 
public  bureaus,  and  bureaus  that  are  departments  of  welfare  boards. 

The  second  question  is  as  to  the  respective  merits  of  private  and  public  organiza- 
tions. This  is  the  precise  point  which  has  been  so  much  debated  in  the  public  defender 
discussions.  It  is  more  than  a  question  of  organization,  it  reaches  down  and  calls  into 
consideration  the  fundamental  principles  and  meanings  of  legal  aid  work.  On  this 
question  the  private  corporation  societies  and  charity  bureaus  unite  to  present  one 
side  and  the  public  bureaus  to  present  the  other. 

Before  analyzing  these  questions  and  weighing  the  arguments  it  is  helpful  to  ascer- 
tain the  present  situation.  The  following  table,  arranged  according  to  the  size  of  cities, 
sets  out  where  each  type  is  to  be  found  and  the  number  of  cases  received  by  each  or- 
ganization in  1916.  It  is  readily  apparent  that  the  private  corporation  societies  pre- 
dominate in  the  larger  cities  and  the  charity  bureaus  in  the  cities  of  the  second  class. 
This  is  made  clearer  if  we  add  the  cities  where  the  work  is  still  in  indefinite  shape,  but 
where  the  charity  bureau  type  has  been  adopted,  as  in  Bridgeport,  Des  Moines,  Grand 
Rapids,  Indianapolis,  and  Seattle.  It  is  further  apparent  that  the  private  organizations 
are  to  be  found  mainly  in  the  east,  and  the  public  organizations  mainly  in  the  west. 


176 


LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 


City 

Population ' 

Type 

Cases  in  1916 

Private  Corporation 

41,646 

New  York 

5,670,167 

Private  Corporation 

957 

Department  of  Charity 

5,788 

Chicago 

2,521,822 

Private  Corporation 

10,697 

Department  of  Charity 

4,685 

Philadelphia 

1,750,000 

Private  Corporation 

4,845 

St.  Louis 

850,000 

Public  Bureau 

1,235 

Boston 

767,000 

Private  Corporation 

2,608 

Cleveland 

750,000 

Private  Corporation 

4,946 

Los  Angeles 

600,000 

Public  Bureau 

8,848 

Baltimore 

595,000 

Department  of  Charity 

376 

Pittsburgh 

590,000 

Private  Corporation 

681, 

San  Francisco 

530,000 

Private  Corporation 

242 

Buffalo 

480,000 

Private  Corporation 

1,516 

Cincinnati 

450,000 

Private  Corporation 

1,698 

Milwaukee 

448,000 

Private  Corporation 

1,174 

Newark 

401,000 

Private  Corporation 

2,155 

Minneapolis 

370,000 

Department  of  Charity 

3,029 

Kansas  City 

300,000 

Public  Bureau 

5,270 

St.  Paul 

290,000 

Department  of  Charity 

1,749 

Portland 

275,000 

Public  Bureau 

1,363 

Jersey  City 

270,903 

Private  Corporation 

447 

Louisville 

265,420 

Department  of  Charity 

78 

Rochester 

265,000 

Department  of  Charity 

382 

Omaha 

210,000 

Public  Bureau 

1,318 

Hartford 

150,000 

Department  of  Charity 

134 

Dallas 

135,000 

Public  Bureau 

1,480 

Dayton 

135,000 

Public  Bureau 

922 

Akron 

130,000 

Department  of  Charity 

20 

Duluth 

104,000 

Public  Bureau 

5,629 

San  Diego 

90,000 

Department  of  Charity 

28 

Plainfield 

20,550  a 

Department  of  Charity 

150 

Reason  and  experience  unite  to  indicate  that  the  independent  organization,  which 

generally  is  synonymous  with  the  private  corporation  society,  has  many  points  of 

superiority  over  the  departmental  and  dependent  organization.  It  is 

"  '     essential  in  this  connection  to  stick  to  facts  and  not  to  be  misled  by 

"     .  terminology.  There  are  departmental  bureaus  which  are  independent 

Organizations  .,  ,     °  ™,  .     ,  ,  ..        t.  , 

°  in  all  but  name.  Ihere  are  private  corporation  societies  which  are 

not  independent  as  to  certain  aspects  of  their  work.  The  truth  of  the  propositions 

1  The  population  figures  are  taken  from  the  World  Almanac  for  1917,  page  762. 
-  Figure  given  in  1910  Census. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  177 

hereinafter  advanced  receives  excellent  corroboration  from  this  very  situation,  for 
invariably  in  so  far  as  an  organization  is  independent  the  advantages  of  the  inde- 
pendent type  are  found,  and  in  so  far  as  it  has  surrendered  its  freedom  of  action  the 
corresponding  disadvantages  appear. 

The  independent  type  of  organization,  as  exemplified  by  the  private  corporation 
society,  makes  for  greater  responsibility  and  at  the  same  time  permits  greater  freedom 
of  action.  It  must  stand  on  its  own  feet.  It  cannot  hide  in  the  shadow  or  stay  under 
the  protecting  wing  of  any  other  organization.  Before  the  community,  the  courts, 
and  the  bar  it  must  stand  or  fall  according  to  its  own  reputation.  The  issue  cannot 
be  beclouded  by  any  intermediary.  That  this  fact  inculcates  a  feeling  of  responsi- 
bility is  undeniable.  The  executive  committee  of  a  general  chai'ity  has  no  such  in- 
terest in,  and  feels  no  such  responsibility  for,  a  legal  aid  bureau  which  is  merely  a 
department  of  the  greater  organization,  as  has  the  board  of  directors  of  the  incor- 
porated society.  It  is  not  without  significance  that  as  a  rule  the  best  societies  are 
to-day  of  the  independent  type  and  that  the  work  of  an  independent  legal  aid  organ- 
ization has  never  been  given  up.  A  very  great  failure  in  legal  aid  work  is  chargeable 
to  charity  organization  management  in  Bridgeport;  in  Baltimore  and  Rochester  the 
work  has  not  developed  as  it  should  have  during  a  space  of  six  years  ;  and  in  Des 
Moines,  Grand  Rapids,  and  Indianapolis  the  charity  control  has  failed  to  produce 
any  definite  or  enterprising  legal  aid  undertaking.  It  was  the  realization  of  these 
advantages  which  led  Philadelphia  in  1916  and  Richmond  in  1917  to  become  inde- 
pendent incorporated  societies. 

Legal  aid  work,  when  conducted  as  a  department  of  charity,  has  less  freedom  of 
action.  In  funds,  which  are  its  sinews  for  work,  it  is  often  throttled  by  a  charity  budget 
in  which  it  is  but  a  small  item.  Its  appeal  for  support,  being  through  the  charity, 
lacks  direct  force  with  the  bar  which  should  be  its  main  source  of  reliance,  and  the 
response  depends  less  on  what  it  has  accomplished  and  more  on  what  the  charity  in 
general  has  accomplished.  If  the  charity  fails  to  earn  public  approval,  the  legal  aid 
work  is  also  doomed,  as  it  has  so  resulted  in  Portland,  Oregon.  The  reports  of  the 
legal  aid  departments  are  swallowed  up  in  the  general  charity  reports,  and  are  con- 
fined to  very  brief  compass.  The  legal  aid  attorneys  in  Minneapolis  and  Dayton  have 
submitted  excellent  reports  about  the  nature  and  significance  of  legal  aid  work  which 
have  never  been  published  or  given  to  the  community  in  any  form.  A  few  paragraphs 
are  selected  by  the  general  secretary  or  director  of  public  welfare  for  incorporation 
in  their  annual  report.  The  greater  portion  of  the  attorney's  report  never  reaches 
any  other  person.  For  three  years  the  Bureau  in  Kansas  City  published  its  own  re- 
ports and  in  them  is  contained  much  invaluable  information;  during  the  last  three 
years,  however,  its  reports  have  been  published  as  a  part  of  the  general  report  of 
the  welfare  board,  with  the  result  that  they  have  shrunk  both  in  size  and  value  and 
contain  little  more  than  a  bare  statistical  record.  For  nine  years  the  Cleveland  in- 
corporated society  published  annual  reports  which  still  rank  among  the  best  con- 


178  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

tributions  to  legal  aid  literature,  but  since  it  has  turned  its  financial  control  over 
to  the  Cleveland  Federation  for  Charity  and  Philanthropy,  its  annual  reports  have 
dwindled  to  a  leaflet,  and  in  the  Federation's  Year  Book  it  occupies  a  scant  two 
pages.  In  a  young  movement  such  as  legal  aid  is,  and  in  one  which  is  not  at  all 
understood,  it  is  essential  that  the  work  have  adequate  presentation.  Even  the  persons 
engaged  in  the  work  need  all  the  information  and  assistance  that  can  be  gained  from 
experience  in  other  cities.  The  burden  of  leadership  in  thought  and  in  making  the 
movement  known  has  fallen  entirely  on  the  independent  corporation  societies.  They 
have  been,  and  still  are,  the  producers  and  disseminators  of  the  only  legal  aid  liter- 
ature that  there  is.  Had  it  not  been  for  them,  the  legal  aid  movement  would  never 
have  been  known  and  its  spread  from  city  to  city  could  hardly  have  been  accom- 
plished. 

With  the  departmental  type  of  organization  there  is  less  freedom  of  thought 
and  less  initiative.  This  results  from  the  nature  of  the  arrangement  under  which  the 
departmental  bureau  is  customarily  conducted.  There  is  a  general  secretary  or  director 
who  stands  between  the  legal  aid  attorney  and  the  controlling  board  which  alone  can 
do  things.  Thus  in  Minneapolis  the  attorney  reports  to  the  general  secretary,  and 
he  in  turn  reports  to  the  controlling  board.  This  is  an  unwise  arrangement,  for  no 
general  secretary  is  competent  to  pass  on  the  issues  presented.  Legal  aid  work  is  a 
distinct  thing  from  general  charity  work,  it  requires  the  legally  trained  mind  acting 
in  the  light  of  a  knowledge  of  legal  affairs  to  understand  much  of  its  significance  and 
to  chart  wisely  its  course  of  activity.  The  general  secretary  of  a  charity  organization 
is  disqualified  from  passing  expert  opinion  on  such  matters,  he  lacks  the  legal  train- 
ing to  apply  to  them,  and  he  approaches  them  from  an  entirely  different  background. 
The  same  difficulty  applies,  in  most  instances,  to  the  controlling  board,  which  has  the 
final  word  and  determines  the  budget.  A  board  quite  competent  to  supervise  the  tra- 
ditional charity  departments  is  incompetent  to  determine  the  peculiar  questions  pre- 
sented by  legal  aid  work.  This  checks  growth  and  tends  to  retard  the  development 
which  normally  takes  place  with  an  intelligent  counsel  dealing  directly  with  a  board 
picked  because  of  their  peculiar  fitness  for  and  interest  in  directing  legal  aid  work. 
The  independent  organizations  always  have  been  and  still  are  blazing  the  trail. 

The  greatest  flaw  in  the  departmental  type  is  that  its  power  for  good  is  lessened 
by  the  fact  that  it  tends  to  reach  a  smaller  group  of  persons  than  does  the  inde- 
pendent type.  The  legal  aid  bureau  of  an  associated  charities  or  federated  charities 
generally  has  its  offices  with  that  organization.  Often  the  offices  are  in  the  local 
charity  building.  It  is  the  customaiy  and  the  natural  arrangement  for  all  applicants 
to  go  to  a  central  application  desk,  and  there  to  be  referred  to  the  proper  office  or 
person.  These  facts  give  rise  to  an  impression  in  the  community  which  confuses  legal 
aid  with  charity,  which  in  turn  has  a  marked  effect  in  limiting  the  legal  aid  clients 
to  persons  who  are  applicants  for  charitable  assistance.  The  self-supporting  class,  able 
to  pay  its  own  way  in  the  ordinary  affairs  of  life,  but  unable  to  meet  the  unusual 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES 


179 


expenses  called  for  by  any  litigation,  is  strongly  inclined  to  stay  away.  This  tendency 
has  often  been  suspected,1  but  until  1916  there  was  no  corroborative  evidence. 

In  April,  1916,  the  Legal  Aid  Department  of  the  United  Charities  of  St.  Paul 
moved  its  offices  from  the  Wilder  Charity  Building,  where  it  had  had  offices  with  the 
other  charity  organizations  of  the  city,  to  an  office  building  given  over  largely  to 
lawyers'  offices.  Immediately  the  number  of  clients  doubled.  The  test  is  a  fair  one. 
Both  buildings  are  accessible,  the  Wilder  Charity  Building  is  a  beautiful  modern 
structure  and  the  Society's  present  quarters  are  in  an  old,  third-class  office  building. 
There  are  no  other  or  unusual  circumstances  to  account  for  this  almost  automatic 
doubling  of  the  work.  The  same  attorney  remained  in  charge,  and  the  work  was  car- 
ried on  as  before.  The  increase  was  no  temporary  flurry,  as  an  analysis  of  the  cases 
shows.  The  change  was  made  April  22,  1916.  A  comparison  of  the  cases  accepted 
during  the  five  months  ending  April  30, 1916,  and  during  the  five  months  following 
April,  1916,  makes  this  clear. 


In  Charity  Buildiny 

In  Office  Building 

Month                               Cases 

Month 

Cases 

December                           61 

May 

113 

January                                42 

June 

85 

February                              50 

July 

102 

March                                    50 

August 

85 

April                                    50 

September 

109 

Total        253 

Total 

494 

This  cannot  be  accounted  for  by  any  seasonal  variation.  The  peak  of  the  load  for 
most  organizations  comes  during  the  winter  months.  The  sums  of  money  collected 
for  clients  also  increased  from  $2533.47  to  $3280.71. 

It  is  possible  to  ascertain  where  this  increase  came  from.  The  number  of  cases  sent 
by  the  charities  and  the  courts  remained  constant  and  other  sources  very  nearly  con- 
stant with  the  exception  of  the  State  Labor  Department.  From  this  channel  there 
came  319  cases  as  against  128  during  the  five  months'  period  before  the  change.  This 
is  reflected  in  the  records  of  the  nature  of  the  cases,  which  show  that  the  increased 
work  is  mainly  accounted  for  by  wage  claims,  which  jumped  from  165  to  376  cases. 
For  a  matter  of  this  sort  the  evidence  is  remarkably  clear  and  convincing  that  for- 
merly persons  who  applied  at  the  State  Labor  Board  for  assistance  in  securing  their 
wages  and  were  referred  to  the  legal  aid  society,  when  they  went  to  the  address  given 
and  found  it  to  be  a  charity  building,  declined  to  enter  and  went  away,  and  that  now 
the  same  sort  of  persons  with  the  same  sort  of  cases,  having  the  same  feelings  and  ideas 
about  themselves,  are  quite  willing  to  go  to  the  legal  aid  bureau  in  its  new  location. 

All  these  arguments  are  minimized  in  so  far  as  the  departmental  societies  are  given 
autonomy.  If  a  legal  aid  bureau  of  an  organized  charity  has  in  fact  its  own  offices,  its 
own  executive  committee  empowered  to  decide  and  act,  its  own  budget,  and  the  con- 

1  Cf.  15  Boston  L.  A.  R.  18;  1  Hartford  L.  A.  R.  3;  St.  Louis  (Bar  Ass'n)  L.  A.  R.  3 ;  1  Baltimore  L.  A.  R.  6. 


180  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

trol  of  raising  its  finances,  no  harm  is  done  by  adhering  to  the  name.  These  state- 
ments are  necessarily  generalizations.  In  a  given  locality  they  may  be  outweighed  by 
peculiar  local  conditions.  Nor  are  they  to  be  taken  as  a  disparagement  of  the  work 
performed  by  the  departmental  bureaus.  Some  of  them,  particularly  those  in  Min- 
neapolis and  St.  Paul,  have  done  extremely  well.  It  is  the  sole  purpose  of  this  examina- 
tion to  state  such  conclusions  as  are  demonstrable  by  facts,  so  that  legal  aid  work  may, 
in  the  light  of  experience,  develop  as  soundly  as  possible. 


§6 
In  the  all-important  issue  between  publicly  supported,  publicly  controlled  legal  as- 
sistance to  poor  persons  and  privately  supported,  privately  controlled  legal  assistance 
no  distinction  need  be  made  between  the  "public  defender"  organ- 
j  izations  and  the  "legal  aid"  organizations.  The  conflicting  principles 

*      .        presented  by  the  Los  Angeles  Public  Defender  and  the  New  York 
°  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee  are  in  no  wise  different  from  those 

presented  by  the  Kansas  City  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  the  Board  of  Pub- 
lic Welfare  and  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society.  In  the  ensuing  discussion  no  dis- 
tinction will  be  made,  and  the  phrase  "legal  aid  organizations"  will  be  used  to  include 
both  groups.  The  only  issue  is  which  type  is  superior,  which  type  should  be  selected 
for  the  future  development  of  legal  aid  work, — the  publicly  controlled  or  the  pri- 
vately controlled  legal  aid  organization?1 

Theoretically,  the  argument  for  public  legal  aid  is  irrefutable.  The  basis  of  the 
argument  takes  us  back  to  the  beginning  of  this  report,  where  our  ideal  of  the  free- 
dom and  equality  of  justice  was  set  forth.  Equality  before  the  law  is  the  crux  of  the 
situation;  the  ideal  of  freedom  is  a  reinforcing  principle  which  plays  a  part  in  so  far 
as  it  is  necessary  to  secure  the  essential  principle  of  equality.  Justice  must  be  equally 
accessible  to  all  persons,  and  the  administration  of  justice  must  deal  equally  with  all 
persons.  Where  equality  can  be  secured  only  by  reducing  the  price  of  justice,  the  cost 
must  be  reduced;  where  equality  can  be  secured  only  by  making  justice  free,  then 
there  must  be  freedom  of  justice.  In  the  issue  which  confronts  us  these  ideals  take 
on  concrete  form  and  demand  practical  application. 

Legal  aid  work  is  part  and  parcel  of  the  administration  of  justice.  It  is  not  dis- 
pensing charity.  It  is  simply  giving  or  securing  to  each  applicant  what  is  his  right. 
Historically  we  can  see  that  the  administration  of  justice  by  the  state  as  we  now  have 
it  has  come  about  by  a  gradual  process  of  the  state's  taking  over  to  itself  the  per- 
formance of  the  various  functions  which  make  up  the  administration  of  justice.2  At 

1  Control  and  support  almost  always  go  together.  All  publicly  controlled  bureaus  are  supported  out  of  public  funds. 
All  privately  controlled  societies,  except  three,  are  exclusively  supported  by  private  subscriptions.  The  Buffalo 
Legal  Aid  Society  receives  financial  assistance  from  the  City  of  Buffalo  and  the  County  of  Erie.  The  Richmond  Legal 
Aid  Society  receives  free  rent  in  the  Juvenile  Court  Building.  The  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee  in  New  York  re- 
ceives free  rent  in  a  municipal  building. 

2  Zane:  Bench  and  Bar  in  the  Golden  Age  of  the  Common  Law,  2  Illinois  Law  Review  (1907),  1. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  181 

one  time  the  function  of  the  judge  was  in  private  hands.  The  lord  of  the  manor  was 
the  judge  for  his  tenants.  The  church  exercised  its  ecclesiastical  jurisdiction  over  mar- 
riage and  the  administration  of  estates.  In  the  time  of  Henry  II  a  step  forward  was 
taken  when  the  greater  part  of  the  judicial  function  was  entrusted  to  judges,  respon- 
sible only  to  the  king,  who  as  sovereign  occupied  the  position  of  the  modern  state. 
Many  of  the  ministerial  functions  were  originally  in  private  hands.  After  a  judgment 
for  damages  the  plaintiff  himself  satisfied  his  judgment  by  taking  away  the  defend- 
ant's property.  Now  the  levy  of  execution  is  exclusively  in  the  hands  of  the  sheriff, 
a  public  officer.  Arrests  and  service  of  process  in  criminal  cases  were  for  years  made 
by  private  persons  until  the  police  systems  were  established.  In  the  not  far  distant 
past  prosecutions  for  crime  were  in  private  control.  A  private  individual  made  his 
complaint  and  paid  his  own  attorney  to  prosecute  the  case  in  court.1  This  function 
was  taken  over  by  the  state  acting  through  its  district  attorneys  and  prosecuting 
officers.  To-day  all  the  basic  component  parts  of  the  administration  of  justice  are  in 
the  control  of  the  state,  except  the  part  taken  by  attorneys  in  bringing  and  defend- 
ing civil  suits  and  in  defending  criminal  matters. 

The  state  enacts  the  laws,  controls  the  judges,  the  clerks,  the  bailiffs,  the  sheriffs, 
the  probation  staff,  the  police,  the  district  attorneys,  the  jurors,  and  provides  the  court 
houses.  If  this  were  enough  to  secure  equality  before  the  law,  there  would  not  be  the 
slightest  case  for  public  legal  aid  bureaus.  But  we  have  already  seen  that  in  many  cases 
in  many  fields  of  law,  the  inequality  resulting  from  the  inability  to  employ  counsel 
vitiates  the  equality  of  the  whole  machinery.  We  know  that  this  is  so  because  it  is  the 
attorney  who  supplies  the  motive  power  to  make  the  machinery  of  justice  move.  If 
one  were  to  use  a  homely  analogy,  the  administration  of  justice  might  be  likened  to 
an  automobile,  in  which  the  law  represents  the  engine,  the  judge  the  control,  and  the 
attorney  the  gasoline.  To  give  to  two  men  exactly  the  same  type  of  car  and  supply 
one  with  gasoline  and  the  other  with  none  and  then  to  expect  a  fair  race  is  obviously 
preposterous.  So  long  as  the  attorney  is  made  necessary  by  the  form  of  the  machinery, 
equality  can  be  had  only  if  the  attorney's  services  are  available  to  every  one. 

The  last  step  in  the  extension  to  its  natural  completion  of  the  state's  control  over 
judicial  proceedings  is  the  taking  over,  so  far  as  may  be  necessary  to  secure  equality, 
of  the  control  of  the  attorney,  thereby  guaranteeing  that  poverty  shall  bar  no  one 
from  securing  the  attorney's  services.  It  is  the  accomplishment  of  this  step  which  the 
public  legal  aid  organizations  represent.  The  conception  of  a  judicial  proceeding  in 
which  equality  is  guaranteed  by  having  every  participant  an  officer  of  the  state  is  no 
longer  a  dream,  it  may  be  seen  any  day  in  Los  Angeles.  A  deserted  wife  tells  her  story 
to  a  district  attorney.  He  makes  out  a  complaint  and  transfers  it  to  the  Public  Trus- 
tee, who  makes  a  preliminary  investigation.  The  clerk  draws  a  warrant,  which  is  given 
to  an  officer  for  service.  The  defendant  is  brought  into  court  for  arraignment  and 

1  Hyde:  Reorganization  of  the  Bar,  8  Illinois  Law  Review  (1913),  239,  240;  5  Journal  of  Criminal  Law  and  Crimi- 
nology, 926. 


182  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

trial  before  the  judge.  The  state  and  the  prosecuting  witness  are  represented  by  an 
assistant  district  attorney  and  the  defendant  by  the  Public  Defender.  If  there  is  a 
verdict  or  finding  of  guilt,  the  defendant  is  put  under  the  supervision  of  a  probation 
officer  and  pays  the  weekly  amount  ordered  by  the  court  to  the  Public  Trustee. 

This  is  not  an  argument  for  the  socialization  of  the  bar.  It  is  an  argument  for 
equality.  For  persons  who  are  able  to  employ  their  counsel,  no  change  is  necessary, 
but  for  the  vast  multitude  who  cannot,  some  readjustment  is  imperative.  It  is  not 
a  claim  that  the  state  should  pay  all  lawyers.  It  is  a  claim  that  the  state  should  pay 
for  lawyers  to  represent  poor  persons  in  proper  cases  where  the  attorney's  services  are 
necessary  to  secure  equality  before  the  law.  It  must  be  made  clear  that  the  case  for 
such  state  paid  attorneys  is  not  based  on  sentimentality,  or  charity,  or  kindness,  or 
anything  of  the  sort.  Nor  is  it  a  progressive  proposition  in  the  sense  that  it  is  opposed 
to  a  conservatism  that  cherishes  the  good  in  our  existing  institutions.  It  is  based  on 
fundamentals  as  to  which  citizens  of  all  opinions  —  conservatives  and  radicals  —  are 
in  accord. 

The  point  is  that  in  all  litigation  the  state  is  the  great  silent  party  in  interest. 
This  is  clear  in  criminal  cases,  in  divorce  matters,  and  in  disbarment  proceedings.  It 
is  equally  true  in  all  so-called  private  litigation.1  If  this  were  not  so,  why  should  the 
state  require  that  parties  to  private  litigation  use  its  laws,  its  courts,  and  its  judges 
to  determine  their  private  quarrel?  Originally  the  state  was  compelled  to  take  a  hand 
to  preserve  the  peace,  to  prevent  private  vengeance,  self-help,  self-redress,  all  of  which 
disturbed  the  King's  peace.  With  the  rise  of  the  ideals  of  democracy  a  far  better 
reason  was  supplied.  Our  government  was  designed  to  secure  through  its  laws  the  in- 
dividual rights  to  life,  liberty,  and  property,  and  the  more  newly  conceived  social 
interests.  The  laws  are  able  to  effect  these  purposes  only  through  the  administration 
of  justice.  When  a  man  by  his  labor  has  accumulated  property  there  are  persons  who 
would  like  to  take  it  away  from  him  by  force  or  trickery.  To  permit  it  would  be  to 
sanction  anarchy.  The  law  forbids,  and  it  attains  its  end  through  the  administration 
of  justice,  which  enjoins  the  wrong,  or  gives  redress,  or  punishes  the  offender.  If,  for 
any  reason,  the  man  were  prohibited  from  obtaining  the  assistance  of  the  law  through 
the  processes  of  the  administration  of  justice,  his  rights  would  be  worthless,  the  law 
would  be  an  impotent  sham,  and  his  property  could  be  taken  with  impunity.  Yet 
this  is  precisely  the  position  of  the  poor. 

To  the  conservative  the  proposal  that  the  state  should  provide  counsel  for  the  poor 
seems  class  legislation.  By  this  he  means  that  it  is  unjust  to  tax  those  who  have  ac- 
cumulated property  by  their  energy,  frugality,  and  enterprise  in  order  to  help  those 
who  have  not.  In  other  words,  he  feels  that  equality  of  opportunity  becomes  mean- 
ingless if  those  who  take  their  opportunities  are  to  be  penalized  in  favor  of  those 
who  do  nothing.  When  properly  applied  these  points  have  great  force,  but  they  have 

1  Cf.  Blackstone's  statement :  "Besides,  the  public  is  in  nothing  so  essentially  interested  as  in  securing  to  every  indi- 
vidual his  private  rights."  1  Blackstone's  Commentaries,  139. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  183 

no  application  within  the  realm  of  justice.  Exact  justice  is  the  basis  of  equality  of 
opportunity.  It  is  as  repugnant  to  the  conservative  as  to  any  one  that  a  man  should 
prosper  by  employing  persons  to  work  for  him,  taking  the  profits  of  their  labor,  dis- 
charging them  without  pay,  and  being  enabled  to  pursue  such  a  course  with  impunity 
because  of  the  inability  of  the  workmen  to  invoke  the  machinery  of  justice  in  their 
behalf.  Yet  this  non-payment  of  wages  has  happened  in  hundreds  of  thousands  of 
cases. 

There  is  no  justification  for  saying  that  justice  should  be  denied  if  a  person  cannot 
pay  the  price  fixed.  No  one  would  claim  that  the  only  persons  entitled  to  protection 
are  those  who  are  able  to  defray  the  cost  of  that  protection  by  paying  the  judge  and 
clerk  their  salaries,  the  jurors  their  fees,  and  by  renting  the  court  room.  The  cost  of 
justice  is  variously  estimated.  In  Massachusetts  the  expense  to  the  state  of  a  civil 
jury  trial  has  been  fixed  at  $248.89  per  day.1  The  Public  Defender  in  Los  Angeles 
has  reported  that  the  salaries,  fees,  and  overhead  expenses  in  a  criminal  jury  trial 
amount  to  $200  per  day.2  The  daily  cost  of  the  Philadelphia  Court  of  Common  Pleas 
is  about  $150.3  The  expense  of  a  jury  trial  in  the  Chicago  Municipal  Court  is  not 
less  than  $75  per  day.4  Any  serious  proposal  to  restrict  the  use  of  the  courts  to  only 
such  persons  as  could  defray  these  expenses  is  inconceivable.  Justice  is  not  merchan- 
dise; it  cannot  be  granted  or  withheld  according  to  the  purchasing  power  of  the 
applicant.  It  is  the  affirmative  duty  of  the  state,  at  public  expense,  to  do  all  that  is 
needful  to  secure  justice  to  every  one.  In  the  main  this  is  perfectly  recognized.  The 
state  does  afford  all  that  is  necessary  with  the  exception  of  the  attorney.  As  this 
omission  is  fatal  in  certain  cases,  the  argument  concludes  that  the  state  must  admin- 
ister its  justice  better  by  supplying  the  attorney  in  such  cases. 

Emergencies  and  times  of  stress  often  serve  to  make  clear  the  injustice  of  a  course 
of  conduct  which  is  tolerated  in  every  day  life.  After  the  great  explosion  of  ammu- 
nition at  the  Jersey  City  wharves,  known  as  the  "  Black  Tom  "  explosion,  the  City 
Attorney's  office  publicly  offered  to  accept  the  claims  of  the  families  whose  men  had 
been  killed  and  to  bring  suits  for  negligence  without  any  charge  to  the  clients  what- 
soever. The  injustice  of  leaving  these  destitute  families  without  redress  or  of  com- 
pelling them  to  seek  relief  through  the  usual  channel  of  the  contingent  fee  became 
so  clear  that  the  public  appreciated  and  undertook  its  responsibility.  The  federal  gov- 
ernment, in  cooperation  with  the  states,  has  undertaken  to  furnish  free  legal  aid  to 
the  ten  million  men  of  draft  age  in  connection  with  the  legal  problems  raised  by  the 
new  classifications  of  men  under  the  selective  draft  law.5  The  attorneys  who  are  giv- 
ing the  advice  are  not  to  be  paid  out  of  public  funds>  but  they  are  under  govern- 

1  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Industrial  Accident  Board  0/1914-1915  (Public  Document  105  of  1916),  page  71. 

2  In  a  supplemental  report  to  the  Report  of  the  Public  Defender  to  the  Board  of  Supervisors  for  the  year  1915-16. 

3  Address  of  Judge  Charles  L.  Brown  to  the  Men's  Club  of  the  Market  Square  Presbyterian  Church  (1914),  page  12. 

4  Eighthand  Ninth  Chicago  Municipal  Court  Reports,  page  130.  For  a  general  article  see  Rood:  The  Cost  of  Public 
Justice,  12  Illinois  L.  Rev.  (1918)  540. 

6  A  concise  presentation  of  the  regulations  is  contained  in  2  Mass.  Law  Quarterly,  563  et  seq. 


184  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

mental  control  and  the  clients  are  not  to  pay  fees.  This  is  public  legal  aid  work  in 
one  limited  field.  It  is  the  assumption  by  the  government  of  the  responsibility  which 
during  the  first  draft  the  legal  aid  societies  all  over  the  country  met  to  the  fullest 
extent  of  their  resources. 

If  this  position  is  well  taken,  and  the  logic  behind  it  is  undeniably  strong,  it  fol- 
lows that  it  should  be  the  state,  and  not  any  private  group,  which  should  provide 
and  control  the  attorneys  for  the  poor.  The  administration  of  justice  is  a  public 
affair,  every  part  of  which  must  be  subject  to  public  control.  These  attorneys  for 
the  poor  stand  on  the  same  footing  as  the  judges.  Both  are  supplied  by  the  state  be- 
cause only  through  them  can  the  administration  of  justice  operate.  Such  attorneys 
should  no  more  be  left  to  private  selection  or  made  subject  to  private  control  than 
should  the  judges.  Further,  it  is  a  fact  that  the  privately  supported  agencies  are 
unable  to  meet  the  entire  need  because  they  lack  the  necessary  funds.  The  state  can 
recognize  no  such  limitation.  In  its  supreme  duty  of  administering  justice,  the  state 
cannot  permit  a  condition  under  which  its  administration  is  equal  or  unequal,  a 
success  or  a  failure,  according  to  the  ability  or  inability  of  a  handful  of  private  per- 
sons to  raise  a  certain  amount  of  money. 

In  passing  from  the  theoretical  to  the  actual  we  leave  an  argument  that  is  all  in 
favor  of  publicly  controlled  and  publicly  supported  legal  aid  organizations  and  are 
immediately  confronted  with  a  practical  situation  which  gives  rise  to  grave  doubts. 
All  of  the  public  bureaus  are  controlled  by  municipal  governments  except  that  of 
Los  Angeles,  which  is  a  county  office.  It  is  a  commonplace  that  many  American  mu- 
nicipalities possess  improper  and  inefficient  governments  in  which  politics  play  an 
undue  part.  It  is  always  a  question  whether  it  is  safe  to  entrust  an  essential  service, 
such  as  legal  aid,  to  such  a  government.  The  privately  incorporated  societies  in  the 
larger  eastern  cities  have  frankly  been  afraid  to  surrender  any  part  of  their  autonomy 
to  political  control.1 

Certain  direct  advantages  have  resulted  from  the  fact  that  a  legal  aid  bureau  was 
a  public  undertaking.  St.  Louis  affords  an  excellent  illustration  because,  during  its 
history,  it  has  been  both  a  private  and  a  public  organization.  The  investigator  re- 
ports that  since  the  society  came  under  public  control  her  position  has  carried  with 
it  much  greater  dignity  and  power,  enabling  her  to  use  channels  formerly  closed  and 
to  do  more  efficient  work.  The  Bureau  has  the  whole-hearted  cooperation  of  the  other 
public  departments.  As  a  private  society  there  was  great  difficulty  in  getting  justices 
of  the  peace  to  accept  in  forma  pauperis  affidavits,  thereby  waiving  their  costs,  but 
now  they  offer  no  objection.2  There  was  a  further  difficulty  in  that  the  jurors'  fees 
in  the  justice's  court  amounted  to  nine  dollars,  and  these  had  to  be  paid.  Now,  if 
a  jury  is  claimed,  the  Bureau  is  not  obliged  to  pay  the  fees  because  the  jurors  are 

1  The  New  York  Legislature  has  authorized  the  Board  of  Estimate  of  the  City  of  New  York  to  appropriate  $25,000 
for  the  Legal  Aid  Society.  The  New  York  Society  has  not  used  this  fund.  It  has  always  been  afraid  of  political  con- 
trol. See  23  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  13 ;  32  Ibid.  10:  11  Ibid.  No.  4,  p.  2 ;  History  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  page  48. 
1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  86,  88. 


THE  FIVE  DIFFERENT  TYPES  185 

required  to  serve  as  a  public  duty.  Even  more  important,  the  public  bureaus  are 
unquestionably  better  known,  they  reach  a  wider  field,  and  they  are  answering  the 
demand  for  legal  assistance  with  a  nearer  approach  to  completeness  than  the  private 
societies.  This  fact  appears  very  clearly  in  the  later  discussion  as  to  how  far  the  legal 
aid  organizations  are  meeting  the  full  need.1  It  may  here  be  noted  that  since  the 
Hartford  society  became  a  public  bureau  on  January  1,  1917,  its  work  has  more  than 
tripled.2  In  St.  Louis  the  work  has  likewise  made  a  substantial  increase.3  Detailed 
records  are  available  and  from  them  it  appears  that  the  nature  of  the  cases,  the  sources 
of  the  cases,  the  nationalities  of  the  applicants,  and  the  fees  charged,  are  almost  exactly 
the  same  under  public  control  as  they  were  when  the  work  was  controlled  by  the  Bar 
Association. 

The  public  legal  aid  bureaus  started  out  with  a  splendid  record.  Most  of  the  posi- 
tions in  the  legal  aid  staffs  were  put  under  civil  service  regulations,  high  standards 
were  set,  and  there  was  no  sign  of  political  interference.  It  has  been  felt  by  persons 
who  were  closely  watching  this  development  that  any  original  success  was  not  con- 
clusive, that  the  real  test  would  come  only  after  the  bureaus  had  been  in  existence 
a  few  years,  long  enough  for  the  novelty  to  wear  off  and  for  public  interest  to  wane.4 
Until  1917  the  outlook  was  most  hopeful.  Los  Angeles,  Portland,  Kansas  City,  St. 
Louis,  Dallas,  Duluth,  Dayton,  Hartford,  and  Omaha  were  doing  splendid  work,  they 
had  placed  excellent  attorneys  in  charge,  and  in  several  respects  they  were  proving 
more  successful  than  the  private  societies.  Thus,  in  Kansas  City,  the  Legal  Aid  Bu- 
reau established  a  much  higher  standard  in  the  treatment  of  desertion  cases  than  any 
private  society  had  attained.  In  one  year  thirteen  deserting  husbands  were  traced  and 
brought  back  from  Missouri,  Oklahoma,  Colorado,  Nebraska,  and  Washington  at  an 
expense  of  six  hundred  dollars.  The  Bureau  officially  stated  that  if  a  deserting  hus- 
band could  be  found,  no  expense  would  be  spared  in  bringing  him  to  justice.  The  pri- 
vate societies  have  been  prohibited  by  financial  considerations  from  even  attempting 
this  work.  Most  of  the  attorneys  in  the  public  legal  aid  bureaus  were  placed  under 
the  civil  service,  and  were  selected  after  examinations  into  their  fitness.  Politics  did 
not  venture  to  meddle  in  their  offices.  There  was  a  change  of  administration  in  Kansas 
City,  the  Republicans  replacing  the  Democrats,  but  the  legal  aid  attorney  was  not 
interfered  with,  the  budget  appropriation  was  kept  up,  and  the  Bureau's  work  went 
along  uninterruptedly. 

In  1917,  however,  the  danger  of  this  public  type  of  legal  aid  organization  was 
made  clear.  In  May  a  new  administration  took  over  the  city  government  of  Dallas. 

1  Chapter  XX,  Present  Position  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  §  1,  page  192. 

2  The  work  in  Hartford  is  naturally  small.  For  three  years  the  organization  was  private.  During  the  first  year  it 
averaged  6  cases  a  month,  during  the  second  7  cases,  and  during  the  third  8  cases.  The  public  bureau  has  averaged 
27  cases  a  month. 

3  This  does  not  appear  from  the  records  in  the  Appendix  because  since  the  Bureau  became  a  public  undertaking  no 
record  of  cases  is  made  in  which  advice  only  is  given. 

4  Cf.  statement  of  Rudolph  Matz,  late  President  of  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society,  in  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the 
Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  61,  52. 


186  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

The  Mayor  dismissed  the  director  of  the  Department  of  Public  Welfare  under  which 
the  Legal  Aid  Bureau  operated.  He  then  sought  to  appoint  a  personal  friend  as  at- 
torney for  the  Bureau,  and  when  that  gave  rise  to  a  storm  of  public  protest  he  abol- 
ished the  Bureau  entirely.  Legal  aid  work  no  longer  exists  in  Dallas.  In  July  a  new 
administration  was  elected  in  Portland,  Oregon.  The  attorney  holding  the  office  of 
Public  Defender  had  attained  the  highest  rank  in  a  competitive  civil  service  examina- 
tion for  the  position  and  had  received  a  permanent  appointment.  He  had  not  supported 
the  newly  elected  Mayor  in  his  campaign,  however,  and  on  July  13  the  City  Council, 
at  the  Mayor's  request,  without  any  public  hearing  and  without  notification  to  the 
Public  Defender,  abolished  the  office.  In  both  instances  the  evidence  is  clear  that  the 
bureaus  were  doing  good  work,  that  the  attorneys  were  superior  men,  and  that  the 
discontinuance  of  the  work  was  due  solely  to  petty  political  considerations.  As  if  to 
furnish  a  striking  contrast,  the  year  1917  also  witnessed  the  establishment  by  private 
enterprise  in  New  York  of  a  privately  controlled,  privately  supported,  Voluntary 
Defenders  Committee,  which  by  virtue  of  its  personnel,  equipment,  and  work  ranks 
among  the  very  best  legal  aid  organizations  in  the  country. 

Because  of  this  unhappy  discrepancy  between  theory  and  fact,  the  only  conclusions 
that  can  be  drawn  as  to  the  respective  merits  of  public  and  private  legal  aid  organ- 
izations are  local  rather  than  general  in  application.  Where  local  political  conditions 
permit,  there  is  every  reason  for  organizing  legal  aid  work  as  a  public  affair  under 
public  control.  On  the  other  hand,  in  cities  where  private  legal  aid  organizations  are 
well  established,  there  is  every  reason  for  them  to  remain  as  they  are.  They  possess 
a  freedom  of  action,  a  liberty  in  taking  risks  in  making  experiments,  which  will  leave 
in  their  hands  for  several  years  to  come  the  duty  of  leadership  in  the  development 
of  legal  aid  work. 

Nevertheless,  there  should  be  a  clear  consciousness  on  the  part  of  all  legal  aid 
organizations  that  they  are  engaged  in  the  performance  of  a  public  function,  and  that 
their  ultimate  goal  is  to  become  a  part  of  the  state's  administration  of  justice.  Thus 
far  the  only  attempt  at  public  control  has  been  through  the  municipality,  which  is  un- 
doubtedly the  weakest  part  of  our  entire  structure  of  government.  It  is  easily  con- 
ceivable that  some  plan  may  be  devised  whereby  the  value  of  public  control  may  be 
secured  without  paying  the  price  of  diminished  efficiency  through  political  inter- 
ference. As  legal  aid  work  relates  itself  to  the  administration  of  justice  rather  than 
to  municipal  government,  it  is  prefei-able  that  the  work  should  be  organized  and 
controlled  as  a  part  of  the  judicial  machinery  which  is  increasingly  being  taken  out 
of  the  field  of  partisan  politics.  In  the  last  chapter  of  this  report,  dealing  with  the 
future  of  legal  aid  work,  a  suggestion  of  this  sort  is  considered.1 


1  See  pout.  Chapter  XXV,  A  More  Equal  Administration  of  Justice,  §  3,  page  246. 


Chapter  XX 
PRESENT  POSITION  OF  LEGAL  AID  WORK 

The  largest  law  office  in  the  United  States  is  the  Legal  Aid  Society  of  New 
York,  with  nearly  40,000  new  cases  annually.  The  next  largest  office  is  the  Legal 
Aid  Society  of  Chicago,  with  12,000  new  cases  annually.  John  H.  Wigmore.1 

§  1 

THE  present  extent  of  organized  legal  aid  work  involves  two  considerations : 
first,  measured  by  geography  and  by  the  size  of  cities,  how  far  have  the  legal  aid 

■n  .  t-.   ,     ,     organizations  been  able  to  extend  themselves?  second,  measured  bv 

Present  Extent        ft  .  .- 

r..i     w    j,         the  need,  how  far  have  the  organizations  been  able  to  extend  their 

assistance  in  the  cities  where  they  exist? 

If  the  cities  in  which  legal  aid  organizations  are  to  be  found  were  marked  on  a 
map  of  the  United  States,  the  eye  would  at  once  see  that  there  are  two  great  areas 
wherein  legal  aid  work  is  non-existent.  One  is  the  far  west.  Bounded  by  lines  run- 
ning Duluth-Minneapolis-Omaha— Dallas  on  the  east  and  Portland-San  Fran- 
cisco—Los Angeles  on  the  west,  there  is  an  enormous  extent  of  territory  without 
legal  aid  organizations.  This  is  all  newer  country,  there  is  as  yet  no  great  need  for 
the  work,  for  there  are  almost  no  large  cities.2  The  extension  of  legal  aid  work  into 
this  field  is  only  a  question  of  time.  If  a  need  manifests  itself,  societies  or  bureaus  will 
be  formed  and  the  work  undertaken  in  due  course.3 

The  second  area  is  that  of  the  southeast.  South  and  east  of  a  line  running  Rich- 
mond-Louisville-Nashville-New Orleans  no  legal  aid  work  is  done.  The  organiza- 
tions in  these  boundary  cities  have  not  flourished  as  well  as  elsewhere.  The  situation 
here  differs  radically  from  that  of  the  far  west.  There  is  great  need  of  the  work,  for 
there  are  large  cities  with  much  poverty.  It  is  not  a  question  of  orderly  extension  in 
due  course,  for  the  attempt  to  plant  legal  aid  institutions  has  already  been  made,  but 
without  success.  In  Atlanta  and  Birmingham  societies  were  started  under  the  inspi- 
ration of  small  local  groups,  did  well  for  a  while,  and  then  were  allowed  to  lapse.  In 
Chattanooga,  Knoxville,  and  Memphis  some  steps  for  the  formation  of  organizations 
were  taken,  but  the  plans  have  accomplished  practically  nothing.  Here  is  to  be  found 
the  only  general  failure  of  the  legal  aid  idea.  No  satisfactory  explanation  of  this  con- 
dition has  ever  been  offered.  Apparently  there  is  need  for  the  assistance  of  some 
strong  central  organization  to  cooperate  with  local  groups  and  to  assist  the  work 
until  it  shall  have  won  local  interest  and  support. 

This  geographical  examination  reveals  the  extent  of  the  work  only  in  a  most  gen- 
eral way.  A  far  better  test  is  afforded  by  cities,  for  organized  legal  aid  work  is  es- 

1  From  an  editorial  in  12  Illinois  Law  Review  (1917),  38. 

2  A  movement  to  start  an  organization  is  underway  in  Salt  Lake  City.  Denver  once  had  a  flourishing  society  which 
does  not  now  exist. 

3  Letters  from  attorneys  in  Washington,  Montana,  and  Utah  have  already  come  to  some  of  the  larger  eastern  organ- 
izations asking  for  information  about  the  work. 


188 


LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 


sentially  a  city  problem.  We  have  earlier  seen  that  the  growth  of  urban  population 
was  a  prime  factor  in  bringing  about  the  breakdown  of  the  administration  of  jus- 
tice, and  that  it  is  in  the  large  cities  that  the  great  denial  of  justice  exists.  The  chief 
defect  in  our  traditional  administration  of  justice  which  causes  hardship  to  the  poor 
is  the  expense  of  counsel.  In  the  country  towns  and  smaller  cities  this  difficulty  is 
overcome  by  the  charity  work  of  the  lawyers.  It  is  the  general  opinion  that  it  is 
rare  indeed  for  an  inhabitant  of  a  small  town  to  be  denied  legal  assistance  even  if 
he  is  unable  to  pay  for  it.  Just  where  the  line  of  demarcation  is  to  be  drawn  is  not 
certain,  but  there  is  good  authority  for  fixing  it  at  cities  with  a  population  of  one 
hundred  thousand.  In  connection  with  this  study  letters  were  sent  to  the  charity 
organization  societies  (also  called  "associated,"  "federated,"  and  "united  charities") 
in  all  cities  and  towns  in  the  United  States  where  there  were  no  legal  aid  organiza- 
tions, asking  if  they  experienced  a  need  for  organized  legal  aid  work.  The  replies  in- 
dicate that  the  one  hundred  thousand  population  mark  is  as  accurate  a  dividing  line 
as  can  be  fixed.  There  seems  to  be  a  tacit  agreement  that  this  is  the  point  at  which 
a  city  becomes  a  large  city  and  at  which  those  problems  that  are  essentially  "city" 
problems  make  their  appearance.1 

In  considering  how  far  the  legal  aid  movement  has  been  able  to  cover  the  large 
cities  we  face  three  situations:  cities  with  no  legal  aid  work,  cities  with  very  little 
legal  aid  work,  and  cities  having  definitely  established  organizations  doing  substan- 
tial work  that  gives  every  indication  of  steady,  consistent  development.  The  follow- 
ing table  presents  the  facts  in  summary  form.  We  know  that  legal  aid  work  started 
in  New  York  and  Chicago,  our  two  largest  cities,  so  that  the  question  is  how  far  the 
leo-al  aid  movement  has  been  able  to  work  downward  into  the  cities  with  smaller 
populations.  In  order  to  indicate  this,  the  cities  are  divided  into  five  groups,  each 
lower  group  including  the  higher  group,  so  that  the  total  number  of  cities  having 
a  population  over  the  specified  figure  may  appear.2 


Total  Cities  of  this 

Class  in  the 

United  States 

Legal  Aid  Work 

Class 

None 

Very  Little 

Definitely 
Established 

1.  Cities  over  350,000 

2.  Cities  over  300,000 

3.  Cities  over  200,000 

4.  Cities  over  150,000 

5.  Cities  over  100,000 

18 
21 
33 
41 

71 

0 
0 
3 

6 

27 

0 

2 

4 

6 

10 

18 
19 
26 
29 
34 

For  the  purpose  of  this  test,  which  aims  to  ascertain  to  what  extent  legal  aid  or- 
ganizations have  been  established  in  our  large  cities,  we  may  consider  that  the  situ- 


1  Dr.  King  in  his  book  Wealth  and  Income  of  the  People  of  the  United  States,  in  discussing  the  growth  of  large  cities 
(page  20),  fixes  the  line  at  cities  with  a  population  of  over  one  hundred  thousand. 

2  The  table  is  based  on  the  legal  aid  situation  on  January  1,  1917.  The  cities  are  grouped  according  to  the  population 
credited  to  them  on  that  date  by  the  World  Almanac  for  1917.  For  this  purpose  the  1910  Census  figures  are  too  old 
to  be  accurate. 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION 


189 


ation  in  cities  having  no  work  or  very  little  work  is  unsatisfactory,  and  that  in  cities 
having  definitely  established  work  it  is  reasonably  satisfactory.  A  recapitulation  in 
percentage  terms,  based  on  the  preceding  table,  shows  very  clearly  the  present  extent 
of  legal  aid  organizations. 


Class 

Total  Cities  of  this 

Class  i?i  the 

United  States 

Percentage  of  Cities  in  ■ 

vhich  Legal  Aid  Work  is 

Satisfactory 

Unsatisfactory 

1.  Cities  over  350,000 

18 

100.0 

.0 

2.  Cities  over  300,000 

21 

90.0 

10.0 

3.  Cities  over  200,000 

33 

78.8 

21.2 

4.  Cities  over  150,000 

41 

70.7 

29.3 

5.  Cities  over  100,000 

71 

47.9 

52.1 

There  is  still  much  room  for  the  extension  of  legal  aid  work  into  new  fields.  The 
large  cities  are  by  no  means  completely  covered.  When  it  is  remembered  that  the 
idea  did  not  begin  to  spread  until  1900,  it  is  remarkable  that  it  has  been  able  in 
seventeen  years  to  take  definite  shape  in  all  the  largest  cities  and  in  three-quarters 
of  those  having  over  two  hundred  thousand  inhabitants.  The  problem  of  expansion 
for  the  immediate  future — and  one  which  will  call  for  intelligent  direction  from 
some  central  body — is  to  establish  organizations  in  the  twenty-five  cities  having 
none  and  to  strengthen  those  in  the  nine  cities  where  the  movement  is  still  weak. 
This  is  essentially  an  extension  into  a  new  class  of  citv,  one  whose  population  is 
above  one  hundred  thousand  but  below  two  hundred  thousand. 

In  taking  up  the  question  of  the  extent  to  which  the  legal  aid  organizations  in  the 
cities  where  they  exist  have  been  able  to  meet  the  full  demand  of  the  poor  for  legal 
assistance,  we  at  once  encounter  a  difficulty  because  we  have  no  objective  standard 
by  which  to  measure  their  work.  We  can  estimate  the  number  of  the  poor  in  the 
larger  cities,  but  there  is  no  way  of  knowing  how  many  of  them  each  year  are  involved 
in  litigation  or  need  legal  aid.  It  is  possible,  however,  to  work  out  a  reasonably  ac- 
curate standard  suitable  for  our  immediate  purpose.  The  public  legal  aid  bureaus,  in 
localities  where  they  exist,  are  well  known  to,  and  very  generally  used  by,  the  poor 
of  the  city.  The  Kansas  City  Legal  Aid  Bureau  is  the  oldest  of  this  type,  and  un- 
questionably is  the  best  locally  known  legal  aid  organization  in  the  United  States. 
In  1915,  which  was  a  normal  and  average  year,  one  out  of  every  64  persons  in  the 
total  population1  applied  to  it  for  assistance.  The  Los  Angeles  office  is  the  second 
best  known,  and  in  1915  it  received  one  application  from  each  78  in  the  population.2 
On  the  basis  of  this  Kansas  City— Los  Angeles  record,  we  may  say  that  the  standard 
annual  legal  aid  clientele  would  consist  of  one  person  for  each  75  inhabitants.  There 
are  no  data  anywhere  which  would  show  this  estimate  to  be  materially  in  error  and, 
on  the  other  hand,  there  is  evidence  to  indicate  that  it  closely  approximates  a  true 

1  The  Bureau  serves  a  population  wider  than  that  within  the  city  limits,  which  in  1915  was  fixed  at  400,000. 

2  Los  Angeles  is  a  county  office  serving  the  entire  county  population,  which  in  1915  was  fixed  at  800,000. 


190  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

standard.  Thus,  according  to  our  criterion,  Kansas  City  and  Los  Angeles  were  re- 
ceiving as  many  applications  as  they  should,  so  that  during  1916,  which  was  a  year 
of  more  steady  employment  giving  rise  to  fewer  wage  claims,  they  should  have  re- 
ceived somewhat  fewer  applications.  Their  records  show  this  to  have  been  the  case.1 
Considering  the  cities  where  private  societies  have  longest  been  established :  the  New 
York  organization  in  1915  extended  assistance  to  one  in  each  116  of  the  population, 
and  it  is  known  that  there  is  a  large  demand  for  legal  aid  which  is  not  being  met  be- 
cause of  inadequate  finances.  The  Chicago  organizations  in  1915  received  cases  from 
one  in  each  162  of  the  population:  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  has  stated  that 
if  funds  permitted,  it  could  double  its  work;  and  the  Chicago  Bureau  of  Personal 
Service,  with  increased  resources,  did  in  fact  during  the  next  year  extend  its  work 
85  per  cent. 

In  many  ways  it  would  be  preferable  to  measure  the  extent  of  legal  aid  work  by 
the  1915  figures,  but  as  this  would  exclude  organizations  formed  in  1915  or  early 
in  1916,  it  is  necessary  to  take  the  fiscal  year  of  1916.  In  the  following  table  are  set 
out,  first,  what  the  standard  clientele  of  each  legal  aid  organization  should  be  on  the 
basis  of  one  client  for  each  seventy-five  inhabitants;2  second,  the  actual  number  of 
cases  received  during  the  fiscal  year  of  1916;  third,  the  percentage  that  the  actual 
number  bears  to  the  standard;  and  fourth,  in  an  outside  column,  the  per  capita  amount 
expended  in  each  city  for  legal  aid  work,  for  there  is  a  close  relation  between  the 
financial  condition  of  the  societies  and  the  extent  of  their  work.  Such  local  factors 
as  enter  in  to  make  the  table  inaccurate  for  comparative  purposes  are  set  out  in  the 
notes. 

Table  showing  Present  Extent  of  Legal  Aid  Work 


Legal  Aid 
Organizations  in 

Standard 
Clientele 

Cases  in 
1916 

Per  Cent  of 
Standard 

Per  Capita 

Amount  Spent 

in  Cents 

Kansas  City 

5,333 

5,270 

99.0 

1.05 

Los  Angeles 

10,666 

8,848 

83.0 

2.35 

Dallas 

1,800 

1,480 

82.0 

1.78 

Duluth 

1,386 

s 

80.0 

3 

New  York 

75,602 

48,391 

64.0 

1.11 

Minneapolis 

4,933 

3,029 

61.0 

.93 

Plainfield 

274 

150 

54.0 

4 

Dayton 

1,800 

922 

51.0 

.97 

1  The  work  in  Kansas  City  decreased  from  6202  eases  in  1915  to  5270  in  1916 ;  in  Los  Angeles  from  10,277  in  1915  to  8848 
in  1916;  the  decreases  being  15  per  cent  and  14  per  cent  respectively. 

2  Since  1910  there  have  been  such  great  changes  in  urban  population,  as  notably  in  Cleveland  and  Detroit,  that  the 
Census  figures  are  wholly  antiquated.  The  figures  for  population  on  January  1, 1917,  as  given  in  the  World  Almanac, 
are  used. 

3  The  Duluth  Free  Legal  Aid  Bureau  case  figures  include  the  Municipal  Court  probation  cases,  so  that  they  cannot 
be  used  in  this  connection.  For  the  same  reason  the  expense  apportionable  to  the  legal  aid  work  is  not  known.  A 
careful  estimate,  however,  shows  that  Duluth  ranks  no  lower  than  80  per  cent. 

4  Legal  aid  expense  not  known,  as  the  figures  are  not  separated  from  the  general  budget  of  the  Charity  Organiza- 
tion Society. 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION 


191 


Legal  Aid 

Standard 

Cases  in 

Per  Cent  of 

Per  Capita 

Organizations  in 

Clientele 

1916 

Standard 

Amount  Spent 
in  Cents 

Cleveland 

10,000 

4,946 

49.0 

.43 

Omaha 

2,800 

1,318 

47.0 

.31 

Chicago 

33,624 

15,382 

46.0 

1.73 

St.  Paul 

3,866 

1,749 

45.0 

.63 

Newark 

5,346 

2,155 

43.0 

.78 

Portland1 

3,666 

1,363 

37.0 

.71 

Boston 2 

10,234 

2,608 

25.0 

.84 

Buffalo 

6,400 

1,516 

24.0 

.49 

Cincinnati 

7,517 

1,698 

22.0 

.30 

Philadelphia 

23,333 

4,845 

21.0 

.25 

Milwaukee 

5,983 

1,174 

20.0 

.45 

Nashville 

1,853 

260 

14.0 

a 

Jersey  City 

3,612 

447 

12.0 

4 

Rochester 

3,533 

282 

11.0 

.49 

Columbus 

2,800 

300 

11.0 

5 

St.  Louis 

11,333 

1,235 

11.0 

.686 

Cambridge 

1,466 

104 

7.0 

7 

Hartford 

2,000 

134 

6.7 

.08 

Richmond 

2,133 

121 

5.6 

.02 

Pittsburgh 

13,904 

684 

4.9 

.32 

Baltimore 

8,782 

376 

4.2 

.17 

Detroit 

11,000 

410 

3.5 

.06 

San  Francisco 

7,133 

242 

3.4 

.18 

San  Diego 

1,200 

28 

2.3 

.01 

Louisville 

3,539 

78 

2.2 

8 

Washington,  D.  C. 

4,904 

75 

1.5 

.00 

New  Orleans 

5,333 

74 

1.4 

.02 

Akron 

1,733 

20 

1.2 

.00 

New  Haven 

2,133 

18 

.8 

.00 

Eliminating  those  organizations  whose  case  figures  for  one  reason  or  another  are 
not  closely  accurate,  it  appears  that  the  general  average  attained  by  thirty  cities 
is  28.1  per  cent.  In  other  words,  it  is  undoubtedly  true  that  thus  far  the  legal  aid 
organizations  as  a  whole  have  not  developed  sufficient  strength  to  satisfy  the  entire 
need.  They  have  been  able  to  accomplish  only  one- third  of  their  whole  aim.  As  many 


1  The  ca.se  figure  represents  only  the  public  defender's  criminal  work.  No  statistics  of  civil  cases  were  kept 

2  The  standard  is  not  strictly  applicable  to  Boston  because  in  that  city  wage  claims  are  collected  by  the  State  Com- 
missioner of  Labor.  Semble  Chicago  and  Cleveland,  owing  to  the  existence  of  the  small  claims  courts. 

3  The  Nashville  expense  figures  could  not  be  secured. 
-  Complete  expenses  for  the  year  are  not  known. 

5  In  Columbus  the  attorneys  volunteer  their  services  and  pay  the  incidental  expenses,  so  that  no  total  expense  figure 
can  be  computed. 

6  In  St.  Louis  cases  calling  only  for  advice  are  not  recorded.  If  these  were  known,  it  is  probable  that  St  Louis  would 
rank  at  about  50  per  cent. 

7  Law  school  students  constitute  the  staff  in  Cambridge.  Expenses  are  nominal  and  are  not  stated. 

8  The  expenses  of  the  Legal  Aid  Committee  are  not  kept  distinct  from  those  of  the  Associated  Charities. 


192  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

of  the  organizations  are  new,  the  result  of  this  test  is  not  surprising;  but  the  fact 
remains  that  if  organized  legal  aid  work  is  to  solve  the  problem  of  the  denial  of 
justice,  it  must  in  the  near  future  find  the  means  and  the  resources  to  extend  its  as- 
sistance to  this  great  group  of  persons  who  thus  far  have  not  been  reached. 

A  division  of  the  organizations  according  to  their  various  types  gives  interesting 
results  that  bear  out  some  of  the  observations  made  in  the  preceding  chapter.  It 
is  obvious  that  the  public  bureaus  are  far  better  known  and  that,  because  they  have 
larger  funds  at  their  disposal,  they  are  more  nearly  able  to  satisfy  the  demand.  It  is 
also  clear  that  the  independent  private  corporation  societies  are  able  to  reach  and  to 
care  for  a  much  wider  field  than  the  bureaus  which  are  organized  as  departments  of 
charities.  A  resume,  based  on  the  preceding  table,  shows  in  percentage  terms  how  far 
the  organizations,  grouped  according  to  type,  have  been  able  to  attain  the  standard. 

Type  Per  cent  of  Standard 

1.  Public  Bureaus  72.4 

2.  Private  Corporation  Societies  30.6 

3.  Departments  of  Charities  18.7 

4.  Law  School  Societies  3.1 

5.  Bar  Association  Societies  5.3 

6.  Miscellaneous  10.0 


§2 
While  it  is  true  that  the  legal  aid  movement  still  has  a  long  road  to  travel,  it  is 
equally  true  that  already  the  existing  organizations  hold  strong  positions  in  their 
respective  communities,  and  that  more  than  any  other  agency  they  are 

°      '  striking  at  the  root  difficulty  in  our  administration  of  justice  by  plac- 

'"  ing  at  the  disposal  of  poor  persons  their  staffs  of  skilled  attorneys. 

The  legal  aid  organizations  of  the  United  States  are  to-day  providing  a  corps 
of  one  hundred  and  seventy-five  attorneys,  all  members  of  the  bar  and  admitted  to 
practice  in  all  courts.  Of  these,  sixty-two  devote  their  entire  time  to  the  work  and 
one  hundred  and  thirteen  are  employed  for  part  of  their  time,  which  ranges  from 
one-third  to  one-half  of  the  working  day.  These  attorneys  are  assisted  by  sixty-three 
clerks  and  stenographers  on  full  time,  six  on  part  time,  and  by  thirty-three  investi- 
gators and  social  workers  who  spend  their  entire  time  in  legal  aid  service.  This  force 
of  two  hundred  and  sixty-seven  persons,  especially  trained  in  legal  aid  work,  consti- 
tutes a  mighty  force  for  making  the  position  of  the  poor  more  equal  before  the  law. 
In  addition  to  these  paid  staffs,  there  is  a  much  larger  number  of  volunteer  attorneys 
and  workers  who  give  a  measure  of  their  time  which  in  the  aggregate  forms  no  incon- 
siderable item. 

Legal  aid  work  is  essentially  a  young  lawyer's  work.  It  has  been  said  with  much 
truth,  "In  such  excellent  work  every  member  of  the  bar  might  well  bear  a  part.  But 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION  193 

it  appears  that  the  older  members  have  left  it  all  for  the  young  ones."1  There  are 
twenty-eight  organizations  that  have  attorneys  in  charge  of  their  work,  and  these  ex- 
ecutive attorneys,  on  an  average,  have  been  members  of  the  bar  for  only  seven  years. 
As  a  number  of  these  attorneys  have  been  in  charge  for  several  years,  if  figures  had 
been  compiled  three  or  four  years  ago,  they  would  have  shown  a  still  younger  group 
of  leading  attorneys.  The  assistant  attorneys  on  the  staffs  are  almost  entirely  even 
younger  men. 

All  praise  is  due  to  the  loyalty  of  these  young  attorneys  to  the  cause  of  legal  aid 
work.  As  Mr.  Briesen  has  written,  "Its  success  depends  entirely  on  the  purest  devo- 
tion of  its  attorneys,  upon  an  almost  religious  denial  of  every  particle  of  self-interest 
on  their  part."  They  have  been  faithful  to  their  trust.  The  present  position  of  legal 
aid  work  is  due  almost  entirely  to  them.  They  have  been  the  leaders,  the  organizers, 
the  workers,  the  thinkers,  and  the  developers.  If  any  older  member  of  the  bar  is  en- 
titled to  take  credit  unto  himself,  it  is  Mr.  Briesen,  and  yet  he  has  repeatedly  taken 
occasion  to  pay  his  tribute  to  the  efforts  of  the  younger  attorneys.2  No  one  fact 
impresses  the  observer  who  sees  one  office  after  another  more  than  the  courage,  zeal, 
and  devotion  which  they  everywhere  manifest.  To  these  men,  invariably  overworked, 
generally  underpaid,  struggling  with  insufficient  equipment,  sacrificing  their  oppor- 
tunity to  build  up  any  private  practice  of  their  own,  the  entire  profession  owes  a  great 
debt.  Legal  aid  work  is  what  it  is  to-day,  it  has  advanced  as  far  as  it  has,  its  reputa- 
tion is  clear  and  free  from  suspicion  because  of  them. 


The  greatest  weakness  of  organized  legal  aid  work,  the  one  great  factor  which  con- 
stantly bars  its  path,  and  which  may  ultimately  prove  its  undoing,  is  its  lack  of  funds. 
The  reason  that  the  existing  organizations  have  not  more  completely 
'  answered  the  demand  of  the  poor  for  legal  assistance  is  that  they  are 

grossly  under-financed.  This  ever  present  condition  of  an  impoverished 
treasury  has  forced  the  two  greatest  mistakes  in  the  development  of  the  work.  It 
deterred  the  organizations  from  accepting  the  cases  of  injured  workmen,3  and  it  has 
precluded  them  from  entering  the  criminal  field.4  Inadequacy  of  support  compelled 
the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  to  give  up  its  work  in  Brooklyn  for  a  while  and 
still  makes  it  impossible  to  open  sorely  needed  branch  offices  in  the  Brownsville  and 
Williamsburgh  districts  and  in  Queens  County.5  Mr.  Briesen  in  a  speech  on  "The 
Future"6  pointed  out  the  great  obstacle  when  he  said,  "Our  hands  are  tied."  The  Chi- 
cago Legal  Aid  Society,  adopting  the  high  courage  of  its  leader,  the  late  Rudolph 
Matz,  determined  to  accept  its  full  responsibility,  and  to  meet  the  entire  demand,  with 

1  From  an  article  in  18  Case  and  Comment  (1912),  463,  quoting  the  St.  Louis  Republic. 
'23  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  3;  25  Ibid.  17.  3  See  ante,  page  85.  *  See  ante,  page  155. 

6  41  N.  Y.  L.A.  R.  28.  6  11  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.,  No.  4,  p.  3. 


194  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

faith  that  its  work  would  be  appreciated  and  the  necessary  support  would  be  forth- 
coming. In  1914  it  had  climbed  well  toward  its  goal,1  but  the  financial  support  did 
not  materialize,  and  it  was  forced  to  make  drastic  retrenchments.  It  is  now  able  to 
keep  its  office  open  for  clients  only  two  hours  a  day,  thereby  mechanically  reducing 
the  number  of  applications,  and  it  is  forced  to  entrust  much  of  its  work  to  volunteers. 
Everywhere  among  the  privately  supported  organizations  the  story  is  the  same.  Some 
of  the  public  bureaus  are  in  a  stronger  position,  but  even  their  finances  are  not  yet 
adequate.  The  organizations  all  live  a  hand-to-mouth  existence,  which  is  not  only  de- 
pressing to  the  workers,  but  is  a  repressive  force  that  keeps  the  legal  aid  work  down 
and  prevents  it  from  accepting  the  great  opportunity  which  awaits  it. 

Thousands  of  persons  have  been  denied  justice  because  the  organizations  were  un- 
able to  extend  assistance  to  them.  Within  the  organizations  unfortunate  results  have 
been  produced.  Boards  of  directors  have  been  forced  to  underpay  their  staffs.  This 
has  meant  that  young  men,  attracted  to  the  work  by  their  ideals  of  service,  have  at 
the  end  of  a  few  years  been  automatically  forced  to  abandon  the  work  in  order  that 
they  might  earn  their  living.  There  has  been  a  constant  change  of  personnel  which 
has  greatly  impaired  the  efficiency  of  the  work,2  and  it  has  made  more  difficult  the 
evolution  of  any  science  in  its  conduct.  It  has  tended  to  narrow  the  conception  of  the 
work  by  keeping  it  intensely  local.  Few  of  the  executive  attorneys  have  ever  had  time 
to  learn  much  more  than  how  to  conduct  their  own  offices.  About  the  time  when  they 
have  mastered  that  and  are  beginning  to  observe  what  is  going  on  in  other  cities,  they 
are  forced  to  leave  the  service  and  their  experience  and  ideas  are  lost. 

Taking  the  figures  from  the  societies  which  pay  their  executive  attorneys  anything, 
it  appears  that  seventeen  organizations  retain  men  for  their  full  time  at  an  average 
yearly  salary  of  82217.  Excluding  the  salary  of  the  chief  attorney  for  the  Voluntarv 
Defenders  Committee,  which  is  the  only  organization  thus  far  to  be  put  on  a  straight- 
forward business  basis,  the  average  salary  drops  to  $1887.  The  seven  organizations 
that  retain  men  on  part  time  (one-half  to  one-third  of  their  time)  pay  an  average 
yearly  salary  of  $628.  It  is  perfectly  apparent  that  at  such  figures  the  legal  aid  soci- 
eties cannot  command  or  retain  the  services  of  the  type  and  calibre  of  men  they  ought 
to  have  and  must  have  if  their  work  is  to  be  properly  conducted  and  successful. 

When  the  nature  of  the  work  is  considered,  the  extreme  poverty  of  the  organiza- 
tions is  the  more  remarkable.  They  are  engaged  in  an  essential  public  service;  they 
are  performing  for  the  community  an  obligation  which  comes  before  any  duty  to  give 
charitable  support.  As  careful  an  observer  as  Lyman  Abbott  has  stated,  "The  first 
duty  of  society  to  the  poor  is  not  to  give  them  charity  but  to  secure  them  justice."3 
If  the  work  were  done  at  an  enormous  cost,  an  explanation  would  be  afforded;  but  in 
point  of  fact  legal  aid  work  is  the  least  expensive  of  all  so-called  charitable  under- 

1  Measured  according  to  our  standard  previously  laid  down,  the  work  in  Chicago  in  1914  was  answering  64  per  cent 
of  the  entire  need,  as  against  46  per  cent  in  1916. 

2  14  Boston  L.  A.  R.  5.  a  4  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  2,  p.  2. 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION  195 

takings.  In  the  year  1916  the  total  cost  of  thirty  organizations,  which  took  care  of 
over  one  hundred  thousand  cases,  was  only  $181,408.  As  a  part  of  this  gross  expense 
was  met  by  fees  paid  by  clients,  the  net  average  cost  to  the  community  for  each  case 
undertaken  was  about  one  dollar  and  fifty  cents.1  The  annual  expense  of  two  or  three 
first-class  children's  agencies  or  general  charities  would  exceed  the  entire  expense  of 
these  thirty  legal  aid  organizations. 

Legal  aid  work  is  carried  on  entirely  by  current  subscriptions.  The  societies  start 
each  year  with  no  balances,  with  no  assured  income,  so  that  they  are  forced  to  mea- 
sure the  extent  of  their  work  from  month  to  month  according  to  the  donations  which 
they  may  receive.  Of  thirty-five  societies  from  which  accurate  statistics  are  available, 
thirty  have  no  endowment  whatever.  The  endowments  and  invested  funds  of  the 
societies  in  New  York,  Chicago,  Philadelphia,  Boston,  and  Pittsburgh  amount  to  a 
total  of  only  $37,356.86.  How  pitiably  small  this  figure  is  may  be  seen  by  contrasting 
it  with  the  endowment  of  a  single  well-financed  agency  such  as  the  Massachusetts 
Society  for  the  Prevention  of  Cruelty  to  Children,  which  has  invested  funds  to  the 
value  of  $352,198.2 

Legal  aid  work  in  general  does  not  receive  any  financial  assistance  from  state  or 
municipal  governments.  The  few  public  bureaus  are,  of  course,  supported  by  public 
funds.  Of  the  twenty-seven  non-public  organizations  as  to  which  accurate  statistics 
are  known,  only  three  are  publicly  aided.  The  Buffalo  Legal  Aid  Bureau  receives  an 
annual  grant  of  $750  from  the  county  of  Erie  and  a  like  grant  from  the  city  of 
Buffalo.  This  exceptional  situation  is  due  to  the  earnest  efforts  of  the  Bureau's  presi- 
dent, John  Alan  Hamilton,  who  requested  the  appropriations  on  the  straightforward 
basis  of  services  rendered,  which  it  was  easy  enough  to  prove.  The  Voluntary  Defend- 
ers Committee  is  given  free  rent,  and  the  Richmond  Legal  Aid  Society  is  permitted 
to  use  a  room  and  the  telephone  in  the  Juvenile  Court  Building.  The  other  private 
organizations — and  it  is  this  group  which  is  still  doing  by  far  the  greater  portion 
of  the  work — receive  nothing. 

The  work  has  had  to  be  financed  by  periodic  appeals  to  the  bar  and  to  the  public. 
The  results  have  been  wholly  unsuccessful.  Various  reasons  are  ascribed  for  this  failure, 
of  which  two  are  most  prominent.  Financing  is  a  matter  for  the  boards  of  directors 
or  executive  committees.  These  boards,  consisting  in  the  main  of  lawyers,  seem  on 
the  whole  to  have  been  sadly  lacking  in  imagination  and  enterprise,  so  that  they  have 
failed  to  arouse  any  general  interest  in  the  work.  It  is  certain  that  the  legal  aid  idea 
has  not  been  made  clear,  and  that  even  to-day  the  work  is  very  generally  unknown. 
Although  legal  aid  societies  have  existed  since  1876  and  the  public  defender  offices 
only  since  1914,  the  latter,  due  to  two  or  three  excellent  publicists,  are  to-day  far 
better  known  in  the  United  States.  Seemingly  there  has  not  been  great  difficulty  in 

1  The  figure  varies  from  city  to  city.  In  New  York  it  has  been  below  one  dollar  per  case  for  years;  in  Kansas  City 
and  Cleveland  it  has  been  as  low  as  fifty  cents  per  case. 

2  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  State  Board  of  Charity  for  1917,  page  102. 


196  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

securing  legislative  appropriations  for  the  public  defenders  work,  and  in  New  York, 
where  the  undertaking  is  privately  financed,  the  committee  in  charge  was  able  to 
secure  in  a  short  space  of  time  nearly  as  large  an  income  as  the  Legal  Aid  Society 
has  been  able  to  acquire  after  forty-one  years  of  service. 

The  second  reason  alleged  is  that  legal  aid  work,  from  its  very  nature,  lacks  the 
appeal  which  other  sorts  of  charities  possess,  so  that  its  voice  is  lost  in  the  multitude 
of  appeals  with  which  the  public  is  deluged.1  This  reason  must  be  accepted  with  some 
reserve.  While  the  civil  work  of  the  legal  aid  organizations  may  not  be  as  dramatic 
as  the  criminal  work  of  the  public  defenders,  it  is  full  of  vital  interest  if  the  proper 
persons  could  be  found  to  give  it  adequate  expression.  Within  the  four  walls  of  the 
legal  aid  offices  human  life  is  laid  bare.  More  tragedies  and  comedies  are  enacted  than 
can  be  seen  on  any  stage.  The  people  of  the  cities  march  in  endless  procession  through 
the  offices,  leaving  behind  them  a  composite  picture  of  life  in  our  great  cities.  They 
are  not  the  wrecks  and  failures  of  our  civilization ;  they  are  self-respecting,  self-sup- 
porting persons.  As  nearly  as  one  group  can,  they  represent  the  common  people.  What 
they  think,  how  they  fare,  wherein  they  are  handicapped,  are  matters  of  concern  to  every 
one,  for  it  is  to  make  the  lives  of  just  such  persons  somewhat  brighter  and  fairer  that 
we  are  trying  to  build  a  civilization  founded  on  democracy. 

That  legal  aid  work  fails  to  carry  any  appeal  is  true  to  this  extent.  For  a  definite 
appreciation  of  why  the  poor  are  denied  justice  and  of  how  essential  organized  legal 
aid  work  is  to  a  more  equal  administration  of  the  laws,  some  background  of  know- 
ledge concerning  our  legal  institutions  is  necessary.  Every  one  can  understand  that 
an  abandoned  family  is  likely  to  starve  if  it  is  not  relieved;  but  it  is  not  so  self-evi- 
dent that  the  calamity  might  have  been  prevented  if  the  processes  of  the  law  could 
have  been  invoked,  and  that  to  seek  redress  through  the  law  required  somebody  to 
provide  free  legal  assistance.  This  very  situation  ought  to  constitute  a  strong  and 
direct  appeal  to  the  members  of  the  bar.  Boards  of  directors  have  not  thoroughly 
cultivated  this  field  and  so  have  met  with  but  moderate  success.2 

This  financial  obstacle,  ever  present  with  every  organization,  is  to-day  the  great 
limitation  of  legal  aid  work.  It  lacks  the  sinews  of  war.  It  is  in  leash,  held  in  at  every 
turn.  Bad  financing  as  to  income  is  the  rock  on  which  all  private  organizations  may 
go  to  pieces.  All  other  factors  in  the  present  situation  are  decidedly  hopeful.  But  this 
problem  remains  to  be  solved,  and  it  must  be  solved  quickly  or  else  the  organized  legal 
aid  movement  must  fail  to  go  forward  and  gradually  cease  to  be  an  important  fac- 
tor in  the  equalization  of  the  administration  of  justice. 


1  Cf.  22  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  6,  17 ;  34  Ibid.  6. 

2  This  is  considered  further  in  Chapter  XXIV,  Legal  Aid  and  the  Bar.  See  post,  page  226. 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION  19^ 


Legal  aid  work  has  not  yet  passed  out  of  the  stage  of  localized  organization.  We  have 

already  seen  that  the  societies  were  started  in  the  various  cities  by  local  groups  act- 

_  ing  independently.  If  there  was  no  such  group,  no  society  was  started, 

**  and  if  the  group  failed  or  dispersed,  the  society  went  with  it.  There 

never  has  been,  as  there  is  not  now,  any  strong  central  agency  in  a 

position  of  leadership.  There  is  no  centralized  responsibility  or  authority.  The  legal 

aid  movement  has  not  yet  become  a  coordinated  national  undertaking. 

There  is  a  steadily  growing  realization  among  the  local  organizations  of  acommunity 
of  purpose  and  of  the  need  for  closer  cooperation.  The  feeling  of  comradeship  became 
strong  enough  in  1911  to  bring  about  a  successful  conference  of  delegates  from  the 
various  societies  then  in  existence.  The  discussion  turned  mainly  on  the  advisability 
of  some  union,  and  while  there  was  a  feeling  that  such  steps  ought  to  be  taken  and 
excellent  arguments  for  such  a  plan  were  advanced,  there  was  also  a  certain  holding 
back  and  a  reluctance  to  be  committed  to  anything  definite.  This  was  perhaps  en- 
tirely natural  at  such  a  first  gathering.  The  upshot  of  the  meeting  was  to  secure  a 
committee  to  draft  a  form  of  alliance. 

A  second  conference  was  held  in  1912,  at  which  the  National  Alliance  of  Legal  Aid 
Societies  was  formed  and  a  constitution  and  by-laws  were  adopted.  From  the  point 
of  view  of  organization  this  is  as  far  as  the  development  has  proceeded.  The  Central 
Committee  of  the  National  Alliance  has  called  two  conventions,  which  have  been  pro- 
ductive of  fruitful  discussions  and  of  a  valuable  interchange  of  opinions,  but  it  has 
done  nothing  else.  The  weakness  of  the  Alliance  and  the  strength  of  the  local  tradi- 
tion are  well  attested  by  the  fact  that  even  the  conventions  are  in  the  main  planned 
for  and  controlled  by  a  local  committee  of  the  society  which  is  the  host,  and  the  ex- 
penses of  the  convention  are  defrayed  by  that  local  organization.  Thus  if  the  local 
society  delays  the  printing  of  the  record  of  the  proceedings  (and  these  records  un- 
questionably constitute  the  most  valuable  information  about  legal  aid  work  in  exist- 
ence), the  National  Alliance  can  do  nothing  but  wait,  and  if  the  funds  of  the  local 
society  permit  the  printing  of  only  a  limited  number  of  copies,  the  National  Alliance 
can  do  nothing  but  submit. 

As  it  exists  to-day,  the  National  Alliance  is  like  a  federal  government  without 
power  of  taxation.  It  is  impotent.  There  is  a  power  to  assess  the  local  organizations, 
but  it  is  not  in  use,  partly  because  the  local  societies  desire  that  the  central  body  should 
not  be  strong  and  partly  because  they  are  poor.  For  all  practical  purposes  the  Na- 
tional Alliance  does  not  exist  except  for  a  few  days  once  in  two  years  when  a  con- 
vention is  in  session. 

The  situation  is  unfortunate.  It  has  retarded  development  and  it  may  cause  serious 
trouble.  There  is  an  imperative  demand  for  such  elementary  things  as  standardized 
records  of  work,  conventionalized  classifications  of  the  nature,  source,  and  disposition 


198  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

of  cases,  and  uniformity  of  financial  accounting.  It  ought  to  be  possible  for  one  society 
to  compare  its  work  with  that  of  any  other  in  order  to  benefit  from  the  lessons  which 
accurate  comparisons  teach,  but  as  there  are  as  many  systems  as  there  are  organiza- 
tions, even  the  simplest  comparison  is  a  puzzle.  There  is  great  need  for  a  central  clear- 
ing house  to  provide  for  the  proper  reference  of  cases.1  As  commerce  and  business  have 
overflowed  all  artificial  state  boundary  lines,  so  legal  aid  work  often  runs  beyond  the 
confines  of  the  city  or  state.  With  forty-one  organizations  in  existence  a  substantial 
beginning  could  be  made.  A  Boston  creditor  could  collect  from  his  debtor  in  San 
Francisco,  and  a  wife  deserted  in  Chicago  could  trace  and  locate  her  husband  in  New 
Orleans.  Such  a  central  agency  could  establish  relationships  with  attorneys  in  smaller 
towns  who  were  willing  to  do  their  share  of  legal  aid  work  and  thus  provide  a  com- 
plete network,  stretching  over  the  entire  country,  so  that  no  claims  would  have  to 
be  abandoned  because  of  the  absence  of  parties  from  the  jurisdiction.  The  essential  of 
any  such  plan  is  close  supervision,  which  ensures  that  prompt  attention  be  given  to 
all  matters  so  referred.  One  local  organization  cannot  exercise  such  a  control  over 
another  organization ;  it  can  be  done  only  by  a  central  body.  As  it  is  to-day,  legal  aid 
societies  often  refer  cases  to  private  attorneys  rather  than  the  legal  aid  societies  in 
other  cities  because  they  have  no  guarantee  that  the  latter  will  render  prompt  and 
accurate  service. 

There  is  no  definite  head,  no  leadership  in  the  legal  aid  movement.  Because  of  this 
no  intelligent  propaganda  or  missionary  work  is  carried  on.  There  is  no  attempt  to 
bring  legal  aid  work  to  the  attention  of  bar  associations  or  other  groups  in  cities  where 
there  is  an  obvious  need  for  such  work.  What  happens  at  the  present  time  is  that 
persons  desirous  of  having  a  legal  aid  society  hear  of  the  work  in  some  one  city,  and 
so,  when  they  establish  their  organization,  copy  the  only  plan  which  they  know  of  with 
all  its  virtues  and  vices,  or  they  may  write  to  a  number  of  larger  societies  and  receive 
in  reply  such  inconsistent  information  and  such  diverse  models  to  follow  that  in  de- 
spair they  erect  their  own  structure  as  best  they  know  how.  This  is  a  slipshod  way 
of  conducting  an  important  undertaking.  A  central  bureau,  with  a  field  secretary, 
could  place  accurate  information  at  the  disposal  of  any  organizers,  could  assist  in 
installing  a  proper  system  calculated  to  take  care  of  the  work  efficiently  and  economi- 
cally, and  could  help  new  organizations  through  their  first  hard  years.  Intelligent 
leadership  will  be  increasingly  necessary  as  other  remedial  agencies  develop  and  ex- 
pand. It  will  be  a  distinct  loss  if  the  public  defenders  are  allowed  to  grow  apart  from 
the  legal  aid  organizations.  Thus  far  no  attempt  has  been  made  to  bring  the  two 
together  or  to  show  that  the  two  belong  together  and  have  much  to  learn  from  each 
other. 

There  are  some  enemies  of  the  legal  aid  movement  which  can  be  attacked  only 
through  a  powerful  central  organization.  Abuse  of  the  term  "legal  aid"  may  become 
a  serious  menace  to  a  natural  future  development.  Because  of  the  universally  high 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  34. 


THEIR  PRESENT  POSITION  199 

standard  of  the  societies  thus  far  the  term  "legal  aid"  has  earned  a  connotation  of 
fair  play  and  square  dealing.  It  has  a  good  will  that  can  easily  be  capitalized  by  un- 
scrupulous attorneys.  This  is  not  a  chimerical  fear,  for  there  are  instances  where  it 
has  already  happened.  In  England  the  organization  most  nearly  like  our  legal  aid 
society  is  called  "Poor  Man's  Lawyers'  Association."  There  are  a  number  of  such  or- 
ganizations, but  until  1913  they  formed  no  alliance  and  had  no  concerted  strength. 
As  a  result,  there  grew  up  all  over  England  "Legal  Aid  Societies,"  which  were  sim- 
ply catch  names  to  draw  business,  serving  the  same  purpose  as  the  "  runner,"  so  that 
the  term  "legal  aid  society"  became  as  much  a  term  of  reproach  in  England  as  it  is 
above  reproach  in  the  United  States.  Such  societies  have  been  publicly  denounced 
as  wolves  in  sheep's  clothing.1 

Attempts  to  trade  on  the  name  have  been  made  in  New  York,  but  were  repressed 
by  the  vigorous  action  of  the  local  society.  In  cities  without  societies  the  process  can 
be  and  has  been  accomplished  with  impunity.  There  are  to-day  three  legal  aid  socie- 
ties in  widely  different  parts  of  the  country  which  are  struggling  under  a  heavy  handi- 
cap because,  before  their  existence,  the  name  was  used  for  fraudulent  purposes.  A 
wide-awake  central  body  could  have  stopped  such  practices  by  promptly  detecting 
them  and  enlisting  the  cooperation  of  the  local  bar  association  for  their  repression. 
Legal  aid  organizations  may  have  no  funds  in  their  treasuries,  but  in  their  name 
they  have  an  invaluable  asset.  They  must  guard  it,  for  the  chief  strength  of  legal 
aid  organizations  in  reaching  the  people  who  need  help  is  the  guarantee  which  the 
name  carries. 

There  are  further  great  possibilities  for  concerted  action.  There  are  national  prob- 
lems on  which  the  experience  of  the  legal  aid  organizations  ought  to  be  formulated. 
In  many  aspects  of  the  divorce  problem  they  could  shed  much  light  from  the  cases 
which  come  to  them.  If  a  study  of  non-payment  of  wages  were  to  be  made,  their  files 
together  with  the  records  of  labor  bureaus  would  furnish  the  best  evidence.  More 
important,  they  should  play  a  direct  part  in  the  nation-wide  movement  for  a  bet- 
terment of  the  administration  of  justice  by  reorganization  of  courts  and  simplifi- 
cation of  procedure.  They  should  cooperate  with  such  definite  work  as  that  of  the 
American  Judicature  Society.  In  these  subjects  they  are  vitally  concerned.  They  have 
the  background  from  which  to  point  out  how  the  existing  denial  of  justice  to  the 
poor  may  be  lessened.  They  have  a  responsibility,  second  to  none,  in  the  planning 
and  carrying  through  of  our  Americanization  program.  They  possess  the  latent  pos- 
sibilities of  becoming  a  mighty  factor  in  the  betterment  of  American  justice. 

None  of  these  things  are  being  done;  none  of  these  possibilities  are  being  real- 
ized.2 There  is  nowhere  any  responsibility  or  authority  to  undertake  these  larger 
projects.  An  adequate  central  organization  is  imperatively  needed  to  make  legal  aid 
work  a  more  concerted,  aggressive,  vital,  and  intelligent  force. 

1  See  an  article  in  Truth  for  January  1, 1913(No.  1880),  page  12;  also  47  Law  Journal  (1912),  48. 

2  See  also  post,  page  217. 


Chapter  XXI 
LEGAL  AID  AND  THE  LAW 

It  is  precisely  because  the  force  of  things  tends  always  to  destroy 
equality,  that  the  force  of  legislation  ought  always  to  tend  to  main- 
tain it.  Rousseau.1 

§1 

THE  legal  aid  organizations  throughout  the  country  have  steadily  taken  a  deep 
interest  in  legislation,  they  have  made  valuable  contributions  in  many  strug- 
gles to  write  wise  laws  on  the  statute  books,  and  they  have  themselves  secured  the 
enactment  of  several  excellent  pieces  of  legislation.  The  legal  aid  socie- 
€^.  _      .         ties  are  not  legislative  bureaus,  they  have  no  political  affiliations,  and 
'    s  they  are  not  vehicles  for  the  promotion  of  any  pet  cause  or  panacea. 

Their  primary  work  is  confined  to  giving  through  their  staffs  of  attor- 
neys the  legal  advice  and  assistance  in  individual  cases  which  poor  persons  need.  It 
early  became  apparent,  however,  that  if  they  were  to  be  effective  in  their  fight  against 
injustice,  they  must  from  time  to  time  take  a  part  in  the  formulation  of  remedial  le- 
gislation. They  saw  cases  of  injustice  which  the  law  was  powerless  to  redress  because 
of  the  inadequacy  of  certain  provisions  or  the  lack  of  proper  laws  framed  to  meet  the 
changed  conditions.  In  1903  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  amended  the  purpose 
clause  of  its  constitution  so  that  it  read : 

"The  purpose  of  this  Society  shall  be  to  render  legal  aid  and  assistance,  gratu- 
itously if  necessary,  to  all  who  may  appear  worthy  thereof  and  who  are  unable 
to  procure  assistance  elsewhere,  and  to  promote  measures  for  their  protection." 

Language  of  similar  import  will  now  be  found  in  the  constitutions  of  the  majority 
of  societies.  The  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  states  as  one  of  its  objects: 

"Second.  To  take  cognizance  of  the  workings  of  existing  laws  and  methods  of 
procedure,  and  to  suggest  improvements." 

Whether  expressed  in  words  or  not,  all  the  organizations,  public  and  private,  have 
concerned  themselves  with  legislation  when  their  experience  indicated  a  need  for 
improvement.2 

It  is  worth  while  to  enumerate  in  summary  form  the  various  legislative  campaigns 
which  the  societies  have  undertaken  or  in  which  they  have  played  important  parts. 
Such  a  statement  gives  an  idea  of  the  sort  of  measures  with  which  the  organizations 
have  concerned  themselves,  and  serves  to  indicate  the  general  and  intelligent  interest 
which  they  have  taken  in  the  matter  of  law-making.  Maryland  had  had  since  the 
eighteenth  century  a  law  regulating  the  support  of  illegitimate  children  which  lim- 
ited the  amount  of  payments  that  could  be  enforced  against  the  father  to  thirty 

1  Quoted  in  Roberts  v.  Boston,  5  Cush.  (1849)  198,  204. 
1 14  World's  Work  (1907),  9091,  9093. 


RELATION  TO  THE  LAW  201 

dollars  a  year  for  seven  years.  The  attorney  for  the  Baltimore  Legal  Aid  Bureau, 
together  with  a  member  of  the  local  bar,  drew  a  bill,  which  was  passed  in  1912,  leav- 
ing the  payments  to  be  fixed  in  the  discretion  of  the  court  up  to  the  sum  of  thirty 
dollars  a  month.1  In  Boston,  the  attorney  for  the  Legal  Aid  Society  cooperated  with 
a  committee  of  judges  which  drafted  the  present  Massachusetts  law  on  illegitimacy, 
enacted  in  1913.  In  1916  the  Society  secured  the  passage  of  a  law  limiting  the  rate 
of  interest  on  small  loans  to  three  per  cent  per  month,  and  a  second  law  safeguarding 
the  assignment  of  wages.2  The  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  Buffalo  pointed  out  the  harsh- 
ness of  the  law  governing  the  conditional  sales  of  furniture  on  instalment  payments 
and  the  inefficacy  of  civil  proceedings  to  secure  support  for  abandoned  children,  and 
recommended  legislation. 

The  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  has  entered  largely  mto  legislative  activity.  It  has 
carried  on  the  sterling  work  of  the  Protective  Agency  in  the  matter  of  providing 
adequate  legal  safeguards  for  the  protection  of  children  from  abuse.  A  law  secured 
by  the  Protective  Agency  in  1905  was  declared  unconstitutional,  but  was  redrafted 
and  reenacted  through  the  efforts  of  the  Society  in  1907.3  In  the  same  year  work 
was  begun  on  legislation  to  regulate  interest  charges  on  loans  secured  by  pledges,4 
which  was  continued  on  through  the  next  year,5  and  a  bill  was  presented  and  urged 
before  the  state  legislature  in  1909  which  failed  to  pass.6  A  decision  holding  uncon- 
stitutional the  act  regulating  wage  assignments  caused  the  Society  to  take  up  that 
fight  and  to  frame  a  law  which  would  stand  attack.7  Work  on  these  and  other  mat- 
ters was  carried  on  during  1910,  although  the  legislature  was  not  in  session.8  When 
the  legislature  met  in  1911  the  bills  received  favorable  committee  reports,  were 
passed  by  one  house,  and  killed  by  the  other.9  In  1916,  following  sensational  dis- 
closures by  the  press  as  to  the  rates  of  interest  charged  poor  persons  on  small  loans, 
a  group  of  organizations,  including  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  took  up  a  campaign  which 
led  to  the  enactment  in  1917  of  a  proper  act  regulating  the  business  of  small  loans. 
The  backbone  of  the  fight  was  provided  by  a  document,  proving  beyond  question 
the  extortions  which  the  laxity  of  the  law  permitted,  published  by  the  City  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Welfare.10  This  remarkable  document  was  irrefutable  because  it  was 
based  entirely  on  the  records  of  actual  cases,  of  which  the  Legal  Aid  Society  fur- 
nished nearly  one-half. 

As  a  part  of  the  organization  of  the  Cleveland  Legal  Aid  Society  there  has  always 
existed  a  most  energetic  legislative  committee.  Its  greatest  triumph  is  the  Cleveland 
Small  Claims  Court.  It  not  only  sponsored  this  court,  but  conducted  an  investigation 
of  the  evils  of  the  justice  of  the  peace  system  that  was  published  and  led  to  the  suc- 
cessful campaign,  in  which  all  the  better  interests  in  the  city  took  part,  for  a  mod- 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  38. 

2  16  Boston  L.  A.  11.  10.  3  2  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  12;  3  Ibid.  12, 16.  *  3  Ibid.  IT.  6  4  Ibid.  8. 
6  6  Ibid.  8.            '  5  Ibid.  9.            8  6  Ibid.  7.            9  7  Ibid.  8. 

10  Bulletin  of  the  Departmentof  Public  Welfare,  City  of  Chicago,  vol.  i,  No.  4  (November,  1916),  "Loan  Shark  Num- 
ber." 


202  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

em  municipal  court.1  The  activities  of  the  Legislative  Committee  have  covered  wage 
assignments,  attachments  of  wages,  desertion,  and  small  loans,2  delays  in  small  causes, 
a  summer  criminal  session  to  secure  prompt  hearings  for  prisoners  held  on  serious 
charges,  public  defenders,3  legislation  to  provide  the  court  trustee  plan,4  service  of 
process  by  mail,5  and  fairer  provisions  for  an  equity  of  redemption  in  chattel  mort- 
gages.6 Not  all  of  these  matters  were  brought  to  the  desired  conclusion,  but  the  Soci- 
ety has  to  its  credit,  in  addition  to  its  municipal  court  bill,  five  important  accom- 
plishments in  the  loan  shark  law,  a  provision  for  three  days1  notice  before  the  attach- 
ment of  a  married  man's  wages,  registered  mail  service,  the  reduction  of  court  costs, 
and  an  amendment  making  the  desertion  of  a  pregnant  woman  an  extraditable  crime.7 

The  Cincinnati  Legal  Aid  Society,  being  in  the  same  state  with  Cleveland,  has 
cooperated  with  that  organization  in  successfully  urging  the  loan  shark  legislation,8 
and  in  advocating  the  court  trustee  plan  which  thus  far  has  met  great  opposition.9 
The  public  bureau  in  Dallas,  before  politics  cut  its  life  short,  had  pointed  out  serious 
flaws  in  the  Texas  laws  and  had  advocated  legislation  of  a  modern  type  dealing  with 
desertion  and  non-support  (analogous  to  the  Uniform  Desertion  Act),  the  require- 
ment of  some  intervening  period  between  the  issuance  of  a  marriage  license  and  the 
performance  of  the  ceremony,  provision  against  fraudulent  divorce,  stricter  usury  laws, 
an  exemption  of  a  fixed  proportion  of  wages  from  assignments,  and  safeguards  against 
conditional  sale  abuses  in  instalment  furniture  contracts.10  The  first  attorney  for  the 
Hartford  Legal  Aid  Bureau  was  elected  to  the  legislature,  from  which  vantage-point 
he  was  able  to  urge  many  interesting  measures.  His  work  in  connection  with  the 
Hartford  Home  Rule  bill  made  possible  the  referendum  vote  by  which  the  Hartford 
municipal  Legal  Aid  Bureau  was  established.  He  drafted  the  so-called  public  defender 
law.11  Other  measures,  which  were  not  understood  and  so  failed  of  passage,  related  to 
the  establishment  of  a  small  claims  court,  the  establishment  of  county  legal  aid  soci- 
eties with  attorneys  to  be  appointed  by  the  governor,  and  in  forma  pauperis  pro- 
ceedings with  assignment  of  counsel.12 

The  public  bureau  in  Kansas  City  signalized  its  appearance  as  a  new  factor  in  the 
administration  of  justice  by  making  an  elaborate  investigation  of  the  abuses  of  the 
justice  of  the  peace  system.  This  led  to  an  amendment  of  the  Missouri  law  on  gar- 
nishment of  wages  which  had  become  a  national  scandal.13  Forty  railroads  enter  Kansas 
City,  and  under  the  law  it  was  permissible  to  attach  the  wages  of  any  employee  of 

I  American  Judicature  Society,  Bulletin  VIII,  page  5;  Justice  for  the  Poor  (First  Report  of  the  Cleveland  Legal  Aid 
Society),  page  2;  4  Cleveland  L.  A.  R.  19;  6  Ibid.  7, 16;  9  Ibid.  13. 

*  2  Ibid.  11.  3  3  Ibid.  10, 15.  4  7  Ibid.  12,  16.  "  7  Ibid.  16.  6  8  Ibid.  12. 

7  See  pamphlet  published  by  the  Cleveland  Legal  Aid  Society  entitled  "  All  Men  are  Equal  before  the  Law." 

8  7  Cincinnati  L.  A.  R.  5,  and  fly-leaf  on  cover.  9  6  Ibid.  9. 

10  Second  Annual  Report  of  the  Dallas  Board  of  Public  Welfare,  pages  9,  10. 

II  This  has  already  been  commented  on  ante,  page  117. 

12  These  matters  are  not  set  out  in  the  Hartford  reports.  They  were  introduced  in  the  1915  session  of  the  legislature 
and  are  House  Bills  Numbers  443.  442,  and  480  respectively. 

13  1  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  12  et  seq. 


RELATION  TO  THE  LAW  203 

these  roads,  wherever  he  might  work,  by  service  of  process  on  the  Kansas  City  office 
of  the  road.  One  employee  was  obliged  to  travel  nine  hundred  miles  to  defend  such 
a  suit  and  prove  that  he  owed  no  debt.  As  it  was  possible  to  bring  suits  in  Missouri 
against  employees  in  any  part  of  the  country,  which  they  were  obliged  to  default 
because  they  could  not  travel  so  far  to  put  in  an  appearance,  a  wholesale  collection 
business,  permeated  with  fraud,  sprang  up.  This  traffic  became  a  specialty  of  certain 
justices'1  courts,  which  became  known  as  "Jack  Rabbit"  courts.  As  a  result  of  the 
investigation,  the  abuse  was  stopped. 

Only  a  few  of  the  measures  advocated  by  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  during 
its  long  period  of  activity1  can  be  mentioned.  It  has  taken  part  in  urging  the  kinds 
of  legislation  that  have  already  been  noted  in  connection  with  other  organizations, 
such  as  the  loan  shark  laws2  and  more  stringent  provisions  to  enforce  payment  of 
wages,3  and  in  addition  it  has  fought  to  better  the  condition  of  seamen.  It  sent  one 
of  its  members  to  Washington  to  appear  before  the  Congressional  Committee  on  the 
Merchant  Marine,  and  secured  laws  to  prevent  shanghaiing  and  peonage  among  sail- 
ors.4 It  has  further  argued  for  the  extension  of  the  United  States  Shipping  Commis- 
sioner's jurisdiction,  against  allotments  of  pay  to  persons  other  than  dependents, 
and  against  shipping  fees  which  induced  a  form  of  slavery.5 

In  Pittsburgh  the  Society  has  studied  unsatisfactory  laws  which  work  injustice, 
has  noted  how  like  defects  have  been  cured  elsewhere,  and  has  publicly  advocated 
legislation  to  reduce  costs,  to  prevent  fraud  through  the  conducting  of  a  business 
under  an  assumed  name,  to  secure  more  stringent  supervision  of  industrial  weekly- 
payment  insurance  policies,  and  to  empower  the  Labor  Board  to  collect  wage  claims.6 
Of  the  work  done  in  Philadelphia,  the  most  important  was  the  Society's  inaugura- 
tion of  a  campaign  for  a  municipal  court,  which  was  persisted  in  for  years  and  which 
finally,  in  cooperation  with  other  agencies,  gave  Philadelphia  its  present  admirable 
court.7  It  made  an  investigation  of  the  situation  on  the  waterfront  which  disclosed 
horrible  conditions  in  the  treatment  of  sailors.8  It  arranged  for  a  hearing  before  the 
Congressional  Committee  on  the  Merchant  Marine  and,  in  cooperation  with  the  New 
York  Society,  submitted  evidence  which  brought  about  protective  legislation.  It 
also  succeeded  in  having  the  powers  of  the  insurance  commissioner  somewhat  in- 
creased in  supervising  industrial  insurance  policies.9  At  the  conferences  of  legal  aid 
societies,  matters  of  legislation  and  suggestions  for  improvements  are  the  most  com- 
mon topics  of  discussion.10  As  yet,  no  combined  attempt  to  work  out  national  legis- 
lation in  which  all  organizations  might  cooperate  has  been  made. 

It  is  apparent  that  the  legal  aid  organizations  have  taken  up  the  burden  of  try- 

1  29  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  10;  40  Ibid.  20;  41  Ibid.  10. 

2  30  Ibid.  37.  3  32  Ibid.  35.  i  31  Ibid.  10.  s  29  Ibid.  36.  6  8  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  14-21;  also  7  Ibid.  27. 
7  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  24. 

6  3  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  9.  9  8  Ibid.  7. 

10  See  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  15,  21,  23-26;  Ibid.,  Second  Confer- 
ence, pages  24,  28,  38;  Ibid.,  Third  Conference,  page  26;  Ibid.,  Fourth  Conference,  pages  132, 140. 


204  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

ing,  through  remedial  legislation,  to  keep  the  law  equal  in  the  face  of  changes  and 
new  plans  and  devices  which  tend  to  destroy  equality.  It  is  clear  that  the  societies 
come  into  contact  with  legal  abuses  which  would  not  appear  in  the  ordinary  private 
law  office,  and  which  the  community  in  general  would  not  be  in  a  position  to  detect 
or  understand.  Because  of  the  position  of  the  legal  aid  society  and  because  it  has 
accepted  the  responsibility  of  remedying  defects  as  rapidly  as  it  is  able,  it  has  un- 
questionably served  to  secure  the  enactment  of  wise  measures  which,  without  it,  never 
would  have  become  law.  Two  entirely  different  illustrations  will  show  concretely  why 
this  is  and  how  it  works  out. 

For  years  there  has  been  in  California  a  curious  rule  about  costs  on  appeal.  A 
plaintiff  might  bring  his  action  in  the  lower  courts  and  obtain  judgment.  The  de- 
fendant, thereupon,  could  claim  an  appeal  by  paying  one  dollar  and  twenty-five 
cents.  This  not  only  forced  the  plaintiff  to  try  his  case  all  over  again  and  subjected 
the  proceedings  to  delay,  but  it  permitted  the  defendant  to  take  no  further  action 
at  all  and  to  have  the  case  pend  indefinitely.  The  only  recourse  open  to  the  plaintiff 
was  to  enter  the  defendant's  appeal  in  the  Superior  Court  himself,  pay  six  dollars 
for  such  docketing,  and  also  pay  two  dollars  for  having  the  case  marked  on  the  cal- 
endar. Unquestionably  thousands  of  attorneys  for  plaintiffs  in  as  many  cases,  when 
confronted  with  this  situation,  have  felt  the  absurdity  as  well  as  the  injustice  of  put- 
ting a  premium  on  appeals  and  of  compelling  the  plaintiff  to  pay  the  costs  of  an  ap- 
peal which  he  did  not  take  and  did  not  want.  Undoubtedly  many  of  them  felt  that  it 
ought  to  be  set  right,  and  perhaps  a  few  jotted  down  notes  to  draft  a  bill  in  a  leisure 
moment.  Yet  they  must  all  have  gone  on  to  their  other  business  and  forgotten  it,  for 
no  attempt  to  change  the  law  was  ever  made. 

The  Los  Angeles  Public  Defender  had  not  been  at  his  civil  work  for  six  months 
before  he  saw  the  defect  in  the  law.  He  reported  on  it  officially,1  drew  a  bill,  submit- 
ted it  to  the  legislature,  and  in  1915  the  procedural  rule  was  amended.2  The  Public  De- 
fender not  only  was  in  a  position  to  discover  this  little  kink  in  the  law,  but  also  he 
felt  that  the  responsibility  rested  on  him,  that  it  was  his  business  to  straighten  it 
out,  and  he  promptly  proceeded  to  do  so. 

There  are  innumerable  places  in  the  law  where  just  such  betterments  will  make 
the  course  of  justice  run  more  smoothly.  They  are  not  glaring  defects  about  which 
a  public  hue  and  cry  can  be  aroused;  reformers  will  never  change  them,  for  reformers 
will  never  know  of  them.  The  inevitable  result  of  changing  conditions  and  of  a  body 
of  law  which  is  gradually  built  up  case  by  case  is  to  leave  some  loose  ends  which 
cause  needless  friction  and  injustice.  Many  groups  in  the  country  are  watchful  for 
just  such  things,  and  they  possess  the  coherence  and  resources  to  take  care  of  them- 
selves. The  poor  are  not  in  a  position  to  understand  or  to  act.  For  that  vast  number 
the  legal  aid  society  must  act  as  champion,  for  in  the  course  of  its  daily  work  it  finds 

1  Place  of  Vie  Public  Defender  in  the  Administration  of  Justice,  page  24. 

2  Acts  0/1915,  California  Code,  §  981. 


RELATION  TO  THE  LAW  205 

these  omissions  and  from  the  wealth  of  its  experience  it  can  easily  determine  just 
what  remedial  legislation  is  necessary. 

The  second  illustration  relates  to  a  defect  in  substantive  rather  than  procedural 
law,  and  shows  an  entirely  different  function  which  the  legal  aid  society  performs. 
The  world  has  always  had  its  usurers,  but  the  modern  loan  shark,  specializing  in 
small  loans  and  doing  business  among  the  very  poor,  is  a  by-product  of  our  great 
industrial  cities  with  their  wage-earning  population.  In  Massachusetts  until  1916 
the  law  permitted  a  lender  to  loan  ten  dollars  and  to  charge  interest  on  that  loan  at 
the  rate  of  one  hundred  and  eighty  per  cent  per  year.  It  also  permitted  an  instalment 
house  to  sell  a  diamond  ring  and  to  take  as  security  an  assignment  of  wages  which 
bound  all  future  wages  earned  for  a  period  of  two  years  and  exempted  not  a  penny. 
When  the  assignment  was  filed,  the  employer  was  legally  bound  to  turn  all  the  em- 
ployee's pay  over  to  the  creditor.  The  abuses  were  so  gross  that  public  attention  was 
directed  to  them  and  the  question  became  of  immediate  public  concern.  A  wave  of 
reform  secured  a  law  in  1913  concerning  small  loans  which  promptly  proved  not  to 
have  changed  interest  rates  at  all.  Nothing  was  accomplished  as  to  wage  assignments 
in  general.  Year  after  year  earnest  attempts  were  made,  but  they  all  failed  because 
the  Committee  on  Legal  Affairs  was  unwilling  to  recommend  legislation  until  the 
proponents  could  prove  their  case. 

The  poor  do  not  appear  at  legislative  hearings  to  present  evidence  in  their  own  be- 
half as  to  how  they  are  exploited.  Those  who  had  appeared  in  their  behalf  were  certain 
of  their  case,  but  they  were  unable  to  prove  it.  In  1916  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  co- 
operating with  the  Law  Department  of  the  City  of  Boston,  the  Russell  Sage  Founda- 
tion, and  one  member  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  entered  the  fight.  The  Society, 
because  of  its  position,  was  able  to  make  two  invaluable  contributions.  First,  from 
its  files  it  was  possible  to  produce  records  of  actual  cases  whose  authenticity  could  not 
be  challenged,  and  which  proved  beyond  question  that  the  alleged  abuses  were  being 
perpetrated  daily.  Second,  the  Society  was  able  to  serve  as  a  centre  around  which  all 
forces  could  unite  and  to  undertake  the  leadership  in  a  public  campaign,  for  its  atti- 
tude was  known  to  be  impartial,  it  had  no  selfish  interests  to  serve,  and  the  sincerity  of 
its  motives  and  the  truth  of  its  statements  could  not  be  impugned.  After  a  five  months' 
fight  against  a  naturally  bitter  opposition  both  bills — one  fixing  the  maximum  rate 
of  interest  on  small  loans  at  three  per  cent  per  month  and  one  safeguarding  wage 
assignments  by  provisions  for  exemptions  and  the  wife's  consent — were  made  law.1 

This  achievement  finds  its  counterpart  in  the  work  of  other  societies  in  other  cities. 
It  reveals  a  militant  group  of  organizations.  The  significance  of  such  work  is  that 
it  denotes  the  presence  of  an  organization  that  can  speak  for  an  estate  in  the  com- 
munity which  by  reason  of  its  own  limitations  is  inarticulate.  This  is  an  important 
contribution  toward  preserving  the  fairness  of  the  substantive  law  which  is  the  requi- 
site foundation  for  an  equal  administration  of  justice. 

1  Massachusetts  Acts  o/1916,  chaps.  208  and  224. 


206  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

§  2 
Under  our  common  law  system  the  decision  of  a  court  of  last  resort  not  only  adju- 
dicates the  rights  of  the  particular  parties  to  the  action,  but  also  fixes  the  law  for 
all  future  similar  cases.  In  the  generality  of  its  application  a  case 

°   '  decision  is  as  important  as  an  act  of  legislature.  It  follows,  therefore, 

that  a  proper  and  equitable  decision  may  have  as  much  effect  in  safe- 
guarding the  rights  of  the  poor  as  a  remedial  statute.  Precisely  the  same  reasons 
which  lead  legal  aid  organizations  into  legislative  work  lead  them  to  seek  final  adju- 
dications in  proper  cases. 

Thus  far  the  societies  have  by  no  means  taken  as  large  a  part  in  appellate  work 
as  they  have  in  remedial  legislation.  They  have  been  debarred  by  the  expenses  en- 
tailed in  appeals  for  transcripts,  records,  briefs,  and  court  fees.  It  is  financially  im- 
possible for  most  organizations  to  undertake  such  disbursements.  They  have  reasoned, 
and  with  much  wisdom,  that  so  long  as  the  funds  at  their  disposal  are  small,  it  is 
inadvisable  to  spend  on  one  unusual  case  a  sum  which  would  enable  them  to  extend 
their  assistance  to  one  hundred  applicants  with  ordinary  cases.  As  the  limit  of  an 
organization's  resources  is  an  absolute  limit,  the  societies  have  been,  and  still  are, 
unable  to  secure  to  their  clients  as  complete  legal  protection  as  wealthier  litigants 
may  avail  themselves  of.  This  is  a  clear  limitation  to  the  service  which  thev  can  afford. 

Because  of  our  case  system,  however,  it  is  imperative  that  somehow  certain  types 
of  cases  should  be  finally  determined.  It  is  one  thing  not  to  appeal  from  the  ruling 
of  a  trial  judge  on  a  point  of  evidence  which,  though  erroneous  and  prejudicial, 
cannot  affect  the  settled  rule  of  law  and  operates  only  to  defeat  the  individual  in  the 
particular  case.  This  is  an  injustice,  and  it  is  regrettable  that  such  instances  occur, 
but  so  long  as  the  legal  aid  societies  are  poorly  supported,  instances  of  this  sort  are 
inevitable.  It  is  a  far  different  thing  that  a  ruling  which  makes  new  law  and  affects 
many  persons  should  be  allowed  to  stand  unquestioned  if  it  is  unfair  or  is  deemed 
erroneous,  such  for  example  as  a  decision  by  an  inferior  court  or  tribunal  that  injured 
longshoremen  are  not  within  the  provisions  of  the  workmen's  compensation  act.  In 
cases  wherein  new  important  points  of  law  and  matters  of  general  legal  or  social  in- 
terests are  involved,  it  is  essential  that  legal  aid  organizations  should  be  able  to 
carry  the  issue  through  to  the  highest  court  for  its  decision.  Every  society  should 
have  a  "fighting  fund"  for  this  purpose. 

There  is  an  opportunity  for  the  legal  aid  organizations  to  supply  a  much  needed 
element,  which  has  for  some  time  been  entirely  lacking,  in  the  steady  development 
of  our  common  law.  The  common  law  is  the  people's  law;  it  has  had  its  being  in  their 
life;  it  has  been  able  to  develop  in  a  comprehensive  way  through  the  controversies 
of  all  classes  of  citizens,  high  and  low,  in  all  sorts  of  cases,  big  and  little.  This  sturdy, 
all-round  development  is  not  so  clear  to-day.  The  poor  cannot  afford  appeals,  the 
small  case  does  not  warrant  the  incurring  of  large  expense,  and  the  large  private 


RELATION  TO  THE  LAW  207 

offices,  engaging  in  general  practice  and  doing  legal  aid  work  as  a  part  of  that  prac- 
tice, no  longer  exist.  A  glance  at  the  reports  will  show  that  the  only  cases  of  the 
poor  which  receive  appellate  attention  are  personal  injury  suits  where  the  stakes 
are  large  enough  to  induce  attorneys  to  assume  the  expense  themselves.  The  highest 
courts  are  being  largely  confined  to  expositions  of  the  law  of  negligence,  of  property 
matters  such  as  wills  and  trusts,  of  corporation,  banking,  and  business  law,  of  taxa- 
tion, and  of  procedure.  In  the  main  these  are  the  only  cases  brought  to  them.  Two 
generations  ago  Chief  Justice  Shaw  of  Massachusetts  was  called  upon  to  decide 
whether  a  calf  was  subject  to  attachment,1  and  when  the  care  with  which  he  exam- 
ined the  issue  evoked  some  merriment  at  the  bar,  he  said  with  much  emotion:  "Gen- 
tlemen, this  may  seem  to  you  a  trifling  case,  but  it  is  a  very  important  question  to 
a  great  many  poor  families."2  One  may  search  far  in  the  reports  of  to-day  without 
finding  any  comparable  instance.  It  has  in  large  measure  been  this  inability  of  the 
mass  of  the  people  to  secure  a  development  of  the  common  law  suited  to  their  needs 
that  has  driven  them  to  act  through,  their  representatives  and  resulted  in  our  endless 
legislation  concerning  both  substantive  and  procedural  law. 

It  has  been  said  with  much  truth  that  the  offices  of  legal  aid  organizations  are 
the  only  common  law  offices  that  remain  in  existence  in  the  large  cities.3  There  the 
common  law  may  be  seen  working  itself  out  in  its  application  to  the  people  in  their 
daily  lives.  Innumerable  questions  arise  which  have  never  been  decided  and  which 
ought  to  be  decided.4  As  an  illustration,  it  is  not  clear  under  Massachusetts  law 
whether  the  fictitious  lease  is  a  lawful  method  of  ejecting  a  tenant  at  will  without 
the  two  weeks'  notice  required  by  statute.5  It  is  used  every  year  in  thousands  of  cases. 
It  is  not  to  the  interest  of  landlords  to  dispute  it,  the  poor  who  are  ejected  by  it 
are  unable  to  question  it,  and  as  a  result  it  continues  in  existence.  Slightly  different 
in  operation  but  tending  to  the  same  result  is  the  too  common  practice  in  compen- 
sation cases  where  insurance  companies  take  appeals  and  the  employee  is  unable  to 
file  a  brief  and  present  his  side  of  the  case.  One-sided  argument  cannot  secure  as  fair 
a  construction  of  the  statute  as  a  decision  rendered  after  full  hearing  of  both  sides. 

Just  as  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  necessary  to  secure  to  the  individual  poor 
person  his  day  in  court,  so  they  are  necessary  to  secure  his  hearing  on  appeal.  But 
the  latter  is  more  than  a  question  of  individual  justice;  on  it  may  depend  the  right 
to  protection  and  redress  of  countless  other  persons  similarly  situated.  It  is  not  of 
chief  importance  whether  the  legal  aid  organizations  win  or  lose  their  appeals;  the 
prime  consideration  is  that  our  common  law  system  should  have  a  fair  chance  to 
work  itself  out  by  having  points  needing  determination  brought  to  the  supreme 
courts,  and  by  having  those  issues  fairly  argued,  not  from  one,  but  from  both  points 
of  view. 

1  Carruth  v.  Grassie,  11  Gray,  211.  2  Chase  :  Lemuel  Stow  (1918),  page  280. 

3  Rowe :  Joseph  H.  Choate  and  Right  Training  for  the  Bar,  24  Case  and  Comment  (1917),  264,  273,  275. 

1  30  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  48 ;  cf.  Parry  :  The  Law  and  the  Poor,  page  175.  B  Cf.  page  14,  ante. 


208  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

What  little  work  of  this  sort  the  legal  aid  societies  have  been  able  to  do  serves  to 
indicate  very  clearly  what  a  valuable  work  they  might,  if  permitted,  perform  for  the 
law.  At  the  time  of  the  loan  shark  campaign  in  New  York  a  question  arose  as  to  the 
legality  of  the  lenders'  charging  a  ten  dollar  fee  as  "attorney's  services"  in  drawing 
the  papers  taken  as  security  for  the  loan.  By  such  a  device  all  the  laws  limiting 
interest  rates  could  be  set  at  naught.  The  plan  is  a  very  common  one,  and  it  must 
have  been  successfully  employed  in  New  York  in  thousands  of  cases.  No  borrower 
had  ever  been  in  a  position  to  undertake  the  long  fight  necessary  to  test  this  sub- 
terfuge and  to  secure  a  final  adjudication.  In  the  case  of  London  Realty  Company 
v.  Riorden  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  undertook  to  defend  a  suit  based  on 
such  a  transaction  on  the  ground  that  the  loan  was  in  violation  of  law.  The  Muni- 
cipal Court  gave  judgment  for  the  plaintiff.  The  Society  appealed  and  the  Appel- 
late term  of  the  Supreme  Court  affirmed  the  judgment.  The  Society  took  a  further 
appeal  to  the  Appellate  Division,  where  the  court  reversed  the  affirmed  judgment, 
saying  that  the  attorney's  fee  was  "a  device  or  pretext  to  evade  the  law."  This  time 
the  lender  appealed  and  the  Society  followed  the  case  to  the  Court  of  Appeals,  where 
it  was  finally  ruled  that  the  law  had  been  violated  and  the  judgment  was  set  aside.1 
It  is  interesting  to  note  that  in  the  companion  field  of  wage  assignments  the  law 
concerning  the  requirement  of  notice  to  the  employer,  although  that  question  must 
have  been  a  decisive  factor  in  innumerable  cases,  was  never  determined  until  the 
Russell  Sage  Foundation  engaged  counsel  to  take  the  necessary  appeals. 

The  maritime  law  permits  sailors  to  be  fined  for  disobedience  because  strict  disci- 
pline on  shipboard  is  essential.  In  order  that  fines  might  not  degenerate  into  abuse, 
the  law  required  the  master  to  make  an  entry  in  the  log  book  concurrently  with  the 
imposition  of  the  fine.  This  provision  was  not  complied  with,  and  it  became  an  easy 
matter  for  unscrupulous  captains  to  discharge  their  crews  with  little  or  no  pay  on 
the  allegation  that  there  were  deductions  for  fines.  No  sailor  was  in  a  position  to 
dispute  the  illegality  of  this  conduct.  When  the  situation  came  to  the  attention  of 
the  Seaman's  Branch  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  a  case  was  brought  before 
the  federal  court  where  it  was  held  that  if  entries  were  not  properly  made,  there  could 
be  no  deductions  for  fines.2  Such  a  decision  automatically  carries  the  intended  pro- 
tection of  the  law  to  all  seamen  on  American  vessels. 

A  less  important  instance,  which  has  a  good  deal  of  humor  in  it,  is  found  in  the 
practice  of  the  Philadelphia  Legal  Aid  Society.  In  its  struggle  against  the  loan  shark 
the  Society,  failing  at  first  to  find  any  point  of  attack,  set  up  as  a  desperate  defence 
to  a  suit  in  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas  the  contention  that  an  office  where  usurious 
rates  of  interest  were  charged  was  a  disorderly  house.  By  some  weird  reasoning  this 
was  sustained.  It  sufficed  to  keep  the  lenders  at  bay  until  the  Society  worked  out  the 
more  tenable  theory  of  enjoining  all  suits  brought  on  usurious  notes.3 

1  36  N.  V.  L.  A.  R.  26 ;  37  Ibid.  30 ;  38  Ibid.  27.  2  The  St.  Paul,  133  Federal,  1002  ;  30  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  89. 

3  8  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  6. 


RELATION  TO  THE  LAW  209 

In  Hartford  certain  employers  who  had  less  than  five  employees  contended  that 
the  compensation  act  did  not  apply  to  them.  The  Legal  Aid  Committee  took  a  test 
case  to  the  Supreme  Court,  where  the  general  applicability  of  the  act  was  upheld.1 
In  Boston  the  Legal  Aid  Society  has  taken  up  for  final  determination  cases  involv- 
ing the  power  of  the  Industrial  Accident  Board  to  control  the  fees  charged  by  physi- 
cians to  injured  employees,2  the  construction  of  a  statute  requiring  insurance  com- 
panies to  pay  compensation  to  employees  who  had  received  an  award  from  the  Board, 
notwithstanding  an  appeal  taken  to  the  Supreme  Court  by  the  insurance  company,3 
and  the  right  of  a  seaman  to  libel  a  ship  for  his  wages  when  the  agreement  under 
which  the  master  had  shipped  his  crew  was  in  accordance  with  the  custom  of  shares 
with  a  stipulated  daily  wage  in  addition.4 

The  most  important  ruling  obtained  by  a  legal  aid  society  is  the  California  deci- 
sion, already  referred  to  in  connection  with  the  question  of  costs  as  a  denial  of  jus- 
tice, in  which  the  court  held  that  in  order  to  prevent  a  frustration  of  justice,  courts 
of  record  have  an  inherent  power  to  permit  a  suit  without  prepayment  of  costs  when 
it  appears  that  the  enforcement  of  costs  will  preclude  the  party  from  all  possible 
relief.0  In  this  matter  the  attorney  for  the  San  Francisco  Legal  Aid  Society  appeared 
as  amicus  curiae.  This  decision  at  once  opens  the  doors  of  the  courts  in  proper  cases 
to  persons  throughout  the  state  who  have  hitherto  been  barred  from  seeking  redress 
because  of  their  inability  to  defray  the  required  court  costs  and  fees.  Should  a  recog- 
nition of  the  simple  truths  on  which  the  decision  rests  lead  to  its  adoption  in  other 
jurisdictions,  this  case  would  mark  an  advance,  second  only  to  the  original  in  forma 
pauperis  statute  of  Henry  VII,  in  the  progress  toward  a  more  free  and  equal  justice. 


1  2  Hartford  L.  A.  R.  4.  2  Holland  v.  Zeuner,  228  Mass.  142. 

3  Insurance  Co.  v.  Peloquin,  225  Mass.  30;  16  Boston  L.  A.  R.  16. 

*  Holmes  v.  Schooner  Mettacomet,  230  Fed.  308  ;  233  Ibid.  261. 

0  Martin  v.  Superior  Court  for  Alameda  County,  64  California  Decisions  (October,  1917),  422. 


Chapter  XXII 
LEGAL  AID  AND  THE  COMMUNITY 

Perhaps  you  may  discover  many  things  yet  wanting  in  the  Law ;  Mischiefs 
in  the  Execution  and  Application  of  the  Laws,  which  ought  to  be  better 
provided  against;  Mischiefs  annoying  of  Mankind,  against  which  no  Laws 
are  yet  provided.  The  Reformation  of  the  Law,  and  more  Law  for  the  Re- 
formation of  the  World  is  what  is  mightily  called  for.  From  the  First  Amer- 
ican Address  to  Lawyers.1 

REMEDIAL  legislation  and  the  final  determination  of  legal  issues  of  general 
application  affect  the  entire  community,  and  work  in  these  two  directions  is 
work  for  the  community.  The  service  which  legal  aid  organizations  render  to  the 
.  community  is,  however,  not  confined  to  these  two  forms  of  activity, 
~  .  "  but  extends  into  many  fields  and  its  effects  reach  far  and  wide.  As  all 
their  work  is  legal  in  nature  and  pertains  to  law,  the  contributions 
which  the  societies  make  to  the  common  welfare  are  along  legal  lines.  Because  of  their 
peculiarly  close  contact  with  life  no  general  legal  wrong  or  fraud  can  long  be  per- 
petrated on  the  poor  before  some  case,  revealing  the  situation,  comes  to  their  office 
and  provides  a  point  of  attack.  The  organizations  detect  fraudulent  schemes,  sup- 
press abuses,  study  conditions,  educate  persons  in  matters  of  law  which  they  ought  to 
know,  and  are  the  first  to  act  when  some  new  need  for  legal  assistance  appears.  So  far 
as  these  various  activities  can  be  reduced  to  one  formula,  it  is  that  of  law  enforce- 
ment rather  than  of  law  making. 

The  loan  shark  has  been  able  to  exist  in  spite  of  laws  either  by  evading  or  ignor- 
ing them.  Important  as  remedial  legislation  is  in  curbing  his  power  or  in  ousting  him, 
it  is  equally  important  to  fight  him  by  enforcing  the  laws  against  him,  and  mak- 
ing it  impossible  for  him  to  practise  usury  by  recovering  back  from  him  all  excess 
payments  and  preventing  borrowers  from  overpaying  on  their  loans.  During  the  last 
three  years  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society  has  acted  in  1266  cases,  permitting  the 
payment  of  the  legal  rates,  but  cutting  off  all  excess  sums  demanded  by  the  lend- 
ers, which  aggregated  SI 6,884. 88.2  Everywhere  the  legal  aid  organizations  have  been 
the  most  determined  enemy  of  the  loan  sharks,  driving  them  to  cover  by  exposure 
and  thwarting  their  carefully  concealed  plans  for  evading  the  law.3  Thus,  in  Massachu- 
setts, after  the  new  law  regulating  interest  rates  was  passed,  the  lenders  immediately 
became  incorporated  and  required  all  borrowers  to  agree  to  buy  shares  of  their  stock 


1  By  Cotton  Mather  in  1710,  quoted  in  Warren  :  History  of  the  American  Bar,  page  ix. 

2  Eubank :  Loan  Sharks  and  Loan  Shark  Legislation  in  Illinois,  7  Journal  of  Criminal  Law,  No.  1  (May,  1917), 
reprinted  by  the  Russell  Sage  Foundation.  See  page  11  of  the  reprint. 

3  The  reports  of  the  legal  aid  societies  are  full  of  statements  as  to  this  work.  See  particularly  8  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev. 
No.  1,  p.  1 ;  10  Ibid.  No.  1,  p.  1 ;  6  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  11 ;  also  Bulletin  of  the  National  Federation  of  Remedial  Loan 
Associations  for  November,  1916,  page  7  ;  Chicago  Legal  Neios  for  March  28, 1918  (whole  No.  3298),  pages  277,  280. 


RELATION  TO  THE  COMMUNITY  211 

on  the  pretext  that  it  was  to  afford  security  for  the  loan.  This  in  effect  served  to  break 
down  the  law  and  to  restore  the  former  high  rates.  Four  test  cases  were  brought  by 
the  Legal  Aid  Society,  with  the  result  that  the  lenders'  licenses  were  suspended  or 
revoked,  and  the  subterfuge  was  abandoned.1  In  thus  protecting  and  enforcing  the 
law  in  all  its  vigor  the  Society  was  not  merely  aiding  four  individual  borrowers :  it 
was  preventing  the  exploitation  of  the  one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  borrowers  of 
small  loans  in  Massachusetts,  and  promoting  the  community  welfare. 

Attempts  are  steadily  being  made  to  perpetrate  hoaxes  or  fraudulent  schemes  on 
the  less  intelligent  members  of  the  community.  Where  some  element  of  gambling  or 
of  a  lottery  is  included,  the  lure  is  strong  and  the  trick  works.  In  1914  a  most  ingen- 
ious "club  plan"  for  the  sale  of  furniture,  with  the  usual  speculative  accompani- 
ments, was  promoted  in  New  York.  Thousands  of  poor  persons  joined  and  paid  in, 
in  sums  of  twenty-five  cents  a  week,  the  vast  amount  of  one  hundred  and  sixty  thou- 
sand dollars.  The  Legal  Aid  Society  secured  warrants  to  which  the  defendants  pleaded 
guilty,  and  then  undertook  in  behalf  of  thirteen  thousand  victims  to  liquidate  the 
business  so  that  the  purchasers  might  be  saved  as  much  as  possible.2  Following  this 
experience  the  Society  published  a  statement  of  schemes  to  be  avoided  by  the  poor.3 
The  love  of  chance-taking  is  not  the  only  human  frailty  that  is  capitalized.  Vanity 
does  just  as  well,  and  the  concern  which  offers  to  make  a  "movie"  star  of  any  appli- 
cant finds  willing  listeners  who  cheerfully  pay  for  a  course  of  instruction.4  The  legal 
aid  societies  in  the  various  cities  are  constantly  on  the  watch  for  these  fraudulent  under- 
takings and  combat  them  to  the  best  of  their  ability.5 

Other  illustrations  abound.  The  mere  mention  of  some  of  them  suffices  to  show  the 
value  of  the  service  which  the  societies  render.  The  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  the  Educa- 
tional Alliance  and  the  Legal  Aid  Society  in  New  York  cooperated  to  stop  the  illegal 
traffic  in  divorces  which  certain  rabbis  were  carrying  on  among  the  Jewish  immigrant 
population.6  In  Philadelphia  it  was  discovered  that  a  large  manufacturing  plant  was 
in  the  habit  of  paying  its  employees,  many  of  whom  were  minors,  by  check.  These 
checks  were  cashed  at  the  nearest  place,  which  was  a  saloon.  On  the  Legal  Aid  Soci- 
ety's representation  the  company  discontinued  its  practice  and  paid  in  cash.7  Special 
protective  work  in  behalf  of  immigrants  has  been  undertaken ;  the  New  York  Legal 
Aid  Society  opened  and  maintained  a  special  immigration  branch  until  lack  of  funds 
forced  it  to  be  given  up.8  Conditions  from  which  seamen  have  suffered,  such  as  shang- 
haiing, crimping,  and  the  exaction  of  fees  for  getting  men  jobs,  have  been  steadily 


1 16  Boston  L.  A.  R.  10-14;  Report  of  the  Massachusetts  Supervisor  of  Loan  Agencies  for  January  1, 1917  (Public  Doc- 
ument No.  96  of  1917),  pages  16-21. 

2  39  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  19  ;  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  133. 

3  89  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  24.  *  40  Ibid.  36. 

6  3  Buffalo  L.  A.  R.  6;  6  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  13;  7  Ibid.  17-26 ;  16  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  6;  21  Ibid.  8;  22  P>id.  8;  4  Philadel- 
phia L.  A.  R.  4,  5. 

6  11  Educational  Alliance  Report.  56;  22  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  10.  *  8  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  10. 

8  36  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  18;  37  Ibid.  10,  21 ;  38  Ibid.  12. 


212  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

combated.1  In  1907  the  New  York  Society,  through  the  attorney  for  its  Seamen's 
Branch,  secured  evidence  on  which  a  boarding-house  keeper  was  convicted  of  exact- 
ing a  shipping  fee.  A  notice  of  this  conviction  was  issued  by  the  United  States  Com- 
missioner of  Navigation  and  publicly  posted  in  all  American  ports.2  When  this  one 
conviction  proved  an  insufficient  deterrent,  the  Society  promptly  followed  it  up  with 
further  convictions.3 

The  societies  have  undertaken  an  amount  of  educational  work  in  instructing  the 
poorer  classes  as  to  their  legal  rights  and  liabilities  by  the  publication  of  handbooks 
setting  out  the  law  in  simple  and  easily  understandable  language.  In  1912  the  Kan- 
sas City  Legal  Aid  Bureau  published  a  forty-four  page  booklet  covering  the  legal 
questions  that  most  commonly  arise  in  the  lives  of  the  poor.  A  first  edition  of  two 
thousand  copies  was  immediately  exhausted,  and  a  second  edition,  with  translations 
into  different  languages,  was  printed.4  The  organization  in  Akron,  finding  that  bor- 
rowers were  paying  interest  rates  greatly  in  excess  of  the  legal  maximum  because  of 
their  ignorance  of  the  law,  prepared  and  distributed  twelve  thousand  copies  of  a  leaf- 
let dealing  with  the  provisions  of  law  concerning  loans,  chattel  mortgages,  assign- 
ments, and  the  like.5  The  Bureau  in  Nashville  has  in  preparation  a  pamphlet  dealing 
with  the  law  in  general  for  distribution  among  the  employees  of  the  industrial  plants 
of  the  city.  The  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  has  published  an  edition  of  five  thou- 
sand copies  of  a  Handbook  for  Domestic  Servants?  Its  other  publication  of  this  sort, 
being  a  compendium  of  the  maritime  law  and  known  as  The  Sailors''  Log,  has  carried 
its  name  around  the  world.  A  first  issue  of  five  thousand  copies  in  1904  proved  inade- 
quate to  meet  the  demand,  a  second  edition  was  issued  in  1906,7  and  a  third  edition 
is  now  ready  for  printing.  Following  the  declaration  of  war  by  the  United  States, 
several  of  the  societies  met  an  obvious  need  and  produced  concise  little  volumes  of 
Law  for  Soldiers,  Sailors,  and  their  Dependents. 


§  2 
Nothing  could  indicate  more  vividly  the  value  to  the  community  of  having  in  its 
midst  organizations  like  the  legal  aid  societies  than  the  events  which  took  place  after 
W  w  h  America's  entry  into  the  World  War.  The  complete  story  cannot  be 
written  yet,  for  much  work  which  has  been  done  by  the  legal  aid  organ- 
izations has  not  yet  been  reported  on  and  so  is  unknown,  but  enough  has  come  to  light 
to  prove  the  present  point  of  legal  aid  service  to  the  community,  state,  and  nation. 
In  Boston  a  Lawyers'  Preparedness  Committee  was  formed  to  be  in  readiness  for 
such  legal  problems  as  the  vast  changes  were  certain  to  produce.  It  was  apparent  to 

1  8  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  10;  27  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  29;  32  Ibid.  42. 

2  32  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  3.  3  S3  Ibid.  31;  35  Ibid.  28;  39  Ibid.  32.  *  3  Kansas  City  L.  A.  R.  5. 

6  First  Report  of  the  Charity  Organization  Society  of  Akron,  report  of  the  Legal  Aid  Committee,  page  14. 
6  31  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  48;  33  Ibid.  13.  7  29  Ibid.  10 ;  31  Ibid.  9. 


RELATION  TO  THE  COMMUNITY  213 

this  Committee  that  the  best  machinery  for  handling  a  large  volume  of  cases  was  to 
be  found  in  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  and  therefore  the  Committee  asked  the  Society 
to  undertake  all  legal  work  for  men  entering  service  and  their  dependents.  Through 
the  press  it  was  publicly  announced  that  all  such  persons  could  secure  free  legal  ad- 
vice and  assistance  of  any  sort  from  the  Society's  attorneys.1  As  the  situation  devel- 
oped, and  as  the  Home  Service  Section  of  the  local  chapter  of  the  American  Red 
Cross  found  itself  steadily  confronted  with  legal  questions  concerning  the  government 
allotments,  allowances,  compensation,  insurance,  and  cases  under  the  Soldiers'1  and 
Sailors'1  Relief  Act,  it  became  clear  that  this  mass  of  work  could  best  be  entrusted 
to  the  Legal  Aid  Society,  which  was  effected  through  its  becoming  counsel  for  the 
Home  Service  Section.  In  New  York  there  was  evidence  that  a  number  of  disrepu- 
table attorneys  and  others  were  preying  on  ignorant  persons  of  draft  age  by  hold- 
ing out  that  thev  could  secure  exemption  on  payment  of  a  large  fee.  For  their  own 
ends  these  shysters  encouraged  attempts  to  evade  the  selective  draft  law.  To  combat 
this  evil  it  was  decided  to  open  a  bureau  where  reliable  advice  about  the  law  could  be 
secured  at  nominal  cost.  Recognizing  the  reputation  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society  and 
its  ability  to  provide  quickly  the  facilities  and  machinery  for  taking  many  cases, 
the  Mayors  Committee  on  National  Defence  and  the  War  Committee  of  the  Bar 
Association  of  the  City  of  New  York  asked  the  Society  to  establish  a  bureau  for 
draft  information.  This  was  immediately  done,  and  the  bureau  continued  its  work 
throughout  the  period  of  the  first  draft.2  In  Milwaukee,  following  a  statement  of  the 
governor  of  Wisconsin  that  men  were  being  charged  exorbitant  fees  in  connection 
with  exemption  claims,  the  Legal  Aid  Society  made  arrangements  with  the  Chair- 
man of  the  District  Board  whereby  any  matters  might  be  referred  to  the  Society  in 
the  discre  cion  of  the  Board.3 

In  carrying  out  their  assignments,  the  societies  soon  saw  that  the  chief  difficulty 
which  they  had  to  combat  was  ignorance  of  law.  Persons  failed  to  safeguard  them- 
selves in  the  manner  prescribed  by  law  because  they  did  not  know  that  any  legal  steps 
were  necessary.  The  provisions  of  the  War  Risk  Insurance  Act  of  October  6, 1917, 
and  of  the  Civil  Relief  Act  of  March  8, 1918,  were  very  generally  unknown.  To  point 
out  the  difficulties  likely  to  present  themselves  to  the  average  man  and  his  family 
and  to  urge  proper  legal  action,  the  Society  in  Boston  published  a  thirty-eight  page 
pocket  size  booklet  of  Legal  Suggestions  for  Soldiers  and  Sailors  and  their  Depend- 
ents." *  Over  one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  copies  were  distributed,  the  requests  com- 
ing from  every  state  in  the  Union;  twenty-five  thousand  copies  going  to  the  Army 
and  Navy;  thirty  thousand  to  Exemption  Boards,  thirty-five  thousand  to  the  Red 
Cross,  fifteen  thousand  to  Public  Safety  Committees;  twenty  thousand  to  War  Camp 
Community  Service  Committees;  and  the  balance  on  individual  applications.  The 

1  24  Case  and  Comment  (October,  1917),  400.  2  15  N".  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  Xo.  4  (October,  1917),  1. 

3  1  Milwaukee  L.  A.  R.  4. 

4  See  Boston  Evening  Transcript  for  August  4. 1917  (editorial) ;  Ibid,  for  October  10, 1917  (editorial) ;  Boston  Adver- 
tiser for  August  2.  1917. 


214  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

Council  of  National  Defence  recommended  to  the  various  State  Councils  that  they 
publish  similar  pamphlets.  Legal  aid  organizations  in  New  York,  Philadelphia,  Louis- 
ville, Milwaukee,  and  Rochester1  printed  like  pamphlets  for  their  respective  juris- 
dictions. In  other  states  the  idea,  which  was  first  conceived  and  acted  on  by  the  legal 
aid  organizations,  has  been  taken  up  by  other  groups  and  organizations. 

The  usefulness  of  the  individual  societies  would  have  been  greatly  increased  if  they 
had  been  united  under  the  control  of  some  one  central  agency.  When  the  federal  gov- 
ernment in  1918,  through  the  Council  of  National  Defence,  made  its  comprehensive 
plans2  to  extend  legal  aid  to  every  soldier  and  sailor  and  his  family,  the  legal  aid 
organizations  should  have  been  the  first  to  offer  themselves.  By  reason  of  their  favor- 
able location,  their  reputation  for  integrity,  and  their  great  experience  in  caring  for 
a  multitude  of  cases,  they  might  easily  have  become  in  every  large  city  the  centre  of 
legal  work  for  men  in  service  and  their  dependents.  If  they  had  possessed  a  properly 
empowered  and  alert  central  office,  it  would  have  been  heard  in  the  councils  at  Wash- 
ington, and  could  have  placed  at  the  government's  disposal  a  trained  and  equipped 
staff  of  attorneys  with  a  going  organization  capable  of  indefinite  expansion.  Because 
they  had  failed  to  erect  any  central  authority,  the  societies  were  unable  to  grasp  the 
greatest  opportunity  ever  presented  them. 


§3 

There  is  a  new  movement  in  the  realm  of  law  which  will  prove  of  incalculable  benefit 

to  the  community  at  large  and  in  which  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  likely  to  play 

an  important  part.  It  may  be  called  the  science  of  preventive  law.  As  phy- 

r  sicians  have  made  great  strides  in  preventive  medicine,  as  workers  in  the 

WE  I  Q/ffl 

field  of  social  service  are  placing  their  emphasis  on  the  prevention  of  the 
factors  which  cause  poverty  and  degeneracy,3  so  it  is  becoming  recognized  that  the 
legal  profession  may  perform  a  like  service  in  the  law.  The  science  of  prevention  in 
all  three  branches  means  the  same  process  of  searching  for  the  cause  of  the  wrong 
condition  and  then  of  ascertaining  the  cure.  As  Henry  Stockbridge,  chairman  of  the 
Section  of  Legal  Education  of  the  American  Bar  Association,  has  put  it:4  "When 
an  evil  is  once  recognized,  the  first  remedial  step  is  to  ascertain  the  cause  and  then 
to  seek  out  and  apply  the  antidote  or  remedy." 

Our  law  has  never  had  forehanded  scientific  development.  This  is  the  weakness 
of  the  common  law  method  of  building  law  case  by  case.  Much  legislation  has  been 


1  Rochester  L.  A.  R.  for  1917.  page  8. 

2  Official  Bulletin  for  July  15, 1918,  vol.  ii.  No.  360  ;  Supplementary  Bulletin  No.  84  of  the  Council  of  National  Defence, 
August,  1918. 

3  Pear:  Social  Values  in  Public  and  Private  Relief,  published  in  The  Field  of  Social  Service  (1915),  pages  208-210. 

*  41  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1916)  659.  Cf.  Chief  Justice  Olsen  of  the  Chicago  Municipal  Court:  Efficiency  in  the  Admin- 
istration of  Criminal  Justice,  page  29— "We  shall  try  the  modern  methods  of  the  medical  profession— diagnosis  and 
prevention,  when  cure  is  impossible." 


RELATION  TO  THE  COMMUNITY  215 

necessary,  but  the  statutes  too  often  represent  only  opinion  or  snap  judgment  and 
not  conclusions  drawn  from  definitely  ascertained  facts.  One  reason  for  the  failure 
of  the  law  to  deal  with  difficulties  before  they  come  to  pass  instead  of  always  after 
they  have  happened  is  that  the  necessary  basic  material  has  not  been  ready  at  hand. 
The  experience  and  data  which  the  hospitals  and  clinics  afforded  in  medicine,  and 
which  the  charity  organizations'  files  and  records  furnished  in  social  service,  were  not 
to  be  found  in  the  average  law  office.  Court  dockets  possess  a  fund  of  information 
which  the  modern  municipal  courts  are  beginning  to  analyze  and  study  for  the  pur- 
pose of  suggesting  betterments.  Outside  of  the  courts  there  has  been  no  organization 
which  afforded  the  cases  by  which  the  workings  of  the  law  could  be  observed  and 
tested. 

It  may  be  said  that  American  law  at  the  present  time  stands  in  need  of  four  great 
things.  First,  the  reorganization  of  courts ;  second,  the  simplification  of  procedure ; 
third,  the  equalization  of  the  administration  of  justice  so  that  denial  of  justice  to 
the  poor  may  cease ;  and  fourth,  a  Bureau  of  Justice  of  the  sort  suggested  by  Dean 
Pound,1  which  shall  provide  the  means  for  the  scientific  study  of  the  law,  for  detect- 
ing its  shortcomings,  and  for  providing  the  necessary  information  by  which  alone 
constructive  remedial  work  is  made  possible.  If  all  the  changes  advocated  by  the 
leaders  of  the  first  three  movements  could  be  effected  to-day,  a  new  series  of  prob- 
lems would  begin  to  appear  to-morrow.  This  is  inevitable  because  no  institution  which 
is  static  can  be  satisfactory  when  all  the  life  which  it  attempts  to  regulate  is  in  con- 
stant flux.  Only  by  a  Bureau  of  Justice  which  can  keep  abreast  of  changing  condi- 
tions and  ascertain  how  and  where  new  laws  are  needed  or  old  ones  call  for  different 
application  can  the  recurrence  of  the  old  errors  be  avoided.  It  is  unquestionably  a  tre- 
mendous task,  but  it  is  necessary  if  the  law  is  to  be  a  living  science  instead  of  a  set  of 
archaic  dogmas  and  doctrines.  Had  there  been  such  a  Bureau  during  the  last  quarter 
of  the  nineteenth  century,  it  would  have  known  that  the  structure  of  our  judicial 
organization  was  faulty,  that  the  procedure  was  over-technical,  wasteful,  and  slow, 
and  that  there  was  a  necessity  for  supplying  attorneys  to  the  poor.  With  such  know- 
ledge it  might  have  induced  courts  and  legislatures  to  act  so  that  the  difficulties 
would  have  been  met  as  soon  as  they  arose. 

The  legal  aid  organizations  cannot  be  such  a  Bureau  of  Justice,  but  they  can  be 
a  part  of  it,  and  by  their  own  preventive  work  in  the  field  of  law  which  affects  the 
poor  they  can  give  an  object  lesson  which  will  hasten  its  coming.  No  more  appropri- 
ate point  of  departure  could  be  made,  for  the  need  in  this  particular  field  is  great 
and  no  organizations  come  closer  to  the  life  of  the  common  people  of  the  nation.2 
The  legal  aid  organizations  are  beginning  to  realize  that  out  of  their  vast  volume  of 

1  This  was  suggested  by  Dean  Pound  in  his  address  before  the  Conference  of  Delegates  of  State  and  Local  Bar  As- 
sociations on  September  3, 1917.  The  address  has  not  been  printed,  but  this  point  is  mentioned  in  24  Case  and  Com- 
ment, 422,  423. 

2  Cf.  statement  of  Graham  Taylor  in  his  address  to  legal  aid  society  delegates,  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth 
Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  130. 


216  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

work  they  can  develop  this  scientific  by-product.1  The  proposition  has  been  given 
excellent  presentation  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society 
in  these  words:2 

"  To  be  militant  in  placing  needed  laws  on  the  books,  and  vigilant  in  securing 
their  enforcement,  are  undoubtedly  great  services  to  the  community,  easily  com- 
prehended because  of  their  dramatic  appeal.  What  is  even  more  sorely  needed, 
however,  is  a  sensitive  instrument  with  which  to  detect  the  failures  of  our  legal 
system,  and  a  fund  of  social  experience  out  of  which  to  build  anew. 

"  The  present  system  of  the  administration  of  justice  is  in  the  process  of  under- 
going great  and  far-reaching  changes  by  reason  of  the  attempt  to  re-shape  its 
antique  framework  to  meet  the  needs  of  modern  society.  The  great  task  is  bring- 
ing about  experimentation  with  new  methods  of  administering  justice,  elimi- 
nation of  unnecessary  cost  and  complicated  procedure,  and  the  recasting  of 
the  powers  of  the  various  courts.  The  rapid  spread  of  administrative  boards,  the 
instituting  of  small  claims  courts  in  which  court  costs  are  eliminated,  together 
with  the  lawyer,  the  project  of  a  Domestic  Relations  Court  combining  the  pres- 
ent jurisdiction  in  that  field  of  the  Divorce,  Probate,  Criminal,  and  Juvenile 
Courts,  are  all  parts  of  the  process  of  reconstruction.  It  is  the  readiness  and  abil- 
ity to  serve  the  community  in  this  great  task  that  has  so  suddenly  thrust  the 
Society  into  its  present  unique  position. 

"  The  Legal  Aid  Society  is  often  the  only  agent  for  collecting  the  needed  data. 
How  many  people  are  denied  justice  because  they  cannot  afford  to  advance  the 
costs  of  court?  Even  the  most  systematically  kept  court  records  can  disclose,  at 
best,  the  number  of  small  suits  actually  begun,  but  not  those  which  were  never 
brought  because  of  poverty.  The  answer  lies  written  in  the  files  of  the  Society. 
What  are  the  most  common  abuses  in  the  legal  profession,  and  can  they  be  less- 
ened or  eliminated  ?  How  is  the  Workman's  Compensation  Act  working  out  in 
practice  from  the  employee's  point  of  view  ?  How  far  is  the  neglected  wife,  child, 
or  parent,  prevented,  by  defects  in  the  laws,  from  securing  the  support  which 
those  very  laws  attempted  to  guarantee?  These  and  many  other  vital  questions 
can  be  answered  in  whole,  or  in  part,  only  by  an  analysis  of  the  material  which 
is  continually  pouring  into  the  offices  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society." 

Although  the  movement  is  only  at  its  inception,  tangible  proofs  of  what  it  can  ac- 
complish are  available  and  have  been  mentioned  in  earlier  pages.  The  campaign  in 
Illinois  for  better  laws  regulating  small  loans  was  built  up  on  facts  many  of  which 
were  ascertained  from  data  furnished  by  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society.  Similarly, 
the  evidence  which  proved  the  flaws  in  the  Massachusetts  law  concerning  wage  as- 
signments, and  which  also  showed  just  what  was  necessary  to  provide  adequate  safe- 
guards, came  from  the  cases  of  the  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society.  It  was  the  study  of  the 
evils  of  the  justice  of  the  peace  system  by  the  Legal  Aid  Society  in  Cleveland  that 
pointed  the  way  to  the  small  claims  court.  In  New  York,  when  the  question  of  abol- 
ishing arrest  on  execution  for  wage  claims  under  fifty  dollars  was  discussed,  there 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  20;  Ibid.,  Fourth  Conference,  page 
63;  1  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  8;  31  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  13;  16  Boston  L.  A.  R.  8 ;  15  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  2,  p.  1. 

2  Director's  Report  for  1916,  16  Boston  L.  A.  R.  3,  4. 


RELATION  TO  THE  COMMUNITY  217 

was  much  generalizing,  but  the  actual  facts  of  the  use  of  the  body  execution  and  of 
its  effect  were  found  in  cases  of  the  Legal  Aid  Society.  On  this  one  small  point  the 
Society  was  able  to  produce  one  hundred  and  eighty-four  cases  covering  a  period  of 
two  years.1  Along  precisely  the  same  lines,  in  the  field  of  criminal  law  the  defender 
organizations  can  collect  information  which  will  give  further  assistance  to  the  com- 
munity in  its  ancient  problem  of  crime  and  the  treatment  of  criminals. 

To  do  work  of  this  sort,  certain  mechanical  arrangements  are  indispensable.  All 
records  must  be  accurately  arranged  so  that  they  are  easily  available,  and  they  must 
be  intelligently  tabulated.  Societies  which  have  in  the  past  prided  themselves  on 
"doing  their  work  instead  of  keeping  records"  must  make  an  abrupt  face-about  and 
fall  into  line  with  scientific  progress.  In  the  evolution  of  a  technique  of  legal  aid 
work  the  guiding  principle  must  be  the  planning  of  case  and  other  records  so  that 
they  shall  have  definite  meaning  and  can  be  utilized.  This  is  one  further  reason  why 
a  central  and  governing  legal  aid  agency  is  imperative. 

Some  of  this  preventive  law  work  the  societies  can  do  alone.  Much  more  they  can  do 
in  cooperation  with  other  agencies  such  as  the  courts,  bar  associations,  labor  commis- 
sions, charities,  and  the  like.  It  is  easy  to  see  how  much  cooperation  could  do,  and 
how  necessary  each  would  be  to  the  other,  in  such  matters  respectively  as  denial  of 
justice  through  court  costs,  professional  misconduct,  non-payment  of  wages,  and  the 
practical  working  of  the  laws  governing  support  of  families.  Many  of  our  commu- 
nity problems  are  not  yet  solved.  Some  we  are  only  beginning  to  perceive.  Before  defi- 
nite steps  can  be  taken  there  must  be  the  stage  of  straight  thinking  and  interchange 
of  opinion.  This  is  an  age  of  democracy,  not  only  in  government  but  in  thought.  Our 
problems  are  so  complex  that  no  one  man  knows  enough  to  see  the  whole  solution. 
Only  by  cooperation,  by  putting  together  the  best  thoughts  from  all  sources,  is  the 
remedy  to  be  found. 

The  community  needs  light  from  every  angle.  It  sorely  needs  to  learn  that  putting 
laws  on  the  books  is  nothing.  Enforcement  is  the  test.  If  in  actual  application  a  law 
fails  to  accomplish  its  intended  purpose,  then  it  is  not  the  remedy.  Here  the  legal  aid 
experience  is  invaluable,  for  in  many  instances  the  desired  information  can  best  come 
from  the  legal  aid  organizations. 


§  4 
The  greatest  service  which  the  societies  render  to  the  community  is  their  promotion 
of  good  citizenship.  By  their  protection  of  the  immigrant  and  their  securing  to  the 
native  born  their  legal  rights,  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  each  year 

_...        7 .         proving;  to  their  hundred  thousand  clients  the  integrity  and  fairness 
Citizenship  ... 

r       of  our  institutions.  This  engenders  respect  for  law,  loyalty,  and  pa- 
triotism. A  competent  observer  has  remarked2  that  the  legal  aid  society  "has  a 

1  34  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  21.  2  Editorial  in  8  Charities  Review  (1898),  4. 


218  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

field  which  presents  direct  possibilities  of  promoting  good  citizenship  and  faith  in 
our  institutions,  especially  among  our  immigrant  population,  such  as  are  scarcely 
afforded  in  any  other  way." 

It  was  the  vision  of  this  service  which  the  legal  aid  society  could  render  that  in- 
spired Mr.  Briesen  to  transform  it  from  a  restricted  to  an  American  organization. 
A  statement  of  this  work  for  the  making  of  good  citizenship  cannot  better  be  pre- 
sented than  in  his  own  words,1  written  after  having  seen  the  process  steadily  going 
on  for  twelve  years:  "It  is  not  merely  that  we  protect  the  weak  from  being  wronged 
and  defrauded  of  that  which  is  their  just  due;  that  is  a  great  deal  to  be  sure,  but 
there  are  other  and  collateral  results  which  are  of  value  to  the  community  and  the 
country. 

"  The  Society's  work  makes  good  citizens  and  arouses  a  sentiment  of  respect  for 
the  laws,  and  also,  I  may  say,  a  sentiment  of  patriotism.  Many  of  our  clients  are 
persons  of  foreign  birth — people,  often,  who  are  ignorant  of  the  laws  and  of  how 
to  set  the  machinery  of  the  law  in  motion.  They  have  some  vague  idea  that  there 
is  law  for  the  redress  of  wrongs,  but  they  have  heard  that  it  is  too  costly  a  luxury 
for  the  poor;  that  it  is  law  for  the  rich  and  not  for  the  poor.  They  know  they  have 
been  defrauded  and  wronged,  but  redress  may  seem  to  them  hopeless.  They  have  no 
money  to  secure  it,  and  therefore  they  think  it  is  not  for  them.  The  consequence  is 
that  they  become  bitter,  not  only  against  the  particular  person  who  has  wronged  them 
but  against  society  in  general,  against  the  country  which  permits  society  to  be  or- 
ganized on  so  unjust  a  basis.  Such  persons — and  they  need  not  be  confined  to  persons 
of  foreign  birth  by  any  means — are  ripe  to  listen  to  those  social  agitators  and  dis- 
turbers who  are  only  too  prevalent.  They  are  ripe  for  enlistment  in  the  ranks  of  those 
who  are  regarded  as  dangerous  to  the  security  of  law  and  order." 


1 17  Ann.  Am.  Ac.  Pol.  &  Soc.  Science  (1901),  165. 


Chapter  XXIII 
LEGAL  AID  AND  THE  ORGANIZED  CHARITIES 

Workers  in  organized  charity  frequently  find  cases  needing  legal  aid  and 
no  other  relief — cases  where  legal  aid  is  the  only  thing  necessary  to  relieve 
suffering.  Or  it  may  be  that  material  relief  is  needed ;  but  in  addition  a  legal 
redress  of  some  wrong  will  effect  the  only  permanent  cure  and  reestablish 
a  family  on  a  self-respecting,  self-reliant  footing.  Marion  Houston.1 

IN  considering  the  services  rendered  by  legal  aid  societies  to  the  various  charity 
organizations  we  are  concerned  not  alone  with  those  societies  which  are  depart- 
ments of  charities,  but  with  the  work  of  all  organizations  of  all  types.  Even  the  de- 
partmental bureaus  are  not  confined  in  their  service  to  the  charities  of  which  they 
are  a  part,  although  the  form  of  their  organization  tends  somewhat  to  restrict  the 
freedom  with  which  other  charities  utilize  them,  but  join  with  the  independent  or- 
ganizations in  giving  their  assistance  and  cooperation  to  all  the  charities  in  their 
respective  cities.  This  legal  work  consists  not  in  advising  the  charity  itself  in  its 
corporate  capacity  on  matters  involving  its  entity  or  its  policy,  but  in  providing 
legal  advice  and  assistance  in  those  cases  which  the  charity  has  undertaken  and 
which  present  legal  questions.  For  the  sake  of  clearness  we  may  also  exclude  the 
relatively  small  number  of  cases  in  which  the  charity  has  no  interest  except  to  refer 
them  directly  to  the  legal  aid  society.  Thus  we  are  not  concerned  with  the  case  where 
a  man  who  has  a  wage  claim  goes  to  a  charity  because  he  does  not  know  where  else 
to  go  and  is  forthwith  sent  to  the  legal  aid  office.  Such  a  case  does  not  differ  from  a 
matter  referred  by  a  newspaper,  or  a  private  person,  or  from  a  direct  application. 
It  requires  no  cooperation  and  implies  no  relationship.  The  situation,  which  it  is 
the  purpose  of  this  chapter  to  discuss,  is  that  where  a  charity  in  trying  to  work  out 
some  case  problem  presented  to  it  finds  itself  confronted  with  a  legal  question  which 
may  be  the  major  or  minor  issue  in  the  case,  but  which  must  be  answered  if  the  case 
is  to  be  properly  diagnosed  and  treated,  and  which  the  charity  worker  himself  is  not 
qualified  to  decide. 


The  charities  in  their  daily  work  with  individuals  and  families  constantly  find  sit- 
uations that  call  for  legal  advice  and  assistance.  Persons  apply  for  charitable  assist- 
Th  v  7  t  ance  when  they  are  in  trouble,  and  that  trouble  invariably  traces 
its  origin  back  to  one  or  more  of  three  causes — individual  frailty 
or  weakness,  which  is  the  rarest  cause;  social  or  economic  maladjust- 
ment, which  is  the  commonest  cause;  and  what  may  be  called  legal  maladjustment  or 

1  From  an  article  on  Cooperation  in  2  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  1,  p.  2  (January,  1904),  by  Marion  Houston,  who 
was  at  that  time  the  representative  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Council  of  Civic  Cooperation  in  New  York. 


220  I.EGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

inability  to  secure  redress  by  law,  which  is  a  very  frequent  source  of  trouble.  Illness 
is  an  example  of  the  first,  unemployment  of  the  second,  and  of  the  third  an  injured 
workman  unable  to  secure  compensation,  a  family  whose  breadwinner  pays  the  greater 
portion  of  his  wages  to  some  loan  shark,  a  deserted  wife,  or  the  mother  of  an  ille- 
gitimate child. 

It  is  the  task  of  the  trained  social  worker  not  merely  to  tide  over  any  emergency 
which  may  exist,  but,  what  is  more  important,  to  diagnose  the  case  with  a  view  to 
preventing  a  recurrence  of  the  cause  and  of  lifting  the  person  or  family  out  of  a 
subnormal  condition  to  one  of  independence  and  self-supporting  self-respect.  When 
the  difficulty  or  a  part  of  the  difficulty  appears  to  involve  law,  the  social  worker 
needs  to  be  able  to  secure  prompt,  accurate,  and  expert  advice.  The  charities  have 
from  their  origin  faced  this  difficulty  if  their  cases  were  to  be  intelligently  conducted, 
but  it  is  only  within  comparatively  recent  years  that  the  difficulty  has  become  one 
of  great  concern.  This  is  largely  the  result  of  two  factors.  First,  the  changed  con- 
ditions which  resulted  in  wholesale  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  at  once  increased 
the  number  of  cases  where  the  distress  could  be  traced  to  legal  maladjustment.  Sec- 
ond, with  the  modern  training  of  the  social  worker  the  emphasis  has  been  laid  on 
preventing  the  recurrence  of  the  trouble,  which  in  turn  has  called  for  skilled  diag- 
nosis, and  this  has  uncovered  the  existence  of  situations  calling  for  legal  action  which 
formerly  would  have  been  passed  over.  Whereas  the  charity  worker  was  formerly 
content  to  supply  material  assistance  to  a  destitute  family,  now  the  educated  social 
worker  makes  an  objective  of  finding  the  deserting  husband,  and  of  compelling 
him  to  perform  his  moral  and  legal  duty  to  support  his  family.  This  changed  point 
of  view  marks  the  development  of  charity  into  social  service  which  is  not  the  less 
sympathetic  because  it  is  the  more  intelligent. 

In  their  endeavor  to  secure  adequate  legal  advice  and  assistance,  the  charities  have 
customarily  adopted  an  expedient  which  is  called  the  volunteer  counsel  or  honorary 
counsel  plan.  They  have  placed  on  their  directorates  or  committees  one  or  more  at- 
torneys, prominent  in  the  profession,  who  were  supposed  to  hold  themselves  in  readi- 
ness to  give  instruction  on  points  of  law.  However  satisfactory  this  arrangement 
may  have  been  in  earlier  times,  it  has  proved  entirely  inadequate  under  present  con- 
ditions in  the  large  cities.  Just  as  the  private  law  offices  formerly  cared  for  poor  cli- 
ents and  did  legal  aid  work  in  their  own  offices,  and  when  the  great  demand  for  free 
legal  assistance  came  were  unable  to  cope  with  the  need,  and  because  of  the  altered 
conditions  of  law  practice  gradually  gave  up  the  legal  aid  work  altogether,  so  much 
the  same  change  has  gone  on  with  regard  to  the  work  of  honorary  counsel  for  charity 
organizations,  except  that  the  facts  were  not  as  quickly  realized  and  the  necessary 
readjustments  were  more  slowly  made. 

Three  flaws  are  clearly  apparent  in  the  volunteer  or  honorary  counsel  plan.  It  fails 
to  provide  as  prompt  or  as  much  legal  advice  as  social  workers  need.  The  lawyers  who 
are  chosen  for  the  positions  are  men  of  reputation  and  extensive  practice.  They  are 


RELATION  TO  THE  CHARITIES  221 

extremely  busy.  Workers  are  very  much  disinclined  to  bother  such  men  with  what 
may  seem  petty  questions.  They  do  not  feel  free  to  go  to  such  offices  as  often  as  may 
be  necessary  to  have  legal  doubts  in  their  cases  resolved  for  them.  When  they  do  go 
they  are  quite  likely  to  find  the  lawyer  engaged  in  conferences  or  meetings  which 
cannot  be  interrupted.  This  is  not  the  fault  of  the  individual  lawyer;  it  is  not  that 
he  attempts  to  evade  his  responsibility — nearly  every  one  has  rendered  conscientious 
service;  it  is  the  fault  of  the  conditions  which  attend  the  plan. 

In  the  second  place  the  charity  work  suffers  because  it  is  not  the  lawyer's  first 
business  to  care  for  such  cases.  Modern  offices  work  under  pressure,  and  when  a  choice 
has  to  be  made  between  the  firm's  business  and  the  charity  case,  it  is  inevitable  that 
the  former  should  obtain  precedence.  The  charity  case  is  put  by  until  a  more  favor- 
able opportunity,  or  else  it  is  turned  over  to  one  of  the  office  "cubs,"  who  has  just 
graduated  from  law  school,  to  experiment  with.  It  is  a  general  rule  that  the  cases 
presented  by  the  charities  cannot  afford  to  wait.  The  worker  presents  the  problem  in 
order  to  be  able  to  plan  the  best  possible  relief  in  the  light  of  the  legal  situation 
that  is  involved.  If  the  legal  answer  or  the  legal  action  cannot  be  had  promptly,  the 
arrangements  go  awry  and  constructive  progress  is  greatly  hindered.  For  example,  if 
the  charity  case  is  one  of  family  destitution  because  the  father  has  been  injured 
and  is  not  receiving  compensation,  the  charity  worker  needs  to  know  at  once  whether 
compensation  will  automatically  be  paid  after  two  weeks,  or  whether  a  contest  will 
be  necessary,  and  if  so,  how  long  it  will  probably  take,  or  whether  there  is  no  chance 
for  any  compensation.  Only  with  these  questions  answered  can  the  worker  form  any 
intelligent  estimate  of  the  best  course  to  pursue.  If  compensation  is  to  be  available 
shortly,  the  problem  is  only  one  of  tiding  over  an  emergency;  if  there  is  no  legal 
relief  in  sight,  then  the  injured  man  must  be  trained  in  some  lighter  sort  of  work 
and  a  position  be  found  for  him ;  if  a  contest  is  necessary,  then  a  very  delicate  bal- 
ancing of  probabilities  concerning  the  chance  of  success  and  the  time  required  has  to 
be  undertaken  with  the  lawyer's  close  cooperation. 

Finally,  the  volunteer  counsel  plan  is  not  calculated  to  procure  accurate  or  expert 
advice.  If  it  does  secure  accurate  advice,  it  is  only  in  a  most  uneconomical  way.  The 
body  of  the  law  is  now  so  vast  that  no  one  man  knows  it  all  or  can  keep  pace  with 
its  growth.  Specialization  has  necessarily  resulted,  and  the  larger  offices,  from  which 
the  honorary  counsel  are  drawn,  have  generally  specialized  along  lines  of  corpora- 
tion, banking,  business,  and  property  law.  The  legal  problems  of  the  poor  do  not 
fall  in  these  fields.  It  is  not  surprising  that  the  patent  expert  knows  nothing  about 
a  boarding-house  keeper's  lien  or  that  the  corporation  expert  knows  nothing  about 
the  criminal  procedure  to  enforce  family  support.  Many  of  the  cases  that  come  to 
the  charities  from  the  poor  are  in  the  by-ways  of  the  law  in  which  most  lawyers  are 
not  expert  and  about  which  they  know  very  little. 

To  make  this  concrete,  we  may  consider  two  typical  situations.  One  great  group 
of  charities  in  our  larger  cities  are  known  as  the  associated,  or  united,  or  federated 


222  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

charities,  or  charity  organization  societies.  In  their  cases  a  common  problem  relates 
to  the  loan  shark.  A  destitute  family  needs  help  because  the  wage-earner  pays  ten 
per  cent  per  month  interest  on  a  loan.  The  precise  question  is  whether  there  is  any 
legal  relief,  and  with  this  question  the  social  worker  goes  to  the  charity's  counsel. 
It  is  quite  likely  that  he  has  only  a  vague  knowledge  of  the  law  and  therefore  must 
needs  look  it  up.  As  this  subject  has  been  a  battle-ground  of  contention  in  the  last 
five  years,  the  statutes  represent  a  series  of  acts,  repeals,  amendments,  and  revisions, 
with  the  usual  embroidery  of  case  interpretations,  further  supplemented  in  several 
jurisdictions  by  administrative  rulings  by  loan  supervisors  or  bank  commissioners. 
In  his  search  the  lawyer  finds  his  digests  valueless,  the  statutes  a  maze,  and  perhaps 
he  overlooks  the  administrative  rulings  which  are  unknown  to  many  lawyers.  If  he 
decides  that  the  rate  of  interest  is  in  excess  of  law,  he  is  confronted  with  procedural 
doubts.  He  may  find  that  the  most  summary  procedure  is  before  an  administrative 
official,  but  the  nature  of  such  proceedings  is  not  familiar  to  him.  When  he  finally 
gets  his  result,  much  valuable  time  of  a  valuable  man  has  been  wasted.  The  attor- 
ney for  the  legal  aid  society  could  be  called  on  the  telephone,  and  in  many  instances 
would  have  the  accurate  answer  on  the  tip  of  his  tongue.  The  contrast  is  not  one  of 
personalities,  but  of  system.  The  legal  aid  attorney  is  probably  the  inferior  lawyer 
of  the  two,  but  he  has  had  several  hundred  cases  of  the  sort,  he  has  been  through  the 
procedure  often,  so  that  the  entire  law  on  this  subject  is  an  open  book  to  him. 

Our  second  great  group  of  charity  organizations  are  the  children's  agencies.  A 
common  problem  with  them  is  that  of  the  illegitimate  child.  In  planning  the  chrkTs 
future,  the  primary  considerations  are  whether  the  alleged  father  can  be  compelled 
to  provide  support  and,  if  so,  what  order  can  be  secured.  The  chances  are  that  the 
honorary  counsel  cannot  accurately  estimate  the  situation  because  in  his  entire  prac- 
tice he  may  never  have  had  a  bastardy  case.  These  matters  are  commonplaces  in  the 
legal  aid  office.  Their  attorneys  have  scores  of  such  cases,  they  have  been  through 
bitterly  contested  trials  and  know  the  pitfalls,  they  have  submitted  briefs  and  know 
the  law,  and  through  frequent  appearances  they  know  the  sort  and  kind  of  evidence 
which  judges  require  to  fix  paternity  and  make  orders  for  support. 

These  statements  rest  not  alone  on  their  intrinsic  reasonableness.  They  are  sup- 
ported by  direct  evidence  from  the  charities  themselves.1  In  connection  with  this 
study  letters  were  sent  to  the  charity  organization  societies  in  all  cities  where  there 
are  no  legal  aid  organizations,  asking  how  they  cared  for  the  legal  problems  in  their 
cases  and  if  their  arrangements  were  satisfactory.  A  few  replied  that  they  were  able 
to  use  nearby  legal  aid  societies ;  the  vast  majority  stated  that  they  used  the  volunteer 
or  honorary  counsel  plan.  As  to  the  effectiveness  of  that  arrangement,  the  opinion 
varies  according  to  the  size  of  the  cities.  Places  having  a  population2  of  less  than 

1  T7ie  First  Report  of  the  Legal  Aid  Bureau  of  the  Federated  Charities  of  Baltimore  contains  an  excellent  state- 
ment, pages  1-7. 

2  Population  figures  are  based  on  the  1910  Census  figures. 


RELATION  TO  THE  CHARITIES  223 

ten  thousand  report  that  they  have  few,  if  any,  legal  problems.  The  charity  societies 
in  cities  with  populations  ranging  up  to  forty  thousand  find  that  for  such  legal  mat- 
ters as  are  presented  the  voluntary  counsel  plan  is  generally  satisfactory.  In  the  replies 
from  charities  in  cities  with  from  forty  thousand  to  seventy  thousand  inhabitants, 
there  is  a  note  of  doubt.  The  remark  is  repeatedly  made  that  the  plan  can  be  only 
temporary  in  its  success  and  will  be  outgrown  if  work  increases.  The  charities  in 
cities  above  seventy  thousand,  with  one  exception,  report  a  need  for  a  more  definite 
method  of  caring  for  their  legal  problems.  The  one  exception  is  Denver,  where  the 
Social  Service  Bureau  is  able  to  avail  itself  of  the  services  of  an  attorney  who  was  for 
several  years  chief  attorney  for  the  Chicago  Legal  Aid  Society.  Such  an  exception 
tends  rather  to  prove  the  rule. 

§  2 

The  volunteer  counsel  plan  in  the  larger  cities  fails  to  give  the  service  which  the 

charities  ought  to  have.  There  are  two  alternative  remedies,  one  for  each  charity  to 

.  retain  and  pay  its  own  attorney,  and  the  other  for  the  charities  to 

a- j  n        utilize  the  staffs  of  the  legal  aid  organizations.  A  few  of  the  largest 

° .      .  charities,  particularly  the  Humane  Societies,  have  adopted  the  former 

°  course.  Most  of  the  charities,  however,  are  now  obtaining  their  legal 

advice  from  the  legal  aid  societies. 

The  various  legal  aid  organizations  do  a  great  amount  of  work  for  the  charities 
in  their  respective  cities.  We  have  noted  earlier  in  examining  the  sources  of  legal  aid 
work  that  a  very  substantial  number  of  cases  came  from  the  charities.  These  numbers 
refer  only  to  clients,  and  do  not  include  calls  from  social  workers  for  advice.  In  St.  Paul 
the  record  of  such  calls  which  has  been  kept  shows  that  in  1913  workers  sought  the 
legal  aid  society's  assistance  in  forty-seven  instances,  in  1914  two  hundred  and  eighty- 
seven  times,  in  1915  seven  hundred  and  seventy-six  times,  and  in  1916  nine  hundred 
and  fifty-four  times.1  This  last  figure  represents  over  three  calls  each  working  day. 
The  legal  aid  reports  contain  frequent  references  to  this  particular  phase  of  their 
work.2  Perhaps  the  most  advanced  step  has  been  taken  by  the  Children's  Aid  Society 
in  Boston,  which  has  retained  the  Legal  Aid  Society  as  its  special  counsel  and  thereby 
is  able  to  command  a  definite  amount  of  time  for  its  workers.  It  has  given  the  pro- 
position this  clear  expression:3 

"  It  is  desirable  that  our  workers  have  easy  access  to  lawyers  having  a  wide  know- 
ledge of  all  laws  affecting  our  work,  and  it  is  also  desirable  that  this  knowledge 
and  experience  be  concentrated  in  the  office  of  an  organization  such  as  the  Legal 
Aid  Society.  Our  legal  problems  are  uncommon  in  the  average  law  office. 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  107. 

2  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies, page  104;  Ibid.,  Second  Conference,  page  29; 
Ibid.,  First  Conference,  page  7;  19N.Y.L.  A.  R.  26;  8  Philadelphia  L.  A.  R.  8.  10;  6  Chicago  L.  A.  K.  6;  3  N.Y.  Legal 
Aid  Rev.  No.  2,  p.  4;  11  Ibid.  No.  1,  p.  4;  11  Ibid.  No.  3,  p.  4. 

s  Boston  Children's  Aid  Society,  Report  for  1916,  page  26. 


224  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

"  The  Legal  Aid  Society  is  also  used  as  counsel  by  many  of  the  other  social 
agencies  in  the  city.  It  is  therefore  acquiring  an  experience  in  the  handling  of 
such  work  as  to  make  it  of  unusual  help;  first  in  the  treatment  of  immediate 
legal  needs  and  second  in  the  analysis  of  defective  procedure  and  the  devising  of 
remedies." 

The  legal  aid  organizations  are  qualified  to  give  to  the  charities  accessible,  prompt, 
and  expert  legal  service.  Their  attorneys  are  always  available  for  consultation,  because 
that  is  a  part  of  their  duty.  For  a  like  reason  the  necessary  work  can  be  promptly 
performed.  Cases  brought  by  the  charities  are  a  part  of  the  work  which  it  is  the  busi- 
ness of  the  legal  aid  society  to  undertake.  Charity  cases  are  carried  through  by  a 
legal  aid  office  just  as  a  paying  client's  case  is  conducted  by  a  private  law  office.  The 
service  is  expert  because  the  legal  aid  attorneys,  through  long  and  repeated  experi- 
ence, become  specialists1  in  the  law  which  is  most  commonly  involved  in  the  cases 
of  the  poor. 

§  3 
Each  large  city  now  has  its  several  charities  dealing  with  the  various  kinds  of  prob- 
lems which  are  presented.  The  addition  of  the  legal  aid  society  completes  the  circle.2 

gi  .        The  system  of  cooperation  whereby  the  charities  bring  their  cases  to 

"  the  legal  aid  society  is  not  only  better  than  that  of  the  volunteer  coun- 

sel plan  but,  for  several  reasons,  it  is  preferable  to  having  each  organization  retain  its 
own  attorney. 

Centralization  fixes  responsibility,  avoids  duplication3  and  waste  of  effort,  and  re- 
duces cost.  The  situation  here  is  like  that  discussed  earlier,  when  it  appeared  that 
various  courts,  tribunals,  and  administrative  departments  needed  from  time  to  time 
to  refer  cases  to  attorneys.  Here  as  there,  it  seems  sounder  to  have  one  central  bureau 
to  which  all  similar  matters  may  be  referred  rather  than  a  decentralized  system  of 
one  attorney  for  each  organization  or  department.4  This  is  so  because  the  problem 
is  a  unit  and  the  cases,  from  wherever  they  are  referred,  are  of  the  same  nature. 

Cooperation  by  the  charities  operates  to  increase  the  advantages  which  the  legal 
aid  societies  of  themselves  can  give.  As  the  charities  send  in  all  their  legal  cases  to 
the  one  central  agency,  its  experienceis  automatically  increased,  its  staff  becomes  more 
expert,  and  consequently  its  service  to  the  charities  reaches  a  higher  plane  of  profi- 
ciency. Both  the  legal  aid  societies  and  the  charities  are  serving  the  same  community. 
Each  needs  the  other,  and  their  close  cooperation  brings  about  mutual  benefits.5 

The  pooling  of  all  experience  in  one  office  furthers  the  preventive  work  which 
the  legal  aid  society  can  do  by  affording  it  more  material  from  which  to  diagnose 
legal  ills  and  ascertain  their  remedies.  If  each  charity  were  to  have  its  own  attorney, 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  Fourth  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  pages  107,118, 119. 

1  24  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  17.  8  3  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  12. 

1  See  ante,  page  89.  6  15  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  2,  p.  6. 


RELATION  TO  THE  CHARITIES  225 

devoting  only  a  part  of  his  time  to  such  work,  there  would  be  a  wealth  of  material  so 
divided  up  in  a  number  of  offices  that  it  would  be  unintelligible.  Two  hundred  wage 
assignment  cases  in  one  office  afford  a  sound  basis  for  constructive  reasoning;  if  split 
up  into  twenty  offices,  the  salient  facts  appear  less  clearly  and  there  is  hardly  enough 
experience  in  any  one  place  to  afford  a  satisfactory  test  for  any  conclusions. 

While  the  legal  aid  organizations  undertake  preventive  law  work  primarily  for  the 
benefit  of  the  community  at  large,  the  charities  profit  from  all  such  work.  As  the  poor 
are  better  protected  from  extortion,  and  as  the  application  of  the  law  is  made  more 
prompt  and  certain  in  bringing  redress,  the  area  within  which  legal  maladjustment  is 
a  provocative  cause  of  distress  is  narrowed,  the  burden  of  the  charities  is  lightened, 
and  for  the  future  they  are  able  to  bring  about  more  permanent  results  in  such  of  their 
cases  as  come  within  the  added  protections  secured  by  the  legal  aid  organizations. 


Chapter  XXIV 
LEGAL  AID  AND  THE  BAR 

It  is  the  sense  of  this  Conference  that  bar  associations,  state  and 
local,  should  be  urged  to  foster  the  formation  and  efficient  adminis- 
tration of  legal  aid  societies  for  legal  relief  work  for  the  worthy  poor, 
with  the  active  and  sympathetic  cooperation  of  such  associations.1 

THERE  is  a  direct  relationship  between  legal  aid  organizations  and  the  mem- 
bers of  the  bar,  both  as  individual  attorneys  and  as  a  collective  body.  Out  of 
this  relationship  there  spring  reciprocal  obligations  to  be  observed  by  each  and  ser- 
vices to  be  rendered  to  each.  While  the  responsibilities  are  bilateral,  the  performance 
is  still  very  much  one-sided.  The  legal  aid  societies  have  recognized  their  position  and 
have  served  the  bar  to  the  limit  of  their  ability;  the  lawyers  are  only  dimly  aware 
that  they  owe  a  debt  to  legal  aid  work,  and  as  yet  they  have  not  taken  the  part  which 
may  fairly  be  expected  of  them.  Where  there  ought  to  be  the  closest  possible  alliance, 
there  is  not  a  semblance  of  ordered  and  sustained  cooperation.  It  is  profitless  to  at- 
tempt to  fix  or  apportion  the  blame  for  the  past;  but  it  is  of  high  importance  both 
to  the  cause  of  legal  aid  work  and  to  the  reputation  of  the  profession,  that  the  wholly 
unsatisfactory  nature  of  the  present  situation  be  stated  and  that  steps,  calculated  to 
improve  it,  be  suggested. 


The  services  which  legal  aid  organizations  have  rendered,  and  are  rendering,  to  the 
bar  may  be  first  considered,  as  they  are  undisputed  and  can  be  simply  explained.  Sum- 
j    . .  _     marily  stated,  the  societies  are  performing  for  the  bar  its  legal  and  moral 
°  .  responsibility  to  poor  persons  needing  legal  assistance,  by  virtue  of  their 

work  and  their  position  they  are  strengthening  the  reputation  and  pop- 
ularity of  the  profession  in  the  community,  they  are  disclosing  and  bring- 
ing to  the  proper  authorities  cases  of  abuse  and  misconduct  by  individual  attorneys, 
they  are  from  time  to  time  advising  and  assisting  individual  lawyers  on  matters  in 
which  they  have  become  specialists,  and  they  are  more  and  more  cooperating  with  the 
bar  in  its  efforts  to  better  the  administration  of  justice,  to  keep  the  profession  clean, 
and  to  secure  proper  educational  training. 

Most  of  these  points  have  already  been  considered  in  their  appropriate  connections. 
The  profession  is  admittedly  interested  in  legal  education  and  in  standards  for  ad- 
mission to  the  bar.  Many  state  bar  associations  have  special  committees  on  legal  edu- 
cation. The  Section  of  Legal  Education  of  the  American  Bar  Association  is  working 
with  the  bar  examiners  to  erect  and  maintain  suitable  standard  educational  require- 

1  From  a  resolution  unanimously  adopted  by  the  Conference  of  Delegates  of  State  and  Local  Bar  Associations  at 
their  meeting,  held  in  conjunction  with  the  American  Bar  Association,  on  September  3,  1917.  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Jour- 
nal, No.  4,  p.  592;  42  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  It.  (1917)437. 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  227 

merits  for  admission  to  the  bar.  Their  encouragement  of  the  Carnegie  Foundation's 
study  of  legal  education,  of  which  the  present  volume  is  a  part,  has  been  more  than 
generous.  One  mooted  and  perplexing  question  has  been  the  requirement  of  train- 
ing in  practice.  Here  the  legal  aid  society  steps  forward,  partakes  in  the  discussion, 
and  offers  a  tangible  solution.  It  was  through  the  legal  aid  society  that  the  articles 
on  the  legal  clinic  by  Dean  Wigmore  and  William  V.  Rowe  were  brought  to  the  atten- 
tion of  all  the  bar  associations  in  the  country.  So  far  as  its  position  warrants,  the  legal 
aid  society  is  contributing  its  thought  on  those  aspects  of  the  question  which  are 
peculiarly  within  its  knowledge,  and  it  stands  ready  to  assume  its  fair  share  of  the 
burden  in  bringing  about  the  clinical  training  of  law  students  in  its  offices. 

The  bar  is  closely  concerned  with  the  administration  of  justice  and  with  its  bet- 
terment. We  have  seen  that  the  legal  aid  societies  have  played  an  important  part  in 
the  shaping  of  the  law,1  and  that  they  have  developed  as  far  as  anybody  within  the 
profession  the  science  of  preventive  law.2  In  all  such  work  they  are  in  fact  cooper- 
ating with  the  bar  and  furthering  the  bar's  interests.  Of  less  importance  but  deserv- 
ing mention  is  the  assistance  to  individual  lawyers  in  particular  cases.  Legal  aid 
attorneys  have  become  experts  in  the  law  governing  certain  types  of  cases,  such  as 
workmen's  compensation,  separation  between  husband  and  wife,  assignments  of  wages, 
small  loans,  illegitimacy,  criminal  proceedings  to  enforce  support,  and  most  recently 
in  the  laws  concerning  men  in  military  service.  It  is  a  common  thing  for  attorneys  in 
private  practice  to  ask  for  advice  and  suggestions  when  such  a  case  is  brought  to  their 
office.  All  assistance  of  this  sort  the  societies  gladly  furnish. 

Discipline  is  a  primary  concern  of  all  bar  associations.  In  this  unpleasant  and  dif- 
ficult work  the  legal  aid  societies  have  proved  themselves  valuable  allies.  They  serve 
to  supplement  the  jurisdiction  of  the  bar  associations  by  bringing  to  light  abuses 
which  would  not  otherwise  be  known.  In  the  great  cities,  where  the  bar  is  so  large 
that  the  members  do  not  know  one  another,  where  personal  acquaintance  is  limited  to 
one's  own  circle  of  practice,  the  legal  aid  societies  deal  with  a  class  of  attorneys  who 
are  unknown  to  the  leaders  of  the  bar,  they  negotiate  with  them,  try  cases  against 
them,  and  come  into  contact  with  them  in  daily  practice,  so  that  they  are  in  a  posi- 
tion to  detect  improper  and  unlawful  conduct.  They  can  also  observe  those  collec- 
tion agencies,  dealing  in  the  smaller  claims  against  the  poorer  people,  which  carry  on 
their  business  in  a  manner  perilously  close  to  the  line  prohibiting  the  practice  of  law 
by  corporations,  and  which  secure  their  collections  in  devious  ways  including  the  use 
of  demand  notes,  forms  of  complaint,  and  summonses  that  approach  abuse  of  legal 
process.  It  must  never  be  forgotten  that  the  legal  aid  organizations  act  and  speak 
for  those  who  are  particularly  defenceless  and  who,  when  they  are  imposed  upon,  or 
cheated,  or  charged  extortionate  fees  are  completely  at  a  loss  as  to  what  they  should 
do,  and  have  no  money  to  engage  counsel  to  institute  proceedings  for  redress  in  their 

1  See  ante,  Chapter  XXI,  Legal  Aid  and  the  Law,  page  200. 

2  See  ante,  Chapter  XXII,  Legal  Aid  and  the  Community,  §  3,  page  214. 


228  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

behalf.  At  this  most  needed  point  the  legal  aid  societies  can  best  stand  as  guardian. 
They  have  won  the  confidence  of  these  poorer  classes  and  are  generally  known  to 
them.  The  societies,  very  fortunately  for  work  of  this  sort,  are  in  an  impartial  position 
which  is  respected.  They  have  no  private  interests  at  stake,  they  do  not  act  to  earn  a 
fee,  and  the  lawyer  whom  they  call  to  render  an  accounting  knows  that  they  are  acting 
only  in  accordance  with  their  duty.  Just  as  they  have  served  to  extend  the  adminis- 
tration of  justice  into  this  great  field  at  the  bottom  of  society,  so  they  have  extended 
the  watchfulness  and  discipline  of  the  bar  association.1  They  have  brought  hundreds 
of  cases  to  grievance  committees  in  all  parts  of  the  country.  They  are  in  a  position 
to  do  even  more,  and  if  accorded  a  measure  of  encouragement,  they  will  do  more. 

What  have  thus  far  been  presented  may  be  called  minor  contributions.  There 
remain  for  consideration  two  great  services  which  are  performed  by  all  legal  aid  or- 
ganizations everywhere  for  the  benefit  and  in  behalf  of  the  bar.  They  are  a  most 
powerful  influence  in  preserving  the  faith  of  the  common  people  in  the  integrity  of 
the  bar.  The  profession  as  a  whole,  particularly  its  better  members,  has  no  concep- 
tion of  the  appalling  number  of  persons  who  to-day  view  the  lawyer  with  suspicion 
and  distrust.  The  deadly  parallel  between  the  commentary  of  De  Tocqueville  on  the 
American  bar  and  that  of  Bryce,  fifty  years  later,  is  well  known.2  The  change  from 
"the  highest  political  class"  and  "the  only  enlightened  class  whom  the  people  do  not 
distrust"  to  "a  part  of  the  great  organized  system  of  industrial  and  financial  enter- 
prise" ceasing  "to  be  so  much  of  a  distinct  professional  class"  is  a  matter  of  history. 
The  change  is  summed  up  in  the  saying  that  formerly  lawyers  had  clients,  now  clients 
have  lawyers.3  Since  Bryce,  a  period  of  forty  years  has  elapsed,  during  which  the  pen- 
dulum might  have  swung  back  in  a  more  favorable  direction,  but  it  has  not.  The 
distrust  of  lawyers  to-day  is  marked,4  but  it  differs  from  the  dissatisfaction  of  earlier 
times  in  that  it  is  not  the  product  of  jealousy  or  fear  of  a  new  ruling  class,  but  pro- 
ceeds from  intelligent  criticism  founded  on  facts.  In  these  forty  years  a  generation 
has  been  born,  grown  up,  and  is  now  carrying  on  the  affairs  of  the  world  and  caus- 
ing most  of  the  cases  which  require  legal  treatment.  This  generation,  at  least  that 
part  born  in  the  lower  social  stratas,  has  apparently  been  taught  from  infancy  that 
lawyers  are  a  class  who  prey  on  the  weak,  who  profit  out  of  their  misery,  and  who 
are  so  strongly  entrenched  that  the  state  cannot  curb  them.  To  this  attitude  the  con- 
tingent fee,  the  commercialization  of  the  profession,  and  the  lowering  of  standards 
have,  in  their  results,  all  contributed.  Quite  typical  is  the  remark  of  the  applicant 
for  legal  aid  who,  on  being  told  that  the  society  could  not  accept  his  case  and  that 
he  should  go  to  some  honest  lawyer,  replied  that  he  had  never  associated  together  the 
words  "honest"  and  "lawyer."  This  man  was  not  a  tramp,  or  a  dead-beat,  or  even  a 

1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  48 ;  33  N.  Y.  L.  A.  R.  25. 

2  Brandeis:  Business — A  Profession  (1914),  pages  314-318. 

3  That  the  lawyer  has  tended  to  become  an  employee  is  noted  by  Dean  Pound  in  his  address,  Causes  of  Popular  Dis- 
satisfaction with  the  Administration  of  Justice,  in  29  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  395,  415. 

*  History  of  the  Harvard  Law  School  (1917),  page  155. 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  229 

charity  applicant.  He  had  been  a  painter  for  twenty  years  and  had  always  supported 
himself  and  his  family,  until  an  accident  disabled  him  and  forced  him  to  seek  redress 
by  law.  That  the  large  majority  of  their  clients  entertain  a  low  opinion  of  the  bar 
is  the  unanimous  testimony  of  the  legal  aid  attorneys.  They  do  not  speak  in  haste 
or  with  bitterness.  They  merely  voice  a  conclusion  forced  upon  them  by  the  thousands 
of  persons  who  annually  pass  in  and  out  of  their  offices. 

The  legal  aid  societies  strive  to  teach  their  clients  not  only  that  the  law  is  fair,  but 
that  lawyers  are  not  without  honor  and  conscience.  The  work  is  done  by  men  who  are 
themselves  lawyers,  who  hold  high  ideals  of  professional  obligation,  and  who  feel  keenly 
the  reproaches  flung  at  their  profession.  Their  work  serves  as  a  pledge  of  the  bar's 
good  faith,  and  they  gladly  give  to  the  bar  as  much  credit  as  can  truthfully  be  ascribed 
to  it.  Were  they  in  a  position  to  state  that  in  all  their  work  they  were  acting  for  the 
whole  bar,  and  performing  for  it  its  recognized  collective  responsibility  to  see  that 
no  one  was  denied  justice  because  of  inability  to  pay  fees,  they  could  implant  in  the 
minds  of  the  multitudes  who  seek  their  assistance  a  renewed  faith  in  the  integrity  of 
the  bar  in  this  country,  and  a  renewal  of  the  law-abiding  spirit.  The  legal  aid  societies 
are  undeniably  popular.  If  the  bar  were  more  closely  identified  in  the  public  mind 
with  their  work,  the  same  good  will  would  be  reflected  and  attach  to  it.  An  eminent 
lawyer  has  written  to  his  profession  concerning  the  legal  aid  society:1 

"But  we  can  do  nothing  which  will  so  surely  increase  public  confidence  in  us 
collectively  as  to  make  this  society  flourish  as  a  distinctively  legal  charity." 

The  last  and  greatest  service  which  the  legal  aid  organizations  render  is  that  in 
all  their  work  they  are  relieving  the  bar  of  a  heavy  burden  by  performing  for  the 
bar  its  legal  and  ethical  obligation  to  see  that  no  one  shall  suffer  injustice  through 
inability,  because  of  poverty,  to  obtain  needed  legal  advice  and  assistance.  Each  case 
which  a  legal  aid  organization  undertakes  puts  the  bar  in  debt  to  it,  for  in  the  con- 
duct of  that  case  it  is  doing  the  work  of  the  bar  for  the  bar.2  This  fact  discloses  the 
essence  of  the  relationship  between  legal  aid  organizations  and  the  bar.  It  is  com- 
monly expressed  in  the  narrow  language  of  providing  a  place  to  which  lawyers  may 
send  their  charity  cases,  leaving  themselves  free  to  engage  in  remunerative  work. 
This  is  but  a  small  aspect  of  the  situation ;  it  fails  to  include  the  thousands  of  per- 
sons who  never  apply  to  private  offices,  knowing  that  they  cannot  pay  the  expected 
fees,  and  yet  who  need  counsel  and  representation  if  they  are  to  secure  justice.  With 
all  these  persons  the  members  of  the  bar  are  concerned.  As  individuals  and  collec- 
tively as  a  profession,  they  are  under  obligation  to  give  or  provide  them  the  necessary 
legal  assistance.  To-day  the  bar  performs  its  obligation  vicariously  through  the  legal 

1  Holls:  The  Legal  Aid  Society,  8  Charities  Review  (1898),  21.  Cf.  2  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review.  No.  4,  p.  2.  It  is  inter- 
esting to  note  that  the  same  thing  has  been  said  to  the  English  bar,  48  Law  Journal  (1913),  180. 

2  Cf.  8  Chicago  L.  A.  R.  9 ;  7  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  11.  By  far  the  best  presentation  of  this  fact  is  contained  in  a  letter 
under  date  of  Decembers,  1916,  from  George  S.  Hornblowerof  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society  to  Bronson  Winthrop, 
chairman  of  a  special  committee  of  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association  appointed  to  investigate  the  Legal  Aid 
Society. 


230  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

aid  organizations.  It  is  proper  that  it  should  be  done  in  this  organized  way  which 
secures  economy  and  efficiency,1  but  it  does  not  make  an  end  of  the  responsibility 
resting  on  the  bar.  The  very  fact  that  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  thus  doing  the 
bar's  work  places  the  bar  under  obligation  to  supervise  and  provide  leadership  for  the 
legal  aid  work  and  to  supply  the  necessary  financial  and  moral  support.  These  are 
the  services  which  lawyers  should  render  to  legal  aid  work.  The  legal  aid  organiza- 
tions are  entitled  to  look  to  the  bar  for  this  leadership  and  support.  Such  assistance 
is  accorded  in  scanty  measure  because  the  bar  in  general  does  not  see  the  situation 
in  this  light,  and  apparently  does  not  admit  the  premise  that  there  rests  on  every 
lawyer  a  definite  duty  toward  the  poor  litigant. 


With  this  present  prevailing  opinion  it  is  impossible  to  bring  home  the  obligation 

of  the  bar  to  legal  aid  organizations  without  first  making  clear  the  lawyer's  duty 

,      to  the  poor  litigant.  It  is  the  general  rule  that  each  attorney,  on  his 

.  "  admission  as  a  minister  of  justice  and  agent  of  the  court,  becomes 

Obligation  to  ,  .     ,  .  .     «_        .,  ,  ,  xj 

te  subject  to  assignments  from  the  court  to  represent  needy  persons 

without  charge  or  for  any  fee  they  may  be  able  to  pay.  The  theory 
of  this  obligation  is  not  peculiar  to  our  law;  it  is  a  characteristic  of  the  lawyer's  po- 
sition in  all  civilized  communities,  and  there  is  evidence  that  it  has  been  recognized 
from  the  earliest  times.2  In  criminal  cases  the  legal  nature  of  the  obligation  is  clear 
because  it  is  enforced.  No  statute  is  necessary  to  give  the  court  this  right  to  call 
upon  the  bar,  its  power  is  inherent,  and  statutes  only  declare  it.3  In  civil  cases,  as 
we  have  already  seen,4  the  power  has  fallen  into  such  disuse  that  its  existence  is  for- 
gotten or  denied.  Because  it  is  not  employed  there  is  an  absence  of  authorities 
squarely  on  the  point,  but  in  a  number  of  decisions  the  language  shows  unmistak- 
ably the  court's  opinion  of  the  rule  of  law.5  The  reason  for  the  rule  is  precisely  the 
same  in  civil  as  in  criminal  cases,6  and  the  court  has  the  same  inherent  power  to 
command  the  services  of  counsel  in  aid  of  persons  unable  to  pay.7  There  are  statutes 
expressly  conferring  this  power  in  civil  matters  on  certain  courts  in  certain  cases  in 
Illinois,  Indiana,  Missouri,  New  Jersey,  New  York,  and  Tennessee;  and  Congress  by 

1  Cf.  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal  (October,  1917),  589. 

2  Brunner:  Early  History  of  the  Attorney,  3  Illinois  L.  Rev.  257. 

3  Presby  w.  Klickitat  County,  5  Wash.  329,  332;  6  Corpus  Juris,  727. 

4  See  ante.  Chapter  XIV,  §  1,  page  100. 

6  House  v.  Whitis,  5  Baxt.  (Tenn.)  690,  692;  Matter  of  Kelly,  12  Daly  (N.  Y.),  110;  Harris  v.  Mutual  Life  Ins.  Co.  13 
N.  Y.  Supp.  718;  Todd  v.  Todd,  9  N.  J.  L.  J.  342 ;  Kern  v.  State,  35  Ind.  288;  see  the  text  statements  in  16  Encyc.  of 
Pleading  and  Practice,  690,  and  3  Am.  &  Eng.  Encyc.  of  Law,  417,  419. 

6  Cf.  Goldman:  Public  Defender  (1917),  page  18. 

7  This  opinion  is  confirmed  by  George  P.  Costigan,  Jr.,  Professor  at  the  Northwestern  University  Law  School,  who 
has  just  completed  an  exhaustive  study  of  cases  bearing  on  the  lawyer's  duty  in  all  its  aspects  in  connection  with 
his  source-book  entitled  "Cases  and  Other  Authorities  on  Legal  Ethics"  (1917).  Professor  Costigan,  in  response  to 
an  enquiry,  states:  "  It  seems  to  me  clear  that  there  is  a  duty  on  every  lawyeras  an  officer  of  the  court  to  accept  an 
appointment  by  the  court  to  represent  poor  clients  in  civil  as  well  as  in  criminal  cases." 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  231 

Act  of  July  20,  1892,  in  dealing  with  the  in  forma  pauperis  proceedings,  authorized 
the  assignment  of  counsel  in  the  federal  courts.1  The  assignment  of  attorneys  to  act 
as  divorce  proctors  is  a  further  illustration  of  the  same  power.2  Under  the  provision 
of  the  Soldiers'  and  Sailors'  Civil  Relief  Act  every  court  in  the  land  is  empowered  in 
all  cases  and  required  in  certain  cases  to  assign  counsel  to  act  in  behalf  of  men  absent 
in  military  service.3 

That  the  attorney,  because  of  the  nature  of  his  office,  is  under  legal  obligation  to 
assist  needy  suitors  finds  confirmation  in  the  laws  and  customs  of  other  countries. 
In  France,  the  obligation  of  service  was  early  enunciated  by  a  royal  edict  which  said 
of  the  attorney,  "  He  was  not,  under  pain  of  being  disbarred,  to  refuse  his  services 
to  the  indigent  and  oppressed."  4  The  obligation  is  still  recognized,5  and  on  it  is  based 
the  French  system  of  securing  legal  assistance  to  the  poor  known  as  "l'assistance 
judiciaire." 6  In  Spain,  the  attorneys  on  admission  swear  "to  take  charge  of  cases  com- 
mitted to  them  by  the  courts  at  the  instance  of  litigants  who  could  not  find  a  law- 
yer; to  defend  gratuitously  poor  clients  where  there  were  no  lawyers  paid  for  that 
purpose.117  Likewise  in  Italy,  lawyers  must  give  gratuitous  service  to  the  poor.8  The 
German  system  known  as  "  the  privilege  of  the  poor,"  which  is  analogous  to  the  French 
judicial  assistance  and  to  our  in  forma  pauperis,  permits  citizens  in  cases  of  exigency 
to  demand  from  the  government  the  services  of  a  lawyer.9  The  two  Scottish  bar  asso- 
ciations undertake  each  year  to  furnish  solicitors  and  advocates,  who  are  then  assigned 
by  the  court  in  cases  of  indigent  suitors. 

In  England  the  assignment  system  has  for  years  been  as  little  used  in  civil  cases 
as  in  the  United  States.  Concerning  the  common  law,  Chief  Justice  Hale  is  credited 
with  the  statement  that  if  the  court  assigned  a  Serjeant  to  be  counsel  and  he  refused 
to  act,  the  court  would  make  bold  to  commit  him  to  prison.10  During  the  last  half 
century  the  English  administration  of  justice  failed  as  completely  as  that  in  the 
United  States  to  secure  equality  and  to  provide  for  the  cases  of  the  poor.  The  fail- 
ure was  in  many  ways  more  serious  because  no  organized  legal  aid  movement  devel- 
oped to  ameliorate  this  condition  as  it  did  in  America.  In  1913,  however,  the  Supreme 
Court  of  Judicature  issued  rules  providing  a  comprehensive  plan  for  securing  to  the 
poor  their  day  in  that  court  with  adequate  representation.  The  power  of  assignment 


1  Whelan  v.  Manhattan  Ry.  Co.  86  Fed.  219.  2  This  has  been  stated  ante  in  Chapter  XIV,  §  2,  page  102. 

3  Public  Act  No.  103  of  the  65th  Congress,  §§  200  et  seq. 

4  Carter:  Ethics  of  the  Legal  Profession  (1915),  page  26. 

6  Fuller:  The  French  Bar,  an  address  delivered  before  the  New  York  City  Bar  Association,  and  later  published  in 
23  Yale  Law  Journal  (December,  1913),  113,  120. 

c  See  post,  Chapter  XXV,  §  8,  page  246.  Cf.  Parry:  The  Law  and  the  Poor,  page  147  ;  105  Contemporary  Review,  562; 
Speech  of  M.  Bruwaert,  French  Consul-General  in  New  York,  at  the  Legal  Aid  Society  Banquet,  Report  of  Speeches 
at  Twenty-fifth  Anniversary  Dinner  of  the  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  page  28:  Thery:  French  Legal  Assistance 
for  the  Poor,  1  International  Law  Notes  (January,  1916),  No.  1,  p.  12. 

7  Manuel  Rodriguez-Serra:  Admission  of  Attorneys  from  Vie  Spanish  Standpoint,  35  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  842 ;  Cohen: 
The  Law — Business  or  Profession  ?  (1916),  page  61. 

8  Cohen:  Ibid.,  page  64.  9  7  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  3,  p.  17. 
10  3  Campbell's  Lives  of  the  Chief  Justices,  20. 


232  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

was  revived.  Because  of  the  similarity  in  legal  institutions,  English  precedents  carry 
more  weight  with  us  than  those  of  any  other  country,  and  for  that  reason  the  court's 
declaration  of  the  attorney's  duty  is  significant.  No  act  of  Parliament  gave  to  the 
courts  the  control  which  they  purpose  to  exercise.  The  High  Court  rightly  considered 
that  it  had  ample  inherent  power.  The  rules  provide  for  the  formation  of  lists  of 
solicitors  and  barristers  who  volunteer  their  services  and  then  continue:1 

"Rule  26 And  the  Court  or  Judge  or  proper  officer  shall  assign  to  the  appli- 
cant a  solicitor  and  a  counsel  (whether  named  in  the  list  kept  pursuant  to  Rule  23 
(2)  or  not),  to  assist  him  in  the  conduct  of  the  proceedings.  .  .  . 

"27.  A  solicitor  or  counsel  assigned  under  Rule  26,  shall  not  be  at  liberty  to 
refuse  his  assistance  unless  he  satisfies  the  proper  officer  or  the  Court  or  a  Judge 
that  he  has  some  good  ground  for  refusing." 

This  obligation  owed  by  every  lawyer  to  the  poor,  which  is  stated  with  reasonable 
clearness  in  the  American  cases,  and  which  is  undisputed  in  other  systems  of  law, 
finds  unmistakable  support  in  the  accepted  standards  of  ethics.  In  other  words,  this 
duty  is  in  part  a  legal  obligation  because  the  lawyer  is  a  minister  of  justice,  and  in 
part  an  ethical  responsibility  because  of  his  membership  in  a  profession.  In  matters 
of  this  sort  accepted  canons  of  ethics  are  entitled  to  as  much  weight  as  decisions  in 
adjudicated  cases  and  most  attorneys  so  regard  them.2 

When  the  adoption  of  the  present  canons  of  ethics  of  the  American  Bar  Associ- 
ation was  under  discussion,  Mr.  Justice  Brewer  pointed  out  that  the  most  important 
part  was  the  Oath  of  Admission,  which  included  within  itself  the  final  statement  of 
the  lawyer's  duty.3  Of  this  Oath  it  is  said  in  Part  III  of  the  Canons  as  adopted,4  "The 
general  principles  which  should  ever  control  the  lawyer  in  the  practice  of  his  profession 
are  clearly  set  forth  in  the  following  Oath  of  Admission  to  the  Bar,  formulated  upon 
that  in  use  in  the  State  of  Washington,  and  which  conforms  in  its  main  outlines 
to  the  duties  of  lawyers  as  defined  by  statutory  enactments  in  that  and  many  other 
states  of  the  Union — duties  which  they  are  sworn  on  admission  to  obey  and  for  the 
wilful  violation  of  which  disbarment  is  provided."  The  final  clause  of  this  Oath  is:5 

"I  will  never  reject  from  any  consideration  personal  to  myself  the  cause  of  the 
defenceless  or  the  oppressed,  or  delay  any  man's  cause  for  lucre  or  malice.  So  help 
me  God." 

In  these  time-honored  words  the  obligation  of  service  is  imposed.6  Here  there  is 
no  distinction  between  the  duty  in  civil  and  criminal  cases.  This  broad  declaration 
is  supported  by  similar  statements  in  all  treatises  on  ethics.  The  first  code  of  ethics 
in  America  was  probably  that  drawn  up  by  David  Hoffman  early  in  the  nineteenth 

1  These  rules  are  contained  in  the  1914  Rule  Book.  They  are  Order  16,  IV,  Proceedings  by  and  against  Poor  Persons. 

2  Cf.  statement  of  the  Missouri  Bar  Association  concerning  the  canons  of  ethics  adopted  by  the  American  Bar  As- 
sociation, 39  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  (1914)  562. 

3  See  31  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  R.  62;  33  Ibid.  570.  *  S3  Ibid.  584.  B  33  Ibid.  685. 

e  The  lawyer's  oath  in  the  Canton  of  Geneva,  which  has  been  in  force  for  years,  reads:  "I  swear  before  God  not  to 
reject,  for  any  consideration  personal  to  myself,  the  cause  of  the  weak,  the  stranger,  or  the  oppressed." 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  233 

century.  As  he  expressed  it  in  his  eighteenth  canon:1  "I  shall  never  close  my  ear  or 
heart  because  my  clients'  means  are  low.  Those  who  have  none,  and  who  have  just 
causes,  are,  of  all  others,  the  best  entitled  to  sue  or  be  defended;  and  they  shall  receive 
a  due  portion  of  my  services,  cheerfully  given.11  Sharswood  in  the  course  of  his  cele- 
brated lectures  on  ethics  referred  to  this  duty  in  several  connections.  Of  the  bar  in 
general  he  said:2  "It  is  indeed  the  noblest  faculty  of  the  profession  to  counsel  the 
ignorant,  defend  the  weak  and  oppressed,  and  to  stand  forth  on  all  occasions  as  the 
bulwark  of  private  rights  against  the  assaults  of  power."  And  of  the  lawyer  he  said:3 
"There  are  many  cases,  in  which  it  will  be  his  duty,  perhaps  more  properly  his  privi- 
lege, to  work  for  nothing.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  the  time  will  never  come,  at  this 
or  any  other  Bar  in  this  country,  when  a  poor  man  with  an  honest  cause,  though 
without  a  fee,  cannot  obtain  the  services  of  honest  counsel,  in  the  prosecution  or  de- 
fence of  his  rights."  The  Hon.  Charles  E.  Hughes,  formerly  a  justice  of  the  Supreme 
Court  of  the  United  States,  has  said :  "  To  take  from  the  poor  man  a  part  of  the  bur- 
den which  necessarily  falls  on  him  because  of  his  poverty  and  see  to  it  that  he  obtains 
in  every  proper  case  his  legal  rights  has  always  seemed  to  me  to  be  a  part  of  the  duty 
of  the  lawyer.114 

By  well-settled  principles  of  professional  ethics  and  by  the  voice  of  authority,  so 
far  as  the  courts  have  been  called  upon  to  express  their  judgment,  the  attorney  is 
called  upon  to  render  services  to  the  needy.  This  he  has  not  done.  The  legal  aid  soci- 
ety has  done  it  for  him.  The  attorney  for  the  Pittsburgh  Legal  Aid  Society  appeared 
as  counsel  for  a  woman,  the  prosecuting  witness  in  a  criminal  case,  only  a  few  years 
ago.  The  attorney  for  the  defendant  in  his  address  to  the  jury  remarked  that  the 
legal  aid  appearance  was  unwarranted  and  that  the  entire  county  bar  stood  ready  to 
assist  such  a  needy  woman.  The  facts  were  that  the  woman  had  consulted  several  mem- 
bers of  that  bar,  who  had  relieved  her  of  what  little  money  she  had  without  doing 
anything  for  her,  and  only  then  did  she  seek  the  help  of  the  legal  aid  organization.5 
As  a  fact  of  general  application  it  is  not  true  that  the  members  of  the  bar  despoil 
the  poor — some  of  them  do,  but  they  are  a  small  minority;  yet  it  is  the  fact  that 
the  bar  as  a  whole  has  done  almost  nothing  to  assist  the  poor  in  securing  that  justice 
which  our  institutions  profess  to  guarantee  them.  With  the  existence  of  organized 
legal  aid  work,  blame  does  not  attach  to  the  bar  for  allowing  such  organizations  to 
undertake  the  cases  of  the  poor.  This  method  of  meeting  the  need  is  in  every  way 
desirable.  But  having  permitted  the  legal  aid  societies  to  perform  for  them  for  their 
own  professional  obligation,  censure  justly  attaches  to  the  members  of  the  bar  for 
having  failed  to  give  something  of  their  earnings  for  the  support  and  something  of 
their  time  for  the  leadership  of  this  legal  aid  work. 

1  2  Am.  Law  School  Rev.  230,  232. 

2  Sharswood :  Professional  Ethics  (fifth  edition,  1884),  page  63.  3  Ibid.,  page  151. 
4  16  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Review,  No.  1,  p.  1. 

6  2  Pittsburgh  L.  A.  R.  18. 


234  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

§  3 

By  virtue  of  the  position  and  work  of  the  legal  aid  organizations  in  the  community 

the  obligation  of  the  bar  to  the  poor  may  be  said  to  have  been  hypothecated  to  the 

e      •         ^     legal  aid  organizations.  They  having  performed  and  being  equipped  to 

D  better  perform  the  bar's  responsibility  to  the  weak  and  oppressed,  the 

bar  should  feel  that  it  is  incumbent  on  it  to  render  to  the  legal  aid  soci- 

°  ,  eties  the  services  of  which  they  stand  in  need. 

tVoTK  .  . 

The  legal  aid  societies  need  leadership,  moral  support,  and  financial 
support.  These  three  things  go  together  and  are  of  one  piece.  They  are  essential  to 
the  well-being  of  every  legal  aid  organization.  One  fact  which  very  forcibly  strikes 
the  observer  of  the  work  in  different  cities  is  that  legal  aid  success  or  failui'e  goes 
hand  in  hand  with  good  or  bad  support  from  the  bar.  Given  the  amount  of  interest 
and  cooperation  accorded  by  the  local  bar,  the  strength  of  the  legal  aid  work  can  be 
accurately  estimated  and  foretold.  No  society  can  flourish  in  the  face  of  hostility,  or 
suspicion,  or  indifference  from  the  attorneys  of  the  city.  In  this  situation  there  is  no 
middle  ground;  those  who  are  not  with  the  work  are  necessarily  against  it.  To  know 
nothing  about  legal  aid  work,  to  care  nothing  about  it,  and  to  do  nothing  for  it  is 
to  doom  it  as  effectively  as  by  open  opposition. 

The  vast  portion  of  the  bar  has  been  in  this  middle  position.  They  have  paid  little 
attention  to  the  work  and  its  needs.  One  could  read  the  proceedings  of  ninety-five 
per  cent  of  the  various  bar  associations  without  finding  a  mention  of  legal  aid  work 
in  their  discussions.  The  assumption  would  be  warranted  that  the  bar  had  no  interest 
in  or  concern  for  this  great  attempt  to  equalize  the  administration  of  justice.  In  Sep- 
tember, 1917,  something  about  legal  aid  work  was  made  known  at  the  Conference  of 
Delegates  of  State  and  Local  Bar  Associations,  held  in  conjunction  with  the  American 
Bar  Association.  For  the  first  time  in  forty  years  legal  aid  work,  which  is  national 
in  scope,  was  given  consideration  by  a  national  gathering  of  lawyers.  The  resolution, 
proposed  by  Charles  A.  Boston  of  the  New  York  Bar  and  unanimously  passed  by  the 
delegates,  which  has  been  quoted  as  the  keynote  of  this  chapter,  expresses  the  duty 
which  the  bar  owes.  Judged  by  the  standard  there  set,  the  bar  as  a  whole  must  be  held 
to  have  defaulted  on  its  obligation. 

The  blame  in  part  attaches  to  the  legal  aid  societies  themselves.  Knowing  the  con- 
servatism of  the  bar  and  its  occupation  in  other  worthy  lines  of  endeavor,  the  soci- 
eties have  failed  to  present  their  case  and  to  force  the  issue.  Having  failed  to  estab- 
lish a  central  agency  of  their  own,  they  have  had  no  spokesman  for  their  cause  in 
the  general  meetings  of  the  bar.  What  should  be  made  clear  is  that  the  legal  aid 
organizations  represent  one  of  the  great  legal  reform  movements  of  the  times.  It 
ranks  with  the  movements  for  reorganization  of  courts  and  for  simplification  of  pro- 
cedure. It  needs  the  same  study  and  requires  the  same  support.  There  might  well  be 
a  section  of  the  American  Bar  Association  on  legal  aid  or,  better  still,  on  the  equal- 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  235 

ization  of  the  administration  of  justice,  so  that  all  the  remedial  agencies  making  for 
that  end  might  be  included.  Were  legal  aid  given  the  dignity  and  support  which 
would  attach  from  such  consideration,  their  work  would  receive  an  enormous  impetus. 
Aided  by  such  prestige,  they  could  more  successfully  consider  with  the  local  associa- 
tions how  the  bonds  between  the  two  could  be  strengthened  and  the  work  of  bringing 
justice  to  the  poor  be  advanced. 

The  legal  aid  organizations  need  the  best  leadership  which  can  be  obtained.  For  the 
greater  part  of  this  guidance  they  rightly  and  necessarily  turn  to  the  bar.  If  their 
undertaking  were  a  thing  apart,  they  might  be  left  to  work  out  their  own  salvation  or 
fail,  as  the  case  might  be,  but  it  is  not.  They  are  dealing  with  one  of  the  most  vex- 
ing problems  in  the  law,  and  one  which  is  immediately  related  to  the  entire  admin- 
istration of  justice.  The  other  reforms  which  are  receiving  the  bar's  attention  aim  to 
better  our  justice;  this  is  concerned  with  bringing  about  justice  where  there  has  been 
none.  If  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  to  grow  and  develop  along  sound  lines,  if 
they  are  to  attain  their  end  completely  and  expeditiously,  they  require  the  highest 
wisdom  in  their  supervision  and  control.  As  most  of  the  issues  which  arise  are  legal  in 
nature,  they  need  for  leaders  men  of  legal  training,  with  a  thorough  knowledge  of 
existing  defects  in  the  administration  of  justice  and  of  large  vision  as  to  how  those 
difficulties  may  best  be  overcome.  The  actual  case  work  can  be  left  to  the  staffs  of 
attorneys,  but  the  matters  of  policy  involved  call  for  riper  experience  and  more 
mature  judgment. 

Legal  aid  work  in  its  present  state  of  development  gives  rise  to  a  host  of  questions, 
some  of  which  have  been  answered  wrongly,  many  of  which  are  still  disputed  and 
unsolved.  What  is  the  line  of  legal  aid  jurisdiction,  so  that  it  may  perform  the  service 
for  which  it  exists  and  yet  refrain  from  competition  with  the  bar?  Should  divorce, 
criminal,  bankruptcy,  or  personal  injury  cases  be  refused?  Should  fees  be  charged 
and,  if  so,  to  what  extent  and  under  what  method?  How  far  should  the  societies 
themselves  pay  court  costs  where  clients  are  destitute  and  their  cases  pressing?  What 
legislation  should  be  advocated?  Should  the  societies  advertise  in  order  that  the  thou- 
sands who  may  need  their  assistance  may  know  of  their  existence?  Are  they  warranted 
in  exerting  their  influence  in  the  election  or  appointment  of  officials  to  positions 
which  are  of  great  importance  in  their  work,  such  as  marshals,  members  of  industrial 
accident  commissions,  and  judges  of  the  lower  courts? 

In  the  future  development  of  the  work  more  intricate  questions,  involving  rela- 
tionships with  other  bodies  and  fundamental  matters  of  policy,  are  bound  to  arise. 
They  are  now  on  the  horizon,  if  indeed  they  are  not  already  here.  Should  the  socie- 
ties ally  themselves  with  the  law  schools  to  establish  the  legal  clinic  and  how  may 
that  be  done?  Ought  they  to  try  to  incorporate  within  themselves  the  existing  public 
defender  offices  and  to  establish  criminal  departments  where  no  one  is  doing  that 
work?  How  far  should  the  organizations  urge  conciliation  and  arbitration  as  methods 
of  settling  disputes  superior  to  those  now  employed?  Is  it  desirable  that  they  follow 


236  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

the  ideas  presented  by  the  Labor  Secretariat  and  the  Ford  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  and 
undertake  to  do  certain  types  of  legal  work  for  labor  unions  and  employers?  To  what 
extent  must  the  local  societies  surrender  their  control  and  become  merged  in  one 
federal  or  central  organization?  How  far  is  the  small  claims  court  a  better  method 
of  securing  justice  in  thousands  of  the  cases  which  the  legal  aid  organizations  now 
care  for  themselves,  and  may  they  not  best  promote  their  own  interests  by  urging  the 
creation  of  such  courts?  Perhaps  the  supreme  question  of  all  is,  Should  the  societies 
plan  ultimately  to  become  governmental  agencies,  as  state  controlled  bureaus  or  as 
a  department  of  the  administration  of  justice? 

It  requires  no  intimate  knowledge  of  legal  aid  work  to  appreciate  that  the  wise 
settlement  of  such  issues  can  be  had  only  if  the  best  intelligence  is  directed  to  them. 
Increasingly  the  bar  must  supply  some  of  its  best  members  for  the  positions  of  lead- 
ership or  the  whole  movement  will  fail  of  its  high  purpose  and  possibilities.  Only 
by  steady,  persistent,  and  intelligent  guidance  of  the  highest  order  will  the  work  be 
reduced  to  a  science,  its  proper  place  in  our  legal  institutions  be  secured,  and  its 
development  into  a  comprehensive  national  agency  for  the  equalization  of  the  admin- 
istration of  justice  be  obtained.  If  the  bar  is  unable  or  unwilling  to  grant  this  lead- 
ership, the  legal  aid  movement  will  retrogress,  decay,  and  fall  into  disrepute.  What 
is  to-day  our  fairest  hope  as  the  solution  for  the  existing  denial  of  justice  will  be  lost. 

There  are  ample  indications  that  lack  or  laxity  of  proper  control  by  the  bar  will 
bring  on  these  results.  In  Bridgeport  inattention  and  indifference  permitted  an  attor- 
ney to  take  over  the  legal  aid  work,  to  use  it  as  a  means  of  self-advertisement,  and 
so  to  conduct  its  affairs  that  he  was  later  questioned  about  the  expenditure  of  trust 
funds  and  left  the  city.  Shortly  thereafter  Bridgeport  became  a  centre  of  munitions 
manufacturing  and  grew  into  a  vast  industrial  city.  It  needs  legal  aid  work  badly 
and  it  has  none.  The  task  of  establishing  it  is  now  rendered  doubly  difficult,  and  it 
will  be  obliged  to  encounter  an  atmosphere  of  distrust  not  only  from  lawyers  but 
from  those  whom  it  will  seek  to  help.  The  Newark  organization,  though  to-day  doing 
a  fine  work,  has  labored  under  a  heavy  handicap  owing  to  a  prejudice  against  it 
resulting  from  a  course  of  conduct  by  an  earlier  attorney  which  would  have  been 
impossible  under  decent  supervision.  For  a  number  of  years  before  the  present  Soci- 
ety was  established  in  San  Francisco,  the  local  bar  permitted  an  attorney  to  hold 
himself  out  as  a  legal  aid  society  for  purposes  of  private  gain.  In  New  Orleans,  and 
even  more  strikingly  in  Detroit,  as  we  have  already  seen,  bar  associations  have  paid 
so  little  attention  to  the  work  that  it  has  been  unable  to  advance  and  remains  wholly 
inadequate  to  cope  with  the  need  of  the  poor  for  legal  assistance  in  those  cities. 

About  a  third  of  the  societies  have  boards  of  directors,  consisting  mainly  of 
lawyers,  who  have  rendered  admirable  and  faithful  service.  These  are  the  organiza- 
tions which  have  gone  steadily  ahead,  which  have  been  brought  up  to  a  high  state 
of  efficiency,  and  which  lead  in  the  development  of  legal  aid  work  throughout  the 
country.  Satisfactory  as  this  present  leadership  is,  there  is  no  guarantee  of  its  continu- 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  237 

ance.  When  these  men  die  or  resign  there  is  no  reasonable  certainty  that  worthy  suc- 
cessors can  be  found.  Collectively  the  bar  is  perpetual,  and  in  its  associations  it  has 
continued  an  uninterrupted  existence.  Were  the  bar  associations  to  have  active  super- 
visory committees  on  legal  aid  work,  an  element  of  permanence  could  be  secured.1 
It  would  be  a  task  of  such  a  committee  to  instill  into  the  minds  of  all  lawyers  a  more 
lively  interest  in  the  work,  and  it  could  be  called  upon  to  find  in  the  profession  and 
to  draft  for  positions  of  leadership  as  the  need  arose  the  best  qualified  men  in  its 
membership.  Such  a  supervision  was  contemplated  by  the  resolution  of  the  Confer- 
ence of  the  Delegates  of  State  and  Local  Bar  Associations.  In  all  probability  it  will 
first  be  acted  upon  in  New  York,  where  the  Legal  Aid  Society  has  requested  and 
the  Association  of  the  Bar  of  the  City  of  New  York  has  appointed  a  special  com- 
mitttee  to  enquire  into  the  needs  of  legal  aid  work. 


§  4 
The  legal  aid  organizations  should  find  their  chief  financial  resource  in  the  member- 
ship of  the  bar.2  They  ought  not  to  be  compelled  to  solicit  contributions  from  the 
.  ,      general  public  until  they  can  truthfully  state  to  that  public  that  the  bar 
has  done  its  appropriate  share.  It  is  common  knowledge  that  the  bar  as 
"j  a  profession  is  not  considered  charitable.  The  contrast  with  the  med- 

ical profession  is  frequently  drawn.  It  is  asserted  with  much  truth  that 
the  great  surgeon,  giving  a  part  of  every  day  to  visitations  in  the  hospitals,  and 
performing  the  most  serious  operations  for  the  poor  without  charge,  has  no  coun- 
terpart among  lawyers.  Until  the  legal  aid  society  became  established  there  was  an 
unfairness  in  the  criticism  because  there  was  no  way  in  which  the  average  lawyer 
could  render  this  public  service.  The  poor  clients  never  came  to  his  office  and  there  was 
no  place  where  he  could  find  them.  As  law  is  practised,  it  would  be  well-nigh  impos- 
sible for  a  lawyer  to  set  aside  an  hour  or  two  a  day  for  charity  cases.  Even  if  he  could, 
its  desirability  would  be  doubtful,  for  it  involves  an  unnecessary  loss  of  time  and 
waste  of  efficiency.  The  bar  can  most  effectively  render  its  charitable  service  in  cooper- 
ation with  the  legal  aid  societies  by  enabling  them  to  become  powerful,  well-equipped, 
and  well-manned  organizations. 

The  appeal  of  the  legal  aid  societies  to  the  bar  rests  not  only  on  this  charity  basis, 
but  may  also  properly  be  put  on  a  basis  of  services  rendered.  It  is  the  fact  that  the 
organizations  are  performing  for  the  bar  its  duty  to  the  poor.  To  do  this  they  are 
spending  money,  and  by  their  work  they  are  leaving  the  lawyers  free  to  devote  them- 
selves to  the  cases  of  paying  clients.  If  the  members  of  the  bar  are  to  have  the  legal 
aid  organizations  perform  a  duty  which  by  law  and  ethics  is  primarily  their  own  obli- 
gation, then  they  may  fairly  be  called  upon  to  meet  the  expenses  necessarily  incurred 
by  the  societies  in  doing  that  work. 

1  Cf.  Holls:  The  Legal  Aid  Society,  8  Charities  Rev.  (1898)  15,  21.  2 11  N.  Y.  Legal  Aid  Rev.  No.  3,  p.  2. 


238 


LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 


Such  financial  support  the  bar  has  not  given.  The  growth  of  legal  aid  work  has  been 
made  possible  by  laymen  and  not  lawyers.  That  the  societies  have  found  it  less  diffi- 
cult to  interest  and  to  get  subscriptions  from  the  public  than  from  the  bar  indicates 
a  condition  which  is  not  healthy,  and  which  is  discreditable  to  lawyers  in  general. 
Precisely  what  the  bar  has  done  may  be  seen  by  examining  the  income  figures  of  some 
of  the  larger  legal  aid  societies  for  the  year  1916.  In  the  following  table  the  subscrib- 
ers and  subscriptions  are  divided  as  between  laymen  and  lawyers,  and  it  appears  that 
six  societies  in  the  largest  cities  of  the  country,  with  an  aggregate  income  of  sixty 
thousand  dollars,  received  only  twenty  thousand  dollars  from  lawyers. 


City 

Total  Subscriptions 

No. 

Amount 

Boston 

249 

$5,789.00 

Buffalo 

157 

1,524.00 

Chicago 

520* 

14,870.25 

Newark 

167 

1,513.00 

New  York 

913 

32,803.05 

Philadelphia 

432 

3,156.00 

From  Laymen 


No. 
122 
106 
446 

86 
489 
387 


Amount 
$2,434.00 
974.00 
10,683.25 

1,133.50 
21,537.05 

2,835.00 


No. 

127 

51 

74 

81 

424 

45 


From  Lawyers 


Amount 

$3,355.00 

550.00 

4,187.00 

379.50 

11,266.00 

321.00 


The  proportionate  part  of  the  expense  borne  by  the  bar  appears  from  the  following 
table,  which  gives  the  percentage  of  the  society's  total  membership  who  are  lawyers, 
and  the  percentage  of  the  total  income  given  by  lawyers. 


Percentage  Borne  by  Lawyers 
in  Number  in  Amount 


City 

Boston 

Buffalo 

Chicago 

Newark 

New  York 

Philadelphia 

These  figures  show  what  a  limited  number  of  attorneys  have  done.  What  the  bar 
as  a  whole  has  not  done  is  disclosed  by  an  examination  of  what  proportion  of  the  bar 
in  these  respective  cities  gives  anything  at  all  to  the  legal  aid  work.  The  following 
table  states  the  total  membership  of  the  bar  in  these  six  cities  according  to  the  1910 
Census  and  the  number  which  support  legal  aid  work. 


51.0% 

58.0% 

32.4 

36.0 

14.2 

28.1 

48.0 

25.0 

46.4 

34.3 

10.4 

10.1 

City 

Number  of  Lawyers 

Number  of  Lawyers 
Supporting  Legal  Aid 

Per  cent  of  Bar 
Supporting  Legal  Aid 

Boston 

1,360 

127 

9.3% 

Buffalo 

714 

51 

7.1 

Chicago 

3.896 

74 

1.9 

Newark 

390 

81 

23.0 

New  York 

10,661 

424 

3.9 

Philadelphia 

1,843 

45 

2.4 

These  figures,  which  will  probably  come  as  a  shock  to  the  public-spirited  portion 
of  the  bar,  are  not  altered  or  bettered  by  any  donations  from  the  bar  in  its  collective 


RELATION  TO  THE  BAR  239 

capacity.  An  examination  of  all  financial  reports  for  1916  shows  only  two  such  in- 
stances of  support — one  in  Detroit,  where  the  entire  budget  of  the  Society  consists 
of  a  five  hundred  dollar  appropriation  from  the  Bar  Association,  and  one  in  Rich- 
mond, where  after  a  sharp  debate  and  with  much  opposition,  the  Bar  Association 
voted  two  hundred  dollars  for  the  society  just  starting  in  that  city.  In  1917  the 
Rochester  Bar  Association  gave  one  hundred  dollars  to  the  local  Legal  Aid  Bureau.1 
It  is  fair  to  add  that  the  new  organizations  in  Jersey  City  and  San  Francisco  have 
had  the  greater  part  of  their  expenses,  which  are  still  small,  defrayed  by  individual 
lawyers. 

When  these  facts  were  shown  to  the  Conference  of  Bar  Association  delegates,  and 
after  a  pointed  statement  by  Moorfield  Storey,  the  Conference  voted  to  add  to  its 
original  resolution  on  legal  aid  work  a  clause  "  that  attorneys  generally  be  urged  to 
give  such  societies  their  moral  and  financial  support." 2 

What  the  bar  could  do  by  its  concerted  action  may  be  suggested  by  a  simple  com- 
putation. We  have  earlier  estimated  that  if  the  legal  aid  organizations  in  the  cities 
where  they  now  exist  are  to  meet  completely  the  need  for  legal  assistance,  they  must 
extend  their  work  three  and  a  half  times.  This  would  mean  an  annual  expense  of  not 
more  than  $584,500.  We  know  that  organizations  should  be  established  in  thirty- 
seven  additional  cities.  These  are  nearly  all  places  with  populations  of  between  one 
hundred  thousand  and  two  hundred  thousand  persons,  and  in  a  city  of  this  size  an 
adequate  legal  aid  organization  can  be  maintained  for  $2000.  For  extension  into  new 
cities,  therefore,  we  should  add  $74,000.  This  would  amount  to  a  total  annual  national 
legal  aid  budget  of  $658,500.  This  income  could  be  raised  if  every  member  of  the 
bar  in  the  United  States  would  give,  either  directly  or  through  his  bar  association, 
to  legal  aid  work  in  satisfaction  of  his  obligation  to  the  poor  about  five  dollars.  There 
is  nothing  unreasonable  in  such  a  proposition.  Even  assuming  that  about  half  of  the 
bar  cannot  afford  that  amount  or  never  can  be  made  to  feel  their  responsibility,  the 
annual  expense  to  each  lawyer  in  the  remaining  half  would  be  only  about  ten  dollars. 

In  other  words,  the  American  bar  has  it  easily  within  its  power  to  permit  legal  aid 
work  to  develop  to  its  natural  completion,  to  perform  the  full  measure  of  the  respon- 
sibility which  rests  on  it  as  a  profession,  and  thereby  to  put  to  an  end  the  existing 
denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  in  the  United  States. 

On  whether  in  the  years  to  come,  now  that  the  Conference  of  Delegates  of  State 
and  Local  Bar  Associations  has  given  clear  expression  to  the  bar's  duty,  the  legal 
aid  societies  receive  the  unstinted  support  of  the  whole  bar  will  depend  in  large  mea- 
sure— on  this  more  than  on  anything  else — the  future  of  legal  aid  work. 


1  Rochester  L.  A.  R.  for  1917,  page  16.  2  3  Am.  Bar  Ass'n  Journal,  697. 


Chapter  XXV 
A  MORE  EQUAL  ADMINISTRATION  OF  JUSTICE 

Equal  and  exact  justice  has  been  the  passionate  demand  of  the  hu- 
man soul  since  man  has  wronged  his  fellow  man ;  it  has  been  the  dream  of 
the  philosopher,  the  aim  of  the  lawgiver,  the  endeavor  of  the  judge,  the 
ultimate  test  of  every  government  and  every  civilization.  Chief  Justice 
Winslow  of  the  Supreme  Court  of  Wisconsin.* 

§   1 

WE  can  end  the  existing  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  if  we  can  secure  an  ad- 
ministration of  justice  which  shall  be  accessible  to  every  person  no  matter 
how  humble,  and  which  shall  be  adjusted  so  carefully  to  the  needs  of  the  present 
day  world  that  it  cannot  be  dislocated,  or  the  evenness  of  its  oper- 
ation  be  disturbed,  by  the  fact  of  poverty. 

The  constructive  methods  which  will  enable  our  judicial  institu- 
tions to  realize  their  ideal  are  clear,  first,  because  we  know  the  precise 
difficulties  to  be  remedied,  and  second,  because  there  are  already  in  existence  many 
agencies  definitely  designed  to  obviate  or  overcome  these  difficulties  and  which,  with 
proper  development  and  expansion,  can  be  made  wholly  successful.  Of  these  the  great- 
est is  the  already  formidable  group  of  legal  aid  organizations.  They  are,  indeed,  the 
key  to  the  solution  of  the  whole  problem,  for  if  we  can  speedily  give  them  the  resources 
which  they  need  and  deserve,  they  will  move  forward  and  become  the  instrument 
through  which  we  can  attain  the  desired  end.  Properly  equipped,  they  will  provide 
the  necessary  stimulus,  they  will  furnish  the  requisite  leadership,  and  they  will  devise 
the  concrete  detailed  working  plans  and  carry  them  through  to  completion. 

In  the  existing  machinery  of  justice  there  are  three  defects,  which  in  their  practi- 
cal results  destroy  the  impartiality  of  the  administration  of  justice  and  thereby  make 
impossible  that  absolute  equality  before  the  law  which  the  ideal  of  democracy  de- 
mands, which  our  form  of  government  was  designed  to  secure,  and  which  it  is  try- 
ing to  guarantee  through  a  fair  and  sound  substantive  law.  The  first  difficulty  is  that 
the  machinery  often  moves  so  slowly,  or  can  be  made  to  move  so  slowly,  that  wholly 
unwarranted  delays  occur  to  rob  the  protection  and  redress  vouchsafed  by  law  of 
much  of  its  efficacy  and  value.  The  second  difficulty  is  that  the  wheels  of  justice  can- 
not be  set  in  motion  simply  by  a  complaint  based  on  the  commission  of  a  wrong,  but 
require,  in  addition,  a  certain  amount  of  financial  lubrication  in  the  form  of  pay- 
ments to  the  courts  for  costs  and  fees.  If  persons,  because  they  are  poor,  are  unable 
to  satisfy  this  requirement,  they  are  debarred  from  seeking  redress,  the  whole  law  is 
powerless  to  afford  its  intended  protection,  and  this  is  so  even  where  poverty  is  the 
result  of  the  very  wrong  which  renders  necessary  the  appeal  to  the  processes  of  the  law. 

1  From  an  Address  delivered  April  25,  1912,  before  the  Northwestern  University  Law  School ;  quoted  in  4  Journal  of 
Criminal  Law  and  Criminology  (1914),  660. 


A  MORE  EQUAL  JUSTICE  241 

Though  delays  and  costs  have  caused,  and  until  eliminated  will  continue  to  cause, 
much  injustice  to  the  poor,  they  are  only  superficial  defects  in  the  technical  struc- 
ture of  our  legal  institutions.  Where  intelligent  rearrangements,  suiting  the  admin- 
istration of  justice  to  the  conditions  of  life  which  it  is  intended  to  control,  have  been 
made,  as  in  the  small  claims  courts,  both  difficulties  have  been  successfully  overcome. 
Complete  solutions  of  general  application  are  contained  in  the  definite  plans,  now 
making  headway,  for  the  reorganization  of  courts  and  the  simplification  of  procedure. 
By  allying  themselves  with  these  great  movements,  the  legal  aid  organizations  can 
most  speedily  and  effectively  make  justice  prompt  in  all  matters,  summary  in  certain 
types  of  cases  where  quick  relief  is  the  only  relief,  inexpensive,  and  free  in  those 
instances  where  equality  of  justice  can  be  had  only  by  freedom  of  justice.  Organ- 
ized legal  aid,  in  the  capacity  of  a  coordinated  national  undertaking,  should  work 
in  close  cooperation  with  such  national  agencies  as  the  American  Judicature  Society 
and  the  American  Bar  Association  Special  Committee  to  Suggest  Remedies  and 
Formulate  Laws  to  Prevent  Delay  and  Unnecessary  Cost  in  Litigation;  and  the 
local  societies  should  join  with  the  proper  committees  of  local  bar  associations  in  all 
their  activities  along  these  lines.  In  this  way  they  can  best  present  the  particular 
difficulties  which  they  know,  and  can  see  to  it  that  in  the  general  plans  for  the  bet- 
terment of  the  administration  of  justice  ample  provision  is  made  to  secure  a  form 
of  structure  and  type  of  machinery  which  will  be  able  to  guarantee  equality  before 
the  law  to  the  poor. 

The  third  difficulty  results  from  the  trilemma  that  the  machinery  of  justice  can 
be  operated  only  through  attorneys,  that  attorneys  must  be  paid  for  their  services, 
and  that  the  poor  are  unable  to  pay  for  such  services.  This  is  the  great,  the  inher- 
ent and  fundamental  difficulty — inherent  because  our  legal  institutions  were  framed 
with  the  intention  that  trained  advocates  should  be  employed,  and  fundamental  in 
the  sense  that  no  amount  of  reorganization  or  simplification,  short  of  a  complete 
overturn  of  the  whole  structure,  can  entirely  remove  the  necessity  for  the  attorney. 
This  is  a  difficulty  rather  than  a  defect,  for  in  the  main  it  is  as  undesirable  as  it  is 
impossible  that  the  proper  functions  of  the  lawyer  in  the  administration  of  justice 
should  be  altogether  eliminated.  This  problem  differs  radically  from  that  relating 
to  delays  or  costs,  and  calls  for  an  entirely  different  solution.  It  is  not  well  recognized 
or  generally  appreciated,  and  there  are  no  definite  movements  or  organizations  which 
offer  opportunities  for  alliances. 

The  task  of  the  legal  aid  organizations  is  to  present  with  all  possible  clearness  this 
difficulty  in  its  full  force,  to  draw  to  themselves  the  interest  and  cooperation  of 
judges,  bar  associations,  and  others  concerned  with  the  perfecting  of  justice,  and  to 
devote  themselves  patiently  and  unremittingly  to  a  study  of  those  agencies  and 
methods  which  may  be  made  to  serve  toward  this  end.  There  are  now  in  existence  three 
great  agencies,  operating  in  as  many  fields  of  law,  illustrating  two  distinct  plans  for 
overcoming  this  obstacle,  which  have  passed  through  the  experimental  stage  so  that 


242  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

immediate  reliance  may  be  placed  on  them.  These  are  the  small  claims  courts,  the 
domestic  relations  courts,  and  the  industrial  accident  commissions,  which  are  so  con- 
stituted and  so  operate  that  in  the  average  small  claim,  the  average  complaint  for 
non-support,  and  the  average  case  of  an  employee  injured  at  work  the  employment 
of  counsel  is  unnecessary. 

This  is  accomplished  in  the  small  claims  court  by  the  segregation  of  simple  cases 
involving  small  amounts  in  one  court,  where  the  proceedings  are  without  technicali- 
ties or  formal  rules  so  that  there  is  no  need  for  the  performance  of  the  attorney's 
function.  These  courts  by  virtue  of  their  greater  powers  can  deal  with  most  small 
matters  sounding  in  debt  or  contract  far  more  effectively  than  can  the  legal  aid  socie- 
ties. Organized  legal  aid,  therefore,  should  everywhere  advocate  the  establishment  of 
courts  of  this  type.  If  it  can  secure  small  claims  branches  of  the  municipal  courts  in 
all  large  cities,  it  will  automatically  obviate  the  difficulty  of  attorneys'  fees,  and  inci- 
dentally the  defects  of  delays  and  costs,  and  gain  for  the  poor  an  entirely  equal  ad- 
ministration of  a  branch  of  the  law  which  controls  a  very  great  number  of  the  con- 
troversies to  which  they  are  party.  The  legal  aid  organizations  are  the  natural  bodies 
to  undertake  the  development  of  the  small  claims  court  because  they  are  in  a  position 
to  understand  its  efficiency;  to  appreciate  why  it  needs  as  complementary  functions 
power  to  order  instalment  payments  of  judgments,  control  ejectment  proceedings,  act 
as  trustee  for  debtors,  and  employ  conciliation;  and  also  to  detect  the  point  at  which 
the  method  becomes  unworkable  and  where  the  attorney  again  becomes  necessary. 

The  domestic  relations  courts,  as  to  most  of  the  cases  of  desertion  and  non-support 
of  wives  and  children  which  are  now  within  their  jurisdiction,  have  successfully  met 
the  difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel  by  limiting  the  need  for  his  services  through 
standardization  of  forms  and  simplification  of  procedure,  and  by  maintaining  an  ad- 
ministrative department  of  probation  officers  who  perform  the  remaining  necessary 
parts  of  the  attorney's  function.  Such  courts  exist  in  the  largest  cities  and  in  most 
of  the  large  cities.  They  are  unquestionably  empowered  and  equipped  to  secure  better 
redress  than  are  the  legal  aid  societies.  The  question  for  organized  legal  aid  is  how 
far  they  should  attempt  to  have  included  within  the  jurisdiction  of  the  domestic 
relations  courts  the  kindred  matters  of  divorce,  separation,  illegitimacy,  guardian- 
ship, and  adoption.  This  is  debatable  ground;  it  may  well  prove  that  in  libels  for 
divorce  attorneys  are  indispensable.  The  experiment  of  this  widened  jurisdiction,  in 
which  the  criminal  processes  and  conciliation  will  be  at  the  court's  disposal,  ought 
to  be  made.  On  the  inside  the  judges  can  watch  its  operation;  on  the  outside  there 
is  no  organization  better  situated  to  detect  any  breakdown,  or  to  ascertain  the  de- 
sirable limits  of  any  such  jurisdiction,  than  the  legal  aid  society.  These  courts  are  as 
successful  in  domestic  disputes  as  the  small  claims  courts  are  in  their  field.  In  so  far 
as  the  legal  aid  societies  can  secure  their  wise  extension,  to  that  extent  will  another 
great  category  of  the  cases  of  the  poor  be  placed  under  an  administration  of  justice 


A  MORE  EQUAL  JUSTICE  243 

which  will  be  accessible  and  able  to  operate  impartially  in  fact  because  free  of  the 
difficulties  which  have  hitherto  destroyed  equality. 

The  industrial  accident  commissions,  aided  by  a  simplification  of  the  substantive 
law  on  points  of  liability  and  damages,  have  erected  an  administrative  machinery 
which  accurately  and  quickly  adjusts  and  disposes  of  the  larger  proportion  of  the 
cases  of  injured  workmen  which  come  within  their  jurisdiction.  Such  commissions 
now  exist  in  nearly  all  states.  The  question  for  the  legal  aid  organizations  in  this 
connection  is  not  one  of  territorial  expansion,  but  one  of  how  far  this  new  adminis- 
trative method  of  securing  justice  can  be  extended  into  other  departments  of  law. 
The  automatic  settlement  of  disputes  by  supervised  agreements  instead  of  through 
the  traditional  channels  of  judicial  litigation  unquestionably  achieves  an  entire  free- 
dom and  equality  of  justice.  The  method  is  easily  capable  of  application  to  cases  of 
interstate  employees,  seamen,  and  with  some  modifications  to  passengers  on  railroads 
and  street  railways.  There  are  great  difficulties  in  the  way  of  its  extension  to  cases 
where  there  is  no  contractual  or  other  preexisting  legal  relationship  between  the 
parties,  as  to  the  pedestrian  run  over  by  an  automobile,  or  to  the  driver  of  a  team  who 
has  a  collision  with  a  street  car.  But  to  the  extent  that  it  can  be  carried,  it  will  serve 
to  eliminate  the  inequalities  of  the  traditional  system,  and  its  proper  extension  is 
therefore  a  matter  of  immediate  concern  to  legal  aid  organizations. 

At  the  same  time  the  legal  aid  societies  must  bear  in  mind  that  there  is  a  fixed 
point  at  which  this  administrative  method  breaks  down.  As  to  the  cases  which  give 
rise  to  bona  fide  contests  on  law  or  facts,  the  administrative  method,  though  it  has 
developed  some  points  of  superiority,  differs  only  in  a  superficial  way  from  the  tra- 
ditional methods  of  litigation  in  the  courts  and  is  subject  to  the  same  limitations. 
There  is  the  same  need  for  the  attorney  and  the  same  difficulty  presented  by  the 
inability  of  the  poor  to  pay  for  attorney's  services.  In  all  appeals  this  difficulty  is 
accentuated.  Here  organized  legal  aid  should  play  its  part  by  supplying  attorneys 
to  all  injured  persons  who  are  not  able  to  retain  their  own  attorneys.  The  ability  of 
applicants  to  engage  their  own  counsel  should  be  determined  in  these  as  in  any  other 
cases, — by  the  fact  of  poverty  and  not  by  the  speculative  value  of  the  claim.  If  the 
societies  can  thus  supplement  the  administrative  machinery,  they  will  protect  the 
community,  the  bar,  and  the  courts  from  a  recurrence  of  the  dangers  and  iniquities 
of  the  contingent  fee  system. 

There  are  other  agencies  and  methods  which  cannot  be  immediately  relied  on,  but 
which  may,  under  intelligent  study  and  guidance, develop  into  formidable  instruments 
for  the  equalizing  of  the  administration  of  justice.  Conciliation  and  arbitration  as 
judicial  functions  are  still  new  and  untried.  How  far  administrative  officials,  partic- 
ularly those  empowered  to  lend  their  assistance  in  litigation,  can  be  utilized  to  secure 
equal  rights  for  the  poor  is  a  consideration  involving  many  elements  of  doubt.  Of 
these  matters  conciliation  probably  contains  the  greatest  possibilities,  but  they  all 
warrant  close  and  sympathetic  observation  and  the  results  of  their  experiments  should 


244  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

be  made  known  to  the  legal  world.  In  such  work  the  legal  aid  organizations  may  well 
play  an  important,  if  not  a  leading  part.  They  have  a  direct  interest,  and  they  are 
in  a  position  to  see  whether  these  agencies  and  methods  perform  in  fact  the  promise 
which  in  theory  they  contain.  New  suggestions  and  proposals  will  steadily  arise  which 
in  their  turn  will  require  this  same  observation  and  report. 

In  these  ways  the  legal  aid  organizations  can  promote  the  necessary  reconstruc- 
tion of  the  administration  of  justice  and  thereby  scientifically  eliminate  so  much  of 
the  denial  of  justice  to  the  poor  as  is  caused  by  gaps,  or  flaws,  or  outworn  parts,  or 
imperfect  adjustments  in  the  organization  of  our  administration  of  justice. 

They  must  go  further.  In  vast  tracts  of  the  civil  law  and  in  all  of  the  criminal  law 
relating  to  the  more  serious  crimes,  equality  in  the  administration  of  justice  can  be 
had  only  by  supplying  attorneys  to  the  poor.  In  civil  matters  this  has  always  been 
the  function  of  the  legal  aid  societies;  in  criminal  affairs  it  is  now  the  function  of 
the  public  defenders.  This  part  of  their  task  is  well  known  to  the  organizations.  The 
work  of  the  public  defenders  must  be  carried  on  in  all  cities,  and  it  is  preferable  that 
it  should  be  done  in  conjunction  with,  and  as  a  part  of,  the  legal  aid  work.  The  legal 
aid  organizations  must  extend  themselves  into  all  of  the  large  cities,  and  must  triple 
their  staffs  and  undertake  a  threefold  increase  of  their  work.  If  these  things  can  be 
done,  that  part  of  the  denial  of  justice  which  is  traceable  solely  to  the  inability  of  the 
poor  to  employ  counsel  will  be  eliminated,  and  it  is  only  in  this  way  that  the  great 
difficulty  of  the  expense  of  counsel  will  be  completely  overcome. 


§  2 
At  the  present  time  the  legal  aid  organizations  in  the  United  States  are  equipped 
to  do  none  of  these  things.  They  will  be  able  to  continue  to  care  for  a  certain  num- 
ber of  individual  cases,  but  that  is  not  enough.  They  will  either  go 
ore    jji-     forwar(j  or  backwarcl.  Either  they  will  become  the  best  instrumen- 
cien      ega  tality  for  the  equalization  of  American  justice,  or  they  will  fail,  and 

be  discarded,  and  some  other  plan  will  be  utilized.  Because  of  the  work 
they  have  accomplished,  the  wealth  of  their  experience,  and  the  excellence  of  their 
record,  it  is  in  every  way  desirable  that  it  should  be  made  possible  for  them  to  succeed. 
For  the  success  of  organized  legal  aid  work  there  are  three  imperative  requisites — 
better  leadership,  a  sound  financial  foundation,  and  the  merger  of  all  the  individual 
societies  and  bureaus  and  public  defender  offices  into  a  definite  union  with  centralized 
responsibility  and  authority. 

Of  these  three  cardinal  needs  the  greatest  is  leadership,  for  it  may  fairly  be  assumed 
that  under  intelligent  guidance  proper  financing  would  be  secured  and  a  central  legal 
aid  bureau  would  be  established.  To  ensure  the  wise  direction  and  development  of 
organized  legal  aid  work  there  are  needed  for  the  boards  of  directors  and  executive 
committees  men  of  high  calibre,  endowed  with  both  vision  and  courage,  who  fairly 


A  MORE  EQUAL  JUSTICE  245 

represent  the  various  elements  in  the  community  who  are  concerned  in  this  work.  Such 
groups  are  the  judges,  the  charities,  the  churches,  the  employers,  the  labor  unions, 
the  law  schools,  and  above  all  the  bar,  for  in  this  undertaking  the  members  of  the 
bar  have  the  greatest  responsibility.  The  societies  cannot  be  expected  to  evolve  the 
necessary  leaders  from  within  themselves.  It  is  not  only  natural  but  inevitable  that 
they  should  look  to  the  bar.  It  is  the  duty  and  the  privilege  of  the  bar  associations, 
which  most  nearly  represent  the  bar  in  its  collective  capacity,  to  provide  from  among 
their  own  leaders  a  number  of  properly  qualified  lawyers  who  can  constitute  the  nu- 
cleus of  legal  aid  leadership  and  add  to  themselves  persons  representing  other  groups 
in  interest.  This  alliance  between  legal  aid  work  and  the  bar  should  reach  from  top 
to  bottom.  As  a  local  undertaking  it  should  have  the  supervision  and  support  of  the 
local  bar  associations,  and  as  a  national  movement  it  should  have  the  supervision  and 
support  of  the  American  Bar  Association. 

The  acute  financial  crisis  which  the  legal  aid  societies  face  need  not  always  remain 
a  stumbling-block  in  the  path  of  their  development.  If  the  pressing  demands  of  the 
present  were  squarely  met,  arrangements  could  unquestionably  be  made  which  would 
care  for  the  future.  Legal  aid  work  is  not  expensive,  its  needs  are  modest,  but  at  the 
present  time  it  is  denied  even  this  small  support.  If  the  organizations  were  given  a 
clear  track  for  a  few  years  and  provided  with  the  necessary  resources  during  this  in- 
tervening period,  they  could  rid  themselves  of  the  handicaps  under  which  they  now 
struggle  and  attain  such  a  position  of  responsibility  and  strength  that  they  would 
earn  and  attract  their  necessary  income  from  available  sources.  The  shoulders  of  the 
bar  are  broad  enough  to  carry  the  whole  load  so  easily  that  the  individual  member 
would  scarcely  feel  its  weight.  If  the  work  becomes,  as  it  ought  to  become,  a  part  of 
the  bar's  work,  if  the  situation  is  made  clear  to  the  bar  associations  so  that  they  feel 
their  responsibility,  there  will  be  no  great  difficulty  in  securing  small  subscriptions 
from  lawyers  generally,  made  as  a  matter  of  professional  duty,  which  in  the  aggregate 
will  furnish  the  legal  aid  organizations  with  the  greater  part  of  the  funds  that  they 
require.  In  addition  there  are  many  members  of  the  community  who  are  able  and  will- 
ing to  give  generously  for  this  object,  which  they  regard  as  a  worthy  charity.  If  the 
salient  features  of  the  work  were  presented  to  the  public  in  an  intelligible  and  sym- 
pathetic form,  the  number  of  donors  could  be  materially  increased.  Once  the  legal 
aid  societies  obtain  proper  leadership  and  are  given  an  opportunity  for  development, 
there  is  every  reason  to  believe  that  finances  will  cease  to  constitute  a  menace  always 
threatening  their  existence. 

The  need  for  some  union  of  legal  aid  organizations  that  will  nationalize  the  work 
and  provide  a  central  responsibility  and  authority  is  obvious.  In  their  National  Alli- 
ance the  societies  have  erected  a  shell  without  substance.  For  the  future,  the  work  is 
too  great  to  be  conducted  in  a  slipshod  way,  and  its  extension  into  new  fields  is  too 
important  to  be  left  to  a  hit-or-miss  policy.  The  combined  experience  of  the  societies 
must  be  assembled  and  a  technique  for  the  conduct  of  the  work  developed.  A  standard 


246  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

system  of  records  and  accounts  must  be  devised  and  then  installed.  Matters  of  policy 
should  become  uniform  as  rapidly  as  possible.  A  clearing  house,  with  power  of  super- 
vision, is  necessary  for  a  free  transference  of  cases  throughout  the  country.  Some 
initiative  must  be  manifested  in  establishing  societies  where  they  are  needed.  There 
must  be  some  central  body  authorized  to  represent  and  speak  for  the  organized  legal 
aid  movement  in  the  councils  of  the  bar,  at  the  meetings  of  the  charities,  and  at  the 
law  school  conferences,  and  to  cooperate  with  such  undertakings  as  the  American 
Judicature  Society.  If  there  is  to  be  any  intelligent  development  in  cooperation  with 
the  other  remedial  agencies,  there  must  be  a  central  bureau  to  disseminate  informa- 
tion to  all  the  legal  aid  organizations  as  to  how  such  agencies  operate,  what  their 
advantages  are,  and  wherein  they  are  limited.  The  present  state  of  affairs,  in  which  no 
society  except  the  local  society  understands  how  small  claims  are  cared  for  in  Cleve- 
land or  wages  collected  in  Massachusetts,  cannot  be  allowed  to  continue.  The  admin- 
istration of  justice  is  a  serious  business,  and  its  reconstruction  requires  infinite  pains, 
well-considered  suggestions,  and  judgment  of  the  highest  order.  Because  they  have 
undertaken  the  responsibility  of  championing  the  cause  of  the  poor,  the  legal  aid 
organizations  are  vitally  concerned  in  any  reorganization,  and  they  can,  if  they  will, 
make  contributions  of  information  that  are  invaluable  because  they  are  not  obtain- 
able from  any  other  source.  If  their  voice  is  to  be  heard,  as  it  has  not  been  heard  in  the 
past,  and  if  their  opinions  are  to  carry  weight,  they  must  present  a  united  front,  hav- 
ing clearly  formulated  their  aims,  and  speak  with  singleness  of  mind  to  a  definite  and 
agreed  purpose. 

Inasmuch  as  the  legal  aid  organizations  are  rendering  an  essential  public  service,  it 

is  likely  that  ultimately  their  work  will  pass  under  public  control.  This  fact  should 

never  be  forgotten  by  those  who  are,  or  may  become,  responsible  for 

°7       r    7.  .  .      the  future  of  organized  legal  aid,  and  they  will  do  well  to  shape  their 
wider  Judicial        ,  ...    ...  °     ,  .       •       mu  j  x.    u     a.      xi_- 

_,  j  plans  with  this  end  in  view.  1  here  is  no  need  to  hasten  this  process 

of  transferring  the  responsibility  to  the  state,  the  ideas  which  must 

precede  it  are  imperceptibly  but  steadily  taking  possession  of  men's  minds,  and  the 

change  will  come  about  in  its  own  good  time.  It  is  always  difficult,  particularly  for 

those  in  the  midst  of  a  movement,  to  gauge  progress  by  present  indications,  but 

a  glance  backward  over  the  road  traveled  gives  a  clue  as  to  what  is  taking  place. 

When  the  attorney  for  the  first  public  legal  aid  bureau,  in  1911,  predicted  that  in 

ten  years  there  would  be  a  dozen  public  organizations,1  his  hearers,  who  were  the  best 

informed  persons  in  the  United  States  on  legal  aid  work,  were  unable  to  give  full 

credence  to  the  statement.  Yet  within  five  years  eight  such  bureaus  were  established. 


1  Report  of  Proceedings  of  the  First  Conference  of  Legal  Aid  Societies,  page  41. 


A  MORE  EQUAL  JUSTICE  247 

What  will  be  the  situation  at  the  end  of  another  ten  years  no  one  can  foretell,  but 
the  tendency  is  none  the  less  perfectly  clear. 

The  task  of  the  private  organizations  will  be  to  bring  legal  aid  work  up  to  the 
highest  possible  point  of  efficiency,  so  that  when  the  time  comes  they  may  surrender 
into  public  hands  a  definite  undertaking  which  has  passed  beyond  the  experimental 
stage,  with  its  guiding  principles  well  established,  and  with  a  well-developed  tech- 
nique for  the  conduct  of  its  work.  They  must  also  bring  their  experience  to  bear  in 
order  that  this  tendency  toward  public  control  may  not  go  forward  blindly,  but 
may  be  given  intelligent  direction. 

Their  experience  makes  it  perfectly  clear  that  legal  aid  work  is  of  a  piece  with  the 
administration  of  justice,  and  that  it  has  no  logical  connection  with  municipal  gov- 
ernment. Primarily  for  this  reason,  and  also  because  they  know  that  there  is  danger 
in  entrusting  this  service  to  city  officials,  the  legal  aid  societies  will  do  well  to  con- 
sider if  their  work  may  not  most  properly,  and  most  safely,  be  placed  under  judicial 
control.  It  is  entirely  possible  that  into  the  comprehensive  plans  for  the  reshaping  of 
our  judicial  organization,  which  are  now  going  forward,  there  might  be  incorporated 
a  definite  scheme  for  judicial  control  of  legal  aid  work.1  The  accepted  principle  under- 
lying the  present  proposals  for  reorganization  of  courts  and  simplification  of  proced- 
ure is  that  the  judges  must  be  our  experts  in  justice;  they  must  be  charged  with  the 
responsibility  and  given  the  power  to  make  the  machinery  of  justice  operate  smoothly, 
and  efficiently,  and  economically.  It  is  just  as  important  that  they  be  made  respon- 
sible and  entrusted  with  power  so  that  they  may  see  to  it  that  the  administration 
of  justice  is  accessible  to  all  and  operates  equally.  It  involves  nothing  more  than  an 
extension  of  the  work  done  by  clerks  of  small  claims  courts  under  judicial  direction, 
or  by  probation  officers  who  are  amenable  to  judicial  control,  or  by  the  administra- 
tive departments  of  the  industrial  accident  commissions.  The  author  of  the  Chicago 
Municipal  Court  Act,  which  was  the  first  law  to  put  the  theory  of  judicial  respon- 
sibility for  the  administration  of  justice  into  practice,  contemplated  a  "Bureau  of 
Justice,"  under  judicial  control,  which  should  give  to  poor  persons  the  services  of 
attorneys  in  both  civil  and  criminal  cases.2  This  is  precisely  what  has  been  effected 
in  England  by  the  Supreme  Court  rules  of  1913.  It  is  akin  to  the  method  by  which 
legal  aid  work  has  for  years  been  carried  on  in  France,  Scotland,  and  Belgium. 

The  rules  in  France,  which  regulate  "LAssistance  Judiciare  Gratuite,"  prescribe 

1  Cf.  Resolution  introduced  in  1917  before  the  Massachusetts  Constitutional  Convention  (Convention,  No.  8),  which 
read: 

"To  the  end  that  Article  XI  of  Part  I  of  the  constitution  maybe  given  full  force  and  effect  throughout  the  common- 
wealth, the  justices  of  the  supreme  judicial  court  may,  in  their  discretion,  make  rules  of  court  or  take  any  other 
action  designed  to  guarantee  that  no  subject  of  the  commonwealth  shall,  because  of  poverty,  be  denied  certain  ac- 
cess to  the  courts,  or  proper  representation  therein,  in  any  proceeding,  whether  civil  or  criminal. 

"It  is  hereby  expressly  declared  that  the  above  conferred  power  extends  to  provisions  concerning  the  payment  of 
court  costs,  the  assignment  of  counsel,  the  creation,  control  and  supervision  of  organizations  or  bureaus  to  render 
legal  aid  and  assistance  to  poor  persons,  and  to  the  expenditure  of  such  sums  of  money  as  may  be  appropriated  by 
the  legislature  for  these  purposes. 

"The  authority  hereby  entrusted  to  the  justices  of  the  supreme  judicial  court  may,  by  them,  be  delegated  in  whole 
or  part  to  the  justices  of  any  other  court." 

2  Hiram  T.  Gilbert:  Practice  hi  the  Municipal  Court  of  Chicago  (1906),  pages  546  ct  seq. 


248  LEGAL  AID  ORGANIZATIONS 

that  there  be  attached  to  each  court  of  justice  a  quasi-tribunal  of  representatives 
of  the  legal  corporations  who  pass  on  the  poverty  of  all  applicants  for  free  judicial 
legal  aid  and  also  on  the  merits  of  the  cases  which  they  present.  If  the  applicant  is 
found  to  be  a  poor  person  with  a  meritorious  claim,  he  is  thereupon  entitled  to  free 
legal  assistance.  The  law  corporations  designate  from  among  their  membership  law- 
yers who  are  to  be  called  upon  by  the  court  for  this  purpose.  Students  share  in  the 
work,  and  it  is  a  condition  of  their  admission  to  the  bar  that  during  the  last  period 
of  their  training  they  shall  have  served  in  connection  with  the  Bureau  that  regulates 
this  judicial  assistance.  Expenses  of  litigation,  such  as  witness  fees  and  cost  of  print- 
ing, are  borne  by  the  public  treasury.  The  system  in  Belgium  and  other  continental 
countries  is  analogous,  and  by  a  Convention  on  Civil  Procedure  concluded  at  The 
Hague  it  was  provided  that  the  citizens  of  each  country  should  be  entitled  to  receive 
in  each  other  country  the  benefits  of  this  judicial  legal  assistance.1 

The  Scottish  system,  which  traces  its  history  back  to  an  Act  of  1424,2  operates  as 
follows :  A  number  of  solicitors  are  each  year  selected  by  their  associations  to  act  as 
agents  for  the  poor.  An  applicant  for  legal  assistance  presents  to  such  an  agent  cer- 
tificates from  his  parish  as  to  the  fact  of  his  poverty.  The  agent  draws  and  presents 
a  petition  for  leave  to  sue  in  forma  pauperis  to  a  tribunal  of  four  attorneys,  who 
pass  upon  the  applicant's  right  to  sue  in  that  manner.  If  admitted  to  the  Poor  Rolls 
and  given  permission  to  sue  without  payment  of  costs,  the  person's  case  is  entered, 
and  the  judge  assigns  as  his  representative  a  counsel  from  the  list  appointed  by  the 
Faculty  of  Advocates.3 

The  method  which  now  obtains  in  England  is  an  adaptation  of  these  French  and 
Scottish  systems,  which  have  much  in  common,  worked  out  by  judges  of  the  Supreme 
Court  after  conferences  with  the  bar,  and  promulgated  by  rules  dated  April  28, 1913, 
which  took  effect  June  9,  1914.4  Persons  apply  or  write  to  the  prescribed  officers 
who  are  attached  to  each  division  of  the  High  Court  and  receive  the  proper  form  of 
application.  Before  permission  to  sue  without  payment  of  costs  or  attorney's  fees  is 
granted,  the  court  must  be  satisfied  that  the  applicant  has  a  reasonable  cause  of  ac- 
tion or  defence,  and  that  his  means,  exclusive  of  wearing  apparel,  household  goods, 
tools  of  trade,  and  the  subject-matter  of  the  action,5  do  not  exceed  the  sum  of  £50, 
or  in  special  circumstances  £100.  To  ascertain  these  facts,  the  case  is  sent  to  a  soli- 
citor for  his  examination  and  report.  Lists  of  solicitors  who  have  volunteered  to 
accept  assignments  are  kept,  and  in  addition  the  court  may  assign  any  solicitor  it 

1  Norman  Bentwick:  Legal  Aid  for  tlie  Poor,  105  Contemporary  Review  (1914),  659,  562;  Thery:  French  Legal  Assist- 
ance for  the  Poor,  1  International  Law  Notes  (1916),  No.  1,  p.  12. 

2  135  Law  Times  (1913),  247. 

3  An  excellent  description  of  this  system  in  Scotland  is  contained  in  47  Law  Journal,  49. 

*  All  rules,  together  with  forms,  which  set  out  this  system  in  full  are  contained  in  the  1914  Rule  Book,  and  are  listed 
as  Order  16,  IV,  §§  22-Sld.  The  best  account  of  what  has  been  done  under  these  rules  is  to  be  found  in  the  statement 
by  W.  F.  A.  Archibald,  Chairman  of  the  London  Prescribed  Officers,  published  in  full  in  the  Law  Times  for  March 
18, 1916,  and  in  part  in  1  International  Law  Notes,  No.  4  (1916),  p.  56. 

6  It  is  to  be  noted  that  no  person  is  denied  relief  by  the  court,  as  the  legal  aid  societies  in  the  United  States  have 
denied  their  assistance,  on  any  theory  that  the  person  can  secure  his  own  attorney  by  arranging  for  a  contingent  fee. 


A  MORE  EQUAL  JUSTICE  249 

may  wish.  If  the  report  is  favorable,  the  judge  then  assigns  a  solicitor  and  barrister  to 
prepare  and  present  the  case  before  the  court  for  trial.  There  are  lists  of  counsel  who 
have  volunteered  their  services,  but  the  court  is  free  to  assign  the  case  to  any  member 
of  the  bar.  Persons  admitted  to  sue  or  defend  under  these  rules  are  not  required  to 
pay  court  costs  and  are  not  liable  for  the  fees  of  the  opposing  party.  They  are  pro- 
hibited from  paying  fees  to  solicitors  and  counsel  for  their  services,  and  if  members 
of  the  bar  seek  to  obtain  remuneration  from  such  clients,  they  are  punishable  for 
contempt  of  court.  Poor  persons,  if  successful,  may  be  awarded  costs,  and  the  court 
may  fix  an  attorney's  fee  out  of  such  costs,  or  out  of  the  recovery  if  it  is  substantial. 
The  rules  contemplated  a  Treasury  grant  to  defray  the  incidental  expenses  of  such 
litigation,  but  the  grant  was  not  made  owing  to  the  immediate  advent  of  war. 

None  of  these  systems  is  complete.  Legal  aid  work,  as  it  is  organized  in  America, 
possesses  many  points  of  superiority.  These  other  systems  do,  however,  serve  as  excel- 
lent precedents,  and  they  add  to  the  fund  of  information  from  which  sound  plans  may 
be  formulated  for  placing  legal  aid  work  under  judicial  control  and  thereby  making 
it  an  integral  part  of  the  administration  of  justice. 


§4 

These  suggested  future  developments  are  all  practical  and  capable  of  achievement. 
Once  these  matters  are  given  proper  presentation,  the  loyal  support  of  the  bar,  the 
_  ,  .  assistance  of  the  courts,  and  the  sustaining  interest  of  the  public  may  be 
confidently  expected.  The  ends  which  they  seek  to  attain  are  of  direct 
concern  not  only  to  the  fair  administration  of  justice,  but  to  the  well-being  of  the 
nation.  It  is  of  high  importance  that  such  developments  be  encouraged  and  supported, 
not  for  the  sake  of  the  legal  aid  organizations  themselves, — they  of  themselves  are 
nothing, — but  because  in  them,  with  all  their  faults  and  weaknesses,  is  contained  our 
best  immediate  hope  for  a  realization  of  our  ideal  of  such  an  equal  administration  of 
the  laws  that  denial  of  justice  on  account  of  poverty  shall  forever  be  made  impossible 
in  America. 


V* 


T> 


!.*'/ 


APPENDIX 

NOTE  TO  STATISTICAL  TABLES 

Table      I.  Cases  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 

Table    II.  Amounts  Collected  for  Clients  by  Legal  Aid  Organizations 

Table  III.  Expenses  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 


NOTE  TO  STATISTICAL  TABLES 

IN  the  following  three  tables  are  contained  the  basic  statistical  records  of  legal  aid 
work — the  number  of  cases  received  by  each  organization,  the  sums  of  money  col- 
lected for  their  clients  by  each  organization,  and  the  amounts  expended  by  each  or- 
ganization in  the  conduct  of  its  work.  No  table  showing  the  income  of  the  organi- 
zations is  necessary  for,  as  legal  aid  work  is  now  financed,  the  organizations  each 
year  spend  all  that  they  receive,  so  that  the  income  and  expense  figures  are  practically 
identical. 

Not  all  of  the  desired  information  is  available.  In  order  to  show  to  what  extent 
the  tables  are  incomplete,  there  are  placed  at  the  right  hand  side  of  each  table  two 
columns  in  which  are  noted  the  total  number  of  organizations  in  existence  each  year 
and  the  number  of  organizations  whose  records  are  known  and  are  contained  within 
the  table  for  that  year.  As  the  figures  which  are  unavailable  are  those  of  the  smaller 
societies,  they  would,  if  they  were  known  and  included,  serve  to  increase  the  totals 
presented  in  the  tables  only  in  a  slight  degree. 

These  figures  may  be  regarded  as  minimum  figures.  All  "estimates,"  so  far  as  they 
could  be  detected,  have  been  excluded.  The  tables  substantially  underestimate  the 
work  in  two  particulars.  The  collection  figures  represent  little  more  than  cash  sums 
secured  and  paid  over  to  clients.  There  are  many  cases  in  which  the  debtor,  after  being 
called  to  account  or  sued  by  the  legal  aid  society,  pays  the  client  directly.  In  most 
instances  these  recoveries,  although  properly  to  be  credited  to  the  society  as  the  result 
of  its  work,  cannot  be  known.  Further,  many  cases  result  not  in  a  cash  payment,  but 
in  an  order  for  weekly  payments,  as  in  husband  and  wife,  support  of  children,  illegiti- 
macy, and  workmen's  compensation  cases.  The  exact  amounts  paid  under  such  orders, 
which  have  been  secured  by  the  efforts  of  the  society,  are  not  known  and  so  do  not 
appear  in  statements  of  sums  collected  for  clients.  The  case  figures  represent  only  cases 
undertaken  for  poor  persons.  They  do  not  include  the  advice  and  other  work  done  for 
lawyers  or  social  workers.  Further,  a  few  organizations  list  as  cases  only  matters  in 
which  some  action  is  taken,  so  that  these  figures  do  not  include  cases  of  poor  persons 
where  advice  only  was  given. 

The  tables  are  arranged  in  cross  columns,  so  that  in  each  instance  they  show : 

1.  The  work  of  each  organization  in  each  year. 

2.  The  work  of  all  organizations  in  each  year. 

3.  The  total  work  of  each  organization. 

4.  The  grand  total  of  all  organizations  from  1876  to  1916  inclusive. 

The  fiscal  year  of  a  number  of  the  organizations  does  not  conform  to  the  calendar 
year.  In  such  instances  the  work  has  been  listed  as  of  the  year  which  included  the 
greater  number  of  months  of  the  particular  fiscal  year.  Thus  the  work  done  during 
a  fiscal  year  running  from  November  1,  1915,  to  October  31, 1916,  has  been  placed 
in  the  column  of  the  year  1916.  Although  this  is  arbitrary  in  a  way,  such  an  arrange- 
ment was  necessary  to  make  possible  any  orderly  and  definite  presentation. 


TABLE   I  :  1876-1916 

(a)  Annual  Number  of  Cases  of  Each  Legal  Aid  Organization. 
(A)  Annual  Total  Cases  of  All  Organizations. 


(c)  Total  Cases  of  Each  Organization. 

(a1)  Total  Cases  of  All  Organizations  for  4-1  Years. 


Chicago 
Levi  Aid 


1870 
1877 
1878 
1879 
1880 
1881 
1882 
1883 
1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 


1890 
1891 
1892 
1893 
1891 
1895 
1896 
1897 
1898 
1899 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1901 
1905 
1906 
1907 
1908 
1909 
1910 
1911 
1912 
1913 
1914 
1915 
_1916 
Total  I 


287 

499 
687 
504 

in 


198 

305 

354 

568 

664 

707 

1.085 

006 

1,107 

1,175 

1.114 

1.041 

1,154 

1,352 

2,229 

2.608 


2.353      16,637 


630 
mm 
1. 391 
1.257 
1.516 
5,753 


1,164 
2.407 
S.7.S.! 
3,523 
4,029 
4,881 
5,006 
3,217 
4,564 
4.087 
4.307 
4.618 
3,755 
3.760 
3.421 
8.625 
4.158 


159 
385 
1,145 
1.614 
1.455 
1,347 
1,095 


2,499 
3,284 
2.980 
2,678 
2.290 
2,135 
2,776 
9,085 
2,861 
3,269 
4,200 

2,929 

4,955 

4,990 


5,102 
6,262 
8,442 
13,904 
15,409 
19,121 
10,074 
10,097 
211,691 


294 

508 

689 

823 

811 

1,358 

1,478 

1,699 

2,888 

3,124 

3,515 

4,167 

4.747 

2,537 

4.685 

33.270 


885 
1.179 
1,509 


459 
606 
908 
1,208 
1,158 
1,382 
1,533 
2.435 
3.025 
5,805 
4,948 
24.382 


914 

1.480 


607 
2,294 
4,504 
5,929 
13,004 


2,313 

5,409 

5.354 

8,573 

3,199 

6,262 

10,301 

6,202 

10,277 

5,270 

8.848 

1,1 

1.905 
1,065 
3,039 


7,y.;* 


2,140 

2,155 


212 
750 
859 
1.908 
2,122 
2,832 
3,413 
3,400 
3,640 
3,802 
3,906 
3,485 
3,313 
3,500 
4,078 
5,412 
5,541 
8.285 
7,835 
7,027 
7,473 
5,350 
5,602 
9,436 
14,365 
15.880 
15,257 
18,469 
20,277 
21,372 
23,175 
26,399 
31,036 
30,105 
82.419 
33,809 
87,706 
39,189 
lfl.4.lil 
42,000 
41,946 


584,831 


1,406 
1,980 
3,801 
6,371 
5,431 
8.993 
7.737 
7.445 
4,824 
4,402 
7.087 
2,581 
7,997 
11,715 
5,788 


~M: 


701 
1,278 
1,165 
1,422 
1,383 
1,477 
1,818 
2,514 
8,479 
3,874 
4,290 
4,845 


28,757 


1,998 
1,393 


788 

.'.1157 


1,905 
1,895 


-. 


i     i 


1.903 
J.1SS 
2£!2 
3.413 
3.400 
3,640 
3,802 
3.462 
3.870 
5.624 
7,611 
9.316 
10.282 
10.656 
11.199 
15,427 
16,128 
15,017 
12.115 
12.399 
16,189 
20,896 
23,366 
23,544 
28,358 
34,159 
33,352 
37.603 
42.596 
50,944 
48,212 
52,644 
90,950 

87.141 
109.048 
113,719 
117,201 


1876 
1877 
1878 
1879 
188  ■ 
1831 
1882 
1883 
1884 
188S 
1886 
1887 
1888 
1889 
1890 
1891 
1892 
1893 
1894 
1895 
1896 
1897 
1898 
1899 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1906 
1907 
1908 
1909 
1910 
1911 
1912 
1913 
1914 
1915 
1916 


I.1S8.T00  -j  IZATlos3  4 


TABLE  II  :  1870-1010 


(n)  Annual  Amount  Collected  for  Clients  by  Each  Legal  Aid  Organization  in  even  Dollars. 
(A)  Annual  Total  Collections  by  All  Organizations  in  even  Dollars. 


(<■)  Total  Collections  by  Each  Organization  in  even  Dollars. 
(</)  Total  Collections  by  All  Organizations  for  41  Years  i\  even  Dollars. 


Table  II 


Chicago 

New  York 

< 

Ed 

> 

= 
-J 
■< 

1 

% 

2- 

< 

01 

>■ 

C 

I 

o 

e 

9 

m 

a 

d 

1AM 

III 

c 

a 
0 

c 

3 

a 

C 
O 

t 

Q 

3 
q 

X 

4$ 

c 

— 

be 
a 
< 

i 

"3 

If 

a 
I 

a 

D 

a 

s 

i 

a 

Z 

V 

> 

X 

I 
Z 

■9 
^  a, 

ii 

--.  a 
;  a  a 

?!   gS 

0 .5  a 

gs£ 

- 
S 

O 

a 
■0 

- 

be 

= 

,0 

4> 

- 

3 

2 

in 

EL. 

3 

5 
c 
3 
en 

O 

H 
e 

I 

Q 
En 

2 

41 

H    = 

11 

n 

=  a 

II 

•"■V. 

1876 

$1,000 

$1,000 

1x71; 

1 

1877 

5,019 

J.01S 

1877 

, 

1878 

8.089 

8,089 

1878 

1 

1879 

7.514 

7,514 

1X79 

1 

1880 

8,080 

8,880 

lxxo 

1 

1881 

9.149 

9.140 

1881 

1 

1XX2 

12,460 

12,400 

1882 

1 

1883 

17,040 

17,040 

1 

1884 

19,062 

19,002 

1834 

1 

1885 

17,711 

17.711 

1885 

1 

1886 

$277 

19,080 

10,351 

1886 

2 

2 

1887 

885 

16,870 

1887 

2 

2 

1888 

$2,475 

3,753 

14,624 

1888 

3 

3 

1889 

8,065 

i,Vi:i 

20,104 

S2.708 

1XX9 

3 

3 

1890 

10,658 

1,923 

34,099 

47,580 

1890 

3 

3 

1891 

9,877 

864 

55,077 

65,818 

1891 

1 

3 

1X9:! 

B,DS3 

1,991 

74,282 

88,208 

1X92 

3 

3 

18B3 

6,648 



39,955 

37,603 

1893 

3 

2 

1894 

2,969 

.1.11711 

62,624 

68,872 

1894 

4 

3 

1896 

4,271 

1,785 

60,285 

00.. Ml 

1895 

4 

3 

1896 

3,639 

1.799 

71.257 

1896 

4 

3 

1897 

4,000 

1,601 

72.810 

78,480 

1x97 

4 

3 

1898 

2,762 

2,287 

67,811 

72,860 

1898 

4 

3 

1899 

4,325 

1,454 

68,796 

72,575 

1899 

4 

3 

1900 

2,7"4 

2,562 

96,704 

101,070 

1900 

5 

3 

901 

$585 

2,715 

2,266 

78,173 

83,739 

19111 

6 

4 

9112 

1,491 

4,838 

2,313 

$15,770 

54.855 

78,507 

19112 

10 

5 

L903 

2,000 

3,890 

!,885 

59,646 

$310 

88,781 

1903 

10 

5 

1904 

■1.600 

2.741 

.1.515 

58,665 

$1,070 

414 

71,005 

1904 

13 

a 

1905 

5,917 

8,857 

$6,548 

01,1111 

1.649 

900 

80,020 

1905 

12 

6 

1906 

8,100 

7,200 

9,794 

827 

72,833 

489 

09,040 

1900 

12 

6 

907 

8,888 

7,009 

10,198 

90,286 

1,134 

120.515 

L907 

IS 

5 

90H 

5,700 

9,503 

23,354 

1,908 

S0.IH,3 

2,000 

974 

1908 

13 

7 

909 

7.718 

5,954 

21,006 

lnn,ii7l 

1,323 

1  16,103 

1909 

11 

5 

9111 

6,080 

7,845 

28,516 

$010 

$0,0  Hi 

101,724 

1  1,948 

2,076 

,851 

1910 

15 

8 

911 

0,686 

8,048 

.'.'.in.' 

820 

8,904 

122,838 

10,822 

$1,000 

3,257 

185,587 

1911 

16 

9 

B12 

0.131 

17,200 

19,740 

1,151 

10,962 

11 -',129 

12,164 

857 

5,046 

$1,852 

" 

1912 

-'1 

10 

913 

9,989 

22,861 

26,679 

$1,175 

2,751 

$5,280 

10,140 

$3,530 

1  18,046 

7.125 

6,191 

3,887 

$2,672 

8,457 

$1,429 

244,162 

LOIS 

ax 

15 

914 

4.005 

$1,159 

88,066 

80,623 

1,659 

$746 

1,202 

8,086 

$218 

7,705 

5.707 

l  14,885 

14.413 

6,330 

6,676 

5,648 

$812 

4,893 

5.006 

268,849 

1914 

19 

916 

25,195 

$948 

1,847 

18,528 

20,269 

>,03ll 

$949 

669 

1,776 

6.027 

390 

6,014 

$.'6,273 

5,450 

3,589 

139,327 

14,500 

10,894 

7,073 

4,191 

000 

7,390 

5,781 

$-110 

191B 

98 

24 

918 

22,808 

2,881 

410 

21,520 

32,787 

.'.-'71 

3,889 

1,209 

2,580 

10.787 

'..'3 

5,143 

23.18,1 

$73 

$1,892 

7,401 

$1,049 

0.704 

$112 

128,005 

16,537 

12,511 

$:,,<ni,i 

11,286 

6,800 

689 

5,199 

6,477 

$085 

310.199 

1916 

n 

29 

OTAI. 

(120,828 

83,820  83,216      $285,501 

$269,706 

-7.1 tl 

$4,838|$2,624|  $10,890 

$33,030 

$931 

$55,81  1 

fUU.-.ti 

$73 

-l.Vi.' 

$22,088   1  $1,049 

$28,788 

$112 

$2,  43*. 70)1 

$93,091 

$37,783 

$5,063 1  $-14,954 

$19,211 

$2,40l|  $27,701 

$18,693 

$410 

$685 

$3,590,081 

[ZATIONS  41   VfaHS 

TABLE  III 

(a)  Annual  Expense  of  Each  Legal  Aid  Organization  in  even  Dollars. 
(6)  Annual  Total  Expense  of  All  Organizations  in  even  Dollars. 


1876-1910 

(c)  Total  Expense  of  Each  Organization  in  even  Dollars. 

((/)  Total  Expensf.  of  All  Organizations  for  41  Years  in  even  Dollars. 


Table  /// 


Chicago 

New  York 

& 

9  . 

V 

o 

a 

i 

a 
o 

1 

o 

& 

Lega 

/  Aid 

a  »  , 
||| 

a 
q 

a 

a 

u 

■a 
a 

rt 

> 
u 

3 

| 

a 

c 
o 

d 
Q 

| 

Q 

3 

Q 

■g 
X 

>> 
U 
I 

a 

5 

V 

Be 

s 

< 

b 
•J 

v 
v 
i& 

3 
cd 

2 

1 

0 

| 

cd 

;* 

V 

5 

it  § 

Hi 
ill 

a! 
cd 

B 
z 

a 
a 

bo 

3 

i 

a 
1 

5 

y 

o 
BS 

3 
O 

-J 

3 

& 

s 

u 

5 
c 
a 
en 

o 

8 

- 

i 

a 
« 

H 

: 

> 
a 
•J 

< 

M 
' 
M 
>• 

_=  "t 

- 

1876 

$1,060 

$1,060 

1 

1877 

1,518 

1,519 

1 

1878 

1,570 

1.570 

1878 

, 

1879 

1,816 

1,810 

1 

1880 

2,248 

8.846 

1880 

1 

1881 

lf>H 

2.622 

1881 

1 

1882 

2,715 

8,715 

1882 

1 

1883 

2,838 

2,838 

1883 

1 

1884 

2,817 

2,817 

1884 

1 

1885 

8,87( 

2.870 

1886 

l 

1886 

$850 

2,871 

9,820 

1886 

2 

1887 

1,953 

3,052 

5,005 

1887 

2 

1888 

$8,806 

2.783 

2,901 

8,739 

1888 

5 

1889 

3,771 

3,382 

3,272 

10,485 

1889 

3 

1890 

5,371 

3.(186 

3,496 

11,053 

1890 

3 

1891 

3,058 

3.651 

5,172 

12,761 

1891 

9 

1892 

6.508 

3,634 

4,881 

128 

1892 

3 

1893 

6,184 



5,241 

11.365 

1  393 

2 

1891 

5,407 

3.094 

(1,098 

14,507 

1894 

3 

1895 

5,192 

2,871 

6.309 

14,312 

is:,:, 

3 

1896 

9.956 

2,554 

6,940 

13,450 

9 

1897 

3.424 

3.357 

7.953 

1897 

3 

1898 

1,49! 

2,539 

7,643 

$33 

1898 

4 

1899 

5,551 

1.340 

10,130 

16,039 

5 

1900 

3,  199 

-'.\'l 

$1,095 

14,524 

21,669 

1900 

4 

1901 

$1,263 

3.886 

3.873 

8,883 

17,980 

29,883 

1901 

5 

1902 

1.648 

4.1^7 

1.104 

2,750 

17,307 

89,086 

1902 

5 

1903 

1,138 

4.71M 

2.988 

9,000 

20,808 

33,333 

6 

1904 

1,400 

5,400 

2,749 

3.450 

22,702 

2,068 

98,820 

1904 

6 

1905 

1.500 

4,224 

3.000 

2,903 

1,654 

42,794 

1906 

6 

1906 

1.788 

7.457 

4,600 

$1,064 

82,116 

3,960 

2,862 

53,347 

190G 

7 

1907 

e,704 

8,060 

6.606 

1,583 

98,682 

3,001 

1,904 

68,680 

1907 

7 

1908 

2,169 

8.253 

7.679 

1,409 

H,485 

3,102 

2,137 

99,  ",31 

1908 

7 

1909 

2,560 

8,361 

1(1,020 

1.864 

41,641 

5,381 

1,685 

$658 

72.170 

1909 

S 

1910 

2.809 

8.091 

12,175 

2,968 

%i 

$1,338 

30,400 

6,1«9 

1,713 

1,046 

76.602 

1910 

9 

1911 

.1,741 

12,851 

14,518 

:  368 

500 

5,804 

43,114 

6,740 

$5,000 

1,846 

033 

$251 

07,250 

1911 

11 

1912 

11,107 

4,507 

$1,742 

19.180 

19.850 

$492 

2,208 

.-.mi 

5,107 

46,194 

7,053 

7,516 

2,293 

1,176 

619 

119,705 

1912 

21 

14 

1913 

800 

5,030 

2,015 

24.826 

18,075 

1,220 

2,603 

500 

5,283 

$4,641 

$1 ,824 

,5,200 

3,703 

8,973 

2,510 

1,024 

833 

$9,808 

$1,175 

133,600 

1918 

19 

1914 

!,<H5 

5,991 

8,158 

26.853 

22.300 

1.238 

1,841 

$552 

500 

$2,801 

3,808 

18,831 

2,040 

44,140 

7,888 

0,381 

8,344 

1,295 

688 

1,384 

160,189 

1914 

20 

1915 

1,010 

5.390 

2,336 

17,599 

89,800 

1  80S 

3.774 

*2.430 

1,282 

B00 

8,082 

(185 

$22 

5,111 

_M  618 

2,281 

$1,440 

15,609 

6,870 

10,446 

4,316 

1.615 

980 

2,381 

1,562 

$16 

166,701 

1915 

18 

26 

1916 

1,020 

6.408 

i,S7S 

18.318 

25.297 

1,359 

3.210 

2.415 

1.315 

500 

4,280 

111 

364 

4,226 

21,1911 

$2,088 

8,435 

3.13J 

14,648 

0,959 

11,609 

$650 

4,437 

1,882 

$37 

1,318 

5,857 

1,839 

2 

$993 

181,408 

1916 

11 

30 

Total 

$5,081 

$50,232 

HO  929 

$208,684 

.?183,(n,7 

$5,518 

$24,310 

$4,845 

$3,089 

.■?-...  ;.i  in 

$9,703 

$240 

fclwi 

$32,101 

$66,284 

$2,088 

$9,93o|  $4,572 

$082,341 

$68,884 

$53,015 

$650 

<M,mi\ 

$9,629 

$37 

$4,693 

$11,041 

$5,980 

$18 

$993 

il, 5, 3,733   ,  |ZAT,ons41  VkARS 

5  \"*l 


INDEX 


u'y 


INDEX 


Abbott,  Lymak,  on  public  duty  to  provide  jus- 
tice, 194. 
Administration  of  Justice,  see  also  Court  Costs, 

Delay,  Expense  of  Lawyers'  Services,  Fail- 
ure of  Administration  of  Justice. 
Administrative  tribunals'  effect  on,  83. 
Bar's  relation  to,  227. 
Defects  in 

Cause  disparity  in  rights,  15. 

Classification  of,  16. 

Due  to  bad  machinery,  14. 

Expense  of  lawyers,  fundamental,  31. 

Not  intentional,  15. 

Not  realized,  16. 

Serious  nature  of,  15. 

Summary  of,  240. 
Defects  in  criminal  field,  serious,  114. 

Equality  not  secured,  104. 

Influence  of  the  defender,  119,  124. 

Political  effect,  125. 
Early,  had  simple  machinery,  6. 

Was  inexpensive,  6. 
Equality  and  freedom  essential  to,  3. 
Expense  to  state  of,  23. 
Failure  to  provide  lawyers,  33. 
Function  of,  in  a  democracy,  182. 
History  of  state  control  over,  180. 
Impartiality  not  attained,  8. 
Inadequate,  effect  of,  5. 
Law  given  life  through,  16. 
Lawyers  supply  motive  power,  32. 
Legal  aid  organizations'  effect  on,  133. 

Public  controlled,  effect  on,  146. 
Legal  aid  work  and,  relation  between,  106, 

128, 180. 
Legal  aid  work  part  of,  149. 
Popular  suspicion  of,  xi. 
Remedial  agencies'  relation  to,  38. 
Small  causes  neglected  by,  8,  41. 
Substantive  law  and,  5. 
Used  for  extortion,  9. 
Vital  problem  of  to-day,  16. 
Waste  of,  increases  living  cost,  42. 
Administration  Orders,  see  English  County 
Courts. 

Administrative  Officials 
Advice  given  by,  94. 
Definition  of  term,  94. 
Growth  of,  98. 
Kinds  of,  94,  95. 
Services  in  litigation,  95. 
Wages  collected  by,  96. 
Massachusetts  plan,  96-98. 
California  plan,  98. 


Administrative  Tribunals,  see  also  Industrial 
Accident  Commissions,  Interstate  Com- 
merce Commission,  Workmen's  Compen- 
sation Acts. 

In  general,  83. 

Advantages  of,  over  courts,  91.  [94. 

Distinguished  from  administrative  officials, 

Future  development,  91. 

Incorporation  in  judicial  system,  91. 

Promote  equality  of  justice,  91. 

Rise  of,  83. 

Advertising  by  legal  aid  organizations,  ques- 
tion of,  235. 
Agencies,  see  Remedial  Agencies. 
Akron  Legal  Aid  Committee,  145,  176,  191, 
212. 

Started  in  1910,  145. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Pamphlet  on  law  issued,  212. 
American  Bar  Association 
Canons  of  Ethics,  232. 
On  conciliation,  60. 
Report  of  Special  Committee  on  Preventing 

Unnecessary  Cost,  20,  241. 
Section  on  legal  aid  suggested,  234. 
Section  on  equal  justice  suggested,  235. 
Speech  of  Roscoe  Pound  before,  7. 
Supervision  by,  of  national  legal  aid  work,  245. 
American  Judicature  Society 
Conciliation  endorsed  by,  67. 
Procedure  reform  plans,  19. 
On  substantive  law,  14. 

Legal  aid    organizations    should   cooperate 

with,  199,  241,  246.  [139. 

Americanization  of  legal  aid  by  Briesen,  137, 

Americanization  Program,  see  also  Immigrants. 

Retarded  by  injustice,  9. 
Anarchy 

And  denial  of  justice,  5. 
Caused  by  denial  of  justice,  10-12, 182. 
Experience  of  Roosevelt,  11. 
Appeals 
Court  costs  in,  27. 
Effect  of,  27,  206. 
California  rule,  204. 
Cost  of,  under  compensation  acts,  85,  89. 

Unfairness  of,  89. 
Delay  through,  17,  18. 
Number  taken  from  formal  and  informal 

courts,  53. 
Reasonable  delay  in,  proper,  18. 
Restricted  in  small  claims  courts,  45,  46. 
Right  of,  essential,  18. 
Rule  allowing  new  trials,  18. 


256 


INDEX 


Arbitration 

Commercial  bodies,  use  by,  69. 
Conciliation,  relation  to,  70. 
Court's  attitude  to,  68. 

Effect  on  costs,  delays,  and  expense  of  law- 
yers, 70,  72. 
Future  of,  72. 
Growth  of  idea,  70. 
Judicial  arbitration 
Beginnings  of,  71. 
Cleveland  rules  for,  48. 
New  York  rules  for,  55,  71. 
Not  yet  tested,  243. 
Legal  aid  organizations  use,  164. 
Maritime  disputes,  94. 
Nature  of,  68. 

Like  small  claims  court,  71. 
Procedural  law  disregarded,  69. 
Rabbis'  use  of,  71. 
Substantive  law  disregarded,  69. 
Submission,  form  of,  defective,  69. 
Argentine  Republic,  Counsel  provided  in  crim- 
inal cases,  115. 
Assigned  Counsel 
In  general,  100. 
In  civil  cases,  100. 

Disuse  of  procedure,  100. 
In  England,  102,  249. 
In  foreign  countries,  101,  248. 
Unfairness  of,  101. 
Bill  in  Connecticut  legislature  for,  202. 
Federal  law  concerning,  231. 
Needed  in  certain  cases,  32,  56. 
Statute  of  Henry  VII,  21. 
Theory  of  lawyer's  obligation,  230. 
Under  New  Jersey  compensation  act,  89. 
Under  Soldiers'  Relief  Act,  231. 
Use  of  plan  by  legal  aid  organizations,  101. 
In  criminal  cases,  103. 
Use  of  plan,  108,  112. 
Failure  of  plan,  103,  112. 
Attorneys  not  paid,  112. 
None  in  lower  courts,  108. 
Professional  assigned  counsel,  114. 
Defender  plan  better,  123. 
Assignment  of  Wages 
Means  of  extortion,  9,  10. 
Test  case  on  notice,  208. 
Legal  aid  work  concerning  law  of,  201,  202, 
205. 
Association  of  the  Bar  of  the  City  of  New 

York,  see  New  York  City  Bar  Association. 
Assumption  of  Risk 

Origin  and  effect  of  doctrine,  14. 
Under  compensation  acts,  87. 
Atlanta  Legal  Aid  Society,  short  life  of,  143, 
187. 


Attorneys,  see  Lawyers,  Expense  of  Lawyers' 

Services. 
Austin,  Benjamin,  on  need  for  defender,  115. 

Baker,  Newton  D.,  provides  counsel  to  accused 

in  Cleveland,  125. 
Ballantine,  Arthur  A. ,  on  compensation  plan 

for  passengers,  90. 
Baltimore  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  145,  176,  177, 
191,201. 
Started  in  1911, 145. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Changes  illegitimacy  law,  201. 
Bankruptcy  Cases 

Court  trustee  for  small,  57. 
Rejected  by  some  legal  aid  organizations,  153. 
Bar,  see  also  Bar  Associations,  Lawyers,  Legal 
Aid  and  the  Bar. 
Aid  legal  aid  organizations,  143,  145. 
Distrusted  first  legal  aid,  135. 
Knows  little  of  legal  aid,  151. 
Legal  aid  should  appeal  to,  196. 
Popular  distrust  of,  228. 
Responsibility  for  administration  of  justice, 

ix,  xiv. 
Can  end  denial  of  justice,  239. 
Standard  lowered  by  contingent  fees,  86. 
Bar  Associations,  see  also  American  Bar  Asso- 
ciation. [248. 
Assistance  to  poor  in  France  and  Scotland, 
Consider  the  defender  plan,  116. 
Duty  to  lead  legal  aid,  245. 
Duty  to  support  legal  aid,  226. 
Failure  to  support  legal  aid,  174,  238. 
Indifference  to  poor,  37. 
Legal  aid  and  preventive  law,  217. 
Start  legal  aid  work,  140, 141,  144. 
Bar  Association  Legal  Aid  Societies,  see  Types 

of  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 
Belgium,  provision  for  poor  persons,  248. 
Bernheimer,  Charles  L.,  work  for  arbitration, 

69. 
Birmingham  Legal  Aid  Society 
Failure  of,  145,  187. 
Bar  did  not  support,  174. 
Boards,  Industrial  Accident,  see  Industrial 

Accident  Commissions. 
Boards  of  Health,  legal  assistance  by,  95. 
Bonds,  see  also  Straw  Bondsmen. 
Required  as  security  for  costs,  28. 
Effect  of,  29. 
Boston,  Charles  A.,  resolution  on  Legal  Aid 

Work,  234. 
Boston  Legal  Aid  Society,  28,  76,  77,  97,  129, 
140,  142,  143,  146,  154-156,  159,  160,  163, 
164,  166-168,   173,  176,  191,  195,  201,  209, 
210,  213,  216,  223,  238. 
Started  in  1900,  140. 


INDEX 


257 


Cases  of: 
Classified,  154. 
Sources,  159. 
Dispositions,  160. 
Cooperation  with  Children's  Aid  Society,  223. 
Criminal  cases  refused,  156. 
Divorce  cases  refused,  155. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees 

Amount  of,  168. 
Believes  in  charging,  167. 
Rate  charged,  166. 
Illegitimacy  law  changed,  201. 
Litigation  avoided,  164. 
Reference  of  cases,  plan,  163. 
Report  on  preventive  law,  216. 
Small  loans  law  changed,  201. 
Support  by  bar,  238. 
Test  cases  by,  209,  210. 
War  service  by,  213. 
Briefs,  expense  of,  27. 
Briesen,  Arthur  v. 
And  Theodore  Roosevelt,  10. 
Influence  on  legal  aid,  171. 
Leadership  and  vision,  136,  140. 
Quoted  on 

Citizenship,  218. 
Conciliation,  63. 
Effect  of  bad  finances,  193. 
Legal  aid  attorneys,  193. 
Purpose  of  legal  aid,  133. 
Bryce,  James,  on  American  lawyers,  228. 
Buffalo  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  145, 156,  168,  176, 
191,  195,201,238. 
Founded  in  1912, 145. 
Criminal  cases  declined,  156. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees  charged  by,  168. 
Legislative  work,  201. 
Public  grant  to,  195. 
Support  by  bar,  238. 
Bureau  of  Justice,  A 
Need  for,  15,  215. 
Central  legal  agency,  90. 
Under  judicial  control,  247. 
Bureau  of  Justice,  The  (Chicago),  136,  144. 
Founded  in  1888, 136. 
Rapid  growth  of,  136. 
Resume  of  work,  144. 
Merged  in  Chicago  Legal  Aid,  144. 
Bureau  of  Personal  Service,  The  (Chicag-o), 
142,  176,  190.  6  ; 

Enters  legal  aid  work,  142. 
Eighty-five  per  cent  increase  in  work,  190. 
Bureaus,  Legal  Aid,  see  Legal  Aid  Organiza- 
tions. 

Burke,  William  F.,  work  in  Cleveland  Court, 

48. 


California  Commission  on  Immigration,  95. 

California  Industrial  Accident  Commission, 
on  effect  of  delays,  84. 

California  State  Bureau  of  Labor,  wages  col- 
lected by,  98. 

Cambridge  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  see  Harvard 

Legal  Aid  Bureau. 
Carnegie  Foundation 

Studies  in  legal  education,  xi. 
Study  of  legal  education,  227. 
Central  Legal  Aid  Organization 
Need  for,  197,  217. 

In  desertion  cases,  170. 
To  standardize  records,  160. 
To  nationalize  work,  245. 
To  be  clearing  house,  246. 
Condition  to  future  success,  244. 
Possibilities  of,  198,  199. 

War  service  by,  214. 
Result  of  failure  to  establish,  234. 
Chambers  of  Commerce,  see  New  York  Cham- 
ber of  Commerce,  Chicago  Association  of 
Credit  Men. 

Arbitration  favored  by,  68,  69. 
Charity  Organizations 
Express  need  for  legal  aid,  188,  222. 
Fail  to  develop  Bridgeport  legal  aid,  177. 
Furnish  legal  aid,  133. 
Legal  aid  work  and 
Relation,  150. 
Cooperation,  219,  224. 
Volunteer  counsel  failure,  220. 
Legal  aid  work  for,  140,  143,  223. 

Expert  service,  222. 
Representation  on  legal  aid  directorate,  245. 
Charity  Organization  Legal  Aid  Bureaus, 

see  Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 
Charity  Work  by  Lawyers,  85. 
Chart,  three  methods  used  to  meet  expense  of 
lawyers'  services,  40. 

Chicago  Association  of  Credit  Men,  provides 
for  arbitration,  69. 

Chicago  Bar  Association,  on  attorneys  in  small 

claims  court,  52. 
Chicago   Legal   Aid  Society,  see   Bureau  of 

Justice,  Protective  Agency  for  Women  and 

Children,  52,  97,  144,  146,  154,  155,   159, 

163-168,  176,  187,  190,  191,  193,  195,  200, 

201,  210,  216,  223,  238. 
Early  history,  136. 
Result  of  merger  in  1905,  144. 
Cases  of 

Classified,  154. 

Sources,  159. 
Criminal  cases  given  up,  156. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees 

Charged  by,  168. 

Report  on,  165,  167. 


258 


INDEX 


Could  double  work,  190. 

Work  limited  by  finances,  193. 

Legislative  work,  200. 

Litigation  avoided,  164. 

Reference  of  cases,  plan,  163. 

Small  loans,  work  in,  260. 

Support  from  bar,  238. 
Chicago  Municipal  Court 

Provision  for  arbitration,  71. 

Small  claims  session  of,   see  Small   Claims 
Courts :  Chicago. 
Chicago  Women's  Club,  starts  legal  aid,  135. 
Children,  see  also  Domestic  Relations. 

Protective  legislation  secured,  201. 
Children's  Aid  Society,  The  Boston,  coopera- 
tion with  legal  aid,  223. 
Choate,  Joseph  H.,  quoted  on  contingent  fees, 

86. 
Churches,  on  legal  aid  directorate,  245. 
Cincinnati  Domestic  Relations  Court 

Wide  jurisdiction,  75. 

Use  of  conciliation,  81. 
Cincinnati  Legal  Aid  Society,  33,  144,  168, 
176,  191,  202. 

Started  in  1907,  144. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Fees  charged  by,  168. 

Legislative  work,  202. 
Cincinnati  Municipal  Court,  provision  for  ar- 
bitration, 71. 
Cities 

Growth  of,  cause  of  judicial  breakdown,  ix, 
xiii,  7. 
Need  for  legal  aid,  133. 

Denial  of  justice  in  large,  187. 

Extent  of  legal  aid  measured  by,  187. 
Citizenship,  see  also  Immigrants,  Americaniza- 
tion. 

Good,  promoted  by  legal  aid.  217. 

Small  claims  court  effect  on,  53. 
Class,  no  dominating,  causes  injustice,  15. 
Class  Distinctions 

Foreign  to  Anglo-Saxon  law,  3. 

Result  of,  inlaw,  12. 

Caused  by  court  costs,  29. 

Substantive  law  free  from,  13. 
Employer's  liability  law,  15. 
Class  Legislation,  public  legal  aid  is  not,  182. 
Clerks  of  Court 

Assistance  of,  to  parties,  48,  78. 
Need  for,  56. 
Cleveland  Legal  Aid  Society,  116,  125,  129, 
143,  146,  154,  159,  164,  166-168,  176,  177, 
191,  201,  216. 

Begun  in  1904,  143. 

Cases 

Classified,  154. 
Sources  of,  159. 


Defender  urged  by,  116. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees 

Believes  in,  167. 
Charged,  168. 
Legislative  work,  201. 
Litigation  avoided,  164. 
Cleveland  Municipal  Court 
Arbitration  rule,  71. 
Costs,  report  on,  20,  23. 
Economy  of,  26. 

Conciliation  branch,  see  Small  Claims  Courts  : 
Cleveland. 
Collection  Agencies 

Fraudulent  in  Missouri,  203. 
Profit  from  defects  in  law,  42. 
Small  claims  courts  and,  54. 
Watched  by  legal  aid,  227. 
Colonies,  American 
Lawyers  in,  31. 
Laws  after  Revolution,  6. 
Were  denied  justice,  6. 
Colorado  Springs  Legal  Aid  Society,  started 

in  1912,  145. 
Columbus  Legal  Aid  Committee 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Slow  growth  of,  174. 
Columbus  Municipal  Court,  power  of,  as  court 

trustee,  58. 
Common  Law 

Appeals  by  poor  needed,  27. 
Legal  aid  work  and 
In  general,  206. 
In  test  cases,  208. 
Opportunity  for,  206. 
No  costs  in,  20. 

Not  scientific  development,  214. 
Community  and  Legal  Aid  Work,  see  also  Citi- 
zenship, Preventive  Law. 
Legal  aid  service  to,  150,  210. 
Prosecution  of  lawyers,  155. 
Loan  shark  work,  210. 
Benefited  by  legal  aid  and  charities  coopera- 
tion, 225. 
Complaints  against  Lawyers 
Legal  aid  work  in,  226. 
Legal  aid  rule  to  reject,  153. 
Criticism  of,  154. 
Compromise  of  Cases 
Forced  by  delay,  17. 
Forced  by  unfair  law,  87. 
Conciliation 

Advantages,  65,  66. 

Definition  of,  60. 

Nature  and  history,  60,  61. 

Codes  of  ethics  sanction,  60. 

Court  rules  for,  in  New  York,  55,  63. 

Future  of,  66,  67. 


INDEX 


259 


Judicial,  not  established,  243. 
Small  claims  courts  and,  63. 

Power  to  use,  59. 
Used  in  European  Courts,  61. 
by  American  courts,  63. 
by  arbitration  boards,  70. 
by  Industrial  Accident  Commissions,  64, 88. 
by  Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  92. 
by  labor  commissions,  97,  98. 
by  legal  aid  organizations,  63. 
in  domestic  relations,  64,  80. 
in  Industrial  Courts,  62. 
Conciliation   Courts,   see   also   Small  Claims 
Courts. 

Power  to  render  judgment,  66. 
Conference  of  Bar  Association  Delegates 
Considers  legal  aid  work,  ix,  234. 
Resolution  on  duty  of  bar,  226,  237,  239. 
Constitution 

Of  Mexico  not  enforced,  16. 
Of  United  States  guarantees  equal  justice,  4. 
Constitutions 

Guarantee  equal  justice,  3,  4,  8. 
Court  costs  not  required  by,  20. 
Protect  accused  persons,  6. 
Provisions  for  conciliation,  61. 
Constitutional  Law 

Compulsory  assignment  of  counsel,  101. 
Judgments  paid  by  instalments,  57. 
Laws  held  unconstitutional 

Detroit  Domestic  Relations  Court  Act,  75. 
Protection  of  children  act,  201. 
Wage  assignments  act,  201. 
Nonpayment  of  wages  criminal,  96,  98,  99. 
Right  of  accused  to  counsel,  103. 
Contempt  Proceedings,  see  Domestic  Relations 

Law. 
Contingent  Fees 

Rise  and  causes  of,  85. 

The  bar  and,  38,  86. 

The  law  and  courts  on,  86. 

Abuses  of,  86,  114. 

Legal  aid  organizations  and,  156,  243. 

Popular  suspicion  of,  183. 

Effect  on  bar,  228. 
Workmen's  compensation  acts  and,  158. 
Corruption,  not  a  cause  of  injustice,  15. 
Cost  of  Justice,  see  Administration  of  Justice, 
Court  Costs,  Delay,  Expense  of  Justice,  Ex- 
pense of  Lawyers'  Services. 
Costs,  see  Court  Costs. 
Council   of  National  Defence,  adopts  legal 

aid  handbooks,  214. 
Counsel,  see  Assignment  of  Counsel,  Expense 

of  Lawyers'  Services,  Lawyers. 
Court  Costs,  see  also  In  Forma  Pauperis  Pro- 
ceedings. 


Abolition  of,  see  Reduction  of. 

Considered,  20. 

By  compensation  acts,  84,  85,  92. 

By  Kansas  Small  Claims  Courts,  45. 

By  Massachusetts  Labor  Bureau,  97. 
Appeal  costs,  27. 

California  rule  changed,  204. 
Bonds  to  secure,  28. 
Briefs  and  transcripts,  27. 
Classification  of,  24. 
Court's  power  to  dispense  with,  29,  209. 
Defect  in  administration  of  justice,  16. 
Denial  of  justice  caused  by,  8,  20,  28,  29. 

In  small  cases,  41,  44. 
Deterrent  to  litigation,  21,  26,  30. 

In  divorce  cases,  155. 
Exist  only  under  statute,  20. 
Legal  aid  appeals  prevented,  206. 
Public  defrayment  of,  in  Europe,  248,  249. 
Question  of,  neglected,  20. 
Reduction  of,  see  Abolition  of. 

Arbitration  proceedings,  71,  72. 

Conciliation  proceedings,  62,  66. 

Domestic  relations  courts,  76,  77. 

Municipal  courts,  25. 

Small  claims  courts,  46,  50,  52. 

Urged  by  legal  aid,  203. 
Remedies  for  difficulty,  25,  26. 
System  of 

Origin,  21. 

Unfair  and  illogical,  22,  23. 
Table  showing  amount  of,  25. 
Witnesses,  27. 
Courts,  see  also  Court  Reorganizations,  Domes- 
tic   Relations   Courts,    Industrial   Courts, 

Small  Claims  Courts. 
Contingent  fees  and,  86. 
Desire  to  end  delays,  19. 
Ejectment,  control  over,  14. 
Need  administrative  branches,  93. 
Political  importance  of,  42. 
Power  to  assign  counsel,  100. 
Records,  use  of,  215. 
Refer  cases  to  legal  aid,  159. 
Lower  courts 

First,  in  America,  6. 

Costs  in,  24. 

Counsel  not  assigned  in,  103. 
Municipal  courts 

Oust  justices  of  peace,  43. 

Effect  on  small  cases,  43. 

Lessen  delay,  19, 

Reduce  costs,  25. 
Courts,  Reorganization  of 
Present  organization  bad,  7. 
Will  not  abolish  lawyers,  31. 
Legal  aid  shoidd  partake  in,  199. 


260 


INDEX 


Not  expensive,  90. 
Need  for,  215. 
Advantages  through 

Lessen  delays,  19. 

Reduce  costs,  27. 

Promote  equality,  128. 

Greater  economy,  26. 
Should  include 

Administrative  methods,  91. 

Central  legal  aid  agency,  90. 

Judicial  legal  aid,  247. 
Court  Trustee,  see  Trustee,  Court. 
Criminal  Cases  [155. 

Failure  of  legal  aid  organizations  in,  141,  144, 

Has  led  to  defender  plan,  156. 
Serious  distinguished  from  minor,  106. 
Criminal  Law,  see  Defender  in  Criminal  Cases, 

Domestic  Relations  Law. 
Antiquated  procedure,  19. 
Constitutional  safeguards,  6. 
Delays  in,  18. 
Poor  persons  and,  105. 
Protections  for  accused,  108. 

Failure  of,  108,  110,  111. 
Criminal  Proceedings 

Assignment  of  counsel  in,  103. 
Bettered  by  defender's  work,  121, 124. 
Lawyers  needed  in,  111. 
Popular  criticism  of,  105. 
Simple  in  lower  courts,  124. 
Wages  collected  through,  96. 
Curtis  v.  Gokay  :  decision  on  arbitration,  68. 

.Dallas  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  97,  148,  176,  185, 
190,  202. 

Under  Public  Welfare  Board,  148. 

Extent  of  work,  190. 

Legislative  work,  202. 

Killed  by  politics,  186. 
Damages,  Law  of,  in  personal  injury  cases,  87. 
Dayton  Legal  Aid  Division,  Department  of 
Welfare,  148,  176,  177,  185, 190. 

Work  taken  over  by  city,  148. 

Extent  of  work,  190. 
De  Tocqueville,  on  American  lawyers,  228. 
Defaults,  service  of  process  by  mail  does  not 

cause,  26,  49. 
Defects  in  Administration  of  Justice,  see  Ad- 
ministration of  Justice,  Court  Costs,  Delay, 

Expense  of  Lawyers'  Services. 
Defender  in  Criminal  Cases 

Definition  of  term,  105. 

History  of  the  defender  plan,  115,  156. 

Substance  of  the  plan,  107.  116. 

Arguments  concerning  need  for,  107, 108, 202. 

Assigned  counsel  and,  100,  112. 

Conduct  of  cases  by,  122. 

Criminal  procedure  improved  by,  124. 


Legal  aid  and,  106. 

Two  should  merge,  235,  244. 
Legislation  concerning,  116, 117. 
Popularity  of  plan,  127. 
Work  of 

Nature,  118. 

Extent,  117, 118. 

Value  of,  119,  123. 

Ethical  questions,  120. 

Expense,  119. 

Results,  118. 
In  lower  criminal  courts,  107. 

Question  of  necessity  for,  124. 

Work  of  probation  staffs,  125, 127. 
In  Columbus,  Los  Angeles,  and  Portland,  117, 
125. 

Work  and  value  of,  126. 
Delay 
The  evil  of,  16, 17. 

In  appeals,  18. 

In  criminal  cases,  18. 

In  personal  injury  cases,  84. 

In  small  cases,  41. 
Two  main  kinds  of,  18. 
Causes  of,  19. 
Early  law  had  little,  6. 
Forces  merchants  to  arbitrate,  69. 
Elihu  Root  on,  17. 
Usefulness  of,  17. 
Methods  of  eliminating 

In  general,  19. 

Arbitration,  70,  72. 

Conciliation,  66. 

Defender  in  criminal  cases,  122. 

Domestic  relations  courts,  76,  77,  82. 

Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  92. 

Small  claims  courts,  45,  50,  52. 
Democracy 

Depends  on  law,  xiv,  5. 
Cannot  have  class  distinctions,  5,  12. 
Denial  of  Justice 

Causes  of,  in  general,  15. 

Delays,  84. 

Excessive  costs,  28. 

Faulty  court  organization,  16. 
Substantive  law  not  a  cause,  15. 
Not  a  class  issue,  9. 
Effects  of 

Far-reaching,  8,  10. 

Anarchy,  5,  11,  12. 

Aids  dishonesty,  9. 

Danger  of,  xiii,  xiv. 

In  domestic  relations  cases,  73. 

In  personal  injury  cases,  86. 
Program  for  ending,  240. 
Reduced  by 

Domestic  relations  courts,  82. 


INDEX 


261 


Small  claims  courts,  55. 

Failure  of  legal  aid  to  end,  194. 
Denmark 

Conciliation  courts  in,  61. 
Their  success,  62. 

Counsel  for  accused  provided,  115. 
Denver  Legal  Aid  Dispensary,  143-14.5. 

Started  in  1904, 143. 

Plan  to  use  law  students,  143. 
Desertion  Cases 

Failure  of  legal  aid  to  handle,  170. 

Special  organization  in  New  York  for,  145. 
Detroit  Domestic  Relations  Court 

Wide  jurisdiction  of,  75. 

Conciliation  employed,  81. 

Held  unconstitutional,  75. 
Detroit  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  144, 160,  166, 174, 
191,  236,  239. 

Started  by  bar  in  1909,  144. 

Disposition  of  cases,  160. 

Donations  by  clients  to,  166. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Bar's  failure  to  extend,  174. 
Difficulties  in  Administration  of  Justice,  see 

Administration  of  Justice,  Court  Costs,  De- 
lays, Expense  of  Lawyers'  Services. 
Disbarment  Proceedings,  cost  of,  borne  by 

state,  28. 
Disposition  of  Cases,  see  Legal  Aid  Work :  Dis- 
position of  cases. 
Dissatisfaction  with  Law 

Causes  of,  15. 

Led  to  administrative  tribunals,  83. 
District  Attorney 

Defender  and,  121. 

Duties  in  criminal  cases,  108-110. 

Powerful  position  of,  113. 

Partiality,  110. 

Shyster  lawyer  and,  114. 
District  of  Columbia  Municipal  Court,  econ- 
omy of,  26. 
Divorce  Cases,  see  also  Domestic  Relations. 

Assignment  of  counsel  in,  102. 

Conciliation  in,  64. 

Costs,  23. 

Legal  aid  rule  to  reject,  155. 
Divorce   Proctors,   in    England   and   United 

States,  102. 
Domestic  Relations,  Cases  of 

Many  among  the  poor,  73. 

Important  in  legal  aid  work,  135,  152. 

Abuses  in,  investigated,  162. 

Conciliation  in,  64. 

State  control  of,  in  Los  Angeles,  181. 
Domestic  Relations  Courts 

Conciliation  used  in,  64,  80. 

Criminal  process  used,  75. 

Future  extension  of,  81. 


General  work  of,  80. 
Needs  of 

Wider  jurisdiction,  74. 

Unification,  74. 

Lawyers'  services,  79. 
Success  of 

In  general,  77,  242. 

Effect  on  delay  and  costs,  76,  77. 

Effect  on  expense  of  lawyers,  78. 
Use  of  probation  staffs,  78. 
Domestic  Relations  Law 

Civil  and  criminal  remedies  contrasted,  76. 
Growth  of  criminal  remedies,  74,  75. 
Inadequacy  of  civil  remedies,  75. 

Contempt  proceedings,  77,  79. 
Interest  of  state  in,  73. 
Difficult  field  for  law,  73. 
Duluth  Free  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  28,  101,  145, 

148,  176,  185,  190. 
Started  in  1913,  145. 
Work  taken  over  by  city,  148. 
Extent  of  work,  190. 
Pays  costs  for  clients,  28. 

JiiDisoN  Electric   Illuminating  Company  of 

Boston,  plans  legal  aid  for  employees,  173. 
Education,  Legal 

Legal  aid  organizations  and,  226. 
Clinical  training,  165,  235. 
Clinical  work  in  Denver,  143. 
Legal  aid  work  done  by  law  students,  145, 
148. 
Significance  of,  174. 
Plan  in  France,  248. 
Ejectment  Proceedings,  see  also  Landlord  and 
Tenant  Law. 
Use  of  fictitious  leases,  14. 
Embree,  William  Dean,  report  of,  quoted,  121. 
Employees,    see    Interstate    Commerce    Em- 
ployees, Wage-Earners,  Workmen's  Compen- 
sation Acts,  Workmen,  Injured. 
Employers 

Legal  aid  furnished  by,  171,  172,  236. 
On  legal  aid  directorate,  245.  [89. 

Reports  to  industrial  accident  commissions, 
Unscrupulous,  aided  by  inadequate  adminis- 
tration of  justice,  9. 
Endowments,  legal  aid  organizations  lack,  195. 
England,  fraudulent  legal  aid  societies  in,  199. 
English  County  Courts 

Provision  for  small  cases,  42. 
Act  as  court  trustee,  58. 
Control  over  ejectment,  59. 
Use  of  instalment  judgments,  57. 
English  Law 
Arbitration  developed,  68. 
Assignment  of  counsel,  102,  231. 
Rules  for,  232. 


262 


INDEX 


Court  costs  in  early,  20,  21. 

Divorce  proctors  in,  102. 

Failure  to  secure  equality,  22,  231. 

Unfair  criminal  law,  6,  107. 
Judicial  legal  aid  work,  247. 
Treasury  grant  for  costs,  28. 
Equality,  political  and  economic,  depend  on 

law,  5. 
Equality  of  Justice 

History  of  the  principle,  3. 

Legal  guarantees  of,  3,  4. 

An  essential  requirement,  xi,  3,  180,  215,  240. 

Democracy  and,  5. 

Political  significance,  4,  5. 

In  criminal  matters,  105, 107. 

Defender  secures,  127. 
In  early  laws,  6. 
Assigned  counsel  and,  103. 
Substantive  law  and,  13,  15. 
Promoted  by 

Administrative  tribunals,  91. 
Arbitration,  71. 
Conciliation,  66. 

Domestic  relations  courts,  80,  81. 
Compensation  acts,  88. 
Requires  lawyers,  129. 
Ethics 

In  criminal  cases,  120. 
Legal  aid  standard  high,  165. 
Ethics,  Canons  of:  lawyer's  duty  to  poor,  232. 
Ethical  Culture  Society,  founds  Bureau  of 

Justice,  136. 
Evidence,  Rules  of,  see  also  Procedural  Law. 
Disregarded  by  Industrial  Accident  Commis- 
sions, 88. 
Expense  of  Justice,  see  Administration  of  Jus- 
tice, Court  Costs,  Expense  of  Lawyers'  Ser- 
vices. 
Effect  in  criminal  cases,  112. 
Cost  to  government,  183. 
Reduced  by 

Conciliation,  65. 
Defender,  120, 123. 
Industrial  accident  commissions,  90. 
Small  claims  courts,  51,  52. 
Expense  of  Lawyers'  Services 
In  colonies,  6. 

The  fundamental  difficulty,  31,  128,  241. 
Lawyers'  services  necessary,  16,  111. 
Poor  unable  to  meet,  33,  88. 
Results  of 

Prohibits  small  cases,  41,  44. 
Destroys  equality,  181. 
Unnecessary  in  part,  33,  125. 
Solution  of  difficulty 
In  general,  39. 
Assignment  of  counsel,  100. 
Administrative  tribunals,  87,  91. 


Conciliation  proceedings,  62,  66. 
Domestic  relations  courts,  78. 
Legal  aid  organizations,  133. 
Small  claims  courts,  45,  46,  52. 
In  foreign  countries,  115. 
Extent  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  see  Legal  Aid 
Work,  Extent  of. 

.r  ailure  of  Administration  of  Justice 
Causes  of,  6,  7. 
Realized  slowly,  7. 
Evidence  of,  8,  151. 
Farmers,  state  legal  aid  for,  in  Virginia,  95. 
Federal  Government  :   legal   aid   to   drafted 

men,  183. 
Fees,  see  also  Contingent  Fees,  Court  Costs,  Ex- 
pense of  Lawyers'  Services. 
Charged  by  legal  aid  organizations 
First  rules,  135. 
Plan  of  retainer,  139. 
Nature  of,  charged,  165. 
Table  showing  amount,  16S,  note  1. 
Practice  varies,  136,  165. 
Arguments  concerning,  165,  167,  235. 
Fellow  Servant  Rule 
Origin  and  effect  of,  14. 
Under  compensation  acts,  89. 
Finances  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 
Early  difficulties,  137,  142. 
Legal  aid  work  not  expensive,  194. 

Table  of  expenses,  see  Appendix,  Table  III. 
Per  capita  expense,  190. 
Meagre  amount  of,  193,  195. 
Effect  of  inadequate,  142,  184,  193,  196,  200. 
In  Chicago,  190. 
In  New  York,  144,  155,  211. 
In  Denver,  144. 
No  grants  from  state,  195. 
Income  from  clients'  fees,  168. 
Better  in  independent  organizations,  177. 
Duty  of  bar  to  provide,  237,  239,  245. 

Amount  given  by  lawyers,  238. 
Strong,  condition  to  future  of  work,  244. 
Ford  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  172-236. 
Its  plan,  criticized,  172. 
Table  of  work,  172. 
Fraud,  denial  of  justice  abets,  9. 
Frauoulent  Legal  Aid  Organizations 
First  attempt  to  start,  138. 
Danger  of,  199. 
Freedom  of  Justice,  see  Equality  of  Justice. 
A  basic  principle,  3. 
Relation  to  equality,  180. 
French  Law 
Assistance  to  poor  persons,  26. 
Assignment  of  counsel,  101. 
Judicial  legal  aid,  247. 


INDEX 


263 


Lawyers'  duty  to  poor,  231. 
New  trial  after  conviction,  119. 
Future  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  see  Legal  Aid 
Work,  Future  of. 

Garland,  ex  parte,  decision   as  to  lawyer's 

function,  32. 
Garnishment  of  Wages,  used  for  extortion,  9. 
Germany 

Counsel  for  poor  in,  231. 

Legal  aid  work  in,  171. 

Criticism  of  organization,  171. 
German  Society,  The 

Legal  aid  to  immigrants,  134.  [137. 

Supported  New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  135, 

Withdraws  support,  137. 
Government,  see  also  State. 

One  of  laws,  not  men,  4. 

Duty  to  provide  justice,  4,  5,  182. 

Relation  of  individual  to,  13. 
Grand  Jury,  function  in  criminal  cases,  108. 

Value  questioned,  109. 

tl  ale,  Chief  Justice,  on  duty  of  assigned  coun- 
sel, 231. 

Handbooks  on  Law,  published  by  legal  aid  or- 
ganizations, 212. 

Hamilton,  John  Alan,  work  for  Buffalo  Legal 
Aid,  195. 

Harley,  Herbert,  on  administrative  tribunals, 
83. 

Habtford  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  148,  168,  176, 
185,  191,  202,  209. 
Work  taken  over  by  city,  148,  202. 
Growth  under  public  control,  185. 
Fees  charged,  168. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Legislative  work,  202. 
Test  case  by,  209. 

Harvard  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  145,  174,  191. 
Founded  by  students  in  1913,  145. 
Good  work  of,  174. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 

Hoffman,  David,  first  code  of  ethics  by,  232. 

Houston,  Marion,  on  legal  aid  and  charity  co- 
operation, 219. 

Hughes,  Charles  E. ,  on  lawyer's  duty  to  poor, 
233. 

Husband  and  Wife,  see  Domestic  Relations. 

I  LLEGrriMACY,  see  also  Domestic  Relations. 
Common  problem  in  children's  agencies,  222. 
Legal  aid  expert  in  law,  222. 

Laws  changed   by  legal  aid  organizations, 
200,  201. 
Immigbants,  see  also  Americanization,  Citizen- 
ship. 

And  American  institutions,  ix. 


Importance  of  justice,  xiv. 
In  criminal  matters,  125. 
Denial  of  justice,  effect  on,  11. 
Legal  aid  founded  to  aid,  133. 
Special  branch  in  New  York  for,  211. 
Unable  to  collect  wages,  9. 
Immigbation 
And  administration  of  justice,  7. 

Cause  of  difficulty,  ix,  xiii. 
Increased  need  for  legal  aid,  133. 
Immigration  Commission,  gives  legal  aid,  95. 
Incorporated  Legal  Aid  Societies,  see  Types 

of  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 
Industrial  Accident  Commissions 
Growth  of,  90. 
Success  of,  in  general,  243. 
Lessen  delay,  84. 
Limits  of,  89. 
Effect  on  need  for  lawyers,  87,  91. 
Effect  on  appeals,  85,  89. 
Settlement  of  cases  by,  87. 
Trials  before,  informal,  88. 
Use  of  conciliation,  64,  88. 
Use  of  legal  aid  organizations,  89. 
Use  of  investigators,  88. 
Cost  of,  in  Massachusetts,  90. 
Industrial  Courts 
System  of,  in  Europe,  62. 
Use  conciliation,  62. 
Infebiob  Coubts,  see  Courts:  Lower  courts. 
In  Forma  Pauperis  Proceeding 
At  common  law,  30. 
Statutes  establishing,  21,  22. 
Disuse  in  America,  22. 
In  federal  courts,  26,  231. 
And  assignment  of  counsel,  32,  100. 
Need  for  extension  of,  26. 
Denied  in  contingent  fee  cases,  86. 
Plan  in  England,  249. 

In  Scotland  and  France,  26,  101.  [110. 

Innocence,  presumption  rule  in  criminal  law, 
Instalments 

Judgments  paid  in,  56. 
Value  of,  57. 
Practice  in  England,  57. 
Interstate  Commerce  Commission 
In  general,  92. 
Legal  aid  by,  92. 
Interstate   Commerce,    Employees   in,   need 

compensation  act,  90. 
Investigators 
Use  of,  by 

Industrial  Accident  Commissions,  87,  88. 
Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  92,  93. 
Massachusetts  Labor  Bureau,  97. 
Minnesota  Labor  Bureau,  95. 
Value  of  plan,  91. 
Italian  Law:  lawyer's  duty  to  poor,  231. 


264 


INDEX 


Jersey  City  Legal  Aid  Society,  138,  155, 176, 
191,  239. 

Early  history,  138. 

Regular  society  formed,  148. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Divorce  cases  rejected,  155. 
Judges,  see  also  Courts. 

Conciliation  distrusted  by,  60,  65. 

Duty  of,  in  criminal  cases,  108. 

Function  of,  in  private  control,  181. 

Indifferent  to  denial  of  justice,  9,  11,  37. 

Lack  power  to  enforce  equality,  109. 

Refer  cases  to  legal  aid,  159. 

Representation  on  legal  aid  directorate,  245. 

Weak,  danger  of,  47. 
Judgment,  see  Instalments,  Judgments  paid  in. 
Judicial  Control  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  see  also 
Public  Legal  Aid. 

Superior  to  municipal  control,  186,  247. 

Legal  aid  a  public  function,  246. 

Trend  towards  public  control,  246. 

In  other  countries,  247,  248. 

American  precedents  for,  249. 
Judicial   Legislation,   in  injured  employees' 

cases,  15. 

Justice,  see  aho  Administration  of  Justice,  De- 
nial of  Justice,  Equality  of  Justice,  Expense 
of  Justice,  Failure  of  Justice. 

The  end  of  legal  institutions,  13. 
Justice  according  to  Law 

The  only  safe  method,  xii,  13. 

Defects  of,  13. 

Its  merit  challenged,  10. 

Regulation  of  public  utilities,  92. 

Administrative  tribunals  and,  91. 

Arbitration  and,  69. 

Conciliation  and,  67. 

Small  claims  courts  and,  45,  47,  51,  54. 
Justice  of  the  Peace 

Corrupt  in  small  cases,  42. 

Evils  investigated  by  legal  aid,  201,  202. 
Juvenile  Courts,  see  Domestic  Relations  Courts. 

IYansas  City  Domestic  Relations  Court 
Its  service,  77. 
Uses  conciliation,  81. 
Kansas  City  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  97,  129,  145, 

154,  164,  170,  176,  177,  180,  185,  189,  190, 

202,  212. 
Started  in  1910,  145. 
Under  Board  of  Public  Welfare,  146. 

Significance  of,  146. 
Cases  classified,  154. 
Desertion  cases,  success  in,  170, 185. 
Extent  of  work,  190. 
Handbook  on  law,  212. 


Legislative  work,  202. 
Litigation  avoided,  164. 
Per  cent  of  population  clients,  189. 
Kansas  Small  Debtors'  Courts,   see  Small 
Claims  Courts :  Kansas. 

Labor  Commissions,  96-98. 
Labor  Unions 

Representation  on  legal  aid  directorate,  245. 

Legal  aid  work  by,  141. 

Legal  aid  relation  to,  236. 

Lacey,    Judge   (Detroit   Domestic    Relations 
Court) 

On  need  for  wider  jurisdiction,  76. 

On  use  of  criminal  process,  73. 
Landlord  and  Tenant  Law 

Feudal  in  conception,  14. 

Use  of  fictitious  leases  in,  14,  207. 

Court  control  over  ejectment,  14,  59. 
In  England,  59. 

Under  Soldiers'  Relief  Act,  59,  note  2. 
Latshaw,  Judge  (Kansas  City  Criminal  Court), 

on  need  for  defender,  116. 
Law,  see  also  Administration  of  Justice,  Com- 
mon Law,  Criminal  Law,  Government, 
Domestic  Relations  Law.  Legislation.  Pre- 
ventive Law,  Procedural  Law,  Substantive 
Law. 

Administrative,  rapid  rise  of,  83. 

American,  four  cardinal  needs  of,  215. 

Handbooks  on,  published  by  legal  aid,  212. 

Modern,  is  complicated  science,  7,  16,  31. 

Rights  protected  by,  5. 
Law  Schools,  see  Education,  Legal. 
Law  School  Legal  Aid  Societies,  see  Types  of 

Legal  Aid  Organizations. 
Lawyers,  see  also  Bar,  Expense  of  Lawyers'  Ser- 
vices. 

Competition  with,  by  legal  aid,  235. 

Duty  to  court,  165. 

Duty  to  poor  persons,  100,  101,  230-232. 

Importance  and  necessity  of,  7,  31,  32,  87. 

Indifference  to  denial  of  justice,  9,  11,  37, 
85. 

Indifference  to  legal  aid,  236. 

Failure  to  support,  238. 
Conciliation  proceedings  and 

Distrust  of,  60,  65. 

Eliminated  by,  62,  64,  66. 
Conduct  in  criminal  cases,  111,  112. 
Delays,  desire  to  end,  19. 
Domestic  relations  courts  and,  80,  89. 
Small  claims  courts  and 

Needed  in,  56,  89. 

Excluded  from,  44,  46,  49,  52,  87. 
Workmen's  compensation  acts  and,  88. 

Oppose  extension  of  acts,  91. 

Needed  in  cases  under,  89,  91. 


INDEX 


265 


State  paid,  argument  for,  181. 

Voluntary  service  of,  219,  236. 
Leadership,  Legal  Aid  Need  for,  235,  244. 
"Legal  Aid" 

Danger  of  abuse  of  phrase,  198. 

Phrase  protected  by  courts,  138. 

Standard  name  for  organizations,  140. 
Legal  Aid  Bureaus,  see  Legal  Aid  Organiza- 
tions. 
Legal  Aid  Organizations  [individual  organ- 
izations  are   indexed  by  cities],   see  also 
Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 

Definition  of,  134. 

In  general,  128,  159. 

Causes  of  formation,  85. 

Are  part  of  administration  of  justice,  128, 162, 
171. 

Do  not  advertise,  158. 

Popularity  of,  229. 

Reputation  with  courts,  159. 

See  popular  distrust  of  law,  11. 

In  criminal  field 
Need  for,  116. 
Relation  to  defender,  106,  127. 

History  of 

Period  from  1876  to  1899,  134. 
Local  nature  of  work,  138. 
Period  from  1900-1909,  140. 
Period  from  1910-1913,  145. 
First  public  legal  aid,  146. 
National  alliance  formed,  147. 
Period  from  1914-1918,  147. 
Resume"  of  history,  148. 

Staffs  of  attorneys,  192. 
Excellence  of,  193,  229. 
Loyalty  of,  ix. 

And  arbitration,  70. 

And  assignment  of  counsel  plan,  101,  102, 
104. 

And  conciliation,  63. 

And  domestic  relations  courts,  79. 

And  defender  in  criminal  cases,  127, 156, 169. 

And  industrial  accident  commissions,  89. 

And  labor  commissions,  97. 

And  small  claims  courts,  46,  49,  56. 
Legal  Aid  Review,  quarterly  publication,  value 

of,  143. 
Legal  Aid  Work,  see  also  Central  Legal  Aid 
Organization,  Charity  Organizations  and 
Legal  Aid,  Common  Law,  Community  and 
Legal  Aid,  Finances  of  Legal  Aid  Organ- 
izations, Judicial  Control  of  Legal  Aid 
Work,  Legislation,  Legal  Aid  and  the  Bar, 
Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations. 

Organized  and  individual  distinguished,  133. 

Origin  of,  133. 

Distrusted  by  bar,  135. 

Principles  controlling.  162,  164. 

Hampered  by  finances,  193. 


Inexpensive  to  conduct,  194. 

Cost  of  work  per  case,  195. 
Method  of  conducting  work,  161. 
Rapid  growth  of,  133. 
Reference  of  cases,  163. 
Under  judicial  control,  50,  186. 
In  Scotland  and  France,  101. 
Cases 

Nature  of  first  cases,  135. 

Total  work  in  1889,  139. 

Total  amount  of  work,  151,  152. 

Number  for  charities,  223. 

Table  of  number  of  cases,  Appendix, 
Table  I. 

Table  of  collections  for  clients,  Appendix, 
Table  II. 
Disposition  of  cases,  160, 161. 
Extent  of 

From  geographical  viewpoint,  187. 

Tested  by  size  of  cities,  188. 

Tested  by  amount  of  work,  189. 

Table  showing,  for  each  organization,  190. 

Tested  by  types  of  organizations,  192. 
Future  of 

Importance  of,  240. 

Depends  on  bar,  239. 

Cooperation  with  remedial  agencies,  241- 
243. 

Requires  growth,  244. 

Development  of  technique,  247. 

Trend  towards  judicial  control,  247. 

Plans  for,  feasible,  249. 
Nature  of  work 

In  general,  134,  152. 

Part  of  administration  of  justice,  180, 186, 
246,  247. 

Entirely  local,  197. 

Vital  and  human,  196. 

Classification  of  cases,  154. 

Trustee  work,  58. 

Types  of  cases  rejected 
Criticism  of,  153. 
Criminal  cases,  144,  155. 
Personal  injury  cases,  156. 

Similarity  to  small  claims  courts,  164. 
Philosophy  of 

Early  limited  conception,  135. 

Broadened  by  Briesen,  137. 

Influence  of  public  bureaus,  146. 

Development  of  ideas,  151. 

Distinct  from  charity  work,  178. 
Records 

Criticism  of,  160. 

Must  be  standardized,  197,  246. 

Importance  of,  217. 

Early,  135. 

Use  of,  for  remedial  legislation,  201,  205. 

Of  dispositions  of  cases,  142, 159. 


266 


INDEX 


Of  nationalities  of  clients,  137. 
Of  nature  of  cases,  153. 
Of  sources  of  cases,  142, 158. 
Reports  on,  see  Reports  of  Legal  Aid  Organ- 
izations. 
Sources  of  cases,  158,  159. 
War  service,  212,  214. 
Legal  Aid  Work  and  the  Bar 

Relationship  between,  100, 138, 141,  226. 

Future  work  depends  on,  239. 
Competition  between,  85,  156,  157,  162. 
Service  to  bar,  276. 

Aid  bar's  reputation,  228. 
Investigate  complaints,  155. 
Duty  of  bar  to  legal  aid,  229,  230,  232,  233, 

236. 
Indifference  of  bar  to  legal  aid,  175. 
Failure  to  support,  85,  238. 
Per  cent  of  bar  aiding,  238. 
Legal  Education,  see  Education. 
Legal  Suggestions  for  Soldiers  and  Sailors, 
published  by  Boston  Legal  Aid  Society,  213. 
Legislation 

Interest  of  legal  aid  in,  200. 
Opportunity  for  remedial,  150,  204. 
Improved  by  legal  aid  organizations,  200,  203- 
205. 
Legislatures  disposed  to  end  Delays,  19. 
Levine,  Judge  Manuel 
Conciliation  work  by,  64. 
On  small  claims  courts,  54. 
Lincoln,  Abraham 

Quotation  on  conciliation,  60. 
Adopted  as  legal  aid  principle,  164. 
Litigation  used  as  last  resort  in  legal  aid,  164. 
Loans,  see  Small  Loans. 
Loan  Sharks,  see  Small  Loans. 
Lodging-house  Keepers,  legal  disadvantages 

of  small.  43. 
Longshoremen,  and  compensation  acts,  90. 
Los  Angeles  County  Public  Defender,  23,  97, 
98, 101, 105, 117,  124, 126, 148,  163, 169, 176, 
180,  182-185,  189,  190,  204. 
A  public  office  of  county,  105. 
Established  in  1913,117. 
Extent  of  work,  117, 190. 
Nature  and  result  of  work,  118,  123,  204. 
Expense  of  office,  120. 
Work  of,  compared  with  private  attorneys, 

122,  123. 
Should  appear  in  lower  courts,  124. 
Per  cent  of  population  clients  of,  189. 
Plan  of  referring  cases,  163. 
Los  Angeles  Domestic  Relations  Court,  77. 
Los  Angeles  Police  Court  Public  Defender, 
148. 
Established  in  1915, 117, 126. 
Method  of  work,  126. 


Louisville   Legal  Aid  Committee,   145,  176, 
191,  214. 
Started  in  1913,  145. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
War  service,  214. 

Machinery  of  Justice,  see  Administration  of 
Justice. 

Magna  Carta,  its  tradition  of  free  justice,  3. 

Mail,  see  Service  of  Process  by  Mail. 

Marshall,  Chief  Justice,  on  importance  of  jus- 
tice, 9. 

Martin  v.  Alameda  County  :  California  deci- 
sion on  costs,  29. 

Massachusetts  Bar  Association,  considers  ex- 
tension of  compensation  plan  to  railway  pas- 
sengers, 91. 

Massachusetts  Immigration  Commission,  advo- 
cates defender,  116. 

Massachusetts  Labor  Commission,  effective  col- 
lection of  wages  by,  96,  97,  129. 

Master  and  Servant,  see  Workmen's  Compen- 
sation Acts.  [193. 

Matz,  Rudolph,  leader  of  legal  aid  in  Chicago, 

Medical  Experts,  see  Witnesses. 

Milwaukee  Legal  Aid  Society,  148,  160,  176, 
191,  213,  214. 
Disposition  of  cases,  160. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
War  service,  213,  214. 

Minneapolis  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  145,  160, 168, 
176-178,  180,  190. 
Started  in  1913,  145. 
Alliance  with  law  school,  145. 
Disposition  of  cases,  160. 
Extent  of  work,  190. 
Fees  charged  by,  168. 
Good  work  of,  180. 

Minneapolis  Small  Claims  Coubt,  see  Small 
Claims  Courts:  Minneapolis. 

Minnesota  Department  of  Labor,  legal  aid  by. 
in  compensation  cases,  95. 

Municipal  Courts,  see  Courts:  Municipal. 

Murder  Cases 

Counsel  assigned  to  accused  in,  103,  112. 

Success  of  plan,  112. 
Defence  of  insanity,  122. 

Nashvflle  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  58,  148,  153, 
173,  191,  212. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Service  to  employers,  173. 

Rejects  bankruptcy  cases,  153. 

Pamphlet  on  law,  212. 
National  Alliance  of  Legal  Aid  Societies, see 
also  Central  Legal  Aid  Organization. 

Organized  in  1912,  147. 

Weakness  of,  147,  197,  245. 

Should  standardize  records,  160. 


INDEX 


267 


National  Desertion  Bureau,  145,  170,  176. 
Started  in  1911,  145. 
Nature  and  success  of,  170.  [of. 

Nature  of  Cases,  see  Legal  Aid  Work,  Nature 

Negligence  Cases,  see  Industrial  Accident  Cora- 
missions,  Personal  Injury  Cases,  Workmen's 
Compensation  Acts. 

Newark  Legal  Aid  Society,  33,  97, 141,  160, 
168,  176,  191,  236,  238. 
Started  in  1901,  141. 
Disposition  of  cases,  160. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees  charged,  168. 
Support  by  lawyers,  238. 

New  Haven,  Yale  law  students  do  legal  aid 
work  in,  148,  191. 

New  Jersey  Legal  Aid  Society,  see  Newark 
Legal  Aid  Society. 

New  Jersey  Workmen's  Compensation  Bu- 
reau, 89,  95. 

New  Orleans  Legal  Aid  Society,  145,  174, 
191,  236. 
Started  in  1913, 145. 
Grown  slowly,  174. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
New  Trial 
Allowed  on  appeals,  18. 
Power  of  judge  to  order,  110. 
Correction  of  abuses  of,  19. 
Ordered  for  district  attorney's  improper  con- 
duct, 110. 
New  York  Chamber  of  Commerce 
Provides  for  arbitration,  69. 
Use  of  conciliation,  70. 
New  York  City  Bar  Association 
Special  committee  on  legal  aid,  237. 
Report  on  public  defender,  113. 
Excellent  grievance  work,  153. 
New  York  County  Lawyers'  Association 
Report  on  public  defender,  113. 
Excellent  grievance  work,  153. 
New  York  Educational  Alliance  Legal  Aid 
Bureau,  142,  168,  176,  211,  214. 
First  work  of,  142. 
Fees  charged,  168. 
Stops  divorce  traffic,  211. 
War  service,  214. 
New  York  Labor  Secretariat,  236. 

Plan  of,  141,  171. 
New  York  Legal  Aid  Society,  10,  63,  97,  101, 
116,   136-138,    140,  142-144,  146,  147,  152, 
154,  156,  157,  159,  162,  164-168,  176,  180, 
187,  190,  193,  195,  199,  200,  203,  208,  211, 
212,  213,  217,  237,  238. 
Early  history  of,  134. 
Careful  organization,  135,  139. 
Constitution  and  name  changed,  137,  139. 
Work  broadened,  137. 
Branch  offices  opened  by,  139,  144. 


Fights  fraudulent  society,  138. 

Fees 

Retainer  charged.  139. 
Fees  charged,  168. 
Report  on,  166,  167. 

Litigation  avoided,  161. 

Plan  of,  widely  copied,  140. 

Visited  by  Roosevelt,  10. 

Classification  of  cases,  154. 

Sources  of  cases,  159. 

Extent  of  work,  190. 

Per  cent  of  population  clients,  190. 

War  service,  213. 

Inadequate  finances,  193. 

Amount  of  support  by  bar,  238. 

Remedial  legislation,  201,  203. 

Test  cases,  208. 

Thwarts  furniture  swindle,  211. 

And  criminal  cases,  116. 

And  domestic  servants  cases,  162. 

And  immigrants,  211. 

And  personal  injury  cases,  157. 

Publications  of 

Legal  Aid  Review,  143. 
Handbook  for  Domestic  Servants,  212. 
Sailor's  Log,  212. 
New  York  Municipal  Court 

Arbitration  rules,  55,  64,  71. 

Conciliation  rules,  55,  63. 
New  York  State  Bar  Association,  resolution 

on  conciliation,  67. 
New  York  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee, 
108, 117, 118, 121,  148, 169, 180, 186, 194, 195. 

Established  in  1917, 117. 

Extent,  nature,  result  of  work,  118. 

And  district  attorney,  121. 

Experience  as  to  confessions  of  guilt,  121. 

Excellence  of,  186,  194. 

New  Zealand,  provision  of  counsel  for  accused, 
115. 

Non-support,  see  Desertion    Cases,  Domestic 

Relations. 
Norway 

Provision  of  counsel  for  accused,  115. 

Conciliation  courts  in,  61. 
Their  success,  62. 

Omaha  Free  Legal  Aid  Bureau,  148, 176, 185, 
191. 

Established  in  1916,  148. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Organization  of  Courts,  see  Courts,  Reorgan- 
ization of. 

I  assengers  on  Railways,  compensation  plan 

for,  90. 
Patriotism,  see  also  Citizenship. 

Weakened  by  denial  of  justice,  11. 


268 


INDEX 


Pauperis,  In  Forma,  see  In  Forma  Pauperis. 
People  v.  Harris  :  case  illustrating  work  of  de- 
fender, 118. 

Per  Capita  Amount  expended  by  Legal  Aid 

Organizations,  190. 
Personal  Injury  Cases,  see  Contingent  Fees, 
Industrial  Accident  Commissions,  Work- 
men's Compensation  Acts. 
Rise  of  this  litigation,  85. 
Declined  by  legal  aid  organizations,  85,  156. 
Rule  criticized,  157. 
Philadelphia  Domestic  Relations  Court 
Jurisdiction  of,  75. 
Use  of  conciliation,  81. 
Philadelphia  Legal  Aid  Society,  18,  101, 141. 
146,  154,  163,  167,  168,  176,  177,  191,  195, 
203,208,211,214,238. 
Begun  in  1902,  141. 
Classification  of  cases,  154. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Fees  charged,  167,  168. 
Legislative  work,  203. 
Community  service,  208,  211. 
War  service,  238. 
Reference  of  cases,  163. 
Support  from  bar,  238. 
Philadelphia  Municipal  Court,  recommends 

small  claims  court,  54. 
Piers  Plowman,  on  defects  in  justice,  16. 
Pittsburgh  Legal  Aid  Society,  144,  147,  176, 
191,  195,  203,  233. 
Started  in  1908,  144. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 

Legislative  work,  203.  [190. 

Plainfield  Legal  Aid  Committee,  148,  176, 

Extent  of  work,  190. 
Pleading,  see  Procedural  Law. 
"Poor  Man's  Lawyer,"  in  London,  138. 
Poor  Persons,  see  also  In  Forma  Pauperis. 
Effect  of  denial  of  justice  on,  9. 
Do  not  receive  equal  justice,  8,  11. 
Unable  to  use  the  courts,  9,  15. 
Unable  to  pay  court  costs,  29. 
Unable  to  employ  counsel,  33. 
Unable  to  take  appeals,  27,  206. 
Nature  of  litigation  of,  39. 
Preyed  on  by  swindlers,  9,  152. 
Free  advice  to,  by  administrative  officials,  94. 
Court  as  trustee  for,  57. 
English  1913  Rules  for,  102. 
Pope,  James  H.,  public  defender  in  Los  Angeles 
Police  Court,  126. 

Population,  growth  of,  cause  of  judicial  failure, 

7,  188. 

Portland  (Oregon)  Municipal  Court  Purlic 
Defendeb,  148,  169,  176, 177,  185,  186,  191. 
Established  in  1915,  125. 
Work  of,  126. 


Undertakes  civil  cases,  148. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Killed  by  politics,  186. 
Portland  (Oregon)  Small  Claims  Court,  see 

Small  Claims  Courts :  Portland. 
Pound,  Roscoe 
Advocates  a  bureau  of  justice,  15,  215. 
On  new  development  of  law,  37. 
On  substantive  law,  14. 
On  causes  of  failure  of  justice,  7. 
On  small  cases,  41,  54. 
Practice,  see  Procedural  Law. 
Practice  of  Law,  changed  by  commercial  ex- 
pansion in  United  States,  85. 
Preliminary  Hearing  in  Criminal  Cases,  108. 
Preventive  Law 
Definition  of,  214. 
Legal  aid  opportunity  in,  215,  224. 
Cooperation  with  other  agencies,  217. 
Use  of  case  material,  216. 
Examples  of,  216. 
Pritchett,  Henry  S.,  Introduction  by,  xi. 
Probation  Staffs 

In  domestic  relations  courts 
Importance  of,  78,  79,  81. 
Supplant  lawyers,  78,  80,  82,  242. 
In  superior  criminal  courts,  108,  109. 
In  inferior  criminal  courts,  125-127. 
Value  of  data  collected  by,  124. 
Procedural  Law 

Serious  defects  in,  xiii. 
Causes  denial  of  justice,  16. 
Causes  delay,  19. 

Complicated,  requires  lawyers,  32. 
Too  complicated  for  small  cases,  41. 
Unnecessary  for  small  causes,  52,  54. 
Complicated  by  legislatures,  7. 
Arbitration  proceedings  disregard,  69,  71. 
Conciliation  courts  have  informal,  62. 
Domestic  relations  courts  have  simple,  78. 
Small  claims  courts  abolish  technicalities,  46, 
47,  50,  52,  54. 

Workmen's  compensation  acts  have  simpli- 
fied, 87,  88. 

Simplification  of 

A  cardinal  need,  215. 

Elihu  Root  on,  42. 

Will  promote  equality,  128. 

Will  solve  delays  and  costs,  241. 

Will  not  solve  need  for  lawyers,  31. 

Legal  aid  should  lead  in,  199. 
Prosecuting  Attorney,  see  District  Attorney. 

Police  should  not  act  as,  125. 
Protective  Agency  for  Women  and  Children, 

The  Chicago,  136,  144,  201. 
Founded  in  1886,  135. 
Nature  and  amount  of  work,  136,  144. 
Merged  in  Chicago  legal  aid  society,  144. 


INDEX 


269 


Protocol  in  New  York  Cloak  Industry,  pro- 
vides for  arbitration  and  conciliation,  70. 

Public  Defender,  see  Defender  in  Criminal 
Cases,  Los  Angeles  County  Public  Defender, 
Los  Angeles  Police  Court  Public  Defender, 
Portland  Municipal  Court  Public  Defender, 
New  York  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee; 
see  also  Criminal  Cases,  Criminal  Law,  Crimi- 
nal Proceedings. 

Public  Legal  Aid  Bureaus,  see  Types  of  Legal 
Aid  Organizations. 

Public  Legal  Aid  Work 
Importance  of  the  idea,  146. 
The  wisdom  of,  ix. 
And  existing  legal  aid  work,  236. 

Public  Service  Law,  popular  criticism  of,  14. 

XVecords  of  Legal  Aid  Work,  see  Legal  Aid 

Work:  Records. 
Redlich,  Professor,  report  on  Case  Method, 

xi. 
Reed,  Alfred  Z.,  in  charge  of  Carnegie  Foun- 
dation studies  in  legal  education,  xi. 
Remedial  Agencies  (for  the  different  agencies 
see  Analysis  of  Contents,  Part  II,  page  iv). 

In  general,  37. 

Classification  of,  38. 

Tests  of,  38. 

Significance  of,  128. 
Remedial  Legislation,  see  Legislation. 
Remedy  Suggested 

For  costs  on  appeal,  27. 

For  excessive  court  costs,  25. 

For  cost  of  witnesses,  27. 

For  delays,  19. 

For  abuse  of  ejectment,  14. 
Repobts  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 

Published  from  start  in  New  York,  135. 
In  Chicago,  136. 

Need  for  full  reports,  178. 

Of  independent  societies  best,  177. 

Convey  true  impression  of  work,  150. 
Revenue  to  State  from  Court  Costs,  21,  26. 
Revolution,  American,  caused  by  injustice,  12. 
Richmond  Legal  Aid  Society,  148,  177,  191, 
195, 239. 

Extent  of  work  in,  191. 

Contribution  from  bar  association,  239. 
Rights  of  Individuals 

Complicated  in  modern  law,  7. 

Depend  entirely  on  law,  xii,  4,  5,  9. 

Defined  by  substantive  law,  13. 
Robinson,  David,   Portland    Municipal    Court 

Public  Defender,  125. 
Rochester  Legal  Protection  Committee,  55, 
145,  168, 176, 177,  191,  214,  239. 

Started  in  1911,  145. 

Fees  charged,  168. 


Extent  of  work,  191. 

War  service,  214. 

Contribution  from  bar  association,  239. 
Roosevelt,  Theodore,  experience  in  legal  aid 

work,  10. 
Root,  Elihu 

Foreword  by,  ix. 

On  delay,  17. 

On  simple  procedure,  42. 
Rowe,  William  V.,  study  of  legal  clinics,  227. 
"Runners" 

In  criminal  cases,  114, 123, 125. 
Ousted  by  defenders,  126. 

Legal  aid  to  protect  immigrants  from,  133. 

In  personal  injury  cases,  86, 157. 
Russell  Sage  Foundation 

Anti-loan  shark  work,  205. 

Test  case  on  wage  assignments,  206. 

St.  Louis  Legal  Aid  Bubeau,  145,  148,  154, 
168,  176, 184,  185,  191. 

Started  in  1912,  145. 

Work  taken  over  by  city,  148. 

Classification  of  cases,  154. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Fees  charged,  168. 

Experience  under  public  control,  184. 
St.  Paul  Legal  Aid   Depabtment,  145,    176, 
179,  180,  191,  223. 

Started  in  1912,  145. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Good  work  of,  180. 

Work  for  charities,  223. 

Growth  after  moving  to  lawyers'  building,  179. 
San  Diego  Legal  Aid  Bubeau,  148,  176,  191. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 
Sav  Francisco  Legal  Aid  Society,  98, 148, 160, 
176,  191,  209,  236,  239. 

Disposition  of  cases,  160. 

Extent  of  work,  191. 

Test  case  on  court  costs,  209. 
Sailors,  see  Seamen. 
Sailor's  Log,  published  by  New  York  Legal  Aid 

Society,  212. 
Saloman,  Edward,  first  president  of  New  York 

Legal  Aid  Society,  134. 
Schmidt,  J.  P.,  advocates  defender  plan,  116. 
Scottish  Law 

Assistance  to  poor  persons,  26. 

Assignment  of  counsel  plan,  101,  115. 

Bar  associations  furnish  counsel,  231. 

Judicial  legal  aid,  248. 
Seamen 

Legal  aid  by  Shipping  Commissioners,  94. 

Legal  aid  service  to 
In  Boston,  209. 

In  New  York,  139,  203,  208,211. 
In  Philadelphia,  203. 


270 


INDEX 


Handbook  of  law  for,  212. 
Need  a  compensation  act,  90. 
Separate   Maintenance,  see  Domestic   Rela- 
tions. 
Service  of  Process 
Various  methods  used,  22. 
Use  of  telephone,  44,  63. 
By  police  in  domestic  relations  cases,  76. 
By  mail,  22,  26. 

In  small  claims  courts,  44,  63. 

Under  compensation  acts,  84. 

Advantages  of,  91,  202. 
Settlement  of  Cases,  forced  by  delay,  1 7. 
Sharswood,  on  lawyer's  duty  to  poor,  233. 
Shipping  Commissioners 
Give  advice  to  seamen,  94. 
Arbitration  of  disputes,  94. 
"  Shyster  "  Lawyers 

In  criminal  cases,  114,  125. 
Ousted  by  defenders,  126. 
Plan  fraudulent  legal  aid  organization,  138. 
Simplification  of  Procedure,  see  Procedural 

Laws,  Simplification  of. 
Small  Claims  and  Small  Causes 

Administration  of  justice  neglects,  8,  41. 
Court  costs  in,  24. 

First  handled  by  justices  of  peace,  42. 
Under  municipal  courts,  43. 
Provision  for,  in  England,  42. 
Small  Claims  Courts 
Necessity  for,  41. 
Success  of,  242. 

Overcome  delay  and  costs,  241. 

In  what  cases,  49. 

Political  significance,  53. 

Conditions  to,  53. 
Appeals  from,  53. 
Extension  of  plan,  54,  202. 
Wider  powers  for,  55,  57,  59. 
Clerks  of,  assist  parties,  247. 
Inferior  to  Labor  Commission  in  wage  col- 
lections, 98. 
Chicago  Court 

Origin  and  purpose,  51. 

Costs  and  delays  in,  52. 

Attorneys  in,  52. 

Volume  of  work,  52. 

Jurisdiction  wide,  52. 
Cleveland  Court 

Best  type,  48. 

Origin  and  development,  48. 

Success  of,  50. 

Work  of,  50. 

Attorneys  in,  49. 

Uses  conciliation,  63. 
Kansas  Courts 

Origin,  43. 

Statute  creating,  44. 


Nature  of  work.  44,  46. 

Effect  on  costs  and  delays,  45. 

Attorneys  excluded,  45. 

Unsoundness  of,  45. 

Influence  on  Portland  Court,  46. 
Minneapolis  Court 

Establishment  of,  54. 

Has  conciliation  power,  63. 
Portland  Court 

Origin,  nature  of  work,  46. 

Success  of,  47. 

Attorneys  prohibited,  46. 
Small    Debtor's    Courts,    see    Small    Claims 

Courts. 
Small  Loans 

Rise  of  loan  sharks,  10,  11.  [95. 

Advice  on,   by  administrative  officials,  94, 
Legal  aid  attorneys  specialists  in,  222. 
Laws  regulating,  improved  by  legal  aid  or- 
ganizations, 201,  202,  205,  208,  211. 
Social   Interests,   secured  by   state  through 
law,  13,  182. 

Social  Workers,  modern  training  of,  220. 
Socialization  of  Bar,  not  involved   in   state 

legal  aid,  182. 
Society  for  Gratuitous"  Defence  of  Accused 

Persons,  in  Rome,  115. 
Societies,  Legal  Aid,  see  Legal  Aid  Organiza- 
tions. 
Soldiers,  see  Legal  Aid  Work :  War  service. 
Soldiers'  and  Sailors'  Civil  Relief  Act 
Provides  for 
Assignment  of  counsel,  231. 
Instalment  judgments,  57. 
Control  over  ejectment,  59,  note  2. 
Sources  of  Cases,  see  Legal  Aid  Work :  Sources 
of  cases.  [231. 

Spanish  Law:  oath  of  attorney  to  serve  poor, 
Standard  Number  of  Clients  for  each  Legal 

Aid  Organization,  attempt  to  fix,  190. 
State,  see  also  Government. 
Interest  of 

In  all  litigation,  182. 
In  domestic  relations,  73,  75,  82,  102. 
In  ejectment  proceedings,  59. 
Duty  to  provide  justice,  ix,  169,  183,  184. 
Duty  to  furnish  lawyers 
In  criminal  cases,  105,  112. 
In  all  cases,  181. 
Control  over  administration  of  justice,  180. 
Does  not  support  legal  aid  work,  195. 
Stockbridge,  Henry,  on  preventive  law,  214. 
Storey,  Moorfield,  on  bar's  duty  to  legal  aid, 

239. 
"Straw"  Bondsmen 

In  criminal  cases,  114, 125. 
Ousted  by  defenders,  126. 
Street  Raiiways,  compensation  plan  for  pas- 
sengers on,  90. 


INDEX 


271 


Submission  to  Arbitration,  see  Arbitration. 
Substantive  Law 

Fair,  essential  to  equal  justice,  5,  13,  205. 

Importance  of,  5,  13. 

Satisfactory  condition  of,  xii,  13. 

Not  a  cause  of  injustice,  15. 

Not  self-enforcing,  16. 

Adequate  in  domestic  relations,  73. 

Of  landlord  and  tenant,  unfair,  14. 

Of  public  service  companies,  14. 

Unfair  to  injured  workmen,  14,  84. 

Changed  by  compensation  acts,  87. 

And  arbitration,  69. 

And  conciliation,  67. 
Summons,  archaic  form  used,  33. 

1  aft,  William  H.,  on  public  concern  in  litiga- 
tion, 28. 

Technicalities,  see  Procedural  Law. 
Term  Fees,  as  court  costs,  23. 
Towns,  charity  work  by  lawyers  in,  33,  188. 
Train,  Arthur,  on  need  for  defender,  116. 
Transcript  of  Evidence,  expense  of,  27. 
Trustee,  Court 

Need  for,  57,  153,  202. 
The  plan,  57. 

In  English  County  Courts,  58. 
Trustee  Process,  used  for  extortion,  9. 
Twain,  Mark,  on  legal  aid  work,  150. 
Types  of  Legal  Aid  Organizations 
Classification  of  five  types,  169. 
Extent  of  each  type,  173. 
Present  situation  in  twenty-nine  cities,  176. 
Extent  of  work  of  each  type,  192. 
Change  to  charity  type  after  1910,  145. 
Change  to  public  type  after  1913,  148. 
Specialized  types,  169, 171. 

Criticism  of,  170. 
Law  School  societies,  174. 
Bar  Association  societies,  174. 
Independent  v.  Departmental  Societies 
General  considerations,  175. 
Superiority  of  independent,  176,  179. 
Public  v.  Private  Organizations 
Argument  for  public,  180. 
Experience  of  public,  184. 
Conclusions,  186. 

V  ance,  William  R. 

On  failure  of  lawyer,  37. 

Allies  legal  aid  and  law  school  work,  145. 
Voluntary  Defenders  Committee,   see  New 

York  Voluntary  Defenders  Committee. 

W  ages,  Claims  for 
Non-payment  of,  183,  199. 


Delays  in,  17,  18. 

Handled  by  small  claims  courts,  45,  55. 

Collected  by  administrative  officials,  94,  96 
203.  ' 

Use  of  criminal  process,  98. 

Arbitrated  in  cloak  industry,  70. 

Greatest  legal  aid  work,  135,  136,  152. 

Wage-earners,  unable  to  collect  wages,  7,  9, 
42. 

Walsh,  Frank  P.,  aids  legal  aid  in  Kansas  Citv. 
146.  J 

War  Service,  see  Legal  Aid  Work :  War  ser- 
vice. 

Washington,  D.  C.  (Legal  Aid  Society  of 
the  George  Washington  University  Law 
School) 

Law  students  start  legal  aid,  148. 
Extent  of  work,  191. 
Westchester  County  Legal  Aid  Committee, 

founded  in  1902,  142. 
Wigmore,  John  H. 
On  failure  of  justice,  41,  42. 
On  importance  of  lawyers,  32. 
On  substantive  law,  14. 
On  need  for  defenders,  116. 
On  size  of  legal  aid  work,  187. 
On  legal  clinics,  227.  [240. 

Winslow,    Chief    Justice,   on    equal  justice, 
Witnesses 
Cost  of  summoning,  27. 
In  domestic  relations  courts,  76. 
Medical  experts 

In  murder  cases,  122. 
Cost  of,  84. 

Under  compensation  acts,  84,  88. 
Wood,  Walton  J. 

Public  defender  in  Los  Angeles,  117. 
Report  of,  on  expense  of  office,  120. 
Workmen,  Injured 

Substantive  law  unfair  to,  84. 
Need  legal  aid,  158. 

Workmen  in  Interstate  Commerce,  need  com- 
pensation act,  90. 

Workmen's  Compensation  Acts,  see  also  Indus- 
trial Accident  Commissions. 

Law  unfair  prior  to,  14. 

Secure  more  equal  justice,  15,  84. 

Effect  on 

Court  costs,  26,  27,  84. 

Delays,  84,  87. 

Expense  of  lawyer's  services,  85,  87. 

Permit  service  of  process  by  mail,  84. 

Automatic  settlement  of  cases,  87. 

Extension  of 
To  seamen,  90. 
To  passengers,  90.